Auction of 1.4 GHz Bands Licenses Scheduled for February 7, 2007; Comments Sought on Competitive Bidding Procedures for Auction No. 69, 51817-51822 [E6-14526]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 169 / Thursday, August 31, 2006 / Notices
document should read as follows:
‘‘EPA–HQ–OPPT–2005–0051.’’
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: August 22, 2006.
A. Stanley Meiburg,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 06–7324 Filed 8–30–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
[Report No. AUC–06–69–A (Auction No. 69);
DA 06–1016; AU Docket No. 06–104]
Auction of 1.4 GHz Bands Licenses
Scheduled for February 7, 2007;
Comments Sought on Competitive
Bidding Procedures for Auction No. 69
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
erjones on PROD1PC72 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document announces the
auction of 1.4 GHz Band licenses
scheduled to commence on February 7,
2007 (Auction No. 69). This document
also seeks comments on the competitive
bidding procedures for Auction No. 69.
DATES: Comments are due on or before
September 11, 2006 and reply
comments are due on or before
September 18, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by AU Docket No. 06–104;
DA 06–1016 by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Federal Communications
Commission’s Web Site: https://
www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• People with Disabilities: Contact the
FCC to request reasonable
accommodations (accessible format
documents, sign language interpreters,
CART, etc.) by e-mail: FCC504@fcc.gov
or phone: 202–418–0530 or TTY: 202–
418–0432.
• Paper Filers: Parties who choose to
file by paper must file an original and
four copies of each filing. Filings can be
sent by hand or messenger delivery, by
commercial overnight courier, or by
first-class or overnight U.S. Postal
Service mail (although the Bureau
continues to experience delays in
receiving U.S. Postal Service mail). All
filings must be addressed to the
Commission’s Secretary Attn: WTB/
ASAD, Office of the Secretary, Federal
Communications Commission.
• The Commission’s contractor will
receive hand-delivered or messenger-
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:29 Aug 30, 2006
Jkt 208001
delivered paper filings for the
Commission’s Secretary at 236
Massachusetts Avenue, NE., Suite 110,
Washington, DC 20002. The filing hours
at this location are 8 a.m. to 7 p.m. All
hand deliveries must be held together
with rubber bands or fasteners.
Commercial overnight mail (other than
U.S. Postal Service Express Mail and
Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300 East
Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD
20743.
• U.S. Postal Service first-class,
Express, and Priority mail should be
addressed to 445 12th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20554. The Bureau also
requests that a copy of all comments
and reply comments be submitted
electronically to the following address:
auction69@fcc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Wireless Telecommunications Bureau,
Auctions and Spectrum Access
Division, for legal questions: Howard
Davenport at (202) 418–0660. For
general auction questions: Roy Knowles
or Barbara Sibert at (717) 338–2888.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a
summary of the Auction No. 69
Comment Public Notice released on
August 28, 2006. The complete text of
the Auction No. 69 Comment Public
Notice, including attachments and
related Commission documents is
available for public inspection and
copying from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
Monday through Thursday or from 8
a.m. to 11:30 a.m. on Friday at the FCC
Reference Information Center, Portals II,
445 12th Street, SW., Room CY–A257,
Washington, DC 20554. The Auction No.
69 Comment Public Notice and related
Commission documents may also be
purchased from the Commission’s
duplicating contractor, Best Copy and
Printing, Inc. (BCPI), Portals II, 445 12th
Street, SW., Room CY–B402,
Washington, DC 20554, telephone 202–
488–5300, facsimile 202–488–5563, or
you may contact BCPI at its Web site:
https://www.BCPIWEB.com. When
ordering documents from BCPI please
provide the appropriate FCC document
number for example, DA 06–1016. The
Auction No. 69 Comment Public Notice
and related documents are also available
on the Internet at the Commission’s Web
site: https://wireless.fcc.gov/
auctions/69/.
I. Licenses To Be Offered in Auction
No. 69
1. In Auction No. 69, two 3-megahertz
blocks, each consisting of a pair of 1.5
megahertz segments in the 1392–1395
MHz and 1432–1435 MHz bands, will
be offered in each of six regions known
as Economic Area Groupings (EAGs).
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
51817
Additionally, one 2-megahertz block of
unpaired spectrum in the 1390–1392
MHz band will be offered in each of 52
geographic areas known as Major
Economic Areas (MEAs). The licenses
available in Auction No. 69 are also
listed in Attachment A of the Auction
No. 69 Comment Public Notice.
2. Permissible Services. When
adopting its service rules for these
bands, the Commission established a
flexible regulatory and licensing
framework in order to promote the
provision of new and technologically
innovative services. Licensees may
provide both fixed and mobile services
including wireless internet, high speed
data as well as advanced two-way
mobile and paging services.
3. International Coordination.
Currently, the United States does not
have international agreements with
Canada and Mexico governing
operations in the 1392–1395 MHz,
1432–1435 MHz or the 1390–1392 MHz
bands. Licensees in these bands
operating near the borders must protect
stations in Canada and Mexico from
harmful interference. The Bureau also
notes that operation in these bands may
be subject to future agreements with
Canada and Mexico and therefore may
be subject to further modification.
4. Incumbency Issues. Potential
applicants are advised that there are
several government operations that will
continue to operate in these bands:
1390–1392 MHz
Radio astronomy observations may be
assigned in the 1350–1400 MHz band on
an unprotected basis at the 16 radio
astronomy observatories. Government
operations authorized as of March 22,
1995, at the 17 sites will continue to
operate on a fully protected basis until
January 1, 2009. All other government
operations, except for medical telemetry
(1395–1400 MHz), will operate on a
non-interference basis to authorized
non-Government operations and shall
not hinder implementation of any nonGovernment operations.
1392–1395 MHz and 1432–1435 MHz
Government operations authorized as
of March 22, 1995, at the 17 sites will
continue to operate on a fully protected
basis until January 1, 2009. All other
government operations, except for
medical telemetry (1395–1400 MHz),
will operate on a non-interference basis
to authorized non-Government
operations and shall not hinder
implementation of any non-Government
operations. Government stations in the
fixed and mobile services may operate
indefinitely on a primary basis at the 23
sites. All other Government stations in
E:\FR\FM\31AUN1.SGM
31AUN1
51818
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 169 / Thursday, August 31, 2006 / Notices
the fixed and mobile services shall
operate on a primary basis until reaccommodated in accordance with the
National Defense Authorization Act of
1999.
5. Spectrum Relocation Fund. The
upper half of paired frequencies for 1.4
GHz Bands licenses, i.e., 1432–1435
MHz, is spectrum covered by a
Congressional mandate that requires
that auction proceeds fund the
estimated relocation costs of incumbent
Federal entities. Specifically, the
Commercial Spectrum Enhancement
Act (CSEA) established a Spectrum
Relocation Fund (SRF), to which the
cash proceeds attributable to eligible
frequencies in an auction of licenses
involving such frequencies would be
deposited.
6. On December 27, 2005, pursuant to
CSEA, NTIA notified the Commission
that there are no costs associated with
relocating Federal operations from the
1432–1435 MHz band.
II. Bureau Seeks Comment on Auction
Procedures
7. Section 309(j)(3) of the
Communications Act of 1934, as
amended, requires the Commission to
ensure that, in the scheduling of any
competitive bidding under this
subsection, an adequate period is
allowed before issuance of bidding
rules, to permit notice and comment on
proposed auction procedures.
Consistent with the provisions of
section 309(j)(3) and to ensure that
potential bidders have adequate time to
familiarize themselves with the specific
rules that will govern the day-to-day
conduct of an auction, the Commission
directed the Bureau, under its existing
delegated authority, to seek comment on
a variety of auction-specific procedures
prior to the start of each auction. The
Bureau seeks comment on the following
issues relating to Auction No. 69.
A. Auction Structure
erjones on PROD1PC72 with NOTICES
i. Simultaneous Multiple-Round
Auction Design
8. The Bureau proposes to auction all
licenses included in Auction No. 69 in
a simultaneous multiple-round auction.
This type of auction offers every license
for bid at the same time and consists of
successive bidding rounds in which
eligible bidders may place bids on
individual licenses. Typically, bidding
remains open on all licenses until
bidding stops on every license. The
Bureau seeks comment on this proposal.
9. Information Available to Bidders
Before and During an Auction. The
Bureau also seeks comment on whether
to implement procedures that would
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:29 Aug 30, 2006
Jkt 208001
limit the disclosure of information on
bidder interests and identities relative to
the information procedures that have
typically been used for Commission
auctions. Commenters should indicate
what factors support the position they
take on this issue. In particular,
commenters should specifically address
whether technological considerations or
the likely level of competition in this
auction weighs in favor of or against
limiting the disclosure of information
relative to most past Commission
spectrum auctions.
