National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan; National Priorities List, 54763-54767 [E6-15338]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 181 / Tuesday, September 19, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
Adoption of the Amendment
§ 39.13
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the Federal Aviation Administration
amends part 39 of the Federal Aviation
Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
I
I
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
[Amended]
2. FAA amends § 39.13 by adding the
following new AD:
2006–19–09 Raytheon Aircraft Company:
Amendment 39–14766; Docket No.
FAA–2005–22103; Directorate Identifier
2005–CE–42–AD.
Effective Date
(a) This AD becomes effective on October
24, 2006.
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
I
Affected ADs
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
(b) None.
54763
Applicability
(c) This AD affects Model B300 airplanes,
serial numbers FL–1 through FL–289, that are
certificated in any category.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD is the result of the cabin
passenger seats not meeting the design load
requirements of 14 CFR part 23 during
structural load testing for design changes.
The actions specified in this AD are intended
to prevent the passenger seats from failing
during emergency landing conditions when
high inertial loadings occur. Passenger seat
failure could result in occupant injury.
Compliance
(e) To address this problem, you must do
the following, unless already done:
Actions
Compliance
Procedures
(1) Install a modification kit for each cabin passenger seat as follows:
(i) Install part number (P/N) 130–5108–
0001 for left forward facing seats or right
aft facing seats; and
(ii) Install P/N 130–5108–0002 for right forward facing seats or left aft facing seats.
(2) Remove the TSO label on each cabin seat
and re-identify each modified cabin seat assembly with the new P/N.
Within 24 calendar months or 600 hours timein-service, whichever occurs first after October 24, 2006 (the effective date of this AD).
Follow Raytheon Aircraft Company Service
Bulletin SB 25–3640, Rev. 1; Issued: May
2005, Revised: January 2006.
Before further flight after doing the modification required in paragraph (e)(1) of this AD.
Follow Raytheon Aircraft Company Service
Bulletin SB 25–3640, Rev. 1; Issued: May
2005, Revised: January 2006.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(f) The Manager, Wichita Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, ATTN:
Steven E. Potter, Aerospace Engineer,
Wichita ACO, Airframe and Services Branch,
ACE–118W, 1801 Airport Road, Wichita,
Kansas 67209; telephone: (316) 946–4124;
facsimile: (316) 946–4107, has the authority
to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with RULES
Related Information
(g) None.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(h) You must do the actions required by
this AD following the instructions in
Raytheon Aircraft Company Service Bulletin
SB 25–3640, Rev. 1; Issued: May 2005,
Revised: January 2006. The Director of the
Federal Register approved the incorporation
by reference of this service bulletin in
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51. To get a copy of this service
information, contact Raytheon Aircraft
Company, P.O. Box 85, Wichita, Kansas
67201; telephone: (800) 625–7043. To review
copies of this service information, go to the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA, go
to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/
code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html or call (202) 741–6030. To
view the AD docket, go to the Docket
Management Facility; U.S. Department of
Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW.,
Nassif Building, Room PL–401, Washington,
DC 20590–001 or on the Internet at https://
dms.dot.gov. The docket number is FAA–
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:41 Sep 18, 2006
Jkt 208001
2005–22103; Directorate Identifier 2005–CE–
42–AD.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on
September 11, 2006.
David R. Showers,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E6–15422 Filed 9–18–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 300
National Oil and Hazardous
Substances Pollution Contingency
Plan; National Priorities List
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final notice of deletion of
the Waverly Groundwater
Contamination Superfund Site (Site)
from the National Priorities List (NPL).
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The EPA, Region 7, is
publishing a direct final notice of
deletion of the Site, located near
Waverly, Nebraska, from the NPL. The
NPL, promulgated pursuant to section
105 of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act
(CERCLA) of 1980, as amended, is
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
This direct final deletion will be
effective November 20, 2006 unless EPA
receives adverse comments by October
19, 2006. If adverse comments are
received, the EPA will publish a timely
withdrawal of the direct final deletion
in the Federal Register informing the
public that the deletion will not take
effect.
DATES:
[FRL–8220–4]
PO 00000
Appendix B of 40 CFR part 300, which
is the National Oil and Hazardous
Substances Pollution Contingency Plan
(NCP). This direct final deletion is being
published by the EPA with the
concurrence of the state of Nebraska
through the Nebraska Department of
Environmental Quality because the EPA
has determined that responsible parties
or other persons have implemented all
appropriate response actions required
and, therefore, no further remedial
action pursuant to CERCLA are
appropriate.
Sfmt 4700
Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
SFUND–1986–0005, by one of the
following methods:
• https://www.regulations.gov—
Follow the online instruction for
submitting comments.
• E-mail: hirter.fritz@epa.gov.
• Fax: 913–551–9130.
• Mail: Mr. Fritz Hirter, Community
Involvement Coordinator, U.S. EPA,
Region 7, 901 N 5th Street, Kansas City,
Kansas 66101.
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\19SER1.SGM
19SER1
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with RULES
54764
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 181 / Tuesday, September 19, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
• Hand Delivery: 901 N 5th Street,
Kansas City, Kansas.
Such deliveries are only accepted
during the Docket’s normal hours of
operation, and special arrangements
should be made for deliveries of boxed
information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–SFUND–1986–
0005. The EPA’s policy is that all
comments received will be included in
the public docket without change and
may be made available online at
https://www.regulations.gov, including
any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes
information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit
information that you consider to be CBI
or otherwise protected through https://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The
https://www.regulations.gov Web site is
an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means the EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless
you provide it in the body of your
comment. If you send an e-mail
comment directly to the EPA without
going through https://
www.regulations.gov, your e-mail
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, the EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If the EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, the EPA may not
be able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
will be publicly available only in hard
copy. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the EPA’s Region 7 Superfund Records
Center, 901 N 5th Street, Kansas City,
Kansas 66101 and the Waverly City
Hall, Lancashire Street, Waverly,
Nebraska 68462–1131. Region 7’s
Docket Facility is open from 8 a.m. to
4 p.m. by appointment, Monday through
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:03 Sep 18, 2006
Jkt 208001
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The
EPA Docket telephone number is 913–
551–7166. The Waverly City Hall is
open from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal
holidays, or by appointment. The
Waverly City Hall telephone number is
402–786–2312.
