Claims Against the United States, 46260-46303 [06-6789]
Download as PDF
46260
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 155 / Friday, August 11, 2006 / Proposed Rules
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army
32 CFR Part 536
RIN 0702–AA54
[Docket No. USA–2006–0022]
Claims Against the United States
Department of the Army, DOD.
Proposed rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Department of the Army
proposes to amend its regulations to
reflect a substantial revision of AR 27–
20, an Army publication which governs
the processing of claims worldwide. The
purpose of this revision is to make AR
27–20 clearer and easier to use, after
years of piecemeal amendments. This
rewrite also ensures that AR 27–20 is in
keeping with current statutes, legal
opinions and Department of Justice
guidance pertaining to claims
processing. This updated rule will
expedite payment of meritorious claims
throughout the world.
DATES: Comments submitted on or
before October 10, 2006 will be
considered.
SUMMARY:
You may submit comments,
identified by ‘‘32 CFR part 536, Docket
No. USA–2006–0022 and or RIN 0702–
AA54’’ in the subject line, by any of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Federal Docket Management
System Office, 1160 Defense Pentagon,
Washington, DC 20301–1160.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number or Regulatory
Information Number (RIN) for this
Federal Register document. The general
policy for comments and other
submissions from members of the public
is to make these submissions available
for public viewing on the Internet at
https://www.regulations.gov as they are
received without change, including any
personal identifiers or contact
information.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
George Westerbeke (301) 677–7009,
x220.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
A. Background
This rule was previously published.
The Administrative Procedure Act, as
amended by the Freedom of Information
Act requires that certain policies and
procedures and other information
16:42 Aug 10, 2006
Jkt 208250
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Army has
determined that the Regulatory
Flexibility Act does not apply because
the proposed rule does not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
within the meaning of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612.
C. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Department of the Army has
determined that the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act does not apply
because the proposed rule does not
include a mandate that may result in
estimated costs to State, local or tribal
governments in the aggregate, or the
private sector, of $100 million or more.
D. National Environmental Policy Act
The Department of the Army has
determined that the National
Environmental Policy Act does not
apply because the proposed rule does
not have an adverse impact on the
environment.
E. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Department of the Army has
determined that the Paperwork
Reduction Act does not apply because
the proposed rule does not involve
collection of information from the
public.
F. Executive Order 12630 (Government
Actions and Interference With
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights)
The Department of the Army has
determined that Executive Order 12630
does not apply because the proposed
rule does not impair private property
rights.
G. Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory
Planning and Review)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
concerning the Department of the Army
be published in the Federal Register.
The policies and procedures covered by
this regulation fall into that category.
AR 27–20 and its companion DA Pam
27–162 will be available on the Web site
of the U.S. Army Publications
Directorate, https://www.apd.army.mil,
within a few months of the date of this
Federal Register publication of 32 CFR
part 536. Users are encouraged to
consult the online versions, whose
structure and paragraph numbering are
comparable.
The Department of the Army has
determined that according to the criteria
defined in Executive Order 12866 this
proposed rule is not a significant
regulatory action. As such, the proposed
rule is not subject to Office of
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Management and Budget review under
section 6(a)(3) of the Executive Order.
H. Executive Order 13045 (Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
Risk and Safety Risks)
The Department of the Army has
determined that according to the criteria
defined in Executive Order 13045 this
proposed rule does not apply.
I. Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)
The Department of the Army has
determined that according to the criteria
defined in Executive Order 13132 this
proposed rule does not apply because it
will not have a substantial effect on the
States, on the relationship between the
national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
Col. Dale Woodling,
Commander, United States Army Claims
Service.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 536
Claims, Government employees,
Military personnel.
For reasons stated in the preamble the
Department of the Army proposes to
revise 32 CFR part 536 to read as
follows:
PART 536—CLAIMS AGAINST THE
UNITED STATES
Subpart A—The Army Claims System
Sec.
536.1 Purpose of the Army Claims System.
536.2 Claims authorities.
536.3 Command and organizational
relationships.
536.4 Designation of claims attorneys.
536.5 The Judge Advocate General.
536.6 The Army claims mission.
536.7 Responsibilities of the Commander
USARCS.
536.8 Responsibilities and operations of
command claims services.
536.9 Responsibilities and operations of
area claims offices.
536.10 Responsibilities and operations of
claims processing offices.
536.11 Chief of Engineers.
536.12 Commanding General, U.S. Army
Medical Command.
536.13 Chief, National Guard Bureau.
536.14 Commanders of major Army
commands.
536.15 Claims policies.
536.16 Release of information policies.
536.17 Single-service claims responsibility
(DODD 5515.8 and DODD 5515.9).
536.18 Cross-servicing of claims.
536.19 Disaster claims planning.
536.20 Claims assistance visits.
536.21 Annual claims award.
E:\FR\FM\11AUP2.SGM
11AUP2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 155 / Friday, August 11, 2006 / Proposed Rules
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
Subpart B—Investigation and Processing of
Claims
536.22 Claims investigative responsibility—
general.
536.23 Identifying claims incidents both for
and against the government.
536.24 Delegation of investigative
responsibility.
536.25 Procedures for accepting claims.
536.26 Identification of a proper claim.
536.27 Identification of a proper claimant.
536.28 Claims acknowledgment.
536.29 Revision of filed claims.
536.30 Action upon receipt of claim.
536.31 Opening claim files.
536.32 Transfer of claims among armed
services branches.
536.33 Use of small claims procedures.
536.34 Determination of correct statute.
536.35 Unique issues related to
environmental claims.
536.36 Related remedies.
536.37 Importance of the claims
investigation.
536.38 Elements of the investigation.
536.39 Use of experts, consultants and
appraisers.
536.40 Conducting the investigation.
536.41 Determination of liability—
generally.
536.42 Constitutional torts.
536.43 Incident to service.
536.44 FECA and LSHWCA claims
exclusions.
536.45 Statutory exceptions.
536.46 Other exclusions.
536.47 Statute of limitations.
536.48 Federal employee requirement.
536.49 Scope of employment requirement.
536.50 Determination of damages—
applicable law.
536.51 Collateral source rule.
536.52 Subrogation.
536.53 Evaluation of claims—general rules
and guidelines.
536.54 Joint tortfeasors.
536.55 Structured settlements.
536.56 Negotiations—purpose and extent.
536.57 Who should negotiate.
536.58 Settlement negotiations with
unrepresented claimants.
536.59 Settlement or approval authority.
536.60 Splitting property damage and
personal injury claims.
536.61 Advance payments.
536.62 Action memorandums.
536.63 Settlement agreements.
536.64 Final offers.
536.65 Denial notice 536.66 The ‘‘Parker’’
denial.
536.67 Mailing procedures.
536.68 Appeal or reconsideration.
536.69 Retention of file.
536.70 Preparation and forwarding of
payment vouchers.
536.71 Fund sources.
536.72 Finality of settlement.
Subpart C—Claims Cognizable Under the
Military Claims Act
536.73 Statutory authority for the Military
Claims Act.
536.74 Scope for claims under the Military
Claims Act.
536.75 Claims payable under the Military
Claims Act.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:42 Aug 10, 2006
Jkt 208250
536.76 Claims not payable under the
Military Claims Act.
536.77 Applicable law for claims under the
Military Claims Act.
536.78 Settlement authority for claims
under the Military Claims Act.
536.79 Action on appeal under the Military
Claims Act.
536.80 Payment of costs, settlements, and
judgments related to certain medical
malpractice claims.
536.81 Payment of costs, settlements, and
judgments related to certain legal
malpractice claims.
536.82 Reopening an MCA claim after final
action by a settlement authority.
Subpart D—Claims Cognizable Under the
Federal Tort Claims Act
536.83 Statutory authority for the Federal
Tort Claims Act.
536.84 Scope for claims under the Federal
Tort Claims Act .
536.85 Claims payable under the Federal
Tort Claims Act.
536.86 Claims not payable under the
Federal Tort Claims Act.
536.87 Applicable law for claims under the
Federal Tort Claims Act.
536.88 Settlement authority for claims
under the Federal Tort Claims Act.
536.89 Reconsideration of Federal Tort
Claims Act claims.
Subpart E—Claims Cognizable Under the
Non-Scope Claims Act
536.90 Statutory authority for the NonScope Claims Act.
536.91 Scope for claims under the NonScope Claims Act.
536.92 Claims payable under the NonScope Claims Act.
536.93 Claims not payable under the NonScope Claims Act.
536.94 Settlement authority for claims
under the Non-Scope Claims Act.
536.95 Reconsideration of Non-Scope
Claims Act claims.
Subpart F—Claims Cognizable Under the
National Guard Claims Act
536.96 Statutory authority for the National
Guard Claims Act.
536.97 Scope for claims under the National
Guard Claims Act.
536.98 Claims payable under the National
Guard Claims Act.
536.99 Claims not payable under the
National Guard Claims Act.
536.100 Applicable law for claims under
the National Guard Claims Act.
536.101 Settlement authority for claims
under the National Guard Claims Act.
536.102 Actions on appeal under the
National Guard Claims Act.
Subpart G—Claims Cognizable Under
International Agreements
536.103 Statutory authority for claims
cognizable under international claims
agreements.
536.104 Current agreements in force.
536.105 Responsibilities generally/
international agreements claims.
536.106 Definitions for international
agreements claims.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
46261
536.107 Scope for international agreements
claims arising in the United States.
536.108 Claims payable under international
agreements (for those arising in the
United States).
536.109 Claims not payable under
international agreements (for those
arising in the United States).
536.110 Notification of incidents arising
under international agreements (for
claims arising in the United States).
536.111 Investigation of claims arising
under international agreements (for those
claims arising in the United States).
536.112 Settlement authority for claims
arising under international agreements
(for those claims arising in the United
States).
536.113 Assistance to foreign forces for
claims arising under international
agreements (as to claims arising in the
United States).
536.114 Scope for claims arising overseas
under international agreements.
536.115 Claims procedures for claims
arising overseas under international
agreements.
536.116 Responsibilities as to claims arising
overseas under international agreements.
Subpart H—Maritime Claims
536.117 Statutory authority for maritime
claims.
536.118 Related statutes for maritime
claims.
536.119 Scope for maritime claims.
536.120 Claims payable as maritime claims.
536.121 Claims not payable as maritime
claims.
536.122 Limitation of settlement of
maritime claims.
536.123 Limitation of liability for maritime
claims.
536.124 Settlement authority for maritime
claims.
Subpart I—Claims Cognizable Under Article
139, Uniform Code of Military Justice
536.125 Statutory authority for Uniform
Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) claims.
536.126 Purpose of UCMJ claims.
536.127 Proper claimants; unknown
accused—under the UCMJ.
536.128 Effect of disciplinary action,
voluntary restitution, or contributory
negligence for claims under the UCMJ.
536.129 Claims cognizable as UCMJ claims.
536.130 Claims not cognizable as UCMJ
claims.
536.131 Limitations on assessments arising
from UCMJ claims.
536.132 Procedure for processing UCMJ
claims.
536.133 Reconsideration of UCMJ claims .
536.134 Additional claims judge advocate
and claims attorney responsibilities (for
UCMJ claims).
Subpart J—Claims Cognizable Under the
Foreign Claims Act
536.135 Statutory authority for the Foreign
Claims Act.
536.136 Scope for claims arising under the
Foreign Claims Act.
536.137 Claims payable under the Foreign
Claims Act.
E:\FR\FM\11AUP2.SGM
11AUP2
46262
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 155 / Friday, August 11, 2006 / Proposed Rules
536.138 Claims not payable under the
Foreign Claims Act.
536.139 Applicable law for claims under
the Foreign Claims Act.
536.140 Appointment and functions of
Foreign Claims Commissions.
536.141 Composition of Foreign Claims
Commissions.
536.142 Qualification of members of
Foreign Claims Commissions.
536.143 Settlement authority of Foreign
Claims Commissions.
536.144 Reopening a claim after final action
by a Foreign Claims Commission.
536.145 Solatia payment.
Subpart K—Nonappropriated Fund Claims
536.146 Claims against nonappropriated
fund employees—generally.
536.147 Claims by NAFI employees for
losses incident to employment.
536.148 Claims generated by the acts or
omissions of NAFI employees.
536.149 Identification of persons whose
actions may generate liability.
536.150 Claims payable from appropriated
funds.
536.151 Settlement authority for claims
generated by acts or omissions of NAFI
employees.
536.152 Payment of claims generated by
acts or omissions of NAFI employees.
536.153 Claims involving tortfeasors other
than nonappropriated fund employees:
NAFI contractors.
536.154 Claims involving tortfeasors other
than nonappropriated fund employees:
NAFI risk management program (RIMP)
claims.
536.155 Claims payable involving
tortfeasors other than nonappropriated
fund employees.
536.156 Procedures for claims involving
tortfeasors other than nonappropriated
fund employees.
536.157 Settlement/approval authority for
claims involving tortfeasors other than
nonappropriated fund employees.
Authority: 10 U.S.C. 2733; 10 U.S.C. 1089;
10 U.S.C. 1054; 28 U.S.C. 1291, 2401–2402,
2411–2412, 2671–2680; 10 U.S.C. 2737; 32
U.S.C. 715; 10 U.S.C. 2734a, 2734b; 10 U.S.C.
2734;10 U.S.C. 4801, 4802, 4806; 46 U.S.C.
app. 740; 39 U.S.C. 411; 10 U.S.C. 939; 10
U.S.C. 2736; 10 U.S.C. 2735; 10 U.S.C. 2731.
PART 536—CLAIMS AGAINST THE
UNITED STATES
Subpart A—The Army Claims System
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
§ 536.1 Purpose of the Army Claims
System.
This part sets forth policies and
procedures that govern the
investigating, processing, and settling of
claims against, and in favor of, the
United States under the authority
conferred by statutes, regulations,
international and interagency
agreements, and Department of Defense
Directives (DODDs). It is intended to
ensure that claims are investigated
properly and adjudicated according to
applicable law, and valid recoveries and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:42 Aug 10, 2006
Jkt 208250
affirmative claims are pursued against
carriers, third-party insurers, and
tortfeasors.
§ 536.2
Claims authorities.
(a) General. Claims cognizable under
the following list of statutes and
authorities are processed and settled
under DA Pam 27–162 and this part. All
of these materials may be viewed on the
USARCS Web site, https://
www.jagcnet.army.mil/
85256F33005C2B92/(JAGCNETDocID)/
HOME?OPENDOCUMENT. Select the
link ‘‘Claims Resources.’’
(1) Tort Claims. (i) The Military
Claims Act (MCA), 10 United States
Code (U.S.C.) 2733 (see Subpart C of
this part). The ‘‘incident-to-service’’
provision, applicable to both military
and civilian personnel of the
Department of Defense, is contained in
the MCA.
(ii) The Gonzales Act, 10 U.S.C. 1089.
This act permits individual suits against
health care providers for certain torts
(see § 536.80).
(iii) Certain suits arising out of legal
malpractice, 10 U.S.C. 1054, discussed
at § 536.81 and at DA Pam 27–162,
paragraph 2–62f.
(iv) The Federal Tort Claims Act
(FTCA), 28 U.S.C. 1291, 1402, 2401–
2402, 2411–2412, and 2671–2680 (see
Subpart D of this part). The Westfall
Act, 28 U.S.C. 2679, an integral part of
the FTCA, provides absolute immunity
from individual suit for common law
torts for employees of the United States
acting within the scope of their
employment.
(A) The legislative history of the
FTCA.
(B) Regulations of the Attorney
General implementing the Federal Tort
Claims Act, 28 CFR part 14.
(C) An Appendix to 28 CFR part 14
sets forth certain delegations of
settlement authority to the Secretary of
Veterans Affairs, the Postmaster
General, the Secretary of Defense, the
Secretary of Transportation, and the
Secretary of Health and Human
Services.
(v) The Non-Scope Claims Act
(NSCA), 10 U.S.C. 2737 (see Subpart E
of this part).
(vi) The National Guard Claims Act
(NGCA), 32 U.S.C. 715 (see Subpart F of
this part).
(vii) Claims under International
Agreements or the Foreign Claims Act.
(A) International Agreements Claims
Act (IACA), 10 U.S.C. 2734a and 2734b.
(B) Foreign Claims Act (FCA), 10
U.S.C. 2734 (see Subpart J of this part).
(viii) The Army Maritime Claims
Settlement Act (AMCSA), 10 U.S.C.
4801, 4802 and 4806. Affirmative claims
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
under the AMCSA are processed under
10 U.S.C. 4803 and 4804 (see § 537.16
of this chapter).
(ix) Admiralty Extension Act (AEA),
46 U.S.C. app. 740 (see Subpart H of this
part).
(x) Claims against nonappropriated
fund (NAF) activities and the risk
management program (RIMP) (see
Subpart K of this part), processed under
Army Regulation (AR) 215–1 and AR
608–10.
(xi) Claims by the U.S. Postal Service
for losses or shortages in postal accounts
caused by unbonded Army personnel
(39 U.S.C. 411 and Department of
Defense (DOD) Manual 4525.6-M).
(2) Personnel Claims (subpart I of this
part and AR 27–20, chapter 11).
(i) The Personnel Claims Act (PCA),
31 U.S.C. 3721 (see AR 27–20, chapter
11).
(ii) Redress of injuries to personal
property, Uniform Code of Military
Justice (UCMJ), Article 139, 10 U.S.C.
939 (see Subpart I of this part).
(3) Affirmative Claims (32 CFR part
537).
(i) The Federal Claims Collection Act
(FCCA), 31 U.S.C. 3711–3720E.
(ii) The Federal Medical Care
Recovery Act (FMCRA), 42 U.S.C. 2651–
2653.
(iii) Collection from third-party payers
of reasonable costs of healthcare
services, 10 U.S.C. 1095 .
(b) Fund source authority for claims
under Title 10 statutes. 10 U.S.C. 2736,
advance payments for certain property
claims (see § 536.71).
(c) Fund source authority for tort
claims paid by Financial Management
Service (FMS). 31 U.S.C. 1304, provides
authority for judgments, awards and
compromise settlements.
(d) Additional authorities under Title
10.
(1) 10 U.S.C. 2735, establishes that
settlements (or ‘‘actions’’) under the
Title 10 claims processing statutes are
final and conclusive.
(2) 10 U.S.C. 2731, provides a
definition of the word ‘‘settle.’’
(e) Related remedies statutes. The
Army frequently receives claims or
inquiries that are not cognizable under
the statutory and other authorities
administered by the U.S. Army under
this publication and DA Pam 27–162.
Every effort should be made to refer the
claim or inquiry to the proper authority
following the guidance in § 536.34 or
§ 536.36. (See also the corresponding
paragraphs 2–15 and 2–17, respectively,
in DA Pam 27–162). Some authorities
for related remedies are used more
frequently than others. Where an
authority for a related remedy is
frequently used, it is listed below and is
E:\FR\FM\11AUP2.SGM
11AUP2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 155 / Friday, August 11, 2006 / Proposed Rules
posted on the USARCS Web site (for the
address see § 536.2(a)).
(1) Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. 1346,
provides exclusive jurisdiction in the
Court of Federal Claims over causes of
actions alleging property loss caused by
a Fifth Amendment ‘‘taking.’’
(2) Maritime authority statutes, Public
Vessels Act (PVA), 46 U.S.C. app. 781–
790, Suits in Admiralty Act (SIAA), 46
U.S.C. app. 741–752, and the Rivers and
Harbors Act, 33 U.S.C. 408 and 412.
(3) Federal Employees Compensation
Act (FECA), two excerpts: 5 U.S.C. 8116
and 8140, providing guidance on
personal injury and death claims by
civilian employees arising within the
scope of their employment (see DA Pam
27–162, paragraph 2–15b) and
information on certain claims by
Reserve Officers Training Corps (ROTC)
cadets, respectively, (see DA Pam 27–
162, paragraph 2–17d(2)).
(4) Longshore and Harbor Workers
Compensation Act (LHWCA), 33 U.S.C.
901–950.
(5) Claims for consequential property
damage by civilian employees may only
be considered in the Court of Federal
Claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1491.
(f) Additional materials. There are
some additional authoritative materials
for the processing of claims, mostly of
an administrative nature. For a complete
listing of all of the supplementary
materials relevant to claims processing
under this publication and DA Pam 27–
162 see Appendix B of DA Pam 27–162.
(g) Conflict of authorities. Where a
conflict exists between a general
provision of this publication and a
specific provision found in one of this
publication’s subparts implementing a
specific statute, the specific provision,
as set forth in the statute, will control.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
§ 536.3 Command and organizational
relationships.
(a) The Secretary of the Army. The
Secretary of the Army (SA) heads the
Army Claims System and acts on certain
claims appeals directly or through a
designee.
(b) The Judge Advocate General. The
SA has delegated authority to The Judge
Advocate General (TJAG) to assign areas
of responsibility and designate
functional responsibility for claims
purposes. TJAG has delegated authority
to the Commander USARCS to carry out
the responsibilities assigned in § 536.7
and as otherwise lawfully delegable.
(c) U.S. Army Claims Service.
USARCS, a command and component of
the Office of TJAG, is the agency
through which the SA and TJAG
discharge their responsibilities for the
administrative settlement of claims
worldwide (see AR 10–72). USARCS’
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:42 Aug 10, 2006
Jkt 208250
mailing address is: U.S. Army Claims
Service, 4411 Llewellyn Ave., Fort
George G. Meade, MD 20755–5360,
Commercial: (301) 677–7009.
(d) Command claims services. (1)
Command claims services exercise
general supervisory authority over
claims matters arising within their
assigned areas of operation. Command
claims services will:
(i) Effectively control and supervise
the investigation of potentially
compensable events (PCEs) occurring
within the command’s geographic area
of responsibility, in other areas for
which the command is assigned claims
responsibility, and during the course of
the command’s operations.
(ii) Provide services for the processing
and settlement of claims for and against
the United States.
(2) The Commander USARCS may
delegate authority to establish a
command claims service to the
commander of a major overseas
command or other commands that
include areas outside the United States,
its territories and possessions.
(i) When a large deployment occurs,
the Commander USARCS may designate
a command claims service for a limited
time or purpose, such as for the
duration of an operation and for the
time necessary to accomplish the
mission. The appropriate major Army
command (MACOM) will assist the
Commander USARCS in obtaining
resources and personnel for the mission.
(ii) In coordination with the
Commander USARCS, the MACOM will
designate the area of responsibility for
each new command claims service.
(3) A command claims service may be
a separate organization with a
designated commander or chief. If it is
part of the command’s Office of the Staff
Judge Advocate (SJA), the SJA will also
be the chief of the command claims
service, however, the SJA may designate
a field grade officer as chief of the
service.
(e) Area claims offices. The following
may be designated as area claims offices
(ACOs):
(1) An office under the supervision of
the senior judge advocate (JA) of each
command or organization so designated
by the Commander USARCS. The senior
JA is the head of the ACO.
(2) An office under supervision of the
senior JA of each command in the area
of responsibility of a command claims
service so designated by the chief of that
service after coordination with the
Commander USARCS. The senior JA is
the head of the ACO.
(3) The office of counsel of each U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers (COE) district
within the United States and such other
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
46263
COE commands or agencies as
designated by the Commander USARCS,
with concurrence of the Chief Counsel,
Office of the Chief of Engineers, for all
claims generated within such districts,
commands or agencies. The district
counsel or the attorney in charge of the
command’s or agency’s legal office is
the head of the ACO.
(f) Claims processing offices. Claims
processing offices (CPOs) are normally
small legal offices or ACO subordinate
elements, designated by the Commander
USARCS, a command claims service or
an ACO. These offices are established
for the investigation of all actual and
potential claims arising within their
jurisdiction, on either an area, command
or agency basis. There are four types of
claims processing offices (see § 536.10):
(1) Claims processing offices without
approval authority.
(2) Claims processing offices with
approval authority.
(3) Medical claims processing offices.
(4) Special claims processing offices.
(g) Limitations on delegation of
authority under any subpart. (1) The
Commander USARCS, commanders or
chiefs of command claims services, or
the heads of ACOs or CPOs with
approval authority may delegate, in
writing, all or any portion of their
monetary approval authority to
subordinate JAs or claims attorneys in
their services or offices.
(2) The authority to act upon appeals
or requests for reconsideration, to deny
claims (including disapprovals based on
substantial fraud), to grant waivers of
maximum amounts allowable, or to
make final offers will not be delegated
except that the Commander USARCS
may delegate this authority to USARCS
Division Chiefs.
(3) CPOs will provide copies of all
delegations affecting them to the ACO
and, if so directed, to command claims
services.
§ 536.4
Designation of claims attorneys.
(a) Who may designate. The
Commander USARCS, the senior JA of
a command having a command claims
service, the chief of a command claims
service, the head of an ACO, or the
Chief Counsel of a COE District, may
designate a qualified attorney other than
a JA as a claims attorney. The head of
an ACO may designate a claims attorney
to act as a CPO with approval authority.
(b) Eligibility. To qualify as a claims
attorney, an individual must be a
civilian employee of the Department of
the Army (DA) or DOD, a member of the
bar of a state, the District of Columbia,
or a jurisdiction where U.S. federal law
applies, serving in the grade of GS–11
E:\FR\FM\11AUP2.SGM
11AUP2
46264
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 155 / Friday, August 11, 2006 / Proposed Rules
or above, and performing primary duties
as a legal adviser.
§ 536.5
The Judge Advocate General.
TJAG has worldwide Army Staff
responsibility for administrative
settlement of claims by and against the
U.S. government, generated by
employees of the U.S. Army and DOD
components other than the Departments
of the Navy and Air Force. Where the
Army has single-service responsibility,
TJAG has responsibility for the Army.
See DODD 5515.9. Certain claims
responsibilities of TJAG are exercised by
The Assistant Judge Advocate General
(TAJAG) as set forth in this part and
directed by TJAG.
§ 536.6
The Army claims mission.
(a) Promptly investigate potential
claims incidents with a view to
determining the degree of the Army’s
exposure to liability, the damage
potential, and when the third party is at
fault, whether the Army should take
action to collect for medical expenses,
lost wages and property damage.
(b) Efficiently and expeditiously
dispose of claims against the U.S. by
fairly settling meritorious claims at the
lowest level within the claims system
commensurate with monetary
jurisdiction delegated, or by denying
non-meritorious claims.
(c) Develop a system that has a high
level of proficiency, so that litigation
and appeals can be avoided or kept to
a minimum.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
§ 536.7 Responsibilities of the Commander
USARCS.
The Commander USARCS shall:
(a) Supervise and inspect claims
activities worldwide.
(b) Formulate and implement claims
policies and uniform standards for
claims office operations.
(c) Investigate, process and settle
claims beyond field office monetary
authority and consider appeals and
requests for reconsideration on claims
denied by the field offices.
(d) Supervise the investigation,
processing, and settlement of claims
against, and in favor of, the United
States under the statutes and regulations
listed in § 536.2 and pursuant to other
appropriate statutes, regulations, and
authorizations.
(e) Designate ACOs, CPOs, and claims
attorneys within DA and DOD
components other than the Departments
of the Navy and Air Force, subject to
concurrence of the commander
concerned.
(f) Designate continental United States
(CONUS) geographic areas of claims
responsibility.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:42 Aug 10, 2006
Jkt 208250
(g) Recommend action to be taken by
the SA, TJAG or the U.S. Attorney
General, as appropriate, on claims in
excess of $25,000 or the threshold
amount then current under the FTCA,
on claims in excess of $100,000 or the
threshold amount then current under
the FCA, the MCA, the NGCA, AMCSA,
FCCA and FMRCA and on other claims
that have been appealed. Direct
communication with Department of
Justice (DOJ) and the SA’s designee is
authorized.
(h) Operate the ‘‘receiving State
office’’ for claims arising in the United
States, its territories, commonwealths
and possessions cognizable under
Article VIII of the North Atlantic Treaty
Organization (NATO) Status of Forces
Agreement (SOFA), Partnership for
Peace (PFP) SOFA, Article XVI of the
Singapore SOFA, and other SOFAs
which have reciprocal claims provisions
as delegated by TJAG, as implemented
by 10 U.S.C. 2734a and 2734b (Subpart
G of this part).
(i) Settle claims of the U.S. Postal
Service for reimbursement under 39
U.S.C. 411 (see DOD Manual 4525.6–M).
(j) Settle claims against carriers,
warehouse firms, insurers, and other
third parties for loss of, or damage to,
personal property of DA or DOD
soldiers or civilians incurred while the
goods are in storage or in transit at
government expense (AR 27–20, chapter
11).
(k) Formulate and recommend
legislation for Congressional enactment
of new statutes and the amendment of
existing statutes considered essential for
the orderly and expeditious
administrative settlement of
noncontractual claims.
(l) Perform post-settlement review of
claims.
(m) Prepare, justify, and defend
estimates of budgetary requirements and
administer the Army claims budget.
(n) Maintain permanent records of
claims for which TJAG is responsible.
(o) Assist in developing disaster and
maneuver claims plans designed to
implement the responsibilities set forth
in § 536.9(a)(12).
(p) Develop and maintain plans for a
disaster or civil disturbance in those
geographic areas that are not under the
jurisdiction of an area claims authority
and in which the Army has singleservice responsibility or in which the
Army is likely to be the predominant
Armed Force.
(q) Take initial action, as appropriate,
on claims arising in emergency
situations.
(r) Provide assistance as available or
take appropriate action to ensure that
command claims services and ACOs are
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
carrying out their responsibilities as set
forth in §§ 536.8 and 536.9, including
claims assistance visits.
(s) Serve as proponent for the
database management systems for torts,
personnel and affirmative claims and
provide standard automated claims data
management programs for worldwide
use.
(t) Ensure proper training of claims
personnel.
(u) Coordinate claims activities with
the Air Force, Navy, Marine Corps, and
other DOD agencies to ensure a
consistent and efficient joint service
claims program.
(v) Investigate, process and settle, and
supervise the field office investigation
and processing of, medical malpractice
claims arising in Army medical centers
within the United States; provide
medical claims judge advocates
(MCJAs), medical claims attorneys, and
medical claims investigators assigned to
such medical centers with technical
guidance and direction on such claims.
(w) Coordinate support with the U.S.
Army Medical Command (MEDCOM) on
matters relating to medical malpractice
claims.
(x) Issue an accounting classification
to all properly designated claims
settlement and approval authorities.
(y) Perform the investigation,
processing, and settlement of claims
arising in areas outside command
claims service areas of operation.
(z) Maintain continuous worldwide
deployment and operational capability
to furnish claims advice to any legal
office or command throughout the
world. When authorized by the chain of
command or competent authority, issue
such claims advice or services,
including establishing a claims system
within a foreign country, interpreting
claims aspects of international
agreements, and processing claims
arising from Army involvement in civil
disturbances, chemical accidents under
the Chemical Energy Stockpile Program,
other man-made or natural disasters,
and other claims designated by
competent authority.
(aa) Upon receiving both the
appropriate authority’s directive or
order and full fiscal authorization,
disburse the funds necessary to
administer civilian evacuation,
relocation, and similar initial response
efforts in response to a chemical disaster
arising at an Army facility.
(bb) Respond to all inquiries from the
President, members of Congress,
military officials, and the general public
on claims within USARCS’
responsibility.
(cc) Serve as the proponent for this
publication and DA Pam 27–162, both
E:\FR\FM\11AUP2.SGM
11AUP2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 155 / Friday, August 11, 2006 / Proposed Rules
of which set forth guidance on
personnel, tort, disaster and affirmative
claims, as well as claims management
and administration.
(dd) Provide supervision for the
Army’s affirmative claims and carrier
recovery programs, as well as other
methods for recovering legal debts.
(ee) Provide support for the overseas
environmental claims program as
designated by the DA.
(ff) Execute other claims missions as
designated by DOD, DA, TJAG and other
competent authority.
(gg) Appoint Foreign Claims
Commissions outside Command Claims
Services’ geographic areas of
responsibility.
(hh) Budget for and fund claims
investigations and activities; such as per
diem and transportation of claims
personnel, claimants and witnesses;
independent medical examinations;
appraisals; independent expert
opinions; long distance telephone calls;
recording and photographic equipment;
use of express mail or couriers; and
other necessary expenses.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
§ 536.8 Responsibilities and operations of
command claims services.
(a) Chiefs of command claims
services. Chiefs of command claims
services shall:
(1) Exercise claims settlement
authority as specified in this part,
including appellate authority where so
delegated.
(2) Supervise the investigation,
processing, and settlement of claims
against, and in favor of the United States
under the statutes and regulations listed
in § 536.2, and pursuant to other
appropriate statutes, regulations, and
authorizations.
(3) Designate and grant claims
settlement authority to ACOs. A grant of
such authority will not be effective until
coordinated with the Commander
USARCS, and assigned an office code.
However, the chief of a command
claims service may redesignate a CPO
that already has an assigned office code
as an ACO without coordination with
the Commander USARCS. The
Commander USARCS, will be informed
of such a designation.
(4) Designate and grant claims
approval authority to CPOs. Only CPOs
staffed with a claims judge advocate
(CJA) or claims attorney may be granted
approval authority. A grant of such
authority will not be effective until
coordinated with the Commander
USARCS, and assigned an office code.
(5) Train claims personnel and
monitor their operations and ongoing
claims administration. Conduct a
training course annually.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:42 Aug 10, 2006
Jkt 208250
(6) Implement pertinent claims
policies.
(7) Prepare and publish command
claims directives.
(8) Administer the command claims
expenditure allowance, providing
necessary data, estimates, and reports to
USARCS on a regular basis.
(9) Perform the responsibilities of an
ACO (see § 536.9), as applicable, ensure
that SOFA claims are investigated
properly and timely filed with the
receiving State and adequately funded.
(10) Serve as the United States
‘‘sending State office,’’ if so designated,
when operating in an area covered by a
SOFA.
(11) Supervise and provide technical
assistance to subordinate ACOs within
the command claims service’s
geographic area of responsibility.
(12) Appoint FCCs.
(b) Operations of Command Claims
Services. The SJA of the command shall
supervise the command claims service.
The command SJA may designate a field
grade JA as the chief of the service. An
adequate number of qualified claims
personnel shall be assigned to ensure
that claims are promptly investigated
and acted upon. With the concurrence
of the Commander USARCS, a
command claims service may designate
ACOs within its area of operations to
carry out claims responsibilities within
specified geographic areas subject to
agreement by the commander
concerned.
§ 536.9 Responsibilities and operations of
area claims offices.
(a) Heads of ACOs. Heads of ACOs,
including COE offices (see § 536.3(e)(3))
shall:
(1) Ensure that claims and potential
claims incidents in their area of
responsibility are promptly investigated
in accordance with this part.
(2) Ensure that each organization or
activity (for example, U.S. Army
Reserve (USAR) or Army National
Guard of the United States (ARNGUS)
unit, ROTC detachment, recruiting
company or station, or DOD agency)
within the area appoints a claims officer
to investigate claims incidents not
requiring investigation by a JA (see
§ 536.23) and ensure that this officer is
adequately trained.
(3) Supervise the investigation,
processing, and settlement of claims
against, and in favor of, the United
States under the statutes and regulations
listed in § 536.2 and pursuant to other
appropriate statutes, regulations, and
authorizations.
(4) Act as a claims settlement
authority on claims that fall within the
appropriate monetary jurisdictions set
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
46265
forth in this part and forward claims
exceeding such jurisdictions to the
Commander USARCS, or to the chief of
a command claims service, as
appropriate, for action.
(5) Designate CPOs and request that
the Commander USARCS, or the chief of
a command claims service, as
appropriate, grant claims approval
authority to a CPO for claims that fall
within the jurisdiction of that office.
(6) Supervise the operations of CPOs
within their area.
(7) Implement claims policies and
guidance furnished by the Commander
USARCS.
(8) Ensure that there are adequate
numbers of qualified and adequately
trained CJAs or claims attorneys, RCJAs
or attorneys, recovery claims clerks,
claims examiners, claims adjudicators
and claims clerks in all claims offices
within their areas to act promptly on
claims.
(9) Budget for and fund claims
investigations and activities, such as:
Per diem and transportation of claims
personnel, claimants and witnesses;
independent medical examinations;
appraisals and independent expert
opinions; long distance telephone calls;
recording and photographic equipment;
use of express mail or couriers; and
other necessary expenses.
(10) Within the United States and its
territories, commonwealths and
possessions, procure and disseminate,
within their areas of jurisdiction,
appropriate legal publications on state
or territorial law and precedent relating
to tort claims.
(11) Notify the Commander USARCS,
of all claims and potentially
compensable events (PCEs) as required
by § 536.22(c); notify the chief of a
command claims service of all claims
and PCEs.
(12) Develop and maintain written
plans for a disaster or civil disturbance.
These plans may be internal SJA office
plans or an annex to an installation or
an agency disaster response plan.
(13) Implement the Army’s Article
139 claims program. (See Subpart I of
this part).
(14) Notify USARCS of possible
deployments and ensure adequate FCCs
are appointed by USARCS and are
trained.
(b) Operations of Area Claims Offices.
(1) The ACO is the principal office for
the investigation and adjudication or
settlement of claims, and shall be staffed
with qualified legal personnel under the
supervision of the SJA, command JA, or
COE district or command legal counsel.
(2) In addition to the utilization of
unit claims officers required by
§ 536.10(a), if indicated, the full-time
E:\FR\FM\11AUP2.SGM
11AUP2
46266
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 155 / Friday, August 11, 2006 / Proposed Rules
responsibility for investigating and
processing claims arising within or
related to the activities of a unit or
organization located within a section of
the designated area may be delegated to
another command, unit, or activity by
establishing a CPO at the command,
unit, or activity (see § 536.10(b)(4)).
Normally, all CPOs will operate under
the supervision of the ACO in whose
area the CPO is located. Where a
proposed CPO is not under the
command of the ACO parent
organization, this designation may be
achieved by a support agreement or
memorandum of understanding between
the affected commands.
(3) Normally, claims that cannot be
settled by a COE ACO will be forwarded
directly to the Commander USARCS,
with notice of referral to the Chief
Counsel, COE. However, as part of his
or her responsibility for litigating suits
that involve civil works and military
construction activities, the Chief
Counsel, COE, may require that a COE
ACO forward claims through COE
channels, provided that such
requirement does not preclude the
Commander USARCS from taking final
action within the time limitations set
forth in subparts D and H of this part.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
§ 536.10 Responsibilities and operations
of claims processing offices.
(a) Heads of CPOs. Heads of CPOs
will:
(1) Investigate all potential and actual
claims arising within their assigned
jurisdiction, on either an area,
command, or agency basis. Only a CPO
that has approval authority may
adjudicate and pay presented claims
within its monetary jurisdiction.
(2) Ensure that units and
organizations within their jurisdiction
have appointed claims officers for the
investigation of claims not requiring a
JA’s investigation. (See § 536.22).
(3) Budget for and fund claims
investigations and activities; including,
per diem and transportation of claims
personnel, claimants and witnesses;
independent medical examinations;
appraisals; independent expert
opinions; long distance telephone calls;
recording and photographic equipment;
use of express mail or couriers; and
other necessary expenses.
(4) Within CONUS, procure and
maintain legal publications on local law
relating to tort claims pertaining to their
jurisdiction.
(5) Notify the Commander USARCS of
all claims and claims incidents, as
required by § 536.22 and AR 27–20,
paragraph 2–12.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:42 Aug 10, 2006
Jkt 208250
(6) Implement the Army’s Article 139
claims program (see Subpart I of this
part).
(b) Operations of claims processing
offices. (1) Claims processing office with
approval authority. A CPO that has been
granted approval authority must provide
for the investigation of all potential and
actual claims arising within its assigned
jurisdiction, on an area, command, or
agency basis, and for the adjudication
and payment of all claims presented
within its monetary jurisdiction. If the
estimated value of a claim, after
investigation, exceeds the CPO’s
payment authority, or if disapproval is
the appropriate action, the claim file
will be forwarded to the ACO unless
otherwise specified in this part, or
forwarded to USARCS or the command
claims service, if directed by such
service.
(2) Claims processing offices without
approval authority. A CPO that has not
been granted claims approval authority
will provide for the investigation of all
potential and actual claims arising
within its assigned jurisdiction on an
area, command, or agency basis. Once
the investigation has been completed,
the claim file will be forwarded to the
appropriate ACO for action.
