Continuation of Antidumping Duty Order: Stainless Steel Wire Rods From India, 45023-45024 [E6-12860]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 152 / Tuesday, August 8, 2006 / Notices movement expenses (e.g., international freight) from the gross sales value. The Department clarified its ‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on Manufacturer/exporter Margin (percent) May 6, 2003 (68 FR 23954). This Atar ............................... 18.48 clarification will apply to entries of Corticella/Combattenti .. 3.32 subject merchandise during the period of review produced by companies included in these preliminary results of The Department will disclose calculations performed within five days review for which the reviewed companies did not know their of the date of publication of this notice merchandise was destined for the to the parties of this proceeding, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). An United States. In such instances, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed interested party may request a hearing entries at the All–Others rate if there is within 30 days of publication of these no rate for the intermediate preliminary results. See 19 CFR company(ies) involved in the 351.310(c). Any hearing, if requested, transaction. For a full discussion of this will be held 44 days after the date of clarification, see Antidumping and publication, or the first working day thereafter. Interested parties may submit Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 case briefs no later than 30 days after FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). the date of publication of these preliminary results of review. Rebuttal Cash Deposit Requirements briefs, limited to issues raised in case To calculate the cash deposit rate for briefs, may be filed no later than five each producer and/or exporter included days after the time limit for filing the case briefs, unless the Department alters in this administrative review, we divided the total dumping margins for this time limit. See 19 CFR 351.309(d). each company by the total net value for Parties who submit arguments are that company’s sales during the review requested to submit with the argument period. (1) a statement of the issue, and (2) a The following deposit rates will be brief summary of the argument. Further, effective upon publication of the final parties submitting written comments are results of this administrative review for requested to provide the Department all shipments of pasta from Italy with an additional copy of the public entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, version of any such comments on for consumption on or after the diskette. Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(h), publication date, as provided by section the Department intends to issue the 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash final results of this administrative deposit rates for the companies listed review, which will include the results of above will be the rates established in the its analysis of issues raised in any such final results of this review, except if the comments, or at a hearing, if requested, rate is less than 0.5 percent and, within 120 days of publication of these therefore, de minimis, the cash deposit preliminary results. will be zero; (2) for previously reviewed or investigated companies not listed Assessment Rate above, the cash deposit rate will Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b), the continue to be the company–specific Department calculated an assessment rate published for the most recent final rate for each importer of the subject results in which that manufacturer or merchandise. Upon issuance of the final exporter participated; (3) if the exporter results of this administrative review, if is not a firm covered in this review, a any importer–specific assessment rates prior review, or the original less–thancalculated in the final results are above fair–value (‘‘LTFV’’) investigation, but de minimis (i.e., at or above 0.5 percent), the manufacturer is, the cash deposit the Department will issue appraisement rate will be the rate established for the instructions directly to CBP to assess most recent final results for the antidumping duties on appropriate manufacturer of the merchandise; and entries by applying the assessment rate (4) if neither the exporter nor the to the entered value of the merchandise. manufacturer is a firm covered in this or For assessment purposes, we calculated any previous review conducted by the importer–specific assessment rates for Department, the cash deposit rate will the subject merchandise by aggregating be 11.26 percent, the All Others rate the dumping margins for all U.S. sales established in the LTFV investigation. to each importer and dividing the See Notice of Antidumping Duty Order amount by the total entered value of the and Amended Final Determination of sales to that importer. Where Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Certain appropriate, to calculate the entered Pasta from Italy, 61 FR 38547 (July 24, value, we subtracted international 1996). jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES margins exist for the period July 1, 2004, through June 30, 2005: VerDate Aug<31>2005 20:06 Aug 07, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00030 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 45023 These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until publication of the final results of the next administrative review. Notification to Importers This notice serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and increase the subsequent assessment of the antidumping duties by the amount of antidumping duties reimbursed. These preliminary results of this administrative review are issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4). Dated: July 31, 2006. David M. Spooner, Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. [FR Doc. E6–12796 Filed 8–7–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–533–808] Continuation of Antidumping Duty Order: Stainless Steel Wire Rods From India Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: As a result of the determinations by the Department of Commerce (the Department) and the International Trade Commission (ITC) that revocation of the antidumping duty order on stainless steel wire rods from India would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping and material injury to an industry in the United States, the Department is publishing notice of continuation of this antidumping duty order. EFFECTIVE DATE: August 8, 2006. