South Pacific Tuna Fisheries, 45752-45764 [E6-13098]
Download as PDF
45752
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 154 / Thursday, August 10, 2006 / Proposed Rules
should be reported on a single Form
SA3 and report these systems separately
as multiple Forms SA1 and SA2
systems, the effect of which is the
reduction of the royalty fees due and the
elimination of the systems’ 3.75% fees
obligations.
We note, however, that the FCC has
stated that community units are not
equivalent to franchise areas for
communications law purposes. See
Implementation of Sections of the Cable
Television Consumer Protection and
Competition Act of 1992: Rate
Regulation, 8 FCC Rcd 510, 515, fn 34
(1992) (noting that a cable franchise may
span more than one community unit
operating within a distinct geographic
franchise area). We also note that the
FCC has recently questioned whether
cable system boundaries are
coterminous with franchise area
boundaries. See Implementation of
Section 621(a)(1) of the Cable
Communications Policy Act of 1984 as
amended by the Cable Television
Consumer Protection and Competition
Act of 1992, 20 FCC Rcd 18581, 18588
(2005) (in seeking comment on the
efficacy of the local cable franchising
process under Section 621 of the
Communications Act, the FCC asked,
inter alia: ‘‘Are cable systems generally
equivalent to franchise areas?’’).
In responding to MPAA’s proposal to
amend its rule, commenters should
consider whether there is a general
pattern of disaggregation by cable
operators to support a rule change, and
if so, is it reasonable to equate the term
‘‘community’’ with a cable operator’s
‘‘franchise area’’ as defined by the
Federal Communication Commission?
What would be the advantages and
disadvantages of defining community in
this manner? We also seek comment on
the impact such definitional changes
may have on copyright royalty
payments, and whether and to what
extent the FCC’s statements would affect
the definitions and policies we may
adopt in this proceeding.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
V. Conclusion
We hereby seek comment from the
public on the issues raised by the
Program Suppliers in their Petition for
Rulemaking. The petition and the
attachments may be viewed on the
Copyright Office website at:
www.copyright.gov/docs/cable/soa–
petition–attachment–a.pdf and
www.copyright.gov/docs/cable/soa–
attachments–b–c.pdf. If there are any
other issues not raised or identified in
this NOI related to the requested
changes, interested parties may address
those matters in their comments.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:24 Aug 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
Dated: August 4, 2006
Tanya M. Sandros,
Associate General Counsel.
[FR Doc. E6–13112 Filed 8–9–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1410–30–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 300
[Docket No. 050620161–5161–01; I.D.
061605A]
RIN 0648–AP61
South Pacific Tuna Fisheries
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: NMFS proposes to revise
regulations implementing the South
Pacific Tuna Act of 1988, as amended
(SPTA), to reflect the changes agreed to
in the Third Extension of the Treaty on
Fisheries between the Governments of
Certain Pacific Island States and the
Government of the United States of
America and its annexes, schedules, and
implementing agreements, as amended
(Treaty). New provisions under the
Treaty relate to vessel monitoring
system (VMS) requirements, vessel
reporting requirements, area restrictions
for U.S. purse seine vessels fishing
under the Treaty, and allowing U.S.
longline vessels to fish on the high seas
portion of the Treaty Area. These
actions are needed to bring the United
States into compliance with its
obligations under the Treaty.
DATES: Comments must be received by
October 10, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on the proposed rule or the initial
regulatory flexibility analysis (IRFA),
identified by 0648–AP61, by any of the
following methods:
• E-mail: 0648–AP61@noaa.gov:
Include 0648–AP61 in the subject line
of the message.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Facsimile (fax): 808–973–2941.
Attention: Raymond P. Clarke.
• Mail: Regional Administrator,
NMFS, Pacific Islands Regional Office,
1601 Kapiolani Blvd., Suite 1110,
Honolulu, HI 96814–4700.
Copies of the environmental
assessment (EA), regulatory impact
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
review, and IRFA that were prepared for
this rule may be obtained from the
Regional Administrator of NMFS,
Pacific Islands Regional Office, at the
above address.
Send comments regarding the
reporting burden estimate or any other
aspect of the collection-of-information
requirements in these management
measures, including suggestions for
reducing the burden, to the NMFS
address listed above and to David
Rostker, Office of Management and
Budget (OMB), by email at
DavidlRostker@omb.eop.gov, or by fax
at 202–395–7285.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Raymond P. Clarke, 808–944–2200.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background on the Treaty
The Treaty, implemented through the
SPTA (16 U.S.C. 973 et seq.) and its
implementing regulations at 50 CFR part
300, subpart D, governs the conduct of
U.S. fishing vessel operations in the
Treaty Area. The Treaty authorizes, and
regulates through a licensing system,
U.S. purse seine vessels operations
within all or part of the exclusive
economic zones (EEZs) of the 16 Pacific
Island parties to the Treaty (PIPs), thus
providing access to a large portion of the
western and central Pacific Ocean. The
16 PIPs, each a sovereign state, are
members of the Pacific Islands Forum,
an inter-governmental body.
Until recently the Treaty allowed U.S.
vessels fishing for albacore by the
trolling method to fish in the high seas
portion of the Treaty Area, but it did not
allow U.S. longline vessels to do so. The
Treaty has since been amended to allow
U.S. longline vessels to fish in the high
seas portion of the Treaty Area and the
SPTA was amended in 2004 to reflect
that change (Public Law 108–219). U.S.
longline and albacore troll vessels
fishing in the high seas portion of the
Treaty Area are not subject to the
Treaty’s or SPTA’s licensing
requirements.
The Treaty entered into force in 1988
following ratification by the U.S. and
the PIPs. After an initial 5–year
agreement, the Treaty was renewed in
1993 for an additional 10 years.
Currently, the Treaty allows for a
maximum of 45 licenses to U.S. purse
seine fishing vessels to fish in the
Licensing Area of the Treaty. Of the 45
licenses, 5 are reserved for ‘‘joint
venture’’ arrangements: specifically,
U.S. purse seine fishing vessels engaged
in activities designed to promote the
maximization of benefits generated for
PIPs, such as the use of onshore
facilities in PIPs, purchase of equipment
E:\FR\FM\10AUP1.SGM
10AUP1
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 154 / Thursday, August 10, 2006 / Proposed Rules
and supplies from PIPs and employment
of PIP nationals on such vessels. The
Licensing Area includes all or part of
the EEZs of the following countries:
Australia, Cook Islands, Federated
States of Micronesia, Fiji, Kiribati,
Marshall Islands, Nauru, New Zealand,
Niue, Palau, Papua New Guinea, Samoa,
Solomon Islands, Tonga, Tuvalu, and
Vanuatu. The Treaty Area, which is the
area bounded by the coordinates
provided in paragraph 1(k) of Article 1
of the Treaty, is approximately 10
million square miles (26 million square
kilometers) in size. As of June 2006, 12
U.S. vessels were active in the fishery
under the Treaty (there have been no
joint venture arrangements
implemented to this date).
The Treaty establishes the terms and
conditions associated with certain
aspects of U.S. purse seine vessel
operations and conditions of access to
the EEZs of the PIPs. Treaty terms and
conditions include, but are not limited
to, various fees, area closures, reporting
requirements, and monitoring
requirements. Additionally, the U.S. has
certain Treaty obligations, such as
administrative requirements, payment
of licensing and access fees, and the
collection, compilation, and
summarization of fishery related data.
Under the current agreement governing
financial and administrative aspects of
the Treaty (Agreement between the
Government of the United States of
America and the South Pacific Forum
Fisheries Agency), the United States is
obligated to pay an annual fee of 21
million dollars. The U.S. Government
pays 18 million dollars under a
technical assistance agreement, and the
U.S. purse seine tuna industry,
represented by the American Tunaboat
Association, provides the additional 3
million dollars. All these funds are paid
to the Pacific Islands Forum Fisheries
Agency (FFA), headquartered in
Honiara, Solomon Islands. The FFA
Secretary General and staff act as the
Treaty administrator on behalf of the
PIPs.
NMFS has been designated by the
U.S. Secretary of Commerce as the
agency responsible for implementing
fishery conservation and management
measures required to be imposed on
U.S. fishing vessel owners and operators
under the Treaty and the SPTA. U.S.
operational, administrative, and
enforcement commitments under the
Treaty are carried out by NMFS and the
U.S. Coast Guard.
Background on the Regional VMS
Under the Treaty, U.S. purse seine
vessel operators participating in the
western and central Pacific Ocean purse
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:24 Aug 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
seine fishery must submit a variety of
written reports and provide electronic
communications regarding vessel
position. At present, these reports are
submitted via e-mail communications to
the FFA or the appropriate PIP. The
non-electronically collected information
from U.S. participants is transmitted to
the FFA, typically through NMFS,
Pacific Islands Regional Office, or its
field office in Pago Pago, American
Samoa.
VMS programs that utilize shipboard
transceivers, or VMS units, are used
successfully in several fisheries around
the world for fishery monitoring,
compliance, and surveillance purposes.
These automated systems assist fishery
managers and enforcement personnel in
monitoring compliance with certain
types of fishery regulations, and are
particularly useful in circumstances
where, as under the Treaty, fishing
vessels operate over large geographic
areas and vessel operators are subject to
area restrictions. The VMS automates
monitoring and surveillance using
satellite and communications
technology to send location and identity
information from a fishing vessel to a
designated land-based monitoring
station. Shipboard VMS units can be
programmed to report at set time
intervals. Some systems allow remote
programming of the time intervals. This
is typically done from a land-based
monitoring station via the satellite
communications system. The reporting
intervals may be adjusted (e.g. from 1
time per day to 20 times per hour) based
on operational needs. In some systems,
the VMS units can receive and process
polling commands, such as a request to
transmit the vessel’s current position.
Position fixing is typically done using a
global positioning system receiver
integrated into the VMS unit.
In 1992, the parties to the Treaty
signaled recognition of the potential
value of a VMS by including language
in Annex 1 Part 8 stating ‘‘It is
understood that a region-wide vessel
tracking system applicable to all vessels
licensed to fish in the Treaty Area may
be established. United States vessels
with a license to fish under the Treaty
shall participate in such a system and
shall install and operate a transponder
of a type and in such a manner as may
be agreed by the Parties. It is understood
that data derived through the system
shall be treated as confidential business
information and that the terms and
conditions for access to that information
shall be a matter of discussions between
the Parties’’. If VMS data are requested
under the Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA), the responding agency would be
required to determine the releasability
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
45753
of the information under Exemption 4 of
the FOIA pertaining to the release of
confidential business information, as
well as any other applicable
exemptions.
Recognizing the value of VMS to the
management regime, the 16 PIPs, all
members of the FFA’s policy
coordinating body called the Forum
Fisheries Committee (FFC),
implemented a regional VMS to assist in
the management of highly migratory
species fishery resources within their
EEZs. Specifically, the FFC mandated
that as of October 1, 2001, all fishing
vessels operating under bilateral or
multilateral fishery access agreements
within the EEZs of member nations
would be required to participate in the
FFA’s regional VMS. Under the terms of
the Treaty, the U.S. agreed that vessels
licensed to fish in the Treaty Area
would be required to participate when
a VMS requirement was implemented
within the EEZs of the PIPs.
The principal purpose of the FFA
regional VMS is to support existing
surveillance assets such as patrol
vessels, surveillance flights, and
regional at-sea fishery observers.
Currently, vessels licensed under the
Treaty operate across an area of
approximately 10 million square miles
(26 million square kilometers). Effective
surveillance of an area of this size is
extremely difficult. The FFA regional
VMS is expected to be a valuable asset
in effectively monitoring this vast area
in a cost-effective manner, and is
expected thereby to contribute to the
sustainability of fishery resources. The
specifications for the FFA Regional
VMS were developed and implemented
based upon FFA member countries’
experiences with VMS and taking into
consideration the need to ensure a high
degree of information security and
operational efficiency, with minimum
potential for tampering.
The United States has determined that
a robust regional VMS within the Treaty
Area is needed in order to effectively
manage the fleets of the various distant
water fishing nations that operate in the
western and central Pacific Ocean. Now
that a regional VMS has been
established and domestic VMS-related
regulations have been established in
most of the PIPs, the U.S. is prepared to
participate in the system.
Modifications to the Treaty and the
SPTA and Proposed Regulations
In 2002 the Treaty was extended for
the second time since its inception in
1988 (the 2002 extension is referred to
as the Third Extension). To fulfill the
commitments of the United States to
implement the Treaty amendments
E:\FR\FM\10AUP1.SGM
10AUP1
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
45754
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 154 / Thursday, August 10, 2006 / Proposed Rules
made in the Third Extension, as well as
subsequent technical modifications
made in the seventeenth annual formal
consultation of the parties to the Treaty
in March 2005, NMFS proposes to
revise the regulations implementing the
SPTA. Four modifications were made to
the Treaty: (1) Modifications to vessel
reporting requirements, (2)
modifications to Closed and Limited
Areas, (3) new VMS requirements, and
(4) longline high seas access.
The four modifications would be
implemented in this proposed rule
through revisions to the regulations
implementing the SPTA (with respect to
longline high seas access, the SPTA has
also been amended). These
modifications and how they would be
implemented through this proposed rule
are described below. In addition to
amending the regulations to implement
these Treaty modifications, the
regulations would be amended to
explicitly include the details of certain
requirements that are currently
incorporated only by reference to the
Treaty and its annexes.