Information Repositories:
Comprehensive information on the Site
is available for viewing in the Deletion
Docket at the information repositories
located at: U.S. EPA, Region 7,
Superfund Division Records Center, 901
North 5th Street, Kansas City, Kansas
66101; and the Waverly City Hall,
Lancashire Street, Waverly, Nebraska
68462–1131.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Fritz Hirter, Community Involvement
Coordinator (PLMG/OEP) U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 7, 901 N 5th Street, Kansas City,
Kansas 66101, telephone number: 1–
800–223–0425 or (913) 551–7130; fax
number: 913–551–9130; e-mail address:
hirter.fritz@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. NPL Deletion Criteria
III. Deletion Procedures
IV. Basis for Intended Site Deletion
V. Applicable Deletion Criteria
I. Introduction
The EPA, Region 7, is publishing this
direct final notice of deletion of the
Waverly Groundwater Contamination
Superfund Site (Site) from the National
Priorities List (NPL).
The EPA identifies sites that appear to
present a significant risk to public
health or the environment and
maintains the NPL as the list of those
sites. As described in § 300.425(e)(3) of
the NCP, sites deleted from the NPL
remain eligible for remedial actions if
conditions at a deleted Site warrant
such action.
Because the EPA considers this action
to be noncontroversial and routine, the
EPA is taking it without prior
publication of a notice of intent to
delete. This action will be effective
November 20, 2006 unless the EPA
receives adverse comments by October
19, 2006 on this document. If adverse
comments are received within the 30day public comment period on this
document, the EPA will publish a
timely withdrawal of this direct final
deletion before the effective date of the
deletion and the deletion will not take
effect. The EPA will, as appropriate,
prepare a response to comments and
continue with the deletion process on
the basis of the notice of intent to delete
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
and the comments already received.
There will be no additional opportunity
to comment. Section II of this document
explains the criteria for deleting sites
from the NPL. Section III discusses
procedures that EPA is using for this
action. Section IV discusses the Site and
demonstrates how it meets the deletion
criteria. Section V states the EPA’s
action to delete the Site from the NPL
unless adverse comments are received
during the comment period.
II. NPL Deletion Criteria
Section 300.425(e) of the NCP
provides that releases may be deleted
from the NPL where no further response
is appropriate. In making a
determination to delete a Site from the
NPL, the EPA shall consider, in
consultation with the state, whether any
of the following criteria have been met:
a. Responsible parties or other
persons have implemented all
appropriate response actions required.
b. All appropriate responses under
CERCLA have been implemented, and
no further response action by
responsible parties is appropriate.
c. The remedial investigation has
shown that the release poses no
significant threat to public health or the
environment and, therefore, the taking
of remedial measures are not
appropriate.
Even if a site is deleted from the NPL,
where hazardous substances, pollutants,
or contaminants remain at the deleted
site above levels that allow for
unlimited use and unrestricted
exposure, CERCLA Section 121(c), 42
U.S.C. 9621(c) requires a subsequent
review of the site to ensure that the
remedy remains protective of public
health and the environment. If new
information becomes available which
indicates a need for further action, the
EPA may initiate remedial actions.
Whenever there is a significant release
from a site deleted from the NPL, the
site may be restored to the NPL without
the application of the Hazard Ranking
System.
III. Deletion Procedures
The following procedures apply to
deletion of the Site.
a. The EPA, Region 7, issued a Record
of Decision (ROD) which documented
the required remedial action.
b. All appropriate responses by
responsible parties have been
implemented as documented in the
Final Close-Out Report dated August 2,
2006.
c. The state of Nebraska concurred
with deletion of the Site from the NPL.
The EPA consulted with the state of
Nebraska on the deletion of the Site
E:\FR\FM\19SER1.SGM
19SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 181 / Tuesday, September 19, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
from the NPL prior to developing this
direct final notice of deletion.
Concurrently with the publication of
this direct final notice of deletion, a
notice of the availability of the parallel
notice of intent to delete published
today in the ‘‘Proposed Rules’’ section
of the Federal Register is being
published in a major local newspaper of
general circulation at or near the Site
and is being distributed to appropriate
Federal, State, and local government
officials and other interested parties; the
newspaper notice announces the 30-day
public comment period concerning the
notice of intent to delete the Site from
the NPL.
d. The EPA placed copies of
documents supporting the deletion in
the Deletion Docket at the Site
information repositories identified
above.
e. If adverse comments are received
within the 30-day public comment
period on this document, the EPA will
publish a timely notice of withdrawal of
this direct final notice of deletion before
its effective date and will prepare a
response to comments and continue
with the deletion process on the basis of
the notice of intent to delete and the
comments already received.
Deletion of a site from the NPL does
not itself create, alter, or revoke any
individual’s rights or obligations.
Deletion of the site from the NPL does
not in any way alter EPA’s right to take
enforcement actions, as appropriate.
The NPL is designed primarily for
informational purposes and to assist
EPA management. Section 300.425(e)(3)
of the NCP states that the deletion of a
site from the NPL does not preclude
eligibility for future response actions
should future conditions warrant such
actions.
IV. Basis for Intended Site Deletion
The following information provides
EPA’s rationale for deleting the Site
from the NPL:
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with RULES
Site Location
The Site is located in Lancaster
County in southeastern Nebraska, in and
near the city of Waverly. Waverly is
located along State Highway 6,
approximately 10 miles north of
Lincoln, Nebraska. The population of
the city of Waverly is approximately
2637.
Site History
The Commodity Credit Corporation/
U.S. Department of Agriculture (CCC/
USDA) operated a grain storage facility
in Waverly between 1952 and 1974. The
facility consisted of grain storage
structures (approximately 100 bins and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:03 Sep 18, 2006
Jkt 208001
13 Quonset huts) on concrete
foundations. The fumigant ‘‘80/20’’ was
used at the facility between
approximately 1955 and 1965. The
fumigant is reported to have been
composed of 80% carbon tetrachloride
and 20% carbon disulfide.
The EPA sampled the Waverly
municipal water system in July 1982 as
part of a nationwide survey. The
analytical results indicated
contamination of the public water
supply (PWS) wells 1 and 3 with carbon
tetrachloride and chloroform at
concentrations of up to 200 micrograms
per liter (µg/L) and 7.5 µg/L,
respectively. Subsequent sampling of
PWS 3 in 1983, 1984, 1985, and 1986
showed high levels of carbon
tetrachloride and chloroform. In October
1984, the Site was placed on the NPL of
sites requiring long-term remedial
action.