10. Package Bidding. The Bureau has
considered the possibility of using a
simultaneous multiple-round with
package bidding (SMR–PB) format for
this auction, but is not inclined to
believe that SMR-ndash;PB would be
appropriate for the auction of these
licenses. Under the Commission’s
package bidding rules, bidders can place
bids on any groups of licenses they wish
to win together, with the result that they
win either all the licenses in a group or
none of them. In the SMR-ndash;PB
auction format, each bidder can have at
most a single winning bid.
Consequently, because bidders cannot
win a group of licenses unless they have
explicitly placed a bid on that exact
combination, package bidding may be
more complex for bidders if they wish
to aggregate any or all of a number of
licenses. However, we seek comment on
this issue. If commenters believe that an
SMR-ndash;PB design should be
implemented for this auction, they
should indicate what specific factors
lead them to that conclusion.
ii. Round Structure
11. The Commission will conduct
Auction No. 69 over the Internet.
Alternatively, telephonic bidding will
also be available via the Auction Bidder
Line. The toll-free telephone number for
telephonic bidding will be provided to
qualified bidders.
12. The auction will consist of
sequential bidding rounds. The initial
bidding schedule will be announced in
a public notice to be released at least
one week before the start of the auction.
13. The Bureau proposes to retain the
discretion to change the bidding
schedule in order to foster an auction
pace that reasonably balances speed
with the bidders’ need to study round
results and adjust their bidding
strategies. Under this proposal, the
Bureau may increase or decrease the
amount of time for the bidding rounds
and review periods, or the number of
rounds per day, depending upon
bidding activity levels and other factors.
The Bureau seeks comment on this
proposal.
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
iii. Stopping Rule
14. The Bureau has discretion to
establish stopping rules before or during
multiple round auctions in order to
terminate the auction within a
reasonable time. For Auction No. 69, the
Bureau proposes to employ a
simultaneous stopping rule approach. A
simultaneous stopping rule means that
all licenses remain available for bidding
until bidding closes simultaneously on
all licenses. More specifically, bidding
will close simultaneously on all licenses
after the first round in which no bidder
submits any new bids, applies a
proactive waiver, or submits a
withdrawal. Thus, unless circumstances
dictate otherwise, bidding will remain
open on all licenses until bidding stops
on every license.
15. Further, the Bureau proposes to
retain the discretion to exercise any of
the following options during Auction
No. 69: (a) Use a modified version of the
simultaneous stopping rule. The
modified stopping rule would close the
auction for all licenses after the first
round in which no bidder applies a
waiver, places a withdrawal, or submits
any new bids on any license for which
it is not the provisionally winning
bidder. Thus, absent any other bidding
activity, a bidder placing a new bid on
a license for which it is the
provisionally winning bidder would not
keep the auction open under this
modified stopping rule; (b) Keep the
auction open even if no bidder submits
any new bids, applies a waiver, or
submits a withdrawal. In this event, the
effect will be the same as if a bidder had
applied a waiver. The activity rule,
therefore, will apply as usual and a
bidder with insufficient activity will
either lose bidding eligibility or use a
remaining waiver; and (c) Declare that
the auction will end after a specified
number of additional rounds (special
stopping rule). If the Bureau invokes
this special stopping rule, it will accept
bids in the specified final round(s) after
which the auction will close.
16. The Bureau proposes to exercise
these options only in certain
circumstances, for example, where the
auction is proceeding very slowly, there
is minimal overall bidding activity, or it
appears likely that the auction will not
close within a reasonable period of time.
Before exercising these options, the
Bureau is likely to attempt to increase
the pace of the auction by, for example,
increasing the number of bidding
rounds per day and/or changing the
minimum acceptable bid percentage.
The Bureau seeks comment on these
proposals.
E:\FR\FM\31AUN1.SGM
31AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 169 / Thursday, August 31, 2006 / Notices
iv. Information Relating to Auction
Delay, Suspension, or Cancellation
17. For Auction No. 69, the
Commission proposed that, by public
notice or by announcement during the
auction, the Bureau may delay, suspend,
or cancel the auction in the event of
natural disaster, technical obstacle,
evidence of an auction security breach,
unlawful bidding activity,
administrative or weather necessity, or
for any other reason that affects the fair
and efficient conduct of competitive
bidding. In such cases, the Bureau, in its
sole discretion, may elect to resume the
auction starting from the beginning of
the current round, resume the auction
starting from some previous round, or
cancel the auction in its entirety.
Network interruption may cause the
Bureau to delay or suspend the auction.
The Bureau emphasizes that exercise of
this authority is solely within the
discretion of the Bureau, and its use is
not intended to be a substitute for
situations in which bidders may wish to
apply their activity rule waivers. The
Bureau seeks comment on this proposal.
B. Auction Procedures
erjones on PROD1PC72 with NOTICES
i. Upfront Payments and Bidding
Eligibility
18. The Bureau has delegated
authority and discretion to determine an
appropriate upfront payment for each
license being auctioned. The upfront
payment is a refundable deposit made
by each bidder to establish eligibility to
bid on licenses. Upfront payments
related to the licenses for specific
spectrum subject to auction protect
against frivolous or insincere bidding
and provide the Commission with a
source of funds from which to collect
payments owed at the close of the
auction. With these factors in mind, the
Bureau proposes to calculate upfront
payments on a license-by-license basis
using a formula based on bandwidth
and license area population:
$0.005 * MHz * License Area
Population with a minimum of
$1,000 per license.
19. The Bureau further proposes that
the amount of the upfront payment
submitted by a bidder will determine
the bidder’s initial bidding eligibility in
bidding units. The Bureau proposes that
each license be assigned a specific
number of bidding units equal to the
upfront payment listed in Attachment A
of the Auction No. 69 Comment Public
Notice, on a bidding unit per dollar
basis. The number of bidding units for
a given license is fixed and does not
change during the auction as prices rise.
A bidder’s upfront payment is not
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:29 Aug 30, 2006
Jkt 208001
attributed to specific licenses. Rather, a
bidder may place bids on any
combination of licenses it selected on its
FCC Form 175 as long as the total
number of bidding units associated with
those licenses does not exceed its
current eligibility. Eligibility cannot be
increased during the auction; it can only
remain the same or decrease. Thus, in
calculating its upfront payment amount
and hence its initial bidding eligibility,
an applicant must determine the
maximum number of bidding units it
may wish to bid on (or hold
provisionally winning bids on) in any
single round, and submit an upfront
payment amount covering that total
number of bidding units. Provisionally
winning bids are bids that would
become final winning bids if the auction
were to close in that given round.
20. The proposed number of bidding
units for each license and associated
upfront payment amounts are listed in
Attachment A of the Auction No. 69
Comment Public Notice. The Bureau
seeks comment on these proposals.
ii. Activity Rule
21. In order to ensure that the auction
closes within a reasonable period of
time, an activity rule requires bidders to
bid actively throughout the auction,
rather than wait until late in the auction
before participating. A bidder’s activity
in a round will be the sum of the
bidding units associated with any
licenses upon which it places bids
during the current round and the
bidding units associated with any
licenses for which it holds provisionally
winning bids. Bidders are required to be
active on a specific percentage of their
current bidding eligibility during each
round of the auction. Failure to
maintain the requisite activity level will
result in the use of an activity rule
waiver, if any remain, or a reduction in
the bidder’s eligibility, possibly
curtailing or eliminating the bidder’s
ability to place bids in the auction.
22. The Bureau proposes to divide the
auction into two stages, each
characterized by a different activity
requirement. The auction will start in
Stage One. The Bureau proposes that the
auction generally will advance from
Stage One to Stage Two when the
auction activity level, as measured by
the percentage of bidding units
receiving new provisionally winning
bids, is approximately 20 percent or
below for three consecutive rounds of
bidding. However, the Bureau further
proposes that the Bureau retains the
discretion to change stages unilaterally
by announcement during the auction. In
exercising this discretion, the Bureau
will consider a variety of measures of
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
51819
bidder activity, including, but not
limited to, the auction activity level, the
percentage of licenses (as measured in
bidding units) on which there are new
bids, the number of new bids, and the
percentage of increase in revenue. The
Bureau seeks comment on these
proposals.
23. For Auction No. 69, the Bureau
proposes the following activity
requirements: Stage One: In each round
of the first stage of the auction, a bidder
desiring to maintain its current bidding
eligibility is required to be active on
licenses representing at least 80 percent
of its current bidding eligibility. Failure
to maintain the required activity level
will result in a reduction in the bidder’s
bidding eligibility in the next round of
bidding (unless an activity rule waiver
is used). During Stage One, a bidder’s
reduced eligibility for the next round
will be calculated by multiplying the
bidder’s current round activity by fivefourths (5/4). Stage Two: In each round
of the second stage, a bidder desiring to
maintain its current bidding eligibility
is required to be active on 95 percent of
its current bidding eligibility. Failure to
maintain the required activity level will
result in a reduction in the bidder’s
bidding eligibility in the next round of
bidding (unless an activity rule waiver
is used). During Stage Two, a bidder’s
reduced eligibility for the next round
will be calculated by multiplying the
bidder’s current round activity by
twenty-nineteenths (20/19).
