Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA) Request for Grant Proposals: The Future Leaders Exchange Program: Host Family and School Placement, 55259-55264 [06-7937]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 183 / Thursday, September 21, 2006 / Notices
III. Discussion
The purpose of the rule change is to
implement a surcharge to the monthly
service fee charged to non-clearing
member subscribers of OCC’s Data
Distribution Service (‘‘DDS’’) that have
not converted to the new DDS format by
the revised mandated conversion date of
September 29, 2006.
Both clearing members and nonclearing members may subscribe to
DDS. A clearing member may subscribe
to DDS in order to receive in a machine
readable format data processed by OCC
that is proprietary to such clearing
member (e.g., position and post-trade
entries) as well as non-proprietary data
(i.e., data not specific to the clearing
member) produced by OCC (e.g.,
information relating to series and
prices). Non-clearing members may
subscribe to DDS in order to receive
certain non-proprietary data.
In December, 2004, OCC informed all
DDS subscribers that OCC was requiring
them to convert to the new ENCORE
DDS format by February 28, 2006.
Although OCC diligently worked with
subscribers to facilitate their
implementation of the new DDS format,
it became apparent that some
subscribers needed additional time in
order to complete their systems work.
Accordingly, in December, 2005, OCC
announced an extension of the
mandated conversion date to September
29, 2006.
After the mandated conversion date,
OCC will continue to support the old
legacy data service distribution system.
However, for subscribers that do not
meet the revised conversion date of
September 29, 2006, OCC will charge a
monthly surcharge of $1,000 per month
in order to reasonably allocate the costs
of continuing to support the old legacy
data distribution system.4 The surcharge
will be imposed starting with the
October 2006 billing cycle and will
continue until the subscriber converts to
the new DDS format and ceases to
receive any legacy data service
distribution transmissions. OCC will
terminate all legacy data service
transmissions after March 30, 2007.5
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
II. Description
Section 17A(b)(3)(D) of the Act
requires that the rules of a clearing
agency provide for the equitable
allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and
other charges.6 The Commission finds
that OCC’s proposed rule change is
consistent with this requirement
because by establishing a surcharge for
continued use of its old legacy data
distribution system, OCC will be able to
more equitably allocate its cost of
providing continued service to those
DDS subscribers that have failed to
convert to OCC’s ENCORE DDS format.
4 Pursuant to a separate rule change, OCC will
impose the $1,000 per month surcharge on clearing
member subscribers to DDS that likewise fail to
convert to the new format. Implementation of the
surcharge on clearing members is pending approval
of this rule filing by the Commission. Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 54059 (June 28, 2006), 71
FR 38962 (July 10, 2006) [File No. SR–CC–2006–
06].
5 The March 30, 2007, termination date was the
subject of the amendment to the proposed rule
change filed on July 21, 2006.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:30 Sep 20, 2006
Jkt 208001
IV. Conclusion
On the basis of the foregoing, the
Commission finds that the proposed
rule change is consistent with the
requirements of the Act and in
particular Section 17A of the Act and
the rules and regulations thereunder.
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,7 that the
proposed rule change (File No. SR–
OCC–2006–07) be and hereby is
approved.
For the Commission by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.8
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 06–7839 Filed 9–20–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 5551]
Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs (ECA) Request for Grant
Proposals: The Future Leaders
Exchange Program: Host Family and
School Placement
Announcement Type: New Grant.
Funding Opportunity Number: ECA/
PE/C/PY–07–06.
Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance Number: 00.000.
Key Dates: Application Deadline:
December 4, 2006.
Executive Summary
SUMMARY: The Youth Programs Division
of the Bureau of Educational and
Cultural Affairs announces an open
competition for the placement
component of the Future Leaders
Exchange (FLEX) program. Public and
private non-profit organizations meeting
the provisions described in Internal
Revenue Code section 26 U.S.C.
6 15
U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(D).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
8 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
7 15
PO 00000
Frm 00100
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
55259
501(c)(3) may submit proposals to
recruit and select host families and
schools for high school students
between the ages of 15 and 17 from
countries of the former Soviet Union,
thereafter referred to as Eurasia. This
solicitation and the activities to which
it refers, applies only to FLEX students
from the following Eurasian countries:
Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia,
Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova,
Russia, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan,
Ukraine, and Uzbekistan.
In addition to identifying schools and
screening, selecting, and orienting
families, organizations will be
responsible for: (1) Providing English
language enhancement activities for a
small percentage of students who are
specially identified; (2) orienting all
students at the local level; (3) providing
support services for students; (4)
arranging enhancement activities and
skill-building opportunities; (5)
assessing student performance and
progress; (6) providing mid-year
programming and re-entry training; and
(7) evaluating project success.
Preference will be given to those
organizations that offer participants
opportunities to develop leadership
skills and raise their awareness of
tolerance and social justice through
community activities and networks. The
award of grants and the number of
students who will participate is subject
to the availability of funding in fiscal
year 2007.
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Authority: Overall grant making
authority for this program is contained
in the Mutual Educational and Cultural
Exchange Act of 1961, as amended,
Public Law 87–256, also known as the
Fulbright-Hays Act. The purpose of the
Act is ‘‘to enable the Government of the
United States to increase mutual
understanding between the people of
the United States and the people of
other countries * * *; to strengthen the
ties which unite us with other nations
by demonstrating the educational and
cultural interests, developments, and
achievements of the people of the
United States and other nations * * *
and thus to assist in the development of
friendly, sympathetic, and peaceful
relations between the United States and
the other countries of the world.’’ The
funding authority for the program above
is provided through legislation.
Overview: The Future Leaders
Exchange Program seeks to provide
1,200 high school students with an
opportunity to live in the United States
for the purpose of promoting democratic
values and institutions throughout
Eurasia. Participants will reside with
E:\FR\FM\21SEN1.SGM
21SEN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
55260
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 183 / Thursday, September 21, 2006 / Notices
American host families and attend high
school during the 2007–08 academic
year. In special situations, students may
come to the U.S. for a short-term, rather
than yearlong, program. Further details
about such modifications are provided
in the attached Project Objectives, Goals
and Implementation (POGI) document.
During the year, FLEX participants
will be engaged in a variety of activities,
such as community and school-based
programs, skill-building workshops, and
cultural events. Academic year 2007/
2008 will be the fifteenth year of the
FLEX program, with more than 15,000
students who have been awarded
scholarships.
Goals: The goals of the program are (1)
to promote mutual understanding and
foster a relationship between the people
of Eurasia and the U.S.; (2) to assist the
successor generation of Eurasian
countries in developing the qualities it
will need to lead in their aspirations for
transformation in the 21st century; and
(3) to promote democratic values and
civic responsibility.
Considering the specific focus of the
FLEX program, the following outcomes
will indicate a successful project:
1. Participants will acquire an
understanding of important elements of
a civil society. This includes concepts
such as volunteerism, the idea that
American citizens can and do act at the
grassroots level to deal with societal
problems, and an awareness of and
respect for the rule of law.
2. Participants will acquire an
understanding of a free market economy
and private enterprise, including an
awareness of privatization and an
appreciation of the role of the
entrepreneur in economic growth.
3. Participants will develop an
appreciation for American culture, an
understanding of the diversity of
American society and increased
tolerance and respect for others with
differing views and beliefs.
4. Participants will interact with
Americans and generate enduring ties.
5. Participants will teach Americans
about the cultures of their home
countries.
6. Participants will gain leadership
capacity that will enable them, as FLEX
alumni, to initiate activities in their
home countries that focus on
development and community service.
Objectives: The immediate objectives
of the FLEX program are:
• To place approximately 1,200 preselected high school students from
Eurasian countries in qualified, wellmotivated host families;
• To place students in schools that
have been accredited by the respective
State departments of education;
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:30 Sep 20, 2006
Jkt 208001
• To expose program participants to
American culture and democracy that
will enable them to attain a broad view
of U.S. society and culture;
• To provide appropriate venues for
program participants to share their
culture, lifestyle and traditions with
U.S. citizens;
• To provide participants with
leadership training and opportunities
that foster skills they can take back with
them and use in their home countries;
and
• To provide activities that will
increase and enhance students’
understanding of the importance of
tolerance and respect for the views and
beliefs of others in a civil society.
