Subsistence Management Regulations for Public Lands in AK; Kenai Peninsula Subsistence Resource Region, 46400-46401 [06-6904]
Download as PDF
46400
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 156 / Monday, August 14, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
3. In part 250 remove the words
‘‘District or Regional Supervisor’’
wherever they appear and add, in their
place, the words, ‘‘District Manager or
Regional Supervisor.’’
I 4. In part 250 remove the words
‘‘Regional or District Supervisor’’
wherever they appear and add, in their
place, the words ‘‘District Manager or
Regional Supervisor.’’
I
PART 254—OIL-SPILL RESPONSE
REQUIREMENTS FOR FACILITIES
LOCATED SEAWARD OF THE COAST
LINE
5. The authority citation for part 254
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.
PART 254—[NOMENCLATURE
CHANGE]
6. In part 254 remove the words
‘‘District Supervisor’’ wherever they
appear and add, in their place, the
words, ‘‘District Manager.’’
I
Comments
You may submit electronic comments
(preferred method) and other data to
Subsistence@fws.gov. Please submit as a
PDF or MS Word file, avoiding the use
of any special characters and any form
of encryption. The existing Southcentral
Regional Council will hold a meeting
Thursday, August 24, 2006, in
Anchorage, Alaska, to receive testimony
and discuss the proposed Kenai
Peninsula subsistence Resource Region.
The specific time and place will be
noticed in local and regional
newspapers and by press release.
[FR Doc. 06–6884 Filed 8–11–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–MR–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
36 CFR Part 242
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 100
RIN 1018–AU92
Subsistence Management Regulations
for Public Lands in AK; Kenai
Peninsula Subsistence Resource
Region
Forest Service, Agriculture;
Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Direct final rule.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
AGENCIES:
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Forest Service
and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, are
amending the regulations governing
subsistence use of fish and wildlife in
Alaska by creating an additional
subsistence resource region for the
Kenai Peninsula. This addition of a
separate subsistence resource region
will allow for the creation of a separate
Federal subsistence regional advisory
council for that region. A new regional
council responsible for only the Kenai
Peninsula area will better ensure that
residents with personal knowledge of
the Kenai Peninsula area will have a
meaningful role in the complex issues
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:19 Aug 11, 2006
Jkt 208001
and management challenges of
subsistence management on the Federal
lands of the Kenai Peninsula.
DATES: This rule will be effective on
September 29, 2006, unless we receive
significant adverse comments on or
before September 18, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
electronically to Subsistence@fws.gov.
See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for file
format and other information about
electronic filing. You may also submit
written comments to the Office of
Subsistence Management, 3601 C Street,
Suite 1030, Anchorage, AK 99503.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
Forest Service questions, contact Steve
Kessler, Regional Subsistence Program
Leader, USDA–FS Alaska Region, at
(907) 786–3592. For Fish and Wildlife
Service questions, contact Pete Probasco
at (907) 786–3888.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
In Title VIII of the Alaska National
Interest Lands Conservation Act
(ANILCA) (16 U.S.C. 3111–3126),
Congress found that ‘‘the situation in
Alaska is unique in that, in most cases,
no practical alternative means are
available to replace the food supplies
and other items gathered from fish and
wildlife which supply rural residents
dependent on subsistence uses * * *’’
and that ‘‘continuation of the
opportunity for subsistence uses of
resources on public and other lands in
Alaska is threatened * * *’’ As a result,
Title VIII requires, among other things,
that the Secretary of the Interior and the
Secretary of Agriculture (Secretaries)
implement a joint program to grant a
preference for subsistence uses of fish
and wildlife resources on public lands
in Alaska, unless the State of Alaska
enacts and implements laws of general
applicability that are consistent with
ANILCA and that provide for the
subsistence definition, preference, and
participation specified in Sections 803,
804, and 805 of ANILCA.
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
The State implemented a program that
the Department of the Interior
previously found to be consistent with
ANILCA. However, in December 1989,
the Alaska Supreme Court ruled in
McDowell v. State of Alaska that the
rural preference in the State subsistence
statute violated the Alaska Constitution.
The Court’s ruling in McDowell required
the State to delete the rural preference
from its subsistence statute and,
therefore, negated State compliance
with ANILCA. The Court stayed the
effect of the decision until July 1, 1990.
