Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Bayou Lafourche, LA, 54944-54946 [E6-15558]
Download as PDF
54944
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 182 / Wednesday, September 20, 2006 / Proposed Rules
envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during
the comment period. We may change
this proposed rule in view of them.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[CGD08–06–028]
RIN 1625–AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulation;
Bayou Lafourche, LA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSAL
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to
change the regulations governing six
bridges across Bayou Lafourche, south
of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, in
Lafourche Parish, Louisiana. The
Lafourche Parish Council has requested
that the bridges remain closed to
navigation at various times on weekdays
during the school year. These closures
will facilitate the safe, efficient
movement of staff, students and other
residents within the parish.
DATES: Comments and related material
must reach the Coast Guard on or before
November 20, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may mail comments
and related material to Commander
(dpb), Eighth Coast Guard District, 500
Poydras Street, New Orleans, Louisiana
70130–3310. The Commander, Eighth
Coast Guard District, Bridge
Administration Branch maintains the
public docket for this rulemaking.
Comments and material received from
the public, as well as documents
indicated in this preamble as being
available in the docket, will become part
of this docket and will be available for
inspection or copying at the Bridge
Administration office between 7 a.m.
and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Frank, Bridge Administration
Branch, telephone 504–671–2128.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related material. If you
do so, please include your name and
address, identify the docket number for
this rulemaking [CGD08–06–028],
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and give the reason for each
comment. Please submit all comments
and related material in an unbound
format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 11 inches,
suitable for copying. If you would like
to know they reached us, please enclose
a stamped, self-addressed postcard or
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:27 Sep 19, 2006
Jkt 208001
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. You may submit a request for
a meeting by writing to Commander,
Eighth Coast Guard District, Bridge
Administration Branch at the address
under ADDRESSES explaining why one
would be beneficial. If we determine
that one would aid this rulemaking, we
will hold one at a time and place
announced by a later notice in the
Federal Register.
Background and Purpose
The U.S. Coast Guard, at the request
of the Lafourche Parish Council,
proposes to modify the existing
operating schedules of six bridges across
Bayou Lafourche south of the Gulf
Intracoastal Waterway in Lafourche
Parish, Louisiana. The six bridges
include: Golden Meadow Vertical Lift
Bridge, mile 23.9; the Galliano Pontoon
Bridge, mile 27.8; the South Lafourche
(Tarpon) Vertical Lift Bridge, mile 30.6;
the Cote Blanche Pontoon Bridge, mile
33.9; the Cutoff Vertical Lift Bridge,
mile 36.3; and the Larose Pontoon
Bridge, mile 39.1. The modification of
the existing regulations will allow these
bridges to remain closed to navigation
from 7 a.m. to 8:30 a.m.; from 2 p.m. to
4 p.m.; and from 4:30 p.m. to 5:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday from August 15
through May 31. At all other times, the
bridges would open on signal for the
passage of vessels.
Presently, the draws of these bridges
shall open on signal; except that, from
August 15 through May 31, the draw
need not open for the passage of vessels
Monday through Friday except Federal
holidays from 7 a.m. to 8 a.m.; from 2
p.m. to 4 p.m.; and from 4:30 p.m. to
5:30 p.m.
The existing regulations for the
bridges went into effect on January 27,
2006. The original request by the
petitioner was that the bridges be closed
to navigation from 7 a.m. to 8:30 a.m.;
however, due to a clerical error, the rule
was codified with the morning hours of
7 a.m. to 8 a.m. This request will correct
the discrepancy.
Traffic counts and vessel openings
vary among the six bridges. The
Louisiana Department of Transportation
and Development provided information
on vessel openings for the Larose
Pontoon Bridge, mile 39.1; the Galliano/
South Lafourche (Tarpon) Vertical Lift
Bridge, mile 30.6; and the Golden
Meadow Vertical Lift Bridge, mile 23.9
since the regulation became effective.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
The Lafourche Parish Council also
provided information on vessel
openings and traffic counts for the
Cutoff Vertical Lift Bridge, mile 36.3;
the Cote Blanche Pontoon Bridge, mile
33.9; and the Galliano Pontoon Bridge,
mile 27.8.
