Notice of Availability of the Record of Decision for the Environmental Impact Statement on the South Denali Implementation Plan, Denali National Park and Preserve, AK, 54687-54688 [06-7714]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 180 / Monday, September 18, 2006 / Notices
mail survey; 500 respondents for
telephone interviews).
Estimated average burden hours per
response: 1⁄3 hour for mail survey
respondents; 1⁄12 hour for follow-up
telephone interview respondents.
Frequency of Response: 1 time per
respondent.
Estimated annual reporting burden:
709 hours.
Dated: September 7, 2006.
Leonard E. Stowe,
NPS, Information Collection Clearance
Officer.
[FR Doc. 06–7719 Filed 9–15–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312–52–M
DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR
National Park Service
Legislative Environmental Impact
Statement on Gull Egg Harvest by the
Huna Tlingit in Glacier Bay National
Park
National Park Service, Interior.
Notice of intent to prepare a
Legislative Environmental Impact
Statement.
AGENCY:
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The National Park Service
(NPS) is preparing a Legislative
Environmental Impact Statement (LEIS)
on the potential harvest of gull eggs by
the Huna Tlingit in Glacier Bay National
Park. The purpose of the LEIS is to
respond to Section 4 of the Glacier Bay
National Park Resource Management
Act of 1999 (Pub. L. 106–455) which
requires the Secretary of Interior, in
consultation with local residents, to
assess whether sea gull eggs can be
collected in the park on a limited basis
without impairing the biological
sustainability of the gull population in
the park. The Act further requires that
if the study determines that the limited
collection of sea gull eggs can occur
without impairing the biological
sustainability of the gull population in
the park, the Secretary shall submit
recommendations for legislation to
Congress.
The proposed action alternative will
include harvesting glaucous-winged gull
(Larus glaucescens) eggs by tribal
members of the Hoonah Indian
Association (HIA) under a traditional
harvest strategy cooperatively produced
by NPS and HIA The traditional harvest
strategy would outline the methods by
which eggs could be harvested, harvest
limits, and monitoring actions that
would be implemented to ensure that
park purposes and values would remain
unimpaired. A second alternative will
consider more limited egg harvest
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:48 Sep 15, 2006
Jkt 208001
opportunities. A no action alternative,
which would continue to preclude egg
harvest throughout the park will also be
included in the LEIS.
Scoping: The National Park Service
seeks input from interested groups,
organizations, individuals and
government agencies. Written and
verbal scoping comments are being
solicited. Further information on this
LEIS process is available by contacting
the National Park Service at Glacier Bay
National Park and Preserve.
Our practice is to make comments,
including names, home addresses, home
phone numbers, and email addresses of
respondents, available for public
review. Individual respondents may
request that we withhold their names
and/or home addresses, etc., but if you
wish us to consider withholding this
information you must state this
prominently at the beginning of your
comments. In addition, you must
present a rationale for withholding this
information. This rationale must
demonstrate that disclosure would
constitute a clearly unwarranted
invasion of privacy. Unsupported
assertions will not meet this burden. In
the absence of exceptional,
documentable circumstances, this
information will be released. We will
always make submissions from
organizations or businesses, and from
individuals identifying themselves as
representatives or officials of
organizations or businesses, available
for public inspection in their entirety.
The LEIS is being prepared in
accordance with the requirements of the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4331 et
seq.) and its implementing regulations
at 40 CFR part 1500 and the process for
proposals for legislation (40 CFR
1506.8).
DATES: Comments concerning the scope
of this project should be received on or
before November 17, 2006. The draft
LEIS is projected to be available in early
2007. Submit electronic comments to
https://parkplanning.nps.gov. Written
comments may be mailed to the address
provided below.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary Beth Moss, Project Manager,
Glacier Bay National Park and Preserve,
P.O. Box 140, Gustavus, AK 99826.
Telephone (907) 945–3545 x31, Fax
(907) 945–3703.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Glacier
Bay National Park is the traditional
homeland of the Huna Tlingit people.
The Huna Tlingit harvested eggs at gull
rookeries in Glacier Bay, including the
large nesting site on South Marble
Island, prior to the park being
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
54687
established in 1925. Until recently, the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act prohibited
the harvest of gull eggs, and by statute
and NPS regulations, harvest is still
precluded within park boundaries.
