West Virginia Abandoned Mine Land Reclamation Plan, 54601-54607 [E6-15444]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 180 / Monday, September 18, 2006 / Proposed Rules
and the amount to be included as gross
income derived from any foreign
country that is attributable to a period
during which section 901(j) applies to
such country or gross income from
sources within other foreign countries
or possessions of the United States shall
not exceed the amount so designated by
the regulated investment company in
such written notice. If, however, the
amount designated by the regulated
investment company in the notice
exceeds the shareholder’s proper
proportionate share of foreign taxes or
gross income from sources within
foreign countries or possessions of the
United States, the shareholder is limited
to the amount correctly ascertained.
(b) Shareholder of record custodian of
certain unit investment trusts. * * *
The notice shall designate the holder’s
proportionate share of the amounts of
creditable foreign taxes paid to foreign
countries or possessions of the United
States and the holder’s proportionate
share of the dividend that represents
income derived from sources within
each country that is attributable to a
period during which section 901(j)
applies to such country, if any, and the
holder’s proportionate share of the
dividend that represents income derived
from other foreign countries or
possessions of the United States shown
on the notice received by the nominee
identified as such. * * *
*
*
*
*
*
Par. 5. Section 1.853–4 is amended
by:
1. Revising paragraphs (a) and (b).
2. Adding paragraphs (c) and (d).
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSAL
§ 1.853–4
Manner of making election.
(a) General rule. To make an election
under section 853 for a taxable year, a
regulated investment company must file
a statement of election as part of its
Federal income tax return for the
taxable year. The statement of election
must state that the regulated investment
company elects the application of
section 853 for the taxable year and
agrees to provide the information
required by paragraph (c) of this section.
(b) Irrevocability of the election. The
election shall be made with respect to
all foreign taxes described in paragraph
(c)(2) of this section, and must be made
not later than the time prescribed for
filing the return (including extensions).
This election, if made, shall be
irrevocable with respect to the dividend
(or portion) and the foreign taxes paid
with respect thereto, to which the
election applies.
(c) Required information. A regulated
investment company making an election
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:15 Sep 15, 2006
Jkt 208001
under section 853 must provide the
following information:
(1) The total amount of taxable
income received in the taxable year
from sources within foreign countries
and possessions of the United States
and the amount of taxable income
received in the taxable year from
sources within each such foreign
country or possession.
(2) The total amount of income, war
profits, or excess profits taxes (described
in section 901(b)(1)) to which the
election applies that were paid in the
taxable year to such foreign countries or
possessions and the amount of such
taxes paid to each such foreign country
or possession.
(3) The amount of income, war
profits, or excess profits taxes paid
during the taxable year to which the
election does not apply by reason of any
provision of the Internal Revenue Code
other than section 853(b), including, but
not limited to, section 901(j), section
901(k), or section 901(l).
(4) The date, form, and contents of the
notice to its shareholders.
(5) The proportionate share of
creditable foreign taxes paid to each
such foreign country or possession
during the taxable year and foreign
income received from sources within
each such foreign country or possession
during the taxable year attributable to
one share of stock of the regulated
investment company.
(d) Time and manner of providing
information. The information specified
in paragraph (c) of this section must be
provided at the time and in the manner
prescribed by the Commissioner and,
unless otherwise prescribed, must be
provided on or with a modified Form
1118 filed as part of the RIC’s timely
filed Federal income tax return for the
taxable year.
*
*
*
*
*
Mark E. Matthews,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and
Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 06–7731 Filed 9–15–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
54601
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement
30 CFR Part 948
[WV–111–FOR]
West Virginia Abandoned Mine Land
Reclamation Plan
Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM),
Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule; public comment
period and opportunity for public
hearing on proposed amendment.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We, OSM, are announcing the
receipt of a proposed amendment to the
West Virginia Abandoned Mine Land
Reclamation (AMLR) Plan under the
Surface Mining Control and
Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA or the
Act). The proposed amendment makes
numerous revisions throughout the
State’s AMLR Plan. The amendment is
intended to update and improve the
effectiveness of the West Virginia AMLR
Plan.
This document gives the times and
locations that the West Virginia AMLR
Plan and proposed amendment is
available for your inspection, the
comment period during which you may
submit written comments, and the
procedures that will be followed for the
public hearing, if one is requested.
DATES: We will accept written
comments on the proposed State AMLR
Plan until 4 p.m. on October 18, 2006.
If requested, we will hold a public
hearing on the proposed State AMLR
Plan amendment at 1 p.m. on October
13, 2006. We will accept requests to
speak at a hearing until 4 p.m. on
October 3, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by Docket No. WV–111–FOR,
by any of the following methods:
• E-mail: chfo@osmre.gov. Include
WV–111–FOR in the subject line of the
message;
• Mail/Hand Delivery: Mr. Roger W.
Calhoun, Director, Charleston Field
Office, Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement, 1027
Virginia Street, East, Charleston, West
Virginia 25301; or
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number for this rulemaking. For
detailed instructions on submitting
comments and additional information
on the rulemaking process, see the
E:\FR\FM\18SEP1.SGM
18SEP1
54602
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 180 / Monday, September 18, 2006 / Proposed Rules
‘‘Public Comment Procedures’’ heading
in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section of this document. You may also
request to speak at a public hearing by
any of the methods listed above or by
contacting the individual listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Docket: You may review copies of the
West Virginia AMLR Plan, this
amendment, a listing of any scheduled
public hearings, and all written
comments received in response to this
document at the addresses listed below
during normal business hours, Monday
through Friday, excluding holidays. You
may also receive one free copy of this
amendment to the AMLR Plan by
contacting OSM’s Charleston Field
Office listed below.
Mr. Roger W. Calhoun, Director,
Charleston Field Office, Office of
Surface Mining Reclamation and
Enforcement, 1027 Virginia Street, East,
Charleston, West Virginia 25301,
Telephone: (304) 347–7158. E-mail:
chfo@osmre.gov.
West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection, 601 57th
Street, SE, Charleston, WV 25304,
Telephone: (304) 926–0485.
In addition, you may review a copy of
the AMLR Plan amendment during
regular business hours at the following
locations:
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement, Morgantown Area
Office, 604 Cheat Road, Suite 150,
Morgantown, West Virginia 26508,
Telephone: (304) 291–4004. (By
Appointment Only)
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement, Beckley Area
Office, 313 Harper Park Drive, Suite 3,
Beckley, West Virginia 25801,
Telephone: (304) 255–5265.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Roger W. Calhoun, Director, Charleston
Field Office, Telephone: (304) 347–
7158. E-mail: chfo@osmre.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background on the Abandoned Mine Land
Reclamation Program
II. Description of the Proposed AMLR Plan
Amendment
III. Public Comment Procedures
IV. Procedural Determinations
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSAL
I. Background on the Abandoned Mine
Land Reclamation Program
The West Virginia AMLR Program
was established by Title IV of SMCRA
(30 U.S.C. 1201 et seq.) in response to
concerns over extensive environmental
damage caused by past coal mining
activities. The program is funded by a
reclamation fee collected on each ton of
coal that is produced. The money
collected is used to finance the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:15 Sep 15, 2006
Jkt 208001
reclamation of abandoned coal mines
and for other authorized activities.
Section 405 of the Act allows States and
Indian Tribes to assume exclusive
responsibility for reclamation activity
within the State or on Indian lands if
they develop and submit to the
Secretary of the Interior for approval, a
program (often referred to as a plan) for
the reclamation of abandoned coal
mined lands. The West Virginia AMLR
Plan was approved by OSM effective
February 23, 1981. You can find
additional information about the West
Virginia AMLR Plan at 30 CFR 948.20,
948.25, and 948.26.
II. Description of the Proposed AMLR
Plan Amendment
By letter dated June 27, 2006
(Administrative Record Number WV–
1469), the West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection (WVDEP),
Office of Abandoned Mine Lands and
Reclamation submitted an amendment
to its AMLR Plan under SMCRA (30
U.S.C. 1201 et seq.). The amendment
consists of numerous changes
throughout the AMLR Plan, some of
which concern the AML Enhancement
Rule. In its submittal of the amendment,
the WVDEP stated that the revision
incorporates the AML Enhancement
Rule at 30 CFR Parts 707 and 874, as
published by OSM in the Federal
Register on Friday, February 12, 1999
(64 FR 7470–7483).
In its submittal letter, the State noted
that the amendment also contains minor
organizational and operational changes.
Minor changes, such as organizational
changes, re-numbering of sections,
updating the name of departments or
agencies, deletion of historical narrative,
and the correction of typographical and
grammatical errors, are non-substantive
changes that do not affect the basis of
the original approval of the West
Virginia AMLR Plan. Therefore, these
minor changes are hereby approved, and
we will not identify such nonsubstantive changes in this notice.
West Virginia proposes the following
amendments to the State’s AMLR Plan:
Introduction
Part B, State Reclamation Plan
This part contains additions and
deletions of historical information about
the West Virginia AMLR Plan. This
section also states that the amendment
will update the organization of the
Office of Abandoned Mine Lands and
Reclamation and establish the
Abandoned Mine Lands and
Reclamation Enhancement Rule.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Section II. Purposes of the State
Reclamation Program
Language is deleted and added to
clarify that projects are selected on the
basis of the priorities identified at W.
Va. Code 22–2–4.
Section III. Criteria for Ranking and
Identifying Projects To Be Funded
A. Identification of problems. The
State has deleted language concerning
examples of data provided by
contributors to the Abandoned Mine
Land Inventory System (AMLIS).
B. Prioritization of problems.
Language is added to clarify that
projects are selected on the basis of the
priorities identified at W. Va. Code 22–
2–4.
