Receipt of Endangered Species Recovery Permit Application and Environmental Analysis on This Permit Application, 46239-46240 [E6-13132]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 155 / Friday, August 11, 2006 / Notices of Management and Budget, New Executive Office Building, Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503; due to potential delays in OMB’s receipt and processing of mail sent through the U.S. Postal Service, respondents are encouraged to submit comments by fax to: 202–395– 6974. Dated: August 7, 2006. Anna Marsh, Director, Office of Program Services. [FR Doc. E6–13133 Filed 8–10–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4162–20–P DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT [Docket No. FR–5045–N–32] Federal Property Suitable as Facilities To Assist the Homeless Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development, HUD. AGENCY: ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible use to assist the homeless. EFFECTIVE DATE: DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Bureau of Land Management [OR–4310–33] Steens Mountain Advisory Council— Notice of Renewal Bureau of Land Management, Interior. ACTION: Notice of renewal of the Steens Mountain Advisory Council. AGENCY: SUMMARY: This notice is published in accordance with Section 9(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972, Public Law 92–463. Notice is hereby given that the Secretary of the Interior (Secretary) has renewed the Bureau of Land Management’s Steens Mountain Advisory Council. The purpose of the Council will be to advise the Secretary with respect to the preparation and implementation of the Steens Mountain Cooperative Management and Protection Area Management Plan. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Maggie Langlas, National Landscape Conservation System (171), Bureau of Land Management, 1620 L Street, NW., Room 301 LS, Washington DC 20236, telephone (202) 452–7787. Certification Statement August 11, 2006. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathy Ezzell, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Room 7252, 451 Seventh Street SW., Washington, DC 20410; telephone (202) 708–1234; TTY number for the hearing- and speech-impaired (202) 708–2565, (these telephone numbers are not toll-free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 1–800–927–7588. In accordance with the December 12, 1988 court order in National Coalition for the Homeless v. Veterans Administration, No. 88–2503–OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus Federal building and real property that HUD has reviewed for suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today’s Notice is for the purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been determined suitable or unsuitable this week. I hereby certify that the renewal of the Steens Mountain Advisory Council is necessary and in the public interest in connection with the Secretary’s responsibilities to manage the lands, resources, and facilities administered by the Bureau of Land Management. Dated: August 4, 2006. Dirk Kempthorne, Secretary of the Interior. [FR Doc. 06–6866 Filed 8–10–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–DQ–M hsrobinson on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES1 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Dated: August 3, 2006. Mark R. Johnston, Acting Deputy Assistant, Secretary for Special Needs. [FR Doc. 06–6770 Filed 8–10–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4210–67–M VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:03 Aug 10, 2006 Jkt 208001 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service Receipt of Endangered Species Recovery Permit Application and Environmental Analysis on This Permit Application Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Notice of receipt and intent: request for comments. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The State of Oregon has applied for an enhancement of propagation or survival permit to conduct certain activities with gray wolves (Canis lupus) pursuant to section 10(a)(1)(A) of the Endangered PO 00000 Frm 00056 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 46239 Species Act (ESA). In addition, pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), this notice advises the public that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service ‘‘we’’ or ‘‘Service’’) intends to conduct an environmental analysis (environmental assessment or environmental impact statement) for Oregon’s permit application. We solicit comments from the public and from local, State, and Federal agencies on both the permit request and the environmental analysis. DATES: We must receive your comments on this permit application and environmental analysis on or before September 11, 2006. ADDRESSES: Written data or comments should be submitted to the Chief, Endangered Species, Ecological Services, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 911 NE. 11th Avenue, Portland, Oregon 97232–4181 (fax: 503–231–6243). Please refer to the permit number or ‘‘Oregon Wolf Permit Analysis’’ when submitting comments. All comments received, including names and addresses, will become part of the official administrative record and may be made available to the public. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Documents and other information submitted with this application or associated with this analysis are available for review, subject to the requirements of the Privacy Act and Freedom of Information Act, by any party who submits a written request for a copy of such documents to the address above (telephone: 503–231–2063). Please refer to the application’s permit number or ‘‘Oregon Wolf Permit Analysis’’ when requesting copies of documents. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Permit No. TE–122636 Applicant: Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) The applicant has submitted an application for an ESA 10(a)(1)(A) recovery permit authorizing harassment, relocation, and lethal take of gray wolves in Oregon for the purpose of enhancing their recovery, pursuant to the State of Oregon Wolf Conservation and Management Plan (December 2005) developed in consultation with the Service. This plan provides guidelines for a coordinated and effective response to anticipated situations that may arise as gray wolves migrate into Oregon from adjacent States. ODFW proposes to implement proactive strategies and conduct non-lethal control actions to reduce and/or resolve wolf-livestock conflicts and human safety concerns. If non-lethal efforts are unsuccessful and E:\FR\FM\11AUN1.SGM 11AUN1 hsrobinson on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES1 46240 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 155 / Friday, August 11, 2006 / Notices livestock depredations continue, ODFW requests authorization for employees to conduct lethal control