Sweet Cherries Grown in Designated Counties in Washington; Decreased Assessment Rate, 55281-55283 [06-7866]
Download as PDF
55281
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 71, No. 184
Friday, September 22, 2006
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 923
[Docket No. FV06–923–2 FIR]
Sweet Cherries Grown in Designated
Counties in Washington; Decreased
Assessment Rate
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES_1
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Department of
Agriculture (USDA) is adopting, as a
final rule, without change, an interim
final rule which decreased the
assessment rate established for the
Washington Cherry Marketing
Committee (Committee) for the 2006–
2007 and subsequent fiscal periods from
$0.75 to $0.50 per ton for Washington
sweet cherries handled. The Committee
locally administers the marketing order
regulating the handling of sweet
cherries grown in designated counties in
Washington. Assessments upon sweet
cherry handlers are used by the
Committee to fund reasonable and
necessary expenses of the program. The
fiscal period begins April 1 and ends
March 31. The assessment rate will
remain in effect indefinitely unless
modified, suspended or terminated.
DATES: Effective Date: October 23, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert J. Curry or Gary D. Olson,
Northwest Marketing Field Office,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1220 SW Third Avenue,
Suite 385, Portland, OR 97204;
telephone number (503) 326–2724, fax
number (503) 326–7440, or e-mail
address Robert.Curry@usda.gov or
GaryD.Olson@usda.gov.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:03 Sep 21, 2006
Jkt 208001
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; telephone number
(202) 720–2491, fax number (202) 720–
8938, or
e-mail: Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule
is issued under Marketing Order No.
923 (7 CFR part 923), as amended,
regulating the handling of sweet
cherries grown in designated counties in
Washington, hereinafter referred to as
the ‘‘order.’’ The order is effective under
the Agricultural Marketing Agreement
Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–
674), hereinafter referred to as the
‘‘Act.’’
USDA is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. Under the marketing order now
in effect, cherry handlers in designated
counties in Washington are subject to
assessments. Funds to administer the
order are derived from such
assessments. It is intended that the
assessment rate as issued herein will be
applicable to all assessable Washington
sweet cherries beginning April 1, 2006,
and continue until amended,
suspended, or terminated. This rule will
not preempt any State or local laws,
regulations, or policies, unless they
present an irreconcilable conflict with
this rule.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom. Such
handler is afforded the opportunity for
a hearing on the petition. After the
hearing USDA would rule on the
petition. The Act provides that the
district court of the United States in any
district in which the handler is an
inhabitant, or has his or her principal
place of business, has jurisdiction to
review USDA’s ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than
20 days after the date of the entry of the
ruling.
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
This rule continues in effect the
action that decreased the assessment
rate established for the Committee for
the 2006–2007 and subsequent fiscal
periods from $0.75 to $0.50 per ton for
Washington sweet cherries handled
under the order.
The order provides authority for the
Committee, with the approval of USDA,
to formulate an annual budget of
expense and collect assessments from
handlers to administer the program. The
members of the Committee are
producers and handlers of sweet
cherries in designated counties in
Washington. They are familiar with the
Committee’s needs and with the costs
for goods and services in their local area
and are thus in a position to formulate
an appropriate budget and assessment
rate. The assessment rate is formulated
and discussed at a public meeting. All
directly affected persons have an
opportunity to participate and provide
input.
For the 2004–2005 and subsequent
fiscal periods, the Committee
recommended, and the USDA approved,
an assessment rate of $0.75 per ton of
sweet cherries handled. This rate
continued in effect until modified
herein based on the recommendation
and supporting information submitted
by the Committee.
The Committee met on May 3, 2006,
and unanimously recommended 2006–
2007 expenditures of $49,800 and a
decreased assessment rate of $0.50 per
ton of cherries. In comparison, last
year’s budgeted expenditures were
$72,297. The assessment rate of $0.50 is
$0.25 lower than the rate previously in
effect. Due to an anticipated decrease in
operating expenses this year, the
Committee recommended the
assessment rate decrease to maintain the
level of income near the level of
expenses.
