Pistachios Grown in California; Modification of Small Handler Exemption, 51985-51988 [06-7376]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 170 / Friday, September 1, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
public meetings and is similar to other
assessment rate actions issued in past
years. Also, a 10-day comment period
was provided for in the proposed rule
and the comment received has been
considered in reaching a final decision
on this matter.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
List of Subjects
Pistachios Grown in California;
Modification of Small Handler
Exemption
7 CFR Part 916
Marketing agreements, Nectarines,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR parts 916 and 917 are
amended as follows:
I 1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
parts 916 and 917 continues to read as
follows:
I
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
PART 916—NECTARINES GROWN IN
CALIFORNIA
2. Section 916.234 is revised to read
as follows:
I
Assessment rate.
On and after March 1, 2006, an
assessment rate of $0.21 per 25-pound
container or container equivalent of
nectarines is established for California
nectarines.
3. Section 917.258 is revised to read
as follows:
I
§ 917.258
Assessment rate.
On and after March 1, 2006, an
assessment rate of $0.21 per 25-pound
container or container equivalent of
peaches is established for California
peaches.
Dated: August 28, 2006.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 06–7377 Filed 8–31–06; 8:45 am]
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:15 Aug 31, 2006
[Docket No. FV06–983–2 FR]
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
Marketing agreements, Peaches, Pears,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
PART 917—PEACHES GROWN IN
CALIFORNIA
7 CFR Part 983
AGENCY:
7 CFR Part 917
§ 916.234
Agricultural Marketing Service
SUMMARY: This rule modifies the current
handling requirements prescribed under
the California pistachio marketing order
(order). The order regulates the handling
of pistachios grown in California and is
administered locally by the
Administrative Committee for
Pistachios (committee). The
modification increases the exemption
threshold for pistachio handlers who
handle small amounts of pistachios,
primarily for home or personal use.
Currently, handlers of 1,000 pounds or
less of hulled and dried pistachios
(assessed weight) are exempt from most
handling requirements. Under this
modification, the exemption is extended
to handlers of less than 5,000 pounds of
assessed weight pistachios. This change
is not expected to have a significant
impact on the overall quality of
California pistachios found in the
marketplace.
This final rule becomes
effective September 5, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Terry Vawter, Senior Marketing
Specialist, or Kurt J. Kimmel, Regional
Manager, California Marketing Field
Office, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487–
5901, Fax: (559) 487–5906; E-mail:
Terry.Vawter@usda.gov or
Kurt.Kimmel@usda.gov.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or E-mail:
Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
EFFECTIVE DATE:
This final
rule is issued under Marketing Order
No. 983 (7 CFR part 983), regulating the
handling of pistachios grown in
California, hereinafter referred to as the
‘‘order.’’ The order is effective under the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
51985
of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674),
hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
This final rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This rule is not intended
to have retroactive effect. This final rule
will not preempt any State or local laws,
regulations, or policies, unless they
present an irreconcilable conflict with
this rule.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom. A handler
is afforded the opportunity for a hearing
on the petition. After the hearing USDA
would rule on the petition. The Act
provides that the district court of the
United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his
or her principal place of business, has
jurisdiction to review USDA’s ruling on
the petition, provided an action is filed
not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This final rule modifies the current
handling requirements prescribed under
the California pistachio order. This
modification increases the exemption
threshold for pistachio handlers who
handle small amounts of pistachios
from the current level of 1,000 pounds
or less of assessed weight pistachios to
less than 5,000 pounds of assessed
weight pistachios. Under this change,
pistachio handlers who handle less than
5,000 pounds of assessed weight
pistachios are exempt from most
handling requirements established
under the order, including those relating
to aflatoxin testing, minimum quality
inspection, and payment of assessments.
Previous rules, one section of the
order, and two sections of the rules and
regulations refer to ‘‘dried pounds’’ or
‘‘dried weight’’ of pistachios. While
these terms are not defined in the order,
they are generally interchangeable with
the defined term ‘‘assessed weight.’’ For
the purposes of this final rule, the term
‘‘assessed weight’’ will be used.
Section 983.70 of the pistachio order
currently exempts any handler who
handles 1,000 pounds or less of assessed
weight pistachios in any production
year from the requirements of §§ 983.38
through 983.45 and § 983.53 of the
order. A ‘‘production year’’ begins on
E:\FR\FM\01SER1.SGM
01SER1
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
51986
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 170 / Friday, September 1, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
September 1 and ends the following
August 31.