The Site was proposed to the NPL in
October 1984 and became final in June
1986. The Site contaminants posed a
threat to the public health through
direct contact, potential leaching from
soil and the migration of contaminants
in groundwater.
Immediate Actions
In May 1986, the EPA developed an
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis
(EE/CA) Report outlining an Expedited
Response Action (ERA). The ERA
included pumping and treating
groundwater with air stripping
technology and soil gas extraction to
prevent contamination of drinking water
wells, prevent further plume migration,
and to address soil contamination.
Design of the systems was completed in
May 1987.
The EPA began operation of the ERA
system at the Site in February 1988. A
compliance agreement between the
CCC/USDA and the EPA went into
effect in May 1988. In June 1988, the
CCC/USDA took over the operation and
maintenance of the ERA. In September
1990, the ROD was issued for the Site.
The CCC/USDA is responsible for
implementing the actions described in
the ROD for the Site.
Record of Decision Findings
A final ROD was issued by EPA in
September 1990. The remedy described
in the ROD included:
• Extraction of the contaminated
groundwater using the existing
groundwater extraction well (GWEX),
• Onsite treatment of the extracted
groundwater using existing air strippers,
• Active soil extraction using existing
system of soil vapor extraction wells,
and
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
54765
• Continued investigation of the
contaminant plume and monitoring of
the system to determine the
effectiveness of the remedy.
The remedial action objectives
described in the ROD included:
• The prevention of potential
exposure to contaminated groundwater,
• The protection of uncontaminated
groundwater for future use by
preventing further migration of the
contaminated groundwater plume; and
• The restoration of contaminated
groundwater for future use as drinking
water by reducing the carbon
tetrachloride and chloroform
concentrations below health-based
criteria.
The final remedy outlined in the ROD
required the following additional steps:
• The installation of monitoring well
clusters (nested wells) to the north and
northwest to delineate the magnitude
and extent of contamination along this
potential migration route;
• A survey of existing down-gradient
wells north, northeast, and northwest of
the Site;
• Retrieval of data from the identified
wells for use in citing the new
monitoring well clusters;
• A pumping and recovery aquifer
test using the existing (GWEX) and
monitoring wells to evaluate the
hydraulic properties of the aquifer;
• Determine the suitability of existing
wells for use as extraction wells;
• Continue sampling of the existing
and new monitoring wells, water supply
wells, domestic wells, vapor extraction
wells, soil gas monitoring wells, air
compliance points, and GWEX as
specified in the performance criteria;
• Develop a groundwater flow and
transport model of sufficient detail to
determine the correct pumping rate for
the GWEX to enable it to capture the
entire area of the plume that is above
the contamination action level; and
• Investigate potential uses for the
treated water discharged from the
GWEX and the air stripping system.
In 1991–1992, the CCC/USDA
conducted additional site investigations
at the Site to satisfy the requirements of
the ROD. The principal conclusion of
these site investigations were as follows:
• Groundwater beneath the Site flows
in a north-northeast direction;
• Groundwater contamination was
present only in the upper aquifer; and
• A plume of groundwater
contaminated with carbon tetrachloride
and chloroform was present to the
northeast of the Site.
Maximum contaminant levels
detected in this northeast plume were
400 µg/L (carbon tetrachloride) and 200
µg/L (chloroform).
E:\FR\FM\19SER1.SGM
19SER1
54766
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 181 / Tuesday, September 19, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with RULES
The contaminant plume to the
northeast of the Site identified during
CCC/USDA’s 1991–1992 investigations
was beyond the capture zone of the
existing GWEX and is believed to have
migrated from the Site before the ERA
remedial system began operation. This
northeast plume also needed to be
captured and treated to comply fully
with the ROD. To meet this objective,
modifications for the remedial system
were proposed by CCC/USDA in 1993
and approved by the EPA and the state
of Nebraska. The modification involved
installing a supplementary groundwater
extraction well (SGWEX) northeast of
the Site and pumping the groundwater
to the Site’s process building for
treatment in the existing air stripper
system. Additional monitoring wells
were also installed to monitor the
progress of the aquifer cleanup. The
SGWEX system began operation in
1994.
Remedial Actions
In May 1986, the EPA developed an
EE/CA Report outlining an ERA. The
ERA included pumping and treating the
groundwater with air stripping
technology and soil gas extraction.
Design of the system was completed in
May 1987 and a public meeting was
held in Waverly to receive comments on
the proposed ERA.
The EPA began operation of the ERA
system in February 1988. A compliance
agreement between CCC/USDA and EPA
went into effect in May 1988. In June
1988, USDA took over operation and
maintenance of the ERA.
Designed for a flow rate of 169 cubic
feet per minute, the vapor extraction
system (VES) consisted of 17 vapor
extraction wells installed in the soil
above the water table at depths of 27–
39 feet, with the lower 15–20 feet
screened. The VES removed volatile
contaminants from solution to the vapor
phase as the air was drawn through the
soil. The CCC discontinued operation of
the VES in 1993. This action was
approved by the EPA in 1995.
The air stripping system was designed
to accept water at a flow rate of up to
400 gallons per minute (gpm) from the
GWEX, containing concentrations of
carbon tetrachloride and chloroform of
up to 4,000 parts per billion (ppb) and
360 ppb, respectively, and to remove
99.9% of the contaminant
concentrations. Water was pumped to a
flow distributor at the top of the stripper
and cascaded down through a bed of
inert packing material. Clean air entered
the bottom of the column and was
driven upward through the packing and
exited at the top of the column. The
transfer of the VOCs from the water to
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:03 Sep 18, 2006
Jkt 208001
the air produced treated water with very
low VOC concentrations and air with
elevated VOC levels. The air and VOCs
exit the system through a stack 41 feet
above grade. The treated effluent water
from the air stripper is discharged to a
ditch north of the Site. The effluent
water flowed west via drainage ditches
to Salt Creek. Effluent was monitored
under a permit issued under the
National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System program.
The EPA conducted a pre-final
construction completion inspection at
the Site in March 1994 as part of the Site
close-out process. The report for the
Preliminary Close-Out inspection stated
that modification of the existing GWEX
system to add an additional
groundwater extraction well had been
completed in March 1994. The
Preliminary Close-Out report
documented the completion of
construction at the Waverly Site and
provided a schedule for verification of
Site cleanup and final inspection/closeout of the Site. It was completed and
signed on March 29, 1994.