The assessment rate recommended by
the Committee was derived by dividing
anticipated expenses by expected
shipments of Washington sweet
cherries. Applying the $0.50 per ton rate
of assessment to the Committee’s
110,000 ton crop estimate should
provide $55,000 in assessment income.
Thus, income derived from handler
assessments will be adequate to cover
the recommended 2006–2007 budget of
$49,800.
The Committee’s budget of
expenditures for the 2006–2007 period
E:\FR\FM\22SER1.SGM
22SER1
55282
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 184 / Friday, September 22, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES_1
reflect a significant reduction in overall
cost from previous years. This occurred,
in part, because the Committee hired an
outside management services agency to
more efficiently handle the Committee’s
administrative matters. Major expenses
recommended by the Committee for the
2006–2007 year include administration
and data management fees totaling
$25,000, Committee expenses of $16,200
(which includes travel, accounting and
compliance), and office expenses—
including bonds, insurance, telephone,
office equipment and supplies—of
$7,100.
The assessment rate established in
this rule will continue in effect
indefinitely unless modified,
suspended, or terminated by USDA
upon recommendation and information
submitted by the Committee or other
available information.
Although this assessment rate is
effective for an indefinite period, the
Committee will continue to meet prior
to or during each fiscal period to
recommend a budget of expenses and
consider recommendations for
modification of the assessment rate. The
dates and times of the Committee’s
meetings are available from the
Committee or USDA. The Committee’s
meetings are open to the public and
interested persons may express their
views at these meetings. USDA will
evaluate the Committee’s
recommendations and other available
information to determine whether
modification of the assessment rate is
needed. Further rulemaking will be
undertaken as necessary. The
Committee’s 2006–2007 budget has been
reviewed and approved by USDA; those
for subsequent fiscal periods will also
be reviewed and, as appropriate,
approved by USDA.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), the
Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
has considered the economic impact of
this rule on small entities. Accordingly,
AMS has prepared this final regulatory
flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order
that small businesses will not be unduly
or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
behalf. Thus, both statutes have small
entity orientation and compatibility.
There are approximately 1,500 cherry
producers within the regulated
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:03 Sep 21, 2006
Jkt 208001
production area and approximately 53
regulated handlers. Small agricultural
producers are defined by the Small
Business Administration (13 CFR
121.201) as those having annual receipts
of less than $750,000, and small
agricultural service firms are defined as
those whose annual receipts are less
than $6,500,000.
The Washington Agricultural
Statistics Service prepared a
preliminary report for the 2005 shipping
season showing that the total 113,000
ton fresh market sweet cherry utilization
sold for an average of $2,830 per ton.
Based on 1,500 producers in the
production area, the average producer
revenue from the sale of sweet cherries
in 2005 is estimated at approximately
$213,200 per year. In addition, the
Committee reports that most of the
industry’s 53 handlers would have each
averaged gross receipts of less than
$6,500,000 from the sale of fresh sweet
cherries last season. Thus, the majority
of producers and handlers of
Washington sweet cherries may be
classified as small entities.
This rule continues in effect the
action that decreased the assessment
rate established for the Committee and
collected from handlers for the 2006–
2007 and subsequent fiscal periods from
$0.75 to $0.50 per ton for sweet cherries.
The Committee unanimously
recommended 2006–2007 expenditures
of $49,800. With the 2006–2007 crop
estimate of 110,000 tons for fresh sweet
cherries, the Committee anticipates
assessment income of $55,000.
The Committee discussed alternatives
to this rule, including alternative
expenditure levels. Lower assessment
rates were considered, but not
recommended because of the
uncertainty of the crop size estimate.
A review of historical information and
preliminary information pertaining to
the upcoming crop year indicates that
the producer price for the 2006–2007
season could average about $2,830 per
ton for fresh Washington sweet cherries.
Therefore, the estimated assessment
revenue for the 2006–2007 fiscal period
as a percentage of total producer
revenue is 0.018 percent for Washington
sweet cherries.
This rule continues in effect the
action that decreased the assessment
obligation imposed on handlers.