Alternatively, an ACO may direct the
transfer of a claim investigation from a
CPO without approval authority to
another CPO with approval authority,
located within the ACO’s jurisdiction.
(3) Medical claims processing offices.
The MCJAs or medical claims attorneys
at Army medical centers, other than
Walter Reed Army Medical Center, may
be designated by the SJA or head of the
ACO for the installation on which the
center is located as CPOs with approval
authority for medical malpractice claims
only. Claims for amounts exceeding a
medical CPO’s approval authority will
be investigated and forwarded to the
Commander USARCS.
(4) Special claims processing offices.
(i) Designation and authority. The
Commander USARCS, the chief of a
command claims service, or the head of
an ACO may designate special CPOs
within his or her command for specific,
short-term purposes (for example,
maneuvers, civil disturbances and
emergencies). These special CPOs may
be delegated the approval authority
necessary to effect the purpose of their
creation, but in no case will this
delegation exceed the maximum
monetary approval authority set forth in
other subparts of this part for regular
CPOs. All claims will be processed
under the claims expenditure allowance
and claims command and office code of
the authority that established the office
or under a code assigned by USARCS.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
The existence of any special CPO must
be reported to the Commander USARCS,
and the chief of a command claims
service, as appropriate.
(ii) Maneuver damage and claims
office jurisdiction. A special CPO is the
proper organization to process and
approve maneuver damage claims,
except when a foreign government is
responsible for adjudication pursuant to
an international agreement (see Subpart
G of this part). Personnel from the
maneuvering command should be used
to investigate claims and, at the ACO’s
discretion, may be assigned to the
special CPO. The ACO will process
claims filed after the maneuver
terminates. The special CPO will
investigate claims arising while units
are traveling to or from the maneuver
within the jurisdiction of other ACOs,
and forward such claims for action to
the ACO in whose area the claims arose.
Claims for damage to real or personal
property arising on private land that the
Army has used under a permit may be
paid from funds specifically budgeted
by the maneuver for such purposes in
accordance with AR 405–15.
(iii) Disaster claims and civil
disturbance. A special CPO provided for
a disaster or civil disturbance should
include a claims approving authority
with adequate investigatory,
administrative, and logistical support,
including damage assessment and
finance and accounting support. It will
not be dispatched prior to notification of
the Commander USARCS, whose
concurrence must be obtained before the
first claim is paid.
(5) Supervisory requirements. The
CPOs discussed in paragraphs (b)(2)
through (b)(4) of this section must be
supervised by an assigned CJA or claims
attorney in order to exercise delegated
approval authority.
§ 536.11
Chief of Engineers.
The Chief of Engineers, through the
Chief Counsel, shall:
(a) Provide general supervision of the
claims activities of COE ACOs.
(b) Ensure that each COE ACO has a
claims attorney designated in
accordance with § 536.4.
(c) Ensure that claims personnel are
adequately trained, and monitor their
ongoing claims administration.
(d) Implement pertinent claims
policies.
(e) Provide for sufficient funding in
accordance with existing Army
regulations and command directives for
temporary duty (TDY), long distance
telephone calls, recording equipment,
cameras, and other expenses for
investigating and processing claims.
E:\FR\FM\11AUP2.SGM
11AUP2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 155 / Friday, August 11, 2006 / Proposed Rules
(f) Procure and maintain adequate
legal publications on local law relating
to claims arising within the United
States, its territories, commonwealths
and possessions.
(g) Assist USARCS in evaluation of
claims by furnishing qualified expert
and technical advice from COE
resources, on a non-reimbursable basis
except for temporary duty (TDY) and
specialized lab services expenses.
§ 536.12 Commanding General, U.S. Army
Medical Command.
(a) After consulting with the
Commander USARCS on the selection
of medical claims attorneys, the
Commander of the U.S. Army
MEDCOM, the European Medical
Command, or other regional medical
command, through his or her SJA/
Center Judge Advocate, shall ensure that
an adequate number of qualified MCJAs
or medical claims attorneys and medical
claims investigators are assigned to
investigate and process medical
malpractice claims arising at Army
medical centers under the Commander’s
control. In accordance with an
agreement between TJAG and The
Surgeon General, such personnel shall
be used primarily to investigate and
process medical malpractice claims and
affirmative claims and will be provided
with the necessary funding and research
materials to carry out this function.
(b) Upon request of a claims judge
advocate or claims officer, shall provide
a qualified health care provider at a
medical treatment facility (MTF) to
examine a claimant for his injuries even
if the claimant is not otherwise entitled
to care at an MTF (See AR 40–400,
Patient Administration, paragraph 3–
47).
§ 536.13
Chief, National Guard Bureau.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
The Chief, National Guard Bureau
(NGB), shall:
(a) Ensure the designation of a point
of contact for claims matters in each
State Adjutant General’s office.
(b) Provide the name, address, and
telephone number of these points of
contact to the Commander USARCS.
(c) Designate claims officers to
investigate claims generated by ARNG
personnel and forward investigations to
the Active Army ACO that has
jurisdiction over the area in which the
claims incident occurred.
§ 536.14 Commanders of major Army
commands.
Commanders of MACOMs, through
their SJAs, shall:
(a) Assist USARCS in monitoring
ACOs and CPOs under their respective
commands for compliance with the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:42 Aug 10, 2006
Jkt 208250
responsibilities assigned in §§ 536.9 and
536.10.
(b) Assist claims personnel in
obtaining qualified expert and technical
advice from command units and
organizations on a nonreimbursable
basis (although the requesting office
may be required to provide TDY
funding).
(c) Assist TJAG, through the
Commander USARCS, in implementing
the functions set forth in § 536.7.
(d) Coordinate with the ACO within
whose jurisdiction a maneuver is
scheduled, to ensure the prompt
investigation and settlement of any
claims arising from it.
§ 536.15
Claims policies.
(a) General. The following policies
will be adhered to in processing and
adjudicating claims falling within this
regulation. The Commander USARCS is
authorized to publish new policies or
rescind existing policies from time to
time as the need arises.
(1) Notification. The Commander
USARCS must be notified as soon as
possible of both potential and actual
claims which are serious incidents that
cannot be settled within the monetary
jurisdiction of a Command Claims
Service or an ACO, including those
which occur in the area of responsibility
of a CPO. On such claims, the USARCS
Area Action Officer (AAO) must
coordinate with the field office as to all
aspects of the investigation, evaluation
and determination of liability. An offer
of settlement or the assertion of an
affirmative claim must be the result of
a discussion between the AAO and the
field office. Payment of a subrogated
claim may commit the United States to
liability as to larger claims. On the other
hand, where all claims out of an
incident can be paid within field
authority they should be paid promptly
with maximum use of small claims
procedures.
(2) Consideration under all subparts.
Prior to denial, a claim will be
considered under all subparts of this
part, regardless of the form on which the
claim is presented. A claim presented as
a personnel claim will be considered as
a tort prior to denial. A claim presented
as a tort will first be considered as a
personnel claim, and if not payable,
then considered as a tort. If deniable,
the claim will be denied both as a
personnel claim and as a tort.
(3) Compromise. DA policy seeks to
compromise claims in a manner that
represents a fair and equitable result to
both the claimant and the United States.
This policy does not extend to frivolous
claims or claims lacking factual or legal
merit. A claim should not be settled
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
46267
solely to avoid further processing time
and expense. All claims, regardless of
amount, should be evaluated. Congress
imposed no minimum limit on payable
claims nor did it intend that small nonmeritous claims be paid. Practically any
claim, regardless of amount, may be
subject to compromise through direct
negotiation. A CJA or claims attorney
should develop expertise in assessing
liability and damages, including small
property damage claims. For example, a
property damage claim may be
compromised by deducting the cost of
collection, i.e., attorney fees and costs,
even where liability is certain.
(4) Expeditious processing at the
lowest level. Claims investigation and
adjudication should be accomplished at
the lowest possible level, such as the
CPO or ACO that has monetary
authority over the estimated total value
of all claims arising from the incident.
The expeditious investigation and
settlement of claims is essential to
successfully fulfilling the Army’s
responsibilities under the claims
statutes implemented by this part.
(5) Notice to claimants of technical
errors in claim. When technical errors
are found in a claim’s filing or contents,
claimants should be advised of such
errors and the need to correct the claim.
If the errors concern a jurisdictional
matter, a record should be maintained
and the claimant should be immediately
warned that the error must be corrected
before the statute of limitations (SOL)
expires.
(b) Cooperative investigative
environment. Any person who indicates
a desire to file a claim against the
United States cognizable under one of
the subparts of this part will be
instructed concerning the procedure to
follow. The claimant will be furnished
claim forms and, when necessary,
assisted in completing claim forms, and
may be assisted in assembling evidence.
Claims personnel may not assist any
claimant in determining what amount to
claim. During claims investigation,
every effort should be made to create a
cooperative environment that engenders
the free exchange of information and
evidence. The goal of obtaining
sufficient information to make an
objective and fair analysis should be
paramount. Personal contact with
claimants or their representatives is
essential both during investigation and
before adjudication. When settlement is
not feasible, issues in dispute should be
clearly identified to facilitate resolution
of any reconsideration, appeal or
litigation.
(c) Claims directives and plans. (1)
Directives. Two copies of command
claims directives will be furnished to
E:\FR\FM\11AUP2.SGM
11AUP2
46268
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 155 / Friday, August 11, 2006 / Proposed Rules
the Commander USARCS. ACO
directives will be distributed to all DA
and DOD commands, installations and
activities within the ACO’s area of
responsibility, with an information copy
to the Commander USARCS.
(2) Disaster and civil preparedness
plan. One copy of all ACOs’ disaster or
civil disturbance plans or annexes will
be furnished to the Commander
USARCS.
(d) Interpretations. The Commander
USARCS will publish written
interpretations of this part.
Interpretations will have the same force
and effect as this part.
(e) Authority to grant exceptions to
and deviations from this part. If, in
particular instances, it is considered to
be in the best interests of the
government, the Commander USARCS
may authorize deviations from this
part’s specific requirements, except as to
matters based on statutes, treaties and
international agreements, executive
orders, controlling directives of the
Attorney General or Comptroller
General, or other publications that have
the force and effect of law.
(f) Guidance. The Commander
USARCS, may publish bulletins,
manuals, handbooks and notes, and a
DA Pamphlet that provides guidance to
claims authorities on administrative and
procedural rules implementing this part.
These will be binding on all Army
claims personnel.
(g) Communication. All claims
personnel are authorized to
communicate directly with USARCS
personnel for guidance on matters of
policy or on matters relating to the
implementation of this part.
(h) Private relief bills. The issue of a
private relief bill is one between a
claimant and his or her Congressional
representative. There is no established
procedure under which the DA sponsors
private relief legislation. Claims
personnel shall remain neutral in all
private relief matters and shall not make
any statement that purports to reflect
the DA’s position on a private relief bill.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
§ 536.16
Release of information policies.
(a) Conflict of interest. Except as part
of their official duties, government
personnel are forbidden from advising
or representing claimants or from
receiving any payment or gratuity for
services rendered. They may not accept
any share or interest in a claim or assist
in its presentation, under penalty of
federal criminal law (18 U.S.C. 203 and
205).
(b) Release of information. (1)
Relevant statutes pertinent to the release
of information include the Privacy Act
of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a and 552b, the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:42 Aug 10, 2006
Jkt 208250
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5
U.S.C. 552 and the Health Insurance
Portability and Accountability Act
(HIPAA), 42 U.S.C. 1320d through
1320d–8.
(2) It is the policy of USARCS that
unclassified attorney work product may
be released with or without a request
from the claimant or attorney, whenever
such release may help settle the claim
or avoid unnecessary litigation.
(3) A statutory exemption or privilege
may not be waived. Similarly,
documents subject to such statutorily
required nondisclosure, exemption, or
privilege may not be released. Regarding
other exemptions and privileges,
authorities may waive such exemptions
or privileges and direct release of the
protected documents, upon balancing
all pertinent factors, including finding
that release of protected records will not
harm the government’s interest, will
promote settlement of a claim and will
avoid unnecessary litigation, or for other
good cause.
(4) All requests for records and
information made pursuant to the FOIA,
5 U.S.C. 552, the Privacy Act of 1974,
5 U.S.C. 552a, or HIPAA, 42 U.S.C.
1320d, will be processed in accordance
with the procedures set forth in AR 25–
55 and AR 340–21, respectively as well
as 45 CFR parts 160 and 164, DODD
6025.18–R, this part, and DA Pam 27–
162.
(i) Any request for DOD records that
either explicitly or implicitly cites the
FOIA shall be processed under the
provisions of AR 25–55. Requests for
DOD records submitted by a claimant or
claimant’s attorney will be processed
under both the FOIA and under the
Privacy Act when the request is made
by the subject of the records requested
and those records are maintained in a
system of records. Such requests will be
processed under the FOIA time limits
and the Privacy Act fee provisions.
Withheld information must be exempt
from disclosure under both Acts.
(ii) Requests that cite both Acts or
neither Act are processed under both
Acts, using the FOIA time limits and the
Privacy Act fee provisions. For further
guidance, see AR 25–55, paragraphs 1–
301 and 1–503.
(5) The following records may not be
disclosed:
(i) Medical quality assurance records
exempt from disclosure pursuant to 10
U.S.C. 1102(a).
(ii) Records exempt from disclosure
pursuant to appropriate balancing tests
under FOIA exemption (6) (clearly
unwarranted invasion of personal
privacy), exemption (7)(c) (reasonably
constitutes unwarranted invasion of
privacy), and law enforcement records
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
(5 U.S.C. 552 (b)) unless requested by
the subject of the record.
(iii) Records protected by the Privacy
Act.
(iv) Records exempt from disclosure
pursuant to FOIA exemption (1)
(National security) (5 U.S.C. 552(b)),
unless such records have been properly
declassified.
(v) Records exempt from disclosure
pursuant to the attorney-client privilege
under FOIA exemption (5) (5 U.S.C.
552(b)), unless the client consents to the
disclosure.
(6) Records within a category for
which withholding of the record is
discretionary (AR 25–55, paragraph 3–
101), such as exemptions under the
deliberative process or attorney work
product privileges (exemption (5) (5
U.S.C. 552(b)) may be released when
there is no foreseeable harm to
government interests in the judgment of
the releasing authority.
(7) When it is determined that exempt
information should not be released, or a
question as to its releaseability exists,
forward the request and two copies of
the responsive documents to the
Commander USARCS. The Commander
USARCS, acting on behalf of TJAG (the
initial denial authority), may deny
release of records processed under the
FOIA only. The Commander USARCS,
will forward to TJAG all such requests
processed under both the FOIA and PA.
TJAG is the denial authority for Privacy
Act requests (AR 340–21, paragraph 1–
7i).
(c) Claims assistance. In the vicinity
of a field exercise, maneuver or disaster,
claims personnel may disseminate
information on the right to present
claims, procedures to be followed, and
the names and location of claims
officers and the COE repair teams. When
the government of a foreign country in
which U.S. Armed Forces are stationed
has assumed responsibility for the
settlement of certain claims against the
United States, officials of that country
will be furnished as much pertinent
information and evidence as security
considerations permit.
§ 536.17 Single-service claims
responsibility (DODD 5515.8 and DODD
5515.9).
(a) Assignment for DOD claims. The
Army is responsible for processing DOD
claims pursuant to DODD 5515.9
(posted on the USARCS Web site; for
the address see § 536.2(a)).
(b) Statutes and agreements. DOD has
assigned single-service responsibility for
the settlement of certain claims in
certain countries, pursuant to DODD
5515.8 (posted on the USARCS Web
E:\FR\FM\11AUP2.SGM
11AUP2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 155 / Friday, August 11, 2006 / Proposed Rules
site; for the address see § 536.2(a)) under
the following statutes and agreements:
(1) FCA (10 U.S.C. 2734);
(2) MCA (10 U.S.C. 2733);
(3) Status of Forces Agreements (10
U.S.C. 2734a and 2734b);
(4) NATO SOFA (4 U.S.T. 1792,
Treaties and International Acts Series
(T.I.A.S.) 2846) and other similar
agreements;
(5) FCCA (31 U.S.C. 3711–3720E) and
FMCRCA (42 U.S.C. 2651–2653);
(6) Claims not cognizable under any
other provision of law, 10 U.S.C. 2737;
and
(7) Advance payments, 10 U.S.C.
2736.
(c) Specified foreign countries.
Responsibility for the settlement of
claims cognizable under the laws listed
above has been assigned to military
departments pursuant to DODD 5515.8,
as supplemented by executive
agreement and other competent
directives.
(d) When claims responsibility has not
been assigned. When necessary to
implement contingency plans, the
unified or specified commander with
authority over the geographic area in
question may, on an interim basis before
receiving confirmation and approval
from the General Counsel, DOD, assign
single-service responsibility for
processing claims in countries where
such assignment has not already been
made.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
Cross-servicing of claims.
(a) Where claims responsibility has
not been assigned. Claims cognizable
under the FCA or the MCA that are
generated by another military
department within a foreign country for
which single-service claims
responsibility has not been assigned,
may be settled by the Army upon
request of the military department
concerned. Conversely, Army claims
may in appropriate cases be referred to
another military department for
settlement, DODD 5515.8, E1.2 (posted
on the USARCS Web site; for the
address see § 536.2(a)). Tables listing
claims offices worldwide are posted to
the USARCS Web site at that address.
U.S. Air Force claims offices may be
identified by visiting the Web site at
https://afmove.hq.af.mil/
page_afclaims.asp.
(b) Claims generated by the Coast
Guard. Claims resulting from the
activities of, or generated by, Coast
Guardsmen or civilian employees of the
Coast Guard while it is operating as a
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:42 Aug 10, 2006
Jkt 208250
Note to § 536.18: See also § 536.32 for
information on transferring claims among
armed services branches.
§ 536.19
Disaster claims planning.
All ACOs will prepare a disaster
claims plan and furnish a copy to
USARCS. See DA Pam 27–162,
paragraph 1–21 for specific
requirements related to disaster claims
planning.
§ 536.20
Note to § 536.17: See also § 536.32 for
information on transferring claims among
armed services branches.
§ 536.18
service of the U.S. Department of
Homeland Security may upon request
be settled under this part by a foreign
claims commission appointed as
authorized herein, but they will be paid
from Coast Guard appropriations, 10
U.S.C. 2734.
(c) SOFA claims within the United
States. Claims cognizable under the
NATO PFP or Singaporean SOFAs
arising out of the activities of aircraft
within the United States may be
investigated and adjudicated by the U.S.
Air Force under a delegation from the
Commander USARCS. Claims exceeding
the delegated amount will be
adjudicated by the USARCS.
(d) Claims generated by the American
Battle Monuments Commission. Claims
arising out of the activities of or in
cemeteries outside the United States
managed by the American Battle
Monuments Commission (36 U.S.C.
2110) will be investigated and
adjudicated by the U.S. Army.
Claims assistance visits.
Members of USARCS and command
claims services will make claims
assistance visits to field offices on a
periodic basis. See DA Pam 27–162,
paragraph 1–22 for specific
requirements related to claims
assistance visits.
§ 536.21
Annual claims award.
The Commander USARCS will make
an annual claims award to outstanding
field offices. See DA Pam 27–162, para
1–23 for more information on annual
claims awards.
Subpart B—Investigation and
Processing of Claims
§ 536.22 Claims investigative
responsibility—general.
(a) Scope. This subpart addresses the
investigation, processing, evaluation,
and settlement of tort and tort-related
claims for and against the United States.
The provisions of this subpart do not
apply to personnel claims (AR 27–20,
chapter 11), or to claims under subpart
G of this part, §§ 536.113 through
536.116.
(b) Cooperation. Claims investigation
requires team effort between the U.S.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
46269
Army Claims Service (USARCS),
command claims services, and area
claims offices (ACOs) including U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers (COE) District
Offices, claims processing offices
(CPOs), and unit claims officers.
Essential to this effort is the immediate
investigation of claims incidents.
Prompt investigation depends on the
timely reporting of claims incidents as
well as continuous communication
between all commands or echelons
bearing claims responsibility.
(c) Notification to USARCS. A CPO or
an ACO receiving notice of a potentially
compensable event (PCE) that requires
investigation will immediately refer it to
the appropriate claims office. The
Commander USARCS will be notified of
all major incidents involving serious
injury or death or those in which
property damage exceeds $50,000. A
command claims service may delegate
to an ACO the responsibility for
advising USARCS of serious incidents
and complying with mirror file
requirements. A copy of the written
delegation and any changes made
thereafter will be forwarded to the
Commander USARCS.
(d) Geographic concept of
responsibility. A command claims
service or an ACO in whose geographic
area a claims incident occurs is
primarily responsible for initiating
investigation and processing of any
claim filed in the absence of a formal
transfer of responsibility (see §§ 536.30
through 536.36). DOD and Army
organizations whose personnel are
involved in the incident will cooperate
with and assist the ACO, regardless of
where the former may be located.
Note to § 536.22: See the parallel
discussion at DA Pam 27–162, paragraph 2–
1.
§ 536.23 Identifying claims incidents both
for and against the government.
(a) Investigation is required when:
(1) There is property loss or damage.
(i) Property other than that belonging
to the government is damaged, lost, or
destroyed by an act or omission of a
government employee or a member of
North Atlantic Treaty Association
(NATO), Australian or Singaporean
forces stationed or on temporary duty
within the United States.
(ii) Property belonging to the
government is damaged or lost by a
tortious act or omission not covered by
the report of survey system or by a
carrier’s bill of lading.
(2) There is personal injury or death.
(i) A civilian other than an employee
of the U.S. government is injured or
killed by an act or omission of a
E:\FR\FM\11AUP2.SGM
11AUP2
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
46270
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 155 / Friday, August 11, 2006 / Proposed Rules
government employee or by a member
of a NATO, Australian or Singaporean
force stationed or on temporary duty
within the United States. (This category
includes patients injured during
treatment by a health care provider).
(ii) Service members, active or retired,
family members of either, or U.S.
employees, are injured or killed by a
third party and receive medical care at
government expense.
(3) A claim is filed.
(4) A competent authority or another
armed service or federal agency requires
investigation.
(b) Determining who is a government
employee is a matter of federal, not
local, law. Categories of government
employees usually accepted as
tortfeasors under federal law are:
(1) Military personnel (soldiers of the
Army, or members of other services
where the Army exercises single-service
jurisdiction on foreign soil; and soldiers
or employees within the United States
who are members of NATO or of other
foreign military forces with whom the
United States has a reciprocal claims
agreement and whose sending States
have certified that they were acting
within the scope of their duty) who are
serving on full-time active duty in a pay
status, including soldiers:
(i) Assigned to units performing active
or inactive duty.
(ii) Serving on active duty as Reserve
Officer Training Corps (ROTC)
instructors.
(iii) Serving as Army National Guard
(ARNG) instructors or advisors.
(iv) On duty or training with other
federal agencies, for example: The
National Aeronautics and Space
Administration, the Department of
State, the Navy, the Air Force, or DOD
(federal agencies other than the armed
service to which the Soldier is attached
may also provide a remedy).
(v) Assigned as students or ordered
into training at a non-federal civilian
educational institution, hospital,
factory, or other facility (excluding
soldiers on excess leave or those for
whom the training institution or
organization has assumed liability by
written agreement).
(vi) Serving on full-time duty at
nonappropriated fund (NAF) activities.
(vii) Of the United States Army
Reserve (USAR) and ARNG on active
duty under Title 10, U.S.C.
(2) Military personnel who are United
States Army Reserve soldiers including
ROTC cadets who are Army Reserve
soldiers while at annual training, during
periods of active duty and inactive duty
training.
(3) Military personnel who are
soldiers of the ARNG while engaged in
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:42 Aug 10, 2006
Jkt 208250
training or duty under 32 U.S.C. 316,
502, 503, 504, 505, or engaged in
properly authorized community action
projects under the Federal Tort Claims
Act (FTCA), the Non-Scope Claims Act
(NSCA), or the National Guard Claims
Act (NGCA), unless performing duties
in furtherance of a mission for a state,
commonwealth, territory or possession.
(4) Civilian officials and employees of
both the DOD and DA (there is no
practical significance to the distinction
between the terms ‘‘official’’ and
‘‘employee’’), including but not limited
to the following:
(i) Civil service and other full-time
employees of both the DOD and DA who
are paid from appropriated funds.
(ii) Persons providing direct health
care services pursuant to personal
service contracts under 10 U.S.C. 1089
or 1091 or where another person
exercised control over the health care
provider’s day-to-day practice. When
the conduct of a health care provider
performing services under a personal
service contract is implicated in a claim,
the CJA, Medical Claims Judge Advocate
(MCJA), or claims attorney should
consult with USARCS to determine if
that health care provider can be
considered an employee for purposes of
coverage.
(iii) Employees of a NAF
instrumentality (NAFI) if it is an
instrumentality of the United States and
thus a federal agency. To determine
whether a NAFI is a ‘‘federal agency,’’
consider both whether it is an integral
part of the Army charged with an
essential DA operational function and
also what degree of control and
supervision DA personnel exercise over
it. Members or users, unlike employees
of NAFIs, are not considered
government employees; the same is true
of family child care providers. However,
claims arising out of the use of some
NAFI property or from the acts or
omissions of family child care providers
may be payable from such funds under
subpart K of this part as a matter of
policy, even when the user is not acting
within the scope of employment and the
claim is not otherwise cognizable under
any of the other authorities described in
this part.
(5) Prisoners of war and interned
enemy aliens.
(6) Civilian employees of the District
of Columbia ARNG, including those
paid under ‘‘service contracts’’ from
District of Columbia funds.
(7) Civilians serving as ROTC
instructors paid from Federal funds.
(8) ARNG technicians employed
under 32 U.S.C. 709(a) for claims
accruing on or after January 1, 1969
(Pub. L. 90–486, August 13, 1968 (82
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Stat. 755)), unless performing duties
solely in pursuit of a mission for a state,
commonwealth, territory or possession.
(9) Persons acting in an official
capacity for the DOD or DA either
temporarily or permanently with or
without compensation, including but
not limited to the following:
(i) Dollar-a-year personnel.
(ii) Members of advisory committees,
commissions, or boards.
(iii) Volunteers serving in an official
capacity in furtherance of the business
of the United States, limited to those
categories set forth in DA Pam 27–162,
paragraph 2–45.
Note to § 536.23: See the parallel
discussion at DA Pam 27–162, paragraph 2–
2.
§ 536.24 Delegation of investigative
responsibility.
(a) Area Claims Office. An ACO is
authorized to carry out its investigative
responsibility as follows:
(1) At the request of the area claims
authority, commanders and heads of
Army and DOD units, activities, or
components will appoint a
commissioned, warrant, or
noncommissioned officer or a qualified
civilian employee to investigate a claims
incident in the manner set forth in DA
Pam 27–162 and this part. An ACO will
direct such investigation to the extent
deemed necessary.
(2) CPOs are responsible for
investigating claims incidents arising
out of the activities and operations of
their command or agency. An ACO may
assign area jurisdiction to a CPO after
coordination with the appropriate
commander to investigate claims
incidents arising in the ACO’s
designated geographic area. (See
§ 536.3(f)).
(3) Claims incidents involving
patients arising from treatment by a
health care provider in an Army
medical treatment facility (MTF),
including providers defined in
536.23(b)(4)(ii), will be investigated by a
claims judge advocate (CJA), medical
claims judge advocate (MCJA), or claims
attorney rather than by a unit claims
officer.
(4) An ACO will publish and
distribute a claims directive to all DOD
and Army installations and activities
including active, Army Reserve, and
ARNG units as well as units located on
the post at which the ACO is located.
The directive will outline each
installation’s and activity’s claims
responsibilities. It will institute a
serious claims incident reporting
system.
(b) Command claims service
responsibility. A command claims
E:\FR\FM\11AUP2.SGM
11AUP2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 155 / Friday, August 11, 2006 / Proposed Rules
service is responsible for the
investigation and processing of claims
incidents arising in its geographic area
of responsibility or for any incidents
within the authority of any foreign
claims commission (FCC) it appoints.
This responsibility will be carried out
by an ACO or a CPO to the extent
possible. A command claims service
will publish a claims directive outlining
the geographic areas of claims
investigative responsibilities of each of
its installations and activities, requiring
each ACO or CPO to report all serious
claims incidents directly to the
Commander USARCS.
(c) USARCS responsibility. USARCS
exercises technical supervision over all
claims offices, providing guidance on
specific cases throughout the claims
process, including the method of
investigation. Where indicated,
USARCS may investigate a claims
incident that normally falls within a
command claims service’s, an ACO’s, or
a CPO’s jurisdiction. USARCS typically
acts through an area action officer
(AAO) who is assigned as the primary
point of contact with command claims
services, ACOs or CPOs within a given
geographic area. In areas outside the
United States and its commonwealths,
territories and possessions, where there
is no command claims service or ACO,
USARCS is responsible for investigation
and for appointment of FCCs.
Note to § 536.24: See the parallel
discussion at DA Pam 27–162, paragraph 2–
3.
§ 536.25
Procedures for accepting claims.
All ACOs and CPOs will institute
procedures to ensure that potential
claimants or attorneys speak to a CJA,
claims attorney, investigator, or
examiner. On initial contact, claims
personnel will render assistance,
discuss all aspects of the potential
claim, and determine what statutes or
procedures apply. Assistance will be
furnished to the extent set forth in DA
Pam 27–162, paragraph 2–4. To advise
claimants on the correct remedy, claims
personnel will familiarize themselves
with the remedies listed in DA Pam 27–
162, paragraphs 2–15 and 2–17.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
§ 536.26
Identification of a proper claim.
(a) A claim is a writing that contains
a sum certain for each claimant and that
is signed by each claimant, or by an
authorized representative, who must
furnish written authority to sign on a
claimant’s behalf. The writing must
contain enough information to permit
investigation. The writing must be
received not later than two years from
the date the claim accrues. A claim
under the Foreign Claims Act (FCA)
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:42 Aug 10, 2006
Jkt 208250
may be presented orally to either the
United States or the government of the
foreign country in which the incident
occurred, within two years, provided
that it is reduced to writing not later
than three years from the date of
accrual. A claim may be transmitted by
facsimile or telegram. However, a copy
of an original claim must be submitted
as soon as possible.
(b) Where a claim is only for property
damage and it is filed under
circumstances where there might be
injuries, the CJA should inquire if the
claimant desires to split the claim as
discussed in § 536.60.
(c) Normally, a claim will be
presented on a Standard Form (SF) 95
(Claim for Damage, Injury, or Death).
When the claim is not presented on an
SF 95, the claimant will be requested to
complete an SF 95 to ease investigation
and processing.
(d) If a claim names two claimants
and states only one sum certain, the
claimants will be requested to furnish a
sum certain for each. A separate sum
certain must be obtained prior to
payment under the Federal Tort Claims
Act (FTCA), Military Claims Act (MCA),
National Guard Claims Act (NGCA) or
the FCA. The Financial Management
Service will only pay an amount above
the threshold amount of $2,500 for the
FTCA, or $100,000 for the other statutes.
(e) A properly filed claim meeting the
definition of ‘‘claim’’ in paragraph (a) of
this section tolls the two-year statute of
limitations (SOL) even though the
documents required to substantiate the
claim are not present, such as those
listed on the back of an SF 95 or in the
Attorney General’s regulations
implementing the FTCA, 28 CFR 14.1–
14.11. However, refusal to provide such
documents may lead to dismissal of a
subsequent suit under the FTCA or
denial of a claim under other subparts
of this part.
(f) Receipt of a claim by another
federal agency does not toll the SOL.
Receipt of a U.S. Army claim by DOD,
Navy, or Air Force does toll the SOL.
(g) The guidelines set forth in federal
FTCA case law will apply to other
subparts of this part in determining
whether a proper claim was filed.
Note to § 536.26: See the parallel
discussion at DA Pam 27–162, paragraph
2–5.
§ 536.27 Identification of a proper
claimant.
The following are proper claimants:
(a) Claims for property loss or
damage. A claim may be presented by
the owner of the property or by a duly
authorized agent or legal representative
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
46271
in the owner’s name. As used in this
part, the term ‘‘owner’’ includes the
following:
(1) For real property. The mortgagor,
mortgagee, executor, administrator, or
personal representative, if he or she may
maintain a cause of action in the local
courts involving a tort to the specific
property, is a proper claimant. When
notice of divided interests in real
property is received, the claim should if
feasible be treated as a single claim and
a release from all interests must be
obtained. This includes both the owner
and tenant where both claim.
(2) For personal property. A claim
may be presented by a bailee, lessee,
mortgagee, conditional vendor, or others
holding title for purposes of security
only, unless specifically prohibited by
the applicable subpart. When notice of
divided interests in personal property is
received, the claim should if feasible be
treated as a single claim; a release from
all interests must be obtained. Property
loss is defined as loss of actual tangible
property, not consequential damage
resulting from such loss.
(b) Claims for personal injury or
wrongful death. (1) For personal injury.
A claim may be presented by the injured
person or by a duly authorized agent or
legal representative or, where the
claimant is a minor, by a parent or a
person in loco parentis. However,
determine whether the claimant is a
proper claimant under applicable state
law or, if considered under the MCA,
under § 536.77. If not, the claimant
should be so informed in the
acknowledgment letter and requested to
withdraw the claim. If not withdrawn,
deny the claim without delay. An
example is a claim filed on behalf of a
minor for loss of consortium for injury
to a parent where not permitted by state
law. Personal injury claims deriving
from the principal injury may be
presented by other parties. A claim may
not be presented by a ‘‘volunteer,’’
meaning one who has no legal or
contractual obligation, yet voluntarily
pays damages on behalf of an injured
party and then seeks reimbursement for
their economic damages by filing a
claim. See paragraph (f)(3) of this
section.
(2) For wrongful death. A claim may
be presented by the executor or
administrator of the deceased’s estate, or
by any person determined to be legally
or beneficially entitled under applicable
local law. The amount allowed will be
apportioned, to the extent practicable,
among the beneficiaries in accordance
with the law applicable to the incident.
Under the MCA (subpart C of this part),
only one wrongful death claim is
authorized (see § 536.77(c)(1)(i)). Under
E:\FR\FM\11AUP2.SGM
11AUP2
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
46272
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 155 / Friday, August 11, 2006 / Proposed Rules
subparts D and H of this part, a claim
by the insured for property damage may
be considered as a claim by the insurer
as the real party in interest provided the
insured has been reimbursed by the
insurer and the insurance information is
listed on the SF 95. The insurer should
be required to file a separate SF 95 for
payment purposes even though the SOL
has expired. Where the insurance
information is not listed on the SF 95
and the insured is paid by the United
States, the payment of the insurer is the
responsibility of the insured even
though the insurer subsequently files a
timely claim. To avoid this situation,
always inquire as to the status of any
insurance prior to payment of a property
damage claim.
(c) By an agent or legal representative.
A claimant’s agent or legal
representative who presents a claim will
do so in the claimant’s name and sign
the form in such a way that indicates
the agent’s or legal representative’s title
or capacity. When a claim is presented
by an agent or legal representative:
(1) It must contain written evidence of
the agent’s or legal representative’s
authority to sign, such as a power of
attorney, or
(2) It must refer to or cite the statute
granting authority.
(d) Subrogation. A claim may be
presented by the subrogee in his or her
own name if authorized by the law of
the place where the incident giving rise
to the claim occurred, under subpart D
or H of this part only. A lienholder is
not a proper claimant and should be
distinguished from a subrogee to avoid
violation of the Antiassignment Act. See
paragraph (f) of this section. However,
liens arising under Medicare will be
processed directly with the Center for
Medicare and Medicaid Systems. See
DA Pam 27–162, paragraphs 2–57g and
h and 2–58.
(e) Contribution or indemnity. A claim
may be filed for contribution or
indemnification by the party who was
held liable as a joint tortfeasor where
authorized by state law. Such a claim is
not perfected until payment has been
made by the claimant/joint tortfeasor. A
claim filed for contribution prior to
payment being made should be
considered as an opportunity to share a
settlement where the United States is
liable.
(f) Transfer or assignment. (1) Under
the Antiassignment Act (31 U.S.C. 3727)
and Defense Finance and Accounting
Service—Indianapolis (DFAS–IN)
regulation 37–1, a transfer or assignment
is null and void except where it occurs
by operation of law or after a voucher
for the payment has been issued. The
following are null and void:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:42 Aug 10, 2006
Jkt 208250
(i) Every purported transfer or
assignment of a claim against the United
States, or any interest, in whole or in
part, on a claim, whether absolute or
conditional; and
(ii) Every power of attorney or other
purported authority to receive payment
for all or part of any such claim.
(2) The Antiassignment Act was
enacted to eliminate multiple payment
of claims, to cause the United States to
deal only with original parties and to
prevent persons of influence from
purchasing claims against the United
States.
(3) In general, this statute prohibits
voluntary assignments of claims, with
the exception of transfers or
assignments made by operation of law.
The operation of law exception has been
held to apply to claims passing to
assignees because of bankruptcy
proceedings, assignments for the benefit
of creditors, corporate liquidations,
consolidations, or reorganizations, and
where title passes by operation of law to
heirs or legatees. Subrogated claims that
arise under a statute are not barred by
the Antiassignment Act. For example,
subrogated workers’ compensation
claims are cognizable when presented
by the insurer under subpart D or H of
this part, but not other subparts.
(4) Subrogated claims that arise
pursuant to contractual provisions may
be paid to the subrogee, if the legal basis
for the subrogated claim is recognized
by state statute or case law, only under
subpart D or H of this part. For example,
an insurer that issues an insurance
policy becomes subrogated to the rights
of a claimant who receives payment of
a property damage claim. Generally,
such subrogated claims are authorized
by state law and are therefore not barred
by the Antiassignment Act.
(5) Before claims are paid, it is
necessary to determine whether there
may be a valid subrogated claim under
a federal or state statute or a subrogation
contract held valid by state law.
(g) Interdepartmental waiver rule.
Neither the U.S. government nor any of
its instrumentalities are proper
claimants due to the interdepartmental
waiver rule. This rule bars claims by
any organization or activity of the Army,
whether or not the organization or
activity is funded with appropriated or
nonappropriated funds. Certain federal
agencies are authorized by statute to file
claims, for example, Medicare and the
Railroad Retirement Commission. See
DA Pam 27–162, paragraph 2–17f.
(h) States are excluded. If a state, U.S.
commonwealth, territory, or the District
of Columbia maintains a unit to which
ARNG personnel causing the injury or
damage are assigned, such governmental
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
entity is not a proper claimant for loss
or damage to its property. A unit of local
government other than a state,
commonwealth, or territory is a proper
claimant.
Note to § 536.27: See the parallel
discussion at DA Pam 27–162, paragraph 2–
6.
§ 536.28
Claims acknowledgment.
Claims personnel will acknowledge
all claims immediately upon receipt, in
writing, by telephone, or in person. A
defective claim will be acknowledged in
writing, pointing out its defects. Where
the defects render the submission
jurisdictionally deficient based on the
requirements discussed in DA Pam 27–
162, paragraphs 2–5 and 2–6, the
claimant or attorney will be informed in
writing of the need to present a proper
claim no later than two years from the
date of accrual. Suit must be filed in
maritime claims not later than two years
from the date of accrual. See § 536.122.
In any claim for personal injury or
wrongful death, an authorization signed
by the patient, natural or legal guardian
or estate representative will be obtained
authorizing the use of medical
information, including medical records,
in order to use sources other than claims
personnel to evaluate the claim as
required by the Health Care Portability
and Accountability Act (HIPAA), 42
U.S.C. 1320d–1320d–8. See the parallel
discussion at DA Pam 27–162,
paragraph 2–7.
§ 536.29
Revision of filed claims.
(a) General. A revision or change of a
previously filed claim may constitute an
amendment or a new claim. Upon
receipt, the CJA must determine
whether a new claim has been filed. If
so, the claim must be logged with a new
number and acknowledged in
accordance with § 536.27.
(b) New claim. A new claim is filed
whenever the writing alleges a new
theory of liability, a new tortfeasor, a
new party claimant, a different date or
location for the claims incident, or other
basic element that constitutes an
allegation of a different tort not
originally alleged. If the allegation is
made verbally or by e-mail, the claimant
will be informed in writing that a new
SF 95 must be filed. A new claim must
be filed not later than two years from
the accrual date under the FTCA. Filing
a new claim creates an additional six
month period during which suit may
not be filed.
