Rachel Carson National Wildlife Refuge, 47511-47512 [E6-13558]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 159 / Thursday, August 17, 2006 / Notices
support to the protection and restoration
of all its components and adjacent
habitats that directly affect the vitality
and viability of the ecosystem.’’
• Wildlife Observation: A suggestion
was made to develop a through-swamp
canoe/kayak trail. This suggestion was
adopted. A through-swamp canoe/kayak
trail will be developed in Washington
Ditch from the existing parking area to
Lake Drummond and then via the
Feeder Ditch to the Dismal Swamp
Canal, and a partnership will be sought
to oversee maintenance of the trail.
• Road Improvements: A number of
comments about the amount of road
paving that was proposed were
received. The refuge decided to reduce
the amount of paving. The proposed
auto tour route and the access to Lake
Drummond will remain as gravel roads.
Paving will only occur on highest use
access roads at Washington Ditch and
Jericho Ditch.
Dated: July 26, 2006.
Michael G. Thabault,
Acting Regional Director, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, Hadley, Massachusetts.
[FR Doc. E6–13553 Filed 8–16–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
Rachel Carson National Wildlife
Refuge
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability: draft
comprehensive conservation plan and
environmental assessment.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), announce the
availability of the Rachel Carson
National Wildlife Refuge (NWR) Draft
Comprehensive Conservation Plan
(CCP) and Environmental Assessment
(EA). It describes how we intend to
manage Rachel Carson NWR during the
next 15 years. We prepared this Draft
CCP/EA in conformance with the
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) and the National Wildlife
Refuge System Administration Act, as
amended.
The Draft CCP/EA is available for
public review and comment. We must
receive your comments on or before
September 18, 2006. During the 30-day
comment period, we plan to host public
meetings in the local area. We will post
the details of each meeting at least 2
weeks in advance to our project mailing
list in local papers, at the refuge, and at
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
DATES:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:36 Aug 16, 2006
Jkt 208001
our Web site, https://www.fws.gov/
northeast/rachelcarsonrefuge/.
ADDRESSES: You may obtain copies of
the draft CCP/EA on compact disk or in
print by writing to Carl Melberg, U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service, Northeast
Regional Office, 300 Westgate Center
Drive, Hadley, Massachusetts 01035–
9589, or e-mailing
northeastplanning@fws.gov. You may
also view the draft on the Web at
https://library.fws.gov/ccps.htm.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carl
Melberg, 413–253–8521.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
National Wildlife Refuge System
Administration Act of 1966, as amended
by the National Wildlife Refuge System
Improvement Act of 1997 (16 U.S.C.
668dd et seq.), requires the Service to
develop a CCP for each refuge. The
purpose of developing a CCP is to
provide refuge managers with a 15-year
strategy for achieving refuge purposes
and contributing to the mission of the
National Wildlife Refuge System
(NWRS), in conformance with the sound
principles of fish and wildlife science,
natural resources conservation, legal
mandates, and Service policies. In
addition to outlining broad management
direction on conserving wildlife and
habitats, CCPs identify wildlifedependent recreational opportunities
available to the public, including
opportunities for hunting, fishing,
wildlife observation and photography,
and environmental interpretation and
education. The Service will review and
update each CCP at least once every 15
years, in accordance with the National
Wildlife Refuge System Improvement
Act of 1997 and the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321–4370d) (NEPA).
This Draft CCP/EA identifies goals,
long-range objectives, and strategies for
achieving the purposes for which this
refuge was established. The document
poses three management alternatives:
Alternative A (Current Management):
This alternative is the no action
alternative required by NEPA.
Alternative A defines our current
management activities, including those
planned, funded, or under way, and
serves as the baseline against which to
compare the other two action
alternatives. It would maintain our
present levels of approved refuge
staffing and the biological and visitor
programs now in place. Three new
facilities are incorporated in this
alternative to support current and
approved management, staffing, and
administrative obligations. The refuge
would continue to acquire the 3,833
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
47511
acres remaining within its current
approved boundary.
