Parts and Accessories Necessary for Safe Operation; Application for an Exemption From Kershaw Fruit & Cold Storage Co., Inc. and Kershaw Sunnyside Ranches, Inc., 54335-54337 [E6-15224]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 178 / Thursday, September 14, 2006 / Notices
Meacham Boulevard, Fort Worth, Texas;
Mr. Mike Feeley, Aviation Director, City
of Fort Worth, Aviation Department,
4201 N. Main St., Suite 200, Fort Worth,
Texas. Questions may be directed to the
individual named above under the
heading FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, September 7,
2006.
Kelvin L. Solco,
Manager, Airports Division.
[FR Doc. 06–7660 Filed 9–13–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–M
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
RTCA Special Committee 147:
Minimum Operational Performance
Standards for Traffic Alert and
Collision Avoidance Systems Airborne
Equipment
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of RTCA Special
Committee 147 meeting.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice
to advise the public of a meeting of
RTCA Special Committee 147:
Minimum Operational Performance
Standards for Traffic Alert and Collision
Avoidance Systems Airborne
Equipment.
The meeting will be held
October 5, 2006 starting at 9 a.m.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at
RTCA, Inc., 1828 L St., NW., Suite 805,
Washington, DC 20036.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
RTCA Secretariat, 1828 L Street, NW.,
Suite 805, Washington, DC 20036;
telephone (202) 833–9339; fax (202)
833–9434; Web site https://www.rtca.org.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant
to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal
Advisory Committee Act (P.L. 92–463, 5
U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice is hereby
given for a Special Committee 147
meeting. The agenda will include:
• October 5:
• Opening Session (Welcome and
Introductory Remarks, Review/Approve
meeting agenda for 63rd meeting,
Review/Approve Summary of Previous
Meeting).
• FAA TCAS II Program Office
activities and charter.
• SC–147 Activity Reports.
• Surveillance Working Group:
Review and resolution of Final Review
and Comment (FRAC) comments,
Hybrid Surveillance MOPS.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
DATES:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:23 Sep 13, 2006
Jkt 208001
• Pending Plenary approval, forward
comments to RTCA PMC for final
consideration.
• Operations Working Group.
• Discussion and status of draft
‘‘TCAS Safety Bulletin’’ and draft letter
to Flight Operations Departments.
• Discussion of proposed ‘‘Level of
RA’’.
• Requirements Working Group
(RWG).
• Roadmap for potential FAA TCAS
V7.1 rulemaking.
• Workplan for DO–185B
development.
• Closing Session (Other Business,
Future Actions/Activities, Date and
Place of Next Meeting, Adjourn).
Attendance is open to the interested
public but limited to space availability.
With the approval of the chairmen,
members of the public may present oral
statements at the meeting. Persons
wishing to present statements or obtain
information should contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section. Members of the public
may present a written statement to the
committee at any time.
Issued in Washington, DC, on September 6,
2006.
Francisco Estrada C.,
RTCA Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 06–7634 Filed 9–13–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–M
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration
[Docket No. FMCSA–2006–25594]
Parts and Accessories Necessary for
Safe Operation; Application for an
Exemption From Kershaw Fruit & Cold
Storage Co., Inc. and Kershaw
Sunnyside Ranches, Inc.
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of application for
exemption; request for comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: FMCSA requests public
comment on an application for an
exemption received from Kershaw Fruit
& Cold Storage Co., Inc. and Kershaw
Sunnyside Ranches, Inc. regarding the
transportation of wooden fruit bins from
fields to cold storage and packing
facilities. These companies seek the
exemption because they believe
compliance with the general cargo
securement requirements prevents them
from using more efficient and effective
cargo securement methods. Kershaw
Fruit & Cold Storage Co., Inc. and
Kershaw Sunnyside Ranches, Inc.
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
54335
believe the alternative cargo securement
method that they have historically used
would maintain a level of safety that is
equivalent to the level of safety
achieved without the exemption.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before October 16, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
[identified by DOT DMS Docket No.
FMCSA–2006–25594] by any of the
following methods:
• Web site: https://dms.dot.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting
comments on the DOT electronic docket
site.
• Fax: 1–202–493–2251.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 400
Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building,
Room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
• Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 on
the Plaza Level of the Nassif Building,
400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments.
Instructions: All submissions must
include the Agency name and docket
number for this notice. Note that all
comments received will be posted
without change (including any personal
information provided) to https://
dms.dot.gov. See the Privacy Act
heading for further information.
