Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA) Request for Grant Proposals: Summer Language Institutes for American Youth, 45892-45897 [06-6837]
Download as PDF
rwilkins on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
45892
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 154 / Thursday, August 10, 2006 / Notices
new version of IBRS includes the
following data-related changes:
Registrants are now able to add multiple
addresses, phones and e-mails; There is
no longer a short-term/long-term
distinction, so all users are required to
select a U.S. embassy or consulate when
registering a trip; registrants can now
sign up for embassy/consulate specific
e-mail lists and this revision provides
the option of completing a paper version
of the registration which may be emailed, faxed, mailed to U.S. embassies
or consulates or executed in person to
be hand entered in the IBRS database by
the U.S. embassy or consulate.
Originating Office: CA/OCS.
Form Number: DS–4024, DS–4024e.
Respondents: American Citizens
traveling abroad.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
500,000.
Estimated Number of Responses:
500,000.
Average Hours Per Response: 10
minutes.
Total Estimated Burden: 83,333.
Frequency: On occasion.
Obligation to Respond: Voluntary.
DATES: The Department will accept
comments from the public up to 60 days
from October 10, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any of the following methods:
• E-mail: ASKPRI@state.gov.
• Mail (paper, disk, or CD–ROM
submissions): Overseas Citizens
Services, CA/OCS/PRI, U.S. Department
of State, SA–29, 4th Floor, 2201 C
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20520.
• Fax: 202–736–9111.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: Overseas
Citizens Services, CA/OCS/PRI, U.S.
Department of State, 2100 Pennsylvania
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20037.
You must include the DS form
number (if applicable), information
collection title, and OMB control
number in any correspondence.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Direct requests for additional
information regarding the collection
listed in this notice, including requests
for copies of the proposed information
collection and supporting documents, to
Monica A. Gaw, CA/OCS/PRI, U.S.
Department of State, SA–29, 4th Floor,
Washington, DC 20520, who may be
reached on 202–736–9107 or via e-mail
at ASKPRI@state.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We are
soliciting public comments to permit
the Department to:
• Evaluate whether the proposed
information collection is necessary for
the proper performance of our
functions.
• Evaluate the accuracy of our
estimate of the burden of the proposed
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:27 Aug 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
collection, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used.
• Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected.
• Minimize the reporting burden on
those who are to respond, including the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of technology.
Revenue Code section 26 U.S.C.
501(c)(3) may submit proposals to
implement six-to eight-week summer
institutes in China or in an Arabicspeaking country that offer U.S. high
school students formal and informal
language instruction through a
comprehensive exchange experience.
Abstract of Proposed Collection
Authority
Overall grant making authority for
this program is contained in the Mutual
Educational and Cultural Exchange Act
of 1961, as amended, Public Law 87–
256, also known as the Fulbright-Hays
Act. The purpose of the Act is ‘‘to
enable the Government of the United
States to increase mutual understanding
between the people of the United States
and the people of other countries * * *;
to strengthen the ties which unite us
with other nations by demonstrating the
educational and cultural interests,
developments, and achievements of the
people of the United States and other
nations * * * and thus to assist in the
development of friendly, sympathetic,
and peaceful relations between the
United States and the other countries of
the world.’’ The funding authority for
the program above is provided through
legislation.
The American Citizens Services
Internet Based Registration System
(IBRS) makes it possible for U.S.
nationals to register on line from
anywhere in the world. In the event of
a family emergency, natural disaster or
international crisis, U.S. embassies and
consulates rely on this registration
information to provide critical
information and assistance to them.
Methodology
99% of responses are received via
electronic submission on the Internet.
The service is available on the
Department of State, Bureau of Consular
Affairs Web site https://travel.state.gov at
https://travelregistration.state.gov/ibrs/.
The paper version of the collection
permits respondents who do not have
Internet access to provide the
information to the U.S. embassy or
consulate by fax, e-mail, mail or in
person.
Dated: July 21, 2006.
Maura Harty,
Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Consular
Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. E6–13094 Filed 8–9–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 5490]
Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs (ECA) Request for Grant
Proposals: Summer Language
Institutes for American Youth
Announcement Type: New Grant.
Funding Opportunity Number: ECA/
PE/C/PY–07–03.
Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance Number: 00.000.
Application Deadline: October 5,
2006.
Executive Summary: The Youth
Programs Division, Office of Citizen
Exchanges of the Bureau of Educational
and Cultural Affairs, announces an open
competition for projects to provide
foreign language instruction overseas for
American high school students in
Summer 2007. Public and private nonprofit organizations meeting the
provisions described in Internal
PO 00000
Frm 00128
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Purpose
The Bureau of Educational and
Cultural Affairs (ECA) is supporting the
participation of youth in intensive,
substantive educational exchange
opportunities that will promote
language learning as well as engage the
successor generation in a dialogue for
greater understanding.
Promoting the study of critical
languages among American youth is a
vital element of America’s security in
the post-9/11 world and its engagement
in the global economy, as well as
promoting mutual understanding and
respect between the people of the
United States and the citizens of
strategically important countries around
the world.
The goals of the Summer Language
Institute for American Youth are:
• To improve the ability of Americans
to engage with the people of other
countries through the shared language
of the partner country;
• To develop a cadre of Americans
with advanced linguistic skills and
cultural understanding who are able to
advance the international dialogue,
promote the security of the United
States, and compete effectively in the
global economy;
• To provide a tangible incentive for
the learning and use of foreign
languages.
E:\FR\FM\10AUN1.SGM
10AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 154 / Thursday, August 10, 2006 / Notices
In order to achieve these goals, the
Bureau is offering the opportunity for
American secondary school students to
gain language skills in Arabic or
Chinese. ECA plans to award multiple
grants for Summer Language Institutes.
Organizations that wish to apply to
implement institutes in more than one
language must submit separate
proposals for each language. Proposed
institutes will be compared only against
submissions for the same language.
Applicants may apply for a grant
between $100,000 and $250,000 in order
to implement an overseas language
institute between June and August 2007.
Through these institutes, high school
students from the United States will
spend six to eight weeks on a program
abroad in the summer of 2007. The
institutes will provide not only
intensive language instruction in a
classroom setting but will also provide
language-learning opportunities through
immersion in the cultural, social,
educational, and home life of the
partner country. The exchange program
will enhance the participants’
knowledge of the host country’s history,
culture, and political system.
Indicators of a Successful Program
• Pre- and post-institute language
testing of participants will demonstrate
a substantive increase in language skills.
• Participants will demonstrate ‘‘ for
example, through surveys, essays, focus
groups, or presentations ‘‘ a deeper
understanding of the host country’s
culture, including its customs, beliefs,
and practices.
• Alumni will continue their foreign
language study and/or participate in
other exchanges to the participating
countries.
• Students and families from the host
country who engage with the U.S.
participants demonstrate an interest in
learning more about the United States.
rwilkins on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
Capacity of Administering Organization
U.S. applicant organizations must
have the necessary capacity in the
partner country to implement the
program through either its own offices
or a partner institution. Organizations
applying for this grant must
demonstrate their (or their partners’)
capacity for conducting projects of this
nature, focusing on three areas of
competency: (1) Provision of foreign
language instruction programs and
provision of educational and cultural
exchange activities as outlined in this
document; (2) age-appropriate
programming for the target audience;
and (3) experience in working with the
proposed partner country or countries.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:27 Aug 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
45893
Country and Language Information
Institute Summary
For all language study, participants
will learn speaking, listening, reading,
and writing, including new alphabets.
The Bureau reserves the right to alter
the list of eligible countries based on
safety and security concerns.
For Arabic language exchanges:
Applicant organizations should plan to
send students to a country in North
Africa, the Middle East, or the Gulf
region, with the exception of Algeria,
Iraq, Israel, Libya, Lebanon, Saudi
Arabia, West Bank/Gaza, and Yemen.
Students should learn Modern Standard
Arabic in class and colloquial Arabic
through informal study and through
interaction with their host families and
peers.