24. The Bureau seeks comment on
this proposal. Commenters that believe
this activity rule should be modified
should explain their reasoning and
comment on the desirability of an
alternative approach. Commenters are
advised to support their claims with
analyses and suggested alternative
activity rules.
iii. Activity Rule Waivers and Reducing
Eligibility
25. Use of an activity rule waiver
preserves the bidder’s eligibility despite
the bidder’s activity in the current
round being below the required
minimum level. An activity rule waiver
applies to an entire round of bidding,
not to particular licenses. Activity rule
waivers can be either proactive or
automatic and are principally a
mechanism for auction participants to
avoid the loss of bidding eligibility in
the event that exigent circumstances
prevent them from placing a bid in a
particular round.
26. The FCC Auction System assumes
that a bidder that does not meet the
activity requirement would prefer to
apply an activity rule waiver (if
available) rather than lose bidding
E:\FR\FM\31AUN1.SGM
31AUN1
51820
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 169 / Thursday, August 31, 2006 / Notices
erjones on PROD1PC72 with NOTICES
eligibility. Therefore, the system will
automatically apply a waiver at the end
of any bidding round in which a
bidder’s activity level is below the
minimum required unless: (1) The
bidder has no activity rule waivers
remaining; or (2) the bidder overrides
the automatic application of a waiver by
reducing eligibility, thereby meeting the
minimum requirement. If a bidder has
no waivers remaining and does not
satisfy the required activity level, its
eligibility will be permanently reduced,
possibly curtailing or eliminating the
bidder’s ability to place additional bids
in the auction.
27. A bidder with insufficient activity
may wish to reduce its bidding
eligibility rather than use an activity
rule waiver. If so, the bidder must
affirmatively override the automatic
waiver mechanism during the bidding
round by using the reduce eligibility
function in the FCC Auction System. In
this case, the bidder’s eligibility is
permanently reduced to bring the bidder
into compliance with the activity rule.
Reducing eligibility is an irreversible
action. Once eligibility has been
reduced, a bidder will not be permitted
to regain its lost bidding eligibility, even
if the round has not yet closed.
28. A bidder may apply an activity
rule waiver proactively as a means to
keep the auction open without placing
a bid. If a bidder proactively applies an
activity rule waiver (using the apply
waiver function in the FCC Auction
System) during a bidding round in
which no bids or withdrawals are
submitted, the auction will remain open
and the bidder’s eligibility will be
preserved. An automatic waiver applied
by the FCC Auction System in a round
in which there are no new bids,
withdrawals or proactive waivers will
not keep the auction open. A bidder
cannot submit a proactive waiver after
submitting a bid in a round, and
submitting a proactive waiver will
preclude a bidder from placing any bids
in that round. Applying a waiver is
irreversible; once a proactive waiver is
submitted, that waiver cannot be
unsubmitted, even if the round has not
yet closed.
29. The Bureau proposes that each
bidder in Auction No. 69 be provided
with three activity rule waivers that may
be used at the bidder’s discretion during
the course of the auction as set forth
above. The Bureau seeks comment on
this proposal.
iv. Reserve Price or Minimum Opening
Bid
30. Section 309(j) calls upon the
Commission to prescribe methods for
establishing a reasonable reserve price
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:29 Aug 30, 2006
Jkt 208001
b. Minimum Opening Bid
34. Specifically, for Auction No. 69,
the Bureau proposes to calculate
minimum opening bid amounts on a
license-by-license basis using a formula
based on bandwidth and license area
population:
$0.005 * MHz * License Area
Population with a minimum of
$1,000 per license.
This proposed minimum opening bid
amount for each license available in
Auction No. 69 is set forth in
Attachment A of the Auction No. 69
Comment Public Notice. The Bureau
seeks comment on this proposal.
35. If commenters believe that this
minimum opening bid amount will
result in unsold licenses, or is not a
reasonable amount, or should instead
operate as a reserve price, they should
explain why this is so, and comment on
the desirability of an alternative
approach. Commenters are advised to
support their claims with valuation
analyses and suggested reserve prices or
minimum opening bid amount levels or
formulas. In establishing minimum
opening bid amounts, the Bureau
particularly seeks comment on such
factors as the amount of spectrum being
auctioned, levels of incumbency, the
availability of technology to provide
service, the size of the service areas,
issues of interference with other
spectrum bands and any other relevant
factors that could reasonably have an
impact on valuation of the 1.4 GHz
Bands licenses being auctioned. The
Bureau also seeks comment on whether,
consistent with section 309(j), the
public interest would be served by
having no minimum opening bid
amount or reserve price.
32. In contrast to a reserve price, a
minimum opening bid amount is the
minimum bid price set at the beginning
of the auction below which no bids are
accepted. It is generally used to
accelerate the competitive bidding
process. The auctioneer, however, often
has the discretion to lower the
minimum opening bid amount during
the course of the auction. It is also
possible for the minimum opening bid
amount and the reserve price to be the
same amount.
33. In light of section 309(j)’s
requirements, the Bureau proposes to
establish minimum opening bid
amounts for Auction No. 69. The Bureau
believes a minimum opening bid
amount, which has been used in other
auctions, is an effective bidding tool for
accelerating the competitive bidding
process. The Bureau does not propose a
separate reserve price for the licenses to
be offered in Auction No. 69.
v. Bid Amounts
36. The Bureau proposes that, in each
round, eligible bidders be able to place
a bid on a given license in any of nine
different amounts. Under this proposal,
the FCC Auction System interface will
list the nine acceptable bid amounts for
each license.
37. The first of the nine acceptable bid
amounts is called the minimum
acceptable bid amount. The minimum
acceptable bid amount for a license will
be equal to its minimum opening bid
amount until there is a provisionally
winning bid for the license. After there
is a provisionally winning bid for a
license, the minimum acceptable bid
amount for that license will be equal to
the amount of the provisionally winning
bid plus a percentage of that bid amount
calculated using the formula described
below. In general, the percentage will be
higher for a license receiving many bids
than for a license receiving few bids. In
or a minimum opening bid amount
when FCC licenses are subject to
auction, unless the Commission
determines that a reserve price or
minimum opening bid amount is not in
the public interest. Consistent with this
mandate, the Commission has directed
the Bureau to seek comment on the use
of a minimum opening bid amount and/
or reserve price prior to the start of each
auction.
a. Reserve Price
31. In CSEA, Congress requires the
Commission to prescribe methods by
which the total cash proceeds from any
auction of licenses authorizing use of
eligible frequencies, such as 1432–1435
MHz, shall equal at least 110 percent of
the total estimated relocation costs
provided to the Commission pursuant to
CSEA. For purposes of determining
whether a CSEA revenue requirement
has been met, the Commission has
determined that total cash proceeds
means winning bids net of any
applicable bidding credit discounts at
the end of bidding. CSEA also requires
that the total cash proceeds attributable
to eligible spectrum must be at least 110
percent of the total estimated relocation
costs before the Commission may
conclude the auction. If this condition
is not met, CSEA requires that the
Commission shall cancel the auction.
On December 27, 2005, pursuant to
CSEA, NTIA notified the Commission
that there are no costs associated with
relocating Federal operations from the
1432–1435 MHz band. The Bureau does
not propose any reserve price to cover
relocation cost under CSEA.
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\31AUN1.SGM
31AUN1
erjones on PROD1PC72 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 169 / Thursday, August 31, 2006 / Notices
the case of a license for which the
provisionally winning bid has been
withdrawn, the minimum acceptable
bid amount will equal the second
highest bid received for the license.
38. The percentage of the
provisionally winning bid used to
establish the minimum acceptable bid
amount (the additional percentage) is
calculated at the end of each round,
based on an activity index which is a
weighted average of the number of bids
in that round and the activity index
from the prior round. Specifically, the
activity index is equal to a weighting
factor times the number of bids on the
license in the most recent bidding round
plus one minus the weighting factor
times the activity index from the prior
round. The additional percentage is
determined as one plus the activity
index times a minimum percentage
amount, with the result not to exceed a
given maximum. The additional
percentage is then multiplied by the
provisionally winning bid amount to
obtain the minimum acceptable bid for
the next round. The Commission will
initially set the weighting factor at 0.5,
the minimum percentage at 0.1 (10%),
and the maximum percentage at 0.2
(20%). Hence, at these initial settings,
the minimum acceptable bid for a
license will be between 10% and 20%
higher than the provisionally winning
bid, depending upon the bidding
activity for the license.