The GWEX was installed on the north
edge of the Site in the area of greater
groundwater contamination. The well
was screened at 19–34 feet and 39–49
feet below the ground surface. The well
was designed to have a zone of
influence of 1,000 to 1,400 feet while
pumping at 150 gpm. Based on
sampling and monitoring results, the
GWEX was shut down with EPA
approval in 1995.
As part of the ROD, the EPA required
the CCC/USDA to conduct an additional
Site investigation program. The purpose
of this investigation was to verify the
downgradient performance of the ERA
system and to further characterize the
hydrogeologic setting. A main objective
of the investigation was the installation
of a nest of down-gradient monitoring
wells to the northwest of the Site. These
monitoring wells (6A, 6B, and 6C) were
positioned on Lancaster County
property. This work was completed in
February 1992.
The additional Site investigations
revealed a groundwater contaminant
plume northeast of the Site. This plume
had not been captured by the existing
GWEX system since the system was
only affecting the upper aquifer, and the
actual radius of influence of the GWEX
was approximately 800 feet. A portion
of the original contaminant plume
outside the influence of the GWEX was
located to the northeast of the Site along
141st Street. Consequently, the remedial
systems required modifications,
including the installation of a SWGEX
that was completed in early 1994. The
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Site attained the EPA status of
‘‘Construction Complete’’ in April 1994.
Cleanup Standards
The remedial action cleanup activities
are consistent with the objectives of the
NCP and will provide protection to
human health and the environment. The
cleanup standards for specific media
are:
• Groundwater—for carbon
tetrachloride and chloroform is 5.0 µg/
L and 3.8 µg/L respectively,
• Surface water (Air Stripper
Discharge)—for carbon tetrachloride and
chloroform is 6.8 µg/L and 5.0 µg/L
respectively,
• Air ( Combined VOC emissions
from VES air stripper system)—is 0.147
g/s,
• Soil—for carbon tetrachloride and
chloroform are 1.1 milligrams per
kilograms (mg/kg) and 1.7 mg/kg
respectively,
• Soil Gas—(Combined for carbon
tetrachloride and chloroform) is 6.5 µg/
m3.
An Explanation of Significant
Differences was issued in March 2005,
deleting soil gas as a cleanup standard.
Soil and groundwater
contamination—major source of
contamination identified in the ROD—
has been addressed. The exposure
pathways considered in the risk
assessment were: worker and resident
exposure to soil through ingestion and
direct contact, exposure to
contaminated groundwater through
ingestion, and exposure to air emissions
generated by the air stripping and VES
through inhalation. Since the likelihood
of human exposure to significant levels
of carbon tetrachloride and chloroform
contained within soil gas at the Site was
remote, this route was not considered.
The following milestones were
achieved since the EPA began operation
of the remedial system at the Waverly
Site in February 1988:
• Quarterly monitoring and air
sampling data indicated compliance
was achieved for air media and the
CCC/USDA discontinued operation of
the VES in 1993. This action was
approved by EPA in 1995.
• Monthly monitoring and surface
water sampling data, indicated
compliance levels were achieved and
the air stripper system was shut down
with EPA approval in 1999.
• Quarterly monitoring and
groundwater sampling results for the
initial plume indicated compliance was
achieved and the GWEX was shut down
with EPA approval in 1995.
• Quarterly monitoring and
groundwater sampling results for the
offsite plume (being addressed with the
E:\FR\FM\19SER1.SGM
19SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 181 / Tuesday, September 19, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
SGWEX) indicated compliance was
achieved and in 2004 the EPA approved
the shut down of the SGWEX.
Recent analytical results provided in
the Third Quarter FY2006 report for the
Expedited Response Action, Reporting
Period April 2006 through June 2006
indicated that contaminant levels in all
sampled monitoring wells were below
the action levels established in the ROD.
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with RULES
Operation and Maintenance
The ERA systems design
specifications and operation and
maintenance plans are described in the
February 29, 1988, report, Treatment
Plant Facility Operations and
Maintenance Manual for the Expedited
Response Action, Waverly Groundwater
Contamination Site, Waverly, Nebraska.
In November 1988, Argonne National
Laboratory was contracted by the CCC/
USDA to manage the Site, continue
sampling, and operate/maintain the
ERA systems.
The basic operation of the systems has
not changed since they were first
installed. However, a number of
modifications and additions were made
by Argonne to improve the systems’
effectiveness and to facilitate operation.
These changes were described in
Argonne’s 1991 Final Work Plan:
Expedited Remedial Action, Waverly
Contaminated Groundwater Site,
Waverly, Nebraska.
The sampling and analysis program
required monthly and quarterly
sampling and analysis of groundwater
for carbon tetrachloride (CCL4) and
chloroform (CHCL3). Data were used to
track the overall progress toward Site
cleanup and to monitor potential offsite
migration of contaminated groundwater.
Cleanup progress was determined by
comparing the measured contaminant
concentrations of the environmental
samples to specific target concentrations
or action levels for CCL4 and CHCL3 as
described in the ROD.
Since the cleanup levels described in
the ROD have been achieved, routine
O&M is no longer required. However,
groundwater sampling at compliance
points described in the ROD will
continue until the final Five-Year
Review is conducted in 2009.
Five-Year Review
CERCLA requires a Five-Year Review
of all Sites with hazardous substances
remaining above health-base levels for
unrestricted use of the Site. The third
Five-Year Review report was completed
on September 2, 2004, pursuant to
CERCLA 121(c) and to § 300.430(f)(4)(ii)
of the NCP. The conclusion of this FiveYear Review assessment was that the
remedial action in operation at the Site
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:03 Sep 18, 2006
Jkt 208001
at that time was protective of human
health and the environment. However,
hazardous substances and pollutants
remained onsite at levels above the
compliance levels outlined in the ROD.
Sampling activities completed soon
after the 2004 Five-Year Review was
released found contamination levels in
all of the compliance points described
in the ROD had been achieved.
Recent analytical results provided in
the Third Quarter FY2006 report for the
Expedited Response Action, Reporting
Period April 2006 through June 2006
indicated that contaminant levels in all
sampled monitoring wells continue to
be below the action levels established in
the ROD. Another five-year review
report is scheduled for 2009.
