Almonds Grown in California; Changes to Incoming Quality Control Requirements, 47152-47154 [06-6941]
Download as PDF
47152
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 71, No. 158
Wednesday, August 16, 2006
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 981
[Docket No. FV06–981–2 PR]
Almonds Grown in California; Changes
to Incoming Quality Control
Requirements
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This rule invites comments
on changing the incoming quality
control requirements under the
administrative rules and regulations of
the California almond marketing order
(order). The order regulates the handling
of almonds grown in California and is
administered locally by the Almond
Board of California (Board). These
changes would help minimize the risk
of aflatoxin in almonds by removing
inedible kernels from human
consumption. Inedible almonds are poor
quality kernels or pieces of defective
kernels that may be contaminated with
aflatoxin. This action is intended to
improve the overall quality of almonds
placed into consumer channels.
DATES: Comments must be received by
August 23, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments
concerning this rule. Comments must be
sent to the Docket Clerk, Marketing
Order Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue SW, STOP 0237,
Washington, DC 20250–0237; Fax: (202)
720–8938, E-mail:
moab.docketclerk@usda.gov, or Internet:
https://www.regulations.gov. All
comments should reference the docket
number and the date and page number
of this issue of the Federal Register and
will be available for public inspection in
the Office of the Docket Clerk during
regular business hours, or can be viewed
at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/fv/
moab.html.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:49 Aug 15, 2006
Jkt 208001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Maureen T. Pello, Assistant Regional
Manager, or Kurt Kimmel, Regional
Manager, California Marketing Field
Office, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, telephone: (559) 487–
5901, Fax: (559) 487–5906, or E-mail:
Maureen.Pello@usda.gov, or
Kurt.Kimmel@usda.gov.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW, STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or E-mail:
Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
proposed rule is issued under Marketing
Order No. 981, as amended (7 CFR part
981), regulating the handling of almonds
grown in California, hereinafter referred
to as the ‘‘order.’’ The order is effective
under the Agricultural Marketing
Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7
U.S.C. 601–674), hereinafter referred to
as the ‘‘Act.’’
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. This rule is not intended to
have retroactive effect. This rule will
not preempt any State or local laws,
regulations, or policies, unless they
present an irreconcilable conflict with
this rule.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom. Such
handler is afforded the opportunity for
a hearing on the petition. After the
hearing USDA would rule on the
petition. The Act provides that the
district court of the United States in any
district in which the handler is an
inhabitant, or has his or her principal
place of business, has jurisdiction to
review USDA’s ruling on the petition,
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
provided an action is filed not later than
20 days after the date of the entry of the
ruling.
This proposed rule invites comments
on changing the incoming quality
control requirements under the
administrative rules and regulations of
the order. These changes would help
minimize the risk of aflatoxin in
almonds by removing inedible almonds
from human consumption. Inedible
almonds are poor quality kernels or
pieces of defective kernels that may be
contaminated with aflatoxin. These
changes are intended to improve the
overall quality of almonds placed into
consumer channels, and were
recommended by the Board at a meeting
on May 18, 2006.
Section 981.42 of the order provides
authority for a quality control program.
Paragraph (a) of that section requires
handlers to obtain incoming inspections
on almonds received from growers to
determine the percent of inedible
kernels in each lot of any variety. Based
on these inspections, handlers incur an
inedible disposition obligation. They
must satisfy their obligation by
disposing of inedible almonds in outlets
such as oil and animal feed.
Section 981.442(a)(4) of the order’s
administrative rules and regulations
specifies that the weight of inedible
kernels in excess of 1 percent of kernel
weight shall constitute that handler’s
disposition obligation. Handlers must
satisfy the disposition obligation by
delivering packer pickouts, kernels
rejected in blanching, pieces of kernels,
meal accumulated in manufacturing, or
other material, to crushers, feed
manufacturers, feeders, or dealers in nut
wastes on record with the Board as
accepted users of such product.
Accepted users dispose of this material
through non-human consumption
outlets. Paragraph (a)(5) of § 981.442
specifies further that at least 25 percent
of a handler’s total annual disposition
obligation be satisfied with inedible
kernels as defined under § 981.408.