B.4: This paragraph is deleted and
formerly identified as priority 4
projects, research and demonstration
projects.
Factors Considered for Reclamation
Project Evaluation
Item 1. The State has deleted related
language concerning research projects.
Item 6.(e). The existing language is
deleted concerning waiving any
requirement that a reclamation
contractor obtain a reclamation permit
to extract or remove coal if the waiver
will facilitate removal of coal and the
mining is incidental to the project. In its
place, the following language has been
added:
(e) Abandoned Mine Lands and
Reclamation Enhancement Rule, as used in
this part, the following definitions have the
specific meaning;
Definitions: Extraction of coal as an
incidental part means the extraction of coal
which is necessary to enable the construction
to be accomplished. For this purpose of this
part, only that coal extraction from within
the right-of-way. In the case of a road,
railroad, utility line or other such road
construction, or within the boundaries of the
area directly affected by other types of
government-financed construction, may be
considered incidental to that construction
and shall be subject to the requirements of
Chapter 22, Article 3, Section 26, Paragraph
b, of the Code of West Virginia, legislative
rules and this plan. Extraction of coal outside
the right-of-way or boundary of the area
directly affected by the construction shall be
subject to the requirements of Chapter 22,
Article 3 of the Code of West Virginia, and
the rules promulgated thereunder.
Government financing agency means a
Federal, State, county, municipal, or local
unit of government, or a department, bureau,
agency or office of the unit which, directly
or through another unit of government,
finances construction.
Government-financed construction means
construction funded at 50 percent or more by
funds appropriated from a government
financing agency’s budget or obtained from
E:\FR\FM\18SEP1.SGM
18SEP1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSAL
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 180 / Monday, September 18, 2006 / Proposed Rules
general revenue bonds. Government
financing at less than 50 percent may qualify
if the construction is undertaken as an
approved AML reclamation project under
Chapter 22, Article 2 of the Code of West
Virginia. Construction funded through
government financing agency guarantees,
insurance, loans, funds obtained through
industrial revenue bonds or their equivalent,
or in-kind payments does not qualify as
government-financed construction.
(i) The Abandoned Mine Land Program
(AML) shall work in consultation with the
Title V regulatory authority to administer
these provisions.
(I) To qualify as a Federal, State, county,
Municipal, or other local governmentfinanced highway or other construction
project, the construction must be funded at
fifty percent (50%) or more by the relevant
government agency. Funding at less than fifty
percent (50%) may qualify if the construction
is undertaken as an approved AML
Reclamation contract.
(II) For reclamation projects receiving less
than fifty percent (50%) government funding
because of planned coal extraction, AML may
qualify if the construction is undertaken as
an approved Reclamation project under Title
IV of SMCRA. AML shall consult with [the]
Title V regulatory authority to make the
following determinations.
WVDEP must determine the following:
(A) The likelihood of the coal being mined
under a surface mining permit. This
determination must take into account
available information such as:
(a) Coal reserves from existing mine maps
or other sources;
(b) Existing environmental conditions;
(c) All prior mining activity on or adjacent
to the site;
(d) Current and historic coal production in
the area; and
(e) Any known or anticipated interest in
mining the site.
(B) The likelihood that nearby or adjacent
mining activities might create new
environmental problems or adversely affect
existing environmental problems at the site.
(C) The likelihood that reclamation
activities at the site might adversely affect
nearby or adjacent mining activities.
III. If OAML&R [Office of Abandoned Mine
Lands and Reclamation] and DMR (Division
of Mining and Reclamation) decide to
proceed with the reclamation project, then
they must concur in the following
determinations:
(A) The determination of the limits on any
coal refuse, coal waste, or other coal deposits
which can be extracted under the exemption
contained in CSR 38–2–3.31.
(B) The delineation of the boundaries of
the Abandoned Mine Lands Project.
IV. Documentation.
(A) The following documentation must be
included in the AML&R case file:
(a) The determinations made under
sections e.i.II. and e.i.III.
(b) The information taken into account in
making the determinations; and
(c) The names of the parties making
determinations.
V. Special requirements.
(A) For each project, OAML&R must do the
following;
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:15 Sep 15, 2006
Jkt 208001
(a) Characterize the site in terms of mine
drainage, active slides and slide-prone areas,
erosion and sedimentation, vegetation, toxic
materials, and hydrologic balance;
(b) Ensure that the reclamation project is
conducted in accordance with the provision
of 30 CFR Subchapter R and CSR 59–1 et seq.
(c) Develop specific site reclamation
requirements, including performance bond in
accordance with West Virginia Code 22–3–
26(b); and
(d) Require the contractor conducting the
reclamation to provide prior to the time
reclamation begins applicable documents
that clearly authorize the extraction of coal
and payment of royalties.
VI. Limitation.
If the reclamation contractor extracts coal
beyond the limits of the incidental coal
specified in paragraph e.i.III.A. of this
section, the contractor must obtain a permit
under CSR 38–2 et seq. for mining such coal.
Item 6.(g). The existing language
concerning the recovery of coal from
refuse piles, impoundments, or
abandoned mine workings containing
coal is deleted.
Item 8. This item concerns the
probability of post-reclamation
management, maintenance and control
of the area consistent with the
reclamation completed. Language is
deleted concerning requesting
information from field offices ‘‘well in
advance of submitting a Construction
Grant to OSMRE.’’ A sentence
concerning public meetings is deleted.
Finally, a sentence is deleted
concerning submittal of site selections
and information to OSM after the
intensive investigation process.
Section IV. Coordination of Reclamation
Work Among Abandoned Mine Land
Programs
Under the paragraph concerning the
Rural Abandoned Mine Land Program
(RAMP), new paragraph three is added
to read as follows:
3. The Office of Surface Mining has the
responsibility for funding the Appalachian
Clean Streams Initiative (ACSI), Watershed
Cooperative Agreement (WCA) program, and
the Federal Reclamation Program.
The ACSI began as a broad based program
to eliminate acid mine drainage from
abandoned coal mines. The mission of the
ASCI is to facilitate and coordinate citizen
groups, university researchers, the coal
industry, corporations, the environmental
community, and local, state, and Federal
government agencies that are involved in
cleaning up streams polluted by acid mine
drainage.
The WCA program, as part of the ACSI,
funds are available to award cooperative
agreements to not-for-profit organizations,
especially small watershed groups, that
undertake local acid mine drainage
reclamation projects. The maximum award
amount for each cooperative agreement will
normally be $100,000.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
54603
Section VI. Reclamation on Private Land
Subsection H. Under contractor
responsibilities, four items are deleted
at the end of this subsection concerning
waste sites that are used in conjunction
with an abandoned mine land project.
Section VIII. Public Participation and
Agency Review
(1) State Plan Revision.
Paragraph (a), concerning public
participation, has been revised with
several additions and deletions in the
statement of public notice that was
published in West Virginia regarding
the current amendment. The language
being revised related to an amendment
to the AMLR Plan dating to 1987.
The State also amended a paragraph
concerning conducting a public meeting
prior to submitting a grant application.
References to grant applications are
deleted and other language added
relating to non-emergency construction
projects. As amended, the paragraph
provides as follows:
Prior to submission(s) of a non-emergency
construction project to the OSM for the
issuance of an Authorization to Proceed
(ATP), the WVDEP will conduct at least one
public meeting in Charleston, West Virginia
to describe the project submittal’s contents.
Additional public meetings may be
conducted in other appropriate locations for
specific sites in the non-emergency
construction project in the following cases:
In other areas, references to grants
have been deleted, a reference to a grant
has been changed to ‘‘non-emergency
construction project,’’ and the words
‘‘environmental assessment’’ have been
deleted in two places. Finally, at item
(1) under the sentence ‘‘the
Environmental Assessments may be
reviewed by the following agencies,’’ a
reference to the ‘‘Office of Culture and
History’’ is deleted and replaced by
‘‘State Historic Preservation Office.’’
IX. Administrative Framework
A. Organizational (State Level)
In the second sentence, the
description of the Office of Abandoned
Mine Lands and Reclamation
(OAML&R) has been changed from
‘‘eight’’ to ‘‘six’’ groups. Additionally,
the following changes to the
descriptions of the OAML&R have been
made: ‘‘Grants/Administration’’ is now
‘‘Administration;’’ ‘‘Design’’ is now
‘‘Project Design;’’ ‘‘In-House Design’’ is
deleted; ‘‘Construction’’ is changed to
‘‘Project Construction;’’ and ‘‘Special
Reclamation Program and Stream
Restoration’’ has been deleted. The
word ‘‘Morgantown’’ has been deleted
as a regional AML&R staff office. The
following sentence is deleted:
E:\FR\FM\18SEP1.SGM
18SEP1
54604
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 180 / Monday, September 18, 2006 / Proposed Rules
Staff from each group is located in each
regional office, as stated above and is
accountable to the Engineer on day-by-day
operations, with general guidance from the
Nitro Headquarters.
specifications for projects. This group also
administers exploratory drilling, aerial
mapping and surveying contracts. The plans
and specifications are used by contractors to
bid on jobs.
Item 1. Under the sentence ‘‘the
program is served by the following
groups,’’ at Item 1., the heading ‘‘Grant/
Administration’’ is changed to
‘‘Administration.’’ Language is added to
the end of the last sentence, and an
additional sentence is added to read as
follows:
Items 7 and 8. These items have been
deleted and provided as follows:
They track expenditures as they relate to
administrative and construction functions
responsible for management of grants,
budgets and financial administration of
OAML&R. The Stream Restoration [Group]
performing all program water monitoring
functions.
