Amendment to the Hass Avocado Promotion, Research, and Information Order: Adjust Representation on the Hass Avocado Board, 52285-52287 [06-7372]
Download as PDF
52285
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 71, No. 171
Tuesday, September 5, 2006
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
telephone (202) 720–9915, fax (202)
205–2800, or e-mail
Marlene.Betts@usda.gov.
The Hass
Avocado Promotion, Research, and
Consumer Information Order (Order) is
issued under the Hass Avocado
Promotion, Research, and Information
Act of 2000 (Act) [7 U.S.C. 7801–7813].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Order 12866
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
7 CFR Part 1219
The Office of Management and Budget
has waived the review process required
by Executive Order 12866 for this
action.
[Doc. No. FV–06–701–FR]
Executive Order 12988
Amendment to the Hass Avocado
Promotion, Research, and Information
Order: Adjust Representation on the
Hass Avocado Board
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. This rule is not intended to
have retroactive effect. Section 1212(c)
of the Hass Avocado Promotion,
Research, and Information Act of 2000
states that the Act may not be construed
to preempt or supersede any other
program relating to Hass avocado
promotion, research, industry
information, and consumer information
organized and operated under the laws
of the United States or of a State.
Under Section 1207(a)(1) of the Hass
Avocado Promotion, Research, and
Information Act of 2000, a person
subject to the Order may file a petition
with the Department of Agriculture
(USDA) stating that the Order, any
provision for the Order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the Order, is not established in
accordance with law, and requesting a
modification of the Order or an
exemption from the Order. Any petition
filed challenging the Order, any
provision of the Order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the Order,
shall be filed within two years after the
effective date of the Order, provision, or
obligation subject to challenge in the
petition. The petitioner will have the
opportunity for a hearing on the
petition. Thereafter, USDA will issue a
ruling on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United
States in any district in which the
petitioner resides or conducts business
shall have the jurisdiction to review a
final ruling on the petition, if the
petitioner files a complaint for that
purpose not later that 20 days after the
date of the entry of USDA’s final ruling.
Agricultural Marketing Service
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
erjones on PRODPC60 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This rule adjusts the number
of members on the Hass Avocado Board
(Board) to reflect changes in the
production of domestic Hass avocados
in the United States and the volume of
imported Hass avocados into the U.S.
over the 2003, 2004, and 2005 calendar
years, which are three years after
assessments commenced. These
adjustments are required by the Hass
Avocado Promotion, Research, and
Information Order (Order). The results
of the adjustment is one additional
importer member and alternate and one
less domestic producer member and
alternate of Hass avocados that are
subject to assessments. As a result of
these changes, the Board membership
will be composed of seven domestic
producer members and alternates and
five importer members and alternates.
Currently, the Board is composed of
eight domestic producer members and
alternates, and four importer members
and alternates. These changes to the
Board are effective for the Secretary of
Agriculture’s 2006 appointments.
EFFECTIVE DATE: October 5, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Marlene M. Betts, Research and
Promotion Branch, Fruit and Vegetable
Programs, Agricultural Marketing
Service, USDA, Stop 0244, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW., Room
2535–S, Washington, DC 20250–0244,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:26 Sep 01, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Regulatory Flexibility Act and
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) [5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.], the Agricultural Marketing Service
has considered the economic impact of
this action on small entities and has
certified that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
businesses subject to such actions so
that small businesses will not be
disproportionately burdened. In
accordance with the provision of the
Act and section 1219.30 of the Order,
this rule merely adjusts representation
on the Board to reflect changes in
production levels of domestic Hass
avocados in the U.S. and the volume of
imported Hass avocados into the U.S.
over the 2003, 2004, and 2005 calendar
year. There are approximately 20,000
producers and 200 importers, covered
by the Hass avocado program. The
Small Business Administration [13 CFR
121.201] defines small agricultural
producers as those having annual
receipts of $750,000 or less annually
and small agricultural service firms as
those having annual receipts of $6.5
million or less. Importers would be
considered agricultural service firms.