Other Components: One organization
has been awarded a grant to perform the
following functions: Recruitment and
selection of Eurasian students;
assistance in documentation and
preparation of DS–2019 visa forms;
preparation of cross-cultural materials;
pre-departure orientation; international
travel from home to host community
and return; facilitation of ongoing
communication between the natural
parents and placement organization, as
needed; maintenance of a student
database and provision of data to the
U.S. Department of State; and ongoing
follow-up with alumni after their return
to Eurasia.
Another organization is responsible
for supporting students with
disabilities. This involves a post-arrival
orientation and reentry training as well
as ongoing support throughout the year
in order to help them cope with
challenges specific to their
circumstances. Placement organizations
will be in direct communication with
this organization, especially since some
students with disabilities may need
supplementary independence skills
training early on in the program.
Guidelines: Applicants are requested
to submit a narrative outlining a
comprehensive strategy for the
administration and implementation of
the placement component of the FLEX
program including the identification of
host families and schools; organization
of post-arrival orientation programming;
placement of students, as needed, in
pre-academic intensive English
program; enrichment programming;
monitoring and supporting participants;
and evaluation. Specific responsibilities
are as follows:
(1) Recruitment, screening, selection,
and Eurasia/FLEX-specific orientation
of host families;
(2) enrollment in an accredited
school;
(3) post-arrival orientation for
participants;
PO 00000
Frm 00101
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(4) placement of a small number of
students with disabilities;
(5) pre-program specialized English
language tutoring for pre-selected
students who require focused
preparation for their academic year;
(6) specialized training of local staff
and volunteers to work with FLEX
students from Eurasia;
(7) preparation and dissemination of
materials to students pertaining to the
respective placement organization;
(8) dispersal of program-specific
information, such as alumni activity
reports and Host Family and School
Administrator handbooks, to respective
persons involved with the program (e.g.,
host families, school administrators,
local coordinators);
(9) program-related enhancement and
leadership training activities;
(10) troubleshooting;
(11) communication with the
organizations conducting other program
components, when appropriate;
(12) evaluation of the students’
performance;
(13) quarterly evaluation of the
organization’s success in achieving
program goals;
(14) mid-year orientations to assess
progress; and
(15) Eurasia-specific re-entry training
to prepare students for readjustment to
their home environments.
Applicants must request a grant for
the placement of at least 30 students.
There is no ceiling on the number of
students who may be placed by one
organization. Placements may be in any
region of the U.S. Strong preference will
be given to organizations that choose to
place participants in clusters of at least
three students. Please refer to the
Solicitation Package, available on
request from the address listed below,
for details on essential program
elements, permissible costs, and criteria
used to select and place students.
We anticipate grants beginning no
later than April 2007, subject to the
availability of funds.
Most participants arrive in their host
communities during the month of
August and remain for 10 or 11 months
until their departure during the period
mid-May to late June 2008. Students
with disabilities and students requiring
supplementary English language
instruction may arrive at the end of July.
Administration of the program must
be in compliance with reporting and
withholding regulations for Federal,
State, and local taxes as applicable.
Recipient organizations should
demonstrate tax regulation adherence in
the proposal narrative and budget.
Applicants should submit the health
and accident insurance plans they
E:\FR\FM\21SEN1.SGM
21SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 183 / Thursday, September 21, 2006 / Notices
intend to use for students on this
program. If use of a private plan is
proposed, the State Department will
compare that plan with the Bureau plan
and make a determination of which will
be applicable.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
II. Award Information
Type of Award: New Grant
Agreement.
Fiscal Year Funds: FY 2007.
Approximate Total Funding:
$6,625,000.
Approximate Number of Awards: 10–
15 grants.
Average Grant Award: Dependent on
the number of proposed students, total
amount not to exceed $5,500 per
student; a minimum award is
approximately $165,000.
Anticipated Award Date: April 2007,
pending availability of funds.
Anticipated Project Completion Date:
August 2008.
Additional Information: Pending
successful implementation of this
program and the availability of funds in
subsequent fiscal years, it is ECA’s
intent to renew grants awarded under
this competition for at least two
additional fiscal years, before openly
competing it again.
III. Eligibility Information
III.1. Eligible applicants: Applications
may be submitted by public and private
non-profit organizations meeting the
provisions described in Internal
Revenue Code section 26 U.S.C.
501(c)(3).
III.2. Cost Sharing or Matching Funds:
There is no minimum or maximum
percentage required for this
competition. However, the Bureau
encourages applicants to provide
maximum levels of cost sharing and
funding in support of its programs.
When cost sharing is offered, it is
understood and agreed that the
applicant must provide the amount of
cost sharing as stipulated in its proposal
and later included in an approved grant
agreement. Cost sharing may be in the
form of allowable direct or indirect
costs. For accountability, you must
maintain written records to support all
costs which are claimed as your
contribution, as well as costs to be paid
by the Federal government. Such
records are subject to audit. The basis
for determining the value of cash and
in-kind contributions must be in
accordance with OMB Circular A–110,
(Revised), Subpart C.23—Cost Sharing
and Matching. In the event you do not
provide the minimum amount of cost
sharing as stipulated in the approved
budget, ECA’s contribution will be
reduced in like proportion.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:30 Sep 20, 2006
Jkt 208001
III. 3. Other Eligibility Requirements:
Bureau grant guidelines require that
organizations with less than four years
experience in conducting international
exchanges be limited to $60,000 in
Bureau funding. ECA will award grants
in amounts exceeding $60,000,which
will cover costs to support and monitor
a minimum of 30 students.
Consequently, organizations with less
than four years experience in
conducting international exchanges are
ineligible to apply under this
competition. The Bureau encourages
applicants to provide maximum levels
of cost sharing and funding in support
of its programs.
IV. Application and Submission
Information
Note: Please read the complete
announcement before sending inquiries or
submitting proposals. Once the RFGP
deadline has passed, Bureau staff may not
discuss this competition with applicants
until the proposal review process has been
completed.
IV.1. Contact Information to Request
an Application Package: Please contact
The Office of Youth Programs, ECA/PE/
C/PY, Room 568, U.S. Department of
State, SA–44, 301 4th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20547, telephone (202)
203–7527, and fax (202) 203–7529, email Judy Nowlin at NowlinJR@state.gov
to request a Solicitation Package. Please
refer to the Funding Opportunity
Number ECA/PE/C/PY–07–06 located at
the top of this announcement when
making your request.
Alternatively, an electronic
application package may be obtained
from https://www.grants.gov. Please see
section IV.3f for further information.
The Solicitation Package contains the
Proposal Submission Instruction (PSI)
document, which consists of required
application forms and standard
guidelines for proposal preparation.
It also contains the Project Objectives,
Goals and Implementation (POGI)
document, which provides specific
information, award criteria and budget
instructions tailored to this competition.
Please specify Bureau Program Officer
Anna Mussman
(MussmanAP@state.gov) and refer to the
Funding Opportunity Number (ECA/PE/
C/PY–07–06) at the top of this
announcement on all other inquiries
and correspondence.
IV.2. To Download a Solicitation
Package Via Internet: The entire
Solicitation Package may be
downloaded from the Bureau’s Web site
at https://exchanges.state.gov/education/
rfgps/menu.htm. Please read all
information before downloading.
PO 00000
Frm 00102
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
55261
IV.3. Content and Form of
Submission: Applicants must follow all
instructions in the Solicitation Package.
The original and 8 copies of the
application should be sent per the
instructions under IV.3e. ‘‘Application
Deadline and Methods of Submissions’’
section below.
IV.3a. You are required to have a Dun
and Bradstreet Data Universal
Numbering System (DUNS) number to
apply for a grant or cooperative
agreement from the U.S. Government.
This number is a nine-digit
identification number, which uniquely
identifies business entities. Obtaining a
DUNS number is easy and there is no
charge. To obtain a DUNS number,
access https://
www.dunandbradstreet.com or call 1–
866–705–5711. Please ensure that your
DUNS number is included in the
appropriate box of the SF–424 which is
part of the formal application package.
