Airworthiness Directives; Gippsland Aeronautics Pty. Ltd. Model GA8 Airplanes, 54901-54902 [06-7928]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 182 / Wednesday, September 20, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
2142, 2183, 2203, 2208, 2209, 2243, 2244,
2252, 2278a–9, 2278b–6, 2279a–2279f–1,
2279aa–5(e)); secs. 411 and 412 of Pub. L.
100–233, 101 Stat. 1568, 1638; secs. 409 and
414 of Pub. L. 100–399, 102 Stat. 989, 1003,
and 1004.
Subpart G—Mergers, Consolidations,
and Charter Amendments of
Associations
§ 611.1124
[Amended]
11. Amend § 611.1124 by removing
the reference, ‘‘§ 611.1090 of this part’’
and adding in its place, ‘‘section 5.17(a)
of the Act’’ in paragraph (n).
I
Dated: September 14, 2006.
Roland Smith,
Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board.
[FR Doc. 06–7951 Filed 9–19–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6705–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2006–24955; Directorate
Identifier 2006–CE–31–AD; Amendment 39–
14768; AD 2006–19–11]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Gippsland
Aeronautics Pty. Ltd. Model GA8
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results
from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
issued by an airworthiness authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. We are issuing this AD to
require actions to correct the unsafe
condition on these products.
DATES: This AD becomes effective
October 25, 2006.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of certain publications listed in this AD
as of October 25, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD
docket on the Internet at https://
dms.dot.gov or in person at the Docket
Management Facility, U.S. Department
of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street,
SW., Nassif Building, Room PL–401,
Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Doug Rudolph, Aerospace Engineer,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:46 Sep 19, 2006
Jkt 208001
FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901
Locust, Room 301, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 329–
4059; facsimile: (816) 329–4090.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would
apply to the specified products. That
NPRM was published in the Federal
Register on June 19, 2006 (71 FR 35223).
That NPRM proposed to require
relocating the seat stop of the pilot and
second occupant seat.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD. We
have considered the comments received.
Jack Buster with the Modification and
Replacement Parts Association
(MARPA) provides comments on the
MCAI AD process pertaining to how the
FAA addresses publishing manufacturer
service information as part of a
proposed AD action. The commenter
states that the proposed rule attempts to
require compliance with a public law by
reference to a private writing (as
referenced in paragraph (e) of the
proposed AD). The commenter would
like the FAA to incorporate by reference
(IBR) the Gippsland service bulletin.
We agree with Mr. Buster. However,
we do not IBR any document in a
proposed AD action, instead we IBR the
document in the final rule. Since we are
issuing the proposal as a final rule AD
action, Gippsland Aeronautics
Mandatory Service Bulletin SB–GA8–
2005–29, Issue 2, dated February 14,
2006, is incorporated by reference.
Mr. Buster requests IBR documents be
made available to the public by
publication in the Federal Register or in
the Docket Management System (DMS).
We are currently reviewing issues
surrounding the posting of service
bulletins in the Department of
Transportation’s DMS as part of the AD
docket. Once we have thoroughly
examined all aspects of this issue and
have made a final determination, we
will consider whether our current
practice needs to be revised.
Mr. Buster comments on the
vagueness of paragraph (g)(2) of the
proposed AD and states that the
requirements may be unenforceable in a
court of law.
We partially agree with Mr. Buster.
We are considering clarifying the text of
paragraph (g)(2) in future ADs to more
clearly remind operators they are
required to assure a product is
airworthy before it is returned to
service. However, we consider the
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
54901
existing text to be legally enforceable
since it requires performing FAAapproved corrective actions before
returning the product to an airworthy
condition. No change is required to this
final rule in that regard.
Conclusion
We reviewed the available data,
including the comments received, and
determined that air safety and the
public interest require adopting the AD
as proposed.
Differences Between This AD and the
MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and
related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But
we might have found it necessary to use
different words from those in the MCAI
to ensure the AD is clear for U.S.
operators and is enforceable in a U.S.
court of law. In making these changes,
we do not intend to differ substantively
from the information provided in the
MCAI and related service information.
We might also have required different
actions in this AD from those in the
MCAI in order to follow our FAA
policies. Any such differences are
described in a separate paragraph of the
AD. These requirements, if any, take
precedence over the actions copied from
the MCAI.
Costs of Compliance
Based on the service information, we
estimate that this AD will affect about
22 products of U.S. registry. We also
estimate that it will take about 2 workhours per product to do the action and
that the average labor rate is $80 per
work-hour. Required parts will cost
about $20 per product. Where the
service information lists required parts
costs that are covered under warranty,
we have assumed that there will be no
charge for these costs. As we do not
control warranty coverage for affected
parties, some parties may incur costs
higher than estimated here. Based on
these figures, we estimate the cost of
this AD on U.S. operators to be $7,920,
or $360 per product ($180 per seat
assembly).
