Examination Rating System for the Federal Home Loan Banks and the Office of Finance, 55181-55201 [06-7848]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 183 / Thursday, September 21, 2006 / Notices
Potomac Yard (South Building), 2777 S.
Crystal Drive Arlington, VA. The hours
of operation of this Docket Facility are
from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The Docket telephone number
is (703) 305–5805.
2. Electronic access. You may access
this Federal Register document
electronically through the EPA Internet
under the ‘‘Federal Register’’ listings at
https://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr.
II. Tentative Agenda
Tentatively, the following items are
on the agenda:
1. Overview of GHS.
2. NAFTA Perspectives.
3. Goals of Harmonization: EPA and
Stakeholder Perspectives.
4. Building Block and Sample Label
Presentation.
5. Key Issues and Concerns Raised in
Comments.
6. Options for Implementation
Mechanisms.
7. Key State Issues.
8. Education, Training and Outreach.
III. How Can I Request to Participate in
this Meeting?
You may submit a request to
participate in this meeting to the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT. Do not submit any information
in your request that is considered CBI.
Requests to participate in the meeting,
identified by docket ID number EPA–
HQ–OPP–2004–0205, must be received
on or before October 5, 2006.
List of Subjects
Environmental protection, global
harmonization, labeling, occupational
safety and health, pesticides and pests,
reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: September 18, 2006.
Jay S. Ellenberger,
Acting Director, Field External Affairs
Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. 06–8057 Filed 9–20–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–S
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY
COMMISSION
Sunshine Act Meeting
Equal
Employment Opportunity Commission
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:
FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS
ANNOUNCEMENT: 71 FR 54282, Thursday,
September 14, 2006.
PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF
MEETING: Thursday, September 21, 2006,
10 a.m. (Eastern Time).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:30 Sep 20, 2006
Jkt 208001
CHANGE IN THE MEETING:
The meeting has
been cancelled.
CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:
Stephen Llewellyn, Acting Executive
Officer on (202) 663–4070.
Dated: September 19, 2006.
Stephen Llewellyn,
Acting Executive Officer, Executive
Secretariat.
[FR Doc. 06–8118 Filed 9–19–06; 3:26 pm]
BILLING CODE 6570–01–M
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
Public Information Collections
Approved by Office of Management
and Budget
September 8, 2006.
SUMMARY: The Federal Communications
Commission (FCC) has received Office
of Management and Budget (OMB)
approval for the following public
information collections pursuant to the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
Public Law 104–13. An agency may not
conduct or sponsor and a person is not
required to respond to a collection of
information unless it displays a
currently valid control number.
DATES: Emergency revision of a
currently approved collection effective
on September 8, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nicole R. On’gele, Federal
Communications Commission, 445 12th
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554,
(202) 418–2991 or via the Internet at
nicole.ongele@fcc.gov.
OMB Control No.: 3060–0798.
OMB Approval Date: September 8,
2006.
Expiration Date: 2/28/07.
Title: FCC Application for Wireless
Telecommunications Bureau Radio
Service Authorization.
Form No.: FCC Form 601.
Estimated Annual Burdens: 250,920
responses; 219,505 hours, and
$50,144,000.
Needs and Uses: The Commission has
received emergency OMB approval to
implement a modified information
collection in connection with FCC Form
601 (OMB Control No. 3060–0798),
pursuant to a Commission order that
became effective on June 5, 2006. The
information collection associated with
the FCC Form 601, specifically
Schedule B, is being modified in order
to ensure that the Commission will
receive from winning bidders claiming
special designated entity benefits all
information necessary to permit the
Frm 00022
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Commission to review the qualifications
of that winning bidder to receive such
benefits. While the FCC Form 601,
Schedule B, already requires the
submission of most of the information
that the Commission requires to conduct
this review, the modified information
collection will ensure that the
Commission receives additional
information as mandated by a recent
Commission order revising the rules
applicable to entities seeking designated
entity benefits. Until the electronic
version of the form (specifically, the
Schedule B) can be updated in the
Commission’s Universal Licensing
System (ULS), applicants will be
requested to provide this same
information in an attachment to the
existing version of Form 601, filed
electronically. The Commission uses the
information provided by applicants on
FCC Form 601 to update its database
and to determine if the applicant is
legally, technically and financially
qualified to provide licensed services
and to make proper use of the frequency
spectrum. The information collected
pursuant to this modified information
collection will be used to ensure that
only legitimate designated entities, as
defined by the Commission’s rules, reap
the benefits of the Commission’s
designated entity program.
