No FEAR Act Notice, 51652-51653 [06-7247]
Download as PDF
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
51652
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 168 / Wednesday, August 30, 2006 / Notices
id. at 13–15. In Docket No. C2004–3,
pleadings addressed fee levels for
Stamped Stationery. Although those
arguments were not germane to the
jurisdictional issue, they appear, at least
at first blush, to be somewhat
problematic. Consequently, in
suggesting that a creative pricing
approach may be appropriate, the
Commission hopes to focus interested
persons on the challenge at hand and
perhaps to temper rote reliance on any
preconceived fee structures.
The Commission’s observations may
also have the salutary effect of
encouraging discussion among
interested parties concerning an
acceptable fee structure. With the
threshold issue resolved, this possibility
would not appear to be an unobtainable
goal. It may, however, prove to be
elusive. This guidance simply reflects
the Commission’s preliminary views. It
is not intended to limit any interested
persons’ option, and participants remain
free to present evidence and argument
as they wish.
To facilitate discussions among
interested persons the Commission will
allow notices of intervention to be filed
in this proceeding. Intervention, at this
stage, will permit intervenors, including
the Office of the Consumer Advocate, to
participate in any pre-or post-filing
conference the Postal Service may wish
to convene. To the extent such
conference(s) may be convened, any
such discussions would be deemed
privileged in any proceeding before the
Commission.
Sunset date. To ensure this docket
proceeds in an orderly fashion, the
Commission establishes a due date for
the filing of a request of February 26,
2007. Absent a request or other filing
related thereto filed on or before that
date, this docket will terminate and be
considered withdrawn as of February
26, 2007.
Representation of the general public.
In conformance with section 3624(a) of
title 39, the Commission designates
Shelley S. Dreifuss, director of the
Commission’s Office of the Consumer
Advocate, to represent the interests of
the general public in this proceeding.
Pursuant to this designation, Ms.
Dreifuss will direct the activities of
Commission personnel assigned to
assist her and, upon request, will supply
their names for the record. Neither Ms.
Dreifuss nor any of the assigned
personnel will participate in or provide
advice on any Commission decision in
this proceeding.
Ordering Paragraphs
16:39 Aug 29, 2006
Dated: August 25, 2006.
By the Commission.
Steven W. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–14408 Filed 8–29–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P
RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD
No FEAR Act Notice
On May 15, 2002, Congress enacted
the ‘‘Notification and Federal Employee
Antidiscrimination and Retaliation Act
of 2002,’’ which is now known as the
No FEAR Act. One purpose of the Act
is to ‘‘require that Federal agencies be
accountable for violations of
antidiscrimination and whistleblower
protection laws.’’ Public Law 107–174,
Summary. In support of this purpose,
Congress found that ‘‘agencies cannot be
run effectively if those agencies practice
or tolerate discrimination.’’ Public Law
107–74, Title I, General Provisions,
Section 101(1).
The Act also requires this agency to
provide this notice to Federal
employees, former Federal employees
and applicants for Federal employment
to inform you of the rights and
protections available to you under
Federal antidiscrimination,
whistleblower protection and retaliation
laws.
Antidiscrimination Laws
A Federal agency cannot discriminate
against an employee or applicant with
It is ordered:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
1. The Commission establishes Docket
No. MC2006–7 for the purpose of
receiving a request from the Postal
Service for a recommended decision
establishing a classification and fee
schedule for Stamped Stationery.
2. The Commission will sit en banc in
this proceeding.
3. Notices of intervention are due no
later than 28 days following the
submission of the Postal Service
Request.
4. Shelley S. Dreifuss, director of the
Commission’s Office of the Consumer
Advocate, is designated to represent the
interests of the general public.
5. The due date for filing a request to
establish the Stamped Stationery
classification in this proceeding is
February 26, 2007.
6. Absent a request or other filing
related thereto filed on or before
February 26, 2007, this docket will
terminate and be considered withdrawn
as of February 26, 2007.
7. The Secretary shall arrange for
publication of this document in the
Federal Register.
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00087
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
respect to the terms, conditions or
privileges of employment on the basis of
race, color, religion, sex, national origin,
age, disability, marital status or political
affiliation. Discrimination on these
bases is prohibited by one or more of the
following statutes: 5 U.S.C. 2302(b)(1),
29 U.S.C. 206(d), 29 U.S.C. 631, 29
U.S.C. 633a, 29 U.S.C. 791 and 42 U.S.C.