IV.3b. All proposals must contain an
executive summary, proposal narrative
and budget. Please Refer to the
Solicitation Package. It contains the
mandatory Proposal Submission
Instructions (PSI) document and the
Project Objectives, Goals and
Implementation (POGI) for additional
formatting and technical requirements.
IV.3c. You must have nonprofit status
with the IRS at the time of application.
If your organization is a private
nonprofit which has not received a grant
or cooperative agreement from ECA in
the past three years, or if your
organization received nonprofit status
from the IRS within the past four years,
you must submit the necessary
documentation to verify nonprofit status
as directed in the PSI document. Failure
to do so will cause your proposal to be
declared technically ineligible.
IV.3d. Please take into consideration
the following information when
preparing your proposal narrative:
IV.3d.1 Adherence to all regulations
governing the J Visa. The Office of
Citizen Exchanges of the Bureau of
Educational and Cultural Affairs is the
official program sponsor of the exchange
program covered by this RFGP, and an
employee of the Bureau will be the
‘‘Responsible Officer’’ for the program
under the terms of 22 CFR 62, which
covers the administration of the
Exchange Visitor Program (J visa
program). Under the terms of 22 CFR 62,
organizations receiving grants under
this RFGP will be third parties
‘‘cooperating with or assisting the
sponsor in the conduct of the sponsor’s
program.’’ The actions of grantee
program organizations shall be
‘‘imputed to the sponsor in evaluating
the sponsor’s compliance with’’ 22 CFR
E:\FR\FM\21SEN1.SGM
21SEN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
55262
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 183 / Thursday, September 21, 2006 / Notices
62. Therefore, the Bureau expects that
any organization receiving a grant under
this competition will render all
assistance necessary to enable the
Bureau to fully comply with 22 CFR 62
et seq.
The Bureau of Educational and
Cultural Affairs places great emphasis
on the secure and proper administration
of Exchange Visitor (J visa) Programs
and adherence by grantee program
organizations and program participants
to all regulations governing the J visa
program status. Therefore, proposals
should explicitly state in writing that the
applicant is prepared to assist the
Bureau in meeting all requirements
governing the administration of
Exchange Visitor Programs as set forth
in 22 CFR 62. If your organization has
experience as a designated Exchange
Visitor Program Sponsor, the applicant
should discuss their record of
compliance with 22 CFR 62 et. seq.,
including the oversight of their
Responsible Officers and Alternate
Responsible Officers, screening and
selection of program participants,
provision of pre-arrival information and
orientation to participants, monitoring
of participants, proper maintenance and
security of forms, recordkeeping,
reporting and other requirements.
The Office of Citizen Exchanges of
ECA will be responsible for issuing DS–
2019 forms to participants in this
program. A copy of the complete
regulations governing the
administration of Exchange Visitor (J)
programs is available at https://
exchanges.state.gov or from: United
States Department of State, Office of
Exchange Coordination and
Designation, ECA/EC/ECD—SA–44,
Room 734, 301 4th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20547, telephone: (202)
203–5029, fax: (202) 453–8640.
IV.3.d.2 Diversity, Freedom and
Democracy Guidelines. Pursuant to the
Bureau’s authorizing legislation,
programs must maintain a non-political
character and should be balanced and
representative of the diversity of
American political, social, and cultural
life. ‘‘Diversity’’ should be interpreted
in the broadest sense and encompass
differences including, but not limited to
ethnicity, race, gender, religion,
geographic location, socio-economic
status, and disabilities. Applicants are
strongly encouraged to adhere to the
advancement of this principle both in
program administration and in program
content.
Please refer to the review criteria
under the ‘‘Support for Diversity’’
section for specific suggestions on
incorporating diversity into your
proposal. Public Law 104–319 provides
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:30 Sep 20, 2006
Jkt 208001
that ‘‘in carrying out programs of
educational and cultural exchange in
countries whose people do not fully
enjoy freedom and democracy,’’ the
Bureau ‘‘shall take appropriate steps to
provide opportunities for participation
in such programs to human rights and
democracy leaders of such countries.’’
Public Law 106–113 requires that the
governments of the countries described
above do not have inappropriate
influence in the selection process.
Proposals should reflect advancement of
these goals in their program contents, to
the full extent deemed feasible.
IV.3d.3. Program monitoring and
evaluation. Monitoring: Proposals must
include a plan to monitor and evaluate
the project’s success, both as the
activities unfold and at the end of the
program. The Bureau recommends that
your proposal include a draft survey
questionnaire or other technique, plus a
description of a methodology that will
be used to link outcomes to original
project objectives. The Bureau expects
that the grantee will track participants
and be able to respond to key
monitoring questions throughout the
year, particularly on effects of the
program on program participants, their
host families and communities.
Successful monitoring depends
heavily on setting clear goals and
outcomes at the outset of a program.
Your monitoring plan should include a
description of your project’s objectives
and how and when you intend to
measure these outcomes. You should
also show how your project objectives
link to the goals of the program
described in this RFGP.
Overall, the quality of your
monitoring plan will be judged on how
well it specifies successes and
challenges. Grantees will be required to
provide reports analyzing their
monitoring findings to the Bureau in
their regular program reports. All data
collected, including survey responses
and contact information, must be
maintained for a minimum of three
years and provided to the Bureau upon
request.
Evaluation: The Bureau’s Office of
Policy and Evaluation will conduct
evaluations of the FLEX program
through E-GOALS, its online system for
surveying program participants and
collecting data about program
performance. These evaluations assist
ECA and its program grantees in
meeting the requirements of the
Government Performance Results Act
(GPRA) of 1993. This Act requires
Federal agencies to measure the results
of their programs in meeting predetermined performance goals and
objectives.
PO 00000
Frm 00103
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
All FLEX program participants will
take three online surveys:
1. Standardized pre-program surveys,
at the beginning of the program;
2. Standardized post-program surveys,
at the end of the program and before
their return home; and
3. Standardized follow-up surveys,
approximately six months to a year after
the conclusion of the program.
These surveys help ECA assess:
Student satisfaction with the program;
student attitudes and views; the extent
of learning and skill development
(including leadership); reliance on new
learning and skills in their studies, at
work, and in their communities; and
their efforts to share new ideas,
knowledge, and insights with citizens in
their home countries.
Since organizations play a critical role
in facilitating E-GOALS evaluations of
FLEX participants, it is imperative that
applicants include a plan to ensure that
FLEX students complete the postprogram surveys while they are still on
program and prior to their departure
from the United States; this includes
monitoring the response rate through
collection of a certificate issued by the
system to each student upon completion
of the survey. The grantee will be
working directly with an E-GOALS
evaluator in the Office of Policy and
Evaluation. Please see specific
responsibilities in the accompanying
Project Objectives, Goals and
Implementation (POGI) document.
IV.3e. Please take the following
information into consideration when
preparing your budget:
1V.3e.1. Applicants must submit a
comprehensive budget for the entire
program. Per capita costs are not to
exceed $5,500 per participant. The
budget must reflect costs for a minimum
of 30 participants. Please indicate
clearly the number of students funded.
There must be a summary budget as
well as breakdowns reflecting both
administrative and program budgets.
Applicants may provide separate subbudgets for each program component,
phase, location, or activity to provide
clarification.
IV.3e.2. Allowable costs for the
program and additional budget guidance
are outlined in detail in the POGI
document.
Please refer to the Solicitation
Package for complete budget guidelines
and formatting instructions.
IV.3f. Application deadline and
methods of submission.
Application deadline date: December
4, 2006.
Reference number: ECA/PE/C/PY–07–
06.
E:\FR\FM\21SEN1.SGM
21SEN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 183 / Thursday, September 21, 2006 / Notices
Methods of submission: applications
may be submitted in one of two ways:
(1) In hard copy, via a nationally
recognized overnight delivery service
(i.e., DHL, Federal Express, UPS,
Airborne Express, or U.S. Postal Express
Overnight Mail, etc.), or
(2) Electronically through https://
www.grants.gov. Along with the Project
Title, all applicants must enter the
above Reference Number in Box 11 on
the SF–424 contained in the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI)
of the solicitation document.