of wolves. Under the ODFW proposal, young-of-the-year (juveniles) captured before October 1, and any lactating females, would be released or relocated rather than killed. No lethal take by private landowners would be authorized by this permit. Currently, the ODFW is authorized through their section 6 Cooperative Agreement under the ESA to conduct non-lethal gray wolf management actions in Oregon for this species, which is Federally listed as endangered. These actions include trapping, collaring, taking blood and hair samples, harassing, and other forms of take that are not reasonably expected to result in the death or permanent disabling of a wolf. A practical, responsive management program is essential to enhancing survival of the wolf in the wild (Service 1987; Service 1994; Service 1999). The program must respond to wolf-livestock conflicts, while promoting wolf recovery objectives. If issued, Oregon’s permit would provide standards for: (a) Determining problem wolf status (including investigative procedures and criteria), (b) conducting wolf control actions, and (c) disposition of problem wolves. In addition to evaluation under the ESA, we are analyzing issuance of this permit under NEPA (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.). Some environmental impacts of wolf management were analyzed in our 1988 Environmental Action Memorandum on the Interim Wolf Control Plan for the Northern Rocky Mountains and the 1999 Evaluation and Recommended Modifications to it. Our environmental analysis for ODFW’s permit application will include changes in the gray wolf’s population status since 1999 and other issues specific to Oregon. Under NEPA, a reasonable range of alternatives to a proposed project must be developed and considered in our environmental review, along with a noaction alternative. Our NEPA evaluation will evaluate the potential impacts of alternatives for wolf conservation actions in Oregon. Management actions would be developed to conserve wolf populations and to protect livestock and pets. An alternative will be selected and a permit decision made after completion of all required analyses and consideration of all comments received in response to this Notice. Any wolves existing in Oregon would likely be due to range expansion of the northern Rocky Mountains wolf population. However, the State of Oregon has established its own wolf VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:03 Aug 10, 2006 Jkt 208001 population objectives. These population objectives are documented in the Oregon Wolf Conservation and Management Plan, which can be found at: https://www.dfw.state.or.us/wolves/. The ODFW permit application can be found at: https://www.fws.gov/pacific/ ecoservices/endangered/recovery/ default.htm. Additional information about wolf recovery and conservation in the northwestern United States, including control of problem wolves, can be found in various reports at: https:// westerngraywolf.fws.gov/. Public Comments Solicited We solicit public review and comment on this ESA recovery permit application and related NEPA environmental review. Our practice is to make comments, including names and home addresses of respondents, available for public review during regular business hours. Individual respondents may request that we withhold their home addresses from the record, which we will honor to the extent allowable by law. There also may be circumstances in which we would withhold from the record a respondent’s identity, to the extent allowable by law. If you wish us to withhold your name and/or address, you must state this prominently at the beginning of your comment, but you should be aware that we may be required to disclose your name and address pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act. Moreover, we will not consider anonymous comments. We will make all submissions from organizations or businesses, and from individuals identifying themselves as representatives or officials of organizations or businesses, available for public inspection in their entirety. Comments and materials received will be available for public inspection, by appointment, during normal business hours at the above address. Authority This document is published under the authority of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). Dated: June 19, 2006. David J. Wesley, Regional Director, Region 1, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. [FR Doc. E6–13132 Filed 8–10–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–55–P PO 00000 Frm 00057 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement Notice of Proposed Information Collection for 1029–0094, 1029–0098 and 1029–0119 Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement. ACTION: Notice and request for comments. AGENCY: SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM) is announcing its intention to request approval to continue the collections of information for 30 CFR part 700—general provisions, 30 CFR part 769—the petition process for the designation of Federal lands as unsuitable for all or certain types of surface coal mining operations and for termination of previous designations, and 30 CFR 874.16—contractor eligibility requirements for general reclamation and its Abandoned Mine Land Contractor Information form. These information collection activities were previously approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), and assigned clearance numbers 1029–0094, 1029–0098, and 1029–0119, respectively. Comments on the proposed information collection must be received by October 10, 2006, to be assured of consideration. DATES: Comments may be mailed to John A. Trelease, Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, 1951 Constitution Ave., NW., Room 202—SIB, Washington, DC 20240. Comments may also be submitted electronically to jtrelease@osmre.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To request a copy of the information collection requests, explanatory information and related forms, contact John A. Trelease, at (202) 208–2783. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: OMB regulations at 5 CFR 1320, which implementing provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13), require that interested members of the public and affected agencies have an opportunity to comment on information collection and recordkeeping activities [see 5 CFR 1320.8 (d)]. This notice identifies information collections that OSM will be submitting to OMB for approval. These collections are contained in (1) 30 CFR 700, General (1029–0094); (2) 30 CFR part 769, Petition process for designation of Federal lands as ADDRESSES: E:\FR\FM\11AUN1.SGM 11AUN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 155 (Friday, August 11, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46239-46240]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-13132]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service