(c) Amendment. An increase or
decrease in the amount claimed
constitutes an amendment, not a new
claim. Similarly, the addition of
E:\FR\FM\11AUP2.SGM
11AUP2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 155 / Friday, August 11, 2006 / Proposed Rules
required information not on the original
claim constitutes an amendment.
Examples are date of birth, marital
status, military status, names of
witnesses, claimant’s address,
description, or location of property or
insurance information. An amendment
may be filed before or after the two year
SOL has run unless final action has
been taken. A new number will not be
assigned to an amended claim; however,
a change in the amount will be
annotated in the database.
Note to § 536.29: See the parallel
discussion at DA Pam 27–162, paragraph 2–
8.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
§ 536.30
Action upon receipt of claim.
(a) A properly filed claim stops the
running of the SOL when it is received
by any organization or activity of the
DOD or the U.S. Armed Services.
Placing a claim in the mail does not
constitute filing. The first Army claims
office that receives the claim will date,
time stamp, and initial the claim as of
the date the claim was initially received
‘‘on post,’’ not by the claims office. If
initially received close to the SOL’s
expiration date by an organization or
activity that does not have a claims
office, claims personnel will discover
and record in the file the date of original
receipt.
(b) The ACO or CPO that first receives
the claim will enter the claim into the
Tort and Special Claims Application
(TSCA) database and let the system
assign a number to the claim. The claim,
whether on an SF 95 or in any other
format, shall be scanned into a
computer and uploaded onto the TSCA
database so that it will become a
permanent part of the electronic record.
A joint claim will be given a number for
each claimant, for example, husband
and wife, injured parent and children. If
only one sum is filed for all claimants,
the same sum will be assigned for each
claimant. However, request the claimant
to name a sum for each claimant. The
claim will bear this number throughout
the claims process. Upon transfer, a new
number will not be assigned by the
receiving office. If a claim does not meet
the definition of a proper claim under
§§ 536.26 and 536.27, it will be date
stamped and logged as a Potentially
Compensable Event (PCE).
(c) The claim will be transferred if the
claim incident arose in another ACO’s
geographic area; the receiving ACO will
use the claims number originally
assigned.
(d) Non-Appropriated Fund
Instrumentality (NAFI) claims that
relate to claims determined cognizable
under subpart K of this part will be
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:42 Aug 10, 2006
Jkt 208250
marked with the symbol ‘‘NAFI’’
immediately following the claimant’s
name, to preclude erroneous payment
from appropriated funds (APF). This
symbol will also be included in the
subject line of all correspondence.
(e) Upon receipt, copies of the claims
will be furnished as follows (when a
current e-mail address is available and
it is agreeable with the receiving party,
providing copies by e-mail is
acceptable):
(1) To USARCS, if the amount
claimed exceeds $25,000, or $50,000 per
incident. However, if the claim arises
under the FTCA or AMCSA, only
furnish copies if the amount claimed
exceeds $50,000, or $100,000 per
incident.
(2) For medical malpractice claims, to
the appropriate MTF Commander/s
through MEDCOM Headquarters, and to
the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology
at the addresses listed below.
MEDCOM, ATTN: MCHO–CL–Q, 2050
Worth Road, Suite 26, Fort Sam Houston,
Texas 78234–5026.
Department of Legal Medicine, Armed
Forces Institute of Pathology, 1335 E. West
Highway, #6–100, Silver Spring, MD 20910–
6254, Commercial: 301–295–8115, E-Mail:
casha@afip.osd.mil.
(3) If the claim is against AAFES
forward a copy to: HQ Army and Air
Force Exchange Service (AAFES),
ATTN: Office of the General Counsel
(GC–Z), P.O. Box 650062, Dallas, TX
75265–0062, E-Mail:
blanchp@aafes.com.
(4) If the claim involves a NAFI,
including a recreational user or family
child care provider forward a copy to:
Army Central Insurance Fund, ATTN:
CFSC–FM–I, 4700 King Street,
Alexandria, VA 22302–4406, E-Mail:
riskmanagement@cfsc.army.mil.
(f) ACOs or CPOs will furnish a copy
of any medical or dental malpractice
claim to the MTF or dental treatment
facility commander and advise the
commander of all subsequent actions.
The commander will be assisted in his
or her responsibility to complete DD
Form 2526 (Case Abstract for
Malpractice Claims).
Note to § 536.30: See the parallel
discussion at DA Pam 27–162, paragraph 2–
9.
§ 536.31
Opening claim files.
A claim file will be opened when:
(a) Information that requires
investigation under § 536.23 is received.
(b) Records or other documents are
requested by a potential claimant or
legal representative.
(c) A claim is filed.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
46273
Note to § 536.31: See the parallel
discussion at DA Pam 27–162, paragraph 2–
10.
§ 536.32 Transfer of claims among armed
services branches.
(a) Claims filed with the wrong
federal agency, or claims that should be
adjudicated by receiving State offices
under NATO or other SOFA, will be
immediately transferred to the proper
agency together with notice of same to
the claimant or legal representative.
Where multiple federal agencies are
involved, other agencies will be
contacted and a lead agency established
to take all actions on the claim. Where
the DA is the lead agency, any final
action will include other agencies.
Similarly, where another agency is the
lead agency, that agency will be
requested to include DA in any final
action. Such inclusion will prevent
multiple dates for filing suit or appeal.
(b) If another agency has taken denial
action on a claim that involves the DA,
without informing the DA, and in which
the DA desires to make a payment, the
denial action may be reconsidered by
the DA not later than six months from
the date of mailing and payment made
thereafter.
Note to § 536.32: See also §§ 536.17 and
536.18; AR 27–20, paragraph 13–2; and the
parallel and related discussion of this topic
at DA Pam 27–162, paragraphs 1–19, 1–20,
2–13 and 13–2.
§ 536.33
Use of small claims procedures.
Small claims procedures are
authorized for use whenever a claim
may be settled for $5,000 or less. These
procedures are designed to save
processing time and eliminate the need
for most of the documentation otherwise
required. These procedures are
described in DA Pam 27–162,
paragraphs 2–14 and 2–26.
§ 536.34
Determination of correct statute.
(a) Consideration under more than
one statute. When Congress enacted the
various claims statutes, it intended to
allow federal agencies to settle
meritorious claims. A claim must be
considered under other statutes in this
part unless one particular statute
precludes the use of other statutes,
whether the claim is filed on DD Form
1842 (Claim for Loss of or Damage to
Personal Property Incident to Service) or
SF 95. Prior to denial of an AR 27–20,
chapter 11 claim, consider whether it
may fall within the scope of subparts C,
D, or F of this part, and where indicated,
question the claimant to determine
whether the claim sounds in tort.
(b) Exclusiveness of certain remedies.
Certain remedies exclude all others. For
E:\FR\FM\11AUP2.SGM
11AUP2
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
46274
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 155 / Friday, August 11, 2006 / Proposed Rules
example, the Court of Federal Claims
has exclusive jurisdiction over U.S.
Constitution Fifth Amendment takings,
express or implied-in-fact, as well as
governmental contract losses, or
intangible property losses. Claims of
this nature for $10,000 or less may be
filed in a U.S. District Court. There is no
administrative remedy. While the FTCA
is the preemptive tort remedy in the
United States, its commonwealths,
territories and possessions,
nevertheless, other remedies must be
exhausted prior to favorable
consideration under the FTCA. The
FTCA does not preclude use of the MCA
or the NGCA for claims arising out of
noncombat activities or brought by
soldiers for incident-to-service property
losses sustained within the United
States. See DA Pam 27–162, paragraphs
2–15a and b for a more detailed
discussion of determining the correct
statute for property claims versus
personal injury and death claims. In
addition, it is important to consider the
nature of the claim, e.g., whether the
claim may be medical malpractice in
nature, related to postal matter, or an
automobile accident. Discussions of
these and many other different types of
claims are also provided herein as well
as in the corresponding paragraph 2–15
of DA Pam 27–162. It is also very
important to consider when a claim may
fall outside the jurisdiction of the Army
claims system. Some of these instances
are alluded to immediately above, but
for a detailed discussion of related
remedies see § 536.36 of this part and
paragraph 2–17 of DA Pam 27–162.
(c) Status of Forces Agreement
Claims. (1) Claims arising out of the
performance of official duties in a
foreign country where the United States
is the sending State must be filed and
processed under a SOFA, provided that
the claimant is a proper party claimant
under the SOFA. DA Pam 27–162,
paragraph 2–15c sets forth the rules
applicable in particular countries. A
SOFA provides an exclusive remedy
subject to waiver as set forth in
§ 536.76(h) of this part.
(2) Single-service jurisdiction is
established for all foreign countries in
which a SOFA is in effect and for
certain other countries. A list of these
countries is posted on the USARCS Web
site; for the address see § 536.2(a).
Claims will be processed by the service
exercising single-service responsibility.
In the United States, USARCS is the
receiving State office and all SOFA
claims should be forwarded
immediately to USARCS for action.
Appropriate investigation under subpart
B of this part procedures is required of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:42 Aug 10, 2006
Jkt 208250
an ACO or a CPO under USARCS’
direction.
(d) Foreign Claims Act claims. (1)
Claims by foreign inhabitants, arising in
a foreign country, which are not
cognizable under a SOFA, fall
exclusively under the FCA. The
determination as to whether a claimant
is a foreign inhabitant is governed by
the rules set out in subpart C and
subpart J of this part. In case of doubt,
this determination must be based on
information obtained from the claimant
and others, particularly where the
claimant is a former U.S. service
member or a U.S. citizen residing in a
foreign country.
(2) Tort claims will be processed by
the armed service that exercises singleservice responsibility. When requested,
the Commander USARCS may furnish a
Judge Advocate or civilian attorney to
serve as a Foreign Claims Commission
(FCC) for another service. With the
concurrence of the Commander
USARCS, Army JAs may be appointed
as members of another department’s
foreign claims commissions. See
Subpart J of this part. The FCA permits
compensation for damages caused by
‘‘out-of-scope’’ tortious conduct of
Soldier and civilian employees. Many of
these claims are also compensable
under Article 139, Uniform Code of
Military Justice. See DA Pam 27–162,
chap. 9. To avoid the double payment
of claims, ACOs and CPOs must
promptly notify the Command Claims
Service of each approved Article 139
claim involving a claimant who could
also file under an applicable SOFA.
(e) National Guard Claims Act claims.
(1) Claims attributed to the acts or
omissions of ARNG personnel in the
course of employment fall into the
categories set forth in subpart F of this
part.
(2) An ACO will establish with a state
claims office routine procedures for the
disposition of claims, designed to
ensure that the United States and state
authorities do not issue conflicting
instructions for processing claims. The
procedures will require personnel to
advise the claimant of any remedy
against the state or its insurer.
(i) Where the claim arises out of the
act or omission of a member of the
ARNG or a person employed under 32
U.S.C. 709, it must be determined
whether the employee is acting on
behalf of the state or the United States.
For example, an ARNG pilot employed
under section 709 may be flying on a
state mission, federal mission, or both,
on the same trip. This determination
will control the disposition of the claim.
If agreement with the concerned state
cannot be reached and the claim is
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
otherwise payable, efforts may be made
to enter into a sharing agreement with
the state concerned. The following
procedures are required in the event
there is a remedy against the state and
the state refuses to pay or the state
maintains insurance coverage and the
claimant has filed an administrative
claim against the United States. First,
forward the file and the tort claim
memorandum, including information on
the status of any judicial or
administrative action the claimant has
taken against the state or its insurer to
the Commander USARCS. Upon receipt,
the Commander USARCS will
determine whether to require the
claimant to exhaust his or her remedy
against the state or its insurer or
whether the claim against the United
States can be settled without requiring
such exhaustion. If the Commander
USARCS decides to follow the latter
course of action, he or she will also
determine whether to obtain an
assignment of the claim against the state
or its insurer and whether to initiate
recovery action to obtain contribution or
indemnification. The state or its insurer
will be given appropriate notification in
accordance with state law.
(ii) If an administrative claim remedy
exists under state law or the state
maintains liability insurance, the
Commander USARCS or an ACO acting
upon the Commander USARCS’
approval may enter into a sharing
agreement covering payment of future
claims. The purpose of such an
agreement is to determine in advance
whether the state or the DA is
responsible for processing a claim (did
the claim arise from a federal or state
mission?), to expedite payment in
meritorious claims, and to preclude
double recovery by a claimant.
(f) Third-party claims involving an
independent contractor.
(1) Generally. (i) Upon receipt, all
claims will be examined to determine
whether a contractor of the United
States is the tortfeasor. If so, the
claimant or legal representative will be
notified of the name and address of the
contractor and further advised that the
United States is not responsible for the
acts or omissions of an independent
contractor. This will be done prior to
any determination as to the contractor’s
degree of culpability as compared to
that of the United States.
(ii) If, upon investigation, the damage
is considered to be primarily due to the
contractor’s fault or negligence, the
claim will be referred to the contractor
or the contractor’s insurance carrier for
settlement and the claimant will be so
advised.
E:\FR\FM\11AUP2.SGM
11AUP2
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 155 / Friday, August 11, 2006 / Proposed Rules
(iii) Health care providers hired under
personal services contracts under the
provisions of 10 U.S.C. 1089 are not
considered to be independent
contractors but employees of the United
States for tort claims purposes.
(2) Claims for injury or death of
contractor employees. Upon receipt of a
claim for injury or death of a contractor
employee, a copy of the portions of the
contract applicable to claims and
workers’ compensation will be obtained,
either through the contracting office or
from the contractor. Claims personnel
must find out the status of any claim for
workers’ compensation benefits as well
as whether the United States paid the
premiums. The goal is to involve the
contractor in any settlement, where
indicated, in the manner set forth in DA
Pam 27–162, paragraphs 2–15f and 2–
61. In claims arising in foreign countries
consider whether the claim is covered
by the Defense Bases Act, 42 U.S.C.
1651–1654.
(g) Claims by contractors for damage
to or loss of their property during the
performance of their contracts. Claims
by contractors for property damage or
loss should be referred to the
contracting officer for determination as
to whether the claim is payable under
the contract. Such a claim is not payable
under the FTCA where the damage
results from an in-scope act or omission.
Contract appeal procedures must be
exhausted prior to consideration as a
bailment under the MCA or FCA.
(h) Maritime claims. Maritime torts
are excluded from consideration under
the FTCA. The various maritime statutes
are exclusive remedies within the
United States and its territorial waters.
Maritime statutes include the Army
Maritime Claims Settlement Act
(AMCSA), 10 U.S.C. 4801, 4802 and
4806, the Suits in Admiralty Act (SIAA),
46 U.S.C. app. 781–790, the Public
Vessels Act (PVA), 46 U.S.C. app. 781–
790, and the Admiralty Extension Act
(AEA), 46 U.S.C. app. 740. Within the
U.S. and its territorial waters, maritime
suits may be filed under the SIAA or the
PVA without first filing an
administrative claim, except where
administrative filing is required by the
AEA. Administrative claims may also be
filed under the AMSCA. In any
administrative claim brought under the
AMCSA, all action must be completed
not later than two years from its accrual
date or the SOL will expire. Outside the
United States, a maritime tort may be
brought under the MCA or FCA as well
as the AMCSA. The body of water on
which it occurs must be navigable and
a maritime nexus must exist. Once a
maritime claim is identified, give the
claimant written notice of the two-year
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:42 Aug 10, 2006
Jkt 208250
filing requirement. In case of doubt, the
ACO or CPO should discuss the matter
with the appropriate AAO. Even when
the claimant does not believe that a
maritime claim is involved, provide the
claimant with precautionary notice. See
DA Pam 27–162, paragraphs 2–7e and
8–6.
(i) Postal claims. See also DA Pam 27–
162, paragraphs 2–15i, 2–30 and 2–56g
discussing postal claims.
(1) Claims by the U.S. Postal Service
for funds and stock are adjudicated by
USARCS with assistance from the
Military Postal Service Agency and the
ACO or CPO having jurisdiction over
the particular Army post office, when
directed by USARCS to assist in the
investigation of the claim.
(2) Claims for loss of registered and
insured mail are processed under
subpart C of this part by the ACO or
CPO having jurisdiction over the
particular Army post office.
(3) Claims for loss of, or damage to,
parcels delivered by United Parcel
Service (UPS) are the responsibility of
UPS.
(j) Blast damage claims. After
completing an investigation and prior to
final action, all blast damage claims
resulting from Army firing and
demolition activities must be forwarded
to the Commander USARCS for
technical review. The sole exception to
this rule is when a similar claim is filed
citing the same time, place and type of
damage as one which has already
received technical review. See also DA
Pam 27–162, paragraph 2–28.
(k) Motor vehicle damage claims
arising from the use of nongovernmental vehicles. See also § 536.60
(splitting property damage and personal
injury claims) and DA Pam 27–162,
paragraphs 2–15k (determining the
correct statute), 2–61 (joint tortfeasors),
and 2–62e (indemnity or contribution).
(1) Government tortfeasors. A Soldier
or U.S. government civilian employee
who negligently damages his or her
personal property while acting within
the scope of employment is not a proper
claimant for damage to that property.
(2) Claims by lessors for damage to
rental vehicles. Third-party claims
arising from the use of rental vehicles
will be processed in the same manner as
NAFI commercially insured activities
after exhaustion of any other remedy
under the Government Travel Card
Program or the Surface Deployment and
Distribution Command Car Rental
Agreement.
(3) Third-party damages arising from
the use of privately owned vehicles.
Third-party tort claims arising within
the United States from a Soldier’s use of
a privately owned vehicle (POV) while
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
46275
allegedly within the scope of
employment must be forwarded to the
Commander USARCS for review and
consultation before final action. The
claim will be investigated and any
authorization for use ascertained
including payment for mileage. A copy
of the Soldier’s POV insurance policy
will be obtained prior to forwarding. If
the DA is an additional insurer under
applicable state law, the claim will be
forwarded to the Soldier’s liability
carrier for payment. When the tort claim
arises in a foreign country, follow the
provisions of Subpart J of this part.
(l) Claims arising from gratuitous use
of DOD or Army vehicles, equipment or
facilities. (1) Before the commencement
of any event that involves the use of
DOD or Army land, vehicles, equipment
or Army personnel for community
activities, the Command involved
should be advised to first determine and
weigh the risk to potential third-party
claimants against the benefits to the
DOD or the Army. Where such risk is
excessive, try to obtain an agreement
from the sponsoring civilian
organization holding the Army
harmless. When feasible, third-party
liability insurance may be required from
the sponsor and the United States added
to the policy as a third-party insured.
(2) When Army equipment and
personnel are used for debris removal
relief pursuant to the Federal Disaster
Relief Act, 42 U.S.C. 5173, the state is
required to assume responsibility for
third-party claims. The senior judge
advocate for a task force engaged in
such relief should obtain an agreement
requiring the state to hold the Army
harmless and establish a procedure for
payment by the state. Claims will be
received, entered into the TSCA
database, investigated and forwarded to
state authorities for action.
(m) Real estate claims. Claims for
rent, damage, or other payments
involving the acquisition, use,
possession or disposition of real
property or interests therein, are
generally payable under AR 405–15.
These claims are handled by the Real
Estate Claims Office in the appropriate
COE District or a special office created
for a deployment. Directorate of Real
Estate, Office of the Chief of Engineers,
has supervisory authority. Claims for
damage to real property and incidental
personal property, but not for rent (for
example, claims arising during a
maneuver or deployment) may be
payable under subparts C or J of this
part. However, priority should be given
to the use of AR 405–15 as it is more
flexible and expeditious. In contingency
operations and deployments, there is a
large potential for overlap between
E:\FR\FM\11AUP2.SGM
11AUP2
46276
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 155 / Friday, August 11, 2006 / Proposed Rules
contractual property damage claims and
noncombat activity/maneuver claims.
Investigate carefully to ensure the claim
is in the proper channel (claims or real
estate), that it is fairly settled, and that
the claimant does not receive a double
payment. For additional guidance, see
subpart J of this part and United States
Army Claims Service Europe
(USACSEUR) Real Estate/Office of the
Judge Advocate Standard Operating
Procedures for Processing Claims
Involving Real Estate During
Contingency Operations (August 20,
2002).
(n) Claims generated by civil works
projects. Civil works projects claims
arising from tortious activities are
defined by whether the negligent or
wrongful act or omission arising from a
project or activity is funded by a civil
works appropriation. Civil works claims
are those noncontractual claims which
arise from a negligent or wrongful act or
omission during the performance of a
project or activity funded by civil works
appropriations as distinguished from a
project or activity funded by Army
operation and maintenance funds. Civil
works claims are paid out of civil works
appropriations to the extent set forth in
§ 536.71(f). A civil works claim can also
arise out of a noncombat activity, for
example, an inverse condemnation
claim in which flooding exceeds the
high water mark. Maritime claims under
subpart H of this part are civil works
claims when they arise out of the
operation of a dam, locks or
navigational aid.
Note to § 536.34: See parallel discussion at
DA Pam 27–162, paragraph 2–1.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
§ 536.35 Unique issues related to
environmental claims.
Claims for property damage, personal
injury, or death arising in the United
States based on contamination by toxic
substances found in the air or the
ground must be reported by USARCS to
the Environmental Law Division of the
Army Litigation Center and the
Environmental Torts Branch of DOJ.
Such claims arising overseas must be
reported to the Command Claims
Service with geographical jurisdiction
over the claim and USARCS. Claims for
personal injury from contamination
frequently arise at an area that is the
subject of claims for cleanup of the
contamination site. The cleanup claims
involve other Army agencies, use of
separate funds, and prolonged
investigation. Administrative settlement
is not usually feasible because
settlement of property damage claims
must cover all damages, including
personal injury. Payment by Defense
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:42 Aug 10, 2006
Jkt 208250
Environmental Rehabilitation Funds
should be considered initially and any
such payment should be deducted from
any settlement under AR 27–20.
§ 536.36
Related remedies.
An ACO or a CPO routinely receives
claims or inquiries about claims that
clearly are not cognizable under this
part. It is the DA’s policy that every
effort be made to discover another
remedy and inform the inquirer as to its
nature. Claims personnel will
familiarize themselves with the
remedies set forth in DA Pam 27–162,
paragraph 2–17, to carry out this policy.
If no appropriate remedy can be
discovered, forward the file to the
Commander USARCS, with
recommendations.
§ 536.37 Importance of the claims
investigation.
Prompt and thorough investigation
will be conducted on all potential and
actual claims for and against the
government. Evidence developed during
an investigation provides the basis for
every subsequent step in the
administrative settlement of a claim or
in the pursuit of a lawsuit. Claims
personnel must gather and record
adverse as well as favorable
information. The CJA, claims attorney or
unit claims officer must preserve their
legal and factual findings.
§ 536.38
Elements of the investigation.
(a) The investigation is conducted to
ascertain the facts of an incident. Which
facts are relevant often depends on the
law and regulations applicable to the
conduct of the parties involved but
generally the investigation should
develop definitive answers to such
questions as ‘‘When?’’ ‘‘Where?’’
‘‘Who?’’ ‘‘What?’’ and ‘‘How?’’.
Typically, the time, place, persons, and
circumstances involved in an incident
may be established by a simple report,
but its cause and the resulting damage
may require extensive effort to obtain all
the pertinent facts.
(b) The object of the investigation is
to gather, with the least possible delay,
the best available evidence without
accumulating excessive evidence
concerning any particular fact. The
claimant is often an excellent source of
such information and should be
contacted early in the investigation,
particularly when there is a question as
to whether the claim was timely filed.
§ 536.39 Use of experts, consultants and
appraisers.
(a) ACOs or CPOs will budget
operation and maintenance (O&M)
funds for the costs of hiring property
appraisers, accident reconstructionists,
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
expert consultants to furnish opinions,
and medical specialists to conduct
independent medical examinations
(IMEs). Other expenses to be provided
for from O&M funds include the
purchase of documents, such as medical
records, and the hiring of mediators. See
§ 536.53(b). Where the cost exceeds
$750 or local funds are exhausted, a
request for funding should be directed
to the Commander USARCS, with
appropriate justification. The USARCS
AAO must be notified as soon as
possible when an accident
reconstruction is indicated.
(b) Where the claim arises from
treatment at an Army MTF, the
MEDDAC commander should be
requested to fund the cost of an
independent consultant’s opinion or an
IME.
(c) The use of outside consultants and
appraisers should be limited to claims
in which liability or damages cannot be
determined otherwise and in which the
use of such sources is economically
feasible, for instance, where property
damage is high in amount and not
determinable by a government appraiser
or where the extent of personal injury is
serious and a government IME is neither
available nor acceptable to a claimant.
Prior to such an examination at an MTF,
ensure that the necessary specialists are
available and a prompt written report
may be obtained.
(d) Either an IME or an expert opinion
is procured by means of a personal
services contract under the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR), part 37,
48 CFR 37.000 through 37.604, through
the local contracting office. The contract
must be in effect prior to
commencement of the records review.
Payment is authorized only upon
receipt of a written report responsive to
the questions asked by the CJA or claims
attorney.
(e) Whenever a source other than
claims personnel is used to assist in the
evaluation of a claim in which medical
information protected by HIPAA is
involved, the source must sign an
agreement designed to protect the
patient’s privacy rights.
§ 536.40
Conducting the investigation.
(a) The methods and techniques for
investigating specific categories of
claims are set forth in DA Pam 27–162,
paragraphs 2–25 through 2–34. The
investigation of medical malpractice
claims should be conducted by a CJA or
claims attorney, using a medical claims
investigator.
(b) A properly filed claim must
contain enough information to permit
investigation. For example, if the claim
does not specify the date, location or
E:\FR\FM\11AUP2.SGM
11AUP2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 155 / Friday, August 11, 2006 / Proposed Rules
details of every incident complained of,
the claimant or legal representative
should be required to furnish the
information.
(c) Request the claimant or legal
representative to specify a theory of
liability. However, the investigation
should not be limited to the theories
specified, particularly where the
claimant is unrepresented. All logical
theories should be investigated.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
§ 536.41 Determination of liability—
generally.
16:42 Aug 10, 2006
Jkt 208250
Constitutional torts.
A claim for violation of the U.S.
Constitution does not constitute a state
tort and is not cognizable under any
subpart. A constitutional claim will be
scrutinized in order to determine
whether it is totally or partially payable
as a state tort. For example, a Fifth
Amendment taking may be payable in
an altered form as a real estate claim.
For further discussion see DA Pam 27–
162, paragraph 2–36.
§ 536.43
(a) Under the FTCA, the United States
is liable in the same manner and to the
same extent as a private individual
under like circumstances in accordance
with the law of the place where the act
or omission giving rise to the tort
occurred (28 U.S.C. 2673 and 2674).
This means that liability must rest on
the existence of a tort cognizable under
state law, hereinafter referred to as a
state tort. A finding of state tort liability
requires the litigating attorney to prove
the elements of duty, breach of duty,
causation, and damages as interpreted
by federal case law.
(b) The foregoing principles and
requirements will be followed in regard
to tort claims against the United States
under other subparts, with certain
exceptions noted within the individual
subparts or particular tort statutes.
(c) Interpretation will be made in
accordance with FTCA case law and
also maritime case law where
applicable. Additionally, a noncombat
activity can furnish the basis for a claim
under subparts C, F, and J of this part.
Noncombat activities include claims
arising out of civil works, such as
inverse condemnation.
(d) Federal, not state or local, law
applies to a determination as to who is
a federal employee or a member of the
armed forces. Under all subparts, the
designation ‘‘federal employee’’
excludes a contractor of the United
States. See 28 U.S.C. 2671. See however,
§ 536.23(b) (4)(ii) concerning personal
services contractors. For employment
identification purposes apply FTCA
case law in making a determination.
(e) Federal, not state or local, law
applies to an interpretation of the SOL
under all subparts. Minority or
incompetence does not toll the SOL.
Case law developed under the FTCA
will be used in other subparts in
interpreting SOL questions.
(f) Under the FTCA state or local law
is used to determine scope of
employment and under other subparts
for guidance.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
§ 536.42
Incident to service.
(a) A member of the armed forces’
claim for personal injury or wrongful
death arising incident to service is not
payable under any subpart except to the
extent permitted by the receiving State
under §§ 536.107 through 536.113
(Claims arising overseas); however, a
claim by a member of the United States
Armed Forces for property loss or
damage may be payable under AR 27–
20, chapter 11 or, if not, under subparts
C, E, F, or G of this part. Derivative
claims and claims for indemnity are also
excluded.
(b) Claims for personal injury or
wrongful death by members of a foreign
military force participating in a joint
military exercise or operation arising
incident to service are not payable
under any subpart. Claims for property
loss or damage, but not subrogated
claims, may be payable under subpart C
of this part. Derivative claims and
claims for indemnity or contribution are
not payable under any subpart.
Note to § 536.43: For further discussion see
DA Pam 27–162, paragraph 2–37.
§ 536.44 FECA and LSHWCA claims
exclusions.
A federal or NAFI employee’s
personal injury or wrongful death claim
payable under the Federal Employees
Compensation Act (FECA) or the
Longshore and Harbor Workers
Compensation Act (LSHWCA) is not
payable under any subpart. Derivative
claims are also excluded but a claim for
indemnity may be payable under certain
circumstances. A federal or NAFI
employee’s claim for an incident-toservice property loss or damage may be
payable under AR 27–20, chapter 11 or,
if not, under subparts C, D, F, G, H or
J of this part. For further discussion see
DA Pam 27–162, paragraph 2–38.
§ 536.45
Statutory exceptions.
This topic is more fully discussed in
DA Pam 27–162, paragraph 2–39. The
exclusions listed below are found at 28
U.S.C. 2680 and apply to subparts C, D,
F, and H and §§ 536.107 through
536.113 (Claims arising in the United
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
46277
States) of subpart G, except as noted
therein, and not to subparts E, J or
§§ 536.107–536.113 (Claims arising
overseas) of subpart G of this part. A
claim is not payable if it:
(a) Is based upon an act or omission
of an employee of the U.S. government,
exercising due care, in the execution of
a statute or regulation, whether or not
such statute or regulation is valid. This
exclusion does not apply to a
noncombat activity claim.
(b) Is based upon the exercise or
performance or the failure to exercise or
perform a discretionary function or duty
on the part of a federal agency or an
employee of the government, whether or
not the discretion is abused. This
exclusion does not apply to a
noncombat activity claim.
(c) Arises out of the loss, miscarriage,
or negligent transmission of letters or
postal matters. This exclusion is not
applicable to registered or certified mail
claims under subpart C of this part. See
§ 536.34(i).
(d) Arises in respect of the assessment
or collection of any tax or customs duty,
or the detention of any goods or
merchandise by any customs or other
law enforcement officer. See 28 U.S.C.
2680(c).
(e) Is cognizable under the SIAA (46
U.S.C. app. 741–752), the PVA (46
U.S.C. app. 781–790), or the AEA (46
U.S.C. app. 740). This exclusion does
not apply to subparts C, F, H or J of this
part.
(f) Arises out of an act or omission of
any federal employee in administering
the provisions of the Trading with the
Enemy Act, 50 U.S.C. app. 1–44.
(g) Is for damage caused by the
imposition or establishment of a
quarantine by the United States.
(h) Arises out of assault, battery, false
imprisonment, false arrest, malicious
prosecution, abuse of process, libel,
slander, misrepresentation, deceit, or
interference with contract rights, except
for acts or omissions of investigation of
law enforcement officers of the U.S.
government with regard to assault,
battery, false imprisonment, false arrest,
abuse of process or malicious
prosecution. This exclusion also does
not apply to a health care provider as
defined in 10 U.S.C. 1089 and § 536.80
of this part, under the conditions listed
therein.
(i) Arises from the fiscal operations of
the U.S. Department of the Treasury or
from the regulation of the monetary
system.
(j) Arises out of the combatant
activities of U.S. military or naval
forces, or the Coast Guard during time
of war.
E:\FR\FM\11AUP2.SGM
11AUP2
46278
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 155 / Friday, August 11, 2006 / Proposed Rules
(k) Arises in a foreign country. This
exclusion does not apply to subparts C,
E, F, H, J or §§ 536.114 through 536.116
(Claims arising overseas) of subpart G of
this part.
(l) Arises from the activities of the
Tennessee Valley Authority, 28 U.S.C.
2680(l).
(m) Arises from the activities of the
Panama Canal Commission, 28 U.S.C.
2680(m).
(n) Arises from the activities of a
federal land bank, a federal intermediate
credit bank, or a bank for cooperatives,
28 U.S.C. 2680(n).
Note to § 536.45: This topic is more fully
discussed in DA Pam 27–162, paragraph 2–
39.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
§ 536.46
Other exclusions.
(a) Statutory employer. A claim is not
payable under any subpart if it is for
personal injury or death of any contract
employee for whom benefits are
provided under any workers’
compensation law, if the provisions of
the workers’ compensation insurance
are retrospective and charge an
allowable expense to a cost-type
contract, or if precluded by state law.
See Federal Tort Claims Handbook
(FTCH), section II, D7 (posted on the
Web at https://www.jagcnet.army.mil/
laawsxxi/cds.nsf. Select the link
‘‘Claims’’ under ‘‘JAG Publications.’’)
The statutory employer exclusion also
applies to claims that may be covered by
the Defense Bases Act, 42 U.S.C. 1651–
1654.
(b) Flood exclusion. Within the
United States a claim is not payable if
it arises from damage caused by flood or
flood waters associated with the
construction or operation of a COE flood
control project, 33 U.S.C. 702(c). See DA
Pam 27–162, paragraph 2–40.
(c) ARNG property. A claim is not
payable under any subpart if it is for
damage to, or loss of, property of a state,
commonwealth, territory, or the District
of Columbia caused by ARNG
personnel, engaged in training or duty
under 32 U.S.C. 316, 502, 503, 504, or
505, who are assigned to a unit
maintained by that state,
commonwealth, territory, or the District
of Columbia. See DA Pam 27–162,
paragraph 2–41.
(d) Federal Disaster Relief Act. Within
the United States a claim is not payable
if it is for damage to, or loss of, property
or for personal injury or death arising
out of debris removal by a federal
agency or employee in carrying out the
provisions of the Federal Disaster Relief
Act, 42 U.S.C. 5173. See DA Pam 27–
162, paragraph 2–42.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:42 Aug 10, 2006
Jkt 208250
(e) Non-justiciability doctrine. A claim
is not payable under any subpart if it
arises from activities that present a nonjusticiable political question. See DA
Pam 27–162, paragraph 2–43.
(f) National Vaccine Act. (42 U.S.C.
300aa-l through 300aa-7). A claim is not
payable under any subpart if it arises
from the administration of a vaccine
unless the conditions listed in the
National Vaccine Injury Compensation
Program (42 U.S.C. 300aa-9 through
300aa-19) have been met. See DA Pam
27–162, paragraph 2–17c(6)(a).
(g) Defense Mapping Agency. A claim
is not payable under any subpart if it
arises from inaccurate charting by the
Defense Mapping Agency, 10 U.S.C.
456. See FTCH section II, B4s (Web
address at paragraph (a) of this section).
(h) Quiet Title Act. Within the U.S., a
claim is not payable if it falls under the
Quiet Title Act 28 U.S.C. 2409a.
(i) Defense Bases Act. A claim arising
outside the United States is not payable
if it is covered by the Defense Bases Act,
42 U.S.C. 1651–1654.
Note to § 536.46: See parallel discussion at
DA Pam 27–162, paragraphs 2–40 through 2–
43.
§ 536.47
Statute of limitations.
To be payable, a claim against the
United States under any subpart, except
§§ 536.114 through 536.116 (Claims
arising overseas), must be filed no later
than two years from the date of accrual
as determined by federal law. The
accrual date is the date on which the
claimant is aware of the injury and its
cause. The claimant is not required to
know of the negligent or wrongful
nature of the act or omission giving rise
to the claim. The date of filing is the
date of receipt by the appropriate
federal agency, not the date of mailing.
See also § 536.26(a) and parallel
discussion at DA Pam 27–162,
paragraph 2–44.
§ 536.48
Federal employee requirement.
To be payable, a claim under any
subpart except subpart K of this part,
§§ 536.153 through 536.157 (Claims
involving tortfeasors other than
nonappropriated fund employees), must
be based on the acts or omissions of a
member of the armed forces, a member
of a foreign military force within the
United States with which the United
States has a reciprocal claims
agreement, or a federal civilian
employee. This does not include a
contractor of the United States. Apply
federal case law for interpretation. See
parallel discussion at DA Pam 27–162,
paragraph 2–46.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
§ 536.49 Scope of employment
requirement.
To be payable, a claim must be based
on acts or omissions of a member of the
armed forces, a member of a foreign
military force within the United States
with which the United States has a
reciprocal claims agreement, or a federal
employee acting within the scope of
employment, except for subparts E, J, or
subpart K of this part, §§ 536.153
through 536.157 (Claims involving
tortfeasors other than nonappropriated
fund employees). A claim arising from
noncombat activities must be based on
the armed service’s official activities.
Excluded are claims based on vicarious
liability or the holder theory in which
the owner of the vehicle is responsible
for any injury or damage regardless of
who the operator was. See parallel
discussion at DA Pam 27–162,
paragraph 2–46.
§ 536.50 Determination of damages—
applicable law.
(a) The Federal Tort Claims Act. The
whole law of the place where the
incident giving rise to the claim
occurred, including choice of law rules,
is applicable. Therefore, the law of the
place of injury or death does not
necessarily apply. Where there is a
conflict between local law and an
express provision of the FTCA, the latter
governs.
(b) The Military Claims Act or
National Guard Claims Act. See
subparts C and F of this part. The law
set forth in § 536.80 applies only to
claims accruing on or after September 1,
1995. The law of the place of the
incident giving rise to the claim will
apply to claims arising in the United
States, its commonwealths, territories
and possessions prior to September 1,
1995. The general principles of U.S. tort
law will apply to property damage or
loss claims arising outside the United
States prior to September 1, 1995.
Established principles of general
maritime law will apply to injury or
death claims arising outside the United
States prior to September 1, 1995. See
Moragne v. States Marine Lines, Inc.,
398 U.S. 375 (1970) and federal case
law. Where general maritime law
provides no guidance, the general
principles of U.S. tort law will apply.
(c) The Foreign Claims Act. See
subpart J of this part. The law of the
place of occurrence applies to the
resolution of claims. However, the law
of damages set forth in § 536.139 will
serve as a guide.
(d) The Army Maritime Claims
Settlement Act. Maritime law applies.
(e) Damages not payable. Under all
subparts, property loss or damage refers
E:\FR\FM\11AUP2.SGM
11AUP2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 155 / Friday, August 11, 2006 / Proposed Rules
to actual tangible property. Accordingly,
consequential damages, including, but
not limited to bail, interest
(prejudgment or otherwise), or court
costs are not payable. Costs of
preparing, filing, and pursuing a claim,
including expert witness fees, are not
payable. The payment of punitive
damages, that is, damages in addition to
general and special damages that are
otherwise payable, is prohibited. See
DA Pam 27–162, paragraphs 2–56 and
3–4b.
(f) Source of attorney’s fees.
Attorney’s fees are taken from the
settlement amount and not added
thereto. They may not exceed 20 percent
of the settlement amount under any
subpart.
Note to § 536.50: For further discussion see
DA Pam27–162, paragraph 2–51.
§ 536.51
Collateral source rule.
Where permitted by applicable state
or maritime law, damages recovered
from collateral sources are payable
under subparts D and H, but not under
subparts C, E, F, or J of this part. For
further discussion see DA Pam 27–162,
paragraph 2–57.
§ 536.52
Subrogation.
Subrogation is the substitution of one
person in place of another with regard
to a claim, demand or right. It should
not be confused with a lien, which is an
obligation of the claimant. Applicable
state law should be researched to
determine the distinction between
subrogation and a lien. Subrogation
claims are payable under subparts D and
H, but not under subparts C, E, F or J
of this part. For further discussion see
DA Pam 27–162, paragraph 2–58.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
§ 536.53 Evaluation of claims—general
rules and guidelines.
(a) Before claims personnel evaluate a
claim:
(1) A claimant or claimant’s legal
representative will be furnished the
opportunity to substantiate the claim by
providing essential documentary
evidence according to the claim’s nature
including, but not instead of, the
following: medical records and reports,
witness statements, itemized bills and
paid receipts, estimates, federal tax
returns, W–2 forms or similar proof of
loss of earnings, photographs, and
reports of appraisals or investigation. If
necessary, request permission, through
the legal representative, to interview the
claimant, the claimant’s family,
proposed witnesses and treating health
care providers (HCPs). In a professional
negligence claim, the claimant will
submit an expert opinion when
requested. State law concerning the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:42 Aug 10, 2006
Jkt 208250
requirement for an affidavit of merit
should be cited.