The modification of the additional 30minute closure request affects each
bridge differently. The additional time
will require vessels already delayed by
the morning closures to be delayed an
additional 30 minutes. The number of
vessels delayed per bridge varies but on
average there are approximately 12 to 14
vessels delayed per month on
approximately 8 days per bridge.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
The proposed rule would modify the
existing regulations in 33 CFR 117.465
to facilitate the movement of high
volumes of vehicular traffic across the
bridge during periods of increased
transits during the school year. These
closures would allow for vehicles and
school busses to transit across the
bridges unimpeded both before and after
school hours. The change would allow
these six bridges on Bayou Lafourche
south of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway,
mile 35.6 west of Harvey Lock, in
Larose, to remain closed to navigation
from 7 a.m. to 8:30 a.m.; from 2 p.m. to
4 p.m.; and from 4:30 p.m. to 5:30 p.m.
Monday through Friday from August 15
to May 31. At all other times, the bridge
will open on signal for the passage of
vessels. The proposed regulation does
not affect the SR 1 (Leeville) Vertical
Lift Bridge, mile 13.3. This bridge is a
mid-level vertical lift bridge and is
scheduled to be replaced by a high-level
fixed bridge in the near future.
Regulatory Evaluation
This proposed rule is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866,
Regulatory Planning and Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office
of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. It is not
‘‘significant’’ under the regulatory
policies and procedures of the
Department of Homeland Security. We
expect the economic impact of this
proposed rule to be so minimal that a
full Regulatory Evaluation is
unnecessary.
This proposed rule would allow the
six bridges to remain closed to
navigation an additional 30 minutes in
the morning to facilitate the movement
of school children within Lafourche
Parish. According to the information
provided by the applicant, the public at
E:\FR\FM\20SEP1.SGM
20SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 182 / Wednesday, September 20, 2006 / Proposed Rules
large is better served by the closure
times.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this proposed rule would have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This proposed rule would affect
the following entities: the owners and
operators of vessels needing to transit
the bridges during the requested closure
periods.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this proposed rule would have
a significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this proposed rule would economically
affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule so that
they can better evaluate its effects on
them and participate in the rulemaking.
If the rule would affect your small
business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the Eighth
Coast Guard District Bridge
Administration Branch at the address
above. The Coast Guard will not
retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this rule or
any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSAL
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:27 Sep 19, 2006
Jkt 208001
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this proposed rule will not
result in such an expenditure, we do
discuss the effects of this proposed rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not affect a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This proposed rule is not an
economically significant rule and would
not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
54945
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Commandant Instruction
M16475.1D, which guides the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded that there are no factors
in this case that would limit the use of
a categorical exclusion under section
2.B.2 of the Instruction. Therefore, we
believe that this rule should be
categorically excluded, under figure 2–
1, paragraph (32)(e), of the Instruction,
from further environmental
documentation. Under figure 2–1,
paragraph (32)(e), of the Instruction, an
‘‘Environmental Determination Check
List’’ and a ‘‘Categorical Exclusion
Determination’’ are not required for this
rule. However, comments on this
section still be considered before the
final rule.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE
OPERATION REGULATIONS
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
1. The authority citation for part 117
continues to read as follows:
E:\FR\FM\20SEP1.SGM
20SEP1
54946
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 182 / Wednesday, September 20, 2006 / Proposed Rules
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1; 33
CFR 1.05–1(g); section 117.255 also issued
under the authority of Pub. L. 102–587, 106
Stat. 5039.
2. Section 117.465(a) is revised to
read as follows:
§ 117.465
Lafourche Bayou.
(a) The draws of the following bridges
shall open on signal; except that, from
August 15 through May 31, the draw
need not open for the passage of vessels
Monday through Friday except Federal
holidays from 7 a.m. to 8:30 a.m.; from
2 p.m. to 4 p.m.; and from 4:30 p.m. to
5:30 p.m.:
(1) SR 308 (Golden Meadow) Bridge,
mile 23.9, at Golden Meadow
(2) Galliano Pontoon Bridge, mile
27.8, at Galliano
(3) SR 308 (South Lafourche (Tarpon))
Bridge, mile 30.6, at Galliano
(4) Cote Blanche Pontoon Bridge, mile
33.9, at Cutoff
(5) Cutoff Vertical Lift Bridge, mile
36.3, at Cutoff
(6) SR 310 (Larose Pontoon) Bridge,
mile 39.1, at Larose
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: September 10, 2006.