Section 983.38 of the order establishes
a maximum aflatoxin level and the
aflatoxin testing protocol, among other
things.
Section 983.39 of the order establishes
minimum quality levels in terms of
maximum defects and minimum sizes.
Section 983.40 of the order establishes
procedures for reworking pistachios that
fail to meet the requirements prescribed
in §§ 983.38 and 983.39.
Section 983.41 of the pistachio order
authorizes alternative aflatoxin testing
methods for handlers handling less than
1 million pounds of assessed weight
pistachios per production year, and
authorizes the committee to grant such
handlers exemptions from minimum
quality testing requirements.
Section 983.42 of the order permits
commingling of inspected and certified
lots with other inspected and certified
lots.
Section 983.43 of the order authorizes
rules and regulations to establish
conditions under which pistachios
would be subject to reinspection.
Under § 983.44 of the order, all
pistachios required to be inspected and
certified may be subject to container
marking or other identification
requirements.
Section 983.45 of the order requires
the committee (with USDA’s approval)
to establish reporting and disposition
procedures for substandard pistachios
(those not meeting aflatoxin and
minimum quality requirements).
Finally, § 983.53 of the order
authorizes handler assessment to defray
program administrative costs.
The committee met on March 1, 2006,
and unanimously recommended
increasing the current handler
exemption from including handlers who
handle 1,000 pounds or less of assessed
weight pistachios to handlers who
handle less than 5,000 pounds of
assessed weight pistachios. This action
is authorized under § 983.70 of the
order, and will be implemented by
adding a new section in the marketing
order’s rules and regulations (§ 983.170
Handler exemption). This rule also
makes conforming changes to the
order’s rules and regulations to reflect
the change in the exemption level.
Specifically, the new § 983.170
exempts handlers who handle less than
5,000 pounds of assessed weight
pistachios in a production year from the
requirements of §§ 983.38 through
983.45 and § 983.53 of the order.
In addition, conforming changes are
necessary in § 983.143, paragraph (b)(2),
as well as in § 983.147, paragraphs (c)
and (g), to clarify that the handling
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:15 Aug 31, 2006
Jkt 208001
exemption applies to handlers of less
than 5,000 pounds of assessed weight
pistachios rather than the currentlyapplicable level of 1,000 pounds or less
of assessed weight pistachios.
The committee estimates that the
amount of pistachios handled by
handlers with less than 5,000 pounds of
assessed weight pistachios is
approximately 48,515 pounds of the
total 283,419,713 pounds handled in the
2005–2006 production year, or less than
0.02 percent of all pistachios handled
that production year. In the committee’s
opinion, quantities of pistachios that are
less than 5,000 pounds are not
commercially-significant and are
unlikely to have an impact in the
marketplace. These pistachios would
likely be sold at local farmers’ markets;
kept for home use; distributed to
friends, neighbors, business associates,
or others; or used for other noncommercial purposes, rather than enter
the conventional channels of trade.
Exempt handlers will continue to file
the required report, the ACP–4, with the
committee by November 15 of each
production year (§ 983.147 Reports).
Also, under the authority contained in
§ 983.50, Random verification audits,
and § 983.51, Verification of reports, the
committee would maintain the right to
spot-check these handlers to ensure
marketing order compliance.
The committee noted that when the
order was promulgated, there was
limited information about pistachio
handlers and the volumes of pistachios
each handled. Thus, the initial order
provided for what was believed to be a
reasonable exemption level of 1,000
pounds or less of assessed weight
pistachios. After operating under the
marketing order regulations for
approximately one year, the committee
believes that the handling exemption
level is too low and recommended this
relaxation.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), the
Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
has considered the economic impact of
this action on small entities.
Accordingly, AMS has prepared this
final regulatory flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order
that small businesses will not be unduly
or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
behalf. Thus, both statutes have small
entity orientation and compatibility.
There are approximately 50 handlers
of California pistachios who are subject
to regulation under the order and about
741 producers of pistachios in the
production area. This final rule results
in about 28 of the current handlers
being exempt from most regulatory
provisions of the order. The number of
known handlers has increased since the
committee began operation because they
now have the authority under the order
to gather information about handlers.