39. The eight additional bid amounts
are calculated using the minimum
acceptable bid amount and a bid
increment percentage. The first
additional acceptable bid amount equals
the minimum acceptable bid amount
times one plus the bid increment
percentage, rounded. If, for example, the
bid increment percentage is 5 percent,
the calculation is (minimum acceptable
bid amount) * (1 + 0.05) rounded, or
(minimum acceptable bid amount) *
1.05, rounded; the second additional
acceptable bid amount equals the
minimum acceptable bid amount times
one plus two times the bid increment
percentage, rounded, or (minimum
acceptable bid amount) * 1.1, rounded;
the third additional acceptable bid
amount equals the minimum acceptable
bid amount times one plus three times
the bid increment percentage, rounded,
or (minimum acceptable bid amount) *
1.15, rounded; etc. The Bureau will
round the results of these calculations,
as well as the calculations to determine
the minimum acceptable bid amounts,
using our standard rounding
procedures. For Auction No. 69, the
Bureau proposes to use a bid increment
percentage of 5 percent to calculate the
eight additional acceptable bid amounts.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:29 Aug 30, 2006
Jkt 208001
40. The Bureau retains the discretion
to change the minimum acceptable bid
amounts, the parameters of the formula
to determine the percentage of the
provisionally winning bid used to
determine the minimum acceptable bid,
and the bid increment percentage if it
determines that circumstances so
dictate. The Bureau will do so by
announcement in the FCC Auction
System during the auction. The Bureau
seeks comment on these proposals.
vi. Provisionally Winning Bids
41. Provisionally winning bids are
bids that would become final winning
bids if the auction were to close in that
given round. At the end of a bidding
round, a provisionally winning bid for
each license will be determined based
on the highest bid amount received for
the license. In the event of identical
high bid amounts being submitted on a
license in a given round (i.e., tied bids),
the Bureau will use a random number
generator to select a single provisionally
winning bid from among the tied bids.
The remaining bidders, as well as the
provisionally winning bidder, can
submit higher bids in subsequent
rounds. However, if the auction were to
end with no other bids being placed, the
winning bidder would be the one that
placed the provisionally winning bid. If
any bids are received on the license in
a subsequent round, the provisionally
winning bid again will be determined
by the highest bid amount received for
the license.
42. A provisionally winning bid will
remain the provisionally winning bid
until there is a higher bid on the license
at the close of a subsequent round,
unless the provisionally winning bid is
withdrawn. Bidders are reminded that
provisionally winning bids count
toward activity for purposes of the
activity rule.
vii. Bid Removal and Bid Withdrawal
43. For Auction No. 69, the Bureau
proposes the following bid removal
procedures. Before the close of a
bidding round, a bidder has the option
of removing any bid placed in that
round. By removing selected bids in the
FCC Auction System, a bidder may
effectively unsubmit any bid placed
within that round. In contrast to the bid
withdrawal provisions, a bidder
removing a bid placed in the same
round is not subject to a withdrawal
payment. Once a round closes, a bidder
may no longer remove a bid.
44. A bidder may withdraw its
provisionally winning bids using the
withdraw bids function in the FCC
Auction System. A bidder that
withdraws its provisionally winning
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
51821
bid(s) is subject to the bid withdrawal
payment provisions of the Commission
rules. The Bureau seeks comment on
these bid removal and bid withdrawal
procedures.
45. In the Part 1 Third Report and
Order, 65 FR 13540, May 21, 1997, the
Commission explained that allowing bid
withdrawals facilitates efficient
aggregation of licenses and the pursuit
of backup strategies as information
becomes available during the course of
an auction. The Commission noted,
however, that in some instances bidders
may seek to withdraw bids for improper
reasons. The Bureau, therefore, has
discretion in managing the auction to
limit the number of withdrawals to
prevent any bidding abuses. The
Commission stated that the Bureau
should assertively exercise its
discretion, consider limiting the number
of rounds in which bidders may
withdraw bids, and prevent bidders
from bidding on a particular market if
the Bureau finds that a bidder is abusing
the Commission’s bid withdrawal
procedures.
46. Applying this reasoning, the
Bureau proposes to limit each bidder to
withdrawing provisionally winning bids
in no more than two rounds during the
course of the auction. To permit a
bidder to withdraw bids in more than
two rounds may encourage insincere
bidding or the use of withdrawals for
anti-competitive purposes. The two
rounds in which withdrawals may be
used will be at the bidder’s discretion;
withdrawals otherwise must be in
accordance with the Commission’s
rules. There is no limit on the number
of provisionally winning bids that may
be withdrawn in either of the rounds in
which withdrawals are used.
Withdrawals will remain subject to the
bid withdrawal payment provisions
specified in the Commission’s rules.
C. Post-Auction Procedures
i. Establishing the Interim Withdrawal
Payment Percentage
47. The Bureau seeks comment on the
appropriate percentage of a withdrawn
bid that should be assessed as an
interim withdrawal payment, in the
event that a final withdrawal payment
cannot be determined at the close of the
auction. In general, the Commission’s
rules provide that a bidder that
withdraws a bid during an auction is
subject to a withdrawal payment equal
to the difference between the amount of
the withdrawn bid and the amount of
the winning bid in the same or
subsequent auction(s). However, if a
license for which there has been a
withdrawn bid is neither subject to a
E:\FR\FM\31AUN1.SGM
31AUN1
51822
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 169 / Thursday, August 31, 2006 / Notices
erjones on PROD1PC72 with NOTICES
subsequent higher bid nor won in the
same auction, the final withdrawal
payment cannot be calculated until a
corresponding license is subject to a
higher bid or won in a subsequent
auction. When that final payment
cannot yet be calculated, the bidder
responsible for the withdrawn bid is
assessed an interim bid withdrawal
payment, which will be applied toward
any final bid withdrawal payment that
is ultimately assessed. The Commission
recently amended its rules to provide
that in advance of the auction, the
Commission shall establish the
percentage of the withdrawn bid to be
assessed as an interim bid withdrawal
payment between three percent (3%)
and twenty percent (20%).
48. When it adopted the new rule, the
Commission indicated that the level of
the interim withdrawal payment in a
particular auction will be based on the
nature of the service and the inventory
of the licenses being offered. The
Commission noted that it may impose a
higher interim withdrawal payment
percentage to deter the anti-competitive
use of withdrawals when, for example,
bidders likely will not need to aggregate
licenses offered, such as when few
licenses are offered that are not on
adjacent frequencies or in adjacent
areas, or there are few synergies to be
captured by combining licenses.
49. With respect to an auction of the
licenses in the 1.4 GHz Bands, the
service rules permit a variety of fixed
and mobile services, some of which may
best be offered by combining licenses on
adjacent frequencies or in adjacent
areas. Balancing the potential need for
bidders to use withdrawals to avoid
incomplete combinations of licenses
with our interest in deterring strategic
withdrawals, the Bureau proposes a
percentage below the maximum 20
percent (20%) permitted under the
current rules but above the 3 percent
(3%) previously provided by the
Commission’s rules. Specifically, the
Bureau proposes to establish the
percentage of the withdrawn bid to be
assessed as an interim bid withdrawal
payment at ten percent (10%) for the 1.4
GHz Bands auction. The Bureau seeks
comment on this proposal.
ii. Establishing the Additional Default
Payment Percentage
50. Any winning bidder that defaults
or is disqualified after the close of an
auction (i.e., fails to remit the required
down payment within the prescribed
period of time, fails to submit a timely
long-form application, fails to make full
payment, or is otherwise disqualified) is
liable for a default payment under 47
CFR 1.2104(g)(2). This payment consists
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:29 Aug 30, 2006
Jkt 208001
of a deficiency payment, equal to the
difference between the amount of the
bidder’s bid and the amount of the
winning bid the next time a license
covering the same spectrum is won in
an auction, plus an additional payment
equal to a percentage of the defaulter’s
bid or of the subsequent winning bid,
whichever is less. Until recently this
additional payment for noncombinatorial auctions has been set at 3
percent of the defaulter’s bid or of the
subsequent winning bid, whichever is
less.
51. The CSEA/Part 1 Report and
Order, 71 FR 6214, February 7, 2006,
modified section 1.2104(g)(2) by, inter
alia, increasing the 3 percent limit on
the additional default payment for noncombinatorial auctions to 20 percent.
Under the modified rule, the
Commission will, in advance of each
non-combinatorial auction, establish an
additional default payment for that
auction of 3 percent up to a maximum
of 20 percent. As the Commission has
indicated, the level of this payment in
each case will be based on the nature of
the service and the inventory of the
licenses being offered.
52. For Auction No. 69, the Bureau
proposes to establish an additional
default payment of 10 percent. As noted
in the CSEA/Part 1 Report and Order,
defaults weaken the integrity of the
auctions process and impede the
deployment of service to the public, and
an additional default payment of more
than the previous 3 percent will be more
effective in deterring defaults. At the
same time, the Bureau does not believe
the detrimental effects of any defaults in
Auction No. 69 are likely to be
unusually great. Balancing these
considerations, the Bureau proposes an
additional default payment of 10
percent of the relevant bid. The Bureau
seeks comment on this proposal.
