In the Matter of Mr. Nicholas A. Chaimov; Order Prohibiting Involvement in NRC-Licensed Activities (Effective Immediately), 54528-54529 [E6-15309]

Download as PDF 54528 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 179 / Friday, September 15, 2006 / Notices Source: The World Health Organization (WHO). 2. Immunization: The average of DPT3 and measles immunization rates for the most recent year available. Source: The World Health Organization (WHO). 3. Total Public Expenditure on Primary Education: Total expenditures by government at all levels of primary education divided by GDP. Source: The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) and National Governments. 4. Girls’ Primary Completion Rate: The number of female students completing primary education divided by the population in the relevant age cohort. Source: World Bank and the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). [FR Doc. E6–15323 Filed 9–14–06; 8:45 am] for all Americans with disabilities and their families. NCD is composed of 15 members appointed by the President and confirmed by the U.S. Senate. ACCOMMODATIONS: Those needing reasonable accommodations should notify NCD at least two weeks before these meetings. LANGUAGE TRANSLATION: In accordance with E.O. 13166, Improving Access to Services for Persons with Limited English Proficiency, those people with disabilities who are limited English proficient and seek translation services for these meetings should notify NCD at least two weeks before these events. Dated: September 12, 2006. Mark S. Quigley, Acting Executive Director. [FR Doc. 06–7735 Filed 9–13–06; 2:52 pm] BILLING CODE 6820–MA–P BILLING CODE 9210–01–P NATIONAL COUNCIL ON DISABILITY NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Sunshine Act Meetings [IA–06–046] Quarterly Meeting/News Conference/Panel Discussion/ Stakeholder Dialogue. DATE AND TIME: October 30, 2006, 9 a.m.– 5 p.m. EST. LOCATION: JW Marriott Hotel, 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. STATUS: This meeting will be open to the public and free of charge. AGENDA: Reports from the Chairperson and the Executive Director, Team Reports, Unfinished Business, New Business, Announcements, Adjournment. TYPE: News Conference, Report Release, Stakeholder Dialogue. DATE AND TIME: October 31, 2006, 9 a.m.– 1 p.m. LOCATION: AARP, Brickfield Conference Center, enter at 600 E Street, NW., Washington, DC. STATUS: This meeting will be open to the public and free of charge. AGENDA: News conference to release NCD’s report, Creating Livable Communities, Panel Discussion, and Stakeholder Dialogue. SUNSHINE ACT MEETING CONTACT: Mark S. Quigley, Director of Communications, NCD, 1331 F Street, NW., Suite 850, Washington, DC 20004; 202–272–2004 (voice), 202–272–2074 (TTY), 202–272– 2022 (fax). AGENCY MISSION: NCD is an independent Federal agency making recommendations to the President and Congress to enhance the quality of life In the Matter of Mr. Nicholas A. Chaimov; Order Prohibiting Involvement in NRC-Licensed Activities (Effective Immediately) jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES TYPE: VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:51 Sep 14, 2006 Jkt 208001 I Mr. Nicholas A. Chaimov was employed as a Senior Reactor Operator at the Reed College Reactor (the facility). Reed College (the licensee) is the holder of License No. R–112 issued by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or Commission) pursuant to Part 50 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) on July 2, 1968, for the facility. The license authorizes the operation of the facility in accordance with the conditions specified therein. The facility is located on the licensee’s site in Portland, Oregon. II On May 31, 2005, an inspection of licensed activities was initiated at the licensee’s facility in response to allegations received at the NRC Headquarters on May 19, 2005, that Mr. Nicholas A. Chaimov had engaged in deliberate misconduct. Specifically, it was alleged that Mr. Nicholas A. Chaimov had deliberately removed a jumper on the control rod drive circuit of the reactor without the licensee’s authorization or approval. Removal of that jumper prevented the shim rod from being withdrawn, so that the reactor could not be taken to the critical startup condition. That jumper had been properly installed, in accordance with the Reed College Reactor Safety PO 00000 Frm 00076 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Analysis Report (SAR), until Mr. Nicholas A. Chaimov deliberately removed it. The allegation was unresolved by the inspection and was subsequently referred to the NRC Office of Investigations (OI). OI completed its investigation and substantiated that on May 10, 2005, Mr. Nicholas A. Chaimov deliberately removed a jumper on the control rod drive circuit of the reactor