Using these criteria, most producers and
importers covered by the program
would be considered small businesses
under the criteria established by the
Small Business Administration (13 CFR
121.201).
At its January 2006 meeting, the
Board reviewed the production for the
domestic Hass avocados in the U.S. and
the volume of imported Hass avocados
over the 2003, 2004, and 2005 calendar
years and decided to recommend one
additional member and alternate
member for importers and one less
member and alternate for domestic
producers of Hass avocados that are
subject to the assessment. The total
average combined volume of Hass
avocados produced in the U.S. and
imported into the U.S. for the 2003,
2004, and 2005 calendar years was 712
million pounds. Of this amount, 53.2
percent was Hass avocados imported
into the U.S. and 46.8 percent was
domestically produced Hass avocados.
Representation on the Board (12) is
comprised of: (1) Seven producer
members and their alternates; (2) two
E:\FR\FM\05SER1.SGM
05SER1
52286
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 171 / Tuesday, September 5, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
erjones on PRODPC60 with RULES
importer members and their alternates;
and, (3) three producer or importer
members and their alternates, also
known as the ‘‘swing seats.’’ Under the
Act and Order the three ‘‘swing seats’’
are allocated so as to reflect as nearly as
possible the proportion of domestic
production and imports supplying the
U.S. market. The proportion is based on
the average volume of domestic
production and the average volume of
imports into the U.S. market over the
previous three years. With regard to
alternatives, the adjustments to the three
‘‘swing seats’’ in this rule are in
conformance with the provisions of the
Act and Order. This rule merely adjusts
representation on the Board to provide
the ‘‘swing seats’’ with three importer
members and imposes no new burden
on the industry.
There are no relevant Federal rules
that duplicate, overlap, or conflict with
this rule.
In accordance with the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB)
regulation [5 CFR part 1320] which
implements the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 [44 U.S.C. Chapter 35], the
information collection and
recordkeeping requirements that are
imposed by the Order have been
approved previously under OMB
control number 0581–0093. This rule
does not result in a change to the
information collection and
recordkeeping requirements previously
approved.
Background
The Hass Avocado Promotion,
Research, and Information Act of 2000
(7 U.S.C. 7801–7813) provides for the
establishment of a coordinated program
of promotion, research, industry
information, and consumer information
designed to strengthen the avocado
industry’s position in the domestic
marketplace, and to maintain, develop,
and expand markets and uses for Hass
avocados in the domestic marketplace.
The program is financed by an
assessment of 2.5 cents per pound on
fresh Hass avocados produced and
handled in the U.S. and on fresh Hass
avocados imported into the U.S. Also
under the Act, the Secretary may issue
regulations. Pursuant to the Act, an
Order was made effective September 9,
2002. The Order established a Board of
12 members and alternates. For
purposes of establishing the Board,
seven members and their alternates
shall be producers of Hass avocados;
two members and their alternates shall
be importers of Hass avocados; and,
three members and their alternates shall
be producers or importers of Hass
avocados, also known as the ‘‘swing
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:26 Sep 01, 2006
Jkt 208001
seats.’’ The three ‘‘swing seats’’ are
allocated so as to reflect as nearly as
possible the proportion of domestic
production and imports supplying the
U.S. market. Such proportion is
determined using the average volume of
domestic production and the average
volume of imports into the U.S. market
over the previous three years.
Section 1219.30(c) of the Order
provides that at the end of three years
after assessment funds began, the Board
shall review the production of domestic
Hass avocados in the U.S. and the
volume of imported Hass avocados on
the basis of the amount of assessments
collected from producers and importers
over the immediately preceding threeyear period. The Board may recommend
to the Secretary modification to the
Board based on proportion of domestic
production and imports supplying the
U.S. market.
