Claims on Behalf of the United States, 45475-45482 [E6-12974]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 153 / Wednesday, August 9, 2006 / Proposed Rules
‘‘commercial and industrial
enterprises’’. The Committee further
included the following statement about
section 7871(e):
The bill clarifies that, with respect to
bonds issued by Indian tribal governments,
the term ‘essential governmental function’
does not include any governmental function
that is not customarily performed (and
financed with governmental tax-exempt
bonds) by State and local governments with
general taxing powers. For example, issuance
of bonds to finance commercial or industrial
facilities (e.g., private rental housing, cement
factories, or mirror factories) which bonds
technically may not be private activity bonds
is not included within the scope of the
essential governmental function exception.
Additionally, the committee wishes to
stress that only those activities that are
customarily financed with governmental
bonds (e.g., schools, roads, governmental
buildings, etc.) are intended to be within the
scope of this exception, notwithstanding that
isolated instances of a State or local
government issuing bonds for another
activity may occur.
H.R. Rep. No. 100–391, at 1139 (1987).
The 1987 Conference Committee
adding the limited manufacturing
facility provision of section
7871(c)(3)(A), noted that:
A facility which does not qualify as a
manufacturing facility for purposes of this
provision may nonetheless be financed with
tax-exempt bonds issued by a tribal
government provided that the facility
satisfies the ‘essential governmental function’
standard (i.e., the facility is comparable to
facilities that are customarily acquired or
constructed and operated by States and local
governments). For example, a building used
for offices for a tribal government itself
would be comparable to State or local
government office buildings, and therefore,
could be financed with tax-exempt bonds. As
another example, a lodge owned and
operated by a tribal government may be
eligible for tax-exempt financing if it is
comparable to lodges customarily owned and
operated by State park or recreation agencies.
H.R. Rep. No. 100–495, at 1012 n.5
(1987) (Conf. Rep.).
The IRS has become aware of an
increasing number of instances in which
taxpayers have raised questions about
the application of section 7871(e).
Accordingly, the Treasury Department
and the IRS have determined to seek
public comment in advance of issuing
proposed regulations in this area.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSAL
Explanation of Provisions
The Treasury Department and the IRS
anticipate that the proposed regulations
will provide that for purposes of section
7871(c) and section 7871(e), an activity
will be considered an essential
governmental function that is
customarily performed by State and
local governments if: (1) There are
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:06 Aug 08, 2006
Jkt 208001
numerous State and local governments
with general taxing powers that have
been conducting the activity and
financing it with tax-exempt
governmental bonds, (2) State and local
governments with general taxing powers
have been conducting the activity and
financing it with tax-exempt
governmental bonds for many years, and
(3) the activity is not a commercial or
industrial activity. The proposed
regulations will further provide that
examples of activities customarily
performed by State and local
governments include, but are not
limited to, public works projects such as
roads, schools, and government
buildings.
Request for Comments
Before the notice of proposed
rulemaking is issued, consideration will
be given to any written comments that
are submitted timely (preferably a
signed original and eight (8) copies) to
the IRS. All comments will be available
for public inspection and copying.
Drafting Information
The principal authors of this advance
notice of proposed rulemaking are
Aviva M. Roth and Timothy L. Jones,
Office of the Chief Counsel (Tax-exempt
and Government Entities), however,
other personnel from the IRS and
Treasury Department participated in its
development.
Mark E. Matthews,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and
Enforcement.
[FR Doc. E6–12884 Filed 8–8–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army
32 CFR Part 537
RIN 0702–AA55
[Docket No. USA–2006–0023]
Claims on Behalf of the United States
Department of the Army, DOD.
Proposed rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Department of the Army
proposes to amend its regulation to
reflect a substantial revision of AR 27–
20, an Army publication which governs
the processing of claims worldwide. The
purpose of this revision is to make AR
27–20 clearer and easier to use, after
years of piecemeal amendments. This
rewrite also ensures that AR 27–20 is in
keeping with current statutes, legal
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
45475
opinions and Department of Justice
guidance pertaining to claims
processing. This updated rule will
expedite payment of meritorious claims
throughout the world. AR 27–20
includes rules for processing affirmative
claims, i.e., recovery actions on behalf
of the United States.
DATES: Comments submitted on or
before October 10, 2006 will be
considered.
You may submit comments,
identified by ‘‘32 CFR Part 537, Docket
No. USA–2006–0023 and or RIN 0702–
AA55’’ in the subject line, by any of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Federal Docket Management
System Office, 1160 Defense Pentagon,
Washington, DC 20301–1160.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number or Regulatory
Information Number (RIN) for this
Federal Register document. The general
policy for comments and other
submissions from members of the public
is to make these submissions available
for public viewing on the Internet at
https://www.regulations.gov as they are
received without change, including any
personal identifiers or contact
information.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
George Westerbeke (301) 677–7009,
x220.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background
This rule was previously published.
The Administrative Procedure Act, as
amended by the Freedom of Information
Act requires that certain policies and
procedures and other information
concerning the Department of the Army
be published in the Federal Register.
The policies and procedures covered by
this regulation fall into that category.
Rules for processing affirmative
claims are found mostly in Chapter 14
of AR 27–20; however, rules for
processing maritime affirmative claims
are contained in Chapter 8. For
purposes of this Federal Register
publication and its corresponding
codification in the Code of Federal
Regulations, all rules for affirmative
claims processing have been
incorporated into 32 CFR part 537. AR
27–20 and its companion DA Pam 27–
162 will be available on the Web site of
the U.S. Army Publications Directorate,
https://www.apd.army.mil, within a few
months of the date of this Federal
Register publication of 32 CFR part 537.
E:\FR\FM\09AUP1.SGM
09AUP1
45476
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 153 / Wednesday, August 9, 2006 / Proposed Rules
I. Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)
Users are encouraged to consult the
online versions, whose structure and
paragraph numbering are comparable.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Army has
determined that the Regulatory
Flexibility Act does not apply because
the proposed rule does not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
within the meaning of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612.
C. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Department of the Army has
determined that according to the criteria
defined in Executive Order 13132 this
proposed rule does not apply because it
will not have a substantial effect on the
States, on the relationship between the
national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
Dale Woodling,
Commander, United States Army Claims
Service.
The Department of the Army has
determined that the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act does not apply
because the proposed rule does not
include a mandate that may result in
estimated costs to State, local or tribal
governments in the aggregate, or the
private sector, of $100 million or more.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 537
D. National Environmental Policy Act
PART 537—CLAIMS ON BEHALF OF
THE UNITED STATES
The Department of the Army has
determined that the National
Environmental Policy Act does not
apply because the proposed rule does
not have an adverse impact on the
environment.
E. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Department of the Army has
determined that the Paperwork
Reduction Act does not apply because
the proposed rule does not involve
collection of information from the
public.
F. Executive Order 12630 (Government
Actions and Interference With
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights)
The Department of the Army has
determined that Executive Order 12630
does not apply because the proposed
rule does not impair private property
rights.
G. Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory
Planning and Review)
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSAL
The Department of the Army has
determined that according to the criteria
defined in Executive Order 12866 this
proposed rule is not a significant
regulatory action. As such, the proposed
rule is not subject to Office of
Management and Budget review under
section 6(a)(3) of the Executive Order.
H. Executive Order 13045 (Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
Risk and Safety Risks)
The Department of the Army has
determined that according to the criteria
defined in Executive Order 13045 this
proposed rule does not apply.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:06 Aug 08, 2006
Jkt 208001
Claims, Government employees,
Health care, Military personnel.
For the reasons stated in the preamble
the Department of the Army proposes to
revise 32 CFR part 537 to read as
follows:
Sec.
537.1 Statutory authority for non-maritime
claims.
537.2 Scope of non-maritime affirmative
claims statutes.
537.3 Claims collectible.
537.4 Claims not collectible.
537.5 Applicable law.
537.6 Identification of recovery incidents.
537.7 Notice to USARCS.
537.8 Investigation.
537.9 Assertion.
537.10 Recovery procedures.
537.11 Litigation.
537.12 Settlement authority.
537.13 Enforcement of assertions.
537.14 Depositing of collections.
537.15 Statutory authority for maritime
claims and claims involving civil works
of a maritime nature.
537.16 Scope for maritime claims.
537.17 Scope for civil works claims of
maritime nature.
537.18 Settlement authority for maritime
claims.
537.19 Demands arising from maritime
claims.
537.20 Certification to Congress.
Authority: 31 U.S.C. 3711–3720E; 42
U.S.C. 2651–2653; 10 U.S.C. 1095; 10 U.S.C.
4803–4804; 33 U.S.C. 408.
§ 537.1 Statutory authority for nonmaritime claims.
(a) The Federal Claims Collection Act.
The Federal Claims Collection Act
(FCCA), is set forth at 31 U.S.C. 3711–
3720E, as amended by the Debt
Collection Act of 1982, Public Law 97–
365, 96 Stat. 1749 (October 1982),
Public Law 101–552, 104 Stat. 2746
(November 1990).
(b) Federal Medical Care Recovery
Act. The Federal Medical Care Recovery
Act (FMCRA) is set forth at 42 U.S.C.
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
2651–53, as amended by the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 1997, Public Law 104–202, section
1075, 110 Stat. 2422.
(c) Title 10 United States Code
Section 1095. 10 U.S.C. 1095, Public
Law 101–510, section 713, 107 Stat.
1547, 1689 (1993), as amended by
Public Law 103–160, 104 Stat. 1485
(November 1990).
Note to § 537.1: All of these statutes may
be viewed on the USARCS Web site, https://
www.jagcnet.army.mil/85256F33005C2B92/
(JAGCNETDocID)/HOME?OPENDOCUMENT.
Select the link ‘‘Claims Resources.’’
§ 537.2 Scope of non-maritime affirmative
claims statutes.
(a) Recovery for government property
loss or damage. The FCCA, originally
passed in 1966, gives federal agencies
the authority to collect a claim of the
United States government for money or
property arising out of the activities of
the agency in question. However, the
broad authority is limited for purposes
of this regulation to claims for loss of or
damage to property, as the FMCRA takes
precedence for medical care recoveries.
(b) Recovery for medical expenses and
lost military pay. (1) The FMCRA,
passed in 1962, authorizes recovery
from a third person of the expenses for
medical care the United States furnishes
to a person who is injured or suffers a
disease when such care is authorized or
required by law. Likewise the United
States is authorized to recover the cost
of pay for members of the uniformed
services unable to perform duties.
Recovery normally arises out of a thirdparty tort under local law as to which
the United States has an independent
cause of action.
(2) Under 10 U.S.C. 1095 the United
States is also deemed a third-party
beneficiary or subrogee under an
alternative system of computations such
as workers’ compensation; hospital lien
laws; contract rights under the terms of
insurance policies including medical
payment coverage; uninsured,
underinsured and no-fault coverage; and
no-fault laws.
(c) Recovery of health insurance. 10
U.S.C. 1095 permits recovery of health
insurance for medical care furnished at
military medical treatment facilities
(MTFs), including supplemental
policies. This third-party collection
program has been delegated to the
Surgeon General of the Army by the
Judge Advocate General (TJAG).