Docket: For access to the docket and
to read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
dms.dot.gov at any time or Room PL–
401 on the Plaza Level of the Nassif
Building, 400 Seventh Street, SW.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. DMS is available 24
hours each day, 365 days each year. If
you want to be notified that we received
your comments, please include a selfaddressed, stamped envelope or
postcard or print the acknowledgement
page that appears after submitting
comments online.
Privacy Act: Anyone may search the
electronic form of all comments
received into any of DOT’s dockets by
the name of the individual submitting
the comment (or of the person signing
the comment, if submitted on behalf of
an association, business, labor Federal
Register published on April 11, 2000
(65 FR 19477). This statement is also
available at https://dms.dot.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Luke W. Loy, Federal Motor Carrier
Safety Administration, Office of Bus and
Truck Standards and Operations,
E:\FR\FM\14SEN1.SGM
14SEN1
54336
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 178 / Thursday, September 14, 2006 / Notices
Vehicle and Roadside Operations
Division (MC–PSV), phone (202) 366–
0676, 400 Seventh Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20590–0001.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
Background
Section 4007 of the Transportation
Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA–
21) (Pub.L. 105–178, June 9, 1998, 112
Stat. 401) amended 49 U.S.C. 31315 and
31136(e) to provide authority to grant
exemptions from motor carrier safety
regulations. On August 20, 2004,
FMCSA published a final rule (69 FR
51589) implementing section 4007.
Under this rule, FMCSA must publish a
notice of each exemption request in the
Federal Register [49 CFR 381.315(a)].
The Agency must provide the public
with an opportunity to inspect the
information relevant to the application,
including any safety analyses that have
been conducted. The Agency must also
provide an opportunity for public
comment on the request.
The Agency reviews the safety
analyses and the public comments and
determines whether granting the
exemption would likely achieve a level
of safety equivalent to or greater than
the level that would be achieved by the
current regulation (49 CFR 381.305).
The decision of the Agency must be
published in the Federal Register [49
CFR 381.315(b)]. If the Agency denies
the request, it must state the reason for
doing so. If the decision is to grant the
exemption, the notice must specify the
person or class of persons receiving the
exemption and the regulatory provision
or provisions from which an exemption
is granted. The notice must also specify
the effective period of the exemption
(up to two years) and explain the terms
and conditions of the exemption. The
exemption may be renewed [49 CFR
381.315(c) and 49 CFR 381.300(b)].
The Application for Exemption
Kershaw Fruit & Cold Storage Co., Inc.
and Kershaw Sunnyside Ranches, Inc.
(Kershaw) are family-owned businesses
that grow approximately 35,000 bins of
apples each fall. During the harvest
period (August–October), Kershaw
transports apples from the fields where
they are harvested to cold storage
facilities and from these cold storage
facilities to packing houses in
Washington. The apples are transported
in wooden bins. Kershaw typically
hauls 48–64 bins at a time using either
48- or 40-foot trailers with a 20-foot pup
trailer.
Kershaw has applied for an
exemption from the tiedown
requirements of 49 CFR 393.110.
Typically, Kershaw has used corner
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:23 Sep 13, 2006
Jkt 208001
irons and a series of cables to secure the
bins of apples to a trailer for transport,
which it contends ‘‘* * * has been the
accepted procedure for many years in
our industry.’’ The typical method of
securement used by Kershaw, consisting
of corner irons and longitudinal cables,
is now prohibited by 49 CFR 393.110. A
copy of the application for exemption
and accompanying photographs is
included in the docket referenced at the
beginning of this notice.
Kershaw states that approximately 10
years ago, plastic bins were introduced
into the industry for use as an
alternative to the wooden bins that had
been used to transport products from
the fields to other locations. Kershaw
does not own or use any plastic bins. It
uses wooden bins exclusively. Kershaw
contends that the plastic bins are more
prone to slide off trailers under certain
conditions while in transit (presumably
because of the lower coefficient of
friction between the plastic bins and the
trailer floor as compared to that between
the wooden bins and the trailer floor).
While Kershaw notes that plastic bins
may slide off trucks ‘‘ * * * causing
safety concerns and transportation
delays * * *,’’ it states that its ‘‘* * *
track record with wood bins has been
excellent * * *’’ Consequently,
Kershaw has requested an exemption
from 49 CFR 393.110 for its drivers who
transport wooden fruit bins from fields
to cold storage facilities and packing
houses, provided the wooden bins are
secured by corner irons and cables as
has been done in the past.
