Notice of Acceptance for Docketing of the Application, Notice of Opportunity for Hearing and Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement and Conduct Scoping Process for Facility Operating License No. DPR-59 for an Additional 20-Year Period, Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., James A. Fitzpatrick Nuclear Power Plant, 55032-55035 [06-7974]
Download as PDF
55032
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 182 / Wednesday, September 20, 2006 / Notices
Minutes
• Update on NSF Working Group on
the Impact of Proposal and Award
Management Mechanisms Study of
Award Size, Duration and Proposal
Success Rates
• Status of NSF FY 2007 Budget
Request
• Status of NSF Strategic Plan, FY
2006–2011
Committee on Programs and Plans (9:30
a.m.–10:30 a.m.)
• Approval of Minutes
• Status Reports:
Æ Task Force on Transformative
Research
Æ Task Force on Hurricane Science &
Engineering
Æ Subcommittee on Polar Issues
Æ Task Force on International Science
• Timing and Circumstances for
Annual Board Reexamination of
Priority Order of MREFC
Candidates for New Start Projects:
Dr. Ken Ford
• Transmitting Director’s Review
Board Packages to the National
Science Board: Review of Process
Committee on Education and Human
Resources (10:30 a.m.–12 p.m.)
• Approval of May 2006 Minutes
• Science Mathematics and Research
for Transformation (SMART)
Program
• Doctoral Completion Project
• Ensuring America’s Competitive
Edge through Education and
Research: The NSF Role
• Subcommittee on Science and
Engineering Indicators
• Update on November 7, 2006 NSB
Workshop: ‘‘Moving Forward to
Improve Engineering Education’’
• NSB items
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Closed
Committee on Strategy and Budget
Closed: (9:15 a.m.–9:30 a.m.)
• Status of NSF FY 2008 Budget
Request
Plenary Sessions of the Board (1:15
p.m.–3 p.m.)
Plenary Executive Closed (1:15 p.m.–
1:20 p.m.)
• Approval of August 2006 Minutes
Plenary Closed (1:20 p.m.–1:25 p.m.)
• Approval of August 2006 Minutes
• Closed Committee Reports
Plenary Open (1:25 p.m.–3 p.m.)
• Approval of August 2006 Minutes
• Resolution to Close November 2006
Meeting
• Chairman’s Report
• Director’s Report
• Open Committee Reports
Michael P. Crosby,
Executive Officer and NSB Office Director.
[FR Doc. 06–7914 Filed 9–18–06; 12:53 pm]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:40 Sep 19, 2006
Jkt 205001
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection:
Comment Request
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC).
ACTION: Notice of pending NRC action to
submit an information collection
request to OMB and solicitation of
public comment.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The NRC is preparing a
submittal to OMB for review of
continued approval of information
collections under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. Chapter 35).
Information pertaining to the
requirement to be submitted:
1. The title of the information
collection: ‘‘General Licensee
Registration,’’ NRC Form 664.
2. Current OMB approval number:
3150–0198.
3. How often the collection is
required: Annually.
4. Who is required or asked to report:
General Licensees of the NRC who
possess devices subject to registration
under 10 CFR 31.5.
5. The estimated number of annual
respondents: 1,000.
6. The number of hours needed
annually to complete the requirement or
request: 333 hours annually (1,000
respondents × 20 minutes per form).
7. Abstract: NRC Form 664 is used by
NRC general licensees to make reports
regarding certain generally licensed
devices subject to registration. The
registration program allows NRC to
better track general licensees, so that
they can be contacted or inspected as
necessary, and to make sure that
generally licensed devices can be
identified even if lost or damaged, and
to further ensure that general licensees
are aware of and understand the
requirements for the possession of
devices containing byproduct material.
Greater awareness helps to ensure that
general licensees will comply with the
requirements for proper handling and
disposal of generally licensed devices
and would reduce the potential for
incidents that could result in
unnecessary radiation exposure to the
public and contamination of property.
Submit, by November 20, 2006,
comments that address the following
questions:
1. Is the proposed collection of
information necessary for the NRC to
properly perform its functions? Does the
information have practical utility?
2. Is the burden estimate accurate?
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
3. Is there a way to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected?
4. How can the burden of the
information collection be minimized,
including the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology?
A copy of the draft supporting
statement may be viewed free of charge
at the NRC Public Document Room, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Room O–1 F21, Rockville, MD
20852. OMB clearance requests are
available at the NRC worldwide Web
site: https://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/
doc-comment/omb/. The
document will be available on the NRC
home page site for 60 days after the
signature date of this notice.
Comments and questions about the
information collection requirements
may be directed to the NRC Clearance
Officer, Brenda Jo. Shelton, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, T–5 F52,
Washington, DC 20555–0001, by
telephone at 301–415–7233, or by
Internet electronic mail to
INFOCOLLECTS@NRC.GOV.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 14th day
of September 2006.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Brenda Jo. Shelton,
NRC Clearance Officer, Office of Information
Services.