(d) Worldwide applicability. The
foregoing authorities are worldwide in
application, except for
intergovernmental claims waived by
treaty, for example, North Atlantic
Treaty Association Status of Forces
E:\FR\FM\09AUP1.SGM
09AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 153 / Wednesday, August 9, 2006 / Proposed Rules
Agreement (NATO SOFA), Article VIII,
paragraph 1.
§ 537.3
Claims collectible.
(a) Claims for medical expenses.
Claims for the value of medical care
furnished to active or retired members
of the uniformed services, family
members of either category, employees
of the Department of the Army (DA) or
Department of Defense (DOD), or other
persons to whom care was furnished
because authorized or required by law
and resulting in injury, death or disease,
including those:
(1) Arising out of a tort under local
law,
(2) Arising out of an on-the-job injury
compensable under workers’
compensation law except for Federal
Employees Compensation Act (FECA)
recoveries,
(3) Based on the United States being
a third-party beneficiary of the
insurance contract of the injured party
to include medical payment coverage,
lost wages, as well as uninsured,
underinsured, and no-fault coverage.
(b) Claims for lost military pay.
Claims for the value of lost pay of active
members of the uniformed services
arising out of a tort under local law
resulting in injury, death or disease.
(c) Claims for property loss. Claims
arising out of a tort under local law for
the value of lost or missing DA or DOD
property, including non-appropriated
fund instrumentality (NAFI) property,
or for the cost of repairs of such
property, including damage to assigned
quarters, are not collectable under 10
U.S.C. 2775. (See § 537.4).
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSAL
§ 537.4
Claims not collectible.
(a) Where the tortfeasor is a
department, agency or instrumentality
of the United States. (See § 536.27(g) of
this chapter).
(b) Where the tortfeasor is a member
of the uniformed services or an
employee of the DA or DOD, acting
within the scope of employment, who
damages or loses property. See AR 735–
5, chapter 13.
(c) Where the damage or loss of
property falls under a contractor bill of
lading and recovery is pursued by the
contracting agency, e.g., Surface
Deployment and Distribution Command
(SDDC), formerly the Military Traffic
Management Command (MTMC), for
lost or destroyed shipments.
(d) Where damage to assigned
quarters, or equipment or furnishings
therein, is collectible from a member of
the uniformed services under 10 U.S.C.
2775.
(e) Where the medical care is
furnished by a Department of Veterans
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:06 Aug 08, 2006
Jkt 208001
Affairs facility to other than active duty
members of the uniformed services for
service-connected disabilities.
§ 537.5
Applicable law.
(a) Basis for recovery. (1) Most
recovery assertions are based on the
negligence or wrongful acts or
omissions of the person or entity that
caused the loss. These actions or
omissions must constitute a tort as
determined by the law of place of
occurrence, except in no-fault
jurisdictions where the no-fault law
permits recovery. Where the tort is not
complete within the jurisdiction where
it originally occurred, the law of the
original jurisdiction is nevertheless
applicable. For example, if a plane
crashes in Virginia due to the negligence
of a Federal Aviation Administration
controller in Maryland, Maryland law
determines the extent and nature of the
tort. However, as to what law of
damages is applicable, Maryland or
Virginia depecage (choice of law) theory
may apply. For example, if the flight
originated in Indiana and the
destination was Virginia, the conflict
law of both Maryland and Virginia must
be applied. See DA Pam 27–162,
paragraph 2–35.
(2) Recovery assertions based on the
United States being a third-party
beneficiary or subrogee are not based on
tort, but on the right to recover under
local law, For example, the right of a
third party to recover workers’
compensation benefits is based on local
law. However, the right of a third-party
beneficiary to recover under an
insurance contract may turn on whether
an exclusionary clause is valid under
the law of the jurisdiction where the
contract was made.
(b) Statute of limitations. (1) Federal
law determines when a recovery
assertion must be made. Assertions for
the value of medical expenses, lost
military pay or property loss or damage
based on a tort must be made not later
than three years from the date of
accrual, 28 U.S.C. 2415(b). The date of
accrual is usually the date of the
occurrence giving rise to the recovery,
for example, the date of injury or death
for medical expenses and lost military
pay or the date of damage or loss for a
government property assertion. There
are exceptions. For example, the loss of
property in rightful possession of
another accrues when that person
claims ownership or converts the
property to his own use.
(2) Recovery assertions based on an
implied-in-law contract against a nofault or personal-injury-protection
insured must be brought no later than
six years from the date of accrual, 28
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
45477
U.S.C. 2415(a), United States v. Limbs,
524 F.2d 799 (9th Cir. 1975). The date
of accrual is usually the date of
occurrence.
(3) Actions asserted on a third-party
beneficiary basis against an insurer or
workers compensation fund must
comply with the state notice
requirement, which varies from one to
six years, or the insurer’s notice
requirement set forth in the policy.
United States v. Hartford Acci. & Indem.
Co., 460 F.2d 17 (9th Cir. 1972), cert.
den. 409 U.S. 979 (1972).
(4) The statute of limitations is tolled
or does not start running until the
responsible federal official is notified of
the existence of a recoverable loss,
Jankowitz v. United States, 533 F.2d 538
(D.C. Cir. 1976), United States v. Golden
Acres, Inc., 684 F. Supp. 96 (D. Del.
1986). The responsible federal official
can be the area claims office (ACO), the
claims processing office (CPO), a
command claims service or USARCS,
depending on who receives the notice
under this regulation. However, because
of the responsibility to notify the MTF
or TRICARE fiscal intermediary, and by
regulation the notice must be
expeditious, delayed notification could
start the statute of limitations running.
Additionally, when an ACO or CPO
discovers the existence of an assertion,
the statute of limitations will begin to
run regardless of when the MTF or the
TRICARE intermediary sends a notice.
The date of receipt of a notice must be
entered into the affirmative claims
management program/database (ACMP)
and the notice must be date-stamped
and initialed.
§ 537.6 Identification of recovery
incidents.
(a) Responsibilities. Each command
claims service and ACO will develop
means to identify recovery incidents
arising in its geographic area of
responsibility. See §§ 536.10 and 536.11
of this chapter and paragraph 2–2 of DA
Pam 27–162. This requires publication
of a claims directive to all DOD and
Army installations, units and activities
in its area, emphasizing the importance
of reporting serious incidents to
recovery judge advocates (RJAs) or
civilian recovery attorneys.
(b) Screening procedures. (1) Establish
a point of contact in each unit and
activity in the area of responsibility and
screen their sources periodically,
including motor pools, family housing,
departments of public works, safety
offices, provost marshals, and criminal
investigation divisions. Review civilian
news and police reports, military police
blotters and reports, court proceedings,
line of duty and AR 15–6 investigations
E:\FR\FM\09AUP1.SGM
09AUP1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSAL
45478
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 153 / Wednesday, August 9, 2006 / Proposed Rules
and similar sources to identify potential
medical care recovery claims.
(2) The MTF commander will ensure
that the claims office is notified of
instances in which the MTF provides, or
is billed by a civilian facility for,
inpatient or outpatient care resulting
from injuries (such as broken bones or
burns arising from automobile
accidents, gas explosions, falls, civilian
malpractice, and similar incidents) that
do not involve collections from a health
benefits or Medicare supplemental
insurer. Claims personnel will
coordinate with MTF personnel to
ensure that inpatient and outpatient
records and emergency room and clinic
logs are properly screened to identify
potential cases. The RJA or recovery
attorney will screen the MTF
comptroller records database and
division records as well as ambulance
logs to identify potential medical care
recovery cases. The RJA or recovery
attorney will also coordinate with Navy
and Air Force claims offices and MTFs
to ensure they identify potential claims
involving treatment provided to Army
personnel.
(3) The MTF commander will also
ensure that the MTF does not release
billings or medical records, or respond
to requests for assistance with workers’
compensation forms, without
coordinating with the RJA or recovery
attorney.
(4) The TRICARE fiscal intermediary
is required to identify and mail certain
information promptly to the claims
office designated as the state point of
contact. The fiscal intermediary must
mail the TRICARE Explanation of
Benefits, showing the amount TRICARE
paid on the claim along with what
diagnostic codes were used, and DD
Form 2527, Statement of Personal
Injury. A sample Statement of Personal
Injury (DD Form 2527) is posted on the
USARCS Web site; for the address, see
the Note to § 537.1.
(5) The RJA or recovery attorney will
also coordinate with Navy and Air Force
claims offices and MTFs to ensure they
identify potential claims involving
treatment provided to Army personnel,
AR 40–400, paragraph 13–5.
(c) When to open a recovery file. (1)
Upon identification of a potential
recovery incident or upon receipt of a
billing from a TRICARE Fiscal
Intermediary or an MTF, a file will be
opened and entered into the ACMP by
the first ACO or CPO that learns of the
event even if liability has not been
established. Incidents under Navy, Air
Force or Coast Guard jurisdiction will
not be so entered but referred to the
responsible service. Complete listings of
claims/recovery offices worldwide are
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:06 Aug 08, 2006
Jkt 208001
posted on the USARCS Web site; for the
address, see the Note to § 537.1. At the
site, select the link ‘‘Claims Resources.’’
At the next screen, click on ‘‘Tables
Listing Claims Offices Worldwide.’’).
(2) Army responsibility for affirmative
claims is as follows:
(i) Damage to or loss of real or
personal property of the DOD or the
Army even if located at installations or
activities under the jurisdiction of other
uniformed services.
(ii) Personal injury to persons whose
primary care for an accident-related
injury is furnished at an Army MTF,
regardless of the uniformed services
affiliation of the person or sponsor, but
not to those treated at another
uniformed service’s MTF even if the
person is an active duty Army member.
(iii) Personal injury to an active duty
or retired Army member or a family
member of either category treated under
TRICARE.
(iv) A lead agency will be established
whenever:
(A) Property damaged or lost
belonging to more than one service is
involved in the same incident.
(B) Personal injury victims are treated
at MTFs of more than one service.
(C) Personal injury victims with
affiliations to more than one service are
treated under TRICARE.
(D) Lead agencies may be established
locally for claims valued at $50,000 or
less. For claims greater than $50,000
USARCS will be notified and will deal
with the other service at headquarters
level. (See § 536.32 of this chapter.)
§ 537.7
Notice to USARCS.
Upon receipt of notice of a claim
involving either actual or potential
amounts within USARCS’ monetary
jurisdiction, that is, where final action
will be taken by USARCS or the
Department of Justice, immediate notice
will be given to USARCS. Forwarding a
copy of the serious incident report,
discussed in § 536.22(c) of this chapter,
to USARCS, will meet this requirement.
Thereafter, mirror file copies will be
furnished to USARCS in accordance
with AR 27–20, paragraph 2–12. This
allows for continuous monitoring and
discussion between the ACO and the
USARCS area action officer (AAO).
§ 537.8
Investigation.
(a) Claims over $50,000. Hands-on
investigation will be conducted by
claims personnel as set forth in DA Pam
27–162, Chapter 2, Section IV,
regardless of the amount of insurance
coverage immediately available, with a
view to discovery of other sources of
recovery, for example, vehicle defects or
improper maintenance, road design and
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
absence of warning signs, products
liability, medical malpractice in civilian
treatment facilities. Where the
employment of experts is indicated
follow the procedures in § 536.39 of this
chapter. No attorney representation
agreement will be sent to the injured
party’s representative without USARCS
approval.
