Visas: Documentation of Nonimmigrants Under the Immigration and Nationality Act; Correction, 50338-50339 [E6-14140]
Download as PDF
50338
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 165 / Friday, August 25, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
FDC date
State
City
Airport
FDC No.
08/03/03 ..............
MO
St Louis ............................................
Lambert-St Louis Intl .......................
6/5168
08/03/03 ..............
MO
St Louis ............................................
Lambert-St Louis Intl .......................
6/5169
05/10/06 ..............
08/01/06 ..............
ME
NH
Augusta ............................................
Keene ...............................................
Augusta State ..................................
Dillant-Hopkins .................................
6/7012
6/4653
08/01/06 ..............
08/02/06 ..............
MA
GA
Orange .............................................
Atlanta ..............................................
Orange Muni ....................................
Hartsfield Jackson Atlanta Intl .........
6/4654
6/4815
08/02/06 ..............
NH
Rochester .........................................
Skyhaven .........................................
6/4816
08/02/06 ..............
WA
Pullman/Moscos ...............................
Pullman/Moscow Regional ..............
6/4822
08/03/06 ..............
08/03/06 ..............
08/03/06 ..............
NJ
NJ
CA
Wildwood .........................................
Wildwood .........................................
Long Beach ......................................
Cape May County ............................
Cape May County ............................
Long Beach/Daugherty Field ...........
6/4914
6/4916
6/4967
08/03/06 ..............
AZ
Tucson .............................................
Ryan Field ........................................
6/5012
08/03/06 ..............
AL
Muscle Shoals .................................
Northwest Alabama Regional ..........
6/5153
08/04/06 ..............
08/04/06 ..............
FL
FL
Destin ...............................................
Destin ...............................................
Destin-Fort Walton Beach ...............
Destin-Fort Walton Beach ...............
6/5225
6/5226
08/04/06 ..............
FL
Destin ...............................................
Destin-Fort Walton Beach ...............
6/5227
08/07/06 ..............
08/08/06 ..............
NY
OR
New York .........................................
Redmond .........................................
John F. Kennedy Intl .......................
Roberts Field ...................................
6/5449
6/5636
08/08/06 ..............
CA
San Francisco ..................................
San Francisco Intl ............................
6/5618
Why Is the Department Correcting This
Rule?
[FR Doc. 06–7129 Filed 8–24–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–M
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 5523]
22 CFR Part 41
RIN 1400–AC06
Visas: Documentation of
Nonimmigrants Under the Immigration
and Nationality Act; Correction
Department of State.
Correcting amendments.
AGENCY:
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
ACTION:
SUMMARY: This document contains
corrections to the final rule published in
the Federal Register of June 30, 2006.
The rule expanded guidance to consular
offices for the review of nonimmigrant
visa issuances and refusals.
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is
effective on August 25, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Charles E. Robertson, Legislation and
Regulations Division, Visa Services,
Department of State, Washington, DC
20520–0106. Phone: 202–663–3969. Email: robertsonce3@state.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:27 Aug 24, 2006
Jkt 208001
The rule as published on June 30,
2006 (71 FR 37494), contained an
amendment to 22 CFR 41.121, governing
review nonimmigrant visa refusals, as
well as an addition to 22 CFR 41.113
providing guidelines for review of
nonimmigrant visa issuances. Due to a
clerical error, the first appearance of the
words ‘‘refusal’’ and ‘‘issuance’’ in their
respective rules is transposed, so that
the first appearance of the word
‘‘issuance’’ in 41.113 (i) appears as
‘‘refusal’’ and the first appearance of the
word ‘‘refusal’’ in 41.121 (c) appears as
‘‘issuance’’. The purpose of this
correction is to reverse that
transposition so that the purpose of each
rule change is clear.
List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 41
Aliens, Foreign officials, Immigration,
Nonimmigrants, Passports and visas,
Students.
Accordingly, 22 CFR part 41 is
corrected by making the following
correcting amendments:
I
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Subject
LDA/DME Rwy 30L,
Amdt 1.