without the licensee’s authorization or approval. Although this unauthorized facility modification did not adversely impact reactor safety nor was the health and safety of the public affected because the facility’s startup checklist detected a malfunction in the rod control system and the problem was corrected by the licensee before operation was allowed, conduct of this nature by an individual raises serious doubt as to whether the individual can be relied upon to comply with NRC requirements. III Based on the information obtained during the OI investigation, the NRC concludes that Mr. Nicholas A. Chaimov, an employee of the licensee, made changes to the facility so that it was not as described in the SAR. These changes caused the licensee to be in violation of 10 CFR 50.59, ‘‘Changes, test, and experiments.’’ It was further found that Mr. Chaimov’s actions were willful such that he had engaged in deliberate misconduct in violation of 10 CFR 50.5, ‘‘Deliberate misconduct.’’ The NRC must be able to rely on the licensee and its employees to comply with NRC requirements in all material respects. Mr. Nicholas A. Chaimov’s action has raised serious doubt as to whether he can be relied upon to comply with NRC requirements. Consequently, I lack the requisite reasonable assurance that licensed activities can be conducted in compliance with the Commission’s requirements and that the health and safety of the public will be protected if Mr. Nicholas A. Chaimov is permitted at this time to be involved in NRC-licensed activities. Therefore, the public’s health, safety, and interest require that Mr. Nicholas A. Chaimov be prohibited from any involvement in NRC-licensed activities for a period of three years from the date of this Order. Furthermore, pursuant to 10 CFR 2.202, ‘‘Orders,’’ the NRC finds that the significance of Mr. Nicholas A. Chaimov’s conduct described above is such that the public’s health, safety, and interest require that this Order be immediately effective. IV Accordingly, pursuant to Sections 104c, 161b, 161i, 161o, 182 and 186 of E:\FR\FM\15SEN1.SGM 15SEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 179 / Friday, September 15, 2006 / Notices the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and the Commission’s regulations in 10 CFR 2.202, 10 CFR 50.5, and 10 CFR 150.20, it is hereby ordered, effective immediately, that: 1. Mr. Nicholas A. Chaimov is prohibited for three years from the date of this Order from engaging in NRClicensed activities. NRC-licensed activities are those activities that are conducted pursuant to a specific or general license issued by the NRC, including, but not limited to, those activities of Agreement State licensees conducted pursuant to the authority granted by 10 CFR 150.20. 2. If Mr. Nicholas A. Chaimov is currently involved with another licensee in NRC-licensed activities, he must immediately cease those activities, and inform the NRC of the name, address, and telephone number of that licensee, and provide a copy of this Order to that licensee. The Director, Office of Enforcement, may, in writing, relax or rescind any of the above conditions upon demonstration by Mr. Nicholas A. Chaimov of good cause. jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES V In accordance with 10 CFR 2.202, Mr. Nicholas A. Chaimov must, and any other person adversely affected by this Order may, submit an answer to this Order, and may request a hearing on this Order, within 20 days of the date of this Order. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the time to request a hearing. A request for extension of time must be made in writing to the Director, Office of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555, and include a statement of good cause for the extension. The answer may consent to this Order. Unless the answer consents to this Order, the answer shall, in writing and under oath or affirmation, specifically admit or deny each allegation or charge made in this Order and shall set forth the matters of fact and law on which Mr. Nicholas A. Chaimov or other person adversely affected relies and the reasons as to why the Order should not have been issued. Any answer or request for a hearing shall be submitted to the Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Attn: Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff, Washington, DC 20555. Copies also shall be sent to the Director, Office of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555, the Assistant General Counsel for Materials Litigation and Enforcement at the same address, and Mr. Nicholas A. Chaimov, if the answer or hearing request is by a person other than Mr. VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:51 Sep 14, 2006 Jkt 208001 Nicholas A. Chaimov. Because of continuing disruptions in delivery of mail to United States