Sanitizers with No Food-Contact Uses in Registered Pesticide Products; Revocation of Tolerance Exemptions, 46123-46125 [E6-13173]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 155 / Friday, August 11, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of this final
rule in the Federal Register. This final
rule is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by
5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides
and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is
amended as follows:
I
PART 180—AMENDED
1. The authority citation for part 180
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
2. Section 180.442 is amended by
alphabetically adding commodities to
the table in paragraph (a) and by
removing Sweet potato, roots from the
table in paragraph (b) to read as follows:
I
§ 180.442 Bifenthrin; tolerances for
residues.
*
*
Parts
per million
*
*
*
*
Brassica, leafy greens, subgroup 5B
*
*
*
*
Coriander, dried leaves ....................
Coriander, leaves .............................
Coriander, seed ................................
*
*
*
*
Okra ..................................................
Pea and bean, dried shelled, expect
soybean, subgroup 6C ..................
*
*
*
*
Turnip, greens ..................................
*
*
*
*
Vegetable, tuberous and corm, subgroup 1C .......................................
*
*
*
*
3.5
*
25
6.0
5.0
*
0.50
0.15
*
3.5
*
0.05
*
[FR Doc. E6–13058 Filed 8–10–06; 8:45 am]
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
BILLING CODE 6560–50–S
VerDate Aug<31>2005
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2006–0495; FRL–8086–1]
Sanitizers with No Food-Contact Uses
in Registered Pesticide Products;
Revocation of Tolerance Exemptions
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is revoking eight
exemptions from the requirement of a
tolerance that are associated with six
food-contact surface sanitizing solutions
because these specific tolerance
exemptions correspond to uses no
longer current or registered in the
United States under the Federal
Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide
Act (FIFRA), and because there are
insufficient data to make the
determination of safety required by the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(FFDCA). These ingredients are subject
to reassessment by August 2006 under
section 408(q) of FFDCA, as amended by
the Food Quality Protection Act of 1996
(FQPA). The eight tolerance exemptions
are considered ‘‘reassessed’’ for
purposes of FFDCA’s section 408(q) and
count as a tolerance reassessment
toward the August 2006 review
deadline.
This rule is effective 90 days
from August 11, 2006. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received
on or before October 10, 2006, and must
be filed in accordance with the
instructions provided in 40 CFR part
178 (see also Unit V. of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under docket
identification (ID) number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2006–0495. All documents in the
docket are listed in the index for the
docket. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, e.g., Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available in the electronic docket at
https://www.regulations.gov, or, if only
available in hard copy, at the OPP
Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S-4400,
One Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777
S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The
Docket Facility is open from 8:30 a.m.
to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday,
DATES:
Commodity
*
40 CFR Part 180
SUMMARY:
Dated:August 1, 2006.
Lois Rossi,
Director, Registration Division, Office of
Pesticide Programs.
(a) *
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
16:23 Aug 10, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
46123
excluding legal holidays. The Docket
Facility telephone number is (703) 3055805.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Laura Bailey, Antimicrobials Division
(7510P), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave, NW., Washington,
DC 20460-0001; telephone number: 703308-6212; e-mail address:
bailey.laura@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are an agricultural
producer, food manufacturer, or
pesticide manufacturer. Potentially
affected entities may include, but are
not limited to:
• Crop production (NAICS code 111).
• Animal production (NAICS code
112).
• Food manufacturing (NAICS code
311).
• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
code 32532).
This listing is not intended to be
exhaustive, but rather provides a guide
for readers regarding entities likely to be
affected by this action. Other types of
entities not listed in this unit could also
be affected. The North American
Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes have been provided to
assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to
certain entities. To determine whether
you or your business may be affected by
this action, you should carefully
examine the applicability provisions in
Unit II. If you have any questions
regarding the applicability of this action
to a particular entity, consult the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
B. How Can I Access Electronic Copies
of this Document?
In addition to accessing an electronic
copy of this Federal Register document
through the electronic docket at https://
www.regulations.gov, you may access
this Federal Register document
electronically through the EPA Internet
under the ‘‘Federal Register’’ listings at
https://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr. You may
also access a frequently updated
electronic version of 40 CFR part 180
through the Government Printing
Office’s pilot e-CFR site at https://
www.gpoaccess.gov/ecfr.
C. Can I File an Objection or Hearing
Request?
