Notice of Disclosure of Confidential Business Information Obtained Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act to EPA Contractor GRB Environmental Services, Inc., 54477-54478 [E6-15336]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 179 / Friday, September 15, 2006 / Notices SUMMARY: On August 30, 2006, the Department of Education published a notice in the Federal Register (Page 51587, Column 1) for the information collection, ‘‘The IEPS Reporting System (NRC) Program Which Includes the Performance Reports for 14 Programs— the FLAS Program, IIPP Program, UISFL Program, BIE Program, CIBE Program, AORC Program, LRC Program, IRS Program, FRA Program, DDRA Program, SA Program, GPA Program, and TICFIA Program.’’ This notice hereby corrects the title to ‘‘The IEPS Reporting System Which Includes the Performance Reports for 14 Programs—the NRC Program, the FLAS Program, IIPP Program, UISFL Program, BIE Program, CIBE Program, AORC Program, FRA Program, DDRA Program, SA Program, GPA Program, and TICFIA Program.’’ The IC Clearance Official, Regulatory Information Management Services, Office of the Chief Information Officer, hereby issues a correction notice as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. Dated: September 11, 2006. Angela C. Arrington, IC Clearance Official, Regulatory Information Management Services, Office of the Management. [FR Doc. E6–15291 Filed 9–14–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4000–01–P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Energy Information Administration Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request Energy Information Administration (EIA), Department of Energy (DOE). ACTION: Agency information collection activities: submission for OMB review; comment request. jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES AGENCY: SUMMARY: The EIA has submitted the Form EIA–902, ‘‘Annual Geothermal Heat Pump Manufacturers Survey’’ to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and a 14-month extension under section 3507(h)(1) of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., at 3507(h)(1)). DATES: Comments must be filed by October 16, 2006. If you anticipate that you will be submitting comments but find it difficult to do so within that period, you should contact the OMB Desk Officer for DOE listed below as soon as possible. ADDRESSES: Send comments to John Asalone, OMB Desk Officer for DOE, VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:51 Sep 14, 2006 Jkt 208001 Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget. To ensure receipt of the comments by the due date, submission by FAX at 202–395–7285 or e-mail to John_A._Asalone@omb.eop.gov is recommended. The mailing address is 726 Jackson Place, NW., Washington, DC 20503. The OMB DOE Desk Officer may be telephoned at (202) 395–4650. (A copy of your comments should also be provided to EIA’s Statistics and Methods Group at the address below.) FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information should be directed to Kara Norman. To ensure receipt of the comments by the due date, submission by FAX (202–287– 1705) or e-mail (kara.norman@eia.doe.gov) is also recommended. The mailing address is Statistics and Methods Group (EI–70), Forrestal Building, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC 20585–0670. Kara Norman may be contacted by telephone at (202) 287–1902. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This section contains the following information about the energy information collection submitted to OMB for review: (1) The collection numbers and title; (2) the sponsor (i.e., the Department of Energy component; (3) the current OMB docket number (if applicable); (4) the type of request (i.e., new, revision, extension, or reinstatement); (5) response obligation (i.e., mandatory, voluntary, or required to obtain or retain benefits); (6) a description of the need for and proposed use of the information; (7) a categorical description of the likely respondents; and (8) an estimate of the total annual reporting burden (i.e., the estimated number of likely respondents times the proposed frequency of response per year times the average hours per response). 1. EIA–902, ‘‘Annual Geothermal Heat Pump Manufacturers Survey’’. 2. Energy Information Administration. 3. OMB Number: 1905–0204. 4. 14-month approval requested. 5. Mandatory. 6. The EIA–902 is used to collect data about the manufacture and distribution of geothermal heat pumps and the status of the industry. The information collected will be used by public and private analysts interested in geothermal heat pumps and related energy issues. 7. Business or other for-profit. 8. 85 hours per year (20 respondents × 1 response per year × 4.25 hours per response). Please refer to the supporting statement as well as the proposed forms and instructions for more information PO 00000 Frm 00025 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 54477 about the purpose, who must report, when to report, where to submit, the elements to be reported, detailed instructions, provisions for confidentiality, and uses (including possible nonstatistical uses) of the information. For instructions on obtaining materials, see the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Statutory Authority: Section 3507(h)(1) of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. No. 104–13) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., at 3507(h)(1)). Issued in Washington, DC, September 8, 2006. Jay H. Casselberry, Agency Clearance Officer, Energy Information Administration. [FR Doc. E6–15341 Filed 9–14–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6450–01–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [FRL–8220–1] Notice of Disclosure of Confidential Business Information Obtained Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act to EPA Contractor GRB Environmental Services, Inc. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Notice; request for comment. AGENCY: SUMMARY: EPA has authorized GRB Environmental Services Inc. of New York, New York, for access to Information which has been submitted to EPA under the environmental statues administered by the Agency. Some of this information may be claimed or determined to be confidential business information (CBI). DATES: Comments concerning CBI access will be accepted through September 22, 2006. ADDRESSES: Comments should be sent to Philip Ingram, Contracting Officer, Environmental Protection Agency Mail Code: MTS–4–3, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105. Telephone: (415) 972–3715. Notice of Required Determinations, Contract Provisions and Opportunity To Comment Under EPA contract number: EP–R9– 06–03, GRB Environmental Services Inc. provides records management support services to the Environmental Protection Agency Region 9. In performing these tasks, GRB Environmental Services Inc. employees have access to agency documents for purposes of document processing, filing, abstracting, E:\FR\FM\15SEN1.SGM 