As a result of the McDowell decision,
the Department of the Interior and the
Department of Agriculture
(Departments) assumed, on July 1, 1990,
responsibility for implementation of
Title VIII of ANILCA on public lands.
On June 29, 1990, the Temporary
Subsistence Management Regulations
for Public Lands in Alaska were
published in the Federal Register (55
FR 27114).
Federal Subsistence Regional Advisory
Councils
Pursuant to the Subsistence
Management Regulations for Federal
Public Lands in Alaska, April 6, 1992,
and the Subsistence Management
Regulations for Federal Public Lands in
Alaska, 36 CFR 242.11 (2002) and 50
CFR 100.11 (2002), and for the purposes
identified therein, we divided Alaska
into 10 subsistence resource regions,
each of which is represented by a
Federal Subsistence Regional Advisory
Council (Regional Council). The
Regional Councils provide a forum for
residents of the regions, who have
personal knowledge of local conditions
and resource requirements, to have a
meaningful role in the subsistence
management of fish and wildlife on
Alaska public lands. The Regional
Council members represent varied
geographical, cultural, and user
diversity within each region.
Current Rule
The Kenai Peninsula has unique fish
and wildlife management challenges
due to intense use of the Peninsula’s
fish and wildlife by local and nonlocal
residents and by nonresidents, and due
to the recent Board actions to begin to
provide a meaningful subsistence
priority for fisheries in Federally
managed fresh waters on the Kenai
Peninsula. Kenai Peninsula lands
primarily under Federal management
include the Chugach National Forest
and the Kenai National Wildlife Refuge.
A new region and regional council will
better ensure that residents with
personal knowledge of the Kenai
Peninsula area will have a meaningful
E:\FR\FM\14AUR1.SGM
14AUR1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 156 / Monday, August 14, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
role in subsistence use management on
Federal public lands.
By this direct final rule, the Federal
Subsistence Board is establishing an
additional subsistence resource region,
the Kenai Peninsula Subsistence
Resource Region. This Region will be
composed of State Game Management
Units 7, 14C, and 15, taken from the
Southcentral Subsistence Resource
Region.
The Board will recommend to the
Secretaries that current Southcentral
Regional Council members residing
within the Kenai Peninsula Region be
appointed to membership on the Kenai
Peninsula Subsistence Regional
Advisory Council and that members
who reside in what will be the new
Southcentral Region remain members of
that Council. A special membership
recruitment effort will be conducted this
summer and fall to fill the additional
vacancies on the Kenai Peninsula
Council and to replace members on the
Southcentral Council being appointed to
the Kenai Peninsula Council.
We are publishing this rule without a
prior proposal because we view this
action as an administrative action by the
Federal Subsistence Board. This rule
will be effective, as published in this
document, September 29, 2006, unless
we receive significant adverse
comments on or before September 18,
2006. Significant adverse comments are
comments that provide strong
justifications why the rule should not be
adopted or for changing the rule. If we
receive significant adverse comments,
we will publish a notice in the Federal
Register withdrawing this rule before
the effective date. In the event that we
do receive any significant adverse
comments, we will engage in the normal
rulemaking process to promulgate these
changes to the CFR. Therefore, in this
issue of the Federal Register, we have
published a proposed rule regarding
these regulatory changes. We will give
the same consideration to comments
submitted in response to either this
direct final rule or the proposed rule;
you do not need to submit separate
comments for both documents.
As discussed above, if we receive no
significant adverse comments by the
close of the comment period, then this
direct final rule will become effective
September 29, 2006. In that case, we
will publish a document in the Federal
Register, before the effective date of this
direct final rule, confirming the effective
date and withdrawing the related
proposed rule.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:19 Aug 11, 2006
Jkt 208001
Required Determinations
Regulatory Planning and Review
[Executive Order (E.O.) 12866],
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601
et seq.), and Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act (5 U.S.C.
804(2))
An economic analysis is not necessary
because this rule will not have an
economic impact on any entities, large
or small. The Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) has determined that this
rule is not a significant rule under E.O.
12866, and, therefore, OMB has not
reviewed it.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (2
U.S.C. 1501 et seq.)
In accordance with the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act:
(a) This rule will not ’’significantly or
uniquely’’ affect small governments. A
Small Government Agency Plan is not
required.
