Notice of Lodging Proposed Consent Decree, 51850-51851 [06-7265]

Download as PDF 51850 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 169 / Thursday, August 31, 2006 / Notices Representatives of any other Indian tribe that believes itself to be culturally affiliated with the unassociated funerary objects should contact Dr. Peter Lape, Burke Museum, University of Washington, Box 353010, Seattle, WA 98195–3010, telephone (206) 685–2282, October 2, 2006. Repatriation of the unassociated funerary objects to the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Reservation, Oregon may proceed after that date if no additional claimants come forward. The Burke Museum is responsible for notifying the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Reservation, Oregon that this notice has been published. Dated: August 14, 2006. Sherry Hutt, Manager, National NAGPRA Program. [FR Doc. 06–7278 Filed 8–30–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4312–50–M INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 731–TA–344, 391–A, 392–A and C, 393–A, 394–A, 396, and 399– A (Second Review)] United States International Trade Commission (Commission) determines,2 pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)) (the Act), that revocation of the antidumping duty orders on the following types of bearings from China, France, Germany, Japan, and the United Kingdom would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time. Certain Bearings From China, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Singapore, and the United Kingdom Determinations On the basis of the record 1 developed in the subject five-year reviews, the Product Country Tapered roller bearings ........................................................................................... Ball bearings ............................................................................................................ Ball bearings ............................................................................................................ Ball bearings ............................................................................................................ Ball bearings ............................................................................................................ Ball bearings ............................................................................................................ China 3 .................................................... France .................................................... Germany ................................................ Italy ......................................................... Japan ..................................................... United Kingdom ..................................... The Commission also determines that revocation of the antidumping duty orders on the following types of bearings from France and Singapore would not be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material Country Ball bearings ............................................................................................................ Spherical plain bearings .......................................................................................... Singapore 4 ............................................. France 5 .................................................. erjones on PROD1PC72 with NOTICES The Commission instituted these reviews on June 1, 2005 (70 FR 31531) and determined on September 7, 2005 that it would conduct full reviews (70 FR 54568, September 15, 2005). Notice of the scheduling of the Commission’s reviews and of a public hearing to be held in connection therewith was given by posting copies of the notice in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, and by publishing the notice in the Federal Register on October 18, 2005 (70 FR 60556).6 The hearing was held in Washington, DC, on May 2, 2006, and all persons who requested the opportunity were permitted to appear in person or by counsel. The Commission transmitted its determination in this review to the 1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)). 2 Commissioner Deanna Tanner Okun not participating. VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:29 Aug 30, 2006 Jkt 208001 Secretary of Commerce on August 25, 2006. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 3876 (August 2006), entitled Certain Bearings from China, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Singapore, and the United Kingdom: Investigation Nos. 731–TA– 344, 391–A, 392–A and C, 393–A, 394– A, and 399–A (Second Review). By order of the Commission. Issued: August 28, 2006. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 06–7350 Filed 8–30–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 3 Chairman Daniel R. Pearson dissenting. Charlotte R. Lane dissenting. 5 Commissioners Stephen Koplan and Charlotte R. Lane dissenting. 4 Commissioner PO 00000 Frm 00054 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 731–TA–344 731–TA–392–A 731–TA–391–A 731–TA–393–A 731–TA–394–A 731–TA–399–A injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time. Product Background Investigation No. Investigation No. 731–TA–396 731–TA–392–C DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Notice of Lodging Proposed Consent Decree In accordance with Departmental Policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that a proposed Consent Decree in United States v. Howard McKenzie & EBT Property Holding Co., Inc., No. 2:06–CV–02353, was lodged with the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina on August 23, 2006. The proposed Consent Decree concerns a compliant filed by the United States against Howard McKenzie & EBT Property Holding Co., Inc., pursuant to sections 301 and 404 of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1311 and 1344, with respect to Defendants’ alleged violations of the Clean Air Act by discharging pollutants into waters of 6 The schedule of the Commission’s reviews and of the public hearing was revised on December 9, 2005 (70 FR 75482, December 20, 2005) and on May 4, 2006 (71 FR 27513, May 11, 2006). E:\FR\FM\31AUN1.SGM 31AUN1 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 169 / Thursday, August 31, 2006 / Notices the United States without a permit. The proposed Consent Decree resolves these allegations by requiring the restoration of the wetlands at issue and the payment of a civil penalty. The Department of Justice will accept written comments relating to this proposed Consent Decree for thirty (30) days from the date of publication of this Notice. Please address comments to Marvin J. Caughman, Assistant United States Attorney, Wachovia Building, Suite 500, 1441 Main Street, Columbia, South Carolina 29201 and refer to United States v. Howard McKenzie & EBT Property Holding Co., Inc., No. 2:06–CV–02353. The proposed Consent Decree may be examined at the Clerk’s Office, United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, United States Courthouse, 901 Richland Lane, Columbia, South Carolina. In addition, the proposed Consent Decree may be viewed at https://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/ open.html. Stephen Samuels, Assistant Chief, Environmental Defense Section, Environment & Natural Resources Division. [FR Doc. 06–7265 Filed 8–30–06; 8:45 am] Bruce Gelber, Section Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural Resources Division. [FR Doc. 06–7295 Filed 8–30–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–15–M BILLING CODE 4410–15–M DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE erjones on PROD1PC72 with NOTICES Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act Notice is hereby given that on August 23, 2006 a proposed Consent Decree in United States v. Mallinckrodt et. al, Civil Action No. 4:02CV1488, was lodged with the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri. In this action the United States sought recovery of response costs incurred by the Environmental Protection Agency at the Great Lakes Container Corporation Superfund Site located in St. Louis, Missouri. The Consent Decree requires Defendant Shell Oil Company to reimburse the United States $228,630.00 in response costs. The Department of Justice will receive for a period of thirty (30) days from the date of this publication comments relating to the Consent Decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20044–7611, and should refer to United States v. Mallinckrodt, et. al. D.J. Ref. 90–11–3–07280. The Consent Decree VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:29 Aug 30, 2006 may be examined at the Office of the United States Attorney, Thomas F. Eagleton U.S. Courthouse, 111 South 10th Street, 20th Floor, St. Louis, MO 63102, and at U.S. EPA Region VII, 901 North 5th Street, Kansas City, Kansas 66025. During the public comment period, the Consent Decree may also be examined on the following Department of Justice Web site, to https://www/ usdoj.gov/enrd/Consent_Decree.html. A copy of the Consent Decree may also be obtained by mail from the Consent Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20044–7611 or by faxing or e-mailing a request to Tonia Fleetwood (tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov), fax no. (202) 514–0097, phone confirmation number (202) 514–1547. In requesting a copy from the Consent Decree Library, please enclose a check in the amount of $4.75 (without attachments) or $5.75 (with attachments) for United States v. Mallinckrodt, et al. (25 cents per page reproduction cost) payable to the U.S. Treasury. Jkt 208001 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Notice of Extension of Comment Period on Consent Decree Under the Clean Water Act Under 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that the comment period for the purposed Consent Decree lodged on June 22, 2006, with the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico in United States v. Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority (PRASA), Civil Action No. 06–1624 (SEC), is being extended from August 7, 2006 through September 15, 2006. The original notice of this proposed settlement, which summarizes the settlement and identifies where copies of the Consent Decree may be obtained, was published in the Federal Register on July 7, 2006, Vol. 71, No. 130, Pg. 38660–38661. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney General of the Environment and Natural Resources Division, Department of Justice, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20004–7611, and should refer to United States v. PRASA, Civil Action No. 06–1624 (SEC), D.J. Ref. 90–5–1–1–08385, and PO 00000 Frm 00055 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 51851 should be received by September 15, 2006. Bruce S. Gelber, Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural Resources Division. [FR Doc. 06–7296 Filed 8–30–06; 8:45am] BILLING CODE 4410–15–M DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act Notice is hereby given that on August 15, 2006, a proposed Consent Decree in United States v. The Sherwin-Williams Company et al., Civil Action Number 00–2064, was lodged with the United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois. The proposed consent decree resolves claims against The Sherwin-Williams Company, The Glidden Company, and Speciality Coatings Company, Inc. (collectively, ‘‘Defendants’’), under Section 107 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (‘‘CERCLA’’), 42 U.S.C. 9607, for the reimbursement of response costs incurred and to be incurred by EPA, in connection with the release and threatened release of hazardous substances at the Cross Brothers Pail Recycling Superfund Site in Pembroke Township, Kankakee County, Illinois (‘‘the Site’’). Under the proposed Consent Decree, Defendants will reimburse the United States $200,000 in outstanding past response costs at the Site. The Department of Justice will receive, for a period of thirty (30) days from the date of this publication, comments relating to the Consent Decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20044–7611, with a copy to Matthew A. Fogelson, Trial Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice, Environment and Natural Resources Division, Environmental Enforcement Section, 301 Howard Street, Suite 1050, San Francisco, CA 94105, and should refer to United States v. The SherwinWilliams Company et al., DOJ Ref. #90– 11–2–477/1. Commenters may request an opportunity for a public meeting in the affected area, in accordance with Section 7003(d) of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6973(d). The Consent Decree may be examined at the Office of the United States E:\FR\FM\31AUN1.SGM 31AUN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 169 (Thursday, August 31, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51850-51851]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7265]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging Proposed Consent Decree