[FR Doc. E6–15577 Filed 9–19–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50–333]
Notice of Acceptance for Docketing of
the Application, Notice of Opportunity
for Hearing and Notice of Intent To
Prepare an Environmental Impact
Statement and Conduct Scoping
Process for Facility Operating License
No. DPR–59 for an Additional 20-Year
Period, Entergy Nuclear Operations,
Inc., James A. Fitzpatrick Nuclear
Power Plant
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC or the Commission)
is considering an application for the
renewal of Operating License No. DPR–
59, which authorizes Entergy Nuclear
Operations, Inc. (Entergy), to operate the
James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power
Plant (JAFNPP) at 2536 megawatts
thermal. The renewed license would
authorize the applicant to operate the
JAFNPP for an additional 20 years
beyond the period specified in the
current license. JAFNPP is located on
Lake Ontario in Oswego County,
E:\FR\FM\20SEN1.SGM
20SEN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 182 / Wednesday, September 20, 2006 / Notices
approximately seven miles northeast of
the City of Oswego, New York. The
current operating license for the
JAFNPP expires on October 17, 2014.
On August 1, 2006, the Commission’s
staff received the application from
Entergy, to renew the Operating License
No. DPR–59 for JAFNPP, pursuant to 10
CFR part 54. A Notice of Receipt and
Availability of the license renewal
application (LRA) was published in the
Federal Register on August 11, 2006 (71
FR 46245).
The Commission’s staff has reviewed
the LRA for its acceptability and has
determined that Entergy has submitted
sufficient information in accordance
with 10 CFR 54.19, 54.21, 54.22, 54.23,
and 51.53(c), and the application is
acceptable for docketing. The current
Docket No. 50–333 for Operating
License No. DPR–59 will be retained.
The docketing of the renewal
application does not preclude
requesting additional information as the
review proceeds, nor does it predict
whether the Commission will grant or
deny the application.
Before issuance of each requested
renewed license, the NRC will have
made the findings required by the
Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended
(the Act), and the Commission’s rules
and regulations. In accordance with 10
CFR 54.29, the NRC may issue a
renewed license on the basis of its
review if it finds that actions have been
identified and have been or will be
taken with respect to: (1) Managing the
effects of aging during the period of
extended operation on the functionality
of structures and components that have
been identified as requiring aging
management review, and (2) timelimited aging analyses that have been
identified as requiring review, such that
there is reasonable assurance that the
activities authorized by the renewed
license will continue to be conducted in
accordance with the current licensing
basis (CLB), and that any changes made
to the plant’s CLB comply with the Act
and the Commission’s regulations. The
Commission also must first find that the
requirements of subpart A of 10 CFR 51
have been satisfied, and that matters
raised under 10 CFR 2.335 have been
addressed.
Within 60 days after the date of
publication of this Federal Register
Notice, the applicant may file a request
for a hearing, and any person whose
interest may be affected by this
proceeding and who wishes to
participate as a party in the proceeding
must file a written request for a hearing
and a petition for leave to intervene
with respect to the renewal of the
license. Requests for a hearing and a
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:40 Sep 19, 2006
Jkt 205001
petition for leave to intervene shall be
filed in accordance with the
Commission’s ‘‘Rules of Practice for
Domestic Licensing Proceedings’’ in 10
CFR part 2.
Interested persons should consult a
current copy of 10 CFR 2.309, which is
available at the Commission’s Public
Document Room (PDR), located at One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852 and is
accessible from the Agencywide
Documents Access and Management
System (ADAMS) Public Electronic
Reading Room on the Internet at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. Persons who do not have
access to ADAMS or who encounter
problems in accessing the documents
located in ADAMS should contact the
NRC’s PDR reference staff by telephone
at 1–800–397–4209, or 301–415–4737,
or by e-mail at pdr@nrc.gov. If a request
for a hearing/petition for leave to
intervene is filed within the 60-day
period, the Commission or a presiding
officer designated by the Commission or
by the Chief Administrative Judge of the
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board
Panel will rule on the request/petition;
and the Secretary or the Chief
Administrative Judge of the Atomic
Safety and Licensing Board will issue a
notice of a hearing or an appropriate
order. In the event that no request for a
hearing/petition for leave to intervene is
filed within the 60-day period, the NRC
may, upon completion of its evaluations
and upon making the findings required
under 10 CFR parts 51 and 54, renew
the license without further notice.
As required by 10 CFR 2.309, a
petition for leave to intervene shall set
forth with particularity the interest of
the petitioner in the proceeding, and
how that interest may be affected by the
results of the proceeding, taking into
consideration the limited scope of
matters that may be considered
pursuant to 10 CFR parts 51 and 54. The
petition must specifically, explain the
reasons why intervention should be
permitted with particular reference to
the following factors: (1) The nature of
the requestor’s/petitioner’s right under
the Act to be made a party to the
proceeding; (2) the nature and extent of
the requestor’s/petitioner’s property,
financial, or other interest in the
proceeding; and (3) the possible effect of
any decision or order which may be
entered in the proceeding on the
requestor’s/petitioner’s interest. The
petition must also set forth the specific
contentions which the petitioner/
requestor seeks to have litigated at the
proceeding.