(2) When the claimant or the legal
representative fails to respond in a
timely manner to informal demands for
documentary evidence, interviews, or
an independent medical examination
(IME), make a written request. Such
written request provides notice to the
claimant that failure to provide
substantiating evidence will result in an
evaluation of the claim based only on
information currently in the file. When,
despite the government’s request, there
is insufficient information in the file to
permit evaluation, the claim will be
denied for failure to document it.
Failure to submit to an IME or sign an
authorization to use medical
information protected by HIPAA, for
review or evaluation by a source other
than claims personnel, are both grounds
for denial for failure to document,
provided such evaluation is essential to
the determination of liability or
damages. State a time limit, for example,
30 or 60 days, to furnish the
substantiation or expert opinion
required in a medical malpractice claim.
(3) If, in exchange for complying with
the government’s request for the
foregoing information, the claimant or
the legal representative requests similar
information from the file, the claimant
may be provided such information and
documentation as is releasable under
the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
(FRCP). Additionally, work product may
be released if such release will help
settle the claim. See § 536.18.
(b) An evaluation should be viewed
from the claimant’s perspective. In other
words, before denying a claim, first
determine whether there is any
reasonable basis for compromise.
Certain jurisdictional issues and
statutory bases may not be open for
compromise. The incident to service
and FECA exclusions are rarely subject
to compromise, whereas the SOL is
more subject to compromise. Factual
and legal disputes are compromisable,
frequently providing a basis for limiting
damages, not necessarily grounds for
denial. Where a precise issue of dispute
is identified and is otherwise
unresolvable, mediation by a
disinterested qualified person, such as a
federal judge, or foreign equivalent for
claims arising under the FCA, should be
obtained upon agreement with the
claimant or the claimant’s legal
representative. Contributory negligence
has given way to comparative
negligence in most United States
jurisdictions. In most foreign countries,
comparative negligence is the rule of
law.
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
46279
Note to § 536.53: For further discussion see
DA Pam 27–162, paragraph 2–59.
§ 536.54
Joint tortfeasors.
When joint tortfeasors are liable, it is
DA policy to pay only the fair share of
a claim attributable to the fault of the
United States rather than pay the claim
in full and then bring suit against the
joint tortfeasor for contribution. If
payment from a joint tortfeasor is not
forthcoming after the CJA’s demand, the
United States should settle for its fair
share, provided the claimant is willing
to hold the United States harmless.
Where a joint tortfeasor’s liability
greatly outweighs that of the United
States, the claim should be referred to
the joint tortfeasor for action.
§ 536.55
Structured settlements.
(a) The use of future periodic
payments, including reversionary
medical trusts, is encouraged to ensure
that the injured party is adequately
compensated and able to meet future
needs.
(1) It is necessary to ensure adequate
care and compensation for a minor or
other incompetent claimant or
unemployed survivor over a period of
years.
(2) A medical trust is necessary to
ensure the long-term availability of
funds for anticipated future medical
care, the cost of which is difficult to
predict.
(3) The injured party’s life expectancy
cannot be reasonably determined or is
likely to be shortened.
(b) Under subpart D of this part,
structured settlements cannot be
required but are encouraged in
situations listed above or where state
law permits them. In the case of a
minor, every effort should be made to
insure that the minor, and not the
parents, receives the benefit of the
settlement. Annuity payments at the age
of majority should be considered. If
rejected, a blocked bank account may be
used.
(c) It is the policy of the Department
of Justice never to discuss the tax-free
nature of a structured settlement.
Note to § 536.55: For further discussion,
see DA Pam 27–162, paragraph 2–63.
§ 536.56
extent.
Negotiations—purpose and
It is DA policy to settle meritorious
claims promptly and fairly through
direct negotiation at the lowest possible
level. The Army’s negotiator should not
admit liability as such is not necessary.
However, the settlement should reflect
diminished value where contributory
negligence or other value-diminishing
E:\FR\FM\11AUP2.SGM
11AUP2
46280
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 155 / Friday, August 11, 2006 / Proposed Rules
factors exist. The negotiator should be
thoroughly familiar with all aspects of
the case, including the claimant’s
background, the key witnesses, the
anticipated testimony and the
appearance of the scene. There is no
substitute for the claims negotiator’s
personal study of, and participation in,
the case before settlement negotiations
begin. If settlement is not possible due
to the divergence in the offers, refine the
issues as much as possible in order to
expedite any subsequent suit. Mediation
should be used if the divergence is due
to an issue of law affecting either
liability or damages. For further
discussion see DA Pam 27–162,
paragraph 2–64.
§ 536.57
Who should negotiate.
An AAO or, when delegated
additional authority, an ACO or a CPO,
has authority to settle claims in an
amount exceeding the monetary
authority delegated by regulation. It is
DA policy to delegate USARCS
authority, on a case-by-case basis, to an
ACO or a CPO possessing the
appropriate ability and experience. Only
an attorney should negotiate with a
claimant’s attorney. Negotiations with
unrepresented claimants may be
conducted by a non-attorney, under the
supervision of an attorney. For further
discussion see DA Pam 27–162,
paragraph 2–65.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
§ 536.58 Settlement negotiations with
unrepresented claimants.
All aspects of the applicable law and
procedure, except the amount to be
claimed, should be explained to both
potential and actual claimants. The
negotiator will ensure that the claimant
is aware of whether the negotiator is an
attorney or a non-attorney, and that the
negotiator represents the United States.
As to claims within USARCS’ monetary
authority, the chronology and details of
negotiations should be memorialized
with a written record furnished to the
claimant. The claimant should
understand that it is not necessary to
hire an attorney, but when an attorney
is needed, the negotiator should
recommend hiring one. In a claim where
liability is not an issue, the claimant
should be informed that if an attorney
is retained, the claimant should attempt
to negotiate an hourly fee for
determination of damages only. For
further discussion see DA Pam 27–162,
paragraph 2–68.
§ 536.59
Settlement or approval authority.
‘‘Settlement authority’’ is a statutory
term (10 U.S.C. 2735) meaning that
officer authorized to approve, deny or
compromise a claim, or make final
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:42 Aug 10, 2006
Jkt 208250
action. ‘‘Approval authority’’ means the
officer empowered to settle, pay or
compromise a claim in full or in part,
provided the claimant agrees. ‘‘Final
action authority’’ means the officer
empowered to deny or make a final offer
on a claim. Determining the proper
officer empowered to approve or make
final action on a claim depends on the
claims statute involved and any
limitations that apply under that statute.
DA Pam 27–162, paragraph 2–69,
outlines how various authority is
delegated among offices.
§ 536.60 Splitting property damage and
personal injury claims.
Normally, a claim will include all
damages that accrue by reason of the
incident. Where a claimant has a claim
for property damage and personal injury
arising from the same incident, the
property damage claim may be paid,
under certain circumstances, prior to
the filing of the personal injury claim.
The personal injury claim may be filed
later provided it is filed within the
applicable statute of limitations. When
both property damage and personal
injury arise from the same incident, the
property damage claim may be paid to
either the claimant or, under subparts D
or H of this part, the insurer and the
same claimant may receive a subsequent
payment for personal injury. Only under
subparts D or H of this part may the
insurer receive subsequent payment for
subrogated medical bills and lost
earnings when the personal injury claim
is settled. The primary purpose of
settling an injured claimant’s property
damage claim before settling the
personal injury claim is to pay the
claimant for vehicle damage
expeditiously and avoid costs associated
with delay such as loss of use, loss of
business, or storage charges. The
Commander USARCS’ approval must be
obtained whenever the estimated value
of any one claim exceeds $25,000, or the
value of all claims, actual or potential,
arising from the incident exceeds
$50,000; however, if the claim arises
under the FTCA or AMCSA, only if the
amount claimed exceeds $50,000, or
$100,000 per incident.
§ 536.61
Advance payments.
(a) This section implements 10 U.S.C.
2736 (Act of September 8, 1961 (75 Stat.
488)) as amended by Public Law 90–521
(82 Stat. 874); Public Law 98–564 (90
Stat. 2919); and Public Law 100–465
(102 Stat. 2005)). No new liability is
created by 10 U.S.C. 2736, which merely
permits partial advance payments, only
under subparts C, F or J of this part, on
claims not yet filed. See AR 27–20,
paragraph 11–18 for information on
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
emergency partial payments in
personnel claims, which are not
governed by 10 U.S.C. 2736.
(b) The Judge Advocate General
(TJAG) and the Assistant Judge
Advocate General (TAJAG) may make
advance payments in amounts not
exceeding $100,000; the Commander
USARCS, in amounts not exceeding
$25,000, and the authorities designated
in §§ 536.78(b)(4) and (b)(5) and
536.101, in amounts not exceeding
$10,000, subject to advance
coordination with USARCS, if the
estimated total value of the claim
exceeds their monetary authority.
Requests for advance payments in
excess of $10,000 will be forwarded to
USARCS for processing.
(c) Under subpart J of this part, threemember foreign claims commissions
may make advance payments under the
FCA in amounts not exceeding $10,000,
subject to advance coordination with
USARCS if the estimated total value of
the claim exceeds their monetary
authority.
(d) An advance payment, not
exceeding $100,000, is authorized in the
limited category of claims or potential
claims considered meritorious under
subparts C, F or J of this part, that result
in immediate hardship. An advance
payment is authorized only under the
following circumstances:
(1) The claim, or potential claim, must
be determined to be cognizable and
meritorious under the provisions of
subparts C, F or J of this part.
(2) An immediate need for food,
clothing, shelter, medical or burial
expenses, or other necessities exists.
(3) The payee, so far as can be
determined, would be a proper
claimant, including an incapacitated
claimant’s spouse or next-of-kin.
(4) The total damage sustained must
exceed the amount of the advance
payment.
(5) A properly executed advance
payment acceptance agreement has been
obtained. This acceptance agreement
must state that it does not constitute an
admission of liability by the United
States and that the amount paid shall be
deducted from any subsequent award.
(e) There is no statutory authority for
making advance payments for claims
payable under subparts D or H of this
part.
Note to § 536.61: For further discussion see
DA Pam 27–162, paragraph 2–71.
§ 536.62
Action memorandums.
(a) When required. (1) All claims will
be acted on prior to being closed except
for those that are transferred. For claims
on which suit is filed before final action,
E:\FR\FM\11AUP2.SGM
11AUP2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 155 / Friday, August 11, 2006 / Proposed Rules
see § 536.66. A settlement authority may
deny or pay in full or in part any claim
in a stated amount within his or her
delegated authority. An approval
authority may pay in full or in part, but
may not deny, a claim in a stated
amount within his or her delegated
authority. If any one claim arising out of
the same incident exceeds a settlement
or approval authority’s monetary
jurisdiction, all claims from that
incident will be forwarded to the
authority having jurisdiction.
(2) In any claim which must be
supported by an expert opinion as to
duty, negligence, causation or damages,
an expert opinion must be submitted
upon request. All opinions must meet
the standards set forth in Federal Rule
of Evidence 702.
(3) An action memorandum is
required for all final actions regardless
of whether payment is made
electronically. The memorandum will
contain a sufficient rendition of the
facts, law or damages to justify the
action being taken. (A model action is
posted on the USARCS Web site; for the
address see § 536.2(a).)
(b) Memorandum of Opinion. Upon
completion of the investigation, the
ACO or CPO will prepare a
memorandum of opinion in the format
prescribed at DA Pam 27–162, when a
claim is forwarded to USARCS for
action. This requirement can be waived
by the USARCS AAO.
(c) Claim brought by a claims
authority or superior. A claim filed by
an approval or settlement authority or
his or her superior officer in the chain
of command or a family member of
either will be investigated and
forwarded for final action, without
recommendation, to the next higher
settlement authority (in an overseas
area, this includes a command claims
service) or to USARCS.
Note to § 536.62: For further discussion see
DA Pam 27–162, paragraph 2–72.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
§ 536.63
Settlement agreements.
(a) When required. (1) A claimant’s
acceptance of an award constitutes full
and final settlement and release of any
and all claims against the United States
and its employees, except as to
payments made under §§ 536.60 and
536.61. A settlement agreement is
required prior to payment on all tort
claims, whether the claim is paid in full
or in part.
(2) DA Form 1666 (Claims Settlement
Agreement) may be used for payment of
COE claims of $2500 or less or all Army
Central Insurance Fund and Army and
Air Force Exchange Service claims.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:42 Aug 10, 2006
Jkt 208250
(3) DA Form 7500 (Tort Claim
Payment Report) will be used for all
payments from the Defense Finance and
Accounting Service (DFAS), for
example, FTCA claims of $2500 or less,
FCA and MCA claims of $100,000 or
less and all maritime claims regardless
of amount.
(4) Financial Management Service
(FMS) Forms 194, 196 and 197 will be
used for all payments from the
Judgment Fund, for example, FTCA
claims exceeding $2,500, MCA and FCA
claims exceeding $100,000.
(5) An alternative settlement
agreement will be used when the
claimant is represented by an attorney,
or when any of the above settlement
agreement forms are legally insufficient
(such as when multiple interests are
present, a hold harmless agreement is
reached, or there is a structured
settlement). For further discussion, see
DA Pam 27–162, paragraph 2–73c.
(b) Unconditional settlement. The
settlement agreement must be
unconditional. The settlement
agreement represents a meeting of the
minds. Any changes to the agreement
must be agreed upon by all parties. The
return of a proffered settlement
agreement with changes written thereon
or on an accompanying document
represents, in effect, a counteroffer and
must be resolved. Even if the claimant
signs the agreement and objects to its
terms, either in writing or verbally, the
settlement is defective and the objection
must be resolved. Otherwise a final offer
should be made.
(c) Court approval. (1) When required.
Court approval is required in a wrongful
death claim, or where the claimant is a
minor or incompetent. The claimant is
responsible to obtain court approval in
a jurisdiction that is locus of the act or
omission giving rise to the claim or in
which the claimant resides. The court
must be a state or local court, including
a probate court. If the claimant can
show that court approval is not required
under the law of the jurisdiction where
the incident occurred or where the
claimant resides, the citation of the
statute will be provided and accompany
the payment documents.
(2) Attorney representation. If the
claimant is a minor or incompetent, the
claimant must be represented by a
lawyer. If not already represented, the
claimant should be informed that the
requirement is mandatory unless state
or local law expressly authorizes the
parents or a person in loco parentis to
settle the claim.
(3) Costs. The cost of obtaining court
approval will be factored into the
amount of the settlement; however, the
amount of the costs and other costs will
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
46281
not be written into the settlement, only
the 20% limitation on attorney fees will
be included.
(4) Claims involving an estate or
personal representative of an estate. On
claims presented on behalf of a
decedent’s estate, the law of the state
having jurisdiction should be reviewed
to determine who may bring a claim on
behalf of the estate, if court appointment
of an estate representative is required,
and if court approval of the settlement
is required.
(d) Signature requirements. (1) Except
as noted below, all settlement
agreements will be signed individually
by each claimant. A limited power of
attorney signed by the claimant
specifically stating the amount being
accepted and authorizing an attorney at
law or in fact to sign is acceptable when
the claimant is unavailable to sign. The
signatures of the administrator or
executor of the estate, appointed by a
court of competent jurisdiction or
authorized by local law, are required.
The signatures of all adult beneficiaries,
acknowledging the settlement, should
be obtained unless permission is given
by Commander USARCS. Court
approval must be obtained where
required by state law. If not required by
state law, the citation of the state statute
will accompany the payment document.
Additionally, all adult heirs will sign as
acknowledging the settlement. In lieu
thereof, where the adult heirs are not
available, the estate representative will
acknowledge that all heirs have been
informed of the settlement.
(2) Generally, only a court-appointed
guardian of a minor’s estate, or a person
performing a similar function under
court supervision, may execute a
binding settlement agreement on a
minor’s claim. In the United States, the
law of the state where the minor resides
or is domiciled will determine the age
of majority and the nature and type of
court approval that is needed, if any.
The age of majority is determined by the
age at the time of settlement, not the
date of filing.
(3) For claims arising in foreign
countries where the amount agreed
upon does not exceed $2,500, the
requirement to obtain a guardian may be
eliminated. For settlements over $2,500,
whether or not the claim arose in the
United States, refer to applicable local
law, including the law of the foreign
country where the minor resides.
(4) In claims where the claimant is an
incompetent, and for whom a guardian
has been appointed by a court of
competent jurisdiction, the signature of
the guardian must be obtained. In cases
in which competence of the claimant
appears doubtful, a written statement by
E:\FR\FM\11AUP2.SGM
11AUP2
46282
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 155 / Friday, August 11, 2006 / Proposed Rules
the plaintiff’s attorney and a member of
the immediate family should be
obtained.
(5) Settlement agreements involving
subrogated claims must be executed by
a person authorized by the corporation
or company to act in its behalf and
accompanied by a document signed by
a person authorized by the corporation
or company to delegate execution
authority.
(6) If it is believed that the foregoing
requirements are materially impeding
settlement of the claim, bring the matter
to the attention of the Commander
USARCS for appropriate resolution.
(e) Attorneys’ fees and costs. (1)
Attorneys’ fees for all subparts fall
under the American Rule and are
payable only out of the up front cash in
any settlement. Attorneys’ fees will be
stated separately in the settlement
agreement as a sum not to exceed 20%
of the award.
(2) Costs are a matter to be determined
solely between the attorney and the
claimant and will not be set forth or
otherwise enumerated in the settlement
agreement.
(f) Claims involving workers’
compensation carriers. The settlement
of a claim involving a claimant who has
elected to receive workers’
compensation benefits under local law
may require the consent of the workers’
compensation insurance carrier, and in
certain jurisdictions, the state agency
that has authority over workers’
compensation awards. Accordingly,
claims approval and settlement
authorities should be aware of local
requirements.
(g) Claims involving multiple
interests. Where two or more parties
have an interest in the claim, obtain
signatures on the settlement agreement
from all parties. Examples are where
both the subrogee and subrogor file a
single claim for property damage, where
both landlord and tenant file a claim for
damage to real property, or when a POV
is leased, both the lessor or lessee.
(h) Claims involving structured
settlements. All settlement agreements
involving structured settlements will be
prepared by the Tort Claims Division,
USARCS, and approved by the Chief or
Deputy Chief, Tort Claims Division.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
§ 536.64
Final offers.
(a) When claims personnel believe
that a claim should be compromised,
and after every reasonable effort has
been made to settle at less than the
amount claimed, a settlement authority
will make a written final offer within
his or her monetary jurisdiction or
forward the claim to the authority
having sufficient monetary jurisdiction,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:42 Aug 10, 2006
Jkt 208250
recommending a final offer under the
applicable statute. The final offer notice
will contain sufficient detail to outline
each element of damages as well as
discuss contributory negligence, the
SOL or other reasons justifying a
compromise offer. The offer letter
should include language indicating that
if the offer is not accepted within a
named time period, for example, 30 or
60 days, the offer is withdrawn and the
claim is denied.
(b) A final offer under subpart D of
this part will notify the claimant of the
right to sue, not later than six months
from the notice’s date of mailing, and of
the right to request reconsideration. The
procedures for processing a request for
reconsideration are set forth in § 536.89.
(c) Under subparts C or F of this part,
the notice will contain an appeal
paragraph. A similar procedure will be
followed in subparts E and H of this
part. Subpart J of this part sets forth its
own procedures for FCA final offers.
The procedures for processing an appeal
are set forth in § 536.79 of this part. The
letter must inform claimants of the
following:
(1) They must accept the offer within
60 days or appeal. The appeal should
state a counteroffer.
(2) The identity of the official who
will act on the appeal, and the
requirement that the appeal will be
addressed to the settlement authority
who last acted on the claim.
(3) No form is prescribed for the
appeal, but the notice of appeal must
fully set forth the grounds for appeal or
state that it is based on the record as it
exists at the time of denial or final offer.
(4) The appeal must be postmarked
not later than 60 days after the date of
mailing of the final notice of action. If
the last day of the appeal period falls on
a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, as
specified in Rule 6a of the Federal Rules
of Civil Procedure, the following day
will be considered the final day of the
appeal period.
(d) Where a claim for the same injury
falls under both subparts C and D of this
part (the MCA and the FTCA), and the
denial or final offer applies equally to
each such claim, the letter of
notification must advise the claimant
that any suit brought on any portion of
the claim filed under the FTCA must be
brought not later than six months from
the date of mailing of the notice of final
offer and any appeal under subpart C of
this part must be made as stated in
paragraph (c) of this section. Further,
the claimant must be advised that if suit
is brought, action on any appeal under
subpart C of this part will be held in
abeyance pending final determination of
such suit.
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
(e) Upon request, the settlement
authority may extend the six-month
reconsideration or 60-day appeal period
provided good cause is shown. The
claimant will be notified as to whether
the request is granted under the FTCA
and that the request precludes the filing
of suit under the FTCA for 6 months.
Only one reconsideration is authorized.
Accordingly, that claimant should be
informed of the need to make all
submissions timely.
Note to § 536.64: For further discussion see
DA Pam 27–162, paragraph 2–74.
§ 536.65
Denial notice.
(a) Where there is no reasonable basis
for compromise, a settlement authority
will deny a claim within his or her
monetary jurisdiction or forward the
claim recommending denial to the
settlement authority that has
jurisdiction. The denial notice will
contain instructions on the right to sue
or request reconsideration. The notice
will state the basis for denial. No
admission of liability will be made. A
notice to an unrepresented claimant
should detail the basis for denial in lay
language sufficient to permit an
informed decision as to whether to
request appeal or reconsideration. In the
interest of deterring reconsideration,
appeal or suit, a denial notice may be
releasable under the Federal Rules of
Civil Procedure or by the work product
documents doctrine.
(b) Regardless of the claim’s nature or
the statute under which it may be
considered, letters denying claims on
jurisdictional grounds that are valid,
certain, and not easily overcome (and
for this reason no detailed investigation
as to the merits of the claim was
conducted), must state that denial on
such grounds is not to be construed as
an opinion on the merits of the claim or
an admission of liability. In medical
malpractice claims, the denial should
state that the file is being referred to
U.S. Army Medical Command for
review. If sufficient factual information
exists to make a tentative ruling on the
merits of the claim, liability may be
expressly denied.
Note to § 536.65: See § 536.53, on denying
a claim for failure to substantiate. In
addition, the procedures and rules in DA
Pam 27–162, paragraph 2–69, settlement and
approval authority, apply equally to the
denial of claims. See also DA Pam 27–162,
paragraph 2–75.
§ 536.66
The ‘‘Parker’’ denial.
(a) When suit is filed before final
action is taken on a subpart D of this
part claim, a denial letter will be issued
only upon request of DOJ or the trial
E:\FR\FM\11AUP2.SGM
11AUP2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 155 / Friday, August 11, 2006 / Proposed Rules
attorney. If suit is filed prematurely or
in error, the claimant may be requested
to withdraw the suit without prejudice.
Such a request must be coordinated
with the trial attorney.
(b) Claimants who have filed
companion claims should be notified
that, due to suit being filed, no action
can be taken pending the outcome of
suit and they may file suit if they wish.
Note to § 536.66: For further discussion see
DA Pam 27–162, paragraph 2–76.
§ 536.67
Mailing procedures.
Thirty or sixty day letters seeking
information from claimants, final offers
and denial notices are time-sensitive as
they require a claimant to take
additional action within certain time
limits. Accordingly, follow procedures
to ensure that the date of mailing and
receipt of a request for reconsideration
are documented. Use certified mail with
return receipt requested (or registered
mail, if being sent to a foreign country
other than by the military postal system)
to mail such notices. Upon receipt, an
appeal or request for reconsideration
will be date-time stamped, logged in,
and acknowledged as set forth in
§ 536.68.
Note to § 536.67: See also AR 27–20,
paragraph 13–5, and DA Pam 27–162,
paragraph 2–77.
§ 536.68
Appeal or reconsideration.
(a) An appeal or a request for
reconsideration will be acknowledged
in writing. A request for reconsideration
under subpart D of this part invokes the
six-month period during which suit
cannot be filed, 28 CFR 14.9(b). The
acknowledgment letter will underscore
this restriction.
(b) Where the contents of the appeal
or request for reconsideration indicate,
additional investigation will be
conducted and the original action
changed if warranted. Except for subpart
J of this part, which sets forth separate
rules for FCCs, if the relief requested is
not warranted the settlement authority
will forward the claim to a higher
settlement authority with a claims
memorandum of opinion (see § 536.62)
stating the reasons why the request is
invalid.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
Note to § 536.68: See also DA Pam 27–162,
paragraph 2–78.
§ 536.69
Retention of file.
After final action has been taken, the
settlement authority will retain the file
until at least one month after either the
period of filing suit or the appeal has
expired and until all data has been
entered into the database. A paid claim
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:42 Aug 10, 2006
Jkt 208250
file will be retained until final action
has been taken on all other claims
arising out of the same incident. If any
single claim arising out of the same
incident must be forwarded to higher
authority for final action, all claims files
for that incident will be forwarded at
the same time. For further discussion
see DA Pam 27–162, paragraph 2–79.
§ 536.70 Preparation and forwarding of
payment vouchers.
(a) An unrepresented claimant will be
listed as the sole payee. Joint claimants
will not be listed since settlement
agreements must specify the amount
payable to each claimant individually
and each must be issued a separate
check.
(b) When a claimant is represented by
an attorney, only one payment voucher
will be issued with the claimant and the
attorney as joint payees. The payment
will be sent to the office of the
claimant’s attorney. The attorney of
record, either an individual or firm
designated by the claimant, will be the
co-payee. If claimant has been
represented by other attorneys in the
same claim, such attorneys will not be
listed as payees, even if they have a lien.
Satisfaction of any such fee will be a
matter between the claimant and such
attorney. If payment is made by
electronic transfer, the funds will be
paid into the account of the claimant.
However, if requested, the payment may
be made into the attorney’s escrow
account provided the claimant has
provided written authorization.
(c) In a structured settlement the
structured settlement broker will be the
sole payee, who is authorized to issue
checks for the amounts set forth in the
settlement agreement. The up-front cash
payment may be deposited into an
escrow account established for the
benefit of the claimant.
(d) If a claimant is a minor or has been
declared incompetent by a court or
other authority authorized to do so,
payment will be made to the courtappointed guardian of the minor or
incompetent, at a financial institution
approved by the court approving the
settlement.
(e) If the claimant is representing a
deceased’s estate on a wrongful death
claim, or a survival action on behalf of
the deceased, the payment will be made
to the court-appointed representative of
the estate. No payment will be made
directly to the estate.
Note to § 536.70: See also § 536.63 and DA
Pam 27–162, paragraphs 2–73 and 2–81.
§ 536.71
Fund sources.
(a) 31 U.S.C. 1304 sets forth the type
and limits of claims payable out of the
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
46283
Judgment Fund. Only final payments
that are not payable out of agency funds
are allowable, per the Treasury
Financial Manual, Volume I, part 6,
Chapter 3110, at Section 3115,
September 2000 (available at https://
www.fms.treas.gov/tfm/vol1/
v1p6c310.pdf). Threshold amounts for
payment from the judgment fund vary
according to the subpart and statutes
under which a claim is processed. To
determine the threshold amount for any
given payment procedure one must
arrive at a sum of all awards for all
claims arising out of that incident,
including derivative claims. A joint
amount is not acceptable. A claim for
injury to a spouse or a child is a
separate claim from one for loss of
consortium or services by a spouse or
parent. The monetary limits of $2,500
set forth in subpart D and $100,000 set
forth in subparts C, F or J of this part,
apply to each separate claim.
(b) A subpart D, E, or subpart G of this
part, §§ 536.107 through 536.113 claim
for $2,500 or less is paid from the open
claims allotment (see AR 27–20
paragraph 13–6b(1)) or, if arising from a
project funded by a civil works
appropriation, from COE civil works
funds. The Department of the Treasury
pays any settlement exceeding $2,500 in
its entirety, from the Judgment Fund.
However, if a subpart G of this part,
§§ 536.107–536.113 claim is treated as a
noncombat activity claim, payment is
made as set forth in paragraph (c) of this
section.
(c) The first $100,000 for each
claimant on a claim settled under
subparts C, F or J of this part is paid
from the open claims allotment. Any
amount over $100,000 is paid out of the
Judgment Fund.
(d) If not over $500,000, a claim
arising under subpart H of this part is
paid from the open claims allotment or
civil works project funds as appropriate.
A claim exceeding $500,000 is paid
entirely by a deficiency appropriation.
(e) AAFES or NAFI claims are paid
from nonappropriated funds, except
when such claims are subject to
apportionment between appropriated
and nonappropriated funds. See DA
Pam 27–162, paragraph 2–80h.
(f) COE claims arising out of projects
not funded out of civil works project
funds are payable from the open claims
allotment not to exceed $2,500 for
subpart D claims and $100,000 for
claims arising from subparts C, F or J of
this part and from the Judgment Fund,
over such amounts.
Note to § 536.71: For further discussion see
DA Pam 27–162, paragraph 2–80.
E:\FR\FM\11AUP2.SGM
11AUP2
46284
§ 536.72
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 155 / Friday, August 11, 2006 / Proposed Rules
Finality of settlement.
A claimant’s acceptance of an award,
except for an advance payment or a split
payment for property damage only,
constitutes a release of the United States
and its employees from all liability.
Where applicable, a release should
include the ARNG or the sending State.
For further discussion see DA Pam 27–
162, paragraph 2–82.
Subpart C—Claims Cognizable Under
the Military Claims Act
§ 536.73 Statutory authority for the Military
Claims Act.
The statutory authority for this
subpart is contained in the Act of
August 10, 1956 (70A Stat. 153, 10
U.S.C. 2733), commonly referred to as
the Military Claims Act (MCA), as
amended by 90–521, September 1968
(82 Stat. 874); Public Law 90–522,
September 1968 (82 Stat. 875); Public
Law 90–525, September 1968 (82 Stat.
877); Public Law 93–336, July 8, 1974
(88 Stat. 291); Public Law 98–564,
October 1984 (98 Stat. 2918); and Public
Law 103–337, October 1994 (108 Stat.
2664).
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
§ 536.74 Scope for claims under the
Military Claims Act.
(a) The guidance set forth in this
subpart applies worldwide and
prescribes the substantive bases and
special procedural requirements for the
settlement of claims against the United
States for death or personal injury, or
damage to, or loss or destruction of,
property:
(1) Caused by military personnel or
civilian employees (enumerated in
§ 536.23(b)) acting within the scope of
their employment, except for nonfederalized Army National Guard
soldiers as explained in subpart F of this
part; or
(2) Incident to the noncombat
activities of the armed services (see AR
27–20, Glossary).
(b) A tort claim arising in the United
States, its commonwealths, territories,
and possessions may be settled under
this subpart if the Federal Tort Claims
Act (FTCA) does not apply to the type
of claim under consideration or if the
claim arose incident to noncombat
activities. For example, a claim by a
service member for property loss or
damage incident to service may be
settled if the loss arises from a tort and
is not payable under AR 27–20, Chapter
11.
(c) A tort claim arising outside the
United States may be settled under this
subpart only if the claimant has been
determined to be an inhabitant
(normally a resident) of the United
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:42 Aug 10, 2006
Jkt 208250
States at the time of the incident giving
rise to the claim. See § 536.136(b).
§ 536.75 Claims payable under the Military
Claims Act.
(a) General. Unless otherwise
prescribed, a claim for personal injury,
death, or damage to, or loss or
destruction of, property is payable
under this subpart when:
(1) Caused by an act or omission of
military personnel or civilian employees
of the DA or DOD, acting within the
scope of their employment, that is
determined to be negligent or wrongful;
or
(2) Incident to the noncombat
activities of the armed services.
(b) Property. Property that may be the
subject of claims for loss or damage
under this subpart includes:
(1) Real property used and occupied
under lease (express, implied, or
otherwise). See § 536.34(m) and
paragraph 2–15m of DA Pam 27–162.
(2) Personal property bailed to the
government under an agreement
(express or implied), unless the owner
has expressly assumed the risk of
damage or loss.
(3) Registered or insured mail in the
DA’s possession, even though the loss
was caused by a criminal act.
(4) Property of a member of the armed
forces that is damaged or lost incident
to service, if such a claim is not payable
as a personnel claim under AR 27–20,
chapter 11.
(c) Maritime claims. Claims that arise
on the high seas or within the territorial
waters of a foreign country are payable
unless settled under subpart H of this
part.
§ 536.76 Claims not payable under the
Military Claims Act.
(a) Those resulting wholly from the
claimant’s or agent’s negligent or
wrongful act. (See § 536.77(a)(1)(i) on
contributory negligence).
(b) Claims arising from private or
domestic obligations rather than from
government transactions.
(c) Claims based solely on
compassionate grounds.
(d) A claim for any item, the
acquisition, possession, or
transportation of which was in violation
of DA directives, such as illegal war
trophies.
(e) Claims for rent, damage, or other
payments involving the acquisition, use,
possession or disposition of real
property or interests therein by and for
the Department of the Army (DA) or
Department of Defense (DOD). See
§ 536.34(m) and paragraph 2–15m of DA
Pam 27–162.
(f) Claims not in the best interests of
the United States, contrary to public
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
policy, or otherwise contrary to the
basic intent of the governing statute (10
U.S.C. 2733); for example, claims for
property damage or loss or personal
injury or death of inhabitants of
unfriendly foreign countries or
individuals considered to be unfriendly
to the United States. When a claim is
considered not payable for the reasons
stated in this section, it will be
forwarded for appropriate action to the
Commander USARCS with the
recommendations of the responsible
claims office.
(g) Claims presented by a national, or
a corporation controlled by a national,
of a country at war or engaged in armed
conflict with the United States, or any
country allied with such enemy country
unless the appropriate settlement
authority determines that the claimant
is, and at the time of the incident was,
friendly to the United States. A prisoner
of war or an interned enemy alien is not
excluded from bringing an otherwise
payable claim for damage, loss, or
destruction of personal property in the
custody of the government.
(h) A claim for damages or injury,
which a receiving State should
adjudicate and pay under an
international agreement, unless a
consistent and widespread alternative
process of adjudicating and paying such
claims has been established within the
receiving State. See DA Pam 27–162,
paragraph 3–4a, for further discussion of
the conditions of waiver.
(i) Claims listed in §§ 536.42, 536.43,
536.44, 536.45, and 536.46 of this part,
except for the exclusion listed in
§ 536.45(k). Additionally, the exclusions
in §§ 536.45(a), (b), (e) and (k) do not
apply to a claim arising incident to
noncombat activities.
(j) Claims based on strict or absolute
liability and similar theories.
(k) Claims payable under subparts D
or J of this part, or under AR 27–20,
chapter 11.
(l) Claims involving DA vehicles
covered by insurance in accordance
with requirements of a foreign country
unless coverage is exceeded or the
insurer is bankrupt. When an award is
otherwise payable and an insurance
settlement is not reasonably available, a
field claims office should request
permission from the Commander
USARCS to pay the award, provided
that an assignment of benefits is
obtained.
§ 536.77 Applicable law for claims under
the Military Claims Act.
(a) General principles. (1) Tort claims
excluding claims arising out of
noncombat activities. (i) In determining
liability, such claims will be evaluated
E:\FR\FM\11AUP2.SGM
11AUP2
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 155 / Friday, August 11, 2006 / Proposed Rules
under general principles of law
applicable to a private individual in the
majority of American jurisdictions,
except where the doctrine of
contributory negligence applies. The
MCA requires that contributory
negligence be interpreted and applied
according to the law of the place of the
occurrence, including foreign (local) law
for claims arising in foreign countries
(see 10 U.S.C. 2733(b)(4)).
(ii) Claims are cognizable when based
on those acts or omissions recognized as
tortious by a majority of jurisdictions
that require proof of duty, negligence,
and proximate cause resulting in
compensable injury or loss subject to
the exclusions set forth at § 536.76.
Strict or absolute liability and similar
theories are not grounds for liability
under this subpart.
(2) Tort claims arising out of
noncombat activities. Claims arising out
of noncombat activities under
§§ 536.75(a)(2) and (b) are not tort
claims and require only proof of
causation. However, the doctrine of
contributory negligence will apply, to
the extent set forth in 10 U.S.C.
2733(b)(4) and paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this
section.
(3) Principles applicable to all subpart
C claims. (i) Interpretation of meanings
and construction of questions of law
under the MCA will be determined in
accordance with federal law. The
formulation of binding interpretations is
delegated to the Commander USARCS,
provided that the statutory provisions of
the MCA are followed.
(ii) Scope of employment will be
determined in accordance with federal
law. Follow guidance from reported
FTCA cases. The formulation of a
binding interpretation is delegated to
the Commander USARCS, provided the
statutory provisions of the MCA are
followed.
(iii) The collateral source doctrine is
not applicable.
(iv) The United States will only be
liable for the portion of loss or damage
attributable to the fault of the United
States or its employees. Joint and
several liability is inapplicable.
(v) No allowance will be made for
court costs, bail, interest, inconvenience
or expenses incurred in connection with
the preparation and presentation of the
claim.
(vi) Punitive or exemplary damages
are not payable.
(vii) Claims for negligent infliction of
emotional distress may only be
entertained when the claimant suffered
physical injury arising from the same
incident as the claim for emotional
distress, or the claimant is the
immediate family member of an injured
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:42 Aug 10, 2006
Jkt 208250
party/decedent, was in the zone of
danger and manifests physical injury for
the emotional distress. Claims for
intentional infliction of emotional
distress will be evaluated under general
principles of American law as set forth
in paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this section and
will be considered as an element of
damages under paragraph (b)(3)(ii) of
this section. Claims for either negligent
or intentional infliction of emotional
distress are excluded when they arise
out of assault, battery, false arrest, false
imprisonment, malicious prosecution,
abuse of process, libel, or slander, as
defined in § 536.45(h).
(viii) In a claim for personal injury or
wrongful death, the total award for noneconomic damages to any direct victim
and all persons, including those
derivative to the claim, who claim
injury by or through that victim will not
exceed $500,000. However, separate
claims for emotional distress considered
under paragraph (b)(1) of this section
are not subject to the $500,000 cap for
the wrongful death claim as they are not
included in the wrongful death claim;
rather, each is a separate claim with its
own $500,000 cap under paragraph
(b)(3)(ii) of this section. Continuous or
repeated exposure to substantially the
same or similar harmful activity or
conditions is treated as one incident for
the purposes of determining the extent
of liability. If the claim accrued prior to
September 1, 1995, these limitations do
not apply. Any such limitation in the
law of the place of occurrence will
apply.
(b) Personal injury claims. (1) Eligible
claimants. Only the following may
claim:
(i) Persons who suffer physical
injuries or intentional emotional
distress, but not subrogees (when
claiming property loss or damage,
medical expenses or lost earnings); see
paragraph (a)(3)(iii) of this section.
(ii) Spouses for loss of consortium,
but not parent-child or child-parent loss
of consortium;
(iii) Members of the immediate family
who were in the zone of danger of the
injured person as defined in paragraph
(a)(3)(vii) of this section.
(2) Economic damages. Elements of
economic damage are limited to the
following:
(i) Past expenses, including medical,
hospital and related expenses actually
incurred. Nursing and similar services
furnished gratuitously by a family
member are compensable. Itemized bills
or other suitable proof must be
furnished. Expenses paid by, or
recoverable from, insurance or other
sources are not recoverable.
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
46285
(ii) Future medical, hospital, and
related expenses. When requested, a
medical examination is required.
(iii) Past lost earnings as substantiated
by documentation from both the
employer and a physician.
(iv) Loss of earning capacity and
ability to perform services, as
substantiated by acceptable medical
proof. When requested, past federal
income tax forms must be submitted for
the previous five years and the injured
person must undergo an independent
medical examination (IME). Estimates of
future losses must be discounted to
present value at a discount rate of one
to three percent after deducting for
income taxes. When a medical trust
providing for all future care is
established, personal consumption may
be deducted from future losses.
(v) Compensation paid to a person for
essential household services that the
injured person can no longer provide for
himself or herself. These costs are
recoverable only to the extent that they
neither have been paid by, nor are
recoverable from, insurance.
