Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent Extension; AVASTIN, 54997-54998 [E6-15555]
Download as PDF
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 182 / Wednesday, September 20, 2006 / Notices
toward the actual amount of extension
that the Director of Patents and
Trademarks may award (for example,
half the testing phase must be
subtracted, as well as any time that may
have occurred before the patent was
issued), FDA’s determination of the
length of a regulatory review period for
a human drug product will include all
of the testing phase and approval phase
as specified in 35 U.S.C. 156(g)(1)(B).
FDA approved for marketing the
human drug product FUZEON
(enfuvirtide). FUZEON is indicated for
use in combination with other
antiretroviral agents for the treatment of
HIV–1 infection in treatmentexperienced patients with evidence of
HIV–1 replication despite ongoing
antiretroviral therapy. Subsequent to
this approval, the Patent and Trademark
Office received a patent term restoration
application for FUZEON (U.S. Patent
No. 6,133,418) from Duke University,
and the Patent and Trademark Office
requested FDA’s assistance in
determining this patent’s eligibility for
patent term restoration. In a letter dated
April 6, 2004, FDA advised the Patent
and Trademark Office that this human
drug product had undergone a
regulatory review period and that the
approval of FUZEON represented the
first permitted commercial marketing or
use of the product. Shortly thereafter,
the Patent and Trademark Office
requested that FDA determine the
product’s regulatory review period.
FDA has determined that the
applicable regulatory review period for
FUZEON is 2,312 days. Of this time,
2,133 days occurred during the testing
phase of the regulatory review period,
while 179 days occurred during the
approval phase. These periods of time
were derived from the following dates:
1. The date an exemption under
section 505(i) of the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (the act) (21 U.S.C.
355(i)) became effective: November 14,
1996. FDA has verified the applicant’s
claim that the date the investigational
new drug application became effective
was on November 14, 1996.
2. The date the application was
initially submitted with respect to the
human drug product under section
505(b) of the act: September 16, 2002.
The applicant claims June 24, 2002, as
the date the new drug application
(NDA) for FUZEON (NDA 21–481) was
initially submitted. The applicant
claims this is the date it submitted the
first module of NDA 21–481, which was
submitted in several units as part of a
rolling NDA submission procedure. It is
FDA’s position that the approval phase
begins when the marketing application
is complete. A review of FDA records
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:40 Sep 19, 2006
Jkt 205001
reveals that the final module of the
marketing application was submitted on
September 16, 2002, which is
considered to be the NDA initially
submitted date.
3. The date the application was
approved: March 13, 2003. FDA has
verified the applicant’s claim that NDA
21–481 was approved on March 13,
2003. This determination of the
regulatory review period establishes the
maximum potential length of a patent
extension. However, the U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office applies several
statutory limitations in its calculations
of the actual period for patent extension.
In its application for patent extension,
this applicant seeks 569 days of patent
term extension.
Anyone with knowledge that any of
the dates as published are incorrect may
submit to the Division of Dockets
Management (see ADDRESSES) written or
electronic comments and ask for a
redetermination by November 20, 2006.
Furthermore, any interested person may
petition FDA for a determination
regarding whether the applicant for
extension acted with due diligence
during the regulatory review period by
March 19, 2007. To meet its burden, the
petition must contain sufficient facts to
merit an FDA investigation. (See H.
Rept. 857, part 1, 98th Cong., 2d sess.,
pp. 41–42, 1984.) Petitions should be in
the format specified in 21 CFR 10.30.
Comments and petitions should be
submitted to the Division of Dockets
Management. Three copies of any
mailed information are to be submitted,
except that individuals may submit one
copy. Comments are to be identified
with the docket number found in
brackets in the heading of this
document. Comments and petitions may
be seen in the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday.
Dated: September 1, 2006.
Jane A. Axelrad,
Associate Director for Policy, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research.