15SEN1 54478 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 179 / Friday, September 15, 2006 / Notices analyzing, inventorying, retrieving, tracking, etc. The documents to which GRB Environmental Services Inc. have access to can potentially include documents submitted under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act and Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act. Some of these documents may contain information claimed as CBI. GRB Environmental Services Inc. is required by contract to protect confidential information. When GRB’s need for the documents is completed, GRB will return them to EPA. Dated: August 23, 2006. Keith Takata, Director, Superfund Division, Region IX. [FR Doc. E6–15336 Filed 9–14–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [ER–FRL–6679–3] Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of EPA Comments jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES Availability of EPA comments prepared pursuant to the Environmental Review Process (ERP), under section 309 of the Clean Air Act and Section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental Policy Act as amended. Requests for copies of EPA comments can be directed to the Office of Federal Activities at 202–564–7167. An explanation of the ratings assigned to draft environmental impact statements (EISs) was published in FR dated April 7, 2006 (71 FR 17845). Draft EISs EIS No. 20050459, ERP No. D–BLM– A82127–00, Programmatic— Vegetation Treatments Using Herbicides on Bureau of Land Management Public Lands in 17 Westerns, including Alaska Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns about surface and ground water impacts, protected beneficial uses and non-targeted flora and fauna. Additionally, EPA recommended that the final EIS address how meeting goals and endpoints will be evaluated and how monitoring will be conducted. Rating EC2. EIS No. 20060164, ERP No. D–AFS– J65462–00, Dakota Prairie Grasslands Noxious Weed Management Project, Implementation, Billings, Slope, Golden Valley, Sioux, Grant, McHenry, Ransom and Richard Counties, ND and Carson, Perkins, and Zwieback Counties, SD. VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:51 Sep 14, 2006 Jkt 208001 Summary: EPA supports the proposed integrated weed management project. Rating LO. EIS No. 20060178, ERP No. D–WPA– J08026–00, Big Stone II Power Plant and Transmission Project, Propose Power Plant, Transmission Alternatives, and Substation Modification, (DOE/EIS–0377), US Army COE Section 10 and 404 Permits, Big Stone City, Grant County, SD and Big Stone County, MN. Summary: EPA expressed environmental objections because of the project’s anticipated wetland impacts, and asked for additional information to determine the least environmentally damaging practicable alternative. Rating EO2. EIS No. 20060184, ERP No. D–COE– D35062–MD, Masonville Dredge Material Containment Facility (DMCF), Construction from Baltimore Harbor Channel north of Point-Rock Point Line, U.S. Army COE Section 10 and 404 Permits, Baltimore, MD. Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns about potential impacts associated with the placement of fill into a large area of Patapsco River, and requested that a mitigation plan be developed and be approved by the resource agencies prior to the Final EIS and before the issuance of the Section 404 permit for the project. Rating EC2. EIS No. 20060220, ERP No. D–BLM– L65513–ID, Snake River Birds of Prey National Conservation Area, Resource Management Plan, Implementation, Ada, Canyon, Elmore, Owyhee Counties, ID. Summary: EPA supports proposed conservation efforts to protect and enhance raptor and raptor prey habitats, but suggests incorporating elements from Alternative C which reduce land disturbances and mitigate for impacts such as erosion, sedimentation, reduced streambank stability, reduce opportunities for spreading noxious plants. Rating EC1. EIS No. 20060242, ERP No. D–FHW– F40436–WI, TIER 1–DEIS—US 8 Project, Construction from Wisconsin 35 (N) to U.S. 53, Funding and Rightof-Way Permit, Polk and Barron Counties, WI. Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns about impacts to wetlands, sensitive watersheds and streams, impaired waters and upland forest. Rating EC2. EIS No. 20060268, ERP No. D–FHW– C40337–DC, 11th Street Bridges Project, Anacostia Freeway I–295/DC 295, to the Southeast/Southwest Freeway (I–695) Improvements, PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Funding, NPDES Permit , U.S. Army COE Section 10 and 404 Permits, Washington, DC. Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns about wetland, water quality, aquatic habitat and noise impacts. EPA requested additional information and mitigation. Rating EC2. EIS No. 20060271, ERP No. D–CGD– A11078–00, Programmatic— Implementation of the U.S. Coast Guard Nationwide Automatic Identification System Project, Providing Vessel Identification, Tracking and Information Exchange Capabilities to Support National Maritime Interests. Summary: EPA does not object to the proposed action. Rating LO. EIS No. 20060280, ERP No. D–AFS– J65466–00, North Zone Range 05 Project, Reauthorizing Livestock Grazing on Eight Existing Allotments, Black Hill National Forest, Bearlodge and Northern Hills Ranger Districts, Crook County, WY and Lawrence County, SD. Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns because range condition assessments appear to be used as a replacement for inventory and monitoring protocols providing biological information on riparian areas. The Final EIS should address inconsistencies between the information presented and stated conclusions regarding current conditions of allotments, and impacts of grazing on soil and water quality. In addition, the Final EIS should include water quality data, site-specific monitoring and/or mitigation plan with identified trigger points, and any other supplemental information used to support range management decisions. Rating EC2. EIS No. 20060299, ERP No. D–FRC– C05149–NY, Niagara Project, Hydroelectric Relicensing Application FERC No. 2216, Niagara River, Niagara County, NY. Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns about potential cumulative impacts to water levels, and requested that this issue be fully discussed in the final IS. Rating EC2. EIS No. 20060269, ERP No. DS–COE– D35062–MD, Masonville Dredged Material Containment Facility, New Information, New Source of Dike Building Material from the Seagirt Dredging Project within the Patapsco River, Funding, Baltimore, MD. Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns about potential impacts associated with the placement of fill into a large area of Patapsco River, and requested that a mitigation plan be E:\FR\FM\15SEN1.SGM 15SEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 179 (Friday, September 15, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54477-54478]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-15336]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-8220-1]


