Rule Concerning Disclosures Regarding Energy Consumption and Water Use of Certain Home Appliances and Other Products Required Under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (“Appliance Labeling Rule”), 45371-45374 [06-6814]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 153 / Wednesday, August 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations Costs of Compliance List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety. There are about 116 airplanes of the affected design in the worldwide fleet. This AD will affect about 21 airplanes of U.S. registry. The required actions will take about 2 work hours per airplane, at an average labor rate of $80 per work hour. Required parts will cost about $8 per airplane. Based on these figures, the estimated cost of the AD for U.S. operators is $3,528, or $168 per airplane. I Authority for This Rulemaking I Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA’s authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the Agency’s authority. We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action. jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES Regulatory Findings We have determined that this AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD: (1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under Executive Order 12866; (2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket. See the ADDRESSES section for a location to examine the regulatory evaluation. VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:38 Aug 08, 2006 Jkt 208001 Adoption of the Amendment Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows: PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES 1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows: Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. § 39.13 [Amended] 2. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) amends § 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness directive (AD): I 2006–16–09 McDonnell Douglas: Amendment 39–14709. Docket No. FAA–2006–24866; Directorate Identifier 2006–NM–105–AD. Effective Date (a) This AD becomes effective September 13, 2006. Affected ADs (b) None. Applicability (c) This AD applies to all McDonnell Douglas Model MD–90–30 airplanes, certificated in any category. Unsafe Condition (d) This AD results from fuel system reviews conducted by the manufacturer. We are issuing this AD to prevent arcing on the in-tank side of the fueling valve during a lightning strike, which could result in an ignition source that could ignite fuel vapor and cause a fuel tank explosion. Compliance (e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the actions have already been done. Installation (f) Within 60 months after the effective date of this AD: Install a clamp, bonding jumper assembly, and attaching hardware to the refueling manifold in the right wing refueling station area, by doing all of the actions specified in the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin MD90–28–011, dated May 16, 2005. Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs) (g)(1) The Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested in accordance with the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. (2) Before using any AMOC approved in accordance with § 39.19 on any airplane to PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 45371 which the AMOC applies, notify the appropriate principal inspector in the FAA Flight Standards Certificate Holding District Office. Material Incorporated by Reference (h) You must use Boeing Service Bulletin MD90–28–011, dated May 16, 2005, to perform the actions that are required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of this document in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Long Beach Division, 3855 Lakewood Boulevard, Long Beach, California 90846, Attention: Data and Service Management, Dept. C1–L5A (D800–0024), for a copy of this service information. You may review copies at the Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Room PL–401, Nassif Building, Washington, DC; on the Internet at https://dms.dot.gov; or at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at the NARA, call (202) 741–6030, or go to https:// www.archives.gov/federal_register/ code_of_federal_regulations/ ibr_locations.html. Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 27, 2006. Ali Bahrami, Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. E6–12828 Filed 8–8–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–13–P FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 16 CFR Part 305 Rule Concerning Disclosures Regarding Energy Consumption and Water Use of Certain Home Appliances and Other Products Required Under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (‘‘Appliance Labeling Rule’’) Federal Trade Commission. Final rule. AGENCY: ACTION: SUMMARY: The Federal Trade Commission (‘‘Commission’’) is amending the Appliance Labeling Rule (‘‘Rule’’) by publishing new ranges of comparability for room air conditioners. The Commission also announces that the current ranges of comparability required by the Rule for water heaters, furnaces, boilers, dishwashers, and pool heaters will remain in effect until further notice. DATES: The amendments published in this notice are effective November 7, 2006. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Hampton Newsome, Attorney, 202–326– 2889, Division of Enforcement, Bureau E:\FR\FM\09AUR1.SGM 09AUR1 45372 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 153 / Wednesday, August 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations of Consumer Protection, Federal Trade Commission, Washington, DC 20580. statement that the prior ranges remain in effect for the next year. The Commission issued the Appliance Labeling Rule (‘‘Rule’’) in 1979, 44 FR 66466 (November 19, 1979), in response to a directive in the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975 (‘‘EPCA’’).1 The Rule covers several categories of major household appliances including water heaters, room air conditioners, furnaces, boilers, dishwashers, and pool heaters. II. New Ranges for Room Air Conditioners SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES The Rule requires manufacturers of all covered appliances to disclose specific energy consumption or efficiency information derived from Department of Energy (‘‘DOE’’) test procedures at the point of sale in the form of an ‘‘EnergyGuide’’ label, in fact sheets (for some appliances), and in catalogs. The Rule requires manufacturers to include, on labels and fact sheets, an energy consumption or efficiency figure and a ‘‘range of comparability.’’ This range shows the highest and lowest energy consumption or efficiencies for all comparable appliance models so consumers can compare the energy consumption or efficiency of similar models. The Rule also requires manufacturers to include on labels for some products a secondary energy usage disclosure in the form of an estimated annual operating cost based on a specified DOE national average cost for the energy the appliance uses. Section 305.8(b) of the Rule requires manufacturers, after filing an initial report, to report certain information annually to the Commission.2 These reports, which assist the Commission in preparing the ranges of comparability, contain the estimated annual energy consumption or energy efficiency ratings for the appliances derived from tests performed pursuant to DOE test procedures. Because manufacturers regularly add new models to their lines, improve existing models, and discontinue others, the data base from which the ranges of comparability are calculated changes constantly. To keep the information on labels up-to-date, the Commission, therefore, publishes new ranges if the upper or lower limits of the ranges have changed by more than 15%. Otherwise, the Commission publishes a 1 42 U.S.C. 6294. The statute also requires the Department of Energy (‘‘DOE’’) to develop test procedures that measure how much energy the appliances use, and to determine the representative average cost a consumer pays for the different types of energy available. 2 Annual reports for water heaters, room air conditioners, furnaces, boilers, and pool heaters are VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:38 Aug 08, 2006 Jkt 208001 The 2006 manufacturer data for room air conditioners indicates that ranges of comparability for room air conditioners have changed significantly since the Commission last amended the ranges in 1995. Accordingly, the Commission is amending the range for room air conditioners in Appendix E of the Rule. The new ranges of comparability for room air conditioners supersede the current ranges, which were published on November 13, 1995 (60 FR 56945). Room air conditioner manufacturers must base the disclosures of estimated annual operating cost required at the bottom of EnergyGuide labels for these products on the 2006 Representative Average Unit Costs of Energy for electricity (9.81 cents per kiloWatt-hour) that were published by DOE on March 11, 2005 (71 FR 9806).3 III. Review of 2005 Data Submissions for Water Heaters, Dishwashers, Furnaces, Boilers, and Pool Heaters Manufacturers have also submitted data for water heaters (including storage-type, gas-fired instantaneous, and heat pump water heaters), dishwashers, furnaces (including boilers), and pool heaters. The ranges of comparability for these products have not changed significantly. Therefore, the current ranges will remain in effect until further notice. Manufacturers should continue to base their cost disclosures on estimated annual operating costs specified in the applicable Appendices to the Rule. IV. Administrative Procedure Act V. Regulatory Flexibility Act The provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act relating to a Regulatory Flexibility Act analysis (5 U.S.C. 603– 604) are not applicable to this proceeding because the amendments do not impose any new obligations on entities regulated by the Appliance Labeling Rule. These technical amendments merely provide a routine change to the range information required on EnergyGuide labels. Thus, the amendments will not have a ‘‘significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.’’ 