[FR Doc. E6–15554 Filed 9–19–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. 2004E–0402]
Determination of Regulatory Review
Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; AVASTIN
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
ACTION:
54997
Notice.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) has determined
the regulatory review period for
AVASTIN and is publishing this notice
of that determination as required by
law. FDA has made the determination
because of the submission of an
application to the Director of Patents
and Trademarks, Department of
Commerce, for the extension of a patent
which claims that human biological
product.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments
and petitions to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit
electronic comments to https://
www.fda.gov/dockets/ecomments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory
Policy (HFD–7), Food and Drug
Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane,
Rockville, MD 20857, 301–594–2041.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug
Price Competition and Patent Term
Restoration Act of 1984 (Public Law 98–
417) and the Generic Animal Drug and
Patent Term Restoration Act (Public
Law 100–670) generally provide that a
patent may be extended for a period of
up to 5 years so long as the patented
item (human drug product, animal drug
product, medical device, food additive,
or color additive) was subject to
regulatory review by FDA before the
item was marketed. Under these acts, a
product’s regulatory review period
forms the basis for determining the
amount of extension an applicant may
receive.
A regulatory review period consists of
two periods of time: A testing phase and
an approval phase. For human
biological products, the testing phase
begins when the exemption to permit
the clinical investigations of the
biological product becomes effective
and runs until the approval phase
begins. The approval phase starts with
the initial submission of an application
to market the human biological product
and continues until FDA grants
permission to market the biological
product. Although only a portion of a
regulatory review period may count
toward the actual amount of extension
that the Director of Patents and
Trademarks may award (for example,
half the testing phase must be
subtracted as well as any time that may
have occurred before the patent was
issued), FDA’s determination of the
length of a regulatory review period for
a human biological product will include
all of the testing phase and approval
E:\FR\FM\20SEN1.SGM
20SEN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
54998
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 182 / Wednesday, September 20, 2006 / Notices
phase as specified in 35 U.S.C.
156(g)(1)(B).
FDA recently approved for marketing
the human biological product AVASTIN
(bevacizumab). AVASTIN, used in
combination with intravenous 5fluorouracil-based chemotherapy, is
indicated for first-line treatment of
patients with metastatic carcinoma of
the colon or rectum. Subsequent to this
approval, the Patent and Trademark
Office received a patent term restoration
application for AVASTIN (U.S. Patent
No. 6,054,297) from Genentech, Inc.,
and the Patent and Trademark Office
requested FDA’s assistance in
determining this patent’s eligibility for
patent term restoration. In a letter dated
July 8, 2005, FDA advised the Patent
and Trademark Office that this human
biological product had undergone a
regulatory review period and that the
approval of AVASTIN represented the
first permitted commercial marketing or
use of the product. Shortly thereafter,
the Patent and Trademark Office
requested that FDA determine the
product’s regulatory review period.
FDA has determined that the
applicable regulatory review period for
AVASTIN is 2,551 days. Of this time,
2,401 days occurred during the testing
phase of the regulatory review period,
while 150 days occurred during the
approval phase. These periods of time
were derived from the following dates:
1. The date an exemption under
section 505(i) of the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 355(i))
became effective: March 5, 1997. The
applicant claims February 3, 1997, as
the date the investigational new drug
application (IND) became effective.
However, FDA records indicate that the
IND effective date was March 5, 1997,
which was 30 days after FDA receipt of
the IND.
2. The date the application was
initially submitted with respect to the
human biological product under section
351 of the Public Health Service Act (42
U.S.C. 262): September 30, 2003. The
applicant claims August 29, 2003, as the
date the biologics license application
(BLA) for AVASTIN (BLA 125085/0)
was initially submitted. The applicant
claims this is the date it submitted the
first unit of BLA 125085/0, which was
submitted in several units as part of a
rolling application submission
procedure. It is FDA’s position that the
approval phase begins when the
marketing application is complete. A
review of FDA records reveals that the
final module of the BLA 125085/0 was
submitted on September 30, 2003,
which is considered to be the complete
marketing application initially
submitted date.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:40 Sep 19, 2006
Jkt 205001
3. The date the application was
approved: February 26, 2004. FDA has
verified the applicant’s claim that BLA
125085/0 was approved on February 26,
2004.
This determination of the regulatory
review period establishes the maximum
potential length of a patent extension.
However, the U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office applies several
statutory limitations in its calculations
of the actual period for patent extension.
