STP Nuclear Operating Company; Receipt of Request for Action Under 10 CFR 2.206, 45586-45587 [E6-12912]
Download as PDF
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
45586
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 153 / Wednesday, August 9, 2006 / Notices
termination of their license. The
application for termination of license
must be accompanied or preceded by an
LTP to be submitted for NRC approval.
If found acceptable by the NRC staff, the
LTP is approved by license amendment,
subject to such conditions and
limitations as the NRC staff deems
appropriate and necessary. SMUD
submitted the proposed LTP for Rancho
Seco by application dated April 12,
2006. In accordance with 10 CFR
20.1405 and 10 CFR 50.82(a)(9)(iii), the
NRC is providing notice to individuals
in the vicinity of the site that the NRC
is in receipt of the Rancho Seco LTP,
and will accept comments from affected
parties.
The Rancho Seco LTP is available for
public viewing at the NRC’s Public
Document Room (PDR) or electronically
through the NRC Agencywide
Documents Access and Management
System (ADAMS) at accession numbers
ML061460052, ML061460053,
ML061460093, ML061460095,
ML061460097, ML061460098,
ML061460100, ML061460101,
ML061460103, ML061460105,
ML061460107, ML061460109,
ML061460110, ML061460113,
ML061460116, ML061460129,
ML061460152, ML061460154,
ML061460157. Documents may be
examined, and/or copied for a fee, at the
PDR, located at One White Flint North,
11555 Rockville Pike (first floor),
Rockville, Maryland. Publicly available
records will be accessible electronically
from the ADAMS Public Library
component on the NRC Web site,
https://www.nrc.gov (the Public
Electronic Reading Room). Persons who
do not have access to ADAMS or who
encounter problems in accessing the
documents located in ADAMS should
contact the NRC PDR Reference staff by
telephone at 1–800–397–4209, or 301–
415–4737, or by E-mail at pdr@nrc.gov.
Comments regarding the Rancho Seco
LTP may be submitted in writing and
addressed to Mr. John B. Hickman, Mail
Stop T–7E18, Decommissioning
Directorate, Division of Waste
Management and Environmental
Protection, Office of Nuclear Material
Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555–0001, telephone (301) 415–
3017 or E-mail jbh@nrc.gov.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 20th day
of July 2006.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:05 Aug 08, 2006
Jkt 208001
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Claudia Craig,
Chief, Reactor Decommissioning Section,
Decommissioning Directorate, Division of
Waste Management and Environmental
Protection, Office of Nuclear Material Safety
and Safeguards.
[FR Doc. E6–12926 Filed 8–8–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 50–498 and 50–499; License
Nos. NPF–76 and NPF–80]
STP Nuclear Operating Company;
Receipt of Request for Action Under 10
CFR 2.206
Notice is hereby given that by petition
dated May 16, 2006, and its supplement
dated June 26, 2006, Mr. Glenn Adler
(petitioner) has requested that the U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
take action with regard to South Texas
Project Electric Generating Station. The
petitioner requests that NRC take
enforcement action in the form of a
Demand for Information that would
require the STP Nuclear Operating
Company (STPNOC), the licensee for
the South Texas Project Electric
Generating Station (STP), to provide
NRC with docketed copies of the
following:
• Any assessments of the safety
conscious work environment (SCWE) at
STP conducted since January 1, 2004;
• Summaries of any associated action
plans and the results of any efforts to
remedy problems revealed by these
surveys, including the following
documents mentioned at an August
2005 meeting apparently convened to
discuss the plant’s SCWE, which
contains—
—a [strengths, weaknesses,
opportunities, and threats] SWOT
analysis to assess the issues and
actions required and follow-up on
these actions to improve station
alignment,
—outsourcing lessons learned, and
—an evaluation of information
technology, supply chain, technical
training, and Wackenhut to assess
the issues and recommended
actions;
• Summaries of any associated action
plans and the results of efforts to
remedy problems revealed by such
surveys in 2001 and 2003; and
• All correspondence between NRC,
STPNOC, and Wackenhut Corporation
concerning the 2001, 2003, and 2005
Comprehensive Cultural Assessments
(CCAs).
