Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent Extension; CYDECTIN, 54993-54994 [06-7800]
Download as PDF
54993
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 182 / Wednesday, September 20, 2006 / Notices
up survey will be low-income parents
and their children from the Rhode
Island site currently participating in the
HtE Project. As described in the prior
OMB submission, these parents are
Medicaid recipients between the ages of
18 and 45 receiving Medicaid through
the managed care provider United
Behavioral Health (UBH) in Rhode
Island who meet study criteria with
regard to their risk for depression.
Children are the biological, adopted,
and stepchildren of these parents,
between 1 and 18 years of age.
The annual burden estimates are
detailed below, and the substantive
content of each component will be
detailed in the supporting statement
attached to the forthcoming 30-day
notice.
ANNUAL BURDEN ESTIMATES
RI 15-month, parent physiological component ...............
RI 15-month, young child physiological component .......
RI 15-month, youth physiological component .................
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 534.65.
In compliance with the requirements
of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
Administration for Children and
Families is soliciting public comment
on the specific aspects of the
information collection described above.
Copies of the proposed collection of
information can be obtained and
comments may be forwarded by writing
to the Administration for Children and
Families, Office of Administration,
Office of Information Services, 370
L’Enfant Promenade, SW., Washington,
DC 20447, Attn: ACF Reports Clearance
Officer. E-mail address:
infocollection@acf.hhs.gov. All requests
should be identified by the title of the
information collection.
The Department specifically requests
comments on: (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Consideration will be given to
comments and suggestions submitted
within 60 days of this publication.
Dated: September 13, 2006.
Robert Sargis,
Reports Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 06–7763 Filed 9–19–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184–01–M
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:40 Sep 19, 2006
Jkt 205001
Number of
responses per
respondent
Number of
respondents
Instrument
400
160
242
Average burden
hours per response
8
8
8
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Children and
Families
Office of Family Assistance; SingleSource Program Expansion
Supplement
Total burden
hours
5 minutes or .08 hrs ..........
5 minutes or .08 hrs ..........
5 minutes or .08 hrs ..........
266.66
106.66
161.33
Dated: September 1, 2006.
Sidonie Squier,
Director, Office of Family Assistance.
[FR Doc. E6–15559 Filed 9–19–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Office of Family Assistance,
Administration for Children and
Families, HHS.
Food and Drug Administration
CFDA#: 93.575.
Determination of Regulatory Review
Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; CYDECTIN
AGENCY:
Legislative Authority: Child Care and
Development Block Grant Act of 1990, as
amended.
Amount of Award: $101,774.00 for
one year.
Project Period: 09/30/2006–09/29/
2007.
Justification for the Exception to
Competition: Oregon State University
(the grantee) is currently conducting
data analyses with funding from a
research grant awarded in FY 2004 to
validate methodologies used to conduct
State market rate surveys on the price
for child care and early education
programs at the State and local levels.
The supplemental funds will allow the
grantee to include additional datasets in
the ongoing analyses representing
sampling methodologies that include a
more diverse care provider sample, a
broader geographical coverage, and
several additional data collection
methods, and will in turn make the
findings from the project more
generalizable to States, Tribes and
Territories implementing the Child Care
and Development Fund program.
CONTACT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION:
Ivelisse Martinez-Beck, Research
Coordinator, Child Care Bureau, Portals
Building, Suite 800, 1250 Maryland
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20024.
Telephone: 202–690–7885.
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
[Docket No. 2004E–0040]
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) has determined
the regulatory review period for
CYDECTIN and is publishing this notice
of that determination as required by
law. FDA has made the determination
because of the submission of an
application to the Director of Patents
and Trademarks, Department of
Commerce, for the extension of a patent
which claims that animal drug product.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments
and petitions to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit
electronic comments to https://
www.fda.gov/dockets/ecomments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory
Policy (HFD–7), Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and
Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers
Lane,Rockville, MD 20857, 301–594–
2041.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug
Price Competition and Patent Term
Restoration Act of 1984 (Public Law 98–
417) and the Generic Animal Drug and
E:\FR\FM\20SEN1.SGM
20SEN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
54994
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 182 / Wednesday, September 20, 2006 / Notices
Patent Term Restoration Act (Public
Law 100–670) generally provide that a
patent may be extended for a period of
up to 5 years so long as the patented
item (human drug product, animal drug
product, medical device, food additive,
or color additive) was subject to
regulatory review by FDA before the
item was marketed. Under these acts, a
product’s regulatory review period
forms the basis for determining the
amount of extension an applicant may
receive.
A regulatory review period consists of
two periods of time: A testing phase and
an approval phase. For animal drug
products, the testing phase begins on
the earlier date when either a major
environmental effects test was initiated
for the drug or when an exemption
under section 512(j) of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C.