(3) Non-economic damages. Elements
of non-economic damages are limited to
the following:
(i) Past and future conscious pain and
suffering. This element is defined as
physical discomfort and distress as well
as mental and emotional trauma. Loss of
enjoyment of life, whether or not it is
discernible by the injured party, is
compensable. The inability to perform
daily activities that one performed prior
to injury, such as recreational activities,
is included in this element. Supportive
medical records and statements by
health care personnel and acquaintances
are required. When requested, the
claimant must submit to an interview.
(ii) Emotional distress. Emotional
distress under the conditions set forth in
paragraph (a)(3)(vii) of this section.
(iii) Physical disfigurement. This
element is defined as impairment
resulting from an injury to a person that
causes diminishment of beauty or
symmetry of appearance rendering the
person unsightly, misshapen, imperfect,
or deformed. A medical statement and
photographs, documenting claimant’s
condition, may be required.
(iv) Loss of consortium. This element
is defined as conjugal fellowship of
husband and wife and the right of each
to the company, society, cooperation,
and affection of the other in every
conjugal relation.
(c) Wrongful death claims. The law of
the place of the incident giving rise to
the claim will apply to claims arising in
the United States, its commonwealths,
territories or possessions.
E:\FR\FM\11AUP2.SGM
11AUP2
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
46286
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 155 / Friday, August 11, 2006 / Proposed Rules
(1) Claimant. (i) Only one claim may
be presented for a wrongful death. It
shall be presented by the decedent’s
personal representative on behalf of all
parties in interest. The personal
representative must be appointed by a
court of competent jurisdiction prior to
any settlement and must agree to make
distribution to the parties in interest
under court jurisdiction, if required.
(ii) Parties in interest are the surviving
spouse, children, or dependent parents
to the exclusion of all other parties. If
there is no surviving spouse, children,
or dependent parents, the next of kin
will be considered a party or parties in
interest. A dependent parent is one who
meets the criteria set forth by the
Internal Revenue Service to establish
eligibility for a DOD identification card.
(2) Economic loss. Elements of
economic damages are limited to the
following:
(i) Loss of monetary support of a
family member from the date of injury
causing death until expiration of
decedent’s worklife expectancy. When
requested, the previous five years
federal income tax forms must be
submitted. Estimates must be
discounted to present value at one to
three percent after deducting for taxes
and personal consumption. Loss of
retirement benefits is compensable and
similarly discounted after deductions.
(ii) Loss of ascertainable
contributions, such as money or gifts to
other than family member claimants as
substantiated by documentation or
statements from those concerned.
(iii) Loss of services from date of
injury to end of life expectancy of the
decedent or the person reasonably
expected to receive such services,
whichever is shorter.
(iv) Expenses as set forth in paragraph
(b)(2)(i) of this section. In addition,
burial expenses are allowable. Expenses
paid by, or recoverable from, insurance
or other sources are not recoverable.
(3) Non-economic loss. Elements of
damages are limited to the following:
(i) Pre-death conscious pain and
suffering.
(ii) Loss of companionship, comfort,
society, protection, and consortium
suffered by a spouse for the death of a
spouse, a child for the death of a parent,
or a parent for the death of a child.
(iii) Loss of training, guidance,
education, and nurture suffered by a
child under the age of 18 for the death
of a parent, until the child becomes 18
years old.
(iv) Claims for the survivors’
emotional distress, mental anguish,
grief, bereavement, and anxiety are not
payable, in particular claims for
intentional or negligent infliction of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:42 Aug 10, 2006
Jkt 208250
emotional distress to survivors arising
out of the circumstances of a wrongful
death are personal injury claims falling
under § 536.77(b)(3).
(d) Property damage claims. The
following provisions apply to all claims
arising in the United States, its
commonwealths, territories and
possessions.
(1) Such claims are limited to damage
to, or loss of, tangible property and costs
directly related thereto. Consequential
damages are not included. (See
§ 536.50(e) and DA Pam 27–162,
paragraph 2–56a.)
(2) Proper claimants are described in
§ 536.27. Claims for subrogation are
excluded. (See § 536.27(e)). However,
there is no requirement that the
claimant use personal casualty
insurance to mitigate the loss.
(3) Allowable elements of damages
and measure of proof (additions to these
elements are permissible with
concurrence of the Commander
USARCS). These elements are discussed
in detail in DA Pam 27–162, paragraph
2–54.
(i) Damages to real property.
(ii) Damage to or loss of personal
property, or personal property that is
not economically repairable.
(iii) Loss of use.
(iv) Towing and storage charges.
(v) Loss of business or profits.
(vi) Overhead.
§ 536.78 Settlement authority for claims
under the Military Claims Act.
(a) Authority of the Secretary of the
Army. The Secretary of the Army, the
Army General Counsel, as the
Secretary’s designee, or another
designee of the Secretary of the Army
may approve settlements in excess of
$100,000.
(b) Delegations of authority. (1)
Denials and final offers made under the
delegations set forth herein are subject
to appeal to the authorities specified in
paragraph (d) of this section.
(2) The Judge Advocate General
(TJAG) and the Assistant Judge
Advocate General (TAJAG) are
delegated authority to pay up to
$100,000 in settlement of a claim and to
disapprove a claim regardless of the
amount claimed.
(3) The Commander USARCS is
delegated authority to pay up to $25,000
in settlement of a claim and to
disapprove or make a final offer in a
claim regardless of the amount claimed.
(4) The Judge Advocate (JA) or Staff
Judge Advocate (SJA), subject to
limitations that USARCS may impose,
and chiefs of a command claims service
are delegated authority to pay up to
$25,000 in settlement, regardless of the
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
amount claimed, and to disapprove or
make a final offer in a claim presented
in an amount not exceeding $25,000.
(5) A head of an area claims office
(ACO) is delegated authority to pay up
to $25,000 in settlement of a claim,
regardless of the amount claimed, and to
disapprove or make a final offer in a
claim presented in an amount not
exceeding $25,000. A head of a claims
processing office (CPO) with approval
authority is delegated authority to
approve, in full or in part, claims
presented for $5,000 or less, and to pay
claims regardless of the amount
claimed, provided an award of $5,000 or
less is accepted in full satisfaction of the
claim.
(6) Authority to further delegate
payment authority is set forth in
§ 536.3(g)(1) of this part. For further
discussions also related to approval,
settlement and payment authority see
also paragraph 2–69 of DA Pam 27–162.
(c) Settlement of multiple claims
arising from a single incident. (1) Where
a single act or incident gives rise to
multiple claims cognizable under this
subpart, and where one or more of these
claims apparently cannot be settled
within the monetary jurisdiction of the
authority initially acting on them, no
final offer will be made. All claims will
be forwarded, along with a
recommended disposition, to the
authority who has monetary jurisdiction
over the largest claim for a
determination of liability. However,
where each individual claim, including
derivative claims, can be settled within
the monetary authority initially acting
on them, and none are subject to denial,
all such claims may be settled even
though the total amount exceeds the
monetary jurisdiction of the approving
or settlement authority.
(2) If such authority determines that
federal liability is established, he or she
may return claims of lesser value to the
field claims office for settlement within
that office’s jurisdiction. The field
claims office must take care to avoid
compromising the higher authority’s
discretion by conceding liability in
claims of lesser amount.
(d) Appeals. Denials or final offers on
claims described as follows may be
appealed to the official designated:
(1) For claims presented in an amount
over $100,000, final decisions on
appeals will be made by the Secretary
of the Army or designee.
(2) For claims presented for $100,000
or less, and any denied claim, regardless
of the amount claimed, in which the
denial was based solely upon an
incident-to-service bar, exclusionary
language in a federal statute governing
compensation of federal employees for
E:\FR\FM\11AUP2.SGM
11AUP2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 155 / Friday, August 11, 2006 / Proposed Rules
job-related injuries (see § 536.44), or
untimely filing, TJAG or TAJAG will
render final decisions on appeals,
except that claims presented for $25,000
or less, and not acted upon by the
Commander USARCS, are governed by
paragraph (d)(3) of this section.
(3) For claims presented for $25,000
or less, final decisions on appeals will
be made by the Commander USARCS,
his or her designee, or the chief of a
command claims service when such
claims are acted on by an ACO under
such service’s jurisdiction.
(4) Sections 536.64, 536.65, and
536.66 of this part set forth the rules
relating to the notification of appeal
rights and processing.
(e) Delegated authority. Authority
delegated by this section will not be
exercised unless the settlement or
approval authority has been assigned an
office code.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
§ 536.79 Action on appeal under the
Military Claims Act.
(a) The appeal will be examined by
the settlement authority who last acted
on the claim, or his or her successor, to
determine if the appeal complies with
the requirements of this regulation. The
settlement authority will also examine
the claim file and decide whether
additional investigation is required;
ensure that all allegations or evidence
presented by the claimant, agent, or
attorney are documented; and ensure
that all pertinent evidence is included.
If claimants state that they appeal, but
do not submit supporting materials
within the 60-day appeal period or an
approved extension thereof, these
appeals will be determined on the
record as it existed at the time of denial
or final offer. Unless action under
paragraph (b) of this section is taken, the
claim and complete investigative file,
including any additional investigation,
and a tort claims memorandum will be
forwarded to the appropriate appellate
authority for necessary action on the
appeal.
(b) If the evidence in the file,
including information submitted by the
claimant with the appeal and that found
by any necessary additional
investigation, indicates that the appeal
should be granted in whole or in part,
the settlement authority who last acted
on the claim, or his or her successor,
will attempt to settle the claim. If a
settlement cannot be reached, the
appeal will be forwarded in accordance
with paragraph (a) of this section.
(c) As to an appeal that requires
action by TJAG, TAJAG, or the Secretary
of the Army or designee, the
Commander USARCS may take the
action in paragraph (b) of this section or
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:42 Aug 10, 2006
Jkt 208250
forward the claim together with a
recommendation for action. All matters
submitted by the claimant will be
forwarded and considered.
(d) Since an appeal under this subpart
is not an adversarial proceeding, no
form of hearing is authorized. A request
by the claimant for access to
documentary evidence in the claim file
to be used in considering the appeal
will be granted unless law or regulation
does not permit access.
(e) If the appellate authority upholds
a final offer or authorizes an award on
appeal from a denial of a claim, the
notice of the appellate authority’s action
will inform the claimant that he or she
must accept the award within 180 days
of the date of mailing of the notice of the
appellate authority’s action or the award
will be withdrawn, the claim will be
deemed denied, and the file will be
closed without future recourse.
§ 536.80 Payment of costs, settlements,
and judgments related to certain medical
malpractice claims.
(a) General. Costs, settlements, or
judgments cognizable under 10 U.S.C.
1089(f) for personal injury or death
caused by any physician, dentist, nurse,
pharmacist, paramedic, or other
supporting personnel (including
medical and dental technicians, nurse
assistants, therapists, and Red Cross
volunteers of the Army Medical
Department (AMEDD), AMEDD
personnel detailed for service with other
than a federal department, agency, or
instrumentality and direct contract
personnel identified in the contract as
federal employees), will be paid
provided that:
(1) The alleged negligent or wrongful
actions or omissions occurred during
the performance of medical, dental, or
related health care functions (including
clinical studies and investigations)
while the medical or health care
employee was acting within the scope of
employment.
(2) Such personnel furnish prompt
notification and delivery of all process
served or received and other documents,
information, and assistance as
requested.
(3) Such personnel cooperate in the
defense of the action on its merits.
(b) Requests for contribution or
indemnification. All requests for
contribution or indemnification under
this section should be forwarded to the
Commander USARCS for action,
following the procedures set forth in
this subpart.
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
46287
§ 536.81 Payment of costs, settlements,
and judgments related to certain legal
malpractice claims.
(a) General. Costs, settlements, and
judgments cognizable under 10 U.S.C.
1054(f) for damages for personal injury
or loss of property caused by any
attorney, paralegal, or other member of
a legal staff will be paid if:
(1) The alleged negligent or wrongful
actions or omissions occurred during
the provision or performance of legal
services while the attorney or legal
employee was acting within the scope of
duties or employment;
(2) Such personnel furnish prompt
notification and delivery of all process
served or received and other documents,
information, and assistance as
requested;
(3) Such personnel cooperate in the
defense of the action on the merits.
(b) Requests for contribution or
indemnification. All requests for
contribution or indemnification under
this section should be forwarded to the
Commander USARCS for action,
following the procedures set forth in
this subpart.
§ 536.82 Reopening an MCA claim after
final action by a settlement authority.
(a) Original approval or settlement
authority (including TAJAG, TJAG,
Secretary of the Army, or the Secretary’s
designees). (1) An original settlement
authority may reconsider the denial of,
or final offer on, a claim brought under
the MCA upon request of the claimant
or the claimant’s authorized agent. In
the absence of such a request, the
settlement authority may on his or her
initiative reconsider a claim.
(2) An original approval or settlement
authority may reopen and correct action
on an MCA claim previously settled in
whole or in part (even if a settlement
agreement has been executed) when it
appears that the original action was
incorrect in law or fact based on the
evidence of record at the time of the
action or subsequently received. For
errors in fact, the new evidence must
not have been discoverable at the time
of final action by either the Army or the
claimant through the exercise of
reasonable diligence. Corrective action
may also be taken when an error
contrary to the parties’ mutual
understanding is discovered in the
original action. If the settlement or
approval authority determines that their
original action was incorrect, they will
modify the action and, if appropriate,
make a supplemental payment. The
basis for a change in action will be
stated in a memorandum included in
the file. For example, a claim was
settled for $15,000, but the settlement
E:\FR\FM\11AUP2.SGM
11AUP2
46288
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 155 / Friday, August 11, 2006 / Proposed Rules
agreement was typed to read ‘‘$1,500’’
and the error is not discovered until the
file is being prepared for payment. If
appropriate, a corrected payment will be
made. A settlement authority who has
reason to believe that a settlement was
obtained by fraud on the part of the
claimant or claimant’s legal
representative will reopen action on that
claim and, if the belief is substantiated,
correct the action. The basis for
correcting an action will be stated in a
memorandum and included in the file.
(b) A successor approval or settlement
authority (including TAJAG, TJAG,
Secretary of the Army, or the Secretary’s
designees). (1) Reconsideration. A
successor approval or settlement
authority may reconsider the denial of,
or final offer on, an MCA claim upon
request of the claimant or the claimant’s
authorized agent only on the basis of
fraud, substantial new evidence, errors
in calculation, or mistake
(misinterpretation) of law.
(2) Settlement correction. A successor
approval or settlement authority may
reopen and correct a predecessor’s
action on a claim that was previously
settled in whole or in part for the same
reasons that an original authority may
do so.
(c) Time requirement for filing request
for reconsideration. Requests
postmarked more than five years from
the date of mailing of final notice will
be denied based on the doctrine of
laches.
(d) Finality of action. Action by the
appropriate authority (either affirming
the prior action or granting full or
granting full or partial relief) is final
under the provisions of 10 U.S.C. 2735.
Action upon a request for
reconsideration constitutes final
administrative disposition of a claim.
No further requests for reconsideration
will be allowed except on the basis of
fraud.
Subpart D—Claims Cognizable Under
the Federal Tort Claims Act
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
§ 536.83 Statutory authority for the Federal
Tort Claims Act.
The statutory authority for this
subpart is the Federal Tort Claims Act
(FTCA) (60 Stat. 842, 28 U.S.C. 2671–
2680), as amended by Public Law 89–
506, July 1966 (80 Stat. 306); Public Law
93–253, March 1974 (88 Stat. 50); Public
Law 97–124, December 1981 (93 Stat.
1666); Public Law 100–694, November
1988 (102 Stat. 4563–67); and Public
Law 101–552, November 1996 (104 Stat.
734); and as implemented by the
Attorney General’s Regulations (28 CFR
14.1 through 14.11 and its Appendix),
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:42 Aug 10, 2006
Jkt 208250
all of which are posted on the USARCS
Web site; for the address see § 536.2(a).
§ 536.84 Scope for claims under the
Federal Tort Claim Act.
(a) General. This subpart applies in
the United States, its commonwealths,
territories and possessions (all
hereinafter collectively referred to as
United States or U.S.). It prescribes the
substantive bases and special
procedural requirements under the
FTCA and the implementing Attorney
General’s regulations for the
administrative settlement of claims
against the United States based on
death, personal injury, or damage to, or
loss of, property caused by negligent or
wrongful acts or omissions by the
United States or its employees acting
within the scope of their employment.
If a conflict exists between this part and
the Attorney General’s regulations, the
latter governs.
(b) Effect of the Military Claims Act.
A tort claim arising in the United States,
its commonwealths, territories, and
possessions may be settled under
subpart C of this part if the Federal Tort
Claims Act (FTCA) does not apply to the
type of claim under consideration or if
the claim arose incident to noncombat
activities. If a claim is filed under both
the FTCA and the Military Claims Act
(MCA), or when both statutes apply
equally, final action thereon will follow
the procedures set forth in DA Pam 27–
162, paragraphs 2–74 through 2–76,
discussing final offers and denial letters.
§ 536.85 Claims payable under the Federal
Tort Claims Act.
(a) Unless otherwise prescribed,
claims for death, personal injury, or
damage to, or loss of, property (real or
personal) are payable under this subpart
when the injury or damage is caused by
negligent or wrongful acts or omissions
of military personnel or civilian
employees of the Department of the
Army or Department of Defense while
acting within the scope of their
employment under circumstances in
which the United States, if a private
person, would be liable to the claimant
in accordance with the law of the place
where the act or omission occurred. The
FTCA is a limited waiver of sovereign
immunity without which the United
States may not be sued in tort.
Similarly, neither the Fifth Amendment
nor any other provision of the U.S.
Constitution creates or permits a federal
cause of action allowing recovery in
tort. Immunity must be expressly
waived, as the FTCA waives it.
(b) To be payable, a claim must arise
from the acts or omissions of an
‘‘employee of the government’’ under 28
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
U.S.C. 2671. Categories of such
employees are listed in § 536.23(b) of
this part.
§ 536.86 Claims not payable under the
Federal Tort Claims Act.
A claim is not payable if it is
identified as an exclusion in DA Pam
27–162, paragraphs 2–36 through 2–43.
§ 536.87 Applicable law for claims under
the Federal Tort Claims Act.
The applicable law for claims falling
under the Federal Tort Claims Act is set
forth in §§ 536.41 through 536.52.
§ 536.88 Settlement authority for claims
under the Federal Tort Claims Act.
(a) General. Subject to the Attorney
General’s approval of payments in
excess of $200,000 for a single claim, or
if the total value of all claims and
potential claims arising out of a single
incident exceeds $200,000 (for which
USARCS must write an action
memorandum for submission to the
Department of Justice), the following
officials are delegated authority to settle
(including payment in full or in part, or
denial) and make final offers on claims
under this subpart:
(1) The Judge Advocate General
(TJAG);
(2) The Assistant Judge Advocate
General (TAJAG); and
(3) The Commander USARCS.
(b) ACO heads. A head of an area
claims office (ACO) is delegated
authority to pay up to $50,000 in
settlement of a claim, regardless of the
amount claimed, and to disapprove or
make a final offer in a claim presented
in an amount not exceeding $50,000,
provided the value of all claims and
potential claims arising out of a single
incident does not exceed $200,000.
(c) CPO heads. A head of a claims
processing office (CPO) with approval
authority is delegated authority to
approve, in full or in part, claims
presented for $5,000 or less, and to pay
claims regardless of amount, provided
an award of $5000 or less is accepted in
full satisfaction of the claim.
(d) Further guidance. Authority to
further delegate payment authority is set
forth in § 536.3(g)(1) of this part. For
further discussions related to approval,
settlement and payment authority see
paragraphs 2–69 and 2–71 of DA Pam
27–162.
(e) Settlement of multiple claims from
a single incident. (1) Where a single act
or incident gives rise to multiple claims
cognizable under this subpart, and
where one claim cannot be settled
within the monetary jurisdiction for one
claim of the authority acting on the
claim or all claims cannot be settled
within the monetary jurisdiction for a
E:\FR\FM\11AUP2.SGM
11AUP2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 155 / Friday, August 11, 2006 / Proposed Rules
single incident, no final offer will be
made. All claims will be forwarded,
along with a recommended disposition,
to the Commander USARCS.
(2) If the Commander USARCS
determines that all claims can be settled
for a total of $200,000 or less, he may
return claims to the field office for
settlement. If the Commander USARCS,
determines that all claims cannot be
settled for a total of $200,000, he must
request Department of Justice authority
prior to settlement of any one claim.
The field claims office must not concede
liability by paying any one claim of
lesser value.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
§ 536.89 Reconsideration of Federal Tort
Claims Act claims.
(a) Reconsideration of paid claims.
Under the provision of 28 U.S.C. 2672,
neither an original or successor
authority may reconsider a claim which
has been paid except as expressly set
forth below. Payment of an amount for
property damage will bar payment for
personal injury or death except for a
split claim provided the provisions of
§ 536.60 are followed. Supplemental
payments for either property or injury
are barred by 10 U.S.C. 2672.
Accordingly, claimants will be informed
that only one claim or payment is
permitted.
(b) Notice of right to reconsideration.
Notice of disapproval or final offer
issued by an authority listed in
§ 536.88(b) will advise the claimant of a
right to reconsideration to be submitted
in writing not later than six months
from the date of mailing the notice.
Such a request will suspend the
requirement to bring suit for a minimum
of six month or until action is taken on
the request. The claimant will be so
informed. See the Attorney General’s
Regulations at 28 CFR 14.9(b), posted on
the USARCS Web site; for the address
see § 536.2(a).
(c) Original approval or settlement
authority. (1) Reconsideration. An
original settlement authority may
reconsider the denial of, or final offer
on, a claim brought under the FTCA
upon request of the claimant or the legal
representative.
(2) Settlement correction. An original
approval or settlement authority may
reopen and correct action on a claim
previously settled in whole or in part
(even if a settlement agreement has been
executed) when an error contrary to the
parties’ mutual understanding is
discovered in the original action. For
example: a claim was settled for
$15,000, but the settlement agreement
was typed to read ‘‘$1,500’’ and the
error is not discovered until the file is
being prepared for payment. If
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:42 Aug 10, 2006
Jkt 208250
appropriate, a corrected payment will be
made. An approval or settlement
authority who has reason to believe that
a settlement was obtained by fraud on
the part of the claimant or claimant’s
legal representative will reopen action
on that claim, and if the belief is
substantiated, correct the action. The
basis for correcting an action will be
stated in a memorandum and included
in the file.
(d) A successor approval or settlement
authority. (1) Reconsideration. A
successor approval or settlement
authority may reconsider the denial of,
or final offer on, an FTCA claim upon
request of the claimant, the claimant’s
authorized agent, or the claimant’s legal
representative only on the basis of
fraud, substantial new evidence, errors
in calculation, or mistake
(misinterpretation) of law.
(2) Settlement correction. A successor
approval or settlement authority may
reopen and correct a predecessor’s
action on a claim that was previously
settled in whole or in part for the same
reasons that an original authority may
do so.
(e) Requirement to forward a request
for reconsideration. When full relief is
not granted, forward all requests for
reconsideration of an ACO’s denial or
final offer to the Commander USARCS
for action. Include all investigative
material and legal analyses generated by
the request.
(f) Action prior to forwarding. A
request for reconsideration should
disclose fully the legal and/or factual
bases that the claimant has asserted as
grounds for relief and provide
appropriate supporting documents or
evidence. Following completion of any
investigation or other action deemed
necessary for an informed disposition of
the request, the approval or settlement
authority will reconsider the claim and
attempt to settle it, granting relief as
warranted. When further settlement
efforts appear unwarranted, the entire
file with a memorandum of opinion will
be forwarded to the Commander
USARCS. The claimant will be informed
of such transfer.
(g) Finality of action. Action by the
appropriate authority (either affirming
the prior action or granting full or
partial relief) upon a request for
reconsideration constitutes final
administrative disposition of a claim.
No further requests for reconsideration
will be allowed except on the basis of
fraud. Attempted further requests for
reconsideration on other grounds will
not toll the six-month period set forth in
28 U.S.C. 2401(b).
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
46289
Subpart E—Claims Cognizable Under
the Non-Scope Claims Act
§ 536.90 Statutory authority for the NonScope Claims Act.
The statutory authority for this
subpart is set forth in the Act of October
1962, 10 U.S.C. 2737, 76 Stat. 767,
commonly called the ‘‘Non-Scope
Claims Act (NSCA).’’
§ 536.91 Scope for claims under the NonScope Claims Act.
(a) This subpart applies worldwide
and prescribes the substantive bases and
special procedural requirements for the
administrative settlement and payment
of not more than $1,000 for any claim
against the United States for personal
injury, death or damage to, or loss of,
property caused by military personnel
or civilian employees, incident to the
use of a U.S. vehicle at any location, or
incident to the use of other U.S.
property on a government installation,
which claim is not cognizable under any
other provision of law.
(b) For the purposes of this subpart,
a ‘‘government installation’’ is a facility
having fixed boundaries owned or
controlled by the government, and a
‘‘vehicle’’ includes every description of
carriage or other artificial contrivance
used, or capable of being used, as means
of transportation on land (1 U.S.C. 4).
(c) Any claim in which there appears
to be a dispute about whether the
employee was acting within the scope of
employment will be considered under
subparts C, D, or F of this part. Only
when all parties, including an insurer,
agree that there is no ‘‘in scope’’ issue
will the claim be considered under this
subpart.
§ 536.92 Claims payable under the NonScope Claims Act.
(a) General. A claim for personal
injury, death, or damage to, or loss of,
property, real or personal, is payable
under this subpart when:
(1) Caused by negligent or wrongful
acts or omissions of Department of
Defense or Department of the Army
(DA) military personnel or civilian
employees, as listed in § 536.23(b):
(i) Incident to the use of a vehicle
belonging to the United States at any
place or;
(ii) Incident to the use of any other
property belonging to the United States
on a government installation.
(2) The claim is not payable under
any other claims statute or regulation
available to the DA for the
administrative settlement of claims.
(b) Personal injury or death. A claim
for personal injury or death is allowable
only for the cost of reasonable medical,
E:\FR\FM\11AUP2.SGM
11AUP2
46290
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 155 / Friday, August 11, 2006 / Proposed Rules
hospital, or burial expenses actually
incurred and not otherwise furnished or
paid by the United States.
(c) Property loss or damage. A claim
for damage to or loss of property is
allowable only for the cost of reasonable
repairs or value at time of loss,
whichever is less.
§ 536.93 Claims not payable under the
Non-Scope Claims Act.
Under this subpart, a claim is not
payable that:
(a) Results in whole or in part from
the negligent or wrongful act of the
claimant or his or her agent or
employee. The doctrine of comparative
negligence does not apply.
(b) Is for medical, hospital, or burial
expenses furnished or paid by the
United States.
(c) Is for any element of damage
pertaining to personal injuries or death
other than as provided in § 536.93(b).
All other items of damage, for example,
compensation for loss of earnings and
services, diminution of earning
capacity, anticipated medical expenses,
physical disfigurement and pain and
suffering are not payable.
(d) Is for loss of use of property or for
the cost of substitute property, for
example, a rental.
(e) Is legally recoverable by the
claimant under an indemnifying law or
indemnity contract. If the claim is in
part legally recoverable, the part
recoverable by the claimant is not
payable.
(f) Is a subrogated claim.
(g) In some circumstances some
claims may be partially payable. See DA
Pam 27–162, paragraph 5–4 for more
information on claims that may be
partially payable.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
§ 536.94 Settlement authority for claims
under the Non-Scope Claims Act.
(a) Settlement authority. The
following are delegated authority to pay
up to $1,000 in settlement of each claim
arising out of one incident and to
disapprove a claim presented in any
amount under this subpart:
(1) The Judge Advocate General
(TJAG);
(2) The Assistant Judge Advocate
General (TAJAG);
(3) The Commander USARCS;
(4) The Judge Advocate (JA) or Staff
Judge Advocate (SJA) or chief of a
command claims service; and
(5) The head of an area claims office
(ACO).
(b) Approval authority. The head of a
claims processing office (CPO) with
approval authority is delegated
authority to approve and pay, in full or
in part, claims presented for $1,000 or
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:42 Aug 10, 2006
Jkt 208250
less and to compromise and pay,
regardless of amount claimed, an agreed
award of $1,000 or less.
(c) Further guidance. Authority to
further delegate payment authority is set
forth in § 536.3(g)(1) of this part. For
further discussions also related to
approval, settlement and payment
authority see also paragraphs 2–69 and
2–71 of DA Pam 27–162.
§ 536.95 Reconsideration of Non-Scope
Claims Act claims.
The provisions of § 536.89 addressing
reconsideration apply and are
incorporated herein by reference. If the
claim is not cognizable under the
Federal Tort Claims Act, appellate
procedures under the Military Claims
Act or NGCA apply.
Subpart F—Claims Cognizable Under
the National Guard Claims Act
§ 536.96 Statutory authority for the
National Guard Claims Act.
The statutory authority for this
subpart is contained in the Act of
September 1960 (32 U.S.C. 715, 74 Stat.
878), commonly referred to as the
‘‘National Guard Claims Act’’ (NGCA),
as amended by Public Law 87–212, (75
Stat. 488), September 1961; Public Law
90–486, (82 Stat. 756), August 1968;
Public Law 90–521, (82 Stat. 874),
September 1968; Public Law 90–525,
(82 Stat. 877), September 1968; Public
Law 91–312, (84 Stat. 412), July 1970;
Public Law 93–336, (88 Stat. 291), July
1974; and Public Law 98–564, (98 Stat.
2918), October 1984.
§ 536.97 Scope for claims under National
Guard Claims Act.
This subpart applies worldwide and
prescribes the substantive bases and
special procedural regulations for the
settlement of claims against the United
States for death, personal injury,
damage to, or loss or destruction of
property.
(a) Soldiers of the Army National
Guard (ARNG) can perform military
duty in an active duty status under the
authority of Title 10 of the United States
Code, in a full-time National Guard duty
or inactive-duty training status under
the authority of Title 32 of the United
States Code, or in a state active duty
status under the authority of a state
code.
(1) When ARNG soldiers perform
active duty, they are under federal
command and control and are paid from
federal funds. For claims purposes,
those soldiers are treated as active duty
soldiers. The NGCA, 32 U.S.C. 715, does
not apply.
(2) When ARNG soldiers perform fulltime National Guard duty or inactive-
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
duty training, they are under state
command and control and are paid from
federal funds. The NGCA does apply,
but as explained in paragraph (c) of this
section it is seldom used.
(3) When ARNG soldiers perform state
active duty, they are under state
command and control and are paid from
state funds. Federal claims statutes do
not apply, but state claims statutes may
apply.
(b) The ARNG also employs civilians,
referred to as technicians and employed
under 32 U.S.C. 709. Technicians are
usually, but not always, ARNG soldiers
who perform the usual 15 days of
annual training (a category of full-time
duty) and 48 drills (inactive-duty
training) per year.
(c) NGCA coverage applies only to
ARNG soldiers performing full-time
National Guard duty or inactive-duty
training and to technicians. However,
since the NGCA’s enactment in 1960,
Congress has also extended Federal Tort
Claims Act (FTCA) coverage to these
personnel.
(1) In 1968, technicians, who were
state employees formerly, were made
federal employees. Along with federal
employee status came FTCA coverage.
Technicians no longer have any state
status, albeit they are hired, fired, and
administered by a state official, the
Adjutant General, acting as the agent of
the federal government.
(2) In 1981, Congress extended FTCA
coverage to ARNG soldiers performing
full-time National Guard duty or
inactive-duty training (such as any
training or other duty under 32 U.S.C.
316, 502–505). Unlike making
technicians federal employees, this
extension of coverage did not affect
their underlying status as state military
personnel.
(d) Claims arising from the negligent
acts or omissions of ARNG soldiers
performing full-time National Guard
duty or inactive-duty training, or of
technicians, will be processed under the
FTCA. Therefore, the NGCA is generally
relevant only to claims arising from
noncombat activities or outside the
United States. Additionally, claims by
members of the National Guard may be
paid for property loss or damage
incident to service if the claim is based
on activities falling under this subpart
and is not payable under AR 27–20,
chapter 11.
§ 536.98 Claims payable under the
National Guard Claims Act.
The provisions of § 536.75 apply to
claims arising under this subpart.
E:\FR\FM\11AUP2.SGM
11AUP2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 155 / Friday, August 11, 2006 / Proposed Rules
§ 536.99 Claims not payable under the
National Guard Claims Act.
The provisions of § 536.76 apply to
claims arising under this subpart.
§ 536.100 Applicable law for claims under
the National Guard Claims Act.
The provisions of § 536.77 apply to
claims arising under this subpart.
§ 536.101 Settlement authority for claims
under the National Guard Claims Act.
The provisions of § 536.78 apply to
claims arising under this subpart.
§ 536.102 Actions on appeal under the
National Guard Claims Act.
The provisions of § 536.79 apply to
claims arising under this subpart.
Subpart G—Claims Cognizable Under
International Agreements
§ 536.103 Statutory authority for claims
cognizable under international claims
agreements.
The authority for claims presented or
processed under this subpart is set forth
in the following federal laws and bi- or
multinational agreements:
(a) 10 U.S.C. 2734a and 10 U.S.C.
2734b (the International Agreements
Claims Act) as amended, for claims
arising overseas under international
agreements.
(b) Various international agreements,
such as the North Atlantic Treaty
Organization (NATO) Status of Forces
Agreement (SOFA) and the Partnership
for Peace (PFP) SOFA.
§ 536.104
Current agreements in force.
Current listings of known agreements
in force are also posted on the USARCS
Web site; for the address see § 536.2(a).
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
§ 536.105 Responsibilities generally/
international agreements claims.
(a) The Commander USARCS is
responsible for:
(1) Providing policy guidance to
command claims services or other
responsible judge advocate (JA) offices
on SOFA or other treaty reimbursement
programs implementing 10 U.S.C. 2734a
and 2734b.
(2) Monitoring the reimbursement
system to ensure that programs for the
proper verification and certification of
reimbursement are in place.
(3) Monitoring funds reimbursed to or
by foreign governments.
(b) Responsibilities in the continental
United States (CONUS)—The
responsibility for implementing these
agreements within the United States has
been delegated to the Secretary of the
Army (SA). The SA, in turn, has
delegated that responsibility to the
Commander USARCS, who is in charge
of the receiving State office for the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:42 Aug 10, 2006
Jkt 208250
United States, as prescribed in DODD
5515.8. The Commander USARCS is
responsible for maintaining direct
liaison with sending State
representatives and establishing
procedures designed to carry out the
provisions of this subpart.
§ 536.106 Definitions for international
agreements claims.
(a) ‘‘Force and civilian component of
force.’’ Members of the sending State’s
armed forces on temporary or
permanent official duty within the
receiving State, civilian employees of
the sending State’s armed forces, and
those individuals acting in an official
capacity for the sending State’s armed
forces. However, under provisions of the
applicable SOFAs the sending State and
the receiving State may agree to exclude
from the definition of ‘‘force’’ certain
individuals, units or formations that
would otherwise be covered by the
SOFA. Where such an exclusion has
been created, this subpart will not apply
to claims arising from actions or
omission by those individuals, units or
formations. ‘‘Force and civilian
component of force’’ also includes
claims arising out of acts or omissions
made by military or civilian personnel,
regardless of nationality, who are
assigned or attached to, or employed by,
an international headquarters
established under the provisions of the
Protocol on the Status of International
Military Headquarters Set Up Pursuant
to the North Atlantic Treaty, dated
August 28, 1952, such as Supreme
Allied Command, Atlantic.
(b) Types of claims under agreements.
(1) Intergovernmental claims. Claims of
one contracting party against any other
contracting party for damage to property
owned by its armed services, or for
injury or death suffered by a member of
the armed services engaged in the
performance of official duties, are
waived. Claims above a minimal
amount for damage to property owned
by a governmental entity other than the
armed services may be asserted. NATO
SOFA, Article VIII, paragraph 1–4;
Singapore SOFA, Article XVI, paragraph
2–3.
(2) Third-party scope claims. Claims
arising out of any acts or omissions of
members of a force or the civilian
component of a sending State done in
the performance of official duty or any
other act, omission, or occurrence for
which the sending State is legally
responsible shall be filed, considered
and settled in accordance with the laws
and regulations of the receiving State
with respect to claims arising from the
activities of its own armed service; see,
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
46291
for example, NATO SOFA, Article VIII,
paragraph 5.
(3) Ex gratia claims. Claims arising
out of tortious acts or omissions not
done in the performance of official
duties shall be considered by the
sending State for an ‘‘ex gratia’’ payment
that is made directly to the injured
party; see, for example, NATO SOFA,
Article VIII, paragraph 6.
§ 536.107 Scope for international
agreements claims arising in the United
States.
This section sets forth procedures and
responsibilities for the investigation,
processing, and settlement of claims
arising out of any acts or omissions of
members of a foreign military force or
civilian component present in the
United States or a territory,
commonwealth, or possession thereof
under the provisions of cost sharing
reciprocal international agreements
which contain claims settlement
provisions applicable to claims arising
in the United States. Article VIII of the
NATO SOFA has reciprocal provisions
applying to all NATO member
countries; the Partnership for Peace
(PFP) Agreement has similiar
provisions, as do the Singapore and
Australian SOFAs.
§ 536.108 Claims payable under
international agreements (for those arising
in the United States).
(a) Within the United States, Art. VIII,
NATO SOFA applies to claims arising
within the North Atlantic Treaty Area,
which includes CONUS and its
territories and possessions north of the
Tropic of Cancer (23.5 degrees north
latitude). This excludes Puerto Rico, the
Virgin Islands, and parts of Hawaii.
Third-party scope claims are payable
under subpart D or, if the claim arises
incident to noncombat activities, under
subpart C of this part. Maritime claims
are payable under subpart H of this part.
The provisions of these subparts on
what claims are payable apply equally
here. The members of the foreign force
or civilian component must be acting in
pursuance of the applicable treaty’s
objectives.
(b) Within the United States, thirdparty ex gratia claims are payable only
by the sending State and are not payable
under subpart E of this part.
§ 536.109 Claims not payable under
international agreements (for those arising
in the United States).
The following claims are not payable:
(a) Claims arising from a member of
a foreign force or civilian component’s
acts or omissions that do not accord
with the objectives of a treaty
E:\FR\FM\11AUP2.SGM
11AUP2
46292
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 155 / Friday, August 11, 2006 / Proposed Rules
authorizing their presence in the United
States.
(b) Claims arising from the acts or
omissions of a member of a foreign force
or civilian component who has been
excluded from SOFA coverage by
agreement between the sending State
and the United States.
(c) Third-party scope claims arising
within the United States that are not
payable under subparts C, D, or H of this
part are listed as barred under those
subparts. As sending State forces are
considered assimilated into the U.S.
Armed Services for purposes of the
SOFAs, their members are also barred
from receiving compensation from the
United States when they are injured
incident to their service, Daberkow v.
United States, 581 F.2d 785 (9th Cir.
1978).
§ 536.110 Notification of incidents arising
under international agreements (for claims
arising in the United States).
To enable USARCS to properly
discharge its claims responsibilities
under the applicable SOFAs, it must be
notified of all incidents, including offduty incidents, in which members of a
foreign military force or civilian
component are involved. Any member
or employee of the U.S. armed services
who learns of an incident involving a
member of a foreign military force or
civilian component resulting in
personal injury, death, or property
damage will immediately notify the
judge advocate (JA) or legal officer at the
installation or activity to which such
person is assigned or attached. The JA
or legal officer receiving such
notification will in turn notify the
Commander USARCS. If the member is
neither assigned nor attached to any
installation or activity within the United
States, the Commander USARCS, will
be notified.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
§ 536.111 Investigation of claims arising
under international agreements (for those
claims arising in the United States).
Responsibility for investigating an
incident rests upon the area claims
office (ACO) or claims processing office
(CPO) responsible for the geographic
area in which the incident occurred.
The Commander USARCS, an ACO, and
a CPO are authorized to designate the
legal office of the installation at which
the member of the foreign force or
civilian component is attached,
including the legal office of another
armed force, to carry out the
responsibility to investigate. The
investigation will comply with the
responsible Service’s implementing
claims regulation. When the member is
neither assigned nor attached within the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:42 Aug 10, 2006
Jkt 208250
United States, the Commander USARCS
will furnish assistance.
