Notice of Proposed Agency Guidance and Request for Comments on the Eligibility of Joint Development Improvements Under Federal Transit Law, 53745-53752 [E6-15022]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 176 / Tuesday, September 12, 2006 / Notices
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
In order to allow FTA to compute
aggregate program performance
measures as required by the President’s
Management Agenda, FTA requests that
all recipients of funding for capital
projects under the ATPPL program
submit the following information
annually:
• Annual visitation to the land unit;
• Annual number of persons who use
the alternative transportation system
(ridership/usage);
• An estimate of the number of
vehicle trips mitigated based on
alternative transportation system usage
and the typical number of passengers
per vehicle;
• Cost per passenger; and,
• A note of any special services
offered for those systems with higher
costs per passenger but more amenities.
State and local government entities
should submit this information as part
of their fourth quarter report through
FTA’s TEAM grants management
system.
Federal land management agencies
should also send this information as
part of their fourth quarter report
(preferably by e-mail), to Henrika
Buchanan-Smith, FTA,
Henrika.Buchanan-Smith@dot.gov; 202–
366–5080; 400 7th St., SW.; Room 9315;
Washington, DC 20590. Examples can
be found on the program Web site at
https://www.fta.dot.gov/atppl.
Oversight
Recipients of FY 2006 ATPPL funds
will be required to certify that they will
comply with all applicable Federal and
FTA programmatic requirements. FTA
direct grantees will complete this
certification as part of the annual
Certification and Assurances package,
and Federal Land Management Agency
recipients will complete the
certification by signing the interagency
agreement. This certification is the basis
for oversight reviews conducted by
FTA.
The Secretary of Transportation and
FTA have elected not to apply the
triennial review requirements of 49
U.S.C. 5307(h)(2) to ATPPL recipients
that are other Federal agencies. Instead,
working with the existing oversight
systems at the Federal Land
Management Agencies, FTA will
perform periodic reviews of specific
projects funded by the ATPPL program.
These reviews will ensure that projects
meet the basic statutory, administrative,
and regulatory requirements as
stipulated by this notice and the
certification. To the extent possible,
these reviews will be coordinated with
other reviews of the project. FTA direct
grantees of ATPPL funds (State, local
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:16 Sep 11, 2006
Jkt 208001
and tribal government entities) will be
subject to all applicable triennial, State
management, civil rights, and other
reviews.
Issued in Washington, DC, this 5th day of
September, 2006.
James S. Simpson,
Administrator.
53745
Region X
Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, and Washington.
Richard F. Krochalis, FTA Regional
Administrator, Jackson Federal Building, 915
Second Avenue, Suite 3142, Seattle, WA
98174–1002, (206) 220–7954.
[FR Doc. E6–15095 Filed 9–11–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–57–P
Appendix A—FTA Regional Offices
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Region I
Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New
Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Vermont.
Richard Doyle, FTA Regional Administrator,
Kendall Square, 55 Broadway, Suite 920,
Cambridge, MA 02142–1093, (617) 494–2055.
Region II
New Jersey, New York, and Virgin Islands.
Letitia Thompson, FTA Regional
Administrator, One Bowling Green, Room
429, New York, NY 10004–1415, (212) 668–
2170.
Region III
Delaware, District of Columbia, Maryland,
Pennsylvania, Virginia, and West Virginia.
Susan Borinsky, FTA Regional
Administrator, 1760 Market Street, Suite 500,
Philadelphia, PA 19103–4124, (215) 656–
7100.
Region IV
Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky,
Mississippi, North Carolina, Puerto Rico,
South Carolina, and Tennessee. Yvette
Taylor, FTA Regional Administrator, 61
Forsyth Street, SW., Suite 17T50, Atlanta, GA
30303, (404) 562–3500.
Region V
Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota,
Ohio, and Wisconsin. Marisol Simon, FTA
Regional Administrator, 200 West Adams
Street, Suite 320, Chicago, IL 60606–5232,
(312) 353–2789.
Region VI
Arkansas, Louisiana, New Mexico,
Oklahoma, and Texas. Robert Patrick, FTA
Regional Administrator, 819 Taylor Street,
Room 8A36, Ft. Worth, TX 76102, (817) 978–
0550.
Region VII
Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, and Nebraska.
Mokhtee Ahmad, FTA Regional
Administrator, 901 Locust Street, Suite 404,
Kansas City, MO 64106, (816) 329–3920.
Region VIII
Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South
Dakota, Utah, and Wyoming. Lee Waddleton,
FTA Regional Administrator, 12300 West
Dakota, Suite 310, Lakewood, CO 80228–
2583, (720) 963–3300.
Region IX
American Samoa, Arizona, California,
Guam, Hawaii, Nevada, and the Northern
Mariana Islands. Leslie Rogers, FTA Regional
Administrator, 201 Mission Street, Suite
2210, San Francisco, CA 94105–1839, (415)
744–3133.
PO 00000
Frm 00097
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Federal Transit Administration
[Docket No: FTA–2006–23511]
Notice of Proposed Agency Guidance
and Request for Comments on the
Eligibility of Joint Development
Improvements Under Federal Transit
Law
Federal Transit Administration
(FTA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed guidance
with request for comment.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Federal Transit
Administration (FTA) seeks public
comment on the following proposed
guidance on joint development capital
projects funded by the Federal Transit
Administration. The Safe, Accountable,
Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity
Act of 2005: A Legacy for Users
(SAFETEA–LU) enacted certain
amendments to the definition of the
term ‘‘capital project’’ as used in 49
U.S.C. 5302(a)(1)(G) relating to ‘‘joint
development’’ activities by recipients of
Federal funds under 49 U.S.C. 5301 et
seq. (Federal Transit Law). The Federal
Transit Administration (FTA) proposes
to adopt the following guidance in
accordance with the procedures for
notice and an opportunity for the public
to comment set forth at 49 U.S.C. 5334(l)
and FTA’s Notice of Final Policy
Statement for Implementation of Notice
and Comment Procedures for
Documents Imposing ‘‘Binding
Obligations,’’ as published in the
Federal Register on June 5, 2006. The
following proposed guidance seeks to
ensure maximum benefit to the people
who ride public transportation, to FTA
grantees that choose to sponsor joint
development improvements (the project
sponsor), and to their joint development
partners by (i) Affording FTA grantees
maximum flexibility within the law to
work with the private sector and others
for purposes of joint development, (ii)
generally deferring to the decisions of
the project sponsor, negotiating and
contracting at arm’s length with third
parties, to utilize Federal Transit funds
and program income for joint
development purposes, and (iii)
promoting transit-oriented
E:\FR\FM\12SEN1.SGM
12SEN1
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
53746
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 176 / Tuesday, September 12, 2006 / Notices
development, subject to the broad
parameters set forth herein.
DATES: Comments must be received by
October 12, 2006. Late-filed comments
will be considered to the extent
practicable.
ADDRESSES: To ensure your comments
are not entered more than once into the
DOT Docket, please identify your
submissions by the following docket
number: FTA–2006–23511. Please make
your submissions by only one of the
following means:
• Web site: https://dms.dot.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting
comments on the DOT electronic docket
site.
• Web Site: https://dms.dot.gov.
Follow the online instructions for
making submissions to the DOT
electronic docket site.
• Fax: 1–202–493–2478.
• U.S. Post or Express Mail: Docket
Management System, U.S. Department
of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street,
SW., Nassif Building, Room PL–401,
Washington, DC 20590–001.
• Hand Delivery: To the Docket
Management System; Room PL–401 on
the plaza level of the Nassif Building,
400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal
Holidays.
Instructions: All submissions must
make reference to the ‘‘Federal Transit
Administration’’ and include the docket
number for this notice set forth above.
Due to security procedures in effect
since October 2001 regarding mail
deliveries, mail received through the
U.S. Postal Service may be subject to
delays. Parties making submissions
responsive to this notice should
consider using an express mail firm to
ensure the prompt filing of any
submissions not filed electronically or
by hand. Note that all submissions
received, including any personal
information therein, will be posted
without change or alteration to https://
dms.dot.gov.
Docket: For access to the DOT docket
to read materials relating to this notice,
please go to https://dms.dot.gov at any
time or to the Docket Management
System.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
program questions, please contact
Robert Tuccillo at (202) 366–4050. For
legal questions, please contact Jayme
Blakesley at (202) 366–0304. The
principal office of FTA is located at 400
Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC
20590–0001. Office hours are from 8:30
a.m. to 6 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:16 Sep 11, 2006
Jkt 208001
Statement of Policy
Through this guidance, FTA
interprets the definition and operation
of the term ‘‘capital project’’ as defined
at 49 U.S.C. 5302(a)(1)(G), and as
amended by Section 3003(a) of the Safe,
Accountable, Flexible, Efficient
Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for
Users (‘‘SAFETEA–LU’’). This
amendment permits FTA to issue public
transportation grants ‘‘for the
construction, renovation, and
improvement of intercity bus and
intercity rail stations and terminals,’’
including the construction, renovation,
and improvement of commercial
revenue-producing intercity bus stations
or terminals. In doing so, it modifies the
underlying policy of joint development
improvements, and therefore enhances
the ability of FTA grantees to work with
the private sector and others for
purposes of joint development. To
ensure maximum benefit to the people
who ride public transportation, to FTA
grantees that choose to sponsor joint
development improvements (the
‘‘project sponsor’’), and to their joint
development partners, the following
guidance (i) seeks to afford FTA
grantees maximum flexibility within the
law to work with the private sector and
others for purposes of joint
development, (ii) generally will defer to
the decisions of the project sponsor,
negotiating and contracting at arm’s
length with third parties, to utilize
Federal transit funds and program
income for joint development purposes,
and (iii) aims to promote transitoriented development, subject to the
broad parameters set forth herein.
