Sacramento Municipal Utility District, Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station; Notice of Receipt and Availability for Comment of License Termination Plan, 45585-45586 [E6-12926]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 153 / Wednesday, August 9, 2006 / Notices
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50–244; Renewed License No.
DPR–18]
In the Matter of R.E. Ginna Nuclear
Power Plant, LLC (R.E. Ginna Nuclear
Power Plant); Order Approving
Application Regarding Proposed
Corporate Merger
I.
R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant, LLC
(Ginna LLC or the licensee) is the holder
of Renewed Facility Operating License
No. DPR–18, which authorizes the
possession, use, and operation of the
R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant (the
facility or Ginna). Ginna LLC is licensed
by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC or Commission) to
operate Ginna. The facility is located at
the licensee’s site in Wayne County,
New York.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
II.
By application dated January 23,
2006, as supplemented by letters dated
April 25 and May 25, 2006, (collectively
referred to herein as the application),
Constellation Generation Group, LLC
(CGG LLC), acting on behalf of Ginna
LLC, requested that the NRC, pursuant
to 10 CFR 50.80, consent to the
proposed indirect transfer of control of
the license.
According to the application filed by
CGG LLC, Ginna is wholly owned by
Ginna LLC. Ginna LLC is wholly owned
by Constellation Nuclear Power Plants,
Inc.
As stated in the application, in
connection with the proposed merger of
CGG LLC’s parent company,
Constellation Energy Group, Inc. (CEG,
Inc.), and FPL Group, Inc. (FPL Group),
FPL Group will become a wholly owned
subsidiary of CEG, Inc. At the closing of
the merger, the former shareholders of
FPL Group will own approximately
60% of the outstanding stock of CEG,
Inc., and the pre-merger shareholders of
CEG, Inc., will own the remaining
approximately 40%. In addition, the
CEG, Inc., board of directors will be
composed of fifteen members, nine of
whom will be named by FPL Group, and
six of whom will be named by the
current CEG, Inc. Ginna LLC will
continue to own and operate the facility
and hold the license.
Approval of the indirect transfer of
the facility operating license was
requested by CGG LLC pursuant to 10
CFR 50.80. Notice of the request for
approval and an opportunity for a
hearing was published in the Federal
Register on February 22, 2006 (71 FR
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:05 Aug 08, 2006
Jkt 208001
9176). Comments and a petition to
intervene were received from the
Maryland Office of the People’s
Counsel. However, the petition to
intervene was dismissed by the
Secretary of the Commission by order
dated March 17, 2006.
Under 10 CFR 50.80, no license, or
any right thereunder, shall be
transferred, directly or indirectly,
through transfer of control of the
license, unless the Commission shall
give its consent in writing. Upon review
of the information in the application by
CGG LLC and other information before
the Commission, the NRC staff
concludes that the proposed merger and
resulting indirect transfer of control of
the license will not affect the
qualifications of Ginna LLC as a holder
of the Ginna license, and that the
indirect transfer of control of the license
as held by Ginna LLC, is otherwise
consistent with the applicable
provisions of law, regulations, and
orders issued by the Commission
pursuant thereto.
The findings set forth above are
supported by a safety evaluation dated
August 3, 2006.
III.
Accordingly, pursuant to Sections
161b, 161i, and 184 of the Atomic
Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the
Act), 42 U.S.C. 2201(b), 2201(i), and
2234; and 10 CFR 50.80, it is hereby
ordered that the application regarding
the proposed merger and indirect
license transfer is approved, subject to
the following condition:
Should the proposed merger not be
completed within one year from the date of
issuance, this Order shall become null and
void, provided, however, upon written
application and good cause shown, such date
may in writing be extended.
This Order is effective upon issuance.