IV.3f.1 Submitting Printed
Applications. Applications must be
shipped no later than the above
deadline. Delivery services used by
applicants must have in-place,
centralized shipping identification and
tracking systems that may be accessed
via the Internet and delivery people
who are identifiable by commonly
recognized uniforms and delivery
vehicles. Proposals shipped on or before
the above deadline but received at ECA
more than seven days after the deadline
will be ineligible for further
consideration under this competition.
Proposals shipped after the established
deadlines are ineligible for
consideration under this competition.
ECA will not notify upon receipt of
application. It is each applicant’s
responsibility to ensure that each
package is marked with a legible
tracking number and to monitor/confirm
delivery to ECA via the Internet.
Delivery of proposal packages may not
be made via local courier service or in
person for this competition. Faxed
documents will not be accepted at any
time. Only proposals submitted as
stated above will be considered.
Important note: When preparing your
submission please make sure to include
one extra copy of the completed SF–424
form and place it in an envelope
addressed to ‘‘ECA/EX/PM’’.
The original and eight (8) copies of
the application should be sent to: U.S.
Department of State, SA–44, Bureau of
Educational and Cultural Affairs, Ref.:
ECA/PE/C/PY–07–06, Program
Management, ECA/EX/PM, Room 534,
301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC
20547.
Along with the Project Title, all
applicants must enter the above
Reference Number in Box 11 on the SF–
424 contained in the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI)
of the solicitation document.
IV.3f.2. Submitting electronic
applications. Applicants have the
option of submitting proposals
electronically through Grants.gov
(https://www.grants.gov). Complete
solicitation packages are available at
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:30 Sep 20, 2006
Jkt 208001
Grants.gov in the ‘‘Find’’ portion of the
system. Please follow the instructions
available in the ‘‘Get Started’’ portion of
the site (https://www.grants.gov/
GetStarted).
Applicants have until midnight (12
a.m.) of the closing date to ensure that
their entire application has been
uploaded to the grants.gov site.
Applications uploaded to the site after
midnight of the application deadline
date will be technically ineligible.
Applicants will receive a
confirmation e-mail from grants.gov
upon the successful submission of an
application. ECA will not notify you
upon receipt of electronic applications.
IV.3g. Intergovernmental Review of
Applications Executive Order 12372
does not apply to this program.
V. Application Review Information
V.1. Review process: The Bureau will
review all proposals for technical
eligibility. Proposals will be deemed
ineligible if they do not fully adhere to
the guidelines stated herein and in the
Solicitation Package. All eligible
proposals will be reviewed by the
program office, as well as the Public
Diplomacy section overseas, where
appropriate. Eligible proposals will be
subject to compliance with Federal and
Bureau regulations and guidelines and
forwarded to Bureau grant panels for
advisory review. Proposals may also be
reviewed by the Office of the Legal
Adviser or by other Department
elements. Final funding decisions are at
the discretion of the Department of
State’s Assistant Secretary for
Educational and Cultural Affairs. Final
technical authority for assistance
awards (grants) resides with the
Bureau’s Grants Officer.
Review Criteria: Technically eligible
applications will be competitively
reviewed according to the criteria stated
below. These criteria are not rank
ordered and all carry equal weight in
the proposal evaluation:
1. Program Management and
Planning: Your proposal narrative
should exhibit originality, substance,
and relevance to the Bureau’s mission as
well as to the goals of the FLEX
program. The level of creativity,
resources, and effectiveness will be
primary factors for review. Proposals
should demonstrate an understanding of
Eurasian countries and of the needs of
students from this region, as related to
the program. Proposals should also
indicate how students will be
monitored, trained and prepared for
their role as FLEX alumni. Reviewers
will assess the degree in which
proposals engage participants in
community activities that involve skills
PO 00000
Frm 00104
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
55263
development and leadership training.
They will also assess proposed activities
that foster tolerance and social justice.
Proposals should indicate clearly the
capacity and willingness to provide
short-term programming for some
students if this becomes necessary. A
detailed agenda and work plan should
adhere to the program overview and
guidelines described in the solicitation
package.
2. Ability to achieve program
objectives: Objectives should be
reasonable, feasible, and flexible. With
respect to anticipated program
outcomes, reviewers will assess the
degree to which the proposed outcomes
of the project are realistic and
measurable. Strategies should creatively
utilize and reinforce activities to ensure
an efficient use of program resources.
3. Multiplier effect/impact: Proposed
programs should strengthen long-term
mutual understanding, including
maximum sharing of information and
establishment of long-term institutional
and individual linkages. Reviewers will
assess ways in which proposals include
innovative ways to involve students in
their U.S. communities and substantive
plans to prepare them for their role as
active, effective FLEX alumni.
4. Support of diversity: Proposals
should demonstrate substantive support
of the Bureau’s policy on diversity.
Achievable and relevant features should
be cited in both program administration
(selection of participants, host families,
schools, program venue and program
evaluation) and program content
(orientations, program meetings,
resource materials and follow-up
activities).
5. Organization’s record/institutional
capacity: Proposed personnel and
institutional resources should be
adequate and appropriate to achieve the
program or project’s goals. In assessing
institutional capacity, reviewers will
assess the applicant and its partners to
determine if they offer adequate
resources, expertise, and experience to
fulfill program objectives. Partner
activities should be clearly defined.
Proposals should demonstrate an
institutional record of successful
exchange programs, including
responsible fiscal management and full
compliance with all reporting and J–1
Visa requirements for past Bureau grants
as determined by Bureau Grant Staff.
The Bureau will consider the past
performance of prior recipients and the
demonstrated potential of new
applicants.
6. Project monitoring and evaluation:
Proposals should include a plan to
monitor the activity’s success, both as
the activities unfold and at the end of
E:\FR\FM\21SEN1.SGM
21SEN1
55264
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 183 / Thursday, September 21, 2006 / Notices
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
the program. Reviewers will assess your
plans to monitor student progress and
program activities, particularly in regard
to intended outcomes indicated in your
proposal. Successful applicants will be
expected to submit quarterly reports,
which should be included as an
inherent component of the work plan.
Proposals should also specify ways in
which students will be encouraged and
monitored to ensure they complete the
mandatory end-of-the-year surveys
administered through the E-GOALS
system.
7. Cost-effectiveness/cost sharing:
Reviewers will analyze the budget for
clarity and cost-effectiveness. They will
also assess the rationale of the proposed
budget and whether the allocation of
funds is appropriate to complete tasks
outlined in the project narrative. The
overhead and administrative
components of the proposal, including
salaries and honoraria, should be kept
as low as possible. All other items
should be necessary and appropriate.
Proposals should maximize cost-sharing
through other private sector support as
well as institutional direct funding
contributions. Preference will be given
to organizations whose proposals
demonstrate a quality, cost-effective
program.
VI. Award Administration Information
VI.1a. Award notice: Final awards
cannot be made until funds have been
appropriated by Congress, allocated and
committed through internal Bureau
procedures. Successful applicants will
receive an Assistance Award Document
(AAD) from the Bureau’s Grants Office.
The AAD and the original grant
proposal with subsequent modifications
(if applicable) shall be the only binding
authorizing document between the
recipient and the U.S. Government. The
AAD will be signed by an authorized
Grants Officer, and mailed to the
recipient’s responsible officer identified
in the application.
Unsuccessful applicants will receive
notification of the results of the
application review from the ECA
program office coordinating this
competition.
VI.2. Administrative and National
policy requirements: Terms and
Conditions for the Administration of
ECA agreements include the following:
Office of Management and Budget
Circular A–122, ‘‘Cost Principles for
Nonprofit Organizations.’’
Office of Management and Budget
Circular, ‘‘Cost Principles for
Educational Institutions.’’
OMB Circular A–87, ‘‘Cost Principles
for State, Local and Indian
Governments.’’
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:30 Sep 20, 2006
Jkt 208001
OMB Circular No. A–110 (Revised),
Uniform Administrative
Requirements for Grants and
Agreements with Institutions of
Higher Education, Hospitals, and
other Nonprofit Organizations.
OMB Circular No. A–102, Uniform
Administrative Requirements for
Grants-in-Aid to State and Local
Governments.