(b) Claims of $50,000 or less. The
amount of hands-on investigative effort
is directly related to the amount of
insurance coverage that the tortfeasor
possesses and the amount of coverage
that the injured party has. Where the
injured party is represented, request
information from his lawyer or insurer,
in addition to the documents obtained
in initial screening. The ACO should be
able to form an independent opinion as
to liability based on the investigation of
the government and not solely on that
of the injured party’s attorney.
(c) Claims of $5,000 or less. Small
claims procedures are applicable to the
extent feasible. See § 536.33 of this
chapter. Investigation, assertion and
settlement by e-mail, phone or fax is
encouraged. The investigation and
action should be recorded. DA Form
1668, Small Claims Certificate, may be
used as a model, modifying it as needed.
A sample completed Small Claims
Certificate is posted at USARCS Web
site for the address, see the Note to
§ 537.1.
(d) Relations with injured party. (1)
When the injured party becomes known
and an interview can be conducted
locally, all relevant facts will be
obtained unless the injured party is
represented by a lawyer. In this latter
event, basic information as set forth on
DD Form 2527, Statement of Personal
Injury (a completed sample is posted at
the USARCS Web site; for the address,
see the Note to § 537.1) can be obtained
without violating lawyer-client
privilege. If the injured party is not
immediately available, the information
can be obtained by requesting assistance
from another ACO, a unit claims officer,
a reservist or Army National Guard
(ANG) member, another federal agency,
or another means.
(2) When the injured party is
represented, a Health Insurance
Portability and Accountability Act
(HIPAA) medical release form (sample
posted at the USARCS Web site; see
§ 537 (b)(4)) permitting USARCS to send
out the medical records of the injured
party for claims purposes, will be sent
to the injured party’s lawyer for
completion and return.
(3) When the injured party or his or
her lawyer refuses to furnish necessary
information, it can usually be obtained
by other means, for example, from an
E:\FR\FM\09AUP1.SGM
09AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 153 / Wednesday, August 9, 2006 / Proposed Rules
accident report or investigation. A
notice will be furnished to all parties
that the government has been assigned
the right to bring a claim for the value
of medical care furnished, lost pay or
value of property lost or destroyed, and
that the United States has the right to
bring an independent cause of action. In
absence of timely and appropriate
response, discuss with the AAO to
determine what action should be taken.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSAL
§ 537.9
Assertion.
(a) Asserting demands. If a prima facie
claim exists under state law, a written
demand will be made against all the
tortfeasors and insurers. This includes
demands against the injured party’s own
insurance coverage, no-fault coverage
and workers’ compensation carrier. The
earlier the demand the better. A demand
will not be delayed until the exact
amount of medical expenses or lost pay
is determined. The demand letter will
state that the amount will be furnished
when known. A copy of the demand
will be furnished to the injured party or,
if represented, his lawyer. Two sample
demand (or assertion) letters are posted
at the USARCS Web site (for the
address, see the Note to § 537.1).
Demand letters are for initial contact
with insurance companies. One of the
posted samples is for a medical
assertion for a soldier (that includes
wages). The other is for a medical
assertion for a civilian (that does not
include wages). Remember the
following points when asserting
demands:
(1) The fact that the medical expenses
have been assigned to the United States
and as a result the United States has a
cause of action in federal or state court.
All parties will be notified that if the
insurer pays the amount to another
party, the United States has the right to
collect from the insurer.
(2) Demands for third-party torts are
under the authority of the FMCRA;
demands where there is no tortfeasor are
under the authority of 10 U.S.C. 1095;
demands for property loss or damage are
under the authority of the FCCA.
(b) Documentation of damages. MTFs
are required by AR 40–400, Patient
Administration, chapter 13 to furnish
complete billing documents to RJAs.
(1) TRICARE bills are obtained from
the fiscal intermediary servicing the
ACO. The amounts are based on the
amount TRICARE pays and not the
amount the patient is billed by the
provider. TRICARE bills must be
screened to insure that the care is
incident or accident related as the
demand is limited to that amount.
(2) MTF bills, both outpatient and
inpatient, are obtained from either the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:06 Aug 08, 2006
Jkt 208001
MTF co-located with the ACO or if
another MTF is involved, from that
MTF, regardless of uniformed service
affiliation. Outpatient bills include not
only the cost of the visit but also the
cost of each procedure, such as x-rays or
laboratory tests. Inpatient billing is not
based on services rendered but on a
diagnostic group. Charges for
professional inpatient services will be
itemized the same as outpatient care.
Charges for prescription services will be
included. Screening to ensure that only
incident or accident related care is
claimed is essential. The cost of
ambulance services, ground or air, will
be calculated with MTF assistance and
demanded. Burial expenses are obtained
from the local mortuary affairs office on
DD Form 2063, but will be demanded
only when the insurance coverage
includes such expenses.
(3) Lost pay will be obtained from the
leave or earnings statement or the active
duty pay chart for the year or years in
question and will include special and
incentive pay unless the injured service
member did not receive either due to
the length of time off assigned duty. The
time off duty will be based on the time
service members are unable to perform
duties for which they have been trained
(their military occupational specialty). It
will not be limited to inpatient time.
Time in a medical holding or
convalescent leave will be lost time.
(4) The amount recoverable for
personal property losses is limited to its
value at the time of loss. Depreciation
charts may be used to determine the
reduction from the value at purchase.
Replacement value will not be used.
Both real and personal property damage
will be on the value of labor and cost
of material including the use of heavy
equipment. When the cost of repairs is
greater than $50,000, 10% overhead will
be added. This can be substantiated
using case law and by seeking
documentation from the repair facility.
(c) Double collections prohibited.
When the cost of medical care is
recoverable by the MTF from medical
care insurance, both primary and
supplemental under 10 U.S.C. 1095, an
assertion under FMCRA will be made,
including a demand for lost pay not
recoverable out of health insurance.
While the United States is entitled to
recover costs of medical care from both
the injured parties’ medical insurance
and from the third-party tortfeasor,
USARCS policy is not to collect twice.
RJAs will carefully coordinate with the
MTF to insure that double collection
does not occur. Demand for lost pay
should be enforced as it is not
recoverable from medical care
insurance.
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
§ 537.10
45479
Recovery procedures.
(a) Recovery personnel have three
means of enforcing recovery following
initial assertion.
(1) Referral to litigation pursuant to
§ 537.11;
(2) The head of an ACO should
request Chief, Litigation Division,
OTJAG to have the RJA appointed as a
Special Assistant United States Attorney
when the following criteria are met:
(i) Filing suit is a frequent necessity,
e.g., insurance companies are refusing
payment on small claims either by
raising issues well settled or by
regularly reducing the amount of
medical care as not fair and reasonable;
(ii) The local U.S. Attorney’s office is
in favor of such appointment due to his
previous experience with the RJA and
the additional burden of affirmative
claims litigation on his staff;
(iii) The RJA has at least two years
experience and is likely to continue in
the RJA assignment for at least one year;
and
(iv) Commander USARCS concurs in
the appointment and is willing to
furnish support.
(3) The RJA may request that the
attorney representing the injured party
include the amount asserted by the
United States as part of special damages.
The injured party’s attorney may not
represent the United States nor may the
United States pay attorney fees as this
would be in violation of 5 U.S.C. 3106.
Where indicated, this arrangement
should be reduced to writing. Be
mindful that the attorney’s duty to the
injured party is in conflict with the
interests of the United States where the
amount potentially recoverable is small
in comparison to the amount asserted by
the United States. In this event the RJA
should pursue recovery independently.
(b) Careful monitoring of all assertions
is required to insure timely follow-up
resulting in collection or suit where
indicated. Installation of a suspense
system to avoid the expiration of the
statute of limitations is essential.
Recommendations to file suit should be
forwarded by the RJA well prior to the
expiration of the statute of limitations.
Within six months prior to the running
of the statute of limitations, USARCS
must be notified of the status of the
claim or potential claim. Follow-up
demands should precede filing suit to
create a written record of efforts to avoid
suit. Personal contact with all parties is
encouraged. When represented, contact
the representative.
(c) Sources other than vehicle liability
coverage should be exhausted in cases
where the amount of the potential
recovery exceeds $50,000 and the
coverage is small. Coordination with
E:\FR\FM\09AUP1.SGM
09AUP1
45480
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 153 / Wednesday, August 9, 2006 / Proposed Rules
USARCS is required. USARCS can
obtain expert witnesses for medical
malpractice cases, products liability
cases, or other cases in which another
tortfeasor may be involved.
§ 537.11
Litigation.
(a) If a tortfeasor or insurer refuses to
settle, or if an injured party’s attorney
improperly withholds funds, the RJA or
recovery attorney must consider
litigation to protect the interests of the
United States. Litigation is particularly
appropriate if a particular insurer
consistently refuses to settle claims, or
if the government’s interests are not
adequately represented on a claim over
$25,000.
(b) RJAs or recovery attorneys must
maintain close contact with local U.S.
Attorney’s Offices to ensure these
offices are willing to initiate litigation
on cases.
(c) In order to directly initiate or
intervene in litigation, an RJA or
recovery attorney must prepare a
litigation report and formally refer the
case through the Affirmative Claims
Branch, USARCS, and the Litigation
Division, OTJAG (as required by AR 27–
40, chapter 5), to the U.S. Attorney.
While the RJA or recovery attorney, in
conjunction with the Litigation Division
Torts Branch, should attempt to have
the U.S. Attorney’s Office initiate
litigation at least six months before the
expiration of the statute of limitations
(SOL), the RJA or recovery attorney may
contact USARCS telephonically if SOL
problems necessitate quick action on a
case. The RJA or recovery attorney
should also contact USARCS if a U.S.
Attorney is reluctant to pursue an
important case. An injured party’s
attorney may represent the
government’s interest in litigation
without any special coordination.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSAL
§ 537.12
Settlement authority.
(a) Assertions for $50,000 or less. (1)
Approval authority. An RJA or civilian
recovery attorney, if delegated authority
by his or her ACO or CPO, may
compromise a collection on a claim
asserted for $50,000 or less, unless
recovery action is reserved by a
command claims service.
(2) Final action authority. (i) An ACO,
or CPO if delegated authority by its
ACO, may terminate collection action
on a claim asserted for $50,000 or less,
unless action is reserved by a command
claims service.
(ii) The foregoing authorities may
waive a claim asserted for $50,000 or
less where undue hardship exists.
(iii) Determination of amount. The
amount of $50,000 is determined
totaling the amounts for medical care,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:06 Aug 08, 2006
Jkt 208001
lost military wages, lost earnings or
government property damage arising
form the same claims incident.
(b) Assertions over $50,000. USARCS
retains final authority over assertions
over $50,000. By use of the mirror file
system and through a dialogue between
USARCS and the field during the course
of the assertion, USARCS will decide
whether it or the RJA or civilian
recovery attorney will conduct the
negotiations. To help it decide, the RJA
or civilian recovery attorney will
forward a memorandum for either
medical or property recovery approval,
in the format of the samples posted at
the USARCS Web site (for the address
see the Note to § 537.1). USARCS may
waive the requirement to submit a
memorandum.