Legislation is necessary to authorize the
collection of sea gull eggs in the park,
and regulations would need to be
promulgated to implement the gull egg
collection program in accordance with
the provisions of Section 4 of Pub. L.
106–455.
Dated: August 9, 2006.
Victor Knox,
Acting Regional Director, Alaska.
[FR Doc. 06–7716 Filed 9–15–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312–HX–M
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
Notice of Availability of the Record of
Decision for the Environmental Impact
Statement on the South Denali
Implementation Plan, Denali National
Park and Preserve, AK
National Park Service, Interior.
Notice of Availability of the
Record of Decision for the
Environmental Impact Statement on the
South Denali Implementation Plan.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The National Park Service
(NPS) announces the availability of the
Record of Decision (ROD) for the
Environmental Impact Statement on the
South Denali Implementation Plan,
Denali National Park and Preserve,
Alaska.
This Record of Decision documents
the decision by the NPS, in cooperation
with the State of Alaska and MatanuskaSusitna Borough to adopt the South
Denali Implementation Plan. The Final
South Denali Implementation Plan and
Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS)
was prepared cooperatively by the
National Park Service, the State of
Alaska, and the Matanuska-Susitna
Borough to provide specific direction
for expanded visitor facilities and
recreational opportunities in the South
Denali region until 2021. South Denali
is defined to include the local
communities, the Petersville Road
corridor, the western section of Denali
State Park, the northern part of the
Peters Hills, lands east of the Peters
Hills to the eastern boundary of Denali
State Park, and the Parks Highway
corridor from Rabideaux Creek north
through the state park.
The NPS selected Alternative C, as
described in the FEIS. Of the two action
alternatives, this alternative best meets
the objectives of the plan for resource
E:\FR\FM\18SEN1.SGM
18SEN1
54688
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 180 / Monday, September 18, 2006 / Notices
protection, increasing quality
recreational and access opportunities,
and preserving quality of life values in
local communities. The ROD briefly
discusses the background for the
planning effort, summarizes public
involvement during the planning
process, states the decision and
discusses the basis for it, describes other
alternatives considered, specifies the
environmentally preferable alternative,
and identifies measures adopted to
minimize potential environmental
harm.
The ROD can be found
online at the NPS Planning,
Environmental and Public Comment
Web site at https://
parkplanning.nps.gov/index.cfm.
Copies of the ROD are available on
request from: Miriam Valentine,
National Park Service, Talkeetna Ranger
Station, P.O. Box 588, Talkeetna,
Alaska, 99676. Telephone: (907) 733–
9102.
ADDRESSES:
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mike Tranel, Chief of Planning, National
Park Service, Denali National Park and
Preserve, 240 West 5th Avenue,
Anchorage, Alaska 99501. Telephone:
(907) 644–3611.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The NPS
prepared an EIS, as required, under the
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) of 1969 and Council of
Environmental Quality regulations (40
CFR part 1500).
A Notice of Intent to prepare an
environmental impact statement,
published in the Federal Register in
February 2004 (69 FR 72513), formally
initiated the NPS planning and EIS
effort. A Draft EIS was issued in
September 2005 (70 FR 55414). A
Federal Register notice announcing the
availability of the Final EIS was
published by the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency on May 5, 2006,
commencing the required 30-day noaction period (71 FR 26498). The Final
EIS describes and analyzes the
environmental impacts of two action
alternatives and a no-action alternative.
The NPS selected Alternative C, as
described in the Final EIS. The
emphasis of the selected alternative is to
enhance access and recreational
opportunities throughout the South
Denali region for a variety of visitors,
including Alaskans, independent
travelers, and package tour travelers,
while at the same time protecting the
important resource and community
values in the area, including the rural
lifestyle of local residents.
Major actions of the selected
alternative include:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:18 Sep 15, 2006
Jkt 208001
• Provide a new destination and
additional visitor opportunities in the
South Denali region. New facilities will
offer easily accessible visitor
opportunities along the state’s main
highway between Anchorage and
Fairbanks. The visitor center will
provide visitors an intimate setting and
facilitate their connection to the
landscape and natural resources. It will
offer a range of opportunties for learning
and recreating, and it will provide
visitors of various abilities a chance to
experience alpine and subarctic tundra
environments and opportunities to view
Mount McKinley and the Alaska Range.