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 06–7901 Filed 9–20–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE BOARD
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
55181
[No. 2006–N–05]
Examination Rating System for the
Federal Home Loan Banks and the
Office of Finance
AGENCY:
Federal Housing Finance
Board.
Notice with request for
comments.
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Federal Housing Finance
Board (Finance Board) is requesting
comments on a proposed examination
rating system to be known as the
Federal Home Loan Bank Rating System
(Rating System).
DATES: The Finance Board will accept
comments in writing on or before
October 23, 2006.
Comments: Submit comments to the
Finance Board only once, using any one
of the following methods:
E-mail: comments@fhfb.gov.
Fax: 202–408–2580.
E:\FR\FM\21SEN1.SGM
21SEN1
55182
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 183 / Thursday, September 21, 2006 / Notices
Mail/Hand Delivery: Federal Housing
Finance Board, 1625 Eye Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20006, Attention:
Public Comments.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments. If
you submit your comment to the
Federal eRulemaking Portal, please also
send it by e-mail to the Finance Board
at comments@fhfb.gov to ensure timely
receipt by the agency. Include the
following information in the subject line
of your submission: Federal Housing
Finance Board. Notice: Examination
Rating System for the Federal Home
Loan Banks and the Office of Finance.
Docket Number 2006–N–05.
We will post all public comments we
receive without change, including any
personal information you provide, such
as your name and address, on the
Finance Board Web site at https://
www.fhfb.gov/
Default.aspx?Page=93&Top=93.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Anthony Cornyn, Associate Director,
Supervision and Examination, Office of
Supervision, cornyna@fhfb.gov or 202–
408–2522, or Kari Walter, Associate
Director, Supervisory and Regulatory
Policy, Office of Supervision,
walterk@fhfb.gov or 202–408–2829. You
can send regular mail to the Federal
Housing Finance Board, 1625 Eye
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20006.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
I. Background
The Federal Home Loan Bank Act (12
U.S.C. 1421 et seq.) provides that the
primary duty of the Finance Board is to
ensure that the Federal Home Loan
Banks (Banks) operate in a financially
safe and sound manner. To the extent
consistent with the safety and
soundness charge, the other statutory
duties of the Finance Board are to: (1)
Supervise the Banks; (2) ensure that the
Banks carry out their housing finance
mission; and (3) ensure that the Banks
remain adequately capitalized and able
to raise funds in the capital markets. See
12 U.S.C. 1422a(a)(3).
The Banks are privately capitalized,
government-sponsored enterprises that
provide wholesale credit to members
and housing associates for use in
mortgage lending and related activities.
The Banks have a statutory mandate to
promote housing and community
investment finance. See 12 U.S.C.
1430(g), (i), and (j); 1430b. The Banks
provide long-term, flexible financing to
more than 8,100 member financial
institutions around the country.
In addition to supervising the Banks,
the Finance Board has regulatory
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:30 Sep 20, 2006
Jkt 208001
authority and supervisory oversight
responsibility for the Office of Finance
(OF), which is a joint office of the Banks
that issues consolidated obligations in
the public capital markets on behalf of
the Banks. See 12 U.S.C. 1422b(b)(2); 12
CFR part 985. The Banks fund
themselves principally by issuing
consolidated obligations, which are the
joint and several obligations of all 12
Banks’ and consist of bonds (original
maturity of 1 year or longer) and
discount notes (original maturity of less
than 1 year). Although consolidated
obligations are not guaranteed or
insured by the federal government, the
Banks’ status as government sponsored
enterprises enables them to raise funds
at rates slightly above comparable
obligations issued by the Department of
the Treasury.