§ 536.112 Settlement authority for claims
arising under international agreements (for
those claims arising in the United States).
Settlement authority is delegated to
the Commander USARCS, except for
settlement amounts exceeding the
Commander’s authority as set forth in
subparts C, D, or H of this part, or in
those cases where settlement is reserved
to a higher authority. Pursuant to the
applicable SOFA, the Commander
USARCS will report the proposed
settlement to the sending State office for
concurrence or objection. See, for
example, NATO SOFA, Article VIII.
§ 536.113 Assistance to foreign forces for
claims arising under international
agreements (as to claims arising in the
United States).
All claims arising from activities of
members of NATO, Partnership for
Peace, Singaporean, or Australian forces
in the United States are processed in the
same manner as those arising from
activities of U.S. government personnel.
All JAs and legal offices will provide
assistance similar to that provided to
U.S. armed services personnel.
§ 536.114 Scope for claims arising
overseas under international agreements.
(a) This section sets forth guidance on
claims arising from any act or omission
of soldiers or members of the civilian
component of the U.S. armed services
done in the performance of official duty
or arising from any other act or omission
or occurrence for which the U.S. armed
services are responsible under an
international agreement. Claims
incidents arising in countries for which
the SOFA requires the receiving State to
adjudicate and pay the claims in
accordance with its laws and
regulations are subject to partial
reimbursement by the United States.
(b) Claims by foreign inhabitants
based on acts or omissions outside the
scope of official duties are cognizable
under subpart J of this part. Claims
arising from nonscope acts or omissions
by third parties who are not foreign
inhabitants are cognizable under
subpart E but not under subparts C or
F of this part.
§ 536.115 Claims procedures for claims
arising overseas under international
agreements.
(a) SOFA provisions that call for the
receiving State to adjudicate claims
have been held to be the exclusive
remedy for claims against the United
States, Aaskov v. Aldridge, 695 F. Supp.
595 (D.D.C. 1988); Dancy v. Department
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
of Army, 897 F. Supp. 612 (D.D.C.
1995).
(b) SOFA provisions that call for the
receiving State to adjudicate claims
against the United States usually refer to
claims by third parties brought against
members of the force or civilian
component. This includes claims by
tourists or business travelers as well as
inhabitants of foreign countries.
Depending on how the receiving State
interprets the particular SOFA’s class of
proper claimants, the receiving State
may also consider claims by U.S.
soldiers, civilian employees, and their
family members. Chiefs of command
claims services or other Army JA offices
responsible for claims that arise in
countries bound by SOFA or other
treaty provisions requiring a receiving
State to consider claims against the
United States will ensure that all claims
personnel know the receiving State’s
policy on which persons or classes of
persons are proper claimants under
such provisions. When a claim is filed
both with the receiving State and under
either the Military Claims Act (MCA) or
Foreign Claims Act (FCA), the
provisions of § 536.76(h) of this part and
DA Pam 27–162, paragraph 3–4a apply.
(c) When SOFA provisions provide
for receiving State claims consideration,
the time limit for filing such claims may
be much shorter than the two years
otherwise allowed under the FCA or
MCA. For example, receiving State
claims offices in Germany require that a
claim be filed under the SOFA within
three months of the date that the
claimant is aware of the U.S.
involvement. If the filing period is about
to expire for claims arising in Germany,
have the claimant fill out a claim form,
make two copies, and date-stamp each
copy as received by a sending State
claims office. Return the date-stamped
original of the claim to the claimant
with instructions to promptly file with
the receiving State claims office. Keep
one date-stamped copy as a potential
claim. Forward one date-stamped copy
of the claim to the U.S. Army Claims
Service Europe (USACSEUR). This may
toll the applicable German statute of
limitations. Additionally, many
receiving State claims offices do not
require claimants to demand a sum
certain. All claims personnel must
familiarize themselves with the
applicable receiving State law and
procedures governing SOFA claims.
(d) All foreign inhabitants who file
claims against the United States that fall
within the receiving State’s
responsibility, such as claims based on
acts or omissions within the scope of
U.S. Armed Forces members’ or civilian
employees’ duties, must file the claim
E:\FR\FM\11AUP2.SGM
11AUP2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 155 / Friday, August 11, 2006 / Proposed Rules
with the appropriate receiving State
office. Those U.S. inhabitants whose
claims would be otherwise cognizable
under the Military Claims Act (subpart
C of this part) and whom the receiving
State deems proper claimants under the
SOFA must also file with the receiving
State.
(e) A claim filed with, and considered
by, a receiving State under a SOFA or
other international agreement claims
provision may be considered under
other subparts of this part only if the
receiving State denied the claim on the
basis that it was not cognizable under
the treaty or agreement provisions. See
DA Pam 27–162, paragraph 3–4a(2), for
conditions of waiver of the foregoing
requirement. See also §§ 536.76(h) and
536.138(j) of this part. When a claimant
has filed a claim with a receiving State
and received payment, or the claim has
been denied on the merits, such action
will be the claimant’s final and
exclusive remedy and will bar any
further claims against the United States.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
§ 536.116 Responsibilities as to claims
arising overseas under international
agreements.
(a) Command claims services or other
responsible JA offices within whose
jurisdiction SOFA or other treaty
provisions provide for a claim
reimbursement system, and where DA
has been assigned single-service
responsibility for the foreign country
seeking reimbursement (see § 536.17)
are responsible for:
(1) Establishing programs for
verifying, certifying, and reimbursing
claims payments. Such service or JA
office will provide a copy of its
procedures implementing the program
to the Commander USARCS.
(2) Providing the Commander
USARCS with budget estimates for
reimbursements in addition to the
reports required by AR 27–20,
paragraph 13–7.
(3) Providing the Commander
USARCS each month in which
payments are made, with statistical
information on the number of
individual claims reimbursed, the total
amount paid by the foreign government,
and the total amount reimbursed by the
United States.
(4) Providing the Commander
USARCS with a quarterly report
showing total reimbursements paid
during the quarter for maneuver damage
and tort claims classified according to
major categories of damage determined
by the Commander USARCS, and an
update on major issues or activities that
could affect the reimbursement system’s
operation or funding.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:42 Aug 10, 2006
Jkt 208250
(b) Command claims services or other
responsible Army JA offices will ensure
that all claims personnel within their
areas of responsibility:
(1) Receive annual training on the
receiving State’s claims procedures,
including applicable time limitations,
procedures and the responsible
receiving State claims offices’ locations.
(2) Screen all new claims and
inquiries about claims to identify those
claimants who must file with the
receiving State.
(3) Ensure that all such claimants are
informed of this requirement and the
applicable time limitation.
(4) Ensure that all applicable SOFA
claims based on incidents occurring in
circumstances that bring them within
the United States’ primary sending State
jurisdiction are fully investigated.
Subpart H—Maritime Claims
§ 536.117
claims.
Statutory authority for maritime
The Army Maritime Claims
Settlement Act (AMCSA) (10 U.S.C.
4801–04, 4806, as amended) authorizes
the Secretary of the Army or his
designee to administratively settle or
compromise admiralty and maritime
claims in favor of, and against, the
United States.
§ 536.118
claims.
Related statutes for maritime
(a) The AMCSA permits the
settlement of claims that would
ordinarily fall under the Suits in
Admiralty Act (SIAA), 46 U.S.C. app.
741–752; the Public Vessels Act (PVA),
46 U.S.C. app. 781–790; or the
Admiralty Extension Act (AEA), 46
U.S.C. app. 740. Outside the United
States the AMCSA may be used to settle
admiralty claims in lieu of the Military
Claims Act or Foreign Claims Act.
Within the United States, filing under
the AMCSA is not mandatory for causes
of action as it is for the SIAA or PVA.
(b) Similar maritime claims settlement
authority is exercised by the Department
of the Navy under 10 U.S.C. 7363 and
7621–23 and by the Department of the
Air Force under 10 U.S.C. 9801–9804
and 9806.
§ 536.119
Scope for maritime claims.
The AMCSA applies worldwide and
includes claims that arise on high seas
or within the territorial waters of a
foreign country. At 10 U.S.C. 4802 it
provides for the settlement or
compromise of claims for:
(a) Damage caused by a vessel of, or
in the service of, the Department of
Army (DA) or by other property under
the jurisdiction of the DA.
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
46293
(b) Compensation for towage and
salvage service, including contract
salvage, rendered to a vessel of, or in the
service of, the DA or other property
under the jurisdiction of the DA.
(c) Damage that is maritime in nature
and caused by tortious conduct of U.S.
military personnel or federal civilian
employees, an agent thereof, or property
under the Army’s jurisdiction.
§ 536.120
claims.
Claims payable as maritime
A claim is cognizable under this
subpart if it arises in or on a maritime
location, involves some traditional
maritime nexus or activity, and is
caused by the wrongful act or omission
of a member of the U.S. Army,
Department of Defense (DOD) or DA
civilian employee, or an agent thereof,
while acting within the scope of
employment. This class of claims
includes, but is not limited to:
(a) Damage to a ship, boat, barge, or
other watercraft;
(b) An injury that involves a ship,
boat, barge, or other watercraft;
(c) Damage to a wharf, pier, jetty,
fishing net, farm facilities or other
structures in, on, or adjacent to any
body of water;
(d) Damage or injury on land or on
water arising under the AEA and
allegedly due to operation of an Armyowned or leased ship, boat, barge, or
other watercraft;
(e) An injury that occurs on board an
Army ship, boat, barge or other
watercraft; and
(f) Crash into water of an Army
aircraft.
§ 536.121
claims.
Claims not payable as maritime
Under this subpart, claims are not
payable if they:
(a) Are listed in §§ 536.42, 536.43,
536.44, 536.45 (except at (e) and (k)),
and 536.46;
(b) Are not maritime in nature;
(c) Are not in the best interests of the
United States, are contrary to public
policy, or are otherwise contrary to the
basic intent of the governing statute, for
example, claims for property loss or
damage or personal injury or death by
inhabitants of unfriendly foreign
countries or by individuals considered
to be unfriendly to the United States.
When a claim is considered not payable
for the reasons stated in this section, it
will be forwarded for appropriate action
to the Commander USARCS, along with
the recommendations of the responsible
claims office.
(d) Are presented by a national, or a
corporation controlled by a national, of
a country at war or engaged in armed
E:\FR\FM\11AUP2.SGM
11AUP2
46294
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 155 / Friday, August 11, 2006 / Proposed Rules
conflict with the United States, or any
country allied with such enemy
country, unless the appropriate
settlement authority determines that the
claimant is and, at the time of incident,
was friendly to the United States. A
prisoner of war or an interned enemy
alien is not excluded or barred from
bringing a claim for damage, loss, or
destruction of personal property while
held in the custody of the government
if the claim is otherwise payable.
(e) Are for damages or injuries that a
receiving State should pay for under an
international agreement. See § 536.34(c).
§ 536.122 Limitation of settlement of
maritime claims.
(a) Within the United States the
period of completing an administrative
settlement under the AMCSA is subject
to the same time limitation as that for
beginning suit under the SIAA or PVA;
that is, a two-year period from the date
the cause of the action accrued. The
claimant must have agreed to accept the
settlement and it must be approved for
payment by the Secretary of the Army
or other approval authority prior to the
end of such period. The presentation of
a claim, or its consideration by the DA,
neither waives nor extends the two-year
limitation period and the claimant
should be so informed, in writing, when
the claim is acknowledged. See
§ 536.28.
(b) For causes of action under the
AEA, filing an administrative claim is
mandatory. However, suit is required
under the two-year time limit applicable
to the SIAA and PVA, even though the
AEA provides that no suit shall be filed
under six months after filing a claim.
(c) For causes of action arising outside
the United States, there is no time
limitation for completing an
administrative settlement.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
§ 536.123 Limitation of liability for
maritime claims.
For admiralty claims arising within
the United States under the provisions
of the Limitation of Shipowners’
Liability Act, 46 U.S.C. app. 181–188, in
cases alleging injury or loss due to
negligent operation of its vessel, the
United States may limit its liability to
the value of its vessel after the incident
from which the claim arose. The act
requires filing of an action in federal
District Court within six months of
receiving written notice of a claim.
Therefore, USARCS, or the Chief
Counsel, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(COE), or his designee, must be notified
within 10 working days of the receipt of
any maritime claim arising in the
United States or on the high seas out of
the operation of an Army vessel,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:42 Aug 10, 2006
Jkt 208250
including pleasure craft owned by the
United States. USARCS or Chief
Counsel, COE will coordinate with the
Department of Justice (DOJ) as to
whether to file a limitation of liability
action.
§ 536.124 Settlement authority for
maritime claims.
(a) The Secretary of the Army, the
Army General Counsel as designee of
the Secretary, or other designee of the
Secretary may approve any settlement
or compromise of a claim in any
amount. A claim settled or
compromised in a net amount exceeding
$500,000 will be investigated and
processed and, if approved by the
Secretary of the Army or his or her
designee, will be certified to Congress
for final approval.
(b) The Judge Advocate General
(TJAG), The Assistant Judge Advocate
General (TAJAG), the Commander
USARCS, the Chief Counsel COE, or
Division or District Counsel Offices are
delegated authority to settle, such as to
deny or approve payment in full or in
part, any claim under this subpart
regardless of the amount claimed,
provided that any award does not
exceed $100,000.
(c) A Staff Judge Advocate (SJA) or
chief of a command claims service and
heads of area claims offices (ACOs) are
delegated authority to pay up to
$50,000, regardless of the amount
claimed, and to disapprove or make a
final offer on a claim presented in an
amount not exceeding $50,000.
(d) Authority to further delegate
payment authority is set forth in
§ 536.3(g)(1) of this part. For further
discussion also related to settlement and
approval authority see paragraph 2–69
of DA Pam 27–162.
(e) Where the claimed amount or
potential claim damage exceeds
$100,000 for COE claims or $50,000 for
all others, Commander USARCS will be
notified immediately, and be furnished
a copy of the claim and a mirror file
thereafter. See § 536.30 and AR 27–20,
paragraph 2–12.
Subpart I—Claims Cognizable Under
Article 139, Uniform Code of Military
Justice
§ 536.125 Statutory authority for Uniform
Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) Claims.
The authority for this subpart is
Article 139, Uniform Code of Military
Justice (UCMJ) (10 U.S.C. 939, which
provides redress for property willfully
damaged or destroyed, or wrongfully
taken, by members of the Armed Forces
of the United States.
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
§ 536.126
Purpose of UCMJ claims.
This subpart sets forth the standards
to apply and the procedures to follow in
processing claims for the wrongful
taking or willful damage or destruction
of property by military members of the
Department of the Army.
§ 536.127 Proper claimants; unknown
accused—under the UCMJ.
(a) A proper claimant under this
subpart includes any individual
(whether civilian or military), a
business, charity, or state or local
government that owns, has an
ownership interest in, or lawfully
possesses property.
(b) When cognizable claims are
presented against a unit because the
individual offenders cannot be
identified, this subpart sets forth the
procedures for approval authorities to
direct pay assessments, equivalent to
the amount of damages sustained,
against the unit members who were
present at the scene and to allocate
individual liability in such proportion
as is just under the circumstances.
§ 536.128 Effect of disciplinary action,
voluntary restitution, or contributory
negligence for claims under the UCMJ.
(a) Disciplinary action.
Administrative action under Article
139, UCMJ, and this subpart is entirely
separate and distinct from disciplinary
action taken under other sections of the
UCMJ or other administrative actions.
Because action under both Article 139,
UCMJ, and this subpart requires
independent findings on issues other
than guilt or innocence, a soldier’s
conviction or acquittal of claim-related
charges is not dispositive of liability
under Article 139, UCMJ.
(b) Voluntary restitution. The
approval authority may terminate
Article 139 proceedings without
findings if the soldier voluntarily makes
full restitution to the claimant.
(c) Contributory negligence. A claim
otherwise cognizable and meritorious is
payable whether or not the claimant was
negligent.
§ 536.129
claims.
Claims cognizable as UCMJ
Claims cognizable under Article 139,
UCMJ, are limited to the following:
(a) Requirement that conduct
constructively violate UCMJ. In order to
subject a person to liability under
Article 139, the soldier’s conduct must
be such as would constitute a violation
of one or more punitive Articles of the
UCMJ. However, a referral of charges is
not a prerequisite to action under this
subpart.
(b) Claims for property willfully
damaged. Willful damage is damage
E:\FR\FM\11AUP2.SGM
11AUP2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 155 / Friday, August 11, 2006 / Proposed Rules
inflicted intentionally, knowingly, and
purposefully without justifiable excuse,
as distinguished from damage caused
inadvertently, thoughtlessly or
negligently. Damage, loss, or destruction
of property caused by riotous, violent,
or disorderly acts or acts of depredation,
or through conduct showing reckless or
wanton disregard of the property rights
of others, may be considered willful
damage.
(c) Claims for property wrongfully
taken. A wrongful taking is any
unauthorized taking or withholding of
property, with the intent to deprive,
temporarily or permanently, the owner
or person lawfully in possession of the
property. Damage, loss, or destruction of
property through larceny, forgery,
embezzlement, fraud, misappropriation,
or similar offense may be considered
wrongful taking. However, mere breach
of a fiduciary or contractual duty that
does not involve larceny, forgery,
embezzlement, fraud, or
misappropriation does not constitute
wrongful taking.
(d) Definition of property. Article 139
provides compensation for loss of or
damage to both personal property,
whether tangible or intangible, and real
property. Contrast this to the Personnel
Claims Act and chapter 11 of AR 27–20,
which provides compensation only for
tangible personal property. Monetary
losses may fall into the category of
either tangible property (for example,
cash), or intangible property (for
example, an obligation incurred by a
claimant to a third party as a result of
fraudulent conduct by a soldier),
although recovery for losses of
intangible property may be limited by
other provisions of this part, such as the
exclusion of theft of services (see
§ 536.130(f)) or consequential damages
(see § 536.130(g)).
(e) Claims cognizable under more
than one statute. Claims cognizable
under other claims statutes may be
processed under this subpart.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
§ 536.130
claims.
Claims not cognizable as UCMJ
Claims not cognizable under Article
139, UCMJ, and this subpart, include
the following:
(a) Claims resulting from negligent
acts.
(b) Claims for personal injury or
death.
(c) Claims resulting from acts or
omissions of military personnel acting
within the scope of their employment,
including claims resulting from combat
activities or noncombat activities, as
those terms are defined in the Glossary
of AR 27–20.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:42 Aug 10, 2006
Jkt 208250
(d) Claims resulting from the conduct
of Reserve component personnel who
are not subject to the UCMJ at the time
of the offense.
(e) Subrogated claims.
(f) Claims for theft of services, even if
such theft constitutes a violation of
Article 134 of the UCMJ.
(g) Claims for indirect, remote, or
consequential damages.
(h) Claims by entities in conflict with
the United States or whose interests are
hostile to the United States.
§ 536.131 Limitations on assessments
arising from UCMJ claims.
(a) Limitations on amount. (1) A
special court-martial convening
authority (SPCMCA) has authority to
approve a pay assessment in an amount
not to exceed $5,000 per claimant per
incident and to deny a claim in any
amount. If the Judge Advocate
responsible for advising the SPCMCA
decides that the SPCMCA’s final action
under the provisions of Rule for CourtsMartial 1107 in a court martial arising
out of the same incident would be
compromised, the SPCMCA may
forward the Article 139 claim to the
general court-martial convening
authority (GCMCA) for action.
(2) A GCMCA, or designee, has
authority to approve a pay assessment
in an amount not to exceed $10,000 per
claimant per incident and to deny a
claim in any amount.
(i) If the GCMCA or designee
determines that a claim exceeding
$10,000 per claimant per incident is
meritorious, that officer will assess the
soldier’s pay in the amount of $10,000
and forward the claim to the
Commander USARCS, with a
recommendation to increase the
assessment.
(ii) If the head of the area claims office
(ACO) (usually the GCMCA’s Staff Judge
Advocate (SJA)) decides that the
GCMCA’s final action under the
provisions of Rule for Courts-Martial
1107 in a court-martial arising out of the
same incident would be compromised,
that officer may forward the Article 139
claim to USARCS for action.
(3) Only TJAG, TAJAG, the
Commander USARCS, or designee has
authority to approve assessments in
excess of $10,000 per claimant per
incident.
(b) Limitations on type of damages.
Property loss or damage assessments are
limited to direct damages. This subpart
does not provide redress for indirect,
remote, or consequential damages.
§ 536.132
claims.
Procedure for processing UCMJ
(a) Time limitations on submission of
a claim. A claim must be submitted
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
46295
within 90 days of the incident that gave
rise to it, unless the SPCMCA acting on
the claim determines there is good cause
for delay. Lack of knowledge of the
existence of Article 139, or lack of
knowledge of the identity of the
offender, are examples of good cause for
delay.
(b) Form and presentment of a claim.
The claimant or authorized agent may
present a claim orally or in writing. If
presented orally, the claim must be
reduced to writing, signed, and seek a
definite sum in U.S. dollars within 10
days after oral presentment.
(c) Action upon receipt of a claim.
Any officer receiving a claim will
forward it within two working days to
the SPCMCA exercising jurisdiction
over the soldier or soldiers against
whom the claim is made. If the claim is
made against soldiers under the
jurisdiction of two or more convening
SPCMCAs who are under the same
GCMCA, forward the claim to that
GCMCA. That GCMCA will designate
one SPCMCA to investigate and act on
the claim as to all soldiers involved. If
the claim is made against soldiers under
the jurisdiction of more than one
SPCMCA at different locations and not
under the same GCMCA, forward the
claim to the SPCMCA whose
headquarters is located nearest the situs
of the alleged incident. That SPCMCA
will investigate and act on the claim as
to all soldiers involved. If a claim is
brought against a member of one of the
other military services, forward the
claim to the commander of the nearest
major command of that service
equivalent to a major Army command
(MACOM).
(d) Action by the special court-martial
convening authority. (1) If the claim
appears to be cognizable, the SPCMCA
will appoint an investigating officer
within four working days of receipt of
a claim. The investigating officer will
follow the procedures of this subpart
supplemented by DA Pam 27–162,
chapter 9, and AR 15–6, chapter 4,
which applies to informal
investigations. The SPCMCA may
appoint the claims officer of a command
(if the claims officer is a commissioned
officer) as the investigating officer. In
cases where the special court-martial
convening authority is an inactive duty
soldier of the United States Army
Reserve, the appointment of an
investigating officer will be made within
30 calendar days.
(2) If the claim is not brought against
a person who is a member of the Armed
Forces of the United States at the time
the claim is received, or if the claim
does not appear otherwise cognizable
under Article 139, UCMJ, the SPCMCA
E:\FR\FM\11AUP2.SGM
11AUP2
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
46296
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 155 / Friday, August 11, 2006 / Proposed Rules
may refer it for legal review (see
paragraph (g) of this section) within four
working days of receipt. If after legal
review the SPCMCA determines that the
claim is not cognizable, final action may
be taken disapproving the claim (see
paragraph (h) of this section) without
appointing an investigating officer. In
claims where the special court-martial
convening authority is an inactive duty
soldier of the United States Army
Reserve, the request for a legal review
will be made within 30 calendar days.
(e) Expediting payment through
Personnel Claims Act and Foreign
Claims Act procedures. When
assessment action on a particular claim
will be unduly delayed, the claims
office supporting the SPCMA may
consider the claim under the Personnel
Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. 3721, and chapter
11 of AR 27–20, or under the Foreign
Claims Act, 10 U.S.C. 2734, and subpart
J of this part, as long as it is otherwise
cognizable under that authority. If the
Article 139 claim is later successful, the
claims office will inform the claimant of
the obligation to repay to the
government any overpayment received
under these statutes.
(f) Action by the investigating officer.
The investigating officer will notify the
soldier against whom the claim is made.
(1) If the soldier wishes to make
voluntary restitution, the investigating
officer may, with the SPCMCA’s
concurrence, delay proceedings until
the end of the next pay period to permit
restitution. If the soldier makes payment
to the claimant’s full satisfaction, the
SPCMCA will dismiss the claim.
(2) In the absence of full restitution,
the investigating officer will determine
whether the claim is cognizable and
meritorious under the provisions of
Article 139, UCMJ, and this subpart, and
the amount to be assessed against each
offender. This amount will be reduced
by any restitution the claimant accepts
from an offender in partial satisfaction.
Within 10 working days, or such time as
the SPCMCA may determine, the
investigating officer will submit written
findings and recommendations to the
SPCMCA.
(3) If the soldier is absent without
leave and cannot be notified, a claims
office may process the Article 139 claim
in the soldier’s absence. If an
assessment is approved, forward a copy
of the claim and the memorandum
authorizing pay assessment by
transmittal letter to the servicing
Defense Accounting Office (DAO) for
offset against the soldier’s pay. If the
soldier is dropped from the rolls, the
servicing DAO will forward the
assessment documents to: Commander,
Defense Finance and Accounting
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:42 Aug 10, 2006
Jkt 208250
Service (DFAS), ATTN: Military Pay
Operations, 8899 E. 56th Street,
Indianapolis, IN 46249.
(g) Legal review. The SPCMCA will
refer the claim for legal review to its
servicing legal office upon either
completion of the investigating officer’s
report or the SPCMCA’s determination
that the claim is not cognizable (see
paragraph (d)(2) of this section).
(1) Within five working days or such
time as the SPCMCA determines, that
office will furnish a written opinion as
to:
(i) Whether the claim is cognizable
under the provisions of Article 139,
UCMJ, and this subpart.
(ii) Whether the findings and
recommendations are supported by a
preponderance of the evidence.
(iii) Whether the investigation
substantially complies with the
procedural requirements of Article 139,
UCMJ; this subpart; DA Pam 27–162,
chapter 9; and AR 15–6, chapter 4.
(iv) Whether the claim is clearly not
cognizable (see paragraph (d)(2) of this
section) and final denial action can be
taken without appointing an
investigating officer.
(2) If the investigating officer’s
recommended assessment does not
exceed $5,000, the claims judge
advocate (CJA) or claims attorney will,
upon legal review, forward the claim to
the SPCMCA for final action.
(3) If the investigating officer’s
recommended assessment is more than
$5,000, the CJA or claims attorney will,
upon legal review, forward the claim
file to the head of the ACO, who will
also conduct a legal review within five
working days.
(i) If the recommended assessment
does not exceed $10,000, the head of the
ACO will forward the claim file to the
GCMCA for final action.
(ii) If the recommended assessment
exceeds $10,000, the head of the ACO
will forward the claim file to the
GCMCA for approval of an assessment
up to $10,000 and for a recommendation
of an additional assessment. The head of
the ACO will then forward the claims
file and the GCMCA’s recommendation
to the Commander USARCS for
approval.
(h) Final action. After consulting with
the legal advisor, the approval authority
will disapprove or approve the claim in
an amount equal to, or less than, the
amount of the assessment limitation.
The approval authority is not bound by
the findings or recommendations of the
investigating officer; AR 15–6,
paragraph 2–3a. The approval authority
will notify the claimant, and any soldier
subject to that officer’s jurisdiction, of
the determination and the right of any
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
party to request reconsideration (see
§ 536.133). A copy of the investigating
officer’s findings and recommendation
will be enclosed with the notice. The
approval authority will then suspend
action on the claim for 10 working days
pending receipt of a request for
reconsideration, unless the approval
authority determines that this delay will
result in substantial injustice. If after
this period the approval authority
determines that an assessment is still
warranted, the approval authority will
direct the appropriate DAO to withhold
such amount from the soldier’s pay
account (see § 536.131(a)). For any
soldier not subject to the approval
authority’s jurisdiction, the approval
authority will forward the claim to the
commander who exercises SPCMCA
jurisdiction over the soldier for
assessment. The receiving SPCMCA is
bound by the determination of the
approval authority.
(i) Assessment. Subject to any
limitations set forth in appropriate
regulations, the servicing DAO will
withhold the amount directed by the
approval authority and pay it to the
claimant. The assessment is not subject
to appeal and is binding on any finance
officer. If the servicing DAO cannot
withhold the required amount because
it does not have custody of the soldier’s
pay record, the record is missing, or the
soldier is in a no pay due status, that
office will promptly notify the approval
authority of this fact in writing.
(j) Remission of indebtedness. 10
U.S.C. 4837, which authorizes the
remission and cancellation of
indebtedness of an enlisted person to
the United States or its
instrumentalities, is not applicable and
may not be used to remit and cancel
indebtedness determined as a result of
action under Article 139, UCMJ.
§ 536.133
claims.
Reconsideration of UCMJ
(a) General. Although Article 139,
UCMJ, does not provide for a right of
appeal, either the claimant or a soldier
whose pay is assessed may request the
approval authority (SPCMCA or
GCMCA, depending on the amount
assessed) or successor in command to
reconsider the action. Either party must
submit such a request for
reconsideration in writing and clearly
state the factual or legal basis for the
relief requested. The approval authority
may direct that the matter be
reinvestigated.
(b) Reconsideration by the original
approval authority. The original
approval authority may reconsider the
action at any time while serving as the
approval authority for the claim in
E:\FR\FM\11AUP2.SGM
11AUP2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 155 / Friday, August 11, 2006 / Proposed Rules
question, even after the transfer of the
soldier whose pay was assessed. The
original approval authority may modify
the action if it was incorrect, subject to
paragraph (d) of this section. However,
the approval authority should modify
the action only because of fraud,
substantial new evidence, errors in
calculation, or mistake of law.
(c) Reconsideration by a successor in
command. Subject to paragraph (d) of
this section, a successor in command
may modify an action only because of
fraud, substantial new evidence, errors
in calculation, or mistake of law
apparent on the face of the record.
(d) Legal review and action. Prior to
modifying the original action, the
approval authority will have the
servicing claims office render a legal
opinion and fully explain the basis for
modification as part of the file. If the
legal review agrees that a return of the
assessed pay is appropriate, the
approval authority should request in
writing that the claimant return the
money, setting forth in the letter the
basis for the request. There is no
authority for repayment from
appropriated funds.
(e) Disposition of files. After
completing action on reconsideration,
the approval authority will forward the
reconsideration action to the servicing
claims office, which will then file the
action per § 536.132(h).
(b) Claims arising from the acts or
omissions of the U.S. Armed Forces in
the Marshall Islands or the Federated
States of Micronesia are settled in
accordance with Art. XV, Noncontractual Claims, of the U.S.-Marshall
Islands and Micronesian Status of
Forces Agreement (the ‘‘SOFA’’) (posted
on the USARCS Web site; for the
address see § 536.2(a)). This is pursuant
to the ‘‘agreed upon minutes’’ that are
appended to the SOFA, pursuant to
Section 323 of the Compact of Free
Association between the U.S. and the
Marshall Islands and the Federated
States of Micronesia, enacted by Public
Law 99–239, January 14, 1986. (The
Compact may be viewed at https://
www.fm/jcn/compact/relindex.html).
The ‘‘agreed upon minutes’’ state that
‘‘all claims within the scope of
paragraph 1 of Article XV [Claims], [of
the Compact] * * * shall be processed
and settled exclusively pursuant to the
Foreign Claims Act, 10 U.S.C. 2734, and
any regulations promulgated in
implementation thereof.’’ Therefore,
Title I, Article 178 of the Compact,
regarding claims processing, is not
applicable to claims arising from the
acts or omissions of the U.S. armed
forces, but only to other federal
agencies. Those agencies are required to
follow the provisions of the Federal Tort
Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. 2672.
§ 536.134 Additional claims judge
advocate and claims attorney
responsibilities (for UCMJ claims).
§ 536.136 Scope for claims arising under
the Foreign Claims Act.
In addition to the duties set forth in
this subpart, the CJA or claims attorney
is responsible for forwarding copies of
completed Article 139 actions to
USARCS, maintaining a log, monitoring
the time requirements of pending
Article 139 actions, and publicizing the
Article 139 program to commanders,
soldiers, and the community.
Subpart J—Claims Cognizable Under
the Foreign Claims Act
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
§ 536.135 Statutory authority for the
Foreign Claims Act.
(a) The statutory authority for this
subpart is the Act of August 10, 1956,
10 U.S.C. 2734 (70 Stat. 154), commonly
referred to as the Foreign Claims Act
(FCA), as amended by Public Law 86–
223, September 1959 (73 Stat. 453);
Public Law 86–411, April 1960 (74 Stat.
16); Public Law 90–521, September
1968 (82 Stat. 874); Public Law 91–312,
July 1970 (84 Stat. 412); Public Law 93–
336, July 1974 (88 Stat. 292); Public Law
96–513, Title V, section 511 (95),
December 1980 (94 Stat. 2928). It is
posted on the USARCS Web site; for the
address see § 536.2(a).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:42 Aug 10, 2006
Jkt 208250
(a) Application. This subpart, which
is applicable outside the United States,
its commonwealths, territories and
possessions, including areas under the
jurisdiction of the United States,
implements the FCA and prescribes the
substantive basis and special procedural
requirements for settlement of claims of
inhabitants of a foreign country, or of a
foreign country or a political
subdivision thereof, against the United
States for personal injury, death, or
property damage caused by service
members or civilian employees, or
claims that arise incident to noncombat
activities of the armed forces.
(b) Effect of Military Claims Act
(MCA). Claims arising in foreign
countries will be settled under the MCA
if the injured party is an inhabitant of
the U.S., for example, a member of the
U.S. armed forces, a U.S. civilian
employee, or a family member of either
category. In a wrongful death case, if the
decedent is an inhabitant of a foreign
country, even though his survivors are
U.S. inhabitants, the FCA will apply.
See § 536.74(c).
(c) Effect of Army Maritime Claims
Settlement Act (AMCSA) (10 U.S.C.
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
46297
4801, 4802 and 4808). A maritime claim
may be settled under the FCA.
§ 536.137 Claims payable under the
Foreign Claims Act.
(a) A claim for death, personal injury,
or loss of or damage to property may be
allowed under this subpart if the alleged
damage results from noncombat activity
or a negligent or wrongful act or
omission of soldiers or civilian
employees of the U.S. armed forces, as
enumerated in § 536.23(b), regardless of
whether the act or omission was made
within the scope of their employment.
This includes non-U.S. citizen
employees recruited elsewhere but
employed in a country of which they are
not a citizen. However, a claim
generated by non-U.S. citizen
employees in the country in which they
were recruited and are employed will be
payable only if the act or omission was
made in the scope of employment. But
claims arising from the operation of U.S.
armed forces vehicles or other
equipment by such employees may be
paid, even though the employees are not
acting within the scope of their
employment, provided the employer or
owner of the vehicle or other equipment
would be liable under local law in the
circumstances involved.
(b) Claims generated by officers or
civilian employees of the American
Battle Monuments Commission (36
U.S.C. 2110), acting within the scope of
employment, will be paid from
American Battle Monuments
Commission appropriations.
(c) Claims for the loss of, or damage
to, property that may be settled under
this subpart include the following:
(1) Real property used and occupied
under lease, express, implied, or
otherwise. See § 536.34(m) of this part
and paragraph 2–15m of DA Pam 27–
162.
(2) Personal property bailed to the
government under an agreement,
express or implied, unless the owner
has expressly assumed the risk of
damage or loss.
§ 536.138 Claims not payable under the
Foreign Claims Act
A claim is not payable if it:
(a) Results wholly from the negligent
or wrongful act of the claimant or agent;
(b) Is purely contractual in nature;
(c) Arises from private or domestic
obligations as distinguished from
government transactions;
(d) Is based solely on compassionate
grounds;
(e) Is a bastardy claim for child
support expenses;
(f) Is for any item whose acquisition,
possession, or transportation is in
E:\FR\FM\11AUP2.SGM
11AUP2
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
46298
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 155 / Friday, August 11, 2006 / Proposed Rules
violation of Department of the Army
(DA) or Department of Defense (DOD)
directives, such as illegal war trophies.
(g) Is for rent, damage, or other
payments involving the acquisition, use,
possession, or disposition of real
property or interests therein by and for
the DA. See § 536.34(m) of this part and
paragraph 2–15m of DA Pam 27–162.
(h) Is not in the best interest of the
United States, is contrary to public
policy, or otherwise contrary to the
basic intent of the governing statute (10
U.S.C. § 2734); for example, claims for
property loss or damage, or personal
injury or death caused by inhabitants of
unfriendly foreign countries or by
individuals considered to be unfriendly
to the United States.
(i) Is presented by a national, or a
corporation controlled by a national, of
a country at war or engaged in armed
conflict with the United States, or any
country allied with such enemy country
unless the appropriate settlement
authority determines that the claimant
is, and at the time of the incident was
friendly to the United States. A prisoner
of war or an interned enemy alien is not
excluded from filing a claim for damage,
loss, or destruction of personal property
within the federal government’s custody
if the claim is otherwise payable.
(j) Is for damages or injury, the claim
for which a receiving State should
adjudicate and pay pursuant to an
international agreement, subject to
waiver by the Commander USARCS. See
DA Pam 27–162, paragraph 3–4a(2), for
a discussion of the conditions of waiver.
(k) Is listed in §§ 536.45 and 536.46,
except for the exclusions listed in
§§ 536.45(e), (h) and (k). Additionally,
the exclusions set forth in §§ 536.45(a)
and (b) do not apply to a claim arising
incident to noncombat activities.
(l) Is brought by a subrogee.
(m) Is covered by insurance on the
involved U.S. Armed Forces’ vehicle or
the tortfeasor’s privately owned vehicle
(POV), in accordance with requirements
of a foreign country, unless the claim
exceeds the coverage or the insurer is
insolvent. See § 536.139(c).
(n) Is payable under subpart C of this
part or AR 27–20, chapter 11.
(o) Is brought by or on behalf of a
member of a foreign military force for
personal injury or death arising incident
to service, or pursuant to combined
military operations. Combined military
operations include exercises and United
Nations and North Atlantic Treaty
Organization (NATO) peacekeeping and
humanitarian missions. Derivative
claims arising from these incidents are
also excluded.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:42 Aug 10, 2006
Jkt 208250
§ 536.139 Applicable law for claims under
the Foreign Claims Act.
(a) Venue of incident and domicile of
claimant. In determining an appropriate
award, apply the law and custom of the
country in which the incident occurred
to determine which elements of
damages are payable and which
individuals are entitled to
compensation. However, where the
claimant is an inhabitant of another
foreign country and only temporarily
within the country in which the
incident occurred, the quantum of
certain elements of damages, such as
lost wages and future medical care, may
be calculated based on the law and
economic conditions in the country of
the claimant’s permanent residence.
Where the decedent is the subject of a
wrongful death case, the quantum will
be determined based on the country of
the decedent’s permanent residence
regardless of the fact that his survivors
live in the U.S. or a different foreign
country than the decedent. See § 536.77
for further damages guidance.
(b) Other guidance. The guidance set
forth in §§ 536.77(b) through (d) as to
allowable elements of damages is
generally applicable. Where moral
damages, as defined in DA Pam 27–162,
paragraph 2–53c(4), are permitted, such
damages are payable. In some countries
it is customary to get a professional
appraisal to substantiate certain claims
and pass this cost on to the tortfeasor.
The Commander USARCS or the chief
of a command claims service may, as an
exception to policy, permit the
reimbursement of such costs in
appropriate cases. Where feasible,
claimants should be discouraged from
incurring such costs.
(c) Deductions for insurance. (1)
Insurance coverage recovered or
recoverable will be deducted from any
award. In that regard, every effort will
be made to monitor the insurance aspect
of the case and encourage direct
settlement between the claimant and the
insurer of the tortfeasor.
(2) When efforts under paragraph
(c)(1) of this section are of no avail, or
when it otherwise is determined that an
insurance settlement will not be
reasonably available for application to
the award, no award will be made until
the chief of the command claims service
or the Commander USARCS, has first
granted consent. In such cases, an
assignment of the insured’s rights
against the insurer will be obtained and,
in appropriate cases, reimbursement
action will be instituted against the
insurer under applicable procedures.
(3) If an insurance settlement is not
available due to the insurer’s insolvency
or bankruptcy, a report on the
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
bankruptcy will be forwarded to the
Commander USARCS without delay,
setting forth all pertinent information,
including the alleged reasons for the
bankruptcy and the facts concerning the
licensing of the insurer.
(d) Deductions for amounts paid by
tortfeasor. Settlement authorities will
deduct from the damages any direct
payments by a member or civilian
employee of the U.S. armed forces for
damages (other than solatia).
§ 536.140 Appointment and functions of
Foreign Claims Commissions.