Item 3. The heading of this item is
changed from ‘‘Planning Emergency
Section’’ to ‘‘Planning Group.’’ In the
first sentence, the word ‘‘selecting’’ is
deleted and is replaced by the word
‘‘identifying.’’ The sentence that states
‘‘[a]nd preparing the construction grant
application for submission to OSMRE’’
is deleted. Reference to ‘‘Construction
Grant’’ is deleted. The words ‘‘in
compliance with the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)’’ are
added following the words
‘‘Environmental Assessment.’’ Finally,
the following existing last two sentences
of Item 3 are deleted:
7. Special Reclamation—The function of
this component is to oversee reclamation of
bond forfeiture projects. This includes
bidding and inspections of reclamation
projects which are paid for with bonds from
forfeited permits.
8. Stream Restoration—This group is
involved with the treatment of acid mine
drainage.
B. Personnel Policies
In the fourth paragraph, the address
has been updated that identifies where
copies of laws and regulations are
available for public inspection as
follows:
Copies of these laws and regulations are
available for public inspection in the offices
of the WVDEP, 601 57th Street SE.,
Charleston, West Virginia 25304.
The paragraph concerning performing
a function or duty under Title IV of
SMCRA has been amended as follows:
All OAML&R personnel who perform a
function or duty under Title IV of SMCRA,
will complete and sign the standard ‘‘conflict
of interest’’ form provided by OSM in
accordance with West Virginia Code § 22–3–
31(a).
C. Purchasing and Procurement
The existing language concerning the
procedures concerning design
consultant services is deleted and
replaced with the following language:
Item 4. Under Emergency Group, the
second sentence, relating to an earlier
Plan amendment, is deleted.
Item 5. Under Project Construction
Group, the third sentence is deleted.
The deleted sentence stated as follows:
‘‘This group also may recommend
Change Orders to the Director.’’
Item 6. Under Project Design Group,
this item is amended by deleting the
words ‘‘projects’’ and ‘‘reclamation of’’
in the first sentence. The second
sentence is amended by deleting
language concerning ‘‘open end’’
contracts and adding language
concerning design consultants. As
amended, Item 6 provides as follows:
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSAL
This group is also responsible for
administering and conducting the Emergency
Program. Please see the Emergency Program
Amendment, which is attached to this
document for a more detailed explanation of
this component’s function.
a. Projects greater than $250,000
(1) Requesting program office develops the
Expression of Interest (EOI) purpose, project,
and scope of work, evaluation criteria, and
questionnaire for evaluation.
(2) The OAML&R must select a committee
of three to five members to review the EOIs.
All members must have training on the
process prior to participating on the
committee. They must select a chairperson
for the committee.
(3) This list of committee members is
forwarded to Administrative services
[Services] for review and approval.
(4) Administrative Services forwards the
package to the Purchasing Division for
processing.
(5) [The] Purchasing Division reviews the
package to determine accuracy and
compliance of rules and law.
(6) If information is in compliance with
WV Code 5G–1, the Purchasing Division
places a Class II ad in the newspaper and
publishes the EOI in the Purchasing Bulletin.
(7) The agency receives a copy of the EOI
with the opening time and date established.
(8) On the EOI opening date, the
Purchasing Division opens the EOIs and
forwards the agency copies for review, along
with a list of the firms submitting.
6. Project Design Group—This group
approves all consultant plans and
specifications involving abandoned mine
land projects and oversees the Office InHouse design whose function of this
component is to survey and design smaller
abandoned mine land and bond forfeiture
reclamation projects. They also evaluate and
select design consultants [to] perform all
necessary preparation of plans and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:15 Sep 15, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(9) A meeting should be set for committee
members to develop a short list (minimum of
three firms). This short list will be developed
by a consensus decision of the committee.
Both information provided in the EOI and
personal knowledge of a firm by a committee
member or members can be used in
developing the short list. Scores are not used
to develop the short list.
(10) After developing the short list, the
committee shall score each short listed firm
based on the evaluation criteria described in
the EOI. Each firm begins with a score of 100
points and points are deducted based on the
Consultant Qualification Evaluation. When
points are deducted, the reason for the
deductions must be provided. Reasons for
deductions must be consistent from one firm
to another for each EOI. Partial point
deductions are not allowed. Points may be
deducted for not having enough staff to
perform the job[,] but the description of that
deduction can not specify any particular
project (i.e., DEP 11200). Points may not be
deducted for using sub-consultants.
(11) The points for qualifications and work
experience should total 80 points. The
remaining 20 points shall be used for oral
interviews. The 20 points for oral interview
will give the agency some flexibility (i.e.,
firms approach to the job, their creativeness).
However, the point deductions must remain
consistent. If five points are deducted for not
meeting a prior project plan from one firm,
then each firm that did not meet a prior
project plan must have five points deducted.
(12) A letter is prepared for the signature
of all committee members to the Purchasing
Division with the top three firms ranked in
order by score.
(13) The consensus evaluation, signed
letter, and the Certification of Non-Conflict of
Interest form is forwarded to Administrative
Services for review. After the review and
approval by the agency procurement officer,
this package is submitted to the Purchasing
Division for review and approval.
(14) Once the evaluation is approved by
the assigned Buyer, the Purchasing Divisions
[Division’s] Best Value Evaluation Committee
convenes to review the request to ensure
scores are fair and equitable.
(15) After the Purchasing Divisions
[Division’s] approval, the agency is notified
to start negotiations with the top firm.
(16) A purchase order is prepared by the
assigned Purchasing Division buyer. The bid
file is prepared for the approval and
signature process within the Purchasing
Division.
(17) The bid file is forwarded to the
Attorney Generals [General’s] Office (AG) for
review and approval as to form. Once
approved by the AG, the bid file is returned
to the Purchasing Division. The purchase
order is issued and placed in the U.S. Mail.
(18) After receipt of the purchase order, the
vendor can proceed with the project.
b. Projects less than $250,000,
(1) The program office in charge of the
project for which design services are needed
selects a minimum of three firms which they
know have design knowledge of the
particular types of work associated with the
particular project.
(2) After receipt of the questionnaire of
qualifications, the program office rates those
E:\FR\FM\18SEP1.SGM
18SEP1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSAL
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 180 / Monday, September 18, 2006 / Proposed Rules
firms on their qualifications. The same
qualification as shown for the EOI is used to
score each firm. The highest qualified firm is
then contacted in the form of a work
directive which sets up an on-site meeting to
show the project and request a cost proposal.
(3) Costs are negotiated with that firm and
if they reach an agreement, the appropriate
paperwork is forwarded to administrative
[Administrative] Services for review. If the
cost negotiations are not successful with the
first firm, you proceed with the next firm and
follow that order until a cost is successfully
negotiated.
(4) A purchase order is prepared by the
assigned Purchasing Division Buyer. The bid
file is prepared for the approval and
signature process within the Purchasing
Division.
(5) The bid file is forwarded to the
Attorney Generals [General’s] (AG) Office for
review and approval as to form. Once
approved by the AG, the bid file is returned
to the Purchasing Division. The purchase
order is encumbered and placed in the U.S.
Mail.
c. Definitions.
Agency—DEP—Department of
Environmental Protection.
Agreement—A document used to acquire
services from a firm for a preset fee covering
a specific period of time. Terms & conditions
are outlined in this form. The WV–48
Agreement form is used for delegated
purchases and, on certain occasions, for
services over $10,000 in the absence of any
other formal written contract. The WV–48
must be completed, signed, and forwarded
with other appropriate paperwork to the DEP
Purchasing Office.
Best Value Purchasing—Purchasing
methods used in awarding a contract based
on evaluating and comparing all established
quality criteria where cost is not the sole
determining factor in the award.
Expression of Interest (EOI)—A best value
purchasing tool used only in the selection of
architects and engineers, which permits the
state to award a contract to the most qualified
firm at fair market value determined to be in
the state’s best interest.
FIMS—Financial Information Management
System used by State agencies for recording
financial information and encumbrances.
No-Debt Affidavit—A form required to be
completed by all firms prior to the award of
a contract. In accordance with 5A–3–10A of
the West Virginia Code, no contract or
renewal of any contract may be awarded to
any vendor who is a debtor to the State of
West Virginia in an aggregate amount of
$5,000 or more. This form must be submitted
with the purchase order recommendation.
Program Office—Any of the offices within
DEP (Division of Mining and Reclamation,
Division of Land Restoration, Division of
Water and Waste Management, Division of
Air Quality, Office of Explosives & Blasting,
Office of Abandoned Mine Lands, Office of
Oil & Gas, Office of Legal Services, Office of
Information Technology, Environmental
Enforcement, Office of Environmental
Remediation, and Administration/Executive
Office.
Purchase Order—A document issued by
the Purchasing Division (WV–16) used to
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:15 Sep 15, 2006
Jkt 208001
execute a purchase transaction with a
vendor. It serves as notice to a vendor that
an award has been made.
Specifications—A detailed description of a
commodity or service to be included in a
solicitation or bid or an awarded contract.
Team—Team Effort for Acquisition
Management
Existing paragraph (d) concerning
‘‘Construction Contracts’’ has been
deleted in its entirety.
D. Accounting System
Item 2. The words ‘‘permanent
posting charge number’’ and ‘‘posting
charge’’ have been deleted and replaced
by the words ‘‘project number.’’
Item 3. The words ‘‘as close as
possible’’ have been deleted and
replaced with the words ‘‘within
specified limits.’’
Item 4. In the first sentence, the word
‘‘when’’ is inserted between the word
‘‘and’’ and the phrase ‘‘this office
receives.’’ Also, the words ‘‘posting
charge’’ are deleted and replaced by the
word ‘‘project,’’ and the words ‘‘line
item number’’ are deleted and replaced
by the words ‘‘object code.’’
