Subsistence Management Regulations for Public Lands in Alaska; Kenai Peninsula Subsistence Resource Region, 46427-46428 [06-6905]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 156 / Monday, August 14, 2006 / Proposed Rules
Regional Council will hold a meeting
Thursday, August 24, 2006, in
Anchorage, Alaska, to receive testimony
and discuss the proposed Kenai
Peninsula subsistence Resource Region.
The specific time and place will be
noticed in local and regional
newspapers and by press release.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
36 CFR Part 242
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
Comments
Background
In Title VIII of the Alaska National
Interest Lands Conservation Act
(ANILCA) (16 U.S.C. 3111–3126),
Congress found that ‘‘the situation in
Alaska is unique in that, in most cases,
no practical alternative means are
available to replace the food supplies
and other items gathered from fish and
wildlife which supply rural residents
dependent on subsistence uses * * *’’
and that ‘‘continuation of the
opportunity for subsistence uses of
resources on public and other lands in
Alaska is threatened * * *’’ As a result,
Title VIII requires, among other things,
that the Secretary of the Interior and the
Secretary of Agriculture (Secretaries)
implement a joint program to grant a
preference for subsistence uses of fish
and wildlife resources on public lands
in Alaska, unless the State of Alaska
enacts and implements laws of general
applicability that are consistent with
ANILCA and that provide for the
subsistence definition, preference, and
participation specified in sections 803,
804, and 805 of ANILCA.
The State implemented a program that
the Department of the Interior
previously found to be consistent with
ANILCA. However, in December 1989,
the Alaska Supreme Court ruled in
McDowell v. State of Alaska that the
rural preference in the State subsistence
statute violated the Alaska Constitution.
The Court’s ruling in McDowell required
the State to delete the rural preference
from its subsistence statute and,
therefore, negated State compliance
with ANILCA. The Court stayed the
effect of the decision until July 1, 1990.
As a result of the McDowell decision,
the Department of the Interior and the
Department of Agriculture
(Departments) assumed, on July 1, 1990,
responsibility for implementation of
Title VIII of ANILCA on public lands.
On June 29, 1990, the Temporary
Subsistence Management Regulations
for Public Lands in Alaska were
published in the Federal Register (55
FR 27114).
You may submit electronic comments
(preferred method) and other data to
Subsistence@fws.gov. Please submit as a
PDF or MS Word file, avoiding the use
of any special characters and any form
of encryption. The existing Southcentral
Federal Subsistence Regional Advisory
Councils
Pursuant to the Subsistence
Management Regulations for Federal
Public Lands in Alaska, April 6, 1992,
and the Subsistence Management
50 CFR Part 100
RIN 1018–AU92
Subsistence Management Regulations
for Public Lands in Alaska; Kenai
Peninsula Subsistence Resource
Region
Forest Service, Agriculture;
Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCIES:
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSAL
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Forest Service
and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, are
proposing to amend the regulations
governing subsistence use of fish and
wildlife in Alaska by creating an
additional subsistence resource region
for the Kenai Peninsula. This addition
of a separate subsistence resource region
will allow for the creation of a separate
Federal subsistence regional advisory
council for that region. A new regional
council responsible for only the Kenai
Peninsula area will better ensure that
residents with personal knowledge of
the Kenai Peninsula area will have a
meaningful role in the complex issues
and management challenges of
subsistence management on the Federal
lands of the Kenai Peninsula.
DATES: We must receive your public
comments no later than September 18,
2006.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
electronically to Subsistence@fws.gov.
See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for file
format and other information about
electronic filing. You may also submit
written comments to the Office of
Subsistence Management, 3601 C Street,
Suite 1030, Anchorage, AK 99503.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
Forest Service questions, contact Steve
Kessler, Regional Subsistence Program
Leader, USDA-FS Alaska Region, at
(907) 786–3592. For Fish and Wildlife
Service questions, contact Pete Probasco
at (907) 786–3888.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:17 Aug 11, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
46427
Regulations for Federal Public Lands in
Alaska, 36 CFR 242.11 (2002) and 50
CFR 100.11 (2002), and for the purposes
identified therein, we divided Alaska
into 10 subsistence resource regions,
each of which is represented by a
Federal Subsistence Regional Advisory
Council (Regional Council). The
Regional Councils provide a forum for
residents of the regions, who have
personal knowledge of local conditions
and resource requirements, to have a
meaningful role in the subsistence
management of fish and wildlife on
Alaska public lands. The Regional
Council members represent varied
geographical, cultural, and user
diversity within each region.
