User Fees for Processing Installment Agreements, 51538-51540 [E6-14421]
Download as PDF
51538
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 168 / Wednesday, August 30, 2006 / Proposed Rules
Agreement State Programs,’’ which
became effective on September 3, 1997
(62 FR 46517), NRC program elements
(including regulations) are placed into
four compatibility categories
(Compatibility Category A through D).
In addition, NRC program elements also
can be identified as having particular
health and safety significance or as
being reserved solely to NRC.
The proposed amendment to part 73
would be a program element designated
‘‘NRC’’ based on implementation of the
procedure in NRC’s Management
Directive 5.9, ‘‘Adequacy and
Compatibility of Agreement States.’’ The
requirements in this proposed
amendment are limited to providing
exceptions to requirements in Section
170I of the AEA, as amended by the
EPAct, and are based on a system of
Orders that were developed under
NRC’s authority to protect the common
defense and security which are areas of
exclusive NRC regulatory authority and
cannot be relinquished to the
Agreement States. Therefore, the
requirements of this proposed
amendment should not be adopted by
the Agreement States.
VII. Plain Language
The Presidential memorandum
entitled ‘‘Plain Language in Government
Writing’’ (63 FR 31883; June 10, 1998),
directed that the Government’s writing
be in plain language. NRC requests
comments on the proposed rule
specifically with respect to the clarity
and effectiveness of the language used.
Comments should be sent using one of
the methods detailed under the
ADDRESSES heading of the preamble to
this proposed rule.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSAL
VIII. Environmental Impact:
Categorical Exclusion
NRC has determined that this
proposed rule is the type of action
described in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(3)(ii) as a
categorical exclusion. Therefore, neither
an environmental impact statement nor
an environmental assessment has been
prepared for this proposed rule.
IX. Paperwork Reduction Act
Statement
This proposed rule does not contain
new or amended information collection
requirements subject to the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.). Existing requirements were
approved by the Office of Management
and Budget, approval number 3150–
0002.
Public Protection Notification
The NRC may not conduct or sponsor,
and a person is not required to respond
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:38 Aug 29, 2006
Jkt 208001
to, a request for information or an
information collection requirement
unless the requesting document
displays a currently valid Office of
Management and Budget control
number.
X. Regulatory Analysis
A regulatory analysis has not been
prepared for this regulation because it
relieves restrictions and does not
impose any additional burdens on
licensees.
XI. Regulatory Flexibility Certification
A regulatory flexibility Act analysis is
not required because the proposed
amendment does not impose any
additional burdens on licensees.
XII. Backfit Analysis
NRC has determined that the backfit
rule (§§ 50.109, 70.76, 72.62, or 76.76)
does not apply to this proposed rule
because this amendment would not
involve any provisions that would
impose backfits as defined in the backfit
rule. Therefore, a backfit analysis is not
required.
List of Subjects in 10 CFR Part 73
Criminal penalties, Export, Hazardous
materials transportation, Import,
Nuclear materials, Nuclear power plants
and reactors, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security
measures.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble and under the authority of the
AEA, as amended; the Energy
Reorganization Act of 1974, as
amended; and 5 U.S.C. 553; NRC is
proposing to adopt the following
amendment to 10 CFR part 73.
PART 73—PHYSICAL PROTECTION OF
PLANTS AND MATERIALS
1. The authority citation for part 73
continues to read as follows:
Authority: Secs. 53, 161, 68 Stat. 930, 948,
as amended, sec. 147, 94 Stat. 780 (42 U.S.C.
2073, 2167, 2201); sec. 201, as amended, 204,
88 Stat. 1242, as amended, 1245, sec. 1701,
106 Stat. 2951, 2952, 2953 (42 U.S.C. 5841,
5844, 2297f); sec. 1704, 112 Stat. 2750 (44
U.S.C. 3504 note).