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
As a basis for this request, the
petitioner states that NRC issued an
order in 1998 requiring STP to conduct
periodic surveys by an independent
survey research firm, after NRC found
that the licensee had violated Federal
law by subjecting four employees to a
‘‘hostile work environment’’ after the
employees raised safety concerns. The
licensee hired Synergy Consulting
Services Corporation to conduct
surveys. The Wackenhut Corporation
took over security at STP in July 2001,
after winning a 3-year contract for
security, with an option for an
additional 2 years. The petitioner
further states that in the 2001 and 2003
CCAs, Wackenhut scored poorly on
independent surveys assessing the
STPNOC’s nuclear safety culture, safety
conscious work environment, general
culture and work environment,
leadership, management, and
supervisory skills and practices at STP.
The petitioner states that the STPNOC’s
performance deteriorated below its 2001
performance and that Wackenhut’s
performance problems continued as
indicated in the 2005 CCA. The
petitioner also states that STPNOC’s
action plans apparently were not
successful in respect to Wackenhut and
other entities and it is important for
NRC to scrutinize the steps taken by
STPNOC to rectify problems identified
in the 2001, 2003, and 2005 cultural
surveys. The petitioner concludes that,
by obtaining the documents identified,
NRC will be better informed about any
improvements in STPNOC’s SCWE. The
petitioner also concludes that NRC will
be better able to assess the effectiveness
of previous redresses with Wackenhut
and other entities, for whom problems
persisted, despite STPNOC’s apparently
repeated efforts to remedy them.
The request is being treated pursuant
to Title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations Section 2.206 (10 CFR
2.206) of the Commission’s regulations.
As provided by 10 CFR 2.206, the
agency will take appropriate action on
this petition within a reasonable time. A
copy of the petition is available for
inspection at the Commission’s Public
Document Room (PDR), located at One
White Flint North, Public File Area O1
F21, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor),
Rockville, Maryland. Publicly available
records will be accessible from the
Agencywide Documents Access and
Management System (ADAMS) Public
Electronic Reading Room on the Internet
at the NRC Web site, https://
www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html.
Persons who do not have access to
ADAMS or who encounter problems in
accessing the documents located in
E:\FR\FM\09AUN1.SGM
09AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 153 / Wednesday, August 9, 2006 / Notices
ADAMS should contact the NRC PDR
Reference staff by telephone at 1–800–
397–4209 or 301–415–4737, or by e-mail
to pdr@nrc.gov.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 31st day
of July 2006.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
J.E. Dyer,
Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation.
[FR Doc. E6–12912 Filed 8–8–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste,
Meetings of the ACNW Ad Hoc
Subcommittee on Waste Management
and the ACNW Full Committee; Notice
of Meeting
The ACNW Ad Hoc Subcommittee on
Waste Management will hold a meeting
on August 15–16, 2006, Room T–2B3,
11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville,
Maryland.
The entire meeting will be open to
public attendance.
The agenda for the subject meeting
shall be as follows:
Tuesday and Wednesday, August 15–
16, 2006—8:30 a.m. until the conclusion
of business.
The Ad Hoc Subcommittee will
discuss the following proposed ACNW
reports:
(1) Draft Standard Review Plan for
Waste Determinations.
(2) Predicting the Performance of
Cementitious Barriers.
(3) Draft Rule/Guidance on Preventing
Legacy Sites.
(4) Dry Cask Storage PRA.
The Ad Hoc Subcommittee will gather
information, analyze relevant issues and
facts, and formulate proposed positions
and actions, as appropriate, for
deliberation by the full Committee on
Thursday, August 17, 2006.
Members of the public desiring to
provide oral statements and/or written
comments should notify the Designated
Federal Official, Mr. Antonio F. Dias
(telephone 301–415–6805) five days
prior to the meeting, if possible, so that
appropriate arrangements can be made.