Assessments are applied uniformly on
all handlers, and some of the costs may
be passed on to producers. However,
decreasing the assessment rate reduces
the burden on handlers, and may reduce
the burden on producers.
In addition, the Committee’s meeting
was widely publicized throughout the
Washington sweet cherry industry and
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
all interested persons were invited to
attend and participate in Committee
deliberations on all issues. Like all
Committee meetings, the May 3, 2006,
meeting was a public meeting and all
entities, both large and small, were able
to express views on the issues.
This action imposes no additional
reporting or recordkeeping requirements
on either small or large Washington
sweet cherry handlers. As with all
Federal marketing order programs,
reports and forms are periodically
reviewed to reduce information
requirements and duplication by
industry and public sector agencies.
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the Internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
USDA has not identified any relevant
Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with this rule.
An interim final rule regarding this
action was published in the Federal
Register on June 19, 2006 (71 FR 35145).
Copies of that rule were made available
to handlers and other interested parties
by the Committee. The interim final rule
was also made available through the
Internet by USDA and the Office of the
Federal Register. A 60-day comment
period was provided for interested
persons to respond to the interim final
rule. The comment period ended on
August 18, 2006, and no comments were
received.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
fv/moab.html. Any questions about the
compliance guide should be sent to Jay
Guerber at the previously mentioned
address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
After consideration of all relevant
material presented, including the
information and recommendation
submitted by the Committee and other
available information, it is hereby found
that this rule, as hereinafter set forth,
will tend to effectuate the declared
policy of the Act.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 923
Cherries, Marketing agreements,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
PART 923—SWEET CHERRIES
GROWN IN DESIGNATED COUNTIES
IN WASHINGTON
Accordingly, the interim final rule
amending 7 CFR part 923 which was
I
E:\FR\FM\22SER1.SGM
22SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 184 / Friday, September 22, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
published at 71 FR 35145 on June 19,
2006, is adopted as a final rule without
change.
Dated: September 15, 2006.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 06–7866 Filed 9–21–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD
20 CFR Parts 260 and 320
RIN 3220–AB59
Requests for Reconsideration and
Appeals Within the Board
Railroad Retirement Board.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES_1
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Railroad Retirement
Board (Board) amends its regulations to
include video teleconferencing as an
option for hearings of appeals under the
Railroad Retirement Act and Railroad
Unemployment Insurance Act. The
Board’s hearings officers will determine
if a hearing should be scheduled using
this option, rather than a telephone
conference call hearing or an in person
hearing.
DATES: Effective Date: This regulation
will be effective September 22, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Beatrice Ezerski, Secretary
to the Board, Railroad Retirement Board,
844 Rush Street, Chicago, Illinois 60611.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Marguerite P. Dadabo, Assistant General
Counsel, Railroad Retirement Board,
844 Rush Street, Chicago, Illinois 60611,
(312) 751–4945, TDD (312) 751–4701.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Part 260 of
the Board’s regulations deals generally
with administrative review of denials of
claims or requests for waiver of recovery
of overpayments under the Railroad
Retirement Act (RRA). Part 320 deals
with the same matters under the
Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act
(RUIA). The Board amends these parts
to state that, at the discretion of the
hearings officer, hearings held during
the appeal process may be conducted in
person, by telephone conference call, or
by video teleconferencing. Previously,
the regulations only allowed for
hearings to be held in person or by
telephone conference call.
Specifically, the Board amends
§§ 260.5(i) and 320.22 to state that a
proposed hearing may be held in
person, by telephone conference call, or
by video teleconferencing. These
sections also state that if an individual
objects to having a hearing by video
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:03 Sep 21, 2006
Jkt 208001
teleconferencing, the hearings officer
will find the individual had good cause
for objecting to the time or place of the
hearing and will reschedule the
individual for either a telephone or an
in person hearing for the appeal. The
regulation also amends §§ 260.5(1) and
320.25 to state that the hearings officer
determines whether a hearing is
scheduled for a telephone conference
call, video teleconferencing, or in
person.
The Board published the proposed
rule on December 9, 2005 (70 FR 73175)
and invited comments by February 7,
2006. No comments were received.
Accordingly, the proposed rule is being
published as a final rule without
change.