At its January 2006 meeting, the
Board reviewed the production for the
domestic Hass avocados in the U.S. and
the volume of imported Hass avocados
over the 2003, 2004, and 2005 calendar
years and decided to recommended one
additional member and alternate
member for importers and one less
member and alternate for domestic
producers of Hass avocados that are
subject to the assessment. The total
average combined volume of Hass
avocados produced in the U.S. and
imported into the U.S. for the 2003,
2004, and 2005 calendar years was 712
million pounds. Of this amount, 53.2
percent was Hass avocados imported
into the U.S. and 46.8 percent was
domestically produced Hass avocados.
Representation on the Board (12) is
comprised of: (1) Seven producer
members and their alternates; (2) two
importer members and their alternates;
and, (3) three producer or importer
members and their alternates, also
known as the ‘‘swing seats.’’ Under the
Act and Order the three ‘‘swing seats’’
are allocated so as to reflect as nearly as
possible the proportion of domestic
production and imports supplying the
U.S. market. The proportion is based on
the average volume of domestic
production and the average volume of
imports into the U.S. market over the
previous three years.
The current 12 member Board is
composed of eight producer members
and alternates, and four importer
members and alternates; meaning (1)
seven producer members and alternates;
(2) two importer members and
alternates; and, (3) of the three ‘‘swing
seats’’ two are currently importer
member and alternate seats and one is
a producer member and alternate seat.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
On May 9, 2006, an interim final rule
concerning this action was published in
the Federal Register. Copies of the rule
were made available through the
Internet by USDA and the Office of the
Federal Register. The rule provided a
60-day comment period which ended
July 10, 2006. Two comments were
received, both of which were favorable.
The commenters’ support the rule that
adjusts the number of producer and
importer members on the Hass Avocado
Board. The commenters’ support the
adjustment to the Board that would give
the three ‘‘swing seats’’ to the importers.
In addition, the commenters state that it
is important that the change be made as
part of the Secretary’s 2006
appointments so that members currently
serving could complete their terms of
office and easily seat the new members
at the start of the Board’s fiscal year.
Both commenters support the
implementation of the interim final rule
as it was presented. However, one
commenter was of the view that under
the Act and Order, the Board had
authority to conduct the administrative
process leading to recommending
candidates to the Secretary and that
rulemaking was unnecessary to
complete the process to adjust
representation on the Board. We
disagree. The Department properly
initiated rulemaking to adjust
representation on the Board and this
action completes the rulemaking
process.
After consideration of all relevant
material presented including comments,
the Board’s recommendation, and other
information, the interim final rule, as
published in the Federal Register (71
FR 26821) on May 9, 2006, is adopted
as a final rule.
Representation on the Board based on
the changes in the production of
domestic Hass avocados and the volume
of imported Hass avocados into the U.S.
over the 2003, 2004, and 2005 calendar
year results in one additional importer
member and alternate and one less
producer member and alternate.
Accordingly, all of the ‘‘swing seats’’ are
importers’ therefore, the 12-member
Board will be comprised of seven
producer members and alternates and
five importer members and alternates
effective for the Secretary of
Agriculture’s 2006 appointments.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1219
Administrative practice and
procedure, Advertising, Consumer
information, Hass avocados, Hass
avocado promotion, Marketing
agreements, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
E:\FR\FM\05SER1.SGM
05SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 171 / Tuesday, September 5, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, under the authority of 7
U.S.C. 7801–7813 the amendments to 7
CFR part 1219 published at 71 FR
26821, May 9, 2006, are adopted as final
without change.
I
Dated: August 24, 2006.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 06–7372 Filed 9–1–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Parts 91, 121, 125 and 135
[Docket No. 2005–23462]
RIN 2120–AI64
Thermal/Acoustic Insulation Installed
on Transport Category Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Disposition of comments on
final rule.
erjones on PRODPC60 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: On December 30, 2005, the
FAA published a final rule; request for
comments (Amendment Nos. 91–290,
121–320, 125–50, and 135–103), on the
requirements for thermal/acoustic
insulation flammability (70 FR 77748).