Section 73.1 also issued under secs. 135,
141, Pub. L. 97–425, 96 Stat. 2232, 2241 (42
U.S.C. 10155, 10161). Section 73.37(f) also
issued under sec. 301, Pub. L. 96–295, 94
Stat. 789 (42 U.S.C. 5841 note). Section 73.57
is issued under sec. 606, Pub. L. 99–399, 100
Stat. 876 (42 U.S.C. 2169).
2. A new § 73.28 is added to read as
follows:
§ 73.28 Security background checks for
secure transfer of nuclear materials.
Licensees are excepted from the
security background check provisions in
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Section 170I of the AEA if they have not
received Orders from the Nuclear
Regulatory Commission containing
requirements for background checks for
trustworthiness and reliability that
include fingerprinting and criminal
history record checks as a prerequisite
for unescorted access to radioactive
materials.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 24th day
of August, 2006.
Annette L. Vietti-Cook,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. E6–14397 Filed 8–29–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 300
[REG–148576–05]
RIN 1545–BF69
User Fees for Processing Installment
Agreements
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
and notice of public hearing.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document contains
proposed amendments to the
regulations relating to user fees for
installment agreements. The proposed
amendments affect taxpayers who wish
to pay their liabilities through
installment agreements. This document
also contains a notice of public hearing
on these proposed regulations.
DATES: Written and electronic comments
must be received by September 29,
2006. Outlines of topics to be discussed
at the public hearing scheduled for
October 17, 2006, must be received by
September 25, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Send submissions to:
CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–148576–05),
Internal Revenue Service, POB 7604,
Ben Franklin Station, Washington, DC
20044. Alternatively, taxpayers may
send submissions electronically directly
to the IRS Internet site at www.irs.gov/
regs, or via the Federal e-Rulemaking
Portal at www.regulations.gov (IRS
REG–148576–05). The public hearing
will be held in the auditorium of the
New Carrollton Federal Building, 5000
Ellin Road, Lanham, MD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Concerning submissions and/or to be
placed on the building access list to
attend the hearing, Kelly Banks, 202–
622–7180; concerning cost
methodology, Eva Williams, 202–435–
E:\FR\FM\30AUP1.SGM
30AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 168 / Wednesday, August 30, 2006 / Proposed Rules
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSAL
5514; concerning the proposed
regulations, William Beard, 202–622–
3620 (not toll-free numbers).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Independent Offices
Appropriations Act (IOAA), which is
codified at 31 U.S.C. 9701, authorizes
agencies to prescribe regulations that
establish charges for services provided
by the agency (user fees). The charges
must be fair and must be based on the
costs to the government, the value of the
service to the recipient, the public
policy or interest served, and other
relevant facts. The IOAA provides that
regulations implementing user fees are
subject to policies prescribed by the
President. Those policies are currently
set forth in OMB Circular A–25, 58 FR
38142 (July 15, 1993) (the OMB
Circular).
The OMB Circular encourages user
fees for government-provided services
that confer benefits on identifiable
recipients over and above those benefits
received by the general public. Under
the OMB Circular, an agency that seeks
to impose a user fee for governmentprovided services must calculate its full
cost of providing those services. In
general, the amount of a user fee should
recover the cost of providing the service,
unless the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) grants an exception.
Section 6159 authorizes the IRS to
enter into an agreement with any
taxpayer for the payment of tax in
installments. Section 6331(k) generally
prohibits the IRS from levying to collect
taxes while an installment agreement in
effect. A taxpayer that enters into an
installment agreement therefore receives
a special benefit of being allowed to pay
an outstanding tax obligation over time.
Before entering into an installment
agreement, the IRS must examine the
taxpayer’s financial position to
determine whether such an agreement is
appropriate. Once the agreement is in
effect, the IRS must process the
payments and monitor compliance.