(1) Modifications to vessel reporting
requirements: The purse seine vessel
reporting requirements have been
modified such that: times must be
reported in Universal Coordinated Time
(also known as UTC) rather than
Greenwich Mean Time (or GMT);
catches must be reported in metric tons
(rather than short tons); the weekly
vessel report to the FFA, known as the
WEEK report, is eliminated; the weekly
reports to national authorities continue
but are amended to indicate whether or
not an observer is on board the vessel;
the report for entry into port for
unloading must be submitted at least 24
hours prior to (rather than any time
prior to) the vessel’s arrival into port;
and the vessel operator is required to
report the estimated date and time of
arrival and the estimated date of
departure from port in the report for
port departure and the report entry into
port for unloading, as appropriate.
(2) Modifications to Closed and
Limited Areas: Papua New Guinea’s
archipelagic waters are now closed to
U.S. purse seine vessels (prior to the
Third Extension certain of these waters
were open to U.S. vessels fishing under
the Treaty) and the Solomon Islands
EEZ is now opened to fishing under the
Treaty, with the exception of the area
from the archipelagic baseline for the
main island group (as defined in
Solomon Islands’ Delimitation of
Marine Waters Act 1978) out to 60
nautical miles (111 kilometers) that is
closed to fishing (prior to the Third
Extension all but a small portion of the
Solomon Islands EEZ was a Closed
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:24 Aug 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
Area; the remainder was a Limited Area
in which effort by U.S. purse seine
vessels was restricted).
(3) VMS requirements: To comply
with the FFC’s October 2001 mandate
regarding the regional VMS and the
Treaty amendments made under the
Third Extension, NMFS proposes to
require each U.S. vessel licensed under
the Treaty to have installed and to carry,
operate, and maintain a VMS unit while
in the Treaty Area. The VMS unit and
attendant software would have to be of
a type approved by the FFA as Treaty
Administrator. If the VMS unit
malfunctions or fails, the owner or
operator would be required to provide
notice of such failure or malfunction,
submit substitute reports by an
alternative means at intervals of no
greater than 8 hours, and if directed by
the FFA or NMFS, proceed to a
designated port to repair or replace the
VMS unit. Owners and operators of
vessels licensed under the Treaty would
also be required to register annually on
the FFA Vessel Register (in the past the
FFA administered a ‘‘FFA VMS Register
of Foreign Fishing Vessels’’ and a ‘‘FFA
Regional Register of Foreign Fishing
Vessels’’ but the two have been
consolidated into a single ‘‘FFA Vessel
Register’’). NMFS would
administratively facilitate the
applications for registration on the
register, but vessel owners and operators
would be responsible for completing the
FFA registration forms and the payment
of associated fees. Once a vessel has
been granted registered status on the
FFA Vessel Register, the FFA would
notify the license holder of such status.
Vessel owners and operators are advised
to retain a copy of this notice as a record
of a vessel’s status on the FFA Vessel
Register.
The contact information for the FFA,
as Treaty Administrator, for the purpose
of the manual position reports and the
notifications required in certain
circumstances in the proposed VMSrelated regulations, as well as for
informational purposes, is as follows:
• Telephone: Country code 677,
number 21124.
• Facsimile: Country code 677,
number 23995.
• E-mail: VMS.Help@ffa.int.
Updated contact information may be
obtained from NMFS (see ADDRESSES).
Additional contact information for the
FFA, as Treaty Administrator, for
informational purposes is as follows:
• Internet: https://www.ffa.int.
• Mail: Secretary General, Pacific
Islands Forum Fisheries Agency, PO
Box 629, Honiara, Solomon Islands
Updated contact information may be
obtained from the NMFS American
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Samoa field station, telephone: country
code 684, number 633–5598; facsimile:
country code 684, number 633–1400, or
the NMFS Pacific Islands Regional
Office (see ADDRESSES).
The VMS data would be treated by
NMFS as confidential business
information. However, if VMS data are
requested under FOIA, the responding
agency would be required to determine
the releasability of the information
under Exemption 4 of the FOIA
pertaining to the release of confidential
business information, as well as any
other applicable exemptions. These new
VMS requirements appear in the
proposed regulations at § 300.45.
(4) Longline high seas access: This
proposed rule would exempt U.S.
longline vessels from the prohibitions
currently listed in 50 CFR 300.38,
effectively allowing authorized U.S.
longline vessels to fish in the high seas
portions of the Treaty Area. The original
language of the Treaty stated that only
purse seine vessels could operate under
the Treaty, with one exception, that
being for albacore vessels that trolled
(fished) while transiting through the
high seas portion of the Treaty Area.
The unintended consequence of this
language is that it did not allow for
other types of U.S. vessels, including
longline vessels, to fish on the high seas
portions of the Treaty Area. It was never
the intent of the parties to the Treaty to
exclude U.S. longline vessels to areas
open to all others fleets in the region. In
1999, after an expressed interest on the
part of the U.S. longline industry, the
parties agreed to rectify the situation
and to allow U.S. longline vessels access
to the high seas portions of the Treaty
Area. This exemption for U.S. longline
vessels to fish in the high seas portion
of the Treaty Area appears in the
proposed regulations at § 300.39(a).
Classification
NMFS prepared an EA for this action
that discusses the impact on the
environment as a result of this proposed
rule. A Finding of No Significant Impact
was signed on July 23, 2004. A copy of
the EA is available from NMFS (see
ADDRESSES).
This proposed rule has been
determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
NMFS prepared an IRFA that
describes the economic impact this
proposed rule, if adopted, would have
on small entities. NMFS invites public
comment on the IRFA (see ADDRESSES).
A description of the action, an
explanation of why it is being
considered, and the legal basis for this
action are contained at the beginning of
this section in the preamble and in the
E:\FR\FM\10AUP1.SGM
10AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 154 / Thursday, August 10, 2006 / Proposed Rules
section of the preamble. A
summary of the analysis follows:
Three of the measures in this
proposed action, the modified vessel
reporting requirements, the VMS
requirements, and the modified Closed
and Limited Areas, would apply to
owners and operators of U.S. purse
seine vessels that operate in the Treaty
Area. The measure to allow longline
vessels access to the high seas portion
of the Treaty Area would apply to
owners and operators of U.S. longline
vessels operating in the Pacific Ocean.
Based on the number of U.S. purse seine
vessels licensed under the Treaty and
the number of U.S. longline vessels
permitted to operate in the Pacific
Ocean under the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management
Act and/or the High Seas Fishing
Compliance Act as of June 2006, NMFS
estimates that 12 purse seine vessels
and approximately 183 longline vessels
would be subject to the rule. These
purse seine and longline vessels are
owned by approximately 9 and 183
business entities, respectively. Based on
(limited) financial information about
these fishing fleets, NMFS believes that
as many as 7 and 183 of the affected
purse seine and longline business
entities, respectively, are small business
entities (i.e. they have gross annual
revenues of less than $4.0 million).
The reporting, recordkeeping, and
other compliance requirements of this
proposed rule are described in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this preamble. The classes of small
entities subject to the requirements and
the types of professional skills necessary
to fulfill the requirements are as follows:
(1) Vessel reporting requirements:
These requirements are part of a
collection of information approved by
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction
Act (PRA) (OMB control number 0648–
0218). Approximately seven small
business entities would be subject to
these requirements. The cost of
compliance would be minor: because
the changes have to do only with units
of measure, the timing of reports, and
the reporting of one additional piece of
information (whether or not an observer
is on board), they would require only
minor modifications in habit on the part
of the vessel operators. Fulfillment of
these reporting requirements is not
expected to require any professional
skills that the vessel owners and
operators do not already possess.
(2) Fishing area modifications:
Approximately seven small business
entities would be subject to these
requirements. These modifications
would not impose any new reporting or
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:24 Aug 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
recordkeeping requirements (within the
meaning of the PRA) on purse seine
vessel owners or operators, but they
could affect the economic performance
of such vessels. It is not known whether
the density of exploitable stocks in the
affected areas is greater or less than in
the fleet′s fishing grounds generally.
Because the target stocks are a highly
fluid resource in this region, with high
turnover rates and significant
movements of fish through the region,
any such differences are likely to be
small. The measure is therefore not
expected to have a strong direct effect
on catch rates or resulting economic
returns. However, the modifications
would affect the operational flexibility
of U.S. purse seine vessels, and such
effects could in turn bring economic
impacts. Vessels would have greater
operational flexibility through enhanced
access to the Solomon Islands EEZ but
less flexibility from reduced access to
the waters around Papua New Guinea.
It is not possible to predict whether the
expected positive impacts to small
entities from the former effect would be
less than or greater than the expected
negative impacts from the latter effect.
This is due to a lack of information
about the extent and value of the
operational flexibility afforded by each
of the two affected areas, as well as the
general difficulty in predicting the
behavior of vessels that operate in
response to many biophysical and
economic factors and conditions, many
of which change markedly from year to
year. The impact, while difficult to
predict, is not expected to differ by
entity class (i.e. by small versus large
entity). Fulfillment of these
requirements is not expected to require
any professional skills that the vessel
owners and operators do not already
possess.
(3) VMS requirements: These
requirements are part of a collection of
information approved by OMB under
the PRA (OMB control number 0648–
0218). Approximately seven small
business entities would be subject to
these requirements. The expected
annual cost of complying with the VMS
requirements is no more than about
$4,000 per vessel (including annualized
costs of $1,000-$2,000 for the purchase
of VMS units and approximately $200
for the installation and activation of
VMS units, which might have to be
replaced as often as once every four
years; $1,375 for the annual FFA VMS
registration fee; and approximately $500
for maintenance and routine operation).
This represents about one tenth of one
percent of the total costs of production
for a typical purse seine vessel, and
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
45755
perhaps as much as two tenths of one
percent of the total costs of production
for the smallest affected small business
entity. Fulfillment of these VMS
requirements is not expected to require
any professional skills that the vessel
owners and operators do not already
possess.
(4) Longline high seas access:
Approximately 183 small business
entities would be subject to this
measure. Opening the high seas areas of
the Treaty Area to U.S. longline vessels
would not impose any additional
reporting, recordkeeping, or other
compliance requirements. Since the
measure would expand the fishing area
available to U.S. longline vessels,
increasing their operational flexibility, it
is expected to have positive or neutral
impacts on affected small entities.
NMFS is not aware of any relevant
Federal rules that duplicate, overlap
with, or conflict with this proposed
rule. NMFS considered several
alternatives to this proposed rule. As a
party to the Treaty, the U.S. has
committed itself to implementation of
the Treaty amendments. Consequently,
NMFS has limited discretion with
regard to implementation of the SPTA.
One alternative NMFS considered is to
take no action. However, NMFS rejected
this alternative because it would not
achieve the objectives of the SPTA,
which are to implement the terms of the
Treaty. NMFS also considered several
alternatives to the VMS requirements.
One is to encourage voluntary
compliance with the VMS measures
rather than issuing a rule that would
make them mandatory. To the extent
that voluntary compliance is achieved,
the costs to small entities would be the
same as under the preferred alternative.
Because relying on voluntary
compliance would make it difficult to
ensure that the VMS requirements of the
Treaty are met, this alternative is not
preferred. Two other non-regulatory
alternatives, which would require
agreement by the parties to the Treaty,
are to obtain the desired compliance
and monitoring benefits via enhanced
vessel observer coverage or enhanced
aerial and surface surveillance activities
rather than via a VMS. These
alternatives could achieve the objectives
of the SPTA at potentially lesser cost to
small entities. However, the projected
costs to the public of enhancing vessel
observer coverage or aerial and surface
surveillance to the extent needed to
achieve the compliance and monitoring
benefits offered by a VMS are
significantly greater than the expected
total costs of the VMS alternative.
Because the cost of VMS is significantly
less than the costs of enhanced observer
E:\FR\FM\10AUP1.SGM
10AUP1
45756
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 154 / Thursday, August 10, 2006 / Proposed Rules
coverage or enhanced aerial and surface
monitoring, it appears more appropriate
to choose the more cost-effective VMS
alternative. A copy of the IRFA is
available from NMFS (see ADDRESSES).
This proposed rule contains
collection-of-information requirements
subject to the PRA and which have been
approved by OMB under control
number 0648–0218. The public
reporting burden for the modified vessel
reporting requirements is estimated to
average 1 hour per catch report, with
about five catch reports per year per
respondent, and about 30 minutes per
unloading logsheet, with about six
unloading logsheets per year per
respondent. The public reporting
burden for the VMS requirements is
estimated to average 30 minutes per
year per respondent for what was
formerly called the FFA Regional
Register of Foreign Fishing Vessels
application form, 15 minutes per year
per respondent for what was formerly
called the FFA VMS Register of Foreign
Fishing Vessels application form, and 2
hours per year per respondent for VMS
unit maintenance. As explained
previously, the FFA consolidated the
two previously-used vessel registers into
a single ‘‘FFA Vessel Register’’ on about
September 1, 2005, and there is now a
single application form for the register.
This consolidation had no effect on the
information collection requirement or
the estimated public reporting burden.
Public comment is sought regarding:
whether these collection-of-information
requirements are necessary for the
proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
the accuracy of the burden estimates;
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information,
including through the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology. Send comments
on these or any other aspects of the
collection-of-information requirements
to NMFS (see ADDRESSES) and to David
Rostker, OMB, by email at
DavidlRostker@omb.eop.gov or by fax
at 202–395–7285.
Notwithstanding any other provision
of the law, no person is required to
respond to, and no person shall be
subject to penalty for failure to comply
with, a collection of information subject
to the requirements of the PRA, unless
that collection of information displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 300
Administrative practice and
procedure, Fish, Fisheries, Fishing,
Marine resources, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Treaties.