To carry out its mission of ensuring
that the Banks and the OF are safe and
sound so the Banks can serve as a
reliable source of liquidity and funding
for the nation’s housing finance and
community investment needs, the
Finance Board has one major program
area: supervision of the Banks. See 12
U.S.C. 1440 (requiring the Finance
Board to perform annual examinations
of the Banks). Staff monitors the
performance, condition, and risk profile
of each Bank through on-site
examinations and other supervisory
activities. Examinations are the
cornerstone of the Finance Board’s
safety and soundness supervisory
program. In order to execute an effective
risk-based supervisory program that
promptly identifies and addresses
current and emerging risks to the Banks,
the Office of Supervision plans to
implement the risk rating system
discussed below for use beginning in
calendar year 2007.
II. The Proposed Federal Home Loan
Bank Rating System
The Finance Board is requesting
comments on a proposed examination
rating system to be known as the
Federal Home Loan Bank Rating
System. The proposed Rating System is
attached as an Exhibit to this Notice.
In 2005, the Office of Supervision
began to provide an overall
conclusion—Satisfactory, Fair,
Marginal, or Unsatisfactory—as part of
its Report of Examination. The proposed
Rating System, which is the next step in
communicating exam results to the
Banks, is a risk-focused system under
which each Bank and the OF would be
assigned a composite rating based on an
evaluation of various aspects of their
operations. The composite rating of each
Bank would be based on an evaluation
and rating of 5 key components:
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Corporate governance, market risk,
credit risk, operational risk, and
financial condition and performance.
The composite rating of the OF would
be based primarily on an evaluation of
2 components: corporate governance
and operational risk.
Under the Rating System, we would
take administration of a Bank’s
affordable housing and community
investment activities into account in
assigning component ratings for
corporate governance and operational
risk. Given the importance of affordable
housing and community investment
activities to the mission of the Bank
System, the Office of Supervision may
consider the need for a separate rating
system or a separate ratings component
to evaluate and rate the affordable
housing and community investment
programs of each Bank after gaining
experience with the proposed Rating
System.
The Rating System is intended to
serve 2 purposes. First, it is designed to
reflect in a comprehensive, systematic,
and consistent fashion the overall
condition and performance of an
institution, taking into consideration all
significant financial, operational, and
compliance factors addressed in the
Finance Board’s examination. Second,
the Rating System is meant to further
enhance communication and
transparency between the Office of
Supervision and each Bank and the OF
regarding the results of the examination
process. The ratings for individual
Banks and the OF would not be made
public or released to other Banks, but
would be supplied to the individual
Banks and the OF on a confidential
basis as part of the examination and
supervisory process.
Under the Rating System, each of the
5 components would be assigned a
numeric rating from ‘‘1’’ to ‘‘4.’’ A ‘‘1’’
rating indicates the lowest degree of
supervisory concern, while a ‘‘4’’ rating
indicates the highest degree of
supervisory concern. The composite
rating of each Bank and the OF also
would be rated on a scale of ‘‘1’’ to ‘‘4’’
based on the ratings of the underlying
components. The composite rating
would be based on the component
ratings but it would not be a simple
arithmetic average of the component
ratings. Instead, the relative importance
of each component would be
determined on a case-by-case basis
within the parameters established by
this rating framework. As proposed, an
examiner would take a Bank’s
performance in administering its
affordable housing and community
investment activities into consideration
in assigning a composite rating to the
E:\FR\FM\21SEN1.SGM
21SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 183 / Thursday, September 21, 2006 / Notices
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Bank. More specifically, a Bank’s
performance in administrating it
affordable housing and community
investment activities would be given
special consideration in the corporate
governance and operational risk
components of the Rating System.
The Rating System would become
operative when issued by the Office of
Supervision, which is anticipated to
occur before year end 2006 for
implementation in 2007.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:30 Sep 20, 2006
Jkt 208001
III. Request for Comments
The Finance Board requests comment
on all aspects of the proposed Rating
System. In addition, the Finance Board
invites specific comments on the
following questions:
1. Does the proposed Rating System
capture the essential components of an
institution’s performance and condition
that are relevant to assigning a
composite rating to a Bank and the OF?
If not, what additional or different
components should be considered?