We sought public comments on those
amendments, but they became effective
on February 28, 2006. This action
responds to the comments received on
that final rule; request for comments.
ADDRESSES: You may review the public
docket (Docket No. 2005–23462) in the
Docket Management Facility between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The
Docket Management Facility is on the
plaza level of the Nassif Building at the
Department of Transportation, Room
Plaza 401, 400 Seventh Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20590–0001. Also you
may review the public docket on the
Internet at https://dms.dot.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff
Gardlin, Airframe and Cabin Safety
Branch (ANM–115), Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service, Federal Aviation
Administration, 1601 Lind Avenue,
SW., Renton, Washington 98055–4056;
telephone (425) 227–2136, facsimile
(425) 227–1149, e-mail:
jeff.gardlin@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:26 Sep 01, 2006
Jkt 208001
Background
On September 20, 2000, the FAA
published Notice No. 00–09, which
proposed to upgrade the flammability
and fire protection standards for
thermal/acoustic insulation installed in
transport category airplanes (65 FR
56992). The notice contained a
provision that would require thermal/
acoustic insulation to comply with the
proposed new standards when used as
replacements on airplanes already in
service, as well as requirements about
newly manufactured airplanes. The
requirement was adopted in the final
rule, published on July 31, 2003, in
§§ 91.613(b)(1), 121.312(e)(1),
125.113(c)(1), and 135.170(c)(1) (68 FR
45046). These rules required operators
to use replacement insulation materials
meeting the requirements of § 25.856
after September 2, 2005.
For reasons discussed in the
preamble, we published Amendment
Nos. 91–290, 121–320, 125–50, and
135–103 on December 30, 2005, to
refocus the requirements for
replacement materials (70 FR 77748).
Because of these amendments, only
certain types of thermal/acoustic
insulation are required to comply with
the upgraded standards when replaced.
As noted in the preamble, the revised
requirements align the regulatory
language more closely with the intent of
the provision.
Although the immediately adopted
rule revised the replacement provisions,
we requested comments on the
provisions. Six commenters responded
to the request for comments.
Discussion of Comments
The General Aviation Manufacturers
Association and Continental Airlines
support the rule as written. AMIS
International provided comments that
were not directed at the substance of the
amendments. Airbus, Boeing and the
National Air Transport Association
(NATA) support the rule, but suggest
further changes as well.
Boeing suggests we further amend the
rules so the requirements of 14 CFR part
25 match the revised requirements for
replacement materials. The FAA does
not agree. The intent of the part 25 rule
is to upgrade the standards for thermal/
acoustic insulation in the fuselage of
transport category airplanes. Advisory
Circular 25.856–1, Thermal/Acoustic
Insulation Flame Propagation Test
Method Details, dated 6/24/05, provides
discussion and methods of compliance
for specific installations that simplify
the compliance demonstration.
Conversely, the provision on
replacement thermal/acoustic insulation
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
52287
is intended to address insulation that is
often replaced. The objective of that
requirement is to encourage production
only of materials that comply with the
new standards, as well as to purge
inventories of materials that do not
comply. Thus, the two provisions are
complementary, and need not be the
same. Since manufacturers are
producing airplanes that comply with
the existing requirements of § 25.856(a),
the requirements are clearly feasible.
Changing part 25 as requested would
reduce the level of safety already
achieved.
Boeing further suggests the definition
of insulation provided in the final rule
be included in Advisory Circular
25.856–1 and possibly § 25.856(a) to be
consistent. The FAA does not agree.
Amendment 91–290 et al., does not
‘‘define’’ insulation. These amendments
modify the applicability of requirements
for insulation. That is, they specify the
conditions under which we require
compliance with § 25.856(a) for
replacement thermal/acoustic
insulation. Thus, we require no changes
to the advisory circular since it pertains
to compliance with § 25.856(a), and
does not apply if compliance with
§ 25.856(a) is not required.