Receipt of Endangered Species Recovery Permit Application and 
Environmental Analysis on This Permit Application

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of receipt and intent: request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The State of Oregon has applied for an enhancement of 
propagation or survival permit to conduct certain activities with gray 
wolves (Canis lupus) pursuant to section 10(a)(1)(A) of the Endangered 
Species Act (ESA). In addition, pursuant to the National Environmental 
Policy Act (NEPA), this notice advises the public that the U.S. Fish 
and Wildlife Service ``we'' or ``Service'') intends to conduct an 
environmental analysis (environmental assessment or environmental 
impact statement) for Oregon's permit application. We solicit comments 
from the public and from local, State, and Federal agencies on both the 
permit request and the environmental analysis.

DATES: We must receive your comments on this permit application and 
environmental analysis on or before September 11, 2006.

ADDRESSES: Written data or comments should be submitted to the Chief, 
Endangered Species, Ecological Services, U.S. Fish and Wildlife 
Service, 911 NE. 11th Avenue, Portland, Oregon 97232-4181 (fax: 503-
231-6243). Please refer to the permit number or ``Oregon Wolf Permit 
Analysis'' when submitting comments. All comments received, including 
names and addresses, will become part of the official administrative 
record and may be made available to the public.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Documents and other information 
submitted with this application or associated with this analysis are 
available for review, subject to the requirements of the Privacy Act 
and Freedom of Information Act, by any party who submits a written 
request for a copy of such documents to the address above (telephone: 
503-231-2063). Please refer to the application's permit number or 
``Oregon Wolf Permit Analysis'' when requesting copies of documents.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Permit No. TE-122636

    Applicant: Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW)
    The applicant has submitted an application for an ESA 10(a)(1)(A) 
recovery permit authorizing harassment, relocation, and lethal take of 
gray wolves in Oregon for the purpose of enhancing their recovery, 
pursuant to the State of Oregon Wolf Conservation and Management Plan 
(December 2005) developed in consultation with the Service. This plan 
provides guidelines for a coordinated and effective response to 
anticipated situations that may arise as gray wolves migrate into 
Oregon from adjacent States. ODFW proposes to implement proactive 
strategies and conduct non-lethal control actions to reduce and/or 
resolve wolf-livestock conflicts and human safety concerns. If non-
lethal efforts are unsuccessful and