Handlers with total annual inedible
obligations of less than 1,000 pounds
are exempt from the 25 percent
requirement.
Board research has shown that
aflatoxin in almonds is directly related
to insect damage in inedible kernels. In
order to help minimize the risk of
aflatoxin in almonds, the Board
recommended reducing the tolerance for
E:\FR\FM\16AUP1.SGM
16AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 158 / Wednesday, August 16, 2006 / Proposed Rules
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
inedible kernels from 1 to .50 percent,
and increasing the percent of a handler’s
total annual inedible obligation that
must be true inedibles from 25 to 50
percent. Such revisions are intended to
improve the overall quality of almonds
placed into consumer channels.
All of the Board’s members supported
the change regarding true inedibles, but
three of the Board’s 10 members
opposed the change to reduce the
incoming tolerance for inedible kernels
(the Board’s chairperson abstained).
Those opposed pointed to the existing 2
percent outgoing tolerance and
expressed concern about additional
costs that handlers may incur to
separate out inedible kernels. The
majority of Board members supported
both changes. Paragraphs (a)(4) and
(a)(5) of § 981.442 are proposed to be
revised accordingly.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), the
Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
has considered the economic impact of
this rule on small entities. Accordingly,
AMS has prepared this initial regulatory
flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order
that small businesses will not be unduly
or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
behalf. Thus, both statutes have small
entity orientation and compatibility.
There are approximately 6,000
producers of almonds in the production
area and approximately 115 handlers
subject to regulation under the
marketing order. Small agricultural
producers are defined by the Small
Business Administration (13 CFR
121.201) as those having annual receipts
of less than $750,000, and small
agricultural service firms are defined as
those whose annual receipts are less
than $6,500,000.
Data for the most recently completed
crop year indicate that about 52 percent
of the handlers shipped under
$6,500,000 worth of almonds. Dividing
average almond crop value for 2003–
2005 reported by the National
Agricultural Statistics Service ($2.171
billion) by the number of producers
(6,000) yields an average annual
producer revenue estimate of about
$362,000. Based on the foregoing, about
half of the handlers and a majority of
almond producers may be classified as
small entities.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:49 Aug 15, 2006
Jkt 208001
This rule would revise paragraphs
(a)(4) and (a)(5) of § 981.442 of the
order’s administrative rules and
regulations regarding inedible almonds.
These changes would help minimize the
risk of aflatoxin in almonds by removing
inedible kernels from human
consumption. Inedible almonds are poor
quality kernels or pieces of defective
kernels that may be contaminated with
aflatoxin. Specifically, this action would
reduce the tolerance for inedible kernels
in each variety of almonds received by
a handler from 1 to .50 percent, and
increase the percent of a handler’s
annual inedible obligation that must be
satisfied with dispositions containing
inedible almonds from 25 to 50 percent.
Authority for these changes is provided
in § 981.42(a) of the order.
Regarding the impact of the proposed
action on affected entities, this action is
intended to improve the overall quality
of almonds placed into consumer
channels and therefore would be
beneficial to the industry. In addition,
this rule is not expected to change
handler inspection costs. Handlers must
currently have an incoming inspection
done on each lot of almonds received to
determine the percent of inedible
kernels. Additionally, inedible almond
dispositions must be inspected to
determine the percent of inedible
kernels in such dispositions. Such
inspections are performed by the
inspection agency, which means the
Federal-State Inspection Service. The
inspection agency charges a fee of $40
per hour, plus $0.75 per ton, with a
minimum total fee of $55, to perform an
inedible disposition inspection.
The Board considered various
alternatives and options before making
its recommendation on inedible
almonds. It was decided that a 0.5
percent tolerance was appropriate rather
than 0 percent. As previously stated,
opposition Board members pointed to
the existing 2 percent outgoing tolerance
and expressed concern about additional
costs that handlers may incur to
separate out inedible kernels.
Ultimately, the majority of Board
members supported both changes. The
Board’s Food Quality and Safety (FQS)
Committee met again via teleconference
on June 13, 2006, and concurred with
the Board’s recommendation.
This action would impose no
additional reporting and recordkeeping
burden on California almonds handlers.