Students with basic language skills
who are ready for intermediate
instruction will gain the most from this
immersion experience, but participants
in the Arabic institutes may be
beginning speakers who have had little
or no instruction in the language. The
delegation may be a mix of both groups,
as long as the proposed institute makes
explicit accommodation for learners of
varying skill levels.
For Chinese language exchanges:
Applicant organizations should plan to
send students to Mainland China or
Taiwan. Students must learn Mandarin
in class. Teaching materials used in the
program should be available in both
simplified and traditional character
versions. The Hanyu pinyin
romanization system should be used.
Students with advanced beginner or
intermediate language skills who are
ready for further instruction will gain
the most from an immersion experience.
Participants in the Chinese institutes
will have already studied the language
formally at the time of application for at
least one year. The proposed institute
will make explicit accommodation for
learners of varying skill levels.
Each six to eight-week summer
institute overseas for high school
students will focus on language study
and cultural immersion and will
include four to six hours per day of
formal and informal language training,
plus excursions, briefings and
discussions on key issues.
The grant recipient will provide
language instruction for a delegation of
teenagers who are likely to have mixed
skill levels in the language. While
teaching conversational vocabulary will
be necessary to help students cope with
their immersion setting, classes should
also provide formal instruction in
grammar, vocabulary, and
pronunciation, and will cover speaking,
listening, reading, and writing.
During the exchange, the students
will also have the opportunity to
participate in activities designed to
teach them about community life,
citizen participation, and the culture
and history of the host country.
Activities should engage host country
teenagers as much as possible. The
program activities will introduce the
students to the community—its leaders
and institutions, the ways citizens
participate in local government, and the
resolution of societal problems—and
will include educational excursions that
serve to enhance the visitors’’
understanding of contemporary society,
culture, media, political institutions,
ethnic diversity, history, and
environment of the region. ECA requires
participation in a community service
project that also involves youth of a
similar age from the host country.
Participants should also have
opportunities to give presentations on
their lives in the United States in
community forums.
Since the purpose of the institute is to
provide an immersion program for the
language learners and increase their
language skills, ECA strongly urges
organizations to arrange homestays with
local families for as much of the
duration of the institute as possible,
balancing this with time spent in a hotel
or dormitory setting where the
participants may be more inclined to
speak English.
The delegation should have an adult
accompany them on the international
flight to the host country, and adult staff
should be available to support the
participants during the course of the
institute.
Applicants must provide a plan of
follow-up with alumni, such as by Email, through a Web site or weblog, and/
or in person, primarily for the purpose
of supporting the continuation of the
Participant Selection
The grant recipient will recruit,
screen, and select a group of students
representing the ethnic, racial, socioeconomic, and religious diversity of the
United States. Students should have
completed grade 9, 10, 11, or 12 by
summer 2007, and must not be younger
than 14 nor older than 18 by the start
date of the institute. Selected students
will also demonstrate suitability for an
intensive exchange experience,
including maturity, flexibility, and
adaptability. The students’ language
skills at the start of the institute will
meet the requirements for each language
outlined above.
PO 00000
Frm 00129
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\10AUN1.SGM
10AUN1
45894
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 154 / Thursday, August 10, 2006 / Notices
students’ language studies. Grant
recipients should assist alumni in
maintaining connections with
organizations and individuals in the
host country. The grant recipient will be
expected to work in coordination with
ECA to track the activities of alumni and
their continued interest in studying the
language.
rwilkins on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
School Partnerships
The Summer Language Institutes are
well suited for involving a school
partnership. Applicants may weave a
school partnership component into their
proposals as a way to deepen the
institutional ties between schools in the
United States and in the partner
country. This approach is best suited for
existing partnerships, but could also
help further nascent relationships. The
desirability of a school partnership
component includes the prospect of
offering institutional, rather than just
individual, benefits; curriculum
development; a ‘‘multiplier effect’’ or
the opportunity to engage many people
in the school community in the
institute; and the building of sustainable
relationships as school linkages span
many years.
School partnerships may be included
in a variety of ways. Students could
travel to a partner school, either as a
host site for the institute or to visit
during the institute for a school tour,
home hospitality, or a social activity.
Teachers could team-teach in language
or other subjects. Partner schools could
offer follow-on activities for institute
alumni such as digital video
conferences, online language practice,
implementation of joint projects (via
DVC or online) that were initiated
during the institute, e.g., an oral history
of their communities or a water testing
project.
Building the Summer Language
Institute on a school partnership is not
required but suggested for those
applicants with these linkages. If you
choose this approach, please make
explicit mention of the benefits in your
proposal.
Grant funding includes recruitment
and selection of participants,
orientation, travel, tuition and
maintenance costs, educational
enhancements, cultural and social
activities, alumni activities, and
administrative costs.
Note: All printed materials and formal oral
communications should acknowledge the
role of the U.S. Department of State’s Bureau
of Educational and Cultural Affairs. Drafts of
printed materials developed for this program
should be submitted to ECA for review and
distribution as it sees fit. Copies of materials
given to and prepared by the students should
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:27 Aug 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
be provided to the ECA program office in a
timely fashion.
Programs must comply with J–1 visa
regulations. Please refer to the Proposal
Submission Instructions, including the
Project Objectives, Goals, and
Implementation (POGI) document, for
further information.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Grant.
Fiscal Year Funds: 2007.
Approximate Total Funding:
$1,000,000, pending availability of
funds.
Approximate Number of Awards: 5.
Floor of Award Range: $100,000.
Ceiling of Award Range: $250,000.
Anticipated Award Date: Pending
availability of funds, the proposed start
date is January 20, 2007.
Anticipated Project Completion Date:
Approximately 14 to 18 months after the
start date, depending on the proposed
program plan.
Additional Information: Pending
successful implementation of this
program and the availability of funds in
subsequent fiscal years, ECA may renew
these grants for two additional fiscal
years.
III. Eligibility Information
III.1. Eligible applicants
Applications may be submitted by
public and private non-profit
organizations meeting the provisions
described in Internal Revenue Code
section 26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3).
III.2. Cost Sharing or Matching Funds
There is no minimum or maximum
percentage required for this
competition. However, the Bureau
encourages applicants to provide
maximum levels of cost sharing and
funding in support of its programs.
When cost sharing is offered, it is
understood and agreed that the
applicant must provide the amount of
cost sharing as stipulated in its proposal
and later included in an approved grant
agreement. Cost sharing may be in the
form of allowable direct or indirect
costs. For accountability, you must
maintain written records to support all
costs which are claimed as your
contribution, as well as costs to be paid
by the Federal government. Such
records are subject to audit. The basis
for determining the value of cash and
in-kind contributions must be in
accordance with OMB Circular A–110,
(Revised), Subpart C.23—Cost Sharing
and Matching. In the event you do not
provide the minimum amount of cost
sharing as stipulated in the approved
budget, ECA’s contribution will be
reduced in like proportion.
PO 00000
Frm 00130
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
III.3. Other Eligibility Requirements
Bureau grant guidelines require that
organizations with less than four years
experience in conducting international
exchanges be limited to $60,000 in
Bureau funding. ECA anticipates
awarding grants in the range of $100,000
to $250,000 to support program and
administrative costs required to
implement this exchange program.
Therefore, organizations with less than
four years experience in conducting
international exchanges are ineligible to
apply under this competition. The
Bureau urges applicants to provide
maximum levels of cost sharing and
funding in support of its programs.
IV. Application and Submission
Information
Note: Please read the complete
announcement before sending inquiries or
submitting proposals. Once the RFGP
deadline has passed, Bureau staff may not
discuss this competition with applicants
until the proposal review process has been
completed.
IV.1 Contact Information to Request an
Application Package
Please contact the Youth Programs
Division (ECA/PE/C/PY), Room 568,
U.S. Department of State, SA–44, 301
4th Street, SW., Washington DC 20547,
Telephone (202) 203–7505, Fax (202)
203–7529, E-mail: LantzCS@state.gov to
request a Solicitation Package. Please
refer to the Funding Opportunity
Number (ECA/PE/C/PY–07–03) located
at the top of this announcement when
making your request.
