Notice of Public Meeting by Teleconference Concerning Heavy Duty Diesel Engine Consent Decrees, 47246 [06-6943]
Download as PDF
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
47246
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 158 / Wednesday, August 16, 2006 / Notices
Commission has issued a limited
exclusion order in the above-captioned
investigation directed against products
of respondent System General
Corporation (‘‘SG’’) of Taipei, Taiwan.
The investigation is terminated.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michelle Walters, Esq., Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
708–5468. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June
13, 2005, the Commission instituted this
investigation, based on a complaint filed
by Power Integrations, Inc. (‘‘PI’’) of San
Jose, California. 70 FR 34149 (June 13,
2005). The complaint, as amended and
supplemented, alleged violations of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19
U.S.C. 1337) in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
and the sale within the United States
after importation of certain power
supply controllers and products
containing the same. The Commission
determined that SG violated section 337
by reason of infringement of claims 1, 3,
5, and 6 of United States Patent No.
6,351,398 (‘‘the ’398 patent’’) and claims
26 and 27 of United States Patent No.
6,538,908 (‘‘the ’908 patent’’). The
Commission requested written
submissions from the parties relating to
the appropriate remedy, whether the
statutory public interest factors preclude
issuance of that remedy, and the amount
of bond to be imposed during the
Presidential review period. All parties
filed written submissions.
Having reviewed the record in this
investigation, including the written
submissions of the parties, the
Commission has made its determination
on the issues of remedy, the public
interest, and bonding. The Commission
has determined that the appropriate
form of relief is a limited exclusion
order prohibiting the unlicensed entry
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:24 Aug 15, 2006
Jkt 208001
of power supply controllers that infringe
one or more of claims 1, 3, 5, and 6 of
the ’398 patent or claims 26 and 27 of
the ’908 patent and that are
manufactured by or on behalf of SG, its
affiliated companies, parents,
subsidiaries, licensees, contractors, or
other related business entities, or
successors or assigns. The Commission
has also determined to prohibit the
unlicensed entry of LCD computer
monitors, AC printer adapters, and
sample/demonstration boards
containing such infringing power
supply controllers.
The Commission further determined
that the public interest factors
enumerated in section 337(d)(1) (19
U.S.C. 1337(d)(1)) do not preclude
issuance of the limited exclusion order.
Finally, the Commission determined
that the amount of bond to permit
temporary importation during the
Presidential review period (19 U.S.C.
1337(j)) shall be in the amount of thirtyeight (38) cents per power supply
controller circuit or LCD computer
monitor, AC printer adapter, or sample/
demonstration board containing the
same that are subject to the order. The
Commission’s order was delivered to
the President and the United States
Trade Representative on the day of its
issuance.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in
section 210.50 of the Commission’s
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
210.50).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: August 11, 2006.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E6–13512 Filed 8–15–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
International Transportation
Corporation, Case No. 1:98CV02545;
United States v. Cummins Engine
Company, Case No. 1:98CV02546;
United States v. Detroit Diesel
Corporation, Case No. 1:98CV02548;
United States v. Volvo Truck
Corporation, Case No. 1:98CV02547;
United States v. Mack Trucks, Inc., Case
No. 1:98CV01495; and United States v.
Renault Vehicles Industries, S.A., Case
No. 1:98CV02543). In supporting entry
by the court of the decrees, the United
States committed to meet periodically
with states, industry groups,
environmental groups, and concerned
citizens to discuss consent decree
implementation issues. Future meetings
will be announced here and on EPA’s
Diesel Engine Settlement Web site at:
https://www.epa.gov/compliance/
resources/cases/civil/caa/diesel/
index.html.
Interested parties should contact the
Environmental Protection Agency at the
address listed below prior to the
meeting to reserve a telephone line and
receive instructions for the call.
Agenda
1. Panel Remarks—10 a.m.
Remarks by DOJ and EPA regarding
implementation of the provisions of the
diesel engine consent decrees.
2. Public comments and questions.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Anne Wick, EPA Diesel Engine Consent
Decree Coordinator, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (Mail Code 2242A),
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20460; e-mail:
wick.anne@epa.gov.
Karen S. Dworkin,
Assistant Chief, Environment & Natural
Resources Division, Environmental
Enforcement Section.
[FR Doc. 06–6943 Filed 8–15–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–15–M
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Public Meeting by
Teleconference Concerning Heavy
Duty Diesel Engine Consent Decrees
Notice of Lodging of Second
Amendment to Consent Decree
Involving Point Ruston, LLC and
Asarco LLC Under the Comprehensive
Environmental Response
Compensation, and Liability Act
The Department of Justice and the
Environmental Protection Agency will
hold a public meeting on September 13,
2006 at 10 a.m. by teleconference. The
subject of the meeting will be
implementation of the provisions of the
seven consent decrees signed by the
United States and diesel engine
manufacturers and entered by the
United States District Court for the
District of Columbia on July 1, 1999
(United States v. Caterpillar, Case No.
1:98CV02544; United States v. Navistar
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Notice is hereby given that on July 27,
2006, a proposed amendment to the
existing consent decree (the ‘‘Second
Amendment’’) in United States v.
Asarco Inc., Civil Action No. C91–
5528B was lodged with the United
States District Court for the Western
District of Washington.
This Second Amendment involves the
potential sales of property owned by
E:\FR\FM\16AUN1.SGM
16AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 158 (Wednesday, August 16, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 47246]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-6943]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Public Meeting by Teleconference Concerning Heavy Duty
Diesel Engine Consent Decrees
The Department of Justice and the Environmental Protection Agency
will hold a public meeting on September 13, 2006 at 10 a.m. by
teleconference. The subject of the meeting will be implementation of
the provisions of the seven consent decrees signed by the United States
and diesel engine manufacturers and entered by the United States
District Court for the District of Columbia on July 1, 1999 (United
States v. Caterpillar, Case No. 1:98CV02544; United States v. Navistar
International Transportation Corporation, Case No. 1:98CV02545; United
States v. Cummins Engine Company, Case No. 1:98CV02546; United States
v. Detroit Diesel Corporation, Case No. 1:98CV02548; United States v.
Volvo Truck Corporation, Case No. 1:98CV02547; United States v. Mack
Trucks, Inc., Case No. 1:98CV01495; and United States v. Renault
Vehicles Industries, S.A., Case No. 1:98CV02543). In supporting entry
by the court of the decrees, the United States committed to meet
periodically with states, industry groups, environmental groups, and
concerned citizens to discuss consent decree implementation issues.
Future meetings will be announced here and on EPA's Diesel Engine
Settlement Web site at: https://www.epa.gov/compliance/resources/cases/
civil/caa/diesel/.
Interested parties should contact the Environmental Protection
Agency at the address listed below prior to the meeting to reserve a
telephone line and receive instructions for the call.
Agenda
1. Panel Remarks--10 a.m.
Remarks by DOJ and EPA regarding implementation of the provisions
of the diesel engine consent decrees.
2. Public comments and questions.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anne Wick, EPA Diesel Engine Consent
Decree Coordinator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (Mail Code
2242A), 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460; e-mail:
wick.anne@epa.gov.
Karen S. Dworkin,
Assistant Chief, Environment & Natural Resources Division,
Environmental Enforcement Section.
[FR Doc. 06-6943 Filed 8-15-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M