The Board, with the concurrence of
the Office of Management and Budget,
has determined that this is not a
significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866. Therefore, no
regulatory impact analysis is required.
There are no changes to the information
collections associated with parts 260
and 320.
List of Subjects
20 CFR Part 260
Administrative practice and
procedure, Claims, Railroad retirement,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
20 CFR Part 320
Administrative practice and
procedure, Claims, Railroad
unemployment insurance, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, the Railroad Retirement
Board amends title 20, Chapter II,
subchapter B, part 260 and subchapter
C, part 320 of the Code of Federal
Regulations as follows:
I
PART 260—REQUESTS FOR
RECONSIDERATION AND APPEALS
WITHIN THE BOARD
1. The authority citation for part 260
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 45 U.S.C. 231f: 45 U.S.C. 231g;
45 U.S.C. 355.
2. Revise paragraphs (i)(1), (i)(3) and
(1) of § 260.5 to read as follows:
I
§ 260.5 Appeal from a reconsideration
decision.
*
*
*
*
*
(i) Conduct of an oral hearing. (1) In
any case in which an oral hearing is to
be held, the hearings officer shall
schedule a time and place for the
conduct of the hearing. At the discretion
of the hearings officer, any hearing
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
55283
required under this part may be held in
person, by telephone conference call, or
by video teleconferencing as described
in § 260.5(1). The hearing shall not be
open to the public. The hearings officer
shall promptly notify by mail the party
or parties to the proceeding as to the
time and place for the hearing. The
notice shall include a statement of the
specific issues involved in the case. The
hearings officer shall make every effort
to hold the hearing within 150 days
after the date the appeal is filed.
*
*
*
*
*
(3) The hearings officer shall rule on
any objection timely filed by a party
under paragraph (i) of this section and
shall notify the party of his or her ruling
thereon. The hearings officer may for
good cause shown, or upon his or her
own motion, reschedule the time and/or
place of the hearing. If an individual
objects to having a hearing by video
teleconferencing, the hearings officer
will find the individual’s wish not to
appear by video teleconferencing to be
a good reason for changing the time or
place of the scheduled hearing and will
reschedule the hearing for a time or
place where either a telephone
conference call or an in person hearing
will be held. The hearings officer may
also limit or expand the issues to be
resolved at the hearing.
*
*
*
*
*
(1) Hearing by telephone or video
teleconferencing. As stated in paragraph
(i)(1) of this section, at the discretion of
the hearings officer, any hearing
required under this part may be
conducted in person, by telephone
conference call, or by video
teleconferencing. The hearings officer
may determine the hearing should be
conducted by telephone conference call
or video teleconferencing if use of these
methods would be more efficient than
conducting an in person hearing and the
hearings officer does not determine that
there is a circumstance in the particular
case preventing the use of these
methodologies to conduct the hearing.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 320—INITIAL DETERMINATIONS
UNDER THE RAILROAD
UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE ACT
AND REVIEWS OF AND APPEALS
FROM SUCH DETERMINATIONS
3. The authority citation for part 320
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 45 U.S.C. 355 and 362(1).
4. Add a sentence to the beginning of
paragraph (a) and revise paragraph (c) of
§ 320.22 to read as follows:
I
E:\FR\FM\22SER1.SGM
22SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 184 (Friday, September 22, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 55281-55283]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7866]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 184 / Friday, September 22, 2006 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 55281]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 923
[Docket No. FV06-923-2 FIR]
Sweet Cherries Grown in Designated Counties in Washington;
Decreased Assessment Rate
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is adopting, as a final
rule, without change, an interim final rule which decreased the
assessment rate established for the Washington Cherry Marketing
Committee (Committee) for the 2006-2007 and subsequent fiscal periods
from $0.75 to $0.50 per ton for Washington sweet cherries handled. The
Committee locally administers the marketing order regulating the
handling of sweet cherries grown in designated counties in Washington.
Assessments upon sweet cherry handlers are used by the Committee to
fund reasonable and necessary expenses of the program. The fiscal
period begins April 1 and ends March 31. The assessment rate will
remain in effect indefinitely unless modified, suspended or terminated.