Emergency Reclamation Program
A. Designated Agency by Governor To
Receive Grants To Administer
Emergency Programs
The second sentence is amended by
adding a phrase to clarify that WVDEP
was ‘‘formerly the West Virginia
Department of Energy.’’
B. Legal Opinion From State Attorney
General Regarding Emergency Program
Administration
In the second sentence, the citation
‘‘WV Code Section 22–3’’ is deleted, and
in the third sentence, the citation
‘‘Chapter 22–3–4(b)(1)(A)’’ is changed to
‘‘Chapter 22–2–4(b)(1)(A).’’ In the
language that follows the corrected
citation to Chapter 22–2–4(b)(1)(A), at
(b)(A), the reference to Title ‘‘38’’ is
deleted and ‘‘59’’ is added in its place.
C. Policies and Procedures Regarding
the Emergency Reclamation Program
Item 6. Existing Item 6 concerns a
public meeting for a previous
amendment to the AMLR Plan and is
being deleted.
D. Administrative and Managerial
Structure
Item 2. The following language is
being deleted at the beginning of Item 2:
Six of the positions assigned to the
Emergency Group of the Abandoned Mine
Lands and Reclamation Section consist of
technical personnel. These positions include
5 inspectors and 2 engineers.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
54605
The last sentence at the end of the
existing second paragraph is being
deleted. That sentence stated that
‘‘[t]hese are all newly created
positions.’’
The last two sentences in the existing
third paragraph (the second sentence
contains a reference to page 75) are
being deleted. In their place, a new
sentence is added which states that
‘‘[t]his procedures (sic) is in compliance
to [with] the Department of
Administration, Division of
Purchasing.’’
Item 3. Under (c) Immediate Followup, at (ii), language is being deleted
concerning an engineer, realty
specialist, and is replaced by the phrase
‘‘appropriate personnel.’’ Also, the last
sentence is being deleted which
provides that ‘‘[t]his visit will be
coordinated with the Federal Office of
Surface Mining Reclamation and
Enforcement.’’ As amended,
subparagraph (ii) reads as follows:
(ii) Appropriate personnel will be
dispatched to the site as soon as possible if
a valid emergency situation exists.
At paragraph (iv), ‘‘color slides’’ is
being revised to ‘‘photos.’’
At paragraph (vi), the word
‘‘appropriate’’ is being added between
the words ‘‘conduct’’ and ‘‘appraisals.’’
The words ‘‘if indicated’’ are deleted at
the end of the sentence.
At paragraph (ix), the last sentence is
deleted that reads: ‘‘[t]he details of these
procedures are in the Emergency
Purchases Section.’’
(d) Inspections
At paragraph (ii), the words ‘‘their
immediate supervisors, who will turn
them into the Nitro’’ are being deleted.
In their place, the words ‘‘CharlestonKanawha City Headquarters’’ are added.
F. Emergency Purchases
Item 6. This item is being deleted. The
deleted language reads as follows:
6. In addition to the above stated
procedure, at the time of this writing an open
end or bilateral contract for construction
services is being assembled which may be
utilized for emergency services.
The following page shows the technical
evaluation sheet used to assist in selecting
consultants. The factors may be revised in
the future to reflect different needs.
G. Emergency Reclamation Activities
Language is being deleted that relates to
the number of emergency projects completed
as of 1987.
Water Supply
In the first sentence, the word
‘‘construction’’ is deleted between the phrase
‘‘to the State in its’’ and the word ‘‘grant.’’
Also, the words ‘‘any year’’ are deleted from
E:\FR\FM\18SEP1.SGM
18SEP1
54606
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 180 / Monday, September 18, 2006 / Proposed Rules
between the word ‘‘grant’’ and the phrase
‘‘for the purpose of replacing.’’
Target Areas For AML assistance
Item (3). In the second paragraph, the
words ‘‘and submitted to the Federal Office
of Surface Mining for funding approval’’ are
deleted from the end of the first sentence. As
revised, the sentence reads as follows: ‘‘After
a pool of eligible projects is determined,
potential projects are selected.’’
Revision to State Reclamation Plan Reflecting
Amendments to Title IV of the SMCRA
A. Expanded Eligibility Criteria. Item (2).
In the second paragraph, the citation ‘‘45 FR
14810–14819 March 6, 1980’’ is being deleted
and replaced by the following citation: ‘‘66
FR 31250–31258, June 11, 2001.’’
B. Acid Mine Drainage Treatment and
Abatement Program. Language is being
amended concerning coordination between
the State and the Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS). The State has
deleted references to the Rural Abandoned
Mine Program and to the U.S. Bureau of
Mines. As amended, the language is as
follows:
After consultation with the NRCS, the State
may reclaim certain areas that are severely
impacted by acid mine drainage. (This
coordination will continue the already
present cooperative effort between the State
and the NRCS).
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSAL
III. Public Comment Procedures
Under the provisions of 30 CFR
884.15(a), we are requesting your
comments on whether West Virginia’s
AMLR Plan amendment satisfies the
applicable State reclamation plan
approval criteria of 30 CFR 884.14.
The proposed amendments to the
West Virginia AMLR Plan can be
approved if:
1. The public has been given adequate
notice and opportunity to comment and
the administrative record does not
reflect major unresolved controversies;
2. Views of other Federal agencies
have been solicited and considered;
3. The State has the legal authority,
policies, and administrative structure to
carry out the State AMLR Plan;
4. The State AMLR Plan meets all the
requirements of the Federal AMLR
program provisions;
5. The State has an approved
regulatory program; and
6. The State AMLR Plan is in
compliance with all applicable State
and Federal laws and regulations.
If we approve the proposed
amendments, they will immediately
become part of the West Virginia AMLR
Plan.
Written Comments
Send your written or electronic
comments to OSM at the address given
above. Your written comments should
be specific, pertain only to the issues
proposed in this rulemaking, and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:15 Sep 15, 2006
Jkt 208001
include explanations in support of your
recommendations. We may not consider
or respond to your comments when
developing the final rule if they are
received after the close of the comment
period (see DATES). We will make every
attempt to log all comments into the
administrative record, but comments
delivered to an address other than the
Charleston Field Office may not be
logged in.
Electronic Comments
Please submit Internet comments as
an ASCII or Word file avoiding the use
of special characters and any form of
encryption. Please also include ‘‘Attn:
SATS No. WV–111–FOR, and your
name and return address in your
Internet message. If you do not receive
a confirmation that we have received
your Internet message, contact the
Charleston Field Office at (304) 347–
7158.
Availability of Comments
We will make comments, including
names and addresses of respondents,
available for public review during
normal business hours. We will not
consider anonymous comments. If
individual respondents request
confidentiality, we will honor their
request to the extent allowable by law.
Individual respondents who wish to
withhold their name or address from
public review, except for the city or
town, must state this prominently at the
beginning of their comments. We will
make all submissions from
organizations or businesses, and from
individuals identifying themselves as
representatives or officials of
organizations or businesses, available
for public inspection in their entirety.
Public Hearing
If you wish to speak at the public
hearing, contact the person listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT by 4
p.m. (local time), on October 3, 2006. If
you are disabled and need special
accommodations to attend a public
hearing, contact the person listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. We
will arrange the location and time of the
hearing with those persons requesting
the hearing. If no one requests an
opportunity to speak, we will not hold
a hearing.
To assist the transcriber and ensure an
accurate record, we request, if possible,
that each person who speaks at the
public hearing provide us with a written
copy of his or her comments. The public
hearing will continue on the specified
date until everyone scheduled to speak
has been given an opportunity to be
heard. If you are in the audience and
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
have not been scheduled to speak and
wish to do so, you will be allowed to
speak after those who have been
scheduled. We will end the hearing after
everyone scheduled to speak and others
present in the audience who wish to
speak, have been heard.
Public Meeting
If only one person requests an
opportunity to speak, we may hold a
public meeting rather than a public
hearing. If you wish to meet with us to
discuss the proposed AMLR plan
amendment, please request a meeting by
contacting the person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. All such
meetings will be open to the public and,
if possible, we will post notices of
meetings at the locations listed under
ADDRESSES. We will make a written
summary of each meeting a part of the
Administrative Record.
IV. Procedural Determinations
Executive Order 12630—Takings
This rule does not have takings
implications. This determination is
based on the analysis performed for the
counterpart Federal regulation.
Executive Order 12866—Regulatory
Planning and Review
This rule is exempt from review by
the Office of Management and Budget
under Executive Order 12866.
Executive Order 12988—Civil Justice
Reform
The Department of the Interior has
conducted the reviews required by
section 3 of Executive Order 12988 and
has determined that this rule meets the
applicable standards of subsections (a)
and (b) of that section. However, these
standards are not applicable to the
actual language of State or Tribal
abandoned mine land reclamation plans
and plan amendments because each
program is drafted and promulgated by
a specific State or Tribe, not by OSM.
Decisions on proposed abandoned mine
land reclamation plans and plan
amendments submitted by a State or
Tribe are based solely on a
determination of whether the submittal
meets the requirements of Title IV of
SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1231–1243) and 30
CFR part 884 of the Federal regulations.
Executive Order 13132—Federalism
This rule does not have Federalism
implications. SMCRA delineates the
roles of the Federal and State
governments with regard to the
regulation of abandoned mine land
reclamation programs. One of the
purposes of SMCRA is to ‘‘establish a
nationwide program to protect society
E:\FR\FM\18SEP1.SGM
18SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 180 / Monday, September 18, 2006 / Proposed Rules
and the environment from the adverse
effects of surface coal mining
operations.’’ Section 405(d) of SMCRA
requires State abandoned mine land
reclamation programs to be in
compliance with the procedures,
guidelines, and requirements
established under SMCRA.