Alternatively, an electronic
application package may be obtained
from https://www.grants.gov. Please see
section IV.3f for further information.
The Solicitation Package contains the
Proposal Submission Instruction (PSI)
document, which consists of required
application forms and standard
guidelines for proposal preparation.
It also contains the Project Objectives,
Goals and Implementation (POGI)
document, which provides specific
information, award criteria, and budget
instructions tailored to this competition.
Please specify Bureau Program Officer
Carolyn Lantz and refer to the Funding
Opportunity Number located at the top
of this announcement on all other
inquiries and correspondence.
IV.2. To Download a Solicitation
Package Via Internet
The entire Solicitation Package may
be downloaded from the Bureau’s Web
site at https://exchanges.state.gov/
education/rfgps/menu.htm, or from the
Grants.gov Web site at https://
www.grants.gov.
E:\FR\FM\10AUN1.SGM
10AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 154 / Thursday, August 10, 2006 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
Please read all information before
downloading.
IV.3. Content and Form of Submission
Applicants must follow all
instructions in the Solicitation Package.
The application should be submitted
per the instructions under IV.3f.
‘‘Application Deadline and Methods of
Submission’’ section below.
IV.3a. You are required to have a Dun
and Bradstreet Data Universal
Numbering System (DUNS) number to
apply for a grant or cooperative
agreement from the U.S. Government.
This number is a nine-digit
identification number, which uniquely
identifies business entities. Obtaining a
DUNS number is easy and there is no
charge. To obtain a DUNS number,
access https://
www.dunandbradstreet.com or call 1–
866–705–5711. Please ensure that your
DUNS number is included in the
appropriate box of the SF–424 form that
is part of the formal application
package.
IV.3b. All proposals must contain an
executive summary, proposal narrative
and budget.
Please Refer to the Solicitation
Package. It contains the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI)
document and the Project Objectives,
Goals and Implementation (POGI)
document for additional formatting and
technical requirements.
IV.3c. You must have nonprofit status
with the IRS at the time of application.
If your organization is a private
nonprofit which has not received a grant
or cooperative agreement from ECA in
the past three years, or if your
organization received nonprofit status
from the IRS within the past four years,
you must submit the necessary
documentation to verify nonprofit status
as directed in the PSI document. Failure
to do so will cause your proposal to be
declared technically ineligible.
IV.3d. Please take into consideration
the following information when
preparing your proposal narrative:
IV.3d.1 Adherence To All Regulations
Governing The J Visa: The Office of
Citizen Exchanges of the Bureau of
Educational and Cultural Affairs is the
official program sponsor of the exchange
program covered by this RFGP, and an
employee of the Bureau will be the
‘‘Responsible Officer’’ for the program
under the terms of 22 CFR part 62,
which covers the administration of the
Exchange Visitor Program (J visa
program). Under the terms of 22 CFR
part 62, organizations receiving grants
under this RFGP will be third parties
‘‘cooperating with or assisting the
sponsor in the conduct of the sponsor’s
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:27 Aug 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
program.’’ The actions of grantee
program organizations shall be
‘‘imputed to the sponsor in evaluating
the sponsor’s compliance with’’ 22 CFR
part 62. Therefore, the Bureau expects
that any organization receiving a grant
under this competition will render all
assistance necessary to enable the
Bureau to fully comply with 22 CFR
part 62 et seq.
The Bureau of Educational and
Cultural Affairs places great emphasis
on the secure and proper administration
of Exchange Visitor (J visa) Programs
and adherence by grantee program
organizations and program participants
to all regulations governing the J visa
program status. Therefore, proposals
should explicitly state in writing that
the applicant is prepared to assist the
Bureau in meeting all requirements
governing the administration of
Exchange Visitor Programs as set forth
in 22 CFR part 62. If your organization
has experience as a designated
Exchange Visitor Program Sponsor, the
applicant should discuss their record of
compliance with 22 CFR part 62 et. seq.,
including the oversight of their
Responsible Officers and Alternate
Responsible Officers, screening and
selection of program participants,
provision of pre-arrival information and
orientation to participants, monitoring
of participants, proper maintenance and
security of forms, record-keeping,
reporting and other requirements.
The Office of Citizen Exchanges of
ECA will be responsible for issuing any
DS–2019 forms to foreign participants.
A copy of the complete regulations
governing the administration of
Exchange Visitor (J) programs is
available at https://exchanges.state.gov
or from: United States Department of
State, Office of Exchange Coordination
and Designation, ECA/EC/ECD—SA–44,
Room 734, 301 4th Street, SW.,
Washington DC 20547, Telephone: (202)
203–5029, FAX: (202) 453–8640.
IV.3d.2 Diversity, Freedom and
Democracy Guidelines: Pursuant to the
Bureau’s authorizing legislation,
programs must maintain a non-political
character and should be balanced and
representative of the diversity of
American political, social, and cultural
life. ‘‘Diversity’’ should be interpreted
in the broadest sense and encompass
differences including, but not limited to
ethnicity, race, gender, religion,
geographic location, socio-economic
status, and physical challenges.
Applicants are strongly encouraged to
adhere to the advancement of this
principle both in program
administration and in program content.
Please refer to the review criteria under
the ‘Support for Diversity’ section for
PO 00000
Frm 00131
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
45895
specific suggestions on incorporating
diversity into your proposal. Public Law
104–319 provides that ‘‘in carrying out
programs of educational and cultural
exchange in countries whose people do
not fully enjoy freedom and
democracy,’’ the Bureau ‘‘shall take
appropriate steps to provide
opportunities for participation in such
programs to human rights and
democracy leaders of such countries.’’
Public Law 106—113 requires that the
governments of the countries described
above do not have inappropriate
influence in the selection process.
Proposals should reflect advancement of
these goals in their program contents, to
the full extent deemed feasible.
IV.3d.3. Program Monitoring and
Evaluation: Proposals must include a
plan to monitor and evaluate the
project’s success, both as the activities
unfold and at the end of the program.
The Bureau recommends that your
proposal include a draft survey
questionnaire or other technique plus a
description of a methodology to use to
link outcomes to original project
objectives. The Bureau expects that the
grantee will track participants or
partners and be able to respond to key
evaluation questions, including
satisfaction with the program, learning
as a result of the program, changes in
behavior as a result of the program, and
effects of the program on institutions
(institutions in which participants work
or partner institutions). The evaluation
plan should include indicators that
measure gains in mutual understanding
as well as substantive knowledge.
Successful monitoring and evaluation
depend heavily on setting clear goals
and outcomes at the outset of a program.
Your evaluation plan should include a
description of your project’s objectives,
your anticipated project outcomes, and
how and when you intend to measure
these outcomes (performance
indicators). The more that outcomes are
‘‘smart’’ (specific, measurable,
attainable, results-oriented, and placed
in a reasonable time frame), the easier
it will be to conduct the evaluation. You
should also show how your project
objectives link to the goals of the
program described in this RFGP.
Your monitoring and evaluation plan
should clearly distinguish between
program outputs and outcomes. Outputs
are products and services delivered,
often stated as an amount. Output
information is important to show the
scope or size of project activities, but it
cannot substitute for information about
progress towards outcomes or the
results achieved. Examples of outputs
include the number of people trained or
the number of seminars conducted.
E:\FR\FM\10AUN1.SGM
10AUN1
rwilkins on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
45896
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 154 / Thursday, August 10, 2006 / Notices
Outcomes, in contrast, represent
specific results a project is intended to
achieve and is usually measured as an
extent of change.
Findings on outputs and outcomes
should both be reported, but the focus
should be on outcomes.
We encourage you to assess the
following four levels of outcomes, as
they relate to the program goals set out
in the RFGP (listed here in increasing
order of importance):
1. Participant satisfaction with the
program and exchange experience.
2. Participant learning, such as
increased knowledge, aptitude, skills,
and changed understanding and
attitude. Learning includes both
substantive (subject-specific) learning
and mutual understanding.