Boeing also suggests we change the
rule to exclude blanket type insulation
installed inside galley inserts or other
components. These components can be
replaced and it is not obvious the
replacement includes insulation. The
FAA does not agree. Advisory Circular
25.856–1 already addresses these
components, and describes a means of
compliance that does not necessitate
testing in most cases. Since compliant
materials are available for those cases
when testing is required, the rule should
remain as is.
Airbus similarly suggests we change
the replacement provision to exclude
blanket type insulation when bonded to
interior panels, such as sidewalls or
floors. Airbus notes that these are
infrequently replaced and it would be
difficult to change the insulation. The
FAA does not agree. Although the
insulation is bonded to these panels, if
it is in blanket form, there are available
substitutes that comply. As long as
operators are aware of the particular
parts that are affected, they can
accommodate the upgraded materials
into their maintenance plan.
Airbus also notes that it used many
resources to modify its affected parts
and drawings before the compliance
date, and now some of that effort
appears wasted. Because the issues with
replacement insulation were identified
very late in the process, the FAA
acknowledges that Airbus’ proactive
E:\FR\FM\05SER1.SGM
05SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 171 (Tuesday, September 5, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 52285-52287]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7372]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 171 / Tuesday, September 5, 2006 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 52285]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 1219
[Doc. No. FV-06-701-FR]
Amendment to the Hass Avocado Promotion, Research, and
Information Order: Adjust Representation on the Hass Avocado Board
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule adjusts the number of members on the Hass Avocado
Board (Board) to reflect changes in the production of domestic Hass
avocados in the United States and the volume of imported Hass avocados
into the U.S. over the 2003, 2004, and 2005 calendar years, which are
three years after assessments commenced. These adjustments are required
by the Hass Avocado Promotion, Research, and Information Order (Order).
The results of the adjustment is one additional importer member and
alternate and one less domestic producer member and alternate of Hass
avocados that are subject to assessments. As a result of these changes,
the Board membership will be composed of seven domestic producer
members and alternates and five importer members and alternates.
Currently, the Board is composed of eight domestic producer members and
alternates, and four importer members and alternates. These changes to
the Board are effective for the Secretary of Agriculture's 2006
appointments.
EFFECTIVE DATE: October 5, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marlene M. Betts, Research and
Promotion Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, Agricultural Marketing
Service, USDA, Stop 0244, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Room 2535-S,
Washington, DC 20250-0244, telephone (202) 720-9915, fax (202) 205-
2800, or e-mail Marlene.Betts@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Hass Avocado Promotion, Research, and
Consumer Information Order (Order) is issued under the Hass Avocado
Promotion, Research, and Information Act of 2000 (Act) [7 U.S.C. 7801-
7813].
Executive Order 12866
The Office of Management and Budget has waived the review process
required by Executive Order 12866 for this action.
Executive Order 12988
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This rule is not intended to have retroactive effect.
Section 1212(c) of the Hass Avocado Promotion, Research, and
Information Act of 2000 states that the Act may not be construed to
preempt or supersede any other program relating to Hass avocado
promotion, research, industry information, and consumer information
organized and operated under the laws of the United States or of a
State.
Under Section 1207(a)(1) of the Hass Avocado Promotion, Research,
and Information Act of 2000, a person subject to the Order may file a
petition with the Department of Agriculture (USDA) stating that the
Order, any provision for the Order, or any obligation imposed in
connection with the Order, is not established in accordance with law,
and requesting a modification of the Order or an exemption from the
Order. Any petition filed challenging the Order, any provision of the
Order, or any obligation imposed in connection with the Order, shall be
filed within two years after the effective date of the Order,
provision, or obligation subject to challenge in the petition. The
petitioner will have the opportunity for a hearing on the petition.
