Notice of Availability of Final Contracting Policy, 46893-46894 [06-6929]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 157 / Tuesday, August 15, 2006 / Notices
Although non-emergency issues not
contained in this agenda may come
before the Council for discussion, those
issues may not be the subject of formal
Council action during its 134th meeting.
Council action will be restricted to those
issues listed in this document and any
issue arising after publication of this
document that requires emergency
action under section 305(c) of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act, provided the
public has been notified of the Council’s
intent to take final action to address the
emergency.
Special Accommodations
This meeting is physically accessible
to people with disabilities. Requests for
sign language interpretation or other
auxiliary aids should be directed to
Kitty M. Simonds, (808) 522–8220
(voice) or (808) 522–8226 (fax), at least
5 days prior to the meeting date.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: August 9, 2006.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E6–13307 Filed 8–14–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
Notice of Availability of Final
Contracting Policy
National Ocean Service (NOS),
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA), Department of
Commerce (DOC).
ACTION: Notice of Availability of Final
Revised Contracting Policy.
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The NOAA National Ocean
Service (NOS) is publishing its updated
contracting policy for hydrographic
services per NOAA’s 2005 plans to
review and update the subject policy.
DATES: No comments are solicited
through this notice.
ADDRESSES: Ashley Chappell, Office of
Coast Survey, National Ocean Service,
NOAA (N/CS), 1315 East West Highway,
Station 6113, Silver Spring, MD 20910.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ashley Chappell, Office of Coast
Survey, National Ocean Service, NOAA
(N/CS), 1315 East West Highway,
Station 6113, Silver Spring, Maryland
20910; Telephone: 301–713–2770 ext.
148; fax (301) 713–4019, Attention:
Ashley Chappell; E-mail
ashley.chappell@noaa.gov.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:41 Aug 14, 2006
Jkt 208001
The
contracting policy for hydrographic
services within the National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration
(NOAA), National Ocean Service (NOS)
is final.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
In House Report 108–576, which
accompanied the FY 2005 Consolidated
Appropriations Act, Congress
recommended that NOAA’s National
Ocean Service ‘‘work with the private
mapping community to develop a
strategy for expanding contracting with
private entities to minimize duplication
and take maximum advantage of private
sector capability in fulfillment of
NOAA’s mapping and charting
responsibilities.’’
NOAA first consulted with
congressional staff to clarify the scope of
the request. Subsequently, on June 13,
2005, NOAA submitted a report to
Congress outlining its intent to utilize
its advisory group, the Hydrographic
Services Review Panel (the Panel), as
the primary vehicle for reevalting its
existing mapping and charting
contracting policy established in 1996.
The report stated that the scope of
NOAA’s efforts would be limited to
hydrographic services programs funded
under the ‘‘Mapping and Charting’’
section of the NOAA budget. NOAA
then issued a Federal Register notice
publishing and soliciting comments on
its 1996 policy. The majority of
comments were from private sector
mapping firms and in general were
supportive of NOAA’s existing policy.
Upon review of the public comments
and in consultation with the Panel,
NOAA concluded that a moderate
revision of its existing policy was the
appropriate approach. On April 7, 2006,
NOAA issued a second Federal Register
notice publishing and soliciting
comments on its draft revised policy.
Two comments were received. One was
generally supportive and the second
detailed several concerns.
Two concerns were that NOAA’s
efforts (1) did not respond to the
congressional request and (2) that the
revised policy mistakenly focused solely
on NOAA’s hydrographic services. As
noted, personnel met with congressional
staff and then provided Congress a
report outlining the scope of NOAA’s
intended efforts. That strategy included
utilizing the Panel as the primary
mechanism for engaging the public,
including the private mapping
community, in reexamining the
contracting policy. In terms of the
scope, the congressional language
requesting NOAA to undertake this
effort appeared in the ‘‘Mapping and
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
46893
Charting’’ section of the annual
appropriations report that addresses
only NOAA’s hydrographic services.
The second comment disagreed with
the draft policy’s conclusion that
acquisition of geospatial data is a core
agency mission and that the agency
should maintain a core capability. Upon
review, NOAA concludes its legal
authorities provide language indicating
acquisition of data is a core agency
mission and that the agency should
maintain an adequate operational
capability. For example, the
Hydrographic Services Improvement
Act says that the NOAA administrator
‘‘shall acquire and disseminate
hydrographic data.’’ (33 U.S.C.
