Agency Information Collection Activities: Request for Comments for New Information Collection, 55269-55270 [06-7931]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 183 / Thursday, September 21, 2006 / Notices
Issued on: September 15, 2006.
James R. Kabel,
Chief, Management Programs and Analysis
Division.
[FR Doc. 06–7832 Filed 9–20–06; 8:45 am]
20590. Office hours are from 7:45 a.m.
to 4:15 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Mechanistic Empirical
Pavement Design National Status
Survey.
BILLING CODE 4910–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
[Docket No. FHWA–2006–25848]
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Request for Comments for
New Information Collection
Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The FHWA invites public
comments about our intention to request
the Office of Management and Budget’s
(OMB) approval for a new information
collection, which is summarized below
under SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. We
are required to publish this notice in the
Federal Register by the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Please submit comments by
November 20, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by DOT DMS Docket Number
FHWA–2006–25848 by any of the
following methods:
• Web site: https://dms.dot.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting
comments on the DOT electronic docket
site.
• Fax: 1–202–493–2251.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility;
U.S. Department of Transportation, 400
Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building,
Room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
• Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 on
the plaza level of the Nassif Building,
400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
dms.dot.gov at any time or to Room 401
on the plaza level of the Nassif Building,
400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
questions concerning the Mechanistic
Empirical Pavement Design National
Status Survey, please contact Gary
Crawford, Office of Pavement
Technology, HIPT–1, (202) 366–1286,
Department of Transportation, 400
Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:30 Sep 20, 2006
Jkt 208001
Background
In June 2004, the National
Cooperative Highway Research Program
(NCHRP) released the Mechanistic
Empirical Pavement Design Guide
(MEPDG) for New and Rehabilitated
Pavement Structures. The Federal
Highway Administration (FHWA)
organized a Design Guide
Implementation Team (DGIT) to
immediately begin the process of
informing, educating, and assisting the
FHWA field offices, State Highway
Agencies (DOTs), Industry, and others
about the new design guide. The FHWA
considers implementation of
mechanistic empirical pavement design
a critical element in improving the
National Highway System. It ties
directly into objectives listed in The
Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient
Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for
Users (SAFETEA–LU) section 1503,
which supports longer life pavements
through design-build efforts. The
impacts of long-life pavements include
congestion mitigation and improved
work zone safety. The MEPDG
represents a significant advancement in
pavement design and includes the best
available engineering theory and
mechanistic principles to determine the
structural response and predict
performance over the lifetime of a
pavement structure. The mechanistic
theory is balanced with over 525
empirical observations from the Long
Term Pavement Performance database
that represents a wide range of both
material and climatic conditions. The
use of both the mechanistic theory and
a wide range of empirical observations
make the MEPDG a robust design
procedure. The MEPDG can be
considered a 40-year step forward in
pavement design. The MEPDG is a more
theoretical and mathematical based
procedure, strongly bolstered by
fundamental engineering principles and
is readily useful to academia,
researchers, and practitioners of
pavement analysis and design. The
MEPDG provides significant potential
benefits over the current AASHTO
Guide in achieving cost-effective
pavement designs and rehabilitation
strategies. Most importantly, its useroriented computational software
implements an integrated analysis
approach for predicting pavement
PO 00000
Frm 00110
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
55269
condition over time. This analysis
considers the complex interaction
between traffic loadings, climatic
conditions, materials and pavement
structure. Implementation of the
MEPDG will require a significant
amount of time, resources, and funding.
However, the adoption of the guide has
the potential for providing a substantial
long term savings based on the sheer
magnitude of annual expenditures for
highway pavements. In 2003, over 79
billion dollars was used for highway
purposes; based on data published in
Highway Statistics 2003 from the FHWA
Office of Highway Policy Information.
Any improvement in the designs will
have a significant implication in
reducing costs to maintain these
pavements and more than offset the
resources required to implement the
new pavement design guide.
The DGIT has put forth a strategic
plan of action to aid the transportation
community in deploying this new
technology. The DGIT is an integral part
of an extensive outreach campaign
including enhancement, education, and
implementation strategies to promote
the MEPDG. These activities include
onsite and web-based workshops that
have already educated more than 1,200
engineers across the U.S. in 21 States
and around the globe in Canada,
Europe, China, India, Mexico, and
Central and South America. The FHWA
encourages States to evaluate the utility
that the Mechanistic Empirical
Pavement Design Guide offers and to
carefully implement the guidelines and
recommendations. The long-term goal of
the AASHTO Joint Technical Committee
on Pavements is to adopt the guide as
an AASHTOWare product to replace the
AASHTO 1993 design guide. Moving
towards a mechanistic empirical design
process represents a huge paradigm shift
for the majority of States and will
require a significant amount of
education, training, new equipment,
new testing requirements, and data
collection. Most importantly it will
require better communication and
coordination between the designers,
materials engineers, traffic engineers,
and consultants to collect and maintain
the data needed to optimize the
pavement designs and continue to
validate and calibrate the models in the
Guide. The DGIT is focused on being a
leader in this effort, providing
education, enhancement, and
implementation activities to the
transportation community.