Each contention must consist of a
specific statement of the issue of law or
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
55033
fact to be raised or controverted. In
addition, the requestor/petitioner shall
provide a brief explanation of the bases
of each contention and a concise
statement of the alleged facts or the
expert opinion that supports the
contention on which the requestor/
petitioner intends to rely in proving the
contention at the hearing. The
requestor/petitioner must also provide
references to those specific sources and
documents of which the requestor/
petitioner is aware and on which the
requestor/petitioner intends to rely to
establish those facts or expert opinion.
The requestor/petitioner must provide
sufficient information to show that a
genuine dispute exists with the
applicant on a material issue of law or
fact.1 Contentions shall be limited to
matters within the scope of the action
under consideration. The contention
must be one that, if proven, would
entitle the requestor/petitioner to relief.
A requestor/petitioner who fails to
satisfy these requirements with respect
to at least one contention will not be
permitted to participate as a party.
The Commission requests that each
contention be given a separate numeric
or alpha designation within one of the
following groups: (1) Technical
(primarily related to safety concerns);
(2) environmental; or (3) miscellaneous.
As specified in 10 CFR 2.309, if two
or more requestors/petitioners seek to
co-sponsor a contention or propose
substantially the same contention, the
requestors/petitioners will be required
to jointly designate a representative who
shall have the authority to act for the
requestors/petitioners with respect to
that contention.
Those permitted to intervene become
parties to the proceeding, subject to any
limitations in the order granting leave to
intervene, and have the opportunity to
participate fully in the conduct of the
hearing. A request for a hearing or a
petition for leave to intervene must be
filed by: (1) First class mail addressed
to the Office of the Secretary of the
Commission, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC, 20555–
0001, Attention: Rulemaking and
Adjudications Staff; (2) courier, express
mail, and expedited delivery services:
Office of the Secretary, Sixteenth Floor,
One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland, 20852,
Attention: Rulemaking and
Adjudications Staff; (3) e-mail
1 To the extent that the application contains
attachments and supporting documents that are not
publicly available because they are asserted to
contain safeguards or proprietary information,
petitions desired access to this information should
contact the applicant or applicant’s counsel to
discuss the need for a protective order.
E:\FR\FM\20SEN1.SGM
20SEN1
55034
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 182 / Wednesday, September 20, 2006 / Notices
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
addressed to the Office of the Secretary,
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
HEARINGDOCKET@NRC.GOV; or (4)
facsimile transmission addressed to the
Office of the Secretary, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC, Attention: Rulemakings and
Adjudications Staff at 301–415–1101,
verification number is 301–415–1966.2
A copy of the request for hearing and
petition for leave to intervene must also
be sent to the Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC, 20555–
0001, and it is requested that copies be
transmitted either by means of facsimile
transmission to 301–415–3725 or by email to OGCMailCenter@nrc.gov. A copy
of the request for hearing and petition
for leave to intervene should also be
sent to the attorney for the applicant,
Mr. Terrence A. Burke, Entergy Nuclear,
1340 Echelon Parkway, Mail Stop—
ECH–62, Jackson, Mississippi 39213.
Non-timely requests and/or petitions
and contentions will not be entertained
absent a determination by the
Commission, the presiding officer, or
the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board
that the petition, request and/or
contentions should be granted based on
a balancing of the factors specified in 10
CFR 2.309(a)(1)(i)–(viii).
In addition, the purpose of this notice
is to inform the public that the NRC will
be preparing an environmental impact
statement (EIS) related to the review of
the LRA and to provide the public an
opportunity to participate in the
environmental scoping process, as
defined in 10 CFR 51.29. In accordance
with 10 CFR 51.95(c), the NRC will
prepare an environmental impact
statement that will be used as a
supplement to the Commission’s
NUREG–1437, ‘‘Generic Environmental
Impact Statement for License Renewal
of Nuclear Power Plants’’ (GEIS), dated
May 1996. Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.26,
and as part of the environmental
scoping process, the NRC staff intends
to hold a public scoping meeting. In
addition, as outlined in 36 CFR 800.8,
‘‘Coordination with the National
Environmental Policy Act,’’ the NRC
plans to coordinate compliance with
section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act in meeting the
requirements of the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA).
2 If the request/petition is filed by e-mail or
facsimile, an original and two copies of the
document must be mailed within 2 (two) business
days thereafter to the Secretary, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555–
0001; Attention: Rulemaking and Adjustication
Staff.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:40 Sep 19, 2006
Jkt 205001
In accordance with 10 CFR 51.53(c)
and 10 CFR 54.23, Entergy prepared and
submitted the Environmental Report
(ER) as part of the LRA. The LRA and
the ER are publicly available at the
NRC’s PDR, located at One White Flint
North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville,
Maryland, 20852, or from the NRC’s
ADAMS. The ADAMS Public Electronic
Reading Room is accessible at https://
adamswebsearch.nrc.gov/dologin.htm.