(b) This rule will not produce a
Federal mandate of $100 million or
greater in any year; that is, it is not a
’’significant regulatory action’’ under
the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act.
Takings
In accordance with E.O. 12630, this
rule does not have significant takings
implications. A takings implication
assessment is not required.
Federalism
In accordance with E.O. 13132, this
rule does not have significant
Federalism effects. A Federalism
assessment is not required.
Civil Justice Reform
In accordance with E.O. 12988, the
Office of the Solicitor has determined
that this rule does not unduly burden
the judicial system, and this rule meets
the requirements of sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of the Order.
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.)
This rule does not contain any new
information collection or recordkeeping
requirements under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995.
National Environmental Policy Act
We have determined that an
Environmental Assessment and/or an
Environmental Impact Statement as
defined by the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 need not be prepared
for this rule. This rule does not
constitute a major Federal action
significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment.
William Knauer drafted these
regulations under the guidance of Peter
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
46401
J. Probasco of the Office of Subsistence
Management, Alaska Regional Office,
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
Anchorage, Alaska. Dennis Tol and
Chuck Ardizzone, Alaska State Office,
Bureau of Land Management; Greg Bos,
Carl Jack, and Jerry Berg, Alaska
Regional Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service; Sandy Rabinowitch and Nancy
Swanton, Alaska Regional Office,
National Park Service; Dr. Warren
Eastland, Pat Petrivelli, and Dr. Glenn
Chen, Alaska Regional Office, Bureau of
Indian Affairs; and Steve Kessler,
Alaska Regional Office, USDA-Forest
Service provided additional guidance.
List of Subjects
36 CFR Part 242
Administrative practice and
procedure, Alaska, Fish, National
forests, Public lands, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Wildlife.
50 CFR Part 100
Administrative practice and
procedure, Alaska, Fish, National
forests, Public lands, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Wildlife.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, the Departments amend title
36, part 242, and title 50, part 100, of
the Code of Federal Regulations, as set
forth below.
I
PARTll—SUBSISTENCE
MANAGEMENT REGULATIONS FOR
PUBLIC LANDS IN ALASKA
1. The authority citation for both 36
CFR part 242 and 50 CFR part 100
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 3, 472, 551, 668dd,
3101–3126; 18 U.S.C. 3551–3586; 43 U.S.C.
1733.
Subpart C—Board Determinations
I 2. In § ll.22, paragraph (a) is revised
by adding ‘‘; and’’ at the end of
paragraph (10) and a new paragraph (11)
to read as follows:
§ ll.22
Subsistence resource regions.
(a) * * *
(11) Kenai Peninsula Region.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: July 21, 2006.
Peter J. Probasco,
Acting Chair, Federal Subsistence Board.
Dated: July 20, 2006.
Steve Kessler,
Subsistence Program Leader,
USDA-Forest Service.
[FR Doc. 06–6904 Filed 8–11–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–P;4310–55–P
E:\FR\FM\14AUR1.SGM
14AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 156 (Monday, August 14, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 46400-46401]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-6904]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
36 CFR Part 242
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 100
RIN 1018-AU92
Subsistence Management Regulations for Public Lands in AK; Kenai
Peninsula Subsistence Resource Region
AGENCIES: Forest Service, Agriculture; Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Forest Service and U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, are amending the regulations governing subsistence use of fish
and wildlife in Alaska by creating an additional subsistence resource
region for the Kenai Peninsula. This addition of a separate subsistence
resource region will allow for the creation of a separate Federal
subsistence regional advisory council for that region. A new regional
council responsible for only the Kenai Peninsula area will better
ensure that residents with personal knowledge of the Kenai Peninsula
area will have a meaningful role in the complex issues and management
challenges of subsistence management on the Federal lands of the Kenai
Peninsula.
DATES: This rule will be effective on September 29, 2006, unless we
receive significant adverse comments on or before September 18, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments electronically to
Subsistence@fws.gov. See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for file format and
other information about electronic filing. You may also submit written
comments to the Office of Subsistence Management, 3601 C Street, Suite
1030, Anchorage, AK 99503.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For Forest Service questions, contact
Steve Kessler, Regional Subsistence Program Leader, USDA-FS Alaska
Region, at (907) 786-3592. For Fish and Wildlife Service questions,
contact Pete Probasco at (907) 786-3888.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments
You may submit electronic comments (preferred method) and other
data to Subsistence@fws.gov. Please submit as a PDF or MS Word file,
avoiding the use of any special characters and any form of encryption.