Proposed Guidance Text
I. Eligibility Criteria
a. Definition of ‘‘Capital Project’’
Federal Transit Law defines a ‘‘capital
project’’ for joint development as
follows:
A public transportation improvement that
enhances economic development or
incorporates private investment, including
commercial and residential development,
pedestrian and bicycle access to a public
transportation facility, construction,
renovation, and improvement of intercity bus
and intercity rail stations and terminals, and
the renovation and improvement of historic
transportation facilities, because the
improvement enhances the effectiveness of a
public transportation project and is related
physically or functionally to that public
transportation project, or establishes new or
enhanced coordination between public
transportation and other transportation, and
provides a fair share of revenue for public
transportation that will be used for public
transportation.
49 U.S.C. 5302(a)(1)(G).
PO 00000
Frm 00098
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
This definition establishes the
following criteria for determining
whether a joint development
improvement is eligible for funding
pursuant to a program established under
49 U.S.C. 5301 et seq. (the ‘‘Federal
Transit Law’’): The public
transportation improvement must (i)
Enhance economic development or
incorporate private investment; (ii)(a)
Enhance the effectiveness of a public
transportation project and relates
physically or functionally to that public
transportation project, or (b) establish
new or enhanced coordination between
public transportation and other
transportation; and (iii) provide a fair
share of revenue for public
transportation that will be used for
public transportation. In addition, a
person making an agreement to occupy
space in a facility under this
subparagraph shall pay a reasonable
share of the costs of the facility through
rental payments and other means. 49
U.S.C. 5302(a)(1)(G)(i).
Joint development improvements will
be eligible for FTA funding only if they
satisfy the criteria set forth above, and
do not fall within the exclusion detailed
at 49 U.S.C. 5302(a)(1)(G)(ii), which
excludes the construction of a
commercial revenue-producing facility
(other than an intercity bus station or
terminal) or a part of a public facility
not related to public transportation.
b. ‘‘Enhances Economic Development or
Incorporates Private Investment’’
As noted above, it is a threshold
requirement for Federal funding of a
public transportation improvement as
joint development that such
improvement either (i) Enhance
economic development or (ii)
incorporate private investment.1
i. ‘‘Enhances Economic Development’’
This criterion requires that a joint
development improvement enhance
economic development. A grantee may
satisfy this criterion by demonstrating
that the joint development improvement
will add value to privately-or publiclyfunded economic development activity
occurring in close proximity to a public
transportation facility.
1 In accordance with the statute’s use of the
disjunctive ‘‘or,’’ rather than the conjunctive ‘‘and,’’
FTA shall determine that a transportation
improvement satisfies the threshold requirement for
funding as joint development if the transportation
improvement either (i) Enhances economic
development or (ii) incorporates private investment
(the disjunctive), and shall not require that the
transportation improvement satisfy each of (i) and
(ii) (the conjunctive).
E:\FR\FM\12SEN1.SGM
12SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 176 / Tuesday, September 12, 2006 / Notices
ii. ‘‘Incorporates Private Investment’’
Any joint development improvement
that incorporates private investment
will satisfy this criterion. Private
investment need not be monetary; it
may take the form of cash, real property,
or other benefit to be generated initially
or over the life of the joint development
improvements. FTA will not set a
monetary threshold. The amount and
form of private investment shall be
negotiated by the parties to the joint
development improvement.
c. ‘‘Enhances the Effectiveness of a
Public Transportation Project’’
Any reasonable forecast of joint
development impacts that enhance the
effectiveness of a public transportation
project will satisfy this criterion. These
impacts may include, but are not
limited to, any of the following:
increased ridership, shortened travel
times, and lessened or deferred transit
operating or capital costs.
d. ‘‘Related Physically or Functionally’’
The disjunctive requirement of
physical ‘‘or’’ functional relationship
provides that a joint development
improvement may be built separately
from, but in functional relationship to,
a public transportation project.
Therefore, a joint development
improvement satisfies this element if it
is related physically or functionally to a
public transportation project.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
i. ‘‘Physically Related’’
A joint development improvement is
‘‘physically related’’ to a public
transportation project if it provides a
direct physical connection to public
transportation services or facilities.
Illustrative, but not exhaustive,
examples of physical relationships
include (i) projects built within or
adjacent to public transportation
facilities and (ii) projects using air rights
over public transportation facilities.
ii. ‘‘Functionally Related’’
A joint development improvement is
‘‘functionally related’’ to a public
transportation project if by activity and
use, with or without a direct physical
connection, it (i) enhances the use of,
connectivity with or access to public
transportation; or (ii) provides a
transportation-related service (such as,
but not limited to, remote baggage
handling or shared ticketing) or
community services (such as daycare or
health care) to the public.
Considerations include a reduction in
travel time between the joint
development project and the public
transportation facility, reasonable access
between the joint development project
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:16 Sep 11, 2006
Jkt 208001
and the public transportation facility,
and increased trip generation rates
resulting from the relationship between
the joint development project and the
public transportation facility.
While the functional relationship test
of activity and use permits the use of
FTA funds for joint development
improvements located outside the
structural envelope of a public
transportation project, and may extend
across an intervening street, major
thoroughfare or unrelated property,
functional relationships should not
extend beyond the distance most people
can be expected to safely and
conveniently walk to use the transit
service (in certain cases, for example,
within a radius of 1,500 feet around the
center of the public transportation
project).
e. ‘‘Establishes New or Enhanced
Coordination Between Public
Transportation and Other
Transportation’’ 2
Any reasonable forecast of joint
development impacts that establish new
or enhanced coordination between
public transportation and other
transportation will satisfy this criterion.
FTA will accept any reasonably
supported judgment of new or enhanced
coordination from the project sponsor.
i. ‘‘New or Enhanced Coordination’’
To establish new or enhanced
coordination, a joint development
improvement must create or enhance
the physical or functional connections
between public transportation and other
transportation.3
Examples of physical connections that
establish new or enhanced coordination
include, but are not limited to,
proximate or shared ticket counters,
termini, park-and-ride lots, taxicab bays,
passenger drop-off points, waiting areas,
bicycle paths and sidewalks connecting
public transportation to nontransportation facilities. Projects that
shorten the distance between public
2 Subsection (e), ‘‘New or Enhanced
Coordination,’’ explains the second method for
complying with a disjunctive requirement. As
explained in section (I)(d) of this document, a joint
development improvement may satisfy this
requirement by (i) Relating physically or
functionally to a public transportation project or (ii)
establishing new or enhanced coordination between
public transportation and other transportation.
3 This requirement is similar to, but not the same
as, the requirement of physical or functional
relationship described at subsection (d)(i) and (ii).
The two are distinct, disjunctive requirements, but
they share common criteria. A project could satisfy
both requirements, but need only satisfy one to
qualify for funding as a joint development
improvement. Visualized as such, the disjunctive
requirement would appear as a Venn diagram—
separate requirements with overlapping criteria.
PO 00000
Frm 00099
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
53747
transportation termini and other
transportation shall be presumed to
enhance coordination.
Examples of functional connections
that establish new or enhanced
coordination include, but are not
limited to, shared or coordinated
signage, schedules, and ticketing.
ii. ‘‘Public Transportation’’
Section 5307(a)(7) of Title 49 defines
‘‘public transportation’’ as
‘‘transportation by a conveyance that
provides regular and continuing general or
special transportation to the public, but does
not include schoolbus, charter, or intercity
bus transportation or intercity passenger rail
transportation provided by the entity
described in chapter 243 4 (or a successor to
such entity).’’
iii. ‘‘Other Transportation’’
FTA interprets the term ‘‘other
transportation,’’ as used in 49 U.S.C.
5307(a)(1)(G), to mean all forms of
transportation that are not public
transportation, including, but not
limited to, airplane, school bus, charter
bus, sightseeing vehicle, intercity bus
and rail, automobile, taxicab, bicycle
and pedestrian transportation.
f. ‘‘Provides a Fair Share of Revenue for
Public Transportation That Will Be
Used for Public Transportation’’
The third criterion for determining
whether a joint development
improvement is eligible for funding
pursuant to a program established under
the Federal Transit Law is that the
improvement ‘‘provides a fair share of
revenue for public transportation that
will be used for public transportation.’’ 5
49 U.S.C. 5302(a)(1)(G). FTA will not
define the term ‘‘fair share of revenue,’’
nor will it set a monetary threshold.
What is a fair share of revenue, and
what form it should take,6 shall be
negotiated between the parties involved
in the joint development improvement.
The only requirements are (i) That the
4 National Railroad Passenger Corporation
(‘‘Amtrak’’)
5 This criterion should not be confused with the
requirement of 49 U.S.C. 5302(a)(1)(G)(ii) that ‘‘a
person making an agreement to occupy space in a
facility under this subparagraph shall pay a
reasonable share of the costs of the facility through
rental payments and other means.’’
6 For example, ‘‘fair share of revenue’’ need not
be a direct payment of revenue by an intercity bus
provider to a transit agency but may take the form
of an increase in revenues received by a transit
agency, whether in its capacity as landlord or
otherwise, as a result of enhanced passenger traffic
created by the service of a jointly developed facility
by an intercity bus provider, provided that the
transit agency and intercity bus provider together
designate and report to FTA the source of such ‘‘fair
share of revenue.’’ FTA grantees shall expend the
‘‘fair share of revenue’’ in accordance with the
common grant rule of 49 CFR 18.1–18.52.
