Draft Regulatory Guide and Associated Standard Review Plan: Issuance, Availability, 54530-54531 [E6-15311]
Download as PDF
54530
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 179 / Friday, September 15, 2006 / Notices
renewal of Facility Operating License
No. R–110 and has concluded that this
action will not have a significant effect
on the quality of the human
environment.
For further details with respect to this
action, see: (1) The application for
amendment dated November 21, 1995,
as supplemented on January 31, 2003
and July 10, 2003, (2) Amendment No.
6 to Facility Operating License No. R–
110; (3) the related Safety Evaluation
Report and (4) the Environmental
Assessment dated March 30, 2004.
Documents may be examined, and/or
copied for a fee, at the NRC’s Public
Document Room, located at One White
Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike (first
floor), Rockville, Maryland. The NRC
maintains an Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS), which provides text and
image files of NRC’s public documents.
Documents related to this license
renewal dated on or after November 24,
1999, may be accessed through the
NRC’s Public Electronic Reading Room
on the Internet at https://www.nrc.gov. If
you do not have access to ADAMS or if
there are problems in accessing the
documents located in ADAMS, contact
the NRC Public Document Room (PDR)
Reference staff at 1–800–397–4209, 301–
415–4737 or by e-mail to pdr@nrc.gov.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 14th day
of August 2006.
For the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
Brian E. Thomas,
Chief, Research and Test Reactors Branch,
Division of Policy and Rulemaking, Office
of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. E6–15310 Filed 9–14–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Draft Regulatory Guide and Associated
Standard Review Plan: Issuance,
Availability
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) has issued for public
comment a draft proposed revision of an
existing guide in the agency’s
Regulatory Guide Series. This series has
been developed to describe and make
available to the public such information
as methods that are acceptable to the
NRC staff for implementing specific
parts of the agency’s regulations,
techniques that the staff uses in
evaluating specific problems or
postulated accidents, and data that the
staff needs in its review of applications
for permits and licenses.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:51 Sep 14, 2006
Jkt 208001
This draft Revision 1 of Regulatory
Guide 1.200, ‘‘An Approach for
Determining the Technical Adequacy of
Probabilistic Risk Assessment Results
for Risk-Informed Activities,’’ is
temporarily identified as Draft
Regulatory Guide DG–1161, which
should be mentioned in all related
correspondence. Like its predecessors,
this proposed revision describes one
acceptable approach for determining
whether the quality of a probabilistic
risk assessment (PRA), in total or the
parts that are used to support an
application, is sufficient to provide
confidence in the results, such that the
PRA can be used in regulatory decisionmaking for light-water reactors.
Specifically, Draft Regulatory Guide
DG–1161 provides guidance in four
areas:
(1) A minimal set of functional
requirements of a technically acceptable
PRA.
(2) The NRC’s position on PRA
consensus standards and industry PRA
program documents.
(3) Demonstration that the PRA (in
total or specific parts) used in regulatory
applications is of sufficient technical
adequacy.
(4) Documentation to support a
regulatory submittal.
This guidance is intended to be
consistent with the NRC’s PRA Policy
Statement, entitled ‘‘Use of Probabilistic
Risk Assessment Methods in Nuclear
Activities: Final Policy Statement,’’
which the NRC published in the Federal
Register on August 16, 1995 (60 FR
42622) to encourage use of PRA in all
regulatory matters. That Policy
Statement states that ‘‘ * * * the use of
PRA technology should be increased to
the extent supported by the state-of-theart in PRA methods and data and in a
manner that complements the NRC’s
deterministic approach.’’ Since that
time, many uses have been
implemented or undertaken, including
modification of the NRC’s reactor safety
inspection program and initiation of
work to modify reactor safety
regulations. Consequently, confidence
in the information derived from a PRA
is an important issue, in that the
accuracy of the technical content must
be sufficient to justify the specific
results and insights that are used to
support the decision under
consideration.
Draft Regulatory Guide DG–1161 is
also intended to be consistent with the
more detailed, guidance in Regulatory
Guide 1.174, ‘‘An Approach for Using
Probabilistic Risk Assessment in RiskInformed Decisions on Plant-Specific
Changes to the Licensing Basis,’’ which
the NRC issued in November 2002. In
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
addition, Draft Regulatory Guide DG–
1161 is intended to reflect and endorse
(with certain objections) the following
guidance provided by the American
Society of Mechanical Engineers
(ASME) and the Nuclear Energy
Institute (NEI):
• ASME RA–S–2002, ‘‘Standard for
Probabilistic Risk Assessment for
Nuclear Power Plant Applications,’’
dated April 5, 2002.