Executive Order 13175—Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
In accordance with Executive Order
13175, we have evaluated the potential
effects of this rule on Federallyrecognized Indian tribes and have
determined that the rule does not have
substantial direct effects on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
The basis for this determination is that
our decision is on a State abandoned
mine land reclamation plan and does
not involve a Federal regulation
involving Indian lands.
Executive Order 13211—Regulations
That Significantly Affect the Supply,
Distribution, or Use of Energy
On May 18, 2001, the President issued
Executive Order 13211 which requires
agencies to prepare a Statement of
Energy Effects for a rule that is (1)
considered significant under Executive
Order 12866, and (2) likely to have a
significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy. Because
this rule is exempt from review under
Executive Order 12866 and is not
expected to have a significant adverse
effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy, a Statement of Energy Effects
is not required.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSAL
National Environmental Policy Act
This rule does not require an
environmental impact statement
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:15 Sep 15, 2006
Jkt 208001
because agency decisions on proposed
State and Tribal abandoned mine land
reclamation plans are categorically
excluded from compliance with the
National Environmental Policy Act (42
U.S.C. 4332) by the Manual of the
[*33277] Department of the Interior (516
DM 6, appendix 8, paragraph
8.4B(29)).section 702(d) of SMCRA (30
U.S.C. 1292(d)) provides that agency
decisions on proposed State regulatory
program provisions do not constitute
major Federal actions within the
meaning of section 102(2)(C) of the
National Environmental Policy Act (42
U.S.C. 4332(2)(C)).
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not contain
information collection requirements that
require approval by OMB under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3507 et seq.).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior
certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.). The State submittal,
which is the subject of this rule, is based
upon counterpart Federal regulations for
which an economic analysis was
prepared and certification made that
such regulations would not have a
significant economic effect upon a
substantial number of small entities. In
making the determination as to whether
this rule would have a significant
economic impact, the Department relied
upon the data and assumptions for the
counterpart Federal regulations.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5
U.S.C. 804(2), the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act.
This rule: (a) Does not have an annual
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
54607
effect on the economy of $100 million;
(b) Will not cause a major increase in
costs or prices for consumers,
individual industries, Federal, State, or
local government agencies, or
geographic regions; and (c) Does not
have significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or the ability
of U.S.-based enterprises to compete
with foreign-based enterprises. This
determination is based upon the fact
that the State submittal, which is the
subject of this rule, is based upon
counterpart Federal regulations for
which an analysis was prepared and a
determination made that the Federal
regulation was not considered a major
rule.
Unfunded Mandates
This rule will not impose an
unfunded mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector
of $100 million or more in any given
year. This determination is based upon
the fact that the State submittal, which
is the subject of this rule, is based upon
counterpart Federal regulations for
which an analysis was prepared and a
determination made that the Federal
regulation did not impose an unfunded
mandate.
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 948
Intergovernmental relations, Surface
mining, Underground mining.
Dated: August 18, 2006.
Michael K. Robinson,
Acting Regional Director, Appalachian
Region.
[FR Doc. E6–15444 Filed 9–15–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–05–P
E:\FR\FM\18SEP1.SGM
18SEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 180 (Monday, September 18, 2006)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 54601-54607]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-15444]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
30 CFR Part 948
[WV-111-FOR]
West Virginia Abandoned Mine Land Reclamation Plan
AGENCY: Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM),
Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule; public comment period and opportunity for public
hearing on proposed amendment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, OSM, are announcing the receipt of a proposed amendment to
the West Virginia Abandoned Mine Land Reclamation (AMLR) Plan under the
Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA or the Act).
The proposed amendment makes numerous revisions throughout the State's
AMLR Plan. The amendment is intended to update and improve the
effectiveness of the West Virginia AMLR Plan.
This document gives the times and locations that the West Virginia
AMLR Plan and proposed amendment is available for your inspection, the
comment period during which you may submit written comments, and the
procedures that will be followed for the public hearing, if one is
requested.
DATES: We will accept written comments on the proposed State AMLR Plan
until 4 p.m. on October 18, 2006. If requested, we will hold a public
hearing on the proposed State AMLR Plan amendment at 1 p.m. on October
13, 2006. We will accept requests to speak at a hearing until 4 p.m. on
October 3, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. WV-111-
FOR, by any of the following methods:
E-mail: chfo@osmre.gov. Include WV-111-FOR in the subject
line of the message;
Mail/Hand Delivery: Mr. Roger W. Calhoun, Director,
Charleston Field Office, Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and
Enforcement, 1027 Virginia Street, East, Charleston, West Virginia
25301; or
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and docket number for this rulemaking. For detailed instructions on
submitting comments and additional information on the rulemaking
process, see the
[[Page 54602]]
``Public Comment Procedures'' heading in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section of this document. You may also request to speak at a public
hearing by any of the methods listed above or by contacting the
individual listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Docket: You may review copies of the West Virginia AMLR Plan, this
amendment, a listing of any scheduled public hearings, and all written
comments received in response to this document at the addresses listed
below during normal business hours, Monday through Friday, excluding
holidays. You may also receive one free copy of this amendment to the
AMLR Plan by contacting OSM's Charleston Field Office listed below.
Mr. Roger W. Calhoun, Director, Charleston Field Office, Office of
Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, 1027 Virginia Street, East,
Charleston, West Virginia 25301, Telephone: (304) 347-7158. E-mail:
chfo@osmre.gov.
West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection, 601 57th
Street, SE, Charleston, WV 25304, Telephone: (304) 926-0485.
In addition, you may review a copy of the AMLR Plan amendment
during regular business hours at the following locations:
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, Morgantown Area
Office, 604 Cheat Road, Suite 150, Morgantown, West Virginia 26508,
Telephone: (304) 291-4004. (By Appointment Only)
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, Beckley Area
Office, 313 Harper Park Drive, Suite 3, Beckley, West Virginia 25801,
Telephone: (304) 255-5265.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Roger W. Calhoun, Director,
Charleston Field Office, Telephone: (304) 347-7158. E-mail:
chfo@osmre.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background on the Abandoned Mine Land Reclamation Program
II. Description of the Proposed AMLR Plan Amendment
III. Public Comment Procedures
IV. Procedural Determinations
I. Background on the Abandoned Mine Land Reclamation Program
The West Virginia AMLR Program was established by Title IV of SMCRA
(30 U.S.C. 1201 et seq.) in response to concerns over extensive
environmental damage caused by past coal mining activities. The program
is funded by a reclamation fee collected on each ton of coal that is
produced. The money collected is used to finance the reclamation of
abandoned coal mines and for other authorized activities. Section 405
of the Act allows States and Indian Tribes to assume exclusive
responsibility for reclamation activity within the State or on Indian
lands if they develop and submit to the Secretary of the Interior for
approval, a program (often referred to as a plan) for the reclamation
of abandoned coal mined lands. The West Virginia AMLR Plan was approved
by OSM effective February 23, 1981. You can find additional information
about the West Virginia AMLR Plan at 30 CFR 948.20, 948.25, and 948.26.
II. Description of the Proposed AMLR Plan Amendment
By letter dated June 27, 2006 (Administrative Record Number WV-
1469), the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection
(WVDEP), Office of Abandoned Mine Lands and Reclamation submitted an
amendment to its AMLR Plan under SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1201 et seq.). The
amendment consists of numerous changes throughout the AMLR Plan, some
of which concern the AML Enhancement Rule. In its submittal of the
amendment, the WVDEP stated that the revision incorporates the AML
Enhancement Rule at 30 CFR Parts 707 and 874, as published by OSM in
the Federal Register on Friday, February 12, 1999 (64 FR 7470-7483).
In its submittal letter, the State noted that the amendment also
contains minor organizational and operational changes. Minor changes,
such as organizational changes, re-numbering of sections, updating the
name of departments or agencies, deletion of historical narrative, and
the correction of typographical and grammatical errors, are non-
substantive changes that do not affect the basis of the original
approval of the West Virginia AMLR Plan. Therefore, these minor changes
are hereby approved, and we will not identify such non-substantive
changes in this notice.
West Virginia proposes the following amendments to the State's AMLR
Plan:
Introduction
Part B, State Reclamation Plan
This part contains additions and deletions of historical
information about the West Virginia AMLR Plan. This section also states
that the amendment will update the organization of the Office of
Abandoned Mine Lands and Reclamation and establish the Abandoned Mine
Lands and Reclamation Enhancement Rule.
Section II. Purposes of the State Reclamation Program
Language is deleted and added to clarify that projects are selected
on the basis of the priorities identified at W. Va. Code 22-2-4.
Section III. Criteria for Ranking and Identifying Projects To Be Funded
A. Identification of problems. The State has deleted language
concerning examples of data provided by contributors to the Abandoned
Mine Land Inventory System (AMLIS).
B. Prioritization of problems. Language is added to clarify that
projects are selected on the basis of the priorities identified at W.
Va. Code 22-2-4.
B.4: This paragraph is deleted and formerly identified as priority
4 projects, research and demonstration projects.
Factors Considered for Reclamation Project Evaluation
Item 1. The State has deleted related language concerning research
projects.