E:\FR\FM\12SEN1.SGM
12SEN1
53748
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 176 / Tuesday, September 12, 2006 / Notices
public transportation provider receives
a fair share of revenue, (ii) that such
revenue be used for public
transportation, and (iii) that the project
sponsor obtain a written opinion of
counsel or other advisor (or FTA’s
agreement) that the share of revenue to
public transportation is fair. This allows
a public transportation provider to
negotiate for financial benefits in
exchange for the benefits it will convey
through the joint development
improvement.
g. ‘‘Reasonable Share of the Costs of the
Facility’’
While not a criterion to determine
eligibility, as noted above, it is
nonetheless required that any ‘‘person
making an agreement to occupy space in
a facility under [49 U.S.C. 5302(a)(1)(G)]
shall pay a reasonable share of the costs
of the facility through rental payments
and other means.’’ FTA shall not require
a specific valuation methodology and
shall accept any reasonable valuation
methodology used by the grantee to
determine a reasonable share of the
costs of the facility.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
II. Eligible Activities
Subject to the eligibility criteria
detailed at section (II) above, joint
development improvements expressly
include the following:
• Commercial and residential
development;
• Pedestrian and bicycle access to a
public transportation facility;
• Construction, renovation, and
improvement of intercity bus and
intercity rail stations and terminals; and
• Renovation and improvement of
historic transportation facilities.
49 U.S.C. 5302(a)(1)(G). These and
other joint development improvements
will be eligible for FTA funding if they
satisfy the criteria set forth above, and
do not fall within the exclusion detailed
at 49 U.S.C. 5302(a)(1)(G)(ii), which
excludes the construction of a
commercial revenue-producing facility
(other than an intercity bus station or
terminal) or a part of a public facility
not related to public transportation.7
7 Many aspects of commercial and residential
development will be excluded by 49 U.S.C.
5302(a)(1)(G)(ii), which makes ineligible for FTA
financial assistance the ‘‘construction of a
commercial revenue-producing facility (other than
an intercity bus station or terminal) or a part of a
public facility not related to public transportation.’’
It is important to note, however, that commercial
and residential development is not excluded
wholesale. For example, space in an FTA-funded
facility may be made available for commercial
revenue-producing activities and for connections to
revenue producing activities. Similarly, noncommercial, non-revenue-producing aspects of
commercial and residential developments may be
eligible for FTA financial assistance, subject to the
criteria detailed at section (II).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:16 Sep 11, 2006
Jkt 208001
Costs related to a joint development
improvement are only eligible for
Federal Transit funding pursuant to a
budget contained in an approved grant.
FTA cannot approve funding for costs
associated with a joint development
improvement that are not contained in
an approved grant budget. FTA Regional
Administrators approve joint
development proposals as part of the
grant approval process.
Eligible costs for joint development
improvements include, but are not
limited to, the following:
a. Real Estate Acquisition, including
the acquisition of real property and
structures thereon; 8
b. Demolition of Existing Structures;
c. Site Preparation;
d. Building Foundations, including
substructure improvements for
buildings constructed over transit
facilities;
e. Utilities, including utility
relocation and construction;
f. Walkways, including bicycle lanes
and pedestrian connections and access
links between public transportation
services and related development;
g. Open Space, including site
amenities and related streetscape
improvements such as street furniture
and landscaping;
h. Safety and Security Equipment and
Facilities, including lighting,
surveillance and related intelligent
transportation applications;
i. Construction, renovation, and
improvement of bus and intercity rail
stations and terminals;
j. Facilities that Incorporate
Community Services such as daycare or
health care;
k. Capital Project, and Equipment, for
an Intermodal Transfer Facility or
Transportation Mall, including
acquisition of facilities and equipment,
roadbeds, tracks and bus ramps,
pedestrian concourses, loading shelters,
parking facilities, park-and-ride
services, improvements of existing bus
or rail transit terminals, stations, major
transfer points, and shelters as well as
other facilities directly related to the
linking of public transportation facilities
with other modes of transportation;
l. Furniture, Fixtures and Equipment
(FFE): Transportation-related FFE are
eligible costs in all cases. However, due
to the exclusion of commercial revenueproducing facilities (other than an
intercity bus station or terminal) and
public facilities not related to public
transportation at 49 U.S.C.
8 Note that certain costs in connection with real
estate acquisition (such as costs associated with
eminent domain and relocation assistance) shall be
eligible, as provided by the respective statutes and
regulations.
PO 00000
Frm 00100
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
5302(a)(1)(G)(ii), FFE related to
commercial revenue-producing facilities
(other than an intercity bus station or
terminal) or public facilities not related
to public transportation are considered
ineligible;
m. Parking, including parking
improvements with a public
transportation justification and use or
an intercity bus or intercity rail
justification and use in connection with
joint development; and
n. Project Development Activities,
including design, engineering,
construction cost estimating,
environmental analysis, real estate
packaging and financial projections
(operating income and expenses, debt
service and cash flow analysis), and
negotiations to secure financing and
tenants;
o. Professional Services, including
reasonable and necessary costs incurred
to hire professionals to prepare or
perform items a through n above, or to
assist the grantee in reviewing the same.
III. Ineligible Activities
a. Construction of a Commercial
Revenue-Producing Facility
Eligible costs do not include
construction of commercial revenue
producing facilities (other than an
intercity bus station or terminal) or part
of a public facility not related to public
transportation.
IV. Federal Requirements
FTA’s Master Agreement contains the
standard terms and conditions
governing the administration of a
project supported with Federal
assistance awarded by FTA through a
grant agreement or cooperative
agreement with the recipient, or
supported by FTA through a
Transportation Infrastructure (TIFIA)
Loan, loan guarantee, or line of credit
with the recipient. Not every provision
of the Master Agreement will apply to
every project for which FTA provides
Federal assistance through a grant
agreement or cooperative agreement.
The type of project, the Federal laws
and regulations authorizing Federal
assistance for the project, and the legal
status of the recipient as a State or local
government, private non profit entity, or
private for profit entity will determine
which Federal laws, regulations, and
directives apply. Federal laws,
regulations, and directives that do not
apply will not be enforced. The
recipient shall comply with all
applicable Federal laws, regulations,
and directives, except to the extent that
FTA determines otherwise in writing.
Any violation of a Federal law,
E:\FR\FM\12SEN1.SGM
12SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 176 / Tuesday, September 12, 2006 / Notices
regulation, or directive applicable to the
recipient or its project may result in
penalties to the violating party.
Applicable crosscutting requirements
likely to apply to joint development
improvements include, but are not
limited to, the following:
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
a. Ground Lease or Transfer of Federally
Assisted Real Estate
If the joint development improvement
involves a ground lease or transfer of
federally-funded real estate and there is
no Federal assistance for new
improvements, then the following
requirements apply to the lessee or
transferee and must be incorporated into
the lease or the conveyance instrument:
i. Language found at 49 CFR 26.7
binding the lessee or transferee not to
discriminate based on race, color,
national origin, or sex;
ii. Language found at 49 CFR 27.7;
27.9(b) and 37 binding the lessee or
transferee not to discriminate based on
disability and binding the same to
compliance with the Americans with
Disabilities Act with regard to any
improvements constructed; and
iii. Language contained in FTA’s
Master Agreement, updated annually in
October, particularly relating to
conflicts of interest and debarment and
suspension.
b. Federally Assisted Construction of
Joint Development Improvements
If the construction of improvements is
also federally assisted, then the
following requirements will apply and
must be incorporated into the lease or
the conveyance or encumbrance
instrument:
i. Buy America—language making it
clear that the steel, iron, and
manufactured goods used in the joint
development project are produced in
the United States, as described in 49
U.S.C. 5323(j) and 49 CFR part 661;
ii. Planning and Environmental
Analysis—language making it clear that
the grantee must comply with, and the
joint development project is subject to
the requirements of:
A. The FHWA/FTA metropolitan and
statewide planning regulations at 23
CFR part 450;
B. The National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 4321
et seq.;
C. Executive Order No. 12898,
‘‘Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low-Income
Populations,’’ 59 FR 7629, Feb. 16,
1994;
D. FTA statutory requirements on
environmental matters at 49 U.S.C.
5324(b); Council on Environmental
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:16 Sep 11, 2006
Jkt 208001
Quality regulations on compliance with
the NEPA, 40 CFR part 1500 et seq.;
E. FHWA/FTA regulations,
‘‘Environmental Impact and Related
Procedures,’’ 23 CFR part 771;
F. Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act, 16 U.S.C. 470f,
involving historic and archaeological
preservation; Advisory Council on
Historic Preservation regulations on
compliance with Sec. 106, ‘‘Protection
of Historic and Cultural Properties,’’ 36
CFR part 800; and
G. restrictions on the use of certain
publicly owned lands and historic
resources unless the FTA makes the
specific findings required by 49 U.S.C.
303.
iii. Cargo Preference—language
making it clear that items imported from
abroad and used in the joint
development were shipped
predominantly on U.S.-flag ships and
that the project complies with 46 CFR
part 381, to the extent these regulations
apply to the joint development;
iv. Seismic Safety—language
certifying that a structure conforms to
seismic safety standards, as contained in
49 CFR part 41;
v. Energy Assessments—Language
making it clear that the transferee(s) or
joint developer agrees to perform a
mandatory, energy assessment as
prescribed by 23 CFR part 771 and 42
U.S.C. 8373(b)(1) for any buildings
constructed, reconstructed or modified
with FTA assistance. The assessment
shall be incorporated into the
Environmental Impact Statement or
Environmental Assessment, if the
project has one; otherwise the
assessment shall be provided with the
application for FTA assistance;
vi. Lobbying—49 CFR part 20;
vii. Labor Protection—Language
making it clear that the transferee or
joint developer will adhere to labor
protection requirements applying to
Federal projects, such as Davis-Bacon—
49 U.S.C. 5333(a) and 40 U.S.C. 3141 et
seq., and 29 CFR part 5; Copeland
‘‘Anti-Kickback’’ Act as amended, 18
U.S.C. 874 and 29 CFR part 3; and
Contract Work Hours and Safety
Standards Act, 40 U.S.C. 3701 et seq,
and 29 CFR part 5 and at 40 U.S.C.