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the information collection
requirements in this rule have been
approved by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) under OMB Control
No. 0581–0178. As with all Federal
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
47153
marketing order programs, reports and
forms are periodically reviewed to
reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies.
AMS is committed to compliance
with the Government Paperwork
Elimination Act, which requires
Government agencies in general to
provide the public the option of
submitting information or transacting
business electronically to the maximum
extent possible.
USDA has not identified any relevant
Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with this rule. There are U.S.
Standards for Grades of Shelled
Almonds (7 CFR 51.2105 through
51.2131) and U.S. Standards for Grades
of Almonds in the Shell (7 CFR 51.2075
through 51.2091) issued under the
Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 (7
U.S.C. 1621 through 1627). However,
these standards are voluntary for the
almond industry.
Additionally, the meetings were
widely publicized throughout the
California almond industry and all
interested persons were invited to
attend the meetings and participate in
deliberations on all issues. Like all
Board meetings, the task force meetings
on March 23 and April 26, 2006, the
FQS Committee meetings on April 11,
May 8, and June 13, 2006, and the Board
meeting on May 18, 2006, were public
meetings and all entities, both large and
small, were able to express views on
this issue. Finally, interested persons
are invited to submit information on the
regulatory and informational impacts of
this action on small businesses.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
fv/moab.html. Any questions about the
compliance guide should be sent to Jay
Guerber at the previously mentioned
address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
A 7-day comment period is provided
to allow interested persons to respond
to this proposal. Seven days is deemed
appropriate because the 2006–07 crop
year begins on August 1, 2006, and
therefore, this rule, if adopted, should
be in effect as soon as possible.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 981
Almonds, Marketing agreements,
Nuts, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 981 is proposed to
be amended as follows:
E:\FR\FM\16AUP1.SGM
16AUP1
47154
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 158 / Wednesday, August 16, 2006 / Proposed Rules
PART 981—ALMONDS GROWN IN
CALIFORNIA
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 981 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
2. Section 981.442 is amended by
revising the first sentence of paragraph
(a)(4)(i) and the eleventh sentence in
paragraph (a)(5) to read as follows:
§ 981.442
Quality control.
(a) * * *
(4) Disposition obligation. (i) The
weight of inedible kernels in excess of
.50 percent of kernel weight reported to
the Board of any variety received by a
handler shall constitute that handler’s
disposition obligation. * * *
*
*
*
*
*
(5) Meeting the disposition obligation.
* * * At least 50 percent of a
handler’s total crop year inedible
disposition obligation shall be satisfied
with dispositions consisting of inedible
kernels as defined in § 981.408:
Provided, That this 50 percent
requirement shall not apply to handlers
with total annual obligations of less
than 1,000 pounds. * * *
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: August 9, 2006.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 06–6941 Filed 8–11–06; 2:16 pm]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2006–25563; Directorate
Identifier 2006–NM–083–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Learjet
Model 23, 24, 24A, 24B, 24B–A, 24C,
24D, 24D–A, 24E, 24F, 24F–A, 25, 25A,
25B, 25C, 25D, 25F, 28, 29, 31, 31A, 35,
35A (C–21A), 36, 36A, 55, 55B, and 55C
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
The FAA proposes to adopt a
new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Learjet Model 23, 24, 24A, 24B,
24B–A, 24C, 24D, 24D–A, 24E, 24F,
SUMMARY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:49 Aug 15, 2006
Jkt 208001
24F–A, 25, 25A, 25B, 25C, 25D, 25F, 28,
29, 31, 31A, 35, 35A (C–21A), 36, 36A,
55, 55B, and 55C airplanes. This
proposed AD would require modifying
the left– and right–hand standby fuel
pump switches. This proposed AD
would also require revising the
Emergency and Abnormal Procedures
sections of the airplane flight manual to
advise the flightcrew of the proper
procedures to follow in the event of
failure of the standby fuel pump to shut
off. This proposed AD results from a
report of inadvertent operation of a
standby fuel pump due to an electrical
system malfunction. We are proposing
this AD to prevent this inadvertent
operation, which could result in
inadvertent fuel transfer by the left or
right wing fuel system and subsequent
over–limit fuel imbalance between the
left and right wing fuel loads. This
imbalance could affect lateral control of
the airplane which could result in
reduced controllability.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by October 2, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following
addresses to submit comments on this
proposed AD.