• ASME RA–Sa–2003, ‘‘Standard for
Probabilistic Risk Assessment for
Nuclear Power Plant Applications,’’
Addendum A to ASME RA–S–2002,
dated December 5, 2003.
• ASME RA–Sb–2005, ‘‘Standard for
Probabilistic Risk Assessment for
Nuclear Power Plant Applications,’’
Addendum B to ASME RA–S–2002,
dated December 30, 2005.
• NEI–00–02, ‘‘Probabilistic Risk
Assessment Peer Review Process
Guidance,’’ Revision A3, dated March
20, 2000, with its supplemental
guidance on industry self-assessment,
dated August 16, 2002, and Revision 1,
dated May 19, 2006.
• NEI–05–04, ‘‘Process for Performing
Follow-on PRA Peer Reviews Using the
ASME PRA Standard,’’ dated January
2005.
When used in support of an
application, this regulatory guide will
obviate the need for an in-depth review
of the base PRA by NRC reviewers,
allowing them to focus their review on
key assumptions and areas identified by
peer reviewers as being of concern and
relevant to the application.
Consequently, this guide will provide
for a more focused and consistent
review process. In this regulatory guide,
as in RG 1.174, the quality of a PRA
analysis used to support an application
is measured in terms of its
appropriateness with respect to scope,
level of detail, and technical
acceptability.
This regulatory guide was issued for
trial use in February of 2004, and five
trial applications were conducted. This
revision incorporates lessons learned
from those pilot applications. In
addition, the appendices to this
regulatory guide have been revised to
address the changes made in the
professional society PRA standards and
industry PRA guidance documents.
To accompany Draft Regulatory Guide
DG–1161, the NRC is issuing proposed
Revision 2 of Section 19.1,
‘‘Determining the Technical Adequacy
of Probabilistic Risk Assessment Results
for Risk-Informed Activities,’’ of
NUREG–0800, ‘‘Standard Review Plan
for the Review of Safety Analysis
Reports for Nuclear Power Plants’’
(SRP). This SRP complements Draft
E:\FR\FM\15SEN1.SGM
15SEN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 179 / Friday, September 15, 2006 / Notices
Regulatory Guide DG–1161, in that the
NRC staff will use its guidance to ensure
more focused and consistent review of
PRAs as a basis for regulatory decisionmaking for light-water reactors.
The NRC intends to update
Regulatory Guide 1.200 and its
associated SRP Section 19.1, and to
develop an additional appendix or
revise an existing appendix (as
required), to set forth the staff’s position
when a new or revised PRA standard or
industry program is published.
The NRC staff is soliciting comments
on Draft Regulatory Guide DG–1161, as
well as draft Revision 2 of SRP Section
19.1. Please mention the relevant
document identifiers (DG–1161 and/or
SRP 19.1) in the subject line of your
comments; comments may be
accompanied by relevant information or
supporting data. Comments submitted
in writing or in electronic form will be
made available to the public in their
entirety through the NRC’s Agencywide
Documents Access and Management
System (ADAMS). Personal information
will not be removed from your
comments. You may submit comments
by any of the following methods.
Mail comments to: Rules and
Directives Branch, Office of
Administration, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555–
0001.
E-mail comments to:
NRCREP@nrc.gov. You may also submit
comments via the NRC’s rulemaking
Web site at https://ruleforum.llnl.gov.
Address questions about our rulemaking
Web site to Carol A. Gallagher (301)
415–5905; e-mail CAG@nrc.gov.
Hand-deliver comments to: Rules and
Directives Branch, Office of
Administration, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, 11555 Rockville Pike,
Rockville, Maryland 20852, between
7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. on Federal
workdays.
Fax comments to: Rules and
Directives Branch, Office of
Administration, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission at (301) 415–5144.
Requests for technical information
about Draft Regulatory Guide DG–1161
and/or draft Revision 2 of SRP Section
19.1 may be directed to Ms. Mary T.
Drouin, at (301) 415–6675 or
MXD@nrc.gov.
Comments would be most helpful if
received by October 14, 2006.