Dated: August 3, 2006.
William T. Hogarth,
Assistant Administrator for Fisheries,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, NMFS proposes to amend 50
CFR 300, subpart D, as follows.
PART 300—INTERNATIONAL
FISHERIES REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for 50 CFR
part 300, subpart D continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 973–973r.
2. In § 300.31, definitions for ‘‘FFA
Vessel Register’’, ‘‘Pacific Islands Forum
Fisheries Agency’’ or ‘‘FFA’’, ‘‘UTC’’,
and ‘‘Vessel Monitoring System Unit’’ or
‘‘VMS unit’’ are added, the definition
for ‘‘Limited Area’’ is deleted, and
definitions for ‘‘Regional
Administrator’’, ‘‘Applicable national
law’’, ‘‘Closed Area’’, and ‘‘Treaty Area’’
are revised to read as follows:
§ 300.31
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Applicable national law means any of
the laws of Pacific Island Parties in the
following table and any regulations or
other instruments having the force of
law implemented pursuant to these
laws:
Pacific Island Party
Laws
AUSTRALIA
Antarctic Marine Living Resources Conservation Act, 1981.
Fisheries Management Act, 1991.
Fisheries Administration Act, 1991.
Statutory Fishing Rights Charge Act, 1991.
Fisheries Legislation (Consequential Provisions) Act, 1991.
Foreign Fishing Licences Levy Act, 1991.Fishing Levy Act, 1991.
Fisheries Agreements (Payments) Act, 1991.
Fisheries Agreements (Payments) Act, 1991.
Torres Strait Fisheries Act, 1984.
Whale Protection Act, 1980.
COOK ISLANDS.
Exclusive Economic Zone (Foreign Fishing Craft) Regulations, 1979.
Territorial Sea and Exclusive Economic Zone Act, 1977.Marine Resources Act, 1989.
FEDERATED STATES OF MICRONESIA
Titles 18 and 24 of the Code of the Federated States of Micronesia, as
amended by Public Law Nos. 2-28, 2-31, 3-9, 3-10, 3-34, and 3-80.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
FIJI
Fisheries Act (Cap. 158).
Fisheries Regulations (Cap. 158).
Marine Spaces Act (Cap. 158A).
Marine Spaces (Foreign Fishing Vessels) Regulations, 1979.
KIRIBATI
Fisheries Ordinance, 1979.
Fisheries (Amendment) Act, 1984.
Marine Zones (Declaration) Act, 1983.
Fisheries (Pacific Island States’Treaty with the United States) Act
1988.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:24 Aug 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\10AUP1.SGM
10AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 154 / Thursday, August 10, 2006 / Proposed Rules
Pacific Island Party
45757
Laws
MARSHALL ISLANDS
Title 33, Marine Resources Act, as amended by P.L. 1989-56, P.L.
1991-43, and P.L. 1992-25 of the Marshall Islands Revised Code.
NAURU
Interpretation Act, 1971.
Interpretation Act (Amendment) Act No. 1 1975.
Interpretation Act (Amendment) Act No. 2 1975.
Marine Resources Act, 1978.
NEW ZEALAND
Antarctic Marine Living Resources Act, 1981.Continental Shelf Act,
1964.
Conservation Act, 1987.
Driftnet Prohibition Act, 1991.
Exclusive Economic Zone (Foreign Fishing Craft) Regulations, 1978.
Fishing Industry Board Act, 1963.
Fisheries Act, 1983.
Marine Mammals Protection Act, 1978.
Marine Reserves Act, 1971.
Marine Pollution Act, 1974.
Meat Act, 1964.
Territorial Sea and Exclusive Economic Zone Act, 1977.
Tokelau (Territorial Sea and Exclusive Economic Zone) Act, 1977.
Submarine Cables and Pipelines Protection Act, 1966.
Sugar Loaf Islands Marine Protected Area Act, 1991.
Wildlife Act, 1953.
NIUE
Niue Fish Protection Ordinance 1965.
Sunday Fishing Prohibition Act 1980.
Territorial Sea and Exclusive Economic Zone Act 1978.
PALAU
Palau National Code, Title 27.
PAPUA NEW GUINEA
Fisheries Act (Cap 214).
Fisheries Regulations (Cap 214).
Fisheries (Torres Strait Protected Zone) Act, 1984.
National Seas Act (Cap 361).
Tuna Resources Management Act (Cap 224).
Whaling Act (Cap 225).
SOLOMON ISLANDS
Delimitation of Marine Waters Act, 1978.
Fisheries Act, 1972.
Fisheries Limits Act, 1977.
Fisheries Regulations, 1972.
Fisheries (Foreign Fishing Vessels) Regulations, 1981.
Fisheries (United States of America) (Treaty) Act 1988.
TONGA
Fisheries Act, 1989.
TUVALU
Fisheries Act (Cap 45).
Fisheries (Foreign Fishing Vessel) Regulations, 1982.
Marine Zones (Declaration) Act, 1983.
Foreign Fishing Vessels Licensing (US Treaty) Order 1987.
VANUATU
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
Fisheries Act 1982 (Cap 158).
Fisheries Regulations 1983.
Maritime Zones Act 1981 (Cap 138).
SAMOA
Exclusive Economic Zone Act, 1977.
Territorial Sea Act, 1971.
Fisheries Act, 1988.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:24 Aug 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\10AUP1.SGM
10AUP1
45758
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 154 / Thursday, August 10, 2006 / Proposed Rules
*
*
*
*
*
Closed area means any of the areas in
the following table, as depicted on
charts provided by the Regional
Administrator and as further described
in additional information that may be
provided by the Regional Administrator:
Pacific Island Party
Area
AUSTRALIA
All waters within the seaward boundary of the Australian Fishing Zone
(AFZ) west of a line connecting the point of intersection of the outer
limit of the AFZ by the parallel of latitude 25° 30′ South with the
point of intersection of the meridian of longitude 151 East by the
outer limit of the AFZ and all waters south of the parallel of latitude
25° 30′ South.
COOK ISLANDS
Territorial Sea.
FEDERATED STATES OF MICRONESIA
Three nautical mile territorial sea and nine nautical mile exclusive fishery zone and on all named banks and reefs as depicted on the following charts:
DMAHTC NO 81019 (2nd. ed., Mar. 1945; revised 7/17/72; corrected
through NM 3/78 of 21 June 1978).
DMAHTC NO 81023 (3rd. ed., 7 Aug. 1976).
DMAHTC NO 81002 (4th. ed., 26 Jan. 1980; corrected through NM
4/80).
FIJI
Internal waters, archipelagic waters and territorial seas of Fiji and
Rotuma and its Dependencies.
KIRIBATI
Within archipelagic waters as established in accordance with Marine
Zones (Declaration) Act 1983; within 12 nautical miles drawn from
the baselines from which the territorial seas is measured; and within
2 nautical miles of any anchored fish aggregating device within the
Kiribati exclusive economic zone for which notification of its location
shall be given by geographical coordinates.
MARSHALL ISLANDS
12 nautical mile territorial sea and area within two nautical miles of any
anchored fish aggregating device within the Marshall Islands exclusive economic zone for which notification of its location shall be
given by geographical coordinates.
NAURU
The territorial waters as defined by Nauru Interpretation Act, 1971,
Section 2.
NEW ZEALAND
Territorial waters; waters within 6 nautical miles of outer boundary of
territorial waters; all waters to west of New Zealand main islands and
south of 39° South latitude; all waters to east of New Zealand main
islands south of 40° South latitude; and in respect of Tokelau: areas
within 12 nautical miles of all island and reef baselines; twelve and
one half nautical miles either side of a line joining Atafu and
Nukunonu and Faka’ofo; and coordinates as follows:
Atafu: 8 ° 35’ 10 ″ S, 172 ° 29’ 30 ″ W
Nukunonu: 9 ° 06’ 25 ″ S, 171 ° 52’ 10 ″ W
Faka’ofo: 9 ° 22’ 30 ″ S, 171 ° 16’ 30 ″ W
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
NIUE
Territorial sea and within 3 nautical miles of Beveridge Reef, Antiope
Reef and Haran Reef as depicted by appropriate symbols on NZ
225F (chart showing the territorial sea and exclusive economic zone
of Niue pursuant to the Niue Territorial Sea and Exclusive Economic
Zone Act of 1978).
PALAU
Within 12 nautical miles of all island baselines in the Palau Islands;
and the area:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:24 Aug 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\10AUP1.SGM
10AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 154 / Thursday, August 10, 2006 / Proposed Rules
Pacific Island Party
45759
Area
commencing at the north-easternmost intersection of the outer limit
of the 12 nautical mile territorial sea of Palau by the arc of a circle
having a radius of 50 nautical miles and its center at Latitude 07 °
16′ 34 ″ North, longitude 134 ° 28’ 25 ″ East, being at about the
center of the reef entrance to Malakal Pass; running thence generally south-easterly, southerly, south-westerly, westerly, northwesterly, northerly and north-easterly along that arc to its intersection by the outer limit of the 12 nautical mile territorial sea; and
thence generally northerly, north-easterly, easterly, south-easterly
and southerly along that outer limit to the point of commencement.
Where for the purpose of these specifications it is necessary to determine the position on the surface of the Earth of a point, line or area,
it shall be determined by reference to the World Geodetic System
1984; that is to say, by reference to a spheroid having its center at
the center of the Earth and a major (equatorial) radius of 6,378,137
meters and a flattening of 1/298.2572.
PAPUA NEW GUINEA
All territorial seas, archipelagic and internal waters.
SOLOMON ISLANDS
All internal waters, territorial seas and archipelagic waters; and such
additional waters around the main group archipelago, as defined
under the Delimitation of Marine Waters Act 1978, not exceeding
sixty nautical miles.
TONGA
All waters with depths of not more than 1,000 meters, within the area
bounded by the fifteenth and twenty third and one half degrees of
south latitudes and the one hundred and seventy third and the one
hundred and seventy seventh degrees of west longitudes; also within
a radius of twelve nautical miles from the islands of Teleki Tonga
and Teleki Tokelau.
TUVALU
Territorial sea and waters within two nautical miles of all named banks,
that is Macaw, Kosciusko, Rose, Bayonnaise and Hera, in Tuvalu
exclusive economic zone, as depicted on the chart entitled ‘‘Tuvalu
Fishery Limits’’ prepared by the United Kingdom Hydrographic Department, Taunton, January 11, 1981.
VANUATU
Archipelagic waters and the territorial sea, and internal waters.
SAMOA
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
Territorial sea; reefs, banks and sea-mounts and within 2 nautical
miles of any anchored fish aggregating device within the Samoa exclusive economic zone for which notification of its location shall be
given by geographical coordinates.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:24 Aug 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\10AUP1.SGM
10AUP1
45760
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 154 / Thursday, August 10, 2006 / Proposed Rules
*
*
*
*
*
FFA Vessel Register means the
registry of fishing vessels maintained by
the FFA, comprising those vessels
which are in good standing and licensed
to fish in the waters of FFA member
countries, including those vessels
licensed under § 300.32.
*
*
*
*
*
Pacific Islands Forum Fisheries
Agency or FFA means the organization
established by the 1979 South Pacific
Forum Fisheries Agency Convention.
Regional Administrator means the
Regional Administrator, Pacific Islands
Region, NMFS, 1601 Kapiolani Blvd.,
Suite 1110, Honolulu, HI 96814, or a
designee.
*
*
*
*
*
Treaty Area means all waters north of
60 S. lat. and east of 90 E. long., subject
to the fisheries jurisdiction of Pacific
Island Parties, and all other waters
within rhumb lines connecting the
following points, except for waters
subject to the jurisdiction in accordance
with international law of a State which
is not a party to the Treaty:
Point
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
AA
AB
AC
AD
AE
Latitude
Longitude
2° 35′ 39″ S
1° 01′ 35″ N
1° 01′ 35″ N
10° 00′ 00″ N
14° 00′ 00″ N
14° 00′ 00″ N
12° 30′ 00″ N
12° 30′ 00″ N
15° 00′ 00″ N
15° 00′ 00″ N
18° 00′ 00″ N
18° 00′ 00″ N
12° 00′ 00″ N
12° 00′ 00″ N
5° 00′ 00″ N
1° 00′ 00″ N
1° 00′ 00″ N
8° 00′ 00″ N
8° 00′ 00″ N
0° 00′ 00″
6° 00′ 00″ S
6° 00′ 00″ S
12° 00′ 00″ S
26° 00′ 00″ S
26° 00′ 00″ S
40° 00′ 00″ S
40° 00′ 00″ S
46° 00′ 00″ S
55° 00′ 00″ S
59° 00′ 00″ S
59° 00′ 00″ S
141° 00′ 00″ E
140° 48′ 35″ E
129° 30′ 00″ E
129° 30′ 00″ E
140° 00′ 00″ E
142° 00′ 00″ E
142° 00′ 00″ E
158° 00′ 00″ E
158° 00′ 00″ E
165° 00′ 00″ E
165° 00′ 00″ E
174° 00′ 00″ E
174° 00′ 00″ E
176° 00′ 00″ E
176° 00′ 00″ E
180° 00′ 00″
164° 00′ 00″ W
164° 00′ 00″ W
158° 00′ 00″ W
150° 00′ 00″ W
150° 00′ 00″ W
146° 00′ 00″ W
146° 00′ 00″ W
157° 00′ 00″ W
174° 00′ 00″ W
174° 00′ 00″ W
171° 00′ 00″ W
171° 00′ 00″ W
180° 00′ 00″
160° 00′ 00″ E
152° 00′ 00″ E
and north along
152° degrees of
East longitude
until intersecting
the Australian
200–nautical-mile
limit.
