Proposed Water Service Contract, El Dorado County Water Agency, El Dorado County, CA, 54519-54520 [06-7705]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 179 / Friday, September 15, 2006 / Notices
reference the Bureau of Reclamation/
EDCWA CVP Water Service Contract
EIS/EIR and be sent to: James A.
Roberts, Ph.D., El Dorado County Water
Agency, 3932 Ponderosa Road, Suite
200, Shingle Springs, CA 95682.
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Reclamation
Proposed Water Service Contract, El
Dorado County Water Agency, El
Dorado County, CA
AGENCY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Bureau of Reclamation,
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare a
draft environmental impact statement/
environmental report (EIS/EIR) and
notice of scoping meetings.
SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 102(2)(C)
of the National Environmental Policy
Act (NEPA) of 1969 (as amended) and
Section 21061 of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the
Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation)
and El Dorado County Water Agency
(EDCWA) intend to prepare a joint EIS/
EIR for a Municipal and Industrial (M&I)
water service contract from the Central
Valley Project (CVP), California. The
proposed project consists of a long term
water supply contract under which
Reclamation would provide up to
15,000 acre-feet per annum (AFA) to the
EDCWA for diversion from Folsom
Reservoir or for exchange upstream on
the American River. The EDCWA
proposes to sub-contract this water
equally between El Dorado Irrigation
District (EID) and Georgetown Divide
Public Utility District (GDPUD). EID
proposes to take its supply from Folsom
Reservoir. GDPUD proposes to take its
supply upstream by way of a water
exchange with Placer County Water
Agency (PCWA). The GDPUD diversion
facility is at the American River Pump
Station which is currently under
construction.
DATES: Reclamation and EDCWA will
host two public scoping meetings on the
proposed project. The meeting dates are:
• Tuesday, September 26, 2006, 6 to
8 p.m., Placerville, CA.
• Wednesday, September 27, 2006, 6
to 8 p.m., Greenwood, CA.
Any interested member of the public
is invited to attend. An overview of the
project will be presented and public
comments received. Written comments
should be mailed to James A. Roberts at
the address below by October 11, 2006.
ADDRESSES: The locations of the two
meetings are:
• Placerville—El Dorado Irrigation
District, Harry J. Dunlop Customer
Service Building, Board Room, 2890
Mosquito Road, Placerville.
• Greenwood—Greenwood
Community Center, 4411 Highway 193,
Greenwood, CA 95635.
Written comments on this notice or
the scope of this EIS/EIR should
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:46 Sep 14, 2006
Jkt 208001
Brian Deason, Environmental Specialist,
Bureau of Reclamation, 7794 Folsom
Dam Road, Folsom, California 95630,
telephone: (16) 989–7279 or James A.
Roberts, Ph.D. at the above address,
telephone: (530) 621–5392.
In 1990,
Congress passed Public Law 101–514,
which directed Reclamation to enter
into a long-term CVP M&I water service
contract with EDCWA. Section 206
(b)(1)(B) provides that Reclamation
enter into an M&I water service contract
with EDCWA for up to 15,000 AFA. The
proposed action is the execution of a
long term water service contract with
EDCWA. EDCWA intends to apportion
this new contract water to both EID and
GDPUD based on these parties’
individual water needs and timing
requests. This will require separate
contracts between EDCWA and both EID
and GDPUD with Reclamation approval.
At present, it is assumed that the new
Federal water supply would be split
equally between EID and GDPUD such
that each purveyor would be provided
up to 7,500 AFA.
The EIS/EIR focuses on the potential
environmental impacts resulting from
the execution and implementation of
the new CVP water service contract. The
EIS/EIR will include evaluation of the
no project alternative as well as
alternative delivery quantities. At a
project-level, it will address a
comprehensive nag of in-stream
potential effects resulting from this new
15,000 AFA withdrawal, including a
detailed evaluation of the effects to the
CVP and the State Water Project (SWP).
