Action Affecting Export Privileges; Zheng Zheng; In the Matter of: Zheng Zheng, Univision Technology, Inc., 764 Violet Circle, Naperville, IL 60540, Respondent, 54467-54468 [06-7703]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 179 / Friday, September 15, 2006 / Notices
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Entered this 7th day of September 2006.
Darryl W. Jackson,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Export
Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 06–7704 Filed 9–14–06; 8:45 am]
Control Classification Number 3A001,
from the United States to the People’s
Republic of China (‘‘China’’), without
obtaining licenses from the Department
of Commerce as required by Section
742.4 of the Regulations. In so doing,
BILLING CODE 3510–DT–M
Zheng committed five violations of
Section 764.2(b) of the Regulations.
Charges 6–10: 15 CFR 764.2(e): Acting
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
With Knowledge That a Violation of the
Regulations Was About To Occur: In
Bureau of Industry and Security
connection with the transactions
Action Affecting Export Privileges;
referenced in Charges One through Five
Zheng Zheng; In the Matter of: Zheng
above, Zheng ordered or transferred
Zheng, Univision Technology, Inc., 764 items, including microwave transistors,
Violet Circle, Naperville, IL 60540,
microwave amplifiers, and related
Respondent
equipment, that were to be exported
from the United States with knowledge
Order Relating to Zheng Zheng
that violations of the Regulations would
The Bureau of Industry and Security,
occur. Specifically, Zheng was informed
U.S. Department of Commerce (‘‘BIS’’)
by Univision’s suppliers and others that
has notified Zheng Zheng, President of
the aforementioned items required
Univision Technology, Inc.
export licenses. As such, Zheng, at all
(‘‘Univision’’), in her individual
relevant times, knew that the items
capacity (‘‘Zheng’’), of its intention to
required licenses if exported to China
initiate an administrative proceeding
and that no such licenses would be
against Zheng pursuant to Section 766.3 obtained. In so doing, Zheng committed
of the Export Administration
five violations of Section 764.2(e) of the
Regulations (currently codified at 15
Regulations.
Charge 11: 15 CFR 764.2(g): False
CFR parts 703–774 (2006))
Statement to a BIS Special Agent in the
(‘‘Regulations’’),1 and Section 13(c) of
Course of an Investigation: On or about
the Export Administration Act of 1979,
January 21, 2003, Zheng made a false or
as amended (50 U.S.C. app. §§ 2401–
misleading statement to officials of the
2402 (2000)) (‘‘Act’’),2 by issuing a
U.S. Government in the course of an
proposed charging letter to Zheng that
investigation conducted by BIS
alleged that Zheng committed 11
regarding the export of certain items to
violations of the Regulations.
China. Specifically, in the course of an
Specifically, the charges are:
Charges 1–5: 15 CFR 764.2(b): Causing interview conducted by agents from BIS,
Zheng represented that she had never
the Export of Items Without the
purchased or exported any items that
Required Department of Commerce
required an export license. This
Licenses: On five occasions between on
representation was false or misleading,
or about August 25, 2000, and on or
as Zheng had, on one or more occasions,
about July 2001, Zheng engaged in
arranged for the export of various
conduct prohibited by the Regulations
electronic components, items requiring
by causing the export of microwave
a Department of Commerce license for
transistors, microwave amplifiers, and
export to China. In so doing, Zheng
related equipment, items subject to the
Regulations and classified under Export committed one violation of Section
764.2(g) of the Regulations.
1 The charged violations occurred between 2000
Whereas, BIS and Zheng have entered
and 2003. The Regulations governing the violations
into a Settlement Agreement pursuant to
at issue are found in the 2000 through 2003
Section 766.18(a) of the Regulations
versions of the Code of Federal Regulations (15 CFR
whereby they agreed to settle this matter
parts 730–774 (2000–2003)). The 2006 Regulations
in accordance with the terms and
set forth the procedures that apply to this matter.
2 From August 21, 1994 through November 12,
conditions set forth therein; and
2000, the Act was in lapse. During that period, the
Whereas, I have approved of the terms
President, through Executive Order 12924, which
of such Settlement Agreement:
had been extended by successive Presidential
It is therefore ordered:
Notices, the last of which was August 3, 2000 ( 3
First, that a civil penalty of $288,150
CFR, 2000 Comp. 397 (2001)), continued the
Regulations in effect under the International
is assessed against Zheng, of which
Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701–
$20,000 shall be paid to the U.S.