DATES: Effective Date: October 23, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert J. Curry or Gary D. Olson,
Northwest Marketing Field Office, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1220 SW Third Avenue,
Suite 385, Portland, OR 97204; telephone number (503) 326-2724, fax
number (503) 326-7440, or e-mail address Robert.Curry@usda.gov or
GaryD.Olson@usda.gov.
Small businesses may request information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; telephone number
(202) 720-2491, fax number (202) 720-8938, or e-mail:
Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule is issued under Marketing Order
No. 923 (7 CFR part 923), as amended, regulating the handling of sweet
cherries grown in designated counties in Washington, hereinafter
referred to as the ``order.'' The order is effective under the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-
674), hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.''
USDA is issuing this rule in conformance with Executive Order
12866.
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. Under the marketing order now in effect, cherry
handlers in designated counties in Washington are subject to
assessments. Funds to administer the order are derived from such
assessments. It is intended that the assessment rate as issued herein
will be applicable to all assessable Washington sweet cherries
beginning April 1, 2006, and continue until amended, suspended, or
terminated. This rule will not preempt any State or local laws,
regulations, or policies, unless they present an irreconcilable
conflict with this rule.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and
request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. Such
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition.
After the hearing USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This rule continues in effect the action that decreased the
assessment rate established for the Committee for the 2006-2007 and
subsequent fiscal periods from $0.75 to $0.50 per ton for Washington
sweet cherries handled under the order.
The order provides authority for the Committee, with the approval
of USDA, to formulate an annual budget of expense and collect
assessments from handlers to administer the program. The members of the
Committee are producers and handlers of sweet cherries in designated
counties in Washington. They are familiar with the Committee's needs
and with the costs for goods and services in their local area and are
thus in a position to formulate an appropriate budget and assessment
rate. The assessment rate is formulated and discussed at a public
meeting. All directly affected persons have an opportunity to
participate and provide input.
For the 2004-2005 and subsequent fiscal periods, the Committee
recommended, and the USDA approved, an assessment rate of $0.75 per ton
of sweet cherries handled. This rate continued in effect until modified
herein based on the recommendation and supporting information submitted
by the Committee.
The Committee met on May 3, 2006, and unanimously recommended 2006-
2007 expenditures of $49,800 and a decreased assessment rate of $0.50
per ton of cherries. In comparison, last year's budgeted expenditures
were $72,297. The assessment rate of $0.50 is $0.25 lower than the rate
previously in effect. Due to an anticipated decrease in operating
expenses this year, the Committee recommended the assessment rate
decrease to maintain the level of income near the level of expenses.
The assessment rate recommended by the Committee was derived by
dividing anticipated expenses by expected shipments of Washington sweet
cherries. Applying the $0.50 per ton rate of assessment to the
Committee's 110,000 ton crop estimate should provide $55,000 in
assessment income. Thus, income derived from handler assessments will
be adequate to cover the recommended 2006-2007 budget of $49,800.
The Committee's budget of expenditures for the 2006-2007 period
[[Page 55282]]
reflect a significant reduction in overall cost from previous years.
This occurred, in part, because the Committee hired an outside
management services agency to more efficiently handle the Committee's
administrative matters. Major expenses recommended by the Committee for
the 2006-2007 year include administration and data management fees
totaling $25,000, Committee expenses of $16,200 (which includes travel,
accounting and compliance), and office expenses--including bonds,
insurance, telephone, office equipment and supplies--of $7,100.
The assessment rate established in this rule will continue in
effect indefinitely unless modified, suspended, or terminated by USDA
upon recommendation and information submitted by the Committee or other
available information.
Although this assessment rate is effective for an indefinite
period, the Committee will continue to meet prior to or during each
fiscal period to recommend a budget of expenses and consider
recommendations for modification of the assessment rate. The dates and
times of the Committee's meetings are available from the Committee or
USDA. The Committee's meetings are open to the public and interested
persons may express their views at these meetings. USDA will evaluate
the Committee's recommendations and other available information to
determine whether modification of the assessment rate is needed.