[[Page 46240]]

livestock depredations continue, ODFW requests authorization for 
employees to conduct lethal control of wolves. Under the ODFW proposal, 
young-of-the-year (juveniles) captured before October 1, and any 
lactating females, would be released or relocated rather than killed. 
No lethal take by private landowners would be authorized by this 
permit.
    Currently, the ODFW is authorized through their section 6 
Cooperative Agreement under the ESA to conduct non-lethal gray wolf 
management actions in Oregon for this species, which is Federally 
listed as endangered. These actions include trapping, collaring, taking 
blood and hair samples, harassing, and other forms of take that are not 
reasonably expected to result in the death or permanent disabling of a 
wolf.
    A practical, responsive management program is essential to 
enhancing survival of the wolf in the wild (Service 1987; Service 1994; 
Service 1999). The program must respond to wolf-livestock conflicts, 
while promoting wolf recovery objectives. If issued, Oregon's permit 
would provide standards for: (a) Determining problem wolf status 
(including investigative procedures and criteria), (b) conducting wolf 
control actions, and (c) disposition of problem wolves.
    In addition to evaluation under the ESA, we are analyzing issuance 
of this permit under NEPA (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.). Some environmental 
impacts of wolf management were analyzed in our 1988 Environmental 
Action Memorandum on the Interim Wolf Control Plan for the Northern 
Rocky Mountains and the 1999 Evaluation and Recommended Modifications 
to it. Our environmental analysis for ODFW's permit application will 
include changes in the gray wolf's population status since 1999 and 
other issues specific to Oregon.
    Under NEPA, a reasonable range of alternatives to a proposed 
project must be developed and considered in our environmental review, 
along with a no-action alternative. Our NEPA evaluation will evaluate 
the potential impacts of alternatives for wolf conservation actions in 
Oregon. Management actions would be developed to conserve wolf 
populations and to protect livestock and pets. An alternative will be 
selected and a permit decision made after completion of all required 
analyses and consideration of all comments received in response to this 
Notice.
    Any wolves existing in Oregon would likely be due to range 
expansion of the northern Rocky Mountains wolf population. However, the 
State of Oregon has established its own wolf population objectives. 
These population objectives are documented in the Oregon Wolf 
Conservation and Management Plan, which can be found at: https://
www.dfw.state.or.us/wolves/. The ODFW permit application can be found 
at: https://www.fws.gov/pacific/ecoservices/endangered/recovery/
default.htm. 
    Additional information about wolf recovery and conservation in the 
northwestern United States, including control of problem wolves, can be 
found in various reports at: https://westerngraywolf.fws.gov/. 

Public Comments Solicited

    We solicit public review and comment on this ESA recovery permit 
application and related NEPA environmental review. Our practice is to 
make comments, including names and home addresses of respondents, 
available for public review during regular business hours. Individual 
respondents may request that we withhold their home addresses from the 
record, which we will honor to the extent allowable by law. There also 
may be circumstances in which we would withhold from the record a 
respondent's identity, to the extent allowable by law. If you wish us 
to withhold your name and/or address, you must state this prominently 
at the beginning of your comment, but you should be aware that we may 
be required to disclose your name and address pursuant to the Freedom 
of Information Act. Moreover, we will not consider anonymous comments. 
We will make all submissions from organizations or businesses, and from 
individuals identifying themselves as representatives or officials of 
organizations or businesses, available for public inspection in their 
entirety. Comments and materials received will be available for public 
inspection, by appointment, during normal business hours at the above 
address.

Authority

    This document is published under the authority of the Endangered 
Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).

    Dated: June 19, 2006.
David J. Wesley,
Regional Director, Region 1, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
 [FR Doc. E6-13132 Filed 8-10-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.