Under sections 300.1 and 300.2, the
IRS currently charges $43 for entering
into an installment agreement and $24
for restructuring an installment
agreement or reinstating an installment
agreement that is in default. The amount
of the fees has not changed since the
fees were first implemented in 1995. As
required by the OMB Circular, the IRS
recently completed a review of the
installment agreement program and
determined that the full cost of an
installment agreement is $105. The IRS
also determined that the full cost of
restructuring or reinstating an
installment agreement is $45. The
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:38 Aug 29, 2006
Jkt 208001
higher costs associated with installment
agreements result from increases in
labor and other costs since 1995 and
refinements in the costing model to
better account for the full cost of an
installment agreement. In accordance
with the OMB Circular, these proposed
regulations increase the fees to bring
them in line with actual costs.
These proposed regulations propose
to charge less than full cost for entering
into an installment agreement in cases
where the taxpayer chooses to pay by
way of a direct debit from the taxpayer’s
bank account. The proposed fee for such
an installment agreement is $52. The
reduced fee would only apply to new
installment agreements; the charge
would still be $45 for restructuring or
reinstating an installment agreement,
regardless of the method of payment.
While the OMB Circular requires
agencies to charge full cost, OMB has
granted an exception to the full cost
requirement of the OMB Circular for
direct debit installment agreements. In
addition, the IRS believes that charging
less than full cost will encourage
taxpayers to choose to pay by direct
debit. The IRS has determined that the
default rate on direct debit installment
agreements is much lower than that for
other agreements. These agreements are
therefore beneficial both to taxpayers
and to tax collection.
Proposed Effective Date
These regulations are proposed to be
effective thirty days after the date of
publication in the Federal Register of
the final regulations.
Special Analyses
It has been determined that this notice
of proposed rulemaking is not a
significant regulatory action as defined
in Executive Order 12866. Therefore, a
regulatory assessment is not required. It
is hereby certified that these regulations
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. Accordingly, a regulatory
flexibility analysis is not required. This
certification is based on the information
that follows. The economic impact of
these regulations on any small entity
would result from the entity being
required to pay a fee prescribed by these
regulations in order to obtain a
particular service. The dollar amount of
the fee is not, however, substantial
enough to have a significant economic
impact on any entity subject to the fee.
Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the
Internal Revenue Code, this notice of
proposed rulemaking will be submitted
to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration for
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
51539
comment on its impact on small
business.
Comments and Public Hearing
Before these proposed regulations are
adopted as final regulations,
consideration will be given to any
written (a signed original and eight (8)
copies) or electronic comments that are
submitted timely to the IRS. The IRS
and the Treasury Department request
comments on the clarity of the proposed
regulations and how they may be made
easier to understand. All comments will
be available for public inspection and
copying.
A public hearing has been scheduled
for October 17, 2006, at 10 a.m. in the
auditorium of the New Carrollton
Federal Building, 5000 Ellin Rd.,
Lanham, MD. Due to building security
procedures, visitors must enter at the
main entrance. In addition, all visitors
must present photo identification to
enter the building. Because of access
restrictions, visitors will not be
admitted beyond the immediate
entrance area more than 30 minutes
before the hearing starts. For
information about having your name
placed on the building access list to
attend the hearing, see the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
preamble.
The rules of 26 CFR 601.601(a)(3)
apply to the hearing. Persons who wish
to present oral comments at the hearing
must submit electronic or written
comments and an outline of the
comments to be discussed and the time
to be devoted to each topic (signed
original and eight (8) copies) by
Monday, September 25, 2006. A period
of 10 minutes will be allotted to each
person for making comments. An
agenda showing the scheduling of the
speakers will be prepared after the
deadline for receiving outlines has
passed. Copies of the agenda will be
available free of charge at the hearing.
Drafting Information
The principal author of these
regulations is William Beard, Office of
Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and
Administration), Collection, Bankruptcy
and Summonses Division.
Lists of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 300
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, User fees.
Proposed Amendments to the
Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 300 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
E:\FR\FM\30AUP1.SGM
30AUP1
51540
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 168 / Wednesday, August 30, 2006 / Proposed Rules
PART 300—USER FEES
Paragraph 1. The authority citation
for part 300 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 31 U.S.C. 9701.