Government offices, it is requested that answers and requests for hearing be transmitted to the Secretary of the Commission either by means of facsimile transmission to 301–415–1101 or by e-mail to hearingdocket@nrc.gov and also to the Office of the General Counsel either by means of facsimile transmission to 301– 415–3725 or by e-mail to OGCMailCenter@nrc.gov. If a person other than the licensee requests a hearing, that person shall set forth with particularity the manner in which his interest is adversely affected by this Order and shall address the criteria set forth in 10 CFR 2.309(d). If a hearing is requested by Mr. Nicholas A. Chaimov or a person whose interest is adversely affected, the Commission will issue an Order designating the time and place of any hearing. If a hearing is held, the issue to be considered at such hearing shall be whether this Order should be sustained. Pursuant to 10 CFR 2.202(c)(2)(i), Mr. Nicholas A. Chaimov may, in addition to demanding a hearing, at the time the answer is filed or sooner, move the Presiding Officer to set aside the immediate effectiveness of the Order on the ground that the Order, including the need for immediate effectiveness, is not based on adequate evidence but on mere suspicion, unfounded allegations, or error. In the absence of any request for hearing, or written approval of an extension of time in which to request a hearing, the provisions specified in Section IV above shall be final 20 days from the date of this Order without further order or proceedings. If an extension of time for requesting a hearing has been approved, the provisions specified in Section IV shall be final when the extension expires if a hearing request has not been received. An answer or a request for hearing shall not stay the immediate effectiveness of this order. Dated this 12th day of September 2006. For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Martin J. Virgilio, Deputy Executive Director for Materials, Research, State, and Compliance Programs, Office of the Executive Director for Operations. [FR Doc. E6–15309 Filed 9–14–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590–01–P PO 00000 Frm 00077 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 54529 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. 50–284] Notice of Renewal of Facility Operating License No. R–110; Idaho State University AGN–201M Research Reactor The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has issued Amendment No. 6 to Facility Operating License No. R–110 for the Idaho State University (the licensee), which renews the license for operation of the Idaho State University AGN– 201M Research Reactor Facility located at the Idaho State University in Pocatello, Idaho. The facility is a research reactor that has been operating at a power level not in excess of 5 watts (thermal). The renewed Facility Operating License No. R–110 will expire twenty years from its date of issuance. The amended license complies with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commission’s rules and regulations. The Commission has made appropriate findings as required by the Act and the Commission’s regulations in 10 CFR Chapter I. Those findings are set forth in the license amendment. Opportunity for hearing was afforded in the notice of the proposed issuance of this renewal in the Federal Register on January 8, 1996 (61 FR 563). No request for a hearing or petition for leave to intervene was filed following notice of the proposed action. Continued operation of the reactor will not require alteration of buildings or structures, will not lead to significant changes in effluents released from the facility to the environment, will not increase the probability or consequences of accidents, and will not involve any unresolved issues concerning alternative uses of available resources. Based on the foregoing and on the Environmental Assessment, the Commission concludes that renewal of the license will not result in any significant environmental impacts. The Commission has prepared a ‘‘Safety Evaluation Report Related to the Renewal of the Operating License for the Research Reactor at Idaho State University’’ for the renewal of Facility Operating License No. R–110 and has, based on that evaluation, concluded that the facility can continue to be operated by the licensee without endangering the health and safety of the public. The Commission also prepared an Environmental Assessment which was published in the Federal Register on April 9, 2004, (69 FR 18988) for the E:\FR\FM\15SEN1.SGM 15SEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 179 (Friday, September 15, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54528-54529]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-15309]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[IA-06-046]