(c) Appeals. (1) Assertion for $50,000
or less. Where the assertion is made by
an RJA or civilian recovery attorney, the
appeal will be determined by the SJA,
the medical center judge advocate, or
head of the ACO or CPO. Otherwise, the
appeal will be determined by the
Commander USARCS.
(2) Assertion over $50,000. Where the
assertion is made by a Claims Judge
Advocate or claims attorney, the appeal
will be determined by the Commander
USARCS.
(d) Compromise or waiver. Any
assertion may be compromised, waived
or terminated in whole or in part, if for
example:
(1) The cost to collect does not justify
the cost of enforcement.
(2) There is evidence of fraud or
misrepresentation.
(3) The U.S. cannot locate the
tortfeasor.
(4) Legal merit has not been
substantiated.
(5) The statute of limitations has run
and the debtor refuses to pay.
(6) Collection of all or part of the
amount of funds demanded would
create inequity. The following criteria
apply:
(i) Detailed information on what
funds are available for recovery.
(ii) Reasonable value of the injured
party’s claim for permanent injury, pain
and suffering, decreased earning power,
and any other special damages.
(iii) Military, Department of Veterans
Affairs, Social Security disability, and
any other government benefits accruing
to the injured party.
(iv) Probability and amount of future
medical expenses of the government
and the injured party.
(v) Present and prospective assets,
income, and obligations of the injured
party and those dependent on him or
her.
(vi) The financial condition of the
debtor.
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(vii) The degree and nature of
contributory negligence on the part of
the injured party in causing his injury
or death. (viii) The percentage of
attorney’s fees that his attorney is
willing to reduce.
(ix) The willingness of the tortfeasor
to enter into an installment agreement.
(e) Releases. The RJA or recovery
attorney may execute a release for
affirmative claims in the pre-litigation
stage acknowledging that the
government has received payment in
full of the amount asserted or the
compromised amount agreed upon, or
the final installment payment. The
format of the release should be similar
to the sample posted at the USARCS
Web site (for the address see the Note
to § 537.1). However, the RJA or
recovery attorney may not execute
either an indemnity agreement or a
release which prejudices the
government’s right to recover on other
claims arising out of the same incident
without the approval of USARCS. In
addition, the RJA or recovery attorney
may not execute a release that purports
to release any claim that the injured
party may have other than for medical
care furnished or to be furnished by the
United States. The RJA or recovery
attorney will not execute a release if the
government’s claim is waived or
terminated.
§ 537.13
Enforcement of assertions.
Meritorious assertions that do not
result in collections should be enforced
as follows:
(a) Where the debtor is a business or
corporation otherwise financially
capable the RJA or equivalent should
forward a recommendation to bring suit
or intervene in an existing suit
regardless of the amount of the debt. As
authorized by 28 U.S.C. 3011, the
demand amount in the complaint shall
include an additional 10% of the
original claimed amount, to cover the
administrative costs of processing and
handling the enforcement of the debt.
(b) Where the debtor is an individual
rather than a business, an asset
determination should be made both as
to existing assets or prospective
earnings. If the injured party’s attorney
has made an assets search which is
reliable, review the search before
requesting a new one. Such a search can
be paid for out of existing collections.
(1) If the debtor has assets refer to
USARCS for transfer to a debt collection
contractor or an agency debt collection
center as determined by USARCS.
(2) If the debtor has no assets, but
prospective future earnings, RJA may
seek a confession of judgment and
maintain contact with the debtor for
E:\FR\FM\09AUP1.SGM
09AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 153 / Wednesday, August 9, 2006 / Proposed Rules
future collection where authorized by
state law and filing of suit is not
required. If the amount is less then
$5,000, enter into an installment
payment arrangement.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSAL
§ 537.14
Depositing of collections
(a) Depositing property damage
recovery. (1) Machines, supplies,
watercraft, aircraft, vehicles other than
General Services Administration-owned.
Recovered money must be deposited
into the General Treasury Account
21R3019. This account remains the
same every fiscal year. It was
established in accordance with 31
U.S.C. 3302(b) and by Comptroller
General decision B–205508, 64 Comp.
Gen. 431.
(2) Real property. Collection for
damage to real property must be
deposited into an escrow account on
behalf of the installation or activity at
which the loss occurred. This escrow
account must be set up at the request of
the command claims service, ACO or
CPO with the local finance office or
resource management office with
responsibility for department of
engineering and housing or department
of public works funds. The escrow
account must be set up and managed by
the department of engineering and
housing or the department of public
works to (1) temporarily hold deposits,
and (2) to ‘‘roll over’’ deposits each
fiscal year in order to avoid reversion of
these deposits to the General Treasury at
the end of each fiscal year. If the escrow
account is not set up and managed in
this manner it is operating in violation
of 10 U.S.C. 2782.
(3) NAFI property. The Risk
Management Program (RIMP) often
reimburses local NAFIs for property loss
or damage to facilitate return of
equipment to daily use. When money is
recovered from tortfeasors and their
insurance carriers contact the NAFI
involved for instructions on the current
procedures as to where the recovered
money is to be forwarded and
deposited.
(4) Army Stock Fund or Defense
Business Operations Fund property.
Monies recovered for damage to
property belonging to one of these funds
will be returned to that fund unless the
fund has charged the cost of repair or
replacement to an appropriated fund
account. The Defense Business
Operations Fund replaced the Army
Industrial Fund.
(5) Government housing in cases of
abuse or neglect by soldiers or families.
Monies recovered for damage to
government housing caused by a
soldier’s abuse or negligence (or by a
soldier’s family member or guest of the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:06 Aug 08, 2006
Jkt 208001
soldier) will be deposited into that
installation’s family housing operations
and maintenance (O&M) account.
(6) Government housing in cases of
negligence by nonresidents. Government
housing caused by the negligence of a
nonresident must be asserted against the
nonresident directly or through his/her
insurer. Settlement checks must be
deposited into the real property escrow
account in accordance with 10 U.S.C.
2782.
(b) Depositing recovery of pay
provided to a soldier while
incapacitated. Monies recovered for the
costs of pay provided to a soldier
injured by the tortious acts of another
shall be credited to the local O&M
account that supports the command,
activity, or other unit to which the
soldier was assigned at the time of the
injury.
(c) Depositing medical care recovery.
(1) To a medical treatment facility
account. Continental U.S. (CONUS) and
outside the continental U.S. (OCONUS)
claims offices, and command claims
services, will deposit money recovered
from an automobile insurer for medical
care provided, paid for by, in or through
an MTF to the O&M account of the
Army, Navy, or Air Force MTF that
provided the care. CONUS and
OCONUS claims offices, and command
claims services, will deposit money
recovered from any payor, under any
provision of law, for medical care
provided or paid for by, in or through
an MTF into the MTF’s O&M account.
(2) Deposits when TRICARE paid
directly for treatment. The account in
which to deposit affirmative claims
recoveries when TRICARE has paid
directly for the medical treatment is a
Defense Health Program (DHP) account
for reallocation to the services. This
replaces the general treasury
miscellaneous receipts account
published in AR 37–100 (obsolete).
Deposit to TRICARE using this new
account for recoveries pending deposit,
and recoveries for any claim settled on
or after October 1, 2002. Retroactive
claims depositing is not necessary.
(3) Apportionment of medical care
recovery between accounts. Claims
offices will often have to apportion
recovered money among different
accounts.
(i) Apportioning money between
accounts. If care was provided by an
MTF and paid for by or through the
MTF and/or directly by TRICARE and/
or a unit account for military lost wages
if any, and the amount recovered is less
than the amount asserted, deposit a
prorated amount of money into each
TRICARE account.
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
45481
(ii) Apportioning money between two
or more medical treatment facility
accounts. If care was provided by two
or more MTFs and the claims office
recovers less than the amount asserted,
the claims office should give each MTF
a pro rata share of the money recovered.
For example, if MTF one provided
$2,000 worth of care and MTF two
provided $1,000 worth of care, the
claims office will deposit $800 of a
$1,200 recovery to MTF one’s account
and the remaining $400 to MTF two’s
account. Similarly, if the claims office
recovers an amount less than that
asserted for medical care expenses and
costs of pay provided, the claims office
should give a pro rata share of the
money recovered to both the MTF and
the appropriation account that supports
the injured soldier’s unit.
(d) Fiscal Integrity. Field claims
offices must reconcile the property
damage and medical care recovery
accounts with their servicing defense
accounting office. Field claims offices
must ensure that their deposits have
been credited to the proper accounts
and that these accounts have not been
improperly charged. All accounts must
be reconciled at the end of the fiscal
year.
§ 537.15 Statutory authority for maritime
claims and claims involving civil works of
a maritime nature.
(a) The Army Maritime Claims
Settlement Act. The sections pertinent
to maritime affirmative claims are set
out at 10 U.S.C. 4803–4804.
(b) The Rivers and Harbors Act. The
section of the Act pertinent to
affirmative claims involving civil works
of a maritime nature is set out at 33
U.S.C. 408.
§ 537.16
Scope for maritime claims.
The Army Maritime Claims
Settlement Act (10 U.S.C. 4803–4804)
applies worldwide and includes claims
that arise on high seas or within the
territorial waters of a foreign country.
(a) 10 U.S.C. 4803 provides for agency
settlement or compromise of claims for
damage to:
(1) DA-accountable properties of a
kind that are within the Federal
maritime jurisdiction.
(2) Property under the DA’s
jurisdiction or DA property damaged by
a vessel or floating object.
(b) 10 U.S.C. 4804 provides for the
settlement or compromise of claims in
any amount for salvage services
(including contract salvage and towage)
performed by the DA. Claims for salvage
services are based upon labor cost, per
diem rates for the use of salvage vessels
and other equipment, and repair or
E:\FR\FM\09AUP1.SGM
09AUP1
45482
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 153 / Wednesday, August 9, 2006 / Proposed Rules
replacement costs for materials and
equipment damaged or lost during the
salvage operation. The sum claimed is
usually intended to compensate the
United States for operational costs only,
reserving, however, the government’s
right to assert a claim on a salvage
bonus basis in accordance with
commercial practice.
(c) The United States has three years
from the date a maritime claim accrues
under this section to file suit against the
responsible party or parties.
§ 537.17 Scope for civil works claims of
maritime nature.
Under the River and Harbors Act (33
U.S.C. 408), the United States has the
right to recover fines, penalties,
forfeitures and other special remedies in
addition to compensation for damage to
civil works structures such as a lock or
dam. However, claims arising under 10
U.S.C. 4804 are limited to recovery of
actual damage to Corps of Engineers
(COE) civil works structures.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSAL
§ 537.18
claims.
Settlement authority for maritime
(a) The Secretary of the Army, the
Army General Counsel as designee of
the Secretary, or other designee of the
Secretary may compromise an
affirmative claim brought by the United
States in any amount. A claim settled or
compromised in a net amount exceeding
$500,000 will be investigated and
processed and, if approved by the
Secretary of the Army or his or her
designee, certified to Congress for final
approval.
(b) TJAG, TAJAG, the Commander
USARCS, the Chief Counsel COE, or
Division or District Counsel Offices may
settle or compromise and receive
payment on a claim by the United States
under this part if the amount to be
received does not exceed $100,000.
These authorities may also terminate
collection of claims for the convenience
of the government in accordance with
the standards specified by the DOJ.