5 U.S.C. 605. The Commission has concluded, therefore, that a regulatory flexibility analysis is not necessary, and certifies, under section 605 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 605(b)), that the amendments announced today will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. VI. Paperwork Reduction Act In a June 13, 1988 notice (53 FR 22106), the Commission stated that the Rule contains disclosure and reporting requirements that constitute ‘‘information collection requirements’’ as defined by 5 CFR 1320.7(c), the regulation that implements the Paperwork Reduction Act.4 The Commission noted that the Rule had been reviewed and approved in 1984 by the Office of Management and Budget (‘‘OMB’’) and assigned OMB Control No. 3084–0068. OMB has reviewed the Rule and extended its approval for its recordkeeping and reporting requirements until December 31, 2007. The amendments now being adopted do not change the substance or frequency of the recordkeeping, disclosure, or reporting requirements and, therefore, do not require further OMB clearance. The amendments published in this notice involve routine, technical and minor, or conforming changes to the labeling requirements in the Rule. These technical amendments merely provide a routine change to the range and cost information required on EnergyGuide labels. Accordingly, the Commission finds for good cause that public comment for these technical, procedural amendments is impractical and unnecessary (5 U.S.C. 553(b)(A)(B) and (d)). List of Subjects in 16 CFR Part 305 Advertising, Energy conservation, Household appliances, Labeling, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. I Accordingly, 16 CFR part 305 is amended as follows: due May 1. Annual reports for dishwashers are due June 1. 3 Unlike DOE requirements (see 10 CFR 430.32), FTC labeling rules do not have separate room air conditioner categories for casement-only and casement-slider models. Accordingly, the FTC ranges of comparability for many room air conditioner categories are based on data that include the efficiency ratings of these specialized model types. In some cases, the minimum DOE efficiency standards for casement models are lower than that allowed for other room air conditioner models. 4 44 U.S.C. 3501–3520. PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 PART 305—[AMENDED] 1. The authority citation for part 305 continues to read: I Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6294. E:\FR\FM\09AUR1.SGM 09AUR1 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 153 / Wednesday, August 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations 45373 2. Appendix E to part 305 is revised to read as follows: APPENDIX E TO PART 305.—ROOM AIR CONDITIONERS [Range Information] Range of energy efficiency ratios (EERs) Manufacturer’s rated cooling capacity in Btu’s/yr Low Without Reverse Cycle and with Louvered Sides: Less than 6,000 Btu ......................................................................................................................................... 6,000 to 7,999 Btu ............................................................................................................................................ 8,000 to 13,999 Btu .......................................................................................................................................... 14,000 to 19,999 Btu ........................................................................................................................................ 20,000 and more Btu ........................................................................................................................................ Without Reverse Cycle and without Louvered Sides: Less than 6,000 Btu ......................................................................................................................................... 6,000 to 7,999 .................................................................................................................................................. 8,000 to 13,999 Btu .......................................................................................................................................... 14,000 to 19,999 Btu ........................................................................................................................................ 20,000 and more Btu ........................................................................................................................................ With Reverse Cycle and with Louvered Sides ........................................................................................................ With Reverse Cycle, without Louvered Sides ......................................................................................................... High 9.7 8.7 8.5 8.5 8.5 11.2 11.5 12.0 11.5 9.9 (*) 9.0 8.5 9.0 (*) 9.0 8.5 (*) 10.0 10.5 9.0 (*) 12.0 10.0 * No data submitted for units meeting Federal Minimum Efficiency Standards effective October 1, 2000. Cost Information for Appendix E jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES When the ranges of comparability in Appendix E are used on EnergyGuide labels for room air conditioners, the estimated annual operating cost disclosure appearing in the box at the bottom of the labels must be VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:42 Aug 08, 2006 Jkt 208001 derived using the 2006 Representative Average Unit Costs for electricity (9.81¢ per kiloWatt-hour) and the text below the box must identify the costs as such Appendix L to Part 305—Sample Labels * * * 3. Sample Label 6 of Appendix L to Part 305 is revised to read as follows: I PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 * BILLING CODE 6750–01–P E:\FR\FM\09AUR1.SGM 09AUR1 * 45374 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 153 / Wednesday, August 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations By direction of the Commission. Donald S. Clark, Secretary. [FR Doc. 06–6814 Filed 8–8–06; 8:45 am] Sample Label 6 * * * * * VerDate Aug<31>2005 22:30 Aug 08, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\09AUR1.SGM 09AUR1 ER09AU06.005</GPH> jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES BILLING CODE 6750–01–C