Thereafter, USDA will issue a ruling on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United States in any district in which
the petitioner resides or conducts business shall have the jurisdiction
to review a final ruling on the petition, if the petitioner files a
complaint for that purpose not later that 20 days after the date of the
entry of USDA's final ruling.
Regulatory Flexibility Act and Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) [5 U.S.C.
601 et seq.], the Agricultural Marketing Service has considered the
economic impact of this action on small entities and has certified that
this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory
actions to the scale of businesses subject to such actions so that
small businesses will not be disproportionately burdened. In accordance
with the provision of the Act and section 1219.30 of the Order, this
rule merely adjusts representation on the Board to reflect changes in
production levels of domestic Hass avocados in the U.S. and the volume
of imported Hass avocados into the U.S. over the 2003, 2004, and 2005
calendar year. There are approximately 20,000 producers and 200
importers, covered by the Hass avocado program. The Small Business
Administration [13 CFR 121.201] defines small agricultural producers as
those having annual receipts of $750,000 or less annually and small
agricultural service firms as those having annual receipts of $6.5
million or less. Importers would be considered agricultural service
firms. Using these criteria, most producers and importers covered by
the program would be considered small businesses under the criteria
established by the Small Business Administration (13 CFR 121.201).
At its January 2006 meeting, the Board reviewed the production for
the domestic Hass avocados in the U.S. and the volume of imported Hass
avocados over the 2003, 2004, and 2005 calendar years and decided to
recommend one additional member and alternate member for importers and
one less member and alternate for domestic producers of Hass avocados
that are subject to the assessment. The total average combined volume
of Hass avocados produced in the U.S. and imported into the U.S. for
the 2003, 2004, and 2005 calendar years was 712 million pounds. Of this
amount, 53.2 percent was Hass avocados imported into the U.S. and 46.8
percent was domestically produced Hass avocados.
Representation on the Board (12) is comprised of: (1) Seven
producer members and their alternates; (2) two
[[Page 52286]]
importer members and their alternates; and, (3) three producer or
importer members and their alternates, also known as the ``swing
seats.'' Under the Act and Order the three ``swing seats'' are
allocated so as to reflect as nearly as possible the proportion of
domestic production and imports supplying the U.S. market. The
proportion is based on the average volume of domestic production and
the average volume of imports into the U.S. market over the previous
three years. With regard to alternatives, the adjustments to the three
``swing seats'' in this rule are in conformance with the provisions of
the Act and Order. This rule merely adjusts representation on the Board
to provide the ``swing seats'' with three importer members and imposes
no new burden on the industry.
There are no relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with this rule.
In accordance with the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
regulation [5 CFR part 1320] which implements the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 [44 U.S.C. Chapter 35], the information collection and
recordkeeping requirements that are imposed by the Order have been
approved previously under OMB control number 0581-0093. This rule does
not result in a change to the information collection and recordkeeping
requirements previously approved.
Background
The Hass Avocado Promotion, Research, and Information Act of 2000
(7 U.S.C. 7801-7813) provides for the establishment of a coordinated
program of promotion, research, industry information, and consumer
information designed to strengthen the avocado industry's position in
the domestic marketplace, and to maintain, develop, and expand markets
and uses for Hass avocados in the domestic marketplace. The program is
financed by an assessment of 2.5 cents per pound on fresh Hass avocados
produced and handled in the U.S. and on fresh Hass avocados imported
into the U.S. Also under the Act, the Secretary may issue regulations.
Pursuant to the Act, an Order was made effective September 9, 2002. The
Order established a Board of 12 members and alternates. For purposes of
establishing the Board, seven members and their alternates shall be
producers of Hass avocados; two members and their alternates shall be
importers of Hass avocados; and, three members and their alternates
shall be producers or importers of Hass avocados, also known as the
``swing seats.'' The three ``swing seats'' are allocated so as to
reflect as nearly as possible the proportion of domestic production and
imports supplying the U.S. market. Such proportion is determined using
the average volume of domestic production and the average volume of
imports into the U.S. market over the previous three years.
