Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Designation of Areas for Air Quality Planning Purposes; State of Arizona; Finding of Attainment for Rillito Particulate Matter of 10 Microns or Less (PM10, 44920-44926 [E6-12756]
Download as PDF
44920
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 152 / Tuesday, August 8, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
(iii) The applicable further provisions
of this section and §§ 3.1601 through
3.1610.
(2) For claims filed before December
16, 2003:
*
*
*
*
*
I 16. Amend § 3.1604 by:
I a. Revising the authority citation at
the end of paragraph (c).
I b. Revising paragraph (d)(1)(i).
I c. Adding paragraph (d)(5) following
the authority citation at the end of
paragraph (d)(4).
The revisions and addition read as
follows:
§ 3.1604 Payment from non-Department of
Veterans Affairs sources.
*
*
*
(c) * * *
*
*
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 2303(b)(1)).
(d) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) The plot or interment allowance is
payable based on the deceased veteran’s
eligibility for burial in a national
cemetery (or, in claims filed prior to
December 16, 2003, the deceased
veteran’s service). See § 38.620 of this
chapter.
*
*
*
*
*
(5) A plot or interment allowance may
be paid to a state in addition to a burial
allowance under § 3.1600(a) for claims
filed on or after December 16, 2003.
[FR Doc. E6–12787 Filed 8–7–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 81
[EPA–R09–OAR–2006–AZ–0388; FRL–8206–
4]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; Designation of
Areas for Air Quality Planning
Purposes; State of Arizona; Finding of
Attainment for Rillito Particulate Matter
of 10 Microns or Less (PM10)
Nonattainment Area; Determination
Regarding Applicability of Certain
Clean Air Act Requirements;
Correction
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final
action to determine that the Rillito
moderate PM10 nonattainment area in
Arizona attained the National Ambient
Air Quality Standards for particulate
matter with an aerodynamic diameter
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:43 Aug 07, 2006
Jkt 208001
less than or equal to a nominal 10
micrometers (PM10) by the applicable
attainment date. EPA also finds that the
Rillito area is currently attaining the
PM10 standards, and based on this latter
finding, EPA is determining that certain
Clean Air Act requirements are not
applicable for so long as the Rillito area
continues to attain the PM10 standards.
Lastly, EPA is correcting an error in a
previous rulemaking that involved the
classification of PM10 nonattainment
areas within the State of Arizona.
DATES: This rule is effective on October
10, 2006, without further notice, unless
EPA receives adverse comments by
September 7, 2006. If adverse comment
is received, EPA will publish a timely
withdrawal of the direct final rule in the
Federal Register informing the public
that the rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R09–
OAR–2006–AZ–0388 by one of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
• E-mail: tax.wienke@epa.gov.
• Fax: (415) 947–3579 (please alert
the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT if you are faxing
comments).
• Mail: Wienke Tax, Office of Air
Planning, Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA), Region 9, Mailcode AIR–
2, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco,
California 94105–3901.
• Hand Delivery: Wienke Tax, Office
of Air Planning, Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA), Region 9,
Mailcode AIR–2, 75 Hawthorne Street,
San Francisco, California 94105–3901.
Such deliveries are only accepted
Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. to 4:55
p.m., excluding Federal holidays.
Special arrangements should be made
for deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R09–OAR–2006–
AZ–0388. EPA’s policy is that all
comments received will be included in
the public docket without change and
may be made available online at
https://www.regulations.gov, including
any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes
information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit
information that you consider to be CBI
or otherwise protected through https://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The
https://www.regulations.gov Web site is
an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA, without going through https://
www.regulations.gov, your e-mail
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses. For additional information
about EPA’s public docket visit the EPA
Docket Center homepage at https://
www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
will be publicly available only in hard
copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Office of Air Planning,
Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA), Region 9, Mailcode AIR–2, 75
Hawthorne Street, San Francisco,
California 94105–3901. EPA requests
that if at all possible, you contact the
individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to view
the hard copy of the docket. You may
view the hard copy of the docket
Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. to 4
p.m., excluding Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Wienke Tax, Office of Air Planning,
Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA), Region 9, Mailcode AIR–2, 75
Hawthorne Street, San Francisco,
California 94105–3901, (520) 622–1622,
tax.wienke@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, wherever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Background
A. What National Ambient Air Quality
Standards (NAAQS) Are Considered In
Today’s Finding?
B. What Is The Designation and
Classification of This PM10
Nonattainment Area?
E:\FR\FM\08AUR1.SGM
08AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 152 / Tuesday, August 8, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
C. How Do We Make Attainment
Determinations?
II. What Is The Basis for EPA’s Determination
That the Rillito Area Has Attained The
PM10 NAAQS?
III. What Are the Applicable Planning
Requirements For the Rillito Area as a
Result of EPA’s Attainment
Determination?
IV. EPA’s Final Action
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background
A. What National Ambient Air Quality
Standards (NAAQS) Are Considered In
Today’s Finding?
National Ambient Air Quality
Standards (NAAQS) are safety
thresholds for certain ambient air
pollutants set by EPA to protect public
health and welfare. Particulate matter
with an aerodynamic diameter of less
than or equal to 10 micrometers, or
PM10, is the subject of this action. PM10
is among the ambient air pollutants for
which EPA has established health-based
standards.
PM10 causes adverse health effects by
penetrating deep in the lungs,
aggravating the cardiopulmonary
system. Children, the elderly, and
people with asthma and heart
conditions are the most vulnerable.
On July 1, 1987 (52 FR 24634), EPA
revised the NAAQS for particulate
matter with an indicator that includes
only those particles with an
aerodynamic diameter less than or equal
to a nominal 10 micrometers. See 40
CFR 50.6. The 24-hour primary PM10
standard is 150 micrograms per cubic
meter (µg/m3) with no more than one
expected exceedance per year. The
annual primary PM10 standard is 50 µg/
m3 as an annual arithmetic mean. The
secondary PM10 standards, promulgated
to protect against adverse welfare
effects, are identical to the primary
standards.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
B. What Is the Designation and
Classification of This PM10
Nonattainment Area?