Community Involvement
The EPA published its Community
Relations Plan in January 1986. An
information repository was established
at the Waverly City Hall and all of the
documents used to make decisions
related to the remedial action were
placed there before the ROD was signed.
All other reports and fact sheets were
sent to the repository as they were
completed. Documents in the Deletion
Docket on which EPA relied for
recommendation of the deletion from
the NPL are available to the public in
the information repositories. A public
notice for this action will also be
published in the local newspapers.
V. Applicable Deletion Criteria
One of the three 40 CFR
300.425(e)(1)(i) criteria for site deletion
specifies that EPA may delete a Site
from the NPL if, ‘‘Responsible parties or
other persons have implemented all
appropriate response actions required.’’
The EPA, with the concurrence of the
state of Nebraska, has determined that
all appropriate responses by the
Responsible Parties have been
completed and that no further response
actions are necessary.
State Concurrence
In a letter dated August 24, 2006,
Nebraska Department of Environmental
Quality concurred with the proposed
deletion of the Site from the NPL.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 300
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Chemicals, Hazardous
substances, Hazardous waste,
Intergovernmental relations, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Superfund, Water
pollution control, Water supply.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
54767
Dated: September 7, 2006.
William W. Rice,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 7.
For the reasons set out in this
document, 40 CFR part 300 is amended
as follows:
I
PART 300—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 300
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321(c)(2); 42 U.S.C.
9601–9657; E.O. 12777, 56 FR 54757, 3 CFR,
1991 Comp., p.351; E.O. 12580, 52 FR 2923,
3 CFR, 1987 Comp., p.193.
Appendix B—[Amended]
2. Table 1 of Appendix B to part 300
is amended under ‘‘Nebraska’’ (‘‘NE’’)
by removing the entry for ‘‘Waverly
Groundwater Contamination.’’
I
[FR Doc. E6–15338 Filed 9–18–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 300
[FRL–8220–7]
National Oil and Hazardous
Substances Pollution Contingency
Plan; National Priorities List Update
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of deletion of the
Cedartown Industries, Inc. Superfund
site from the National Priorities List.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The EPA announces the
deletion of the Cedartown Industries,
Inc. Site in Cedartown, Polk County,
Georgia from the National Priorities List
(NPL). The NPL constitutes Appendix B
of the National Oil and Hazardous
Substances Pollution Contingency Plan
(NCP), 40 CFR Part 300, which EPA
promulgated pursuant to section 105 of
the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act of 1980 (CERCLA), as amended.
EPA and the State of Georgia have
determined that the Site poses no
significant threat to public health or the
environment and, therefore, no further
remedial measures pursuant to CERCLA
are appropriate.
DATES: Effective Date: This rule will be
effective September 19, 2006.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket
Identification No. EPA–R04–SFUND–
2006–0385. All documents in the docket
are listed on the https://
www.regulations.gov Web site. Although
listed in the index, some information is
E:\FR\FM\19SER1.SGM
19SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 181 (Tuesday, September 19, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 54763-54767]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-15338]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 300
[FRL-8220-4]
National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan;
National Priorities List
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final notice of deletion of the Waverly Groundwater
Contamination Superfund Site (Site) from the National Priorities List
(NPL).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The EPA, Region 7, is publishing a direct final notice of
deletion of the Site, located near Waverly, Nebraska, from the NPL. The
NPL, promulgated pursuant to section 105 of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) of
1980, as amended, is Appendix B of 40 CFR part 300, which is the
National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP).
This direct final deletion is being published by the EPA with the
concurrence of the state of Nebraska through the Nebraska Department of
Environmental Quality because the EPA has determined that responsible
parties or other persons have implemented all appropriate response
actions required and, therefore, no further remedial action pursuant to
CERCLA are appropriate.
DATES: This direct final deletion will be effective November 20, 2006
unless EPA receives adverse comments by October 19, 2006. If adverse
comments are received, the EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of the
direct final deletion in the Federal Register informing the public that
the deletion will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
SFUND-1986-0005, by one of the following methods:
https://www.regulations.gov--Follow the online instruction
for submitting comments.
E-mail: hirter.fritz@epa.gov.
Fax: 913-551-9130.
Mail: Mr. Fritz Hirter, Community Involvement Coordinator,
U.S. EPA, Region 7, 901 N 5th Street, Kansas City, Kansas 66101.
[[Page 54764]]
Hand Delivery: 901 N 5th Street, Kansas City, Kansas.
Such deliveries are only accepted during the Docket's normal hours
of operation, and special arrangements should be made for deliveries of
boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-SFUND-
1986-0005. The EPA's policy is that all comments received will be
included in the public docket without change and may be made available
online at https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal
information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed
to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information
that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through https://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The https://www.regulations.gov Web site
is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means the EPA will not know
your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body
of your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to the EPA
without going through https://www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address
will be automatically captured and included as part of the comment that
is placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If
you submit an electronic comment, the EPA recommends that you include
your name and other contact information in the body of your comment and
with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If the EPA cannot read your comment
due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification,
the EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files
should avoid the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and
be free of any defects or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
in https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the EPA's Region 7
Superfund Records Center, 901 N 5th Street, Kansas City, Kansas 66101
and the Waverly City Hall, Lancashire Street, Waverly, Nebraska 68462-
1131. Region 7's Docket Facility is open from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. by
appointment, Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The EPA
Docket telephone number is 913-551-7166. The Waverly City Hall is open
from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays,
or by appointment. The Waverly City Hall telephone number is 402-786-
2312.
Information Repositories: Comprehensive information on the Site is
available for viewing in the Deletion Docket at the information
repositories located at: U.S. EPA, Region 7, Superfund Division Records
Center, 901 North 5th Street, Kansas City, Kansas 66101; and the
Waverly City Hall, Lancashire Street, Waverly, Nebraska 68462-1131.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Fritz Hirter, Community
Involvement Coordinator (PLMG/OEP) U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 7, 901 N 5th Street, Kansas City, Kansas 66101,
telephone number: 1-800-223-0425 or (913) 551-7130; fax number: 913-
551-9130; e-mail address: hirter.fritz@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. NPL Deletion Criteria
III. Deletion Procedures
IV. Basis for Intended Site Deletion
V. Applicable Deletion Criteria
I. Introduction
The EPA, Region 7, is publishing this direct final notice of
deletion of the Waverly Groundwater Contamination Superfund Site (Site)
from the National Priorities List (NPL).