• DOT Docket Web site: Go to https://
dms.dot.gov and follow the instructions
for sending your comments
electronically.
• Government-wide rulemaking Web
site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov
and follow the instructions for sending
your comments electronically.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 400
Seventh Street SW., Nassif Building,
room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 on
the plaza level of the Nassif Building,
400 Seventh Street SW., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Contact Learjet, Inc., One Learjet Way,
Wichita, Kansas 67209–2942, for the
service information identified in this
proposed AD
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
James Galstad, Aerospace Engineer,
Systems and Propulsion Branch, ACE–
116W, FAA, Wichita Aircraft
Certification Office, 1801 Airport Road,
Room 100, Mid-Continent Airport,
Wichita, Kansas 67209; telephone (316)
946–4135; fax (316) 946–4107.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
comments to an address listed in the
section. Include the docket
number ‘‘FAA–2006–25563; Directorate
Identifier 2006–NM–083–AD’’ at the
beginning of your comments. We
specifically invite comments on the
overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of
the proposed AD. We will consider all
comments received by the closing date
and may amend the proposed AD in
light of those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
dms.dot.gov, including any personal
information you provide. We will also
post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact with FAA
personnel concerning this proposed AD.
Using the search function of that Web
site, anyone can find and read the
comments in any of our dockets,
including the name of the individual
who sent the comment (or signed the
comment on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19477–78), or you may visit https://
dms.dot.gov.
Comments Invited
Relevant Service Information
We invite you to submit any relevant
written data, views, or arguments
regarding this proposed AD. Send your
We reviewed the Bombardier service
bulletins identified in the following
table:
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
ADDRESSES
Examining the Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://dms.dot.gov, or in
person at the Docket Management
Facility office between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The Docket
Management Facility office (telephone
(800) 647–5227) is located on the plaza
level of the Nassif Building at the DOT
street address stated in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in
the AD docket shortly after the Docket
Management System receives them.
Discussion
We have received a report indicating
that inadvertent operation of a standby
fuel pump due to an electrical system
malfunction occurred on a Learjet
Model 35A (C–21A) airplane. This
condition, if not corrected, could result
in inadvertent fuel transfer by the left or
right wing fuel system and subsequent
over-limit fuel imbalance between the
left and right wing fuel loads. This
imbalance could affect lateral control of
the airplane which could result in
reduced controllability.
E:\FR\FM\16AUP1.SGM
16AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 158 (Wednesday, August 16, 2006)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 47152-47154]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-6941]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 158 / Wednesday, August 16, 2006 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 47152]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 981
[Docket No. FV06-981-2 PR]
Almonds Grown in California; Changes to Incoming Quality Control
Requirements
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule invites comments on changing the incoming quality
control requirements under the administrative rules and regulations of
the California almond marketing order (order). The order regulates the
handling of almonds grown in California and is administered locally by
the Almond Board of California (Board). These changes would help
minimize the risk of aflatoxin in almonds by removing inedible kernels
from human consumption. Inedible almonds are poor quality kernels or
pieces of defective kernels that may be contaminated with aflatoxin.
This action is intended to improve the overall quality of almonds
placed into consumer channels.
DATES: Comments must be received by August 23, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments
concerning this rule. Comments must be sent to the Docket Clerk,
Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, STOP 0237, Washington, DC
20250-0237; Fax: (202) 720-8938, E-mail: moab.docketclerk@usda.gov, or
Internet: https://www.regulations.gov. All comments should reference the
docket number and the date and page number of this issue of the Federal
Register and will be available for public inspection in the Office of
the Docket Clerk during regular business hours, or can be viewed at:
https://www.ams.usda.gov/fv/moab.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Maureen T. Pello, Assistant Regional
Manager, or Kurt Kimmel, Regional Manager, California Marketing Field
Office, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable
Programs, AMS, USDA, telephone: (559) 487-5901, Fax: (559) 487-5906, or
E-mail: Maureen.Pello@usda.gov, or Kurt.Kimmel@usda.gov.
