Black Hills National Forest, Northern Hills Ranger District, South Dakota and Bearlodge Ranger District, Wyoming-North Zone Range 05 Proposal and Analysis, 49414-49415 [06-7104]
Download as PDF
49414
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 163 / Wednesday, August 23, 2006 / Notices
Notice by District Rangers of
Availability for Comment and Decisions:
Laramie District: Laramie Daily
Boomerang, published daily in Laramie,
Albany County, Wyoming.
Douglas District: Casper Star-Tribune,
published daily in Casper, Natrona
County, Wyoming.
Brush Creek—Hayden District:
Rawlins Daily Times, published daily in
Rawlins, Carbon County, Wyoming.
Shoshone National Forest, Wyoming
Notice by Forest Supervisor of
Availability for Comment and Decisions:
Cody Enterprise, published twice
weekly in Cody, Park County, Wyoming.
Notice by District Rangers of
Availability for Comment and Decisions:
Clarks Fork District: Powell Tribune,
published twice weekly in Powell, Park
County, Wyoming.
Wapiti and Greybull Districts: Cody
Enterprise, published twice weekly in
Cody, Park County, Wyoming.
Wind River District: The Dubois
Frontier, published weekly in Dubois,
Fremont County, Wyoming.
Washakie District: Lander Journal,
published twice weekly in Lander,
Fremont County, Wyoming.
Dated: August 9, 2006.
Richard C. Stem,
Deputy Regional Forester, Resources, Rocky
Mountain Region.
[FR Doc. E6–13949 Filed 8–22–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Black Hills National Forest, Northern
Hills Ranger District, South Dakota and
Bearlodge Ranger District, Wyoming—
North Zone Range 05 Proposal and
Analysis
Forest Service, USDA.
Revised notice of intent to
prepare an environmental impact
statement.
AGENCY:
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
ACTION:
SUMMARY: This project will revise
Rangeland Allotment Management
Plans (RAMP) for eight allotments
comprising about 79,634 acres within
two Ranger Districts of the Black Hills
National Forest, and analyze continued
grazing within the constraints of the
Revised Black Hills National Forest
Land and Resource Management Plan,
as amended (BHNF LRMP). A Notice of
Intent to prepare an environmental
impact statement for this project was
published August 17, 2005 (70 FR
48369). More than six months have
elapsed since the projected FEIS date in
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:04 Aug 22, 2006
Jkt 208001
that original NOI. This revised NOI is
being issued to update the project
schedule.
DATES: The Notice of Availability of the
draft environmental impact statement
was published in the Federal Register
on July 7, 2006 (71 FR 38641). The final
environmental impact statement is
expected in September, 2006. No further
formal public comment opportunities
will be offered on this project.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Alice Allen, Project Coordinator, Black
Hills National Forest, Hell Canyon
Ranger District, at 330 Mt. Rushmore
Rd., phone (605) 673–4853.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose and Need for Action: The
purpose of the project is to authorize
livestock grazing in an environmentally
acceptable manner. The EIS will
determine current conditions, analyze
environmental consequences of grazing
management actions on those
conditions, and assist the decision
maker in selecting management/
monitoring strategies consistent with
meeting desired conditions in the BHNF
LRMP, including Goals 1, 2 and 3. The
need for the action is to revise allotment
management plans, reverse any existing
undesirable conditions, and ensure that
authorized uses and associated
management activities move them
towards desired BHNF LRMP
conditions. There is also a need to
respond to requests for grazing permits
on lands not currently being grazed.
Proposed Action: The Northern Hills
and Bearlodge Ranger Districts propose
to implement best management
practices and activities with adaptive
management and monitoring strategies
to allow livestock grazing consistent
with Forest Plan desired conditions,
standards and guidelines. The Proposed
Action is Alternative A in the EIS.
Issues: Key issues include impacts of
the proposal to soil and water quality;
vegetative diversity; wildlife and
wildlife habitat; economic efficiency of
the proposal; timeframe for achieving
desired conditions; and management of
the recently acquired Besant Park,
Tilson and Gonzales parcels.
Alternatives: Alternative B is similar
to Alternative A, but would authorize
livestock grazing on three additional
recently acquired parcels and add these
to adjacent existing allotments.
Alternative D, the No Action
Alternative, is the No Grazing
Alternative and would eliminate any
livestock grazing on the project area.