Alternative B (the Service-preferred
alternative): This alternative represents
the combination of actions that we
believe will most effectively achieve the
purposes and goals of the refuge and
address the major issues. It builds on
the programs identified under current
management. Funding and staffing
would need to increase to adequately
support the program expansions we
propose. We propose to expand the
refuge by 5,558 acres beyond its current
approved boundary of 9,126 acres. We
would add acreage to Brave Boat
Harbor, Upper Wells, Spurwink,
Biddeford, Mousam River, Little River,
and Moody Divisions, and we would
establish a new York River Division,
encompassing the largest undeveloped
salt marsh south of Portland. Alternative
B also includes removing 101 parcels
totaling 164 acres from the current
approved boundary that are no longer
suitable for Service acquisition. The
refuge would continue to acquire the
3,833 acres remaining within its current
approved boundary. This proposal
increases the protection and
management of migratory wildlife,
endangered and threatened species, and
other species of concern by protecting
additional aquatic and upland habitat. It
includes expanded management and
additional public use opportunities for
wildlife-dependent recreation such as
hunting and fishing, as well as wildlife
observation, photography, and
interpretation. A new administrative
complex, including office space,
maintenance facilities, and visitor
contact station, will be built. This
alternative includes combining the
Moody, Lower Wells, Upper Wells, and
Mousam River Divisions into one, the
Wells Bay Division. This alternative will
also increase the number and quality of
wildlife-dependent recreational
opportunities, and allow us to use
Rachel Carson NWR’s proximity to
Portland and urban communities to
better promote NWRS principles and
improve public support for national
wildlife refuges.
Alternative C is the same as
alternative B, however, it proposes to
expand the refuge by 11,397 acres
beyond the current approved boundary.
That 11,397-acre expansion includes the
5,558 acres in Alternative B. It would
add acreage to Brave Boat Harbor, Upper
Wells, Spurwink, Biddeford, and Moody
Divisions, and would establish a new
York River Division, encompassing the
largest undeveloped salt marsh south of
Portland. This alternative will also
increase the number and quality of
wildlife-dependent recreational
E:\FR\FM\17AUN1.SGM
17AUN1
47512
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 159 / Thursday, August 17, 2006 / Notices
opportunities, especially hunting and
fishing, further protect threatened and
endangered species, and control
invasive species.
After the 30-day review and comment
period ends, we will analyze, address,
and consider all comments received and
prepare a final CCP. Availability of the
final CCP will be published in the
Federal Register. The Director must
approve the proposed refuge boundary
expansion before the Regional Director
considers approving the expansion.
All comments, including names and
addresses, become part of the official
public record. Requests for the public
record of this plan will be handled in
accordance with the Freedom of
Information Act, the Council on
Environmental Quality’s NEPA
regulations, and other Service and
Departmental policies and procedures.
Dated: August 11, 2006.
Marvin E. Moriarty,
Regional Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, Hadley, MA 01035–9589.
[FR Doc. E6–13558 Filed 8–16–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[NM–952–06–1420–BJ]
Notice of Filing of Plats of Survey; NM
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The plats of survey described
below are scheduled to be officially
filed in the New Mexico State Office,
Bureau of Land Management, Santa Fe,
New Mexico, (30) thirty calendar days
from the date of this publication.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
New Mexico Principal Meridian, New
Mexico
The plat representing the dependent
resurvey and survey and subdivision of
sections in Township 7 North, Range 10
West, accepted April 24, 2006, for
Group 1032 New Mexico.
The plat representing the dependent
resurvey and subdivision of sections for
Township 9 North, Range 4 West,
accepted July 20, 2006 for Group 1048
New Mexico.
The plat representing the dependent
resurvey and survey of certain Lots in
Section 10 (Including The Retracement
of a portion of the West Boundry of San
Miguel Del Bado Grant, Tract 2 and
portions of the subdivisional lines) for
Township 13 North, Range 14 West,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:36 Aug 16, 2006
Jkt 208001
accepted July 21, 2006 for Group 1049
New Mexico.
The plat representing the dependent
resurvey for Township 29 North, Range
11 West, accepted August 7, 2006 for
Group 1053 New Mexico.
The plat representing the resurvey
and subdivision of sections for
Township 7 North, Range 9 West,
accepted July 24, 2006 for Group 1041
New Mexico.
The Town of Tejon Grant and San
Antonio De Las Huertas Grant,
representing the corrective resurvey,
dependent resurvey and survey
accepted July 21, 2006 for New Mexico.
Indian Meridian, Oklahoma
The plat in two sheets, representing
the dependent resurvey and survey for
Township 9 North, Range 14 East,
accepted May 9, 2006 for Group 116
Oklahoma.
Sixth Principle Meridian, Kansas
The supplemental plat, representing
the subdivision of sections for
Township 33 South, Range 40 West,
accepted July 24, 2006, for Kansas.