(a) Claims cognizable under this
subpart will be referred to the command
responsible for claims arising within its
geographic area of responsibility,
including claims transferred by
agreement between the services
involved. The senior judge advocate of
a command having a command claims
service, or his delegee, will appoint a
sufficient number of Foreign Claims
Commissions (FCCs) to dispose of the
claims. If there is no command claims
service, the responsible commander
may ask the Commander USARCS for
permission to establish one. Otherwise,
the Commander USARCS will appoint a
sufficient number of FCCs from
personnel furnished by the command
involved. See § 576.3(d) of this chapter
for more information about command
claims services.
(b) The Commander USARCS will
appoint all other FCCs to act on all other
claims, regardless of where such claims
arose, unless they arose in a country for
which single-service responsibility has
been assigned to another service. FCCs
appointed by the Commander USARCS
at units based in the continental United
States (CONUS) may act on any claim
arising out of such unit’s operations.
Any FCC operating in, or adjudicating
claims arising out of, a geographical area
within a command claims service’s
jurisdiction, will comply with that
service’s legal and procedural rules.
(c) An FCC may operate as an integral
part of a command claims service,
which will determine the cases to be
assigned to it, furnish necessary
administrative services, and establish
and maintain its records. Where an FCC
does not operate as part of a command
claims service, it may operate as part of
the office or a division, corps or higher
command staff judge advocate (SJA),
which will perform the foregoing
functions.
(d) An appointing authority who
appoints or relieves an FCC whom he or
she has appointed will forward one
copy of each order addressing an FCC’s
appointment, relief, or change of
responsibility to the Commander
E:\FR\FM\11AUP2.SGM
11AUP2
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 155 / Friday, August 11, 2006 / Proposed Rules
USARCS. Upon receipt of an initial
appointing order, the Commander
USARCS will assign an office code
number to the FCC. Without such a
number the FCC has no authority to
approve or pay claims. See AR 27–20,
paragraph 13–1.
(e) Normally, the FCC is responsible
for the investigation of all claims
referred to it, using both the procedures
set forth in subpart B of this part and
any local procedures established by the
appointing authority or command
claims service responsible for the
geographical area in which the claim
arose. Chiefs of a command claims
service may request assistance on claims
investigation within their geographical
areas from units or organizations other
than the FCC. The Commander USARCS
may make the same request for any
claim referred to an FCC appointed
under his or her authority.
(f) When an FCC intends to deny a
claim, or offer an award less than the
amount claimed, it will notify in writing
the claimant, the claimant’s authorized
agent, or legal representative of the
intended action on the claim and the
legal and factual bases for that action. If
the FCC proposes a partial award, a
settlement agreement should be
enclosed with the notice. Claimants will
be advised that they may either accept
the FCC action by returning the signed
settlement agreement or, if dissatisfied
with the FCC’s action, they may submit
a request for reconsideration stating the
factual or legal reasons why they believe
the FCC’s proposed action is incorrect.
This notice serves to give the claimant
an opportunity to request
reconsideration of the FCC action and
state the reasons for the request before
final action is taken on the claim. When
the FCC intends to award the amount
claimed, or recommend an award equal
to the amount claimed to a higher
authority, this procedure is not
necessary. However, a settlement
agreement is required for all awards, full
or partial. See § 536.63(a).
(1) This notice should be given at
least 30 days before the FCC takes final
action, except on small claims
processed pursuant to § 536.33. The
notice should be mailed via certified or
registered mail to the claimant. The
claimant should be informed that any
request for reconsideration should be
addressed to the FCC that took final
action, and that all materials the
claimant wishes the FCC to consider
should be included with the request for
reconsideration.
(2) An FCC may alter its initial
decision based on the claimant’s
response or proceed with the intended
action. If the claimant’s response raises
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:42 Aug 10, 2006
Jkt 208250
a general policy issue, the FCC may
request an advisory opinion from the
Commander USARCS or the chief of the
command claims service while retaining
the claim for final action at its level.
(3) Upon completing of its evaluation
of the claimant’s response, the FCC will
notify the claimant of its final decision
and advise the claimant that its action
is final and conclusive as a matter of
law (10 U.S.C. 2735), unless the final
decision is a recommendation for
payment above its authority. In that
case, the FCC will forward any response
submitted by the claimant along with its
claims memorandum of opinion to the
approval authority, and will notify the
claimant accordingly.
(4) When an FCC determines that a
claim is valued at more than $50,000 or
all claims arising out of a single incident
are valued at more than $100,000, the
file will be transferred to the
Commander USARCS for further action;
see § 536.143(d)(2). Upon request of the
Commander USARCS, the FCC may
negotiate a settlement, the amount of
which exceeds the FCC’s authority;
however, prior approval by a higher
authority is required.
(5) Every reasonable effort should be
made to negotiate a mutually agreeable
settlement on meritorious claims. When
an agreement can be reached, the notice
and response provisions above are not
necessary. If the FCC recommends an
award in excess of its monetary
authority, the settlement agreement
should indicate that its recommendation
is contingent upon approval by higher
authority.
(g) The chief of an overseas command
claims service may delegate to a onemember FCC the responsibility for the
receipt, processing, and investigation of
any claim, regardless of amount, except
those required to be referred to a
receiving State office for adjudication
under the provisions of a treaty
concerning the status of U.S. forces in
the country in which the claim arose. If,
after investigation, it appears that action
by a three-member FCC is appropriate,
the one-member FCC should send the
claim to the appropriate three-member
FCC with a complete investigation
report, including a discussion of the
applicable local law and a
recommendation for disposition.
§ 536.141 Composition of Foreign Claims
Commissions.
(a) Normally, an FCC will be
composed of either one or three
members. Alternate members of threemember FCCs may be appointed when
circumstances require, and may be
substituted for regular members on
specific cases by order of the appointing
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
46299
authority. The appointing orders will
clearly designate the president of a
three-member FCC. Two members of a
three-member FCC will constitute a
quorum, and the FCC’s decision will be
determined by majority vote.
(b) Upon approval by the Commander
USARCS and the appropriate authority
of another uniformed service, the
membership may be composed of one or
more members of another uniformed
service. If another service has singleservice responsibility over the foreign
country in which the claim arose, that
service is responsible for the claim. If
requested, the Commander USARCS
may furnish a JAG officer or claims
attorney to be a member of another
service’s FCC.
§ 536.142 Qualification of members of
Foreign Claims Commissions.
Normally, a member of an FCC will be
either a commissioned officer or a
claims attorney. At least two members
of a three-member FCC must be JAs or
claims attorneys. In exigent
circumstances, a qualified non-lawyer
employee of the armed forces may be
appointed to an FCC, subject to prior
approval by the Commander USARCS.
Such approval may be granted only
upon a showing of the employee’s status
and qualifications and adequate
justification for such appointment (for
example, lack of legally qualified
personnel). The FCC will be limited to
employees who are citizens of the
United States. An officer, claims
attorney, or employee of another armed
force will be appointed a member of an
Army FCC only if approved by the
Commander USARCS.
§ 536.143 Settlement authority of Foreign
Claims Commissions.
(a) In order to determine whether the
claim will be considered by a onemember or three-member FCC, the
claimed amount will be converted to the
U.S. dollar equivalent (based on the
annual Foreign Currency Fluctuation
Account exchange rate, where
applicable). However, the FCC’s
jurisdiction to approve is determined by
the conversion rate on the date of final
action. Accordingly, if the value of the
U.S. dollar has decreased, the FCC will
forward the recommendation to a higher
authority, if necessary.
(b) Payment will be made in the
currency of the country in which the
incident occurred or in which the
claimant resided at the time of the
incident, unless the claimant requests
payment in U.S. dollars or another
currency and such request is approved
by the chief of a command claims
service or the Commander USARCS.
E:\FR\FM\11AUP2.SGM
11AUP2
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
46300
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 155 / Friday, August 11, 2006 / Proposed Rules
However, if the claimant resides in
another foreign country at the time of
payment, payment in an amount
equivalent to that which would have
been paid under the preceding sentence
may be made in the currency of that
third country without the approval of
the Commander USARCS.
(c) A one-member FCC may consider
and pay claims presented in any amount
provided a mutually agreed settlement
may be reached in an amount not
exceeding the FCC’s monetary authority.
A one-member FCC may deny any claim
when the claimed amount does not
exceed its monetary authority. Unless
otherwise restricted by the appointing
authority, a one-member FCC who is a
JA or claims attorney has $15,000
monetary authority, while any other
one-member commission has $5,000
monetary authority.
(d) A three-member FCC, unless
otherwise restricted by the appointing
authority, may take the following
actions on a claim that is properly
before it:
(1) Disapprove a claim presented in
any amount. After following the
procedures in § 536.140, including
reconsideration, the disapproval is final
and conclusive under 10 U.S.C. 2735.
The FCC will inform the appointing
authority of its action. After it takes
final action and disapproves a claim
presented in any amount over $50,000,
the FCC will forward to the appointing
authority the written notice to the
claimant required by § 536.140(f), any
response from the claimant, and its
notice of final action on the claim.
(2) Approve and pay meritorious
claims presented in any amount. (i)
Claims paid in full or in part for an
amount not exceeding $50,000 will be
paid after any reconsideration as set
forth in § 536.140. This action is final
and conclusive under 10 U.S.C. 2735.
(ii) Claims valued at an amount
exceeding $50,000, or multiple claims
arising from the same incident valued at
more than $100,000, will be forwarded
through the appointing authority with a
memorandum of opinion to the
Commander USARCS for action; see DA
Pam 27–162, paragraph 2–60. The
memorandum of opinion will discuss
the amount for which the claimant will
settle and include the recommendation
of the FCC.
(e) The Judge Advocate General
(TJAG), The Assistant Judge Advocate
General (TAJAG) and the Commander
USARCS, or his or her designee serving
at USARCS, may approve and pay, in
whole or in part, any claim as long as
the amount of the award does not
exceed $100,000; may disapprove any
claim, regardless of either the amount
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:42 Aug 10, 2006
Jkt 208250
claimed or the recommendation of the
FCC forwarding the claim; or, if a claim
is forwarded to USARCS for approval of
payment in excess of $50,000, refer the
claim back to the FCC or another FCC
for further action.
(f) Payments in excess of $100,000
will be approved by the Secretary of the
Army, the Army General Counsel as the
Secretary’s designee, or other designee
of the Secretary.
(g) Following approval where
required and receipt of an agreement by
the claimant accepting the specific sum
awarded by the FCC, the claim will be
processed for payment in the
appropriate currency. The first $100,000
of any award will be paid from Army
claims funds. The excess will be
reported to the Financial Management
Service, Department of Treasury, with
the documents listed in DA Pam 27–
162, paragraph 2–81.
(h) If the settlement authority upholds
a final offer or authorizes an award on
appeal from a denial of a claim, the
notice of the settlement authority’s
action will inform the claimant that he
or she must accept the award within 180
days of the date of mailing of the notice
of the settlement authority’s action or
the award will be withdrawn, the claim
will be deemed denied, and the file will
be closed without future recourse.
§ 536.144 Reopening a claim after final
action by a Foreign Claims Commission.
(a) Original approval or settlement
authority (including TAJAG, TJAG,
Secretary of the Army, or the Secretary’s
designees). (1) An original settlement
authority may reconsider the denial of,
or final offer on a claim brought under
the FCA upon request of the claimant or
the claimants authorized agent. In the
absence of such a request, the settlement
authority may reconsider a claim on its
own initiative.
(2) An original approval or settlement
authority may reopen and correct action
on an FCA claim previously settled in
whole or in part (even if a settlement
agreement has been executed) when it
appears that the original action was
incorrect in law or fact based on the
evidence of record at the time of the
action or subsequently received. For
errors in fact, the new evidence must
not have been discoverable at the time
of final action by either the Army or the
claimant through the exercise of
reasonable diligence. Corrective action
may also be taken when an error
contrary to the parties’ mutual
understanding is discovered in the
original action. If it is determined that
the original action was incorrect, the
action will be modified, and if
appropriate, a supplemental payment
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
made. The basis for a change in action
will be stated in a memorandum
included in the file. For example, a
claim was settled for $15,000, but the
settlement agreement was typed to read
‘‘$1,500’’ and the error is not discovered
until the file is being prepared for
payment. If appropriate, a corrected
payment will be made. A settlement
authority who has reason to believe that
a settlement was obtained by fraud on
the part of the claimant or the claimant’s
legal representative, will reopen action
on that claim and, if the belief is
substantiated, correct the action. The
basis for correcting an action will be
stated in a memorandum and included
in the file.
(b) A successor approval or settlement
authority (including TAJAG, TJAG,
Secretary of the Army, or the Secretary’s
designees). (1) Reconsideration. A
successor approval or settlement
authority may reconsider the denial of,
or final offer on, an FCA claim upon
request of the claimant or the claimant’s
authorized agent only on the basis of
fraud, substantial new evidence, errors
in calculation, or mistake
(misinterpretation) of law.
(2) Settlement correction. A successor
approval or settlement authority may
reopen and correct a predecessor’s
action on a claim that was previously
settled in whole or in part for the same
reasons that an original authority may
do so.
(c) Time requirement for filing request
for reconsideration. Requests
postmarked more than five years from
the date of mailing of final notice will
be denied based on the doctrine of
laches.
(d) Finality of action. Action by the
appropriate authority (either affirming
the prior action or granting full or
partial relief) is final under the
provisions of 10 U.S.C. 2735. Action
upon request for reconsideration
constitutes final administrative
disposition of a claim. No further
requests for reconsideration will be
allowed except on the basis of fraud.
§ 536.145
Solatia payment.
Payment of solatia in accordance with
local custom as an expression of
sympathy toward a victim or his or her
family is common in some overseas
commands. Solatia payments are known
to be a custom in the Federated States
of Micronesia, Japan, Korea, and
Thailand. In other countries, the FCC
should consult the command claims
service or Commander USARCS for
guidance. Such payments are not to be
made from the claims expenditure
allowance. These payments are made
from local operation and maintenance
E:\FR\FM\11AUP2.SGM
11AUP2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 155 / Friday, August 11, 2006 / Proposed Rules
funds. This applies even where a
command claims service is directed to
administer the command’s solatia
program. See, for example, United
States Forces Korea Regulation 526–11
regarding solatia amounts and
procedures.
Subpart K—Nonappropriated Fund
Claims
§ 536.146 Claims against nonappropriated
fund employees—generally.
This subpart sets forth the procedures
to follow in the settlement and payment
of claims generated by the acts or
omissions of the employees of
nonappropriated fund (NAF) activities.
NAF activities include NAF or Army
and Air Force Exchange Service
(AAFES) facilities, post exchanges,
bowling centers, officers and
noncommissioned officers’ clubs, and
other facilities located on land or
situated in a building used by an
activity that employs personnel
compensated from NAFs.
§ 536.147 Claims by NAFI employees for
losses incident to employment.
Claims by employees for the loss of or
damage to personal property incident to
employment will be processed in the
manner prescribed by AR 27–20,
chapter 11 and will be paid from NAFs
in accordance with § 536.152.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
§ 536.148 Claims generated by the acts or
omissions of NAFI employees.
(a) Processing. Claims arising out of
acts or omissions of employees of NAFI
activities will be processed and settled
in the manner specified for similar
claims against the United States, except
that payment will be made from NAFs
in accordance with AR 215–1 (Morale,
Welfare, and Recreation Activities and
Nonappropriated Fund
Instrumentalites) and § 536.152 of this
part.
(b) Procedural requirements.
Procedural requirements of this part’s
pertinent subparts, as stated below, will
be followed except as provided in
§§ 536.151 and 536.152. However, when
the Nonappropriated Fund
Instrumentality (NAFI) is protected by a
commercial insurer (for example, flying
and parachute activities), the claim will
be referred to the insurer as outlined in
§ 536.148(d). See Department of Defense
Directive (DODD) 5515.6, dated
November 3, 1956, posted on the
USARCS Web site (see § 536.2(a)).
(1) Claims arising within the United
States, its territories, commonwealths,
or possessions. Such claims will be
processed in the manner prescribed by
subparts C, D, E, F, H or J of this part,
as appropriate.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:42 Aug 10, 2006
Jkt 208250
(2) Claims arising outside the United
States, its territories, commonwealths,
or possessions. Such claims will be
processed in accordance with the
provisions of applicable Status of Forces
Agreements (SOFAs) or in the manner
prescribed by subparts C, D, E, F, H or
J of this part, as appropriate.
(b) Reporting and investigation. Such
claims will be investigated in
accordance with AR 215–1 and subpart
B of this part.
(1) Reporting. Personal injury, death,
or property damage resulting from
vehicular collisions, falls, falling
objects, assaults, or accidents of similar
nature will be reported immediately to
the person in charge of the NAFI or
activity at which it occurred. The report
should be made by the employee who
initially received notice of the incident,
even if the individual involved denies
sustaining personal injury or property
damage. Upon receipt of the report of
the incident, the person in charge of the
NAF activity concerned will transmit
the report to the area claims office
(ACO) or claims processing office (CPO)
for investigation.
(2) Investigation. Claims arising out of
acts or omissions of employees of NAF
activities will be investigated in the
manner set forth in subpart B of this
part. A determination as to whether the
claim is cognizable under this section
will be made as soon as practicable.
(c) Customer complaints. AAFESgenerated complaints will be handled in
accordance with Exchange Service
Manual 57–2. NAFI-generated
complaints will be handled in
accordance with AR 215–1, chapter 3.
Complaints generated by appropriated
funds laundry and dry-cleaning
operations will be handled in
accordance with AR 210–130, chapter 2.
Complaints generated by refunds of
sales proceeds will be handled in
accordance with Exchange Operating
Procedures (EOP) 57–2.
(d) Commercial insurance. Certain
NAFI activities (such as flying and
parachute activities, and all AAFES
concessionaires) may have private
commercial insurance.
(1) A claims investigation under
subpart B of this part will not be
conducted except when the claim’s
estimated value may exceed the
insurance policy limits. In that event,
the Commander USARCS, will be
notified immediately and an
investigation will be conducted with a
view to determining whether the United
States may be liable under subparts C,
D, F, H or J of this part. Otherwise, the
ACO or CPO will refer the claim to the
insurer and furnish copies to the
USARCS AAO, as required in AR 27–20,
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
46301
paragraph 2–12. Assistance will be
furnished to the insurer as needed.
Copies of any other required
investigations may be furnished to the
insurer.
(2) The claim will be reviewed at key
intervals to ensure that progress is being
made, negotiations are properly
conducted, and the file is closed. The
Commander USARCS will be advised of
any problems.
(3) If requested by either the insurer
or NAFI officials, the appropriate claims
authority will assist in or conduct
negotiations.
(4) Where NAFI vehicles are required
to be covered by insurance in foreign
countries, the insurer will process the
claim. However, if the policy coverage
limit is exceeded or the insurer is
insolvent, the claim may be processed
under subpart G, §§ 536.114 through
536.116 (Claims arising overseas) or, if
subpart G does not apply, under
subparts C or J of this part. See
§ 536.139(c) for additional guidance.
§ 536.149 Identification of persons whose
actions may generate liability.
Claims resulting from the acts or
omissions of members of the classes of
persons listed below may be processed
under this section. An ACO or a CPO
authority will ask the Commander
USARCS, for an advisory opinion prior
to settling any claim where the person
whose conduct generated the claim does
not clearly fall within one of the
following categories:
(a) Civilian employees of NAFI
activities whose salaries are paid from
NAFs.
(b) Active duty military personnel
while performing off-duty part-time
work for which they are compensated
from NAFIs, not to include members
who are acting in their capacity as an
officer or other official of the NAFI.
(c) Volunteers serving in an official
capacity in furtherance of the business
of the United States, limited to those
categories set forth in DA Pam 27–162,
paragraph 2–45d.
§ 536.150 Claims payable from
appropriated funds.
Claims payable from appropriated
funds (APFs) will be processed under
the appropriate subpart. Appropriated
fund payable claims include those
resulting from:
(a) Acts or omissions of military
personnel while performing assigned
military duties in connection with NAFI
activities.
(b) Acts or omissions of civilian
employees paid from appropriated
funds in connection with NAFI
activities.
E:\FR\FM\11AUP2.SGM
11AUP2
46302
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 155 / Friday, August 11, 2006 / Proposed Rules
(c) Negligent maintenance of an
appropriated funds facility used by a
NAFI activity but for which the
Department of Defense or Department of
the Army (DA) command concerned is
responsible and has been notified of the
deficiency by the NAF. Where liability
is determined to exist for both a NAFI
and an appropriated fund activity,
liability will be apportioned between
the two activities.
(d) Temporary use of a NAFI facility
by an appropriated fund activity.
(e) Operation of government owned or
rented vehicles on authorized missions
for NAFI activities where the driver is
a DA soldier or civilian employee and
is paid from APFs.
§ 536.151 Settlement authority for claims
generated by acts or omissions of NAFI
employees.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
(a) Settlement. Claims cognizable
under this section and processed under
subparts C, D, E, G, H or J of this part
will be settled by claims authorities
authorized to settle claims under those
subparts subject to the same monetary
and denial authority limitations, except
that The Judge Advocate General
(TJAG), The Assistant Judge Advocate
General (TAJAG), and the Commander
USARCS may settle such claims without
regard to monetary limitations.
However, the approval of the Attorney
General or Assistant General Counsel
may be required for an apportioned
amount to be paid from APFs when
subpart D of this part procedures are
used and the amount to be paid from
APFs exceeds $200,000. Similarly,
approval of TAJAG, the Attorney
General or the Assistant General
Counsel is required when using
procedures under subparts C, F, H, or J
of this part and an apportioned amount
to be paid from APFs exceeds the limits
set for the Commander, USARCS.
(b) Finality of settlement. A
determination made by a claims
settlement authority on a claim
processed under subpart D of this part
is subject to suit. A claim processed
under subparts C or F of this part may
be appealed. Claims processed under
subparts C, D, E, H, or J of this part, or
AR 27–20, chapter 11 may be
reconsidered in accordance with the
sections addressing reconsideration in
those subparts (or paragraphs in the case
of Chapter 11).
§ 536.152 Payment of claims generated by
acts or omissions of NAFI employees.
(a) The settlement or approval
authority will forward the appropriate
payment documents to the office listed
in DA Pam 27–162, paragraph 2–80h,
for payment.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:42 Aug 10, 2006
Jkt 208250
(b) Reimbursement to a foreign
country of the United States’ pro rata
share of a claim paid pursuant to an
international agreement will be made
from NAFs.
§ 536.153 Claims involving tortfeasors
other than nonappropriated fund
employees: NAFI contractors.
AAFES concessionaires and NAFI
contractors, such as entertainment
performers or groups, carnival
operators, and fireworks displayers are
considered independent contractors and
claims arising from their activities
should be disposed of as set forth in DA
Pam 27–162, paragraph 2–15f. If a
dispute arises as to the availability of
liability or workers compensation
insurance the claims should be referred
to AAFES Dallas (see address in
§ 536.30(e)(4)) or the Central Insurance
Fund, U.S. Army Community and
Family Support Agency as applicable.
§ 536.154 Claims involving tortfeasors
other than nonappropriated fund
employees: NAFI risk management program
(RIMP) claims.
The risk management program (RIMP)
is administered by the U.S. Army
Community and Family Support Center
under the provisions of AR 215–1 and
AR 608–10 (Family Child Care Provider
Claims). Providers in order to encourage
authorized personnel, that is, military
and civilian employees, to use the
family child care program and sports
equipment, such claims are processed in
a manner similar to NAFI claims in
§§ 536.146 through 536.152 of this
subpart. Certain claims are payable from
nonappropriated funds even though the
U.S. is not liable under the FTCA or the
MCA as the tortfeasor is not an
appropriated fund or nonappropriated
fund employee.
§ 536.155 Claims payable involving
tortfeasors other than nonappropriated
fund employees.
(a) Non-NAFI RIMP claims can arise
from the activities of:
(1) Members of NAFIs or authorized
users of NAFI sports equipment or
devices for recreational purposes, while
using such property, except real
property, in the manner and for the
purposes authorized by DA regulations
and the charter, constitution, and
bylaws of the particular NAF activity.
(2) Family child care providers,
authorized members of the provider’s
household and approved substitute
providers while care under the family
child care program is being provided in
the manner prescribed in AR 608–10,
except as excluded below. Such claims
are generally limited to injuries to, or
death of, children receiving care under
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
the family child care program that are
caused by the negligence of authorized
providers. Claims arising from the
transportation of such children in motor
vehicles and claims involving loss of or
damage to property are not cognizable.
(b) An ACO or a CPO will ask the
Commander USARCS for an advisory
opinion prior to settling any non-NAFI
RIMP claim where the person whose
conduct generated liability does not fall
clearly within the categories listed
above. Such authorities may also ask,
through the Commander USARCS, for
an advisory opinion from the U.S. Army
Community and Family Support Center
prior to settling any claim arising under
paragraph (a)(2) of this section, where it
is not clear that the injured or deceased
child was receiving care within the
scope of the family child care program.
(c) Where liability has been
determined to exist for both non-NAFI
RIMP and APF activities, liability will
be apportioned between the two
activities.
(d) The total payment for all claims
(including derivative claims), arising as
a result of injury to, or death of, any one
person is limited to $500,000 for each
incident. Continuous or repeated
exposure to substantially the same or
similar harmful activity or conditions is
treated as one incident for purposes of
determining the limits of liability.
§ 536.156 Procedures for claims involving
tortfeasors other than nonappropriated
fund employees.
(a) Reporting. Non-NAFI RIMP claims
(regardless of the amount claimed) and
incidents that could give rise to nonNAFI RIMP claims will be reported to
USARCS and the Army Central
Insurance Fund immediately.
(b) Investigation. ACOs and CPOs are
responsible for the investigation of nonNAFI RIMP claims. Such investigation
will be closely coordinated with
program managers responsible for the
activity generating the claim. Close
coordination with USARCS is also
required, and USARCS will maintain
mirror files containing the investigative
materials of all actual and potential
claims.
(c) Payment. Non-NAFI RIMP claims
will be transmitted for payment to: The
Army Central Insurance Fund, ATTN:
CFSC–FM–I, 4700 King Street,
Alexandria, VA 22302–4406.
(d) Commercial insurance. The
provisions of § 536.148(d) also apply to
claims arising under this section, except
that in claims involving family child
care providers, a claims investigation
will be conducted regardless of whether
commercial insurance exists.
E:\FR\FM\11AUP2.SGM
11AUP2
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 155 / Friday, August 11, 2006 / Proposed Rules
§ 536.157 Settlement/approval authority
for claims involving tortfeasors other than
nonappropriated fund employees.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
(a) Settlement authority. TJAG,
TAJAG, and the Commander USARCS
are authorized to approve in full or in
part, or deny a non-NAFI RIMP claim,
regardless of the amount claimed,
except where an apportioned amount to
be paid from APFs exceeds their
monetary authority and the action of the
Attorney General or Assistant General
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:42 Aug 10, 2006
Jkt 208250
Counsel is required as set forth in
§ 536.151(a).
(b) Approval authority. (1) The staff
judge advocate, Commander or chief of
a command claims service, and a head
of an area claims office are authorized
to approve in full or in part non-NAFI
RIMP claims presented in the amount of
$50,000 or less, provided the acceptance
is in full settlement and all claims and
potential claims arising out of a single
incident do not exceed $100,000.
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
46303
(2) The above authorities are not
delegated authority to deny or make a
final offer on a claim under this section.
Claims requiring such action will be
forwarded to the Commander USARCS
with an appropriate recommendation.
(c) Finality of settlement. A denial or
final offer on a non-NAFI RIMP claim is
final and conclusive and is not subject
to reconsideration or appeal.
[FR Doc. 06–6789 Filed 8–10–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710–08–P
E:\FR\FM\11AUP2.SGM
11AUP2
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 155 (Friday, August 11, 2006)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 46260-46303]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-6789]
[[Page 46259]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Part II
Department of Defense
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Department of the Army
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
32 CFR Part 536
Claims Against the United States; Proposed Rule
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 155 / Friday, August 11, 2006 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 46260]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army
32 CFR Part 536
RIN 0702-AA54
[Docket No. USA-2006-0022]
Claims Against the United States
AGENCY: Department of the Army, DOD.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of the Army proposes to amend its regulations
to reflect a substantial revision of AR 27-20, an Army publication
which governs the processing of claims worldwide. The purpose of this
revision is to make AR 27-20 clearer and easier to use, after years of
piecemeal amendments. This rewrite also ensures that AR 27-20 is in
keeping with current statutes, legal opinions and Department of Justice
guidance pertaining to claims processing. This updated rule will
expedite payment of meritorious claims throughout the world.
DATES: Comments submitted on or before October 10, 2006 will be
considered.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by ``32 CFR part 536,
Docket No. USA-2006-0022 and or RIN 0702-AA54'' in the subject line, by
any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Federal Docket Management System Office, 1160
Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-1160.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and docket number or Regulatory Information Number (RIN) for this
Federal Register document. The general policy for comments and other
submissions from members of the public is to make these submissions
available for public viewing on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov as they are received without change, including any
personal identifiers or contact information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: George Westerbeke (301) 677-7009,
x220.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background
This rule was previously published. The Administrative Procedure
Act, as amended by the Freedom of Information Act requires that certain
policies and procedures and other information concerning the Department
of the Army be published in the Federal Register. The policies and
procedures covered by this regulation fall into that category.
AR 27-20 and its companion DA Pam 27-162 will be available on the
Web site of the U.S. Army Publications Directorate, https://
www.apd.army.mil, within a few months of the date of this Federal
Register publication of 32 CFR part 536. Users are encouraged to
consult the online versions, whose structure and paragraph numbering
are comparable.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Army has determined that the Regulatory
Flexibility Act does not apply because the proposed rule does not have
a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
within the meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-612.
C. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Department of the Army has determined that the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act does not apply because the proposed rule does not
include a mandate that may result in estimated costs to State, local or
tribal governments in the aggregate, or the private sector, of $100
million or more.
D. National Environmental Policy Act
The Department of the Army has determined that the National
Environmental Policy Act does not apply because the proposed rule does
not have an adverse impact on the environment.
E. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Department of the Army has determined that the Paperwork
Reduction Act does not apply because the proposed rule does not involve
collection of information from the public.
F. Executive Order 12630 (Government Actions and Interference With
Constitutionally Protected Property Rights)
The Department of the Army has determined that Executive Order
12630 does not apply because the proposed rule does not impair private
property rights.
G. Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review)
The Department of the Army has determined that according to the
criteria defined in Executive Order 12866 this proposed rule is not a
significant regulatory action. As such, the proposed rule is not
subject to Office of Management and Budget review under section 6(a)(3)
of the Executive Order.
H. Executive Order 13045 (Protection of Children From Environmental
Health Risk and Safety Risks)
The Department of the Army has determined that according to the
criteria defined in Executive Order 13045 this proposed rule does not
apply.
I. Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)
The Department of the Army has determined that according to the
criteria defined in Executive Order 13132 this proposed rule does not
apply because it will not have a substantial effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national government and the States, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels
of government.
Col. Dale Woodling,
Commander, United States Army Claims Service.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 536
Claims, Government employees, Military personnel.
For reasons stated in the preamble the Department of the Army
proposes to revise 32 CFR part 536 to read as follows:
PART 536--CLAIMS AGAINST THE UNITED STATES
Subpart A--The Army Claims System
Sec.
536.1 Purpose of the Army Claims System.
536.2 Claims authorities.
536.3 Command and organizational relationships.
536.4 Designation of claims attorneys.
536.5 The Judge Advocate General.
536.6 The Army claims mission.
536.7 Responsibilities of the Commander USARCS.
536.8 Responsibilities and operations of command claims services.
536.9 Responsibilities and operations of area claims offices.
536.10 Responsibilities and operations of claims processing offices.
536.11 Chief of Engineers.
536.12 Commanding General, U.S. Army Medical Command.
536.13 Chief, National Guard Bureau.
536.14 Commanders of major Army commands.
536.15 Claims policies.
536.16 Release of information policies.
536.17 Single-service claims responsibility (DODD 5515.8 and DODD
5515.9).
536.18 Cross-servicing of claims.
536.19 Disaster claims planning.
536.20 Claims assistance visits.
536.21 Annual claims award.
[[Page 46261]]
Subpart B--Investigation and Processing of Claims
536.22 Claims investigative responsibility--general.
536.23 Identifying claims incidents both for and against the
government.
536.24 Delegation of investigative responsibility.
536.25 Procedures for accepting claims.
536.26 Identification of a proper claim.
536.27 Identification of a proper claimant.
536.28 Claims acknowledgment.
536.29 Revision of filed claims.
536.30 Action upon receipt of claim.
536.31 Opening claim files.
536.32 Transfer of claims among armed services branches.
536.33 Use of small claims procedures.
536.34 Determination of correct statute.
536.35 Unique issues related to environmental claims.
536.36 Related remedies.
536.37 Importance of the claims investigation.
536.38 Elements of the investigation.
536.39 Use of experts, consultants and appraisers.
536.40 Conducting the investigation.
536.41 Determination of liability--generally.
536.42 Constitutional torts.
536.43 Incident to service.
536.44 FECA and LSHWCA claims exclusions.
536.45 Statutory exceptions.
536.46 Other exclusions.
536.47 Statute of limitations.
536.48 Federal employee requirement.
536.49 Scope of employment requirement.
536.50 Determination of damages--applicable law.
536.51 Collateral source rule.
536.52 Subrogation.
536.53 Evaluation of claims--general rules and guidelines.
536.54 Joint tortfeasors.
536.55 Structured settlements.
536.56 Negotiations--purpose and extent.
536.57 Who should negotiate.
536.58 Settlement negotiations with unrepresented claimants.
536.59 Settlement or approval authority.
536.60 Splitting property damage and personal injury claims.
536.61 Advance payments.
536.62 Action memorandums.
536.63 Settlement agreements.
536.64 Final offers.
536.65 Denial notice 536.66 The ``Parker'' denial.
536.67 Mailing procedures.
536.68 Appeal or reconsideration.
536.69 Retention of file.
536.70 Preparation and forwarding of payment vouchers.
536.71 Fund sources.
536.72 Finality of settlement.
Subpart C--Claims Cognizable Under the Military Claims Act
536.73 Statutory authority for the Military Claims Act.
536.74 Scope for claims under the Military Claims Act.
536.75 Claims payable under the Military Claims Act.
536.76 Claims not payable under the Military Claims Act.
536.77 Applicable law for claims under the Military Claims Act.
536.78 Settlement authority for claims under the Military Claims
Act.
536.79 Action on appeal under the Military Claims Act.
536.80 Payment of costs, settlements, and judgments related to
certain medical malpractice claims.
536.81 Payment of costs, settlements, and judgments related to
certain legal malpractice claims.
536.82 Reopening an MCA claim after final action by a settlement
authority.
Subpart D--Claims Cognizable Under the Federal Tort Claims Act
536.83 Statutory authority for the Federal Tort Claims Act.
536.84 Scope for claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act .
536.85 Claims payable under the Federal Tort Claims Act.
536.86 Claims not payable under the Federal Tort Claims Act.
536.87 Applicable law for claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act.
536.88 Settlement authority for claims under the Federal Tort Claims
Act.
536.89 Reconsideration of Federal Tort Claims Act claims.
Subpart E--Claims Cognizable Under the Non-Scope Claims Act
536.90 Statutory authority for the Non-Scope Claims Act.
536.91 Scope for claims under the Non-Scope Claims Act.
536.92 Claims payable under the Non-Scope Claims Act.
536.93 Claims not payable under the Non-Scope Claims Act.
536.94 Settlement authority for claims under the Non-Scope Claims
Act.
536.95 Reconsideration of Non-Scope Claims Act claims.
Subpart F--Claims Cognizable Under the National Guard Claims Act
536.96 Statutory authority for the National Guard Claims Act.
536.97 Scope for claims under the National Guard Claims Act.
536.98 Claims payable under the National Guard Claims Act.
536.99 Claims not payable under the National Guard Claims Act.
536.100 Applicable law for claims under the National Guard Claims
Act.
536.101 Settlement authority for claims under the National Guard
Claims Act.
536.102 Actions on appeal under the National Guard Claims Act.
Subpart G--Claims Cognizable Under International Agreements
536.103 Statutory authority for claims cognizable under
international claims agreements.
536.104 Current agreements in force.
536.105 Responsibilities generally/international agreements claims.
536.106 Definitions for international agreements claims.
536.107 Scope for international agreements claims arising in the
United States.
536.108 Claims payable under international agreements (for those
arising in the United States).
536.109 Claims not payable under international agreements (for those
arising in the United States).
536.110 Notification of incidents arising under international
agreements (for claims arising in the United States).
536.111 Investigation of claims arising under international
agreements (for those claims arising in the United States).
536.112 Settlement authority for claims arising under international
agreements (for those claims arising in the United States).
536.113 Assistance to foreign forces for claims arising under
international agreements (as to claims arising in the United
States).
536.114 Scope for claims arising overseas under international
agreements.
536.115 Claims procedures for claims arising overseas under
international agreements.
536.116 Responsibilities as to claims arising overseas under
international agreements.
Subpart H--Maritime Claims
536.117 Statutory authority for maritime claims.
536.118 Related statutes for maritime claims.
536.119 Scope for maritime claims.
536.120 Claims payable as maritime claims.
536.121 Claims not payable as maritime claims.
536.122 Limitation of settlement of maritime claims.
536.123 Limitation of liability for maritime claims.
536.124 Settlement authority for maritime claims.
Subpart I--Claims Cognizable Under Article 139, Uniform Code of
Military Justice
536.125 Statutory authority for Uniform Code of Military Justice
(UCMJ) claims.
536.126 Purpose of UCMJ claims.
536.127 Proper claimants; unknown accused--under the UCMJ.
536.128 Effect of disciplinary action, voluntary restitution, or
contributory negligence for claims under the UCMJ.
536.129 Claims cognizable as UCMJ claims.
536.130 Claims not cognizable as UCMJ claims.
536.131 Limitations on assessments arising from UCMJ claims.
536.132 Procedure for processing UCMJ claims.
536.133 Reconsideration of UCMJ claims .
536.134 Additional claims judge advocate and claims attorney
responsibilities (for UCMJ claims).
Subpart J--Claims Cognizable Under the Foreign Claims Act
536.135 Statutory authority for the Foreign Claims Act.
536.136 Scope for claims arising under the Foreign Claims Act.
536.137 Claims payable under the Foreign Claims Act.
[[Page 46262]]
536.138 Claims not payable under the Foreign Claims Act.
536.139 Applicable law for claims under the Foreign Claims Act.
536.140 Appointment and functions of Foreign Claims Commissions.
536.141 Composition of Foreign Claims Commissions.
536.142 Qualification of members of Foreign Claims Commissions.
536.143 Settlement authority of Foreign Claims Commissions.
536.144 Reopening a claim after final action by a Foreign Claims
Commission.
536.145 Solatia payment.
Subpart K--Nonappropriated Fund Claims
536.146 Claims against nonappropriated fund employees--generally.
536.147 Claims by NAFI employees for losses incident to employment.
536.148 Claims generated by the acts or omissions of NAFI employees.
536.149 Identification of persons whose actions may generate
liability.
536.150 Claims payable from appropriated funds.
536.151 Settlement authority for claims generated by acts or
omissions of NAFI employees.
536.152 Payment of claims generated by acts or omissions of NAFI
employees.
536.153 Claims involving tortfeasors other than nonappropriated fund
employees: NAFI contractors.
536.154 Claims involving tortfeasors other than nonappropriated fund
employees: NAFI risk management program (RIMP) claims.
536.155 Claims payable involving tortfeasors other than
nonappropriated fund employees.
536.156 Procedures for claims involving tortfeasors other than
nonappropriated fund employees.
536.157 Settlement/approval authority for claims involving
tortfeasors other than nonappropriated fund employees.
Authority: 10 U.S.C. 2733; 10 U.S.C. 1089; 10 U.S.C. 1054; 28
U.S.C. 1291, 2401-2402, 2411-2412, 2671-2680; 10 U.S.C. 2737; 32
U.S.C. 715; 10 U.S.C. 2734a, 2734b; 10 U.S.C. 2734;10 U.S.C. 4801,
4802, 4806; 46 U.S.C. app. 740; 39 U.S.C. 411; 10 U.S.C. 939; 10
U.S.C. 2736; 10 U.S.C. 2735; 10 U.S.C. 2731.