In its application for patent extension,
this applicant seeks 307 days of patent
term extension.
Anyone with knowledge that any of
the dates as published are incorrect may
submit to the Division of Dockets
Management (see ADDRESSES) written or
electronic comments and ask for a
redetermination by November 20, 2006.
Furthermore, any interested person may
petition FDA for a determination
regarding whether the applicant for
extension acted with due diligence
during the regulatory review period by
March 19, 2007. To meet its burden, the
petition must contain sufficient facts to
merit an FDA investigation. (See H.
Rept. 857, part 1, 98th Cong., 2d sess.,
pp. 41–42, 1984.) Petitions should be in
the format specified in 21 CFR 10.30.
Comments and petitions should be
submitted to the Division of Dockets
Management. Three copies of any
mailed information are to be submitted,
except that individuals may submit one
copy. Comments are to be identified
with the docket number found in
brackets in the heading of this
document. Comments and petitions may
be seen in the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday.
Dated: September 1, 2006.
Jane A. Axelrad,
Associate Director for Policy, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research.
[FR Doc. E6–15555 Filed 9–19–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. 2005E–0234]
Determination of Regulatory Review
Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; MACUGEN
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) has determined
the regulatory review period for
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
MACUGEN and is publishing this notice
of that determination as required by
law. FDA has made the determination
because of the submission of an
application to the Director of Patents
and Trademarks, Department of
Commerce, for the extension of a patent
which claims that human drug product.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments
and petitions to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit
electronic comments to https://
www.fda.gov/dockets/ecomments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory
Policy (HFD–7), Food and Drug
Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane,
Rockville, MD 20857, 301–594–2041.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug
Price Competition and Patent Term
Restoration Act of 1984 (Public Law 98–
417) and the Generic Animal Drug and
Patent Term Restoration Act (Public
Law 100–670) generally provide that a
patent may be extended for a period of
up to 5 years so long as the patented
item (human drug product, animal drug
product, medical device, food additive,
or color additive) was subject to
regulatory review by FDA before the
item was marketed. Under these acts, a
product’s regulatory review period
forms the basis for determining the
amount of extension an applicant may
receive.
A regulatory review period consists of
two periods of time: A testing phase and
an approval phase. For human drug
products, the testing phase begins when
the exemption to permit the clinical
investigations of the drug becomes
effective and runs until the approval
phase begins. The approval phase starts
with the initial submission of an
application to market the human drug
product and continues until FDA grants
permission to market the drug product.
Although only a portion of a regulatory
review period may count toward the
actual amount of extension that the
Director of Patents and Trademarks may
award (for example, half the testing
phase must be subtracted, as well as any
time that may have occurred before the
patent was issued), FDA’s determination
of the length of a regulatory review
period for a human drug product will
include all of the testing phase and
approval phase as specified in 35 U.S.C.
156(g)(1)(B).
FDA approved for marketing the
human drug product MACUGEN
(pegaptanib sodium). MACUGEN is
indicated for the treatment of
neovascular (wet) age-related macular
degeneration. Subsequent to this
E:\FR\FM\20SEN1.SGM
20SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 182 (Wednesday, September 20, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54997-54998]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-15555]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. 2004E-0402]
Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; AVASTIN
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined the
regulatory review period for AVASTIN and is publishing this notice of
that determination as required by law. FDA has made the determination
because of the submission of an application to the Director of Patents
and Trademarks, Department of Commerce, for the extension of a patent
which claims that human biological product.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments and petitions to the Division of
Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630
Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit electronic comments
to https://www.fda.gov/dockets/ecomments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory
Policy (HFD-7), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane,
Rockville, MD 20857, 301-594-2041.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug Price Competition and Patent Term
Restoration Act of 1984 (Public Law 98-417) and the Generic Animal Drug
and Patent Term Restoration Act (Public Law 100-670) generally provide
that a patent may be extended for a period of up to 5 years so long as
the patented item (human drug product, animal drug product, medical
device, food additive, or color additive) was subject to regulatory
review by FDA before the item was marketed. Under these acts, a
product's regulatory review period forms the basis for determining the
amount of extension an applicant may receive.