Kershaw also noted that numerous
tiedowns would be required to secure
each load under the provisions of 49
CFR 393.110. It contends that the use of
these additional tiedowns will result in
increased time to secure the load and
decreased efficiency during loading and
unloading operations. Kershaw states
that these time considerations are
critical given the nature of its
operations, where the ‘‘* * * harvest
period is critical and time demanding.’’
In addition, Kershaw notes that
tiedowns that are tightened down over
the bins of apples and in accordance
with the provisions of 49 CFR 393.110
would result in severe damage to the
apples and result in a significant loss of
product.
Kershaw believes that granting the
exemption would not adversely affect
safety. The company argues that its
drivers have safely transported wooden
fruit bins for many years using corner
irons and cables to secure the bins to the
trailer. Kershaw’s commercial motor
vehicle (CMV) operators believed that
securing their loads of wooden fruit bins
in such a manner conformed with the
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
cargo securement requirements in effect
prior to the final rule published on
September 27, 2002 (67 FR 61212),
which went into effect on January 1,
2004. According to Kershaw,
approximately 35,000 bins of its apples
are transported safely in wooden bins
each year during the harvest season.
Kershaw claims its CMV owner/
operators and drivers can achieve and
maintain the same or greater level of
safety with the exemption as would be
achieved by requiring compliance with
49 CFR 393.110.
FMCSA notes that 49 CFR 393.102(b)
requires that ‘‘Securement systems must
provide a downward force equivalent to
at least 20 percent of the weight of the
article of cargo if the article is not fully
contained within the structure of the
vehicle.’’ While Kershaw’s application
for an exemption did not specifically
address this provision, it does not
appear that Kershaw’s current load
securement technique (utilizing a
headerboard and 3⁄8 inch cables
crisscrossed in the front and in the rear
with cable running the length of the top
row of bins as depicted in the
photographs submitted with its
application and on file in the docket
referenced at the beginning of this
notice) satisfies the requirements of this
section.
Request for Comments
In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31315
and 31136(e), FMCSA requests public
comment from all interested persons on
Kershaw’s application for an exemption
from 49 CFR 393.110. FMCSA is also
requesting public comment regarding
Kershaw’s current load securement
technique, specifically with respect to
the requirements of 49 CFR 393.102(b).
It must also be noted that FMCSA can
grant an exemption only if it has
jurisdiction. The Agency’s authority is
generally limited to CMV operations in
interstate commerce. It is not clear from
Kershaw’s application whether the
apples transported in wooden fruit bins
from fields to cold storage and packing
facilities are moving in interstate or
intrastate commerce. If Kershaw
believes the trucking operations for
which it requests the exemption are in
interstate commerce, it should explain
why. Otherwise, FMCSA must reject the
application for lack of jurisdiction.
The Agency will consider all
comments received before the close of
business on the comment closing date
indicated at the beginning of this notice.
Comments will be available for
examination in the docket at the
location listed under the ADDRESSES
section of this notice. The Agency will
file comments received after the
E:\FR\FM\14SEN1.SGM
14SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 178 / Thursday, September 14, 2006 / Notices
comment closing date in the public
docket and will consider them to the
extent practicable. In addition to late
comments, FMCSA will also continue to
file in the public docket relevant
information that becomes available after
the comment closing date. Interested
persons should monitor the public
docket for new material.
Issued on: September 6, 2006.
John H. Hill,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. E6–15224 Filed 9–13–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATON
Surface Transportation Board
[STB Finance Docket No. 34898]
Michael R. Root and Albany & Eastern
Railroad Company—Continuance in
Control Exemption—Iron Bull Railroad
Company LLC
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
Michael R. Root, a noncarrier, and
Albany & Eastern Railroad Company
(AERC), a Class III rail carrier, have filed
a verified notice of exemption to
continue in control of Iron Bull Railroad
Company LLC (IBR), upon IBR’s
becoming a rail carrier.1
The transaction was expected to be
consummated on or after August 25,
2006 (7 days after the amended notice
was filed).
This transaction is related to notices
of exemption in: (1) STB Finance Docket
No. 34896, PIC Railroad LLC—Lease
and Operation Exemption—Union
Pacific Railroad Company, wherein PIC
Railroad LLC (PICR) seeks to lease from
Union Pacific Railroad Company and
operate a rail line known as the
Comstock Subdivision in Iron County,
UT; and (2) STB Finance Docket No.