UTC means Universal Coordinated
Time.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:24 Aug 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
Vessel Monitoring System Unit or
VMS unit means Administratorapproved VMS unit hardware and
software installed on a vessel and
required under § 300.45 as a component
of the regional VMS administered by the
FFA to transmit information between
the vessel and the Administrator and/or
other reporting points designated by
NMFS.
3. In § 300.32, paragraph (d) is revised
to read as follows:
§ 300.32
Vessel licenses.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) The number of available licenses
is 45, five of which shall only be
available to fishing vessels of the United
States engaged in joint venture
arrangements, specifically: vessels
engaged in fishing activity designed to
promote maximization of the benefits
generated for the Pacific Island Parties
from the operations of fishing vessels
licensed pursuant to the Treaty, as
determined by the Administrator. Such
activity can include the use of canning,
transshipment, vessel slipping and
repair facilities located in the Pacific
island Parties; the purchase of
equipment and supplies, including fuel
supplies, from suppliers located in the
Pacific Island Parties; and the
employment of nationals of the Pacific
Island Parties on board such vessels.
*
*
*
*
*
4. Section 300.34 is revised to read as
follows:
§ 300.34
Reporting requirements.
(a) Holders of licenses issued under
§ 300.32 shall comply with the reporting
requirements of this section with
respect to the licensed vessels.
(b) Any information required to be
recorded, or to be notified,
communicated or reported pursuant to a
requirement of these regulations, they
Act, or the Treaty shall be true,
complete and correct. Any change in
circumstances that has the effect of
rendering any of the information
provided false, incomplete or
misleading shall be communicated
immediately to the Regional
Administrator.
(c) The operator of any vessel licensed
under § 300.32 must prepare and submit
accurate, complete, and timely
notifications, requests, and reports with
respect to the licensed vessel, as
described in paragraphs (c)(1) through
(10) of this section.
(1) Catch report forms. A record of
catch, effort and other information must
be maintained on board the vessel, on
catch report forms (also known as
‘‘Regional Purse Seine Logsheets’’, or
RPLs) provided by the Regional
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Administrator. At the end of each day
that the vessel is in the Licensing Area,
all information specified on the form
must, for that day, be recorded on the
form. The completed catch report form
must be mailed by registered airmail to
the Administrator within 14 days of the
vessel′s next entry into port for the
purpose of unloading its fish catch. A
copy of the completed catch report form
must also be submitted to, and received
by, the Regional Administrator within 2
days of the vessel reaching port.
(2) Unloading and transshipment
logsheet forms. At the completion of any
unloading or transshipment of fish from
the vessel, all the information specified
on unloading and transshipment
logsheet forms provided by the Regional
Administrator must, for that unloading
or transshipment, be recorded on such
forms. A separate form must be
completed for each fish processing
destination to which the unloaded or
transshipped fish are bound. The
completed unloading and transshipment
logsheet form or forms must be mailed
by registered airmail to the
Administrator within 14 days of the
completion of the unloading or
transshipment. The submitted form
must be accompanied by a report or
reports of the size breakdown of the
catch as determined by the receiver or
receivers of the fish, and such report
must be signed by the receiver or
receivers. A copy of the completed
unloading and transshipment logsheet,
including a copy of the accompanying
report or reports of the size breakdown
of the catch as determined by the
receiver or receivers of the fish, must
also be submitted to, and received by,
the Regional Administrator within 2
days of the completion of the unloading
or transshipment.
(3) Port departure reports. Before the
vessel′s departure from port for the
purpose of beginning a fishing trip in
the Licensing Area, a report must be
submitted to the Administrator by telex,
transmission via VMS unit, facsimile, or
e-mail that includes the following
information: report type (‘‘LBEG’’);
Regional Register number; trip begin
date; date and time (in UTC) of report;
IRCS; port name; weight of catch on
board (in metric tons) for each of
skipjack tuna, yellowfin tuna, and all
other species combined; intended
action; and estimated date of departure.
This information must be reported in
the format provided by the Regional
Administrator.
(4) Entry into port for unloading
reports. At least 24 hours before the
vessel′s entry into port for the purpose
of unloading fish from any trip
involving fishing within the Licensing
E:\FR\FM\10AUP1.SGM
10AUP1
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 154 / Thursday, August 10, 2006 / Proposed Rules
Area, a report must be submitted to the
Administrator by telex, transmission via
VMS unit, facsimile, or e-mail that
includes the following information:
report type (‘‘LFIN’’); FFA Regional
Register number; trip begin date; date
and time (in UTC) of report; IRCS; port
name; weight of catch on board (in
metric tons) for each of skipjack tuna,
yellowfin tuna, and all other species
combined; intended action; and
estimated date and time (in UTC) of
entry into port. This information must
be reported in the format provided by
the Regional Administrator.
(5) Intent to transship notification and
request. At least 48 hours before
transshipping any or all of the fish on
board the vessel, a notification must be
submitted to the Administrator and a
request must be submitted to the Pacific
Island Party in whose jurisdiction the
transshipment is requested to occur.
The notification to the Administrator
and the request to the Pacific Island
Party may be identical. The notification
and request must include the following
information: name of vessel; IRCS;
vessel position (latitude and longitude
to nearest minute of arc); weight of
catch on board the vessel (in metric
tons) for each of skipjack tuna,
yellowfin tuna, and all other species
combined; and the date, time (in UTC),
and location where such transshipment
is requested to occur. The notification to
the Administrator must be reported in
the format provided by the Regional
Administrator and submitted by telex,
transmission by VMS unit, facsimile, or
e-mail. The request to the Pacific Island
Party must be reported in the format
provided by the Regional Administrator
and sent via the means and to the
address provided by the Regional
Administrator.
(6) Zone entry and exit reports. Each
time the vessel enters or exits the waters
under the jurisdiction of a Pacific Island
Party, a report must be submitted to that
Pacific Island Party that includes the
following information: report type
(‘‘ZENT’’ for entry or ‘‘ZEXT’’ for exit);
FFA Regional Register number; trip
begin date; date and time (in UTC) of
the entry or exit; IRCS; vessel position
(latitude and longitude to nearest
minute of arc); weight of catch on board
(in metric tons) for each of skipjack
tuna, yellowfin tuna, and all other
species combined; and intended action.
This information must be reported in
the format provided by the Regional
Administrator and sent via the means
and to the address provided by the
Regional Administrator.
(7) Weekly reports. Each Wednesday
while the vessel is within the waters
under the jurisdiction of a Pacific Island
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:24 Aug 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
Party, a report must be submitted to that
Pacific Island Party that includes the
following information: report type
(‘‘WEEK’’); FFA Regional Register
number; trip begin date; date and time
(in UTC) of report; IRCS; vessel position
(latitude and longitude to nearest
minute of arc); weight of catch on board
(in metric tons) for each of skipjack
tuna, yellowfin tuna, and all other
species combined; intended action; and
whether or not there is a vessel observer
on board (‘‘Y’’ or ‘‘N’’). This information
must be reported in the format provided
by the Regional Administrator and sent
via the means and to the address
provided by the Regional Administrator.
(8) Port entry reports. At least 24
hours before the vessel′s entry into port
of any Pacific Island Party, a report must
be submitted to that Pacific Island Party
that includes the following information:
report type (‘‘PENT’’); FFA Regional
Register number; trip begin date; date
and time (in UTC) of report; IRCS;
vessel position (latitude and longitude
to nearest minute of arc); weight of
catch on board (in metric tons) for each
of skipjack tuna, yellowfin tuna, and all
other species combined; estimated time
(in UTC) of entry into port; port name;
and intended action. This information
must be reported in the format provided
by the Regional Administrator and sent
via the means and to the address
provided by the Regional Administrator.
(9) Transshipment reports. Upon
completion of transshipment of any or
all of the fish on board the vessel, a
report must be submitted to the
Administrator and to the Pacific Island
Party in whose jurisdiction the
transshipment occurred. The report
must include the following information:
report type (‘‘TRANS’’); FFA Regional
Register number; trip begin date; date
and time (in UTC) of the transshipment;
IRCS; vessel position at time of
transshipment (latitude and longitude to
nearest minute of arc); amount of fish
transshipped (in metric tons) for each of
skipjack tuna, yellowfin tuna, and all
other species combined; name of vessel
to which the fish were transshipped;
and the destination of the transshipped
fish. The report to the Administrator
must be reported in the format provided
by the Regional Administrator and
submitted by telex, transmission by
VMS unit, facsimile, or e-mail. The
report to the Pacific Island Party must
be reported in the format provided by
the Regional Administrator and sent via
the means and to the address provided
by the Regional Administrator.
(10) Other reports and notifications to
Pacific Island Parties. Reports and
notifications must be submitted to the
relevant Pacific Island Parties in each of
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
45761
the circumstances and in the manner
described in the subparagraphs of this
paragraph. Unless otherwise indicated
in this paragraph, the reports must be
prepared in the format provided by the
Regional Administrator and sent via the
means and to the address provided by
the Regional Administrator.
(i) Australia.
(A) Each day while the vessel is
within the Australian Fishing Zone, a
report must be submitted that includes
the following information: vessel
position (latitude and longitude to
nearest minute of arc); and the amount
of catch made during the previous day,
by species.
(B) At least 24 hours before entering
the Australian Fishing Zone, a
notification must be submitted that
indicates an intent to enter the
Australian Fishing Zone.
(ii) Fiji.
(A) Each day while the vessel is in Fiji
fisheries waters, a report must be
submitted that includes the following
information: vessel name; IRCS; country
of registration of the vessel; and vessel
position at the time of the report
(latitude and longitude to nearest
minute of arc).
(B) Each week while the vessel is in
Fiji fisheries waters, a report must be
submitted that includes the amount of
the catch made during the preceding
week, by species.
(iii) Kiribati.
(A) At least 24 hours before entering
a Closed Area under the jurisdiction of
Kiribati, a notification must be
submitted that includes the following
information: vessel name; IRCS; vessel
position at the time of the report
(latitude and longitude to nearest
minute of arc); the reason for entering
the Closed Area; and the estimated time
(in UTC) of entry into the Closed Area
(latitude and longitude to nearest
minute of arc).
(B) Immediately upon entry into or
exit from a Closed Area under the
jurisdiction of Kiribati, a report must be
submitted that includes the following
information: report type (‘‘CAENT’’ for
entry or ‘‘CAEXT’’ for exit); the number
of the vessel′s license issued under
§ 300.32; IRCS; date and time (in UTC)
of the report; vessel position (latitude
and longitude to nearest minute of arc);
amount of the catch on board the vessel,
by species; and status of the boom (‘‘up’’
or ‘‘down’’), net (‘‘deployed’’ or
‘‘stowed’’), and skiff (‘‘deployed’’ or
‘‘stowed’’).
(C) At least 24 hours prior to fueling
the vessel from a tanker in the area of
jurisdiction of Kiribati, a report must be
submitted that includes the following
information: report type (‘‘SBUNK’’); the
E:\FR\FM\10AUP1.SGM
10AUP1
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
45762
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 154 / Thursday, August 10, 2006 / Proposed Rules
number of the vessel′s license issued
under § 300.32; IRCS; trip start date;
name of port from which trip started;
amount of the catch on board the vessel,
by species; estimated time of bunkering;
estimated position of bunkering
(latitude and longitude to nearest
minute of arc); and name of tanker.
(D) After fueling the vessel from a
tanker in the area of jurisdiction of
Kiribati, but no later than 12:00 noon
local time on the following day, a report
must be submitted that includes the
following information: report type
(‘‘FBUNK’’); the number of the vessel′s
license issued under § 300.32; IRCS;
start time of bunkering; end time of
bunkering; amount of fuel received, in
kiloliters; and name of tanker.
(iv) New Zealand.
(A) At least 24 hours before entering
the exclusive economic zone of New
Zealand, a notification must be
submitted that includes the following
information: name of vessel; IRCS;
position of point of entry into the
exclusive economic zone of New
Zealand (latitude and longitude to
nearest minute of arc); amount of catch
on board the vessel, by species; and
condition of the catch on board the
vessel (‘‘fresh’’ or ‘‘frozen’’).
(B) For each day that the vessel is in
the exclusive economic zone of New
Zealand, a notification must be
submitted no later than noon of the
following day of the vessel′s position
(latitude and longitude to nearest
minute of arc) at noon.
(C) For each week or portion thereof
that the vessel is in the exclusive
economic zone of New Zealand, a report
that covers the period from 12:01 a.m.
on Monday to 12:00 midnight on the
following Sunday must be submitted
and received by noon of the following
Wednesday (local time). The report
must include the amount of the catch
taken in the exclusive economic zone of
New Zealand during the reporting
period.
(D) At least 10 days prior to an
intended transshipment in an area
under the jurisdiction of New Zealand,
a notification must be submitted that
includes the intended port, date, and
time of transshipment.
(E) At least 24 hours prior to exiting
the exclusive economic zone of New
Zealand, a notification must be
submitted that includes the following
information: position of the intended
point of exit (latitude and longitude to
nearest minute of arc); the amount of
catch on board the vessel, by species;
and condition of the catch on board the
vessel (‘‘fresh’’ or ‘‘frozen’’).
(v) Solomon Islands.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:24 Aug 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
(A) At least 24 hours prior to entry
into Solomon Islands Fisheries Limits, a
report must be submitted that includes
the following information: expected
vessel position (latitude and longitude
to nearest minute of arc) and expected
date and time of entry.