Current Rulemaking
The Kenai Peninsula has unique fish
and wildlife management challenges
due to intense use of the Peninsula’s
fish and wildlife by local and nonlocal
residents and by nonresidents, and due
to the recent Board actions to begin to
provide a meaningful subsistence
priority for fisheries in Federally
managed fresh waters on the Kenai
Peninsula. Kenai Peninsula lands
primarily under Federal management
include the Chugach National Forest
and the Kenai National Wildlife Refuge.
A new region and associated regional
council will better ensure that residents
with personal knowledge of the Kenai
Peninsula area will have a meaningful
role in subsistence use management on
Federal public lands. The Board will
create this Region by taking State Game
Management Units 7, 14C, and 15, from
the Southcentral Subsistence Resource
Region.
The Board will recommend to the
Secretaries that current Southcentral
Regional Council members residing
within the Kenai Peninsula Region be
appointed to membership on the Kenai
Peninsula Subsistence Regional
Advisory Council and that members
who reside in what will be the new
Southcentral Region remain members of
that Council. A special membership
recruitment effort will be conducted this
summer and fall to fill the additional
vacancies on the Kenai Peninsula
Council and to replace members on the
Southcentral Council being appointed to
the Kenai Peninsula Council.
Elsewhere in today’s Federal Register,
we have published a direct final rule to
promulgate the same regulatory changes
to 36 CFR part 242 and 50 CFR part 100
proposed here. We published the direct
final rule because we anticipate no
significant adverse public comment on
these changes. If we receive no
significant adverse comments regarding
these amendments on or before
E:\FR\FM\14AUP1.SGM
14AUP1
46428
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 156 / Monday, August 14, 2006 / Proposed Rules
September 18, 2006, then these changes
will become effective September 29,
2006, and we will withdraw this
proposed rule. If we do receive
significant adverse comments, then this
proposed rule initiates the normal
notice-and-comment rulemaking
process. We are opening this comment
period for 45 days as it is desirable to
have this regulatory change in place
prior to the councils’ recruitment and
appointment process for the winter 2007
meeting cycle.
Required Determinations
Regulatory Planning and Review
[Executive Order (E.O). 12866],
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601
et seq.), and Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act (5 U.S.C.
804(2))
An economic analysis is not
necessary, because this proposed rule
would not have an economic impact on
any entities, large or small. The Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) has
determined that this proposed rule is
not a significant rule under E.O. 12866,
and, therefore, OMB has not reviewed
this proposed rule.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (2
U.S.C. 1501 et seq.)
In accordance with the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act:
(a) This rule will not ‘‘significantly or
uniquely’’ affect small governments. A
Small Government Agency Plan is not
required.
(b) This rule will not produce a
Federal mandate of $100 million or
greater in any year; that is, it is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act.
Takings
In accordance with E.O. 12630, this
proposed rule would not have
significant takings implications. A
takings implication assessment is not
required.
Federalism
In accordance with E.O. 13132, this
proposed rule would not have
significant Federalism effects. A
Federalism assessment is not required.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSAL
Civil Justice Reform
In accordance with E.O. 12988, the
Office of the Solicitor has determined
that this proposed rule would not
unduly burden the judicial system and
this proposed meets the requirements of
sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of the Order.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:17 Aug 11, 2006
Jkt 208001
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.)
This proposed rule does not contain
any new information collection or
recordkeeping requirements under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
National Environmental Policy Act
We have determined that an
Environmental Assessment and/or an
Environmental Impact Statement as
defined by the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 need not be prepared
for this proposed rule. This proposal
does not constitute a major Federal
action significantly affecting the quality
of the human environment.