Small businesses may request information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW, STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; telephone: (202) 720-
2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938, or E-mail: Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This proposed rule is issued under Marketing
Order No. 981, as amended (7 CFR part 981), regulating the handling of
almonds grown in California, hereinafter referred to as the ``order.''
The order is effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter referred to as the
``Act.''
The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order 12866.
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This rule is not intended to have retroactive effect.
This rule will not preempt any State or local laws, regulations, or
policies, unless they present an irreconcilable conflict with this
rule.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and
request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. Such
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition.
After the hearing USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This proposed rule invites comments on changing the incoming
quality control requirements under the administrative rules and
regulations of the order. These changes would help minimize the risk of
aflatoxin in almonds by removing inedible almonds from human
consumption. Inedible almonds are poor quality kernels or pieces of
defective kernels that may be contaminated with aflatoxin. These
changes are intended to improve the overall quality of almonds placed
into consumer channels, and were recommended by the Board at a meeting
on May 18, 2006.
Section 981.42 of the order provides authority for a quality
control program. Paragraph (a) of that section requires handlers to
obtain incoming inspections on almonds received from growers to
determine the percent of inedible kernels in each lot of any variety.
Based on these inspections, handlers incur an inedible disposition
obligation. They must satisfy their obligation by disposing of inedible
almonds in outlets such as oil and animal feed.
Section 981.442(a)(4) of the order's administrative rules and
regulations specifies that the weight of inedible kernels in excess of
1 percent of kernel weight shall constitute that handler's disposition
obligation. Handlers must satisfy the disposition obligation by
delivering packer pickouts, kernels rejected in blanching, pieces of
kernels, meal accumulated in manufacturing, or other material, to
crushers, feed manufacturers, feeders, or dealers in nut wastes on
record with the Board as accepted users of such product. Accepted users
dispose of this material through non-human consumption outlets.
Paragraph (a)(5) of Sec. 981.442 specifies further that at least 25
percent of a handler's total annual disposition obligation be satisfied
with inedible kernels as defined under Sec. 981.408. Handlers with
total annual inedible obligations of less than 1,000 pounds are exempt
from the 25 percent requirement.
Board research has shown that aflatoxin in almonds is directly
related to insect damage in inedible kernels. In order to help minimize
the risk of aflatoxin in almonds, the Board recommended reducing the
tolerance for
[[Page 47153]]
inedible kernels from 1 to .50 percent, and increasing the percent of a
handler's total annual inedible obligation that must be true inedibles
from 25 to 50 percent. Such revisions are intended to improve the
overall quality of almonds placed into consumer channels.
All of the Board's members supported the change regarding true
inedibles, but three of the Board's 10 members opposed the change to
reduce the incoming tolerance for inedible kernels (the Board's
chairperson abstained). Those opposed pointed to the existing 2 percent
outgoing tolerance and expressed concern about additional costs that
handlers may incur to separate out inedible kernels. The majority of
Board members supported both changes. Paragraphs (a)(4) and (a)(5) of
Sec. 981.442 are proposed to be revised accordingly.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has considered the
economic impact of this rule on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has
prepared this initial regulatory flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in
that they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf. Thus, both statutes have small
entity orientation and compatibility.
There are approximately 6,000 producers of almonds in the
production area and approximately 115 handlers subject to regulation
under the marketing order. Small agricultural producers are defined by
the Small Business Administration (13 CFR 121.201) as those having
annual receipts of less than $750,000, and small agricultural service
firms are defined as those whose annual receipts are less than
$6,500,000.
Data for the most recently completed crop year indicate that about
52 percent of the handlers shipped under $6,500,000 worth of almonds.
Dividing average almond crop value for 2003-2005 reported by the
National Agricultural Statistics Service ($2.171 billion) by the number
of producers (6,000) yields an average annual producer revenue estimate
of about $362,000. Based on the foregoing, about half of the handlers
and a majority of almond producers may be classified as small entities.
This rule would revise paragraphs (a)(4) and (a)(5) of Sec.
981.442 of the order's administrative rules and regulations regarding
inedible almonds. These changes would help minimize the risk of
aflatoxin in almonds by removing inedible kernels from human
consumption. Inedible almonds are poor quality kernels or pieces of
defective kernels that may be contaminated with aflatoxin.