Alternative E proposes the use of rest
periods to achieve faster recovery of
riparian areas. Alternative F would
move the area toward desired
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
conditions by means of reduced
stocking rates, mandatory use of range
riders, or other non-structural adaptive
management actions. No new range
improvements are proposed. Alternative
C, current management, was dismissed
from detailed consideration.
Responsible Official
The Responsible Official for the
allotments on the Bearlodge Ranger
District is Steve Kozel, District Ranger,
Black Hills National Forest, Bearlodge
Ranger District, 121 S. 21st Street,
Sundance, Wyoming 82729. The
Responsible Official for the allotments
on the Northern Hills Ranger District is
the District Ranger, Black Hills National
Forest, Northern Hills Ranger District,
2014 N. Main St., Spearfish, South
Dakota 57783.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
The decision to be made is whether to
continue to permit livestock grazing on
all, part, or none of these allotments
and, if so, under what terms and
conditions to ensure that desired
condition objectives are met, or that
movement occurs toward those
objectives. The Northern Hills District
Ranger will also decide whether or not
to allow livestock graing on three
recently acquired parcels and one
vacant grazing unit, and if so, under
what conditions.
Public Comment
Comments and input regarding the
proposal were requested from the
public, other groups and agencies via
direct mailing on March 21, 2005.
Additional comments were solicited
during August and September 2005 via
public notices and an additional direct
mailing. The Draft EIS was issued for a
45-day public comment in July, 2006.
No further formal public comment
opportunities will be offered on this
project.
Early Notice of Importance of Public
Participation in Subsequent
Environmental Review: The following
was published as part of the original
Notice of Intent. A draft environmental
impact statement will be prepared for
comment. The comment period on the
draft environmental impact statement
will be 45 days from the date the
Environmental Protection Agency
published the notice of availability in
the Federal Register. The Forest Service
believes, at this early stage, it is
important to give reviewers notice of
several court rulings related to public
participation in the environmental
review process. First, reviewers of draft
environmental impact statements must
structure their participation in the
E:\FR\FM\23AUN1.SGM
23AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 163 / Wednesday, August 23, 2006 / Notices
environmental review of the proposal so
that it is meaningful and alerts an
agency to the reviewer’s position and
contentions. Vermont Yankee Nuclear
Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 553
(1978). Also, environmental objections
that could be raised at the draft
environmental impact statement stage
but that are not raised until after
completion of the final environmental
impact statement may be waived or
dismissed by the courts. City of Angoon
v. Hodel, 803 F.2d 1016, 1022 (9th Cir.
1986) and Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. v.
Harris, 490 F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D.
Wis. 1980). Because of these court
rulings, it is very important that those
interested in this proposed action
participate by the close of the 45-day
comment period so that substantive
comments and objections are made
available to the Forest Service at a time
when it can meaningfully consider them
and respond to them in the final
environmental impact statement.
To assist the Forest Service in
identifying and considering issues and
concerns on the proposed action,
comments on the draft environmental
impact statement should be as specific
as possible. It is also helpful if
comments refer to specific pages or
chapters of the draft statement.
Comments may also address the
adequacy of the draft environmental
impact statement or the merits of the
alternatives formulated and discussed in
the statement. Reviewers may wish to
refer to the Council on Environmental
Quality Regulations for implementing
the procedural provisions of the
National Environmental Policy Act at 40
CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.
Comments received, including the
names and addresses of those who
comment, will be considered part of the
public record on this proposal and will
be available for public inspection.
(Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7 and 1508.22;
Forest Service Handbook 1900.15, Section
21)
SUMMARY: In accordance with the Secure
Rural Schools and Community Self
Determination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. No.
106–393) and the Federal Advisory
Committee Act of 1972 (FACA), the U.S.
Department of Agriculture, Forest
Service, Davy Crockett National Forest
Resource Advisory Committee (RAC)
meeting will meet on September 21,
2006.
DATES: The Davy Crockett National
Forest RAC meeting will be held on
September 21, 2006.
ADDRESSES: The Davy Crockett National
Forest RAC meeting will be held at the
Davy Crockett Ranger Station located on
State Highway 7, approximately onequarter mile west of FM 227 in Houston
County, Texas. The meeting will begin
at 6 p.m. and adjourn at approximately
9 p.m. There will be a public comment
period.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Raoul Gagne, District Ranger, Davy
Crockett National Forest, Rt. 1, Box 55
FS, Kennard, Texas 75847: Telephone
936–655–2299 or e-mail at
rgagne@fs.fed.us.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Davy
Crockett National Forest RAC proposes
projects and funding to the Secretary of
Agriculture under section 203 of the
Secure Rural Schools and Community
Self Determination Act of 2000. The
purpose of the September 21, 2006
meeting is to review the status of
approved projects and discuss and
approve additional project proposals to
submit to the Forest Supervisor for the
National Forests and Grasslands in
Texas. These meetings are open to the
public. The public may present written
comments to the RAC. Each formal RAC
meeting will also have time allocated for
hearing public comments. Depending on
the number of persons wishing to
comment and time available, the time
for individual oral comments may be
limited.