The EPA identifies sites that appear to present a significant risk
to public health or the environment and maintains the NPL as the list
of those sites. As described in Sec. 300.425(e)(3) of the NCP, sites
deleted from the NPL remain eligible for remedial actions if conditions
at a deleted Site warrant such action.
Because the EPA considers this action to be noncontroversial and
routine, the EPA is taking it without prior publication of a notice of
intent to delete. This action will be effective November 20, 2006
unless the EPA receives adverse comments by October 19, 2006 on this
document. If adverse comments are received within the 30-day public
comment period on this document, the EPA will publish a timely
withdrawal of this direct final deletion before the effective date of
the deletion and the deletion will not take effect. The EPA will, as
appropriate, prepare a response to comments and continue with the
deletion process on the basis of the notice of intent to delete and the
comments already received. There will be no additional opportunity to
comment. Section II of this document explains the criteria for deleting
sites from the NPL. Section III discusses procedures that EPA is using
for this action. Section IV discusses the Site and demonstrates how it
meets the deletion criteria. Section V states the EPA's action to
delete the Site from the NPL unless adverse comments are received
during the comment period.
II. NPL Deletion Criteria
Section 300.425(e) of the NCP provides that releases may be deleted
from the NPL where no further response is appropriate. In making a
determination to delete a Site from the NPL, the EPA shall consider, in
consultation with the state, whether any of the following criteria have
been met:
a. Responsible parties or other persons have implemented all
appropriate response actions required.
b. All appropriate responses under CERCLA have been implemented,
and no further response action by responsible parties is appropriate.
c. The remedial investigation has shown that the release poses no
significant threat to public health or the environment and, therefore,
the taking of remedial measures are not appropriate.
Even if a site is deleted from the NPL, where hazardous substances,
pollutants, or contaminants remain at the deleted site above levels
that allow for unlimited use and unrestricted exposure, CERCLA Section
121(c), 42 U.S.C. 9621(c) requires a subsequent review of the site to
ensure that the remedy remains protective of public health and the
environment. If new information becomes available which indicates a
need for further action, the EPA may initiate remedial actions.
Whenever there is a significant release from a site deleted from the
NPL, the site may be restored to the NPL without the application of the
Hazard Ranking System.
III. Deletion Procedures
The following procedures apply to deletion of the Site.
a. The EPA, Region 7, issued a Record of Decision (ROD) which
documented the required remedial action.
b. All appropriate responses by responsible parties have been
implemented as documented in the Final Close-Out Report dated August 2,
2006.
c. The state of Nebraska concurred with deletion of the Site from
the NPL. The EPA consulted with the state of Nebraska on the deletion
of the Site
[[Page 54765]]
from the NPL prior to developing this direct final notice of deletion.
Concurrently with the publication of this direct final notice of
deletion, a notice of the availability of the parallel notice of intent
to delete published today in the ``Proposed Rules'' section of the
Federal Register is being published in a major local newspaper of
general circulation at or near the Site and is being distributed to
appropriate Federal, State, and local government officials and other
interested parties; the newspaper notice announces the 30-day public
comment period concerning the notice of intent to delete the Site from
the NPL.
d. The EPA placed copies of documents supporting the deletion in
the Deletion Docket at the Site information repositories identified
above.
e. If adverse comments are received within the 30-day public
comment period on this document, the EPA will publish a timely notice
of withdrawal of this direct final notice of deletion before its
effective date and will prepare a response to comments and continue
with the deletion process on the basis of the notice of intent to
delete and the comments already received.
Deletion of a site from the NPL does not itself create, alter, or
revoke any individual's rights or obligations. Deletion of the site
from the NPL does not in any way alter EPA's right to take enforcement
actions, as appropriate. The NPL is designed primarily for
informational purposes and to assist EPA management. Section
300.425(e)(3) of the NCP states that the deletion of a site from the
NPL does not preclude eligibility for future response actions should
future conditions warrant such actions.
IV. Basis for Intended Site Deletion
The following information provides EPA's rationale for deleting the
Site from the NPL:
Site Location
The Site is located in Lancaster County in southeastern Nebraska,
in and near the city of Waverly. Waverly is located along State Highway
6, approximately 10 miles north of Lincoln, Nebraska. The population of
the city of Waverly is approximately 2637.
Site History
The Commodity Credit Corporation/U.S. Department of Agriculture
(CCC/USDA) operated a grain storage facility in Waverly between 1952
and 1974. The facility consisted of grain storage structures
(approximately 100 bins and 13 Quonset[supreg] huts) on concrete
foundations. The fumigant ``80/20'' was used at the facility between
approximately 1955 and 1965. The fumigant is reported to have been
composed of 80% carbon tetrachloride and 20% carbon disulfide.
The EPA sampled the Waverly municipal water system in July 1982 as
part of a nationwide survey. The analytical results indicated
contamination of the public water supply (PWS) wells 1 and 3 with
carbon tetrachloride and chloroform at concentrations of up to 200
micrograms per liter ([mu]g/L) and 7.5 [mu]g/L, respectively.
Subsequent sampling of PWS 3 in 1983, 1984, 1985, and 1986 showed high
levels of carbon tetrachloride and chloroform. In October 1984, the
Site was placed on the NPL of sites requiring long-term remedial
action.
The Site was proposed to the NPL in October 1984 and became final
in June 1986. The Site contaminants posed a threat to the public health
through direct contact, potential leaching from soil and the migration
of contaminants in groundwater.
Immediate Actions
In May 1986, the EPA developed an Engineering Evaluation/Cost
Analysis (EE/CA) Report outlining an Expedited Response Action (ERA).
The ERA included pumping and treating groundwater with air stripping
technology and soil gas extraction to prevent contamination of drinking
water wells, prevent further plume migration, and to address soil
contamination. Design of the systems was completed in May 1987.
The EPA began operation of the ERA system at the Site in February
1988. A compliance agreement between the CCC/USDA and the EPA went into
effect in May 1988. In June 1988, the CCC/USDA took over the operation
and maintenance of the ERA. In September 1990, the ROD was issued for
the Site. The CCC/USDA is responsible for implementing the actions
described in the ROD for the Site.