OMB Circular No. A–133, Audits of
States, Local Government, and Nonprofit Organizations.
Please reference the following Web
sites for additional information:
https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants,
https://exchanges.state.gov/education/
grantsdiv/terms.htm#articleI.
VI.3. Reporting requirements: You
must provide ECA with a hard copy
original plus one copy of the following
reports:
(1) A final program and financial
report no more than 90 days after the
expiration of the award;
(2) Quarterly program and financial
reports which should include both
quantitative and qualitative data you
have available.
Grantees will be required to provide
reports analyzing their evaluation
findings to the Bureau in their regular
program reports. (Please refer to IV.
Application and submission
instructions (IV.3.d.3) above for Program
Monitoring and Evaluation information.
All data collected, including survey
responses and contact information, must
be maintained for a minimum of three
years and provided to the Bureau upon
request.
All reports must be sent to the ECA
Grants Officer and ECA Program Officer
listed in the final assistance award
document.
VI.4. Program data requirements:
Organizations awarded grants will be
required to maintain specific data on
program participants and activities in an
electronically accessible database format
that can be shared with the Bureaus
required.
VII. Agency Contacts
For questions about this
announcement, contact: Anna
Mussman, Office of Citizen Exchanges,
ECA/PE/C/PY, Room 568, U.S.
Department of State, SA–44, 301 4th
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547.
Telephone: (202) 203–7506, fax number:
(202) 203–7529, Internet address:
MussmanAP@state.gov. All
correspondence with the Bureau
concerning this RFGP should reference
the above title and number ECA/PE/C/
PY–07–06.
Please read the complete Federal
Register announcement before sending
PO 00000
Frm 00105
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
inquiries or submitting proposals. Once
the RFGP deadline has passed, Bureau
staff may not discuss this competition
with applicants until the proposal
review process has been completed.
VIII. Other Information
Notice: The terms and conditions
published in this RFGP are binding and
may not be modified by any Bureau
representative. Explanatory information
provided by the Bureau that contradicts
published language will not be binding.
Issuance of the RFGP does not
constitute an award commitment on the
part of the Government. The Bureau
reserves the right to reduce, revise, or
increase proposal budgets in accordance
with the needs of the program and the
availability of funds. Awards made will
be subject to periodic reporting and
evaluation requirements per section VI.3
above.
Dated: September 13, 2006.
Dina Habib Powell,
Assistant Secretary for Educational and
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 06–7937 Filed 9–20–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
Notice of Submission Deadline for
International Slots for the Summer
2007 Scheduling Season
AGENCY:
Department of Transportation,
FAA.
ACTION:
Notice of submission deadline
SUMMARY: The FAA announces in this
notice that the deadline for submitting
requests for international Arrival
Authorizations at Chicago O’Hare
International Airport (ORD) for
allocation under 14 CFR 93.29 is
October 12, 2006. This date coincides
with the deadline established by the
International Air Transport Association
(IATA) for the Schedule Coordination
Conference for the Summer 2007
season. The FAA will allocate ORD
international Arrival Authorizations for
the period covering the U.S. Summer
Scheduling Season in accordance with
recent changes to the start and end dates
of daylight saving time in the United
States. The applicable period is March
11 through November 3, 2007. The FAA
recognizes that these dates differ from
the March 25 through October 27, 2007
period used by IATA for the Summer
2007 schedule. Therefore, for those
carriers who previously submitted
schedules to the FAA through March 24,
2007, as part of the Winter 2006
E:\FR\FM\21SEN1.SGM
21SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 183 (Thursday, September 21, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55259-55264]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7937]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 5551]
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA) Request for
Grant Proposals: The Future Leaders Exchange Program: Host Family and
School Placement
Announcement Type: New Grant.
Funding Opportunity Number: ECA/PE/C/PY-07-06.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number: 00.000.
Key Dates: Application Deadline: December 4, 2006.
Executive Summary
SUMMARY: The Youth Programs Division of the Bureau of Educational and
Cultural Affairs announces an open competition for the placement
component of the Future Leaders Exchange (FLEX) program. Public and
private non-profit organizations meeting the provisions described in
Internal Revenue Code section 26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3) may submit proposals
to recruit and select host families and schools for high school
students between the ages of 15 and 17 from countries of the former
Soviet Union, thereafter referred to as Eurasia. This solicitation and
the activities to which it refers, applies only to FLEX students from
the following Eurasian countries: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus,
Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, Russia, Tajikistan,
Turkmenistan, Ukraine, and Uzbekistan.
In addition to identifying schools and screening, selecting, and
orienting families, organizations will be responsible for: (1)
Providing English language enhancement activities for a small
percentage of students who are specially identified; (2) orienting all
students at the local level; (3) providing support services for
students; (4) arranging enhancement activities and skill-building
opportunities; (5) assessing student performance and progress; (6)
providing mid-year programming and re-entry training; and (7)
evaluating project success. Preference will be given to those
organizations that offer participants opportunities to develop
leadership skills and raise their awareness of tolerance and social
justice through community activities and networks. The award of grants
and the number of students who will participate is subject to the
availability of funding in fiscal year 2007.
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Authority: Overall grant making authority for this program is
contained in the Mutual Educational and Cultural Exchange Act of 1961,
as amended, Public Law 87-256, also known as the Fulbright-Hays Act.
The purpose of the Act is ``to enable the Government of the United
States to increase mutual understanding between the people of the
United States and the people of other countries * * *; to strengthen
the ties which unite us with other nations by demonstrating the
educational and cultural interests, developments, and achievements of
the people of the United States and other nations * * * and thus to
assist in the development of friendly, sympathetic, and peaceful
relations between the United States and the other countries of the
world.'' The funding authority for the program above is provided
through legislation.
Overview: The Future Leaders Exchange Program seeks to provide
1,200 high school students with an opportunity to live in the United
States for the purpose of promoting democratic values and institutions
throughout Eurasia. Participants will reside with
[[Page 55260]]
American host families and attend high school during the 2007-08
academic year. In special situations, students may come to the U.S. for
a short-term, rather than yearlong, program. Further details about such
modifications are provided in the attached Project Objectives, Goals
and Implementation (POGI) document.
During the year, FLEX participants will be engaged in a variety of
activities, such as community and school-based programs, skill-building
workshops, and cultural events. Academic year 2007/2008 will be the
fifteenth year of the FLEX program, with more than 15,000 students who
have been awarded scholarships.
Goals: The goals of the program are (1) to promote mutual
understanding and foster a relationship between the people of Eurasia
and the U.S.; (2) to assist the successor generation of Eurasian
countries in developing the qualities it will need to lead in their
aspirations for transformation in the 21st century; and (3) to promote
democratic values and civic responsibility.
Considering the specific focus of the FLEX program, the following
outcomes will indicate a successful project:
1. Participants will acquire an understanding of important elements
of a civil society. This includes concepts such as volunteerism, the
idea that American citizens can and do act at the grassroots level to
deal with societal problems, and an awareness of and respect for the
rule of law.
2. Participants will acquire an understanding of a free market
economy and private enterprise, including an awareness of privatization
and an appreciation of the role of the entrepreneur in economic growth.
3. Participants will develop an appreciation for American culture,
an understanding of the diversity of American society and increased
tolerance and respect for others with differing views and beliefs.
4. Participants will interact with Americans and generate enduring
ties.
5. Participants will teach Americans about the cultures of their
home countries.
6. Participants will gain leadership capacity that will enable
them, as FLEX alumni, to initiate activities in their home countries
that focus on development and community service.
Objectives: The immediate objectives of the FLEX program are:
To place approximately 1,200 pre-selected high school
students from Eurasian countries in qualified, well-motivated host
families;
To place students in schools that have been accredited by
the respective State departments of education;
To expose program participants to American culture and
democracy that will enable them to attain a broad view of U.S. society
and culture;
To provide appropriate venues for program participants to
share their culture, lifestyle and traditions with U.S. citizens;
To provide participants with leadership training and
opportunities that foster skills they can take back with them and use
in their home countries; and
To provide activities that will increase and enhance
students' understanding of the importance of tolerance and respect for
the views and beliefs of others in a civil society.