892a(a)(1)). The Act authorizes NOAA
to procure vessels, equipment and
technologies in order to ‘‘maintain
operational expertise in hydrographic
data acquisition and hydrographic
services.’’ (33 U.S.C. 892a(b)(1)).
NOAA Hydrographic Services
Contracting Policy
NOAA recognizes that qualified
commercial sources can provide
competent, professional, cost-effective
hydrographic services to NOAA in
support of its mapping and charting
mission for enhancing navigation safety.
NOAA also recognizes that the
provision of hydrographic services,
including the acquisition and
dissemination of hydrographic and
shoreline data, is a core mission
requirement of NOAA under the 1947
Coast and Geodetic Survey Act and the
Hydrographic Services Improvement
Act of 1998 (as amended). In the interest
of public and environmental safety, the
Federal government’s responsibility for
executing its hydrographic services
missions is manifest and non-delegable.
Therefore, it is incumbent upon NOAA,
as recommended by the Hydrographic
Services Review Panel (the Panel), to
maintain its operational hydrographic
services core capability, and contract for
the remainder of its hydrographic
services to the extent of available
funding.
In general, it is the intent of NOAA to
contract for hydrographic services when
qualified commercial sources exist, and
when such contracts are the most cost
effective method of conducting these
functions. This policy documents the
framework and conditions under which
contracting will be employed to ensure
an open and consistent approach. To
support this policy, NOAA will
maintain a dialogue with private sector
organizations and constituent groups.
For the purposes of this policy, the term
‘‘hydrographic services’’ is defined to
include: Geodesy, hydrography,
E:\FR\FM\15AUN1.SGM
15AUN1
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
46894
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 157 / Tuesday, August 15, 2006 / Notices
photogrammetry, topography, remote
sensing, geophysical (gravity,
seismological, geomagnetic)
measurements, tide and current
observations, and data processing.
Although this policy is limited to
NOAA’s hydrographic services, it is
NOAA’s intent to advance contracting
and adhere to the principles of this
policy to meet all of its geospatial,
surveying and mapping requirements.
NOAA will procure hydrographic
data and services from qualified sources
in accordance with its legal authorities,
the Federal Acquisition Regulations
(FAR) and the Federal Property and
Administrative Services Act of 1949 (40
U.S.C. 541 et seq.), including Title IX
where appropriate. Commonly known
as the ‘‘Brooks Act’’ for Architect/
Engineering (A/E) contracts, Title IX is
a contract mechanism for use in
situations where the professional nature
of the services to be procured requires
that potential contractors have
specialized technical expertise.
NOAA may determine that a
particular surveying or mapping activity
is inherently governmental. NOAA
surveying and mapping activities
considered inherently governmental in
nature may include services necessary
to: (1) Monitor the quality of NOAA
products; (2) promulgate and promote
national and international technical
standards and specifications; (3)
conduct basic research and
development and ensure the rapid
transfer to the private sector of the
derived technology; (4) maintain the
Federal geodetic and navigational
databases necessary to support safe and
efficient marine operations; (5) support
coastal stewardship ecosystem
applications; and (6) support Maritime
Domain Awareness and Homeland
Security preparation and response
activities. To carry out the above
activities, and to adequately monitor
contracted services, NOAA will
maintain a core capability of field and
office expertise.
NOAA may task qualified commercial
sources with surveying and mapping
services in any part of the U.S.
Exclusive Economic Zone for any
NOAA mission-related purpose,
irrespective of pre-defined priority
categories such as those documented in
the NOAA Hydrographic Surveying
Priorities. The government’s interests
and responsibilities for surveying and
mapping vary broadly, and experience
has shown that maintaining flexibility is
key to responding to the nation’s
changing needs for updated surveying
and mapping data.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:36 Aug 14, 2006
Jkt 208001
Ancillary Statements and Actions
As recommended by the Panel, NOAA
will continue to utilize a mix of inhouse and private-sector resources to
accomplish its hydrographic services
missions. Costs and productivity will be
closely monitored within each category
(i.e., public and private) to ensure best
use of hydrographic services resources.