The Small Business Administration
(SBA) (13 CFR 121.201) defines small
agricultural service firms as those
having annual receipts of less than
$6,500,000 and defines small
agricultural producers as those having
annual receipts of less than $750,000.
Thirty-three of the 50 handlers subject
to regulation have annual pistachio
receipts of less than $6,500,000. In
addition, 722 of the 741 producers have
annual receipts less than $750,000.
Therefore, a majority of handlers (66
percent) and producers (97 percent) may
be classified as small entities under the
SBA standards.
This final rule increases the current
handling exemption level for handlers
from 1,000 pounds or less of assessed
weight pistachios to less than 5,000
pounds of assessed weight pistachios.
Exempt handlers could handle their
pistachios free from the requirements of
§§ 983.38 through 983.45 and § 983.53
of the order.
The committee met on March 1, 2006,
to consider the handling exemption and
unanimously recommended revising the
level from 1,000 pounds or less of
assessed weight pistachios to less than
5,000 pounds of assessed weight
pistachios handled per production year.
The committee estimates that the total
volume of pistachios handled by the 28
handlers with less than 5,000 pounds of
assessed weight pistachios is
approximately 48,515 pounds of the
total 283,419,713 pounds handled in the
2005–2006 production year. This
represents less than 0.02 percent of all
pistachios handled that production year.
In the committee’s opinion, 5,000
pounds of assessed weight pistachios is
not commercially significant and
represents pistachios that are unlikely to
enter conventional channels of trade.
The committee also noted that when
the order was promulgated, there was
very little information about pistachio
handlers and their relative volumes. The
initial order provided for what was
believed to be a reasonable exemption
level of 1,000 pounds or less of assessed
weight pistachios. The committee now
E:\FR\FM\01SER1.SGM
01SER1
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 170 / Friday, September 1, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
believes that the exemption level is too
low and should be increased.
The committee recommendation on
March 1, 2006, resulted from
deliberations of its Technical
Subcommittee (subcommittee), the
subcommittee charged with compliance,
quality, and inspection issues under the
order. The March 1, 2006, meeting of
the subcommittee was also a public
meeting, where opinions and concerns
of industry representatives were
solicited, openly discussed, and
deliberated at some length.
The subcommittee and committee
discussed alternatives to this
modification, including not making any
changes or modifying the handling
exemption for handlers of less than
10,000 pounds of assessed weight
pistachios. Both the subcommittee and
the committee ultimately determined
that exempting handlers of less than
5,000 pounds of assessed weight
pistachios was prudent because only 14
additional handlers would be affected,
and the total volume of exempted
pistachios handled is relatively
insignificant (less than 0.02 percent of
total production). Thus, exempting an
estimated total of 28 handlers with less
than 5,000 pounds of assessed weight
pistachios would not affect the overall
quality of the pistachios handled as
those pistachios are likely to be for
home or personal use and will not
compete in traditional markets.
Both the subcommittee and the
committee noted that spot-checks on
small handlers would be continued to
ensure compliance with order
requirements.
This action reduces the reporting
requirements for pistachio handlers who
fall below the 5,000 pound threshold.
Such handlers are also exempt from
most of the other regulatory
requirements imposed under the
authority.
As with all Federal marketing order
programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce
information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies.
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the information collection
requirement that is contained in this
rule has been submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
approval.
The AMS is committed to complying
with the E-Government Act, to promote
the use of the Internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:41 Aug 31, 2006
Jkt 208001
In addition, USDA has not identified
any relevant Federal rules that
duplicate, overlap or conflict with this
final rule.
Further, the committee’s meetings are
widely publicized throughout the
pistachio industry and all interested
persons are encouraged to attend the
meetings and participate in the
committee’s deliberations. In this
respect, the March 1, 2006,
subcommittee and committee meetings
regarding the handler exemption were
public meetings and all entities, both
large and small, were encouraged to
express their views on this issue.
The committee recommendation on
March 1, 2006, resulted from
deliberations of its Technical
Subcommittee, which is charged with
compliance, quality, and inspection
issues under the marketing order.
During the subcommittee meeting, the
opinions and concerns of industry
representatives were solicited, openly
discussed, and deliberated at some
length. The subcommittee made its
unanimous recommendation to the
committee, who agreed with the
recommendation unanimously, as well.
A proposed rule concerning this
action was published in the Federal
Register on June 19, 2006 (71 FR 35201).