Upon enactment of the 1990 Clean Air
Act Amendments (CAA or the Act),
PM10 areas meeting the requirements of
either (i) or (ii) of section 107(d)(4)(B) of
the Act were designated nonattainment
for PM10 by operation of law and
classified ‘‘moderate.’’ These areas
included all former Group I PM10
planning areas identified in 52 FR
29383 (August 7, 1987) and further
clarified in 55 FR 45799 (October 31,
1990), and any other areas violating the
NAAQS for PM10 prior to January 1,
1989 (many of these areas were
identified by footnote 4 in the October
31, 1990 Federal Register document). A
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:48 Aug 07, 2006
Jkt 208001
Federal Register notice announcing the
areas designated nonattainment for
PM10 upon enactment of the 1990 Act
Amendments, known as ‘‘initial’’ PM10
nonattainment areas, was published on
March 15, 1991 (56 FR 11101). A
subsequent Federal Register document
correcting some of these areas was
published on August 8, 1991 (56 FR
37654). These nonattainment
designations and moderate area
classifications were codified in 40 CFR
part 81 in a Federal Register document
published on November 6, 1991 (56 FR
56694). All other areas in the nation not
designated nonattainment at enactment
were designated unclassifiable (see
section 107(d)(4)(B)(iii) of the Act).
The Rillito planning area was among
the areas listed by EPA as a Group I area
(see 52 FR 29383, August 7, 1987) and
was designated nonattainment for PM10
by operation of law and classified
‘‘moderate.’’ In accordance with section
189(a)(2) of the CAA, Arizona was to
submit a state implementation plan
(SIP) by November 15, 1991
demonstrating attainment of the PM10
standards by December 31, 1994 for the
Rillito area.1
C. How Do We Make Attainment
Determinations?
Pursuant to sections 179(c)(1) and
188(b)(2) of the Act, we have the
responsibility of determining within six
months of the applicable attainment
date whether, based on air quality data,
PM10 nonattainment areas attained the
NAAQS by that date. The ‘‘applicable
attainment date’’ is December 31, 1994
for areas, such as Rillito, that were
designated as ‘‘moderate’’
nonattainment for PM10 by operation of
law under the 1990 Amended Act.
Determinations under section 179(c)(1)
of the Act are to be based upon an area’s
‘‘air quality as of the attainment date.’’
Section 188(b)(2) is consistent with this
requirement.
Generally, we will determine whether
an area’s air quality meets the PM10
NAAQS for purposes of section
179(c)(1) and 188(b)(2) based upon data
gathered at established state and local
air monitoring stations (SLAMS) and
national air monitoring stations (NAMS)
in the nonattainment area and entered
into EPA’s Air Quality System (AQS)
database. Data entered into the AQS
have been determined to meet federal
monitoring requirements (see 40 CFR
1 Arizona submitted a moderate area PM
10 plan
for the Rillito area on November 14, 1991. EPA
found this plan to be incomplete by letter dated
May 14, 1992. On April 22, 1994, ADEQ submitted
a revised PM10 plan for Rillito, and EPA found it
to be complete by letter dated August 18, 1994. EPA
has not taken action on this 1994 PM10 plan.
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
44921
50.6; 40 CFR part 50, appendix J; 40
CFR part 53; 40 CFR part 58, appendices
A and B) and may be used to determine
the attainment status of areas. We will
also consider air quality data from other
air monitoring stations in the
nonattainment area provided that the
stations meet the federal monitoring
requirements for SLAMS. All data are
reviewed to determine the area’s air
quality status in accordance with our
guidance at 40 CFR part 50, appendix K.
Attainment of the annual PM10
standard is achieved when the annual
arithmetic mean PM10 concentration
over a three-year period is equal to or
less than 50 µg/m3. Attainment of the
24-hour standard is determined by
calculating the expected number of days
in a year with PM10 concentrations
greater than 150 µg/m3. The 24-hour
standard is attained when the expected
number of days with levels above 150
µg/m3 (averaged over a three-year
period) is less than or equal to one.
Three consecutive years of air quality
data are necessary to show attainment of
the 24-hour and annual standards for
PM10. See 40 CFR part 50, appendix K.
A complete year of air quality data, as
referred to in 40 CFR part 50, appendix
K, is composed of all four calendar
quarters with each quarter containing
data from at least 75 percent of the
scheduled sampling days.
II. What Is the Basis for EPA’s
Determination That the Rillito Area
Has Attained the PM10 NAAQS?
The Rillito PM10 nonattainment area
is located in north central Pima County,
just northwest of the Tucson
metropolitan area in southern Arizona.2
The nonattainment area encompasses
the following nine townships: T11S,
R9E through R12E; and T12S, R8E
through R12E. The incorporated Town
of Marana with a population of
approximately 8,000 is located within
the nonattainment area. A smaller
community, the unincorporated town of
Rillito, is located in the portion of the
nonattainment area historically
associated with maximum ambient PM10
concentrations. The land use around
Rillito is predominantly agricultural.
The only major (i.e., greater than 100
tons per year) stationary point source of
air pollution in the nonattainment area
2 In a 1996 rulemaking (61 FR 21372, May 10,
1996) in which we found that the Phoenix Planning
Area had not attained the PM10 NAAQS by the
applicable attainment date for moderate PM10
nonattainment areas and thus reclassified the area
as ‘‘serious’’, we inadvertently introduced an error
into the ‘‘Arizona—PM–10’’ table in 40 CFR 81.303
by moving the entry for the Rillito planning area
from Pima County to Santa Cruz County. We are
correcting this error in today’s notice under CAA
section 110(k)(6).
E:\FR\FM\08AUR1.SGM
08AUR1
44922
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 152 / Tuesday, August 8, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
is an Arizona Portland Cement (APC)
plant. APC is permitted by ADEQ. Most
of the other stationary sources are sand
and gravel operations mining the
alluvial deposits of the Santa Cruz River
basin. The area in and around the
nonattainment area is expected to
change from rural agricultural to
residential because it will absorb
residential development from the
Tucson metropolitan area.
The Rillito PM10 nonattainment area
has one SLAMS monitor operated by the
Arizona Department of Environmental
Quality (ADEQ). Located at 8820 West
Water Street within the community of
Rillito, this monitor is approximately
0.5 miles northwest of the Arizona
Portland Cement plant. This monitor
was selected by ADEQ to represent
maximum PM10 concentration in the
area to which the public is exposed.
Table 1 summarizes the one-in-six day
PM10 data collected there from 1988–
2005.
TABLE 1.—SUMMARY OF 24 HOUR AND ANNUAL PM10 CONCENTRATIONS (µG/M3) FOR RILLITO, 1988–2005
PM10 Concentrations
Year
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
Maximum 24hour concentration
.................................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................................