Par. 2. Section 300.1(b) is amended by
adding a sentence to the end of the
paragraph to read as follows:
§ 300.1
Installment agreement fee.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * * Effective January 1, 2007,
the fee for entering into an installment
agreement is $105, except that the fee is
$52 when the taxpayer pays by way of
a direct debit from the taxpayer’s bank
account.
*
*
*
*
*
Par. 3. Section 300.2(b) is amended by
adding a sentence to the end of the
paragraph to read as follows:
§ 300.2 Restructuring or reinstatement of
installment agreement fee.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * * Effective January 1, 2007,
the fee for restructuring or reinstating an
installment agreement is $45.
*
*
*
*
*
Mark. E. Matthews,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and
Enforcement.
[FR Doc. E6–14421 Filed 8–29–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[CGD07–06–130]
RIN 1625–AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulations;
Southern Boulevard (SR 700/80)
Bridge, Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway,
mile 1024.7, Palm Beach, FL
Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSAL
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to
change the regulation governing the
operation of the Southern Boulevard (SR
700/80) Bridge across the Atlantic
Intracoastal Waterway, mile 1024.7,
Palm Beach, Florida. The proposed rule
would require the drawbridge to open
twice an hour. The proposed schedule
is based on requests from vessel
operators along the Atlantic Intracoastal
Waterway. The proposed schedule
would require the bridge to open on the
quarter and three quarter-hour and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:38 Aug 29, 2006
Jkt 208001
would meet the reasonable needs of
navigation while not impacting
vehicular traffic.
DATES: Comments and related material
must reach the Coast Guard on or before
October 16, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may mail comments
and related material to Commander
(dpb), Seventh Coast Guard District, 909
SE. 1st Avenue, Room 432, Miami,
Florida 33131–3050. Commander (dpb)
maintains the public docket for this
rulemaking. Comments and material
received from the public, as well as
documents indicated in this preamble as
being available in the docket, will
become part of docket number [CGD07–
06–130] and will be available for
inspection or copying at Commander
(dpb), Seventh Coast Guard District, 909
SE. 1st Avenue, Room 432, Miami,
Florida 33131–3050 between 8 a.m. and
4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Barry Dragon, Seventh Coast Guard
District, Bridge Branch, telephone
number 305–415–6743.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related material. If you
do so, please include your name and
address, identify the docket number for
this rulemaking [CGD07–06–130],
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and give the reason for each
comment. Please submit all comments
and related material in an unbound
format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 11 inches,
suitable for copying. If you would like
to know they reached us, please enclose
a stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during
the comment period. We may change
this proposed rule in view of them.
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for a meeting by writing to Bridge
Branch, Seventh Coast Guard District, at
the address under ADDRESSES explaining
why one would be beneficial. If we
determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time
and place announced by a later notice
in the Federal Register.
Background and Purpose
In 2005, the Coast Guard changed the
regulations on most of the bridges in
Palm Beach County to facilitate
increased vehicular traffic while
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
meeting the reasonable needs of
navigation. Recently waterway users
have requested that the Southern
Boulevard (SR 700/80) bridge regulation
be changed from opening on the hour
and half-hour to opening on the quarter
and three-quarter hour in order to
improve vessel transit sequencing on
the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway
through Palm Beach County. This
proposed schedule will improve transit
times for vessels while not impairing
vehicular traffic.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard proposes to change
the operating regulation of the Southern
Boulevard (SR 700/80) Bridge that
crosses the Atlantic Intracoastal
Waterway, mile 1024.7, in Palm Beach,
FL. The existing regulation that governs
the operation of the Southern Boulevard
(SR 700/80) drawbridge is published in
33 CFR 117.261(w).
The proposed rule would improve
staggered bridge openings and allow
vessels traveling at five knots to
significantly reduce wait times to pass
through the Southern Boulevard (SR
700/80) Drawbridge. The proposed
schedule would have the Southern
Boulevard (SR 700/80) Bridge opening
on the quarter and three-quarter hour.