3. Participant behavior, concrete
actions to apply knowledge in work or
community; greater participation and
responsibility in civic organizations;
interpretation and explanation of
experiences and new knowledge gained;
continued contacts between
participants, community members, and
others.
4. Institutional changes, such as
increased collaboration and
partnerships, policy reforms, new
programming, and organizational
improvements.
Please note: Consideration should be
given to the appropriate timing of data
collection for each level of outcome. For
example, satisfaction is usually
captured as a short-term outcome,
whereas behavior and institutional
changes are normally considered longerterm outcomes.
Overall, the quality of your
monitoring and evaluation plan will be
judged on how well it (1) specifies
intended outcomes; (2) gives clear
descriptions of how each outcome will
be measured; (3) identifies when
particular outcomes will be measured;
and (4) provides a clear description of
the data collection strategies for each
outcome (i.e., surveys, interviews, or
focus groups). (Please note that
evaluation plans that deal only with the
first level of outcomes [satisfaction] will
be deemed less competitive under the
present evaluation criteria.)
Grantees will be required to provide
reports analyzing their evaluation
findings to the Bureau in their regular
program reports. All data collected,
including survey responses and contact
information, must be maintained for a
minimum of three years and provided to
the Bureau upon request.
IV.3e. Please take the following
information into consideration when
preparing your budget:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:27 Aug 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
IV.3e.1. Applicants must submit a
comprehensive budget for the entire
program. Grant requests should be at
least $100,000 and should not exceed
$250,000. There must be a summary
budget as well as breakdowns reflecting
both administrative and program
budgets. Applicants may provide
separate sub-budgets for each program
component, phase, location, or activity
to provide clarification.
Please refer to the POGI and the PSI
documents in the Solicitation Package
for complete budget guidelines and
formatting instructions.
IV.3f. Application Deadline and
Methods of Submission:
Application Deadline Date: October 5,
2006.
Reference Number: ECA/PE/C/PY–
07–03.
Methods of Submission:
Applications may be submitted in one
of two ways:
1. In hard-copy, via a nationally
recognized overnight delivery service
(i.e., DHL, Federal Express, UPS,
Airborne Express, or U.S. Postal Service
Express Overnight Mail, etc.), or
2. Electronically through https://
www.grants.gov.
Along with the Project Title, all
applicants must enter the above
Reference Number in Box 11 on the SF–
424 contained in the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI)
of the solicitation document.
IV.3f.1 Submitting Printed
Applications: Applications must be
shipped no later than the above
deadline. Delivery services used by
applicants must have in-place,
centralized shipping identification and
tracking systems that may be accessed
via the Internet and delivery people
who are identifiable by commonly
recognized uniforms and delivery
vehicles. Proposals shipped on or before
the above deadline but received at ECA
more than seven days after the deadline
will be ineligible for further
consideration under this competition.
Proposals shipped after the established
deadlines are ineligible for
consideration under this competition.
ECA will not notify you upon receipt of
application. It is each applicant’s
responsibility to ensure that each
package is marked with a legible
tracking number and to monitor/confirm
delivery to ECA via the Internet.
Delivery of proposal packages may not
be made via local courier service or in
person for this competition. Faxed
documents will not be accepted at any
time. Only proposals submitted as
stated above will be considered.
Important note: When preparing your
submission please make sure to include
PO 00000
Frm 00132
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
one extra copy of the completed SF–424
form and place it in an envelope
addressed to ‘‘ECA/EX/PM’’.
The original, one fully-tabbed copy,
and six copies of the application with
Tabs A–E (for a total of 8 copies) should
be sent to: U.S. Department of State,
SA–44, Bureau of Educational and
Cultural Affairs, Ref.: ECA/PE/C/PY–
07–03, Program Management, ECA/EX/
PM, Room 534, 301 4th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20547.
Along with the Project Title, all
applicants must enter the above
Reference Number in Box 11 on the SF–
424 contained in the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI)
of the solicitation document.
Applicants must also submit the
executive summary, proposal narrative,
budget section, and any important
appendices as e-mail attachments in
Microsoft Word and Excel to the
following e-mail address:
LantzCS@state.gov. In the E-mail
message subject line, include the name
of the applicant organization and the
partner country. The Bureau will
transmit these files electronically to the
Public Affairs Sections of the relevant
U.S. Embassies for review.
IV.3f.2—Submitting Electronic
Applications: Applicants have the
option of submitting proposals
electronically through Grants.gov
(https://www.grants.gov). Complete
solicitation packages are available at
Grants.gov in the ‘‘Find’’ portion of the
system. Please follow the instructions
available in the ‘‘Get Started’’ portion of
the site (https://www.grants.gov/
GetStarted).
Applicants have until midnight (12
a.m.), Washington, DC, time, of the
closing date to ensure that their entire
applications have been uploaded to the
grants.gov site. Applications uploaded
to the site after midnight of the
application deadline date will be
automatically rejected by the grants.gov
system, and will be technically
ineligible.
Applicants will receive a
confirmation e-mail from grants.gov
upon the successful submission of an
application. ECA will not notify you
upon receipt of electronic applications.
IV.3g. Intergovernmental Review of
Applications: Executive Order 12372
does not apply to this program.
V. Application Review Information
V.1. Review Process
The Bureau will review all proposals
for technical eligibility. Proposals will
be deemed ineligible if they do not fully
adhere to the guidelines stated herein
and in the Solicitation Package. All
E:\FR\FM\10AUN1.SGM
10AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 154 / Thursday, August 10, 2006 / Notices
eligible proposals will be reviewed by
the program office, as well as the Public
Diplomacy section overseas, where
appropriate. Eligible proposals will be
subject to compliance with Federal and
Bureau regulations and guidelines and
forwarded to Bureau grant panels for
advisory review. Proposals may also be
reviewed by the Office of the Legal
Adviser or by other Department
elements. Final funding decisions are at
the discretion of the Department of
State’s Assistant Secretary for
Educational and Cultural Affairs. Final
technical authority for assistance
awards (grants) resides with the
Bureau’s Grants Officer.
Review Criteria
Please see proposal review criteria in
the accompanying Project Objectives,
Goals, and Implementation (POGI)
document.
VI. Award Administration Information
VI.1a. Award Notices
Final awards cannot be made until
funds have been appropriated by
Congress, allocated and committed
through internal Bureau procedures.
Successful applicants will receive an
Assistance Award Document (AAD)
from the Bureau’s Grants Office. The
AAD and the original grant proposal
with subsequent modifications (if
applicable) shall be the only binding
authorizing document between the
recipient and the U.S. Government. The
AAD will be signed by an authorized
Grants Officer, and mailed to the
recipient’s responsible officer identified
in the application.
Unsuccessful applicants will receive
notification of the results of the
application review from the ECA
program office coordinating this
competition.
rwilkins on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
VI.2 Administrative and National Policy
Requirements
Terms and Conditions for the
Administration of ECA agreements
include the following:
Office of Management and Budget
Circular A–122, ‘‘Cost Principles for
Nonprofit Organizations.’’
Office of Management and Budget
Circular A–21, ‘‘Cost Principles for
Educational Institutions.’’
OMB Circular A–87, ‘‘Cost Principles
for State, Local and Indian
Governments’’.
OMB Circular No. A–110 (Revised),
Uniform Administrative Requirements
for Grants and Agreements with
Institutions of Higher Education,
Hospitals, and other Nonprofit
Organizations.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:27 Aug 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
OMB Circular No. A–102, Uniform
Administrative Requirements for
Grants-in-Aid to State and Local
Governments.
OMB Circular No. A–133, Audits of
States, Local Government, and Nonprofit Organizations.
Please reference the following Web
sites for additional information:
https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants:
https://exchanges.state.gov/education/
grantsdiv/terms.htm#articleI
VI.3. Reporting Requirements
You must provide ECA with a hard
copy original plus two copies of the
following reports:
1. A final program and financial
report no more than 90 days after the
expiration of the award;
2. Interim program and financial
reports that include information on the
progress made on the program plan and
program results to date.