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jacqueline Arrowsmith or Dana Mermelstein, AD/CVD Operations, Office 6, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street & Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–5255 and (202) 482–1391, respectively. AGENCY: E:\FR\FM\08AUN1.SGM 08AUN1 45024 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 152 / Tuesday, August 8, 2006 / Notices SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On July 1, 2005, the Department initiated and the ITC instituted a sunset review of the antidumping duty order on stainless steel wire rods from India pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 70 FR 38101 (July 1, 2005) and Stainless Steel Wire Rod from Brazil, France and India, Investigation Nos. 731–TA–636, 731–TA–637, and 731–TA–638 (Second Review), 70 FR 38207 (July 1, 2005). As a result of its review, the Department found that revocation of the antidumping duty order would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping, and notified the ITC of the magnitude of the margins likely to prevail were the order to be revoked. See Stainless Steel Wire Rods from Brazil, France and India: Notice of Final Results of Five-year (Sunset) Reviews of Antidumping Duty Orders, 70 FR 67447 (November 7, 2005). The ITC determined, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act, that revocation of the antidumping duty order on stainless steel wire rods from India would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time. See USITC Publication 3866 Stainless Steel Wire Rod from Brazil, France and India, Investigations Nos. 731–TA–636–638 (Second Review) (July 2006) and Stainless Steel Wire Rod From Brazil, France, and India (Inv. Nos. 731–TA–636–638) 71 FR 42118 (July 25, 2006). United States (HTSUS).1 The HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes. The written description remains dispositive. Determination As a result of the determinations by the Department and the ITC that revocation of this antidumping duty order would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping and material injury to an industry in the United States, pursuant to section 751(d)(2) of the Act, the Department hereby orders the continuation of the antidumping duty order on stainless steel wire rods from India. U.S. Customs and Border Protection will continue to collect antidumping duty cash deposits at the rates in effect at the time of entry for all imports of subject merchandise. The effective date of continuation of this order will be the date of publication in the Federal Register of this Notice of Continuation. Pursuant to sections 751(c)(2) and 751(c)(6)(A) of the Act, the Department intends to initiate the next five-year review of this order not later than June 2011. This five-year (sunset) review and this notice are in accordance with section 751(c) of the Act. Dated: August 1, 2006. David M. Spooner, Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. [FR Doc. E6–12860 Filed 8–7–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES Scope of the Order International Trade Administration Imports covered by this order are certain stainless steel wire rods (SSWR) from India. SSWR are products which are hot-rolled or hot-rolled annealed and/or pickled rounds, squares, octagons, hexagons, or other shapes, in coils. SSWR are made of alloy steels containing, by weight 1.2 percent or less of carbon and 10.5 percent of chromium, with or without other elements. These products are only manufactured by hot-rolling and normally sold in coiled form, and are solid cross-section. The majority of SSWR sold in the United States are round in cross-section shape, annealed and pickled. The most common size is 5.5 millimeters in diameter. The merchandise subject to this order is currently classifiable under subheadings 7221.00.0005, 7221.00.0015, 7221.00.0030, 7221.00.0045, 7221.00.0075 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the (A–428–825) VerDate Aug<31>2005 20:06 Aug 07, 2006 Jkt 208001 Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils From Germany; Notice of Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: In response to requests from Allegheny Ludlum, North American Stainless, United Auto Workers Local 3303, United Steelworkers, and Zanesville Armco Independent Organization, Inc. (collectively, petitioners) and the collapsed AGENCY: 1 The merchandise subject to the scope of these orders was originally classifiable under all of the following HTS subheadings: 7221.00.0005, 7221.00.0015, 7221.00.0020, 7221.00.0030, 7221.00.0040, 7221.00.0045, 7221.00.0060, 7221.00.0075, and 7221.00.0080. HTSUS subheadings 7221.00.0020, 7221.00.0040, 7221.00.0060, 7221.00.0080 are no longer contained in the HTSUS. PO 00000 Frm 00031 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 respondents ThyssenKrupp Nirosta GmbH (ThyssenKrupp Nirosta), ThyssenKrupp VDM GmbH (TKVDM), and ThyssenKrupp Nirosta Prazisionsband GmbH (TKNP) (collectively, TKN), the Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on stainless steel sheet and strip in coils (S4) from Germany. The review covers exports of the subject merchandise to the United States produced by TKN. The period of review (POR) is July 1, 2004, through June 30, 2005. We preliminarily find that TKN made sales at less than normal value during the POR. If these preliminary results are adopted in our final results of this review, we will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to assess antidumping duties based on the difference between the constructed export price (CEP) and normal value (NV). Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. Parties who submit arguments in this proceeding are requested to submit with the arguments: (1) a statement of the issues, (2) a brief summary of the arguments (no longer than five pages, including footnotes) and (3) a table of authorities. EFFECTIVE DATE: August 8, 2006. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Deborah Scott, Tyler Weinhold, or Robert James, AD/CVD Operations, Office 7, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482–2657, (202) 482–1121 or (202) 482– 0649, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background The Department published an antidumping duty order on S4 from Germany on July 27, 1999. See Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order; Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils from Germany, 64 FR 40557 (July 27, 1999). On July 1, 2005, the Department published the notice of opportunity to request administrative review of S4 from Germany for the period July 1, 2004, through June 30, 2005. See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity to Request Administrative Review, 70 FR 38099 (July 1, 2005). On July 29, 2005, petitioners and TKN both requested an administrative review E:\FR\FM\08AUN1.SGM 08AUN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 152 (Tuesday, August 8, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45023-45024]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-12860]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-533-808]


