Self-Regulatory Organizations; American Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change and Amendment No. 1 Thereto Relating to an Extension of a Pilot Program for the Fee Cap Program for Certain Options Spread Trades, 45081-45083 [E6-12839]
Download as PDF
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 152 / Tuesday, August 8, 2006 / Notices
Subcommittee of the Trade Policy Staff
Committee (TPSC) as soon as possible,
but not later than 5 p.m., September 7,
2006.
In order to facilitate prompt
consideration of submissions, USTR
strongly prefers electronic e-mail
submissions in response to this notice.
Hand-delivered submissions will not be
accepted. E-mail submissions should be
single-copy transmissions in English
with the total submission, including
attachments, not to exceed 30 singlespaced standard letter-size pages using
12-point type. The e-mail transmission
should use the following subject line:
‘‘Romania GSP Eligibility Review’’.
Documents must be submitted as
MSWord (‘‘.doc’’), WordPerfect
(‘‘.wpd’’), or text (‘‘.txt’’) files.
Documents submitted as electronic
image files or containing imbedded
images (for example, ‘‘.jpg’’, ‘‘.pdf’’,
‘‘.bmp’’, ‘‘.tif’’, or ‘‘.gif’’) will not be
accepted. Spreadsheets submitted as
supporting documentation are
acceptable as Excel files, pre-formatted
for printing only on 8 1⁄2 x 11 inch
paper. To the extent possible, any data
attachments to the submission should
be included in the same file as the
submission itself, and not as separate
files.
Submissions in response to this notice
will be subject to public inspection by
appointment with the staff of the USTR
Public Reading Room except for
information granted ‘‘business
confidential’’ status pursuant to 15 CFR
2003.6.
If the submission contains business
confidential information, a nonconfidential version of the submission
must also be submitted that indicates
where confidential information was
redacted by inserting asterisks where
material was deleted. In addition, the
confidential version must be clearly
marked ‘‘BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL’’
at the top and bottom of each page of the
document. The non-confidential version
must be clearly marked ‘‘PUBLIC’’ or
‘‘NON–CONFIDENTIAL’’ at the top and
bottom of each page. Documents that are
submitted without any marking might
not be accepted or will be considered
public documents.
For any document containing
business confidential information
submitted as an electronic attached file
to an e-mail transmission, the file name
of the business confidential version
should begin with the characters ‘‘BC-’’,
and the file name of the public version
should begin with the character ‘‘P-’’.
The ‘‘BC-’’ or ‘‘P-’’ should be followed
by the name of the party (government,
company, union, association, etc.)
which is submitting the comments.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:06 Aug 07, 2006
Jkt 208001
45081
E-mail submissions should not
include separate cover letters or
messages in the message area of the email; information that might appear in
any cover letter should be included
directly in the attached file containing
the submission itself, including the
sender’s identifying information with
telephone number, fax number, and email address. The e-mail address for
these submissions is
FR0618@ustr.eop.gov. Documents not
submitted in accordance with these
instructions might not be considered in
this review. If unable to provide
submissions by e-mail, please contact
the GSP Subcommittee to arrange for an
alternative method of transmission.
Public versions of all documents
relating to this review will be available
for public review approximately three
weeks after the due date by appointment
in the USTR Public Reading Room, 1724
F Street, NW, Washington, DC.
Availability of documents may be
ascertained, and appointments may be
made from 9:30 a.m. to noon and 1 p.m.
to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, by
calling 202–395–6186.
fee, or other charge, pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act 3 and Rule 19b–
4(f)(2) thereunder,4 which renders the
proposal effective upon filing with the
Commission. On July 28, 2006, the
Exchange filed Amendment No. 1 to the
proposed rule change.5 The Commission
is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change,
as amended, from interested persons.
Marideth J. Sandler,
Executive Director for the GSP Program,
Chairman, GSP Subcommittee of the Trade
Policy Staff Committee.