Grantees will be required to provide
reports analyzing their evaluation
findings to the Bureau in their regular
program reports. (Please refer to IV.
Application and Submission
Instructions (IV.3.d.3) above for Program
Monitoring and Evaluation information.
All data collected, including survey
responses and contact information, must
be maintained for a minimum of three
years and provided to the Bureau upon
request.
All reports must be sent to the ECA
Grants Officer and ECA Program Officer
listed in the final assistance award
document.
VI.4. Program Data Requirements
Organizations awarded grants will be
required to maintain specific data on
program participants and activities in an
electronically accessible database format
that can be shared with the Bureau as
required. As a minimum, the data must
include the following:
1. Name, address, contact information
and biographic sketch of all persons
who travel internationally on funds
provided by the grant or who benefit
from the grant funding but do not travel.
2. Itineraries of international and
domestic travel, providing dates of
travel and cities in which any exchange
experiences take place. Final schedules
for in-country and U.S. activities must
be received by the ECA Program Officer
at least three work days prior to the
official opening of the activity.
VII. Agency Contacts
For questions about this
announcement, contact: Carolyn Lantz,
Youth Programs Division, Office of
Citizen Exchanges, Bureau of
Educational and Cultural Affairs, ECA/
PO 00000
Frm 00133
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
45897
PE/C/PY–07–03, U.S. Department of
State, SA–44, 301 4th Street, SW., Room
568, Washington, DC 20547, Telephone
(202) 203–7505, Fax (202) 203–7529, Email LantzCS@state.gov.
All correspondence with the Bureau
concerning this RFGP should reference
the above title and number ECA/PE/C/
PY–07–03.
Please read the complete Federal
Register announcement before sending
inquiries or submitting proposals. Once
the RFGP deadline has passed, Bureau
staff may not discuss this competition
with applicants until the proposal
review process has been completed.
VIII. Other Information
Notice
The terms and conditions published
in this RFGP are binding and may not
be modified by any Bureau
representative. Explanatory information
provided by the Bureau that contradicts
published language will not be binding.
Issuance of the RFGP does not
constitute an award commitment on the
part of the Government. The Bureau
reserves the right to reduce, revise, or
increase proposal budgets in accordance
with the needs of the program and the
availability of funds. Awards made will
be subject to periodic reporting and
evaluation requirements per section VI.3
above.
Dated: August 3, 2006.
Dina Habib Powell,
Assistant Secretary for Educational and
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 06–6837 Filed 8–9–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 5488]
Meeting on Possible Mandate
Expansion for the International Mobile
Satellite Organization (IMSO)
The Department of State announces a
meeting to hear public views on issues
related to the possible expansion of the
mandate of the International Mobile
Satellite Organization (IMSO), to
include new oversight and regulatory
responsibilities that may affect U.S. and
non-U.S. mobile satellite services
providers. The IMSO is convening an
Assembly of Parties meeting September
25–29, 2006, for the member
governments to: (1) Consider and act on
proposals to amend the
intergovernmental IMSO Convention
(which has treaty status among most
member governments) to expand the
IMSO’s scope of authority; and (2) elect
a new Director of the Organization.
E:\FR\FM\10AUN1.SGM
10AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 154 (Thursday, August 10, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45892-45897]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-6837]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 5490]
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA) Request for
Grant Proposals: Summer Language Institutes for American Youth
Announcement Type: New Grant.
Funding Opportunity Number: ECA/PE/C/PY-07-03.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number: 00.000.
Application Deadline: October 5, 2006.
Executive Summary: The Youth Programs Division, Office of Citizen
Exchanges of the Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, announces
an open competition for projects to provide foreign language
instruction overseas for American high school students in Summer 2007.
Public and private non-profit organizations meeting the provisions
described in Internal Revenue Code section 26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3) may
submit proposals to implement six-to eight-week summer institutes in
China or in an Arabic-speaking country that offer U.S. high school
students formal and informal language instruction through a
comprehensive exchange experience.
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Authority
Overall grant making authority for this program is contained in the
Mutual Educational and Cultural Exchange Act of 1961, as amended,
Public Law 87-256, also known as the Fulbright-Hays Act. The purpose of
the Act is ``to enable the Government of the United States to increase
mutual understanding between the people of the United States and the
people of other countries * * *; to strengthen the ties which unite us
with other nations by demonstrating the educational and cultural
interests, developments, and achievements of the people of the United
States and other nations * * * and thus to assist in the development of
friendly, sympathetic, and peaceful relations between the United States
and the other countries of the world.'' The funding authority for the
program above is provided through legislation.
Purpose
The Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA) is supporting
the participation of youth in intensive, substantive educational
exchange opportunities that will promote language learning as well as
engage the successor generation in a dialogue for greater
understanding.
Promoting the study of critical languages among American youth is a
vital element of America's security in the post-9/11 world and its
engagement in the global economy, as well as promoting mutual
understanding and respect between the people of the United States and
the citizens of strategically important countries around the world.
The goals of the Summer Language Institute for American Youth are:
To improve the ability of Americans to engage with the
people of other countries through the shared language of the partner
country;
To develop a cadre of Americans with advanced linguistic
skills and cultural understanding who are able to advance the
international dialogue, promote the security of the United States, and
compete effectively in the global economy;
To provide a tangible incentive for the learning and use
of foreign languages.
[[Page 45893]]
In order to achieve these goals, the Bureau is offering the
opportunity for American secondary school students to gain language
skills in Arabic or Chinese. ECA plans to award multiple grants for
Summer Language Institutes. Organizations that wish to apply to
implement institutes in more than one language must submit separate
proposals for each language. Proposed institutes will be compared only
against submissions for the same language. Applicants may apply for a
grant between $100,000 and $250,000 in order to implement an overseas
language institute between June and August 2007.
Through these institutes, high school students from the United
States will spend six to eight weeks on a program abroad in the summer
of 2007. The institutes will provide not only intensive language
instruction in a classroom setting but will also provide language-
learning opportunities through immersion in the cultural, social,
educational, and home life of the partner country. The exchange program
will enhance the participants' knowledge of the host country's history,
culture, and political system.
Indicators of a Successful Program
Pre- and post-institute language testing of participants
will demonstrate a substantive increase in language skills.
Participants will demonstrate `` for example, through
surveys, essays, focus groups, or presentations `` a deeper
understanding of the host country's culture, including its customs,
beliefs, and practices.
Alumni will continue their foreign language study and/or
participate in other exchanges to the participating countries.
Students and families from the host country who engage
with the U.S. participants demonstrate an interest in learning more
about the United States.
Capacity of Administering Organization
U.S. applicant organizations must have the necessary capacity in
the partner country to implement the program through either its own
offices or a partner institution. Organizations applying for this grant
must demonstrate their (or their partners') capacity for conducting
projects of this nature, focusing on three areas of competency: (1)
Provision of foreign language instruction programs and provision of
educational and cultural exchange activities as outlined in this
document; (2) age-appropriate programming for the target audience; and
(3) experience in working with the proposed partner country or
countries.
Country and Language Information
For all language study, participants will learn speaking,
listening, reading, and writing, including new alphabets. The Bureau
reserves the right to alter the list of eligible countries based on
safety and security concerns.
For Arabic language exchanges: Applicant organizations should plan
to send students to a country in North Africa, the Middle East, or the
Gulf region, with the exception of Algeria, Iraq, Israel, Libya,
Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, West Bank/Gaza, and Yemen. Students should learn
Modern Standard Arabic in class and colloquial Arabic through informal
study and through interaction with their host families and peers.
Students with basic language skills who are ready for intermediate
instruction will gain the most from this immersion experience, but
participants in the Arabic institutes may be beginning speakers who
have had little or no instruction in the language. The delegation may
be a mix of both groups, as long as the proposed institute makes
explicit accommodation for learners of varying skill levels.
For Chinese language exchanges: Applicant organizations should plan
to send students to Mainland China or Taiwan. Students must learn
Mandarin in class. Teaching materials used in the program should be
available in both simplified and traditional character versions. The
Hanyu pinyin romanization system should be used.