The ADAMS Accession Numbers for the
LRA and the ER are ML062160494 and
ML062160557, respectively. Persons
who do not have access to ADAMS, or
who encounter problems in accessing
the documents located in ADAMS,
should contact the NRC’s PDR reference
staff by telephone at 1–800–397–4209,
or 301–415–4737, or by e-mail at
pdr@nrc.gov. The LRA and the ER may
also be viewed on the Internet at https://
www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/
licensing/renewal/applications/
fitzpatrick.html. In addition, the LRA
and the ER are available for public
inspection near the JAFNPP at the
following public libraries: Penfield
Library SUNY, 7060 State Route 104,
Oswego, New York 13126; and Oswego
Public Library, 140–142 East Second
Street, Oswego, New York 13126.
Possible alternatives to the proposed
action (license renewal) include no
action and reasonable alternative energy
sources. The NRC is required by 10 CFR
51.95 to prepare a supplement to the
GEIS in connection with the renewal of
an operating license. This notice is
being published in accordance with 10
CFR 51.26.
The NRC staff will first conduct a
scoping process for the supplement to
the GEIS and, as soon as practicable
thereafter, will prepare a draft
supplement to the GEIS for public
comment. Participation in the scoping
process by members of the public and
local, State, Tribal, and Federal
government agencies are encouraged. As
described in 10 CFR 51.29, the scoping
process for the supplement to the GEIS
will be used to accomplish the
following:
a. Define the proposed action which
is to be the subject of the supplement to
the GEIS.
b. Determine the scope of the
supplement to the GEIS and identify the
significant issues to be analyzed in
depth.
c. Identify and eliminate from
detailed study those issues that are
peripheral or that are not significant.
d. Identify any environmental
assessments and other ElSs that are
being or will be prepared that are
related to, but are not part of, the scope
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
of the supplement to the GEIS being
considered.
e. Identify other environmental
review and consultation requirements
related to the proposed action.
f. Indicate the relationship between
the timing of the preparation of the
environmental analyses and the
Commission’s tentative planning and
decision-making schedule.
g. Identify any cooperating agencies
and, as appropriate, allocate
assignments for preparation and
schedules for completing the
supplement to the GEIS to the NRC and
any cooperating agencies.
h. Describe how the supplement to
the GEIS will be prepared, and include
any contractor assistance to be used.
The NRC invites the following entities
to participate in scoping:
a. The applicant, Entergy Nuclear
Operations, Inc.
b. Any Federal agency that has
jurisdiction by law or special expertise
with respect to any environmental
impact involved, or that is authorized to
develop and enforce relevant
environmental standards.
c. Affected State and local
government agencies, including those
authorized to develop and enforce
relevant environmental standards.
d. Any affected Indian tribe.
e. Any person who requests or has
requested an opportunity to participate
in the scoping process.
f. Any person who has petitioned or
intends to petition for leave to
intervene.
In accordance with 10 CFR 51.26, the
scoping process for an EIS may include
a public scoping meeting to help
identify significant issues related to a
proposed activity and to determine the
scope of issues to be addressed in an
EIS. The NRC will hold public meetings
for the JAFNPP license renewal
supplement to the GEIS, at the Town
Municipal Building, 42 Creamery Road,
Oswego, New York 13126, on Thursday,
October 12, 2006. There will be two
identical meetings to accommodate
interested parties. The first meeting will
convene at 1:30 p.m. and will continue
until 4:30 p.m., as necessary. The
second meeting will convene at 7 p.m.
and will continue until 10 p.m., as
necessary. Both meetings will be
transcribed and will include: (1) An
overview by the NRC staff of the NRC’s
license renewal review process; (2) an
overview by the NRC staff of the NEPA
environmental review process, the
proposed scope of the supplement to the
GEIS, and the proposed review
schedule; and (3) the opportunity for
interested government agencies,
organizations, and individuals to submit
E:\FR\FM\20SEN1.SGM
20SEN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 182 / Wednesday, September 20, 2006 / Notices
comments or suggestions on the
environmental issues or the proposed
scope of the supplement to the GEIS.
Additionally, the NRC staff will host
informal discussions one hour prior to
the start of each session at the same
location. No formal comments on the
proposed scope of the supplement to the
GEIS will be accepted during the
informal discussions. To be considered,
comments must be provided either at
the transcribed public meetings or in
writing, as discussed below. For more
information about the proposed action,
the scoping process, and the
environmental impact statement, please
contact the NRC Environmental Project
Manager, Mr. Samuel Hernandez, at
Mail Stop O–11F1, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555, by telephone at 1–800–368–
5642, extension 4049, or by e-mail at
shq@nrc.gov. Persons may register to
attend or present oral comments at the
meetings on the scope of the NEPA
review by contacting Mr. Hernandez.
Members of the public may also register
to speak at the meeting within 15
minutes of the start of each meeting.
Individual oral comments may be
limited by the time available, depending
on the number of persons who register.
Members of the public who have not
registered may also have an opportunity
to speak, if time permits. Public
comments will be considered in the
scoping process for the supplement to
the GEIS. Mr. Hernandez will need to be
contacted no later than September 29,
2006, if special equipment or
accommodations are needed to attend or
present information at the public
meeting, so that the NRC staff can
determine whether the request can be
accommodated.