3704; as well as 49 U.S.C. 5333(b)
concerning protection of transit
employees;
viii. Civil Rights Requirements—49
U.S.C. 5332 and DOT implementing
regulations at 49 CFR part 21 (effecting
Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964),
49 CFR 26 (participation by
Disadvantaged Business Enterprises in
DOT financial assistance programs) and
49 CFR parts 27 and 37 (respectively,
nondiscrimination on the basis of
PO 00000
Frm 00101
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
53749
disability in programs or activities
receiving Federal financial assistance
and transportation services for
individuals with disabilities);
ix. Program Fraud—grantees agree to
comply with Program Fraud Civil
Remedies Act of 1986, as amended, 31
U.S.C. 3801 et seq. and 49 CFR part 31.
Penalties may apply for noncompliance;
x. Language making it clear that the
level of Federal participation in the joint
development provides no U.S.
Government obligation to third parties
in the project; and
xi. Uniform Relocation—If the
federally-funded site to be improved is
occupied by other than the grantee and
the occupant is displaced, the
transferee(s) or joint developer must
comply with 42 U.S.C. 4601 et seq. and
the regulations at 49 CFR part 24.
c. National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA)
In any instance in which FTA
determines that NEPA applies to the
joint development, the level of
environmental analysis will depend
upon the complexity of the project and
its likely impacts. In some instances,
minimal review will be necessary, in
which case FTA may issue a Categorical
Exclusion. Generally, however, joint
development activities that portend
significant environmental impacts will
necessitate the preparation of an
Environmental Assessment or an
Environmental Impact Statement. FTA
is available to provide guidance on the
environmental review process. See
generally the FTA Environmental
Impact and Related Procedures at 23
CFR part 771.
V. Eligibility Procedures
Before becoming eligible for FTA
funding, a joint development
improvement must be approved by the
FTA Regional Administrator, or his
designee, responsible for the project
sponsor’s locality. Only FTA grantees
may sponsor a joint development
improvement. The project sponsor may
submit a joint development proposal at
any time. FTA approval shall be
contingent upon the project sponsor
certifying that the joint development
improvement conforms to the criteria
set forth above and that the project
conforms to the requirements of the
common grant rule found at 49 CFR
18.31. In the event that the project does
not conform to 49 CFR 18.31, FTA may
approve the project if the project
sponsor submits an alternative
certification explaining compliance
with 49 U.S.C. 5302(a)(1)(G) and 49 CFR
18.25(g)(4) and (5) together with
supporting documentation, in each case
E:\FR\FM\12SEN1.SGM
12SEN1
53750
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 176 / Tuesday, September 12, 2006 / Notices
in form and substance satisfactory to
FTA in its reasonable discretion. The
FTA Regional Administrator, or his
designee, shall approve all proposals
that meet the criteria described herein.
Like all projects funded by FTA, joint
development improvements are subject
to the applicable crosscutting
requirements.
There are two methods for seeking
approval for a joint development
project. In all cases, the project sponsor
must submit a completed Joint
Development Checklist and proposed
Joint Development Agreement. By
submitting a completed Joint
Development Checklist, the project
sponsor shall certify that the proposed
joint development improvement
conforms to the criteria of 49 U.S.C.
5302(a)(1)(G) as outlined above.
For an expedited review, the joint
development proposal shall include a
signed Certificate of Compliance. By
signing the Certificate of Compliance,
the project sponsor shall certify, among
other things, that the proposed joint
development improvement conforms to
the requirements of 49 CFR 18.31.
If a project sponsor seeks a more
individualized review of the project, a
joint development proposal shall
include an explanation of compliance
with 49 U.S.C. 5302(a)(1)(G) and 49 CFR
18.25(g)(4) and (5) (the ‘‘alternative
certification’’) with supporting
documentation.
The Joint Development Checklist and
Certificate of Compliance are attached
hereto.
VI. Real Property
Real property acquired by a grantee or
subgrantee pursuant to 49 U.S.C.
5302(a)(1)(G) shall be governed by 49
U.S.C. 5334(h)as amended, and subject
to the obligations and conditions set
forth in 49 CFR 18.31 as amended,
which require the grantee or subgrantee
to request disposition instructions from
FTA whenever real property is no
longer needed for the originally
authorized purpose.9
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
9 FTA shall rely on the parties to joint
development transactions, including, notably,
transit agencies, to determine the appropriate use
and disposition of real property used on joint
development improvements, so long as such
disposition and use complies with applicable
statutes and duly promulgated regulations of FTA.
For example, FTA shall no longer apply, and shall
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:16 Sep 11, 2006
Jkt 208001
VII. Applicability of Third Party
Contracting Requirements
FTA’s third party contracting
requirements, which appear in FTA
Circular 4220.1E, have limited
applicability to joint development
projects. As described on page 12 of
Circular 4220.1E, the third-party
contracting requirements must apply to
the federally funded construction
aspects of joint development. With
regard to revenue contracts as defined in
the Circular, FTA will work with
grantees on a case-by-case basis to craft
approaches that satisfy the statutory and
regulatory requirements while
preserving the benefits of this
innovative contracting strategy to the
maximum possible extent.
If a contract between a grantee and a
third party involving a joint
development project is not a
construction contract or a revenue
contract as defined by Circular 4220.1E,
then such contract is not covered by
FTA’s third party contracting
requirements. Paragraph 7.n. of Circular
4220.1E defines ‘‘revenue contracts’’ as
‘‘those third party contracts whose
primary purpose is to either generate
revenues in connection with a transit
related activity or to create business
opportunities utilizing an FTA funded
asset.’’
Revenue contracts in joint
development projects that do not meet
this primary purpose test are not
covered by the third party contracting
requirements. For example, third party
contracts to manage, operate, and/or
maintain intercity bus or intercity rail
terminals that are part of FTA-funded
joint development projects or tenancy
agreements with third party intercity
bus or intercity rail operators are not
covered revenue contracts. The primary
purpose of such contracts is to carry out
the congressional intent to give grantees
the flexibility to integrate intercity rail
and intercity bus terminals and their
not require it grantees to apply, its administrativelyderived test of ‘‘highest and best transit use’’ (or any
other tests) for determining the value of real
property used in FTA-funded joint developments,
including the disposition of real property connected
to a joint development improvement. In the past,
FTA relied on 49 CFR 18.25(g) as its authority for
requiring (and determining in its discretion) the
‘‘highest and best transit use’’ of such property. No
such requirement is expressly authorized or
required by 49 CFR 18.25(g), however.
PO 00000
Frm 00102
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
related services into FTA-funded joint
development projects.
Even in situations not covered by the
third party contracting requirements,
FTA generally favors full and open
competition. However, where the third
party contracting requirements are not
involved, FTA will leave it to the full
discretion of the grantees to determine
the appropriate extent and nature of
competition, if any, for such contracts.
For example, in cases involving
management of intercity bus or rail
terminals or tenancy agreements in
those terminals, FTA recognizes that
given the unique nature of the national
intercity rail and bus systems, a
competitive procurement process for
such contracts may not be appropriate.
VII. Certificate of Compliance
To ensure compliance with 49 CFR
18.31 and other Federal requirements
related to joint development
improvements, and the acquisition, use
and disposition of real property for such
improvements. FTA shall require
project sponsors to sign a Certificate of
Compliance or, in lieu of such
certificate, an alternative certification
explaining compliance with 49 U.S.C.
5302(a)(1)(G) and 49 CFR 18.25(g)(4)
and (5) with supporting documentation.
By signing the Certificate of
Compliance, the project sponsor shall
certify, among other things, that the
proposed joint development
improvement conforms to the
requirements of 49 CFR 18.31.
IX. Satisfactory Continuing Control
For purposes of this guidance and the
Certificate of Compliance, ‘‘satisfactory
continuing control’’ shall not mean
complete operating or managerial
control of a joint development facility.
In determining whether ‘‘satisfactory
continuing control’’ with respect to a
joint development capital project is
maintained, the project sponsor and
FTA shall consider, as a primary factor,
whether the project sponsor has the
right and power to direct that such
project shall be used for activities
eligible for funding under Federal
Transit Law (49 U.S.C. 53).
Appendix A—Proposed Joint
Development Checklist
BILLING CODE 4910–57–P
E:\FR\FM\12SEN1.SGM
12SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 176 / Tuesday, September 12, 2006 / Notices
53751
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:16 Sep 11, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00103
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\12SEN1.SGM
12SEN1
EN12SE06.020
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 4910–57–C
53752
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 176 / Tuesday, September 12, 2006 / Notices
Appendix B—Proposed Certificate of
Compliance
Certificate of Compliance
Effective as of the date hereof, the
undersigned hereby certifies and covenants
to the Federal Transit Administration
(‘‘FTA’’) as follows:
1. Title. Subject to the obligations and
conditions set forth in 49 CFR 18.31, as
amended, title to real property acquired
under a grant or subgrant for FTA Project
Numberll, [insert project title here] (the
‘‘Project’’), shall vest in the undersigned or
subgrantee thereof (collectively or
individually, as the case may be, the
‘‘Grantee’’).
2. Use. Except as otherwise provided by
Federal statutes, real property shall only be
used for the originally authorized purposes
(which may include Joint Development
purposes that generate program income, both
during and after the award period and used
to support public transportation activities) as
long as needed for such purposes, and that
the Grantee shall not dispose of or encumber
its title or other interests.
3. Disposition. When real property
acquired with funds provided by FTA for the
Project is no longer needed for the purpose
originally authorized by FTA, the Grantee
shall request disposition instructions from
FTA and shall agree that, unless otherwise
authorized by FTA, such disposition shall be
made in accordance with applicable law,
including without limitation 49 U.S.C.
5334(h) and 49 CFR 18.31.