Comments received after that date will
be considered if it is practical to do so,
but the NRC is able to ensure
consideration only for comments
received on or before this date.
Although a time limit is given,
comments and suggestions in
connection with items for inclusion in
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:51 Sep 14, 2006
Jkt 208001
guides currently being developed or
improvements in all published guides
are encouraged at any time.
Electronic copies of Draft Regulatory
Guide DG–1161 are available through
the NRC’s public Web site under Draft
Regulatory Guides in the Regulatory
Guides document collection of the
NRC’s Electronic Reading Room at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doccollections/. Similarly, electronic copies
of draft Revision 2 of SRP Section 19.1
are available at https://www.nrc.gov/
reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/
docs4comment.html. Electronic copies
of the two documents are also available
in ADAMS at https://www.nrc.gov/
reading-rm/adams.html, under
Accession #ML062480134 and
#ML062510220, respectively.
In addition, Draft Regulatory Guide
DG–1161, draft Revision 2 of SRP
Section 19.1, and other related publicly
available documents, including public
comments received, can be viewed
electronically on computers in the
NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR),
which is located at 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland. The PDR
reproduction contractor will make
copies of documents for a fee. The
PDR’s mailing address is USNRC PDR,
Washington, DC 20555–0001. The PDR
can also be reached by telephone at
(301) 415–4737 or (800) 397–4205, by
fax at (301) 415–3548, and by e-mail to
PDR@nrc.gov.
Please note that the NRC does not
intend to distribute printed copies of
either Draft Regulatory Guide DG–1161
or draft Revision 2 of SRP Section 19.1,
unless specifically requested on an
individual basis with adequate
justification. Such requests for single
copies of draft or final guides (which
may be reproduced) or for placement on
an automatic distribution list for single
copies of future draft guides in specific
divisions should be made in writing to
the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555–
0001, Attention: Reproduction and
Distribution Services Section; by e-mail
to DISTRIBUTION@nrc.gov; or by fax to
(301) 415–2289. Telephone requests
cannot be accommodated.
Regulatory guides are not
copyrighted, and Commission approval
is not required to reproduce them.
(5 U.S.C. 552(a))
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 8th day
of September 2006.
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
54531
For the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
Farouk Eltawila,
Director, Division of Risk Assessment and
Special Projects, Office of Nuclear Regulatory
Research.
[FR Doc. E6–15311 Filed 9–14–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY
CORPORATION
Required Interest Rate Assumption for
Determining Variable-Rate Premium for
Single-Employer Plans; Interest
Assumptions for Multiemployer Plan
Valuations Following Mass Withdrawal
Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation.
ACTION: Notice of interest rates and
assumptions.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This notice informs the public
of the interest rates and assumptions to
be used under certain Pension Benefit
Guaranty Corporation regulations. These
rates and assumptions are published
elsewhere (or can be derived from rates
published elsewhere), but are collected
and published in this notice for the
convenience of the public. Interest rates
are also published on the PBGC’s Web
site (https://www.pbgc.gov).
DATES: The required interest rate for
determining the variable-rate premium
under part 4006 applies to premium
payment years beginning in September
2006. The interest assumptions for
performing multiemployer plan
valuations following mass withdrawal
under part 4281 apply to valuation dates
occurring in October 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Catherine B. Klion, Manager, Regulatory
and Policy Division, Legislative and
Regulatory Department, Pension Benefit
Guaranty Corporation, 1200 K Street,
NW., Washington, DC 20005, 202–326–
4024. (TTY/TDD users may call the
Federal relay service toll-free at 1–800–
877–8339 and ask to be connected to
202–326–4024.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Variable-Rate Premiums
Section 4006(a)(3)(E)(iii)(II) of the
Employee Retirement Income Security
Act of 1974 (ERISA) and § 4006.4(b)(1)
of the PBGC’s regulation on Premium
Rates (29 CFR part 4006) prescribe use
of an assumed interest rate (the
‘‘required interest rate’’) in determining
a single-employer plan’s variable-rate
premium. Pursuant to the Pension
Protection Act of 2006, for premium
payment years beginning in 2006 or
2007, the required interest rate is the
E:\FR\FM\15SEN1.SGM
15SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 179 (Friday, September 15, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54530-54531]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-15311]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
Draft Regulatory Guide and Associated Standard Review Plan:
Issuance, Availability
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has issued for public
comment a draft proposed revision of an existing guide in the agency's
Regulatory Guide Series. This series has been developed to describe and
make available to the public such information as methods that are
acceptable to the NRC staff for implementing specific parts of the
agency's regulations, techniques that the staff uses in evaluating
specific problems or postulated accidents, and data that the staff
needs in its review of applications for permits and licenses.