Members of the public may send
written comments on the environmental
scope of the JAFNPP license renewal
review to: Chief, Rules and Directives
Branch, Division of Administrative
Services, Office of Administration, Mail
Stop T–6D59, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC, 20555–
0001, and should cite the publication
date and page number of this Federal
Register notice. Comments may also be
delivered to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Mail Stop T–6D59, Two
White Flint North, 11545 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland, 20852, from
7:30 a.m. to 4:15 p.m. during Federal
workdays. To be considered in the
scoping process, written comments
should be postmarked by November 14,
2006. Electronic comments may be sent
by e-mail to the NRC at
FitzPatrickEIS@nrc.gov, and should be
sent no later than November 14, 2006,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:40 Sep 19, 2006
Jkt 205001
to be considered in the scoping process.
Comments will be available
electronically and accessible through
ADAMS.
Participation in the scoping process
for the supplement to the GEIS does not
entitle participants to become parties to
the proceeding to which the supplement
to the GEIS relates. Matters related to
participation in any hearing are outside
the scope of matters to be discussed at
this public meeting.
At the conclusion of the scoping
process, the NRC will prepare a concise
summary of the determination and
conclusions reached, including the
significant issues identified, and will
send a copy of the summary to each
participant in the scoping process. The
summary will also be available for
viewing in ADAMS. The staff will then
prepare and issue for comment the draft
supplement to the GEIS, which will be
the subject of separate notices and
separate public meetings. Copies will be
available for public viewing at the
above-mentioned addresses, and one
copy per request will be provided free
of charge, to the extent of supply. After
receipt and consideration of the
comments, the NRC will prepare a final
supplement to the GEIS, which will also
be available for public viewing.
Information about the proposed
action, the supplement to the GEIS, and
the scoping process may be obtained
from Mr. Hernandez at the
aforementioned telephone number or
e-mail address.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 14th day
of September 2006.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Eric J. Benner,
Acting Director, Division of License Renewal,
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 06–7974 Filed 9–19–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 50–275 And 50–323]
Pacific Gas and Electric Company;
Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Unit Nos.
1 and 2 Environmental Assessment
and Finding of No Significant Impact
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is considering
issuance of an amendment to Title 10 of
the Code of Federal Regulations (10
CFR), Section 50.90 for Facility
Operating Licenses, Nos. DPR–80 and
DPR–82, issued to Pacific Gas and
Electric Company (PG&E, the licensee)
for operation of the Diablo Canyon
Power Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 (DCPP
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
55035
or facility), located in San Luis Obispo
County, California. Therefore, as
required by 10 CFR 51.21, the NRC is
issuing this environmental assessment
and finding of no significant impact.
Environmental Assessment
Identification of the Proposed Action
The proposed action would delete the
antitrust license conditions from the
licenses.
The proposed action is in accordance
with the licensee’s application dated
January 19, 2006, as supplemented by
letter dated June 20, 2006.
The Need for the Proposed Action
Circumstances have changed
significantly from those that existed
when the antitrust license conditions
were first imposed 28 years ago. In
particular, there have been recent
developments in the law at both the
Federal and State levels to ensure
competition in the industry in
California and elsewhere. Moreover,
agreements binding PG&E related to the
Stanislaus Commitments will continue
to be in effect whether or not the
antitrust conditions actually remain a
part of the DCPP licenses, and
competitors have voiced no opposition
to the removal of the conditions.
Finally, under the limited statutory
authority granted to the NRC under
Section 105 of the Atomic Energy Act of
1954, it appears that the NRC lacks the
authority now to continue to impose the
antitrust conditions against PG&E
through the DCPP licenses. Accordingly,
in consideration of all of the foregoing,
the licensee has requested to remove the
antitrust conditions from the licenses as
the conditions are no longer necessary
to serve the original intended purpose.
Environmental Impacts of the Proposed
Action
The NRC has completed its safety
evaluation of the proposed action and
concludes that the proposed license
amendment involves administrative
actions which have no effect on plant
equipment or operation.
The details of the staff’s safety
evaluation will be provided in the
license amendment that will be issued
as part of the letter to the licensee
approving the license amendment.
The proposed action will not
significantly increase the probability or
consequences of accidents. No changes
are being made in the types of effluents
that may be released off site. There is no
significant increase in the amount of
any effluent released off site. There is no
significant increase in occupational or
public radiation exposure. Therefore,
E:\FR\FM\20SEN1.SGM
20SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 182 (Wednesday, September 20, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55032-55035]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7974]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50-333]
Notice of Acceptance for Docketing of the Application, Notice of
Opportunity for Hearing and Notice of Intent To Prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement and Conduct Scoping Process for Facility
Operating License No. DPR-59 for an Additional 20-Year Period, Entergy
Nuclear Operations, Inc., James A. Fitzpatrick Nuclear Power Plant
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the Commission) is
considering an application for the renewal of Operating License No.
DPR-59, which authorizes Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Entergy), to
operate the James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant (JAFNPP) at 2536
megawatts thermal. The renewed license would authorize the applicant to
operate the JAFNPP for an additional 20 years beyond the period
specified in the current license. JAFNPP is located on Lake Ontario in
Oswego County,
[[Page 55033]]
approximately seven miles northeast of the City of Oswego, New York.