III. Conclusion
53. Comments are due on or before
September 11, 2006, and reply
comments are due on or before
September 18, 2006. All filings related
to the auction of 1.4 GHz Bands licenses
should refer to AU Docket No. 06–104.
Comments may be submitted using the
Commission’s Electronic Comment
Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper
copies. The Bureau strongly encourages
interested parties to file comments
electronically, and requests submission
of a copy via the Auction No. 69 e-mail
box (auction69@fcc.gov).
54. This proceeding has been
designated as a permit-but-disclose
proceeding in accordance with the
Commission’s ex parte rules. Persons
making oral ex parte presentations are
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
reminded that memoranda summarizing
the presentations must contain
summaries of the substance of the
presentations and not merely a listing of
the subjects discussed. More than a one
or two sentence description of the views
and arguments presented is generally
required. Other rules pertaining to oral
and written ex parte presentations in
permit-but-disclose proceedings are set
forth in § 1.1206(b) of the Commission’s
rules.
Federal Communications Commission.
William W. Huber,
Associate Chief, Auctions and Spectrum
Access Division, WTB.
[FR Doc. E6–14526 Filed 8–30–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
[Report No. AUC–06–68–A (Auction No. 68);
DA 06–997; AU Docket No. 06–101]
Auction of FM Broadcast Construction
Permits Scheduled for January 10,
2007; Comments Sought on
Competitive Bidding Procedures for
Auction No. 68
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document announces the
auction of nine FM broadcast
construction permits scheduled to
commence on January 10, 2007 (Auction
No. 68). This document also seeks
comments on reserve prices or
minimum opening bids and other
procedures for Auction No. 68.
DATES: Comments are due on or before
September 6, 2006 and reply comments
are due on or before September 13,
2006.
ADDRESSES: Comments and reply
comments must be identified by AU
Docket No. 06–101; DA 06–997. The
Bureaus request that a copy of all
comments and reply comments be
submitted electronically to the
following address: auction68@fcc.gov.
In addition, comment and reply
comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Federal Communications
Commission’s Web site: https://
www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• People with Disabilities: Contact
the FCC to request reasonable
accommodations (accessible format
documents, sign language interpreters,
E:\FR\FM\31AUN1.SGM
31AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 169 (Thursday, August 31, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51817-51822]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-14526]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
[Report No. AUC-06-69-A (Auction No. 69); DA 06-1016; AU Docket No. 06-
104]
Auction of 1.4 GHz Bands Licenses Scheduled for February 7, 2007;
Comments Sought on Competitive Bidding Procedures for Auction No. 69
AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document announces the auction of 1.4 GHz Band licenses
scheduled to commence on February 7, 2007 (Auction No. 69). This
document also seeks comments on the competitive bidding procedures for
Auction No. 69.
DATES: Comments are due on or before September 11, 2006 and reply
comments are due on or before September 18, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by AU Docket No. 06-104;
DA 06-1016 by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Federal Communications Commission's Web Site: https://
www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
People with Disabilities: Contact the FCC to request
reasonable accommodations (accessible format documents, sign language
interpreters, CART, etc.) by e-mail: FCC504@fcc.gov or phone: 202-418-
0530 or TTY: 202-418-0432.
Paper Filers: Parties who choose to file by paper must
file an original and four copies of each filing. Filings can be sent by
hand or messenger delivery, by commercial overnight courier, or by
first-class or overnight U.S. Postal Service mail (although the Bureau
continues to experience delays in receiving U.S. Postal Service mail).
All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary Attn: WTB/
ASAD, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission.
The Commission's contractor will receive hand-delivered or
messenger-delivered paper filings for the Commission's Secretary at 236
Massachusetts Avenue, NE., Suite 110, Washington, DC 20002. The filing
hours at this location are 8 a.m. to 7 p.m. All hand deliveries must be
held together with rubber bands or fasteners. Commercial overnight mail
(other than U.S. Postal Service Express Mail and Priority Mail) must be
sent to 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743.
U.S. Postal Service first-class, Express, and Priority
mail should be addressed to 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554.
The Bureau also requests that a copy of all comments and reply comments
be submitted electronically to the following address:
auction69@fcc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Wireless Telecommunications Bureau,
Auctions and Spectrum Access Division, for legal questions: Howard
Davenport at (202) 418-0660. For general auction questions: Roy Knowles
or Barbara Sibert at (717) 338-2888.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Auction No. 69
Comment Public Notice released on August 28, 2006. The complete text of
the Auction No. 69 Comment Public Notice, including attachments and
related Commission documents is available for public inspection and
copying from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Monday through Thursday or from 8 a.m.
to 11:30 a.m. on Friday at the FCC Reference Information Center,
Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY-A257, Washington, DC 20554.
The Auction No. 69 Comment Public Notice and related Commission
documents may also be purchased from the Commission's duplicating
contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc. (BCPI), Portals II, 445 12th
Street, SW., Room CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554, telephone 202-488-
5300, facsimile 202-488-5563, or you may contact BCPI at its Web site:
https://www.BCPIWEB.com. When ordering documents from BCPI please
provide the appropriate FCC document number for example, DA 06-1016.
The Auction No. 69 Comment Public Notice and related documents are also
available on the Internet at the Commission's Web site: https://
wireless.fcc.gov/ auctions/69/.
I. Licenses To Be Offered in Auction No. 69
1. In Auction No. 69, two 3-megahertz blocks, each consisting of a
pair of 1.5 megahertz segments in the 1392-1395 MHz and 1432-1435 MHz
bands, will be offered in each of six regions known as Economic Area
Groupings (EAGs). Additionally, one 2-megahertz block of unpaired
spectrum in the 1390-1392 MHz band will be offered in each of 52
geographic areas known as Major Economic Areas (MEAs). The licenses
available in Auction No. 69 are also listed in Attachment A of the
Auction No. 69 Comment Public Notice.
2. Permissible Services. When adopting its service rules for these
bands, the Commission established a flexible regulatory and licensing
framework in order to promote the provision of new and technologically
innovative services. Licensees may provide both fixed and mobile
services including wireless internet, high speed data as well as
advanced two-way mobile and paging services.
3. International Coordination. Currently, the United States does
not have international agreements with Canada and Mexico governing
operations in the 1392-1395 MHz, 1432-1435 MHz or the 1390-1392 MHz
bands. Licensees in these bands operating near the borders must protect
stations in Canada and Mexico from harmful interference. The Bureau
also notes that operation in these bands may be subject to future
agreements with Canada and Mexico and therefore may be subject to
further modification.
4. Incumbency Issues. Potential applicants are advised that there
are several government operations that will continue to operate in
these bands:
1390-1392 MHz
Radio astronomy observations may be assigned in the 1350-1400 MHz
band on an unprotected basis at the 16 radio astronomy observatories.
Government operations authorized as of March 22, 1995, at the 17 sites
will continue to operate on a fully protected basis until January 1,
2009. All other government operations, except for medical telemetry
(1395-1400 MHz), will operate on a non-interference basis to authorized
non-Government operations and shall not hinder implementation of any
non-Government operations.
1392-1395 MHz and 1432-1435 MHz
Government operations authorized as of March 22, 1995, at the 17
sites will continue to operate on a fully protected basis until January
1, 2009. All other government operations, except for medical telemetry
(1395-1400 MHz), will operate on a non-interference basis to authorized
non-Government operations and shall not hinder implementation of any
non-Government operations. Government stations in the fixed and mobile
services may operate indefinitely on a primary basis at the 23 sites.
All other Government stations in
[[Page 51818]]
the fixed and mobile services shall operate on a primary basis until
re-accommodated in accordance with the National Defense Authorization
Act of 1999.
5. Spectrum Relocation Fund. The upper half of paired frequencies
for 1.4 GHz Bands licenses, i.e., 1432-1435 MHz, is spectrum covered by
a Congressional mandate that requires that auction proceeds fund the
estimated relocation costs of incumbent Federal entities. Specifically,
the Commercial Spectrum Enhancement Act (CSEA) established a Spectrum
Relocation Fund (SRF), to which the cash proceeds attributable to
eligible frequencies in an auction of licenses involving such
frequencies would be deposited.
6. On December 27, 2005, pursuant to CSEA, NTIA notified the
Commission that there are no costs associated with relocating Federal
operations from the 1432-1435 MHz band.
II. Bureau Seeks Comment on Auction Procedures
7. Section 309(j)(3) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended,
requires the Commission to ensure that, in the scheduling of any
competitive bidding under this subsection, an adequate period is
allowed before issuance of bidding rules, to permit notice and comment
on proposed auction procedures. Consistent with the provisions of
section 309(j)(3) and to ensure that potential bidders have adequate
time to familiarize themselves with the specific rules that will govern
the day-to-day conduct of an auction, the Commission directed the
Bureau, under its existing delegated authority, to seek comment on a
variety of auction-specific procedures prior to the start of each
auction. The Bureau seeks comment on the following issues relating to
Auction No. 69.