[FR Doc. E6–12833 Filed 8–7–06; 8:45 am]
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for,
the proposed rule change, as amended,
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposal. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
BILLING CODE 3190–W6–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–54261; File No. SR–Amex2006–69)]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
American Stock Exchange LLC; Notice
of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness
of a Proposed Rule Change and
Amendment No. 1 Thereto Relating to
an Extension of a Pilot Program for the
Fee Cap Program for Certain Options
Spread Trades
August 1, 2006.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on July 20,
2006, the American Stock Exchange LLC
(‘‘Amex’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I and II
below, which items have been
substantially prepared by Amex. Amex
has designated the proposed rule change
as one establishing or changing a due,
1 15
2 17
PO 00000
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
Frm 00088
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to extend its
fee cap program for dividend spreads,
merger spreads and short stock interest
spreads (the ‘‘Pilot Program’’) for an
additional six months through February
1, 2007.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on Amex’s Web site at
https://www.amex.com, at the Office of
the Secretary at Amex, and at the
Commission’s Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Pilot Program was established in
February 2006.6 The Exchange believes
that the Pilot Program has operated, as
designed, to allow the Exchange to
become more competitive with fee cap
programs in place at other options
exchanges. Accordingly, the Exchange
believes that a six-month extension is
reasonable and consistent with the
intent of the Pilot Program.
The Pilot Program amended the
Exchange’s fee cap program that limits
per trade the transaction, comparison
3 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
5 In Amendment No. 1, Amex modified the
statutory basis of the proposal from being Section
6(b)(5) of the Act to be Section 6(b)(4) of the Act.
6 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 53415
(March 3, 2006), 71 FR 12745 (March 13, 2006).
4 17
E:\FR\FM\08AUN1.SGM
08AUN1
45082
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 152 / Tuesday, August 8, 2006 / Notices
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
and floor brokerage fees (hereinafter
referred to collectively as ‘‘transactionbased fees’’) charged to specialists,
registered options traders, non-member
market makers, member firms, broker
dealers and non-member broker dealers
(referred to hereinafter as ‘‘noncustomer market participants’’) for
accommodation and spread trades.7 The
Pilot Program was put in place
specifically for option transactions that
are part of dividend spreads,8 merger
spreads,9 and short stock interest
spreads 10 and it amended the fee cap
for such option transactions in the
following manner: First, the Exchange
proposed to convert the cap on
transaction-based fees from a per trade
cap to a cap on all transactions executed
as part of these spreads on the same
trading day in the same option class and
to reduce the amount of fees charged
before the cap is applied to $1,000 per
day. Secondly, the Exchange proposed
to add a monthly fee cap of $50,000 on
transaction-based fees per initiating firm
for transactions in dividend spreads,
merger spreads and short stock interest
spreads. The Exchange proposed to
make these revisions to its fee cap
program to match similar fee cap
programs at other exchanges.11 The
Exchange implemented these two
changes for option transactions that are
part of dividend spreads, merger
spreads, and short stock interest spreads
on a pilot basis until August 1, 2006.
To date, the Exchange believes that
the Pilot Program has been beneficial to
the Exchange because it has brought
more business to the Exchange. In this
manner, non-customer market
participants are encouraged to bring
7 Accommodation trades (also known as cabinet
trades) are transactions to close out positions in
worthless or nearly worthless out-of-the-money
option contracts. Spread trades include: (i)
Reversals and conversions, (ii) dividend spreads,
(iii) box spreads, (iv) butterfly spreads, (v) merger
spreads, and (vi) short sock interest spreads.
8 A dividend spread transaction is defined as any
trade done to achieve a dividend arbitrage between
any two deep-in-the-money options.
9 A merger spread transaction is defined as a
transaction executed pursuant to a merger spread
strategy involving the simultaneous purchase and
sale of options of the same option class and
expiration date, but different strike prices followed
by the exercise of the resulting long option position.
Merger spreads are executed prior to the date that
shareholders of record in a stock subject to a merger
are required to elect their respective form of
consideration (i.e., cash or stock).
10 A short stock interest spread is defined as a
spread that uses two deep in-the-money put options
followed by the exercise of the resulting long
position of the same class in order to establish a
short stock interest arbitrage position. This strategy
is used to capture short stock interest.
11 See PCX Options Fee Schedule and Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 53171 (January 24, 2006),
71 FR 5090 (January 31, 2006) (SR–CBOE 2005–
117).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:06 Aug 07, 2006
Jkt 208001
more order flow to the Exchange
increasing competition among all option
exchanges. Accordingly, the Exchange
believes that an extension of the Pilot
Program for six months through
February 1, 2007 is warranted.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change, as amended, is
consistent with Section 6(b) of the
Act,12 in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(4),13 in
particular, in that it is designed to
provide for the equitable allocation of
reasonable dues, fees, and other charges
among its members and issuers and
other persons using its facilities.