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
E:\FR\FM\20SER1.SGM
20SER1
54902
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 182 / Wednesday, September 20, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not
have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132. This AD will
not have a substantial direct effect on
the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
(3) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this AD and placed it in the AD Docket.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://dms.dot.gov; or in
person at the Docket Management
Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains the
NPRM, the regulatory evaluation, any
comments received, and other
information. The street address for the
Docket Office (telephone (800) 647–
5227) is in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD
docket shortly after receipt.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
I
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
I
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:46 Sep 19, 2006
Jkt 208001
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new AD:
I
2006–19–11 Gippsland Aeronautics Pty.
Ltd.: Amendment 39–14768 Docket No.
FAA–2006–24955; Directorate Identifier
2006–CE–31–AD.
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD)
becomes effective October 25, 2006.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Model GA8
airplanes, all serial numbers through GA8–
05–088, that are certificated in any U.S.
category.
Reason
(d) The mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by
the airworthiness authority for Australia
states that the aircraft manufacturer has
determined that the current location of the
pilot and second occupant seat stops is such
that, at either seat’s most forward position,
aft movement of the control column can be
restricted by the seat structure. If not
corrected, this condition could lead to
reduced controllability of the airplane in
certain conditions. The MCAI requires
relocating the seat stop to eliminate this
condition.
Actions and Compliance
(e) Unless already done, do the following
except as stated in paragraph (f) below:
(1) At the next regularly scheduled
maintenance inspection (e.g. 100 hour or
annual) that occurs 30 days or more after
October 25, 2006 (the effective date of this
AD), modify the pilot and second occupant
seat track rails to add a new stop location.
(2) Do the modification following
Gippsland Aeronautics Mandatory Service
Bulletin SB–GA8–2005–29, Issue 2, dated
February 14, 2006.
FAA AD Differences
(f) None.
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Related Information
(h) This AD is related to MCAI Australian
AD No. AD/GA8/4, effective April 13, 2006,
which references Gippsland Aeronautics
Mandatory Service Bulletin SB–GA8–2005–
29, Issue 2, dated February 14, 2006.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(i) You must use Gippsland Aeronautics
Mandatory Service Bulletin SB–GA8–2005–
29, Issue 2, dated February 14, 2006, to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the
AD specifies otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference of
this service information under 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Gippsland Aeronautics, PO
Box 881, Morwell, Victoria 3840, Australia;
telephone: + 61 (0) 3 5172 1200; facsimile: +
61 (0) 3 5172 1201; e-mail:
support@gippsaero.com.
(3) You may review copies at the FAA,
Central Region, Office of the Regional
Counsel, 901 Locust, Room 506, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106; or at the National Archives
and Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, or go
to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/
cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on
September 12, 2006.
Sandra J. Campbell,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 06–7928 Filed 9–19–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
15 CFR Part 700
[Docket No. 060831232–6232–01]
RIN 0694–AD90
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to
this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, Standards Staff,
FAA, Attn: Doug Rudolph, Aerospace
Engineer, FAA, Small Airplane Directorate,
901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri
64106; telephone: (816) 329–4059; facsimile:
(816) 329–4090, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) Return to Airworthiness: When
complying with this AD, perform FAAapproved corrective actions before returning
the product to an airworthy condition.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any
reporting requirement in this AD, under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act,
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
PO 00000
has approved the information collection
requirements and has assigned OMB Control
Number 2120–0056.
Sfmt 4700
Defense Priorities and Allocations
System (DPAS): Assistance Programs
With Canada and Other Nations
Bureau of Industry and
Security, U.S. Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Bureau of Industry and
Security (BIS) is amending the Defense
Priorities and Allocations System
(DPAS) Regulation (15 CFR part 700) to
provide additional guidance on how
persons in Canada and other foreign
nations may apply for priority rating
authority and special priorities
assistance to obtain items in the United
States, and to provide information on
E:\FR\FM\20SER1.SGM
20SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 182 (Wednesday, September 20, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 54901-54902]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7928]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2006-24955; Directorate Identifier 2006-CE-31-AD;
Amendment 39-14768; AD 2006-19-11]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Gippsland Aeronautics Pty. Ltd. Model
GA8 Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by an airworthiness authority
of another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an
aviation product. We are issuing this AD to require actions to correct
the unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: This AD becomes effective October 25, 2006.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of October 25,
2006.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://
dms.dot.gov or in person at the Docket Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building,
Room PL-401, Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doug Rudolph, Aerospace Engineer, FAA,
Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri
64106; telephone: (816) 329-4059; facsimile: (816) 329-4090.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products.
That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on June 19, 2006 (71 FR
35223). That NPRM proposed to require relocating the seat stop of the
pilot and second occupant seat.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We have considered the comments received.
Jack Buster with the Modification and Replacement Parts Association
(MARPA) provides comments on the MCAI AD process pertaining to how the
FAA addresses publishing manufacturer service information as part of a
proposed AD action. The commenter states that the proposed rule
attempts to require compliance with a public law by reference to a
private writing (as referenced in paragraph (e) of the proposed AD).