ILS Rwy 30R, (CAT
II), Amdt 9.
ILS Rwy 17, Amdt 2C.
VOR Rwy 2, Amdt
12C.
GPS Rwy 32, Orig-D.
ILS OR LOC Rwy 9R,
ILS Rwy 9R (CAT
II), ILS Rwy 9R
(CAT III), Amdt
17A.
NDB OR GPS–B
Amdt 1B.
RNAV (GPS) Rwy 23,
Orig.
LOC Rwy 19, Amdt 6.
VOR–A, Amdt 3.
RNAV (RNP) Y Rwy
30, Orig.
ILS Rwy 6R, Amdt
5A.
RNAV (GPS) Rwy 36,
Orig.
NDB Rwy 32, Amdt 1.
RNAV (GPS) Rwy 32,
Orig-A.
RNAV (GPS) Rwy 14,
Orig-B.
VOR Rwy 4L, Orig.
NDB OR GPS (Rwy
22, Amdt 1).
ILS Rwy 19L, Amdt
19A.
PART 41—VISAS: DOCUMENTATION
OF NONIMMIGRANTS UNDER THE
IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY ACT
1. The authority citation for part 41
shall continue to read as follows:
I
Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1104; Pub. L. 105–277,
112 Stat. 2681–795 through 2681–801.
Additional authority is derived from section
104 of the Illegal Immigration Reform and
Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996
(IIRIRA) Pub. L. 104–208, 110 Stat. 3546.
2. In § 41.113, revise paragraph (i) to
read as follows:
I
§ 41.113
Procedures in issuing visas.
*
*
*
*
*
(i) Nonimmigrant visa issuances must
be reviewed, in accordance with
guidance by the Secretary of State, by
consular supervisors, or a designated
alternate, to ensure compliance with
applicable laws and procedures. Visa
issuances must be reviewed without
delay; that is, on the day of issuance or
as soon as is administratively possible.
If the reviewing officer disagrees with
the decision and he or she has a
consular commission and title, the
reviewing officer may assume
responsibility and readjudicate the case.
If the reviewing officer does not have a
consular commission and title, he or she
E:\FR\FM\25AUR1.SGM
25AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 165 / Friday, August 25, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
must consult with the adjudicating
officer, or with the Visa Office, to
resolve any disagreement.
3. In § 41.121, revise paragraph (c) to
read as follows:
I
§ 41.121
Refusal of individual visas.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Nonimmigrant refusals must be
reviewed, in accordance with guidance
by the Secretary of State, by consular
supervisors, or a designated alternate, to
ensure compliance with laws and
procedures. If the ground(s) of
ineligibility upon which the visa was
refused cannot be overcome by the
presentation of additional evidence, the
refusal must be reviewed without delay;
that is, on the day of the refusal or as
soon as it is administratively possible. If
the ground(s) of ineligibility may be
overcome by the presentation of
additional evidence, and the applicant
has indicated the intention to submit
such evidence, a review of the refusal
may be deferred for not more than 120
days. If the reviewing officer disagrees
with the decision and he or she has a
consular commission and title, the
reviewing officer can assume
responsibility and readjudicate the case.
If the reviewing officer does not have a
consular commission and title, he or she
must consult with the adjudicating
officer, or with the Visa Office, to
resolve any disagreement.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: August 7, 2006.
Stephen A. Edson,
Deputy Assistant Secretary, Visa Services,
Department of State.
[FR Doc. E6–14140 Filed 8–24–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement
30 CFR Part 924
[MS–016–FOR]
State Abandoned Mine Land
Reclamation Plan
Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement, Interior.
ACTION: Final rule; approval of
amendment.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We, the Office of Surface
Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
(OSM), are approving a partial
abandoned mine land reclamation
(AMLR) plan under the Surface Mining
Control and Reclamation Act of 1977
(SMCRA or the Act). Mississippi
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:27 Aug 24, 2006
Jkt 208001
proposed revisions to and addition of
statutes to the Mississippi Surface Coal
Mining and Reclamation Law in order to
authorize and establish an AMLR plan.