2000e–16.
If you believe that you have been the
victim of unlawful discrimination on
the basis of race, color, religion, sex,
national origin or disability, you must
contact an Equal Employment
Opportunity (EEO) counselor within 45
calendar days of the alleged
discriminatory action, or, in the case of
a personnel action, within 45 calendar
days of the effective date of the action,
before you can file a formal complaint
of discrimination with your agency. See,
e.g., 29 CFR 1614. If you believe that
you have been the victim of unlawful
discrimination on the basis of age, you
must either contact an EEO counselor as
noted above or give notice of intent to
sue to the Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission (EEOC) within
180 days of the alleged discriminatory
action. If you are alleging discrimination
based on marital status or political
affiliation, you may file a written
complaint with the U.S. Office of
Special Counsel (OSC) (see contact
information below). In the alternative
(or in some cases, in addition), you may
pursue a discrimination complaint by
filing a grievance through your agency’s
administrative or negotiated grievance
procedures, if such procedures apply
and are available.
Whistleblower Protection Laws
A Federal employee with authority to
take, direct others to take, recommend
or approve any personnel action must
not use that authority to take or fail to
take, or threaten to take or fail to take,
a personnel action against an employee
or applicant because of disclosure of
information by that individual that is
reasonably believed to evidence
violations of law, rule or regulation;
gross mismanagement, gross waste of
funds; an abuse of authority; or a
substantial and specific danger to public
health or safety, unless disclosure of
such information is specifically
prohibited by law and such information
is specifically required by Executive
order to be kept secret in the interest of
national defense or the conduct of
foreign affairs.
Retaliation against an employee or
applicant for making a protected
disclosure is prohibited by 5 U.S.C.
2302(b)(8). If you believe that you have
been the victim of whistleblower
E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM
30AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 168 / Wednesday, August 30, 2006 / Notices
retaliation, you may file a written
complaint (Form OSC–11) with the U.S.
Office of Special Counsel at 1730 M
Street, NW., Suite 218, Washington, DC
20036–4505 or online through the OSC
Web site https://www.osc.gov.
Retaliation for Engaging in Protected
Activity
Disciplinary Actions
Under the existing laws, each agency
retains the right, where appropriate, to
discipline a Federal employee who has
engaged in discriminatory or retaliatory
conduct, up to and including removal.
If OSC has initiated an investigation
under 5 U.S.C. 1214, however,
according to 5 U.S.C. 1214(f), agencies
must seek approval from the Special
Counsel to discipline employees for,
among other activities, engaging in
prohibited retaliation. Nothing in the No
FEAR Act alters existing laws or permits
an agency to take unfounded
disciplinary action against a Federal
employee or to violate the procedural
rights of a Federal employee who has
been accused of discrimination.
Additional Information
For further information regarding the
No FEAR Act regulations, refer to 5 CFR
724, as well as the appropriate offices
within your agency (e.g., EEO/civil
rights office, human resources office or
legal office). Additional information
regarding Federal antidiscrimination,
whistleblower protection and retaliation
laws can be found at the EEOC Web
site—https://www.eeoc.gov and the OSC
Web site—https://www.osc.gov.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Existing Rights Unchanged
Pursuant to section 205 of the No
FEAR Act, neither the Act nor this
notice creates, expands or reduces any
rights otherwise available to any
employee, former employee or applicant
under the laws of the United States,
including the provisions of law
specified in 5 U.S.C. 2302(d).
16:39 Aug 29, 2006
Jkt 208001
BILLING CODE 7905–01–M
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
A Federal agency cannot retaliate
against an employee or applicant
because that individual exercises his or
her rights under any of the Federal
antidiscrimination or whistleblower
protections laws listed above. If you
believe that you are the victim of
retaliation for engaging in protected
activity, you must follow, as
appropriate, the procedures described in
the Antidiscrimination Laws and
Whistleblower Protection Laws sections
or, if applicable, the administrative or
negotiated grievance procedures in
order to pursue any legal remedy.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Dated: August 24, 2006.
Beatrice Ezerski,
Secretary to the Board.