Guidelines and Administration
This Survey will be a continuation of
a previous informal assessment of State
Practices in MEPDG Pavement Design
E:\FR\FM\21SEN1.SGM
21SEN1
55270
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 183 / Thursday, September 21, 2006 / Notices
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
that was undertaken in 2004 by the
AASHTO Lead States Group and will
provide a benchmark for future surveys
to which later responses may be
assessed. The information will serve as
a baseline measurement on the national
activities related to Mechanistic
Pavement Design Procedures. The
information will be used by FHWA to
develop a national program to aid State
DOTs in the implementation efforts and
to guide research efforts. The
information has been requested by the
AASHTO Lead States Group in order to
be better able to address areas of need.
The information will be used in order to
disseminate information and to avoid
the duplication of implementation
efforts. The information will also be
helpful to the AASHTO through the
process of assessing the procedure as an
official national pavement design
procedure. Information concerning
national activities in MEPDG will be
very useful in aiding this governing
body in the balloting process. The
information will aid in guiding the
direction of research and
implementation efforts by both the
FHWA and State DOTs. The results of
the survey will be disseminated by the
FHWA and the Lead States Group to
interested parties throughout the
Nation. Stakeholders in the MEPDG will
be able to assess the adequacy of the
implementation efforts over time. This
information will be collected under a
contract through the Office of Pavement
Technology. The survey will be
administered through electronic media
in order to reduce the burden of the
responders.
Information Proposed for Collection
The information collected will asses
the current state of pavement design and
capture current activities associated
with the implementation of mechanistic
design procedures throughout the
Nation. This information can be
categorized into four major areas.
1. Implementation Plan for
Mechanistic Empirical Pavement
Design. This information includes
current status of pavement design and
implementation strategies included in
the State DOT activities. This includes
information about the major areas of
materials characterization and traffic
collection.
2. Calibration Plan for Mechanistic
Empirical Pavement Design. This
information details the SHA activities
associated with calibration of the
mechanistic pavement design
procedure. Calibration activities at the
State and regional level are of particular
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:30 Sep 20, 2006
Jkt 208001
interest for guiding research activities
and avoiding duplication of efforts.
3. Mechanistic Empirical Pavement
Design: Methodology and Partnering.
This information includes the intended
use of the mechanistic pavement design
procedure for other applications and the
possible use by other transportation
agencies in a State. The mechanistic
pavement design procedure has the
potential to be used in coordination
with innovative contracting techniques
and other pavement analysis and
materials acceptance programs.
4. Mechanistic Empirical Pavement
Design: Training and Communication.
This is information outlining the
training activities anticipated or already
conducted in relation to the mechanistic
pavement design procedure. The
information also includes anticipated
costs associated with implementation
activities.
Burden Hours for Information
Collection
Frequency: Bi-Annual.
Respondents: The Pavement Design
Engineer in each State DOT, Puerto
Rico, and the District of Columbia; for
a total of 52.
Estimated Average Burden per
response: Assuming 1 respondent per
State plus Puerto Rico and the District
of Columbia and 1 hr to respond to the
survey, the total will be approximately
52 burden hours. FHWA is seeking a 3year approval and plan on conducting
the survey in the first and third year of
the approval time period. The estimated
annual burden is 35 hours.
Public Comments Invited: You are
asked to comment on any aspect of this
information collection, including: (1)
Whether the proposed collection is
necessary for the FHWA’s performance;
(2) the accuracy of the estimated
burdens; (3) ways for the FHWA to
enhance the quality, usefulness, and
clarity of the collected information; and
(4) ways that the burden could be
minimized, including the use of
electronic technology, without reducing
the quality of the collected information.
The agency will summarize and/or
include your comments in the request
for OMB’s clearance of this information
collection.
Authority: The Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995; 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35, as amended;
and 49 CFR 1.48.
Issued on: September 15, 2006.
James R. Kabel,
Chief, Management Programs and Analysis
Division.
[FR Doc. 06–7931 Filed 9–20–06; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
Office of Hazardous Materials Safety,
Notice of Application for Special
Permits
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration, DOT.
AGENCY:
List of Applications for Special
Permits.