34897, Iron Bull Railroad Company
LLC—Operation Exemption—PIC
Railroad LLC, wherein Iron Bull
Railroad Company LLC, pursuant to the
same regulations and statute, will
operate the line.
Mr. Root and AERC state that: (1) The
railroads do not connect with each other
or any railroad in their corporate family;
(2) the continuance in control is not part
of a series of anticipated transactions
that would connect the railroads with
each other or any railroad in their
corporate family; and (3) the transaction
does not involve a Class I carrier.
1 IBR will become a Class III carrier as a result of
the transaction in STB Finance Docket No. 34897.
Mr. Root currently controls AERC, a Class III rail
carrier. AERC in turn controls IBR. Consequently,
Mr. Root will control AERC directly and IBR
indirectly. AERC will control IBR directly.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:23 Sep 13, 2006
Jkt 208001
Therefore, the transaction is exempt
from the prior approval requirements of
49 U.S.C. 11323. See 49 CFR
1180.2(d)(2).
Under 49 U.S.C. 10502(g), the Board
may not use its exemption authority to
relieve a rail carrier of its statutory
obligation to protect the interest of its
employees. Section 11326(c), however,
does not provide for labor protection for
transactions under sections 11324 and
11325 that involve only Class III rail
carriers. Accordingly, the Board may not
impose labor protective conditions here,
because all of the carriers involved are
Class III carriers.
If the verified notice contains false or
misleading information, the exemption
is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the
exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d)
may be filed at any time. The filing of
a petition to revoke will not
automatically stay the transaction.
An original and 10 copies of all
pleadings, referring to STB Finance
Docket No. 34898, must be filed with
the Surface Transportation Board, 1925
K Street, NW., Washington, DC 20423–
0001. In addition, a copy of each
pleading must be served on Thomas F.
McFarland, 208 South LaSalle Street,
Suite 1890, Chicago, IL 60604–1112.
Board decisions and notice are
available on our Web site at https://
www.stb.dot.gov.
Decided: September 8, 2006.
By the Board, David M. Konschnik,
Director, Office of Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–15239 Filed 9–13–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
[STB Finance Docket No. 34896; STB
Finance Docket No. 34897]
PIC Railroad LLC—Lease and
Operation Exemption—Union Pacific
Railroad Company; Iron Bull Railroad
Company LLC—Operation
Exemption—PIC Railroad LLC
In STB Finance Docket No. 34896, PIC
Railroad LLC (PICR), a noncarrier, has
filed a verified notice of exemption
under 49 U.S.C. 1150.31 to lease from
Union Pacific Railroad Company (UP)
and operate a rail line known as the
Comstock Subdivision, extending
between milepost 0.1 at or near Iron
Springs and milepost 14.7 at or near
Iron Mountain, a distance of
approximately 14.6 miles in Iron
County, UT.
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
54337
In STB Finance Docket No. 34897,
Iron Bull Railroad Company LLC (IBR),
a noncarrier, has filed a verified notice
of exemption under 49 CFR 1150.31 for
its operation of the rail line pursuant to
an operating agreement with PICR.1
The transactions were scheduled to be
consummated on or shortly after August
22, 2006, the effective date of these
exemptions (7 days after the exemptions
were filed).
The transactions are related to STB
Finance Docket No. 34898, Michael R.
Root and Albany & Eastern Railroad
Company—Continuance in Control
Exemption—Iron Bull Railroad
Company LLC, wherein Mr. Michael R.
Root and Albany & Eastern Railroad
Company will continue in control of
Iron Bull Railroad Company LLC (IBR),
upon IBR becoming a rail carrier as a
result of the transaction in STB Finance
Docket No. 34897.
PICR and IBR certify that their
projected annual revenues as a result of
these transactions will not exceed those
that would qualify them as Class III
carriers and will not exceed $5 million.
If the notice contains false or
misleading information, the exemptions
are void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the
exemptions under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d)
may be filed at any time. The filing of
a petition to revoke will not
automatically stay the transactions.
An original and 10 copies of all
pleadings, referring to STB Finance
Docket Nos. 34896 and 34897, must be
filed with the Surface Transportation
Board, 1925 K Street, NW., Washington,
DC 20423–0001. In addition, one copy
of each pleading must be served on
Thomas F. McFarland, 208 South
LaSalle Street, Suite 1890, Chicago, IL
60604–1112.
Board decisions and notices are
available on our Web site at https://
www.stb.dot.gov.
Decided: September 8, 2006.