[FR Doc. 06–7247 Filed 8–29–06; 8:45 am]
[File No. 500–1]
In the Matter of Amanda Company,
Inc., American International Petroleum
Corp., China Continental, Inc., Com21,
Inc., Cycomm International, Inc.,
DeMarco Energy Systems of America,
Inc., Eco Soil Systems, Inc., Edulink,
Inc., H. Quotient, Inc., Healthtrac, Inc.,
Management Technologies, Inc., Metal
Recovery Technologies, Inc., Paystar
Corp., Royal Oak Mines, Inc., Rubber
Technology International, Inc., Seven
Seas Petroleum, Inc., Surebeam Corp.,
Syncronys Softcorp, Touch America
Holdings, Inc., U.S. Plastic Lumber
Corp., and Xcelera, Inc.; Order of
Suspension of Trading
August 28, 2006.
It appears to the Securities and
Exchange Commission that there is a
lack of current and accurate information
concerning the securities of Amanda
Company, Inc. because it has not filed
any periodic reports since the period
ended December 31, 2002.
It appears to the Securities and
Exchange Commission that there is a
lack of current and accurate information
concerning the securities of American
International Petroleum Corp. because it
has not filed any periodic reports since
the period ended September 30, 2002.
It appears to the Securities and
Exchange Commission that there is a
lack of current and accurate information
concerning the securities of China
Continental, Inc. because it has not filed
any periodic reports since the period
ended September 30, 2003.
It appears to the Securities and
Exchange Commission that there is a
lack of current and accurate information
concerning the securities of Com21, Inc.
because it has not filed any periodic
reports since the period ended March
31, 2003.
It appears to the Securities and
Exchange Commission that there is a
lack of current and accurate information
concerning the securities of Cycomm
International, Inc. because it has not
filed any periodic reports since the
period ended September 30, 2002.
It appears to the Securities and
Exchange Commission that there is a
lack of current and accurate information
concerning the securities of DeMarco
PO 00000
Frm 00088
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
51653
Energy Systems of America, Inc.
because it has not filed any periodic
reports since the period ended
September 30, 2003.
It appears to the Securities and
Exchange Commission that there is a
lack of current and accurate information
concerning the securities of Eco Soil
Systems, Inc. because it has not filed
any periodic reports since the period
ended March 31, 2001.
It appears to the Securities and
Exchange Commission that there is a
lack of current and accurate information
concerning the securities of Edulink,
Inc. because it has not filed any periodic
reports since the period ended
September 30, 2003.
It appears to the Securities and
Exchange Commission that there is a
lack of current and accurate information
concerning the securities of H Quotient,
Inc. because it has not filed any periodic
reports since the period ended
September 30, 2003.
It appears to the Securities and
Exchange Commission that there is a
lack of current and accurate information
concerning the securities of Healthtrac,
Inc. because it has not filed any periodic
reports since the period ended
November 30, 2003.
It appears to the Securities and
Exchange Commission that there is a
lack of current and accurate information
concerning the securities of
Management Technologies, Inc. because
it has not filed any periodic reports
since the period ended October 31,
1997.
It appears to the Securities and
Exchange Commission that there is a
lack of current and accurate information
concerning the securities of Metal
Recovery Technologies, Inc. because it
has not filed any periodic reports since
the period ended September 30, 1998.
It appears to the Securities and
Exchange Commission that there is a
lack of current and accurate information
concerning the securities of Paystar
Corp. because it has not filed any
periodic reports since the period ended
September 30, 2002.
It appears to the Securities and
Exchange Commission that there is a
lack of current and accurate information
concerning the securities of Royal Oak
Mines, Inc. because it has not filed any
periodic reports since the period ended
September 30, 1998.
It appears to the Securities and
Exchange Commission that there is a
lack of current and accurate information
concerning the securities of Rubber
Technology International, Inc. because
it has not filed any periodic reports
since the period ended August 31, 2003.
E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM
30AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 168 (Wednesday, August 30, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51652-51653]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7247]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD
No FEAR Act Notice
On May 15, 2002, Congress enacted the ``Notification and Federal
Employee Antidiscrimination and Retaliation Act of 2002,'' which is now
known as the No FEAR Act. One purpose of the Act is to ``require that
Federal agencies be accountable for violations of antidiscrimination
and whistleblower protection laws.'' Public Law 107-174, Summary. In
support of this purpose, Congress found that ``agencies cannot be run
effectively if those agencies practice or tolerate discrimination.''
Public Law 107-74, Title I, General Provisions, Section 101(1).