The purpose of this amendment is to
demonstrate both the intent and
capability to assume responsibility for
administering and conducting an AMLR
plan.
DATES: Effective Date: August 25, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Arthur W. Abbs, Director, Birmingham
Field Office. Telephone: (205) 290–
7282. E-mail address: aabbs@osmre.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background on the Abandoned Mine Land
Reclamation Program
II. Submission of the AMLR Plan Statutes
III. OSM’s Findings
IV. Summary and Disposition of Comments
V. OSM’s Decision
VI. Procedural Determinations
I. Background on the Abandoned Mine
Land Reclamation Program
The AMLR Program was established
by Title IV of the Act (30 U.S.C. 1201
et seq.) in response to concerns over
extensive environmental damage caused
by past coal mining activities. The
program is funded by a reclamation fee
collected on each ton of coal that is
produced. The money collected is used
to finance the reclamation of abandoned
coal mines and for other authorized
activities. Section 405 of the Act allows
States and Indian Tribes to assume
exclusive responsibility for reclamation
activity within the State or on Indian
lands if they develop and submit, to the
Secretary of the Interior for approval, a
program (often referred to as a plan) for
the reclamation of abandoned coal
mines.
II. Submission of the AMLR Plan
Statutes
By letter dated April 5, 2006
(Administrative Record No. MS–0402),
Mississippi sent us its AMLR plan
statutes under SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1201
et seq.). The purpose of this submission
was to demonstrate both the intent and
capability to assume responsibility for
administering and conducting the
provisions of SMCRA and OSM’s AMLR
program (30 CFR Chapter 7, Subchapter
R). Mississippi revised and added
statutes to the Mississippi Surface Coal
Mining and Reclamation Law at
Sections 53–9–3, 53–9–7, 53–9–89, 53–
9–89(1)(c), 53–9–89(1)(c)(i) through (v),
53–9–101, 53–9–103, 53–9–105, 53–9–
107, 53–9–109, 53–9–111, 53–9–113,
53–9–115, 53–9–117, 53–9–119, 53–9–
121, 53–9–123.
We announced receipt of the
proposed plan statutes in the June 8,
2006, Federal Register (72 FR 33273). In
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
50339
the same document, we opened the
public comment period and provided an
opportunity for a public hearing or
meeting on the adequacy of the statutes.
We did not hold a public hearing or
meeting because no one requested one.
The public comment period ended on
July 10, 2006. We received comments
from three Federal agencies.
III. OSM’s Findings
Following are the findings we made
concerning the AMLR plan statutes
under SMCRA and the Federal
regulations at 30 CFR 884.14 and
884.15. We are approving the statutes as
described below.
In accordance with section 405 of
SMCRA, we find that Mississippi has
submitted AMLR plan statutes for the
reclamation of abandoned mines and
has the authority to implement the
provisions of Title IV of SMCRA.
1. The public has been given adequate
notice and opportunity to comment and
the record does not reflect major
unresolved controversies.
2. We have solicited and considered
the views of the Federal agencies having
an interest in the Mississippi AMLR
plan statutes. Agencies that responded
include: the U.S. Bureau of Land
Management (BLM), U.S. Natural
Resources Conservation Service (NRCS),
and the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
3. The Mississippi Department of
Environmental Quality, Office of
Geology, has the legal authority and
administrative structure to carry out the
State AMLR plan statutes.
4. The Mississippi AMLR plan
statutes meet all requirements of OSM’s
Title IV program provisions.
5. We approved the Mississippi
regulatory program effective September
4, 1980.
6. The Mississippi AMLR plan
statutes are in compliance with all
applicable State and Federal laws and
regulations.
Therefore, we approve Mississippi’s
AMLR plan statutes. Although the
AMLR plan statutes conform to
statutory requirements, Mississippi
must still submit the information
required by 30 CFR 884.13(a) through (f)
before we can make the findings
necessary for full approval of its AMLR
plan. The State will be able to receive
and spend Federal AMLR grant funds
only after we approve its complete State
AMLR plan.