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
55183
2. Do the factors to be considered
under each of the 5 components
(corporate governance, market risk,
credit risk, operational risk, and
financial condition and performance)
address the factors that should be
considered in assessing each of the
components? If not, what additional or
different factors should be considered?
Dated: September 13, 2006.
By the Federal Housing Finance Board.
John P. Kennedy,
General Counsel.
BILLING CODE 6725–01–P
E:\FR\FM\21SEN1.SGM
21SEN1
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 183 / Thursday, September 21, 2006 / Notices
16:30 Sep 20, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\21SEN1.SGM
21SEN1
EN21SE06.000
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
55184
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:30 Sep 20, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\21SEN1.SGM
21SEN1
55185
EN21SE06.001
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 183 / Thursday, September 21, 2006 / Notices
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 183 / Thursday, September 21, 2006 / Notices
16:30 Sep 20, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\21SEN1.SGM
21SEN1
EN21SE06.002
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
55186
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:30 Sep 20, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\21SEN1.SGM
21SEN1
55187
EN21SE06.003
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 183 / Thursday, September 21, 2006 / Notices
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 183 / Thursday, September 21, 2006 / Notices
16:30 Sep 20, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\21SEN1.SGM
21SEN1
EN21SE06.004
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
55188
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:30 Sep 20, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\21SEN1.SGM
21SEN1
55189
EN21SE06.005
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 183 / Thursday, September 21, 2006 / Notices
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 183 / Thursday, September 21, 2006 / Notices
16:30 Sep 20, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\21SEN1.SGM
21SEN1
EN21SE06.006
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
55190
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:30 Sep 20, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\21SEN1.SGM
21SEN1
55191
EN21SE06.007
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 183 / Thursday, September 21, 2006 / Notices
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 183 / Thursday, September 21, 2006 / Notices
16:30 Sep 20, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\21SEN1.SGM
21SEN1
EN21SE06.008
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
55192
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:30 Sep 20, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\21SEN1.SGM
21SEN1
55193
EN21SE06.009
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 183 / Thursday, September 21, 2006 / Notices
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 183 / Thursday, September 21, 2006 / Notices
16:30 Sep 20, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\21SEN1.SGM
21SEN1
EN21SE06.010
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
55194
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:30 Sep 20, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\21SEN1.SGM
21SEN1
55195
EN21SE06.011
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 183 / Thursday, September 21, 2006 / Notices
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 183 / Thursday, September 21, 2006 / Notices
16:30 Sep 20, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\21SEN1.SGM
21SEN1
EN21SE06.012
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
55196
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:30 Sep 20, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\21SEN1.SGM
21SEN1
55197
EN21SE06.013
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 183 / Thursday, September 21, 2006 / Notices
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 183 / Thursday, September 21, 2006 / Notices
16:30 Sep 20, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\21SEN1.SGM
21SEN1
EN21SE06.014
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
55198
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:30 Sep 20, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\21SEN1.SGM
21SEN1
55199
EN21SE06.015
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 183 / Thursday, September 21, 2006 / Notices
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 183 / Thursday, September 21, 2006 / Notices
16:30 Sep 20, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\21SEN1.SGM
21SEN1
EN21SE06.016
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
55200
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 183 / Thursday, September 21, 2006 / Notices
[FR Doc. 06–7848 Filed 9–20–06; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
BILLING CODE 6725–01–C
Office of the Secretary
[Document Identifier: OS–0990–NEW]
FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS
AUTHORITY
60-Day Notice
Membership of the Federal Labor
Relations Authority’s Senior Executive
Service Performance Review Board
Federal Labor Relations
Authority.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the
members of the Performance Review
Board.
DATES:
September 21, 2006.
Jill
M. Crumpacker, Executive Director,
Federal Labor Relations Authority
(FLRA); 1400 K Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20424–0001; (202) 218–
7945.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Section
4314(c) of Title 5, U.S.C. (as amended
by the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978)
requires each agency to establish, in
accordance with regulations prescribed
by the Office of Personnel Management,
one or more Performance Review Boards
(PRB). Section 4314 (c)(4) requires that
notice of appointment of the PRB be
published in the Federal Register.