NOAA will also seek to determine the
optimal resource allocation between inhouse and private-sector resources
based on the strength of the
governmental interest, the total
requirement for mapping and charting
services, and the particular operational
capabilities of either government or
private-sector resources that may make
one more suitable.
NOAA will continue to examine ways
to improve its contracting process, such
as methods for minimizing the turnover
frequency of contracting personnel and
for reducing the length of time required
to award contracts and task orders.
NOAA will maintain its offer of
debriefings to successful and
unsuccessful hydrographic services
contractors after final selection has
taken place. The purpose of these
debriefings is to assist contractors with
identifying significant weaknesses or
deficiencies in their submissions.
NOAA is also exploring the
establishment of an Ocean and Coastal
Mapping Training Center. The Training
Center was initially conceived as a
curriculum to support NOAA’s in-house
hydrographic surveying training
requirements. But NOAA now
recognizes value in broadening the
Center’s scope to include training for
NOAA and private sector contractors in
techniques, standards, and technologies
that support NOAA’s many shoreline,
coastal and ocean mapping activities.
This concept builds on NOAA’s annual
Hydrographic Training and Field
Procedures Workshops currently held
for NOAA personnel and its
hydrographic services contractors to
train and trade valuable lessons learned
from surveying experience. Such
training would be beneficial to current
or prospective NOAA contractors
seeking to strengthen their proposal
submissions.
To view the 1996 National Ocean
Service Contracting Policy; the Brooks
Act, Public Law 92–582 or the 1998 and
2002 Hydrographic Services
Improvement Acts (which authorize
NOAA Navigation Services programs),
visit https://nauticalcharts.noaa.gov/ocs/
hsrp/archive/library.htm.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Dated: August 9, 2006.
Captain Steven Barnum,
NOAA, Director, Office of Coast Survey,
National Ocean Service, National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration.
[FR Doc. 06–6929 Filed 8–14–06; 8:45am]
BILLING CODE 3510–JE–M
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Technology Administration
Technology Administration
Performance Review Board
Membership
The Technology Administration
Performance Review Board (TA PRB)
reviews performance appraisals,
agreements, and recommended actions
pertaining to employees in the Senior
Executive Service and reviews
performance-related pay increases for
ST–3104 employees. The Board makes
recommendations to the appropriate
appointing authority concerning such
matters so as to ensure the fair and
equitable treatment of these individuals.
This notice lists the membership of
the TA PRB and supersedes the list
published in Federal Register Vol. 70,
No. 158, pages 48374–48375, on August
17, 2005.
Bruce Borzino (C), Deputy Director,
National Technical Information
Service, Springfield, VA 22161,
Appointment Expires: 12/31/2008,
General.
Alan Cookson (C) (Alternate), Deputy
Director, Electronics and Electrical
Engineering Laboratory, National
Institute of Standards and
Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899,
Appointment Expires: 12/31/07,
Limited.
Paul Doremus (C), Director of Strategic
Planning, Program Planning and
Integration, National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration, Silver
Spring, MD 20910, Appointment
Expires: 12/31/07, Limited.
Cita Furlani (C), Director, Information
Technology Laboratory, National
Institute of Standards & Technology,
Gaithersburg, MD 20899,
Appointment Expires: 12/31/07,
Limited.
Patrick Gallagher (C) (Alternate),
Director, NIST Center for Neutron
Research, Materials Science and
Engineering Laboratory, National
Institute of Standards and
Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899,
Appointment Expires: 12/31/07,
Limited.
Howard Harary (C), Deputy Director,
Manufacturing Engineering
Laboratory, National Institute of
E:\FR\FM\15AUN1.SGM
15AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 157 (Tuesday, August 15, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46893-46894]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-6929]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Notice of Availability of Final Contracting Policy
AGENCY: National Ocean Service (NOS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA), Department of Commerce (DOC).
ACTION: Notice of Availability of Final Revised Contracting Policy.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The NOAA National Ocean Service (NOS) is publishing its
updated contracting policy for hydrographic services per NOAA's 2005
plans to review and update the subject policy.
DATES: No comments are solicited through this notice.