1706 (2000)) (‘‘IEEPA’’). On November 13, 2000, the
Department of Commerce within 30
Act was reauthorized and it remained in effect
days from the date of entry of this
through August 20, 2001. Since August 21, 2001,
the Act has been in lapse and the President, through Order; $20,000 shall be paid to the U.S.
Executive Order 13222 of August 17, 2001 (3 CFR,
Department of Commerce not later than
2001 Comp. 783 (2002)), as extended by the Notice
March 15, 2007; $20,000 shall be paid
of August 3, 2006 (71 FR 44,551 (August 7, 2006)),
to the U.S. Department of Commerce not
has continued the Regulations in effect under the
IEEPA.
later than September 15, 2007; $20,000
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:51 Sep 14, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
54467
shall be paid to the U.S. Department of
Commerce not later than March 15,
2008; and $20,000 shall be paid to the
U.S. Department of Commerce not later
than September 15, 2008. Payment of
the remaining $188,150 shall be
suspended for a period of three years
and thereafter shall be waived, provided
that during the period of suspension,
Zheng has committed no violations of
the Act, or any regulation, order, or
license issued thereunder and Zheng
has made the payment of $100,000
described above in a timely manner.
Payment shall be made in the manner
specified in the attached instructions.
Second, that, pursuant to the Debt
Collection Act of 1982, as amended (3
U.S.C. 3701–3720E (2000)), the civil
penalty owed under this Order accrues
interest as more fully described in the
attached Notice, and, if payment is not
made by the due date specified herein,
Zheng will be assessed, in addition to
the full amount of the civil penalty and
interest, a penalty charge and an
administrative charge, as more fully
described in the attached Notice.
Third, that the timely payment of the
civil penalty set forth above is hereby
made a condition to the granting,
restoration, or continuing validity of any
export license, license exception,
permission, or privilege granted, or to be
granted, to Zheng. Accordingly, if Zheng
should fail to pay the civil penalty in a
timely manner, the undersigned may
enter an Order denying all of Zheng’s
export privileges under the Regulations
for a period of one year from the date
of entry of this Order.
Fourth, for a period of 10 years from
the date of entry of the Order, Zheng
Zheng, 764 Violet Circle, Naperville, IL
60540, and when acting for or on behalf
of Zheng, her representatives, agents,
assigns or employees (‘‘Denied Person’’),
may not, directly or indirectly,
participate in any way in any
transaction involving any commodity,
software, or technology (hereinafter
collectively referred to as ‘‘item’’)
exported or to be exported from the
United States that is subject to the
Regulations, or in any other activity
subject to the Regulations, including,
but not limited to:
A. Applying for, obtaining, or using
any license, License Exception, or
export control document;
b. Carrying on negotiations
concerning, or ordering, buying,
receiving, using, selling, delivering,
storing, disposing of, forwarding,
transporting, financing, or otherwise
servicing in any way, any transaction
involving any item exported or to be
exported from the United States that is
subject to the Regulations, or in any
E:\FR\FM\15SEN1.SGM
15SEN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
54468
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 179 / Friday, September 15, 2006 / Notices
other activity subject to the Regulations;
or
C. Benefitting in any way from any
transaction involving any item exported
or to be exported from the United States
that is subject to the Regulations, or in
any other activity subject to the
Regulations.
Fifth, that no person may, directly or
indirectly, do any of the following:
A. Export or reexport to or on behalf
of the Denied Person any item subject to
the regulations;
B. Take any action that facilitates the
acquisition or attempted acquisition by
the Denied Person of the ownership,
possession, or control of any item
subject to the Regulations that has been
or will be exported from the United
States, including financing or other
support activities related to a
transaction whereby the Denied Person
acquires or attempts to acquire such
ownership, possession or control;
C. Take any action to acquire from or
to facilitate the acquisition or attempted
acquisition from the Denied Person of
any item subject to the regulations that
has been exported from the United
States;
D. Obtain from the Denied Person in
the United States any item subject to the
Regulations with knowledge or reason
to know that the item will be, or is
intended to be, exported from the
United States; or
E. Engage in any transaction to service
any item subject to the Regulations that
has been or will be exported from the
United States and which is owned,
possessed or controlled by the Denied
Person, or service any item, of whatever
origin, that is owned, possessed or
controlled by the Denied Person if such
service involves the use of any item
subject to the Regulations that has been
or will be exported from the United
States. For purposes of this paragraph,
servicing means installation,
maintenance, repair, modification or
testing.