As required by 5 CFR 430.310,
Chairman Dale Cabaniss has appointed
the following executives to serve on the
2006–2007 PRB for the FLRA, beginning
September 2006 through September
2007:
Frank Battle, Deputy Director of
Administration, National Labor
Relations Board; Jill Crumpacker,
Executive Director, Federal Labor
Relations Authority; Russell G. Harris,
Deputy Administrator, Wage and Hour
Division, U.S. Department of Labor;
Kent Baum, Chief Human Capital
Officer, U.S. Patent and Trademark
Office; Steve Nelson, Director, Office of
Policy and Evaluation, Merit Systems
Protection Board.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 4134(c)(4).
Dated: September 15, 2006.
Jill M. Crumpacker,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 06–7938 Filed 9–20–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6727–01–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:30 Sep 20, 2006
Jkt 208001
AGENCY:
Office of the Secretary.
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request
In compliance with the requirement
of section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
Office of the Secretary (OS), Department
of Health and Human Services, is
publishing the following summary of a
proposed collection for public
comment. Interested persons are invited
to send comments regarding this burden
estimate or any other aspect of this
collection of information, including any
of the following subjects: (1) The
necessity and utility of the proposed
information collection for the proper
performance of the agency’s functions;
(2) the accuracy of the estimated
burden; (3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and (4) the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology to
minimize the information collection
burden.
Type of Information Collection
Request: New collection.
Title of Information Collection:
Evaluation of Office on Women’s Health
Publications.
Form/OMB No.: 0990–NEW.
Use: To improve future publications
and to demonstrate accountability of
efforts, the Office of Women’s Health
(OWH) will evaluate four health
communications materials. Discussion
groups and web-based or paper- based
surveys will be used from randomly
selected participants and returned
response cards.
Frequency: 1.
Affected Public: Individuals or
households.
Annual Number of Respondents:
1648.
Total Annual Responses: 1648.
Average Burden per Response: 1 hour.
Total Annual Hours: 472.
To obtain copies of the supporting
statement and any related forms for the
proposed paperwork collections
referenced above, e-mail your request,
including your address, phone number,
OMB number, and OS document
identifier, to
Sherette.funncoleman@hhs.gov, or call
the Reports Clearance Office on (202)
690–6162. Written comments and
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
55201
recommendations for the proposed
information collections must be
received with 60 days, and directed to
the OS Paperwork Clearance Officer at
the following address: Department of
Health and Human Services, Office of
the Secretary, Assistant Secretary for
Research and Technology, Office of
Resource Management, Attention:
Sherrette Funn-Coleman (0990–NEW),
Room 537–H, 200 Independence
Avenue, SW., Washington DC 20201.
Dated: September 12, 2006.
Alice Bettencourt,
Office of the Secretary, Paperwork Reduction
Act Reports Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 06–7835 Filed 9–20–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150–33–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Office of the Secretary
[Document Identifier: OS–0990–new]
60-Day Notice
Office of the Secretary, Office
on Women’s Health.
AGENCY:
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request
In compliance with the requirement
of section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
Office of the Secretary (OS), Department
of Health and Human Services, is
publishing the following summary of a
proposed collection for public
comment. Interested persons are invited
to send comments regarding this burden
estimate or any other aspect of this
collection of information, including any
of the following subjects: (1) The
necessity and utility of the proposed
information collection for the proper
performance of the agency’s functions;
(2) the accuracy of the estimated
burden; (3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and (4) the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology to
minimize the information collection
burden.
Type of Information Collection
Request: New Collection.
Title of Information Collection: The
Heart Truth Professional Materials
Program Evaluation.
Form/OMB No.: 0990-New
Use: The Heart Truth Campaign was
launched by the National Heart, Lung,
and Blood Institute (NHLBI) in
September 2002 to increase women’s
awareness of heart disease. The Heart
Truth joins together leaders in women’s
E:\FR\FM\21SEN1.SGM
21SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 183 (Thursday, September 21, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55181-55201]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7848]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE BOARD
[No. 2006-N-05]
Examination Rating System for the Federal Home Loan Banks and the
Office of Finance
AGENCY: Federal Housing Finance Board.