360b(j)) became effective and runs until
the approval phase begins. The approval
phase starts with the initial submission
of an application to market the animal
drug product and continues until FDA
grants permission to market the drug
product. Although only a portion of a
regulatory review period may count
toward the actual amount of extension
that the Director of Patents and
Trademarks may award (for example,
half the testing phase must be
subtracted as well as any time that may
have occurred before the patent was
issued), FDA’s determination of the
length of a regulatory review period for
a animal drug product will include all
of the testing phase and approval phase
as specified in 35 U.S.C. 156(g)(4)(B).
FDA recently approved for marketing
the animal drug product CYDECTIN
(moxidectin). CYDECTIN is indicated
for the treatment and control of certain
internal and external parasites in cattle.
Subsequent to this approval, the Patent
and Trademark Office received a patent
term restoration application for
CYDECTIN (U.S. Patent No. 4,916,154)
from American Cyanamid Company,
and the Patent and Trademark Office
requested FDA’s assistance in
determining this patent’s eligibility for
patent term restoration. In a letter dated
April 6, 2004, FDA advised the Patent
and Trademark Office that this animal
drug product had undergone a
regulatory review period and that the
approval of CYDECTIN represented the
first permitted commercial marketing or
use of the product. Shortly thereafter,
the Patent and Trademark Office
requested that FDA determine the
product’s regulatory review period.
FDA has determined that the
applicable regulatory review period for
CYDECTIN is 2,857 days. Of this time,
2,841 days occurred during the testing
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:40 Sep 19, 2006
Jkt 205001
phase of the regulatory review period,
while 16 days occurred during the
approval phase. These periods of time
were derived from the following dates:
1. The date an exemption under
section 512(j) of the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (the act) (21 U.S.C.
355(j)) involving this animal drug
product became effective: April 5, 1990.
The applicant claims April 9, 1990, as
the date the investigational new animal
drug application (INAD) became
effective. However, FDA records
indicate that the date of FDA’s letter
assigning a number to the INAD was
April 5, 1990, which is considered to be
the effective date for the INAD.
2. The date the application was
initially submitted with respect to the
animal drug product under section
512(b) of the act: January 13, 1998. The
applicant claims August 8, 1995, as the
date the new animal drug application
(NADA) for CYDECTIN (NADA 141–
099) was initially submitted. The
applicant claims this is the date it
submitted the first component of NADA
141–099, which was submitted in
several modules. It is FDA’s position
that the approval phase begins when the
marketing application is complete. A
review of FDA records reveals that the
date of FDA’s official acknowledgement
letter assigning a number to NADA 141–
099 was January 13, 1998, which is
considered to be the initially submitted
date for NADA 141–099.
3. The date the application was
approved: January 28, 1998. FDA has
verified the applicant’s claim that
NADA 141–099 was approved on
January 28, 1998.
This determination of the regulatory
review period establishes the maximum
potential length of a patent extension.
However, the U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office applies several
statutory limitations in its calculations
of the actual period for patent extension.
In its application for patent extension,
this applicant seeks 1,754 days of patent
term extension.
Anyone with knowledge that any of
the dates as published are incorrect may
submit to the Division of Dockets
Management (see ADDRESSES) written or
electronic comments and ask for a
redetermination by November 20, 2006.
Furthermore, any interested person may
petition FDA for a determination
regarding whether the applicant for
extension acted with due diligence
during the regulatory review period by
March 19, 2007. To meet its burden, the
petition must contain sufficient facts to
merit an FDA investigation. (See H.
Rept. 857, part 1, 98th Cong., 2d sess.,
pp. 41–42, 1984.) Petitions should be in
the format specified in 21 CFR 10.30.
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Comments and petitions are to be
submitted to the Division of Dockets
Management. Three copies of any
mailed information are to be submitted,
except that individuals may submit one
copy. Comments are to be identified
with the docket number found in
brackets in the heading of this
document. Comments and petitions may
be seen in the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday.
Dated: September 1, 2006.
Jane A. Axelrad,
Associate Director for Policy, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research.
[FR Doc. 06–7800 Filed 9–19–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket Nos. 2006E–0023 and 2006E–0345]
Determination of Regulatory Review
Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; MYCAMINE—New Drug
Application 21–754
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) has determined
the regulatory review period for
MYCAMINE and is publishing this
notice of that determination as required
by law. FDA has made the
determination because of the
submission of applications to the
Director of Patents and Trademarks,
Department of Commerce, for the
extension of a patent which claims that
human drug product.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments
and petitions to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit
electronic comments to https://
www.fda.gov/dockets/ecomments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory
Policy (HFD–7), Food and Drug
Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane,
Rockville, MD 20857, 301–594–2041.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug
Price Competition and Patent Term
Restoration Act of 1984 (Public Law 98–
417) and the Generic Animal Drug and
Patent Term Restoration Act (Public
Law 100–670) generally provide that a
patent may be extended for a period of
up to 5 years so long as the patented
item (human drug product, animal drug
E:\FR\FM\20SEN1.SGM
20SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 182 (Wednesday, September 20, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54993-54994]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7800]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. 2004E-0040]
Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; CYDECTIN
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined the
regulatory review period for CYDECTIN and is publishing this notice of
that determination as required by law. FDA has made the determination
because of the submission of an application to the Director of Patents
and Trademarks, Department of Commerce, for the extension of a patent
which claims that animal drug product.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments and petitions to the Division of
Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630
Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit electronic comments
to https://www.fda.gov/dockets/ecomments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory
Policy (HFD-7), Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug
Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane,Rockville, MD 20857, 301-594-2041.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug Price Competition and Patent Term
Restoration Act of 1984 (Public Law 98-417) and the Generic Animal Drug
and
[[Page 54994]]
Patent Term Restoration Act (Public Law 100-670) generally provide that
a patent may be extended for a period of up to 5 years so long as the
patented item (human drug product, animal drug product, medical device,
food additive, or color additive) was subject to regulatory review by
FDA before the item was marketed. Under these acts, a product's
regulatory review period forms the basis for determining the amount of
extension an applicant may receive.