ADDRESSES: Ashley Chappell, Office of Coast Survey, National Ocean
Service, NOAA (N/CS), 1315 East West Highway, Station 6113, Silver
Spring, MD 20910.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ashley Chappell, Office of Coast
Survey, National Ocean Service, NOAA (N/CS), 1315 East West Highway,
Station 6113, Silver Spring, Maryland 20910; Telephone: 301-713-2770
ext. 148; fax (301) 713-4019, Attention: Ashley Chappell; E-mail
ashley.chappell@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The contracting policy for hydrographic
services within the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
(NOAA), National Ocean Service (NOS) is final.
Background
In House Report 108-576, which accompanied the FY 2005 Consolidated
Appropriations Act, Congress recommended that NOAA's National Ocean
Service ``work with the private mapping community to develop a strategy
for expanding contracting with private entities to minimize duplication
and take maximum advantage of private sector capability in fulfillment
of NOAA's mapping and charting responsibilities.''
NOAA first consulted with congressional staff to clarify the scope
of the request. Subsequently, on June 13, 2005, NOAA submitted a report
to Congress outlining its intent to utilize its advisory group, the
Hydrographic Services Review Panel (the Panel), as the primary vehicle
for reevalting its existing mapping and charting contracting policy
established in 1996. The report stated that the scope of NOAA's efforts
would be limited to hydrographic services programs funded under the
``Mapping and Charting'' section of the NOAA budget. NOAA then issued a
Federal Register notice publishing and soliciting comments on its 1996
policy. The majority of comments were from private sector mapping firms
and in general were supportive of NOAA's existing policy. Upon review
of the public comments and in consultation with the Panel, NOAA
concluded that a moderate revision of its existing policy was the
appropriate approach. On April 7, 2006, NOAA issued a second Federal
Register notice publishing and soliciting comments on its draft revised
policy. Two comments were received. One was generally supportive and
the second detailed several concerns.
Two concerns were that NOAA's efforts (1) did not respond to the
congressional request and (2) that the revised policy mistakenly
focused solely on NOAA's hydrographic services. As noted, personnel met
with congressional staff and then provided Congress a report outlining
the scope of NOAA's intended efforts. That strategy included utilizing
the Panel as the primary mechanism for engaging the public, including
the private mapping community, in reexamining the contracting policy.
In terms of the scope, the congressional language requesting NOAA to
undertake this effort appeared in the ``Mapping and Charting'' section
of the annual appropriations report that addresses only NOAA's
hydrographic services.
The second comment disagreed with the draft policy's conclusion
that acquisition of geospatial data is a core agency mission and that
the agency should maintain a core capability. Upon review, NOAA
concludes its legal authorities provide language indicating acquisition
of data is a core agency mission and that the agency should maintain an
adequate operational capability. For example, the Hydrographic Services
Improvement Act says that the NOAA administrator ``shall acquire and
disseminate hydrographic data.'' (33 U.S.C. 892a(a)(1)). The Act
authorizes NOAA to procure vessels, equipment and technologies in order
to ``maintain operational expertise in hydrographic data acquisition
and hydrographic services.'' (33 U.S.C. 892a(b)(1)).
NOAA Hydrographic Services Contracting Policy
NOAA recognizes that qualified commercial sources can provide
competent, professional, cost-effective hydrographic services to NOAA
in support of its mapping and charting mission for enhancing navigation
safety. NOAA also recognizes that the provision of hydrographic
services, including the acquisition and dissemination of hydrographic
and shoreline data, is a core mission requirement of NOAA under the
1947 Coast and Geodetic Survey Act and the Hydrographic Services
Improvement Act of 1998 (as amended). In the interest of public and
environmental safety, the Federal government's responsibility for
executing its hydrographic services missions is manifest and non-
delegable. Therefore, it is incumbent upon NOAA, as recommended by the
Hydrographic Services Review Panel (the Panel), to maintain its
operational hydrographic services core capability, and contract for the
remainder of its hydrographic services to the extent of available
funding.