Item 6.(e). The existing language is deleted concerning waiving any
requirement that a reclamation contractor obtain a reclamation permit
to extract or remove coal if the waiver will facilitate removal of coal
and the mining is incidental to the project. In its place, the
following language has been added:
(e) Abandoned Mine Lands and Reclamation Enhancement Rule, as
used in this part, the following definitions have the specific
meaning;
Definitions: Extraction of coal as an incidental part means the
extraction of coal which is necessary to enable the construction to
be accomplished. For this purpose of this part, only that coal
extraction from within the right-of-way. In the case of a road,
railroad, utility line or other such road construction, or within
the boundaries of the area directly affected by other types of
government-financed construction, may be considered incidental to
that construction and shall be subject to the requirements of
Chapter 22, Article 3, Section 26, Paragraph b, of the Code of West
Virginia, legislative rules and this plan. Extraction of coal
outside the right-of-way or boundary of the area directly affected
by the construction shall be subject to the requirements of Chapter
22, Article 3 of the Code of West Virginia, and the rules
promulgated thereunder.
Government financing agency means a Federal, State, county,
municipal, or local unit of government, or a department, bureau,
agency or office of the unit which, directly or through another unit
of government, finances construction.
Government-financed construction means construction funded at 50
percent or more by funds appropriated from a government financing
agency's budget or obtained from
[[Page 54603]]
general revenue bonds. Government financing at less than 50 percent
may qualify if the construction is undertaken as an approved AML
reclamation project under Chapter 22, Article 2 of the Code of West
Virginia. Construction funded through government financing agency
guarantees, insurance, loans, funds obtained through industrial
revenue bonds or their equivalent, or in-kind payments does not
qualify as government-financed construction.
(i) The Abandoned Mine Land Program (AML) shall work in
consultation with the Title V regulatory authority to administer
these provisions.
(I) To qualify as a Federal, State, county, Municipal, or other
local government-financed highway or other construction project, the
construction must be funded at fifty percent (50%) or more by the
relevant government agency. Funding at less than fifty percent (50%)
may qualify if the construction is undertaken as an approved AML
Reclamation contract.
(II) For reclamation projects receiving less than fifty percent
(50%) government funding because of planned coal extraction, AML may
qualify if the construction is undertaken as an approved Reclamation
project under Title IV of SMCRA. AML shall consult with [the] Title
V regulatory authority to make the following determinations.
WVDEP must determine the following:
(A) The likelihood of the coal being mined under a surface
mining permit. This determination must take into account available
information such as:
(a) Coal reserves from existing mine maps or other sources;
(b) Existing environmental conditions;
(c) All prior mining activity on or adjacent to the site;
(d) Current and historic coal production in the area; and
(e) Any known or anticipated interest in mining the site.
(B) The likelihood that nearby or adjacent mining activities
might create new environmental problems or adversely affect existing
environmental problems at the site.
(C) The likelihood that reclamation activities at the site might
adversely affect nearby or adjacent mining activities.
III. If OAML&R [Office of Abandoned Mine Lands and Reclamation]
and DMR (Division of Mining and Reclamation) decide to proceed with
the reclamation project, then they must concur in the following
determinations:
(A) The determination of the limits on any coal refuse, coal
waste, or other coal deposits which can be extracted under the
exemption contained in CSR 38-2-3.31.
(B) The delineation of the boundaries of the Abandoned Mine
Lands Project.
IV. Documentation.
(A) The following documentation must be included in the AML&R
case file:
(a) The determinations made under sections e.i.II. and e.i.III.
(b) The information taken into account in making the
determinations; and
(c) The names of the parties making determinations.
V. Special requirements.
(A) For each project, OAML&R must do the following;
(a) Characterize the site in terms of mine drainage, active
slides and slide-prone areas, erosion and sedimentation, vegetation,
toxic materials, and hydrologic balance;
(b) Ensure that the reclamation project is conducted in
accordance with the provision of 30 CFR Subchapter R and CSR 59-1 et
seq.
(c) Develop specific site reclamation requirements, including
performance bond in accordance with West Virginia Code 22-3-26(b);
and
(d) Require the contractor conducting the reclamation to provide
prior to the time reclamation begins applicable documents that
clearly authorize the extraction of coal and payment of royalties.
VI. Limitation.
If the reclamation contractor extracts coal beyond the limits of
the incidental coal specified in paragraph e.i.III.A. of this
section, the contractor must obtain a permit under CSR 38-2 et seq.
for mining such coal.
Item 6.(g). The existing language concerning the recovery of coal
from refuse piles, impoundments, or abandoned mine workings containing
coal is deleted.
Item 8. This item concerns the probability of post-reclamation
management, maintenance and control of the area consistent with the
reclamation completed. Language is deleted concerning requesting
information from field offices ``well in advance of submitting a
Construction Grant to OSMRE.'' A sentence concerning public meetings is
deleted. Finally, a sentence is deleted concerning submittal of site
selections and information to OSM after the intensive investigation
process.
Section IV. Coordination of Reclamation Work Among Abandoned Mine Land
Programs
Under the paragraph concerning the Rural Abandoned Mine Land
Program (RAMP), new paragraph three is added to read as follows:
3. The Office of Surface Mining has the responsibility for
funding the Appalachian Clean Streams Initiative (ACSI), Watershed
Cooperative Agreement (WCA) program, and the Federal Reclamation
Program.
The ACSI began as a broad based program to eliminate acid mine
drainage from abandoned coal mines. The mission of the ASCI is to
facilitate and coordinate citizen groups, university researchers,
the coal industry, corporations, the environmental community, and
local, state, and Federal government agencies that are involved in
cleaning up streams polluted by acid mine drainage.
The WCA program, as part of the ACSI, funds are available to
award cooperative agreements to not-for-profit organizations,
especially small watershed groups, that undertake local acid mine
drainage reclamation projects. The maximum award amount for each
cooperative agreement will normally be $100,000.
Section VI. Reclamation on Private Land
Subsection H. Under contractor responsibilities, four items are
deleted at the end of this subsection concerning waste sites that are
used in conjunction with an abandoned mine land project.
Section VIII. Public Participation and Agency Review
(1) State Plan Revision.
Paragraph (a), concerning public participation, has been revised
with several additions and deletions in the statement of public notice
that was published in West Virginia regarding the current amendment.
The language being revised related to an amendment to the AMLR Plan
dating to 1987.
The State also amended a paragraph concerning conducting a public
meeting prior to submitting a grant application. References to grant
applications are deleted and other language added relating to non-
emergency construction projects. As amended, the paragraph provides as
follows:
Prior to submission(s) of a non-emergency construction project
to the OSM for the issuance of an Authorization to Proceed (ATP),
the WVDEP will conduct at least one public meeting in Charleston,
West Virginia to describe the project submittal's contents.
Additional public meetings may be conducted in other appropriate
locations for specific sites in the non-emergency construction
project in the following cases:
In other areas, references to grants have been deleted, a reference
to a grant has been changed to ``non-emergency construction project,''
and the words ``environmental assessment'' have been deleted in two
places. Finally, at item (1) under the sentence ``the Environmental
Assessments may be reviewed by the following agencies,'' a reference to
the ``Office of Culture and History'' is deleted and replaced by
``State Historic Preservation Office.''
IX. Administrative Framework
A. Organizational (State Level)
In the second sentence, the description of the Office of Abandoned
Mine Lands and Reclamation (OAML&R) has been changed from ``eight'' to
``six'' groups. Additionally, the following changes to the descriptions
of the OAML&R have been made: ``Grants/Administration'' is now
``Administration;'' ``Design'' is now ``Project Design;'' ``In-House
Design'' is deleted; ``Construction'' is changed to ``Project
Construction;'' and ``Special Reclamation Program and Stream
Restoration'' has been deleted. The word ``Morgantown'' has been
deleted as a regional AML&R staff office. The following sentence is
deleted:
[[Page 54604]]
Staff from each group is located in each regional office, as
stated above and is accountable to the Engineer on day-by-day
operations, with general guidance from the Nitro Headquarters.
Item 1. Under the sentence ``the program is served by the following
groups,'' at Item 1., the heading ``Grant/Administration'' is changed
to ``Administration.'' Language is added to the end of the last
sentence, and an additional sentence is added to read as follows:
They track expenditures as they relate to administrative and
construction functions responsible for management of grants, budgets
and financial administration of OAML&R. The Stream Restoration
[Group] performing all program water monitoring functions.
Item 3. The heading of this item is changed from ``Planning
Emergency Section'' to ``Planning Group.'' In the first sentence, the
word ``selecting'' is deleted and is replaced by the word
``identifying.'' The sentence that states ``[a]nd preparing the
construction grant application for submission to OSMRE'' is deleted.
Reference to ``Construction Grant'' is deleted. The words ``in
compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)'' are
added following the words ``Environmental Assessment.'' Finally, the
following existing last two sentences of Item 3 are deleted:
This group is also responsible for administering and conducting
the Emergency Program. Please see the Emergency Program Amendment,
which is attached to this document for a more detailed explanation
of this component's function.
Item 4. Under Emergency Group, the second sentence, relating to an
earlier Plan amendment, is deleted.
Item 5. Under Project Construction Group, the third sentence is
deleted. The deleted sentence stated as follows: ``This group also may
recommend Change Orders to the Director.''
Item 6. Under Project Design Group, this item is amended by
deleting the words ``projects'' and ``reclamation of'' in the first
sentence. The second sentence is amended by deleting language
concerning ``open end'' contracts and adding language concerning design
consultants. As amended, Item 6 provides as follows:
6. Project Design Group--This group approves all consultant
plans and specifications involving abandoned mine land projects and
oversees the Office In-House design whose function of this component
is to survey and design smaller abandoned mine land and bond
forfeiture reclamation projects. They also evaluate and select
design consultants [to] perform all necessary preparation of plans
and specifications for projects. This group also administers
exploratory drilling, aerial mapping and surveying contracts. The
plans and specifications are used by contractors to bid on jobs.
