Proposed Data Collections Submitted for Public Comment and Recommendations, 54659-54661 [E6-15451]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 180 / Monday, September 18, 2006 / Notices
A. Federal Reserve Bank of Boston
(Richard Walker, Community Affairs
Officer) P.O. Box 55882, Boston,
Massachusetts 02106-2204:
1. Marlborough Bancshares, Inc. and
Marlborough Bancshares MHC; to
become bank holding companies by
acquiring 100 percent of the voting
shares of Marlborough Savings Bank, all
of Marlborough, Massachusetts.
B. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago
(Patrick M. Wilder, Assistant Vice
President) 230 South LaSalle Street,
Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
1. PrivateBancorp, Inc., Chicago,
Illinois; to merge with Piedmont
Bancshares, Inc. Atlanta, Georgia, and
thereby indirectly acquire Piedmont
Bank of Georgia, Atlanta, Georgia.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, September 12, 2006.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E6–15371 Filed 9–15–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
[60Day–06–05BW]
Proposed Data Collections Submitted
for Public Comment and
Recommendations
In compliance with the requirement
of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 for
opportunity for public comment on
proposed data collection projects, the
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) will publish periodic
54659
declined over the past several years, it
ranks fifth among deaths from all
causes. The digital rectal examination
(DRE) and prostate specific antigen
(PSA) test are used to screen for prostate
cancer. Screening is controversial and
many are not in agreement as to whether
the potential benefits of screening
outweigh the risks, that is, if prostate
specific antigen (PSA) based screening,
early detection, and later treatment
increases longevity. Although major
medical organizations are divided on
whether men should be routinely
screened for this disease, it appears that
all of the major organizations
recommend discussion with patients
about the benefits and risks of
screening.
The purpose of this project is to
develop and administer a national
survey to a sample of American primary
care physicians to examine whether or
not they: Screen for prostate cancer
using (PSA and/or DRE), recommend
testing and under what conditions,
discuss the tests and the risks and
benefits of screening with patients, and
if their screening practices vary by
factors such as age, ethnicity, and family
history. This study will examine
demographic, social, and behavioral
characteristics of physicians as they
relate to screening and related issues,
including knowledge and awareness,
beliefs regarding efficacy of screening
and treatment, frequency of screening,
awareness of the screening controversy,
influence of guidelines from medical
practices and other organizations, and
participation and/or willingness to
participate in shared decision-making.
There will be no cost to respondents
other than their time to participate in
the survey.
summaries of proposed projects. To
request more information on the
proposed projects or to obtain a copy of
the data collection plans and
instruments, call 404–639–5960 and
send comments to Seleda Perryman,
CDC Assistant Reports Clearance
Officer, 1600 Clifton Road, MS–D74,
Atlanta, GA 30333 or send an e-mail to
omb@cdc.gov.
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology. Written comments should
be received within 60 days of this
notice.
Proposed Project
Survey of Primary Care Physicians’
Practices regarding Prostate Cancer
Screening—New—National Center for
Chronic Disease Prevention and Health
Promotion (NCCDPHP), Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
Background and Brief Description
Prostate cancer is the most common
cancer in men and is the second leading
cause of cancer deaths, behind lung
cancer. The American Cancer Society
estimates that there will be about
234,460 new cases of prostate cancer
and about 27,350 deaths in 2006.
Although prostate cancer deaths have
ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS
Respondents
Number of
respondents
Number of
responses per
respondents
Average
burden per response
(in hours)
Total burden
(in hours)
Primary Care Physicians .................................................................................
2,000
1
30/60
1,000
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Dated: September 11, 2006.
Joan F. Karr,
Acting Reports Clearance Officer, Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. E6–15435 Filed 9–15–06; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P
[60Day–06–06BR]
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
Proposed Data Collections Submitted
for Public Comment and
Recommendations
In compliance with the requirement
of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:48 Sep 15, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 for
opportunity for public comment on
proposed data collection projects, the
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) will publish periodic
summaries of proposed projects. To
request more information on the
proposed projects or to obtain a copy of
the data collection plans and
instruments, call 404–639–5960 and
send comments to Seleda Perryman,
CDC Assistant Reports Clearance
E:\FR\FM\18SEN1.SGM
18SEN1
54660
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 180 / Monday, September 18, 2006 / Notices
Officer, 1600 Clifton Road, MS–74,
Atlanta, GA 30333 or send an e-mail to
omb@cdc.gov.
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology. Written comments should
be received within 60 days of this
notice.