Further rulemaking will be undertaken as necessary. The Committee's
2006-2007 budget has been reviewed and approved by USDA; those for
subsequent fiscal periods will also be reviewed and, as appropriate,
approved by USDA.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has considered the
economic impact of this rule on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has
prepared this final regulatory flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in
that they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf. Thus, both statutes have small
entity orientation and compatibility.
There are approximately 1,500 cherry producers within the regulated
production area and approximately 53 regulated handlers. Small
agricultural producers are defined by the Small Business Administration
(13 CFR 121.201) as those having annual receipts of less than $750,000,
and small agricultural service firms are defined as those whose annual
receipts are less than $6,500,000.
The Washington Agricultural Statistics Service prepared a
preliminary report for the 2005 shipping season showing that the total
113,000 ton fresh market sweet cherry utilization sold for an average
of $2,830 per ton. Based on 1,500 producers in the production area, the
average producer revenue from the sale of sweet cherries in 2005 is
estimated at approximately $213,200 per year. In addition, the
Committee reports that most of the industry's 53 handlers would have
each averaged gross receipts of less than $6,500,000 from the sale of
fresh sweet cherries last season. Thus, the majority of producers and
handlers of Washington sweet cherries may be classified as small
entities.
This rule continues in effect the action that decreased the
assessment rate established for the Committee and collected from
handlers for the 2006-2007 and subsequent fiscal periods from $0.75 to
$0.50 per ton for sweet cherries. The Committee unanimously recommended
2006-2007 expenditures of $49,800. With the 2006-2007 crop estimate of
110,000 tons for fresh sweet cherries, the Committee anticipates
assessment income of $55,000.
The Committee discussed alternatives to this rule, including
alternative expenditure levels. Lower assessment rates were considered,
but not recommended because of the uncertainty of the crop size
estimate.
A review of historical information and preliminary information
pertaining to the upcoming crop year indicates that the producer price
for the 2006-2007 season could average about $2,830 per ton for fresh
Washington sweet cherries. Therefore, the estimated assessment revenue
for the 2006-2007 fiscal period as a percentage of total producer
revenue is 0.018 percent for Washington sweet cherries.
This rule continues in effect the action that decreased the
assessment obligation imposed on handlers. Assessments are applied
uniformly on all handlers, and some of the costs may be passed on to
producers. However, decreasing the assessment rate reduces the burden
on handlers, and may reduce the burden on producers.
In addition, the Committee's meeting was widely publicized
throughout the Washington sweet cherry industry and all interested
persons were invited to attend and participate in Committee
deliberations on all issues. Like all Committee meetings, the May 3,
2006, meeting was a public meeting and all entities, both large and
small, were able to express views on the issues.
This action imposes no additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large Washington sweet cherry handlers.
As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public sector agencies.
AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote
the use of the Internet and other information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information
and services, and for other purposes.
USDA has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate,
overlap, or conflict with this rule.
An interim final rule regarding this action was published in the
Federal Register on June 19, 2006 (71 FR 35145). Copies of that rule
were made available to handlers and other interested parties by the
Committee. The interim final rule was also made available through the
Internet by USDA and the Office of the Federal Register. A 60-day
comment period was provided for interested persons to respond to the
interim final rule. The comment period ended on August 18, 2006, and no
comments were received.
A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: http:/
/www.ams.usda.gov/fv/moab.html. Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Jay Guerber at the previously mentioned address
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
After consideration of all relevant material presented, including
the information and recommendation submitted by the Committee and other
available information, it is hereby found that this rule, as
hereinafter set forth, will tend to effectuate the declared policy of
the Act.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 923
Cherries, Marketing agreements, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
PART 923--SWEET CHERRIES GROWN IN DESIGNATED COUNTIES IN WASHINGTON
0
Accordingly, the interim final rule amending 7 CFR part 923 which was
[[Page 55283]]
published at 71 FR 35145 on June 19, 2006, is adopted as a final rule
without change.
Dated: September 15, 2006.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 06-7866 Filed 9-21-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P