Joel R. Whitehead,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard Commander,
Eighth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. E6–15558 Filed 9–19–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[CGD08–06–034]
RIN 1625–AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulation;
Bayou Lafourche, LA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSAL
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to
change the regulations governing the
draw of the Valentine Pontoon Bridge
across Bayou Lafourche, mile 44.7, in
Lafourche Parish, Louisiana. The
regulation will allow for the bridge to be
unmanned and remain closed during
hours of infrequent traffic with an
advance notification requirement to
open the bridge.
DATES: Comments and related material
must reach the Coast Guard on or before
November 20, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may mail comments
and related material to Commander
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:27 Sep 19, 2006
Jkt 208001
(dpb), Eighth Coast Guard District, 500
Poydras Street, New Orleans, Louisiana
70130–3310. The Commander, Eighth
Coast Guard District, Bridge
Administration Branch maintains the
public docket for this rulemaking.
Comments and material received from
the public, as well as documents
indicated in this preamble as being
available in the docket, will become part
of this docket and will be available for
inspection or copying at the Bridge
Administration office between 7 a.m.
and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Frank, Bridge Administration
Branch, telephone 504–671–2128.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related material. If you
do so, please include your name and
address, identify the docket number for
this rulemaking [CGD08–06–034],
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and give the reason for each
comment. Please submit all comments
and related material in an unbound
format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 11 inches,
suitable for copying. If you would like
to know they reached us, please enclose
a stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during
the comment period. We may change
this proposed rule in view of them.
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. You may submit a request for
a meeting by writing to Commander,
Eighth Coast Guard District, Bridge
Administration Branch at the address
under ADDRESSES explaining why one
would be beneficial. If we determine
that one would aid this rulemaking, we
will hold one at a time and place
announced by a later notice in the
Federal Register.
Background and Purpose
The U.S. Coast Guard, at the request
of the Lafourche Parish Council,
proposes to modify the existing
operating schedules of the Valentine
Pontoon Bridge across Bayou Lafourche,
mile 44.7, in Lafourche Parish,
Louisiana. The majority of the bridge’s
openings occur between the hours of 6
a.m. and 6 p.m. The bridge owner
proposes to continue to open the bridge
on signal during these hours and to
open the bridge on signal if at least four
hours advance notification is given
between the hours of 6 p.m. and 6 a.m.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Presently, the draw of the bridge opens
on signal for the passage of traffic.
Several large shipyards are located on
Bayou Lafourche upstream of the bridge.
The Lafourche Parish Council has
contacted these facilities and has
received letters of no objection to the
proposed changes. A recent review of
the bridge tender logs indicates that
approximately 700 vessels transited
through the bridge over the past year.
Approximately 80% of the vessels
transiting though the bridge site did so
between the hours of 6 a.m. and 6 p.m.
Additionally, it would appear that the
majority of the night time openings for
the bridge are for trawl vessels and they
appear to increase during the months of
May and August. Many of the trawl
vessels appear to transit in clusters and
pass through the bridge site on the same
bridge opening. Presently, it is unclear
as to whether or not a four-hour advance
notification will place an undue burden
on the vessel owners; however, the
regulation will be written so that the
bridge will be required to open on signal
during the advance notification period if
a temporary surge in water traffic
occurs.
Traffic counts were not included as
part of the submittal from the bridge
owner as the request is to reduce the
requirement of having a bridge tender at
the bridge 24 hours a day due to the
limited number of vessel openings that
occur during the hours of 6 p.m. to 6
a.m.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
The proposed rule would modify the
existing regulations in 33 CFR 117.465.