Annual average
163
170
94
133
96
68
63
91
84
129
81
102
129
89
70
118
93
84
*69.2
*83.3
*39.0
37.1
33.6
27.6
28.3
36.2
38.3
41.9
32.4
37.8
* 42.1
33.6
37.1
39.5
32.2
39.1
3-year annual
average
NA
NA
*63.8
*53.1
* 36.6
32.8
29.8
30.7
34.3
38.8
37.5
37.4
* 37.4
* 37.8
* 37.6
36.7
36.3
36.9
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
* Indicates that the mean does not satisfy criteria for a complete data set.
* Values shown in bold text represent exceedances of the applicable standard.
As noted above, the 24-hour PM10
standard is attained when the expected
number of days with levels above 150
µg/m3 (averaged over a three-year
period) is less than or equal to one.
Based on the data summarized in table
1, above, we find no exceedances of the
24-hour PM10 standard for the 1992–
1994 period and thus the expected
number of days with levels above 150
µg/m3 (averaged over that three-year
period) is zero. As such, we find that
Rillito attained the 24-hour PM10
NAAQS by the applicable attainment
date (1994). Furthermore, since 1994, no
exceedances of the 24-hour PM10
standard have been recorded at the
Rillito monitoring station and thus, we
find that the area has continued to
attain, and is currently attaining, the 24hour standard.
Also as noted above, attainment of the
annual PM10 standard is achieved when
the annual arithmetic mean PM10
concentration over a three-year period is
equal to or less than 50 µg/m3. Review
of the data for calendar years 1992–1994
reveals an arithmetic average of 29.8 µg/
m3. As such, we find that Rillito
attained the annual PM10 standard by
the applicable attainment date (1994).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:43 Aug 07, 2006
Jkt 208001
Since 1994, there have been no
exceedances of the annual PM10
standard, and thus, we find that the area
has continued to attain, and is currently
attaining, the annual standard.
III. What Are The Applicable Planning
Requirements For The Rillito Area As
A Result Of EPA’s Attainment
Determination?
The air quality planning requirements
for moderate PM10 nonattainment areas,
such as the Rillito nonattainment area,
are set out in part D, subparts 1 and 4
of title I of the Act. We have issued
guidance in a General Preamble 3
describing how we will review SIPs and
SIP revisions submitted under title I of
the Act, including those containing
moderate PM10 nonattainment area SIP
provisions.
In some designated nonattainment
areas, monitored data demonstrates that
the NAAQS has already been achieved.
Based on its interpretation of the Act,
EPA has determined that certain
requirements of part D, subparts 1 and
3 ‘‘General Preamble for the Implementation of
Title I of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990’’
(57 FR 13498, April 16, 1992, as supplemented 57
FR 18070, April 28, 1992).
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
2 (of title I) of the Act do not apply and
therefore do not require certain
submissions for an area that has attained
the NAAQS. These include reasonable
further progress (RFP) requirements,
attainment demonstrations and
contingency measures, because these
provisions have the purpose of helping
achieve attainment of the NAAQS.
EPA’s Clean Data Policy is the subject
of two memoranda setting forth our
interpretation of the provisions of the
Act as they apply to areas that have
attained the relevant NAAQS. EPA also
finalized the statutory interpretation set
forth in the policy in a final rule, 40
CFR 51.918, as part of its ‘‘Final Rule to
Implement the 8-hour Ozone National
Ambient Air Quality Standard—Phase
2’’ (Phase 2 Final Rule). See discussion
in the preamble to the rule at 70 FR
71645–71646 (November 29, 2005). EPA
believes that the legal bases set forth in
detail in our Phase 2 Final Rule; our
May 10, 1995 memorandum from John
S. Seitz, entitled ‘‘Reasonable Further
Progress, Attainment Demonstration,
and Related Requirements for Ozone
Nonattainment Areas Meeting the
Ozone National Ambient Air Quality
Standard’’ (Seitz memo); and our
E:\FR\FM\08AUR1.SGM
08AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 152 / Tuesday, August 8, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
December 14, 2004 memorandum from
Stephen D. Page entitled ‘‘Clean Data
Policy for the Fine Particle National
Ambient Air Quality Standards’’ (Page
memo) are equally pertinent to the
interpretation of provisions of subparts
1 and 4 applicable to PM10. EPA’s
interpretation of how the provisions of
the Act apply to areas with ‘‘clean data’’
is not logically limited to ozone and
PM2.5, because the rationale is not
dependent upon the type of pollutant.
Our interpretation that an area that is
attaining the standard is relieved of
obligations to demonstrate RFP and to
provide an attainment demonstration
and contingency measures pursuant to
part D of the CAA, pertains whether the
standard is PM10, ozone, or PM2.5.
The reasons for relieving an area that
has attained the relevant standard of
certain part D, subparts 1 and 2
obligations, applies equally to part D,
subpart 4, which contains specific
attainment demonstration and RFP
provisions for PM10 nonattainment
areas. As we have explained in the
Phase 2 Final Rule and our ozone and
PM2.5 clean data memoranda, EPA
believes it is reasonable to interpret
provisions regarding RFP and
attainment demonstrations, along with
related requirements, so as not to
require SIP submissions if an area
subject to those requirements is already
attaining the NAAQS (i.e., attainment of
the NAAQS is demonstrated with three
consecutive years of complete, qualityassured air quality monitoring data).
Three U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeals
have upheld EPA rulemakings applying
its interpretation of subparts 1 and 2
with respect to ozone. Sierra Club v.
EPA, 99 F.3d 1551 (10th Cir. 1996);
Sierra Club v. EPA, 375 F.3d 537 (7th
Cir. 2004); Our Children’s Earth
Foundation v. EPA, No. 04–73032 (9th
Cir. June 28, 2005)(memorandum
opinion). It has been EPA’s longstanding
interpretation that the general
provisions of part D, subpart 1 of the
Act (sections 171 and 172) do not
require the submission of SIP revisions
concerning RFP for areas already
attaining the ozone NAAQS. In the
General Preamble, we stated:
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
[R]equirements for RFP will not apply in
evaluating a request for redesignation to
attainment since, at a minimum, the air
quality data for the area must show that the
area has already attained. Showing that the
State will make RFP towards attainment will,
therefore, have no meaning at that point. 57
FR at 13564.
EPA believes the same reasoning applies
to the PM10 provisions of part D, subpart
4.