The existing Southcentral Regional Council will hold a meeting
Thursday, August 24, 2006, in Anchorage, Alaska, to receive testimony
and discuss the proposed Kenai Peninsula subsistence Resource Region.
The specific time and place will be noticed in local and regional
newspapers and by press release.
Background
In Title VIII of the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation
Act (ANILCA) (16 U.S.C. 3111-3126), Congress found that ``the situation
in Alaska is unique in that, in most cases, no practical alternative
means are available to replace the food supplies and other items
gathered from fish and wildlife which supply rural residents dependent
on subsistence uses * * *'' and that ``continuation of the opportunity
for subsistence uses of resources on public and other lands in Alaska
is threatened * * *'' As a result, Title VIII requires, among other
things, that the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of
Agriculture (Secretaries) implement a joint program to grant a
preference for subsistence uses of fish and wildlife resources on
public lands in Alaska, unless the State of Alaska enacts and
implements laws of general applicability that are consistent with
ANILCA and that provide for the subsistence definition, preference, and
participation specified in Sections 803, 804, and 805 of ANILCA.
The State implemented a program that the Department of the Interior
previously found to be consistent with ANILCA. However, in December
1989, the Alaska Supreme Court ruled in McDowell v. State of Alaska
that the rural preference in the State subsistence statute violated the
Alaska Constitution. The Court's ruling in McDowell required the State
to delete the rural preference from its subsistence statute and,
therefore, negated State compliance with ANILCA. The Court stayed the
effect of the decision until July 1, 1990. As a result of the McDowell
decision, the Department of the Interior and the Department of
Agriculture (Departments) assumed, on July 1, 1990, responsibility for
implementation of Title VIII of ANILCA on public lands. On June 29,
1990, the Temporary Subsistence Management Regulations for Public Lands
in Alaska were published in the Federal Register (55 FR 27114).
Federal Subsistence Regional Advisory Councils
Pursuant to the Subsistence Management Regulations for Federal
Public Lands in Alaska, April 6, 1992, and the Subsistence Management
Regulations for Federal Public Lands in Alaska, 36 CFR 242.11 (2002)
and 50 CFR 100.11 (2002), and for the purposes identified therein, we
divided Alaska into 10 subsistence resource regions, each of which is
represented by a Federal Subsistence Regional Advisory Council
(Regional Council). The Regional Councils provide a forum for residents
of the regions, who have personal knowledge of local conditions and
resource requirements, to have a meaningful role in the subsistence
management of fish and wildlife on Alaska public lands. The Regional
Council members represent varied geographical, cultural, and user
diversity within each region.
Current Rule
The Kenai Peninsula has unique fish and wildlife management
challenges due to intense use of the Peninsula's fish and wildlife by
local and nonlocal residents and by nonresidents, and due to the recent
Board actions to begin to provide a meaningful subsistence priority for
fisheries in Federally managed fresh waters on the Kenai Peninsula.
Kenai Peninsula lands primarily under Federal management include the
Chugach National Forest and the Kenai National Wildlife Refuge. A new
region and regional council will better ensure that residents with
personal knowledge of the Kenai Peninsula area will have a meaningful
[[Page 46401]]
role in subsistence use management on Federal public lands.
By this direct final rule, the Federal Subsistence Board is
establishing an additional subsistence resource region, the Kenai
Peninsula Subsistence Resource Region. This Region will be composed of
State Game Management Units 7, 14C, and 15, taken from the Southcentral
Subsistence Resource Region.
The Board will recommend to the Secretaries that current
Southcentral Regional Council members residing within the Kenai
Peninsula Region be appointed to membership on the Kenai Peninsula
Subsistence Regional Advisory Council and that members who reside in
what will be the new Southcentral Region remain members of that
Council. A special membership recruitment effort will be conducted this
summer and fall to fill the additional vacancies on the Kenai Peninsula
Council and to replace members on the Southcentral Council being
appointed to the Kenai Peninsula Council.