This draft Revision 1 of Regulatory Guide 1.200, ``An Approach for
Determining the Technical Adequacy of Probabilistic Risk Assessment
Results for Risk-Informed Activities,'' is temporarily identified as
Draft Regulatory Guide DG-1161, which should be mentioned in all
related correspondence. Like its predecessors, this proposed revision
describes one acceptable approach for determining whether the quality
of a probabilistic risk assessment (PRA), in total or the parts that
are used to support an application, is sufficient to provide confidence
in the results, such that the PRA can be used in regulatory decision-
making for light-water reactors. Specifically, Draft Regulatory Guide
DG-1161 provides guidance in four areas:
(1) A minimal set of functional requirements of a technically
acceptable PRA.
(2) The NRC's position on PRA consensus standards and industry PRA
program documents.
(3) Demonstration that the PRA (in total or specific parts) used in
regulatory applications is of sufficient technical adequacy.
(4) Documentation to support a regulatory submittal.
This guidance is intended to be consistent with the NRC's PRA
Policy Statement, entitled ``Use of Probabilistic Risk Assessment
Methods in Nuclear Activities: Final Policy Statement,'' which the NRC
published in the Federal Register on August 16, 1995 (60 FR 42622) to
encourage use of PRA in all regulatory matters. That Policy Statement
states that `` * * * the use of PRA technology should be increased to
the extent supported by the state-of-the-art in PRA methods and data
and in a manner that complements the NRC's deterministic approach.''
Since that time, many uses have been implemented or undertaken,
including modification of the NRC's reactor safety inspection program
and initiation of work to modify reactor safety regulations.
Consequently, confidence in the information derived from a PRA is an
important issue, in that the accuracy of the technical content must be
sufficient to justify the specific results and insights that are used
to support the decision under consideration.
Draft Regulatory Guide DG-1161 is also intended to be consistent
with the more detailed, guidance in Regulatory Guide 1.174, ``An
Approach for Using Probabilistic Risk Assessment in Risk-Informed
Decisions on Plant-Specific Changes to the Licensing Basis,'' which the
NRC issued in November 2002. In addition, Draft Regulatory Guide DG-
1161 is intended to reflect and endorse (with certain objections) the
following guidance provided by the American Society of Mechanical
Engineers (ASME) and the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI):
ASME RA-S-2002, ``Standard for Probabilistic Risk
Assessment for Nuclear Power Plant Applications,'' dated April 5, 2002.
ASME RA-Sa-2003, ``Standard for Probabilistic Risk
Assessment for Nuclear Power Plant Applications,'' Addendum A to ASME
RA-S-2002, dated December 5, 2003.
ASME RA-Sb-2005, ``Standard for Probabilistic Risk
Assessment for Nuclear Power Plant Applications,'' Addendum B to ASME
RA-S-2002, dated December 30, 2005.
NEI-00-02, ``Probabilistic Risk Assessment Peer Review
Process Guidance,'' Revision A3, dated March 20, 2000, with its
supplemental guidance on industry self-assessment, dated August 16,
2002, and Revision 1, dated May 19, 2006.
NEI-05-04, ``Process for Performing Follow-on PRA Peer
Reviews Using the ASME PRA Standard,'' dated January 2005.
When used in support of an application, this regulatory guide will
obviate the need for an in-depth review of the base PRA by NRC
reviewers, allowing them to focus their review on key assumptions and
areas identified by peer reviewers as being of concern and relevant to
the application. Consequently, this guide will provide for a more
focused and consistent review process. In this regulatory guide, as in
RG 1.174, the quality of a PRA analysis used to support an application
is measured in terms of its appropriateness with respect to scope,
level of detail, and technical acceptability.
This regulatory guide was issued for trial use in February of 2004,
and five trial applications were conducted. This revision incorporates
lessons learned from those pilot applications. In addition, the
appendices to this regulatory guide have been revised to address the
changes made in the professional society PRA standards and industry PRA
guidance documents.