With respect to RFP, section 171(1)
states that, for purposes of part D of title
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:48 Aug 07, 2006
Jkt 208001
I, RFP ‘‘means such annual incremental
reductions in emissions of the relevant
air pollutant as are required by this part
or may reasonably be required by the
Administrator for the purpose of
ensuring attainment of the applicable
NAAQS by the applicable date.’’ Thus,
whether dealing with the general RFP
requirement of section 172(c)(2), the
ozone-specific RFP requirements of
sections 182(b) and (c), or the specific
RFP requirements for PM10 areas of part
D, subpart 4, section 189(c)(1), the
stated purpose of RFP is to ensure
attainment by the applicable attainment
date. Section 189(c)(1) states that:
Plan revisions demonstrating attainment
submitted to the Administrator for approval
under this subpart shall contain quantitative
milestones which are to be achieved every 3
years until the area is redesignated
attainment and which demonstrate
reasonable further progress, as defined in
section 7501(1) of this title, toward
attainment by the applicable date.
Although this section states that
revisions shall contain milestones
which are to be achieved until the area
is redesignated to attainment, such
milestones are designed to show
reasonable further progress ‘‘toward
attainment by the applicable attainment
date’’, as defined by section 171. Thus,
it is clear that once the area has attained
the standard, no further milestones are
necessary or meaningful. This
interpretation is supported by language
in section 189(c)(3), which mandates
that a state that fails to achieve a
milestone must submit a plan that
assures that the state will achieve the
next milestone or attain the NAAQS if
there is no next milestone. Section
189(c)(3) assumes that the requirement
to submit and achieve milestones does
not continue after attainment of the
NAAQS.
If an area has in fact attained the
standard, the stated purpose of the RFP
requirement will have already been
fulfilled.4 EPA took this position with
4 Thus we believe that it is a distinction without
a difference that section 189(c)(1) speaks of the RFP
requirement as one to be achieved until an area is
‘‘redesignated attainment’’, as opposed to section
172(c)(2), which is silent on the period to which the
requirement pertains, or the ozone nonattainment
area RFP requirements in sections 182(b)(1) or 182
(c)(2), which refer to the RFP requirements as
applying until the ‘‘attainment date’’, since, section
189(c)(1) defines RFP by reference to section 171(1)
of the Act. Reference to section 171(1) clarifies that,
as with the general RFP requirements in section
172(c)(2) and the ozone-specific requirements of
section 182(b)(1) and 182(c)(2), the PM-specific
requirements may only be required ‘‘for the purpose
of ensuring attainment of the applicable national
ambient air quality standard by the applicable
date.’’ 42 U.S.C. section 7501(1). As discussed in
the text of this rulemaking, EPA interprets the RFP
requirements, in light of the definition of RFP in
section 171(1), and incorporated in section
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
44923
respect to the general RFP requirement
of section 172(c)(2) in the April 16, 1992
General Preamble and also in the May
10, 1995 memorandum with respect to
the requirements of sections 182(b) and
(c). We are extending that interpretation
to the specific provisions of part D,
subpart 4. In the General Preamble, we
stated, in the context of a discussion of
the requirements applicable to the
evaluation of requests to redesignate
nonattainment areas to attainment, that
the ‘‘requirements for RFP will not
apply in evaluating a request for
redesignation to attainment since, at a
minimum, the air quality data for the
area must show that the area has already
attained. Showing that the State will
make RFP towards attainment will,
therefore, have no meaning at that
point.’’ (57 FR 13564). See also our
September 4, 1992 memorandum from
John Calcagni, entitled ‘‘Procedures for
Processing Requests to Redesignate
Areas to Attainment’’ (Calcagni memo),
p. 6.
With respect to the attainment
demonstration requirements of section
189(a)(1)(B), an analogous rationale
leads to the same result. Section
189(a)(1)(B) requires that the plan
provide for ‘‘a demonstration (including
air quality modeling) that the [SIP] will
provide for attainment by the applicable
attainment date. * * *’’ As with the
RFP requirements, if an area is already
monitoring attainment of the standard,
EPA believes there is no need for an
area to make a further submission
containing additional measures to
achieve attainment. This is also
consistent with the interpretation of the
section 172(c) requirements provided by
EPA in the General Preamble, the Page
memo, and the section 182(b) and (c)
requirements set forth in the Seitz
memo. As EPA stated in the General
Preamble, no other measures to provide
for attainment would be needed by areas
seeking redesignation to attainment
since ‘‘attainment will have been
reached.’’ (57 FR at 13564).
Other SIP submission requirements
are linked with these attainment
demonstration and RFP requirements,
and similar reasoning applies to them.
These requirements include the
contingency measure requirements of
sections 172(c)(9) and 182(c)(9). We
have interpreted the contingency
measure requirements of sections
172(c)(9) and 182(c)(9) as no longer
applying when an area has attained the
standard because those ‘‘contingency
measures are directed at ensuring RFP
189(c)(1), to be a requirement that no longer applies
once the standard has been attained.
E:\FR\FM\08AUR1.SGM
08AUR1
44924
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 152 / Tuesday, August 8, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
and attainment by the applicable date.’’
(57 FR at 13564); Seitz memo, pp. 5–6.
Both sections 172(c)(1) and
189(a)(1)(C) require ‘‘provisions to
assure that reasonably available control
measures’’ (i.e., RACM) are
implemented in a nonattainment area.
The General Preamble, 57 FR at 13560
(April 16, 1992), states that EPA
interprets section 172(c)(1) so that
RACM requirements are a ‘‘component’’
of an area’s attainment demonstration.
Thus, for the same reason the
attainment demonstration no longer
applies by its own terms, the
requirement for RACM no longer
applies. EPA has consistently
interpreted this provision to require
only implementation of potential RACM
measures that could contribute to
reasonable further progress or to
attainment. General Preamble, 57 FR at
13498. Thus, where an area is already
attaining the standard, no additional
RACM measures are required.5 EPA is
interpreting section 189(a)(1)(C)
consistent with its interpretation of
section 172(c)(1).
Here, as in both our Phase 2 Final
Rule and ozone and PM2.5 clean data
memoranda, we emphasize that the
suspension of a requirement to submit
SIP revisions concerning these RFP,
attainment demonstration, RACM, and
other related requirements exists only
for as long as a nonattainment area
continues to monitor attainment of the
standard. If such an area experiences a
violation of the NAAQS, the basis for
the requirements being suspended
would no longer exist. Therefore, the
area would again be subject to a
requirement to submit the pertinent SIP
revision or revisions and would need to
address those requirements. Thus, a
determination that an area need not
submit one of the SIP submittals
amounts to no more than a suspension
of the requirements for so long as the
area continues to attain the standard.
However, once EPA ultimately
redesignates the area to attainment, the
area will be entirely relieved of these
requirements to the extent the
maintenance plan for the area does not
rely on them.