In general, it is the intent of NOAA to contract for hydrographic
services when qualified commercial sources exist, and when such
contracts are the most cost effective method of conducting these
functions. This policy documents the framework and conditions under
which contracting will be employed to ensure an open and consistent
approach. To support this policy, NOAA will maintain a dialogue with
private sector organizations and constituent groups. For the purposes
of this policy, the term ``hydrographic services'' is defined to
include: Geodesy, hydrography,
[[Page 46894]]
photogrammetry, topography, remote sensing, geophysical (gravity,
seismological, geomagnetic) measurements, tide and current
observations, and data processing. Although this policy is limited to
NOAA's hydrographic services, it is NOAA's intent to advance
contracting and adhere to the principles of this policy to meet all of
its geospatial, surveying and mapping requirements.
NOAA will procure hydrographic data and services from qualified
sources in accordance with its legal authorities, the Federal
Acquisition Regulations (FAR) and the Federal Property and
Administrative Services Act of 1949 (40 U.S.C. 541 et seq.), including
Title IX where appropriate. Commonly known as the ``Brooks Act'' for
Architect/Engineering (A/E) contracts, Title IX is a contract mechanism
for use in situations where the professional nature of the services to
be procured requires that potential contractors have specialized
technical expertise.
NOAA may determine that a particular surveying or mapping activity
is inherently governmental. NOAA surveying and mapping activities
considered inherently governmental in nature may include services
necessary to: (1) Monitor the quality of NOAA products; (2) promulgate
and promote national and international technical standards and
specifications; (3) conduct basic research and development and ensure
the rapid transfer to the private sector of the derived technology; (4)
maintain the Federal geodetic and navigational databases necessary to
support safe and efficient marine operations; (5) support coastal
stewardship ecosystem applications; and (6) support Maritime Domain
Awareness and Homeland Security preparation and response activities. To
carry out the above activities, and to adequately monitor contracted
services, NOAA will maintain a core capability of field and office
expertise.
NOAA may task qualified commercial sources with surveying and
mapping services in any part of the U.S. Exclusive Economic Zone for
any NOAA mission-related purpose, irrespective of pre-defined priority
categories such as those documented in the NOAA Hydrographic Surveying
Priorities. The government's interests and responsibilities for
surveying and mapping vary broadly, and experience has shown that
maintaining flexibility is key to responding to the nation's changing
needs for updated surveying and mapping data.
Ancillary Statements and Actions
As recommended by the Panel, NOAA will continue to utilize a mix of
in-house and private-sector resources to accomplish its hydrographic
services missions. Costs and productivity will be closely monitored
within each category (i.e., public and private) to ensure best use of
hydrographic services resources. NOAA will also seek to determine the
optimal resource allocation between in-house and private-sector
resources based on the strength of the governmental interest, the total
requirement for mapping and charting services, and the particular
operational capabilities of either government or private-sector
resources that may make one more suitable.
NOAA will continue to examine ways to improve its contracting
process, such as methods for minimizing the turnover frequency of
contracting personnel and for reducing the length of time required to
award contracts and task orders. NOAA will maintain its offer of
debriefings to successful and unsuccessful hydrographic services
contractors after final selection has taken place. The purpose of these
debriefings is to assist contractors with identifying significant
weaknesses or deficiencies in their submissions. NOAA is also exploring
the establishment of an Ocean and Coastal Mapping Training Center. The
Training Center was initially conceived as a curriculum to support
NOAA's in-house hydrographic surveying training requirements. But NOAA
now recognizes value in broadening the Center's scope to include
training for NOAA and private sector contractors in techniques,
standards, and technologies that support NOAA's many shoreline, coastal
and ocean mapping activities. This concept builds on NOAA's annual
Hydrographic Training and Field Procedures Workshops currently held for
NOAA personnel and its hydrographic services contractors to train and
trade valuable lessons learned from surveying experience. Such training
would be beneficial to current or prospective NOAA contractors seeking
to strengthen their proposal submissions.
To view the 1996 National Ocean Service Contracting Policy; the
Brooks Act, Public Law 92-582 or the 1998 and 2002 Hydrographic
Services Improvement Acts (which authorize NOAA Navigation Services
programs), visit https://nauticalcharts.noaa.gov/ocs/hsrp/archive/
library.htm.
Dated: August 9, 2006.
Captain Steven Barnum,
NOAA, Director, Office of Coast Survey, National Ocean Service,
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
[FR Doc. 06-6929 Filed 8-14-06; 8:45am]
BILLING CODE 3510-JE-M