The commenter would like the FAA to incorporate by reference (IBR) the
Gippsland service bulletin.
We agree with Mr. Buster. However, we do not IBR any document in a
proposed AD action, instead we IBR the document in the final rule.
Since we are issuing the proposal as a final rule AD action, Gippsland
Aeronautics Mandatory Service Bulletin SB-GA8-2005-29, Issue 2, dated
February 14, 2006, is incorporated by reference.
Mr. Buster requests IBR documents be made available to the public
by publication in the Federal Register or in the Docket Management
System (DMS).
We are currently reviewing issues surrounding the posting of
service bulletins in the Department of Transportation's DMS as part of
the AD docket. Once we have thoroughly examined all aspects of this
issue and have made a final determination, we will consider whether our
current practice needs to be revised.
Mr. Buster comments on the vagueness of paragraph (g)(2) of the
proposed AD and states that the requirements may be unenforceable in a
court of law.
We partially agree with Mr. Buster. We are considering clarifying
the text of paragraph (g)(2) in future ADs to more clearly remind
operators they are required to assure a product is airworthy before it
is returned to service. However, we consider the existing text to be
legally enforceable since it requires performing FAA-approved
corrective actions before returning the product to an airworthy
condition. No change is required to this final rule in that regard.
Conclusion
We reviewed the available data, including the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
the AD as proposed.
Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable in a U.S. court of
law. In making these changes, we do not intend to differ substantively
from the information provided in the MCAI and related service
information.
We might also have required different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow our FAA policies. Any such differences
are described in a separate paragraph of the AD. These requirements, if
any, take precedence over the actions copied from the MCAI.
Costs of Compliance
Based on the service information, we estimate that this AD will
affect about 22 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that it
will take about 2 work-hours per product to do the action and that the
average labor rate is $80 per work-hour. Required parts will cost about
$20 per product. Where the service information lists required parts
costs that are covered under warranty, we have assumed that there will
be no charge for these costs. As we do not control warranty coverage
for affected parties, some parties may incur costs higher than
estimated here. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this AD
on U.S. operators to be $7,920, or $360 per product ($180 per seat
assembly).
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
[[Page 54902]]
General requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA
with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by
prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the
Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This
regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses
an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products
identified in this rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866;
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
(3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD Docket.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://
dms.dot.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains the NPRM, the regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The street address for the Docket
Office (telephone (800) 647-5227) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments
will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
2006-19-11 Gippsland Aeronautics Pty. Ltd.: Amendment 39-14768
Docket No. FAA-2006-24955; Directorate Identifier 2006-CE-31-AD.
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective October
25, 2006.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Model GA8 airplanes, all serial numbers
through GA8-05-088, that are certificated in any U.S. category.
Reason
(d) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
issued by the airworthiness authority for Australia states that the
aircraft manufacturer has determined that the current location of
the pilot and second occupant seat stops is such that, at either
seat's most forward position, aft movement of the control column can
be restricted by the seat structure. If not corrected, this
condition could lead to reduced controllability of the airplane in
certain conditions. The MCAI requires relocating the seat stop to
eliminate this condition.
Actions and Compliance
(e) Unless already done, do the following except as stated in
paragraph (f) below:
(1) At the next regularly scheduled maintenance inspection (e.g.
100 hour or annual) that occurs 30 days or more after October 25,
2006 (the effective date of this AD), modify the pilot and second
occupant seat track rails to add a new stop location.
(2) Do the modification following Gippsland Aeronautics
Mandatory Service Bulletin SB-GA8-2005-29, Issue 2, dated February
14, 2006.
FAA AD Differences
(f) None.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Standards Staff, FAA, Attn: Doug Rudolph, Aerospace Engineer, FAA,
Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 329-4059; facsimile: (816) 329-
4090, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) Return to Airworthiness: When complying with this AD,
perform FAA-approved corrective actions before returning the product
to an airworthy condition.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the information
collection requirements and has assigned OMB Control Number 2120-
0056.
Related Information
(h) This AD is related to MCAI Australian AD No. AD/GA8/4,
effective April 13, 2006, which references Gippsland Aeronautics
Mandatory Service Bulletin SB-GA8-2005-29, Issue 2, dated February
14, 2006.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(i) You must use Gippsland Aeronautics Mandatory Service
Bulletin SB-GA8-2005-29, Issue 2, dated February 14, 2006, to do the
actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Gippsland Aeronautics, PO Box 881, Morwell, Victoria 3840,
Australia; telephone: + 61 (0) 3 5172 1200; facsimile: + 61 (0) 3
5172 1201; e-mail: support@gippsaero.com.
(3) You may review copies at the FAA, Central Region, Office of
the Regional Counsel, 901 Locust, Room 506, Kansas City, Missouri
64106; or at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-
register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on September 12, 2006.
Sandra J. Campbell,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 06-7928 Filed 9-19-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P