Therefore, we believe that, for the
reasons set forth here and established in
our prior ‘‘clean data’’ memoranda and
rulemakings, a PM10 nonattainment area
that has ‘‘clean data,’’ should be
5 The EPA’s interpretation that the statute only
requires implementation of RACM measures that
would advance attainment was upheld by the
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
(Sierra Club v. EPA, 314 F.3d 735, 743–745 (5th Cir.
2002), and by the United States Court of Appeals
for the D.C. Circuit (Sierra Club v. EPA, 294 F.3d
155, 162–163 (D.C. Cir. 2002)).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:48 Aug 07, 2006
Jkt 208001
relieved of the part D, subpart 4
obligations to provide an attainment
demonstration pursuant to section
189(a)(1)(B), the RACM provisions of
section 189(a)(1)(C), and the RFP
provisions established by section
189(c)(1) of the Act, as well as the
aforementioned attainment
demonstration, RACM, RFP and
contingency measure provisions of part
D, subpart 1 contained in section 172 of
the Act.6
Should EPA at some future time
determine that an area that had clean
data, but which has not yet been
redesignated as attainment for a
NAAQS, has violated the relevant
standard, the area would again be
required to submit the pertinent
requirements under the SIP for the area.
Attainment determinations under the
policy do not shield an area from other
required actions, such as provisions to
address pollution transport.
As set forth above, EPA finds that
because the Rillito area has continued to
attain the NAAQS, the requirement of
an attainment demonstration,
reasonable further progress, reasonably
available control measures and
contingency measures no longer applies
for so long as the area continues to
monitor attainment of the PM10 NAAQS.
If measurements of ambient PM10
concentration in the Rillito area reveal
a violation of the PM10 NAAQS, then
the State of Arizona would again be
required to submit the pertinent CAA
requirements for this nonattainment
area.7
6 In prior rulemakings involving the Clean Data
Policy and PM10, EPA has applied criteria in
addition to that of attainment of the standard. See,
e.g., 67 FR 43020 (June 26, 2002). EPA does not
believe that those additional criteria are required by
statute or are necessary for application of the policy
for PM10 areas, and does not employ them in
applying the policy to ozone and PM2.5 areas. EPA
intends to make its application of the policy
consistent for ozone, PM10, and PM2.5, and does not
intend to require an area to meet additional criteria
for PM10.
7 Note, however, that on January 17, 2006, EPA
published proposed revisions to the NAAQS for
particulate matter. See https://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/
EPA-AIR/2006/January/Day-17/. The proposed
revisions address two categories of particulate
matter: fine particles which are particles 2.5
micrometers in diameter and smaller; and
‘‘inhalable coarse’’ particles which are particles
between 2.5 and 10 micrometers (PM10–2.5). Upon
finalization of a primary 24-hour standard for
PM10–2.5, EPA proposes to revoke the current 24hour PM10 standard in all areas of the country
except in areas where there is at least one monitor
located in an urbanized area (as defined by the U.S.
Bureau of the Census) with a minimum population
of 100,000 that violates the current 24-hour PM10
standard based on the most recent three years of
data. In addition, EPA proposes to revoke the
current annual PM10 standard upon finalization of
a primary 24-hour standard for PM10–2.5.
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
IV. EPA’s Final Action
Based on quality-assured data meeting
the requirements of 40 CFR part 50,
appendix K, we find that the Rillito,
Arizona nonattainment area attained the
PM10 NAAQS by the applicable
attainment date (1994) and is currently
attaining the standard. This action is not
a redesignation to attainment under
CAA section 107(d)(3) because we have
not yet approved a maintenance plan as
meeting the requirements of section
175A of the CAA or determined that the
area has met the other CAA
requirements for redesignation. The
classification and designation status in
40 CFR part 81 will remain moderate
nonattainment for this area until such
time as Arizona meets the CAA
requirements for redesignation of the
Rillito area to attainment. See footnote
7.
EPA also finds that, because the
Rillito area has continued to attain the
NAAQS, the following CAA
requirements no longer apply: The part
D, subpart 4 obligations to provide an
attainment demonstration pursuant to
section 189(a)(1)(B), the RACM
provisions of 189(a)(1)(C), the RFP
provisions established by section
189(c)(1), and the attainment
demonstration, RACM, RFP and
contingency measure provisions of part
D, subpart 1 contained in section 172 of
the Act.
Lastly, under CAA section 110(k)(6),
we are correcting the entry for the
Rillito moderate PM10 nonattainment
area in the ‘‘Arizona—PM–10’’ table in
40 CFR 81.303 so that it is identified as
a subarea within Pima County instead of
Santa Cruz County.
We are publishing this rule without
prior proposal because the Agency
views this as a noncontroversial action
and anticipates no adverse comments.
However, in the proposed rules section
of this Federal Register publication,
EPA is publishing a separate document
that will serve as the proposal should
adverse comments be filed. This action
will be effective October 10, 2006,
without further notice unless the EPA
receives relevant adverse comments by
September 7, 2006.
If we receive such comments, then we
will publish a document withdrawing
the final rule and informing the public
that the rule will not take effect. All
public comments received will then be
addressed in a subsequent final rule
based on the proposed rule. We will not
institute a second comment period.
Parties interested in commenting should
do so at this time. If no such comments
are received, the public is advised that
this rule will be effective on October 10,
E:\FR\FM\08AUR1.SGM
08AUR1
44925
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 152 / Tuesday, August 8, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
2006 and no further action will be taken
on the proposed rule.
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993), this action is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ and
therefore is not subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget. For
this reason, this action is also not
subject to Executive Order 13211,
‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001). This action merely makes a
determination based on air quality data
and does not impose any additional
requirements. Accordingly, the
Administrator certifies that this rule
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this
rule does not impose any additional
enforceable duty, it does not contain
any unfunded mandate or significantly
or uniquely affect small governments, as
described in the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4).
This rule also does not have tribal
implications because it will not have a
substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
as specified by Executive Order 13175
(65 FR 97249, November 9, 2000). This
action also does not have Federalism
implications because it does not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999). This action merely
makes a determination based on air
quality data and does not alter the
relationship or the distribution of power
and responsibilities established in the
CAA. This rule also is not subject to
Executive Order 13045 ‘‘Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997), because it is not
economically significant.
The requirements of section 12(d) of
the National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. This rule does
not impose an information collection
burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by October 10, 2006. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this rule for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 81
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, National parks,
Wilderness areas.
Dated: July 25, 2006.
Wayne Nastri,
Regional Administrator, Region 9.