Proposed Project
Brownfield/Land Re-use Public
Health Involvement Triage Tool—
New—Agency for Toxic Substances and
Disease Registry (ATSDR), Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
Background and Brief Description
ATSDR has developed a Triage Tool
that rapidly screens sites to assess the
need for public health agency
involvement. Users of this tool are likely
to include: Health departments,
redevelopers, financial institutions,
licensed environmental professionals,
environmental regulatory agencies, and
economic development agencies. Any
Brownfield or land re-use site that is
being considered for redevelopment is a
candidate for processing through this
rapid assessment tool.
Brownfield sites and land re-use sites
may contain conditions that represent
potential health hazards. Some
and the need for public health
involvement. A separate system within
the Tool allows users to view subjectspecific information (contaminants,
community concerns, etc.) via an
interactive web tool. A Tour Guide has
been developed to provide a visual
walk-through of the Tool and all of its
components.
brownfield sites contain significant
physical or chemical health hazards. For
example, some physical hazards include
open holes, unstable structures, and
sharp objects. Past industrial activities
often leave behind chemical
contamination or drums of chemical
wastes. These types of sites usually do
not have adequate security to prevent
people from being exposed to site
hazards. Abandoned sites generally lack
any restriction to site access. When
people enter these properties there is a
chance that they may be injured or
exposed to toxic chemicals. While most
adults may show little interest in
entering these properties, children and
adolescents often view brownfields as
playgrounds and places to explore,
thereby increasing their risk of
exposure.
Public health agencies are an
important resource to communities who
are either concerned about the health
impacts of current conditions at these
types of sites or are considering
redevelopment of these properties for
expanded re-use. Public health agencies
can assist the community in assessing
potential health impacts, addressing
health concerns of conditions at
brownfield sites, communicating risks,
and supporting appropriate actions to
protect the health of the community.
The Triage Tool consists of an
interactive checklist that is used to
collect information related to the site,
including the suspected contamination,
site access, type of site, proposed re-use,
community concerns, and site
surroundings. After the checklist is
completed, the responses are analyzed
by the internal logic of the Tool. The
Triage Tool uses a hierarchical decision
matrix, which assesses site
characteristics, community concerns,
While ATSDR can only estimate the
annual number of users of the Triage
Tool, we hope that the tool will be
widely available as a resource for site
assessment. To protect user privacy,
ATSDR does not intend to maintain
information entered by users into the
Triage Tool checklist function. ATSDR
also provides disclaimers in the Triage
Tool for purposes of Agency liability.
Users are advised within the Tool to
avoid entering personal information
(e.g., social security numbers, medical
information). Any identifying
information, such as the site contact,
entered into the Triage Tool is provided
for the use by the Tool user and will not
be maintained by ATSDR. ATSDR does
plan to invite feedback regarding the
Triage Tool from users through a
voluntary process. Users may send a
separate e-mail or access a Web site
maintained by ATSDR. This separate email or Web site will also exist to enable
users to contact ATSDR should they
require more assistance or other
information regarding brownfields/land
re-use sites.
Each respondent may use the Triage
Tool more than one time. A high-end,
conservative estimate of five uses per
year is provided here (i.e., assessment of
five sites), with each use requiring about
30 minutes of time. There are no costs
to respondents except their time to
participate in the survey.
ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS
Number of
respondents
Respondents
Number of
responses per
respondent
(average)
Average
burden per
response
(in hours)
Total burden
(hours)
1,000
1,000
500
500
500
5
5
5
5
5
30/60
30/60
30/60
30/60
30/60
2,500
2,500
1,250
1,250
1,250
Total ..........................................................................................................
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Local Health Agency Workers .........................................................................
State Employees (e.g., EPA, DNR, DEM) .......................................................
Developers .......................................................................................................
Financial institution personnel .........................................................................
Environmental or economic professionals .......................................................
........................
........................
........................
8,750
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:07 Sep 15, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\18SEN1.SGM
18SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 180 / Monday, September 18, 2006 / Notices
Dated: September 11, 2006.
Joan F. Karr,
Acting Reports Clearance Officer, Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. E6–15451 Filed 9–15–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services
[CMS–8028–N]
RIN 0938–AO18
Medicare Program; Part A Premium for
Calendar Year 2007 for the Uninsured
Aged and for Certain Disabled
Individuals Who Have Exhausted Other
Entitlement
Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This annual notice announces
Medicare’s Hospital Insurance (Part A)
premium for uninsured enrollees in
calendar year (CY) 2007. This premium
is to be paid by enrollees age 65 and
over who are not otherwise eligible
(hereafter known as the ‘‘uninsured
aged’’) and for certain disabled
individuals who have exhausted other
entitlement. The monthly Part A
premium for the 12 months beginning
January 1, 2007 for these individuals
will be $410. The reduced premium for
certain other individuals as described in
this notice will be $226. Section 1818(d)
of the Social Security Act specifies the
method to be used to determine these
amounts.