This will involve assessments of waterrelated resources including: Fisheries,
riparian species/habitats, water-related
recreation, water-related cultural
resources, and water quality. It will also
address water supply impacts across the
CVP/SWP, flood control at Folsom
Reservoir, and potential effects to CVP
hydropower generation and pumping
impacts at the reservoir. Water-related
analyses will be facilitated through the
application and use of Reclamation’s
planning and operations model,
CALSIM II, along with other
environmental models that utilize
CLASIM II output hydrology. At
present, the lead agencies lack sufficient
information to ascertain whether any of
these impacts will be significant.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
54519
No new infrastructure facilities are
included with this proposed action.
While the EIS/EIR will identify, to the
extent known, possible future
infrastructure projects that would be
needed to fully utilize this contract
water, many of these details are not
currently known. Accordingly, a
program-level assessment of known or
potential facilities will be provided in
the EIS/EIR.
The EIS/EIR will assess potential
impacts to any Indian Trust Assets
(ITAs) or any environmental justice
issues. Input about concerns or issues
related to ITAs is requested from
potentially affected Indian groups and
individuals, the public, and state and
Federal agencies.
This proposed action has been the
subject of previous scoping meetings
that were published in the Federal
Register (58 FR 28034, May 12, 1993,
and 63 FR 30512, June 4, 1998).
However, because the proposed action
and alternatives have been updated and
more than eight years has passed since
the last scoping meetings, additional
scoping activities are being initiated at
this time.
Special Services
If special assistance is required at the
scoping meetings, please contract Donna
Potter at 916–978–5103, TDD 916–978–
5608, or via e-mail at
lpotter@mp.usbr.gov. Please notify Ms.
Potter as far in advance of the meetings
as possible to enable Reclamation to
secure the needed services. If a request
cannot be honored, the requestor will be
notified. A telephone device for the
hearing impaired (TDD) is available at
916–978–5608.
Our practice is to make comments,
including names, home addresses, home
phone numbers, and email addresses of
respondents, available for public
review. Individual respondents may
request that we withhold their names
and/or home addresses, etc., but if you
wish to consider withholding this
information you must state this
prominently at the beginning of your
comments. In addition, you must
present a rationale for withholding this
information. This rationale must
demonstrate that disclosure would
constitute a clearly unwarranted
invasion of privacy. Unsupported
assertions will not meet this burden. In
the absence of exceptional,
documentable circumstances, this
information will be released. We will
always make submissions from
organizations or businesses, and from
individuals identifying themselves as
representatives or officials of
E:\FR\FM\15SEN1.SGM
15SEN1
54520
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 179 / Friday, September 15, 2006 / Notices
organizations or businesses, available
for public inspection in their entirety.
Michael Nepstad,
Acting Regional Environmental Officer, MidPacific Region.
[FR Doc. 06–7705 Filed 9–14–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–MN–M
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 701–TA–364 and 731–
TA–711 and 713–716 (Second Review)]
Oil Country Tubular Goods From
Argentina, Italy, Japan, Korea, and
Mexico
United States International
Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice of Commission
determinations to conduct full five-year
reviews concerning the countervailing
duty order on oil country tubular goods
(‘‘OCTG’’) from Italy and the
antidumping duty orders on OCTG from
Argentina, Italy, Japan, Korea, and
Mexico.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives
notice that it will proceed with full
reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of
the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C.
1675(c)(5)) to determine whether
revocation of the countervailing duty
order on OCTG from Italy and the
antidumping duty orders on OCTG from
Argentina, Italy, Japan, Korea, and
Mexico would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of material
injury within a reasonably foreseeable
time. A schedule for the reviews will be
established and announced at a later
date. For further information concerning
the conduct of these reviews and rules
of general application, consult the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, part 201, subparts A through
E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207,
subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part
207).
DATES:
Effective Date: September 5,
2006.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary Messer (202–205–3193), Office of
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting
the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:51 Sep 14, 2006
Jkt 208001
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its Internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
these reviews may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
September 5, 2006, the Commission
determined that it should proceed to
full reviews in the subject five-year
reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of
the Act. The Commission found that
both the domestic and respondent
interested party group responses to its
notice of institution (71 FR 31207, June
1, 2006) were adequate. A record of the
Commissioners’ votes, the
Commission’s statement on adequacy,
and any individual Commissioner’s
statements will be available from the
Office of the Secretary and at the
Commission’s Web site.