(B) For each week or portion thereof
that the vessel is in the exclusive
economic zone of Solomon Islands, a
report that covers the period from 12:01
a.m. on Monday to 12:00 midnight on
the following Sunday must be submitted
and received by noon of the following
Tuesday (local time). The report must
include the amount of the catch taken
and the number of fishing days spent in
the exclusive economic zone of
Solomon Islands during the reporting
period.
(vi) Tonga.
(A) Each day while the vessel is in the
exclusive economic zone of Tonga, a
report must be submitted that includes
the vessel′s position (latitude and
longitude to nearest minute of arc).
(B) [Reserved]
(vii) Tuvalu.
(A) At least 24 hours prior to entering
Tuvalu fishery limits, a report must be
submitted that includes the following
information: vessel name; IRCS; country
of registration of the vessel; the number
of the vessel′s license issued under
§ 300.32; intended vessel position
(latitude and longitude to nearest
minute of arc) at entry; and amount of
catch on board the vessel, by species.
(B) Every seventh day that the vessel
is in Tuvalu fishery limits, a report must
be submitted that includes vessel
position (latitude and longitude to
nearest minute of arc) and the total
amount of catch on board the vessel.
(C) Immediately upon exit from
Tuvalu fishery limits, a notification
must be submitted that includes vessel
position (latitude and longitude to
nearest minute of arc) and the total
amount of catch on board the vessel.
5. In § 300.38, paragraph (a)(4) is
removed, paragraphs (a)(5) through
(a)(11) are redesignated as paragraphs
(a)(4) through (a)(10), redesignated
paragraph (a)(10) is revised, and
paragraphs (a)(11) through (a)(15) are
added to read as follows:
§ 300.38
Prohibitions.
(a)* * *
(10) To transship fish on board a
vessel that fished in the Licensing Area,
except in accordance with the
requirements of § 300.46.
(11) To fail to have installed, allow to
be programmed, carry, or have
operational a VMS unit while in the
Treaty Area as specified in § 300.45(a).
(12) To fail to activate a VMS unit, to
interrupt, interfere with, or impede the
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
operation of a VMS unit, to tamper with,
alter, damage, or disable a VMS unit, or
to move or remove a VMS unit without
prior notification as specified in
§ 300.45(f).
(13) In the event of a VMS unit failure
or breakdown or interruption of
automatic position reporting in the
Treaty Area, to fail to submit manual
position reports as specified in
§ 300.45(g).
(14) In the event of a VMS unit failure
or breakdown or interruption of
automatic position reporting in the
Treaty Area and if directed by the
Administrator or an authorized officer,
to fail to stow fishing gear or take the
vessel to a designated port as specified
in § 300.45(g).
(15) To fail to repair or replace a VMS
unit as specified in § 300.45(i).
*
*
*
*
*
6. In § 300.39, paragraph (a) is revised
to read as follows:
§ 300.39
Exceptions.
(a) The prohibitions of § 300.38 and
the licensing requirements of § 300.32
do not apply to fishing for albacore tuna
by vessels using the trolling method or
to fishing by vessels using the longline
method in the high seas areas of the
Treaty Area.
*
*
*
*
*
7. In § 300.42, paragraphs (a)(1)(i) and
(b) are revised to read as follows:
§ 300.42 Findings leading to removal from
fishing area.
(a) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) While fishing in the Licensing Area
did not have a license issued under
§ 300.32 to fish in the Licensing Area,
and that under the terms of the Treaty
the fishing is not authorized to be
conducted in the Licensing Area
without such a license.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Upon being advised by the
Secretary of State that proper
notification to Parties has been made by
a Pacific Island Party that such Pacific
Island Party is investigating an alleged
infringement of the Treaty by a vessel in
waters under the jurisdiction of that
Pacific Island Party, the Secretary shall
order the vessel to leave those waters
until the Secretary of State notifies the
Secretary that the order is no longer
necessary.
*
*
*
*
*
8. A new § 300.45 is added to read as
follows:
§ 300.45
Vessel Monitoring System.
(a) Applicability. Holders of vessel
licenses issued under § 300.32 are
E:\FR\FM\10AUP1.SGM
10AUP1
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 154 / Thursday, August 10, 2006 / Proposed Rules
required, in order to have the licensed
vessel in the Treaty Area, to:
(1) Have installed a VMS unit on
board the licensed vessel;
(2) Allow the Administrator, its agent,
or a person authorized by the
Administrator to program the VMS unit
to transmit position and related
information to the Administrator;
(3) If directed by the Regional
Administrator, allow NMFS, its agent,
or a person authorized by NMFS to
program the VMS unit to transmit
position and related information to
NMFS; and
(4) Carry and have operational the
VMS unit at all times while in the
Treaty Area, except as provided in
paragraphs (f) and (g) of this section.
(b) FFA Vessel Register. Purse seine
vessels must be in good standing on the
FFA Vessel Register maintained by the
Administrator in order to be licensed
under the Treaty. FFA Vessel Register
application forms may be obtained from
the Regional Administrator or the
Administrator or from the FFA website:
www.ffa.int. Purse seine vessel owners
or operators must submit completed
FFA Vessel Register applications to the
Regional Administrator for transmittal
to the Administrator and pay fees for
registration of their vessel(s) on the FFA
Vessel Register annually. The vessel
owner or operator may submit a
completed FFA Vessel Register
application form at any time, but the
application must be received by the
Regional Administrator at least seven
days before the first day of the next
licensing period to avoid the potential
lapse of the registration and license
between licensing periods.
(c) VMS unit installation. A VMS unit
required under this section must be
installed by a person authorized by the
Administrator. A list of Administratorauthorized VMS unit installers may be
obtained from the Regional
Administrator or the Administrator.
(d) Hardware and software
specifications. The VMS unit installed
and carried on board a vessel to comply
with the requirements of this section
must consist of hardware and software
that is approved by the Administrator
and able to perform all functions
required by the Administrator. The
initial list of approved hardware and
software will appear in the final rule for
this action. A current list of approved
hardware and software may be obtained
from the Administrator.
(e) Service activation. Other than
when in port or in a shipyard and
having given proper notification to the
Administrator as specified in paragraph
(g) of this section, the owner or operator
of a vessel licensed under § 300.32
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:24 Aug 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
must, when the vessel is in the Treaty
Area:
(1) Activate the VMS unit on board
the licensed vessel to transmit
automatic position reports;
(2) Ensure that no person interrupts,
interferes with, or impedes the
operation of the VMS unit or tampers
with, alters, damages, or disables the
VMS unit, or attempts any of the same;
and
(3) Ensure that no person moves or
removes the VMS unit from the
installed position without first notifying
the Administrator by telephone,
facsimile, or e-mail of such movement
or removal.
(f) Interruption of VMS unit signal.
When a vessel owner or operator is
notified by the Administrator or an
authorized officer that automatic
position reports are not being received,
or the vessel owner or operator is
otherwise alerted or aware that
transmission of automatic position
reports has been interrupted, the vessel
owner and operator must comply with
the following:
(1) The vessel owner or operator must
submit manual position reports that
include vessel name, call sign, current
position (latitude and longitude to the
nearest minute), date, and time to the
Administrator by telephone, facsimile,
or e-mail at intervals of no greater than
eight hours or a shorter interval if and
as specified by the Administrator or an
authorized officer. The reports must
continue to be submitted until the
Administrator has confirmed to the
vessel owner or operator that the VMS
unit is properly transmitting position
reports. If the manual position reports
cannot be made, the vessel operator or
owner must notify the Administrator of
such as soon as possible, by any means
possible.
(2) If directed by the Administrator or
an authorized officer, the vessel
operator must immediately stow the
fishing gear in the manner described in
§ 300.36, take the vessel directly to a
port designated by the Administrator or
authorized officer, and notify the
Administrator by telephone, facsimile,
or e-mail as soon as possible that the
vessel is being taken to port with fishing
gear stowed.
(g) Shutdown of VMS unit while in
port or in shipyard. When a vessel is in
port and not moving, the VMS unit may
be shut down, provided that the
Administrator has been notified by
telephone, facsimile, or e-mail that the
vessel is in port and of the intended
shutdown, and only as long as manual
position reports as described in
paragraph (f)(1) of this section are
submitted to the Administrator at
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
45763
intervals of no greater than 24 hours or
a shorter interval if and as specified by
the Administrator or an authorized
officer. If the VMS unit is shut down
while the vessel is in port, the vessel
owner or operator must notify the
Administrator by telephone, facsimile,
or e-mail as soon as possible after the
vessel′s departure from port. When the
vessel is in a shipyard, the VMS unit
may be shut down and the submission
of manual position reports is not
required, provided that the
Administrator has been notified by
telephone, facsimile, or e-mail that the
vessel is in the shipyard and of the
intended VMS unit shutdown. If the
VMS unit is shut down while the vessel
is in a shipyard, the vessel owner or
operator must notify the Administrator
by telephone, facsimile, or e-mail as
soon as possible after the vessel′s
departure from the shipyard.
(h) VMS unit repair and replacement.
After a fishing trip during which
interruption of automatic position
reports has occurred, the vessel′s owner
or operator must have the VMS unit
repaired or replaced prior to the vessel′s
next trip. If the VMS unit is replaced,
the new VMS unit must be installed by
an Administrator-authorized VMS unit
installer, as specified in paragraph (c) of
this section. In making such repairs or
replacements, conformity with the
current requirements must be met before
the vessel may lawfully operate under
the Treaty.
(i) Access to data. As a condition to
obtaining a license, holders of vessel
licenses issued under § 300.32 must
allow the Regional Administrator, an
authorized officer, the Administrator or
an authorized party officer or designees
access to the vessel′s position data
obtained from the VMS unit at the time
of, or after, its transmission to the
vendor or receiver.
9. A new § 300.46 is added to read as
follows:
§ 300.46
Transshipping requirements.
(a) Applicability. This section applies
to vessels licensed under § 300.32.
(b) Transshipping may only be done
at the time and place authorized for
transshipment by the Pacific Island
Parties, following the notification and
request requirements of § 300.34(c)(5).
(c) The operator and each member of
the crew of a vessel from which any fish
taken in the Licensing Area is
transshipped must:
(1) Allow and assist any person
identified as an officer of the Pacific
Island Party to:
(i) Have full access to the vessel and
any place where such fish is being
transshipped and the use of facilities
E:\FR\FM\10AUP1.SGM
10AUP1
45764
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 154 / Thursday, August 10, 2006 / Proposed Rules
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
and equipment that the officer may
determine is necessary to carry out his
or her duties;
(ii) Have full access to the bridge, fish
on board and areas which may be used
to hold, process, weigh and store fish;
(iii) Remove samples;
(iv) Have full access to the vessel’s
records, including its log and
documentation, for the purpose of
inspection and copying; and
(v) Gather any other information
required to fully monitor the activity
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:24 Aug 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
without interfering unduly with the
lawful operation of the vessel; and
(2) Not assault, obstruct, resist, delay,
refuse boarding to, intimidate, or
interfere with any person identified as
an officer of the Pacific Island Party in
the performance of his or her duties.
(d) Transshipping at sea may only be
done:
(1) In a designated area in accordance
with such terms and conditions as may
be agreed between the operator of the
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
vessel and the Pacific Island Party in
whose jurisdiction the transshipment is
to take place;
(2) In accordance with the
requirements of § 300.34; and
(3) If the catch is transshipped to a
carrier vessel duly authorized in
accordance with national laws.
[FR Doc. E6–13098 Filed 8–9–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
E:\FR\FM\10AUP1.SGM
10AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 154 (Thursday, August 10, 2006)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 45752-45764]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-13098]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 300
[Docket No. 050620161-5161-01; I.D. 061605A]
RIN 0648-AP61
South Pacific Tuna Fisheries
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS proposes to revise regulations implementing the South
Pacific Tuna Act of 1988, as amended (SPTA), to reflect the changes
agreed to in the Third Extension of the Treaty on Fisheries between the
Governments of Certain Pacific Island States and the Government of the
United States of America and its annexes, schedules, and implementing
agreements, as amended (Treaty). New provisions under the Treaty relate
to vessel monitoring system (VMS) requirements, vessel reporting
requirements, area restrictions for U.S. purse seine vessels fishing
under the Treaty, and allowing U.S. longline vessels to fish on the
high seas portion of the Treaty Area. These actions are needed to bring
the United States into compliance with its obligations under the
Treaty.
DATES: Comments must be received by October 10, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on the proposed rule or the initial
regulatory flexibility analysis (IRFA), identified by 0648-AP61, by any
of the following methods:
E-mail: 0648-AP61@noaa.gov: Include 0648-AP61 in the
subject line of the message.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Facsimile (fax): 808-973-2941. Attention: Raymond P.
Clarke.
Mail: Regional Administrator, NMFS, Pacific Islands
Regional Office, 1601 Kapiolani Blvd., Suite 1110, Honolulu, HI 96814-
4700.
Copies of the environmental assessment (EA), regulatory impact
review, and IRFA that were prepared for this rule may be obtained from
the Regional Administrator of NMFS, Pacific Islands Regional Office, at
the above address.