William Knauer drafted these
regulations under the guidance of Peter
J. Probasco of the Office of Subsistence
Management, Alaska Regional Office,
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
Anchorage, Alaska. Dennis Tol and
Chuck Ardizzone, Alaska State Office,
Bureau of Land Management; Greg Bos,
Carl Jack, and Jerry Berg, Alaska
Regional Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service; Sandy Rabinowitch and Nancy
Swanton, Alaska Regional Office,
National Park Service; Dr. Warren
Eastland, Pat Petrivelli, and Dr. Glenn
Chen, Alaska Regional Office, Bureau of
Indian Affairs; and Steve Kessler,
Alaska Regional Office, USDA-Forest
Service provided additional guidance.
List of Subjects
36 CFR Part 242
Administrative practice and
procedure, Alaska, Fish, National
forests, Public lands, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Wildlife.
50 CFR Part 100
Administrative practice and
procedure, Alaska, Fish, National
forests, Public lands, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Wildlife.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, the Departments propose to
amend title 36, part 242, and title 50,
part 100, of the Code of Federal
Regulations, as set forth below.
PARTll—SUBSISTENCE
MANAGEMENT REGULATIONS FOR
PUBLIC LANDS IN ALASKA
1. The authority citation for both 36
CFR part 242 and 50 CFR part 100
would continue to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 3, 472, 551, 668dd,
3101–3126; 18 U.S.C. 3551–3586; 43 U.S.C.
1733.
Subpart C—Board Determinations
2. In § ll.22, paragraph (a) is
revised by adding ‘‘; and’’ at the end of
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
paragraph (10) and a new paragraph (11)
to read as follows:
§ ll.22
Subsistence resource regions.
(a) * * *
(11) Kenai Peninsula Region.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: July 21, 2006.
Peter J. Probasco,
Acting Chair, Federal Subsistence Board.
Dated: July 20, 2006.
Steve Kessler,
Subsistence Program Leader, USDA–Forest
Service.
[FR Doc. 06–6905 Filed 8–11–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–P; 4310–55–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R08–OAR–2006–0604; FRL–8208–7]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; State of
South Dakota; Revisions to the
Administrative Rules of South Dakota
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to take
direct final action approving a State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions
submitted by the State of South Dakota
on January 14, 2005. The January 14,
2005 submittal revises the
Administrative Rules of South Dakota,
Air Pollution Control Program, by
modifying the chapters pertaining to
definitions, ambient air quality, air
quality episodes, operating permits for
minor sources, regulated air pollutant
emissions, new source review,
performance testing, control of visible
emissions, and continuous emission
monitoring systems. In addition, the
State made revisions to the Prevention
of Significant Deterioration program,
which has been delegated to the State.
The intended effect of this action is to
make these revisions federally
enforceable. We are also announcing
that on March 23, 2005, we updated the
delegation of authority for the
implementation and enforcement of the
New Source Performance Standards to
the State of South Dakota. These actions
are being taken under sections 110 and
111 of the Clean Air Act.
In the ‘‘Rules and Regulations’’
section of this Federal Register, EPA is
approving the State’s SIP revision as a
direct final rule without prior proposal
because the Agency views this as a
noncontroversial SIP revision and
E:\FR\FM\14AUP1.SGM
14AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 156 (Monday, August 14, 2006)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 46427-46428]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-6905]
[[Page 46427]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
36 CFR Part 242
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 100
RIN 1018-AU92
Subsistence Management Regulations for Public Lands in Alaska;
Kenai Peninsula Subsistence Resource Region
AGENCIES: Forest Service, Agriculture; Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Forest Service and U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, are proposing to amend the regulations governing subsistence
use of fish and wildlife in Alaska by creating an additional
subsistence resource region for the Kenai Peninsula. This addition of a
separate subsistence resource region will allow for the creation of a
separate Federal subsistence regional advisory council for that region.
A new regional council responsible for only the Kenai Peninsula area
will better ensure that residents with personal knowledge of the Kenai
Peninsula area will have a meaningful role in the complex issues and
management challenges of subsistence management on the Federal lands of
the Kenai Peninsula.