The current operating license for the JAFNPP expires on October 17,
2014.
On August 1, 2006, the Commission's staff received the application
from Entergy, to renew the Operating License No. DPR-59 for JAFNPP,
pursuant to 10 CFR part 54. A Notice of Receipt and Availability of the
license renewal application (LRA) was published in the Federal Register
on August 11, 2006 (71 FR 46245).
The Commission's staff has reviewed the LRA for its acceptability
and has determined that Entergy has submitted sufficient information in
accordance with 10 CFR 54.19, 54.21, 54.22, 54.23, and 51.53(c), and
the application is acceptable for docketing. The current Docket No. 50-
333 for Operating License No. DPR-59 will be retained. The docketing of
the renewal application does not preclude requesting additional
information as the review proceeds, nor does it predict whether the
Commission will grant or deny the application.
Before issuance of each requested renewed license, the NRC will
have made the findings required by the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as
amended (the Act), and the Commission's rules and regulations. In
accordance with 10 CFR 54.29, the NRC may issue a renewed license on
the basis of its review if it finds that actions have been identified
and have been or will be taken with respect to: (1) Managing the
effects of aging during the period of extended operation on the
functionality of structures and components that have been identified as
requiring aging management review, and (2) time-limited aging analyses
that have been identified as requiring review, such that there is
reasonable assurance that the activities authorized by the renewed
license will continue to be conducted in accordance with the current
licensing basis (CLB), and that any changes made to the plant's CLB
comply with the Act and the Commission's regulations. The Commission
also must first find that the requirements of subpart A of 10 CFR 51
have been satisfied, and that matters raised under 10 CFR 2.335 have
been addressed.
Within 60 days after the date of publication of this Federal
Register Notice, the applicant may file a request for a hearing, and
any person whose interest may be affected by this proceeding and who
wishes to participate as a party in the proceeding must file a written
request for a hearing and a petition for leave to intervene with
respect to the renewal of the license. Requests for a hearing and a
petition for leave to intervene shall be filed in accordance with the
Commission's ``Rules of Practice for Domestic Licensing Proceedings''
in 10 CFR part 2.
Interested persons should consult a current copy of 10 CFR 2.309,
which is available at the Commission's Public Document Room (PDR),
located at One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville,
Maryland 20852 and is accessible from the Agencywide Documents Access
and Management System (ADAMS) Public Electronic Reading Room on the
Internet at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. Persons who do
not have access to ADAMS or who encounter problems in accessing the
documents located in ADAMS should contact the NRC's PDR reference staff
by telephone at 1-800-397-4209, or 301-415-4737, or by e-mail at
pdr@nrc.gov. If a request for a hearing/petition for leave to intervene
is filed within the 60-day period, the Commission or a presiding
officer designated by the Commission or by the Chief Administrative
Judge of the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel will rule on the
request/petition; and the Secretary or the Chief Administrative Judge
of the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board will issue a notice of a
hearing or an appropriate order. In the event that no request for a
hearing/petition for leave to intervene is filed within the 60-day
period, the NRC may, upon completion of its evaluations and upon making
the findings required under 10 CFR parts 51 and 54, renew the license
without further notice.
As required by 10 CFR 2.309, a petition for leave to intervene
shall set forth with particularity the interest of the petitioner in
the proceeding, and how that interest may be affected by the results of
the proceeding, taking into consideration the limited scope of matters
that may be considered pursuant to 10 CFR parts 51 and 54. The petition
must specifically, explain the reasons why intervention should be
permitted with particular reference to the following factors: (1) The
nature of the requestor's/petitioner's right under the Act to be made a
party to the proceeding; (2) the nature and extent of the requestor's/
petitioner's property, financial, or other interest in the proceeding;
and (3) the possible effect of any decision or order which may be
entered in the proceeding on the requestor's/petitioner's interest. The
petition must also set forth the specific contentions which the
petitioner/requestor seeks to have litigated at the proceeding.
Each contention must consist of a specific statement of the issue
of law or fact to be raised or controverted. In addition, the
requestor/petitioner shall provide a brief explanation of the bases of
each contention and a concise statement of the alleged facts or the
expert opinion that supports the contention on which the requestor/
petitioner intends to rely in proving the contention at the hearing.
The requestor/petitioner must also provide references to those specific
sources and documents of which the requestor/petitioner is aware and on
which the requestor/petitioner intends to rely to establish those facts
or expert opinion. The requestor/petitioner must provide sufficient
information to show that a genuine dispute exists with the applicant on
a material issue of law or fact.\1\ Contentions shall be limited to
matters within the scope of the action under consideration. The
contention must be one that, if proven, would entitle the requestor/
petitioner to relief. A requestor/petitioner who fails to satisfy these
requirements with respect to at least one contention will not be
permitted to participate as a party.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ To the extent that the application contains attachments and
supporting documents that are not publicly available because they
are asserted to contain safeguards or proprietary information,
petitions desired access to this information should contact the
applicant or applicant's counsel to discuss the need for a
protective order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission requests that each contention be given a separate
numeric or alpha designation within one of the following groups: (1)
Technical (primarily related to safety concerns); (2) environmental; or
(3) miscellaneous.