    In accordance with Departmental Policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is 
hereby given that a proposed Consent Decree in United States v. Howard 
McKenzie & EBT Property Holding Co., Inc., No. 2:06-CV-02353, was 
lodged with the United States District Court for the District of South 
Carolina on August 23, 2006.
    The proposed Consent Decree concerns a compliant filed by the 
United States against Howard McKenzie & EBT Property Holding Co., Inc., 
pursuant to sections 301 and 404 of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1311 
and 1344, with respect to Defendants' alleged violations of the Clean 
Air Act by discharging pollutants into waters of

[[Page 51851]]

the United States without a permit. The proposed Consent Decree 
resolves these allegations by requiring the restoration of the wetlands 
at issue and the payment of a civil penalty. The Department of Justice 
will accept written comments relating to this proposed Consent Decree 
for thirty (30) days from the date of publication of this Notice. 
Please address comments to Marvin J. Caughman, Assistant United States 
Attorney, Wachovia Building, Suite 500, 1441 Main Street, Columbia, 
South Carolina 29201 and refer to United States v. Howard McKenzie & 
EBT Property Holding Co., Inc., No. 2:06-CV-02353.
    The proposed Consent Decree may be examined at the Clerk's Office, 
United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, United 
States Courthouse, 901 Richland Lane, Columbia, South Carolina. In 
addition, the proposed Consent Decree may be viewed at https://
www.usdoj.gov/enrd/open.html.

Stephen Samuels,
Assistant Chief, Environmental Defense Section, Environment & Natural 
Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 06-7265 Filed 8-30-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.