Record of Decision Findings
A final ROD was issued by EPA in September 1990. The remedy
described in the ROD included:
Extraction of the contaminated groundwater using the
existing groundwater extraction well (GWEX),
Onsite treatment of the extracted groundwater using
existing air strippers,
Active soil extraction using existing system of soil vapor
extraction wells, and
Continued investigation of the contaminant plume and
monitoring of the system to determine the effectiveness of the remedy.
The remedial action objectives described in the ROD included:
The prevention of potential exposure to contaminated
groundwater,
The protection of uncontaminated groundwater for future
use by preventing further migration of the contaminated groundwater
plume; and
The restoration of contaminated groundwater for future use
as drinking water by reducing the carbon tetrachloride and chloroform
concentrations below health-based criteria.
The final remedy outlined in the ROD required the following
additional steps:
The installation of monitoring well clusters (nested
wells) to the north and northwest to delineate the magnitude and extent
of contamination along this potential migration route;
A survey of existing down-gradient wells north, northeast,
and northwest of the Site;
Retrieval of data from the identified wells for use in
citing the new monitoring well clusters;
A pumping and recovery aquifer test using the existing
(GWEX) and monitoring wells to evaluate the hydraulic properties of the
aquifer;
Determine the suitability of existing wells for use as
extraction wells;
Continue sampling of the existing and new monitoring
wells, water supply wells, domestic wells, vapor extraction wells, soil
gas monitoring wells, air compliance points, and GWEX as specified in
the performance criteria;
Develop a groundwater flow and transport model of
sufficient detail to determine the correct pumping rate for the GWEX to
enable it to capture the entire area of the plume that is above the
contamination action level; and
Investigate potential uses for the treated water
discharged from the GWEX and the air stripping system.
In 1991-1992, the CCC/USDA conducted additional site investigations
at the Site to satisfy the requirements of the ROD. The principal
conclusion of these site investigations were as follows:
Groundwater beneath the Site flows in a north-northeast
direction;
Groundwater contamination was present only in the upper
aquifer; and
A plume of groundwater contaminated with carbon
tetrachloride and chloroform was present to the northeast of the Site.
Maximum contaminant levels detected in this northeast plume were
400 [mu]g/L (carbon tetrachloride) and 200 [mu]g/L (chloroform).
[[Page 54766]]
The contaminant plume to the northeast of the Site identified
during CCC/USDA's 1991-1992 investigations was beyond the capture zone
of the existing GWEX and is believed to have migrated from the Site
before the ERA remedial system began operation. This northeast plume
also needed to be captured and treated to comply fully with the ROD. To
meet this objective, modifications for the remedial system were
proposed by CCC/USDA in 1993 and approved by the EPA and the state of
Nebraska. The modification involved installing a supplementary
groundwater extraction well (SGWEX) northeast of the Site and pumping
the groundwater to the Site's process building for treatment in the
existing air stripper system. Additional monitoring wells were also
installed to monitor the progress of the aquifer cleanup. The SGWEX
system began operation in 1994.
Remedial Actions
In May 1986, the EPA developed an EE/CA Report outlining an ERA.
The ERA included pumping and treating the groundwater with air
stripping technology and soil gas extraction. Design of the system was
completed in May 1987 and a public meeting was held in Waverly to
receive comments on the proposed ERA.
The EPA began operation of the ERA system in February 1988. A
compliance agreement between CCC/USDA and EPA went into effect in May
1988. In June 1988, USDA took over operation and maintenance of the
ERA.
Designed for a flow rate of 169 cubic feet per minute, the vapor
extraction system (VES) consisted of 17 vapor extraction wells
installed in the soil above the water table at depths of 27-39 feet,
with the lower 15-20 feet screened. The VES removed volatile
contaminants from solution to the vapor phase as the air was drawn
through the soil. The CCC discontinued operation of the VES in 1993.
This action was approved by the EPA in 1995.
The air stripping system was designed to accept water at a flow
rate of up to 400 gallons per minute (gpm) from the GWEX, containing
concentrations of carbon tetrachloride and chloroform of up to 4,000
parts per billion (ppb) and 360 ppb, respectively, and to remove 99.9%
of the contaminant concentrations. Water was pumped to a flow
distributor at the top of the stripper and cascaded down through a bed
of inert packing material. Clean air entered the bottom of the column
and was driven upward through the packing and exited at the top of the
column. The transfer of the VOCs from the water to the air produced
treated water with very low VOC concentrations and air with elevated
VOC levels. The air and VOCs exit the system through a stack 41 feet
above grade. The treated effluent water from the air stripper is
discharged to a ditch north of the Site. The effluent water flowed west
via drainage ditches to Salt Creek. Effluent was monitored under a
permit issued under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
program.
The EPA conducted a pre-final construction completion inspection at
the Site in March 1994 as part of the Site close-out process. The
report for the Preliminary Close-Out inspection stated that
modification of the existing GWEX system to add an additional
groundwater extraction well had been completed in March 1994. The
Preliminary Close-Out report documented the completion of construction
at the Waverly Site and provided a schedule for verification of Site
cleanup and final inspection/close-out of the Site. It was completed
and signed on March 29, 1994.
The GWEX was installed on the north edge of the Site in the area of
greater groundwater contamination. The well was screened at 19-34 feet
and 39-49 feet below the ground surface. The well was designed to have
a zone of influence of 1,000 to 1,400 feet while pumping at 150 gpm.
Based on sampling and monitoring results, the GWEX was shut down with
EPA approval in 1995.
As part of the ROD, the EPA required the CCC/USDA to conduct an
additional Site investigation program. The purpose of this
investigation was to verify the downgradient performance of the ERA
system and to further characterize the hydrogeologic setting. A main
objective of the investigation was the installation of a nest of down-
gradient monitoring wells to the northwest of the Site. These
monitoring wells (6A, 6B, and 6C) were positioned on Lancaster County
property. This work was completed in February 1992.
The additional Site investigations revealed a groundwater
contaminant plume northeast of the Site. This plume had not been
captured by the existing GWEX system since the system was only
affecting the upper aquifer, and the actual radius of influence of the
GWEX was approximately 800 feet. A portion of the original contaminant
plume outside the influence of the GWEX was located to the northeast of
the Site along 141st Street. Consequently, the remedial systems
required modifications, including the installation of a SWGEX that was
completed in early 1994. The Site attained the EPA status of
``Construction Complete'' in April 1994.