ACTION:
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
procedures governing the application
for, and the processing of, special
permits from the Department of
Transportation’s Hazardous Material
Regulations (49 CFR Part 107, Subpart
B), notice is hereby given that the Office
of Hazardous Materials Safety has
received the application described
herein. Each mode of transportation for
which a particular special permit is
requested is indicated by a number in
the ‘‘Nature of Application’’ portion of
the table below as follow: 1—Motor
vehicle, 2—Rail freight, 3—Cargo vessel,
4—Cargo aircraft only, 5—Passengercarrying aircraft.
Comments must be received on
or before October 23, 2006.
DATES:
ADDRESS COMMENTS TO: Record Center,
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration, U.S. Department of
Transportation, Washington, DC 20590.
Comments should refer to the
application number and be submitted in
triplicate. If Confirmation of receipt of
comments if desired, include a selfaddressed stamped postcard showing
the special permit number.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Copies of the applications are available
for inspection in the Records Center,
Nassif Building, 400 7th Street SW.,
Washington DC or at https://dms.dot.gov.
This notice of receipt of applications
for special permit is published in
accordance with Part 107 of the Federal
hazardous materials transportation law
(49 U.S.C. 5117(b); 49 CFR 1.53(b)).
Issued in Washington, DC, on September
15, 2006.
R. Ryan Posten,
Chief, Special Permits Program, Office of
Hazardous Materials, Special Permits &
Approvals.
BILLING CODE 4910–22–P
PO 00000
Frm 00111
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\21SEN1.SGM
21SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 183 (Thursday, September 21, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55269-55270]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7931]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
[Docket No. FHWA-2006-25848]
Agency Information Collection Activities: Request for Comments
for New Information Collection
AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FHWA invites public comments about our intention to
request the Office of Management and Budget's (OMB) approval for a new
information collection, which is summarized below under SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION. We are required to publish this notice in the Federal
Register by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Please submit comments by November 20, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by DOT DMS Docket Number
FHWA-2006-25848 by any of the following methods:
Web site: https://dms.dot.gov. Follow the instructions for
submitting comments on the DOT electronic docket site.
Fax: 1-202-493-2251.
Mail: Docket Management Facility; U.S. Department of
Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building, Room PL-401,
Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery: Room PL-401 on the plaza level of the
Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to https://dms.dot.gov at any time or to Room 401
on the plaza level of the Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street, SW.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For questions concerning the
Mechanistic Empirical Pavement Design National Status Survey, please
contact Gary Crawford, Office of Pavement Technology, HIPT-1, (202)
366-1286, Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20590. Office hours are from 7:45 a.m. to 4:15 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Mechanistic Empirical Pavement Design National Status
Survey.
Background
In June 2004, the National Cooperative Highway Research Program
(NCHRP) released the Mechanistic Empirical Pavement Design Guide
(MEPDG) for New and Rehabilitated Pavement Structures. The Federal
Highway Administration (FHWA) organized a Design Guide Implementation
Team (DGIT) to immediately begin the process of informing, educating,
and assisting the FHWA field offices, State Highway Agencies (DOTs),
Industry, and others about the new design guide. The FHWA considers
implementation of mechanistic empirical pavement design a critical
element in improving the National Highway System. It ties directly into
objectives listed in The Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient
Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) section
1503, which supports longer life pavements through design-build
efforts. The impacts of long-life pavements include congestion
mitigation and improved work zone safety. The MEPDG represents a
significant advancement in pavement design and includes the best
available engineering theory and mechanistic principles to determine
the structural response and predict performance over the lifetime of a
pavement structure. The mechanistic theory is balanced with over 525
empirical observations from the Long Term Pavement Performance database
that represents a wide range of both material and climatic conditions.
The use of both the mechanistic theory and a wide range of empirical
observations make the MEPDG a robust design procedure. The MEPDG can be
considered a 40-year step forward in pavement design. The MEPDG is a
more theoretical and mathematical based procedure, strongly bolstered
by fundamental engineering principles and is readily useful to
academia, researchers, and practitioners of pavement analysis and
design. The MEPDG provides significant potential benefits over the
current AASHTO Guide in achieving cost-effective pavement designs and
rehabilitation strategies. Most importantly, its user-oriented
computational software implements an integrated analysis approach for
predicting pavement condition over time. This analysis considers the
complex interaction between traffic loadings, climatic conditions,
materials and pavement structure. Implementation of the MEPDG will
require a significant amount of time, resources, and funding. However,
the adoption of the guide has the potential for providing a substantial
long term savings based on the sheer magnitude of annual expenditures
for highway pavements. In 2003, over 79 billion dollars was used for
highway purposes; based on data published in Highway Statistics 2003
from the FHWA Office of Highway Policy Information. Any improvement in
the designs will have a significant implication in reducing costs to
maintain these pavements and more than offset the resources required to
implement the new pavement design guide.