(c) An SJA or a chief of a command
claims service and heads of ACOs may
receive payment for the full amount of
a claim not exceeding $100,000, or
compromise any claim in which the
amount to be recovered does not exceed
$50,000 and the amount claimed does
not exceed $100,000.
(d) Any money collected under this
authority shall be deposited into the
U.S. General Treasury, except that
money collected on civil works claims
in favor of the United States pursuant to
33 U.S.C. 408 ‘‘shall be placed to the
credit of the appropriation for the
improvement of the harbor or waterway
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:06 Aug 08, 2006
Jkt 208001
in which the damage occurred * * *’’
(33 U.S.C. 412; 33 U.S.C. 571).
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
§ 537.19
claims.
40 CFR Part 52
Demands arising from maritime
[EPA–R03–OAR–2006–0528; FRL–8206–8]
(a) It is essential that Army claims
personnel demand payment, or notify
the party involved of the Army’s
intention to make such demands, as
soon as possible following receipt of
information of damage to Army property
where the party’s legal liability to
respond exists or might exist. Except as
provided below pertaining to admiralty
claims and claims for damage to civil
works in favor of the United States
pursuant to 33 U.S.C. 408, copies of the
initial demand or written notice of
intention to issue a demand letter, as
well as copies of subsequent
correspondence, will be provided
promptly to the Commander USARCS,
who will monitor the progress of such
claims.
(b) Subject to limitation of settlement
authority, demands for admiralty claims
and civil works damages in favor of the
United States pursuant to 33 U.S.C. 408
may be asserted, regardless of amount,
by the Chief Counsel COE, or his
designees in COE Division or District
Counsel offices.
(c) Where, in response to any demand,
a respondent denies liability, fails to
respond within a reasonable period, or
offers a compromise settlement, the file
will be promptly forwarded to the
Commander USARCS, except in those
cases in which a proposed compromise
settlement is deemed acceptable and the
claim is otherwise within the authority
delegated in § 537.18 of this part. Files
for admiralty claims and civil works
claims in favor of the United States
pursuant to 33 U.S.C. 408 will be
promptly forwarded to the United States
Department of Justice.
§ 537.20
Certification to Congress.
Admiralty claims, including claims
for damage to civil works in favor of the
United States pursuant to 33 U.S.C. 408,
proposed for settlement or compromise
in a net amount exceeding $100,000 will
be submitted through the Commander
USARCS to the Secretary of the Army
for approval and if in excess of $500,000
for certification to Congress for final
approval.
[FR Doc. E6–12974 Filed 8–8–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710–08–P
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; West
Virginia; Amendments to
Nonattainment New Source Review
(NSR) Air Quality Permit Program
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve
a revision to the West Virginia State
Implementation Plan (SIP). The revision
consists of amendments to West
Virginia’s existing Nonattainment New
Source Review (NSR) preconstruction
air quality permit program. This action
is being taken under the Clean Air Act
(CAA or the Act). In a separate action,
EPA will address changes made by West
Virginia to its prevention of significant
deterioration (PSD) air quality permit
program, also submitted on December 1,
2005.
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before September 8,
2006.
Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID Number EPA–
R03–OAR–2006–0528 by one of the
following methods:
A. https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
B. E-mail: campbell.dave@epa.gov.
C. Mail: EPA–R03–OAR–2006–0528,
David Campbell, Chief, Permits and
Technical Assessment Branch, Mailcode
3AP11, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
D. Hand Delivery: At the previouslylisted EPA Region III address. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the
Docket’s normal hours of operation, and
special arrangements should be made
for deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R03–OAR–2006–
0528. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change, and may be
made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through www.regulations.gov
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\09AUP1.SGM
09AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 153 (Wednesday, August 9, 2006)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 45475-45482]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-12974]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army
32 CFR Part 537
RIN 0702-AA55
[Docket No. USA-2006-0023]
Claims on Behalf of the United States
AGENCY: Department of the Army, DOD.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of the Army proposes to amend its regulation to
reflect a substantial revision of AR 27-20, an Army publication which
governs the processing of claims worldwide. The purpose of this
revision is to make AR 27-20 clearer and easier to use, after years of
piecemeal amendments. This rewrite also ensures that AR 27-20 is in
keeping with current statutes, legal opinions and Department of Justice
guidance pertaining to claims processing. This updated rule will
expedite payment of meritorious claims throughout the world. AR 27-20
includes rules for processing affirmative claims, i.e., recovery
actions on behalf of the United States.
DATES: Comments submitted on or before October 10, 2006 will be
considered.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by ``32 CFR Part 537,
Docket No. USA-2006-0023 and or RIN 0702-AA55'' in the subject line, by
any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Federal Docket Management System Office, 1160
Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-1160.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and docket number or Regulatory Information Number (RIN) for this
Federal Register document. The general policy for comments and other
submissions from members of the public is to make these submissions
available for public viewing on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov as they are received without change, including any
personal identifiers or contact information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: George Westerbeke (301) 677-7009,
x220.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background
This rule was previously published. The Administrative Procedure
Act, as amended by the Freedom of Information Act requires that certain
policies and procedures and other information concerning the Department
of the Army be published in the Federal Register. The policies and
procedures covered by this regulation fall into that category.
Rules for processing affirmative claims are found mostly in Chapter
14 of AR 27-20; however, rules for processing maritime affirmative
claims are contained in Chapter 8. For purposes of this Federal
Register publication and its corresponding codification in the Code of
Federal Regulations, all rules for affirmative claims processing have
been incorporated into 32 CFR part 537. AR 27-20 and its companion DA
Pam 27-162 will be available on the Web site of the U.S. Army
Publications Directorate, https://www.apd.army.mil, within a few months
of the date of this Federal Register publication of 32 CFR part 537.
[[Page 45476]]
Users are encouraged to consult the online versions, whose structure
and paragraph numbering are comparable.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Army has determined that the Regulatory
Flexibility Act does not apply because the proposed rule does not have
a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
within the meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-612.
C. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Department of the Army has determined that the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act does not apply because the proposed rule does not
include a mandate that may result in estimated costs to State, local or
tribal governments in the aggregate, or the private sector, of $100
million or more.
D. National Environmental Policy Act
The Department of the Army has determined that the National
Environmental Policy Act does not apply because the proposed rule does
not have an adverse impact on the environment.
E. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Department of the Army has determined that the Paperwork
Reduction Act does not apply because the proposed rule does not involve
collection of information from the public.
F. Executive Order 12630 (Government Actions and Interference With
Constitutionally Protected Property Rights)
The Department of the Army has determined that Executive Order
12630 does not apply because the proposed rule does not impair private
property rights.
G. Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review)
The Department of the Army has determined that according to the
criteria defined in Executive Order 12866 this proposed rule is not a
significant regulatory action. As such, the proposed rule is not
subject to Office of Management and Budget review under section 6(a)(3)
of the Executive Order.
H. Executive Order 13045 (Protection of Children From Environmental
Health Risk and Safety Risks)
The Department of the Army has determined that according to the
criteria defined in Executive Order 13045 this proposed rule does not
apply.
I. Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)
The Department of the Army has determined that according to the
criteria defined in Executive Order 13132 this proposed rule does not
apply because it will not have a substantial effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national government and the States, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels
of government.
Dale Woodling,
Commander, United States Army Claims Service.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 537
Claims, Government employees, Health care, Military personnel.
For the reasons stated in the preamble the Department of the Army
proposes to revise 32 CFR part 537 to read as follows:
PART 537--CLAIMS ON BEHALF OF THE UNITED STATES
Sec.
537.1 Statutory authority for non-maritime claims.
537.2 Scope of non-maritime affirmative claims statutes.
537.3 Claims collectible.
537.4 Claims not collectible.
537.5 Applicable law.
537.6 Identification of recovery incidents.
537.7 Notice to USARCS.
537.8 Investigation.
537.9 Assertion.
537.10 Recovery procedures.
537.11 Litigation.
537.12 Settlement authority.
537.13 Enforcement of assertions.
537.14 Depositing of collections.
537.15 Statutory authority for maritime claims and claims involving
civil works of a maritime nature.
537.16 Scope for maritime claims.
537.17 Scope for civil works claims of maritime nature.
537.18 Settlement authority for maritime claims.
537.19 Demands arising from maritime claims.
537.20 Certification to Congress.
Authority: 31 U.S.C. 3711-3720E; 42 U.S.C. 2651-2653; 10 U.S.C.
1095; 10 U.S.C. 4803-4804; 33 U.S.C. 408.
Sec. 537.1 Statutory authority for non-maritime claims.
(a) The Federal Claims Collection Act. The Federal Claims
Collection Act (FCCA), is set forth at 31 U.S.C. 3711-3720E, as amended
by the Debt Collection Act of 1982, Public Law 97-365, 96 Stat. 1749
(October 1982), Public Law 101-552, 104 Stat. 2746 (November 1990).
(b) Federal Medical Care Recovery Act. The Federal Medical Care
Recovery Act (FMCRA) is set forth at 42 U.S.C. 2651-53, as amended by
the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1997, Public Law
104-202, section 1075, 110 Stat. 2422.
(c) Title 10 United States Code Section 1095. 10 U.S.C. 1095,
Public Law 101-510, section 713, 107 Stat. 1547, 1689 (1993), as
amended by Public Law 103-160, 104 Stat. 1485 (November 1990).
Note to Sec. 537.1: All of these statutes may be viewed on the
USARCS Web site, https://www.jagcnet.army.mil/85256F33005C2B92/
(JAGCNETDocID)/HOME?OPENDOCUMENT. Select the link ``Claims
Resources.''
Sec. 537.2 Scope of non-maritime affirmative claims statutes.
(a) Recovery for government property loss or damage. The FCCA,
originally passed in 1966, gives federal agencies the authority to
collect a claim of the United States government for money or property
arising out of the activities of the agency in question. However, the
broad authority is limited for purposes of this regulation to claims
for loss of or damage to property, as the FMCRA takes precedence for
medical care recoveries.
(b) Recovery for medical expenses and lost military pay. (1) The
FMCRA, passed in 1962, authorizes recovery from a third person of the
expenses for medical care the United States furnishes to a person who
is injured or suffers a disease when such care is authorized or
required by law. Likewise the United States is authorized to recover
the cost of pay for members of the uniformed services unable to perform
duties. Recovery normally arises out of a third-party tort under local
law as to which the United States has an independent cause of action.
(2) Under 10 U.S.C. 1095 the United States is also deemed a third-
party beneficiary or subrogee under an alternative system of
computations such as workers' compensation; hospital lien laws;
contract rights under the terms of insurance policies including medical
payment coverage; uninsured, underinsured and no-fault coverage; and
no-fault laws.
(c) Recovery of health insurance. 10 U.S.C. 1095 permits recovery
of health insurance for medical care furnished at military medical
treatment facilities (MTFs), including supplemental policies. This
third-party collection program has been delegated to the Surgeon
General of the Army by the Judge Advocate General (TJAG).
(d) Worldwide applicability. The foregoing authorities are
worldwide in application, except for intergovernmental claims waived by
treaty, for example, North Atlantic Treaty Association Status of Forces
[[Page 45477]]
Agreement (NATO SOFA), Article VIII, paragraph 1.
Sec. 537.3 Claims collectible.