By the Board, David M. Konschnik,
Director, Office of Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–15242 Filed 9–13–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915–01–P
1 Although PICR will enter into an agreement
whereby IBR will operate the line, PICR also seeks
an exemption to operate to fulfill its common
carrier obligation in the event IBR were to cease
operations.
E:\FR\FM\14SEN1.SGM
14SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 178 (Thursday, September 14, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54335-54337]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-15224]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
[Docket No. FMCSA-2006-25594]
Parts and Accessories Necessary for Safe Operation; Application
for an Exemption From Kershaw Fruit & Cold Storage Co., Inc. and
Kershaw Sunnyside Ranches, Inc.
AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of application for exemption; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: FMCSA requests public comment on an application for an
exemption received from Kershaw Fruit & Cold Storage Co., Inc. and
Kershaw Sunnyside Ranches, Inc. regarding the transportation of wooden
fruit bins from fields to cold storage and packing facilities. These
companies seek the exemption because they believe compliance with the
general cargo securement requirements prevents them from using more
efficient and effective cargo securement methods. Kershaw Fruit & Cold
Storage Co., Inc. and Kershaw Sunnyside Ranches, Inc. believe the
alternative cargo securement method that they have historically used
would maintain a level of safety that is equivalent to the level of
safety achieved without the exemption.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before October 16, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments [identified by DOT DMS Docket No.
FMCSA-2006-25594] by any of the following methods:
Web site: https://dms.dot.gov. Follow the instructions for
submitting comments on the DOT electronic docket site.
Fax: 1-202-493-2251.
Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building, Room PL-401,
Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery: Room PL-401 on the Plaza Level of the
Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
Instructions: All submissions must include the Agency name and
docket number for this notice. Note that all comments received will be
posted without change (including any personal information provided) to
https://dms.dot.gov. See the Privacy Act heading for further
information.
Docket: For access to the docket and to read background documents
or comments received, go to https://dms.dot.gov at any time or Room PL-
401 on the Plaza Level of the Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street, SW.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. DMS is available 24 hours each day, 365 days
each year. If you want to be notified that we received your comments,
please include a self-addressed, stamped envelope or postcard or print
the acknowledgement page that appears after submitting comments online.
Privacy Act: Anyone may search the electronic form of all comments
received into any of DOT's dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or of the person signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477). This statement is also
available at https://dms.dot.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Luke W. Loy, Federal Motor Carrier
Safety Administration, Office of Bus and Truck Standards and
Operations,
[[Page 54336]]
Vehicle and Roadside Operations Division (MC-PSV), phone (202) 366-
0676, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Section 4007 of the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century
(TEA-21) (Pub.L. 105-178, June 9, 1998, 112 Stat. 401) amended 49
U.S.C. 31315 and 31136(e) to provide authority to grant exemptions from
motor carrier safety regulations. On August 20, 2004, FMCSA published a
final rule (69 FR 51589) implementing section 4007. Under this rule,
FMCSA must publish a notice of each exemption request in the Federal
Register [49 CFR 381.315(a)]. The Agency must provide the public with
an opportunity to inspect the information relevant to the application,
including any safety analyses that have been conducted. The Agency must
also provide an opportunity for public comment on the request.
The Agency reviews the safety analyses and the public comments and
determines whether granting the exemption would likely achieve a level
of safety equivalent to or greater than the level that would be
achieved by the current regulation (49 CFR 381.305). The decision of
the Agency must be published in the Federal Register [49 CFR
381.315(b)]. If the Agency denies the request, it must state the reason
for doing so. If the decision is to grant the exemption, the notice
must specify the person or class of persons receiving the exemption and
the regulatory provision or provisions from which an exemption is
granted. The notice must also specify the effective period of the
exemption (up to two years) and explain the terms and conditions of the
exemption. The exemption may be renewed [49 CFR 381.315(c) and 49 CFR
381.300(b)].
The Application for Exemption
Kershaw Fruit & Cold Storage Co., Inc. and Kershaw Sunnyside
Ranches, Inc. (Kershaw) are family-owned businesses that grow
approximately 35,000 bins of apples each fall. During the harvest
period (August-October), Kershaw transports apples from the fields
where they are harvested to cold storage facilities and from these cold
storage facilities to packing houses in Washington. The apples are
transported in wooden bins. Kershaw typically hauls 48-64 bins at a
time using either 48- or 40-foot trailers with a 20-foot pup trailer.