Send comments regarding the reporting burden estimate or any other
aspect of the collection-of-information requirements in these
management measures, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to
the NMFS address listed above and to David Rostker, Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), by email at David--Rostker@omb.eop.gov, or
by fax at 202-395-7285.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Raymond P. Clarke, 808-944-2200.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background on the Treaty
The Treaty, implemented through the SPTA (16 U.S.C. 973 et seq.)
and its implementing regulations at 50 CFR part 300, subpart D, governs
the conduct of U.S. fishing vessel operations in the Treaty Area. The
Treaty authorizes, and regulates through a licensing system, U.S. purse
seine vessels operations within all or part of the exclusive economic
zones (EEZs) of the 16 Pacific Island parties to the Treaty (PIPs),
thus providing access to a large portion of the western and central
Pacific Ocean. The 16 PIPs, each a sovereign state, are members of the
Pacific Islands Forum, an inter-governmental body.
Until recently the Treaty allowed U.S. vessels fishing for albacore
by the trolling method to fish in the high seas portion of the Treaty
Area, but it did not allow U.S. longline vessels to do so. The Treaty
has since been amended to allow U.S. longline vessels to fish in the
high seas portion of the Treaty Area and the SPTA was amended in 2004
to reflect that change (Public Law 108-219). U.S. longline and albacore
troll vessels fishing in the high seas portion of the Treaty Area are
not subject to the Treaty's or SPTA's licensing requirements.
The Treaty entered into force in 1988 following ratification by the
U.S. and the PIPs. After an initial 5-year agreement, the Treaty was
renewed in 1993 for an additional 10 years. Currently, the Treaty
allows for a maximum of 45 licenses to U.S. purse seine fishing vessels
to fish in the Licensing Area of the Treaty. Of the 45 licenses, 5 are
reserved for ``joint venture'' arrangements: specifically, U.S. purse
seine fishing vessels engaged in activities designed to promote the
maximization of benefits generated for PIPs, such as the use of onshore
facilities in PIPs, purchase of equipment
[[Page 45753]]
and supplies from PIPs and employment of PIP nationals on such vessels.
The Licensing Area includes all or part of the EEZs of the following
countries: Australia, Cook Islands, Federated States of Micronesia,
Fiji, Kiribati, Marshall Islands, Nauru, New Zealand, Niue, Palau,
Papua New Guinea, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Tonga, Tuvalu, and Vanuatu.
The Treaty Area, which is the area bounded by the coordinates provided
in paragraph 1(k) of Article 1 of the Treaty, is approximately 10
million square miles (26 million square kilometers) in size. As of June
2006, 12 U.S. vessels were active in the fishery under the Treaty
(there have been no joint venture arrangements implemented to this
date).
The Treaty establishes the terms and conditions associated with
certain aspects of U.S. purse seine vessel operations and conditions of
access to the EEZs of the PIPs. Treaty terms and conditions include,
but are not limited to, various fees, area closures, reporting
requirements, and monitoring requirements. Additionally, the U.S. has
certain Treaty obligations, such as administrative requirements,
payment of licensing and access fees, and the collection, compilation,
and summarization of fishery related data. Under the current agreement
governing financial and administrative aspects of the Treaty (Agreement
between the Government of the United States of America and the South
Pacific Forum Fisheries Agency), the United States is obligated to pay
an annual fee of 21 million dollars. The U.S. Government pays 18
million dollars under a technical assistance agreement, and the U.S.
purse seine tuna industry, represented by the American Tunaboat
Association, provides the additional 3 million dollars. All these funds
are paid to the Pacific Islands Forum Fisheries Agency (FFA),
headquartered in Honiara, Solomon Islands. The FFA Secretary General
and staff act as the Treaty administrator on behalf of the PIPs.
NMFS has been designated by the U.S. Secretary of Commerce as the
agency responsible for implementing fishery conservation and management
measures required to be imposed on U.S. fishing vessel owners and
operators under the Treaty and the SPTA. U.S. operational,
administrative, and enforcement commitments under the Treaty are
carried out by NMFS and the U.S. Coast Guard.
Background on the Regional VMS
Under the Treaty, U.S. purse seine vessel operators participating
in the western and central Pacific Ocean purse seine fishery must
submit a variety of written reports and provide electronic
communications regarding vessel position. At present, these reports are
submitted via e-mail communications to the FFA or the appropriate PIP.
The non-electronically collected information from U.S. participants is
transmitted to the FFA, typically through NMFS, Pacific Islands
Regional Office, or its field office in Pago Pago, American Samoa.
VMS programs that utilize shipboard transceivers, or VMS units, are
used successfully in several fisheries around the world for fishery
monitoring, compliance, and surveillance purposes. These automated
systems assist fishery managers and enforcement personnel in monitoring
compliance with certain types of fishery regulations, and are
particularly useful in circumstances where, as under the Treaty,
fishing vessels operate over large geographic areas and vessel
operators are subject to area restrictions. The VMS automates
monitoring and surveillance using satellite and communications
technology to send location and identity information from a fishing
vessel to a designated land-based monitoring station. Shipboard VMS
units can be programmed to report at set time intervals. Some systems
allow remote programming of the time intervals. This is typically done
from a land-based monitoring station via the satellite communications
system. The reporting intervals may be adjusted (e.g. from 1 time per
day to 20 times per hour) based on operational needs. In some systems,
the VMS units can receive and process polling commands, such as a
request to transmit the vessel's current position. Position fixing is
typically done using a global positioning system receiver integrated
into the VMS unit.
In 1992, the parties to the Treaty signaled recognition of the
potential value of a VMS by including language in Annex 1 Part 8
stating ``It is understood that a region-wide vessel tracking system
applicable to all vessels licensed to fish in the Treaty Area may be
established. United States vessels with a license to fish under the
Treaty shall participate in such a system and shall install and operate
a transponder of a type and in such a manner as may be agreed by the
Parties. It is understood that data derived through the system shall be
treated as confidential business information and that the terms and
conditions for access to that information shall be a matter of
discussions between the Parties''. If VMS data are requested under the
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), the responding agency would be
required to determine the releasability of the information under
Exemption 4 of the FOIA pertaining to the release of confidential
business information, as well as any other applicable exemptions.
Recognizing the value of VMS to the management regime, the 16 PIPs,
all members of the FFA's policy coordinating body called the Forum
Fisheries Committee (FFC), implemented a regional VMS to assist in the
management of highly migratory species fishery resources within their
EEZs. Specifically, the FFC mandated that as of October 1, 2001, all
fishing vessels operating under bilateral or multilateral fishery
access agreements within the EEZs of member nations would be required
to participate in the FFA's regional VMS. Under the terms of the
Treaty, the U.S. agreed that vessels licensed to fish in the Treaty
Area would be required to participate when a VMS requirement was
implemented within the EEZs of the PIPs.
The principal purpose of the FFA regional VMS is to support
existing surveillance assets such as patrol vessels, surveillance
flights, and regional at-sea fishery observers. Currently, vessels
licensed under the Treaty operate across an area of approximately 10
million square miles (26 million square kilometers). Effective
surveillance of an area of this size is extremely difficult. The FFA
regional VMS is expected to be a valuable asset in effectively
monitoring this vast area in a cost-effective manner, and is expected
thereby to contribute to the sustainability of fishery resources. The
specifications for the FFA Regional VMS were developed and implemented
based upon FFA member countries' experiences with VMS and taking into
consideration the need to ensure a high degree of information security
and operational efficiency, with minimum potential for tampering.
The United States has determined that a robust regional VMS within
the Treaty Area is needed in order to effectively manage the fleets of
the various distant water fishing nations that operate in the western
and central Pacific Ocean. Now that a regional VMS has been established
and domestic VMS-related regulations have been established in most of
the PIPs, the U.S. is prepared to participate in the system.
Modifications to the Treaty and the SPTA and Proposed Regulations
In 2002 the Treaty was extended for the second time since its
inception in 1988 (the 2002 extension is referred to as the Third
Extension). To fulfill the commitments of the United States to
implement the Treaty amendments
[[Page 45754]]
made in the Third Extension, as well as subsequent technical
modifications made in the seventeenth annual formal consultation of the
parties to the Treaty in March 2005, NMFS proposes to revise the
regulations implementing the SPTA. Four modifications were made to the
Treaty: (1) Modifications to vessel reporting requirements, (2)
modifications to Closed and Limited Areas, (3) new VMS requirements,
and (4) longline high seas access.
The four modifications would be implemented in this proposed rule
through revisions to the regulations implementing the SPTA (with
respect to longline high seas access, the SPTA has also been amended).
These modifications and how they would be implemented through this
proposed rule are described below. In addition to amending the
regulations to implement these Treaty modifications, the regulations
would be amended to explicitly include the details of certain
requirements that are currently incorporated only by reference to the
Treaty and its annexes.
(1) Modifications to vessel reporting requirements: The purse seine
vessel reporting requirements have been modified such that: times must
be reported in Universal Coordinated Time (also known as UTC) rather
than Greenwich Mean Time (or GMT); catches must be reported in metric
tons (rather than short tons); the weekly vessel report to the FFA,
known as the WEEK report, is eliminated; the weekly reports to national
authorities continue but are amended to indicate whether or not an
observer is on board the vessel; the report for entry into port for
unloading must be submitted at least 24 hours prior to (rather than any
time prior to) the vessel's arrival into port; and the vessel operator
is required to report the estimated date and time of arrival and the
estimated date of departure from port in the report for port departure
and the report entry into port for unloading, as appropriate.
(2) Modifications to Closed and Limited Areas: Papua New Guinea's
archipelagic waters are now closed to U.S. purse seine vessels (prior
to the Third Extension certain of these waters were open to U.S.
vessels fishing under the Treaty) and the Solomon Islands EEZ is now
opened to fishing under the Treaty, with the exception of the area from
the archipelagic baseline for the main island group (as defined in
Solomon Islands' Delimitation of Marine Waters Act 1978) out to 60
nautical miles (111 kilometers) that is closed to fishing (prior to the
Third Extension all but a small portion of the Solomon Islands EEZ was
a Closed Area; the remainder was a Limited Area in which effort by U.S.
purse seine vessels was restricted).
(3) VMS requirements: To comply with the FFC's October 2001 mandate
regarding the regional VMS and the Treaty amendments made under the
Third Extension, NMFS proposes to require each U.S. vessel licensed
under the Treaty to have installed and to carry, operate, and maintain
a VMS unit while in the Treaty Area. The VMS unit and attendant
software would have to be of a type approved by the FFA as Treaty
Administrator. If the VMS unit malfunctions or fails, the owner or
operator would be required to provide notice of such failure or
malfunction, submit substitute reports by an alternative means at
intervals of no greater than 8 hours, and if directed by the FFA or
NMFS, proceed to a designated port to repair or replace the VMS unit.
Owners and operators of vessels licensed under the Treaty would also be
required to register annually on the FFA Vessel Register (in the past
the FFA administered a ``FFA VMS Register of Foreign Fishing Vessels''
and a ``FFA Regional Register of Foreign Fishing Vessels'' but the two
have been consolidated into a single ``FFA Vessel Register''). NMFS
would administratively facilitate the applications for registration on
the register, but vessel owners and operators would be responsible for
completing the FFA registration forms and the payment of associated
fees. Once a vessel has been granted registered status on the FFA
Vessel Register, the FFA would notify the license holder of such
status. Vessel owners and operators are advised to retain a copy of
this notice as a record of a vessel's status on the FFA Vessel
Register.
The contact information for the FFA, as Treaty Administrator, for
the purpose of the manual position reports and the notifications
required in certain circumstances in the proposed VMS-related
regulations, as well as for informational purposes, is as follows:
Telephone: Country code 677, number 21124.
Facsimile: Country code 677, number 23995.
E-mail: VMS.Help@ffa.int.
Updated contact information may be obtained from NMFS (see
ADDRESSES).
Additional contact information for the FFA, as Treaty
Administrator, for informational purposes is as follows:
Internet: https://www.ffa.int.
Mail: Secretary General, Pacific Islands Forum Fisheries
Agency, PO Box 629, Honiara, Solomon Islands
Updated contact information may be obtained from the NMFS American
Samoa field station, telephone: country code 684, number 633-5598;
facsimile: country code 684, number 633-1400, or the NMFS Pacific
Islands Regional Office (see ADDRESSES).
The VMS data would be treated by NMFS as confidential business
information. However, if VMS data are requested under FOIA, the
responding agency would be required to determine the releasability of
the information under Exemption 4 of the FOIA pertaining to the release
of confidential business information, as well as any other applicable
exemptions. These new VMS requirements appear in the proposed
regulations at Sec. 300.45.
(4) Longline high seas access: This proposed rule would exempt U.S.
longline vessels from the prohibitions currently listed in 50 CFR
300.38, effectively allowing authorized U.S. longline vessels to fish
in the high seas portions of the Treaty Area. The original language of
the Treaty stated that only purse seine vessels could operate under the
Treaty, with one exception, that being for albacore vessels that
trolled (fished) while transiting through the high seas portion of the
Treaty Area. The unintended consequence of this language is that it did
not allow for other types of U.S. vessels, including longline vessels,
to fish on the high seas portions of the Treaty Area. It was never the
intent of the parties to the Treaty to exclude U.S. longline vessels to
areas open to all others fleets in the region. In 1999, after an
expressed interest on the part of the U.S. longline industry, the
parties agreed to rectify the situation and to allow U.S. longline
vessels access to the high seas portions of the Treaty Area. This
exemption for U.S. longline vessels to fish in the high seas portion of
the Treaty Area appears in the proposed regulations at Sec. 300.39(a).
Classification
NMFS prepared an EA for this action that discusses the impact on
the environment as a result of this proposed rule. A Finding of No
Significant Impact was signed on July 23, 2004. A copy of the EA is
available from NMFS (see ADDRESSES).