Sixth, that the prohibitions set forth
above do not apply to transactions in
which the Denied Person is involved by
virtue of her employment by a company
which she neither owns nor controls,
provided that she does not have direct,
indirect, constructive, or de facto
responsibility for:
1. Activities or transactions subject to
the Regulations,
2. Participating in negotiations
concerning any activity or transaction
subject to the Regulations,
3. Determining export licensing
requirements, or
4. Applying for, obtaining, or using
any export license, License Exception,
or other export control document.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:51 Sep 14, 2006
Jkt 208001
Seventh, that, after notice and
opportunity for comment as provided in
Section 766.23 of the Regulations, any
person, firm, corporation, or business
organization related to Zheng by
affiliation, ownership, control, or
position of responsibility in the conduct
of trade or related services may also be
made subject to the provisions of the
Order.
Eighth, that this Order does not
prohibit any export, reexport, or other
transaction subject to the Regulations
where the only items involved that are
subject to the Regulations are the
foreign-produced direct product of U.S.origin technology.
Ninth, that the proposed charging
letter, the Settlement Agreement, and
this Order shall be made available to the
public.
Tenth, that this Order shall be served
on the Denied Person, and shall be
published in the Federal Register.
This Order, which constitutes the
final action in this matter, is effective
immediately.
Entered this 7th day of September 2006.
Darryl Jackson,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Export
Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 06–7703 Filed 9–14–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–PT–M
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
(A–427–801, A–559–801)
Antifriction Bearings and Parts Thereof
from France and Singapore:
Revocation of Antidumping Duty
Orders
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On June 1, 2005, the
Department of Commerce initiated and
the International Trade Commission
instituted a sunset review of the
antidumping duty orders on antifriction
bearings and parts thereof from France
and Singapore. As a result of the review,
the International Trade Commission
determined that revocation of the order
on spherical plain bearings and parts
thereof from France and the order on
ball bearings and parts thereof from
Singapore would not be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of material
injury to an industry in the United
States within a reasonably foreseeable
time. Therefore, the Department of
Commerce is revoking these two
antidumping duty orders.
EFFECTIVE DATE: July 11, 2005.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Edythe Artman or Minoo Hatten, Office
5, AD/CVD Operations, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street & Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–3931 and (202)
482–1690, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Scope of the Orders
Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof
The products covered by this order
are ball bearings and parts thereof.
These products include all bearings that
employ balls as the rolling element.
Imports of these products are classified
under the following categories:
antifriction balls, ball bearings with
integral shafts, ball bearings (including
radial ball bearings) and parts thereof,
and housed or mounted ball bearing
units and parts thereof.
Imports of these products are
classified under the following
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS) subheadings:
3926.90.45, 4016.93.00, 4016.93.10,
4016.93.50, 6909.19.5010, 8431.20.00,
8431.39.0010, 8482.10.10, 8482.10.50,
8482.80.00, 8482.91.00, 8482.99.05,
8482.99.2580, 8482.99.35, 8482.99.6595,
8483.20.40, 8483.20.80, 8483.50.8040,
8483.50.90, 8483.90.20, 8483.90.30,
8483.90.70, 8708.50.50, 8708.60.50,
8708.60.80, 8708.70.6060, 8708.70.8050,
8708.93.30, 8708.93.5000, 8708.93.6000,
8708.93.75, 8708.99.06, 8708.99.31,
8708.99.4960, 8708.99.50, 8708.99.5800,
8708.99.8080, 8803.10.00, 8803.20.00,
8803.30.00, 8803.90.30, and 8803.90.90.
Although the HTSUS subheadings
above are provided for convenience and
customs purposes, written descriptions
of the scope of this order remain
dispositive.
Spherical Plain Bearings, Mounted or
Unmounted, and Parts Thereof:
These products include all spherical
plain bearings that employ a spherically
shaped sliding element and include
spherical plain rod ends. Imports of
these products are classified under the
following HTSUS subheadings:
3926.90.45, 4016.93.00, 4016.93.00,
4016.93.10, 4016.93.50, 6909.50,10,
8483.30.80, 8483.90.30, 8485.90.00,
8708.93.5000, 8708.99.50, 8803.10.00,
8803.10.00, 8803.20.00, 8803.30.00, and
8803.90.90. The HTSUS subheadings
are provided for convenience and
customs purposes. The written
description of the scope of this order is
dispositive.