Effective Date: This notice is
effective on January 1, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Clare McFarland, (410) 786–6390.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
I. Background
Section 1818 of the Social Security
Act (the Act) provides for voluntary
enrollment in the Medicare Hospital
Insurance program (Medicare Part A),
subject to payment of a monthly
premium, of certain persons aged 65
and older who are uninsured under the
Old-Age, Survivors and Disability
Insurance (OASDI) program or the
Railroad Retirement Act and do not
otherwise meet the requirements for
entitlement to Medicare Part A. (Persons
insured under the OASDI program or
the Railroad Retirement Act and certain
others do not have to pay premiums for
hospital insurance.)
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:48 Sep 15, 2006
Jkt 208001
Section 1818A of the Act provides for
voluntary enrollment in Medicare Part
A, subject to payment of a monthly
premium, of certain disabled
individuals who have exhausted other
entitlement. These are individuals who
are not currently entitled to Part A
coverage, but who were entitled to
coverage due to a disabling impairment
under section 226(b) of the Act, and
who would still be entitled to Part A
coverage if their earnings had not
exceeded the statutorily defined
substantial gainful activity amount
(section 223(d)(4) of the Act).
Section 1818A(d)(2) of the Act
specifies that the provisions relating to
premiums under section 1818(d)
through section 1818(f) of the Act for
the aged will also apply to certain
disabled individuals as described above.
Section 1818(d) of the Act requires us
to estimate, on an average per capita
basis, the amount to be paid from the
Federal Hospital Insurance Trust Fund
for services incurred in the following
calendar year (including the associated
administrative costs) on behalf of
individuals aged 65 and over who will
be entitled to benefits under Medicare
Part A. We must then determine, during
September of each year, the monthly
actuarial rate for the following year (the
per capita amount estimated above
divided by 12) and publish the dollar
amount for the monthly premium in the
succeeding CY. If the premium is not a
multiple of $1, the premium is rounded
to the nearest multiple of $1 (or, if it is
a multiple of 50 cents but not of $1, it
is rounded to the next highest $1).
Section 13508 of the Omnibus Budget
Reconciliation Act of 1993 (Pub. L. 103–
66) amended section 1818(d) of the Act
to provide for a reduction in the
premium amount for certain voluntary
enrollees (section 1818 and section
1818A). The reduction applies to an
individual who is eligible to buy into
the Medicare Part A program and who,
as of the last day of the previous
month—
• Had at least 30 quarters of coverage
under title II of the Act;
• Was married, and had been married
for the previous 1-year period, to a
person who had at least 30 quarters of
coverage;
• Had been married to a person for at
least 1 year at the time of the person’s
death if, at the time of death, the person
had at least 30 quarters of coverage; or
• Is divorced from a person and had
been married to the person for at least
10 years at the time of the divorce if, at
the time of the divorce, the person had
at least 30 quarters of coverage.
• Section 1818(d)(4)(A) of the Act
specifies that the premium that these
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
54661
individuals will pay for CY 2007 will be
equal to the premium for uninsured
aged enrollees reduced by 45 percent.
II. Monthly Premium Amount for CY
2007
The monthly premium for the
uninsured aged and certain disabled
individuals who have exhausted other
entitlement for the 12 months beginning
January 1, 2007, is $410.
The monthly premium for those
individuals subject to the 45 percent
reduction in the monthly premium is
$226.
III. Monthly Premium Rate Calculation
As discussed in section I of this
notice, the monthly Medicare Part A
premium is equal to the estimated
monthly actuarial rate for CY 2007
rounded to the nearest multiple of $1
and equals one-twelfth of the average
per capita amount, which is determined
by projecting the number of Part A
enrollees aged 65 years and over as well
as the benefits and administrative costs
that will be incurred on their behalf.
The steps involved in projecting these
future costs to the Federal Hospital
Insurance Trust Fund are:
• Establishing the present cost of
services furnished to beneficiaries, by
type of service, to serve as a projection
base;
• Projecting increases in payment
amounts for each of the service types;
and
• Projecting increases in
administrative costs.
We base our projections for CY 2007
on: (a) Current historical data, and (b)
projection assumptions derived from
current law and the Mid-Session Review
of the President’s Fiscal Year 2007
Budget.
We estimate that in CY 2007, 35.808
million people aged 65 years and over
will be entitled to benefits (without
premium payment) and that they will
incur $176.264 billion of benefits and
related administrative costs. Thus, the
estimated monthly average per capita
amount is $410.21 and the monthly
premium is $410. The full monthly
premium reduced by 45 percent is $226.
IV. Costs to Beneficiaries
The CY 2007 premium of $410 is
about 4 percent higher than the CY 2006
premium of $393.