Part 81, chapter I, title 40 of the Code
of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
I
PART 81—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 81
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart C—[Amended]
2. In § 81.303, the table entitled
‘‘Arizona—PM–10’’ is amended by
revising the entries for Santa Cruz
County and Pima County to read as
follows:
I
§ 81.303
*
*
Arizona.
*
*
*
ARIZONA.—PM–10
Designation
Classification
Designated area
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
Date
*
*
*
*
Santa Cruz County:
Nogales planning area ........................................................................................
The portions of the following Townships which are within the State of Arizona and lie east of 111 degrees longitude: T23S, R13E, T23S, R14E,
T24S, R13E, T24S, R14E
Pima County:
Rillito planning area ............................................................................................
Townships: T11S, R9E, T11S, R10E, T11S, R11E, T11S, R12E, T12S,
R8E, T12S, R9E, T12S, R10E, T12S, R11E, T12S, R12E
Ajo planning area ................................................................................................
Township T12S, R6W, and the following sections of Township T12S,
R5W:
a. Sections 6–8
b. Sections 17–20, and
c. Sections 29–32
*
VerDate Aug<31>2005
*
18:48 Aug 07, 2006
*
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
*
Frm 00043
Fmt 4700
Type
*
*
Type
*
11/15/90
Nonattainment
11/15/90
Moderate.
11/15/90
Nonattainment
11/15/90
Moderate.
11/15/90
Nonattainment
11/15/90
Moderate.
*
Sfmt 4700
Date
E:\FR\FM\08AUR1.SGM
*
08AUR1
*
44926
*
*
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 152 / Tuesday, August 8, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
*
*
Procedures, Guidance, and Information
(PGI), available at https://
www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dars/pgi.
This rule was not subject to Office of
Management and Budget review under
Executive Order 12866, dated
September 30, 1993.
*
[FR Doc. E6–12756 Filed 8–7–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
48 CFR Parts 204 and 253
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
[DFARS Case 2005–D004]
Defense Acquisition Regulations
System; Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement; Contract
Reporting
Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, Department of
Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
DoD has issued a final rule
amending the Defense Federal
Acquisition Regulation Supplement
(DFARS) to update text addressing DoD
requirements for reporting of
contracting actions. This rule is a result
of a transformation initiative undertaken
by DoD to dramatically change the
purpose and content of the DFARS.
DATES: Effective Date: August 8, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Bill Sain, Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, OUSD (AT&L)
DPAP (DARS), IMD 3C132, 3062
Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC
20301–3062. Telephone (703) 602–0293;
facsimile (703) 602–0350. Please cite
DFARS Case 2005–D004.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
A. Background
DFARS Transformation is a major
DoD initiative to dramatically change
the purpose and content of the DFARS.
The objective is to improve the
efficiency and effectiveness of the
acquisition process, while allowing the
acquisition workforce the flexibility to
innovate. The transformed DFARS will
contain only requirements of law, DoDwide policies, delegations of FAR
authorities, deviations from FAR
requirements, and policies/procedures
that have a significant effect beyond the
internal operating procedures of DoD or
a significant cost or administrative
impact on contractors or offerors.
Additional information on the DFARS
Transformation initiative is available at
https://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dars/
dfars/transformation/index.htm.
This final rule is a result of the
DFARS Transformation initiative. The
rule removes DFARS text addressing
internal DoD requirements for reporting
of contracting actions. These
requirements have been relocated to the
DFARS companion resource,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:48 Aug 07, 2006
Jkt 208001
This rule will not have a significant
cost or administrative impact on
contractors or offerors, or a significant
effect beyond the internal operating
procedures of DoD. Therefore,
publication for public comment is not
required. However, DoD will consider
comments from small entities
concerning the affected DFARS subparts
in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 610. Such
comments should cite DFARS Case
2005–D004.
C. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act does
not apply, because the rule does not
impose any information collection
requirements that require the approval
of the Office of Management and Budget
under 44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 204 and
253
Government procurement.
Michele P. Peterson,
Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations
System.
Therefore, 48 CFR parts 204 and 253
are amended as follows:
I 1. The authority citation for 48 CFR
parts 204 and 253 continues to read as
follows:
I
Authority: 41 U.S.C. 421 and 48 CFR
chapter 1.
PART 204—ADMINISTRATIVE
MATTERS
2. Subpart 204.6 is revised to read as
follows:
I
Subpart 204.6—Contract Reporting
204.670 Contract action reporting
requirements.
Departments and agencies shall report
contracting actions in accordance with
the requirements at PGI 204.670.
PART 253—FORMS
3. Section 253.204–70 is revised to
read as follows:
I
253.204–70 DD Form 350, Individual
Contracting Action Report.
Follow the instructions at PGI
253.204–70 for completion of DD Form
350.
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
253.204–71
I
[Removed]
4. Section 253.204–71 is removed.
[FR Doc. E6–12783 Filed 8–7–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–08–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations
System
48 CFR Part 219
[DFARS Case 2003–D060]
Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement; Threshold for
Small Business Specialist Review
Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, Department of
Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: DoD has issued a final rule
amending the Defense Federal
Acquisition Regulation Supplement
(DFARS) to revise text pertaining to DoD
implementation of small business
programs. This rule is a result of a
transformation initiative undertaken by
DoD to dramatically change the purpose
and content of the DFARS.
DATES: Effective Date: August 8, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Deborah Tronic, Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, OUSD (AT&L)
DPAP (DARS), IMD 3C132, 3062
Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC
20301–3062. Telephone (703) 602–0289;
facsimile (703) 602–0350. Please cite
DFARS Case 2003–D060.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background
DFARS Transformation is a major
DoD initiative to dramatically change
the purpose and content of the DFARS.
The objective is to improve the
efficiency and effectiveness of the
acquisition process, while allowing the
acquisition workforce the flexibility to
innovate. The transformed DFARS will
contain only requirements of law, DoDwide policies, delegations of FAR
authorities, deviations from FAR
requirements, and policies/procedures
that have a significant effect beyond the
internal operating procedures of DoD or
a significant cost or administrative
impact on contractors or offerors.
Additional information on the DFARS
Transformation initiative is available at
https://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dars/
dfars/transformation/index.htm.