Regulatory Evaluation
This proposed rule is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866,
Regulatory Planning and Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office
of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. It is not
‘‘significant’’ under the regulatory
policies and procedures of the
Department of Homeland Security.
We expect the economic impact of
this proposed rule to be so minimal that
a full Regulatory Evaluation under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
DHS is unnecessary. Because the
proposed rule would provide timed
openings for vehicular traffic and
continue to provide twice an hour
sequenced openings for vessel traffic,
the rule should have little economic
impact.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this proposed rule would have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
E:\FR\FM\30AUP1.SGM
30AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 168 (Wednesday, August 30, 2006)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 51538-51540]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-14421]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 300
[REG-148576-05]
RIN 1545-BF69
User Fees for Processing Installment Agreements
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking and notice of public hearing.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document contains proposed amendments to the regulations
relating to user fees for installment agreements. The proposed
amendments affect taxpayers who wish to pay their liabilities through
installment agreements. This document also contains a notice of public
hearing on these proposed regulations.
DATES: Written and electronic comments must be received by September
29, 2006. Outlines of topics to be discussed at the public hearing
scheduled for October 17, 2006, must be received by September 25, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Send submissions to: CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG-148576-05), Internal
Revenue Service, POB 7604, Ben Franklin Station, Washington, DC 20044.
Alternatively, taxpayers may send submissions electronically directly
to the IRS Internet site at www.irs.gov/regs, or via the Federal e-
Rulemaking Portal at www.regulations.gov (IRS REG-148576-05). The
public hearing will be held in the auditorium of the New Carrollton
Federal Building, 5000 Ellin Road, Lanham, MD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Concerning submissions and/or to be
placed on the building access list to attend the hearing, Kelly Banks,
202-622-7180; concerning cost methodology, Eva Williams, 202-435-
[[Page 51539]]
5514; concerning the proposed regulations, William Beard, 202-622-3620
(not toll-free numbers).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Independent Offices Appropriations Act (IOAA), which is
codified at 31 U.S.C. 9701, authorizes agencies to prescribe
regulations that establish charges for services provided by the agency
(user fees). The charges must be fair and must be based on the costs to
the government, the value of the service to the recipient, the public
policy or interest served, and other relevant facts. The IOAA provides
that regulations implementing user fees are subject to policies
prescribed by the President. Those policies are currently set forth in
OMB Circular A-25, 58 FR 38142 (July 15, 1993) (the OMB Circular).
The OMB Circular encourages user fees for government-provided
services that confer benefits on identifiable recipients over and above
those benefits received by the general public. Under the OMB Circular,
an agency that seeks to impose a user fee for government-provided
services must calculate its full cost of providing those services. In
general, the amount of a user fee should recover the cost of providing
the service, unless the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) grants an
exception.
Section 6159 authorizes the IRS to enter into an agreement with any
taxpayer for the payment of tax in installments. Section 6331(k)
generally prohibits the IRS from levying to collect taxes while an
installment agreement in effect. A taxpayer that enters into an
installment agreement therefore receives a special benefit of being
allowed to pay an outstanding tax obligation over time. Before entering
into an installment agreement, the IRS must examine the taxpayer's
financial position to determine whether such an agreement is
appropriate. Once the agreement is in effect, the IRS must process the
payments and monitor compliance.
Under sections 300.1 and 300.2, the IRS currently charges $43 for
entering into an installment agreement and $24 for restructuring an
installment agreement or reinstating an installment agreement that is
in default. The amount of the fees has not changed since the fees were
first implemented in 1995. As required by the OMB Circular, the IRS
recently completed a review of the installment agreement program and
determined that the full cost of an installment agreement is $105. The
IRS also determined that the full cost of restructuring or reinstating
an installment agreement is $45. The higher costs associated with
installment agreements result from increases in labor and other costs
since 1995 and refinements in the costing model to better account for
the full cost of an installment agreement. In accordance with the OMB
Circular, these proposed regulations increase the fees to bring them in
line with actual costs.