(a) Claims for medical expenses. Claims for the value of medical
care furnished to active or retired members of the uniformed services,
family members of either category, employees of the Department of the
Army (DA) or Department of Defense (DOD), or other persons to whom care
was furnished because authorized or required by law and resulting in
injury, death or disease, including those:
(1) Arising out of a tort under local law,
(2) Arising out of an on-the-job injury compensable under workers'
compensation law except for Federal Employees Compensation Act (FECA)
recoveries,
(3) Based on the United States being a third-party beneficiary of
the insurance contract of the injured party to include medical payment
coverage, lost wages, as well as uninsured, underinsured, and no-fault
coverage.
(b) Claims for lost military pay. Claims for the value of lost pay
of active members of the uniformed services arising out of a tort under
local law resulting in injury, death or disease.
(c) Claims for property loss. Claims arising out of a tort under
local law for the value of lost or missing DA or DOD property,
including non-appropriated fund instrumentality (NAFI) property, or for
the cost of repairs of such property, including damage to assigned
quarters, are not collectable under 10 U.S.C. 2775. (See Sec. 537.4).
Sec. 537.4 Claims not collectible.
(a) Where the tortfeasor is a department, agency or instrumentality
of the United States. (See Sec. 536.27(g) of this chapter).
(b) Where the tortfeasor is a member of the uniformed services or
an employee of the DA or DOD, acting within the scope of employment,
who damages or loses property. See AR 735-5, chapter 13.
(c) Where the damage or loss of property falls under a contractor
bill of lading and recovery is pursued by the contracting agency, e.g.,
Surface Deployment and Distribution Command (SDDC), formerly the
Military Traffic Management Command (MTMC), for lost or destroyed
shipments.
(d) Where damage to assigned quarters, or equipment or furnishings
therein, is collectible from a member of the uniformed services under
10 U.S.C. 2775.
(e) Where the medical care is furnished by a Department of Veterans
Affairs facility to other than active duty members of the uniformed
services for service-connected disabilities.
Sec. 537.5 Applicable law.
(a) Basis for recovery. (1) Most recovery assertions are based on
the negligence or wrongful acts or omissions of the person or entity
that caused the loss. These actions or omissions must constitute a tort
as determined by the law of place of occurrence, except in no-fault
jurisdictions where the no-fault law permits recovery. Where the tort
is not complete within the jurisdiction where it originally occurred,
the law of the original jurisdiction is nevertheless applicable. For
example, if a plane crashes in Virginia due to the negligence of a
Federal Aviation Administration controller in Maryland, Maryland law
determines the extent and nature of the tort. However, as to what law
of damages is applicable, Maryland or Virginia depecage (choice of law)
theory may apply. For example, if the flight originated in Indiana and
the destination was Virginia, the conflict law of both Maryland and
Virginia must be applied. See DA Pam 27-162, paragraph 2-35.
(2) Recovery assertions based on the United States being a third-
party beneficiary or subrogee are not based on tort, but on the right
to recover under local law, For example, the right of a third party to
recover workers' compensation benefits is based on local law. However,
the right of a third-party beneficiary to recover under an insurance
contract may turn on whether an exclusionary clause is valid under the
law of the jurisdiction where the contract was made.
(b) Statute of limitations. (1) Federal law determines when a
recovery assertion must be made. Assertions for the value of medical
expenses, lost military pay or property loss or damage based on a tort
must be made not later than three years from the date of accrual, 28
U.S.C. 2415(b). The date of accrual is usually the date of the
occurrence giving rise to the recovery, for example, the date of injury
or death for medical expenses and lost military pay or the date of
damage or loss for a government property assertion. There are
exceptions. For example, the loss of property in rightful possession of
another accrues when that person claims ownership or converts the
property to his own use.
(2) Recovery assertions based on an implied-in-law contract against
a no-fault or personal-injury-protection insured must be brought no
later than six years from the date of accrual, 28 U.S.C. 2415(a),
United States v. Limbs, 524 F.2d 799 (9th Cir. 1975). The date of
accrual is usually the date of occurrence.
(3) Actions asserted on a third-party beneficiary basis against an
insurer or workers compensation fund must comply with the state notice
requirement, which varies from one to six years, or the insurer's
notice requirement set forth in the policy. United States v. Hartford
Acci. & Indem. Co., 460 F.2d 17 (9th Cir. 1972), cert. den. 409 U.S.
979 (1972).
(4) The statute of limitations is tolled or does not start running
until the responsible federal official is notified of the existence of
a recoverable loss, Jankowitz v. United States, 533 F.2d 538 (D.C. Cir.
1976), United States v. Golden Acres, Inc., 684 F. Supp. 96 (D. Del.
1986). The responsible federal official can be the area claims office
(ACO), the claims processing office (CPO), a command claims service or
USARCS, depending on who receives the notice under this regulation.
However, because of the responsibility to notify the MTF or TRICARE
fiscal intermediary, and by regulation the notice must be expeditious,
delayed notification could start the statute of limitations running.
Additionally, when an ACO or CPO discovers the existence of an
assertion, the statute of limitations will begin to run regardless of
when the MTF or the TRICARE intermediary sends a notice. The date of
receipt of a notice must be entered into the affirmative claims
management program/database (ACMP) and the notice must be date-stamped
and initialed.
Sec. 537.6 Identification of recovery incidents.
(a) Responsibilities. Each command claims service and ACO will
develop means to identify recovery incidents arising in its geographic
area of responsibility. See Sec. Sec. 536.10 and 536.11 of this
chapter and paragraph 2-2 of DA Pam 27-162. This requires publication
of a claims directive to all DOD and Army installations, units and
activities in its area, emphasizing the importance of reporting serious
incidents to recovery judge advocates (RJAs) or civilian recovery
attorneys.
(b) Screening procedures. (1) Establish a point of contact in each
unit and activity in the area of responsibility and screen their
sources periodically, including motor pools, family housing,
departments of public works, safety offices, provost marshals, and
criminal investigation divisions. Review civilian news and police
reports, military police blotters and reports, court proceedings, line
of duty and AR 15-6 investigations
[[Page 45478]]
and similar sources to identify potential medical care recovery claims.
(2) The MTF commander will ensure that the claims office is
notified of instances in which the MTF provides, or is billed by a
civilian facility for, inpatient or outpatient care resulting from
injuries (such as broken bones or burns arising from automobile
accidents, gas explosions, falls, civilian malpractice, and similar
incidents) that do not involve collections from a health benefits or
Medicare supplemental insurer. Claims personnel will coordinate with
MTF personnel to ensure that inpatient and outpatient records and
emergency room and clinic logs are properly screened to identify
potential cases. The RJA or recovery attorney will screen the MTF
comptroller records database and division records as well as ambulance
logs to identify potential medical care recovery cases. The RJA or
recovery attorney will also coordinate with Navy and Air Force claims
offices and MTFs to ensure they identify potential claims involving
treatment provided to Army personnel.
(3) The MTF commander will also ensure that the MTF does not
release billings or medical records, or respond to requests for
assistance with workers' compensation forms, without coordinating with
the RJA or recovery attorney.
(4) The TRICARE fiscal intermediary is required to identify and
mail certain information promptly to the claims office designated as
the state point of contact. The fiscal intermediary must mail the
TRICARE Explanation of Benefits, showing the amount TRICARE paid on the
claim along with what diagnostic codes were used, and DD Form 2527,
Statement of Personal Injury. A sample Statement of Personal Injury (DD
Form 2527) is posted on the USARCS Web site; for the address, see the
Note to Sec. 537.1.
(5) The RJA or recovery attorney will also coordinate with Navy and
Air Force claims offices and MTFs to ensure they identify potential
claims involving treatment provided to Army personnel, AR 40-400,
paragraph 13-5.
(c) When to open a recovery file. (1) Upon identification of a
potential recovery incident or upon receipt of a billing from a TRICARE
Fiscal Intermediary or an MTF, a file will be opened and entered into
the ACMP by the first ACO or CPO that learns of the event even if
liability has not been established. Incidents under Navy, Air Force or
Coast Guard jurisdiction will not be so entered but referred to the
responsible service. Complete listings of claims/recovery offices
worldwide are posted on the USARCS Web site; for the address, see the
Note to Sec. 537.1. At the site, select the link ``Claims Resources.''
At the next screen, click on ``Tables Listing Claims Offices
Worldwide.'').
(2) Army responsibility for affirmative claims is as follows:
(i) Damage to or loss of real or personal property of the DOD or
the Army even if located at installations or activities under the
jurisdiction of other uniformed services.
(ii) Personal injury to persons whose primary care for an accident-
related injury is furnished at an Army MTF, regardless of the uniformed
services affiliation of the person or sponsor, but not to those treated
at another uniformed service's MTF even if the person is an active duty
Army member.
(iii) Personal injury to an active duty or retired Army member or a
family member of either category treated under TRICARE.
(iv) A lead agency will be established whenever:
(A) Property damaged or lost belonging to more than one service is
involved in the same incident.
(B) Personal injury victims are treated at MTFs of more than one
service.
(C) Personal injury victims with affiliations to more than one
service are treated under TRICARE.
(D) Lead agencies may be established locally for claims valued at
$50,000 or less. For claims greater than $50,000 USARCS will be
notified and will deal with the other service at headquarters level.
(See Sec. 536.32 of this chapter.)
Sec. 537.7 Notice to USARCS.
Upon receipt of notice of a claim involving either actual or
potential amounts within USARCS' monetary jurisdiction, that is, where
final action will be taken by USARCS or the Department of Justice,
immediate notice will be given to USARCS. Forwarding a copy of the
serious incident report, discussed in Sec. 536.22(c) of this chapter,
to USARCS, will meet this requirement. Thereafter, mirror file copies
will be furnished to USARCS in accordance with AR 27-20, paragraph 2-
12. This allows for continuous monitoring and discussion between the
ACO and the USARCS area action officer (AAO).
Sec. 537.8 Investigation.
(a) Claims over $50,000. Hands-on investigation will be conducted
by claims personnel as set forth in DA Pam 27-162, Chapter 2, Section
IV, regardless of the amount of insurance coverage immediately
available, with a view to discovery of other sources of recovery, for
example, vehicle defects or improper maintenance, road design and
absence of warning signs, products liability, medical malpractice in
civilian treatment facilities. Where the employment of experts is
indicated follow the procedures in Sec. 536.39 of this chapter. No
attorney representation agreement will be sent to the injured party's
representative without USARCS approval.
(b) Claims of $50,000 or less. The amount of hands-on investigative
effort is directly related to the amount of insurance coverage that the
tortfeasor possesses and the amount of coverage that the injured party
has. Where the injured party is represented, request information from
his lawyer or insurer, in addition to the documents obtained in initial
screening. The ACO should be able to form an independent opinion as to
liability based on the investigation of the government and not solely
on that of the injured party's attorney.
(c) Claims of $5,000 or less. Small claims procedures are
applicable to the extent feasible. See Sec. 536.33 of this chapter.
Investigation, assertion and settlement by e-mail, phone or fax is
encouraged. The investigation and action should be recorded. DA Form
1668, Small Claims Certificate, may be used as a model, modifying it as
needed. A sample completed Small Claims Certificate is posted at USARCS
Web site for the address, see the Note to Sec. 537.1.