To accompany Draft Regulatory Guide DG-1161, the NRC is issuing
proposed Revision 2 of Section 19.1, ``Determining the Technical
Adequacy of Probabilistic Risk Assessment Results for Risk-Informed
Activities,'' of NUREG-0800, ``Standard Review Plan for the Review of
Safety Analysis Reports for Nuclear Power Plants'' (SRP). This SRP
complements Draft
[[Page 54531]]
Regulatory Guide DG-1161, in that the NRC staff will use its guidance
to ensure more focused and consistent review of PRAs as a basis for
regulatory decision-making for light-water reactors.
The NRC intends to update Regulatory Guide 1.200 and its associated
SRP Section 19.1, and to develop an additional appendix or revise an
existing appendix (as required), to set forth the staff's position when
a new or revised PRA standard or industry program is published.
The NRC staff is soliciting comments on Draft Regulatory Guide DG-
1161, as well as draft Revision 2 of SRP Section 19.1. Please mention
the relevant document identifiers (DG-1161 and/or SRP 19.1) in the
subject line of your comments; comments may be accompanied by relevant
information or supporting data. Comments submitted in writing or in
electronic form will be made available to the public in their entirety
through the NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System
(ADAMS). Personal information will not be removed from your comments.
You may submit comments by any of the following methods.
Mail comments to: Rules and Directives Branch, Office of
Administration, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC
20555-0001.
E-mail comments to: NRCREP@nrc.gov. You may also submit comments
via the NRC's rulemaking Web site at https://ruleforum.llnl.gov. Address
questions about our rulemaking Web site to Carol A. Gallagher (301)
415-5905; e-mail CAG@nrc.gov.
Hand-deliver comments to: Rules and Directives Branch, Office of
Administration, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852, between 7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. on
Federal workdays.
Fax comments to: Rules and Directives Branch, Office of
Administration, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission at (301) 415-5144.
Requests for technical information about Draft Regulatory Guide DG-
1161 and/or draft Revision 2 of SRP Section 19.1 may be directed to Ms.
Mary T. Drouin, at (301) 415-6675 or MXD@nrc.gov.
Comments would be most helpful if received by October 14, 2006.
Comments received after that date will be considered if it is practical
to do so, but the NRC is able to ensure consideration only for comments
received on or before this date. Although a time limit is given,
comments and suggestions in connection with items for inclusion in
guides currently being developed or improvements in all published
guides are encouraged at any time.
Electronic copies of Draft Regulatory Guide DG-1161 are available
through the NRC's public Web site under Draft Regulatory Guides in the
Regulatory Guides document collection of the NRC's Electronic Reading
Room at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/. Similarly,
electronic copies of draft Revision 2 of SRP Section 19.1 are available
at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/
docs4comment.html. Electronic copies of the two documents are also
available in ADAMS at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html, under
Accession ML062480134 and ML062510220, respectively.
In addition, Draft Regulatory Guide DG-1161, draft Revision 2 of
SRP Section 19.1, and other related publicly available documents,
including public comments received, can be viewed electronically on
computers in the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR), which is located at
11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland. The PDR reproduction
contractor will make copies of documents for a fee. The PDR's mailing
address is USNRC PDR, Washington, DC 20555-0001. The PDR can also be
reached by telephone at (301) 415-4737 or (800) 397-4205, by fax at
(301) 415-3548, and by e-mail to PDR@nrc.gov.
Please note that the NRC does not intend to distribute printed
copies of either Draft Regulatory Guide DG-1161 or draft Revision 2 of
SRP Section 19.1, unless specifically requested on an individual basis
with adequate justification. Such requests for single copies of draft
or final guides (which may be reproduced) or for placement on an
automatic distribution list for single copies of future draft guides in
specific divisions should be made in writing to the U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, Attention:
Reproduction and Distribution Services Section; by e-mail to
DISTRIBUTION@nrc.gov; or by fax to (301) 415-2289. Telephone requests
cannot be accommodated.
Regulatory guides are not copyrighted, and Commission approval is
not required to reproduce them.
(5 U.S.C. 552(a))
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 8th day of September 2006.
For the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Farouk Eltawila,
Director, Division of Risk Assessment and Special Projects, Office of
Nuclear Regulatory Research.
[FR Doc. E6-15311 Filed 9-14-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P