Kershaw has applied for an exemption from the tiedown requirements
of 49 CFR 393.110. Typically, Kershaw has used corner irons and a
series of cables to secure the bins of apples to a trailer for
transport, which it contends ``* * * has been the accepted procedure
for many years in our industry.'' The typical method of securement used
by Kershaw, consisting of corner irons and longitudinal cables, is now
prohibited by 49 CFR 393.110. A copy of the application for exemption
and accompanying photographs is included in the docket referenced at
the beginning of this notice.
Kershaw states that approximately 10 years ago, plastic bins were
introduced into the industry for use as an alternative to the wooden
bins that had been used to transport products from the fields to other
locations. Kershaw does not own or use any plastic bins. It uses wooden
bins exclusively. Kershaw contends that the plastic bins are more prone
to slide off trailers under certain conditions while in transit
(presumably because of the lower coefficient of friction between the
plastic bins and the trailer floor as compared to that between the
wooden bins and the trailer floor). While Kershaw notes that plastic
bins may slide off trucks `` * * * causing safety concerns and
transportation delays * * *,'' it states that its ``* * * track record
with wood bins has been excellent * * *'' Consequently, Kershaw has
requested an exemption from 49 CFR 393.110 for its drivers who
transport wooden fruit bins from fields to cold storage facilities and
packing houses, provided the wooden bins are secured by corner irons
and cables as has been done in the past.
Kershaw also noted that numerous tiedowns would be required to
secure each load under the provisions of 49 CFR 393.110. It contends
that the use of these additional tiedowns will result in increased time
to secure the load and decreased efficiency during loading and
unloading operations. Kershaw states that these time considerations are
critical given the nature of its operations, where the ``* * * harvest
period is critical and time demanding.'' In addition, Kershaw notes
that tiedowns that are tightened down over the bins of apples and in
accordance with the provisions of 49 CFR 393.110 would result in severe
damage to the apples and result in a significant loss of product.
Kershaw believes that granting the exemption would not adversely
affect safety. The company argues that its drivers have safely
transported wooden fruit bins for many years using corner irons and
cables to secure the bins to the trailer. Kershaw's commercial motor
vehicle (CMV) operators believed that securing their loads of wooden
fruit bins in such a manner conformed with the cargo securement
requirements in effect prior to the final rule published on September
27, 2002 (67 FR 61212), which went into effect on January 1, 2004.
According to Kershaw, approximately 35,000 bins of its apples are
transported safely in wooden bins each year during the harvest season.
Kershaw claims its CMV owner/operators and drivers can achieve and
maintain the same or greater level of safety with the exemption as
would be achieved by requiring compliance with 49 CFR 393.110.
FMCSA notes that 49 CFR 393.102(b) requires that ``Securement
systems must provide a downward force equivalent to at least 20 percent
of the weight of the article of cargo if the article is not fully
contained within the structure of the vehicle.'' While Kershaw's
application for an exemption did not specifically address this
provision, it does not appear that Kershaw's current load securement
technique (utilizing a headerboard and \3/8\ inch cables crisscrossed
in the front and in the rear with cable running the length of the top
row of bins as depicted in the photographs submitted with its
application and on file in the docket referenced at the beginning of
this notice) satisfies the requirements of this section.
Request for Comments
In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31315 and 31136(e), FMCSA requests
public comment from all interested persons on Kershaw's application for
an exemption from 49 CFR 393.110. FMCSA is also requesting public
comment regarding Kershaw's current load securement technique,
specifically with respect to the requirements of 49 CFR 393.102(b). It
must also be noted that FMCSA can grant an exemption only if it has
jurisdiction. The Agency's authority is generally limited to CMV
operations in interstate commerce. It is not clear from Kershaw's
application whether the apples transported in wooden fruit bins from
fields to cold storage and packing facilities are moving in interstate
or intrastate commerce. If Kershaw believes the trucking operations for
which it requests the exemption are in interstate commerce, it should
explain why. Otherwise, FMCSA must reject the application for lack of
jurisdiction.
The Agency will consider all comments received before the close of
business on the comment closing date indicated at the beginning of this
notice. Comments will be available for examination in the docket at the
location listed under the ADDRESSES section of this notice. The Agency
will file comments received after the
[[Page 54337]]
comment closing date in the public docket and will consider them to the
extent practicable. In addition to late comments, FMCSA will also
continue to file in the public docket relevant information that becomes
available after the comment closing date. Interested persons should
monitor the public docket for new material.
Issued on: September 6, 2006.
John H. Hill,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. E6-15224 Filed 9-13-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P