(d) Relations with injured party. (1) When the injured party
becomes known and an interview can be conducted locally, all relevant
facts will be obtained unless the injured party is represented by a
lawyer. In this latter event, basic information as set forth on DD Form
2527, Statement of Personal Injury (a completed sample is posted at the
USARCS Web site; for the address, see the Note to Sec. 537.1) can be
obtained without violating lawyer-client privilege. If the injured
party is not immediately available, the information can be obtained by
requesting assistance from another ACO, a unit claims officer, a
reservist or Army National Guard (ANG) member, another federal agency,
or another means.
(2) When the injured party is represented, a Health Insurance
Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) medical release form (sample
posted at the USARCS Web site; see Sec. 537 (b)(4)) permitting USARCS
to send out the medical records of the injured party for claims
purposes, will be sent to the injured party's lawyer for completion and
return.
(3) When the injured party or his or her lawyer refuses to furnish
necessary information, it can usually be obtained by other means, for
example, from an
[[Page 45479]]
accident report or investigation. A notice will be furnished to all
parties that the government has been assigned the right to bring a
claim for the value of medical care furnished, lost pay or value of
property lost or destroyed, and that the United States has the right to
bring an independent cause of action. In absence of timely and
appropriate response, discuss with the AAO to determine what action
should be taken.
Sec. 537.9 Assertion.
(a) Asserting demands. If a prima facie claim exists under state
law, a written demand will be made against all the tortfeasors and
insurers. This includes demands against the injured party's own
insurance coverage, no-fault coverage and workers' compensation
carrier. The earlier the demand the better. A demand will not be
delayed until the exact amount of medical expenses or lost pay is
determined. The demand letter will state that the amount will be
furnished when known. A copy of the demand will be furnished to the
injured party or, if represented, his lawyer. Two sample demand (or
assertion) letters are posted at the USARCS Web site (for the address,
see the Note to Sec. 537.1). Demand letters are for initial contact
with insurance companies. One of the posted samples is for a medical
assertion for a soldier (that includes wages). The other is for a
medical assertion for a civilian (that does not include wages).
Remember the following points when asserting demands:
(1) The fact that the medical expenses have been assigned to the
United States and as a result the United States has a cause of action
in federal or state court. All parties will be notified that if the
insurer pays the amount to another party, the United States has the
right to collect from the insurer.
(2) Demands for third-party torts are under the authority of the
FMCRA; demands where there is no tortfeasor are under the authority of
10 U.S.C. 1095; demands for property loss or damage are under the
authority of the FCCA.
(b) Documentation of damages. MTFs are required by AR 40-400,
Patient Administration, chapter 13 to furnish complete billing
documents to RJAs.
(1) TRICARE bills are obtained from the fiscal intermediary
servicing the ACO. The amounts are based on the amount TRICARE pays and
not the amount the patient is billed by the provider. TRICARE bills
must be screened to insure that the care is incident or accident
related as the demand is limited to that amount.
(2) MTF bills, both outpatient and inpatient, are obtained from
either the MTF co-located with the ACO or if another MTF is involved,
from that MTF, regardless of uniformed service affiliation. Outpatient
bills include not only the cost of the visit but also the cost of each
procedure, such as x-rays or laboratory tests. Inpatient billing is not
based on services rendered but on a diagnostic group. Charges for
professional inpatient services will be itemized the same as outpatient
care. Charges for prescription services will be included. Screening to
ensure that only incident or accident related care is claimed is
essential. The cost of ambulance services, ground or air, will be
calculated with MTF assistance and demanded. Burial expenses are
obtained from the local mortuary affairs office on DD Form 2063, but
will be demanded only when the insurance coverage includes such
expenses.
(3) Lost pay will be obtained from the leave or earnings statement
or the active duty pay chart for the year or years in question and will
include special and incentive pay unless the injured service member did
not receive either due to the length of time off assigned duty. The
time off duty will be based on the time service members are unable to
perform duties for which they have been trained (their military
occupational specialty). It will not be limited to inpatient time. Time
in a medical holding or convalescent leave will be lost time.
(4) The amount recoverable for personal property losses is limited
to its value at the time of loss. Depreciation charts may be used to
determine the reduction from the value at purchase. Replacement value
will not be used. Both real and personal property damage will be on the
value of labor and cost of material including the use of heavy
equipment. When the cost of repairs is greater than $50,000, 10%
overhead will be added. This can be substantiated using case law and by
seeking documentation from the repair facility.
(c) Double collections prohibited. When the cost of medical care is
recoverable by the MTF from medical care insurance, both primary and
supplemental under 10 U.S.C. 1095, an assertion under FMCRA will be
made, including a demand for lost pay not recoverable out of health
insurance. While the United States is entitled to recover costs of
medical care from both the injured parties' medical insurance and from
the third-party tortfeasor, USARCS policy is not to collect twice. RJAs
will carefully coordinate with the MTF to insure that double collection
does not occur. Demand for lost pay should be enforced as it is not
recoverable from medical care insurance.
Sec. 537.10 Recovery procedures.
(a) Recovery personnel have three means of enforcing recovery
following initial assertion.
(1) Referral to litigation pursuant to Sec. 537.11;
(2) The head of an ACO should request Chief, Litigation Division,
OTJAG to have the RJA appointed as a Special Assistant United States
Attorney when the following criteria are met:
(i) Filing suit is a frequent necessity, e.g., insurance companies
are refusing payment on small claims either by raising issues well
settled or by regularly reducing the amount of medical care as not fair
and reasonable;
(ii) The local U.S. Attorney's office is in favor of such
appointment due to his previous experience with the RJA and the
additional burden of affirmative claims litigation on his staff;
(iii) The RJA has at least two years experience and is likely to
continue in the RJA assignment for at least one year; and
(iv) Commander USARCS concurs in the appointment and is willing to
furnish support.
(3) The RJA may request that the attorney representing the injured
party include the amount asserted by the United States as part of
special damages. The injured party's attorney may not represent the
United States nor may the United States pay attorney fees as this would
be in violation of 5 U.S.C. 3106. Where indicated, this arrangement
should be reduced to writing. Be mindful that the attorney's duty to
the injured party is in conflict with the interests of the United
States where the amount potentially recoverable is small in comparison
to the amount asserted by the United States. In this event the RJA
should pursue recovery independently.
(b) Careful monitoring of all assertions is required to insure
timely follow-up resulting in collection or suit where indicated.
Installation of a suspense system to avoid the expiration of the
statute of limitations is essential. Recommendations to file suit
should be forwarded by the RJA well prior to the expiration of the
statute of limitations. Within six months prior to the running of the
statute of limitations, USARCS must be notified of the status of the
claim or potential claim. Follow-up demands should precede filing suit
to create a written record of efforts to avoid suit. Personal contact
with all parties is encouraged. When represented, contact the
representative.
(c) Sources other than vehicle liability coverage should be
exhausted in cases where the amount of the potential recovery exceeds
$50,000 and the coverage is small. Coordination with
[[Page 45480]]
USARCS is required. USARCS can obtain expert witnesses for medical
malpractice cases, products liability cases, or other cases in which
another tortfeasor may be involved.
Sec. 537.11 Litigation.
(a) If a tortfeasor or insurer refuses to settle, or if an injured
party's attorney improperly withholds funds, the RJA or recovery
attorney must consider litigation to protect the interests of the
United States. Litigation is particularly appropriate if a particular
insurer consistently refuses to settle claims, or if the government's
interests are not adequately represented on a claim over $25,000.
(b) RJAs or recovery attorneys must maintain close contact with
local U.S. Attorney's Offices to ensure these offices are willing to
initiate litigation on cases.
(c) In order to directly initiate or intervene in litigation, an
RJA or recovery attorney must prepare a litigation report and formally
refer the case through the Affirmative Claims Branch, USARCS, and the
Litigation Division, OTJAG (as required by AR 27-40, chapter 5), to the
U.S. Attorney. While the RJA or recovery attorney, in conjunction with
the Litigation Division Torts Branch, should attempt to have the U.S.
Attorney's Office initiate litigation at least six months before the
expiration of the statute of limitations (SOL), the RJA or recovery
attorney may contact USARCS telephonically if SOL problems necessitate
quick action on a case. The RJA or recovery attorney should also
contact USARCS if a U.S. Attorney is reluctant to pursue an important
case. An injured party's attorney may represent the government's
interest in litigation without any special coordination.
Sec. 537.12 Settlement authority.
(a) Assertions for $50,000 or less. (1) Approval authority. An RJA
or civilian recovery attorney, if delegated authority by his or her ACO
or CPO, may compromise a collection on a claim asserted for $50,000 or
less, unless recovery action is reserved by a command claims service.
(2) Final action authority. (i) An ACO, or CPO if delegated
authority by its ACO, may terminate collection action on a claim
asserted for $50,000 or less, unless action is reserved by a command
claims service.
(ii) The foregoing authorities may waive a claim asserted for
$50,000 or less where undue hardship exists.
(iii) Determination of amount. The amount of $50,000 is determined
totaling the amounts for medical care, lost military wages, lost
earnings or government property damage arising form the same claims
incident.
(b) Assertions over $50,000. USARCS retains final authority over
assertions over $50,000. By use of the mirror file system and through a
dialogue between USARCS and the field during the course of the
assertion, USARCS will decide whether it or the RJA or civilian
recovery attorney will conduct the negotiations. To help it decide, the
RJA or civilian recovery attorney will forward a memorandum for either
medical or property recovery approval, in the format of the samples
posted at the USARCS Web site (for the address see the Note to Sec.
537.1). USARCS may waive the requirement to submit a memorandum.
(c) Appeals. (1) Assertion for $50,000 or less. Where the assertion
is made by an RJA or civilian recovery attorney, the appeal will be
determined by the SJA, the medical center judge advocate, or head of
the ACO or CPO. Otherwise, the appeal will be determined by the
Commander USARCS.
(2) Assertion over $50,000. Where the assertion is made by a Claims
Judge Advocate or claims attorney, the appeal will be determined by the
Commander USARCS.
(d) Compromise or waiver. Any assertion may be compromised, waived
or terminated in whole or in part, if for example:
(1) The cost to collect does not justify the cost of enforcement.
(2) There is evidence of fraud or misrepresentation.
(3) The U.S. cannot locate the tortfeasor.
(4) Legal merit has not been substantiated.
(5) The statute of limitations has run and the debtor refuses to
pay.
(6) Collection of all or part of the amount of funds demanded would
create inequity. The following criteria apply:
(i) Detailed information on what funds are available for recovery.
(ii) Reasonable value of the injured party's claim for permanent
injury, pain and suffering, decreased earning power, and any other
special damages.
(iii) Military, Department of Veterans Affairs, Social Security
disability, and any other government benefits accruing to the injured
party.
(iv) Probability and amount of future medical expenses of the
government and the injured party.
(v) Present and prospective assets, income, and obligations of the
injured party and those dependent on him or her.
(vi) The financial condition of the debtor.
(vii) The degree and nature of contributory negligence on the part
of the injured party in causing his injury or death. (viii) The
percentage of attorney's fees that his attorney is willing to reduce.
(ix) The willingness of the tortfeasor to enter into an installment
agreement.