The DGIT has put forth a strategic plan of action to aid the
transportation community in deploying this new technology. The DGIT is
an integral part of an extensive outreach campaign including
enhancement, education, and implementation strategies to promote the
MEPDG. These activities include onsite and web-based workshops that
have already educated more than 1,200 engineers across the U.S. in 21
States and around the globe in Canada, Europe, China, India, Mexico,
and Central and South America. The FHWA encourages States to evaluate
the utility that the Mechanistic Empirical Pavement Design Guide offers
and to carefully implement the guidelines and recommendations. The
long-term goal of the AASHTO Joint Technical Committee on Pavements is
to adopt the guide as an AASHTOWare product to replace the AASHTO 1993
design guide. Moving towards a mechanistic empirical design process
represents a huge paradigm shift for the majority of States and will
require a significant amount of education, training, new equipment, new
testing requirements, and data collection. Most importantly it will
require better communication and coordination between the designers,
materials engineers, traffic engineers, and consultants to collect and
maintain the data needed to optimize the pavement designs and continue
to validate and calibrate the models in the Guide. The DGIT is focused
on being a leader in this effort, providing education, enhancement, and
implementation activities to the transportation community.
Guidelines and Administration
This Survey will be a continuation of a previous informal
assessment of State Practices in MEPDG Pavement Design
[[Page 55270]]
that was undertaken in 2004 by the AASHTO Lead States Group and will
provide a benchmark for future surveys to which later responses may be
assessed. The information will serve as a baseline measurement on the
national activities related to Mechanistic Pavement Design Procedures.
The information will be used by FHWA to develop a national program to
aid State DOTs in the implementation efforts and to guide research
efforts. The information has been requested by the AASHTO Lead States
Group in order to be better able to address areas of need. The
information will be used in order to disseminate information and to
avoid the duplication of implementation efforts. The information will
also be helpful to the AASHTO through the process of assessing the
procedure as an official national pavement design procedure.
Information concerning national activities in MEPDG will be very useful
in aiding this governing body in the balloting process. The information
will aid in guiding the direction of research and implementation
efforts by both the FHWA and State DOTs. The results of the survey will
be disseminated by the FHWA and the Lead States Group to interested
parties throughout the Nation. Stakeholders in the MEPDG will be able
to assess the adequacy of the implementation efforts over time. This
information will be collected under a contract through the Office of
Pavement Technology. The survey will be administered through electronic
media in order to reduce the burden of the responders.
Information Proposed for Collection
The information collected will asses the current state of pavement
design and capture current activities associated with the
implementation of mechanistic design procedures throughout the Nation.
This information can be categorized into four major areas.
1. Implementation Plan for Mechanistic Empirical Pavement Design.
This information includes current status of pavement design and
implementation strategies included in the State DOT activities. This
includes information about the major areas of materials
characterization and traffic collection.
2. Calibration Plan for Mechanistic Empirical Pavement Design. This
information details the SHA activities associated with calibration of
the mechanistic pavement design procedure. Calibration activities at
the State and regional level are of particular interest for guiding
research activities and avoiding duplication of efforts.
3. Mechanistic Empirical Pavement Design: Methodology and
Partnering. This information includes the intended use of the
mechanistic pavement design procedure for other applications and the
possible use by other transportation agencies in a State. The
mechanistic pavement design procedure has the potential to be used in
coordination with innovative contracting techniques and other pavement
analysis and materials acceptance programs.
4. Mechanistic Empirical Pavement Design: Training and
Communication. This is information outlining the training activities
anticipated or already conducted in relation to the mechanistic
pavement design procedure. The information also includes anticipated
costs associated with implementation activities.
Burden Hours for Information Collection
Frequency: Bi-Annual.
Respondents: The Pavement Design Engineer in each State DOT, Puerto
Rico, and the District of Columbia; for a total of 52.
Estimated Average Burden per response: Assuming 1 respondent per
State plus Puerto Rico and the District of Columbia and 1 hr to respond
to the survey, the total will be approximately 52 burden hours. FHWA is
seeking a 3-year approval and plan on conducting the survey in the
first and third year of the approval time period. The estimated annual
burden is 35 hours.
Public Comments Invited: You are asked to comment on any aspect of
this information collection, including: (1) Whether the proposed
collection is necessary for the FHWA's performance; (2) the accuracy of
the estimated burdens; (3) ways for the FHWA to enhance the quality,
usefulness, and clarity of the collected information; and (4) ways that
the burden could be minimized, including the use of electronic
technology, without reducing the quality of the collected information.
The agency will summarize and/or include your comments in the request
for OMB's clearance of this information collection.
Authority: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995; 44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35, as amended; and 49 CFR 1.48.
Issued on: September 15, 2006.
James R. Kabel,
Chief, Management Programs and Analysis Division.
[FR Doc. 06-7931 Filed 9-20-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-P