Under section 408(g) of the FFDCA, as
amended by the FQPA, any person may
E:\FR\FM\11AUR1.SGM
11AUR1
46124
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 155 / Friday, August 11, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
file an objection to any aspect of this
regulation and may also request a
hearing on those objections. The EPA
procedural regulations which govern the
submission of objections and requests
for hearings appear in 40 CFR part 178.
You must file your objection or request
a hearing on this regulation in
accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure
proper receipt by EPA, you must
identify docket ID number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2006–0495 in the subject line on
the first page of your submission. All
requests must be in writing, and must be
mailed or delivered to the Hearing Clerk
on or before October 10, 2006.
In addition to filing an objection or
hearing request with the Hearing Clerk
as described in 40 CFR part 178, please
submit a copy of the filing that does not
contain any CBI for inclusion in the
public docket that is described in
ADDRESSES. Information not marked
confidential pursuant to 40 CFR part 2
may be disclosed publicly by EPA
without prior notice. Submit your
copies, identified by docket ID number
EPA–HQ–OPP–2006–0495, by one of
the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs
(OPP) Regulatory Public Docket (7502P),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460-0001.
• Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public
Docket (7502P), Environmental
Protection Agency, Rm. S-4400, One
Potomac Yard (South Building), 2777 S.
Crystal Drive, Arlington, VA. Deliveries
are only accepted during the Docket’s
normal hours of operation (8:30 a.m. to
4 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays). Special
arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information. The
Docket telephone number is (703) 3055805.
II. Background and Statutory Findings
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
A. What Action is the Agency Taking?
In the Federal Register of June 9, 2006
(71 FR 33416-3419; FRL–8072–8), EPA
issued a proposed rule to revoke 10
exemptions from the requirement of a
tolerance that are associated with 7
ingredients because those substances are
no longer contained in pesticide
products. The proposed rule provided a
30–day comment period that invited
public comment for consideration and
for support of tolerance exemption
retention under the FFDCA standards.
EPA received one comment
expressing a need to retain two
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:23 Aug 10, 2006
Jkt 208001
exemptions and an interest in providing
data to support these exemptions from
the requirement of a tolerance for one
ingredient. Therefore, in this final rule,
EPA is revoking eight exemptions from
the requirement of a tolerance that are
associated with six ingredients because
these specific tolerance exemptions
correspond to uses no longer current or
registered under FIFRA in the United
States. The tolerance exemptions
revoked by this final rule are no longer
necessary to cover residues of the
relevant pesticide chemicals in or on
domestically treated commodities or
commodities treated outside but
imported into the United States.
B. What is the Agency’s Authority for
Taking this Action?
This final rule is issued pursuant to
section 408(d) of FFDCA (21 U.S.C.
346a(d)). Section 408 of FFDCA
authorizes the establishment of
tolerances, exemptions from the
requirement of a tolerance,
modifications in tolerances, and
revocation of tolerances for residues of
pesticide chemicals in or on raw
agricultural commodities and processed
foods. Without a tolerance or tolerance
exemption, food containing pesticide
residues is considered to be unsafe and
therefore ‘‘adulterated’’ under section
402(a) of the FFDCA. If food containing
pesticide residues is found to be
adulterated, the food may not be
distributed in interstate commerce (21
U.S.C. 331(a) and 342 (a)).
EPA’s general practice is to revoke
tolerances and tolerance exemptions for
residues of pesticide chemicals on crops
for which FIFRA registrations no longer
exist and on which the pesticide may
therefore no longer be used in the
United States. EPA has historically been
concerned that retention of tolerances
and tolerance exemptions that are not
necessary to cover residues in or on
legally treated foods may encourage
misuse of pesticides within the United
States. Nonetheless, EPA will establish
and maintain tolerances and tolerance
exemptions even when corresponding
domestic uses are canceled if the
tolerances, which EPA refers to as
‘‘import tolerances,’’ are necessary to
allow importation into the United States
of food containing such pesticide
residues. However, where there are no
imported commodities that require
these import tolerances, the Agency
believes it is appropriate to revoke
tolerances and tolerance exemptions for
unregistered pesticide chemicals in
order to prevent potential misuse.
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
C. When do These Actions Become
Effective?