DATES: We must receive your public comments no later than September 18,
2006.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments electronically to
Subsistence@fws.gov. See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for file format and
other information about electronic filing. You may also submit written
comments to the Office of Subsistence Management, 3601 C Street, Suite
1030, Anchorage, AK 99503.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For Forest Service questions, contact
Steve Kessler, Regional Subsistence Program Leader, USDA-FS Alaska
Region, at (907) 786-3592. For Fish and Wildlife Service questions,
contact Pete Probasco at (907) 786-3888.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments
You may submit electronic comments (preferred method) and other
data to Subsistence@fws.gov. Please submit as a PDF or MS Word file,
avoiding the use of any special characters and any form of encryption.
The existing Southcentral Regional Council will hold a meeting
Thursday, August 24, 2006, in Anchorage, Alaska, to receive testimony
and discuss the proposed Kenai Peninsula subsistence Resource Region.
The specific time and place will be noticed in local and regional
newspapers and by press release.
Background
In Title VIII of the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation
Act (ANILCA) (16 U.S.C. 3111-3126), Congress found that ``the situation
in Alaska is unique in that, in most cases, no practical alternative
means are available to replace the food supplies and other items
gathered from fish and wildlife which supply rural residents dependent
on subsistence uses * * *'' and that ``continuation of the opportunity
for subsistence uses of resources on public and other lands in Alaska
is threatened * * *'' As a result, Title VIII requires, among other
things, that the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of
Agriculture (Secretaries) implement a joint program to grant a
preference for subsistence uses of fish and wildlife resources on
public lands in Alaska, unless the State of Alaska enacts and
implements laws of general applicability that are consistent with
ANILCA and that provide for the subsistence definition, preference, and
participation specified in sections 803, 804, and 805 of ANILCA.
The State implemented a program that the Department of the Interior
previously found to be consistent with ANILCA. However, in December
1989, the Alaska Supreme Court ruled in McDowell v. State of Alaska
that the rural preference in the State subsistence statute violated the
Alaska Constitution. The Court's ruling in McDowell required the State
to delete the rural preference from its subsistence statute and,
therefore, negated State compliance with ANILCA. The Court stayed the
effect of the decision until July 1, 1990. As a result of the McDowell
decision, the Department of the Interior and the Department of
Agriculture (Departments) assumed, on July 1, 1990, responsibility for
implementation of Title VIII of ANILCA on public lands. On June 29,
1990, the Temporary Subsistence Management Regulations for Public Lands
in Alaska were published in the Federal Register (55 FR 27114).
Federal Subsistence Regional Advisory Councils
Pursuant to the Subsistence Management Regulations for Federal
Public Lands in Alaska, April 6, 1992, and the Subsistence Management
Regulations for Federal Public Lands in Alaska, 36 CFR 242.11 (2002)
and 50 CFR 100.11 (2002), and for the purposes identified therein, we
divided Alaska into 10 subsistence resource regions, each of which is
represented by a Federal Subsistence Regional Advisory Council
(Regional Council). The Regional Councils provide a forum for residents
of the regions, who have personal knowledge of local conditions and
resource requirements, to have a meaningful role in the subsistence
management of fish and wildlife on Alaska public lands. The Regional
Council members represent varied geographical, cultural, and user
diversity within each region.
Current Rulemaking
The Kenai Peninsula has unique fish and wildlife management
challenges due to intense use of the Peninsula's fish and wildlife by
local and nonlocal residents and by nonresidents, and due to the recent
Board actions to begin to provide a meaningful subsistence priority for
fisheries in Federally managed fresh waters on the Kenai Peninsula.
Kenai Peninsula lands primarily under Federal management include the
Chugach National Forest and the Kenai National Wildlife Refuge. A new
region and associated regional council will better ensure that
residents with personal knowledge of the Kenai Peninsula area will have
a meaningful role in subsistence use management on Federal public
lands. The Board will create this Region by taking State Game
Management Units 7, 14C, and 15, from the Southcentral Subsistence
Resource Region.
The Board will recommend to the Secretaries that current
Southcentral Regional Council members residing within the Kenai
Peninsula Region be appointed to membership on the Kenai Peninsula
Subsistence Regional Advisory Council and that members who reside in
what will be the new Southcentral Region remain members of that
Council. A special membership recruitment effort will be conducted this
summer and fall to fill the additional vacancies on the Kenai Peninsula
Council and to replace members on the Southcentral Council being
appointed to the Kenai Peninsula Council.