4. Federal Interest. The Federal
Government retains a Federal interest in any
real property, equipment, and supplies
financed with Federal assistance (‘‘Project
Property’’) until, and to the extent that, the
Federal Government relinquishes its Federal
interest in such Project Property.
5. Incidental Use. Any incidental use of
Project Property, as determined by FTA, shall
not exceed that permitted under applicable
Federal laws, regulations, and directives,
including the requirements of FTA’s Master
Agreement.
6. Encumbrance of Project Property. The
Grantee covenants to FTA as follows:
a. Written Transactions. The Grantee
agrees that it will not execute any transfer of
title to the Project Property or enter into an
instrument legally binding on the Grantee
that would encumber Federal Interest in the
Project Property.
b. Oral Transactions. The Grantee agrees
that it will not obligate itself in any manner
to any third party with respect to Project
Property.
7. Notice to Joint Development Partner. The
undersigned has delivered to the Joint
Development Partner a duly executed copy of
this certificate, dated as of the date hereof,
receipt of which has been acknowledged by
the Joint Development Partner in writing to
the undersigned on or before the date of
execution of the Joint Development
Agreement.
8. Other Actions. The Grantee (a) agrees
that it will not take any action that
encumbers the Federal Interest in the Project
Property and (b) hereby affirms that each of
its representations and warranties set forth in
the Master Agreement is true and correct in
all material respects as of the date hereof.
The Grantee agrees that nothing herein shall
supersede, amend, modify or otherwise affect
the provisions, terms or conditions set forth
in the Master Agreement.
9. Definitions.
a. ‘‘FTA’’ shall have the meaning provided
in the preamble of this certificate.
b. ‘‘Grantee’’ shall have the meaning
provided in section (2) of this certificate.
c. ‘‘Joint Development’’ shall mean a
capital project as defined by 49 U.S.C.
5302(a)(1)(G) that is eligible for funding
pursuant to the terms and conditions set
forth in [insert new Joint Development
circular number].
d. ‘‘Joint Development Partner’’ shall mean
[insert definition].
e. ‘‘Master Agreement’’ shall mean that
certain Master Agreement by and between
FTA and the Grantee, as authorized by 49
U.S.C. 53, Title 23, United States Code
(Highways), the National Capital
Transportation Act of 1969, as amended, the
Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient
Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for
Users, the Transportation Equity Act for the
21st Century, as amended, or other Federal
laws that FTA administers, as the same may
be lawfully revised, superseded or
supplemented from time to time.
f. ‘‘Project’’ shall have the meaning
provided in section (1) of this certificate.
g. ‘‘Project Property’’ shall have the
meaning provided in section (4) of this
certificate.
10. No Estoppel. The undersigned agrees
that acceptance of this Certificate of
Compliance by FTA shall not estop the
Federal government from initiating or
conducting, and shall not be used as a
defense for, any investigation, audit or
inquiry by the Federal government following
approval by FTA of the project.
Issued on the 5th day of September, 2006.
James S. Simpson,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. E6–15022 Filed 9–11–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–57–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration Office of
Hazardous Materials Safety
Notice of Delays in Processing of
Special Permit Applications
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration, DOT.
ACTION: List of application delayed
more than 180 days.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
requirements of 49 U.S.C. 5117(c),
PHMSA is publishing the following list
of special permit applications that have
been in process for 180 days or more.
The reason(s) for delay and the expected
completion date for action on each
application is provided in association
with each identified application.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ann
Mazzullo, Office of Hazardous Materials
Special Permits and Approvals, Pipeline
and Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 400 Seventh Street,
SW., Washington, DC 20590–0001, (202)
366–4535.
Key to ‘‘Reason for Delay’’
1. Awaiting additional information
from applicant.
2. Extensive public comment under
review.
3. Application is technically complex
and is of significant impact or
precedent-setting and requires extensive
analysis.
4. Staff review delayed by other
priority issues or volume of special
permit applications.
Meaning of Application Number
Suffixes
N—New application.
M—Modification request.
X—renewal.
PM—Party to application with
modification request.
Issued in Washington, DC, on September 6,
2006.
R. Ryan Posten,
Chief, Special Permits Program, Office of
Hazardous Materials Safety, Special Permits
& Approvals.
NEW SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATIONS
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Application No.
13563–N
14229–N
14232–N
14239–N
14237–N
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Reason for
delay
Applicant
Applied Companies, Valencia, CA ..................................................................................
Senex Explosives, Inc., Cuddy, PA ................................................................................
Luxfer Gas Cylinders–Composite Cylinder Division, Riverside, CA ..............................
Marlin Gas Transport, Inc., Odessa, FL .........................................................................
Advanced Technology Materials, Inc. (ATMI), Danbury, CT ..........................................
16:16 Sep 11, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00104
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\12SEN1.SGM
12SEN1
Estimated date of
completion
1
4
4
1
1
09–30–2006
09–30–2006
09–30–2006
09–30–2006
09–30–2006
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 176 (Tuesday, September 12, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53745-53752]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-15022]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Transit Administration
[Docket No: FTA-2006-23511]
Notice of Proposed Agency Guidance and Request for Comments on
the Eligibility of Joint Development Improvements Under Federal Transit
Law
AGENCY: Federal Transit Administration (FTA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed guidance with request for comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) seeks public comment
on the following proposed guidance on joint development capital
projects funded by the Federal Transit Administration. The Safe,
Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act of 2005: A
Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) enacted certain amendments to the
definition of the term ``capital project'' as used in 49 U.S.C.
5302(a)(1)(G) relating to ``joint development'' activities by
recipients of Federal funds under 49 U.S.C. 5301 et seq. (Federal
Transit Law). The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) proposes to
adopt the following guidance in accordance with the procedures for
notice and an opportunity for the public to comment set forth at 49
U.S.C. 5334(l) and FTA's Notice of Final Policy Statement for
Implementation of Notice and Comment Procedures for Documents Imposing
``Binding Obligations,'' as published in the Federal Register on June
5, 2006. The following proposed guidance seeks to ensure maximum
benefit to the people who ride public transportation, to FTA grantees
that choose to sponsor joint development improvements (the project
sponsor), and to their joint development partners by (i) Affording FTA
grantees maximum flexibility within the law to work with the private
sector and others for purposes of joint development, (ii) generally
deferring to the decisions of the project sponsor, negotiating and
contracting at arm's length with third parties, to utilize Federal
Transit funds and program income for joint development purposes, and
(iii) promoting transit-oriented
[[Page 53746]]
development, subject to the broad parameters set forth herein.
DATES: Comments must be received by October 12, 2006. Late-filed
comments will be considered to the extent practicable.
ADDRESSES: To ensure your comments are not entered more than once into
the DOT Docket, please identify your submissions by the following
docket number: FTA-2006-23511. Please make your submissions by only one
of the following means:
Web site: https://dms.dot.gov. Follow the instructions for
submitting comments on the DOT electronic docket site.
Web Site: https://dms.dot.gov. Follow the online
instructions for making submissions to the DOT electronic docket site.
Fax: 1-202-493-2478.
U.S. Post or Express Mail: Docket Management System, U.S.
Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building,
Room PL-401, Washington, DC 20590-001.
Hand Delivery: To the Docket Management System; Room PL-
401 on the plaza level of the Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street, SW.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal Holidays.
Instructions: All submissions must make reference to the ``Federal
Transit Administration'' and include the docket number for this notice
set forth above. Due to security procedures in effect since October
2001 regarding mail deliveries, mail received through the U.S. Postal
Service may be subject to delays. Parties making submissions responsive
to this notice should consider using an express mail firm to ensure the
prompt filing of any submissions not filed electronically or by hand.
Note that all submissions received, including any personal information
therein, will be posted without change or alteration to https://
dms.dot.gov.
Docket: For access to the DOT docket to read materials relating to
this notice, please go to https://dms.dot.gov at any time or to the
Docket Management System.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For program questions, please contact
Robert Tuccillo at (202) 366-4050. For legal questions, please contact
Jayme Blakesley at (202) 366-0304. The principal office of FTA is
located at 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590-0001. Office
hours are from 8:30 a.m. to 6 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Statement of Policy
Through this guidance, FTA interprets the definition and operation
of the term ``capital project'' as defined at 49 U.S.C. 5302(a)(1)(G),
and as amended by Section 3003(a) of the Safe, Accountable, Flexible,
Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (``SAFETEA-
LU''). This amendment permits FTA to issue public transportation grants
``for the construction, renovation, and improvement of intercity bus
and intercity rail stations and terminals,'' including the
construction, renovation, and improvement of commercial revenue-
producing intercity bus stations or terminals. In doing so, it modifies
the underlying policy of joint development improvements, and therefore
enhances the ability of FTA grantees to work with the private sector
and others for purposes of joint development. To ensure maximum benefit
to the people who ride public transportation, to FTA grantees that
choose to sponsor joint development improvements (the ``project
sponsor''), and to their joint development partners, the following
guidance (i) seeks to afford FTA grantees maximum flexibility within
the law to work with the private sector and others for purposes of
joint development, (ii) generally will defer to the decisions of the
project sponsor, negotiating and contracting at arm's length with third
parties, to utilize Federal transit funds and program income for joint
development purposes, and (iii) aims to promote transit-oriented
development, subject to the broad parameters set forth herein.
Proposed Guidance Text
I. Eligibility Criteria
a. Definition of ``Capital Project''
Federal Transit Law defines a ``capital project'' for joint
development as follows:
A public transportation improvement that enhances economic
development or incorporates private investment, including commercial
and residential development, pedestrian and bicycle access to a
public transportation facility, construction, renovation, and
improvement of intercity bus and intercity rail stations and
terminals, and the renovation and improvement of historic
transportation facilities, because the improvement enhances the
effectiveness of a public transportation project and is related
physically or functionally to that public transportation project, or
establishes new or enhanced coordination between public
transportation and other transportation, and provides a fair share
of revenue for public transportation that will be used for public
transportation.