A regulatory review period consists of two periods of time: A
testing phase and an approval phase. For animal drug products, the
testing phase begins on the earlier date when either a major
environmental effects test was initiated for the drug or when an
exemption under section 512(j) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (21 U.S.C. 360b(j)) became effective and runs until the approval
phase begins. The approval phase starts with the initial submission of
an application to market the animal drug product and continues until
FDA grants permission to market the drug product. Although only a
portion of a regulatory review period may count toward the actual
amount of extension that the Director of Patents and Trademarks may
award (for example, half the testing phase must be subtracted as well
as any time that may have occurred before the patent was issued), FDA's
determination of the length of a regulatory review period for a animal
drug product will include all of the testing phase and approval phase
as specified in 35 U.S.C. 156(g)(4)(B).
FDA recently approved for marketing the animal drug product
CYDECTIN (moxidectin). CYDECTIN is indicated for the treatment and
control of certain internal and external parasites in cattle.
Subsequent to this approval, the Patent and Trademark Office received a
patent term restoration application for CYDECTIN (U.S. Patent No.
4,916,154) from American Cyanamid Company, and the Patent and Trademark
Office requested FDA's assistance in determining this patent's
eligibility for patent term restoration. In a letter dated April 6,
2004, FDA advised the Patent and Trademark Office that this animal drug
product had undergone a regulatory review period and that the approval
of CYDECTIN represented the first permitted commercial marketing or use
of the product. Shortly thereafter, the Patent and Trademark Office
requested that FDA determine the product's regulatory review period.
FDA has determined that the applicable regulatory review period for
CYDECTIN is 2,857 days. Of this time, 2,841 days occurred during the
testing phase of the regulatory review period, while 16 days occurred
during the approval phase. These periods of time were derived from the
following dates:
1. The date an exemption under section 512(j) of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the act) (21 U.S.C. 355(j)) involving this
animal drug product became effective: April 5, 1990. The applicant
claims April 9, 1990, as the date the investigational new animal drug
application (INAD) became effective. However, FDA records indicate that
the date of FDA's letter assigning a number to the INAD was April 5,
1990, which is considered to be the effective date for the INAD.
2. The date the application was initially submitted with respect to
the animal drug product under section 512(b) of the act: January 13,
1998. The applicant claims August 8, 1995, as the date the new animal
drug application (NADA) for CYDECTIN (NADA 141-099) was initially
submitted. The applicant claims this is the date it submitted the first
component of NADA 141-099, which was submitted in several modules. It
is FDA's position that the approval phase begins when the marketing
application is complete. A review of FDA records reveals that the date
of FDA's official acknowledgement letter assigning a number to NADA
141-099 was January 13, 1998, which is considered to be the initially
submitted date for NADA 141-099.
3. The date the application was approved: January 28, 1998. FDA has
verified the applicant's claim that NADA 141-099 was approved on
January 28, 1998.
This determination of the regulatory review period establishes the
maximum potential length of a patent extension. However, the U.S.
Patent and Trademark Office applies several statutory limitations in
its calculations of the actual period for patent extension. In its
application for patent extension, this applicant seeks 1,754 days of
patent term extension.
Anyone with knowledge that any of the dates as published are
incorrect may submit to the Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES) written or electronic comments and ask for a redetermination
by November 20, 2006. Furthermore, any interested person may petition
FDA for a determination regarding whether the applicant for extension
acted with due diligence during the regulatory review period by March
19, 2007. To meet its burden, the petition must contain sufficient
facts to merit an FDA investigation. (See H. Rept. 857, part 1, 98th
Cong., 2d sess., pp. 41-42, 1984.) Petitions should be in the format
specified in 21 CFR 10.30.
Comments and petitions are to be submitted to the Division of
Dockets Management. Three copies of any mailed information are to be
submitted, except that individuals may submit one copy. Comments are to
be identified with the docket number found in brackets in the heading
of this document. Comments and petitions may be seen in the Division of
Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Dated: September 1, 2006.
Jane A. Axelrad,
Associate Director for Policy, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.
[FR Doc. 06-7800 Filed 9-19-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S