Section 1219.30(c) of the Order provides that at the end of three
years after assessment funds began, the Board shall review the
production of domestic Hass avocados in the U.S. and the volume of
imported Hass avocados on the basis of the amount of assessments
collected from producers and importers over the immediately preceding
three-year period. The Board may recommend to the Secretary
modification to the Board based on proportion of domestic production
and imports supplying the U.S. market.
At its January 2006 meeting, the Board reviewed the production for
the domestic Hass avocados in the U.S. and the volume of imported Hass
avocados over the 2003, 2004, and 2005 calendar years and decided to
recommended one additional member and alternate member for importers
and one less member and alternate for domestic producers of Hass
avocados that are subject to the assessment. The total average combined
volume of Hass avocados produced in the U.S. and imported into the U.S.
for the 2003, 2004, and 2005 calendar years was 712 million pounds. Of
this amount, 53.2 percent was Hass avocados imported into the U.S. and
46.8 percent was domestically produced Hass avocados.
Representation on the Board (12) is comprised of: (1) Seven
producer members and their alternates; (2) two importer members and
their alternates; and, (3) three producer or importer members and their
alternates, also known as the ``swing seats.'' Under the Act and Order
the three ``swing seats'' are allocated so as to reflect as nearly as
possible the proportion of domestic production and imports supplying
the U.S. market. The proportion is based on the average volume of
domestic production and the average volume of imports into the U.S.
market over the previous three years.
The current 12 member Board is composed of eight producer members
and alternates, and four importer members and alternates; meaning (1)
seven producer members and alternates; (2) two importer members and
alternates; and, (3) of the three ``swing seats'' two are currently
importer member and alternate seats and one is a producer member and
alternate seat.
On May 9, 2006, an interim final rule concerning this action was
published in the Federal Register. Copies of the rule were made
available through the Internet by USDA and the Office of the Federal
Register. The rule provided a 60-day comment period which ended July
10, 2006. Two comments were received, both of which were favorable.
The commenters' support the rule that adjusts the number of
producer and importer members on the Hass Avocado Board. The
commenters' support the adjustment to the Board that would give the
three ``swing seats'' to the importers. In addition, the commenters
state that it is important that the change be made as part of the
Secretary's 2006 appointments so that members currently serving could
complete their terms of office and easily seat the new members at the
start of the Board's fiscal year. Both commenters support the
implementation of the interim final rule as it was presented. However,
one commenter was of the view that under the Act and Order, the Board
had authority to conduct the administrative process leading to
recommending candidates to the Secretary and that rulemaking was
unnecessary to complete the process to adjust representation on the
Board. We disagree. The Department properly initiated rulemaking to
adjust representation on the Board and this action completes the
rulemaking process.
After consideration of all relevant material presented including
comments, the Board's recommendation, and other information, the
interim final rule, as published in the Federal Register (71 FR 26821)
on May 9, 2006, is adopted as a final rule.
Representation on the Board based on the changes in the production
of domestic Hass avocados and the volume of imported Hass avocados into
the U.S. over the 2003, 2004, and 2005 calendar year results in one
additional importer member and alternate and one less producer member
and alternate. Accordingly, all of the ``swing seats'' are importers'
therefore, the 12-member Board will be comprised of seven producer
members and alternates and five importer members and alternates
effective for the Secretary of Agriculture's 2006 appointments.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1219
Administrative practice and procedure, Advertising, Consumer
information, Hass avocados, Hass avocado promotion, Marketing
agreements, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
[[Page 52287]]
0
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, under the authority of 7
U.S.C. 7801-7813 the amendments to 7 CFR part 1219 published at 71 FR
26821, May 9, 2006, are adopted as final without change.
Dated: August 24, 2006.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 06-7372 Filed 9-1-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P