ACTION: Notice with request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Federal Housing Finance Board (Finance Board) is
requesting comments on a proposed examination rating system to be known
as the Federal Home Loan Bank Rating System (Rating System).
DATES: The Finance Board will accept comments in writing on or before
October 23, 2006.
Comments: Submit comments to the Finance Board only once, using any
one of the following methods:
E-mail: comments@fhfb.gov.
Fax: 202-408-2580.
[[Page 55182]]
Mail/Hand Delivery: Federal Housing Finance Board, 1625 Eye Street,
NW., Washington, DC 20006, Attention: Public Comments.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments. If you submit your comment to the
Federal eRulemaking Portal, please also send it by e-mail to the
Finance Board at comments@fhfb.gov to ensure timely receipt by the
agency. Include the following information in the subject line of your
submission: Federal Housing Finance Board. Notice: Examination Rating
System for the Federal Home Loan Banks and the Office of Finance.
Docket Number 2006-N-05.
We will post all public comments we receive without change,
including any personal information you provide, such as your name and
address, on the Finance Board Web site at https://www.fhfb.gov/
Default.aspx?Page=93&Top=93.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anthony Cornyn, Associate Director,
Supervision and Examination, Office of Supervision, cornyna@fhfb.gov or
202-408-2522, or Kari Walter, Associate Director, Supervisory and
Regulatory Policy, Office of Supervision, walterk@fhfb.gov or 202-408-
2829. You can send regular mail to the Federal Housing Finance Board,
1625 Eye Street, NW., Washington, DC 20006.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Federal Home Loan Bank Act (12 U.S.C. 1421 et seq.) provides
that the primary duty of the Finance Board is to ensure that the
Federal Home Loan Banks (Banks) operate in a financially safe and sound
manner. To the extent consistent with the safety and soundness charge,
the other statutory duties of the Finance Board are to: (1) Supervise
the Banks; (2) ensure that the Banks carry out their housing finance
mission; and (3) ensure that the Banks remain adequately capitalized
and able to raise funds in the capital markets. See 12 U.S.C.
1422a(a)(3).
The Banks are privately capitalized, government-sponsored
enterprises that provide wholesale credit to members and housing
associates for use in mortgage lending and related activities. The
Banks have a statutory mandate to promote housing and community
investment finance. See 12 U.S.C. 1430(g), (i), and (j); 1430b. The
Banks provide long-term, flexible financing to more than 8,100 member
financial institutions around the country.
In addition to supervising the Banks, the Finance Board has
regulatory authority and supervisory oversight responsibility for the
Office of Finance (OF), which is a joint office of the Banks that
issues consolidated obligations in the public capital markets on behalf
of the Banks. See 12 U.S.C. 1422b(b)(2); 12 CFR part 985. The Banks
fund themselves principally by issuing consolidated obligations, which
are the joint and several obligations of all 12 Banks' and consist of
bonds (original maturity of 1 year or longer) and discount notes
(original maturity of less than 1 year). Although consolidated
obligations are not guaranteed or insured by the federal government,
the Banks' status as government sponsored enterprises enables them to
raise funds at rates slightly above comparable obligations issued by
the Department of the Treasury.
To carry out its mission of ensuring that the Banks and the OF are
safe and sound so the Banks can serve as a reliable source of liquidity
and funding for the nation's housing finance and community investment
needs, the Finance Board has one major program area: supervision of the
Banks. See 12 U.S.C. 1440 (requiring the Finance Board to perform
annual examinations of the Banks). Staff monitors the performance,
condition, and risk profile of each Bank through on-site examinations
and other supervisory activities. Examinations are the cornerstone of
the Finance Board's safety and soundness supervisory program. In order
to execute an effective risk-based supervisory program that promptly
identifies and addresses current and emerging risks to the Banks, the
Office of Supervision plans to implement the risk rating system
discussed below for use beginning in calendar year 2007.
II. The Proposed Federal Home Loan Bank Rating System
The Finance Board is requesting comments on a proposed examination
rating system to be known as the Federal Home Loan Bank Rating System.