A regulatory review period consists of two periods of time: A
testing phase and an approval phase. For human biological products, the
testing phase begins when the exemption to permit the clinical
investigations of the biological product becomes effective and runs
until the approval phase begins. The approval phase starts with the
initial submission of an application to market the human biological
product and continues until FDA grants permission to market the
biological product. Although only a portion of a regulatory review
period may count toward the actual amount of extension that the
Director of Patents and Trademarks may award (for example, half the
testing phase must be subtracted as well as any time that may have
occurred before the patent was issued), FDA's determination of the
length of a regulatory review period for a human biological product
will include all of the testing phase and approval
[[Page 54998]]
phase as specified in 35 U.S.C. 156(g)(1)(B).
FDA recently approved for marketing the human biological product
AVASTIN (bevacizumab). AVASTIN, used in combination with intravenous 5-
fluorouracil-based chemotherapy, is indicated for first-line treatment
of patients with metastatic carcinoma of the colon or rectum.
Subsequent to this approval, the Patent and Trademark Office received a
patent term restoration application for AVASTIN (U.S. Patent No.
6,054,297) from Genentech, Inc., and the Patent and Trademark Office
requested FDA's assistance in determining this patent's eligibility for
patent term restoration. In a letter dated July 8, 2005, FDA advised
the Patent and Trademark Office that this human biological product had
undergone a regulatory review period and that the approval of AVASTIN
represented the first permitted commercial marketing or use of the
product. Shortly thereafter, the Patent and Trademark Office requested
that FDA determine the product's regulatory review period.
FDA has determined that the applicable regulatory review period for
AVASTIN is 2,551 days. Of this time, 2,401 days occurred during the
testing phase of the regulatory review period, while 150 days occurred
during the approval phase. These periods of time were derived from the
following dates:
1. The date an exemption under section 505(i) of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 355(i)) became effective: March 5,
1997. The applicant claims February 3, 1997, as the date the
investigational new drug application (IND) became effective. However,
FDA records indicate that the IND effective date was March 5, 1997,
which was 30 days after FDA receipt of the IND.
2. The date the application was initially submitted with respect to
the human biological product under section 351 of the Public Health
Service Act (42 U.S.C. 262): September 30, 2003. The applicant claims
August 29, 2003, as the date the biologics license application (BLA)
for AVASTIN (BLA 125085/0) was initially submitted. The applicant
claims this is the date it submitted the first unit of BLA 125085/0,
which was submitted in several units as part of a rolling application
submission procedure. It is FDA's position that the approval phase
begins when the marketing application is complete. A review of FDA
records reveals that the final module of the BLA 125085/0 was submitted
on September 30, 2003, which is considered to be the complete marketing
application initially submitted date.
3. The date the application was approved: February 26, 2004. FDA
has verified the applicant's claim that BLA 125085/0 was approved on
February 26, 2004.
This determination of the regulatory review period establishes the
maximum potential length of a patent extension. However, the U.S.
Patent and Trademark Office applies several statutory limitations in
its calculations of the actual period for patent extension. In its
application for patent extension, this applicant seeks 307 days of
patent term extension.
Anyone with knowledge that any of the dates as published are
incorrect may submit to the Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES) written or electronic comments and ask for a redetermination
by November 20, 2006. Furthermore, any interested person may petition
FDA for a determination regarding whether the applicant for extension
acted with due diligence during the regulatory review period by March
19, 2007. To meet its burden, the petition must contain sufficient
facts to merit an FDA investigation. (See H. Rept. 857, part 1, 98th
Cong., 2d sess., pp. 41-42, 1984.) Petitions should be in the format
specified in 21 CFR 10.30.
Comments and petitions should be submitted to the Division of
Dockets Management. Three copies of any mailed information are to be
submitted, except that individuals may submit one copy. Comments are to
be identified with the docket number found in brackets in the heading
of this document. Comments and petitions may be seen in the Division of
Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Dated: September 1, 2006.
Jane A. Axelrad,
Associate Director for Policy, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.
[FR Doc. E6-15555 Filed 9-19-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S