This proposed rule has been determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
NMFS prepared an IRFA that describes the economic impact this
proposed rule, if adopted, would have on small entities. NMFS invites
public comment on the IRFA (see ADDRESSES). A description of the
action, an explanation of why it is being considered, and the legal
basis for this action are contained at the beginning of this section in
the preamble and in the
[[Page 45755]]
SUMMARY section of the preamble. A summary of the analysis follows:
Three of the measures in this proposed action, the modified vessel
reporting requirements, the VMS requirements, and the modified Closed
and Limited Areas, would apply to owners and operators of U.S. purse
seine vessels that operate in the Treaty Area. The measure to allow
longline vessels access to the high seas portion of the Treaty Area
would apply to owners and operators of U.S. longline vessels operating
in the Pacific Ocean. Based on the number of U.S. purse seine vessels
licensed under the Treaty and the number of U.S. longline vessels
permitted to operate in the Pacific Ocean under the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management Act and/or the High Seas Fishing
Compliance Act as of June 2006, NMFS estimates that 12 purse seine
vessels and approximately 183 longline vessels would be subject to the
rule. These purse seine and longline vessels are owned by approximately
9 and 183 business entities, respectively. Based on (limited) financial
information about these fishing fleets, NMFS believes that as many as 7
and 183 of the affected purse seine and longline business entities,
respectively, are small business entities (i.e. they have gross annual
revenues of less than $4.0 million).
The reporting, recordkeeping, and other compliance requirements of
this proposed rule are described in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section of this preamble. The classes of small entities subject to the
requirements and the types of professional skills necessary to fulfill
the requirements are as follows:
(1) Vessel reporting requirements: These requirements are part of a
collection of information approved by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (OMB control
number 0648-0218). Approximately seven small business entities would be
subject to these requirements. The cost of compliance would be minor:
because the changes have to do only with units of measure, the timing
of reports, and the reporting of one additional piece of information
(whether or not an observer is on board), they would require only minor
modifications in habit on the part of the vessel operators. Fulfillment
of these reporting requirements is not expected to require any
professional skills that the vessel owners and operators do not already
possess.
(2) Fishing area modifications: Approximately seven small business
entities would be subject to these requirements. These modifications
would not impose any new reporting or recordkeeping requirements
(within the meaning of the PRA) on purse seine vessel owners or
operators, but they could affect the economic performance of such
vessels. It is not known whether the density of exploitable stocks in
the affected areas is greater or less than in the fleet's fishing
grounds generally. Because the target stocks are a highly fluid
resource in this region, with high turnover rates and significant
movements of fish through the region, any such differences are likely
to be small. The measure is therefore not expected to have a strong
direct effect on catch rates or resulting economic returns. However,
the modifications would affect the operational flexibility of U.S.
purse seine vessels, and such effects could in turn bring economic
impacts. Vessels would have greater operational flexibility through
enhanced access to the Solomon Islands EEZ but less flexibility from
reduced access to the waters around Papua New Guinea. It is not
possible to predict whether the expected positive impacts to small
entities from the former effect would be less than or greater than the
expected negative impacts from the latter effect. This is due to a lack
of information about the extent and value of the operational
flexibility afforded by each of the two affected areas, as well as the
general difficulty in predicting the behavior of vessels that operate
in response to many biophysical and economic factors and conditions,
many of which change markedly from year to year. The impact, while
difficult to predict, is not expected to differ by entity class (i.e.
by small versus large entity). Fulfillment of these requirements is not
expected to require any professional skills that the vessel owners and
operators do not already possess.
(3) VMS requirements: These requirements are part of a collection
of information approved by OMB under the PRA (OMB control number 0648-
0218). Approximately seven small business entities would be subject to
these requirements. The expected annual cost of complying with the VMS
requirements is no more than about $4,000 per vessel (including
annualized costs of $1,000-$2,000 for the purchase of VMS units and
approximately $200 for the installation and activation of VMS units,
which might have to be replaced as often as once every four years;
$1,375 for the annual FFA VMS registration fee; and approximately $500
for maintenance and routine operation). This represents about one tenth
of one percent of the total costs of production for a typical purse
seine vessel, and perhaps as much as two tenths of one percent of the
total costs of production for the smallest affected small business
entity. Fulfillment of these VMS requirements is not expected to
require any professional skills that the vessel owners and operators do
not already possess.
(4) Longline high seas access: Approximately 183 small business
entities would be subject to this measure. Opening the high seas areas
of the Treaty Area to U.S. longline vessels would not impose any
additional reporting, recordkeeping, or other compliance requirements.
Since the measure would expand the fishing area available to U.S.
longline vessels, increasing their operational flexibility, it is
expected to have positive or neutral impacts on affected small
entities.
NMFS is not aware of any relevant Federal rules that duplicate,
overlap with, or conflict with this proposed rule. NMFS considered
several alternatives to this proposed rule. As a party to the Treaty,
the U.S. has committed itself to implementation of the Treaty
amendments. Consequently, NMFS has limited discretion with regard to
implementation of the SPTA. One alternative NMFS considered is to take
no action. However, NMFS rejected this alternative because it would not
achieve the objectives of the SPTA, which are to implement the terms of
the Treaty. NMFS also considered several alternatives to the VMS
requirements. One is to encourage voluntary compliance with the VMS
measures rather than issuing a rule that would make them mandatory. To
the extent that voluntary compliance is achieved, the costs to small
entities would be the same as under the preferred alternative. Because
relying on voluntary compliance would make it difficult to ensure that
the VMS requirements of the Treaty are met, this alternative is not
preferred. Two other non-regulatory alternatives, which would require
agreement by the parties to the Treaty, are to obtain the desired
compliance and monitoring benefits via enhanced vessel observer
coverage or enhanced aerial and surface surveillance activities rather
than via a VMS. These alternatives could achieve the objectives of the
SPTA at potentially lesser cost to small entities. However, the
projected costs to the public of enhancing vessel observer coverage or
aerial and surface surveillance to the extent needed to achieve the
compliance and monitoring benefits offered by a VMS are significantly
greater than the expected total costs of the VMS alternative. Because
the cost of VMS is significantly less than the costs of enhanced
observer
[[Page 45756]]
coverage or enhanced aerial and surface monitoring, it appears more
appropriate to choose the more cost-effective VMS alternative. A copy
of the IRFA is available from NMFS (see ADDRESSES).
This proposed rule contains collection-of-information requirements
subject to the PRA and which have been approved by OMB under control
number 0648-0218. The public reporting burden for the modified vessel
reporting requirements is estimated to average 1 hour per catch report,
with about five catch reports per year per respondent, and about 30
minutes per unloading logsheet, with about six unloading logsheets per
year per respondent. The public reporting burden for the VMS
requirements is estimated to average 30 minutes per year per respondent
for what was formerly called the FFA Regional Register of Foreign
Fishing Vessels application form, 15 minutes per year per respondent
for what was formerly called the FFA VMS Register of Foreign Fishing
Vessels application form, and 2 hours per year per respondent for VMS
unit maintenance. As explained previously, the FFA consolidated the two
previously-used vessel registers into a single ``FFA Vessel Register''
on about September 1, 2005, and there is now a single application form
for the register. This consolidation had no effect on the information
collection requirement or the estimated public reporting burden.
Public comment is sought regarding: whether these collection-of-
information requirements are necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including whether the information will
have practical utility; the accuracy of the burden estimates; ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be
collected; and ways to minimize the burden of the collection of
information, including through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology. Send comments on
these or any other aspects of the collection-of-information
requirements to NMFS (see ADDRESSES) and to David Rostker, OMB, by
email at David--Rostker@omb.eop.gov or by fax at 202-395-7285.
Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, no person is
required to respond to, and no person shall be subject to penalty for
failure to comply with, a collection of information subject to the
requirements of the PRA, unless that collection of information displays
a currently valid OMB control number.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 300
Administrative practice and procedure, Fish, Fisheries, Fishing,
Marine resources, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Treaties.
Dated: August 3, 2006.
William T. Hogarth,
Assistant Administrator for Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries
Service.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, NMFS proposes to amend 50
CFR 300, subpart D, as follows.
PART 300--INTERNATIONAL FISHERIES REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for 50 CFR part 300, subpart D continues
to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 973-973r.
2. In Sec. 300.31, definitions for ``FFA Vessel Register'',
``Pacific Islands Forum Fisheries Agency'' or ``FFA'', ``UTC'', and
``Vessel Monitoring System Unit'' or ``VMS unit'' are added, the
definition for ``Limited Area'' is deleted, and definitions for
``Regional Administrator'', ``Applicable national law'', ``Closed
Area'', and ``Treaty Area'' are revised to read as follows:
Sec. 300.31 Definitions.
* * * * *
Applicable national law means any of the laws of Pacific Island
Parties in the following table and any regulations or other instruments
having the force of law implemented pursuant to these laws:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pacific Island Party Laws
------------------------------------------------------------------------
AUSTRALIA
Antarctic Marine Living Resources
Conservation Act, 1981.
Fisheries Management Act, 1991.
Fisheries Administration Act, 1991.
Statutory Fishing Rights Charge Act,
1991.
Fisheries Legislation (Consequential
Provisions) Act, 1991.
Foreign Fishing Licences Levy Act,
1991.Fishing Levy Act, 1991.
Fisheries Agreements (Payments) Act,
1991.
Fisheries Agreements (Payments) Act,
1991.
Torres Strait Fisheries Act, 1984.
Whale Protection Act, 1980.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
COOK ISLANDS.
Exclusive Economic Zone (Foreign
Fishing Craft) Regulations, 1979.
Territorial Sea and Exclusive
Economic Zone Act, 1977.Marine
Resources Act, 1989.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERATED STATES OF MICRONESIA
Titles 18 and 24 of the Code of the
Federated States of Micronesia, as
amended by Public Law Nos. 2-28, 2-
31, 3-9, 3-10, 3-34, and 3-80.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
FIJI
Fisheries Act (Cap. 158).
Fisheries Regulations (Cap. 158).
Marine Spaces Act (Cap. 158A).
Marine Spaces (Foreign Fishing
Vessels) Regulations, 1979.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
KIRIBATI
Fisheries Ordinance, 1979.
Fisheries (Amendment) Act, 1984.
Marine Zones (Declaration) Act, 1983.
Fisheries (Pacific Island
States'Treaty with the United
States) Act 1988.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 45757]]
MARSHALL ISLANDS
Title 33, Marine Resources Act, as
amended by P.L. 1989-56, P.L. 1991-
43, and P.L. 1992-25 of the Marshall
Islands Revised Code.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NAURU
Interpretation Act, 1971.
Interpretation Act (Amendment) Act
No. 1 1975.
Interpretation Act (Amendment) Act
No. 2 1975.
Marine Resources Act, 1978.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NEW ZEALAND
Antarctic Marine Living Resources
Act, 1981.Continental Shelf Act,
1964.
Conservation Act, 1987.
Driftnet Prohibition Act, 1991.
Exclusive Economic Zone (Foreign
Fishing Craft) Regulations, 1978.
Fishing Industry Board Act, 1963.
Fisheries Act, 1983.
Marine Mammals Protection Act, 1978.
Marine Reserves Act, 1971.
Marine Pollution Act, 1974.
Meat Act, 1964.
Territorial Sea and Exclusive
Economic Zone Act, 1977.
Tokelau (Territorial Sea and
Exclusive Economic Zone) Act, 1977.
Submarine Cables and Pipelines
Protection Act, 1966.
Sugar Loaf Islands Marine Protected
Area Act, 1991.
Wildlife Act, 1953.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NIUE
Niue Fish Protection Ordinance 1965.
Sunday Fishing Prohibition Act 1980.
Territorial Sea and Exclusive
Economic Zone Act 1978.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
PALAU
Palau National Code, Title 27.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
PAPUA NEW GUINEA
Fisheries Act (Cap 214).
Fisheries Regulations (Cap 214).
Fisheries (Torres Strait Protected
Zone) Act, 1984.
National Seas Act (Cap 361).
Tuna Resources Management Act (Cap
224).
Whaling Act (Cap 225).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SOLOMON ISLANDS
Delimitation of Marine Waters Act,
1978.
Fisheries Act, 1972.
Fisheries Limits Act, 1977.
Fisheries Regulations, 1972.
Fisheries (Foreign Fishing Vessels)
Regulations, 1981.
Fisheries (United States of America)
(Treaty) Act 1988.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
TONGA
Fisheries Act, 1989.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
TUVALU
Fisheries Act (Cap 45).
Fisheries (Foreign Fishing Vessel)
Regulations, 1982.
Marine Zones (Declaration) Act, 1983.
Foreign Fishing Vessels Licensing (US
Treaty) Order 1987.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
VANUATU
Fisheries Act 1982 (Cap 158).
Fisheries Regulations 1983.
Maritime Zones Act 1981 (Cap 138).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SAMOA
Exclusive Economic Zone Act, 1977.
Territorial Sea Act, 1971.
Fisheries Act, 1988.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 45758]]
* * * * *
Closed area means any of the areas in the following table, as
depicted on charts provided by the Regional Administrator and as
further described in additional information that may be provided by the
Regional Administrator:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pacific Island Party Area
------------------------------------------------------------------------
AUSTRALIA
All waters within the seaward
boundary of the Australian Fishing
Zone (AFZ) west of a line connecting
the point of intersection of the
outer limit of the AFZ by the
parallel of latitude 25[deg] 30'
South with the point of intersection
of the meridian of longitude 151
East by the outer limit of the AFZ
and all waters south of the parallel
of latitude 25[deg] 30' South.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
COOK ISLANDS
Territorial Sea.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERATED STATES OF MICRONESIA
Three nautical mile territorial sea
and nine nautical mile exclusive
fishery zone and on all named banks
and reefs as depicted on the
following charts:
DMAHTC NO 81019 (2nd. ed., Mar.