A. Auction Structure
i. Simultaneous Multiple-Round Auction Design
8. The Bureau proposes to auction all licenses included in Auction
No. 69 in a simultaneous multiple-round auction. This type of auction
offers every license for bid at the same time and consists of
successive bidding rounds in which eligible bidders may place bids on
individual licenses. Typically, bidding remains open on all licenses
until bidding stops on every license. The Bureau seeks comment on this
proposal.
9. Information Available to Bidders Before and During an Auction.
The Bureau also seeks comment on whether to implement procedures that
would limit the disclosure of information on bidder interests and
identities relative to the information procedures that have typically
been used for Commission auctions. Commenters should indicate what
factors support the position they take on this issue. In particular,
commenters should specifically address whether technological
considerations or the likely level of competition in this auction
weighs in favor of or against limiting the disclosure of information
relative to most past Commission spectrum auctions.
10. Package Bidding. The Bureau has considered the possibility of
using a simultaneous multiple-round with package bidding (SMR-PB)
format for this auction, but is not inclined to believe that SMR-
ndash;PB would be appropriate for the auction of these licenses. Under
the Commission's package bidding rules, bidders can place bids on any
groups of licenses they wish to win together, with the result that they
win either all the licenses in a group or none of them. In the SMR-
ndash;PB auction format, each bidder can have at most a single winning
bid. Consequently, because bidders cannot win a group of licenses
unless they have explicitly placed a bid on that exact combination,
package bidding may be more complex for bidders if they wish to
aggregate any or all of a number of licenses. However, we seek comment
on this issue. If commenters believe that an SMR-ndash;PB design should
be implemented for this auction, they should indicate what specific
factors lead them to that conclusion.
ii. Round Structure
11. The Commission will conduct Auction No. 69 over the Internet.
Alternatively, telephonic bidding will also be available via the
Auction Bidder Line. The toll-free telephone number for telephonic
bidding will be provided to qualified bidders.
12. The auction will consist of sequential bidding rounds. The
initial bidding schedule will be announced in a public notice to be
released at least one week before the start of the auction.
13. The Bureau proposes to retain the discretion to change the
bidding schedule in order to foster an auction pace that reasonably
balances speed with the bidders' need to study round results and adjust
their bidding strategies. Under this proposal, the Bureau may increase
or decrease the amount of time for the bidding rounds and review
periods, or the number of rounds per day, depending upon bidding
activity levels and other factors. The Bureau seeks comment on this
proposal.
iii. Stopping Rule
14. The Bureau has discretion to establish stopping rules before or
during multiple round auctions in order to terminate the auction within
a reasonable time. For Auction No. 69, the Bureau proposes to employ a
simultaneous stopping rule approach. A simultaneous stopping rule means
that all licenses remain available for bidding until bidding closes
simultaneously on all licenses. More specifically, bidding will close
simultaneously on all licenses after the first round in which no bidder
submits any new bids, applies a proactive waiver, or submits a
withdrawal. Thus, unless circumstances dictate otherwise, bidding will
remain open on all licenses until bidding stops on every license.
15. Further, the Bureau proposes to retain the discretion to
exercise any of the following options during Auction No. 69: (a) Use a
modified version of the simultaneous stopping rule. The modified
stopping rule would close the auction for all licenses after the first
round in which no bidder applies a waiver, places a withdrawal, or
submits any new bids on any license for which it is not the
provisionally winning bidder. Thus, absent any other bidding activity,
a bidder placing a new bid on a license for which it is the
provisionally winning bidder would not keep the auction open under this
modified stopping rule; (b) Keep the auction open even if no bidder
submits any new bids, applies a waiver, or submits a withdrawal. In
this event, the effect will be the same as if a bidder had applied a
waiver. The activity rule, therefore, will apply as usual and a bidder
with insufficient activity will either lose bidding eligibility or use
a remaining waiver; and (c) Declare that the auction will end after a
specified number of additional rounds (special stopping rule). If the
Bureau invokes this special stopping rule, it will accept bids in the
specified final round(s) after which the auction will close.
16. The Bureau proposes to exercise these options only in certain
circumstances, for example, where the auction is proceeding very
slowly, there is minimal overall bidding activity, or it appears likely
that the auction will not close within a reasonable period of time.
Before exercising these options, the Bureau is likely to attempt to
increase the pace of the auction by, for example, increasing the number
of bidding rounds per day and/or changing the minimum acceptable bid
percentage. The Bureau seeks comment on these proposals.
[[Page 51819]]
iv. Information Relating to Auction Delay, Suspension, or Cancellation
17. For Auction No. 69, the Commission proposed that, by public
notice or by announcement during the auction, the Bureau may delay,
suspend, or cancel the auction in the event of natural disaster,
technical obstacle, evidence of an auction security breach, unlawful
bidding activity, administrative or weather necessity, or for any other
reason that affects the fair and efficient conduct of competitive
bidding. In such cases, the Bureau, in its sole discretion, may elect
to resume the auction starting from the beginning of the current round,
resume the auction starting from some previous round, or cancel the
auction in its entirety. Network interruption may cause the Bureau to
delay or suspend the auction. The Bureau emphasizes that exercise of
this authority is solely within the discretion of the Bureau, and its
use is not intended to be a substitute for situations in which bidders
may wish to apply their activity rule waivers. The Bureau seeks comment
on this proposal.
B. Auction Procedures
i. Upfront Payments and Bidding Eligibility
18. The Bureau has delegated authority and discretion to determine
an appropriate upfront payment for each license being auctioned. The
upfront payment is a refundable deposit made by each bidder to
establish eligibility to bid on licenses. Upfront payments related to
the licenses for specific spectrum subject to auction protect against
frivolous or insincere bidding and provide the Commission with a source
of funds from which to collect payments owed at the close of the
auction. With these factors in mind, the Bureau proposes to calculate
upfront payments on a license-by-license basis using a formula based on
bandwidth and license area population:
$0.005 * MHz * License Area Population with a minimum of $1,000 per
license.
19. The Bureau further proposes that the amount of the upfront
payment submitted by a bidder will determine the bidder's initial
bidding eligibility in bidding units. The Bureau proposes that each
license be assigned a specific number of bidding units equal to the
upfront payment listed in Attachment A of the Auction No. 69 Comment
Public Notice, on a bidding unit per dollar basis. The number of
bidding units for a given license is fixed and does not change during
the auction as prices rise. A bidder's upfront payment is not
attributed to specific licenses. Rather, a bidder may place bids on any
combination of licenses it selected on its FCC Form 175 as long as the
total number of bidding units associated with those licenses does not
exceed its current eligibility. Eligibility cannot be increased during
the auction; it can only remain the same or decrease. Thus, in
calculating its upfront payment amount and hence its initial bidding
eligibility, an applicant must determine the maximum number of bidding
units it may wish to bid on (or hold provisionally winning bids on) in
any single round, and submit an upfront payment amount covering that
total number of bidding units. Provisionally winning bids are bids that
would become final winning bids if the auction were to close in that
given round.
20. The proposed number of bidding units for each license and
associated upfront payment amounts are listed in Attachment A of the
Auction No. 69 Comment Public Notice. The Bureau seeks comment on these
proposals.
ii. Activity Rule
21. In order to ensure that the auction closes within a reasonable
period of time, an activity rule requires bidders to bid actively
throughout the auction, rather than wait until late in the auction
before participating. A bidder's activity in a round will be the sum of
the bidding units associated with any licenses upon which it places
bids during the current round and the bidding units associated with any
licenses for which it holds provisionally winning bids. Bidders are
required to be active on a specific percentage of their current bidding
eligibility during each round of the auction. Failure to maintain the
requisite activity level will result in the use of an activity rule
waiver, if any remain, or a reduction in the bidder's eligibility,
possibly curtailing or eliminating the bidder's ability to place bids
in the auction.
22. The Bureau proposes to divide the auction into two stages, each
characterized by a different activity requirement. The auction will
start in Stage One. The Bureau proposes that the auction generally will
advance from Stage One to Stage Two when the auction activity level, as
measured by the percentage of bidding units receiving new provisionally
winning bids, is approximately 20 percent or below for three
consecutive rounds of bidding. However, the Bureau further proposes
that the Bureau retains the discretion to change stages unilaterally by
announcement during the auction. In exercising this discretion, the
Bureau will consider a variety of measures of bidder activity,
including, but not limited to, the auction activity level, the
percentage of licenses (as measured in bidding units) on which there
are new bids, the number of new bids, and the percentage of increase in
revenue. The Bureau seeks comment on these proposals.