Specifically, this action would reduce the tolerance for inedible
kernels in each variety of almonds received by a handler from 1 to .50
percent, and increase the percent of a handler's annual inedible
obligation that must be satisfied with dispositions containing inedible
almonds from 25 to 50 percent. Authority for these changes is provided
in Sec. 981.42(a) of the order.
Regarding the impact of the proposed action on affected entities,
this action is intended to improve the overall quality of almonds
placed into consumer channels and therefore would be beneficial to the
industry. In addition, this rule is not expected to change handler
inspection costs. Handlers must currently have an incoming inspection
done on each lot of almonds received to determine the percent of
inedible kernels. Additionally, inedible almond dispositions must be
inspected to determine the percent of inedible kernels in such
dispositions. Such inspections are performed by the inspection agency,
which means the Federal-State Inspection Service. The inspection agency
charges a fee of $40 per hour, plus $0.75 per ton, with a minimum total
fee of $55, to perform an inedible disposition inspection.
The Board considered various alternatives and options before making
its recommendation on inedible almonds. It was decided that a 0.5
percent tolerance was appropriate rather than 0 percent. As previously
stated, opposition Board members pointed to the existing 2 percent
outgoing tolerance and expressed concern about additional costs that
handlers may incur to separate out inedible kernels. Ultimately, the
majority of Board members supported both changes. The Board's Food
Quality and Safety (FQS) Committee met again via teleconference on June
13, 2006, and concurred with the Board's recommendation.
This action would impose no additional reporting and recordkeeping
burden on California almonds handlers. In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), the information
collection requirements in this rule have been approved by the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) under OMB Control No. 0581-0178. As with
all Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public sector agencies.
AMS is committed to compliance with the Government Paperwork
Elimination Act, which requires Government agencies in general to
provide the public the option of submitting information or transacting
business electronically to the maximum extent possible.
USDA has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate,
overlap, or conflict with this rule. There are U.S. Standards for
Grades of Shelled Almonds (7 CFR 51.2105 through 51.2131) and U.S.
Standards for Grades of Almonds in the Shell (7 CFR 51.2075 through
51.2091) issued under the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 (7 U.S.C.
1621 through 1627). However, these standards are voluntary for the
almond industry.
Additionally, the meetings were widely publicized throughout the
California almond industry and all interested persons were invited to
attend the meetings and participate in deliberations on all issues.
Like all Board meetings, the task force meetings on March 23 and April
26, 2006, the FQS Committee meetings on April 11, May 8, and June 13,
2006, and the Board meeting on May 18, 2006, were public meetings and
all entities, both large and small, were able to express views on this
issue. Finally, interested persons are invited to submit information on
the regulatory and informational impacts of this action on small
businesses.
A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: http:/
/www.ams.usda.gov/fv/moab.html. Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Jay Guerber at the previously mentioned address
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
A 7-day comment period is provided to allow interested persons to
respond to this proposal. Seven days is deemed appropriate because the
2006-07 crop year begins on August 1, 2006, and therefore, this rule,
if adopted, should be in effect as soon as possible.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 981
Almonds, Marketing agreements, Nuts, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 981 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
[[Page 47154]]
PART 981--ALMONDS GROWN IN CALIFORNIA
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 981 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
2. Section 981.442 is amended by revising the first sentence of
paragraph (a)(4)(i) and the eleventh sentence in paragraph (a)(5) to
read as follows:
Sec. 981.442 Quality control.
(a) * * *
(4) Disposition obligation. (i) The weight of inedible kernels in
excess of .50 percent of kernel weight reported to the Board of any
variety received by a handler shall constitute that handler's
disposition obligation. * * *
* * * * *
(5) Meeting the disposition obligation.
* * * At least 50 percent of a handler's total crop year inedible
disposition obligation shall be satisfied with dispositions consisting
of inedible kernels as defined in Sec. 981.408: Provided, That this 50
percent requirement shall not apply to handlers with total annual
obligations of less than 1,000 pounds. * * *
* * * * *
Dated: August 9, 2006.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 06-6941 Filed 8-11-06; 2:16 pm]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P