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 153 (Wednesday, August 9, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 45371-45374]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-6814]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

16 CFR Part 305


Rule Concerning Disclosures Regarding Energy Consumption and 
Water Use of Certain Home Appliances and Other Products Required Under 
the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (``Appliance Labeling Rule'')

AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Trade Commission (``Commission'') is amending the 
Appliance Labeling Rule (``Rule'') by publishing new ranges of 
comparability for room air conditioners. The Commission also announces 
that the current ranges of comparability required by the Rule for water 
heaters, furnaces, boilers, dishwashers, and pool heaters will remain 
in effect until further notice.

DATES: The amendments published in this notice are effective November 
7, 2006.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Hampton Newsome, Attorney, 202-326-
2889, Division of Enforcement, Bureau

[[Page 45372]]

of Consumer Protection, Federal Trade Commission, Washington, DC 20580.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission issued the Appliance Labeling 
Rule (``Rule'') in 1979, 44 FR 66466 (November 19, 1979), in response 
to a directive in the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975 
(``EPCA'').\1\ The Rule covers several categories of major household 
appliances including water heaters, room air conditioners, furnaces, 
boilers, dishwashers, and pool heaters.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 42 U.S.C. 6294. The statute also requires the Department of 
Energy (``DOE'') to develop test procedures that measure how much 
energy the appliances use, and to determine the representative 
average cost a consumer pays for the different types of energy 
available.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Background

    The Rule requires manufacturers of all covered appliances to 
disclose specific energy consumption or efficiency information derived 
from Department of Energy (``DOE'') test procedures at the point of 
sale in the form of an ``EnergyGuide'' label, in fact sheets (for some 
appliances), and in catalogs. The Rule requires manufacturers to 
include, on labels and fact sheets, an energy consumption or efficiency 
figure and a ``range of comparability.'' This range shows the highest 
and lowest energy consumption or efficiencies for all comparable 
appliance models so consumers can compare the energy consumption or 
efficiency of similar models. The Rule also requires manufacturers to 
include on labels for some products a secondary energy usage disclosure 
in the form of an estimated annual operating cost based on a specified 
DOE national average cost for the energy the appliance uses.
    Section 305.8(b) of the Rule requires manufacturers, after filing 
an initial report, to report certain information annually to the 
Commission.\2\ These reports, which assist the Commission in preparing 
the ranges of comparability, contain the estimated annual energy 
consumption or energy efficiency ratings for the appliances derived 
from tests performed pursuant to DOE test procedures. Because 
manufacturers regularly add new models to their lines, improve existing 
models, and discontinue others, the data base from which the ranges of 
comparability are calculated changes constantly. To keep the 
information on labels up-to-date, the Commission, therefore, publishes 
new ranges if the upper or lower limits of the ranges have changed by 
more than 15%. Otherwise, the Commission publishes a statement that the 
prior ranges remain in effect for the next year.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ Annual reports for water heaters, room air conditioners, 
furnaces, boilers, and pool heaters are due May 1. Annual reports 
for dishwashers are due June 1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. New Ranges for Room Air Conditioners

    The 2006 manufacturer data for room air conditioners indicates that 
ranges of comparability for room air conditioners have changed 
significantly since the Commission last amended the ranges in 1995. 
Accordingly, the Commission is amending the range for room air 
conditioners in Appendix E of the Rule. The new ranges of comparability 
for room air conditioners supersede the current ranges, which were 
published on November 13, 1995 (60 FR 56945). Room air conditioner 
manufacturers must base the disclosures of estimated annual operating 
cost required at the bottom of EnergyGuide labels for these products on 
the 2006 Representative Average Unit Costs of Energy for electricity 
(9.81 cents per kiloWatt-hour) that were published by DOE on March 11, 
2005 (71 FR 9806).\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ Unlike DOE requirements (see 10 CFR 430.32), FTC labeling 
rules do not have separate room air conditioner categories for 
casement-only and casement-slider models. Accordingly, the FTC 
ranges of comparability for many room air conditioner categories are 
based on data that include the efficiency ratings of these 
specialized model types. In some cases, the minimum DOE efficiency 
standards for casement models are lower than that allowed for other 
room air conditioner models.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Review of 2005 Data Submissions for Water Heaters, Dishwashers, 
Furnaces, Boilers, and Pool Heaters

    Manufacturers have also submitted data for water heaters (including 
storage-type, gas-fired instantaneous, and heat pump water heaters), 
dishwashers, furnaces (including boilers), and pool heaters. The ranges 
of comparability for these products have not changed significantly. 
Therefore, the current ranges will remain in effect until further 
notice. Manufacturers should continue to base their cost disclosures on 
estimated annual operating costs specified in the applicable Appendices 
to the Rule.