Electronic recordings will be permitted.
Thursday, August 17, 2006—8:30 a.m.
until the conclusion of business.
The full Committee will discuss and
approve the proposed ACNW reports
noted above.
Procedures for the conduct of and
participation in ACNW meetings were
published in the Federal Register on
October 11, 2005 (70 FR 59081). In
accordance with these procedures, oral
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:05 Aug 08, 2006
Jkt 208001
45587
or written statements may be presented
by members of the public. Electronic
recordings will be permitted only
during those portions of the meeting
that are open to the public. Persons
desiring to make oral statements should
notify Mr. Antonio F. Dias (telephone
301–415–6805), between 8:15 a.m. and
5 p.m. ET, as far in advance as
practicable so that appropriate
arrangements can be made to schedule
the necessary time during the meeting
for such statements. Use of still, motion
picture, and television cameras during
this meeting will be limited to selected
portions of the meeting as determined
by the ACNW Chairman. Information
regarding the time to be set aside for
taking pictures may be obtained by
contacting the ACNW office prior to the
meeting. In view of the possibility that
the schedule for ACNW meetings may
be adjusted by the Chairman as
necessary to facilitate the conduct of the
meeting, persons planning to attend
should notify Mr. Dias as to their
particular needs.
Further information regarding this
meeting can be obtained by contacting
the Designated Federal Official between
7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. (ET). Persons
planning to attend this meeting are
urged to contact the above named
individual at least two working days
prior to the meeting to be advised of any
potential changes to the agenda.
The Subcommittee will hear
presentations from the Nuclear Energy
Institute, the PWR Owners Group and
several PWR sump screen vendors
concerning their response to GSI–191
issues, including sump screen designs
and testing, chemical effects, and
downstream effects. The Subcommittee
will also hear presentations by and hold
discussions with representatives of the
NRC staff, their contractors and other
interested persons regarding this matter.
The Subcommittee will gather
information, analyze relevant issues and
facts, and formulate proposed positions
and actions, as appropriate, for
deliberation by the full Committee.
Members of the public desiring to
provide oral statements and/or written
comments should notify the Designated
Federal Official, Mr. Ralph Caruso
(Telephone: 301–415–8065) five days
prior to the meeting, if possible, so that
appropriate arrangements can be made.
Electronic recordings will be permitted
only during those portions of the
meeting that are open to the public.
Further information regarding this
meeting can be obtained by contacting
the Designated Federal Official between
7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. (ET). Persons
planning to attend this meeting are
urged to contact the above named
individual at least two working days
prior to the meeting to be advised of any
potential changes to the agenda.
Dated: August 3, 2006.
Michael R. Snodderly,
Branch Chief, ACRS/ACNW.
[FR Doc. E6–12915 Filed 8–8–06; 8:45 am]
Dated: August 2, 2006.
Michael R. Snodderly,
Branch Chief, ACRS/ACNW.
[FR Doc. E6–12914 Filed 8–8–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND
BUDGET
Advisory Committee on Reactor
Safeguards; Subcommittee Meeting on
Thermal-Hydraulic Phenomena; Notice
of Meeting
Information Collection Activities:
Submission for the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB)
Review; Comment Request
The ACRS Subcommittee on ThermalHydraulic Phenomena will hold a
meeting on August 23–24, 2006, 11545
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland in
Room T–2B3.
The entire meeting will be open to
public attendance, with the exception of
portions that may be closed to discuss
proprietary information of General
Electric and other screen vendors
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b( c)(4).
The agenda for the subject meeting
shall be as follows: Wednesday, August
23, 2006—8:30 a.m. until the conclusion
of business; Thursday, August 24,
2006—8:30 a.m. until the conclusion of
business.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Office of Management and
Budget.
ACTION: Notice of the OMB review of
information collection and solicitation
of public comment.
SUMMARY: The Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) has recently
submitted to OMB for review the
following three proposals for collection
of information under the provisions of
the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3501 et. seq).
OMB Control No.: 0348–0004.