49 U.S.C. 5302(a)(1)(G).
This definition establishes the following criteria for determining
whether a joint development improvement is eligible for funding
pursuant to a program established under 49 U.S.C. 5301 et seq. (the
``Federal Transit Law''): The public transportation improvement must
(i) Enhance economic development or incorporate private investment;
(ii)(a) Enhance the effectiveness of a public transportation project
and relates physically or functionally to that public transportation
project, or (b) establish new or enhanced coordination between public
transportation and other transportation; and (iii) provide a fair share
of revenue for public transportation that will be used for public
transportation. In addition, a person making an agreement to occupy
space in a facility under this subparagraph shall pay a reasonable
share of the costs of the facility through rental payments and other
means. 49 U.S.C. 5302(a)(1)(G)(i).
Joint development improvements will be eligible for FTA funding
only if they satisfy the criteria set forth above, and do not fall
within the exclusion detailed at 49 U.S.C. 5302(a)(1)(G)(ii), which
excludes the construction of a commercial revenue-producing facility
(other than an intercity bus station or terminal) or a part of a public
facility not related to public transportation.
b. ``Enhances Economic Development or Incorporates Private Investment''
As noted above, it is a threshold requirement for Federal funding
of a public transportation improvement as joint development that such
improvement either (i) Enhance economic development or (ii) incorporate
private investment.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ In accordance with the statute's use of the disjunctive
``or,'' rather than the conjunctive ``and,'' FTA shall determine
that a transportation improvement satisfies the threshold
requirement for funding as joint development if the transportation
improvement either (i) Enhances economic development or (ii)
incorporates private investment (the disjunctive), and shall not
require that the transportation improvement satisfy each of (i) and
(ii) (the conjunctive).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
i. ``Enhances Economic Development''
This criterion requires that a joint development improvement
enhance economic development. A grantee may satisfy this criterion by
demonstrating that the joint development improvement will add value to
privately-or publicly-funded economic development activity occurring in
close proximity to a public transportation facility.
[[Page 53747]]
ii. ``Incorporates Private Investment''
Any joint development improvement that incorporates private
investment will satisfy this criterion. Private investment need not be
monetary; it may take the form of cash, real property, or other benefit
to be generated initially or over the life of the joint development
improvements. FTA will not set a monetary threshold. The amount and
form of private investment shall be negotiated by the parties to the
joint development improvement.
c. ``Enhances the Effectiveness of a Public Transportation Project''
Any reasonable forecast of joint development impacts that enhance
the effectiveness of a public transportation project will satisfy this
criterion. These impacts may include, but are not limited to, any of
the following: increased ridership, shortened travel times, and
lessened or deferred transit operating or capital costs.
d. ``Related Physically or Functionally''
The disjunctive requirement of physical ``or'' functional
relationship provides that a joint development improvement may be built
separately from, but in functional relationship to, a public
transportation project. Therefore, a joint development improvement
satisfies this element if it is related physically or functionally to a
public transportation project.
i. ``Physically Related''
A joint development improvement is ``physically related'' to a
public transportation project if it provides a direct physical
connection to public transportation services or facilities.
Illustrative, but not exhaustive, examples of physical relationships
include (i) projects built within or adjacent to public transportation
facilities and (ii) projects using air rights over public
transportation facilities.
ii. ``Functionally Related''
A joint development improvement is ``functionally related'' to a
public transportation project if by activity and use, with or without a
direct physical connection, it (i) enhances the use of, connectivity
with or access to public transportation; or (ii) provides a
transportation-related service (such as, but not limited to, remote
baggage handling or shared ticketing) or community services (such as
daycare or health care) to the public. Considerations include a
reduction in travel time between the joint development project and the
public transportation facility, reasonable access between the joint
development project and the public transportation facility, and
increased trip generation rates resulting from the relationship between
the joint development project and the public transportation facility.
While the functional relationship test of activity and use permits
the use of FTA funds for joint development improvements located outside
the structural envelope of a public transportation project, and may
extend across an intervening street, major thoroughfare or unrelated
property, functional relationships should not extend beyond the
distance most people can be expected to safely and conveniently walk to
use the transit service (in certain cases, for example, within a radius
of 1,500 feet around the center of the public transportation project).
e. ``Establishes New or Enhanced Coordination Between Public
Transportation and Other Transportation'' \2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Subsection (e), ``New or Enhanced Coordination,'' explains
the second method for complying with a disjunctive requirement. As
explained in section (I)(d) of this document, a joint development
improvement may satisfy this requirement by (i) Relating physically
or functionally to a public transportation project or (ii)
establishing new or enhanced coordination between public
transportation and other transportation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Any reasonable forecast of joint development impacts that establish
new or enhanced coordination between public transportation and other
transportation will satisfy this criterion. FTA will accept any
reasonably supported judgment of new or enhanced coordination from the
project sponsor.
i. ``New or Enhanced Coordination''
To establish new or enhanced coordination, a joint development
improvement must create or enhance the physical or functional
connections between public transportation and other transportation.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ This requirement is similar to, but not the same as, the
requirement of physical or functional relationship described at
subsection (d)(i) and (ii). The two are distinct, disjunctive
requirements, but they share common criteria. A project could
satisfy both requirements, but need only satisfy one to qualify for
funding as a joint development improvement. Visualized as such, the
disjunctive requirement would appear as a Venn diagram--separate
requirements with overlapping criteria.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Examples of physical connections that establish new or enhanced
coordination include, but are not limited to, proximate or shared
ticket counters, termini, park-and-ride lots, taxicab bays, passenger
drop-off points, waiting areas, bicycle paths and sidewalks connecting
public transportation to non-transportation facilities. Projects that
shorten the distance between public transportation termini and other
transportation shall be presumed to enhance coordination.
Examples of functional connections that establish new or enhanced
coordination include, but are not limited to, shared or coordinated
signage, schedules, and ticketing.
ii. ``Public Transportation''
Section 5307(a)(7) of Title 49 defines ``public transportation'' as
``transportation by a conveyance that provides regular and
continuing general or special transportation to the public, but does
not include schoolbus, charter, or intercity bus transportation or
intercity passenger rail transportation provided by the entity
described in chapter 243 \4\ (or a successor to such entity).''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ National Railroad Passenger Corporation (``Amtrak'')
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
iii. ``Other Transportation''
FTA interprets the term ``other transportation,'' as used in 49
U.S.C. 5307(a)(1)(G), to mean all forms of transportation that are not
public transportation, including, but not limited to, airplane, school
bus, charter bus, sightseeing vehicle, intercity bus and rail,
automobile, taxicab, bicycle and pedestrian transportation.
f. ``Provides a Fair Share of Revenue for Public Transportation That
Will Be Used for Public Transportation''
The third criterion for determining whether a joint development
improvement is eligible for funding pursuant to a program established
under the Federal Transit Law is that the improvement ``provides a fair
share of revenue for public transportation that will be used for public
transportation.'' \5\ 49 U.S.C. 5302(a)(1)(G). FTA will not define the
term ``fair share of revenue,'' nor will it set a monetary threshold.
What is a fair share of revenue, and what form it should take,\6\ shall
be negotiated between the parties involved in the joint development
improvement. The only requirements are (i) That the
[[Page 53748]]
public transportation provider receives a fair share of revenue, (ii)
that such revenue be used for public transportation, and (iii) that the
project sponsor obtain a written opinion of counsel or other advisor
(or FTA's agreement) that the share of revenue to public transportation
is fair. This allows a public transportation provider to negotiate for
financial benefits in exchange for the benefits it will convey through
the joint development improvement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ This criterion should not be confused with the requirement
of 49 U.S.C. 5302(a)(1)(G)(ii) that ``a person making an agreement
to occupy space in a facility under this subparagraph shall pay a
reasonable share of the costs of the facility through rental
payments and other means.''
\6\ For example, ``fair share of revenue'' need not be a direct
payment of revenue by an intercity bus provider to a transit agency
but may take the form of an increase in revenues received by a
transit agency, whether in its capacity as landlord or otherwise, as
a result of enhanced passenger traffic created by the service of a
jointly developed facility by an intercity bus provider, provided
that the transit agency and intercity bus provider together
designate and report to FTA the source of such ``fair share of
revenue.'' FTA grantees shall expend the ``fair share of revenue''
in accordance with the common grant rule of 49 CFR 18.1-18.52.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
g. ``Reasonable Share of the Costs of the Facility''
While not a criterion to determine eligibility, as noted above, it
is nonetheless required that any ``person making an agreement to occupy
space in a facility under [49 U.S.C. 5302(a)(1)(G)] shall pay a
reasonable share of the costs of the facility through rental payments
and other means.'' FTA shall not require a specific valuation
methodology and shall accept any reasonable valuation methodology used
by the grantee to determine a reasonable share of the costs of the
facility.
II. Eligible Activities
Subject to the eligibility criteria detailed at section (II) above,
joint development improvements expressly include the following:
Commercial and residential development;
Pedestrian and bicycle access to a public transportation
facility;
Construction, renovation, and improvement of intercity bus
and intercity rail stations and terminals; and
Renovation and improvement of historic transportation
facilities.