These proposed regulations propose to charge less than full cost
for entering into an installment agreement in cases where the taxpayer
chooses to pay by way of a direct debit from the taxpayer's bank
account. The proposed fee for such an installment agreement is $52. The
reduced fee would only apply to new installment agreements; the charge
would still be $45 for restructuring or reinstating an installment
agreement, regardless of the method of payment. While the OMB Circular
requires agencies to charge full cost, OMB has granted an exception to
the full cost requirement of the OMB Circular for direct debit
installment agreements. In addition, the IRS believes that charging
less than full cost will encourage taxpayers to choose to pay by direct
debit. The IRS has determined that the default rate on direct debit
installment agreements is much lower than that for other agreements.
These agreements are therefore beneficial both to taxpayers and to tax
collection.
Proposed Effective Date
These regulations are proposed to be effective thirty days after
the date of publication in the Federal Register of the final
regulations.
Special Analyses
It has been determined that this notice of proposed rulemaking is
not a significant regulatory action as defined in Executive Order
12866. Therefore, a regulatory assessment is not required. It is hereby
certified that these regulations will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. Accordingly, a
regulatory flexibility analysis is not required. This certification is
based on the information that follows. The economic impact of these
regulations on any small entity would result from the entity being
required to pay a fee prescribed by these regulations in order to
obtain a particular service. The dollar amount of the fee is not,
however, substantial enough to have a significant economic impact on
any entity subject to the fee. Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the
Internal Revenue Code, this notice of proposed rulemaking will be
submitted to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration for comment on its impact on small business.
Comments and Public Hearing
Before these proposed regulations are adopted as final regulations,
consideration will be given to any written (a signed original and eight
(8) copies) or electronic comments that are submitted timely to the
IRS. The IRS and the Treasury Department request comments on the
clarity of the proposed regulations and how they may be made easier to
understand. All comments will be available for public inspection and
copying.
A public hearing has been scheduled for October 17, 2006, at 10
a.m. in the auditorium of the New Carrollton Federal Building, 5000
Ellin Rd., Lanham, MD. Due to building security procedures, visitors
must enter at the main entrance. In addition, all visitors must present
photo identification to enter the building. Because of access
restrictions, visitors will not be admitted beyond the immediate
entrance area more than 30 minutes before the hearing starts. For
information about having your name placed on the building access list
to attend the hearing, see the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section
of this preamble.
The rules of 26 CFR 601.601(a)(3) apply to the hearing. Persons who
wish to present oral comments at the hearing must submit electronic or
written comments and an outline of the comments to be discussed and the
time to be devoted to each topic (signed original and eight (8) copies)
by Monday, September 25, 2006. A period of 10 minutes will be allotted
to each person for making comments. An agenda showing the scheduling of
the speakers will be prepared after the deadline for receiving outlines
has passed. Copies of the agenda will be available free of charge at
the hearing.
Drafting Information
The principal author of these regulations is William Beard, Office
of Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and Administration), Collection,
Bankruptcy and Summonses Division.
Lists of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 300
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, User fees.
Proposed Amendments to the Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 300 is proposed to be amended as follows:
[[Page 51540]]
PART 300--USER FEES
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 300 continues to read
as follows:
Authority: 31 U.S.C. 9701.
Par. 2. Section 300.1(b) is amended by adding a sentence to the end
of the paragraph to read as follows:
Sec. 300.1 Installment agreement fee.
* * * * *
(b) * * * Effective January 1, 2007, the fee for entering into an
installment agreement is $105, except that the fee is $52 when the
taxpayer pays by way of a direct debit from the taxpayer's bank
account.
* * * * *
Par. 3. Section 300.2(b) is amended by adding a sentence to the end
of the paragraph to read as follows:
Sec. 300.2 Restructuring or reinstatement of installment agreement
fee.
* * * * *
(b) * * * Effective January 1, 2007, the fee for restructuring or
reinstating an installment agreement is $45.
* * * * *
Mark. E. Matthews,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and Enforcement.
[FR Doc. E6-14421 Filed 8-29-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P