23. For Auction No. 69, the Bureau proposes the following activity
requirements: Stage One: In each round of the first stage of the
auction, a bidder desiring to maintain its current bidding eligibility
is required to be active on licenses representing at least 80 percent
of its current bidding eligibility. Failure to maintain the required
activity level will result in a reduction in the bidder's bidding
eligibility in the next round of bidding (unless an activity rule
waiver is used). During Stage One, a bidder's reduced eligibility for
the next round will be calculated by multiplying the bidder's current
round activity by five-fourths (5/4). Stage Two: In each round of the
second stage, a bidder desiring to maintain its current bidding
eligibility is required to be active on 95 percent of its current
bidding eligibility. Failure to maintain the required activity level
will result in a reduction in the bidder's bidding eligibility in the
next round of bidding (unless an activity rule waiver is used). During
Stage Two, a bidder's reduced eligibility for the next round will be
calculated by multiplying the bidder's current round activity by
twenty-nineteenths (20/19).
24. The Bureau seeks comment on this proposal. Commenters that
believe this activity rule should be modified should explain their
reasoning and comment on the desirability of an alternative approach.
Commenters are advised to support their claims with analyses and
suggested alternative activity rules.
iii. Activity Rule Waivers and Reducing Eligibility
25. Use of an activity rule waiver preserves the bidder's
eligibility despite the bidder's activity in the current round being
below the required minimum level. An activity rule waiver applies to an
entire round of bidding, not to particular licenses. Activity rule
waivers can be either proactive or automatic and are principally a
mechanism for auction participants to avoid the loss of bidding
eligibility in the event that exigent circumstances prevent them from
placing a bid in a particular round.
26. The FCC Auction System assumes that a bidder that does not meet
the activity requirement would prefer to apply an activity rule waiver
(if available) rather than lose bidding
[[Page 51820]]
eligibility. Therefore, the system will automatically apply a waiver at
the end of any bidding round in which a bidder's activity level is
below the minimum required unless: (1) The bidder has no activity rule
waivers remaining; or (2) the bidder overrides the automatic
application of a waiver by reducing eligibility, thereby meeting the
minimum requirement. If a bidder has no waivers remaining and does not
satisfy the required activity level, its eligibility will be
permanently reduced, possibly curtailing or eliminating the bidder's
ability to place additional bids in the auction.
27. A bidder with insufficient activity may wish to reduce its
bidding eligibility rather than use an activity rule waiver. If so, the
bidder must affirmatively override the automatic waiver mechanism
during the bidding round by using the reduce eligibility function in
the FCC Auction System. In this case, the bidder's eligibility is
permanently reduced to bring the bidder into compliance with the
activity rule. Reducing eligibility is an irreversible action. Once
eligibility has been reduced, a bidder will not be permitted to regain
its lost bidding eligibility, even if the round has not yet closed.
28. A bidder may apply an activity rule waiver proactively as a
means to keep the auction open without placing a bid. If a bidder
proactively applies an activity rule waiver (using the apply waiver
function in the FCC Auction System) during a bidding round in which no
bids or withdrawals are submitted, the auction will remain open and the
bidder's eligibility will be preserved. An automatic waiver applied by
the FCC Auction System in a round in which there are no new bids,
withdrawals or proactive waivers will not keep the auction open. A
bidder cannot submit a proactive waiver after submitting a bid in a
round, and submitting a proactive waiver will preclude a bidder from
placing any bids in that round. Applying a waiver is irreversible; once
a proactive waiver is submitted, that waiver cannot be unsubmitted,
even if the round has not yet closed.
29. The Bureau proposes that each bidder in Auction No. 69 be
provided with three activity rule waivers that may be used at the
bidder's discretion during the course of the auction as set forth
above. The Bureau seeks comment on this proposal.
iv. Reserve Price or Minimum Opening Bid
30. Section 309(j) calls upon the Commission to prescribe methods
for establishing a reasonable reserve price or a minimum opening bid
amount when FCC licenses are subject to auction, unless the Commission
determines that a reserve price or minimum opening bid amount is not in
the public interest. Consistent with this mandate, the Commission has
directed the Bureau to seek comment on the use of a minimum opening bid
amount and/or reserve price prior to the start of each auction.
a. Reserve Price
31. In CSEA, Congress requires the Commission to prescribe methods
by which the total cash proceeds from any auction of licenses
authorizing use of eligible frequencies, such as 1432-1435 MHz, shall
equal at least 110 percent of the total estimated relocation costs
provided to the Commission pursuant to CSEA. For purposes of
determining whether a CSEA revenue requirement has been met, the
Commission has determined that total cash proceeds means winning bids
net of any applicable bidding credit discounts at the end of bidding.
CSEA also requires that the total cash proceeds attributable to
eligible spectrum must be at least 110 percent of the total estimated
relocation costs before the Commission may conclude the auction. If
this condition is not met, CSEA requires that the Commission shall
cancel the auction. On December 27, 2005, pursuant to CSEA, NTIA
notified the Commission that there are no costs associated with
relocating Federal operations from the 1432-1435 MHz band. The Bureau
does not propose any reserve price to cover relocation cost under CSEA.
b. Minimum Opening Bid
32. In contrast to a reserve price, a minimum opening bid amount is
the minimum bid price set at the beginning of the auction below which
no bids are accepted. It is generally used to accelerate the
competitive bidding process. The auctioneer, however, often has the
discretion to lower the minimum opening bid amount during the course of
the auction. It is also possible for the minimum opening bid amount and
the reserve price to be the same amount.
33. In light of section 309(j)'s requirements, the Bureau proposes
to establish minimum opening bid amounts for Auction No. 69. The Bureau
believes a minimum opening bid amount, which has been used in other
auctions, is an effective bidding tool for accelerating the competitive
bidding process. The Bureau does not propose a separate reserve price
for the licenses to be offered in Auction No. 69.
34. Specifically, for Auction No. 69, the Bureau proposes to
calculate minimum opening bid amounts on a license-by-license basis
using a formula based on bandwidth and license area population:
$0.005 * MHz * License Area Population with a minimum of $1,000 per
license.
This proposed minimum opening bid amount for each license available in
Auction No. 69 is set forth in Attachment A of the Auction No. 69
Comment Public Notice. The Bureau seeks comment on this proposal.
35. If commenters believe that this minimum opening bid amount will
result in unsold licenses, or is not a reasonable amount, or should
instead operate as a reserve price, they should explain why this is so,
and comment on the desirability of an alternative approach. Commenters
are advised to support their claims with valuation analyses and
suggested reserve prices or minimum opening bid amount levels or
formulas. In establishing minimum opening bid amounts, the Bureau
particularly seeks comment on such factors as the amount of spectrum
being auctioned, levels of incumbency, the availability of technology
to provide service, the size of the service areas, issues of
interference with other spectrum bands and any other relevant factors
that could reasonably have an impact on valuation of the 1.4 GHz Bands
licenses being auctioned. The Bureau also seeks comment on whether,
consistent with section 309(j), the public interest would be served by
having no minimum opening bid amount or reserve price.
v. Bid Amounts
36. The Bureau proposes that, in each round, eligible bidders be
able to place a bid on a given license in any of nine different
amounts. Under this proposal, the FCC Auction System interface will
list the nine acceptable bid amounts for each license.
37. The first of the nine acceptable bid amounts is called the
minimum acceptable bid amount. The minimum acceptable bid amount for a
license will be equal to its minimum opening bid amount until there is
a provisionally winning bid for the license. After there is a
provisionally winning bid for a license, the minimum acceptable bid
amount for that license will be equal to the amount of the
provisionally winning bid plus a percentage of that bid amount
calculated using the formula described below. In general, the
percentage will be higher for a license receiving many bids than for a
license receiving few bids. In
[[Page 51821]]
the case of a license for which the provisionally winning bid has been
withdrawn, the minimum acceptable bid amount will equal the second
highest bid received for the license.
38. The percentage of the provisionally winning bid used to
establish the minimum acceptable bid amount (the additional percentage)
is calculated at the end of each round, based on an activity index
which is a weighted average of the number of bids in that round and the
activity index from the prior round. Specifically, the activity index
is equal to a weighting factor times the number of bids on the license
in the most recent bidding round plus one minus the weighting factor
times the activity index from the prior round. The additional
percentage is determined as one plus the activity index times a minimum
percentage amount, with the result not to exceed a given maximum. The
additional percentage is then multiplied by the provisionally winning
bid amount to obtain the minimum acceptable bid for the next round. The
Commission will initially set the weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum
percentage at 0.1 (10%), and the maximum percentage at 0.2 (20%).
Hence, at these initial settings, the minimum acceptable bid for a
license will be between 10% and 20% higher than the provisionally
winning bid, depending upon the bidding activity for the license.