Copies of the rule were sent to all
committee members and pistachio
handlers. Also, the rule was made
available through the Internet by USDA
and the Office of the Federal Register. A
20-day comment period, ending July 10,
2006, was provided to allow interested
persons to respond to the proposal. No
comments were received in response to
the proposed rule. Accordingly, no
changes will be made to the rule as
proposed.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
fv/moab.html. Any questions about the
compliance guide should be sent to Jay
Guerber at the previously mentioned
address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
After consideration of all relevant
matters presented, including
information and recommendation
submitted by the committee and other
available information, it is hereby found
that this rule, as hereinafter set forth,
will tend to effectuate the declared
policy of the Act.
It is further found that good cause
exists for not postponing the effective
date of this rule until 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register (5
U.S.C. 553) because this rule needs to be
in effect in time for the beginning of the
production year on September 1, 2006.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
51987
Further, handlers are aware of this rule,
which was recommended at a public
meeting. Also, a 20-day comment period
was provided for in the proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 983
Marketing agreements, Pistachios,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 983 is amended as
follows:
I
PART 983—PISTACHIOS GROWN IN
CALIFORNIA
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 983 continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
2. In § 983.143, revise paragraph (b)(2)
to read as follows:
I
§ 983.143
Reinspection.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(2) Handlers exempted from order
requirements under § 983.170 are
exempt from all reinspection
requirements.
3. In § 983.147, paragraphs (c) and (g)
are revised to read as follows:
I
§ 983.147
Reports.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) ACP–4, Federal Marketing Order
Exempt Handler Notification. Each
handler who handles less than 5,000
pounds of assessed weight pistachios in
a production year shall complete and
furnish this report to the committee no
later than November 15 of each
production year.
*
*
*
*
*
(g) Exemptions. Handlers who handle
less than 5,000 pounds of assessed
weight pistachios during any
production year are exempt from filing
all forms, with the exception of the
ACP–4.
*
*
*
*
*
I 4. In part 983, Subpart—
Administrative Rules and Regulations is
amended by adding new § 983.170 to
read as follows:
§ 983.170
Handler exemption.
Pursuant to § 983.70, any handler may
handle pistachios within the production
area free of the requirements in
§§ 983.38 through 983.45 and § 983.53 if
such pistachios are handled in
quantities of less than 5,000 pounds of
assessed weight in any production year.
E:\FR\FM\01SER1.SGM
01SER1
51988
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 170 / Friday, September 1, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
Dated: August 28, 2006.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 06–7376 Filed 8–31–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2006–25703; Directorate
Identifier 2006–SW–20–AD; Amendment 39–
14747; AD 2006–17–51]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Agusta
S.p.A. Model AB139 Helicopters
Federal Aviation
Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
Examining the Docket
This document publishes in
the Federal Register an amendment
adopting Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2006–17–51, sent previously to all
known U.S. owners and operators of
Agusta S.p.A. (Agusta) Model AB139
helicopters by individual letters. This
AD requires, before further flight and at
specified intervals, certain visual
inspections of each tailpipe assembly
for a crack and for overheating. If you
find areas of overheating, this AD also
requires, before further flight, certain
inspections for damage to the
surrounding structure, outside of the
cowling, and inside of each tailpipe
assembly in certain areas. This AD also
requires, before further flight, if you find
a crack, replacing the tailpipe assembly
with an airworthy tailpipe assembly.
This AD is prompted by several reports
of tailpipe assembly cracks. The actions
specified by this AD are intended to
prevent a fire due to the structure in the
cowling area overheating, separation of
a part of a tailpipe assembly, and
subsequent loss of control of the
helicopter.
SUMMARY:
Effective September 18, 2006, to
all persons except those persons to
whom it was made immediately
effective by Emergency AD 2006–17–51,
issued on August 15, 2006, which
contained the requirements of this
amendment.
Comments for inclusion in the Rules
Docket must be received on or before
October 31, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following
addresses to submit comments on this
AD:
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
DATES:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:15 Aug 31, 2006
Jkt 208001
• DOT Docket Web site: Go to https://
dms.dot.gov and follow the instructions
for sending your comments
electronically;
• Government-wide rulemaking Web
site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov
and follow the instructions for sending
your comments electronically;
• Mail: Docket Management Facility;
U.S. Department of Transportation, 400
Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building,
Room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590;
• Fax: (202) 493–2251; or
• Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 on
the plaza level of the Nassif Building,
400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
You may get the service information
identified in this AD from Agusta,
21017 Cascina Costa di Samarate (VA)
Italy, Via Giovanni Agusta 520,
telephone 39 (0331) 229111, fax 39
(0331) 229605–222595.