Items 7 and 8. These items have been deleted and provided as
follows:
7. Special Reclamation--The function of this component is to
oversee reclamation of bond forfeiture projects. This includes
bidding and inspections of reclamation projects which are paid for
with bonds from forfeited permits.
8. Stream Restoration--This group is involved with the treatment
of acid mine drainage.
B. Personnel Policies
In the fourth paragraph, the address has been updated that
identifies where copies of laws and regulations are available for
public inspection as follows:
Copies of these laws and regulations are available for public
inspection in the offices of the WVDEP, 601 57th Street SE.,
Charleston, West Virginia 25304.
The paragraph concerning performing a function or duty under Title
IV of SMCRA has been amended as follows:
All OAML&R personnel who perform a function or duty under Title
IV of SMCRA, will complete and sign the standard ``conflict of
interest'' form provided by OSM in accordance with West Virginia
Code Sec. 22-3-31(a).
C. Purchasing and Procurement
The existing language concerning the procedures concerning design
consultant services is deleted and replaced with the following
language:
a. Projects greater than $250,000
(1) Requesting program office develops the Expression of
Interest (EOI) purpose, project, and scope of work, evaluation
criteria, and questionnaire for evaluation.
(2) The OAML&R must select a committee of three to five members
to review the EOIs. All members must have training on the process
prior to participating on the committee. They must select a
chairperson for the committee.
(3) This list of committee members is forwarded to
Administrative services [Services] for review and approval.
(4) Administrative Services forwards the package to the
Purchasing Division for processing.
(5) [The] Purchasing Division reviews the package to determine
accuracy and compliance of rules and law.
(6) If information is in compliance with WV Code 5G-1, the
Purchasing Division places a Class II ad in the newspaper and
publishes the EOI in the Purchasing Bulletin.
(7) The agency receives a copy of the EOI with the opening time
and date established.
(8) On the EOI opening date, the Purchasing Division opens the
EOIs and forwards the agency copies for review, along with a list of
the firms submitting.
(9) A meeting should be set for committee members to develop a
short list (minimum of three firms). This short list will be
developed by a consensus decision of the committee. Both information
provided in the EOI and personal knowledge of a firm by a committee
member or members can be used in developing the short list. Scores
are not used to develop the short list.
(10) After developing the short list, the committee shall score
each short listed firm based on the evaluation criteria described in
the EOI. Each firm begins with a score of 100 points and points are
deducted based on the Consultant Qualification Evaluation. When
points are deducted, the reason for the deductions must be provided.
Reasons for deductions must be consistent from one firm to another
for each EOI. Partial point deductions are not allowed. Points may
be deducted for not having enough staff to perform the job[,] but
the description of that deduction can not specify any particular
project (i.e., DEP 11200). Points may not be deducted for using sub-
consultants.
(11) The points for qualifications and work experience should
total 80 points. The remaining 20 points shall be used for oral
interviews. The 20 points for oral interview will give the agency
some flexibility (i.e., firms approach to the job, their
creativeness). However, the point deductions must remain consistent.
If five points are deducted for not meeting a prior project plan
from one firm, then each firm that did not meet a prior project plan
must have five points deducted.
(12) A letter is prepared for the signature of all committee
members to the Purchasing Division with the top three firms ranked
in order by score.
(13) The consensus evaluation, signed letter, and the
Certification of Non-Conflict of Interest form is forwarded to
Administrative Services for review. After the review and approval by
the agency procurement officer, this package is submitted to the
Purchasing Division for review and approval.
(14) Once the evaluation is approved by the assigned Buyer, the
Purchasing Divisions [Division's] Best Value Evaluation Committee
convenes to review the request to ensure scores are fair and
equitable.
(15) After the Purchasing Divisions [Division's] approval, the
agency is notified to start negotiations with the top firm.
(16) A purchase order is prepared by the assigned Purchasing
Division buyer. The bid file is prepared for the approval and
signature process within the Purchasing Division.
(17) The bid file is forwarded to the Attorney Generals
[General's] Office (AG) for review and approval as to form. Once
approved by the AG, the bid file is returned to the Purchasing
Division. The purchase order is issued and placed in the U.S. Mail.
(18) After receipt of the purchase order, the vendor can proceed
with the project.
b. Projects less than $250,000,
(1) The program office in charge of the project for which design
services are needed selects a minimum of three firms which they know
have design knowledge of the particular types of work associated
with the particular project.
(2) After receipt of the questionnaire of qualifications, the
program office rates those
[[Page 54605]]
firms on their qualifications. The same qualification as shown for
the EOI is used to score each firm. The highest qualified firm is
then contacted in the form of a work directive which sets up an on-
site meeting to show the project and request a cost proposal.
(3) Costs are negotiated with that firm and if they reach an
agreement, the appropriate paperwork is forwarded to administrative
[Administrative] Services for review. If the cost negotiations are
not successful with the first firm, you proceed with the next firm
and follow that order until a cost is successfully negotiated.
(4) A purchase order is prepared by the assigned Purchasing
Division Buyer. The bid file is prepared for the approval and
signature process within the Purchasing Division.
(5) The bid file is forwarded to the Attorney Generals
[General's] (AG) Office for review and approval as to form. Once
approved by the AG, the bid file is returned to the Purchasing
Division. The purchase order is encumbered and placed in the U.S.
Mail.
c. Definitions.
Agency--DEP--Department of Environmental Protection.
Agreement--A document used to acquire services from a firm for a
preset fee covering a specific period of time. Terms & conditions
are outlined in this form. The WV-48 Agreement form is used for
delegated purchases and, on certain occasions, for services over
$10,000 in the absence of any other formal written contract. The WV-
48 must be completed, signed, and forwarded with other appropriate
paperwork to the DEP Purchasing Office.
Best Value Purchasing--Purchasing methods used in awarding a
contract based on evaluating and comparing all established quality
criteria where cost is not the sole determining factor in the award.
Expression of Interest (EOI)--A best value purchasing tool used
only in the selection of architects and engineers, which permits the
state to award a contract to the most qualified firm at fair market
value determined to be in the state's best interest.
FIMS--Financial Information Management System used by State
agencies for recording financial information and encumbrances.
No-Debt Affidavit--A form required to be completed by all firms
prior to the award of a contract. In accordance with 5A-3-10A of the
West Virginia Code, no contract or renewal of any contract may be
awarded to any vendor who is a debtor to the State of West Virginia
in an aggregate amount of $5,000 or more. This form must be
submitted with the purchase order recommendation.
Program Office--Any of the offices within DEP (Division of
Mining and Reclamation, Division of Land Restoration, Division of
Water and Waste Management, Division of Air Quality, Office of
Explosives & Blasting, Office of Abandoned Mine Lands, Office of Oil
& Gas, Office of Legal Services, Office of Information Technology,
Environmental Enforcement, Office of Environmental Remediation, and
Administration/Executive Office.
Purchase Order--A document issued by the Purchasing Division
(WV-16) used to execute a purchase transaction with a vendor. It
serves as notice to a vendor that an award has been made.
Specifications--A detailed description of a commodity or service
to be included in a solicitation or bid or an awarded contract.
Team--Team Effort for Acquisition Management
Existing paragraph (d) concerning ``Construction Contracts'' has
been deleted in its entirety.
D. Accounting System
Item 2. The words ``permanent posting charge number'' and ``posting
charge'' have been deleted and replaced by the words ``project
number.''
Item 3. The words ``as close as possible'' have been deleted and
replaced with the words ``within specified limits.''
Item 4. In the first sentence, the word ``when'' is inserted
between the word ``and'' and the phrase ``this office receives.'' Also,
the words ``posting charge'' are deleted and replaced by the word
``project,'' and the words ``line item number'' are deleted and
replaced by the words ``object code.''
Emergency Reclamation Program
A. Designated Agency by Governor To Receive Grants To Administer
Emergency Programs
The second sentence is amended by adding a phrase to clarify that
WVDEP was ``formerly the West Virginia Department of Energy.''
B. Legal Opinion From State Attorney General Regarding Emergency
Program Administration
In the second sentence, the citation ``WV Code Section 22-3'' is
deleted, and in the third sentence, the citation ``Chapter 22-3-
4(b)(1)(A)'' is changed to ``Chapter 22-2-4(b)(1)(A).'' In the language
that follows the corrected citation to Chapter 22-2-4(b)(1)(A), at
(b)(A), the reference to Title ``38'' is deleted and ``59'' is added in
its place.
C. Policies and Procedures Regarding the Emergency Reclamation Program
Item 6. Existing Item 6 concerns a public meeting for a previous
amendment to the AMLR Plan and is being deleted.
D. Administrative and Managerial Structure
Item 2. The following language is being deleted at the beginning of
Item 2:
Six of the positions assigned to the Emergency Group of the
Abandoned Mine Lands and Reclamation Section consist of technical
personnel. These positions include 5 inspectors and 2 engineers.
The last sentence at the end of the existing second paragraph is
being deleted. That sentence stated that ``[t]hese are all newly
created positions.''
The last two sentences in the existing third paragraph (the second
sentence contains a reference to page 75) are being deleted. In their
place, a new sentence is added which states that ``[t]his procedures
(sic) is in compliance to [with] the Department of Administration,
Division of Purchasing.''
Item 3. Under (c) Immediate Follow-up, at (ii), language is being
deleted concerning an engineer, realty specialist, and is replaced by
the phrase ``appropriate personnel.'' Also, the last sentence is being
deleted which provides that ``[t]his visit will be coordinated with the
Federal Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement.'' As
amended, subparagraph (ii) reads as follows:
(ii) Appropriate personnel will be dispatched to the site as
soon as possible if a valid emergency situation exists.