The proposed Rating System is attached as an Exhibit to this Notice.
In 2005, the Office of Supervision began to provide an overall
conclusion--Satisfactory, Fair, Marginal, or Unsatisfactory--as part of
its Report of Examination. The proposed Rating System, which is the
next step in communicating exam results to the Banks, is a risk-focused
system under which each Bank and the OF would be assigned a composite
rating based on an evaluation of various aspects of their operations.
The composite rating of each Bank would be based on an evaluation and
rating of 5 key components: Corporate governance, market risk, credit
risk, operational risk, and financial condition and performance. The
composite rating of the OF would be based primarily on an evaluation of
2 components: corporate governance and operational risk.
Under the Rating System, we would take administration of a Bank's
affordable housing and community investment activities into account in
assigning component ratings for corporate governance and operational
risk. Given the importance of affordable housing and community
investment activities to the mission of the Bank System, the Office of
Supervision may consider the need for a separate rating system or a
separate ratings component to evaluate and rate the affordable housing
and community investment programs of each Bank after gaining experience
with the proposed Rating System.
The Rating System is intended to serve 2 purposes. First, it is
designed to reflect in a comprehensive, systematic, and consistent
fashion the overall condition and performance of an institution, taking
into consideration all significant financial, operational, and
compliance factors addressed in the Finance Board's examination.
Second, the Rating System is meant to further enhance communication and
transparency between the Office of Supervision and each Bank and the OF
regarding the results of the examination process. The ratings for
individual Banks and the OF would not be made public or released to
other Banks, but would be supplied to the individual Banks and the OF
on a confidential basis as part of the examination and supervisory
process.
Under the Rating System, each of the 5 components would be assigned
a numeric rating from ``1'' to ``4.'' A ``1'' rating indicates the
lowest degree of supervisory concern, while a ``4'' rating indicates
the highest degree of supervisory concern. The composite rating of each
Bank and the OF also would be rated on a scale of ``1'' to ``4'' based
on the ratings of the underlying components. The composite rating would
be based on the component ratings but it would not be a simple
arithmetic average of the component ratings. Instead, the relative
importance of each component would be determined on a case-by-case
basis within the parameters established by this rating framework. As
proposed, an examiner would take a Bank's performance in administering
its affordable housing and community investment activities into
consideration in assigning a composite rating to the
[[Page 55183]]
Bank. More specifically, a Bank's performance in administrating it
affordable housing and community investment activities would be given
special consideration in the corporate governance and operational risk
components of the Rating System.
The Rating System would become operative when issued by the Office
of Supervision, which is anticipated to occur before year end 2006 for
implementation in 2007.
III. Request for Comments
The Finance Board requests comment on all aspects of the proposed
Rating System. In addition, the Finance Board invites specific comments
on the following questions:
1. Does the proposed Rating System capture the essential components
of an institution's performance and condition that are relevant to
assigning a composite rating to a Bank and the OF? If not, what
additional or different components should be considered?
2. Do the factors to be considered under each of the 5 components
(corporate governance, market risk, credit risk, operational risk, and
financial condition and performance) address the factors that should be
considered in assessing each of the components? If not, what additional
or different factors should be considered?
Dated: September 13, 2006.
By the Federal Housing Finance Board.
John P. Kennedy,
General Counsel.
BILLING CODE 6725-01-P
[[Page 55184]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN21SE06.000
[[Page 55185]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN21SE06.001
[[Page 55186]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN21SE06.002
[[Page 55187]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN21SE06.003
[[Page 55188]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN21SE06.004
[[Page 55189]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN21SE06.005
[[Page 55190]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN21SE06.006
[[Page 55191]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN21SE06.007
[[Page 55192]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN21SE06.008
[[Page 55193]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN21SE06.009
[[Page 55194]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN21SE06.010
[[Page 55195]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN21SE06.011
[[Page 55196]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN21SE06.012
[[Page 55197]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN21SE06.013
[[Page 55198]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN21SE06.014
[[Page 55199]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN21SE06.015
[[Page 55200]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN21SE06.016
[[Page 55201]]
[FR Doc. 06-7848 Filed 9-20-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6725-01-C