Students with advanced beginner or intermediate language skills who
are ready for further instruction will gain the most from an immersion
experience. Participants in the Chinese institutes will have already
studied the language formally at the time of application for at least
one year. The proposed institute will make explicit accommodation for
learners of varying skill levels.
Participant Selection
The grant recipient will recruit, screen, and select a group of
students representing the ethnic, racial, socio-economic, and religious
diversity of the United States. Students should have completed grade 9,
10, 11, or 12 by summer 2007, and must not be younger than 14 nor older
than 18 by the start date of the institute. Selected students will also
demonstrate suitability for an intensive exchange experience, including
maturity, flexibility, and adaptability. The students' language skills
at the start of the institute will meet the requirements for each
language outlined above.
Institute Summary
Each six to eight-week summer institute overseas for high school
students will focus on language study and cultural immersion and will
include four to six hours per day of formal and informal language
training, plus excursions, briefings and discussions on key issues.
The grant recipient will provide language instruction for a
delegation of teenagers who are likely to have mixed skill levels in
the language. While teaching conversational vocabulary will be
necessary to help students cope with their immersion setting, classes
should also provide formal instruction in grammar, vocabulary, and
pronunciation, and will cover speaking, listening, reading, and
writing.
During the exchange, the students will also have the opportunity to
participate in activities designed to teach them about community life,
citizen participation, and the culture and history of the host country.
Activities should engage host country teenagers as much as possible.
The program activities will introduce the students to the community--
its leaders and institutions, the ways citizens participate in local
government, and the resolution of societal problems--and will include
educational excursions that serve to enhance the visitors''
understanding of contemporary society, culture, media, political
institutions, ethnic diversity, history, and environment of the region.
ECA requires participation in a community service project that also
involves youth of a similar age from the host country. Participants
should also have opportunities to give presentations on their lives in
the United States in community forums.
Since the purpose of the institute is to provide an immersion
program for the language learners and increase their language skills,
ECA strongly urges organizations to arrange homestays with local
families for as much of the duration of the institute as possible,
balancing this with time spent in a hotel or dormitory setting where
the participants may be more inclined to speak English.
The delegation should have an adult accompany them on the
international flight to the host country, and adult staff should be
available to support the participants during the course of the
institute.
Applicants must provide a plan of follow-up with alumni, such as by
E-mail, through a Web site or weblog, and/or in person, primarily for
the purpose of supporting the continuation of the
[[Page 45894]]
students' language studies. Grant recipients should assist alumni in
maintaining connections with organizations and individuals in the host
country. The grant recipient will be expected to work in coordination
with ECA to track the activities of alumni and their continued interest
in studying the language.
School Partnerships
The Summer Language Institutes are well suited for involving a
school partnership. Applicants may weave a school partnership component
into their proposals as a way to deepen the institutional ties between
schools in the United States and in the partner country. This approach
is best suited for existing partnerships, but could also help further
nascent relationships. The desirability of a school partnership
component includes the prospect of offering institutional, rather than
just individual, benefits; curriculum development; a ``multiplier
effect'' or the opportunity to engage many people in the school
community in the institute; and the building of sustainable
relationships as school linkages span many years.
School partnerships may be included in a variety of ways. Students
could travel to a partner school, either as a host site for the
institute or to visit during the institute for a school tour, home
hospitality, or a social activity. Teachers could team-teach in
language or other subjects. Partner schools could offer follow-on
activities for institute alumni such as digital video conferences,
online language practice, implementation of joint projects (via DVC or
online) that were initiated during the institute, e.g., an oral history
of their communities or a water testing project.
Building the Summer Language Institute on a school partnership is
not required but suggested for those applicants with these linkages. If
you choose this approach, please make explicit mention of the benefits
in your proposal.
Grant funding includes recruitment and selection of participants,
orientation, travel, tuition and maintenance costs, educational
enhancements, cultural and social activities, alumni activities, and
administrative costs.
Note: All printed materials and formal oral communications
should acknowledge the role of the U.S. Department of State's Bureau
of Educational and Cultural Affairs. Drafts of printed materials
developed for this program should be submitted to ECA for review and
distribution as it sees fit. Copies of materials given to and
prepared by the students should be provided to the ECA program
office in a timely fashion.
Programs must comply with J-1 visa regulations. Please refer to the
Proposal Submission Instructions, including the Project Objectives,
Goals, and Implementation (POGI) document, for further information.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Grant.
Fiscal Year Funds: 2007.
Approximate Total Funding: $1,000,000, pending availability of
funds.
Approximate Number of Awards: 5.
Floor of Award Range: $100,000.
Ceiling of Award Range: $250,000.
Anticipated Award Date: Pending availability of funds, the proposed
start date is January 20, 2007.
Anticipated Project Completion Date: Approximately 14 to 18 months
after the start date, depending on the proposed program plan.
Additional Information: Pending successful implementation of this
program and the availability of funds in subsequent fiscal years, ECA
may renew these grants for two additional fiscal years.
III. Eligibility Information
III.1. Eligible applicants
Applications may be submitted by public and private non-profit
organizations meeting the provisions described in Internal Revenue Code
section 26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3).
III.2. Cost Sharing or Matching Funds
There is no minimum or maximum percentage required for this
competition. However, the Bureau encourages applicants to provide
maximum levels of cost sharing and funding in support of its programs.
When cost sharing is offered, it is understood and agreed that the
applicant must provide the amount of cost sharing as stipulated in its
proposal and later included in an approved grant agreement. Cost
sharing may be in the form of allowable direct or indirect costs. For
accountability, you must maintain written records to support all costs
which are claimed as your contribution, as well as costs to be paid by
the Federal government. Such records are subject to audit. The basis
for determining the value of cash and in-kind contributions must be in
accordance with OMB Circular A-110, (Revised), Subpart C.23--Cost
Sharing and Matching. In the event you do not provide the minimum
amount of cost sharing as stipulated in the approved budget, ECA's
contribution will be reduced in like proportion.
III.3. Other Eligibility Requirements
Bureau grant guidelines require that organizations with less than
four years experience in conducting international exchanges be limited
to $60,000 in Bureau funding. ECA anticipates awarding grants in the
range of $100,000 to $250,000 to support program and administrative
costs required to implement this exchange program. Therefore,
organizations with less than four years experience in conducting
international exchanges are ineligible to apply under this competition.
The Bureau urges applicants to provide maximum levels of cost sharing
and funding in support of its programs.
IV. Application and Submission Information
Note: Please read the complete announcement before sending
inquiries or submitting proposals. Once the RFGP deadline has
passed, Bureau staff may not discuss this competition with
applicants until the proposal review process has been completed.
IV.1 Contact Information to Request an Application Package
Please contact the Youth Programs Division (ECA/PE/C/PY), Room 568,
U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW., Washington DC
20547, Telephone (202) 203-7505, Fax (202) 203-7529, E-mail:
LantzCS@state.gov to request a Solicitation Package. Please refer to
the Funding Opportunity Number (ECA/PE/C/PY-07-03) located at the top
of this announcement when making your request.
Alternatively, an electronic application package may be obtained
from https://www.grants.gov. Please see section IV.3f for further
information.
The Solicitation Package contains the Proposal Submission
Instruction (PSI) document, which consists of required application
forms and standard guidelines for proposal preparation.
It also contains the Project Objectives, Goals and Implementation
(POGI) document, which provides specific information, award criteria,
and budget instructions tailored to this competition.
Please specify Bureau Program Officer Carolyn Lantz and refer to
the Funding Opportunity Number located at the top of this announcement
on all other inquiries and correspondence.
IV.2. To Download a Solicitation Package Via Internet
The entire Solicitation Package may be downloaded from the Bureau's
Web site at https://exchanges.state.gov/education/rfgps/menu.htm, or
from the Grants.gov Web site at https://www.grants.gov.
[[Page 45895]]
Please read all information before downloading.