This final rule is a result of the
DFARS Transformation initiative. The
rule—
E:\FR\FM\08AUR1.SGM
08AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 152 (Tuesday, August 8, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 44920-44926]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-12756]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 81
[EPA-R09-OAR-2006-AZ-0388; FRL-8206-4]
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Designation of
Areas for Air Quality Planning Purposes; State of Arizona; Finding of
Attainment for Rillito Particulate Matter of 10 Microns or Less
(PM10) Nonattainment Area; Determination Regarding
Applicability of Certain Clean Air Act Requirements; Correction
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final action to determine that the
Rillito moderate PM10 nonattainment area in Arizona attained
the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for particulate matter with
an aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to a nominal 10 micrometers
(PM10) by the applicable attainment date. EPA also finds
that the Rillito area is currently attaining the PM10
standards, and based on this latter finding, EPA is determining that
certain Clean Air Act requirements are not applicable for so long as
the Rillito area continues to attain the PM10 standards.
Lastly, EPA is correcting an error in a previous rulemaking that
involved the classification of PM10 nonattainment areas
within the State of Arizona.
DATES: This rule is effective on October 10, 2006, without further
notice, unless EPA receives adverse comments by September 7, 2006. If
adverse comment is received, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of
the direct final rule in the Federal Register informing the public that
the rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R09-
OAR-2006-AZ-0388 by one of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
E-mail: tax.wienke@epa.gov.
Fax: (415) 947-3579 (please alert the individual listed in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT if you are faxing comments).
Mail: Wienke Tax, Office of Air Planning, Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA), Region 9, Mailcode AIR-2, 75 Hawthorne Street,
San Francisco, California 94105-3901.
Hand Delivery: Wienke Tax, Office of Air Planning,
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 9, Mailcode AIR-2, 75
Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California 94105-3901. Such deliveries
are only accepted Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. to 4:55 p.m., excluding
Federal holidays. Special arrangements should be made for deliveries of
boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R09-OAR-
2006-AZ-0388. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be
included in the public docket without change and may be made available
online at https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal
information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed
to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information
that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through https://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The https://www.regulations.gov Web site
is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA, without
going through https://www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses. For additional information about EPA's public
docket visit the EPA Docket Center homepage at https://www.epa.gov/
epahome/dockets.htm.
Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket materials are available either
electronically in https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the
Office of Air Planning, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region
9, Mailcode AIR-2, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California
94105-3901. EPA requests that if at all possible, you contact the
individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to
view the hard copy of the docket. You may view the hard copy of the
docket Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. to 4 p.m., excluding Federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Wienke Tax, Office of Air Planning,
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 9, Mailcode AIR-2, 75
Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California 94105-3901, (520) 622-1622,
tax.wienke@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, wherever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Background
A. What National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) Are
Considered In Today's Finding?
B. What Is The Designation and Classification of This PM\10\
Nonattainment Area?
[[Page 44921]]
C. How Do We Make Attainment Determinations?
II. What Is The Basis for EPA's Determination That the Rillito Area
Has Attained The PM10 NAAQS?
III. What Are the Applicable Planning Requirements For the Rillito
Area as a Result of EPA's Attainment Determination?
IV. EPA's Final Action
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background
A. What National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) Are Considered
In Today's Finding?
National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) are safety
thresholds for certain ambient air pollutants set by EPA to protect
public health and welfare. Particulate matter with an aerodynamic
diameter of less than or equal to 10 micrometers, or PM10,
is the subject of this action. PM10 is among the ambient air
pollutants for which EPA has established health-based standards.
PM10 causes adverse health effects by penetrating deep
in the lungs, aggravating the cardiopulmonary system. Children, the
elderly, and people with asthma and heart conditions are the most
vulnerable.
On July 1, 1987 (52 FR 24634), EPA revised the NAAQS for
particulate matter with an indicator that includes only those particles
with an aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to a nominal 10
micrometers. See 40 CFR 50.6. The 24-hour primary PM10
standard is 150 micrograms per cubic meter ([mu]g/m3) with no more than
one expected exceedance per year. The annual primary PM10
standard is 50 [mu]g/m3 as an annual arithmetic mean. The secondary
PM10 standards, promulgated to protect against adverse
welfare effects, are identical to the primary standards.
B. What Is the Designation and Classification of This PM10
Nonattainment Area?
Upon enactment of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments (CAA or the
Act), PM10 areas meeting the requirements of either (i) or
(ii) of section 107(d)(4)(B) of the Act were designated nonattainment
for PM10 by operation of law and classified ``moderate.''
These areas included all former Group I PM10 planning areas
identified in 52 FR 29383 (August 7, 1987) and further clarified in 55
FR 45799 (October 31, 1990), and any other areas violating the NAAQS
for PM10 prior to January 1, 1989 (many of these areas were
identified by footnote 4 in the October 31, 1990 Federal Register
document). A Federal Register notice announcing the areas designated
nonattainment for PM10 upon enactment of the 1990 Act
Amendments, known as ``initial'' PM10 nonattainment areas,
was published on March 15, 1991 (56 FR 11101). A subsequent Federal
Register document correcting some of these areas was published on
August 8, 1991 (56 FR 37654). These nonattainment designations and
moderate area classifications were codified in 40 CFR part 81 in a
Federal Register document published on November 6, 1991 (56 FR 56694).
All other areas in the nation not designated nonattainment at enactment
were designated unclassifiable (see section 107(d)(4)(B)(iii) of the
Act).
The Rillito planning area was among the areas listed by EPA as a
Group I area (see 52 FR 29383, August 7, 1987) and was designated
nonattainment for PM10 by operation of law and classified
``moderate.'' In accordance with section 189(a)(2) of the CAA, Arizona
was to submit a state implementation plan (SIP) by November 15, 1991
demonstrating attainment of the PM10 standards by December
31, 1994 for the Rillito area.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Arizona submitted a moderate area PM10 plan for
the Rillito area on November 14, 1991. EPA found this plan to be
incomplete by letter dated May 14, 1992. On April 22, 1994, ADEQ
submitted a revised PM10 plan for Rillito, and EPA found
it to be complete by letter dated August 18, 1994. EPA has not taken
action on this 1994 PM10 plan.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. How Do We Make Attainment Determinations?
Pursuant to sections 179(c)(1) and 188(b)(2) of the Act, we have
the responsibility of determining within six months of the applicable
attainment date whether, based on air quality data, PM10
nonattainment areas attained the NAAQS by that date. The ``applicable
attainment date'' is December 31, 1994 for areas, such as Rillito, that
were designated as ``moderate'' nonattainment for PM10 by
operation of law under the 1990 Amended Act. Determinations under
section 179(c)(1) of the Act are to be based upon an area's ``air
quality as of the attainment date.'' Section 188(b)(2) is consistent
with this requirement.