For further details with respect to this
Order, see the initial application dated
January 23, 2006, supplemented by
letters dated April 25 and May 25, 2006,
and the safety evaluation dated August
3, 2006, which are available for public
inspection at the Commission’s Public
Document Room (PDR), located at One
White Flint North, Public File Area 01
F21, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor),
Rockville, Maryland and accessible
electronically from the Agencywide
Documents Access and Management
System (ADAMS) Public Electronic
Reading Room on the Internet at the
NRC Web site, https://www.nrc.gov/
reading-rm/adams.html. Persons who
do not have access to ADAMS or who
encounter problems in accessing the
documents located in ADAMS, should
contact the NRC PDR Reference staff by
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
45585
telephone at 1–800–397–4209, 301–
415–4737, or by E-mail to pdr@nrc.gov.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 3rd day
of August 2006.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Catherine Haney,
Director, Division of Operating Reactor
Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation.
[FR Doc. E6–12925 Filed 8–8–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50–312]
Sacramento Municipal Utility District,
Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating
Station; Notice of Receipt and
Availability for Comment of License
Termination Plan
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission
(NRC) is in receipt of and is making
available for public inspection and
comment the License Termination Plan
(LTP) for the Rancho Seco Nuclear
Generating Station (Rancho Seco)
located in Sacramento County,
California.
Rancho Seco was a 913–MWe
pressurized water reactor designed by
Babcock and Wilcox Company. The
Sacramento Municipal Utility District
(SMUD) shut down Rancho Seco
permanently on June 7, 1989 after
approximately 15 years of operation. On
August 29, 1989, SMUD formally
notified the NRC that the plant was shut
down permanently.
On May 20, 1991, SMUD submitted
the Rancho Seco Decommissioning Plan
and on March 20, 1995, the NRC issued
an Order approving the
Decommissioning Plan and authorizing
the decommissioning of Rancho Seco. In
March 1997, SMUD submitted its Post
Shutdown Decommissioning Activities
Report (PSDAR), in accordance with 10
CFR 50.82. The PSDAR superseded the
original Decommissioning Plan and
provided the information required by 10
CFR 50.82(a)(4).
SMUD began actively
decommissioning Rancho Seco in
February 1997, and completed the
transfer of all of the spent nuclear fuel
to the 10 CFR part 72 ISFSI on August
21, 2002. Plant dismantlement is
substantially complete and most of the
systems, structures and components that
were safety-related or important-tosafety have been removed from the plant
and shipped for disposal.
In accordance with 10 CFR
50.82(a)(9), all power reactor licensees
must submit an application for
E:\FR\FM\09AUN1.SGM
09AUN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
45586
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 153 / Wednesday, August 9, 2006 / Notices
termination of their license. The
application for termination of license
must be accompanied or preceded by an
LTP to be submitted for NRC approval.
If found acceptable by the NRC staff, the
LTP is approved by license amendment,
subject to such conditions and
limitations as the NRC staff deems
appropriate and necessary. SMUD
submitted the proposed LTP for Rancho
Seco by application dated April 12,
2006. In accordance with 10 CFR
20.1405 and 10 CFR 50.82(a)(9)(iii), the
NRC is providing notice to individuals
in the vicinity of the site that the NRC
is in receipt of the Rancho Seco LTP,
and will accept comments from affected
parties.
The Rancho Seco LTP is available for
public viewing at the NRC’s Public
Document Room (PDR) or electronically
through the NRC Agencywide
Documents Access and Management
System (ADAMS) at accession numbers
ML061460052, ML061460053,
ML061460093, ML061460095,
ML061460097, ML061460098,
ML061460100, ML061460101,
ML061460103, ML061460105,
ML061460107, ML061460109,
ML061460110, ML061460113,
ML061460116, ML061460129,
ML061460152, ML061460154,
ML061460157. Documents may be
examined, and/or copied for a fee, at the
PDR, located at One White Flint North,
11555 Rockville Pike (first floor),
Rockville, Maryland. Publicly available
records will be accessible electronically
from the ADAMS Public Library
component on the NRC Web site,
https://www.nrc.gov (the Public
Electronic Reading Room). Persons who
do not have access to ADAMS or who
encounter problems in accessing the
documents located in ADAMS should
contact the NRC PDR Reference staff by
telephone at 1–800–397–4209, or 301–
415–4737, or by E-mail at pdr@nrc.gov.