Authority: These reviews are being
conducted under authority of title VII of the
Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published
pursuant to section 207.62 of the
Commission’s rules.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: September 11, 2006.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E6–15359 Filed 9–14–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 731–TA–707–709
(Second Review)]
Certain Seamless Carbon and Alloy
Steel Standard, Line, and Pressure
Pipe From Argentina, Brazil, and
Germany
United States International
Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice of Commission
determinations to conduct full five-year
reviews concerning the antidumping
duty orders on certain seamless carbon
and alloy steel standard, line, and
pressure pipe (‘‘seamless pipe’’) from
Argentina, Brazil, and Germany.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives
notice that it will proceed with full
reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of
the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C.
1675(c)(5)) to determine whether
revocation of the antidumping duty
orders on seamless pipe from Argentina,
Brazil, and Germany would be likely to
lead to continuation or recurrence of
material injury within a reasonably
foreseeable time. A schedule for the
reviews will be established and
announced at a later date. For further
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
information concerning the conduct of
these reviews and rules of general
application, consult the Commission’s
Rules of Practice and Procedure, part
201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part
201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and
F (19 CFR part 207).
DATES: Effective Date: September 5,
2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary Messer (202–205–3193), Office of
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting
the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its Internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
these reviews may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
September 5, 2006, the Commission
determined that it should proceed to
full reviews in the subject five-year
reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of
the Act. The Commission found that the
domestic interested party group
response to its notice of institution (71
FR 31209, June 1, 2006) was adequate
and that the respondent interested party
group response with respect to
Argentina was adequate and decided to
conduct a full review with respect to the
order covering seamless pipe from
Argentina. The Commission found that
the respondent interested party group
responses with respect to Brazil and
Germany were inadequate.1 However,
the Commission determined to conduct
full reviews concerning seamless pipe
from Brazil and Germany to promote
administrative efficiency in light of its
decision to conduct a full review with
respect to seamless pipe from Argentina.
A record of the Commissioners’ votes,
the Commission’s statement on
adequacy, and any individual
Commissioner’s statements will be
available from the Office of the
Secretary and at the Commission’s Web
site.
Authority: These reviews are being
conducted under authority of title VII of the
Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published
1 Commissioner Deanna Tanner Okun and
Commissioner Charlotte R. Lane found that the
respondent interested party group response with
respect to Germany was adequate.
E:\FR\FM\15SEN1.SGM
15SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 179 (Friday, September 15, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54519-54520]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7705]
[[Page 54519]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Reclamation
Proposed Water Service Contract, El Dorado County Water Agency,
El Dorado County, CA
AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare a draft environmental impact
statement/environmental report (EIS/EIR) and notice of scoping
meetings.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969 (as amended) and Section 21061 of the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the Bureau of Reclamation
(Reclamation) and El Dorado County Water Agency (EDCWA) intend to
prepare a joint EIS/EIR for a Municipal and Industrial (M&I) water
service contract from the Central Valley Project (CVP), California. The
proposed project consists of a long term water supply contract under
which Reclamation would provide up to 15,000 acre-feet per annum (AFA)
to the EDCWA for diversion from Folsom Reservoir or for exchange
upstream on the American River. The EDCWA proposes to sub-contract this
water equally between El Dorado Irrigation District (EID) and
Georgetown Divide Public Utility District (GDPUD). EID proposes to take
its supply from Folsom Reservoir. GDPUD proposes to take its supply
upstream by way of a water exchange with Placer County Water Agency
(PCWA). The GDPUD diversion facility is at the American River Pump
Station which is currently under construction.
DATES: Reclamation and EDCWA will host two public scoping meetings on
the proposed project. The meeting dates are:
Tuesday, September 26, 2006, 6 to 8 p.m., Placerville, CA.
Wednesday, September 27, 2006, 6 to 8 p.m., Greenwood, CA.
Any interested member of the public is invited to attend. An
overview of the project will be presented and public comments received.
Written comments should be mailed to James A. Roberts at the address
below by October 11, 2006.
ADDRESSES: The locations of the two meetings are:
Placerville--El Dorado Irrigation District, Harry J.
Dunlop Customer Service Building, Board Room, 2890 Mosquito Road,
Placerville.
Greenwood--Greenwood Community Center, 4411 Highway 193,
Greenwood, CA 95635.