Cleanup Standards
The remedial action cleanup activities are consistent with the
objectives of the NCP and will provide protection to human health and
the environment. The cleanup standards for specific media are:
Groundwater--for carbon tetrachloride and chloroform is
5.0 [mu]g/L and 3.8 [mu]g/L respectively,
Surface water (Air Stripper Discharge)--for carbon
tetrachloride and chloroform is 6.8 [mu]g/L and 5.0 [mu]g/L
respectively,
Air ( Combined VOC emissions from VES air stripper
system)--is 0.147 g/s,
Soil--for carbon tetrachloride and chloroform are 1.1
milligrams per kilograms (mg/kg) and 1.7 mg/kg respectively,
Soil Gas--(Combined for carbon tetrachloride and
chloroform) is 6.5 [mu]g/m\3\.
An Explanation of Significant Differences was issued in March 2005,
deleting soil gas as a cleanup standard.
Soil and groundwater contamination--major source of contamination
identified in the ROD--has been addressed. The exposure pathways
considered in the risk assessment were: worker and resident exposure to
soil through ingestion and direct contact, exposure to contaminated
groundwater through ingestion, and exposure to air emissions generated
by the air stripping and VES through inhalation. Since the likelihood
of human exposure to significant levels of carbon tetrachloride and
chloroform contained within soil gas at the Site was remote, this route
was not considered.
The following milestones were achieved since the EPA began
operation of the remedial system at the Waverly Site in February 1988:
Quarterly monitoring and air sampling data indicated
compliance was achieved for air media and the CCC/USDA discontinued
operation of the VES in 1993. This action was approved by EPA in 1995.
Monthly monitoring and surface water sampling data,
indicated compliance levels were achieved and the air stripper system
was shut down with EPA approval in 1999.
Quarterly monitoring and groundwater sampling results for
the initial plume indicated compliance was achieved and the GWEX was
shut down with EPA approval in 1995.
Quarterly monitoring and groundwater sampling results for
the offsite plume (being addressed with the
[[Page 54767]]
SGWEX) indicated compliance was achieved and in 2004 the EPA approved
the shut down of the SGWEX.
Recent analytical results provided in the Third Quarter FY2006
report for the Expedited Response Action, Reporting Period April 2006
through June 2006 indicated that contaminant levels in all sampled
monitoring wells were below the action levels established in the ROD.
Operation and Maintenance
The ERA systems design specifications and operation and maintenance
plans are described in the February 29, 1988, report, Treatment Plant
Facility Operations and Maintenance Manual for the Expedited Response
Action, Waverly Groundwater Contamination Site, Waverly, Nebraska.
In November 1988, Argonne National Laboratory was contracted by the
CCC/USDA to manage the Site, continue sampling, and operate/maintain
the ERA systems.
The basic operation of the systems has not changed since they were
first installed. However, a number of modifications and additions were
made by Argonne to improve the systems' effectiveness and to facilitate
operation. These changes were described in Argonne's 1991 Final Work
Plan: Expedited Remedial Action, Waverly Contaminated Groundwater Site,
Waverly, Nebraska.
The sampling and analysis program required monthly and quarterly
sampling and analysis of groundwater for carbon tetrachloride
(CCL4) and chloroform (CHCL3). Data were used to
track the overall progress toward Site cleanup and to monitor potential
offsite migration of contaminated groundwater. Cleanup progress was
determined by comparing the measured contaminant concentrations of the
environmental samples to specific target concentrations or action
levels for CCL4 and CHCL3 as described in the
ROD.
Since the cleanup levels described in the ROD have been achieved,
routine O&M is no longer required. However, groundwater sampling at
compliance points described in the ROD will continue until the final
Five-Year Review is conducted in 2009.
Five-Year Review
CERCLA requires a Five-Year Review of all Sites with hazardous
substances remaining above health-base levels for unrestricted use of
the Site. The third Five-Year Review report was completed on September
2, 2004, pursuant to CERCLA 121(c) and to Sec. 300.430(f)(4)(ii) of
the NCP. The conclusion of this Five-Year Review assessment was that
the remedial action in operation at the Site at that time was
protective of human health and the environment. However, hazardous
substances and pollutants remained onsite at levels above the
compliance levels outlined in the ROD.
Sampling activities completed soon after the 2004 Five-Year Review
was released found contamination levels in all of the compliance points
described in the ROD had been achieved.
Recent analytical results provided in the Third Quarter FY2006
report for the Expedited Response Action, Reporting Period April 2006
through June 2006 indicated that contaminant levels in all sampled
monitoring wells continue to be below the action levels established in
the ROD. Another five-year review report is scheduled for 2009.
Community Involvement
The EPA published its Community Relations Plan in January 1986. An
information repository was established at the Waverly City Hall and all
of the documents used to make decisions related to the remedial action
were placed there before the ROD was signed. All other reports and fact
sheets were sent to the repository as they were completed. Documents in
the Deletion Docket on which EPA relied for recommendation of the
deletion from the NPL are available to the public in the information
repositories. A public notice for this action will also be published in
the local newspapers.
V. Applicable Deletion Criteria
One of the three 40 CFR 300.425(e)(1)(i) criteria for site deletion
specifies that EPA may delete a Site from the NPL if, ``Responsible
parties or other persons have implemented all appropriate response
actions required.'' The EPA, with the concurrence of the state of
Nebraska, has determined that all appropriate responses by the
Responsible Parties have been completed and that no further response
actions are necessary.
State Concurrence
In a letter dated August 24, 2006, Nebraska Department of
Environmental Quality concurred with the proposed deletion of the Site
from the NPL.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 300
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Chemicals,
Hazardous substances, Hazardous waste, Intergovernmental relations,
Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Superfund, Water
pollution control, Water supply.
Dated: September 7, 2006.
William W. Rice,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 7.
0
For the reasons set out in this document, 40 CFR part 300 is amended as
follows:
PART 300--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 300 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321(c)(2); 42 U.S.C. 9601-9657; E.O.
12777, 56 FR 54757, 3 CFR, 1991 Comp., p.351; E.O. 12580, 52 FR
2923, 3 CFR, 1987 Comp., p.193.
Appendix B--[Amended]
0
2. Table 1 of Appendix B to part 300 is amended under ``Nebraska''
(``NE'') by removing the entry for ``Waverly Groundwater
Contamination.''
[FR Doc. E6-15338 Filed 9-18-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P