Title: Request for Advance or
Reimbursement.
Form No.: SF–270.
E:\FR\FM\09AUN1.SGM
09AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 153 (Wednesday, August 9, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45586-45587]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-12912]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 50-498 and 50-499; License Nos. NPF-76 and NPF-80]
STP Nuclear Operating Company; Receipt of Request for Action
Under 10 CFR 2.206
Notice is hereby given that by petition dated May 16, 2006, and its
supplement dated June 26, 2006, Mr. Glenn Adler (petitioner) has
requested that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take action
with regard to South Texas Project Electric Generating Station. The
petitioner requests that NRC take enforcement action in the form of a
Demand for Information that would require the STP Nuclear Operating
Company (STPNOC), the licensee for the South Texas Project Electric
Generating Station (STP), to provide NRC with docketed copies of the
following:
Any assessments of the safety conscious work environment
(SCWE) at STP conducted since January 1, 2004;
Summaries of any associated action plans and the results
of any efforts to remedy problems revealed by these surveys, including
the following documents mentioned at an August 2005 meeting apparently
convened to discuss the plant's SCWE, which contains--
--a [strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats] SWOT analysis
to assess the issues and actions required and follow-up on these
actions to improve station alignment,
--outsourcing lessons learned, and
--an evaluation of information technology, supply chain, technical
training, and Wackenhut to assess the issues and recommended actions;
Summaries of any associated action plans and the results
of efforts to remedy problems revealed by such surveys in 2001 and
2003; and
All correspondence between NRC, STPNOC, and Wackenhut
Corporation concerning the 2001, 2003, and 2005 Comprehensive Cultural
Assessments (CCAs).
As a basis for this request, the petitioner states that NRC issued
an order in 1998 requiring STP to conduct periodic surveys by an
independent survey research firm, after NRC found that the licensee had
violated Federal law by subjecting four employees to a ``hostile work
environment'' after the employees raised safety concerns. The licensee
hired Synergy Consulting Services Corporation to conduct surveys. The
Wackenhut Corporation took over security at STP in July 2001, after
winning a 3-year contract for security, with an option for an
additional 2 years. The petitioner further states that in the 2001 and
2003 CCAs, Wackenhut scored poorly on independent surveys assessing the
STPNOC's nuclear safety culture, safety conscious work environment,
general culture and work environment, leadership, management, and
supervisory skills and practices at STP. The petitioner states that the
STPNOC's performance deteriorated below its 2001 performance and that
Wackenhut's performance problems continued as indicated in the 2005
CCA. The petitioner also states that STPNOC's action plans apparently
were not successful in respect to Wackenhut and other entities and it
is important for NRC to scrutinize the steps taken by STPNOC to rectify
problems identified in the 2001, 2003, and 2005 cultural surveys. The
petitioner concludes that, by obtaining the documents identified, NRC
will be better informed about any improvements in STPNOC's SCWE. The
petitioner also concludes that NRC will be better able to assess the
effectiveness of previous redresses with Wackenhut and other entities,
for whom problems persisted, despite STPNOC's apparently repeated
efforts to remedy them.
The request is being treated pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of
Federal Regulations Section 2.206 (10 CFR 2.206) of the Commission's
regulations. As provided by 10 CFR 2.206, the agency will take
appropriate action on this petition within a reasonable time. A copy of
the petition is available for inspection at the Commission's Public
Document Room (PDR), located at One White Flint North, Public File Area
O1 F21, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville, Maryland.
Publicly available records will be accessible from the Agencywide
Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Public Electronic
Reading Room on the Internet at the NRC Web site, https://www.nrc.gov/
reading-rm/adams.html. Persons who do not have access to ADAMS or who
encounter problems in accessing the documents located in
[[Page 45587]]
ADAMS should contact the NRC PDR Reference staff by telephone at 1-800-
397-4209 or 301-415-4737, or by e-mail to pdr@nrc.gov.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 31st day of July 2006.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
J.E. Dyer,
Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. E6-12912 Filed 8-8-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P