49 U.S.C. 5302(a)(1)(G). These and other joint development
improvements will be eligible for FTA funding if they satisfy the
criteria set forth above, and do not fall within the exclusion detailed
at 49 U.S.C. 5302(a)(1)(G)(ii), which excludes the construction of a
commercial revenue-producing facility (other than an intercity bus
station or terminal) or a part of a public facility not related to
public transportation.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ Many aspects of commercial and residential development will
be excluded by 49 U.S.C. 5302(a)(1)(G)(ii), which makes ineligible
for FTA financial assistance the ``construction of a commercial
revenue-producing facility (other than an intercity bus station or
terminal) or a part of a public facility not related to public
transportation.'' It is important to note, however, that commercial
and residential development is not excluded wholesale. For example,
space in an FTA-funded facility may be made available for commercial
revenue-producing activities and for connections to revenue
producing activities. Similarly, non-commercial, non-revenue-
producing aspects of commercial and residential developments may be
eligible for FTA financial assistance, subject to the criteria
detailed at section (II).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Costs related to a joint development improvement are only eligible
for Federal Transit funding pursuant to a budget contained in an
approved grant. FTA cannot approve funding for costs associated with a
joint development improvement that are not contained in an approved
grant budget. FTA Regional Administrators approve joint development
proposals as part of the grant approval process.
Eligible costs for joint development improvements include, but are
not limited to, the following:
a. Real Estate Acquisition, including the acquisition of real
property and structures thereon; \8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ Note that certain costs in connection with real estate
acquisition (such as costs associated with eminent domain and
relocation assistance) shall be eligible, as provided by the
respective statutes and regulations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
b. Demolition of Existing Structures;
c. Site Preparation;
d. Building Foundations, including substructure improvements for
buildings constructed over transit facilities;
e. Utilities, including utility relocation and construction;
f. Walkways, including bicycle lanes and pedestrian connections and
access links between public transportation services and related
development;
g. Open Space, including site amenities and related streetscape
improvements such as street furniture and landscaping;
h. Safety and Security Equipment and Facilities, including
lighting, surveillance and related intelligent transportation
applications;
i. Construction, renovation, and improvement of bus and intercity
rail stations and terminals;
j. Facilities that Incorporate Community Services such as daycare
or health care;
k. Capital Project, and Equipment, for an Intermodal Transfer
Facility or Transportation Mall, including acquisition of facilities
and equipment, roadbeds, tracks and bus ramps, pedestrian concourses,
loading shelters, parking facilities, park-and-ride services,
improvements of existing bus or rail transit terminals, stations, major
transfer points, and shelters as well as other facilities directly
related to the linking of public transportation facilities with other
modes of transportation;
l. Furniture, Fixtures and Equipment (FFE): Transportation-related
FFE are eligible costs in all cases. However, due to the exclusion of
commercial revenue-producing facilities (other than an intercity bus
station or terminal) and public facilities not related to public
transportation at 49 U.S.C. 5302(a)(1)(G)(ii), FFE related to
commercial revenue-producing facilities (other than an intercity bus
station or terminal) or public facilities not related to public
transportation are considered ineligible;
m. Parking, including parking improvements with a public
transportation justification and use or an intercity bus or intercity
rail justification and use in connection with joint development; and
n. Project Development Activities, including design, engineering,
construction cost estimating, environmental analysis, real estate
packaging and financial projections (operating income and expenses,
debt service and cash flow analysis), and negotiations to secure
financing and tenants;
o. Professional Services, including reasonable and necessary costs
incurred to hire professionals to prepare or perform items a through n
above, or to assist the grantee in reviewing the same.
III. Ineligible Activities
a. Construction of a Commercial Revenue-Producing Facility
Eligible costs do not include construction of commercial revenue
producing facilities (other than an intercity bus station or terminal)
or part of a public facility not related to public transportation.
IV. Federal Requirements
FTA's Master Agreement contains the standard terms and conditions
governing the administration of a project supported with Federal
assistance awarded by FTA through a grant agreement or cooperative
agreement with the recipient, or supported by FTA through a
Transportation Infrastructure (TIFIA) Loan, loan guarantee, or line of
credit with the recipient. Not every provision of the Master Agreement
will apply to every project for which FTA provides Federal assistance
through a grant agreement or cooperative agreement. The type of
project, the Federal laws and regulations authorizing Federal
assistance for the project, and the legal status of the recipient as a
State or local government, private non profit entity, or private for
profit entity will determine which Federal laws, regulations, and
directives apply. Federal laws, regulations, and directives that do not
apply will not be enforced. The recipient shall comply with all
applicable Federal laws, regulations, and directives, except to the
extent that FTA determines otherwise in writing. Any violation of a
Federal law,
[[Page 53749]]
regulation, or directive applicable to the recipient or its project may
result in penalties to the violating party. Applicable crosscutting
requirements likely to apply to joint development improvements include,
but are not limited to, the following:
a. Ground Lease or Transfer of Federally Assisted Real Estate
If the joint development improvement involves a ground lease or
transfer of federally-funded real estate and there is no Federal
assistance for new improvements, then the following requirements apply
to the lessee or transferee and must be incorporated into the lease or
the conveyance instrument:
i. Language found at 49 CFR 26.7 binding the lessee or transferee
not to discriminate based on race, color, national origin, or sex;
ii. Language found at 49 CFR 27.7; 27.9(b) and 37 binding the
lessee or transferee not to discriminate based on disability and
binding the same to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act
with regard to any improvements constructed; and
iii. Language contained in FTA's Master Agreement, updated annually
in October, particularly relating to conflicts of interest and
debarment and suspension.
b. Federally Assisted Construction of Joint Development Improvements
If the construction of improvements is also federally assisted,
then the following requirements will apply and must be incorporated
into the lease or the conveyance or encumbrance instrument:
i. Buy America--language making it clear that the steel, iron, and
manufactured goods used in the joint development project are produced
in the United States, as described in 49 U.S.C. 5323(j) and 49 CFR part
661;
ii. Planning and Environmental Analysis--language making it clear
that the grantee must comply with, and the joint development project is
subject to the requirements of:
A. The FHWA/FTA metropolitan and statewide planning regulations at
23 CFR part 450;
B. The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended, 42
U.S.C. 4321 et seq.;
C. Executive Order No. 12898, ``Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations,'' 59 FR 7629, Feb. 16, 1994;
D. FTA statutory requirements on environmental matters at 49 U.S.C.
5324(b); Council on Environmental Quality regulations on compliance
with the NEPA, 40 CFR part 1500 et seq.;
E. FHWA/FTA regulations, ``Environmental Impact and Related
Procedures,'' 23 CFR part 771;
F. Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, 16 U.S.C.
470f, involving historic and archaeological preservation; Advisory
Council on Historic Preservation regulations on compliance with Sec.
106, ``Protection of Historic and Cultural Properties,'' 36 CFR part
800; and
G. restrictions on the use of certain publicly owned lands and
historic resources unless the FTA makes the specific findings required
by 49 U.S.C. 303.
iii. Cargo Preference--language making it clear that items imported
from abroad and used in the joint development were shipped
predominantly on U.S.-flag ships and that the project complies with 46
CFR part 381, to the extent these regulations apply to the joint
development;
iv. Seismic Safety--language certifying that a structure conforms
to seismic safety standards, as contained in 49 CFR part 41;
v. Energy Assessments--Language making it clear that the
transferee(s) or joint developer agrees to perform a mandatory, energy
assessment as prescribed by 23 CFR part 771 and 42 U.S.C. 8373(b)(1)
for any buildings constructed, reconstructed or modified with FTA
assistance. The assessment shall be incorporated into the Environmental
Impact Statement or Environmental Assessment, if the project has one;
otherwise the assessment shall be provided with the application for FTA
assistance;
vi. Lobbying--49 CFR part 20;
vii. Labor Protection--Language making it clear that the transferee
or joint developer will adhere to labor protection requirements
applying to Federal projects, such as Davis-Bacon--49 U.S.C. 5333(a)
and 40 U.S.C. 3141 et seq., and 29 CFR part 5; Copeland ``Anti-
Kickback'' Act as amended, 18 U.S.C. 874 and 29 CFR part 3; and
Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act, 40 U.S.C. 3701 et seq,
and 29 CFR part 5 and at 40 U.S.C. 3704; as well as 49 U.S.C. 5333(b)
concerning protection of transit employees;
viii. Civil Rights Requirements--49 U.S.C. 5332 and DOT
implementing regulations at 49 CFR part 21 (effecting Title VI of the
Civil Rights Act of 1964), 49 CFR 26 (participation by Disadvantaged
Business Enterprises in DOT financial assistance programs) and 49 CFR
parts 27 and 37 (respectively, nondiscrimination on the basis of
disability in programs or activities receiving Federal financial
assistance and transportation services for individuals with
disabilities);
ix. Program Fraud--grantees agree to comply with Program Fraud
Civil Remedies Act of 1986, as amended, 31 U.S.C. 3801 et seq. and 49
CFR part 31. Penalties may apply for noncompliance;
x. Language making it clear that the level of Federal participation
in the joint development provides no U.S. Government obligation to
third parties in the project; and
xi. Uniform Relocation--If the federally-funded site to be improved
is occupied by other than the grantee and the occupant is displaced,
the transferee(s) or joint developer must comply with 42 U.S.C. 4601 et
seq. and the regulations at 49 CFR part 24.
c. National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
In any instance in which FTA determines that NEPA applies to the
joint development, the level of environmental analysis will depend upon
the complexity of the project and its likely impacts. In some
instances, minimal review will be necessary, in which case FTA may
issue a Categorical Exclusion. Generally, however, joint development
activities that portend significant environmental impacts will
necessitate the preparation of an Environmental Assessment or an
Environmental Impact Statement. FTA is available to provide guidance on
the environmental review process. See generally the FTA Environmental
Impact and Related Procedures at 23 CFR part 771.