The modification to the regulations will
require the bridge owner to open the
bridge on signal from 6 a.m. until 6 p.m.
daily for the passage of vessels. At all
other times, the bridge will open for
signal for the passage of vessels if at
least four hours advance notification is
given. This modification will allow the
bridge owner to reduce their
requirements to have a bridge tender at
the bridge site at all times. The SR 3220
bridge, mile 49.2, at Lockport, is
required to open on signal for the
passage of vessels; except that from 6
p.m. to 10 a.m., the bridge draw shall
open on signal if at least four hours
advance notification is given. As the
next bridge upstream from the Valentine
Bridge already has a more restrictive
regulation established, the new
regulation will only directly affect those
individuals whose vessels or facilities
are located within this five mile stretch
of the waterway. The two largest
commercial facilities have already
submitted letters of no objection to the
proposed changes.
E:\FR\FM\20SEP1.SGM
20SEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 182 (Wednesday, September 20, 2006)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 54944-54946]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-15558]
[[Page 54944]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[CGD08-06-028]
RIN 1625-AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Bayou Lafourche, LA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to change the regulations governing
six bridges across Bayou Lafourche, south of the Gulf Intracoastal
Waterway, in Lafourche Parish, Louisiana. The Lafourche Parish Council
has requested that the bridges remain closed to navigation at various
times on weekdays during the school year. These closures will
facilitate the safe, efficient movement of staff, students and other
residents within the parish.
DATES: Comments and related material must reach the Coast Guard on or
before November 20, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may mail comments and related material to Commander
(dpb), Eighth Coast Guard District, 500 Poydras Street, New Orleans,
Louisiana 70130-3310. The Commander, Eighth Coast Guard District,
Bridge Administration Branch maintains the public docket for this
rulemaking. Comments and material received from the public, as well as
documents indicated in this preamble as being available in the docket,
will become part of this docket and will be available for inspection or
copying at the Bridge Administration office between 7 a.m. and 3 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Frank, Bridge Administration
Branch, telephone 504-671-2128.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related material. If you do so, please include your name
and address, identify the docket number for this rulemaking [CGD08-06-
028], indicate the specific section of this document to which each
comment applies, and give the reason for each comment. Please submit
all comments and related material in an unbound format, no larger than
8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for copying. If you would like to know
they reached us, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope. We will consider all comments and material received during
the comment period. We may change this proposed rule in view of them.
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. You may submit a
request for a meeting by writing to Commander, Eighth Coast Guard
District, Bridge Administration Branch at the address under ADDRESSES
explaining why one would be beneficial. If we determine that one would
aid this rulemaking, we will hold one at a time and place announced by
a later notice in the Federal Register.
Background and Purpose
The U.S. Coast Guard, at the request of the Lafourche Parish
Council, proposes to modify the existing operating schedules of six
bridges across Bayou Lafourche south of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway
in Lafourche Parish, Louisiana. The six bridges include: Golden Meadow
Vertical Lift Bridge, mile 23.9; the Galliano Pontoon Bridge, mile
27.8; the South Lafourche (Tarpon) Vertical Lift Bridge, mile 30.6; the
Cote Blanche Pontoon Bridge, mile 33.9; the Cutoff Vertical Lift
Bridge, mile 36.3; and the Larose Pontoon Bridge, mile 39.1. The
modification of the existing regulations will allow these bridges to
remain closed to navigation from 7 a.m. to 8:30 a.m.; from 2 p.m. to 4
p.m.; and from 4:30 p.m. to 5:30 p.m., Monday through Friday from
August 15 through May 31. At all other times, the bridges would open on
signal for the passage of vessels.
Presently, the draws of these bridges shall open on signal; except
that, from August 15 through May 31, the draw need not open for the
passage of vessels Monday through Friday except Federal holidays from 7
a.m. to 8 a.m.; from 2 p.m. to 4 p.m.; and from 4:30 p.m. to 5:30 p.m.
The existing regulations for the bridges went into effect on
January 27, 2006. The original request by the petitioner was that the
bridges be closed to navigation from 7 a.m. to 8:30 a.m.; however, due
to a clerical error, the rule was codified with the morning hours of 7
a.m. to 8 a.m. This request will correct the discrepancy.