You may examine the docket that
contains the AD, any comments, and
other information on the Internet at
https://dms.dot.gov, or in person at the
Docket Management System (DMS)
Docket Offices between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The Docket Office
(telephone (800) 647–5227) is located on
the plaza level of the Department of
Transportation Nassif Building at the
street address stated in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in
the AD docket shortly after the DMS
receives them.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ed
Cuevas, Aviation Safety Engineer, FAA,
Rotorcraft Directorate, Safety
Management Group, Fort Worth, Texas
76193–0111, telephone (817) 222–5355,
fax (817) 222–5961.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August
15, 2006, the FAA issued Emergency AD
2006–17–51 for Agusta Model AB139
helicopters, which requires before
further flight and at specified intervals,
certain visual inspections of each
tailpipe assembly for a crack and for
overheating. If you find areas of
overheating, the AD also requires, before
further flight, certain inspections for
damage to the surrounding structure,
outside of the cowling, and inside of
each tailpipe assembly in certain areas
using a flashlight or a mirror and a
flashlight depending on the location.
The AD also requires, before further
flight, if you find a crack, replacing the
tailpipe assembly with an airworthy
tailpipe assembly. That action was
prompted by several reports of tailpipe
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
assembly cracks. This condition, if not
corrected, could result in a fire due to
the structure in the cowling area
overheating, separation of a part of a
tailpipe assembly, and subsequent loss
of control of the helicopter.
The European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA) notified us that an unsafe
condition may exist on Agusta S.p.A.
Model AB139 helicopters. EASA
advises that the field has reported
tailpipe assembly cracks. EASA also
advises that this issue, if not corrected,
could lead to overheating of the
structure in the cowling area or
separation of parts hence endangering
the safety of helicopter flight.
Agusta has issued Bollettino Tecnico
No. 139–069, dated August 11, 2006
(BT), which describes procedures for a
detailed visual inspection for cracks on
the tailpipe. EASA classified this BT as
mandatory and issued Emergency AD
No. 2006–0242–E, dated August 11,
2006.
This helicopter model is
manufactured in Italy and is type
certificated for operation in the United
States under the provisions of 14 CFR
21.29 and the applicable bilateral
agreement. Pursuant to the applicable
bilateral agreement, EASA has kept the
FAA informed of the situation described
above. The FAA has examined the
findings of EASA, reviewed all available
information, and determined that AD
action is necessary for products of this
type design that are certificated for
operation in the United States.
Since the unsafe condition described
is likely to exist or develop on other
Agusta Model AB139 helicopters of the
same type design, the FAA issued
Emergency AD 2006–17–51 to prevent a
fire due to the structure in the cowling
area overheating, separation of a part of
a tailpipe assembly, and subsequent loss
of control of the helicopter. The AD
requires the following:
• Before further flight, and thereafter
at intervals not to exceed 25 hours timein-service, access the rear areas of each
tailpipe assembly by removing the rear
cowling.
• Visually inspect each tailpipe
assembly inside the cowling for a crack.
• Inspect the structure surrounding
each tailpipe assembly for overheating.
If you find areas of overheating, inspect
for damage to the surrounding structure.
• Inspect for overheating in the area
of each tailpipe assembly outside the
cowling. Inspect the internal part of
each tailpipe assembly in the areas
depicted in Areas A, Figure 1, of this
AD for a crack:
Æ Clean the end of each tailpipe
assembly with a cloth. While applying
E:\FR\FM\01SER1.SGM
01SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 170 (Friday, September 1, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 51985-51988]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7376]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 983
[Docket No. FV06-983-2 FR]
Pistachios Grown in California; Modification of Small Handler
Exemption
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule modifies the current handling requirements
prescribed under the California pistachio marketing order (order). The
order regulates the handling of pistachios grown in California and is
administered locally by the Administrative Committee for Pistachios
(committee). The modification increases the exemption threshold for
pistachio handlers who handle small amounts of pistachios, primarily
for home or personal use. Currently, handlers of 1,000 pounds or less
of hulled and dried pistachios (assessed weight) are exempt from most
handling requirements. Under this modification, the exemption is
extended to handlers of less than 5,000 pounds of assessed weight
pistachios. This change is not expected to have a significant impact on
the overall quality of California pistachios found in the marketplace.