Dated: August 17, 2006.
Raoul W. Gagne,
Designated Federal Officer, Davy Crockett
National Forest RAC.
[FR Doc. 06–7098 Filed 8–22–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Dated: August 17, 2006.
Craig Bobzien,
Forest Supervisor, Black Hills National Forest.
[FR Doc. 06–7104 Filed 8–22–06; 8:45am]
Natural Resources Conservation
Service
Notice of Public Meeting, Davy
Crockett National Forest Resource
Advisory Committee
Notice of Proposed Change to Section
IV of the Virginia State Technical Guide
Forest Service, Agriculture.
ACTION: Notice of meeting.
AGENCY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:04 Aug 22, 2006
Jkt 208001
Notice of Availability of
proposed changes in the Virginia NRCS
State Technical Guide for review and
comment.
ACTION:
SUMMARY: It has been determined by the
NRCS State Conservationist for Virginia
that changes must be made in the NRCS
State Technical Guide specifically in
practice standards: #328, Conservation
Crop Rotation, #329, Residue and
Tillage Management No Till/Strip Till/
Direct Seed, #345, Residue and Tillage
Management Mulch Till, #528,
Prescribed Grazing and #612, Tree/
Shrub Establishment. These practices
will be used to plan and install
conservation practices on cropland,
pastureland, woodland, and wildlife
land.
Comments will be received for a
30-day period commencing with the
date of this publication.
DATES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Inquire in writing to M. Denise Doetzer,
State Conservationist, Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS), 1606
Santa Rosa Road, Suite 209, Richmond,
Virginia 23229–5014; Telephone
number (804) 287–1665; Fax number
(804) 287–1736. Copies of the practice
standards will be made available upon
written request to the address shown
above or on the Virginia NRCS Web site:
https://www.va.nrcs.usda.gov/technical/
draftstandards.html.
Section
343 of the Federal Agriculture
Improvement and Reform Act of 1996
states that revisions made after
enactment of the law to NRCS State
technical guides used to carry out
highly erodible land and wetland
provisions of the law shall be made
available for public review and
comment. For the next 30 days, the
NRCS in Virginia will receive comments
relative to the proposed changes.
Following that period, a determination
will be made by the NRCS in Virginia
regarding disposition of those comments
and a final determination of change will
be made to the subject standards.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
W. Ray Dorsett,
Assistant State Conservationist (Operations),
Natural Resources Conservation Service,
Richmond, Virginia.
[FR Doc. E6–13752 Filed 8–22–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–16–P
Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS), U.S.
Department of Agriculture.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
49415
E:\FR\FM\23AUN1.SGM
23AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 163 (Wednesday, August 23, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49414-49415]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-7104]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Black Hills National Forest, Northern Hills Ranger District,
South Dakota and Bearlodge Ranger District, Wyoming--North Zone Range
05 Proposal and Analysis
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Revised notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact
statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This project will revise Rangeland Allotment Management Plans
(RAMP) for eight allotments comprising about 79,634 acres within two
Ranger Districts of the Black Hills National Forest, and analyze
continued grazing within the constraints of the Revised Black Hills
National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan, as amended (BHNF
LRMP). A Notice of Intent to prepare an environmental impact statement
for this project was published August 17, 2005 (70 FR 48369). More than
six months have elapsed since the projected FEIS date in that original
NOI. This revised NOI is being issued to update the project schedule.
DATES: The Notice of Availability of the draft environmental impact
statement was published in the Federal Register on July 7, 2006 (71 FR
38641). The final environmental impact statement is expected in
September, 2006. No further formal public comment opportunities will be
offered on this project.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alice Allen, Project Coordinator,
Black Hills National Forest, Hell Canyon Ranger District, at 330 Mt.
Rushmore Rd., phone (605) 673-4853.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose and Need for Action: The purpose of the project is to
authorize livestock grazing in an environmentally acceptable manner.