39. The eight additional bid amounts are calculated using the
minimum acceptable bid amount and a bid increment percentage. The first
additional acceptable bid amount equals the minimum acceptable bid
amount times one plus the bid increment percentage, rounded. If, for
example, the bid increment percentage is 5 percent, the calculation is
(minimum acceptable bid amount) * (1 + 0.05) rounded, or (minimum
acceptable bid amount) * 1.05, rounded; the second additional
acceptable bid amount equals the minimum acceptable bid amount times
one plus two times the bid increment percentage, rounded, or (minimum
acceptable bid amount) * 1.1, rounded; the third additional acceptable
bid amount equals the minimum acceptable bid amount times one plus
three times the bid increment percentage, rounded, or (minimum
acceptable bid amount) * 1.15, rounded; etc. The Bureau will round the
results of these calculations, as well as the calculations to determine
the minimum acceptable bid amounts, using our standard rounding
procedures. For Auction No. 69, the Bureau proposes to use a bid
increment percentage of 5 percent to calculate the eight additional
acceptable bid amounts.
40. The Bureau retains the discretion to change the minimum
acceptable bid amounts, the parameters of the formula to determine the
percentage of the provisionally winning bid used to determine the
minimum acceptable bid, and the bid increment percentage if it
determines that circumstances so dictate. The Bureau will do so by
announcement in the FCC Auction System during the auction. The Bureau
seeks comment on these proposals.
vi. Provisionally Winning Bids
41. Provisionally winning bids are bids that would become final
winning bids if the auction were to close in that given round. At the
end of a bidding round, a provisionally winning bid for each license
will be determined based on the highest bid amount received for the
license. In the event of identical high bid amounts being submitted on
a license in a given round (i.e., tied bids), the Bureau will use a
random number generator to select a single provisionally winning bid
from among the tied bids. The remaining bidders, as well as the
provisionally winning bidder, can submit higher bids in subsequent
rounds. However, if the auction were to end with no other bids being
placed, the winning bidder would be the one that placed the
provisionally winning bid. If any bids are received on the license in a
subsequent round, the provisionally winning bid again will be
determined by the highest bid amount received for the license.
42. A provisionally winning bid will remain the provisionally
winning bid until there is a higher bid on the license at the close of
a subsequent round, unless the provisionally winning bid is withdrawn.
Bidders are reminded that provisionally winning bids count toward
activity for purposes of the activity rule.
vii. Bid Removal and Bid Withdrawal
43. For Auction No. 69, the Bureau proposes the following bid
removal procedures. Before the close of a bidding round, a bidder has
the option of removing any bid placed in that round. By removing
selected bids in the FCC Auction System, a bidder may effectively
unsubmit any bid placed within that round. In contrast to the bid
withdrawal provisions, a bidder removing a bid placed in the same round
is not subject to a withdrawal payment. Once a round closes, a bidder
may no longer remove a bid.
44. A bidder may withdraw its provisionally winning bids using the
withdraw bids function in the FCC Auction System. A bidder that
withdraws its provisionally winning bid(s) is subject to the bid
withdrawal payment provisions of the Commission rules. The Bureau seeks
comment on these bid removal and bid withdrawal procedures.
45. In the Part 1 Third Report and Order, 65 FR 13540, May 21,
1997, the Commission explained that allowing bid withdrawals
facilitates efficient aggregation of licenses and the pursuit of backup
strategies as information becomes available during the course of an
auction. The Commission noted, however, that in some instances bidders
may seek to withdraw bids for improper reasons. The Bureau, therefore,
has discretion in managing the auction to limit the number of
withdrawals to prevent any bidding abuses. The Commission stated that
the Bureau should assertively exercise its discretion, consider
limiting the number of rounds in which bidders may withdraw bids, and
prevent bidders from bidding on a particular market if the Bureau finds
that a bidder is abusing the Commission's bid withdrawal procedures.
46. Applying this reasoning, the Bureau proposes to limit each
bidder to withdrawing provisionally winning bids in no more than two
rounds during the course of the auction. To permit a bidder to withdraw
bids in more than two rounds may encourage insincere bidding or the use
of withdrawals for anti-competitive purposes. The two rounds in which
withdrawals may be used will be at the bidder's discretion; withdrawals
otherwise must be in accordance with the Commission's rules. There is
no limit on the number of provisionally winning bids that may be
withdrawn in either of the rounds in which withdrawals are used.
Withdrawals will remain subject to the bid withdrawal payment
provisions specified in the Commission's rules.
C. Post-Auction Procedures
i. Establishing the Interim Withdrawal Payment Percentage
47. The Bureau seeks comment on the appropriate percentage of a
withdrawn bid that should be assessed as an interim withdrawal payment,
in the event that a final withdrawal payment cannot be determined at
the close of the auction. In general, the Commission's rules provide
that a bidder that withdraws a bid during an auction is subject to a
withdrawal payment equal to the difference between the amount of the
withdrawn bid and the amount of the winning bid in the same or
subsequent auction(s). However, if a license for which there has been a
withdrawn bid is neither subject to a
[[Page 51822]]
subsequent higher bid nor won in the same auction, the final withdrawal
payment cannot be calculated until a corresponding license is subject
to a higher bid or won in a subsequent auction. When that final payment
cannot yet be calculated, the bidder responsible for the withdrawn bid
is assessed an interim bid withdrawal payment, which will be applied
toward any final bid withdrawal payment that is ultimately assessed.
The Commission recently amended its rules to provide that in advance of
the auction, the Commission shall establish the percentage of the
withdrawn bid to be assessed as an interim bid withdrawal payment
between three percent (3%) and twenty percent (20%).
48. When it adopted the new rule, the Commission indicated that the
level of the interim withdrawal payment in a particular auction will be
based on the nature of the service and the inventory of the licenses
being offered. The Commission noted that it may impose a higher interim
withdrawal payment percentage to deter the anti-competitive use of
withdrawals when, for example, bidders likely will not need to
aggregate licenses offered, such as when few licenses are offered that
are not on adjacent frequencies or in adjacent areas, or there are few
synergies to be captured by combining licenses.
49. With respect to an auction of the licenses in the 1.4 GHz
Bands, the service rules permit a variety of fixed and mobile services,
some of which may best be offered by combining licenses on adjacent
frequencies or in adjacent areas. Balancing the potential need for
bidders to use withdrawals to avoid incomplete combinations of licenses
with our interest in deterring strategic withdrawals, the Bureau
proposes a percentage below the maximum 20 percent (20%) permitted
under the current rules but above the 3 percent (3%) previously
provided by the Commission's rules. Specifically, the Bureau proposes
to establish the percentage of the withdrawn bid to be assessed as an
interim bid withdrawal payment at ten percent (10%) for the 1.4 GHz
Bands auction. The Bureau seeks comment on this proposal.
ii. Establishing the Additional Default Payment Percentage
50. Any winning bidder that defaults or is disqualified after the
close of an auction (i.e., fails to remit the required down payment
within the prescribed period of time, fails to submit a timely long-
form application, fails to make full payment, or is otherwise
disqualified) is liable for a default payment under 47 CFR
1.2104(g)(2). This payment consists of a deficiency payment, equal to
the difference between the amount of the bidder's bid and the amount of
the winning bid the next time a license covering the same spectrum is
won in an auction, plus an additional payment equal to a percentage of
the defaulter's bid or of the subsequent winning bid, whichever is
less. Until recently this additional payment for non-combinatorial
auctions has been set at 3 percent of the defaulter's bid or of the
subsequent winning bid, whichever is less.
51. The CSEA/Part 1 Report and Order, 71 FR 6214, February 7, 2006,
modified section 1.2104(g)(2) by, inter alia, increasing the 3 percent
limit on the additional default payment for non-combinatorial auctions
to 20 percent. Under the modified rule, the Commission will, in advance
of each non-combinatorial auction, establish an additional default
payment for that auction of 3 percent up to a maximum of 20 percent. As
the Commission has indicated, the level of this payment in each case
will be based on the nature of the service and the inventory of the
licenses being offered.
52. For Auction No. 69, the Bureau proposes to establish an
additional default payment of 10 percent. As noted in the CSEA/Part 1
Report and Order, defaults weaken the integrity of the auctions process
and impede the deployment of service to the public, and an additional
default payment of more than the previous 3 percent will be more
effective in deterring defaults. At the same time, the Bureau does not
believe the detrimental effects of any defaults in Auction No. 69 are
likely to be unusually great. Balancing these considerations, the
Bureau proposes an additional default payment of 10 percent of the
relevant bid. The Bureau seeks comment on this proposal.
III. Conclusion
53. Comments are due on or before September 11, 2006, and reply
comments are due on or before September 18, 2006. All filings related
to the auction of 1.4 GHz Bands licenses should refer to AU Docket No.
06-104. Comments may be submitted using the Commission's Electronic
Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. The Bureau
strongly encourages interested parties to file comments electronically,
and requests submission of a copy via the Auction No. 69 e-mail box
(auction69@fcc.gov).
54. This proceeding has been designated as a permit-but-disclose
proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. Persons
making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda
summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance
of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects
discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and
arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to
oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose
proceedings are set forth in Sec. 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules.
Federal Communications Commission.
William W. Huber,
Associate Chief, Auctions and Spectrum Access Division, WTB.
[FR Doc. E6-14526 Filed 8-30-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P