These actions become effective 90
days following publication of a final
rule in the Federal Register to ensure
that all affected parties receive notice of
EPA’s actions. For this rule, the
revocations will affect exemptions for
active or inert ingredients which have
not been used in registered products, in
some cases, for many years. The Agency
believes that existing stocks of pesticide
products containing active or inert
ingredients covered by the exemptions
have been completely exhausted and
that treated commodities have had
sufficient time for passage through the
channels of trade. However, if EPA is
presented with information that existing
stocks would still be available and that
information is verified, the Agency will
consider extending the expiration date
of the exemption. If you have comments
regarding existing stocks and whether
the effective date allows sufficient time
for treated commodities to clear the
channels of trade, please submit
comments as described under
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
Any commodities listed in the
regulatory text of this document that are
treated with the pesticide chemicals
subject to this final rule, and that are in
the channels of trade following the
tolerance exemption revocations, shall
be subject to FFDCA section 408(1)(5),
as established by the FQPA. Under this
section, any residues of these pesticide
chemicals in or on such food shall not
render the food adulterated so long as it
is shown to the satisfaction of the Food
and Drug Administration that:
1. The residue is present as the result
of an application or use of the pesticide
chemical at a time and in a manner that
was lawful under FIFRA, and
2. The residue does not exceed the
level that was authorized at the time of
the application or use to be present on
the food under an exemption from
tolerance. Evidence to show that food
was lawfully treated may include
records that verify the dates that the
pesticide chemical was applied to such
food.
D. What Is the Contribution to Tolerance
Reassessment?
By law, EPA is required by August
2006, to reassess the tolerances and
exemptions from tolerances that were in
existence on August 2, 1996. This
document revokes eight tolerance
exemptions for food-contact surface
sanitizing solutions under FFDCA
section 408(q), as amended by FQPA in
1996.
E:\FR\FM\11AUR1.SGM
11AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 155 / Friday, August 11, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
III. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
In this final rule, EPA is revoking
specific tolerance exemptions
established under section 408(d) of
FFDCA. The Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) has exempted this type of
action from review under Executive
Order 12866, entitled Regulatory
Planning and Review (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993). Because this rule has
been exempted from review under
Executive Order 12866 due to its lack of
significance, this final rule is not subject
to Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001). This final rule does not
contain any information collections
subject to OMB approval under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq., or impose any
enforceable duty or contain any
unfunded mandate as described under
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Public
Law 104-4). Nor does it require any
special considerations under Executive
Order 12898, entitled Federal Actions to
Address Environmental Justice in
Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994); or OMB review or any Agency
action under Executive Order 13045,
entitled Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997).
This action does not involve any
technical standards that would require
Agency consideration of voluntary
consensus standards pursuant to section
12(d) of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995
(NTTAA), Public Law 104-113, section
12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note). Pursuant to
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.), the Agency
previously assessed whether revocations
of tolerances might significantly impact
a substantial number of small entities
and concluded that, as a general matter,
these actions do not impose a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This analysis
was published on December 17, 1997
(62 FR 66020), and was provided to the
Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small
Business Administration. Taking into
account this analysis, and available
information concerning the pesticide
listed in this rule, the Agency hereby
certifies that this final action will not
have a significant economic impact on
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:23 Aug 10, 2006
Jkt 208001
a substantial number of small entities.
Specifically, as per the 1997 notice, EPA
has reviewed its available data on
imports and foreign pesticide usage and
concludes that there is a reasonable
international supply of food not treated
with pesticides containing the
ingredients being revoked in this notice.
Furthermore, for the pesticide named in
this final rule, the Agency knows of no
extraordinary circumstances that exist
as to the present revocations that would
change the EPA’s previous analysis. In
addition, the Agency has determined
that this action will not have a
substantial direct effect on States, on the
relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132, entitled
Federalism (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999). Executive Order 13132 requires
EPA to develop an accountable process
to ensure ‘‘meaningful and timely input
by State and local officials in the
development of regulatory policies that
have federalism implications.’’ ‘‘Policies
that have federalism implications’’ is
defined in the Executive order to
include regulations that have
‘‘substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.’’ This final rule
directly regulates growers, food
processors, food handlers and food
retailers, not States. This action does not
alter the relationships or distribution of
power and responsibilities established
by Congress in the preemption
provisions of section 408(n)(4) of
FFDCA. For these same reasons, the
Agency has determined that this final
rule does not have any ‘‘tribal
implications’’ as described in Executive
Order 13175, entitled Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments (65 FR 67249, November
6, 2000). Executive Order 13175,
requires EPA to develop an accountable
process to ensure ‘‘meaningful and
timely input by tribal officials in the
development of regulatory policies that
have tribal implications.’’ ‘‘Policies that
have tribal implications’’ is defined in
the Executive order to include
regulations that have ‘‘substantial direct
effects on one or more Indian tribes, on
the relationship between the Federal
Government and the Indian tribes, or on
the distribution of power and
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
46125
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.’’ This
final rule will not have substantial
direct effects on tribal governments, on
the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as
specified in Executive Order 13175.
Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not
apply to this final rule.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Antimicrobial, Sanitizers, Pesticides
and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: August 2, 2006.
Frank Sanders,
Director, Antimicrobials Division, Office of
Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is
amended as follows:
I
PART 180—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 180
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
§ 180.940
[Amended]
2. Section 180.940 is amended as
follows:
I i. In the table to paragraph (a) by
removing the entry for ‘‘Potassium
Permanganate’’ (CAS Reg. No.7722–64–
7).
I ii. In the table to paragraph (b) by
removing the entry for ‘‘Sodium mono–
and didodecylphenoxy–
benzenedisulfonate’’ (CAS Reg. No.
None).
I iii. In the table to paragraph (c) by
removing the entries for ‘‘Alkyl (C12–
C15) monoether of mixed (ethylenepropylene) polyalkylene glycol, cloud
point of 70–77 °C in 1% aqueous
solution, average molecular weight (in
amu), 807;’’ (CAS Reg. No. None);
‘‘Benzensulfonamide, N-chloro-4methyl, sodium salt;’’ (CAS Reg. No.
127–65–1); ‘‘Benzenesulfonic acid,
oxybis[dodecyl-’’ (CAS Reg. No. 30260–
73–2); ‘‘Calcium bromide’’ (CAS Reg.
No. 7789–41–5); ‘‘Potassium
Permanganate’’ (CAS Reg. No.7722–64–
7); and ‘‘Sodium mono-and
didodecylphenoxy-benzenedisulfonate’’
(CAS Reg. No. None)
I
[FR Doc. E6–13173 Filed 8–10–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–S
E:\FR\FM\11AUR1.SGM
11AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 155 (Friday, August 11, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 46123-46125]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-13173]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0495; FRL-8086-1]
Sanitizers with No Food-Contact Uses in Registered Pesticide
Products; Revocation of Tolerance Exemptions
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is revoking eight exemptions from the requirement of a
tolerance that are associated with six food-contact surface sanitizing
solutions because these specific tolerance exemptions correspond to
uses no longer current or registered in the United States under the
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), and
because there are insufficient data to make the determination of safety
required by the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA). These
ingredients are subject to reassessment by August 2006 under section
408(q) of FFDCA, as amended by the Food Quality Protection Act of 1996
(FQPA). The eight tolerance exemptions are considered ``reassessed''
for purposes of FFDCA's section 408(q) and count as a tolerance
reassessment toward the August 2006 review deadline.
DATES: This rule is effective 90 days from August 11, 2006. Objections
and requests for hearings must be received on or before October 10,
2006, and must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in
40 CFR part 178 (see also Unit V. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0495. All documents in the
docket are listed in the index for the docket. Although listed in the
index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are
available in the electronic docket at https://www.regulations.gov, or,
if only available in hard copy, at the OPP Regulatory Public Docket in
Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr.,
Arlington, VA. The Docket Facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The Docket Facility
telephone number is (703) 305-5805.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Laura Bailey, Antimicrobials Division
(7510P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone
number: 703-308-6212; e-mail address: bailey.laura@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
Potentially affected entities may include, but are not limited to:
Crop production (NAICS code 111).
Animal production (NAICS code 112).
Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).
This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides
a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this
action. Other types of entities not listed in this unit could also be
affected. The North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS)
codes have been provided to assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to certain entities. To determine
whether you or your business may be affected by this action, you should
carefully examine the applicability provisions in Unit II. If you have
any questions regarding the applicability of this action to a
particular entity, consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
B. How Can I Access Electronic Copies of this Document?
In addition to accessing an electronic copy of this Federal
Register document through the electronic docket at https://
www.regulations.gov, you may access this Federal Register document
electronically through the EPA Internet under the ``Federal Register''
listings at https://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr. You may also access a
frequently updated electronic version of 40 CFR part 180 through the
Government Printing Office's pilot e-CFR site at https://
www.gpoaccess.gov/ecfr.
C. Can I File an Objection or Hearing Request?
Under section 408(g) of the FFDCA, as amended by the FQPA, any
person may
[[Page 46124]]
file an objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request
a hearing on those objections. The EPA procedural regulations which
govern the submission of objections and requests for hearings appear in
40 CFR part 178. You must file your objection or request a hearing on
this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR
part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify docket ID
number EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0495 in the subject line on the first page of
your submission. All requests must be in writing, and must be mailed or
delivered to the Hearing Clerk on or before October 10, 2006.