The size or precision grade of a
bearing does not influence whether the
E:\FR\FM\15SEN1.SGM
15SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 179 (Friday, September 15, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54467-54468]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7703]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
Action Affecting Export Privileges; Zheng Zheng; In the Matter
of: Zheng Zheng, Univision Technology, Inc., 764 Violet Circle,
Naperville, IL 60540, Respondent
Order Relating to Zheng Zheng
The Bureau of Industry and Security, U.S. Department of Commerce
(``BIS'') has notified Zheng Zheng, President of Univision Technology,
Inc. (``Univision''), in her individual capacity (``Zheng''), of its
intention to initiate an administrative proceeding against Zheng
pursuant to Section 766.3 of the Export Administration Regulations
(currently codified at 15 CFR parts 703-774 (2006))
(``Regulations''),\1\ and Section 13(c) of the Export Administration
Act of 1979, as amended (50 U.S.C. app. Sec. Sec. 2401-2402 (2000))
(``Act''),\2\ by issuing a proposed charging letter to Zheng that
alleged that Zheng committed 11 violations of the Regulations.
Specifically, the charges are:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The charged violations occurred between 2000 and 2003. The
Regulations governing the violations at issue are found in the 2000
through 2003 versions of the Code of Federal Regulations (15 CFR
parts 730-774 (2000-2003)). The 2006 Regulations set forth the
procedures that apply to this matter.
\2\ From August 21, 1994 through November 12, 2000, the Act was
in lapse. During that period, the President, through Executive Order
12924, which had been extended by successive Presidential Notices,
the last of which was August 3, 2000 ( 3 CFR, 2000 Comp. 397
(2001)), continued the Regulations in effect under the International
Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701-1706 (2000))
(``IEEPA''). On November 13, 2000, the Act was reauthorized and it
remained in effect through August 20, 2001. Since August 21, 2001,
the Act has been in lapse and the President, through Executive Order
13222 of August 17, 2001 (3 CFR, 2001 Comp. 783 (2002)), as extended
by the Notice of August 3, 2006 (71 FR 44,551 (August 7, 2006)), has
continued the Regulations in effect under the IEEPA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Charges 1-5: 15 CFR 764.2(b): Causing the Export of Items Without
the Required Department of Commerce Licenses: On five occasions between
on or about August 25, 2000, and on or about July 2001, Zheng engaged
in conduct prohibited by the Regulations by causing the export of
microwave transistors, microwave amplifiers, and related equipment,
items subject to the Regulations and classified under Export Control
Classification Number 3A001, from the United States to the People's
Republic of China (``China''), without obtaining licenses from the
Department of Commerce as required by Section 742.4 of the Regulations.
In so doing, Zheng committed five violations of Section 764.2(b) of the
Regulations.
Charges 6-10: 15 CFR 764.2(e): Acting With Knowledge That a
Violation of the Regulations Was About To Occur: In connection with the
transactions referenced in Charges One through Five above, Zheng
ordered or transferred items, including microwave transistors,
microwave amplifiers, and related equipment, that were to be exported
from the United States with knowledge that violations of the
Regulations would occur. Specifically, Zheng was informed by
Univision's suppliers and others that the aforementioned items required
export licenses. As such, Zheng, at all relevant times, knew that the
items required licenses if exported to China and that no such licenses
would be obtained. In so doing, Zheng committed five violations of
Section 764.2(e) of the Regulations.
Charge 11: 15 CFR 764.2(g): False Statement to a BIS Special Agent
in the Course of an Investigation: On or about January 21, 2003, Zheng
made a false or misleading statement to officials of the U.S.
Government in the course of an investigation conducted by BIS regarding
the export of certain items to China. Specifically, in the course of an
interview conducted by agents from BIS, Zheng represented that she had
never purchased or exported any items that required an export license.
This representation was false or misleading, as Zheng had, on one or
more occasions, arranged for the export of various electronic
components, items requiring a Department of Commerce license for export
to China. In so doing, Zheng committed one violation of Section
764.2(g) of the Regulations.
Whereas, BIS and Zheng have entered into a Settlement Agreement
pursuant to Section 766.18(a) of the Regulations whereby they agreed to
settle this matter in accordance with the terms and conditions set
forth therein; and
Whereas, I have approved of the terms of such Settlement Agreement:
It is therefore ordered:
First, that a civil penalty of $288,150 is assessed against Zheng,
of which $20,000 shall be paid to the U.S. Department of Commerce
within 30 days from the date of entry of this Order; $20,000 shall be
paid to the U.S. Department of Commerce not later than March 15, 2007;
$20,000 shall be paid to the U.S. Department of Commerce not later than
September 15, 2007; $20,000 shall be paid to the U.S. Department of
Commerce not later than March 15, 2008; and $20,000 shall be paid to
the U.S. Department of Commerce not later than September 15, 2008.