Continuation of Antidumping Duty Order: Stainless Steel Wire Rods 
From India

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: As a result of the determinations by the Department of 
Commerce (the Department) and the International Trade Commission (ITC) 
that revocation of the antidumping duty order on stainless steel wire 
rods from India would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of 
dumping and material injury to an industry in the United States, the 
Department is publishing notice of continuation of this antidumping 
duty order.

EFFECTIVE DATE: August 8, 2006.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jacqueline Arrowsmith or Dana 
Mermelstein, AD/CVD Operations, Office 6, Import Administration, 
International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 
Street & Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 
(202) 482-5255 and (202) 482-1391, respectively.

[[Page 45024]]


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On July 1, 2005, the Department initiated and the ITC instituted a 
sunset review of the antidumping duty order on stainless steel wire 
rods from India pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, 
as amended (the Act). See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 70 
FR 38101 (July 1, 2005) and Stainless Steel Wire Rod from Brazil, 
France and India, Investigation Nos. 731-TA-636, 731-TA-637, and 731-
TA-638 (Second Review), 70 FR 38207 (July 1, 2005).
    As a result of its review, the Department found that revocation of 
the antidumping duty order would likely lead to continuation or 
recurrence of dumping, and notified the ITC of the magnitude of the 
margins likely to prevail were the order to be revoked. See Stainless 
Steel Wire Rods from Brazil, France and India: Notice of Final Results 
of Five-year (Sunset) Reviews of Antidumping Duty Orders, 70 FR 67447 
(November 7, 2005). The ITC determined, pursuant to section 751(c) of 
the Act, that revocation of the antidumping duty order on stainless 
steel wire rods from India would likely lead to continuation or 
recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States 
within a reasonably foreseeable time. See USITC Publication 3866 
Stainless Steel Wire Rod from Brazil, France and India, Investigations 
Nos. 731-TA-636-638 (Second Review) (July 2006) and Stainless Steel 
Wire Rod From Brazil, France, and India (Inv. Nos. 731-TA-636-638) 71 
FR 42118 (July 25, 2006).

Scope of the Order

    Imports covered by this order are certain stainless steel wire rods 
(SSWR) from India. SSWR are products which are hot-rolled or hot-rolled 
annealed and/or pickled rounds, squares, octagons, hexagons, or other 
shapes, in coils. SSWR are made of alloy steels containing, by weight 
1.2 percent or less of carbon and 10.5 percent of chromium, with or 
without other elements. These products are only manufactured by hot-
rolling and normally sold in coiled form, and are solid cross-section. 
The majority of SSWR sold in the United States are round in cross-
section shape, annealed and pickled. The most common size is 5.5 
millimeters in diameter.
    The merchandise subject to this order is currently classifiable 
under subheadings 7221.00.0005, 7221.00.0015, 7221.00.0030, 
7221.00.0045, 7221.00.0075 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 
United States (HTSUS).\1\ The HTSUS subheadings are provided for 
convenience and customs purposes. The written description remains 
dispositive.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The merchandise subject to the scope of these orders was 
originally classifiable under all of the following HTS subheadings: 
7221.00.0005, 7221.00.0015, 7221.00.0020, 7221.00.0030, 
7221.00.0040, 7221.00.0045, 7221.00.0060, 7221.00.0075, and 
7221.00.0080. HTSUS subheadings 7221.00.0020, 7221.00.0040, 
7221.00.0060, 7221.00.0080 are no longer contained in the HTSUS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Determination

    As a result of the determinations by the Department and the ITC 
that revocation of this antidumping duty order would likely lead to 
continuation or recurrence of dumping and material injury to an 
industry in the United States, pursuant to section 751(d)(2) of the 
Act, the Department hereby orders the continuation of the antidumping 
duty order on stainless steel wire rods from India. U.S. Customs and 
Border Protection will continue to collect antidumping duty cash 
deposits at the rates in effect at the time of entry for all imports of 
subject merchandise.
    The effective date of continuation of this order will be the date 
of publication in the Federal Register of this Notice of Continuation. 
Pursuant to sections 751(c)(2) and 751(c)(6)(A) of the Act, the 
Department intends to initiate the next five-year review of this order 
not later than June 2011.
    This five-year (sunset) review and this notice are in accordance 
with section 751(c) of the Act.

    Dated: August 1, 2006.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
 [FR Doc. E6-12860 Filed 8-7-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P