The supplemental plat, representing
the subdivision of sections for
Township 33 South, Range 41 West,
accepted July 24, 2006, for Kansas.
The supplemental plat, representing
the subdivision of sections for
Township 34 South, Range 41 West,
accepted July 24, 2006, for Kansas.
The supplemental plat, representing
the subdivision of sections for
Township 34 South, Range 40 West,
accepted July 24, 2006, for Kansas.
If a protest against a survey, as shown
on any of the above plats is received
prior to the date of official filing, the
filing will be stayed pending
consideration of the protest. A plat will
not be officially filed until the day after
all protests have been dismissed.
A person or party who wishes to
protest against any of these surveys
must file a written protest with the New
Mexico State Director, Bureau of Land
Management, stating that they wish to
protest.
A statement of reasons for a protest
may be filed with the notice of protest
to the State Director, or the statement of
reasons must be filed with the State
Director within thirty days after the
protest is filed.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
These plats will be available for
inspection in the New Mexico State
Office, Bureau of Land Management,
and P.O. Box 27115, Santa Fe, New
Mexico 87502–0115. Copies may be
obtained from this office upon payment
of $1.10 per sheet.
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Dated: July 8, 2006.
Stephen W. Beyerlein,
Acting Chief Cadastral Surveyor, New Mexico.
[FR Doc. 06–6972 Filed 8–16–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–FB–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
Native American Graves Protection
and Repatriation Review Committee:
Nomination Solicitation
AGENCY:
National Park Service, Interior.
Native American Graves
Protection and Repatriation Review
Committee; Notice of Nomination
Solicitation.
ACTION:
SUMMARY: THE NATIONAL PARK SERVICE IS
SOLICITING NOMINATIONS FOR TWO
MEMBERS OF THE NATIVE AMERICAN
GRAVES PROTECTION AND REPATRIATION
REVIEW COMMITTEE. THE SECRETARY OF
THE INTERIOR WILL APPOINT ONE MEMBER
FROM NOMINATIONS SUBMITTED BY INDIAN
TRIBES, NATIVE HAWAIIAN ORGANIZATIONS,
AND TRADITIONAL NATIVE AMERICAN
RELIGIOUS LEADERS. THIS PARTICULAR
APPOINTEE IS NOT REQUIRED TO BE A
TRADITIONAL NATIVE AMERICAN RELIGIOUS
LEADER. THE SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR
WILL ALSO APPOINT ONE MEMBER FROM
NOMINATIONS SUBMITTED BY NATIONAL
MUSEUM ORGANIZATIONS AND SCIENTIFIC
ORGANIZATIONS. Nominations must
include the following information.1.
Nominations by Indian tribes or Native
Hawaiian organizations: Nominations
must be submitted on official tribal or
organization letterhead with the
nominator’s original signature and
daytime telephone number. The
nominator must be the official
authorized by the tribe or organization
to submit nominations in response to
this solicitation. The nomination must
include a statement that the nominator
is so authorized.
2. Nominations by traditional
religious leaders: Nominations must be
submitted with the nominator’s original
signature and daytime telephone
number. The nominator must explain
how he or she meets the definition of
traditional religious leader.
3. Nominations by national museum
organizations and scientific
organizations: Nominations must be
submitted on organization letterhead
with the nominator’s original signature
and daytime telephone number. The
nominator must be the official
authorized by the organization to submit
nominations in response to this
solicitation. The nomination must
E:\FR\FM\17AUN1.SGM
17AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 159 (Thursday, August 17, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47511-47512]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-13558]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
Rachel Carson National Wildlife Refuge
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability: draft comprehensive conservation plan
and environmental assessment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce the
availability of the Rachel Carson National Wildlife Refuge (NWR) Draft
Comprehensive Conservation Plan (CCP) and Environmental Assessment
(EA). It describes how we intend to manage Rachel Carson NWR during the
next 15 years. We prepared this Draft CCP/EA in conformance with the
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the National Wildlife
Refuge System Administration Act, as amended.
DATES: The Draft CCP/EA is available for public review and comment. We
must receive your comments on or before September 18, 2006. During the
30-day comment period, we plan to host public meetings in the local
area. We will post the details of each meeting at least 2 weeks in
advance to our project mailing list in local papers, at the refuge, and
at our Web site, https://www.fws.gov/northeast/rachelcarsonrefuge/.