We estimate that approximately
556,000 enrollees will voluntarily enroll
in Medicare Part A by paying the full
premium. We estimate an additional
1,000 enrollees will pay the reduced
premium. We estimate that the aggregate
cost to enrollees paying these premiums
will be about $114 million in CY 2007
E:\FR\FM\18SEN1.SGM
18SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 180 (Monday, September 18, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54659-54661]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-15451]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
[60Day-06-06BR]
Proposed Data Collections Submitted for Public Comment and
Recommendations
In compliance with the requirement of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 for opportunity for public comment on
proposed data collection projects, the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) will publish periodic summaries of proposed projects.
To request more information on the proposed projects or to obtain a
copy of the data collection plans and instruments, call 404-639-5960
and send comments to Seleda Perryman, CDC Assistant Reports Clearance
[[Page 54660]]
Officer, 1600 Clifton Road, MS-74, Atlanta, GA 30333 or send an e-mail
to omb@cdc.gov.
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the information shall have practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways
to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents,
including through the use of automated collection techniques or other
forms of information technology. Written comments should be received
within 60 days of this notice.
Proposed Project
Brownfield/Land Re-use Public Health Involvement Triage Tool--New--
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
Background and Brief Description
ATSDR has developed a Triage Tool that rapidly screens sites to
assess the need for public health agency involvement. Users of this
tool are likely to include: Health departments, redevelopers, financial
institutions, licensed environmental professionals, environmental
regulatory agencies, and economic development agencies. Any Brownfield
or land re-use site that is being considered for redevelopment is a
candidate for processing through this rapid assessment tool.
Brownfield sites and land re-use sites may contain conditions that
represent potential health hazards. Some brownfield sites contain
significant physical or chemical health hazards. For example, some
physical hazards include open holes, unstable structures, and sharp
objects. Past industrial activities often leave behind chemical
contamination or drums of chemical wastes. These types of sites usually
do not have adequate security to prevent people from being exposed to
site hazards. Abandoned sites generally lack any restriction to site
access. When people enter these properties there is a chance that they
may be injured or exposed to toxic chemicals. While most adults may
show little interest in entering these properties, children and
adolescents often view brownfields as playgrounds and places to
explore, thereby increasing their risk of exposure.
Public health agencies are an important resource to communities who
are either concerned about the health impacts of current conditions at
these types of sites or are considering redevelopment of these
properties for expanded re-use. Public health agencies can assist the
community in assessing potential health impacts, addressing health
concerns of conditions at brownfield sites, communicating risks, and
supporting appropriate actions to protect the health of the community.
The Triage Tool consists of an interactive checklist that is used
to collect information related to the site, including the suspected
contamination, site access, type of site, proposed re-use, community
concerns, and site surroundings. After the checklist is completed, the
responses are analyzed by the internal logic of the Tool. The Triage
Tool uses a hierarchical decision matrix, which assesses site
characteristics, community concerns, and the need for public health
involvement. A separate system within the Tool allows users to view
subject-specific information (contaminants, community concerns, etc.)
via an interactive web tool. A Tour Guide has been developed to provide
a visual walk-through of the Tool and all of its components.
While ATSDR can only estimate the annual number of users of the
Triage Tool, we hope that the tool will be widely available as a
resource for site assessment. To protect user privacy, ATSDR does not
intend to maintain information entered by users into the Triage Tool
checklist function. ATSDR also provides disclaimers in the Triage Tool
for purposes of Agency liability. Users are advised within the Tool to
avoid entering personal information (e.g., social security numbers,
medical information). Any identifying information, such as the site
contact, entered into the Triage Tool is provided for the use by the
Tool user and will not be maintained by ATSDR. ATSDR does plan to
invite feedback regarding the Triage Tool from users through a
voluntary process. Users may send a separate e-mail or access a Web
site maintained by ATSDR. This separate e-mail or Web site will also
exist to enable users to contact ATSDR should they require more
assistance or other information regarding brownfields/land re-use
sites.
Each respondent may use the Triage Tool more than one time. A high-
end, conservative estimate of five uses per year is provided here
(i.e., assessment of five sites), with each use requiring about 30
minutes of time. There are no costs to respondents except their time to
participate in the survey.
Estimated Annualized Burden Hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Average
Number of responses per burden per Total burden
Respondents respondents respondent response (in (hours)
(average) hours)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Local Health Agency Workers..................... 1,000 5 30/60 2,500
State Employees (e.g., EPA, DNR, DEM)........... 1,000 5 30/60 2,500
Developers...................................... 500 5 30/60 1,250
Financial institution personnel................. 500 5 30/60 1,250
Environmental or economic professionals......... 500 5 30/60 1,250
---------------------------------------------------------------
Total....................................... .............. .............. .............. 8,750
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 54661]]
Dated: September 11, 2006.
Joan F. Karr,
Acting Reports Clearance Officer, Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention.
[FR Doc. E6-15451 Filed 9-15-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P