Receipt of Endangered Species Recovery Permit Application and Environmental Analysis on This Permit Application, 46239-46240 [E6-13132]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 155 / Friday, August 11, 2006 / Notices
of Management and Budget, New
Executive Office Building, Room 10235,
Washington, DC 20503; due to potential
delays in OMB’s receipt and processing
of mail sent through the U.S. Postal
Service, respondents are encouraged to
submit comments by fax to: 202–395–
6974.
Dated: August 7, 2006.
Anna Marsh,
Director, Office of Program Services.
[FR Doc. E6–13133 Filed 8–10–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162–20–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR–5045–N–32]
Federal Property Suitable as Facilities
To Assist the Homeless
Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Community Planning and
Development, HUD.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: This Notice identifies
unutilized, underutilized, excess, and
surplus Federal property reviewed by
HUD for suitability for possible use to
assist the homeless.
EFFECTIVE DATE:
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[OR–4310–33]
Steens Mountain Advisory Council—
Notice of Renewal
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of renewal of the Steens
Mountain Advisory Council.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This notice is published in
accordance with Section 9(a)(2) of the
Federal Advisory Committee Act of
1972, Public Law 92–463. Notice is
hereby given that the Secretary of the
Interior (Secretary) has renewed the
Bureau of Land Management’s Steens
Mountain Advisory Council.
The purpose of the Council will be to
advise the Secretary with respect to the
preparation and implementation of the
Steens Mountain Cooperative
Management and Protection Area
Management Plan.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Maggie Langlas, National Landscape
Conservation System (171), Bureau of
Land Management, 1620 L Street, NW.,
Room 301 LS, Washington DC 20236,
telephone (202) 452–7787.
Certification Statement
August 11, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kathy Ezzell, Department of Housing
and Urban Development, Room 7252,
451 Seventh Street SW., Washington,
DC 20410; telephone (202) 708–1234;
TTY number for the hearing- and
speech-impaired (202) 708–2565, (these
telephone numbers are not toll-free), or
call the toll-free Title V information line
at 1–800–927–7588.
In
accordance with the December 12, 1988
court order in National Coalition for the
Homeless v. Veterans Administration,
No. 88–2503–OG (D.D.C.), HUD
publishes a Notice, on a weekly basis,
identifying unutilized, underutilized,
excess and surplus Federal building and
real property that HUD has reviewed for
suitability for use to assist the homeless.
Today’s Notice is for the purpose of
announcing that no additional
properties have been determined
suitable or unsuitable this week.
I hereby certify that the renewal of the
Steens Mountain Advisory Council is
necessary and in the public interest in
connection with the Secretary’s
responsibilities to manage the lands,
resources, and facilities administered by
the Bureau of Land Management.
Dated: August 4, 2006.
Dirk Kempthorne,
Secretary of the Interior.
[FR Doc. 06–6866 Filed 8–10–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–DQ–M
hsrobinson on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES1
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Dated: August 3, 2006.
Mark R. Johnston,
Acting Deputy Assistant, Secretary for Special
Needs.
[FR Doc. 06–6770 Filed 8–10–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–M
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:03 Aug 10, 2006
Jkt 208001
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
Receipt of Endangered Species
Recovery Permit Application and
Environmental Analysis on This Permit
Application
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of receipt and intent:
request for comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The State of Oregon has
applied for an enhancement of
propagation or survival permit to
conduct certain activities with gray
wolves (Canis lupus) pursuant to
section 10(a)(1)(A) of the Endangered
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
46239
Species Act (ESA). In addition, pursuant
to the National Environmental Policy
Act (NEPA), this notice advises the
public that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service ‘‘we’’ or ‘‘Service’’) intends to
conduct an environmental analysis
(environmental assessment or
environmental impact statement) for
Oregon’s permit application. We solicit
comments from the public and from
local, State, and Federal agencies on
both the permit request and the
environmental analysis.