EFFECTIVE DATE: This final rule becomes effective September 5, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Terry Vawter, Senior Marketing
Specialist, or Kurt J. Kimmel, Regional Manager, California Marketing
Field Office, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487-5901, Fax: (559)
487-5906; E-mail: Terry.Vawter@usda.gov or Kurt.Kimmel@usda.gov.
Small businesses may request information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202)
720-2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938, or E-mail: Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This final rule is issued under Marketing
Order No. 983 (7 CFR part 983), regulating the handling of pistachios
grown in California, hereinafter referred to as the ``order.'' The
order is effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of
1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter referred to as the
``Act.''
The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order 12866.
This final rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988,
Civil Justice Reform. This rule is not intended to have retroactive
effect. This final rule will not preempt any State or local laws,
regulations, or policies, unless they present an irreconcilable
conflict with this rule.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and
request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. A
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition.
After the hearing USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This final rule modifies the current handling requirements
prescribed under the California pistachio order. This modification
increases the exemption threshold for pistachio handlers who handle
small amounts of pistachios from the current level of 1,000 pounds or
less of assessed weight pistachios to less than 5,000 pounds of
assessed weight pistachios. Under this change, pistachio handlers who
handle less than 5,000 pounds of assessed weight pistachios are exempt
from most handling requirements established under the order, including
those relating to aflatoxin testing, minimum quality inspection, and
payment of assessments.
Previous rules, one section of the order, and two sections of the
rules and regulations refer to ``dried pounds'' or ``dried weight'' of
pistachios. While these terms are not defined in the order, they are
generally interchangeable with the defined term ``assessed weight.''
For the purposes of this final rule, the term ``assessed weight'' will
be used.
Section 983.70 of the pistachio order currently exempts any handler
who handles 1,000 pounds or less of assessed weight pistachios in any
production year from the requirements of Sec. Sec. 983.38 through
983.45 and Sec. 983.53 of the order. A ``production year'' begins on
[[Page 51986]]
September 1 and ends the following August 31.
Section 983.38 of the order establishes a maximum aflatoxin level
and the aflatoxin testing protocol, among other things.
Section 983.39 of the order establishes minimum quality levels in
terms of maximum defects and minimum sizes.
Section 983.40 of the order establishes procedures for reworking
pistachios that fail to meet the requirements prescribed in Sec. Sec.
983.38 and 983.39.
Section 983.41 of the pistachio order authorizes alternative
aflatoxin testing methods for handlers handling less than 1 million
pounds of assessed weight pistachios per production year, and
authorizes the committee to grant such handlers exemptions from minimum
quality testing requirements.
Section 983.42 of the order permits commingling of inspected and
certified lots with other inspected and certified lots.
Section 983.43 of the order authorizes rules and regulations to
establish conditions under which pistachios would be subject to
reinspection.
Under Sec. 983.44 of the order, all pistachios required to be
inspected and certified may be subject to container marking or other
identification requirements.
Section 983.45 of the order requires the committee (with USDA's
approval) to establish reporting and disposition procedures for
substandard pistachios (those not meeting aflatoxin and minimum quality
requirements).
Finally, Sec. 983.53 of the order authorizes handler assessment to
defray program administrative costs.
The committee met on March 1, 2006, and unanimously recommended
increasing the current handler exemption from including handlers who
handle 1,000 pounds or less of assessed weight pistachios to handlers
who handle less than 5,000 pounds of assessed weight pistachios. This
action is authorized under Sec. 983.70 of the order, and will be
implemented by adding a new section in the marketing order's rules and
regulations (Sec. 983.170 Handler exemption). This rule also makes
conforming changes to the order's rules and regulations to reflect the
change in the exemption level.
Specifically, the new Sec. 983.170 exempts handlers who handle
less than 5,000 pounds of assessed weight pistachios in a production
year from the requirements of Sec. Sec. 983.38 through 983.45 and
Sec. 983.53 of the order.