IV.3. Content and Form of Submission
Applicants must follow all instructions in the Solicitation
Package. The application should be submitted per the instructions under
IV.3f. ``Application Deadline and Methods of Submission'' section
below.
IV.3a. You are required to have a Dun and Bradstreet Data Universal
Numbering System (DUNS) number to apply for a grant or cooperative
agreement from the U.S. Government. This number is a nine-digit
identification number, which uniquely identifies business entities.
Obtaining a DUNS number is easy and there is no charge. To obtain a
DUNS number, access https://www.dunandbradstreet.com or call 1-866-705-
5711. Please ensure that your DUNS number is included in the
appropriate box of the SF-424 form that is part of the formal
application package.
IV.3b. All proposals must contain an executive summary, proposal
narrative and budget.
Please Refer to the Solicitation Package. It contains the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI) document and the Project
Objectives, Goals and Implementation (POGI) document for additional
formatting and technical requirements.
IV.3c. You must have nonprofit status with the IRS at the time of
application. If your organization is a private nonprofit which has not
received a grant or cooperative agreement from ECA in the past three
years, or if your organization received nonprofit status from the IRS
within the past four years, you must submit the necessary documentation
to verify nonprofit status as directed in the PSI document. Failure to
do so will cause your proposal to be declared technically ineligible.
IV.3d. Please take into consideration the following information
when preparing your proposal narrative:
IV.3d.1 Adherence To All Regulations Governing The J Visa: The
Office of Citizen Exchanges of the Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs is the official program sponsor of the exchange program covered
by this RFGP, and an employee of the Bureau will be the ``Responsible
Officer'' for the program under the terms of 22 CFR part 62, which
covers the administration of the Exchange Visitor Program (J visa
program). Under the terms of 22 CFR part 62, organizations receiving
grants under this RFGP will be third parties ``cooperating with or
assisting the sponsor in the conduct of the sponsor's program.'' The
actions of grantee program organizations shall be ``imputed to the
sponsor in evaluating the sponsor's compliance with'' 22 CFR part 62.
Therefore, the Bureau expects that any organization receiving a grant
under this competition will render all assistance necessary to enable
the Bureau to fully comply with 22 CFR part 62 et seq.
The Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs places great
emphasis on the secure and proper administration of Exchange Visitor (J
visa) Programs and adherence by grantee program organizations and
program participants to all regulations governing the J visa program
status. Therefore, proposals should explicitly state in writing that
the applicant is prepared to assist the Bureau in meeting all
requirements governing the administration of Exchange Visitor Programs
as set forth in 22 CFR part 62. If your organization has experience as
a designated Exchange Visitor Program Sponsor, the applicant should
discuss their record of compliance with 22 CFR part 62 et. seq.,
including the oversight of their Responsible Officers and Alternate
Responsible Officers, screening and selection of program participants,
provision of pre-arrival information and orientation to participants,
monitoring of participants, proper maintenance and security of forms,
record-keeping, reporting and other requirements.
The Office of Citizen Exchanges of ECA will be responsible for
issuing any DS-2019 forms to foreign participants.
A copy of the complete regulations governing the administration of
Exchange Visitor (J) programs is available at https://
exchanges.state.gov or from: United States Department of State, Office
of Exchange Coordination and Designation, ECA/EC/ECD--SA-44, Room 734,
301 4th Street, SW., Washington DC 20547, Telephone: (202) 203-5029,
FAX: (202) 453-8640.
IV.3d.2 Diversity, Freedom and Democracy Guidelines: Pursuant to
the Bureau's authorizing legislation, programs must maintain a non-
political character and should be balanced and representative of the
diversity of American political, social, and cultural life.
``Diversity'' should be interpreted in the broadest sense and encompass
differences including, but not limited to ethnicity, race, gender,
religion, geographic location, socio-economic status, and physical
challenges. Applicants are strongly encouraged to adhere to the
advancement of this principle both in program administration and in
program content. Please refer to the review criteria under the `Support
for Diversity' section for specific suggestions on incorporating
diversity into your proposal. Public Law 104-319 provides that ``in
carrying out programs of educational and cultural exchange in countries
whose people do not fully enjoy freedom and democracy,'' the Bureau
``shall take appropriate steps to provide opportunities for
participation in such programs to human rights and democracy leaders of
such countries.'' Public Law 106--113 requires that the governments of
the countries described above do not have inappropriate influence in
the selection process. Proposals should reflect advancement of these
goals in their program contents, to the full extent deemed feasible.
IV.3d.3. Program Monitoring and Evaluation: Proposals must include
a plan to monitor and evaluate the project's success, both as the
activities unfold and at the end of the program. The Bureau recommends
that your proposal include a draft survey questionnaire or other
technique plus a description of a methodology to use to link outcomes
to original project objectives. The Bureau expects that the grantee
will track participants or partners and be able to respond to key
evaluation questions, including satisfaction with the program, learning
as a result of the program, changes in behavior as a result of the
program, and effects of the program on institutions (institutions in
which participants work or partner institutions). The evaluation plan
should include indicators that measure gains in mutual understanding as
well as substantive knowledge.
Successful monitoring and evaluation depend heavily on setting
clear goals and outcomes at the outset of a program. Your evaluation
plan should include a description of your project's objectives, your
anticipated project outcomes, and how and when you intend to measure
these outcomes (performance indicators). The more that outcomes are
``smart'' (specific, measurable, attainable, results-oriented, and
placed in a reasonable time frame), the easier it will be to conduct
the evaluation. You should also show how your project objectives link
to the goals of the program described in this RFGP.
Your monitoring and evaluation plan should clearly distinguish
between program outputs and outcomes. Outputs are products and services
delivered, often stated as an amount. Output information is important
to show the scope or size of project activities, but it cannot
substitute for information about progress towards outcomes or the
results achieved. Examples of outputs include the number of people
trained or the number of seminars conducted.
[[Page 45896]]
Outcomes, in contrast, represent specific results a project is intended
to achieve and is usually measured as an extent of change.
Findings on outputs and outcomes should both be reported, but the
focus should be on outcomes.
We encourage you to assess the following four levels of outcomes,
as they relate to the program goals set out in the RFGP (listed here in
increasing order of importance):
1. Participant satisfaction with the program and exchange
experience.
2. Participant learning, such as increased knowledge, aptitude,
skills, and changed understanding and attitude. Learning includes both
substantive (subject-specific) learning and mutual understanding.
3. Participant behavior, concrete actions to apply knowledge in
work or community; greater participation and responsibility in civic
organizations; interpretation and explanation of experiences and new
knowledge gained; continued contacts between participants, community
members, and others.
4. Institutional changes, such as increased collaboration and
partnerships, policy reforms, new programming, and organizational
improvements.
Please note: Consideration should be given to the appropriate
timing of data collection for each level of outcome. For example,
satisfaction is usually captured as a short-term outcome, whereas
behavior and institutional changes are normally considered longer-term
outcomes.
Overall, the quality of your monitoring and evaluation plan will be
judged on how well it (1) specifies intended outcomes; (2) gives clear
descriptions of how each outcome will be measured; (3) identifies when
particular outcomes will be measured; and (4) provides a clear
description of the data collection strategies for each outcome (i.e.,
surveys, interviews, or focus groups). (Please note that evaluation
plans that deal only with the first level of outcomes [satisfaction]
will be deemed less competitive under the present evaluation criteria.)
Grantees will be required to provide reports analyzing their
evaluation findings to the Bureau in their regular program reports. All
data collected, including survey responses and contact information,
must be maintained for a minimum of three years and provided to the
Bureau upon request.
IV.3e. Please take the following information into consideration
when preparing your budget:
IV.3e.1. Applicants must submit a comprehensive budget for the
entire program. Grant requests should be at least $100,000 and should
not exceed $250,000. There must be a summary budget as well as
breakdowns reflecting both administrative and program budgets.
Applicants may provide separate sub-budgets for each program component,
phase, location, or activity to provide clarification.
Please refer to the POGI and the PSI documents in the Solicitation
Package for complete budget guidelines and formatting instructions.