Opportunities to view wildlife exist as
well as opportunities to spend a day or
more at the visitor center or in the
surrounding area.
• Offer a wide variety of high-quality
recreation opportunities throughout the
South Denali region for a variety of
visitors. Visitors traveling in groups and
those traveling independently can
benefit from the options offered. Some,
and perhaps all, of the facilities and
opportunities should be attractive to
Alaska residents who recreate in the
South Denali region. The new Parks
Highway visitor center will provide
information, orientation, interpretive
programs, and shelter to visitors. Public
use cabins, trail systems for a wide
variety of user groups, and camping
facilities will provide options for
visitors to experience the landscape in
remote as well as in easily accessible
settings. New trails, parking areas, boat
launch, and potential docking facility
will provide increased access to rivers
and public lands in the South Denali
region. Together these developments
should accommodate the visitor growth
anticipated for the South Denali region
over the next 15 to 20 years.
• Create economic and employment
opportunities for local residents through
establishment of a new visitor
destination. Residents of south central
Alaska, in particular, will benefit from
improved recreational access with this
alternative. Rural character may be
negatively affected, particularly for the
community of Trapper Creek. Negative
impacts will be partially mitigated by
measures in the plan to protect the
scenic qualities of adjacent road
corridors. The agencies will continue to
address local interests by seeking public
input during future planning and
implementation efforts.
National Park Service,
Department of the Interior.
SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 102(2)(C)
of the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969, the National Park Service
(NPS) announces the availability of the
Record of Decision (ROD) on the final
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
for the Stream Management Plan,
Herbert Hoover National Historic Site
(Site), West Branch, Iowa. The Midwest
Regional Director approved the ROD for
this final EIS on August 1, 2006.
Specifically, the Site will adopt and
implement actions described under
Alternative E, the preferred alternative,
in the final EIS. Under the selected
action, the primary strategy entails the
restoration of the function of the stream
corridor and a floodwater detention area
in the upstream portion of the Park.
The EIS considered and evaluated five
alternatives to the selected action. A full
range of foreseeable environmental
consequences was assessed. The
overriding concern expressed by the
Site and the public during the
development of this action was the
protection of fundamental resources and
values of the Site. Alternative E—
Provide 50-Year Flood Protection—is
the selected alternative since it best
meets the objectives of the Site. The
preferred alternative will not result in
the impairment of resources and values.
The ROD includes a statement of the
decision made, synopses of other
alternatives considered, the basis for the
decision, the rationale for why the
selected action is the environmentally
preferred alternative, a finding of no
impairment of Site resources and
values, and an overview of public
involvement in the decisionmaking
process.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Superintendent, Stream Management
Plan Record of Decision, Herbert Hoover
National Historic Site, P.O. Box 607,
West Branch, Iowa 52358, or by calling
319–643–2541. Copies of the final EIS
and ROD are available upon request
from the above address.
Dated: July 31, 2006.
Victor Knox,
Acting Regional Director.
[FR Doc. 06–7714 Filed 9–15–06; 8:45 am]
Dated: August 1, 2006.
Ernest Quintana,
Regional Director, Midwest Region.
[FR Doc. 06–7715 Filed 9–15–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–PF–M
BILLING CODE 4310–70–M
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
Notice of Availability for the Record of
Decision on the Final Environmental
Impact Statement for the Stream
Management Plan, Herbert Hoover
National Historic Site, West Branch, IA
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\18SEN1.SGM
18SEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 180 (Monday, September 18, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54687-54688]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7714]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
Notice of Availability of the Record of Decision for the
Environmental Impact Statement on the South Denali Implementation Plan,
Denali National Park and Preserve, AK
AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of Availability of the Record of Decision for the
Environmental Impact Statement on the South Denali Implementation Plan.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Park Service (NPS) announces the availability of
the Record of Decision (ROD) for the Environmental Impact Statement on
the South Denali Implementation Plan, Denali National Park and
Preserve, Alaska.