Specifically, the Exchange is proposing
to implement revisions to a fee cap
program that is competitive with similar
programs at other options exchanges.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange believes that proposed
rule change will not impose any burden
on competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited
or received with respect to the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change, as
amended, has become effective pursuant
to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act 14
and subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b–4
thereunder 15 because it establishes or
changes a due, fee, or other charge. At
any time within 60 days of the filing of
the proposed rule change, the
Commission may summarily abrogate
such rule change if it appears to the
Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public
interest, for the protection of investors,
or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.16
12 15
U.S.C. 78f(b).
U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
14 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
15 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
16 The effective date of the original proposed rule
change is July 20, 2006, the date of the original
filing, and the effective date of Amendment No.1 is
July 28, 2006, the filing date of the amendment. For
purposes of calculating the 60-day abrogation
period within which the Commission may
summarily abrogate the proposed rule change, as
amended, under Section 19(b)(3)(C) of the Act, the
Commission considers the period to commence on
13 15
PO 00000
Frm 00089
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change, as amended, is consistent with
the Act. Comments may be submitted by
any of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–Amex-2006–69 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–Amex-2006–69. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room. Copies of such filing also will be
available for inspection and copying at
the principal office of Amex. All
comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–Amex-2006–69 and should
be submitted on or before August 29,
2006.
July 28, 2006, the date on which the Exchange
submitted Amendment No. 1. See 15 U.S.C.
78s(b)(3)(C).
E:\FR\FM\08AUN1.SGM
08AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 152 / Tuesday, August 8, 2006 / Notices
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.17
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–12839 Filed 8–7–06; 8:45 am]
concerning the purpose of, and basis for,
the proposed rule change, as amended,
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposal. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below, and
is set forth in Sections A, B, and C
below. Amex has prepared summaries,
set forth in Sections A, B, and C below,
of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–54262; File No. SR–Amex–
2006–64]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
American Stock Exchange LLC; Notice
of Filing of Proposed Rule Change and
Amendment No. 1 Thereto Relating to
a Retroactive Suspension of
Transaction Charges for Specialist
Orders in the Nasdaq-100 Tracking
Stock (QQQQ)
August 1, 2006.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on July 7,
2006, the American Stock Exchange LLC
(‘‘Amex’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) submitted to
the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items
have been prepared by Amex. On July
27, 2006, the Exchange submitted
Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule
change.3 The Commission is publishing
this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change, as amended, from
interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to
retroactively apply a suspension of
transaction charges for specialist orders
in connection with the trading of the
Nasdaq-100 Index Tracking Stock
(Symbol: QQQQ) from July 1, 2006
through July 12, 2006.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on Amex’s Web site (https://
www.amex.com), at Amex’s principal
office, and at the Commission’s Public
Reference Room.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
17 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 Amendment No. 1 replaced and superseded the
original filing in its entirety.
1 15
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:06 Aug 07, 2006
Jkt 208001
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to
retroactively apply a suspension of
transaction charges for specialist orders
in the QQQQ from July 1, 2006 through
July 12, 2006. The Exchange previously
extended the suspension of the QQQQ
from March 1, 2006 through June 30,
2006.4 The Exchange, in a companion
filing, also proposed the adoption of a
suspension of transaction charges for
specialist orders in the Nasdaq-100
Tracking Stock (QQQQ) from July 13,
2006 through August 31, 2006.5 In order
to waive transaction fees for specialist
orders in the QQQQ from July 1, 2006
through August 31, 2006, the Exchange
has proposed to retroactively suspend
transaction fees for specialist
transactions from July 1, 2006 through
July 12, 2006.
Specialist orders currently are
charged $0.0034 ($0.34 per 100 shares),
capped at $300 per trade (88,235
shares). Effective December 1, 2004, the
Nasdaq-100 Index Tracking Stock
(formerly ‘‘QQQ’’) transferred its listing
from Amex to The Nasdaq Stock Market,
Inc (‘‘Nasdaq’’). It now trades on Nasdaq
under the symbol QQQQ. After the
transfer, Amex began trading QQQQ on
an unlisted trading privileges basis.
The Exchange believes that the
retroactive suspension of transaction
charges for specialist transactions in the
QQQQ from July 1, 2006 through July
12, 2006 is consistent with the adoption
of the proposal to suspend transaction
charges for specialist orders generally in
the QQQQ through August 31, 2006.