The EIS will determine current conditions, analyze environmental
consequences of grazing management actions on those conditions, and
assist the decision maker in selecting management/monitoring strategies
consistent with meeting desired conditions in the BHNF LRMP, including
Goals 1, 2 and 3. The need for the action is to revise allotment
management plans, reverse any existing undesirable conditions, and
ensure that authorized uses and associated management activities move
them towards desired BHNF LRMP conditions. There is also a need to
respond to requests for grazing permits on lands not currently being
grazed.
Proposed Action: The Northern Hills and Bearlodge Ranger Districts
propose to implement best management practices and activities with
adaptive management and monitoring strategies to allow livestock
grazing consistent with Forest Plan desired conditions, standards and
guidelines. The Proposed Action is Alternative A in the EIS.
Issues: Key issues include impacts of the proposal to soil and
water quality; vegetative diversity; wildlife and wildlife habitat;
economic efficiency of the proposal; timeframe for achieving desired
conditions; and management of the recently acquired Besant Park, Tilson
and Gonzales parcels.
Alternatives: Alternative B is similar to Alternative A, but would
authorize livestock grazing on three additional recently acquired
parcels and add these to adjacent existing allotments. Alternative D,
the No Action Alternative, is the No Grazing Alternative and would
eliminate any livestock grazing on the project area. Alternative E
proposes the use of rest periods to achieve faster recovery of riparian
areas. Alternative F would move the area toward desired conditions by
means of reduced stocking rates, mandatory use of range riders, or
other non-structural adaptive management actions. No new range
improvements are proposed. Alternative C, current management, was
dismissed from detailed consideration.
Responsible Official
The Responsible Official for the allotments on the Bearlodge Ranger
District is Steve Kozel, District Ranger, Black Hills National Forest,
Bearlodge Ranger District, 121 S. 21st Street, Sundance, Wyoming 82729.
The Responsible Official for the allotments on the Northern Hills
Ranger District is the District Ranger, Black Hills National Forest,
Northern Hills Ranger District, 2014 N. Main St., Spearfish, South
Dakota 57783.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
The decision to be made is whether to continue to permit livestock
grazing on all, part, or none of these allotments and, if so, under
what terms and conditions to ensure that desired condition objectives
are met, or that movement occurs toward those objectives. The Northern
Hills District Ranger will also decide whether or not to allow
livestock graing on three recently acquired parcels and one vacant
grazing unit, and if so, under what conditions.
Public Comment
Comments and input regarding the proposal were requested from the
public, other groups and agencies via direct mailing on March 21, 2005.
Additional comments were solicited during August and September 2005 via
public notices and an additional direct mailing. The Draft EIS was
issued for a 45-day public comment in July, 2006. No further formal
public comment opportunities will be offered on this project.
Early Notice of Importance of Public Participation in Subsequent
Environmental Review: The following was published as part of the
original Notice of Intent. A draft environmental impact statement will
be prepared for comment. The comment period on the draft environmental
impact statement will be 45 days from the date the Environmental
Protection Agency published the notice of availability in the Federal
Register. The Forest Service believes, at this early stage, it is
important to give reviewers notice of several court rulings related to
public participation in the environmental review process. First,
reviewers of draft environmental impact statements must structure their
participation in the
[[Page 49415]]
environmental review of the proposal so that it is meaningful and
alerts an agency to the reviewer's position and contentions. Vermont
Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 553 (1978). Also,
environmental objections that could be raised at the draft
environmental impact statement stage but that are not raised until
after completion of the final environmental impact statement may be
waived or dismissed by the courts. City of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d
1016, 1022 (9th Cir. 1986) and Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490
F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980). Because of these court rulings,
it is very important that those interested in this proposed action
participate by the close of the 45-day comment period so that
substantive comments and objections are made available to the Forest
Service at a time when it can meaningfully consider them and respond to
them in the final environmental impact statement.
To assist the Forest Service in identifying and considering issues
and concerns on the proposed action, comments on the draft
environmental impact statement should be as specific as possible. It is
also helpful if comments refer to specific pages or chapters of the
draft statement. Comments may also address the adequacy of the draft
environmental impact statement or the merits of the alternatives
formulated and discussed in the statement. Reviewers may wish to refer
to the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations for implementing
the procedural provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act at
40 CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.
Comments received, including the names and addresses of those who
comment, will be considered part of the public record on this proposal
and will be available for public inspection.
(Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7 and 1508.22; Forest Service Handbook
1900.15, Section 21)
Dated: August 17, 2006.
Craig Bobzien,
Forest Supervisor, Black Hills National Forest.
[FR Doc. 06-7104 Filed 8-22-06; 8:45am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M