This Record of Decision documents the decision by the NPS, in
cooperation with the State of Alaska and Matanuska-Susitna Borough to
adopt the South Denali Implementation Plan. The Final South Denali
Implementation Plan and Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) was
prepared cooperatively by the National Park Service, the State of
Alaska, and the Matanuska-Susitna Borough to provide specific direction
for expanded visitor facilities and recreational opportunities in the
South Denali region until 2021. South Denali is defined to include the
local communities, the Petersville Road corridor, the western section
of Denali State Park, the northern part of the Peters Hills, lands east
of the Peters Hills to the eastern boundary of Denali State Park, and
the Parks Highway corridor from Rabideaux Creek north through the state
park.
The NPS selected Alternative C, as described in the FEIS. Of the
two action alternatives, this alternative best meets the objectives of
the plan for resource
[[Page 54688]]
protection, increasing quality recreational and access opportunities,
and preserving quality of life values in local communities. The ROD
briefly discusses the background for the planning effort, summarizes
public involvement during the planning process, states the decision and
discusses the basis for it, describes other alternatives considered,
specifies the environmentally preferable alternative, and identifies
measures adopted to minimize potential environmental harm.
ADDRESSES: The ROD can be found online at the NPS Planning,
Environmental and Public Comment Web site at https://
parkplanning.nps.gov/index.cfm. Copies of the ROD are available on
request from: Miriam Valentine, National Park Service, Talkeetna Ranger
Station, P.O. Box 588, Talkeetna, Alaska, 99676. Telephone: (907) 733-
9102.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mike Tranel, Chief of Planning,
National Park Service, Denali National Park and Preserve, 240 West 5th
Avenue, Anchorage, Alaska 99501. Telephone: (907) 644-3611.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The NPS prepared an EIS, as required, under
the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969 and Council of
Environmental Quality regulations (40 CFR part 1500).
A Notice of Intent to prepare an environmental impact statement,
published in the Federal Register in February 2004 (69 FR 72513),
formally initiated the NPS planning and EIS effort. A Draft EIS was
issued in September 2005 (70 FR 55414). A Federal Register notice
announcing the availability of the Final EIS was published by the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency on May 5, 2006, commencing the required
30-day no-action period (71 FR 26498). The Final EIS describes and
analyzes the environmental impacts of two action alternatives and a no-
action alternative.
The NPS selected Alternative C, as described in the Final EIS. The
emphasis of the selected alternative is to enhance access and
recreational opportunities throughout the South Denali region for a
variety of visitors, including Alaskans, independent travelers, and
package tour travelers, while at the same time protecting the important
resource and community values in the area, including the rural
lifestyle of local residents.
Major actions of the selected alternative include:
Provide a new destination and additional visitor
opportunities in the South Denali region. New facilities will offer
easily accessible visitor opportunities along the state's main highway
between Anchorage and Fairbanks. The visitor center will provide
visitors an intimate setting and facilitate their connection to the
landscape and natural resources. It will offer a range of opportunties
for learning and recreating, and it will provide visitors of various
abilities a chance to experience alpine and subarctic tundra
environments and opportunities to view Mount McKinley and the Alaska
Range. Opportunities to view wildlife exist as well as opportunities to
spend a day or more at the visitor center or in the surrounding area.
Offer a wide variety of high-quality recreation
opportunities throughout the South Denali region for a variety of
visitors. Visitors traveling in groups and those traveling
independently can benefit from the options offered. Some, and perhaps
all, of the facilities and opportunities should be attractive to Alaska
residents who recreate in the South Denali region. The new Parks
Highway visitor center will provide information, orientation,
interpretive programs, and shelter to visitors. Public use cabins,
trail systems for a wide variety of user groups, and camping facilities
will provide options for visitors to experience the landscape in remote
as well as in easily accessible settings. New trails, parking areas,
boat launch, and potential docking facility will provide increased
access to rivers and public lands in the South Denali region. Together
these developments should accommodate the visitor growth anticipated
for the South Denali region over the next 15 to 20 years.
Create economic and employment opportunities for local
residents through establishment of a new visitor destination. Residents
of south central Alaska, in particular, will benefit from improved
recreational access with this alternative. Rural character may be
negatively affected, particularly for the community of Trapper Creek.
Negative impacts will be partially mitigated by measures in the plan to
protect the scenic qualities of adjacent road corridors. The agencies
will continue to address local interests by seeking public input during
future planning and implementation efforts.
Dated: July 31, 2006.
Victor Knox,
Acting Regional Director.
[FR Doc. 06-7714 Filed 9-15-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-PF-M