DATES: We must receive your comments
on this permit application and
environmental analysis on or before
September 11, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Written data or comments
should be submitted to the Chief,
Endangered Species, Ecological
Services, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
911 NE. 11th Avenue, Portland, Oregon
97232–4181 (fax: 503–231–6243). Please
refer to the permit number or ‘‘Oregon
Wolf Permit Analysis’’ when submitting
comments. All comments received,
including names and addresses, will
become part of the official
administrative record and may be made
available to the public.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Documents and other information
submitted with this application or
associated with this analysis are
available for review, subject to the
requirements of the Privacy Act and
Freedom of Information Act, by any
party who submits a written request for
a copy of such documents to the address
above (telephone: 503–231–2063).
Please refer to the application’s permit
number or ‘‘Oregon Wolf Permit
Analysis’’ when requesting copies of
documents.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Permit No. TE–122636
Applicant: Oregon Department of Fish
and Wildlife (ODFW)
The applicant has submitted an
application for an ESA 10(a)(1)(A)
recovery permit authorizing harassment,
relocation, and lethal take of gray
wolves in Oregon for the purpose of
enhancing their recovery, pursuant to
the State of Oregon Wolf Conservation
and Management Plan (December 2005)
developed in consultation with the
Service. This plan provides guidelines
for a coordinated and effective response
to anticipated situations that may arise
as gray wolves migrate into Oregon from
adjacent States. ODFW proposes to
implement proactive strategies and
conduct non-lethal control actions to
reduce and/or resolve wolf-livestock
conflicts and human safety concerns. If
non-lethal efforts are unsuccessful and
E:\FR\FM\11AUN1.SGM
11AUN1
hsrobinson on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES1
46240
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 155 / Friday, August 11, 2006 / Notices
livestock depredations continue, ODFW
requests authorization for employees to
conduct lethal control of wolves. Under
the ODFW proposal, young-of-the-year
(juveniles) captured before October 1,
and any lactating females, would be
released or relocated rather than killed.
No lethal take by private landowners
would be authorized by this permit.
Currently, the ODFW is authorized
through their section 6 Cooperative
Agreement under the ESA to conduct
non-lethal gray wolf management
actions in Oregon for this species,
which is Federally listed as endangered.
These actions include trapping,
collaring, taking blood and hair
samples, harassing, and other forms of
take that are not reasonably expected to
result in the death or permanent
disabling of a wolf.
A practical, responsive management
program is essential to enhancing
survival of the wolf in the wild (Service
1987; Service 1994; Service 1999). The
program must respond to wolf-livestock
conflicts, while promoting wolf
recovery objectives. If issued, Oregon’s
permit would provide standards for: (a)
Determining problem wolf status
(including investigative procedures and
criteria), (b) conducting wolf control
actions, and (c) disposition of problem
wolves.
In addition to evaluation under the
ESA, we are analyzing issuance of this
permit under NEPA (42 U.S.C. 4321 et
seq.). Some environmental impacts of
wolf management were analyzed in our
1988 Environmental Action
Memorandum on the Interim Wolf
Control Plan for the Northern Rocky
Mountains and the 1999 Evaluation and
Recommended Modifications to it. Our
environmental analysis for ODFW’s
permit application will include changes
in the gray wolf’s population status
since 1999 and other issues specific to
Oregon.
Under NEPA, a reasonable range of
alternatives to a proposed project must
be developed and considered in our
environmental review, along with a noaction alternative. Our NEPA evaluation
will evaluate the potential impacts of
alternatives for wolf conservation
actions in Oregon. Management actions
would be developed to conserve wolf
populations and to protect livestock and
pets. An alternative will be selected and
a permit decision made after completion
of all required analyses and
consideration of all comments received
in response to this Notice.
Any wolves existing in Oregon would
likely be due to range expansion of the
northern Rocky Mountains wolf
population. However, the State of
Oregon has established its own wolf
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:03 Aug 10, 2006
Jkt 208001
population objectives. These population
objectives are documented in the
Oregon Wolf Conservation and
Management Plan, which can be found
at: https://www.dfw.state.or.us/wolves/.
The ODFW permit application can be
found at: https://www.fws.gov/pacific/
ecoservices/endangered/recovery/
default.htm.
Additional information about wolf
recovery and conservation in the
northwestern United States, including
control of problem wolves, can be found
in various reports at: https://
westerngraywolf.fws.gov/.