V. Eligibility Procedures
Before becoming eligible for FTA funding, a joint development
improvement must be approved by the FTA Regional Administrator, or his
designee, responsible for the project sponsor's locality. Only FTA
grantees may sponsor a joint development improvement. The project
sponsor may submit a joint development proposal at any time. FTA
approval shall be contingent upon the project sponsor certifying that
the joint development improvement conforms to the criteria set forth
above and that the project conforms to the requirements of the common
grant rule found at 49 CFR 18.31. In the event that the project does
not conform to 49 CFR 18.31, FTA may approve the project if the project
sponsor submits an alternative certification explaining compliance with
49 U.S.C. 5302(a)(1)(G) and 49 CFR 18.25(g)(4) and (5) together with
supporting documentation, in each case
[[Page 53750]]
in form and substance satisfactory to FTA in its reasonable discretion.
The FTA Regional Administrator, or his designee, shall approve all
proposals that meet the criteria described herein. Like all projects
funded by FTA, joint development improvements are subject to the
applicable crosscutting requirements.
There are two methods for seeking approval for a joint development
project. In all cases, the project sponsor must submit a completed
Joint Development Checklist and proposed Joint Development Agreement.
By submitting a completed Joint Development Checklist, the project
sponsor shall certify that the proposed joint development improvement
conforms to the criteria of 49 U.S.C. 5302(a)(1)(G) as outlined above.
For an expedited review, the joint development proposal shall
include a signed Certificate of Compliance. By signing the Certificate
of Compliance, the project sponsor shall certify, among other things,
that the proposed joint development improvement conforms to the
requirements of 49 CFR 18.31.
If a project sponsor seeks a more individualized review of the
project, a joint development proposal shall include an explanation of
compliance with 49 U.S.C. 5302(a)(1)(G) and 49 CFR 18.25(g)(4) and (5)
(the ``alternative certification'') with supporting documentation.
The Joint Development Checklist and Certificate of Compliance are
attached hereto.
VI. Real Property
Real property acquired by a grantee or subgrantee pursuant to 49
U.S.C. 5302(a)(1)(G) shall be governed by 49 U.S.C. 5334(h)as amended,
and subject to the obligations and conditions set forth in 49 CFR 18.31
as amended, which require the grantee or subgrantee to request
disposition instructions from FTA whenever real property is no longer
needed for the originally authorized purpose.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ FTA shall rely on the parties to joint development
transactions, including, notably, transit agencies, to determine the
appropriate use and disposition of real property used on joint
development improvements, so long as such disposition and use
complies with applicable statutes and duly promulgated regulations
of FTA. For example, FTA shall no longer apply, and shall not
require it grantees to apply, its administratively-derived test of
``highest and best transit use'' (or any other tests) for
determining the value of real property used in FTA-funded joint
developments, including the disposition of real property connected
to a joint development improvement. In the past, FTA relied on 49
CFR 18.25(g) as its authority for requiring (and determining in its
discretion) the ``highest and best transit use'' of such property.
No such requirement is expressly authorized or required by 49 CFR
18.25(g), however.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
VII. Applicability of Third Party Contracting Requirements
FTA's third party contracting requirements, which appear in FTA
Circular 4220.1E, have limited applicability to joint development
projects. As described on page 12 of Circular 4220.1E, the third-party
contracting requirements must apply to the federally funded
construction aspects of joint development. With regard to revenue
contracts as defined in the Circular, FTA will work with grantees on a
case-by-case basis to craft approaches that satisfy the statutory and
regulatory requirements while preserving the benefits of this
innovative contracting strategy to the maximum possible extent.
If a contract between a grantee and a third party involving a joint
development project is not a construction contract or a revenue
contract as defined by Circular 4220.1E, then such contract is not
covered by FTA's third party contracting requirements. Paragraph 7.n.
of Circular 4220.1E defines ``revenue contracts'' as ``those third
party contracts whose primary purpose is to either generate revenues in
connection with a transit related activity or to create business
opportunities utilizing an FTA funded asset.''
Revenue contracts in joint development projects that do not meet
this primary purpose test are not covered by the third party
contracting requirements. For example, third party contracts to manage,
operate, and/or maintain intercity bus or intercity rail terminals that
are part of FTA-funded joint development projects or tenancy agreements
with third party intercity bus or intercity rail operators are not
covered revenue contracts. The primary purpose of such contracts is to
carry out the congressional intent to give grantees the flexibility to
integrate intercity rail and intercity bus terminals and their related
services into FTA-funded joint development projects.
Even in situations not covered by the third party contracting
requirements, FTA generally favors full and open competition. However,
where the third party contracting requirements are not involved, FTA
will leave it to the full discretion of the grantees to determine the
appropriate extent and nature of competition, if any, for such
contracts. For example, in cases involving management of intercity bus
or rail terminals or tenancy agreements in those terminals, FTA
recognizes that given the unique nature of the national intercity rail
and bus systems, a competitive procurement process for such contracts
may not be appropriate.
VII. Certificate of Compliance
To ensure compliance with 49 CFR 18.31 and other Federal
requirements related to joint development improvements, and the
acquisition, use and disposition of real property for such
improvements. FTA shall require project sponsors to sign a Certificate
of Compliance or, in lieu of such certificate, an alternative
certification explaining compliance with 49 U.S.C. 5302(a)(1)(G) and 49
CFR 18.25(g)(4) and (5) with supporting documentation. By signing the
Certificate of Compliance, the project sponsor shall certify, among
other things, that the proposed joint development improvement conforms
to the requirements of 49 CFR 18.31.
IX. Satisfactory Continuing Control
For purposes of this guidance and the Certificate of Compliance,
``satisfactory continuing control'' shall not mean complete operating
or managerial control of a joint development facility. In determining
whether ``satisfactory continuing control'' with respect to a joint
development capital project is maintained, the project sponsor and FTA
shall consider, as a primary factor, whether the project sponsor has
the right and power to direct that such project shall be used for
activities eligible for funding under Federal Transit Law (49 U.S.C.
53).
Appendix A--Proposed Joint Development Checklist
BILLING CODE 4910-57-P
[[Page 53751]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN12SE06.020
BILLING CODE 4910-57-C
[[Page 53752]]
Appendix B--Proposed Certificate of Compliance
Certificate of Compliance
Effective as of the date hereof, the undersigned hereby
certifies and covenants to the Federal Transit Administration
(``FTA'') as follows:
1. Title. Subject to the obligations and conditions set forth in
49 CFR 18.31, as amended, title to real property acquired under a
grant or subgrant for FTA Project Number----, [insert project title
here] (the ``Project''), shall vest in the undersigned or subgrantee
thereof (collectively or individually, as the case may be, the
``Grantee'').
2. Use. Except as otherwise provided by Federal statutes, real
property shall only be used for the originally authorized purposes
(which may include Joint Development purposes that generate program
income, both during and after the award period and used to support
public transportation activities) as long as needed for such
purposes, and that the Grantee shall not dispose of or encumber its
title or other interests.
3. Disposition. When real property acquired with funds provided
by FTA for the Project is no longer needed for the purpose
originally authorized by FTA, the Grantee shall request disposition
instructions from FTA and shall agree that, unless otherwise
authorized by FTA, such disposition shall be made in accordance with
applicable law, including without limitation 49 U.S.C. 5334(h) and
49 CFR 18.31.
4. Federal Interest. The Federal Government retains a Federal
interest in any real property, equipment, and supplies financed with
Federal assistance (``Project Property'') until, and to the extent
that, the Federal Government relinquishes its Federal interest in
such Project Property.
5. Incidental Use. Any incidental use of Project Property, as
determined by FTA, shall not exceed that permitted under applicable
Federal laws, regulations, and directives, including the
requirements of FTA's Master Agreement.
6. Encumbrance of Project Property. The Grantee covenants to FTA
as follows:
a. Written Transactions. The Grantee agrees that it will not
execute any transfer of title to the Project Property or enter into
an instrument legally binding on the Grantee that would encumber
Federal Interest in the Project Property.
b. Oral Transactions. The Grantee agrees that it will not
obligate itself in any manner to any third party with respect to
Project Property.
7. Notice to Joint Development Partner. The undersigned has
delivered to the Joint Development Partner a duly executed copy of
this certificate, dated as of the date hereof, receipt of which has
been acknowledged by the Joint Development Partner in writing to the
undersigned on or before the date of execution of the Joint
Development Agreement.
8. Other Actions. The Grantee (a) agrees that it will not take
any action that encumbers the Federal Interest in the Project
Property and (b) hereby affirms that each of its representations and
warranties set forth in the Master Agreement is true and correct in
all material respects as of the date hereof. The Grantee agrees that
nothing herein shall supersede, amend, modify or otherwise affect
the provisions, terms or conditions set forth in the Master
Agreement.
9. Definitions.
a. ``FTA'' shall have the meaning provided in the preamble of
this certificate.
b. ``Grantee'' shall have the meaning provided in section (2) of
this certificate.
c. ``Joint Development'' shall mean a capital project as defined
by 49 U.S.C. 5302(a)(1)(G) that is eligible for funding pursuant to
the terms and conditions set forth in [insert new Joint Development
circular number].
d. ``Joint Development Partner'' shall mean [insert definition].
e. ``Master Agreement'' shall mean that certain Master Agreement
by and between FTA and the Grantee, as authorized by 49 U.S.C. 53,
Title 23, United States Code (Highways), the National Capital
Transportation Act of 1969, as amended, the Safe, Accountable,
Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users,
the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century, as amended, or
other Federal laws that FTA administers, as the same may be lawfully
revised, superseded or supplemented from time to time.
f. ``Project'' shall have the meaning provided in section (1) of
this certificate.
g. ``Project Property'' shall have the meaning provided in
section (4) of this certificate.
10. No Estoppel. The undersigned agrees that acceptance of this
Certificate of Compliance by FTA shall not estop the Federal
government from initiating or conducting, and shall not be used as a
defense for, any investigation, audit or inquiry by the Federal
government following approval by FTA of the project.
Issued on the 5th day of September, 2006.
James S. Simpson,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. E6-15022 Filed 9-11-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-57-P