In addition, conforming changes are necessary in Sec. 983.143,
paragraph (b)(2), as well as in Sec. 983.147, paragraphs (c) and (g),
to clarify that the handling exemption applies to handlers of less than
5,000 pounds of assessed weight pistachios rather than the currently-
applicable level of 1,000 pounds or less of assessed weight pistachios.
The committee estimates that the amount of pistachios handled by
handlers with less than 5,000 pounds of assessed weight pistachios is
approximately 48,515 pounds of the total 283,419,713 pounds handled in
the 2005-2006 production year, or less than 0.02 percent of all
pistachios handled that production year. In the committee's opinion,
quantities of pistachios that are less than 5,000 pounds are not
commercially-significant and are unlikely to have an impact in the
marketplace. These pistachios would likely be sold at local farmers'
markets; kept for home use; distributed to friends, neighbors, business
associates, or others; or used for other non-commercial purposes,
rather than enter the conventional channels of trade.
Exempt handlers will continue to file the required report, the ACP-
4, with the committee by November 15 of each production year (Sec.
983.147 Reports). Also, under the authority contained in Sec. 983.50,
Random verification audits, and Sec. 983.51, Verification of reports,
the committee would maintain the right to spot-check these handlers to
ensure marketing order compliance.
The committee noted that when the order was promulgated, there was
limited information about pistachio handlers and the volumes of
pistachios each handled. Thus, the initial order provided for what was
believed to be a reasonable exemption level of 1,000 pounds or less of
assessed weight pistachios. After operating under the marketing order
regulations for approximately one year, the committee believes that the
handling exemption level is too low and recommended this relaxation.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has considered the
economic impact of this action on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has
prepared this final regulatory flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in
that they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf. Thus, both statutes have small
entity orientation and compatibility.
There are approximately 50 handlers of California pistachios who
are subject to regulation under the order and about 741 producers of
pistachios in the production area. This final rule results in about 28
of the current handlers being exempt from most regulatory provisions of
the order. The number of known handlers has increased since the
committee began operation because they now have the authority under the
order to gather information about handlers.
The Small Business Administration (SBA) (13 CFR 121.201) defines
small agricultural service firms as those having annual receipts of
less than $6,500,000 and defines small agricultural producers as those
having annual receipts of less than $750,000. Thirty-three of the 50
handlers subject to regulation have annual pistachio receipts of less
than $6,500,000. In addition, 722 of the 741 producers have annual
receipts less than $750,000. Therefore, a majority of handlers (66
percent) and producers (97 percent) may be classified as small entities
under the SBA standards.
This final rule increases the current handling exemption level for
handlers from 1,000 pounds or less of assessed weight pistachios to
less than 5,000 pounds of assessed weight pistachios. Exempt handlers
could handle their pistachios free from the requirements of Sec. Sec.
983.38 through 983.45 and Sec. 983.53 of the order.
The committee met on March 1, 2006, to consider the handling
exemption and unanimously recommended revising the level from 1,000
pounds or less of assessed weight pistachios to less than 5,000 pounds
of assessed weight pistachios handled per production year.
The committee estimates that the total volume of pistachios handled
by the 28 handlers with less than 5,000 pounds of assessed weight
pistachios is approximately 48,515 pounds of the total 283,419,713
pounds handled in the 2005-2006 production year. This represents less
than 0.02 percent of all pistachios handled that production year. In
the committee's opinion, 5,000 pounds of assessed weight pistachios is
not commercially significant and represents pistachios that are
unlikely to enter conventional channels of trade.
The committee also noted that when the order was promulgated, there
was very little information about pistachio handlers and their relative
volumes. The initial order provided for what was believed to be a
reasonable exemption level of 1,000 pounds or less of assessed weight
pistachios. The committee now
[[Page 51987]]
believes that the exemption level is too low and should be increased.
The committee recommendation on March 1, 2006, resulted from
deliberations of its Technical Subcommittee (subcommittee), the
subcommittee charged with compliance, quality, and inspection issues
under the order. The March 1, 2006, meeting of the subcommittee was
also a public meeting, where opinions and concerns of industry
representatives were solicited, openly discussed, and deliberated at
some length.