Elsewhere in today's Federal Register, we have published a direct
final rule to promulgate the same regulatory changes to 36 CFR part 242
and 50 CFR part 100 proposed here. We published the direct final rule
because we anticipate no significant adverse public comment on these
changes. If we receive no significant adverse comments regarding these
amendments on or before
[[Page 46428]]
September 18, 2006, then these changes will become effective September
29, 2006, and we will withdraw this proposed rule. If we do receive
significant adverse comments, then this proposed rule initiates the
normal notice-and-comment rulemaking process. We are opening this
comment period for 45 days as it is desirable to have this regulatory
change in place prior to the councils' recruitment and appointment
process for the winter 2007 meeting cycle.
Required Determinations
Regulatory Planning and Review [Executive Order (E.O). 12866],
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), and Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (5 U.S.C. 804(2))
An economic analysis is not necessary, because this proposed rule
would not have an economic impact on any entities, large or small. The
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has determined that this proposed
rule is not a significant rule under E.O. 12866, and, therefore, OMB
has not reviewed this proposed rule.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.)
In accordance with the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act:
(a) This rule will not ``significantly or uniquely'' affect small
governments. A Small Government Agency Plan is not required.
(b) This rule will not produce a Federal mandate of $100 million or
greater in any year; that is, it is not a ``significant regulatory
action'' under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act.
Takings
In accordance with E.O. 12630, this proposed rule would not have
significant takings implications. A takings implication assessment is
not required.
Federalism
In accordance with E.O. 13132, this proposed rule would not have
significant Federalism effects. A Federalism assessment is not
required.
Civil Justice Reform
In accordance with E.O. 12988, the Office of the Solicitor has
determined that this proposed rule would not unduly burden the judicial
system and this proposed meets the requirements of sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of the Order.
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.)
This proposed rule does not contain any new information collection
or recordkeeping requirements under the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995.
National Environmental Policy Act
We have determined that an Environmental Assessment and/or an
Environmental Impact Statement as defined by the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 need not be prepared for this proposed rule. This
proposal does not constitute a major Federal action significantly
affecting the quality of the human environment.
William Knauer drafted these regulations under the guidance of
Peter J. Probasco of the Office of Subsistence Management, Alaska
Regional Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Anchorage, Alaska.
Dennis Tol and Chuck Ardizzone, Alaska State Office, Bureau of Land
Management; Greg Bos, Carl Jack, and Jerry Berg, Alaska Regional
Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Sandy Rabinowitch and Nancy
Swanton, Alaska Regional Office, National Park Service; Dr. Warren
Eastland, Pat Petrivelli, and Dr. Glenn Chen, Alaska Regional Office,
Bureau of Indian Affairs; and Steve Kessler, Alaska Regional Office,
USDA-Forest Service provided additional guidance.
List of Subjects
36 CFR Part 242
Administrative practice and procedure, Alaska, Fish, National
forests, Public lands, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements,
Wildlife.
50 CFR Part 100
Administrative practice and procedure, Alaska, Fish, National
forests, Public lands, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements,
Wildlife.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, the Departments propose to
amend title 36, part 242, and title 50, part 100, of the Code of
Federal Regulations, as set forth below.
PART------SUBSISTENCE MANAGEMENT REGULATIONS FOR PUBLIC LANDS IN
ALASKA
1. The authority citation for both 36 CFR part 242 and 50 CFR part
100 would continue to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 3, 472, 551, 668dd, 3101-3126; 18 U.S.C.
3551-3586; 43 U.S.C. 1733.
Subpart C--Board Determinations
2. In Sec. ----.22, paragraph (a) is revised by adding ``; and''
at the end of paragraph (10) and a new paragraph (11) to read as
follows:
Sec. ----.22 Subsistence resource regions.
(a) * * *
(11) Kenai Peninsula Region.
* * * * *
Dated: July 21, 2006.
Peter J. Probasco,
Acting Chair, Federal Subsistence Board.
Dated: July 20, 2006.
Steve Kessler,
Subsistence Program Leader, USDA-Forest Service.
[FR Doc. 06-6905 Filed 8-11-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P; 4310-55-P