PART 536--CLAIMS AGAINST THE UNITED STATES
Subpart A--The Army Claims System
Sec. 536.1 Purpose of the Army Claims System.
This part sets forth policies and procedures that govern the
investigating, processing, and settling of claims against, and in favor
of, the United States under the authority conferred by statutes,
regulations, international and interagency agreements, and Department
of Defense Directives (DODDs). It is intended to ensure that claims are
investigated properly and adjudicated according to applicable law, and
valid recoveries and affirmative claims are pursued against carriers,
third-party insurers, and tortfeasors.
Sec. 536.2 Claims authorities.
(a) General. Claims cognizable under the following list of statutes
and authorities are processed and settled under DA Pam 27-162 and this
part. All of these materials may be viewed on the USARCS Web site,
https://www.jagcnet.army.mil/85256F33005C2B92/(JAGCNETDocID)/
HOME?OPENDOCUMENT. Select the link ``Claims Resources.''
(1) Tort Claims. (i) The Military Claims Act (MCA), 10 United
States Code (U.S.C.) 2733 (see Subpart C of this part). The ``incident-
to-service'' provision, applicable to both military and civilian
personnel of the Department of Defense, is contained in the MCA.
(ii) The Gonzales Act, 10 U.S.C. 1089. This act permits individual
suits against health care providers for certain torts (see Sec.
536.80).
(iii) Certain suits arising out of legal malpractice, 10 U.S.C.
1054, discussed at Sec. 536.81 and at DA Pam 27-162, paragraph 2-62f.
(iv) The Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), 28 U.S.C. 1291, 1402,
2401-2402, 2411-2412, and 2671-2680 (see Subpart D of this part). The
Westfall Act, 28 U.S.C. 2679, an integral part of the FTCA, provides
absolute immunity from individual suit for common law torts for
employees of the United States acting within the scope of their
employment.
(A) The legislative history of the FTCA.
(B) Regulations of the Attorney General implementing the Federal
Tort Claims Act, 28 CFR part 14.
(C) An Appendix to 28 CFR part 14 sets forth certain delegations of
settlement authority to the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, the
Postmaster General, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of
Transportation, and the Secretary of Health and Human Services.
(v) The Non-Scope Claims Act (NSCA), 10 U.S.C. 2737 (see Subpart E
of this part).
(vi) The National Guard Claims Act (NGCA), 32 U.S.C. 715 (see
Subpart F of this part).
(vii) Claims under International Agreements or the Foreign Claims
Act.
(A) International Agreements Claims Act (IACA), 10 U.S.C. 2734a and
2734b.
(B) Foreign Claims Act (FCA), 10 U.S.C. 2734 (see Subpart J of this
part). (viii) The Army Maritime Claims Settlement Act (AMCSA), 10
U.S.C. 4801, 4802 and 4806. Affirmative claims under the AMCSA are
processed under 10 U.S.C. 4803 and 4804 (see Sec. 537.16 of this
chapter).
(ix) Admiralty Extension Act (AEA), 46 U.S.C. app. 740 (see Subpart
H of this part).
(x) Claims against nonappropriated fund (NAF) activities and the
risk management program (RIMP) (see Subpart K of this part), processed
under Army Regulation (AR) 215-1 and AR 608-10.
(xi) Claims by the U.S. Postal Service for losses or shortages in
postal accounts caused by unbonded Army personnel (39 U.S.C. 411 and
Department of Defense (DOD) Manual 4525.6-M).
(2) Personnel Claims (subpart I of this part and AR 27-20, chapter
11).
(i) The Personnel Claims Act (PCA), 31 U.S.C. 3721 (see AR 27-20,
chapter 11).
(ii) Redress of injuries to personal property, Uniform Code of
Military Justice (UCMJ), Article 139, 10 U.S.C. 939 (see Subpart I of
this part).
(3) Affirmative Claims (32 CFR part 537).
(i) The Federal Claims Collection Act (FCCA), 31 U.S.C. 3711-3720E.
(ii) The Federal Medical Care Recovery Act (FMCRA), 42 U.S.C. 2651-
2653.
(iii) Collection from third-party payers of reasonable costs of
healthcare services, 10 U.S.C. 1095 .
(b) Fund source authority for claims under Title 10 statutes. 10
U.S.C. 2736, advance payments for certain property claims (see Sec.
536.71).
(c) Fund source authority for tort claims paid by Financial
Management Service (FMS). 31 U.S.C. 1304, provides authority for
judgments, awards and compromise settlements.
(d) Additional authorities under Title 10.
(1) 10 U.S.C. 2735, establishes that settlements (or ``actions'')
under the Title 10 claims processing statutes are final and conclusive.
(2) 10 U.S.C. 2731, provides a definition of the word ``settle.''
(e) Related remedies statutes. The Army frequently receives claims
or inquiries that are not cognizable under the statutory and other
authorities administered by the U.S. Army under this publication and DA
Pam 27-162. Every effort should be made to refer the claim or inquiry
to the proper authority following the guidance in Sec. 536.34 or Sec.
536.36. (See also the corresponding paragraphs 2-15 and 2-17,
respectively, in DA Pam 27-162). Some authorities for related remedies
are used more frequently than others. Where an authority for a related
remedy is frequently used, it is listed below and is
[[Page 46263]]
posted on the USARCS Web site (for the address see Sec. 536.2(a)).
(1) Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. 1346, provides exclusive jurisdiction in
the Court of Federal Claims over causes of actions alleging property
loss caused by a Fifth Amendment ``taking.''
(2) Maritime authority statutes, Public Vessels Act (PVA), 46
U.S.C. app. 781-790, Suits in Admiralty Act (SIAA), 46 U.S.C. app. 741-
752, and the Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 U.S.C. 408 and 412.
(3) Federal Employees Compensation Act (FECA), two excerpts: 5
U.S.C. 8116 and 8140, providing guidance on personal injury and death
claims by civilian employees arising within the scope of their
employment (see DA Pam 27-162, paragraph 2-15b) and information on
certain claims by Reserve Officers Training Corps (ROTC) cadets,
respectively, (see DA Pam 27-162, paragraph 2-17d(2)).
(4) Longshore and Harbor Workers Compensation Act (LHWCA), 33
U.S.C. 901-950.
(5) Claims for consequential property damage by civilian employees
may only be considered in the Court of Federal Claims pursuant to 28
U.S.C. 1491.
(f) Additional materials. There are some additional authoritative
materials for the processing of claims, mostly of an administrative
nature. For a complete listing of all of the supplementary materials
relevant to claims processing under this publication and DA Pam 27-162
see Appendix B of DA Pam 27-162.
(g) Conflict of authorities. Where a conflict exists between a
general provision of this publication and a specific provision found in
one of this publication's subparts implementing a specific statute, the
specific provision, as set forth in the statute, will control.
Sec. 536.3 Command and organizational relationships.
(a) The Secretary of the Army. The Secretary of the Army (SA) heads
the Army Claims System and acts on certain claims appeals directly or
through a designee.
(b) The Judge Advocate General. The SA has delegated authority to
The Judge Advocate General (TJAG) to assign areas of responsibility and
designate functional responsibility for claims purposes. TJAG has
delegated authority to the Commander USARCS to carry out the
responsibilities assigned in Sec. 536.7 and as otherwise lawfully
delegable.
(c) U.S. Army Claims Service. USARCS, a command and component of
the Office of TJAG, is the agency through which the SA and TJAG
discharge their responsibilities for the administrative settlement of
claims worldwide (see AR 10-72). USARCS' mailing address is: U.S. Army
Claims Service, 4411 Llewellyn Ave., Fort George G. Meade, MD 20755-
5360, Commercial: (301) 677-7009.
(d) Command claims services. (1) Command claims services exercise
general supervisory authority over claims matters arising within their
assigned areas of operation. Command claims services will:
(i) Effectively control and supervise the investigation of
potentially compensable events (PCEs) occurring within the command's
geographic area of responsibility, in other areas for which the command
is assigned claims responsibility, and during the course of the
command's operations.
(ii) Provide services for the processing and settlement of claims
for and against the United States.
(2) The Commander USARCS may delegate authority to establish a
command claims service to the commander of a major overseas command or
other commands that include areas outside the United States, its
territories and possessions.
(i) When a large deployment occurs, the Commander USARCS may
designate a command claims service for a limited time or purpose, such
as for the duration of an operation and for the time necessary to
accomplish the mission. The appropriate major Army command (MACOM) will
assist the Commander USARCS in obtaining resources and personnel for
the mission.
(ii) In coordination with the Commander USARCS, the MACOM will
designate the area of responsibility for each new command claims
service.
(3) A command claims service may be a separate organization with a
designated commander or chief. If it is part of the command's Office of
the Staff Judge Advocate (SJA), the SJA will also be the chief of the
command claims service, however, the SJA may designate a field grade
officer as chief of the service.
(e) Area claims offices. The following may be designated as area
claims offices (ACOs):
(1) An office under the supervision of the senior judge advocate
(JA) of each command or organization so designated by the Commander
USARCS. The senior JA is the head of the ACO.
(2) An office under supervision of the senior JA of each command in
the area of responsibility of a command claims service so designated by
the chief of that service after coordination with the Commander USARCS.
The senior JA is the head of the ACO.
(3) The office of counsel of each U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(COE) district within the United States and such other COE commands or
agencies as designated by the Commander USARCS, with concurrence of the
Chief Counsel, Office of the Chief of Engineers, for all claims
generated within such districts, commands or agencies. The district
counsel or the attorney in charge of the command's or agency's legal
office is the head of the ACO.
(f) Claims processing offices. Claims processing offices (CPOs) are
normally small legal offices or ACO subordinate elements, designated by
the Commander USARCS, a command claims service or an ACO. These offices
are established for the investigation of all actual and potential
claims arising within their jurisdiction, on either an area, command or
agency basis. There are four types of claims processing offices (see
Sec. 536.10):
(1) Claims processing offices without approval authority.
(2) Claims processing offices with approval authority.
(3) Medical claims processing offices.
(4) Special claims processing offices.
(g) Limitations on delegation of authority under any subpart. (1)
The Commander USARCS, commanders or chiefs of command claims services,
or the heads of ACOs or CPOs with approval authority may delegate, in
writing, all or any portion of their monetary approval authority to
subordinate JAs or claims attorneys in their services or offices.
(2) The authority to act upon appeals or requests for
reconsideration, to deny claims (including disapprovals based on
substantial fraud), to grant waivers of maximum amounts allowable, or
to make final offers will not be delegated except that the Commander
USARCS may delegate this authority to USARCS Division Chiefs.
(3) CPOs will provide copies of all delegations affecting them to
the ACO and, if so directed, to command claims services.
Sec. 536.4 Designation of claims attorneys.
(a) Who may designate. The Commander USARCS, the senior JA of a
command having a command claims service, the chief of a command claims
service, the head of an ACO, or the Chief Counsel of a COE District,
may designate a qualified attorney other than a JA as a claims
attorney. The head of an ACO may designate a claims attorney to act as
a CPO with approval authority.
(b) Eligibility. To qualify as a claims attorney, an individual
must be a civilian employee of the Department of the Army (DA) or DOD,
a member of the bar of a state, the District of Columbia, or a
jurisdiction where U.S. federal law applies, serving in the grade of
GS-11
[[Page 46264]]
or above, and performing primary duties as a legal adviser.
Sec. 536.5 The Judge Advocate General.
TJAG has worldwide Army Staff responsibility for administrative
settlement of claims by and against the U.S. government, generated by
employees of the U.S. Army and DOD components other than the
Departments of the Navy and Air Force. Where the Army has single-
service responsibility, TJAG has responsibility for the Army. See DODD
5515.9. Certain claims responsibilities of TJAG are exercised by The
Assistant Judge Advocate General (TAJAG) as set forth in this part and
directed by TJAG.
Sec. 536.6 The Army claims mission.
(a) Promptly investigate potential claims incidents with a view to
determining the degree of the Army's exposure to liability, the damage
potential, and when the third party is at fault, whether the Army
should take action to collect for medical expenses, lost wages and
property damage.
(b) Efficiently and expeditiously dispose of claims against the
U.S. by fairly settling meritorious claims at the lowest level within
the claims system commensurate with monetary jurisdiction delegated, or
by denying non-meritorious claims.
(c) Develop a system that has a high level of proficiency, so that
litigation and appeals can be avoided or kept to a minimum.
Sec. 536.7 Responsibilities of the Commander USARCS.
The Commander USARCS shall:
(a) Supervise and inspect claims activities worldwide.
(b) Formulate and implement claims policies and uniform standards
for claims office operations.
(c) Investigate, process and settle claims beyond field office
monetary authority and consider appeals and requests for
reconsideration on claims denied by the field offices.
(d) Supervise the investigation, processing, and settlement of
claims against, and in favor of, the United States under the statutes
and regulations listed in Sec. 536.2 and pursuant to other appropriate
statutes, regulations, and authorizations.
(e) Designate ACOs, CPOs, and claims attorneys within DA and DOD
components other than the Departments of the Navy and Air Force,
subject to concurrence of the commander concerned.
(f) Designate continental United States (CONUS) geographic areas of
claims responsibility.
(g) Recommend action to be taken by the SA, TJAG or the U.S.
Attorney General, as appropriate, on claims in excess of $25,000 or the
threshold amount then current under the FTCA, on claims in excess of
$100,000 or the threshold amount then current under the FCA, the MCA,
the NGCA, AMCSA, FCCA and FMRCA and on other claims that have been
appealed. Direct communication with Department of Justice (DOJ) and the
SA's designee is authorized.
(h) Operate the ``receiving State office'' for claims arising in
the United States, its territories, commonwealths and possessions
cognizable under Article VIII of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization
(NATO) Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA), Partnership for Peace (PFP)
SOFA, Article XVI of the Singapore SOFA, and other SOFAs which have
reciprocal claims provisions as delegated by TJAG, as implemented by 10
U.S.C. 2734a and 2734b (Subpart G of this part).
(i) Settle claims of the U.S. Postal Service for reimbursement
under 39 U.S.C. 411 (see DOD Manual 4525.6-M).
(j) Settle claims against carriers, warehouse firms, insurers, and
other third parties for loss of, or damage to, personal property of DA
or DOD soldiers or civilians incurred while the goods are in storage or
in transit at government expense (AR 27-20, chapter 11).
(k) Formulate and recommend legislation for Congressional enactment
of new statutes and the amendment of existing statutes considered
essential for the orderly and expeditious administrative settlement of
noncontractual claims.
(l) Perform post-settlement review of claims.
(m) Prepare, justify, and defend estimates of budgetary
requirements and administer the Army claims budget.
(n) Maintain permanent records of claims for which TJAG is
responsible.
(o) Assist in developing disaster and maneuver claims plans
designed to implement the responsibilities set forth in Sec.
536.9(a)(12).
(p) Develop and maintain plans for a disaster or civil disturbance
in those geographic areas that are not under the jurisdiction of an
area claims authority and in which the Army has single-service
responsibility or in which the Army is likely to be the predominant
Armed Force.
(q) Take initial action, as appropriate, on claims arising in
emergency situations.
(r) Provide assistance as available or take appropriate action to
ensure that command claims services and ACOs are carrying out their
responsibilities as set forth in Sec. Sec. 536.8 and 536.9, including
claims assistance visits.
(s) Serve as proponent for the database management systems for
torts, personnel and affirmative claims and provide standard automated
claims data management programs for worldwide use.
(t) Ensure proper training of claims personnel.
(u) Coordinate claims activities with the Air Force, Navy, Marine
Corps, and other DOD agencies to ensure a consistent and efficient
joint service claims program.
(v) Investigate, process and settle, and supervise the field office
investigation and processing of, medical malpractice claims arising in
Army medical centers within the United States; provide medical claims
judge advocates (MCJAs), medical claims attorneys, and medical claims
investigators assigned to such medical centers with technical guidance
and direction on such claims.
(w) Coordinate support with the U.S. Army Medical Command (MEDCOM)
on matters relating to medical malpractice claims.
(x) Issue an accounting classification to all properly designated
claims settlement and approval authorities.
(y) Perform the investigation, processing, and settlement of claims
arising in areas outside command claims service areas of operation.
(z) Maintain continuous worldwide deployment and operational
capability to furnish claims advice to any legal office or command
throughout the world. When authorized by the chain of command or
competent authority, issue such claims advice or services, including
establishing a claims system within a foreign country, interpreting
claims aspects of international agreements, and processing claims
arising from Army involvement in civil disturbances, chemical accidents
under the Chemical Energy Stockpile Program, other man-made or natural
disasters, and other claims designated by competent authority.
(aa) Upon receiving both the appropriate authority's directive or
order and full fiscal authorization, disburse the funds necessary to
administer civilian evacuation, relocation, and similar initial
response efforts in response to a chemical disaster arising at an Army
facility.
(bb) Respond to all inquiries from the President, members of
Congress, military officials, and the general public on claims within
USARCS' responsibility.
(cc) Serve as the proponent for this publication and DA Pam 27-162,
both
[[Page 46265]]
of which set forth guidance on personnel, tort, disaster and
affirmative claims, as well as claims management and administration.
(dd) Provide supervision for the Army's affirmative claims and
carrier recovery programs, as well as other methods for recovering
legal debts.
(ee) Provide support for the overseas environmental claims program
as designated by the DA.
(ff) Execute other claims missions as designated by DOD, DA, TJAG
and other competent authority.
(gg) Appoint Foreign Claims Commissions outside Command Claims
Services' geographic areas of responsibility.
(hh) Budget for and fund claims investigations and activities; such
as per diem and transportation of claims personnel, claimants and
witnesses; independent medical examinations; appraisals; independent
expert opinions; long distance telephone calls; recording and
photographic equipment; use of express mail or couriers; and other
necessary expenses.
Sec. 536.8 Responsibilities and operations of command claims
services.
(a) Chiefs of command claims services. Chiefs of command claims
services shall:
(1) Exercise claims settlement authority as specified in this part,
including appellate authority where so delegated.
(2) Supervise the investigation, processing, and settlement of
claims against, and in favor of the United States under the statutes
and regulations listed in Sec. 536.2, and pursuant to other
appropriate statutes, regulations, and authorizations.
(3) Designate and grant claims settlement authority to ACOs. A
grant of such authority will not be effective until coordinated with
the Commander USARCS, and assigned an office code. However, the chief
of a command claims service may redesignate a CPO that already has an
assigned office code as an ACO without coordination with the Commander
USARCS. The Commander USARCS, will be informed of such a designation.
(4) Designate and grant claims approval authority to CPOs. Only
CPOs staffed with a claims judge advocate (CJA) or claims attorney may
be granted approval authority. A grant of such authority will not be
effective until coordinated with the Commander USARCS, and assigned an
office code.
(5) Train claims personnel and monitor their operations and ongoing
claims administration. Conduct a training course annually.
(6) Implement pertinent claims policies.
(7) Prepare and publish command claims directives.
(8) Administer the command claims expenditure allowance, providing
necessary data, estimates, and reports to USARCS on a regular basis.
(9) Perform the responsibilities of an ACO (see Sec. 536.9), as
applicable, ensure that SOFA claims are investigated properly and
timely filed with the receiving State and adequately funded.
(10) Serve as the United States ``sending State office,'' if so
designated, when operating in an area covered by a SOFA.
(11) Supervise and provide technical assistance to subordinate ACOs
within the command claims service's geographic area of responsibility.
(12) Appoint FCCs.
(b) Operations of Command Claims Services. The SJA of the command
shall supervise the command claims service. The command SJA may
designate a field grade JA as the chief of the service. An adequate
number of qualified claims personnel shall be assigned to ensure that
claims are promptly investigated and acted upon. With the concurrence
of the Commander USARCS, a command claims service may designate ACOs
within its area of operations to carry out claims responsibilities
within specified geographic areas subject to agreement by the commander
concerned.
Sec. 536.9 Responsibilities and operations of area claims offices.
(a) Heads of ACOs. Heads of ACOs, including COE offices (see Sec.
536.3(e)(3)) shall:
(1) Ensure that claims and potential claims incidents in their area
of responsibility are promptly investigated in accordance with this
part.
(2) Ensure that each organization or activity (for example, U.S.
Army Reserve (USAR) or Army National Guard of the United States
(ARNGUS) unit, ROTC detachment, recruiting company or station, or DOD
agency) within the area appoints a claims officer to investigate claims
incidents not requiring investigation by a JA (see Sec. 536.23) and
ensure that this officer is adequately trained.
(3) Supervise the investigation, processing, and settlement of
claims against, and in favor of, the United States under the statutes
and regulations listed in Sec. 536.2 and pursuant to other appropriate
statutes, regulations, and authorizations.
(4) Act as a claims settlement authority on claims that fall within
the appropriate monetary jurisdictions set forth in this part and
forward claims exceeding such jurisdictions to the Commander USARCS, or
to the chief of a command claims service, as appropriate, for action.
(5) Designate CPOs and request that the Commander USARCS, or the
chief of a command claims service, as appropriate, grant claims
approval authority to a CPO for claims that fall within the
jurisdiction of that office.
(6) Supervise the operations of CPOs within their area.
(7) Implement claims policies and guidance furnished by the
Commander USARCS.
(8) Ensure that there are adequate numbers of qualified and
adequately trained CJAs or claims attorneys, RCJAs or attorneys,
recovery claims clerks, claims examiners, claims adjudicators and
claims clerks in all claims offices within their areas to act promptly
on claims.
(9) Budget for and fund claims investigations and activities, such
as: Per diem and transportation of claims personnel, claimants and
witnesses; independent medical examinations; appraisals and independent
expert opinions; long distance telephone calls; recording and
photographic equipment; use of express mail or couriers; and other
necessary expenses.
(10) Within the United States and its territories, commonwealths
and possessions, procure and disseminate, within their areas of
jurisdiction, appropriate legal publications on state or territorial
law and precedent relating to tort claims.
(11) Notify the Commander USARCS, of all claims and potentially
compensable events (PCEs) as required by Sec. 536.22(c); notify the
chief of a command claims service of all claims and PCEs.
(12) Develop and maintain written plans for a disaster or civil
disturbance. These plans may be internal SJA office plans or an annex
to an installation or an agency disaster response plan.
(13) Implement the Army's Article 139 claims program. (See Subpart
I of this part).
(14) Notify USARCS of possible deployments and ensure adequate FCCs
are appointed by USARCS and are trained.
(b) Operations of Area Claims Offices. (1) The ACO is the principal
office for the investigation and adjudication or settlement of claims,
and shall be staffed with qualified legal personnel under the
supervision of the SJA, command JA, or COE district or command legal
counsel.
(2) In addition to the utilization of unit claims officers required
by Sec. 536.10(a), if indicated, the full-time
[[Page 46266]]
responsibility for investigating and processing claims arising within
or related to the activities of a unit or organization located within a
section of the designated area may be delegated to another command,
unit, or activity by establishing a CPO at the command, unit, or
activity (see Sec. 536.10(b)(4)). Normally, all CPOs will operate
under the supervision of the ACO in whose area the CPO is located.
Where a proposed CPO is not under the command of the ACO parent
organization, this designation may be achieved by a support agreement
or memorandum of understanding between the affected commands.
(3) Normally, claims that cannot be settled by a COE ACO will be
forwarded directly to the Commander USARCS, with notice of referral to
the Chief Counsel, COE. However, as part of his or her responsibility
for litigating suits that involve civil works and military construction
activities, the Chief Counsel, COE, may require that a COE ACO forward
claims through COE channels, provided that such requirement does not
preclude the Commander USARCS from taking final action within the time
limitations set forth in subparts D and H of this part.
Sec. 536.10 Responsibilities and operations of claims processing
offices.
(a) Heads of CPOs. Heads of CPOs will:
(1) Investigate all potential and actual claims arising within
their assigned jurisdiction, on either an area, command, or agency
basis. Only a CPO that has approval authority may adjudicate and pay
presented claims within its monetary jurisdiction.
(2) Ensure that units and organizations within their jurisdiction
have appointed claims officers for the investigation of claims not
requiring a JA's investigation. (See Sec. 536.22).
(3) Budget for and fund claims investigations and activities;
including, per diem and transportation of claims personnel, claimants
and witnesses; independent medical examinations; appraisals;
independent expert opinions; long distance telephone calls; recording
and photographic equipment; use of express mail or couriers; and other
necessary expenses.
(4) Within CONUS, procure and maintain legal publications on local
law relating to tort claims pertaining to their jurisdiction.
(5) Notify the Commander USARCS of all claims and claims incidents,
as required by Sec. 536.22 and AR 27-20, paragraph 2-12.
(6) Implement the Army's Article 139 claims program (see Subpart I
of this part).
(b) Operations of claims processing offices. (1) Claims processing
office with approval authority. A CPO that has been granted approval
authority must provide for the investigation of all potential and
actual claims arising within its assigned jurisdiction, on an area,
command, or agency basis, and for the adjudication and payment of all
claims presented within its monetary jurisdiction. If the estimated
value of a claim, after investigation, exceeds the CPO's payment
authority, or if disapproval is the appropriate action, the claim file
will be forwarded to the ACO unless otherwise specified in this part,
or forwarded to USARCS or the command claims service, if directed by
such service.
(2) Claims processing offices without approval authority. A CPO
that has not been granted claims approval authority will provide for
the investigation of all potential and actual claims arising within its
assigned jurisdiction on an area, command, or agency basis. Once the
investigation has been completed, the claim file will be forwarded to
the appropriate ACO for action. Alternatively, an ACO may direct the
transfer of a claim investigation from a CPO without approval authority
to another CPO with approval authority, located within the ACO's
jurisdiction.
(3) Medical claims processing offices. The MCJAs or medical claims
attorneys at Army medical centers, other than Walter Reed Army Medical
Center, may be designated by the SJA or head of the ACO for the
installation on which the center is located as CPOs with approval
authority for medical malpractice claims only. Claims for amounts
exceeding a medical CPO's approval authority will be investigated and
forwarded to the Commander USARCS.
(4) Special claims processing offices. (i) Designation and
authority. The Commander USARCS, the chief of a command claims service,
or the head of an ACO may designate special CPOs within his or her
command for specific, short-term purposes (for example, maneuvers,
civil disturbances and emergencies). These special CPOs may be
delegated the approval authority necessary to effect the purpose of
their creation, but in no case will this delegation exceed the maximum
monetary approval authority set forth in other subparts of this part
for regular CPOs. All claims will be processed under the claims
expenditure allowance and claims command and office code of the
authority that established the office or under a code assigned by
USARCS. The existence of any special CPO must be reported to the
Commander USARCS, and the chief of a command claims service, as
appropriate.
(ii) Maneuver damage and claims office jurisdiction. A special CPO
is the proper organization to process and approve maneuver damage
claims, except when a foreign government is responsible for
adjudication pursuant to an international agreement (see Subpart G of
this part). Personnel from the maneuvering command should be used to
investigate claims and, at the ACO's discretion, may be assigned to the
special CPO. The ACO will process claims filed after the maneuver
terminates. The special CPO will investigate claims arising while units
are traveling to or from the maneuver within the jurisdiction of other
ACOs, and forward such claims for action to the ACO in whose area the
claims arose. Claims for damage to real or personal property arising on
private land that the Army has used under a permit may be paid from
funds specifically budgeted by the maneuver for such purposes in
accordance with AR 405-15.
(iii) Disaster claims and civil disturbance. A special CPO provided
for a disaster or civil disturbance should include a claims approving
authority with adequate investigatory, administrative, and logistical
support, including damage assessment and finance and accounting
support. It will not be dispatched prior to notification of the
Commander USARCS, whose concurrence must be obtained before the first
claim is paid.
(5) Supervisory requirements. The CPOs discussed in paragraphs
(b)(2) through (b)(4) of this section must be supervised by an assigned
CJA or claims attorney in order to exercise delegated approval
authority.
Sec. 536.11 Chief of Engineers.
The Chief of Engineers, through the Chief Counsel, shall:
(a) Provide general supervision of the claims activities of COE
ACOs.
(b) Ensure that each COE ACO has a claims attorney designated in
accordance with Sec. 536.4.
(c) Ensure that claims personnel are adequately trained, and
monitor their ongoing claims administration.
(d) Implement pertinent claims policies.
(e) Provide for sufficient funding in accordance with existing Army
regulations and command directives for temporary duty (TDY), long
distance telephone calls, recording equipment, cameras, and other
expenses for investigating and processing claims.
[[Page 46267]]
(f) Procure and maintain adequate legal publications on local law
relating to claims arising within the United States, its territories,
commonwealths and possessions.
(g) Assist USARCS in evaluation of claims by furnishing qualified
expert and technical advice from COE resources, on a non-reimbursable
basis except for temporary duty (TDY) and specialized lab services
expenses.
Sec. 536.12 Commanding General, U.S. Army Medical Command.
(a) After consulting with the Commander USARCS on the selection of
medical claims attorneys, the Commander of the U.S. Army MEDCOM, the
European Medical Command, or other regional medical command, through
his or her SJA/Center Judge Advocate, shall ensure that an adequate
number of qualified MCJAs or medical claims attorneys and medical
claims investigators are assigned to investigate and process medical
malpractice claims arising at Army medical centers under the
Commander's control. In accordance with an agreement between TJAG and
The Surgeon General, such personnel shall be used primarily to
investigate and process medical malpractice claims and affirmative
claims and will be provided with the necessary funding and research
materials to carry out this function.
(b) Upon request of a claims judge advocate or claims officer,
shall provide a qualified health care provider at a medical treatment
facility (MTF) to examine a claimant for his injuries even if the
claimant is not otherwise entitled to care at an MTF (See AR 40-400,
Patient Administration, paragraph 3-47).
Sec. 536.13 Chief, National Guard Bureau.
The Chief, National Guard Bureau (NGB), shall:
(a) Ensure the designation of a point of contact for claims matters
in each State Adjutant General's office.
(b) Provide the name, address, and telephone number of these points
of contact to the Commander USARCS.
(c) Designate claims officers to investigate claims generated by
ARNG personnel and forward investigations to the Active Army ACO that
has jurisdiction over the area in which the claims incident occurred.
Sec. 536.14 Commanders of major Army commands.
Commanders of MACOMs, through their SJAs, shall:
(a) Assist USARCS in monitoring ACOs and CPOs under their
respective commands for compliance with the responsibilities assigned
in Sec. Sec. 536.9 and 536.10.
(b) Assist claims personnel in obtaining qualified expert and
technical advice from command units and organizations on a
nonreimbursable basis (although the requesting office may be required
to provide TDY funding).
(c) Assist TJAG, through the Commander USARCS, in implementing the
functions set forth in Sec. 536.7.
(d) Coordinate with the ACO within whose jurisdiction a maneuver is
scheduled, to ensure the prompt investigation and settlement of any
claims arising from it.
Sec. 536.15 Claims policies.
(a) General. The following policies will be adhered to in
processing and adjudicating claims falling within this regulation. The
Commander USARCS is authorized to publish new policies or rescind
existing policies from time to time as the need arises.
(1) Notification. The Commander USARCS must be notified as soon as
possible of both potential and actual claims which are serious
incidents that cannot be settled within the monetary jurisdiction of a
Command Claims Service or an ACO, including those which occur in the
area of responsibility of a CPO. On such claims, the USARCS Area Action
Officer (AAO) must coordinate with the field office as to all aspects
of the investigation, evaluation and determination of liability. An
offer of settlement or the assertion of an affirmative claim must be
the result of a discussion between the AAO and the field office.
Payment of a subrogated claim may commit the United States to liability
as to larger claims. On the other hand, where all claims out of an
incident can be paid within field authority they should be paid
promptly with maximum use of small claims procedures.
(2) Consideration under all subparts. Prior to denial, a claim will
be considered under all subparts of this part, regardless of the form
on which the claim is presented. A claim presented as a personnel claim
will be considered as a tort prior to denial. A claim presented as a
tort will first be considered as a personnel claim, and if not payable,
then considered as a tort. If deniable, the claim will be denied both
as a personnel claim and as a tort.
(3) Compromise. DA policy seeks to compromise claims in a manner
that represents a fair and equitable result to both the claimant and
the United States. This policy does not extend to frivolous claims or
claims lacking factual or legal merit. A claim should not be settled
solely to avoid further processing time and expense. All claims,
regardless of amount, should be evaluated. Congress imposed no minimum
limit on payable claims nor did it intend that small non-meritous
claims be paid. Practically any claim, regardless of amount, may be
subject to compromise through direct negotiation. A CJA or claims
attorney should develop expertise in assessing liability and damages,
including small property damage claims. For example, a property damage
claim may be compromised by deducting the cost of collection, i.e.,
attorney fees and costs, even where liability is certain.
(4) Expeditious processing at the lowest level. Claims
investigation and adjudication should be accomplished at the lowest
possible level, such as the CPO or ACO that has monetary authority over
the estimated total value of all claims arising from the incident. The
expeditious investigation and settlement of claims is essential to
successfully fulfilling the Army's responsibilities under the claims
statutes implemented by this part.
(5) Notice to claimants of technical errors in claim. When
technical errors are found in a claim's filing or contents, claimants
should be advised of such errors and the need to correct the claim. If
the errors concern a jurisdictional matter, a record should be
maintained and the claimant should be immediately warned that the error
must be corrected before the statute of limitations (SOL) expires.
(b) Cooperative investigative environment. Any person who indicates
a desire to file a claim against the United States cognizable under one
of the subparts of this part will be instructed concerning the
procedure to follow. The claimant will be furnished claim forms and,
when necessary, assisted in completing claim forms, and may be assisted
in assembling evidence. Claims personnel may not assist any claimant in
determining what amount to claim. During claims investigation, every
effort should be made to create a cooperative environment that
engenders the free exchange of information and evidence. The goal of
obtaining sufficient information to make an objective and fair analysis
should be paramount. Personal contact with claimants or their
representatives is essential both during investigation and before
adjudication. When settlement is not feasible, issues in dispute should
be clearly identified to facilitate resolution of any reconsideration,
appeal or litigation.
(c) Claims directives and plans. (1) Directives. Two copies of
command claims directives will be furnished to
[[Page 46268]]
the Commander USARCS. ACO directives will be distributed to all DA and
DOD commands, installations and activities within the ACO's area of
responsibility, with an information copy to the Commander USARCS.
(2) Disaster and civil preparedness plan. One copy of all ACOs'
disaster or civil disturbance plans or annexes will be furnished to the
Commander USARCS.
(d) Interpretations. The Commander USARCS will publish written
interpretations of this part. Interpretations will have the same force
and effect as this part.
(e) Authority to grant exceptions to and deviations from this part.
If, in particular instances, it is considered to be in the best
interests of the government, the Commander USARCS may authorize
deviations from this part's specific requirements, except as to matters
based on statutes, treaties and international agreements, executive
orders, controlling directives of the Attorney General or Comptroller
General, or other publications that have the force and effect of law.
(f) Guidance. The Commander USARCS, may publish bulletins, manuals,
handbooks and notes, and a DA Pamphlet that provides guidance to claims
authorities on administrative and procedural rules implementing this
part. These will be binding on all Army claims personnel.
(g) Communication. All claims personnel are authorized to
communicate directly with USARCS personnel for guidance on matters of
policy or on matters relating to the implementation of this part.
(h) Private relief bills. The issue of a private relief bill is one
between a claimant and his or her Congressional representative. There
is no established procedure under which the DA sponsors private relief
legislation. Claims personnel shall remain neutral in all private
relief matters and shall not make any statement that purports to
reflect the DA's position on a private relief bill.
Sec. 536.16 Release of information policies.
(a) Conflict of interest. Except as part of their official duties,
government personnel are forbidden from advising or representing
claimants or from receiving any payment or gratuity for services
rendered. They may not accept any share or interest in a claim or
assist in its presentation, under penalty of federal criminal law (18
U.S.C. 203 and 205).
(b) Release of information. (1) Relevant statutes pertinent to the
release of information include the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a
and 552b, the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552 and the
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), 42 U.S.C.
1320d through 1320d-8.
(2) It is the policy of USARCS that unclassified attorney work
product may be released with or without a request from the claimant or
attorney, whenever such release may help settle the claim or avoid
unnecessary litigation.
(3) A statutory exemption or privilege may not be waived.
Similarly, documents subject to such statutorily required
nondisclosure, exemption, or privilege may not be released. Regarding
other exemptions and privileges, authorities may waive such exemptions
or privileges and direct release of the protected documents, upon
balancing all pertinent factors, including finding that release of
protected records will not harm the government's interest, will promote
settlement of a claim and will avoid unnecessary litigation, or for
other good cause.
(4) All requests for records and information made pursuant to the
FOIA, 5 U.S.C. 552, the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, or HIPAA,
42 U.S.C. 1320d, will be processed in accordance with the procedures
set forth in AR 25-55 and AR 340-21, respectively as well as 45 CFR
parts 160 and 164, DODD 6025.18-R, this part, and DA Pam 27-162.
(i) Any request for DOD records that either explicitly or
implicitly cites the FOIA shall be processed under the provisions of AR
25-55. Requests for DOD records submitted by a claimant or claimant's
attorney will be processed under both the FOIA and under the Privacy
Act when the request is made by the subject of the records requested
and those records are maintained in a system of records. Such requests
will be processed under the FOIA time limits and the Privacy Act fee
provisions. Withheld information must be exempt from disclosure under
both Acts.
(ii) Requests that cite both Acts or neither Act are processed
under both Acts, using the FOIA time limits and the Privacy Act fee
provisions. For further guidance, see AR 25-55, paragraphs 1-301 and 1-
503.
(5) The following records may not be disclosed:
(i) Medical quality assurance records exempt from disclosure
pursuant to 10 U.S.C. 1102(a).
(ii) Records exempt from disclosure pursuant to appropriate
balancing tests under FOIA exemption (6) (clearly unwarranted invasion
of personal privacy), exemption (7)(c) (reasonably constitutes
unwarranted invasion of privacy), and law enforcement records (5 U.S.C.
552 (b)) unless requested by the subject of the record.
(iii) Records protected by the Privacy Act.
(iv) Records exempt from disclosure pursuant to FOIA exemption (1)
(National security) (5 U.S.C. 552(b)), unless such records have been
properly declassified.
(v) Records exempt from disclosure pursuant to the attorney-client
privilege under FOIA exemption (5) (5 U.S.C. 552(b)), unless the client
consents to the disclosure.
(6) Records within a category for which withholding of the record
is discretionary (AR 25-55, paragraph 3-101), such as exemptions under
the deliberative process or attorney work product privileges (exemption
(5) (5 U.S.C. 552(b)) may be released when there is no foreseeable harm
to government interests in the judgment of the releasing authority.
(7) When it is determined that exempt information should not be
released, or a question as to its releaseability exists, forward the
request and two copies of the responsive documents to the Commander
USARCS. The Commander USARCS, acting on behalf of TJAG (the initial
denial authority), may deny release of records processed under the FOIA
only. The Commander USARCS, will forward to TJAG all such requests
processed under both the FOIA and PA. TJAG is the denial authority for
Privacy Act requests (AR 340-21, paragraph 1-7i).
(c) Claims assistance. In the vicinity of a field exercise,
maneuver or disaster, claims personnel may disseminate information on
the right to present claims, procedures to be followed, and the names
and location of claims officers and the COE repair teams. When the
government of a foreign country in which U.S. Armed Forces are
stationed has assumed responsibility for the settlement of certain
claims against the United States, officials of that country will be
furnished as much pertinent information and evidence as security
considerations permit.
Sec. 536.17 Single-service claims responsibility (DODD 5515.8 and
DODD 5515.9).
(a) Assignment for DOD claims. The Army is responsible for
processing DOD claims pursuant to DODD 5515.9 (posted on the USARCS Web
site; for the address see Sec. 536.2(a)).
(b) Statutes and agreements. DOD has assigned single-service
responsibility for the settlement of certain claims in certain
countries, pursuant to DODD 5515.8 (posted on the USARCS Web
[[Page 46269]]
site; for the address see Sec. 536.2(a)) under the following statutes
and agreements:
(1) FCA (10 U.S.C. 2734);
(2) MCA (10 U.S.C. 2733);
(3) Status of Forces Agreements (10 U.S.C. 2734a and 2734b);
(4) NATO SOFA (4 U.S.T. 1792, Treaties and International Acts
Series (T.I.A.S.) 2846) and other similar agreements;
(5) FCCA (31 U