Public Comments Solicited
We solicit public review and
comment on this ESA recovery permit
application and related NEPA
environmental review. Our practice is to
make comments, including names and
home addresses of respondents,
available for public review during
regular business hours. Individual
respondents may request that we
withhold their home addresses from the
record, which we will honor to the
extent allowable by law. There also may
be circumstances in which we would
withhold from the record a respondent’s
identity, to the extent allowable by law.
If you wish us to withhold your name
and/or address, you must state this
prominently at the beginning of your
comment, but you should be aware that
we may be required to disclose your
name and address pursuant to the
Freedom of Information Act. Moreover,
we will not consider anonymous
comments. We will make all
submissions from organizations or
businesses, and from individuals
identifying themselves as
representatives or officials of
organizations or businesses, available
for public inspection in their entirety.
Comments and materials received will
be available for public inspection, by
appointment, during normal business
hours at the above address.
Authority
This document is published under the
authority of the Endangered Species Act
of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et
seq.).
Dated: June 19, 2006.
David J. Wesley,
Regional Director, Region 1, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. E6–13132 Filed 8–10–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement
Notice of Proposed Information
Collection for 1029–0094, 1029–0098
and 1029–0119
Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement (OSM) is announcing
its intention to request approval to
continue the collections of information
for 30 CFR part 700—general provisions,
30 CFR part 769—the petition process
for the designation of Federal lands as
unsuitable for all or certain types of
surface coal mining operations and for
termination of previous designations,
and 30 CFR 874.16—contractor
eligibility requirements for general
reclamation and its Abandoned Mine
Land Contractor Information form.
These information collection activities
were previously approved by the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB), and
assigned clearance numbers 1029–0094,
1029–0098, and 1029–0119,
respectively.
Comments on the proposed
information collection must be received
by October 10, 2006, to be assured of
consideration.
DATES:
Comments may be mailed to
John A. Trelease, Office of Surface
Mining Reclamation and Enforcement,
1951 Constitution Ave., NW., Room
202—SIB, Washington, DC 20240.
Comments may also be submitted
electronically to jtrelease@osmre.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To
request a copy of the information
collection requests, explanatory
information and related forms, contact
John A. Trelease, at (202) 208–2783.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: OMB
regulations at 5 CFR 1320, which
implementing provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub.
L. 104–13), require that interested
members of the public and affected
agencies have an opportunity to
comment on information collection and
recordkeeping activities [see 5 CFR
1320.8 (d)]. This notice identifies
information collections that OSM will
be submitting to OMB for approval.
These collections are contained in (1) 30
CFR 700, General (1029–0094); (2) 30
CFR part 769, Petition process for
designation of Federal lands as
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\11AUN1.SGM
11AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 155 (Friday, August 11, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46239-46240]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-13132]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
Receipt of Endangered Species Recovery Permit Application and
Environmental Analysis on This Permit Application
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of receipt and intent: request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The State of Oregon has applied for an enhancement of
propagation or survival permit to conduct certain activities with gray
wolves (Canis lupus) pursuant to section 10(a)(1)(A) of the Endangered
Species Act (ESA). In addition, pursuant to the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA), this notice advises the public that the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service ``we'' or ``Service'') intends to conduct an
environmental analysis (environmental assessment or environmental
impact statement) for Oregon's permit application. We solicit comments
from the public and from local, State, and Federal agencies on both the
permit request and the environmental analysis.