The subcommittee and committee discussed alternatives to this
modification, including not making any changes or modifying the
handling exemption for handlers of less than 10,000 pounds of assessed
weight pistachios. Both the subcommittee and the committee ultimately
determined that exempting handlers of less than 5,000 pounds of
assessed weight pistachios was prudent because only 14 additional
handlers would be affected, and the total volume of exempted pistachios
handled is relatively insignificant (less than 0.02 percent of total
production). Thus, exempting an estimated total of 28 handlers with
less than 5,000 pounds of assessed weight pistachios would not affect
the overall quality of the pistachios handled as those pistachios are
likely to be for home or personal use and will not compete in
traditional markets.
Both the subcommittee and the committee noted that spot-checks on
small handlers would be continued to ensure compliance with order
requirements.
This action reduces the reporting requirements for pistachio
handlers who fall below the 5,000 pound threshold. Such handlers are
also exempt from most of the other regulatory requirements imposed
under the authority.
As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public sector agencies.
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the information collection requirement that is contained
in this rule has been submitted to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for approval.
The AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to
promote the use of the Internet and other information technologies to
provide increased opportunities for citizen access to Government
information and services, and for other purposes.
In addition, USDA has not identified any relevant Federal rules
that duplicate, overlap or conflict with this final rule.
Further, the committee's meetings are widely publicized throughout
the pistachio industry and all interested persons are encouraged to
attend the meetings and participate in the committee's deliberations.
In this respect, the March 1, 2006, subcommittee and committee meetings
regarding the handler exemption were public meetings and all entities,
both large and small, were encouraged to express their views on this
issue.
The committee recommendation on March 1, 2006, resulted from
deliberations of its Technical Subcommittee, which is charged with
compliance, quality, and inspection issues under the marketing order.
During the subcommittee meeting, the opinions and concerns of industry
representatives were solicited, openly discussed, and deliberated at
some length. The subcommittee made its unanimous recommendation to the
committee, who agreed with the recommendation unanimously, as well.
A proposed rule concerning this action was published in the Federal
Register on June 19, 2006 (71 FR 35201). Copies of the rule were sent
to all committee members and pistachio handlers. Also, the rule was
made available through the Internet by USDA and the Office of the
Federal Register. A 20-day comment period, ending July 10, 2006, was
provided to allow interested persons to respond to the proposal. No
comments were received in response to the proposed rule. Accordingly,
no changes will be made to the rule as proposed.
A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: http:/
/www.ams.usda.gov/fv/moab.html. Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Jay Guerber at the previously mentioned address
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
After consideration of all relevant matters presented, including
information and recommendation submitted by the committee and other
available information, it is hereby found that this rule, as
hereinafter set forth, will tend to effectuate the declared policy of
the Act.
It is further found that good cause exists for not postponing the
effective date of this rule until 30 days after publication in the
Federal Register (5 U.S.C. 553) because this rule needs to be in effect
in time for the beginning of the production year on September 1, 2006.
Further, handlers are aware of this rule, which was recommended at a
public meeting. Also, a 20-day comment period was provided for in the
proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 983
Marketing agreements, Pistachios, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
0
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 983 is amended as
follows:
PART 983--PISTACHIOS GROWN IN CALIFORNIA
0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 983 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
0
2. In Sec. 983.143, revise paragraph (b)(2) to read as follows:
Sec. 983.143 Reinspection.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(2) Handlers exempted from order requirements under Sec. 983.170
are exempt from all reinspection requirements.
0
3. In Sec. 983.147, paragraphs (c) and (g) are revised to read as
follows:
Sec. 983.147 Reports.
* * * * *
(c) ACP-4, Federal Marketing Order Exempt Handler Notification.
Each handler who handles less than 5,000 pounds of assessed weight
pistachios in a production year shall complete and furnish this report
to the committee no later than November 15 of each production year.
* * * * *
(g) Exemptions. Handlers who handle less than 5,000 pounds of
assessed weight pistachios during any production year are exempt from
filing all forms, with the exception of the ACP-4.
* * * * *
0
4. In part 983, Subpart--Administrative Rules and Regulations is
amended by adding new Sec. 983.170 to read as follows:
Sec. 983.170 Handler exemption.
Pursuant to Sec. 983.70, any handler may handle pistachios within
the production area free of the requirements in Sec. Sec. 983.38
through 983.45 and Sec. 983.53 if such pistachios are handled in
quantities of less than 5,000 pounds of assessed weight in any
production year.
[[Page 51988]]
Dated: August 28, 2006.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 06-7376 Filed 8-31-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P