Other Components: One organization has been awarded a grant to
perform the following functions: Recruitment and selection of Eurasian
students; assistance in documentation and preparation of DS-2019 visa
forms; preparation of cross-cultural materials; pre-departure
orientation; international travel from home to host community and
return; facilitation of ongoing communication between the natural
parents and placement organization, as needed; maintenance of a student
database and provision of data to the U.S. Department of State; and
ongoing follow-up with alumni after their return to Eurasia.
Another organization is responsible for supporting students with
disabilities. This involves a post-arrival orientation and reentry
training as well as ongoing support throughout the year in order to
help them cope with challenges specific to their circumstances.
Placement organizations will be in direct communication with this
organization, especially since some students with disabilities may need
supplementary independence skills training early on in the program.
Guidelines: Applicants are requested to submit a narrative
outlining a comprehensive strategy for the administration and
implementation of the placement component of the FLEX program including
the identification of host families and schools; organization of post-
arrival orientation programming; placement of students, as needed, in
pre-academic intensive English program; enrichment programming;
monitoring and supporting participants; and evaluation. Specific
responsibilities are as follows:
(1) Recruitment, screening, selection, and Eurasia/FLEX-specific
orientation of host families;
(2) enrollment in an accredited school;
(3) post-arrival orientation for participants;
(4) placement of a small number of students with disabilities;
(5) pre-program specialized English language tutoring for pre-
selected students who require focused preparation for their academic
year;
(6) specialized training of local staff and volunteers to work with
FLEX students from Eurasia;
(7) preparation and dissemination of materials to students
pertaining to the respective placement organization;
(8) dispersal of program-specific information, such as alumni
activity reports and Host Family and School Administrator handbooks, to
respective persons involved with the program (e.g., host families,
school administrators, local coordinators);
(9) program-related enhancement and leadership training activities;
(10) troubleshooting;
(11) communication with the organizations conducting other program
components, when appropriate;
(12) evaluation of the students' performance;
(13) quarterly evaluation of the organization's success in
achieving program goals;
(14) mid-year orientations to assess progress; and
(15) Eurasia-specific re-entry training to prepare students for
readjustment to their home environments.
Applicants must request a grant for the placement of at least 30
students. There is no ceiling on the number of students who may be
placed by one organization. Placements may be in any region of the U.S.
Strong preference will be given to organizations that choose to place
participants in clusters of at least three students. Please refer to
the Solicitation Package, available on request from the address listed
below, for details on essential program elements, permissible costs,
and criteria used to select and place students.
We anticipate grants beginning no later than April 2007, subject to
the availability of funds.
Most participants arrive in their host communities during the month
of August and remain for 10 or 11 months until their departure during
the period mid-May to late June 2008. Students with disabilities and
students requiring supplementary English language instruction may
arrive at the end of July.
Administration of the program must be in compliance with reporting
and withholding regulations for Federal, State, and local taxes as
applicable. Recipient organizations should demonstrate tax regulation
adherence in the proposal narrative and budget.
Applicants should submit the health and accident insurance plans
they
[[Page 55261]]
intend to use for students on this program. If use of a private plan is
proposed, the State Department will compare that plan with the Bureau
plan and make a determination of which will be applicable.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: New Grant Agreement.
Fiscal Year Funds: FY 2007.
Approximate Total Funding: $6,625,000.
Approximate Number of Awards: 10-15 grants.
Average Grant Award: Dependent on the number of proposed students,
total amount not to exceed $5,500 per student; a minimum award is
approximately $165,000.
Anticipated Award Date: April 2007, pending availability of funds.
Anticipated Project Completion Date: August 2008.
Additional Information: Pending successful implementation of this
program and the availability of funds in subsequent fiscal years, it is
ECA's intent to renew grants awarded under this competition for at
least two additional fiscal years, before openly competing it again.
III. Eligibility Information
III.1. Eligible applicants: Applications may be submitted by public
and private non-profit organizations meeting the provisions described
in Internal Revenue Code section 26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3).
III.2. Cost Sharing or Matching Funds: There is no minimum or
maximum percentage required for this competition. However, the Bureau
encourages applicants to provide maximum levels of cost sharing and
funding in support of its programs. When cost sharing is offered, it is
understood and agreed that the applicant must provide the amount of
cost sharing as stipulated in its proposal and later included in an
approved grant agreement. Cost sharing may be in the form of allowable
direct or indirect costs. For accountability, you must maintain written
records to support all costs which are claimed as your contribution, as
well as costs to be paid by the Federal government. Such records are
subject to audit. The basis for determining the value of cash and in-
kind contributions must be in accordance with OMB Circular A-110,
(Revised), Subpart C.23--Cost Sharing and Matching. In the event you do
not provide the minimum amount of cost sharing as stipulated in the
approved budget, ECA's contribution will be reduced in like proportion.
III. 3. Other Eligibility Requirements: Bureau grant guidelines
require that organizations with less than four years experience in
conducting international exchanges be limited to $60,000 in Bureau
funding. ECA will award grants in amounts exceeding $60,000,which will
cover costs to support and monitor a minimum of 30 students.
Consequently, organizations with less than four years experience in
conducting international exchanges are ineligible to apply under this
competition. The Bureau encourages applicants to provide maximum levels
of cost sharing and funding in support of its programs.
IV. Application and Submission Information
Note: Please read the complete announcement before sending
inquiries or submitting proposals. Once the RFGP deadline has
passed, Bureau staff may not discuss this competition with
applicants until the proposal review process has been completed.
IV.1. Contact Information to Request an Application Package: Please
contact The Office of Youth Programs, ECA/PE/C/PY, Room 568, U.S.
Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547,
telephone (202) 203-7527, and fax (202) 203-7529, e-mail Judy Nowlin at
NowlinJR@state.gov to request a Solicitation Package. Please refer to
the Funding Opportunity Number ECA/PE/C/PY-07-06 located at the top of
this announcement when making your request.
Alternatively, an electronic application package may be obtained
from https://www.grants.gov. Please see section IV.3f for further
information.
The Solicitation Package contains the Proposal Submission
Instruction (PSI) document, which consists of required application
forms and standard guidelines for proposal preparation.
It also contains the Project Objectives, Goals and Implementation
(POGI) document, which provides specific information, award criteria
and budget instructions tailored to this competition.
Please specify Bureau Program Officer Anna Mussman
(MussmanAP@state.gov) and refer to the Funding Opportunity Number (ECA/
PE/C/PY-07-06) at the top of this announcement on all other inquiries
and correspondence.
IV.2. To Download a Solicitation Package Via Internet: The entire
Solicitation Package may be downloaded from the Bureau's Web site at
https://exchanges.state.gov/education/rfgps/menu.htm. Please read all
information before downloading.
IV.3. Content and Form of Submission: Applicants must follow all
instructions in the Solicitation Package. The original and 8 copies of
the application should be sent per the instructions under IV.3e.
``Application Deadline and Methods of Submissions'' section below.
IV.3a. You are required to have a Dun and Bradstreet Data Universal
Numbering System (DUNS) number to apply for a grant or cooperative
agreement from the U.S. Government. This number is a nine-digit
identification number, which uniquely identifies business entities.
Obtaining a DUNS number is easy and there is no charge. To obtain a
DUNS number, access https://www.dunandbradstreet.com or call 1-866-705-
5711. Please ensure that your DUNS number is included in the
appropriate box of the SF-424 which is part of the formal application
package.
IV.3b. All proposals must contain an executive summary, proposal
narrative and budget. Please Refer to the Solicitation Package. It
contains the mandatory Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI) document
and the Project Objectives, Goals and Implementation (POGI) for
additional formatting and technical requirements.
IV.3c. You must have nonprofit status with the IRS at the time of
application. If your organization is a private nonprofit which has not
received a grant or cooperative agreement from ECA in the past three
years, or if your organization received nonprofit status from the IRS
within the past four years, you must submit the necessary documentation
to verify nonprofit status as directed in the PSI document. Failure to
do so will cause your proposal to be declared technically ineligible.