1945; revised 7/17/72; corrected
through NM 3/78 of 21 June 1978).
DMAHTC NO 81023 (3rd. ed., 7 Aug.
1976).
DMAHTC NO 81002 (4th. ed., 26 Jan.
1980; corrected through NM 4/80).
---------------------------------- ------------------------------------
FIJI
Internal waters, archipelagic waters
and territorial seas of Fiji and
Rotuma and its Dependencies.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
KIRIBATI
Within archipelagic waters as
established in accordance with
Marine Zones (Declaration) Act 1983;
within 12 nautical miles drawn from
the baselines from which the
territorial seas is measured; and
within 2 nautical miles of any
anchored fish aggregating device
within the Kiribati exclusive
economic zone for which notification
of its location shall be given by
geographical coordinates.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
MARSHALL ISLANDS
12 nautical mile territorial sea and
area within two nautical miles of
any anchored fish aggregating device
within the Marshall Islands
exclusive economic zone for which
notification of its location shall
be given by geographical
coordinates.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NAURU
The territorial waters as defined by
Nauru Interpretation Act, 1971,
Section 2.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NEW ZEALAND
Territorial waters; waters within 6
nautical miles of outer boundary of
territorial waters; all waters to
west of New Zealand main islands and
south of 39[deg] South latitude; all
waters to east of New Zealand main
islands south of 40[deg] South
latitude; and in respect of Tokelau:
areas within 12 nautical miles of
all island and reef baselines;
twelve and one half nautical miles
either side of a line joining Atafu
and Nukunonu and Faka'ofo; and
coordinates as follows:
Atafu: 8 [deg] 35' 10 '' S, 172
[deg] 29' 30 '' W
Nukunonu: 9 [deg] 06' 25 '' S, 171
[deg] 52' 10 '' W
Faka'ofo: 9 [deg] 22' 30 '' S, 171
[deg] 16' 30 '' W
---------------------------------- ------------------------------------
NIUE
Territorial sea and within 3 nautical
miles of Beveridge Reef, Antiope
Reef and Haran Reef as depicted by
appropriate symbols on NZ 225F
(chart showing the territorial sea
and exclusive economic zone of Niue
pursuant to the Niue Territorial Sea
and Exclusive Economic Zone Act of
1978).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
PALAU
Within 12 nautical miles of all
island baselines in the Palau
Islands; and the area:
[[Page 45759]]
commencing at the north-easternmost
intersection of the outer limit of
the 12 nautical mile territorial
sea of Palau by the arc of a
circle having a radius of 50
nautical miles and its center at
Latitude 07 [deg] 16' 34 '' North,
longitude 134 [deg] 28' 25 ''
East, being at about the center of
the reef entrance to Malakal Pass;
running thence generally south-
easterly, southerly, south-
westerly, westerly, north-
westerly, northerly and north-
easterly along that arc to its
intersection by the outer limit of
the 12 nautical mile territorial
sea; and thence generally
northerly, north-easterly,
easterly, south-easterly and
southerly along that outer limit
to the point of commencement.
Where for the purpose of these
specifications it is necessary to
determine the position on the
surface of the Earth of a point,
line or area, it shall be determined
by reference to the World Geodetic
System 1984; that is to say, by
reference to a spheroid having its
center at the center of the Earth
and a major (equatorial) radius of
6,378,137 meters and a flattening of
1/298.2572.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
PAPUA NEW GUINEA
All territorial seas, archipelagic
and internal waters.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SOLOMON ISLANDS
All internal waters, territorial seas
and archipelagic waters; and such
additional waters around the main
group archipelago, as defined under
the Delimitation of Marine Waters
Act 1978, not exceeding sixty
nautical miles.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
TONGA
All waters with depths of not more
than 1,000 meters, within the area
bounded by the fifteenth and twenty
third and one half degrees of south
latitudes and the one hundred and
seventy third and the one hundred
and seventy seventh degrees of west
longitudes; also within a radius of
twelve nautical miles from the
islands of Teleki Tonga and Teleki
Tokelau.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
TUVALU
Territorial sea and waters within two
nautical miles of all named banks,
that is Macaw, Kosciusko, Rose,
Bayonnaise and Hera, in Tuvalu
exclusive economic zone, as depicted
on the chart entitled ``Tuvalu
Fishery Limits'' prepared by the
United Kingdom Hydrographic
Department, Taunton, January 11,
1981.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
VANUATU
Archipelagic waters and the
territorial sea, and internal
waters.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SAMOA
Territorial sea; reefs, banks and sea-
mounts and within 2 nautical miles
of any anchored fish aggregating
device within the Samoa exclusive
economic zone for which notification
of its location shall be given by
geographical coordinates.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 45760]]
* * * * *
FFA Vessel Register means the registry of fishing vessels
maintained by the FFA, comprising those vessels which are in good
standing and licensed to fish in the waters of FFA member countries,
including those vessels licensed under Sec. 300.32.
* * * * *
Pacific Islands Forum Fisheries Agency or FFA means the
organization established by the 1979 South Pacific Forum Fisheries
Agency Convention.
Regional Administrator means the Regional Administrator, Pacific
Islands Region, NMFS, 1601 Kapiolani Blvd., Suite 1110, Honolulu, HI
96814, or a designee.
* * * * *
Treaty Area means all waters north of 60 S. lat. and east of 90 E.
long., subject to the fisheries jurisdiction of Pacific Island Parties,
and all other waters within rhumb lines connecting the following
points, except for waters subject to the jurisdiction in accordance
with international law of a State which is not a party to the Treaty:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point Latitude Longitude
------------------------------------------------------------------------
A 2[deg] 35' 141[deg] 00'
39'' S 00'' E
B 1[deg] 01' 140[deg] 48'
35'' N 35'' E
C 1[deg] 01' 129[deg] 30'
35'' N 00'' E
D 10[deg] 00' 129[deg] 30'
00'' N 00'' E
E 14[deg] 00' 140[deg] 00'
00'' N 00'' E
F 14[deg] 00' 142[deg] 00'
00'' N 00'' E
G 12[deg] 30' 142[deg] 00'
00'' N 00'' E
H 12[deg] 30' 158[deg] 00'
00'' N 00'' E
I 15[deg] 00' 158[deg] 00'
00'' N 00'' E
J 15[deg] 00' 165[deg] 00'
00'' N 00'' E
K 18[deg] 00' 165[deg] 00'
00'' N 00'' E
L 18[deg] 00' 174[deg] 00'
00'' N 00'' E
M 12[deg] 00' 174[deg] 00'
00'' N 00'' E
N 12[deg] 00' 176[deg] 00'
00'' N 00'' E
O 5[deg] 00' 176[deg] 00'
00'' N 00'' E
P 1[deg] 00' 180[deg] 00'
00'' N 00''
Q 1[deg] 00' 164[deg] 00'
00'' N 00'' W
R 8[deg] 00' 164[deg] 00'
00'' N 00'' W
S 8[deg] 00' 158[deg] 00'
00'' N 00'' W
T 0[deg] 00' 150[deg] 00'
00'' 00'' W
U 6[deg] 00' 150[deg] 00'
00'' S 00'' W
V 6[deg] 00' 146[deg] 00'
00'' S 00'' W
W 12[deg] 00' 146[deg] 00'
00'' S 00'' W
X 26[deg] 00' 157[deg] 00'
00'' S 00'' W
Y 26[deg] 00' 174[deg] 00'
00'' S 00'' W
Z 40[deg] 00' 174[deg] 00'
00'' S 00'' W
AA 40[deg] 00' 171[deg] 00'
00'' S 00'' W
AB 46[deg] 00' 171[deg] 00'
00'' S 00'' W
AC 55[deg] 00' 180[deg] 00'
00'' S 00''
AD 59[deg] 00' 160[deg] 00'
00'' S 00'' E
AE 59[deg] 00' 152[deg] 00'
00'' S 00'' E and north
along 152[deg]
degrees of East
longitude until
intersecting the
Australian 200-
nautical-mile
limit.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
UTC means Universal Coordinated Time.
Vessel Monitoring System Unit or VMS unit means Administrator-
approved VMS unit hardware and software installed on a vessel and
required under Sec. 300.45 as a component of the regional VMS
administered by the FFA to transmit information between the vessel and
the Administrator and/or other reporting points designated by NMFS.
3. In Sec. 300.32, paragraph (d) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 300.32 Vessel licenses.
* * * * *
(d) The number of available licenses is 45, five of which shall
only be available to fishing vessels of the United States engaged in
joint venture arrangements, specifically: vessels engaged in fishing
activity designed to promote maximization of the benefits generated for
the Pacific Island Parties from the operations of fishing vessels
licensed pursuant to the Treaty, as determined by the Administrator.
Such activity can include the use of canning, transshipment, vessel
slipping and repair facilities located in the Pacific island Parties;
the purchase of equipment and supplies, including fuel supplies, from
suppliers located in the Pacific Island Parties; and the employment of
nationals of the Pacific Island Parties on board such vessels.
* * * * *
4. Section 300.34 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 300.34 Reporting requirements.
(a) Holders of licenses issued under Sec. 300.32 shall comply with
the reporting requirements of this section with respect to the licensed
vessels.
(b) Any information required to be recorded, or to be notified,
communicated or reported pursuant to a requirement of these
regulations, they Act, or the Treaty shall be true, complete and
correct. Any change in circumstances that has the effect of rendering
any of the information provided false, incomplete or misleading shall
be communicated immediately to the Regional Administrator.
(c) The operator of any vessel licensed under Sec. 300.32 must
prepare and submit accurate, complete, and timely notifications,
requests, and reports with respect to the licensed vessel, as described
in paragraphs (c)(1) through (10) of this section.
(1) Catch report forms. A record of catch, effort and other
information must be maintained on board the vessel, on catch report
forms (also known as ``Regional Purse Seine Logsheets'', or RPLs)
provided by the Regional Administrator. At the end of each day that the
vessel is in the Licensing Area, all information specified on the form
must, for that day, be recorded on the form. The completed catch report
form must be mailed by registered airmail to the Administrator within
14 days of the vessel's next entry into port for the purpose of
unloading its fish catch. A copy of the completed catch report form
must also be submitted to, and received by, the Regional Administrator
within 2 days of the vessel reaching port.
(2) Unloading and transshipment logsheet forms. At the completion
of any unloading or transshipment of fish from the vessel, all the
information specified on unloading and transshipment logsheet forms
provided by the Regional Administrator must, for that unloading or
transshipment, be recorded on such forms. A separate form must be
completed for each fish processing destination to which the unloaded or
transshipped fish are bound. The completed unloading and transshipment
logsheet form or forms must be mailed by registered airmail to the
Administrator within 14 days of the completion of the unloading or
transshipment. The submitted form must be accompanied by a report or
reports of the size breakdown of the catch as determined by the
receiver or receivers of the fish, and such report must be signed by
the receiver or receivers. A copy of the completed unloading and
transshipment logsheet, including a copy of the accompanying report or
reports of the size breakdown of the catch as determined by the
receiver or receivers of the fish, must also be submitted to, and
received by, the Regional Administrator within 2 days of the completion
of the unloading or transshipment.
(3) Port departure reports. Before the vessel's departure from port
for the purpose of beginning a fishing trip in the Licensing Area, a
report must be submitted to the Administrator by telex, transmission
via VMS unit, facsimile, or e-mail that includes the following
information: report type (``LBEG''); Regional Register number; trip
begin date; date and time (in UTC) of report; IRCS; port name; weight
of catch on board (in metric tons) for each of skipjack tuna, yellowfin
tuna, and all other species combined; intended action; and estimated
date of departure. This information must be reported in the format
provided by the Regional Administrator.
(4) Entry into port for unloading reports. At least 24 hours before
the vessel's entry into port for the purpose of unloading fish from any
trip involving fishing within the Licensing
[[Page 45761]]
Area, a report must be submitted to the Administrator by telex,
transmission via VMS unit, facsimile, or e-mail that includes the
following information: report type (``LFIN''); FFA Regional Register
number; trip begin date; date and time (in UTC) of report; IRCS; port
name; weight of catch on board (in metric tons) for each of skipjack
tuna, yellowfin tuna, and all other species combined; intended action;
and estimated date and time (in UTC) of entry into port. This
information must be reported in the format provided by the Regional
Administrator.
(5) Intent to transship notification and request. At least 48 hours
before transshipping any or all of the fish on board the vessel, a
notification must be submitted to the Administrator and a request must
be submitted to the Pacific Island Party in whose jurisdiction the
transshipment is requested to occur. The notification to the
Administrator and the request to the Pacific Island Party may be
identical. The notification and request must include the following
information: name of vessel; IRCS; vessel position (latitude and
longitude to nearest minute of arc); weight of catch on board the
vessel (in metric tons) for each of skipjack tuna, yellowfin tuna, and
all other species combined; and the date, time (in UTC), and location
where such transshipment is requested to occur. The notification to the
Administrator must be reported in the format provided by the Regional
Administrator and submitted by telex, transmission by VMS unit,
facsimile, or e-mail. The request to the Pacific Island Party must be
reported in the format provided by the Regional Administrator and sent
via the means and to the address provided by the Regional
Administrator.
(6) Zone entry and exit reports. Each time the vessel enters or
exits the waters under the jurisdiction of a Pacific Island Party, a
report must be submitted to that Pacific Island Party that includes the
following information: report t