Notice of Disclosure of Confidential Business Information 
Obtained Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation 
and Liability Act to EPA Contractor GRB Environmental Services, Inc.

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice; request for comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA has authorized GRB Environmental Services Inc. of New 
York, New York, for access to Information which has been submitted to 
EPA under the environmental statues administered by the Agency. Some of 
this information may be claimed or determined to be confidential 
business information (CBI).

DATES: Comments concerning CBI access will be accepted through 
September 22, 2006.

ADDRESSES: Comments should be sent to Philip Ingram, Contracting 
Officer, Environmental Protection Agency Mail Code: MTS-4-3, 75 
Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105. Telephone: (415) 972-3715.

Notice of Required Determinations, Contract Provisions and Opportunity 
To Comment

    Under EPA contract number: EP-R9-06-03, GRB Environmental Services 
Inc. provides records management support services to the Environmental 
Protection Agency Region 9. In performing these tasks, GRB 
Environmental Services Inc. employees have access to agency documents 
for purposes of document processing, filing, abstracting,

[[Page 54478]]

analyzing, inventorying, retrieving, tracking, etc. The documents to 
which GRB Environmental Services Inc. have access to can potentially 
include documents submitted under the Resource Conservation and 
Recovery Act and Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, 
and Liability Act.
    Some of these documents may contain information claimed as CBI. GRB 
Environmental Services Inc. is required by contract to protect 
confidential information. When GRB's need for the documents is 
completed, GRB will return them to EPA.

    Dated: August 23, 2006.
Keith Takata,
Director, Superfund Division, Region IX.
[FR Doc. E6-15336 Filed 9-14-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.