IV.3d. Please take into consideration the following information
when preparing your proposal narrative:
IV.3d.1 Adherence to all regulations governing the J Visa. The
Office of Citizen Exchanges of the Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs is the official program sponsor of the exchange program covered
by this RFGP, and an employee of the Bureau will be the ``Responsible
Officer'' for the program under the terms of 22 CFR 62, which covers
the administration of the Exchange Visitor Program (J visa program).
Under the terms of 22 CFR 62, organizations receiving grants under this
RFGP will be third parties ``cooperating with or assisting the sponsor
in the conduct of the sponsor's program.'' The actions of grantee
program organizations shall be ``imputed to the sponsor in evaluating
the sponsor's compliance with'' 22 CFR
[[Page 55262]]
62. Therefore, the Bureau expects that any organization receiving a
grant under this competition will render all assistance necessary to
enable the Bureau to fully comply with 22 CFR 62 et seq.
The Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs places great
emphasis on the secure and proper administration of Exchange Visitor (J
visa) Programs and adherence by grantee program organizations and
program participants to all regulations governing the J visa program
status. Therefore, proposals should explicitly state in writing that
the applicant is prepared to assist the Bureau in meeting all
requirements governing the administration of Exchange Visitor Programs
as set forth in 22 CFR 62. If your organization has experience as a
designated Exchange Visitor Program Sponsor, the applicant should
discuss their record of compliance with 22 CFR 62 et. seq., including
the oversight of their Responsible Officers and Alternate Responsible
Officers, screening and selection of program participants, provision of
pre-arrival information and orientation to participants, monitoring of
participants, proper maintenance and security of forms, recordkeeping,
reporting and other requirements.
The Office of Citizen Exchanges of ECA will be responsible for
issuing DS-2019 forms to participants in this program. A copy of the
complete regulations governing the administration of Exchange Visitor
(J) programs is available at https://exchanges.state.gov or from: United
States Department of State, Office of Exchange Coordination and
Designation, ECA/EC/ECD--SA-44, Room 734, 301 4th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20547, telephone: (202) 203-5029, fax: (202) 453-8640.
IV.3.d.2 Diversity, Freedom and Democracy Guidelines. Pursuant to
the Bureau's authorizing legislation, programs must maintain a non-
political character and should be balanced and representative of the
diversity of American political, social, and cultural life.
``Diversity'' should be interpreted in the broadest sense and encompass
differences including, but not limited to ethnicity, race, gender,
religion, geographic location, socio-economic status, and disabilities.
Applicants are strongly encouraged to adhere to the advancement of this
principle both in program administration and in program content.
Please refer to the review criteria under the ``Support for
Diversity'' section for specific suggestions on incorporating diversity
into your proposal. Public Law 104-319 provides that ``in carrying out
programs of educational and cultural exchange in countries whose people
do not fully enjoy freedom and democracy,'' the Bureau ``shall take
appropriate steps to provide opportunities for participation in such
programs to human rights and democracy leaders of such countries.''
Public Law 106-113 requires that the governments of the countries
described above do not have inappropriate influence in the selection
process. Proposals should reflect advancement of these goals in their
program contents, to the full extent deemed feasible.
IV.3d.3. Program monitoring and evaluation. Monitoring: Proposals
must include a plan to monitor and evaluate the project's success, both
as the activities unfold and at the end of the program. The Bureau
recommends that your proposal include a draft survey questionnaire or
other technique, plus a description of a methodology that will be used
to link outcomes to original project objectives. The Bureau expects
that the grantee will track participants and be able to respond to key
monitoring questions throughout the year, particularly on effects of
the program on program participants, their host families and
communities.
Successful monitoring depends heavily on setting clear goals and
outcomes at the outset of a program. Your monitoring plan should
include a description of your project's objectives and how and when you
intend to measure these outcomes. You should also show how your project
objectives link to the goals of the program described in this RFGP.
Overall, the quality of your monitoring plan will be judged on how
well it specifies successes and challenges. Grantees will be required
to provide reports analyzing their monitoring findings to the Bureau in
their regular program reports. All data collected, including survey
responses and contact information, must be maintained for a minimum of
three years and provided to the Bureau upon request.
Evaluation: The Bureau's Office of Policy and Evaluation will
conduct evaluations of the FLEX program through E-GOALS, its online
system for surveying program participants and collecting data about
program performance. These evaluations assist ECA and its program
grantees in meeting the requirements of the Government Performance
Results Act (GPRA) of 1993. This Act requires Federal agencies to
measure the results of their programs in meeting pre-determined
performance goals and objectives.
All FLEX program participants will take three online surveys:
1. Standardized pre-program surveys, at the beginning of the
program;
2. Standardized post-program surveys, at the end of the program and
before their return home; and
3. Standardized follow-up surveys, approximately six months to a
year after the conclusion of the program.
These surveys help ECA assess: Student satisfaction with the
program; student attitudes and views; the extent of learning and skill
development (including leadership); reliance on new learning and skills
in their studies, at work, and in their communities; and their efforts
to share new ideas, knowledge, and insights with citizens in their home
countries.
Since organizations play a critical role in facilitating E-GOALS
evaluations of FLEX participants, it is imperative that applicants
include a plan to ensure that FLEX students complete the post-program
surveys while they are still on program and prior to their departure
from the United States; this includes monitoring the response rate
through collection of a certificate issued by the system to each
student upon completion of the survey. The grantee will be working
directly with an E-GOALS evaluator in the Office of Policy and
Evaluation. Please see specific responsibilities in the accompanying
Project Objectives, Goals and Implementation (POGI) document.
IV.3e. Please take the following information into consideration
when preparing your budget:
1V.3e.1. Applicants must submit a comprehensive budget for the
entire program. Per capita costs are not to exceed $5,500 per
participant. The budget must reflect costs for a minimum of 30
participants. Please indicate clearly the number of students funded.
There must be a summary budget as well as breakdowns reflecting both
administrative and program budgets. Applicants may provide separate
sub-budgets for each program component, phase, location, or activity to
provide clarification.
IV.3e.2. Allowable costs for the program and additional budget
guidance are outlined in detail in the POGI document.
Please refer to the Solicitation Package for complete budget
guidelines and formatting instructions.
IV.3f. Application deadline and methods of submission.
Application deadline date: December 4, 2006.
Reference number: ECA/PE/C/PY-07-06.
[[Page 55263]]
Methods of submission: applications may be submitted in one of two
ways:
(1) In hard copy, via a nationally recognized overnight delivery
service (i.e., DHL, Federal Express, UPS, Airborne Express, or U.S.
Postal Express Overnight Mail, etc.), or
(2) Electronically through https://www.grants.gov. Along with the
Project Title, all applicants must enter the above Reference Number in
Box 11 on the SF-424 contained in the mandatory Proposal Submission
Instructions (PSI) of the solicitation document.
IV.3f.1 Submitting Printed Applications. Applications must be
shipped no later than the above deadline. Delivery services used by
applicants must have in-place, centralized shipping identification and
tracking systems that may be accessed via the Internet and delivery
people who are identifiable by commonly recognized uniforms and
delivery vehicles. Proposals shipped on or before the above deadline
but received at ECA more than seven days after the deadline will be
ineligible for further consideration under this competition. Proposals
shipped after the established deadlines are ineligible for
consideration under this competition. ECA will not notify upon receipt
of application. It is each applicant's responsibility to ensure that
each package is marked with a legible tracking number and to monitor/
confirm delivery to ECA via the Internet. Delivery of proposal packages
may not be made via local courier service or in person for this
competition. Faxed documents will not be accepted at any time. Only
proposals submitted as stated above will be considered.
Important note: When preparing your submission please make sure to
include one extra copy of the completed SF-424 form and place it in an
envelope addressed to ``ECA/EX/PM''.
The original and eight (8) copies of the application should be sent
to: U.S. Department of State, SA-44, Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs, Ref.: ECA/PE/C/PY-07-06, Program Management, ECA/EX/PM, Room
534, 301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547.
Along with the Project Title, all applicants must enter the above
Reference Number in Box 11 on the SF-424 contained in the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI) of the solicitation document.
IV.3f.2. Submitting electronic applications. Applicants have the
option of submitting proposals electronically through Grants.gov
(https://www.grants.gov). Complete solicitation packages are available
at Grants.gov in the ``Find'' portion of the system. Please follow the
instructions available in the ``Get Started'' portion of the site
(https://www.grants.gov/GetStarted).