In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the
Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of
the filing that does not contain any CBI for inclusion in the public
docket that is described in ADDRESSES. Information not marked
confidential pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA
without prior notice. Submit your copies, identified by docket ID
number EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0495, by one of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory Public
Docket (7502P), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001.
Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public Docket (7502P),
Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South
Building), 2777 S. Crystal Drive, Arlington, VA. Deliveries are only
accepted during the Docket's normal hours of operation (8:30 a.m. to 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays). Special
arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information. The
Docket telephone number is (703) 305-5805.
II. Background and Statutory Findings
A. What Action is the Agency Taking?
In the Federal Register of June 9, 2006 (71 FR 33416-3419; FRL-
8072-8), EPA issued a proposed rule to revoke 10 exemptions from the
requirement of a tolerance that are associated with 7 ingredients
because those substances are no longer contained in pesticide products.
The proposed rule provided a 30-day comment period that invited public
comment for consideration and for support of tolerance exemption
retention under the FFDCA standards.
EPA received one comment expressing a need to retain two exemptions
and an interest in providing data to support these exemptions from the
requirement of a tolerance for one ingredient. Therefore, in this final
rule, EPA is revoking eight exemptions from the requirement of a
tolerance that are associated with six ingredients because these
specific tolerance exemptions correspond to uses no longer current or
registered under FIFRA in the United States. The tolerance exemptions
revoked by this final rule are no longer necessary to cover residues of
the relevant pesticide chemicals in or on domestically treated
commodities or commodities treated outside but imported into the United
States.
B. What is the Agency's Authority for Taking this Action?
This final rule is issued pursuant to section 408(d) of FFDCA (21
U.S.C. 346a(d)). Section 408 of FFDCA authorizes the establishment of
tolerances, exemptions from the requirement of a tolerance,
modifications in tolerances, and revocation of tolerances for residues
of pesticide chemicals in or on raw agricultural commodities and
processed foods. Without a tolerance or tolerance exemption, food
containing pesticide residues is considered to be unsafe and therefore
``adulterated'' under section 402(a) of the FFDCA. If food containing
pesticide residues is found to be adulterated, the food may not be
distributed in interstate commerce (21 U.S.C. 331(a) and 342 (a)).
EPA's general practice is to revoke tolerances and tolerance
exemptions for residues of pesticide chemicals on crops for which FIFRA
registrations no longer exist and on which the pesticide may therefore
no longer be used in the United States. EPA has historically been
concerned that retention of tolerances and tolerance exemptions that
are not necessary to cover residues in or on legally treated foods may
encourage misuse of pesticides within the United States. Nonetheless,
EPA will establish and maintain tolerances and tolerance exemptions
even when corresponding domestic uses are canceled if the tolerances,
which EPA refers to as ``import tolerances,'' are necessary to allow
importation into the United States of food containing such pesticide
residues. However, where there are no imported commodities that require
these import tolerances, the Agency believes it is appropriate to
revoke tolerances and tolerance exemptions for unregistered pesticide
chemicals in order to prevent potential misuse.
C. When do These Actions Become Effective?
These actions become effective 90 days following publication of a
final rule in the Federal Register to ensure that all affected parties
receive notice of EPA's actions. For this rule, the revocations will
affect exemptions for active or inert ingredients which have not been
used in registered products, in some cases, for many years. The Agency
believes that existing stocks of pesticide products containing active
or inert ingredients covered by the exemptions have been completely
exhausted and that treated commodities have had sufficient time for
passage through the channels of trade. However, if EPA is presented
with information that existing stocks would still be available and that
information is verified, the Agency will consider extending the
expiration date of the exemption. If you have comments regarding
existing stocks and whether the effective date allows sufficient time
for treated commodities to clear the channels of trade, please submit
comments as described under SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
Any commodities listed in the regulatory text of this document that
are treated with the pesticide chemicals subject to this final rule,
and that are in the channels of trade following the tolerance exemption
revocations, shall be subject to FFDCA section 408(1)(5), as
established by the FQPA. Under this section, any residues of these
pesticide chemicals in or on such food shall not render the food
adulterated so long as it is shown to the satisfaction of the Food and
Drug Administration that:
1. The residue is present as the result of an application or use of
the pesticide chemical at a time and in a manner that was lawful under
FIFRA, and
2. The residue does not exceed the level that was authorized at the
time of the application or use to be present on the food under an
exemption from tolerance. Evidence to show that food was lawfully
treated may include records that verify the dates that the pesticide
chemical was applied to such food.