ADDRESSES: You may obtain copies of the draft CCP/EA on compact disk or
in print by writing to Carl Melberg, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
Northeast Regional Office, 300 Westgate Center Drive, Hadley,
Massachusetts 01035-9589, or e-mailing northeastplanning@fws.gov. You
may also view the draft on the Web at https://library.fws.gov/ccps.htm.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carl Melberg, 413-253-8521.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The National Wildlife Refuge System
Administration Act of 1966, as amended by the National Wildlife Refuge
System Improvement Act of 1997 (16 U.S.C. 668dd et seq.), requires the
Service to develop a CCP for each refuge. The purpose of developing a
CCP is to provide refuge managers with a 15-year strategy for achieving
refuge purposes and contributing to the mission of the National
Wildlife Refuge System (NWRS), in conformance with the sound principles
of fish and wildlife science, natural resources conservation, legal
mandates, and Service policies. In addition to outlining broad
management direction on conserving wildlife and habitats, CCPs identify
wildlife-dependent recreational opportunities available to the public,
including opportunities for hunting, fishing, wildlife observation and
photography, and environmental interpretation and education. The
Service will review and update each CCP at least once every 15 years,
in accordance with the National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act
of 1997 and the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C.
4321-4370d) (NEPA).
This Draft CCP/EA identifies goals, long-range objectives, and
strategies for achieving the purposes for which this refuge was
established. The document poses three management alternatives:
Alternative A (Current Management): This alternative is the no
action alternative required by NEPA. Alternative A defines our current
management activities, including those planned, funded, or under way,
and serves as the baseline against which to compare the other two
action alternatives. It would maintain our present levels of approved
refuge staffing and the biological and visitor programs now in place.
Three new facilities are incorporated in this alternative to support
current and approved management, staffing, and administrative
obligations. The refuge would continue to acquire the 3,833 acres
remaining within its current approved boundary.
Alternative B (the Service-preferred alternative): This alternative
represents the combination of actions that we believe will most
effectively achieve the purposes and goals of the refuge and address
the major issues. It builds on the programs identified under current
management. Funding and staffing would need to increase to adequately
support the program expansions we propose. We propose to expand the
refuge by 5,558 acres beyond its current approved boundary of 9,126
acres. We would add acreage to Brave Boat Harbor, Upper Wells,
Spurwink, Biddeford, Mousam River, Little River, and Moody Divisions,
and we would establish a new York River Division, encompassing the
largest undeveloped salt marsh south of Portland. Alternative B also
includes removing 101 parcels totaling 164 acres from the current
approved boundary that are no longer suitable for Service acquisition.
The refuge would continue to acquire the 3,833 acres remaining within
its current approved boundary. This proposal increases the protection
and management of migratory wildlife, endangered and threatened
species, and other species of concern by protecting additional aquatic
and upland habitat. It includes expanded management and additional
public use opportunities for wildlife-dependent recreation such as
hunting and fishing, as well as wildlife observation, photography, and
interpretation. A new administrative complex, including office space,
maintenance facilities, and visitor contact station, will be built.
This alternative includes combining the Moody, Lower Wells, Upper
Wells, and Mousam River Divisions into one, the Wells Bay Division.
This alternative will also increase the number and quality of wildlife-
dependent recreational opportunities, and allow us to use Rachel Carson
NWR's proximity to Portland and urban communities to better promote
NWRS principles and improve public support for national wildlife
refuges.
Alternative C is the same as alternative B, however, it proposes to
expand the refuge by 11,397 acres beyond the current approved boundary.
That 11,397-acre expansion includes the 5,558 acres in Alternative B.
It would add acreage to Brave Boat Harbor, Upper Wells, Spurwink,
Biddeford, and Moody Divisions, and would establish a new York River
Division, encompassing the largest undeveloped salt marsh south of
Portland. This alternative will also increase the number and quality of
wildlife-dependent recreational
[[Page 47512]]
opportunities, especially hunting and fishing, further protect
threatened and endangered species, and control invasive species.
After the 30-day review and comment period ends, we will analyze,
address, and consider all comments received and prepare a final CCP.
Availability of the final CCP will be published in the Federal
Register. The Director must approve the proposed refuge boundary
expansion before the Regional Director considers approving the
expansion.
All comments, including names and addresses, become part of the
official public record. Requests for the public record of this plan
will be handled in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act, the
Council on Environmental Quality's NEPA regulations, and other Service
and Departmental policies and procedures.
Dated: August 11, 2006.
Marvin E. Moriarty,
Regional Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Hadley, MA 01035-
9589.
[FR Doc. E6-13558 Filed 8-16-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P