We are publishing this rule without a prior proposal because we
view this action as an administrative action by the Federal Subsistence
Board. This rule will be effective, as published in this document,
September 29, 2006, unless we receive significant adverse comments on
or before September 18, 2006. Significant adverse comments are comments
that provide strong justifications why the rule should not be adopted
or for changing the rule. If we receive significant adverse comments,
we will publish a notice in the Federal Register withdrawing this rule
before the effective date. In the event that we do receive any
significant adverse comments, we will engage in the normal rulemaking
process to promulgate these changes to the CFR. Therefore, in this
issue of the Federal Register, we have published a proposed rule
regarding these regulatory changes. We will give the same consideration
to comments submitted in response to either this direct final rule or
the proposed rule; you do not need to submit separate comments for both
documents.
As discussed above, if we receive no significant adverse comments
by the close of the comment period, then this direct final rule will
become effective September 29, 2006. In that case, we will publish a
document in the Federal Register, before the effective date of this
direct final rule, confirming the effective date and withdrawing the
related proposed rule.
Required Determinations
Regulatory Planning and Review [Executive Order (E.O.) 12866],
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), and Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (5 U.S.C. 804(2))
An economic analysis is not necessary because this rule will not
have an economic impact on any entities, large or small. The Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has determined that this rule is not a
significant rule under E.O. 12866, and, therefore, OMB has not reviewed
it.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.)
In accordance with the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act:
(a) This rule will not ''significantly or uniquely'' affect small
governments. A Small Government Agency Plan is not required.
(b) This rule will not produce a Federal mandate of $100 million or
greater in any year; that is, it is not a ''significant regulatory
action'' under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act.
Takings
In accordance with E.O. 12630, this rule does not have significant
takings implications. A takings implication assessment is not required.
Federalism
In accordance with E.O. 13132, this rule does not have significant
Federalism effects. A Federalism assessment is not required.
Civil Justice Reform
In accordance with E.O. 12988, the Office of the Solicitor has
determined that this rule does not unduly burden the judicial system,
and this rule meets the requirements of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
the Order.
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.)
This rule does not contain any new information collection or
recordkeeping requirements under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
National Environmental Policy Act
We have determined that an Environmental Assessment and/or an
Environmental Impact Statement as defined by the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 need not be prepared for this rule. This rule does
not constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the
quality of the human environment.
William Knauer drafted these regulations under the guidance of
Peter J. Probasco of the Office of Subsistence Management, Alaska
Regional Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Anchorage, Alaska.
Dennis Tol and Chuck Ardizzone, Alaska State Office, Bureau of Land
Management; Greg Bos, Carl Jack, and Jerry Berg, Alaska Regional
Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Sandy Rabinowitch and Nancy
Swanton, Alaska Regional Office, National Park Service; Dr. Warren
Eastland, Pat Petrivelli, and Dr. Glenn Chen, Alaska Regional Office,
Bureau of Indian Affairs; and Steve Kessler, Alaska Regional Office,
USDA-Forest Service provided additional guidance.
List of Subjects
36 CFR Part 242
Administrative practice and procedure, Alaska, Fish, National
forests, Public lands, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements,
Wildlife.
50 CFR Part 100
Administrative practice and procedure, Alaska, Fish, National
forests, Public lands, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements,
Wildlife.
0
For the reasons set out in the preamble, the Departments amend title
36, part 242, and title 50, part 100, of the Code of Federal
Regulations, as set forth below.
PART------SUBSISTENCE MANAGEMENT REGULATIONS FOR PUBLIC LANDS IN
ALASKA
0
1. The authority citation for both 36 CFR part 242 and 50 CFR part 100
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 3, 472, 551, 668dd, 3101-3126; 18 U.S.C.
3551-3586; 43 U.S.C. 1733.
Subpart C--Board Determinations
0
2. In Sec. ----.22, paragraph (a) is revised by adding ``; and'' at
the end of paragraph (10) and a new paragraph (11) to read as follows:
Sec. ----.22 Subsistence resource regions.
(a) * * *
(11) Kenai Peninsula Region.
* * * * *
Dated: July 21, 2006.
Peter J. Probasco,
Acting Chair, Federal Subsistence Board.
Dated: July 20, 2006.
Steve Kessler,
Subsistence Program Leader,
USDA-Forest Service.
[FR Doc. 06-6904 Filed 8-11-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P;4310-55-P