DATES: We must receive your comments on this permit application and
environmental analysis on or before September 11, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Written data or comments should be submitted to the Chief,
Endangered Species, Ecological Services, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, 911 NE. 11th Avenue, Portland, Oregon 97232-4181 (fax: 503-
231-6243). Please refer to the permit number or ``Oregon Wolf Permit
Analysis'' when submitting comments. All comments received, including
names and addresses, will become part of the official administrative
record and may be made available to the public.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Documents and other information
submitted with this application or associated with this analysis are
available for review, subject to the requirements of the Privacy Act
and Freedom of Information Act, by any party who submits a written
request for a copy of such documents to the address above (telephone:
503-231-2063). Please refer to the application's permit number or
``Oregon Wolf Permit Analysis'' when requesting copies of documents.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Permit No. TE-122636
Applicant: Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW)
The applicant has submitted an application for an ESA 10(a)(1)(A)
recovery permit authorizing harassment, relocation, and lethal take of
gray wolves in Oregon for the purpose of enhancing their recovery,
pursuant to the State of Oregon Wolf Conservation and Management Plan
(December 2005) developed in consultation with the Service. This plan
provides guidelines for a coordinated and effective response to
anticipated situations that may arise as gray wolves migrate into
Oregon from adjacent States. ODFW proposes to implement proactive
strategies and conduct non-lethal control actions to reduce and/or
resolve wolf-livestock conflicts and human safety concerns. If non-
lethal efforts are unsuccessful and
[[Page 46240]]
livestock depredations continue, ODFW requests authorization for
employees to conduct lethal control of wolves. Under the ODFW proposal,
young-of-the-year (juveniles) captured before October 1, and any
lactating females, would be released or relocated rather than killed.
No lethal take by private landowners would be authorized by this
permit.
Currently, the ODFW is authorized through their section 6
Cooperative Agreement under the ESA to conduct non-lethal gray wolf
management actions in Oregon for this species, which is Federally
listed as endangered. These actions include trapping, collaring, taking
blood and hair samples, harassing, and other forms of take that are not
reasonably expected to result in the death or permanent disabling of a
wolf.
A practical, responsive management program is essential to
enhancing survival of the wolf in the wild (Service 1987; Service 1994;
Service 1999). The program must respond to wolf-livestock conflicts,
while promoting wolf recovery objectives. If issued, Oregon's permit
would provide standards for: (a) Determining problem wolf status
(including investigative procedures and criteria), (b) conducting wolf
control actions, and (c) disposition of problem wolves.
In addition to evaluation under the ESA, we are analyzing issuance
of this permit under NEPA (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.). Some environmental
impacts of wolf management were analyzed in our 1988 Environmental
Action Memorandum on the Interim Wolf Control Plan for the Northern
Rocky Mountains and the 1999 Evaluation and Recommended Modifications
to it. Our environmental analysis for ODFW's permit application will
include changes in the gray wolf's population status since 1999 and
other issues specific to Oregon.
Under NEPA, a reasonable range of alternatives to a proposed
project must be developed and considered in our environmental review,
along with a no-action alternative. Our NEPA evaluation will evaluate
the potential impacts of alternatives for wolf conservation actions in
Oregon. Management actions would be developed to conserve wolf
populations and to protect livestock and pets. An alternative will be
selected and a permit decision made after completion of all required
analyses and consideration of all comments received in response to this
Notice.
Any wolves existing in Oregon would likely be due to range
expansion of the northern Rocky Mountains wolf population. However, the
State of Oregon has established its own wolf population objectives.
These population objectives are documented in the Oregon Wolf
Conservation and Management Plan, which can be found at: https://
www.dfw.state.or.us/wolves/. The ODFW permit application can be found
at: https://www.fws.gov/pacific/ecoservices/endangered/recovery/
default.htm.
Additional information about wolf recovery and conservation in the
northwestern United States, including control of problem wolves, can be
found in various reports at: https://westerngraywolf.fws.gov/.
Public Comments Solicited
We solicit public review and comment on this ESA recovery permit
application and related NEPA environmental review. Our practice is to
make comments, including names and home addresses of respondents,
available for public review during regular business hours. Individual
respondents may request that we withhold their home addresses from the
record, which we will honor to the extent allowable by law. There also
may be circumstances in which we would withhold from the record a
respondent's identity, to the extent allowable by law. If you wish us
to withhold your name and/or address, you must state this prominently
at the beginning of your comment, but you should be aware that we may
be required to disclose your name and address pursuant to the Freedom
of Information Act. Moreover, we will not consider anonymous comments.
We will make all submissions from organizations or businesses, and from
individuals identifying themselves as representatives or officials of
organizations or businesses, available for public inspection in their
entirety. Comments and materials received will be available for public
inspection, by appointment, during normal business hours at the above
address.
Authority
This document is published under the authority of the Endangered
Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
Dated: June 19, 2006.
David J. Wesley,
Regional Director, Region 1, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. E6-13132 Filed 8-10-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P