(e) Releases. The RJA or recovery attorney may execute a release
for affirmative claims in the pre-litigation stage acknowledging that
the government has received payment in full of the amount asserted or
the compromised amount agreed upon, or the final installment payment.
The format of the release should be similar to the sample posted at the
USARCS Web site (for the address see the Note to Sec. 537.1). However,
the RJA or recovery attorney may not execute either an indemnity
agreement or a release which prejudices the government's right to
recover on other claims arising out of the same incident without the
approval of USARCS. In addition, the RJA or recovery attorney may not
execute a release that purports to release any claim that the injured
party may have other than for medical care furnished or to be furnished
by the United States. The RJA or recovery attorney will not execute a
release if the government's claim is waived or terminated.
Sec. 537.13 Enforcement of assertions.
Meritorious assertions that do not result in collections should be
enforced as follows:
(a) Where the debtor is a business or corporation otherwise
financially capable the RJA or equivalent should forward a
recommendation to bring suit or intervene in an existing suit
regardless of the amount of the debt. As authorized by 28 U.S.C. 3011,
the demand amount in the complaint shall include an additional 10% of
the original claimed amount, to cover the administrative costs of
processing and handling the enforcement of the debt.
(b) Where the debtor is an individual rather than a business, an
asset determination should be made both as to existing assets or
prospective earnings. If the injured party's attorney has made an
assets search which is reliable, review the search before requesting a
new one. Such a search can be paid for out of existing collections.
(1) If the debtor has assets refer to USARCS for transfer to a debt
collection contractor or an agency debt collection center as determined
by USARCS.
(2) If the debtor has no assets, but prospective future earnings,
RJA may seek a confession of judgment and maintain contact with the
debtor for
[[Page 45481]]
future collection where authorized by state law and filing of suit is
not required. If the amount is less then $5,000, enter into an
installment payment arrangement.
Sec. 537.14 Depositing of collections
(a) Depositing property damage recovery. (1) Machines, supplies,
watercraft, aircraft, vehicles other than General Services
Administration-owned. Recovered money must be deposited into the
General Treasury Account 21R3019. This account remains the same every
fiscal year. It was established in accordance with 31 U.S.C. 3302(b)
and by Comptroller General decision B-205508, 64 Comp. Gen. 431.
(2) Real property. Collection for damage to real property must be
deposited into an escrow account on behalf of the installation or
activity at which the loss occurred. This escrow account must be set up
at the request of the command claims service, ACO or CPO with the local
finance office or resource management office with responsibility for
department of engineering and housing or department of public works
funds. The escrow account must be set up and managed by the department
of engineering and housing or the department of public works to (1)
temporarily hold deposits, and (2) to ``roll over'' deposits each
fiscal year in order to avoid reversion of these deposits to the
General Treasury at the end of each fiscal year. If the escrow account
is not set up and managed in this manner it is operating in violation
of 10 U.S.C. 2782.
(3) NAFI property. The Risk Management Program (RIMP) often
reimburses local NAFIs for property loss or damage to facilitate return
of equipment to daily use. When money is recovered from tortfeasors and
their insurance carriers contact the NAFI involved for instructions on
the current procedures as to where the recovered money is to be
forwarded and deposited.
(4) Army Stock Fund or Defense Business Operations Fund property.
Monies recovered for damage to property belonging to one of these funds
will be returned to that fund unless the fund has charged the cost of
repair or replacement to an appropriated fund account. The Defense
Business Operations Fund replaced the Army Industrial Fund.
(5) Government housing in cases of abuse or neglect by soldiers or
families. Monies recovered for damage to government housing caused by a
soldier's abuse or negligence (or by a soldier's family member or guest
of the soldier) will be deposited into that installation's family
housing operations and maintenance (O&M) account.
(6) Government housing in cases of negligence by nonresidents.
Government housing caused by the negligence of a nonresident must be
asserted against the nonresident directly or through his/her insurer.
Settlement checks must be deposited into the real property escrow
account in accordance with 10 U.S.C. 2782.
(b) Depositing recovery of pay provided to a soldier while
incapacitated. Monies recovered for the costs of pay provided to a
soldier injured by the tortious acts of another shall be credited to
the local O&M account that supports the command, activity, or other
unit to which the soldier was assigned at the time of the injury.
(c) Depositing medical care recovery. (1) To a medical treatment
facility account. Continental U.S. (CONUS) and outside the continental
U.S. (OCONUS) claims offices, and command claims services, will deposit
money recovered from an automobile insurer for medical care provided,
paid for by, in or through an MTF to the O&M account of the Army, Navy,
or Air Force MTF that provided the care. CONUS and OCONUS claims
offices, and command claims services, will deposit money recovered from
any payor, under any provision of law, for medical care provided or
paid for by, in or through an MTF into the MTF's O&M account.
(2) Deposits when TRICARE paid directly for treatment. The account
in which to deposit affirmative claims recoveries when TRICARE has paid
directly for the medical treatment is a Defense Health Program (DHP)
account for reallocation to the services. This replaces the general
treasury miscellaneous receipts account published in AR 37-100
(obsolete). Deposit to TRICARE using this new account for recoveries
pending deposit, and recoveries for any claim settled on or after
October 1, 2002. Retroactive claims depositing is not necessary.
(3) Apportionment of medical care recovery between accounts. Claims
offices will often have to apportion recovered money among different
accounts.
(i) Apportioning money between accounts. If care was provided by an
MTF and paid for by or through the MTF and/or directly by TRICARE and/
or a unit account for military lost wages if any, and the amount
recovered is less than the amount asserted, deposit a prorated amount
of money into each TRICARE account.
(ii) Apportioning money between two or more medical treatment
facility accounts. If care was provided by two or more MTFs and the
claims office recovers less than the amount asserted, the claims office
should give each MTF a pro rata share of the money recovered. For
example, if MTF one provided $2,000 worth of care and MTF two provided
$1,000 worth of care, the claims office will deposit $800 of a $1,200
recovery to MTF one's account and the remaining $400 to MTF two's
account. Similarly, if the claims office recovers an amount less than
that asserted for medical care expenses and costs of pay provided, the
claims office should give a pro rata share of the money recovered to
both the MTF and the appropriation account that supports the injured
soldier's unit.
(d) Fiscal Integrity. Field claims offices must reconcile the
property damage and medical care recovery accounts with their servicing
defense accounting office. Field claims offices must ensure that their
deposits have been credited to the proper accounts and that these
accounts have not been improperly charged. All accounts must be
reconciled at the end of the fiscal year.
Sec. 537.15 Statutory authority for maritime claims and claims
involving civil works of a maritime nature.
(a) The Army Maritime Claims Settlement Act. The sections pertinent
to maritime affirmative claims are set out at 10 U.S.C. 4803-4804.
(b) The Rivers and Harbors Act. The section of the Act pertinent to
affirmative claims involving civil works of a maritime nature is set
out at 33 U.S.C. 408.
Sec. 537.16 Scope for maritime claims.
The Army Maritime Claims Settlement Act (10 U.S.C. 4803-4804)
applies worldwide and includes claims that arise on high seas or within
the territorial waters of a foreign country.
(a) 10 U.S.C. 4803 provides for agency settlement or compromise of
claims for damage to:
(1) DA-accountable properties of a kind that are within the Federal
maritime jurisdiction.
(2) Property under the DA's jurisdiction or DA property damaged by
a vessel or floating object.
(b) 10 U.S.C. 4804 provides for the settlement or compromise of
claims in any amount for salvage services (including contract salvage
and towage) performed by the DA. Claims for salvage services are based
upon labor cost, per diem rates for the use of salvage vessels and
other equipment, and repair or
[[Page 45482]]
replacement costs for materials and equipment damaged or lost during
the salvage operation. The sum claimed is usually intended to
compensate the United States for operational costs only, reserving,
however, the government's right to assert a claim on a salvage bonus
basis in accordance with commercial practice.
(c) The United States has three years from the date a maritime
claim accrues under this section to file suit against the responsible
party or parties.
Sec. 537.17 Scope for civil works claims of maritime nature.
Under the River and Harbors Act (33 U.S.C. 408), the United States
has the right to recover fines, penalties, forfeitures and other
special remedies in addition to compensation for damage to civil works
structures such as a lock or dam. However, claims arising under 10
U.S.C. 4804 are limited to recovery of actual damage to Corps of
Engineers (COE) civil works structures.
Sec. 537.18 Settlement authority for maritime claims.
(a) The Secretary of the Army, the Army General Counsel as designee
of the Secretary, or other designee of the Secretary may compromise an
affirmative claim brought by the United States in any amount. A claim
settled or compromised in a net amount exceeding $500,000 will be
investigated and processed and, if approved by the Secretary of the
Army or his or her designee, certified to Congress for final approval.
(b) TJAG, TAJAG, the Commander USARCS, the Chief Counsel COE, or
Division or District Counsel Offices may settle or compromise and
receive payment on a claim by the United States under this part if the
amount to be received does not exceed $100,000. These authorities may
also terminate collection of claims for the convenience of the
government in accordance with the standards specified by the DOJ.
(c) An SJA or a chief of a command claims service and heads of ACOs
may receive payment for the full amount of a claim not exceeding
$100,000, or compromise any claim in which the amount to be recovered
does not exceed $50,000 and the amount claimed does not exceed
$100,000.
(d) Any money collected under this authority shall be deposited
into the U.S. General Treasury, except that money collected on civil
works claims in favor of the United States pursuant to 33 U.S.C. 408
``shall be placed to the credit of the appropriation for the
improvement of the harbor or waterway in which the damage occurred * *
*'' (33 U.S.C. 412; 33 U.S.C. 571).
Sec. 537.19 Demands arising from maritime claims.
(a) It is essential that Army claims personnel demand payment, or
notify the party involved of the Army's intention to make such demands,
as soon as possible following receipt of information of damage to Army
property where the party's legal liability to respond exists or might
exist. Except as provided below pertaining to admiralty claims and
claims for damage to civil works in favor of the United States pursuant
to 33 U.S.C. 408, copies of the initial demand or written notice of
intention to issue a demand letter, as well as copies of subsequent
correspondence, will be provided promptly to the Commander USARCS, who
will monitor the progress of such claims.
(b) Subject to limitation of settlement authority, demands for
admiralty claims and civil works damages in favor of the United States
pursuant to 33 U.S.C. 408 may be asserted, regardless of amount, by the
Chief Counsel COE, or his designees in COE Division or District Counsel
offices.
(c) Where, in response to any demand, a respondent denies
liability, fails to respond within a reasonable period, or offers a
compromise settlement, the file will be promptly forwarded to the
Commander USARCS, except in those cases in which a proposed compromise
settlement is deemed acceptable and the claim is otherwise within the
authority delegated in Sec. 537.18 of this part. Files for admiralty
claims and civil works claims in favor of the United States pursuant to
33 U.S.C. 408 will be promptly forwarded to the United States
Department of Justice.
Sec. 537.20 Certification to Congress.
Admiralty claims, including claims for damage to civil works in
favor of the United States pursuant to 33 U.S.C. 408, proposed for
settlement or compromise in a net amount exceeding $100,000 will be
submitted through the Commander USARCS to the Secretary of the Army for
approval and if in excess of $500,000 for certification to Congress for
final approval.
[FR Doc. E6-12974 Filed 8-8-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-P