The Act also requires this agency to provide this notice to Federal
employees, former Federal employees and applicants for Federal
employment to inform you of the rights and protections available to you
under Federal antidiscrimination, whistleblower protection and
retaliation laws.
Antidiscrimination Laws
A Federal agency cannot discriminate against an employee or
applicant with respect to the terms, conditions or privileges of
employment on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin,
age, disability, marital status or political affiliation.
Discrimination on these bases is prohibited by one or more of the
following statutes: 5 U.S.C. 2302(b)(1), 29 U.S.C. 206(d), 29 U.S.C.
631, 29 U.S.C. 633a, 29 U.S.C. 791 and 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16.
If you believe that you have been the victim of unlawful
discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national
origin or disability, you must contact an Equal Employment Opportunity
(EEO) counselor within 45 calendar days of the alleged discriminatory
action, or, in the case of a personnel action, within 45 calendar days
of the effective date of the action, before you can file a formal
complaint of discrimination with your agency. See, e.g., 29 CFR 1614.
If you believe that you have been the victim of unlawful discrimination
on the basis of age, you must either contact an EEO counselor as noted
above or give notice of intent to sue to the Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission (EEOC) within 180 days of the alleged
discriminatory action. If you are alleging discrimination based on
marital status or political affiliation, you may file a written
complaint with the U.S. Office of Special Counsel (OSC) (see contact
information below). In the alternative (or in some cases, in addition),
you may pursue a discrimination complaint by filing a grievance through
your agency's administrative or negotiated grievance procedures, if
such procedures apply and are available.
Whistleblower Protection Laws
A Federal employee with authority to take, direct others to take,
recommend or approve any personnel action must not use that authority
to take or fail to take, or threaten to take or fail to take, a
personnel action against an employee or applicant because of disclosure
of information by that individual that is reasonably believed to
evidence violations of law, rule or regulation; gross mismanagement,
gross waste of funds; an abuse of authority; or a substantial and
specific danger to public health or safety, unless disclosure of such
information is specifically prohibited by law and such information is
specifically required by Executive order to be kept secret in the
interest of national defense or the conduct of foreign affairs.
Retaliation against an employee or applicant for making a protected
disclosure is prohibited by 5 U.S.C. 2302(b)(8). If you believe that
you have been the victim of whistleblower
[[Page 51653]]
retaliation, you may file a written complaint (Form OSC-11) with the
U.S. Office of Special Counsel at 1730 M Street, NW., Suite 218,
Washington, DC 20036-4505 or online through the OSC Web site https://
www.osc.gov.
Retaliation for Engaging in Protected Activity
A Federal agency cannot retaliate against an employee or applicant
because that individual exercises his or her rights under any of the
Federal antidiscrimination or whistleblower protections laws listed
above. If you believe that you are the victim of retaliation for
engaging in protected activity, you must follow, as appropriate, the
procedures described in the Antidiscrimination Laws and Whistleblower
Protection Laws sections or, if applicable, the administrative or
negotiated grievance procedures in order to pursue any legal remedy.
Disciplinary Actions
Under the existing laws, each agency retains the right, where
appropriate, to discipline a Federal employee who has engaged in
discriminatory or retaliatory conduct, up to and including removal. If
OSC has initiated an investigation under 5 U.S.C. 1214, however,
according to 5 U.S.C. 1214(f), agencies must seek approval from the
Special Counsel to discipline employees for, among other activities,
engaging in prohibited retaliation. Nothing in the No FEAR Act alters
existing laws or permits an agency to take unfounded disciplinary
action against a Federal employee or to violate the procedural rights
of a Federal employee who has been accused of discrimination.
Additional Information
For further information regarding the No FEAR Act regulations,
refer to 5 CFR 724, as well as the appropriate offices within your
agency (e.g., EEO/civil rights office, human resources office or legal
office). Additional information regarding Federal antidiscrimination,
whistleblower protection and retaliation laws can be found at the EEOC
Web site--https://www.eeoc.gov and the OSC Web site--https://www.osc.gov.
Existing Rights Unchanged
Pursuant to section 205 of the No FEAR Act, neither the Act nor
this notice creates, expands or reduces any rights otherwise available
to any employee, former employee or applicant under the laws of the
United States, including the provisions of law specified in 5 U.S.C.
2302(d).
Dated: August 24, 2006.
Beatrice Ezerski,
Secretary to the Board.
[FR Doc. 06-7247 Filed 8-29-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7905-01-M