IV.3f. Application Deadline and Methods of Submission:
Application Deadline Date: October 5, 2006.
Reference Number: ECA/PE/C/PY-07-03.
Methods of Submission:
Applications may be submitted in one of two ways:
1. In hard-copy, via a nationally recognized overnight delivery
service (i.e., DHL, Federal Express, UPS, Airborne Express, or U.S.
Postal Service Express Overnight Mail, etc.), or
2. Electronically through https://www.grants.gov.
Along with the Project Title, all applicants must enter the above
Reference Number in Box 11 on the SF-424 contained in the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI) of the solicitation document.
IV.3f.1 Submitting Printed Applications: Applications must be
shipped no later than the above deadline. Delivery services used by
applicants must have in-place, centralized shipping identification and
tracking systems that may be accessed via the Internet and delivery
people who are identifiable by commonly recognized uniforms and
delivery vehicles. Proposals shipped on or before the above deadline
but received at ECA more than seven days after the deadline will be
ineligible for further consideration under this competition. Proposals
shipped after the established deadlines are ineligible for
consideration under this competition. ECA will not notify you upon
receipt of application. It is each applicant's responsibility to ensure
that each package is marked with a legible tracking number and to
monitor/confirm delivery to ECA via the Internet. Delivery of proposal
packages may not be made via local courier service or in person for
this competition. Faxed documents will not be accepted at any time.
Only proposals submitted as stated above will be considered.
Important note: When preparing your submission please make sure to
include one extra copy of the completed SF-424 form and place it in an
envelope addressed to ``ECA/EX/PM''.
The original, one fully-tabbed copy, and six copies of the
application with Tabs A-E (for a total of 8 copies) should be sent to:
U.S. Department of State, SA-44, Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs, Ref.: ECA/PE/C/PY-07-03, Program Management, ECA/EX/PM, Room
534, 301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547.
Along with the Project Title, all applicants must enter the above
Reference Number in Box 11 on the SF-424 contained in the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI) of the solicitation document.
Applicants must also submit the executive summary, proposal
narrative, budget section, and any important appendices as e-mail
attachments in Microsoft Word and Excel to the following e-mail
address: LantzCS@state.gov. In the E-mail message subject line, include
the name of the applicant organization and the partner country. The
Bureau will transmit these files electronically to the Public Affairs
Sections of the relevant U.S. Embassies for review.
IV.3f.2--Submitting Electronic Applications: Applicants have the
option of submitting proposals electronically through Grants.gov
(https://www.grants.gov). Complete solicitation packages are available
at Grants.gov in the ``Find'' portion of the system. Please follow the
instructions available in the ``Get Started'' portion of the site
(https://www.grants.gov/GetStarted).
Applicants have until midnight (12 a.m.), Washington, DC, time, of
the closing date to ensure that their entire applications have been
uploaded to the grants.gov site. Applications uploaded to the site
after midnight of the application deadline date will be automatically
rejected by the grants.gov system, and will be technically ineligible.
Applicants will receive a confirmation e-mail from grants.gov upon
the successful submission of an application. ECA will not notify you
upon receipt of electronic applications.
IV.3g. Intergovernmental Review of Applications: Executive Order
12372 does not apply to this program.
V. Application Review Information
V.1. Review Process
The Bureau will review all proposals for technical eligibility.
Proposals will be deemed ineligible if they do not fully adhere to the
guidelines stated herein and in the Solicitation Package. All
[[Page 45897]]
eligible proposals will be reviewed by the program office, as well as
the Public Diplomacy section overseas, where appropriate. Eligible
proposals will be subject to compliance with Federal and Bureau
regulations and guidelines and forwarded to Bureau grant panels for
advisory review. Proposals may also be reviewed by the Office of the
Legal Adviser or by other Department elements. Final funding decisions
are at the discretion of the Department of State's Assistant Secretary
for Educational and Cultural Affairs. Final technical authority for
assistance awards (grants) resides with the Bureau's Grants Officer.
Review Criteria
Please see proposal review criteria in the accompanying Project
Objectives, Goals, and Implementation (POGI) document.
VI. Award Administration Information
VI.1a. Award Notices
Final awards cannot be made until funds have been appropriated by
Congress, allocated and committed through internal Bureau procedures.
Successful applicants will receive an Assistance Award Document (AAD)
from the Bureau's Grants Office. The AAD and the original grant
proposal with subsequent modifications (if applicable) shall be the
only binding authorizing document between the recipient and the U.S.
Government. The AAD will be signed by an authorized Grants Officer, and
mailed to the recipient's responsible officer identified in the
application.
Unsuccessful applicants will receive notification of the results of
the application review from the ECA program office coordinating this
competition.
VI.2 Administrative and National Policy Requirements
Terms and Conditions for the Administration of ECA agreements
include the following:
Office of Management and Budget Circular A-122, ``Cost Principles
for Nonprofit Organizations.''
Office of Management and Budget Circular A-21, ``Cost Principles
for Educational Institutions.''
OMB Circular A-87, ``Cost Principles for State, Local and Indian
Governments''.
OMB Circular No. A-110 (Revised), Uniform Administrative
Requirements for Grants and Agreements with Institutions of Higher
Education, Hospitals, and other Nonprofit Organizations.
OMB Circular No. A-102, Uniform Administrative Requirements for
Grants-in-Aid to State and Local Governments.
OMB Circular No. A-133, Audits of States, Local Government, and
Non-profit Organizations.
Please reference the following Web sites for additional
information:
https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants:
https://exchanges.state.gov/education/grantsdiv/terms.htm#articleI
VI.3. Reporting Requirements
You must provide ECA with a hard copy original plus two copies of
the following reports:
1. A final program and financial report no more than 90 days after
the expiration of the award;
2. Interim program and financial reports that include information
on the progress made on the program plan and program results to date.
Grantees will be required to provide reports analyzing their
evaluation findings to the Bureau in their regular program reports.
(Please refer to IV. Application and Submission Instructions (IV.3.d.3)
above for Program Monitoring and Evaluation information.
All data collected, including survey responses and contact
information, must be maintained for a minimum of three years and
provided to the Bureau upon request.
All reports must be sent to the ECA Grants Officer and ECA Program
Officer listed in the final assistance award document.
VI.4. Program Data Requirements
Organizations awarded grants will be required to maintain specific
data on program participants and activities in an electronically
accessible database format that can be shared with the Bureau as
required. As a minimum, the data must include the following:
1. Name, address, contact information and biographic sketch of all
persons who travel internationally on funds provided by the grant or
who benefit from the grant funding but do not travel.
2. Itineraries of international and domestic travel, providing
dates of travel and cities in which any exchange experiences take
place. Final schedules for in-country and U.S. activities must be
received by the ECA Program Officer at least three work days prior to
the official opening of the activity.
VII. Agency Contacts
For questions about this announcement, contact: Carolyn Lantz,
Youth Programs Division, Office of Citizen Exchanges, Bureau of
Educational and Cultural Affairs, ECA/PE/C/PY-07-03, U.S. Department of
State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW., Room 568, Washington, DC 20547,
Telephone (202) 203-7505, Fax (202) 203-7529, E-mail LantzCS@state.gov.
All correspondence with the Bureau concerning this RFGP should
reference the above title and number ECA/PE/C/PY-07-03.
Please read the complete Federal Register announcement before
sending inquiries or submitting proposals. Once the RFGP deadline has
passed, Bureau staff may not discuss this competition with applicants
until the proposal review process has been completed.
VIII. Other Information
Notice
The terms and conditions published in this RFGP are binding and may
not be modified by any Bureau representative. Explanatory information
provided by the Bureau that contradicts published language will not be
binding. Issuance of the RFGP does not constitute an award commitment
on the part of the Government. The Bureau reserves the right to reduce,
revise, or increase proposal budgets in accordance with the needs of
the program and the availability of funds. Awards made will be subject
to periodic reporting and evaluation requirements per section VI.3
above.
Dated: August 3, 2006.
Dina Habib Powell,
Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of
State.
[FR Doc. 06-6837 Filed 8-9-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P