In the Matter of Mr. Nicholas A. Chaimov; Order Prohibiting 
Involvement in NRC-Licensed Activities (Effective Immediately)

I

    Mr. Nicholas A. Chaimov was employed as a Senior Reactor Operator 
at the Reed College Reactor (the facility). Reed College (the licensee) 
is the holder of License No. R-112 issued by the U.S. Nuclear 
Regulatory Commission (NRC or Commission) pursuant to Part 50 of Title 
10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) on July 2, 1968, for the 
facility. The license authorizes the operation of the facility in 
accordance with the conditions specified therein. The facility is 
located on the licensee's site in Portland, Oregon.

II

    On May 31, 2005, an inspection of licensed activities was initiated 
at the licensee's facility in response to allegations received at the 
NRC Headquarters on May 19, 2005, that Mr. Nicholas A. Chaimov had 
engaged in deliberate misconduct. Specifically, it was alleged that Mr. 
Nicholas A. Chaimov had deliberately removed a jumper on the control 
rod drive circuit of the reactor without the licensee's authorization 
or approval. Removal of that jumper prevented the shim rod from being 
withdrawn, so that the reactor could not be taken to the critical 
startup condition. That jumper had been properly installed, in 
accordance with the Reed College Reactor Safety Analysis Report (SAR), 
until Mr. Nicholas A. Chaimov deliberately removed it. The allegation 
was unresolved by the inspection and was subsequently referred to the 
NRC Office of Investigations (OI). OI completed its investigation and 
substantiated that on May 10, 2005, Mr. Nicholas A. Chaimov 
deliberately removed a jumper on the control rod drive circuit of the 
reactor without the licensee's authorization or approval. Although this 
unauthorized facility modification did not adversely impact reactor 
safety nor was the health and safety of the public affected because the 
facility's startup checklist detected a malfunction in the rod control 
system and the problem was corrected by the licensee before operation 
was allowed, conduct of this nature by an individual raises serious 
doubt as to whether the individual can be relied upon to comply with 
NRC requirements.

III

    Based on the information obtained during the OI investigation, the 
NRC concludes that Mr. Nicholas A. Chaimov, an employee of the 
licensee, made changes to the facility so that it was not as described 
in the SAR. These changes caused the licensee to be in violation of 10 
CFR 50.59, ``Changes, test, and experiments.'' It was further found 
that Mr. Chaimov's actions were willful such that he had engaged in 
deliberate misconduct in violation of 10 CFR 50.5, ``Deliberate 
misconduct.'' The NRC must be able to rely on the licensee and its 
employees to comply with NRC requirements in all material respects. Mr. 
Nicholas A. Chaimov's action has raised serious doubt as to whether he 
can be relied upon to comply with NRC requirements.
    Consequently, I lack the requisite reasonable assurance that 
licensed activities can be conducted in compliance with the 
Commission's requirements and that the health and safety of the public 
will be protected if Mr. Nicholas A. Chaimov is permitted at this time 
to be involved in NRC-licensed activities. Therefore, the public's 
health, safety, and interest require that Mr. Nicholas A. Chaimov be 
prohibited from any involvement in NRC-licensed activities for a period 
of three years from the date of this Order. Furthermore, pursuant to 10 
CFR 2.202, ``Orders,'' the NRC finds that the significance of Mr. 
Nicholas A. Chaimov's conduct described above is such that the public's 
health, safety, and interest require that this Order be immediately 
effective.