At paragraph (iv), ``color slides'' is being revised to ``photos.''
At paragraph (vi), the word ``appropriate'' is being added between
the words ``conduct'' and ``appraisals.'' The words ``if indicated''
are deleted at the end of the sentence.
At paragraph (ix), the last sentence is deleted that reads: ``[t]he
details of these procedures are in the Emergency Purchases Section.''
(d) Inspections
At paragraph (ii), the words ``their immediate supervisors, who
will turn them into the Nitro'' are being deleted. In their place, the
words ``Charleston-Kanawha City Headquarters'' are added.
F. Emergency Purchases
Item 6. This item is being deleted. The deleted language reads as
follows:
6. In addition to the above stated procedure, at the time of
this writing an open end or bilateral contract for construction
services is being assembled which may be utilized for emergency
services.
The following page shows the technical evaluation sheet used to
assist in selecting consultants. The factors may be revised in the
future to reflect different needs.
G. Emergency Reclamation Activities
Language is being deleted that relates to the number of
emergency projects completed as of 1987.
Water Supply
In the first sentence, the word ``construction'' is deleted
between the phrase ``to the State in its'' and the word ``grant.''
Also, the words ``any year'' are deleted from
[[Page 54606]]
between the word ``grant'' and the phrase ``for the purpose of
replacing.''
Target Areas For AML assistance
Item (3). In the second paragraph, the words ``and submitted to
the Federal Office of Surface Mining for funding approval'' are
deleted from the end of the first sentence. As revised, the sentence
reads as follows: ``After a pool of eligible projects is determined,
potential projects are selected.''
Revision to State Reclamation Plan Reflecting Amendments to Title IV of
the SMCRA
A. Expanded Eligibility Criteria. Item (2). In the second
paragraph, the citation ``45 FR 14810-14819 March 6, 1980'' is being
deleted and replaced by the following citation: ``66 FR 31250-31258,
June 11, 2001.''
B. Acid Mine Drainage Treatment and Abatement Program. Language
is being amended concerning coordination between the State and the
Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). The State has deleted
references to the Rural Abandoned Mine Program and to the U.S.
Bureau of Mines. As amended, the language is as follows:
After consultation with the NRCS, the State may reclaim certain
areas that are severely impacted by acid mine drainage. (This
coordination will continue the already present cooperative effort
between the State and the NRCS).
III. Public Comment Procedures
Under the provisions of 30 CFR 884.15(a), we are requesting your
comments on whether West Virginia's AMLR Plan amendment satisfies the
applicable State reclamation plan approval criteria of 30 CFR 884.14.
The proposed amendments to the West Virginia AMLR Plan can be
approved if:
1. The public has been given adequate notice and opportunity to
comment and the administrative record does not reflect major unresolved
controversies;
2. Views of other Federal agencies have been solicited and
considered;
3. The State has the legal authority, policies, and administrative
structure to carry out the State AMLR Plan;
4. The State AMLR Plan meets all the requirements of the Federal
AMLR program provisions;
5. The State has an approved regulatory program; and
6. The State AMLR Plan is in compliance with all applicable State
and Federal laws and regulations.
If we approve the proposed amendments, they will immediately become
part of the West Virginia AMLR Plan.
Written Comments
Send your written or electronic comments to OSM at the address
given above. Your written comments should be specific, pertain only to
the issues proposed in this rulemaking, and include explanations in
support of your recommendations. We may not consider or respond to your
comments when developing the final rule if they are received after the
close of the comment period (see DATES). We will make every attempt to
log all comments into the administrative record, but comments delivered
to an address other than the Charleston Field Office may not be logged
in.
Electronic Comments
Please submit Internet comments as an ASCII or Word file avoiding
the use of special characters and any form of encryption. Please also
include ``Attn: SATS No. WV-111-FOR, and your name and return address
in your Internet message. If you do not receive a confirmation that we
have received your Internet message, contact the Charleston Field
Office at (304) 347-7158.
Availability of Comments
We will make comments, including names and addresses of
respondents, available for public review during normal business hours.
We will not consider anonymous comments. If individual respondents
request confidentiality, we will honor their request to the extent
allowable by law. Individual respondents who wish to withhold their
name or address from public review, except for the city or town, must
state this prominently at the beginning of their comments. We will make
all submissions from organizations or businesses, and from individuals
identifying themselves as representatives or officials of organizations
or businesses, available for public inspection in their entirety.
Public Hearing
If you wish to speak at the public hearing, contact the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT by 4 p.m. (local time), on
October 3, 2006. If you are disabled and need special accommodations to
attend a public hearing, contact the person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT. We will arrange the location and time of the
hearing with those persons requesting the hearing. If no one requests
an opportunity to speak, we will not hold a hearing.
To assist the transcriber and ensure an accurate record, we
request, if possible, that each person who speaks at the public hearing
provide us with a written copy of his or her comments. The public
hearing will continue on the specified date until everyone scheduled to
speak has been given an opportunity to be heard. If you are in the
audience and have not been scheduled to speak and wish to do so, you
will be allowed to speak after those who have been scheduled. We will
end the hearing after everyone scheduled to speak and others present in
the audience who wish to speak, have been heard.
Public Meeting
If only one person requests an opportunity to speak, we may hold a
public meeting rather than a public hearing. If you wish to meet with
us to discuss the proposed AMLR plan amendment, please request a
meeting by contacting the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT. All such meetings will be open to the public and, if possible,
we will post notices of meetings at the locations listed under
ADDRESSES. We will make a written summary of each meeting a part of the
Administrative Record.
IV. Procedural Determinations
Executive Order 12630--Takings
This rule does not have takings implications. This determination is
based on the analysis performed for the counterpart Federal regulation.
Executive Order 12866--Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is exempt from review by the Office of Management and
Budget under Executive Order 12866.
Executive Order 12988--Civil Justice Reform
The Department of the Interior has conducted the reviews required
by section 3 of Executive Order 12988 and has determined that this rule
meets the applicable standards of subsections (a) and (b) of that
section. However, these standards are not applicable to the actual
language of State or Tribal abandoned mine land reclamation plans and
plan amendments because each program is drafted and promulgated by a
specific State or Tribe, not by OSM. Decisions on proposed abandoned
mine land reclamation plans and plan amendments submitted by a State or
Tribe are based solely on a determination of whether the submittal
meets the requirements of Title IV of SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1231-1243) and
30 CFR part 884 of the Federal regulations.
Executive Order 13132--Federalism
This rule does not have Federalism implications. SMCRA delineates
the roles of the Federal and State governments with regard to the
regulation of abandoned mine land reclamation programs. One of the
purposes of SMCRA is to ``establish a nationwide program to protect
society
[[Page 54607]]
and the environment from the adverse effects of surface coal mining
operations.'' Section 405(d) of SMCRA requires State abandoned mine
land reclamation programs to be in compliance with the procedures,
guidelines, and requirements established under SMCRA.
Executive Order 13175--Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
In accordance with Executive Order 13175, we have evaluated the
potential effects of this rule on Federally-recognized Indian tribes
and have determined that the rule does not have substantial direct
effects on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
The basis for this determination is that our decision is on a State
abandoned mine land reclamation plan and does not involve a Federal
regulation involving Indian lands.
Executive Order 13211--Regulations That Significantly Affect the
Supply, Distribution, or Use of Energy
On May 18, 2001, the President issued Executive Order 13211 which
requires agencies to prepare a Statement of Energy Effects for a rule
that is (1) considered significant under Executive Order 12866, and (2)
likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy. Because this rule is exempt from review
under Executive Order 12866 and is not expected to have a significant
adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy, a
Statement of Energy Effects is not required.
National Environmental Policy Act
This rule does not require an environmental impact statement
because agency decisions on proposed State and Tribal abandoned mine
land reclamation plans are categorically excluded from compliance with
the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332) by the Manual of
the [*33277] Department of the Interior (516 DM 6, appendix 8,
paragraph 8.4B(29)).section 702(d) of SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1292(d))
provides that agency decisions on proposed State regulatory program
provisions do not constitute major Federal actions within the meaning
of section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act (42
U.S.C. 4332(2)(C)).
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not contain information collection requirements that
require approval by OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3507 et seq.).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior certifies that this rule will not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
The State submittal, which is the subject of this rule, is based upon
counterpart Federal regulations for which an economic analysis was
prepared and certification made that such regulations would not have a
significant economic effect upon a substantial number of small
entities. In making the determination as to whether this rule would
have a significant economic impact, the Department relied upon the data
and assumptions for the counterpart Federal regulations.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. This rule: (a) Does not
have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million; (b) Will not
cause a major increase in costs or prices for consumers, individual
industries, Federal, State, or local government agencies, or geographic
regions; and (c) Does not have significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the
ability of U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based
enterprises. This determination is based upon the fact that the State
submittal, which is the subject of this rule, is based upon counterpart
Federal regulations for which an analysis was prepared and a
determination made that the Federal regulation was not considered a
major rule.
Unfunded Mandates
This rule will not impose an unfunded mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector of $100 million or more in any
given year. This determination is based upon the fact that the State
submittal, which is the subject of this rule, is based upon counterpart
Federal regulations for which an analysis was prepared and a
determination made that the Federal regulation did not impose an
unfunded mandate.
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 948
Intergovernmental relations, Surface mining, Underground mining.
Dated: August 18, 2006.
Michael K. Robinson,
Acting Regional Director, Appalachian Region.
[FR Doc. E6-15444 Filed 9-15-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-05-P