D. What Is the Contribution to Tolerance Reassessment?
By law, EPA is required by August 2006, to reassess the tolerances
and exemptions from tolerances that were in existence on August 2,
1996. This document revokes eight tolerance exemptions for food-contact
surface sanitizing solutions under FFDCA section 408(q), as amended by
FQPA in 1996.
[[Page 46125]]
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
In this final rule, EPA is revoking specific tolerance exemptions
established under section 408(d) of FFDCA. The Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) has exempted this type of action from review under
Executive Order 12866, entitled Regulatory Planning and Review (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993). Because this rule has been exempted from
review under Executive Order 12866 due to its lack of significance,
this final rule is not subject to Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This final rule does
not contain any information collections subject to OMB approval under
the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., or impose
any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded mandate as described under
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Public Law
104-4). Nor does it require any special considerations under Executive
Order 12898, entitled Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice
in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations (59 FR 7629,
February 16, 1994); or OMB review or any Agency action under Executive
Order 13045, entitled Protection of Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997). This action does
not involve any technical standards that would require Agency
consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant to section
12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995
(NTTAA), Public Law 104-113, section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.), the Agency previously assessed whether revocations of tolerances
might significantly impact a substantial number of small entities and
concluded that, as a general matter, these actions do not impose a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
This analysis was published on December 17, 1997 (62 FR 66020), and was
provided to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration. Taking into account this analysis, and available
information concerning the pesticide listed in this rule, the Agency
hereby certifies that this final action will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Specifically, as per the 1997 notice, EPA has reviewed its available
data on imports and foreign pesticide usage and concludes that there is
a reasonable international supply of food not treated with pesticides
containing the ingredients being revoked in this notice. Furthermore,
for the pesticide named in this final rule, the Agency knows of no
extraordinary circumstances that exist as to the present revocations
that would change the EPA's previous analysis. In addition, the Agency
has determined that this action will not have a substantial direct
effect on States, on the relationship between the national government
and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
among the various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order
13132, entitled Federalism (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999). Executive
Order 13132 requires EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure
``meaningful and timely input by State and local officials in the
development of regulatory policies that have federalism implications.''
``Policies that have federalism implications'' is defined in the
Executive order to include regulations that have ``substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.'' This final
rule directly regulates growers, food processors, food handlers and
food retailers, not States. This action does not alter the
relationships or distribution of power and responsibilities established
by Congress in the preemption provisions of section 408(n)(4) of FFDCA.
For these same reasons, the Agency has determined that this final rule
does not have any ``tribal implications'' as described in Executive
Order 13175, entitled Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments (65 FR 67249, November 6, 2000). Executive Order 13175,
requires EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure ``meaningful
and timely input by tribal officials in the development of regulatory
policies that have tribal implications.'' ``Policies that have tribal
implications'' is defined in the Executive order to include regulations
that have ``substantial direct effects on one or more Indian tribes, on
the relationship between the Federal Government and the Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.'' This final rule will not have
substantial direct effects on tribal governments, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as specified in Executive Order 13175.
Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this final rule.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Antimicrobial, Sanitizers, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: August 2, 2006.
Frank Sanders,
Director, Antimicrobials Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
0
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows:
PART 180--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
Sec. 180.940 [Amended]
0
2. Section 180.940 is amended as follows:
0
i. In the table to paragraph (a) by removing the entry for ``Potassium
Permanganate'' (CAS Reg. No.7722-64-7).
0
ii. In the table to paragraph (b) by removing the entry for ``Sodium
mono-and didodecylphenoxy-benzenedisulfonate'' (CAS Reg. No. None).
0
iii. In the table to paragraph (c) by removing the entries for ``Alkyl
(C12-C15) monoether of mixed (ethylene-propylene)
polyalkylene glycol, cloud point of 70-77 [deg]C in 1% aqueous
solution, average molecular weight (in amu), 807;'' (CAS Reg. No.
None); ``Benzensulfonamide, N-chloro-4-methyl, sodium salt;'' (CAS Reg.
No. 127-65-1); ``Benzenesulfonic acid, oxybis[dodecyl-'' (CAS Reg. No.
30260-73-2); ``Calcium bromide'' (CAS Reg. No. 7789-41-5); ``Potassium
Permanganate'' (CAS Reg. No.7722-64-7); and ``Sodium mono-and
didodecylphenoxy-benzenedisulfonate'' (CAS Reg. No. None)
[FR Doc. E6-13173 Filed 8-10-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-S