IV. Summary and Disposition of
Comments
Public Comments
We asked for public comments on the
amendment, but did not receive any.
E:\FR\FM\25AUR1.SGM
25AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 165 (Friday, August 25, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 50338-50339]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-14140]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 5523]
22 CFR Part 41
RIN 1400-AC06
Visas: Documentation of Nonimmigrants Under the Immigration and
Nationality Act; Correction
AGENCY: Department of State.
ACTION: Correcting amendments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document contains corrections to the final rule published
in the Federal Register of June 30, 2006. The rule expanded guidance to
consular offices for the review of nonimmigrant visa issuances and
refusals.
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is effective on August 25, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charles E. Robertson, Legislation and
Regulations Division, Visa Services, Department of State, Washington,
DC 20520-0106. Phone: 202-663-3969. E-mail: robertsonce3@state.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Why Is the Department Correcting This Rule?
The rule as published on June 30, 2006 (71 FR 37494), contained an
amendment to 22 CFR 41.121, governing review nonimmigrant visa
refusals, as well as an addition to 22 CFR 41.113 providing guidelines
for review of nonimmigrant visa issuances. Due to a clerical error, the
first appearance of the words ``refusal'' and ``issuance'' in their
respective rules is transposed, so that the first appearance of the
word ``issuance'' in 41.113 (i) appears as ``refusal'' and the first
appearance of the word ``refusal'' in 41.121 (c) appears as
``issuance''. The purpose of this correction is to reverse that
transposition so that the purpose of each rule change is clear.
List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 41
Aliens, Foreign officials, Immigration, Nonimmigrants, Passports
and visas, Students.
0
Accordingly, 22 CFR part 41 is corrected by making the following
correcting amendments:
PART 41--VISAS: DOCUMENTATION OF NONIMMIGRANTS UNDER THE
IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY ACT
0
1. The authority citation for part 41 shall continue to read as
follows:
Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1104; Pub. L. 105-277, 112 Stat. 2681-795
through 2681-801. Additional authority is derived from section 104
of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act
of 1996 (IIRIRA) Pub. L. 104-208, 110 Stat. 3546.
0
2. In Sec. 41.113, revise paragraph (i) to read as follows:
Sec. 41.113 Procedures in issuing visas.
* * * * *
(i) Nonimmigrant visa issuances must be reviewed, in accordance
with guidance by the Secretary of State, by consular supervisors, or a
designated alternate, to ensure compliance with applicable laws and
procedures. Visa issuances must be reviewed without delay; that is, on
the day of issuance or as soon as is administratively possible. If the
reviewing officer disagrees with the decision and he or she has a
consular commission and title, the reviewing officer may assume
responsibility and readjudicate the case. If the reviewing officer does
not have a consular commission and title, he or she
[[Page 50339]]
must consult with the adjudicating officer, or with the Visa Office, to
resolve any disagreement.
0
3. In Sec. 41.121, revise paragraph (c) to read as follows:
Sec. 41.121 Refusal of individual visas.
* * * * *
(c) Nonimmigrant refusals must be reviewed, in accordance with
guidance by the Secretary of State, by consular supervisors, or a
designated alternate, to ensure compliance with laws and procedures. If
the ground(s) of ineligibility upon which the visa was refused cannot
be overcome by the presentation of additional evidence, the refusal
must be reviewed without delay; that is, on the day of the refusal or
as soon as it is administratively possible. If the ground(s) of
ineligibility may be overcome by the presentation of additional
evidence, and the applicant has indicated the intention to submit such
evidence, a review of the refusal may be deferred for not more than 120
days. If the reviewing officer disagrees with the decision and he or
she has a consular commission and title, the reviewing officer can
assume responsibility and readjudicate the case. If the reviewing
officer does not have a consular commission and title, he or she must
consult with the adjudicating officer, or with the Visa Office, to
resolve any disagreement.
* * * * *
Dated: August 7, 2006.
Stephen A. Edson,
Deputy Assistant Secretary, Visa Services, Department of State.
[FR Doc. E6-14140 Filed 8-24-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-06-P