Written comments on this notice or the scope of this EIS/EIR should
reference the Bureau of Reclamation/EDCWA CVP Water Service Contract
EIS/EIR and be sent to: James A. Roberts, Ph.D., El Dorado County Water
Agency, 3932 Ponderosa Road, Suite 200, Shingle Springs, CA 95682.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian Deason, Environmental
Specialist, Bureau of Reclamation, 7794 Folsom Dam Road, Folsom,
California 95630, telephone: (16) 989-7279 or James A. Roberts, Ph.D.
at the above address, telephone: (530) 621-5392.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In 1990, Congress passed Public Law 101-514,
which directed Reclamation to enter into a long-term CVP M&I water
service contract with EDCWA. Section 206 (b)(1)(B) provides that
Reclamation enter into an M&I water service contract with EDCWA for up
to 15,000 AFA. The proposed action is the execution of a long term
water service contract with EDCWA. EDCWA intends to apportion this new
contract water to both EID and GDPUD based on these parties' individual
water needs and timing requests. This will require separate contracts
between EDCWA and both EID and GDPUD with Reclamation approval. At
present, it is assumed that the new Federal water supply would be split
equally between EID and GDPUD such that each purveyor would be provided
up to 7,500 AFA.
The EIS/EIR focuses on the potential environmental impacts
resulting from the execution and implementation of the new CVP water
service contract. The EIS/EIR will include evaluation of the no project
alternative as well as alternative delivery quantities. At a project-
level, it will address a comprehensive nag of in-stream potential
effects resulting from this new 15,000 AFA withdrawal, including a
detailed evaluation of the effects to the CVP and the State Water
Project (SWP). This will involve assessments of water-related resources
including: Fisheries, riparian species/habitats, water-related
recreation, water-related cultural resources, and water quality. It
will also address water supply impacts across the CVP/SWP, flood
control at Folsom Reservoir, and potential effects to CVP hydropower
generation and pumping impacts at the reservoir. Water-related analyses
will be facilitated through the application and use of Reclamation's
planning and operations model, CALSIM II, along with other
environmental models that utilize CLASIM II output hydrology. At
present, the lead agencies lack sufficient information to ascertain
whether any of these impacts will be significant.
No new infrastructure facilities are included with this proposed
action. While the EIS/EIR will identify, to the extent known, possible
future infrastructure projects that would be needed to fully utilize
this contract water, many of these details are not currently known.
Accordingly, a program-level assessment of known or potential
facilities will be provided in the EIS/EIR.
The EIS/EIR will assess potential impacts to any Indian Trust
Assets (ITAs) or any environmental justice issues. Input about concerns
or issues related to ITAs is requested from potentially affected Indian
groups and individuals, the public, and state and Federal agencies.
This proposed action has been the subject of previous scoping
meetings that were published in the Federal Register (58 FR 28034, May
12, 1993, and 63 FR 30512, June 4, 1998). However, because the proposed
action and alternatives have been updated and more than eight years has
passed since the last scoping meetings, additional scoping activities
are being initiated at this time.
Special Services
If special assistance is required at the scoping meetings, please
contract Donna Potter at 916-978-5103, TDD 916-978-5608, or via e-mail
at lpotter@mp.usbr.gov. Please notify Ms. Potter as far in advance of
the meetings as possible to enable Reclamation to secure the needed
services. If a request cannot be honored, the requestor will be
notified. A telephone device for the hearing impaired (TDD) is
available at 916-978-5608.
Our practice is to make comments, including names, home addresses,
home phone numbers, and email addresses of respondents, available for
public review. Individual respondents may request that we withhold
their names and/or home addresses, etc., but if you wish to consider
withholding this information you must state this prominently at the
beginning of your comments. In addition, you must present a rationale
for withholding this information. This rationale must demonstrate that
disclosure would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.
Unsupported assertions will not meet this burden. In the absence of
exceptional, documentable circumstances, this information will be
released. We will always make submissions from organizations or
businesses, and from individuals identifying themselves as
representatives or officials of
[[Page 54520]]
organizations or businesses, available for public inspection in their
entirety.
Michael Nepstad,
Acting Regional Environmental Officer, Mid-Pacific Region.
[FR Doc. 06-7705 Filed 9-14-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MN-M