As specified in 10 CFR 2.309, if two or more requestors/petitioners
seek to co-sponsor a contention or propose substantially the same
contention, the requestors/petitioners will be required to jointly
designate a representative who shall have the authority to act for the
requestors/petitioners with respect to that contention.
Those permitted to intervene become parties to the proceeding,
subject to any limitations in the order granting leave to intervene,
and have the opportunity to participate fully in the conduct of the
hearing. A request for a hearing or a petition for leave to intervene
must be filed by: (1) First class mail addressed to the Office of the
Secretary of the Commission, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC, 20555-0001, Attention: Rulemaking and Adjudications
Staff; (2) courier, express mail, and expedited delivery services:
Office of the Secretary, Sixteenth Floor, One White Flint North, 11555
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland, 20852, Attention: Rulemaking and
Adjudications Staff; (3) e-mail
[[Page 55034]]
addressed to the Office of the Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, HEARINGDOCKET@NRC.GOV; or (4) facsimile transmission
addressed to the Office of the Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC, Attention: Rulemakings and Adjudications
Staff at 301-415-1101, verification number is 301-415-1966.\2\ A copy
of the request for hearing and petition for leave to intervene must
also be sent to the Office of the General Counsel, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, 20555-0001, and it is requested
that copies be transmitted either by means of facsimile transmission to
301-415-3725 or by e-mail to OGCMailCenter@nrc.gov. A copy of the
request for hearing and petition for leave to intervene should also be
sent to the attorney for the applicant, Mr. Terrence A. Burke, Entergy
Nuclear, 1340 Echelon Parkway, Mail Stop--ECH-62, Jackson, Mississippi
39213.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ If the request/petition is filed by e-mail or facsimile, an
original and two copies of the document must be mailed within 2
(two) business days thereafter to the Secretary, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; Attention:
Rulemaking and Adjustication Staff.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Non-timely requests and/or petitions and contentions will not be
entertained absent a determination by the Commission, the presiding
officer, or the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board that the petition,
request and/or contentions should be granted based on a balancing of
the factors specified in 10 CFR 2.309(a)(1)(i)-(viii).
In addition, the purpose of this notice is to inform the public
that the NRC will be preparing an environmental impact statement (EIS)
related to the review of the LRA and to provide the public an
opportunity to participate in the environmental scoping process, as
defined in 10 CFR 51.29. In accordance with 10 CFR 51.95(c), the NRC
will prepare an environmental impact statement that will be used as a
supplement to the Commission's NUREG-1437, ``Generic Environmental
Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Power Plants'' (GEIS),
dated May 1996. Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.26, and as part of the
environmental scoping process, the NRC staff intends to hold a public
scoping meeting. In addition, as outlined in 36 CFR 800.8,
``Coordination with the National Environmental Policy Act,'' the NRC
plans to coordinate compliance with section 106 of the National
Historic Preservation Act in meeting the requirements of the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA).
In accordance with 10 CFR 51.53(c) and 10 CFR 54.23, Entergy
prepared and submitted the Environmental Report (ER) as part of the
LRA. The LRA and the ER are publicly available at the NRC's PDR,
located at One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville,
Maryland, 20852, or from the NRC's ADAMS. The ADAMS Public Electronic
Reading Room is accessible at https://adamswebsearch.nrc.gov/
dologin.htm. The ADAMS Accession Numbers for the LRA and the ER are
ML062160494 and ML062160557, respectively. Persons who do not have
access to ADAMS, or who encounter problems in accessing the documents
located in ADAMS, should contact the NRC's PDR reference staff by
telephone at 1-800-397-4209, or 301-415-4737, or by e-mail at
pdr@nrc.gov. The LRA and the ER may also be viewed on the Internet at
https://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal/applications/
fitzpatrick.html. In addition, the LRA and the ER are available for
public inspection near the JAFNPP at the following public libraries:
Penfield Library SUNY, 7060 State Route 104, Oswego, New York 13126;
and Oswego Public Library, 140-142 East Second Street, Oswego, New York
13126.
Possible alternatives to the proposed action (license renewal)
include no action and reasonable alternative energy sources. The NRC is
required by 10 CFR 51.95 to prepare a supplement to the GEIS in
connection with the renewal of an operating license. This notice is
being published in accordance with 10 CFR 51.26.
The NRC staff will first conduct a scoping process for the
supplement to the GEIS and, as soon as practicable thereafter, will
prepare a draft supplement to the GEIS for public comment.
Participation in the scoping process by members of the public and
local, State, Tribal, and Federal government agencies are encouraged.