IV. Administrative Procedure Act

    The amendments published in this notice involve routine, technical 
and minor, or conforming changes to the labeling requirements in the 
Rule. These technical amendments merely provide a routine change to the 
range and cost information required on EnergyGuide labels. Accordingly, 
the Commission finds for good cause that public comment for these 
technical, procedural amendments is impractical and unnecessary (5 
U.S.C. 553(b)(A)(B) and (d)).

V. Regulatory Flexibility Act

    The provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act relating to a 
Regulatory Flexibility Act analysis (5 U.S.C. 603-604) are not 
applicable to this proceeding because the amendments do not impose any 
new obligations on entities regulated by the Appliance Labeling Rule. 
These technical amendments merely provide a routine change to the range 
information required on EnergyGuide labels. Thus, the amendments will 
not have a ``significant economic impact on a substantial number of 
small entities.'' 5 U.S.C. 605. The Commission has concluded, 
therefore, that a regulatory flexibility analysis is not necessary, and 
certifies, under section 605 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 
U.S.C. 605(b)), that the amendments announced today will not have a 
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.

VI. Paperwork Reduction Act

    In a June 13, 1988 notice (53 FR 22106), the Commission stated that 
the Rule contains disclosure and reporting requirements that constitute 
``information collection requirements'' as defined by 5 CFR 1320.7(c), 
the regulation that implements the Paperwork Reduction Act.\4\ The 
Commission noted that the Rule had been reviewed and approved in 1984 
by the Office of Management and Budget (``OMB'') and assigned OMB 
Control No. 3084-0068. OMB has reviewed the Rule and extended its 
approval for its recordkeeping and reporting requirements until 
December 31, 2007. The amendments now being adopted do not change the 
substance or frequency of the recordkeeping, disclosure, or reporting 
requirements and, therefore, do not require further OMB clearance.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

List of Subjects in 16 CFR Part 305

    Advertising, Energy conservation, Household appliances, Labeling, 
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

0
Accordingly, 16 CFR part 305 is amended as follows:

PART 305--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 305 continues to read:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6294.


[[Page 45373]]



2. Appendix E to part 305 is revised to read as follows:

             Appendix E to Part 305.--Room Air Conditioners
                           [Range Information]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                            Range of energy efficiency
Manufacturer's rated cooling capacity in           ratios (EERs)
                Btu's/yr                 -------------------------------
                                                Low            High
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Without Reverse Cycle and with Louvered
 Sides:
    Less than 6,000 Btu.................             9.7            11.2
    6,000 to 7,999 Btu..................             8.7            11.5
    8,000 to 13,999 Btu.................             8.5            12.0
    14,000 to 19,999 Btu................             8.5            11.5
    20,000 and more Btu.................             8.5             9.9
Without Reverse Cycle and without
 Louvered Sides:
    Less than 6,000 Btu.................             (*)             (*)
    6,000 to 7,999......................             9.0            10.0
    8,000 to 13,999 Btu.................             8.5            10.5
    14,000 to 19,999 Btu................             9.0             9.0
    20,000 and more Btu.................             (*)             (*)
With Reverse Cycle and with Louvered                 9.0            12.0
 Sides..................................
With Reverse Cycle, without Louvered                 8.5           10.0
 Sides..................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* No data submitted for units meeting Federal Minimum Efficiency
  Standards effective October 1, 2000.

Cost Information for Appendix E

    When the ranges of comparability in Appendix E are used on 
EnergyGuide labels for room air conditioners, the estimated annual 
operating cost disclosure appearing in the box at the bottom of the 
labels must be derived using the 2006 Representative Average Unit 
Costs for electricity (9.81[cent] per kiloWatt-hour) and the text 
below the box must identify the costs as such


0
3. Sample Label 6 of Appendix L to Part 305 is revised to read as 
follows:

Appendix L to Part 305--Sample Labels

* * * * *
BILLING CODE 6750-01-P

[[Page 45374]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR09AU06.005

Sample Label 6

* * * * *

    By direction of the Commission.
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 06-6814 Filed 8-8-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750-01-C?>