4 See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release Nos.
53871 (May 25, 2006), 71 FR 31236 (June 1, 2006)
and 54094 (July 3, 2006), 71 FR 39135 (July 11,
2006) (SR–Amex–2006–42) (retroactively applying a
suspension of transaction charges for specialist
orders in connection with the trading of the QQQQ
from March 1, 2006, through April 5, 2006). See
also Securities Exchange Act Release No. 53701
(April 21, 2006), 71 FR 25253 (April 28, 2006) (SR–
Amex–2006–30) (suspending specialist transaction
charges in connection with the QQQQ from April
6, 2006, through June 30, 2006).
5 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 54227
(July 27, 2006).
PO 00000
Frm 00090
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
45083
The Exchange further believes that a
retroactive suspension of transaction
fees on specialist orders in the QQQQ is
appropriate to enhance the
competitiveness of executions on Amex.
The Exchange proposes to amend the
Amex Fee Schedule to indicate that
transaction charges for specialist orders
in the QQQQ have been suspended from
July 1, 2006 through August 31, 2006.
As provided in the companion filing,
the Exchange submits that a suspension
of transaction fees for specialist orders
in connection with the QQQQ is
consistent with Section 6(b)(4) of the
Act.6 Specifically, the Exchange
believes that suspending transaction
charges for QQQQ specialist orders is an
equitable allocation of reasonable fees
among Exchange members. The
Exchange believes that the fact that
specialists have greater obligations than
other members and are also subject to
other Exchange fees, in addition to
transaction fees, supports this proposal
to retroactively apply the fee
suspension.
The Exchange notes that specialists
are subject to a variety of Exchange fees
other than transaction charges, such as
a floor clerk fee, a floor facility fee, a
post fee, and a registration fee.7 In
addition, specialists and other floor
members of the Exchange are subject to
technology and membership fees.8
Certain market participants, such as
customers, non-member broker-dealers
and market-makers, and member brokerdealers, are not subject to the majority
of these fees. In addition, a specialist
unit, in order to adequately ‘‘make a
market’’ in assigned securities, must be
sufficiently staffed 9 and have adequate
technology resources to handle the
volume of orders (especially in the
QQQQ) that are sent to the Exchange.
The Exchange believes that these
operational costs borne by specialists
further support the proposal to
temporarily suspend QQQQ transaction
fees on specialist orders.
6 Section 6(b)(4) states that the rules of a national
securities exchange must provide for an equitable
allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other
charges among its members and issuers and other
persons using its facilities. 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
7 The floor clerk, floor facility, post, and
registration fees, on an annual basis, are $900,
$2,400, $1,000, and $800, respectively.
8 A technology fee of $6,000 per year is assessed
on all specialists and other floor participants at the
Exchange. Annual membership dues of $1,500 must
be paid by all members while annual membership
fees are payable depending on the type of
membership and circumstances. Non-members are
not subject to these fees.
9 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 53386
(February 28, 2006), 71 FR 11250 (March 6, 2006)
(requiring specialists to employ an adequate
number of clerks).
E:\FR\FM\08AUN1.SGM
08AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 152 (Tuesday, August 8, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45081-45083]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-12839]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-54261; File No. SR-Amex-2006-69)]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; American Stock Exchange LLC;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change
and Amendment No. 1 Thereto Relating to an Extension of a Pilot Program
for the Fee Cap Program for Certain Options Spread Trades
August 1, 2006.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on July 20, 2006, the American Stock Exchange LLC (``Amex'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and
II below, which items have been substantially prepared by Amex. Amex
has designated the proposed rule change as one establishing or changing
a due, fee, or other charge, pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the
Act \3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) thereunder,\4\ which renders the proposal
effective upon filing with the Commission. On July 28, 2006, the
Exchange filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change.\5\ The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change, as amended, from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
\4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
\5\ In Amendment No. 1, Amex modified the statutory basis of the
proposal from being Section 6(b)(5) of the Act to be Section 6(b)(4)
of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to extend its fee cap program for dividend
spreads, merger spreads and short stock interest spreads (the ``Pilot
Program'') for an additional six months through February 1, 2007.