As described in 10 CFR 51.29, the scoping process for the supplement to
the GEIS will be used to accomplish the following:
a. Define the proposed action which is to be the subject of the
supplement to the GEIS.
b. Determine the scope of the supplement to the GEIS and identify
the significant issues to be analyzed in depth.
c. Identify and eliminate from detailed study those issues that are
peripheral or that are not significant.
d. Identify any environmental assessments and other ElSs that are
being or will be prepared that are related to, but are not part of, the
scope of the supplement to the GEIS being considered.
e. Identify other environmental review and consultation
requirements related to the proposed action.
f. Indicate the relationship between the timing of the preparation
of the environmental analyses and the Commission's tentative planning
and decision-making schedule.
g. Identify any cooperating agencies and, as appropriate, allocate
assignments for preparation and schedules for completing the supplement
to the GEIS to the NRC and any cooperating agencies.
h. Describe how the supplement to the GEIS will be prepared, and
include any contractor assistance to be used.
The NRC invites the following entities to participate in scoping:
a. The applicant, Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.
b. Any Federal agency that has jurisdiction by law or special
expertise with respect to any environmental impact involved, or that is
authorized to develop and enforce relevant environmental standards.
c. Affected State and local government agencies, including those
authorized to develop and enforce relevant environmental standards.
d. Any affected Indian tribe.
e. Any person who requests or has requested an opportunity to
participate in the scoping process.
f. Any person who has petitioned or intends to petition for leave
to intervene.
In accordance with 10 CFR 51.26, the scoping process for an EIS may
include a public scoping meeting to help identify significant issues
related to a proposed activity and to determine the scope of issues to
be addressed in an EIS. The NRC will hold public meetings for the
JAFNPP license renewal supplement to the GEIS, at the Town Municipal
Building, 42 Creamery Road, Oswego, New York 13126, on Thursday,
October 12, 2006. There will be two identical meetings to accommodate
interested parties. The first meeting will convene at 1:30 p.m. and
will continue until 4:30 p.m., as necessary. The second meeting will
convene at 7 p.m. and will continue until 10 p.m., as necessary. Both
meetings will be transcribed and will include: (1) An overview by the
NRC staff of the NRC's license renewal review process; (2) an overview
by the NRC staff of the NEPA environmental review process, the proposed
scope of the supplement to the GEIS, and the proposed review schedule;
and (3) the opportunity for interested government agencies,
organizations, and individuals to submit
[[Page 55035]]
comments or suggestions on the environmental issues or the proposed
scope of the supplement to the GEIS. Additionally, the NRC staff will
host informal discussions one hour prior to the start of each session
at the same location. No formal comments on the proposed scope of the
supplement to the GEIS will be accepted during the informal
discussions. To be considered, comments must be provided either at the
transcribed public meetings or in writing, as discussed below. For more
information about the proposed action, the scoping process, and the
environmental impact statement, please contact the NRC Environmental
Project Manager, Mr. Samuel Hernandez, at Mail Stop O-11F1, U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555, by telephone at 1-
800-368-5642, extension 4049, or by e-mail at shq@nrc.gov. Persons may
register to attend or present oral comments at the meetings on the
scope of the NEPA review by contacting Mr. Hernandez. Members of the
public may also register to speak at the meeting within 15 minutes of
the start of each meeting. Individual oral comments may be limited by
the time available, depending on the number of persons who register.
Members of the public who have not registered may also have an
opportunity to speak, if time permits. Public comments will be
considered in the scoping process for the supplement to the GEIS. Mr.
Hernandez will need to be contacted no later than September 29, 2006,
if special equipment or accommodations are needed to attend or present
information at the public meeting, so that the NRC staff can determine
whether the request can be accommodated.
Members of the public may send written comments on the
environmental scope of the JAFNPP license renewal review to: Chief,
Rules and Directives Branch, Division of Administrative Services,
Office of Administration, Mail Stop T-6D59, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC, 20555-0001, and should cite the publication
date and page number of this Federal Register notice. Comments may also
be delivered to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Mail Stop T-
6D59, Two White Flint North, 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland,
20852, from 7:30 a.m. to 4:15 p.m. during Federal workdays. To be
considered in the scoping process, written comments should be
postmarked by November 14, 2006. Electronic comments may be sent by e-
mail to the NRC at FitzPatrickEIS@nrc.gov, and should be sent no later
than November 14, 2006, to be considered in the scoping process.
Comments will be available electronically and accessible through ADAMS.
Participation in the scoping process for the supplement to the GEIS
does not entitle participants to become parties to the proceeding to
which the supplement to the GEIS relates. Matters related to
participation in any hearing are outside the scope of matters to be
discussed at this public meeting.
At the conclusion of the scoping process, the NRC will prepare a
concise summary of the determination and conclusions reached, including
the significant issues identified, and will send a copy of the summary
to each participant in the scoping process. The summary will also be
available for viewing in ADAMS. The staff will then prepare and issue
for comment the draft supplement to the GEIS, which will be the subject
of separate notices and separate public meetings. Copies will be
available for public viewing at the above-mentioned addresses, and one
copy per request will be provided free of charge, to the extent of
supply. After receipt and consideration of the comments, the NRC will
prepare a final supplement to the GEIS, which will also be available
for public viewing.
Information about the proposed action, the supplement to the GEIS,
and the scoping process may be obtained from Mr. Hernandez at the
aforementioned telephone number or e-mail address.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 14th day of September 2006.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Eric J. Benner,
Acting Director, Division of License Renewal, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation.
[FR Doc. 06-7974 Filed 9-19-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P