Payment of the remaining $188,150 shall be suspended for a period of
three years and thereafter shall be waived, provided that during the
period of suspension, Zheng has committed no violations of the Act, or
any regulation, order, or license issued thereunder and Zheng has made
the payment of $100,000 described above in a timely manner. Payment
shall be made in the manner specified in the attached instructions.
Second, that, pursuant to the Debt Collection Act of 1982, as
amended (3 U.S.C. 3701-3720E (2000)), the civil penalty owed under this
Order accrues interest as more fully described in the attached Notice,
and, if payment is not made by the due date specified herein, Zheng
will be assessed, in addition to the full amount of the civil penalty
and interest, a penalty charge and an administrative charge, as more
fully described in the attached Notice.
Third, that the timely payment of the civil penalty set forth above
is hereby made a condition to the granting, restoration, or continuing
validity of any export license, license exception, permission, or
privilege granted, or to be granted, to Zheng. Accordingly, if Zheng
should fail to pay the civil penalty in a timely manner, the
undersigned may enter an Order denying all of Zheng's export privileges
under the Regulations for a period of one year from the date of entry
of this Order.
Fourth, for a period of 10 years from the date of entry of the
Order, Zheng Zheng, 764 Violet Circle, Naperville, IL 60540, and when
acting for or on behalf of Zheng, her representatives, agents, assigns
or employees (``Denied Person''), may not, directly or indirectly,
participate in any way in any transaction involving any commodity,
software, or technology (hereinafter collectively referred to as
``item'') exported or to be exported from the United States that is
subject to the Regulations, or in any other activity subject to the
Regulations, including, but not limited to:
A. Applying for, obtaining, or using any license, License
Exception, or export control document;
b. Carrying on negotiations concerning, or ordering, buying,
receiving, using, selling, delivering, storing, disposing of,
forwarding, transporting, financing, or otherwise servicing in any way,
any transaction involving any item exported or to be exported from the
United States that is subject to the Regulations, or in any
[[Page 54468]]
other activity subject to the Regulations; or
C. Benefitting in any way from any transaction involving any item
exported or to be exported from the United States that is subject to
the Regulations, or in any other activity subject to the Regulations.
Fifth, that no person may, directly or indirectly, do any of the
following:
A. Export or reexport to or on behalf of the Denied Person any item
subject to the regulations;
B. Take any action that facilitates the acquisition or attempted
acquisition by the Denied Person of the ownership, possession, or
control of any item subject to the Regulations that has been or will be
exported from the United States, including financing or other support
activities related to a transaction whereby the Denied Person acquires
or attempts to acquire such ownership, possession or control;
C. Take any action to acquire from or to facilitate the acquisition
or attempted acquisition from the Denied Person of any item subject to
the regulations that has been exported from the United States;
D. Obtain from the Denied Person in the United States any item
subject to the Regulations with knowledge or reason to know that the
item will be, or is intended to be, exported from the United States; or
E. Engage in any transaction to service any item subject to the
Regulations that has been or will be exported from the United States
and which is owned, possessed or controlled by the Denied Person, or
service any item, of whatever origin, that is owned, possessed or
controlled by the Denied Person if such service involves the use of any
item subject to the Regulations that has been or will be exported from
the United States. For purposes of this paragraph, servicing means
installation, maintenance, repair, modification or testing.
Sixth, that the prohibitions set forth above do not apply to
transactions in which the Denied Person is involved by virtue of her
employment by a company which she neither owns nor controls, provided
that she does not have direct, indirect, constructive, or de facto
responsibility for:
1. Activities or transactions subject to the Regulations,
2. Participating in negotiations concerning any activity or
transaction subject to the Regulations,
3. Determining export licensing requirements, or
4. Applying for, obtaining, or using any export license, License
Exception, or other export control document.
Seventh, that, after notice and opportunity for comment as provided
in Section 766.23 of the Regulations, any person, firm, corporation, or
business organization related to Zheng by affiliation, ownership,
control, or position of responsibility in the conduct of trade or
related services may also be made subject to the provisions of the
Order.
Eighth, that this Order does not prohibit any export, reexport, or
other transaction subject to the Regulations where the only items
involved that are subject to the Regulations are the foreign-produced
direct product of U.S.-origin technology.
Ninth, that the proposed charging letter, the Settlement Agreement,
and this Order shall be made available to the public.
Tenth, that this Order shall be served on the Denied Person, and
shall be published in the Federal Register.
This Order, which constitutes the final action in this matter, is
effective immediately.
Entered this 7th day of September 2006.
Darryl Jackson,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Export Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 06-7703 Filed 9-14-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-PT-M