Comments regarding the Rancho Seco
LTP may be submitted in writing and
addressed to Mr. John B. Hickman, Mail
Stop T–7E18, Decommissioning
Directorate, Division of Waste
Management and Environmental
Protection, Office of Nuclear Material
Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555–0001, telephone (301) 415–
3017 or E-mail jbh@nrc.gov.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 20th day
of July 2006.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:05 Aug 08, 2006
Jkt 208001
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Claudia Craig,
Chief, Reactor Decommissioning Section,
Decommissioning Directorate, Division of
Waste Management and Environmental
Protection, Office of Nuclear Material Safety
and Safeguards.
[FR Doc. E6–12926 Filed 8–8–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 50–498 and 50–499; License
Nos. NPF–76 and NPF–80]
STP Nuclear Operating Company;
Receipt of Request for Action Under 10
CFR 2.206
Notice is hereby given that by petition
dated May 16, 2006, and its supplement
dated June 26, 2006, Mr. Glenn Adler
(petitioner) has requested that the U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
take action with regard to South Texas
Project Electric Generating Station. The
petitioner requests that NRC take
enforcement action in the form of a
Demand for Information that would
require the STP Nuclear Operating
Company (STPNOC), the licensee for
the South Texas Project Electric
Generating Station (STP), to provide
NRC with docketed copies of the
following:
• Any assessments of the safety
conscious work environment (SCWE) at
STP conducted since January 1, 2004;
• Summaries of any associated action
plans and the results of any efforts to
remedy problems revealed by these
surveys, including the following
documents mentioned at an August
2005 meeting apparently convened to
discuss the plant’s SCWE, which
contains—
—a [strengths, weaknesses,
opportunities, and threats] SWOT
analysis to assess the issues and
actions required and follow-up on
these actions to improve station
alignment,
—outsourcing lessons learned, and
—an evaluation of information
technology, supply chain, technical
training, and Wackenhut to assess
the issues and recommended
actions;
• Summaries of any associated action
plans and the results of efforts to
remedy problems revealed by such
surveys in 2001 and 2003; and
• All correspondence between NRC,
STPNOC, and Wackenhut Corporation
concerning the 2001, 2003, and 2005
Comprehensive Cultural Assessments
(CCAs).
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
As a basis for this request, the
petitioner states that NRC issued an
order in 1998 requiring STP to conduct
periodic surveys by an independent
survey research firm, after NRC found
that the licensee had violated Federal
law by subjecting four employees to a
‘‘hostile work environment’’ after the
employees raised safety concerns. The
licensee hired Synergy Consulting
Services Corporation to conduct
surveys. The Wackenhut Corporation
took over security at STP in July 2001,
after winning a 3-year contract for
security, with an option for an
additional 2 years. The petitioner
further states that in the 2001 and 2003
CCAs, Wackenhut scored poorly on
independent surveys assessing the
STPNOC’s nuclear safety culture, safety
conscious work environment, general
culture and work environment,
leadership, management, and
supervisory skills and practices at STP.
The petitioner states that the STPNOC’s
performance deteriorated below its 2001
performance and that Wackenhut’s
performance problems continued as
indicated in the 2005 CCA. The
petitioner also states that STPNOC’s
action plans apparently were not
successful in respect to Wackenhut and
other entities and it is important for
NRC to scrutinize the steps taken by
STPNOC to rectify problems identified
in the 2001, 2003, and 2005 cultural
surveys. The petitioner concludes that,
by obtaining the documents identified,
NRC will be better informed about any
improvements in STPNOC’s SCWE. The
petitioner also concludes that NRC will
be better able to assess the effectiveness
of previous redresses with Wackenhut
and other entities, for whom problems
persisted, despite STPNOC’s apparently
repeated efforts to remedy them.
The request is being treated pursuant
to Title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations Section 2.206 (10 CFR
2.206) of the Commission’s regulations.
As provided by 10 CFR 2.206, the
agency will take appropriate action on
this petition within a reasonable time. A
copy of the petition is available for
inspection at the Commission’s Public
Document Room (PDR), located at One
White Flint North, Public File Area O1
F21, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor),
Rockville, Maryland. Publicly available
records will be accessible from the
Agencywide Documents Access and
Management System (ADAMS) Public
Electronic Reading Room on the Internet
at the NRC Web site, https://
www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html.