Traffic counts and vessel openings vary among the six bridges. The
Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development provided
information on vessel openings for the Larose Pontoon Bridge, mile
39.1; the Galliano/South Lafourche (Tarpon) Vertical Lift Bridge, mile
30.6; and the Golden Meadow Vertical Lift Bridge, mile 23.9 since the
regulation became effective. The Lafourche Parish Council also provided
information on vessel openings and traffic counts for the Cutoff
Vertical Lift Bridge, mile 36.3; the Cote Blanche Pontoon Bridge, mile
33.9; and the Galliano Pontoon Bridge, mile 27.8.
The modification of the additional 30-minute closure request
affects each bridge differently. The additional time will require
vessels already delayed by the morning closures to be delayed an
additional 30 minutes. The number of vessels delayed per bridge varies
but on average there are approximately 12 to 14 vessels delayed per
month on approximately 8 days per bridge.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
The proposed rule would modify the existing regulations in 33 CFR
117.465 to facilitate the movement of high volumes of vehicular traffic
across the bridge during periods of increased transits during the
school year. These closures would allow for vehicles and school busses
to transit across the bridges unimpeded both before and after school
hours. The change would allow these six bridges on Bayou Lafourche
south of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, mile 35.6 west of Harvey Lock,
in Larose, to remain closed to navigation from 7 a.m. to 8:30 a.m.;
from 2 p.m. to 4 p.m.; and from 4:30 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. Monday through
Friday from August 15 to May 31. At all other times, the bridge will
open on signal for the passage of vessels. The proposed regulation does
not affect the SR 1 (Leeville) Vertical Lift Bridge, mile 13.3. This
bridge is a mid-level vertical lift bridge and is scheduled to be
replaced by a high-level fixed bridge in the near future.
Regulatory Evaluation
This proposed rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits
under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that Order. It is not ``significant''
under the regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of
Homeland Security. We expect the economic impact of this proposed rule
to be so minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation is unnecessary.
This proposed rule would allow the six bridges to remain closed to
navigation an additional 30 minutes in the morning to facilitate the
movement of school children within Lafourche Parish. According to the
information provided by the applicant, the public at
[[Page 54945]]
large is better served by the closure times.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this proposed rule would have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This proposed rule would affect the following
entities: the owners and operators of vessels needing to transit the
bridges during the requested closure periods.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this proposed rule
would have a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment
(see ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to
what degree this proposed rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule so that they can better
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the
rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact the Eighth Coast Guard District
Bridge Administration Branch at the address above. The Coast Guard will
not retaliate against small entities that question or complain about
this rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this proposed rule
under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications
for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this proposed rule will not result in such an
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this proposed rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not affect a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This proposed rule is not an economically significant rule and
would not create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that
might disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Commandant Instruction
M16475.1D, which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have concluded that there are no factors in this case that would limit
the use of a categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the
Instruction. Therefore, we believe that this rule should be
categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph (32)(e), of the
Instruction, from further environmental documentation. Under figure 2-
1, paragraph (32)(e), of the Instruction, an ``Environmental
Determination Check List'' and a ``Categorical Exclusion
Determination'' are not required for this rule. However, comments on
this section still be considered before the final rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as
follows:
[[Page 54946]]
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g); section 117.255 also issued
under the authority of Pub. L. 102-587, 106 Stat. 5039.
2. Section 117.465(a) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 117.465 Lafourche Bayou.
(a) The draws of the following bridges shall open on signal; except
that, from August 15 through May 31, the draw need not open for the
passage of vessels Monday through Friday except Federal holidays from 7
a.m. to 8:30 a.m.; from 2 p.m. to 4 p.m.; and from 4:30 p.m. to 5:30
p.m.:
(1) SR 308 (Golden Meadow) Bridge, mile 23.9, at Golden Meadow
(2) Galliano Pontoon Bridge, mile 27.8, at Galliano
(3) SR 308 (South Lafourche (Tarpon)) Bridge, mile 30.6, at
Galliano
(4) Cote Blanche Pontoon Bridge, mile 33.9, at Cutoff
(5) Cutoff Vertical Lift Bridge, mile 36.3, at Cutoff
(6) SR 310 (Larose Pontoon) Bridge, mile 39.1, at Larose
* * * * *
Dated: September 10, 2006.
Joel R. Whitehead,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard Commander, Eighth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. E6-15558 Filed 9-19-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P