IV

    Accordingly, pursuant to Sections 104c, 161b, 161i, 161o, 182 and 
186 of

[[Page 54529]]

the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and the Commission's 
regulations in 10 CFR 2.202, 10 CFR 50.5, and 10 CFR 150.20, it is 
hereby ordered, effective immediately, that:
    1. Mr. Nicholas A. Chaimov is prohibited for three years from the 
date of this Order from engaging in NRC-licensed activities. NRC-
licensed activities are those activities that are conducted pursuant to 
a specific or general license issued by the NRC, including, but not 
limited to, those activities of Agreement State licensees conducted 
pursuant to the authority granted by 10 CFR 150.20.
    2. If Mr. Nicholas A. Chaimov is currently involved with another 
licensee in NRC-licensed activities, he must immediately cease those 
activities, and inform the NRC of the name, address, and telephone 
number of that licensee, and provide a copy of this Order to that 
licensee.
    The Director, Office of Enforcement, may, in writing, relax or 
rescind any of the above conditions upon demonstration by Mr. Nicholas 
A. Chaimov of good cause.

V

    In accordance with 10 CFR 2.202, Mr. Nicholas A. Chaimov must, and 
any other person adversely affected by this Order may, submit an answer 
to this Order, and may request a hearing on this Order, within 20 days 
of the date of this Order. Where good cause is shown, consideration 
will be given to extending the time to request a hearing. A request for 
extension of time must be made in writing to the Director, Office of 
Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555, 
and include a statement of good cause for the extension. The answer may 
consent to this Order. Unless the answer consents to this Order, the 
answer shall, in writing and under oath or affirmation, specifically 
admit or deny each allegation or charge made in this Order and shall 
set forth the matters of fact and law on which Mr. Nicholas A. Chaimov 
or other person adversely affected relies and the reasons as to why the 
Order should not have been issued. Any answer or request for a hearing 
shall be submitted to the Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 
Commission, Attn: Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff, Washington, DC 
20555. Copies also shall be sent to the Director, Office of 
Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555, 
the Assistant General Counsel for Materials Litigation and Enforcement 
at the same address, and Mr. Nicholas A. Chaimov, if the answer or 
hearing request is by a person other than Mr. Nicholas A. Chaimov. 
Because of continuing disruptions in delivery of mail to United States 
Government offices, it is requested that answers and requests for 
hearing be transmitted to the Secretary of the Commission either by 
means of facsimile transmission to 301-415-1101 or by e-mail to 
hearingdocket@nrc.gov and also to the Office of the General Counsel 
either by means of facsimile transmission to 301-415-3725 or by e-mail 
to OGCMailCenter@nrc.gov. If a person other than the licensee requests 
a hearing, that person shall set forth with particularity the manner in 
which his interest is adversely affected by this Order and shall 
address the criteria set forth in 10 CFR 2.309(d).
    If a hearing is requested by Mr. Nicholas A. Chaimov or a person 
whose interest is adversely affected, the Commission will issue an 
Order designating the time and place of any hearing. If a hearing is 
held, the issue to be considered at such hearing shall be whether this 
Order should be sustained.
    Pursuant to 10 CFR 2.202(c)(2)(i), Mr. Nicholas A. Chaimov may, in 
addition to demanding a hearing, at the time the answer is filed or 
sooner, move the Presiding Officer to set aside the immediate 
effectiveness of the Order on the ground that the Order, including the 
need for immediate effectiveness, is not based on adequate evidence but 
on mere suspicion, unfounded allegations, or error.
    In the absence of any request for hearing, or written approval of 
an extension of time in which to request a hearing, the provisions 
specified in Section IV above shall be final 20 days from the date of 
this Order without further order or proceedings. If an extension of 
time for requesting a hearing has been approved, the provisions 
specified in Section IV shall be final when the extension expires if a 
hearing request has not been received. An answer or a request for 
hearing shall not stay the immediate effectiveness of this order.


     Dated this 12th day of September 2006.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Martin J. Virgilio,
Deputy Executive Director for Materials, Research, State, and 
Compliance Programs, Office of the Executive Director for Operations.
[FR Doc. E6-15309 Filed 9-14-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.