Persons who do not have access to
ADAMS or who encounter problems in
accessing the documents located in
E:\FR\FM\09AUN1.SGM
09AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 153 (Wednesday, August 9, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45585-45586]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-12926]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50-312]
Sacramento Municipal Utility District, Rancho Seco Nuclear
Generating Station; Notice of Receipt and Availability for Comment of
License Termination Plan
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is in receipt of and is
making available for public inspection and comment the License
Termination Plan (LTP) for the Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station
(Rancho Seco) located in Sacramento County, California.
Rancho Seco was a 913-MWe pressurized water reactor designed by
Babcock and Wilcox Company. The Sacramento Municipal Utility District
(SMUD) shut down Rancho Seco permanently on June 7, 1989 after
approximately 15 years of operation. On August 29, 1989, SMUD formally
notified the NRC that the plant was shut down permanently.
On May 20, 1991, SMUD submitted the Rancho Seco Decommissioning
Plan and on March 20, 1995, the NRC issued an Order approving the
Decommissioning Plan and authorizing the decommissioning of Rancho
Seco. In March 1997, SMUD submitted its Post Shutdown Decommissioning
Activities Report (PSDAR), in accordance with 10 CFR 50.82. The PSDAR
superseded the original Decommissioning Plan and provided the
information required by 10 CFR 50.82(a)(4).
SMUD began actively decommissioning Rancho Seco in February 1997,
and completed the transfer of all of the spent nuclear fuel to the 10
CFR part 72 ISFSI on August 21, 2002. Plant dismantlement is
substantially complete and most of the systems, structures and
components that were safety-related or important-to-safety have been
removed from the plant and shipped for disposal.
In accordance with 10 CFR 50.82(a)(9), all power reactor licensees
must submit an application for
[[Page 45586]]
termination of their license. The application for termination of
license must be accompanied or preceded by an LTP to be submitted for
NRC approval. If found acceptable by the NRC staff, the LTP is approved
by license amendment, subject to such conditions and limitations as the
NRC staff deems appropriate and necessary. SMUD submitted the proposed
LTP for Rancho Seco by application dated April 12, 2006. In accordance
with 10 CFR 20.1405 and 10 CFR 50.82(a)(9)(iii), the NRC is providing
notice to individuals in the vicinity of the site that the NRC is in
receipt of the Rancho Seco LTP, and will accept comments from affected
parties.
The Rancho Seco LTP is available for public viewing at the NRC's
Public Document Room (PDR) or electronically through the NRC Agencywide
Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) at accession numbers
ML061460052, ML061460053, ML061460093, ML061460095, ML061460097,
ML061460098, ML061460100, ML061460101, ML061460103, ML061460105,
ML061460107, ML061460109, ML061460110, ML061460113, ML061460116,
ML061460129, ML061460152, ML061460154, ML061460157. Documents may be
examined, and/or copied for a fee, at the PDR, located at One White
Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville, Maryland.
Publicly available records will be accessible electronically from the
ADAMS Public Library component on the NRC Web site, https://www.nrc.gov
(the Public Electronic Reading Room). Persons who do not have access to
ADAMS or who encounter problems in accessing the documents located in
ADAMS should contact the NRC PDR Reference staff by telephone at 1-800-
397-4209, or 301-415-4737, or by E-mail at pdr@nrc.gov.
Comments regarding the Rancho Seco LTP may be submitted in writing
and addressed to Mr. John B. Hickman, Mail Stop T-7E18, Decommissioning
Directorate, Division of Waste Management and Environmental Protection,
Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, telephone (301) 415-
3017 or E-mail jbh@nrc.gov.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 20th day of July 2006.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Claudia Craig,
Chief, Reactor Decommissioning Section, Decommissioning Directorate,
Division of Waste Management and Environmental Protection, Office of
Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards.
[FR Doc. E6-12926 Filed 8-8-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P