The text of the proposed rule change is available on Amex's Web
site at https://www.amex.com, at the Office of the Secretary at Amex,
and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change, as
amended, and discussed any comments it received on the proposal. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Pilot Program was established in February 2006.\6\ The Exchange
believes that the Pilot Program has operated, as designed, to allow the
Exchange to become more competitive with fee cap programs in place at
other options exchanges. Accordingly, the Exchange believes that a six-
month extension is reasonable and consistent with the intent of the
Pilot Program.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 53415 (March 3,
2006), 71 FR 12745 (March 13, 2006).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Pilot Program amended the Exchange's fee cap program that
limits per trade the transaction, comparison
[[Page 45082]]
and floor brokerage fees (hereinafter referred to collectively as
``transaction-based fees'') charged to specialists, registered options
traders, non-member market makers, member firms, broker dealers and
non-member broker dealers (referred to hereinafter as ``non-customer
market participants'') for accommodation and spread trades.\7\ The
Pilot Program was put in place specifically for option transactions
that are part of dividend spreads,\8\ merger spreads,\9\ and short
stock interest spreads \10\ and it amended the fee cap for such option
transactions in the following manner: First, the Exchange proposed to
convert the cap on transaction-based fees from a per trade cap to a cap
on all transactions executed as part of these spreads on the same
trading day in the same option class and to reduce the amount of fees
charged before the cap is applied to $1,000 per day. Secondly, the
Exchange proposed to add a monthly fee cap of $50,000 on transaction-
based fees per initiating firm for transactions in dividend spreads,
merger spreads and short stock interest spreads. The Exchange proposed
to make these revisions to its fee cap program to match similar fee cap
programs at other exchanges.\11\ The Exchange implemented these two
changes for option transactions that are part of dividend spreads,
merger spreads, and short stock interest spreads on a pilot basis until
August 1, 2006.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ Accommodation trades (also known as cabinet trades) are
transactions to close out positions in worthless or nearly worthless
out-of-the-money option contracts. Spread trades include: (i)
Reversals and conversions, (ii) dividend spreads, (iii) box spreads,
(iv) butterfly spreads, (v) merger spreads, and (vi) short sock
interest spreads.
\8\ A dividend spread transaction is defined as any trade done
to achieve a dividend arbitrage between any two deep-in-the-money
options.
\9\ A merger spread transaction is defined as a transaction
executed pursuant to a merger spread strategy involving the
simultaneous purchase and sale of options of the same option class
and expiration date, but different strike prices followed by the
exercise of the resulting long option position. Merger spreads are
executed prior to the date that shareholders of record in a stock
subject to a merger are required to elect their respective form of
consideration (i.e., cash or stock).
\10\ A short stock interest spread is defined as a spread that
uses two deep in-the-money put options followed by the exercise of
the resulting long position of the same class in order to establish
a short stock interest arbitrage position. This strategy is used to
capture short stock interest.
\11\ See PCX Options Fee Schedule and Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 53171 (January 24, 2006), 71 FR 5090 (January 31, 2006)
(SR-CBOE 2005-117).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To date, the Exchange believes that the Pilot Program has been
beneficial to the Exchange because it has brought more business to the
Exchange. In this manner, non-customer market participants are
encouraged to bring more order flow to the Exchange increasing
competition among all option exchanges. Accordingly, the Exchange
believes that an extension of the Pilot Program for six months through
February 1, 2007 is warranted.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change, as amended, is
consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act,\12\ in general, and furthers
the objectives of Section 6(b)(4),\13\ in particular, in that it is
designed to provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues,
fees, and other charges among its members and issuers and other persons
using its facilities. Specifically, the Exchange is proposing to
implement revisions to a fee cap program that is competitive with
similar programs at other options exchanges.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\13\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange believes that proposed rule change will not impose any
burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change, as amended, has become effective
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act \14\ and subparagraph
(f)(2) of Rule 19b-4 thereunder \15\ because it establishes or changes
a due, fee, or other charge. At any time within 60 days of the filing
of the proposed rule change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such
rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
\15\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
\16\ The effective date of the original proposed rule change is
July 20, 2006, the date of the original filing, and the effective
date of Amendment No.1 is July 28, 2006, the filing date of the
amendment. For purposes of calculating the 60-day abrogation period
within which the Commission may summarily abrogate the proposed rule
change, as amended, under Section 19(b)(3)(C) of the Act, the
Commission considers the period to commence on July 28, 2006, the
date on which the Exchange submitted Amendment No. 1. See 15 U.S.C.
78s(b)(3)(C).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change, as amended, is consistent with the Act. Comments may be
submitted by any of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-Amex-2006-69 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-Amex-2006-69. This
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,
all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection
and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of such
filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of Amex. All comments received will be posted without
change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information
from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to
make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number
SR-Amex-2006-69 and should be submitted on or before August 29, 2006.
[[Page 45083]]
For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-12839 Filed 8-7-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P