Applicants have until midnight (12 a.m.) of the closing date to
ensure that their entire application has been uploaded to the
grants.gov site. Applications uploaded to the site after midnight of
the application deadline date will be technically ineligible.
Applicants will receive a confirmation e-mail from grants.gov upon
the successful submission of an application. ECA will not notify you
upon receipt of electronic applications.
IV.3g. Intergovernmental Review of Applications Executive Order
12372 does not apply to this program.
V. Application Review Information
V.1. Review process: The Bureau will review all proposals for
technical eligibility. Proposals will be deemed ineligible if they do
not fully adhere to the guidelines stated herein and in the
Solicitation Package. All eligible proposals will be reviewed by the
program office, as well as the Public Diplomacy section overseas, where
appropriate. Eligible proposals will be subject to compliance with
Federal and Bureau regulations and guidelines and forwarded to Bureau
grant panels for advisory review. Proposals may also be reviewed by the
Office of the Legal Adviser or by other Department elements. Final
funding decisions are at the discretion of the Department of State's
Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs. Final
technical authority for assistance awards (grants) resides with the
Bureau's Grants Officer.
Review Criteria: Technically eligible applications will be
competitively reviewed according to the criteria stated below. These
criteria are not rank ordered and all carry equal weight in the
proposal evaluation:
1. Program Management and Planning: Your proposal narrative should
exhibit originality, substance, and relevance to the Bureau's mission
as well as to the goals of the FLEX program. The level of creativity,
resources, and effectiveness will be primary factors for review.
Proposals should demonstrate an understanding of Eurasian countries and
of the needs of students from this region, as related to the program.
Proposals should also indicate how students will be monitored, trained
and prepared for their role as FLEX alumni. Reviewers will assess the
degree in which proposals engage participants in community activities
that involve skills development and leadership training. They will also
assess proposed activities that foster tolerance and social justice.
Proposals should indicate clearly the capacity and willingness to
provide short-term programming for some students if this becomes
necessary. A detailed agenda and work plan should adhere to the program
overview and guidelines described in the solicitation package.
2. Ability to achieve program objectives: Objectives should be
reasonable, feasible, and flexible. With respect to anticipated program
outcomes, reviewers will assess the degree to which the proposed
outcomes of the project are realistic and measurable. Strategies should
creatively utilize and reinforce activities to ensure an efficient use
of program resources.
3. Multiplier effect/impact: Proposed programs should strengthen
long-term mutual understanding, including maximum sharing of
information and establishment of long-term institutional and individual
linkages. Reviewers will assess ways in which proposals include
innovative ways to involve students in their U.S. communities and
substantive plans to prepare them for their role as active, effective
FLEX alumni.
4. Support of diversity: Proposals should demonstrate substantive
support of the Bureau's policy on diversity. Achievable and relevant
features should be cited in both program administration (selection of
participants, host families, schools, program venue and program
evaluation) and program content (orientations, program meetings,
resource materials and follow-up activities).
5. Organization's record/institutional capacity: Proposed personnel
and institutional resources should be adequate and appropriate to
achieve the program or project's goals. In assessing institutional
capacity, reviewers will assess the applicant and its partners to
determine if they offer adequate resources, expertise, and experience
to fulfill program objectives. Partner activities should be clearly
defined. Proposals should demonstrate an institutional record of
successful exchange programs, including responsible fiscal management
and full compliance with all reporting and J-1 Visa requirements for
past Bureau grants as determined by Bureau Grant Staff. The Bureau will
consider the past performance of prior recipients and the demonstrated
potential of new applicants.
6. Project monitoring and evaluation: Proposals should include a
plan to monitor the activity's success, both as the activities unfold
and at the end of
[[Page 55264]]
the program. Reviewers will assess your plans to monitor student
progress and program activities, particularly in regard to intended
outcomes indicated in your proposal. Successful applicants will be
expected to submit quarterly reports, which should be included as an
inherent component of the work plan. Proposals should also specify ways
in which students will be encouraged and monitored to ensure they
complete the mandatory end-of-the-year surveys administered through the
E-GOALS system.
7. Cost-effectiveness/cost sharing: Reviewers will analyze the
budget for clarity and cost-effectiveness. They will also assess the
rationale of the proposed budget and whether the allocation of funds is
appropriate to complete tasks outlined in the project narrative. The
overhead and administrative components of the proposal, including
salaries and honoraria, should be kept as low as possible. All other
items should be necessary and appropriate. Proposals should maximize
cost-sharing through other private sector support as well as
institutional direct funding contributions. Preference will be given to
organizations whose proposals demonstrate a quality, cost-effective
program.
VI. Award Administration Information
VI.1a. Award notice: Final awards cannot be made until funds have
been appropriated by Congress, allocated and committed through internal
Bureau procedures. Successful applicants will receive an Assistance
Award Document (AAD) from the Bureau's Grants Office. The AAD and the
original grant proposal with subsequent modifications (if applicable)
shall be the only binding authorizing document between the recipient
and the U.S. Government. The AAD will be signed by an authorized Grants
Officer, and mailed to the recipient's responsible officer identified
in the application.
Unsuccessful applicants will receive notification of the results of
the application review from the ECA program office coordinating this
competition.
VI.2. Administrative and National policy requirements: Terms and
Conditions for the Administration of ECA agreements include the
following:
Office of Management and Budget Circular A-122, ``Cost Principles for
Nonprofit Organizations.''
Office of Management and Budget Circular, ``Cost Principles for
Educational Institutions.''
OMB Circular A-87, ``Cost Principles for State, Local and Indian
Governments.''
OMB Circular No. A-110 (Revised), Uniform Administrative Requirements
for Grants and Agreements with Institutions of Higher Education,
Hospitals, and other Nonprofit Organizations.
OMB Circular No. A-102, Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants-
in-Aid to State and Local Governments.
OMB Circular No. A-133, Audits of States, Local Government, and Non-
profit Organizations.
Please reference the following Web sites for additional
information: https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants, https://
exchanges.state.gov/education/grantsdiv/terms.htm#articleI.
VI.3. Reporting requirements: You must provide ECA with a hard copy
original plus one copy of the following reports:
(1) A final program and financial report no more than 90 days after
the expiration of the award;
(2) Quarterly program and financial reports which should include
both quantitative and qualitative data you have available.
Grantees will be required to provide reports analyzing their
evaluation findings to the Bureau in their regular program reports.
(Please refer to IV. Application and submission instructions (IV.3.d.3)
above for Program Monitoring and Evaluation information.
All data collected, including survey responses and contact
information, must be maintained for a minimum of three years and
provided to the Bureau upon request.
All reports must be sent to the ECA Grants Officer and ECA Program
Officer listed in the final assistance award document.
VI.4. Program data requirements: Organizations awarded grants will
be required to maintain specific data on program participants and
activities in an electronically accessible database format that can be
shared with the Bureaus required.
VII. Agency Contacts
For questions about this announcement, contact: Anna Mussman,
Office of Citizen Exchanges, ECA/PE/C/PY, Room 568, U.S. Department of
State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547. Telephone:
(202) 203-7506, fax number: (202) 203-7529, Internet address:
MussmanAP@state.gov. All correspondence with the Bureau concerning this
RFGP should reference the above title and number ECA/PE/C/PY-07-06.
Please read the complete Federal Register announcement before
sending inquiries or submitting proposals. Once the RFGP deadline has
passed, Bureau staff may not discuss this competition with applicants
until the proposal review process has been completed.
VIII. Other Information
Notice: The terms and conditions published in this RFGP are binding
and may not be modified by any Bureau representative. Explanatory
information provided by the Bureau that contradicts published language
will not be binding. Issuance of the RFGP does not constitute an award
commitment on the part of the Government. The Bureau reserves the right
to reduce, revise, or increase proposal budgets in accordance with the
needs of the program and the availability of funds. Awards made will be
subject to periodic reporting and evaluation requirements per section
VI.3 above.
Dated: September 13, 2006.
Dina Habib Powell,
Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of
State.
[FR Doc. 06-7937 Filed 9-20-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P