Generally, we will determine whether an area's air quality meets
the PM10 NAAQS for purposes of section 179(c)(1) and
188(b)(2) based upon data gathered at established state and local air
monitoring stations (SLAMS) and national air monitoring stations (NAMS)
in the nonattainment area and entered into EPA's Air Quality System
(AQS) database. Data entered into the AQS have been determined to meet
federal monitoring requirements (see 40 CFR 50.6; 40 CFR part 50,
appendix J; 40 CFR part 53; 40 CFR part 58, appendices A and B) and may
be used to determine the attainment status of areas. We will also
consider air quality data from other air monitoring stations in the
nonattainment area provided that the stations meet the federal
monitoring requirements for SLAMS. All data are reviewed to determine
the area's air quality status in accordance with our guidance at 40 CFR
part 50, appendix K.
Attainment of the annual PM10 standard is achieved when
the annual arithmetic mean PM10 concentration over a three-
year period is equal to or less than 50 [mu]g/m\3\. Attainment of the
24-hour standard is determined by calculating the expected number of
days in a year with PM10 concentrations greater than 150
[mu]g/m\3\. The 24-hour standard is attained when the expected number
of days with levels above 150 [mu]g/m\3\ (averaged over a three-year
period) is less than or equal to one. Three consecutive years of air
quality data are necessary to show attainment of the 24-hour and annual
standards for PM10. See 40 CFR part 50, appendix K. A
complete year of air quality data, as referred to in 40 CFR part 50,
appendix K, is composed of all four calendar quarters with each quarter
containing data from at least 75 percent of the scheduled sampling
days.
II. What Is the Basis for EPA's Determination That the Rillito Area Has
Attained the PM10 NAAQS?
The Rillito PM10 nonattainment area is located in north
central Pima County, just northwest of the Tucson metropolitan area in
southern Arizona.\2\ The nonattainment area encompasses the following
nine townships: T11S, R9E through R12E; and T12S, R8E through R12E. The
incorporated Town of Marana with a population of approximately 8,000 is
located within the nonattainment area. A smaller community, the
unincorporated town of Rillito, is located in the portion of the
nonattainment area historically associated with maximum ambient
PM10 concentrations. The land use around Rillito is
predominantly agricultural. The only major (i.e., greater than 100 tons
per year) stationary point source of air pollution in the nonattainment
area
[[Page 44922]]
is an Arizona Portland Cement (APC) plant. APC is permitted by ADEQ.
Most of the other stationary sources are sand and gravel operations
mining the alluvial deposits of the Santa Cruz River basin. The area in
and around the nonattainment area is expected to change from rural
agricultural to residential because it will absorb residential
development from the Tucson metropolitan area.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ In a 1996 rulemaking (61 FR 21372, May 10, 1996) in which we
found that the Phoenix Planning Area had not attained the
PM10 NAAQS by the applicable attainment date for moderate
PM10 nonattainment areas and thus reclassified the area
as ``serious'', we inadvertently introduced an error into the
``Arizona--PM-10'' table in 40 CFR 81.303 by moving the entry for
the Rillito planning area from Pima County to Santa Cruz County. We
are correcting this error in today's notice under CAA section
110(k)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Rillito PM10 nonattainment area has one SLAMS
monitor operated by the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality
(ADEQ). Located at 8820 West Water Street within the community of
Rillito, this monitor is approximately 0.5 miles northwest of the
Arizona Portland Cement plant. This monitor was selected by ADEQ to
represent maximum PM10 concentration in the area to which
the public is exposed. Table 1 summarizes the one-in-six day
PM10 data collected there from 1988-2005.
Table 1.--Summary of 24 Hour and Annual PM10 Concentrations ([mu]g/m\3\) for Rillito, 1988-2005
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PM10 Concentrations
-----------------------------------------------------
Year Maximum 24-hour 3-year annual
concentration Annual average average
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1988...................................................... 163 *69.2 NA
1989...................................................... 170 *83.3 NA
1990...................................................... 94 *39.0 *63.8
1991...................................................... 133 37.1 *53.1
1992...................................................... 96 33.6 * 36.6
1993...................................................... 68 27.6 32.8
1994...................................................... 63 28.3 29.8
1995...................................................... 91 36.2 30.7
1996...................................................... 84 38.3 34.3
1997...................................................... 129 41.9 38.8
1998...................................................... 81 32.4 37.5
1999...................................................... 102 37.8 37.4
2000...................................................... 129 * 42.1 * 37.4
2001...................................................... 89 33.6 * 37.8
2002...................................................... 70 37.1 * 37.6
2003...................................................... 118 39.5 36.7
2004...................................................... 93 32.2 36.3
2005...................................................... 84 39.1 36.9
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Indicates that the mean does not satisfy criteria for a complete data set.
* Values shown in bold text represent exceedances of the applicable standard.
As noted above, the 24-hour PM10 standard is attained
when the expected number of days with levels above 150 [mu]g/m\3\
(averaged over a three-year period) is less than or equal to one. Based
on the data summarized in table 1, above, we find no exceedances of the
24-hour PM10 standard for the 1992-1994 period and thus the
expected number of days with levels above 150 [mu]g/m\3\ (averaged over
that three-year period) is zero. As such, we find that Rillito attained
the 24-hour PM10 NAAQS by the applicable attainment date
(1994). Furthermore, since 1994, no exceedances of the 24-hour
PM10 standard have been recorded at the Rillito monitoring
station and thus, we find that the area has continued to attain, and is
currently attaining, the 24-hour standard.
Also as noted above, attainment of the annual PM10
standard is achieved when the annual arithmetic mean PM10
concentration over a three-year period is equal to or less than 50
[mu]g/m\3\. Review of the data for calendar years 1992-1994 reveals an
arithmetic average of 29.8 [mu]g/m\3\. As such, we find that Rillito
attained the annual PM10 standard by the applicable
attainment date (1994). Since 1994, there have been no exceedances of
the annual PM10 standard, and thus, we find that the area
has continued to attain, and is currently attaining, the annual
standard.
III. What Are The Applicable Planning Requirements For The Rillito Area
As A Result Of EPA's Attainment Determination?
The air quality planning requirements for moderate PM10
nonattainment areas, such as the Rillito nonattainment area, are set
out in part D, subparts 1 and 4 of title I of the Act. We have issued
guidance in a General Preamble \3\ describing how we will review SIPs
and SIP revisions submitted under title I of the Act, including those
containing moderate PM10 nonattainment area SIP provisions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ ``General Preamble for the Implementation of Title I of the
Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990'' (57 FR 13498, April 16, 1992, as
supplemented 57 FR 18070, April 28, 1992).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In some designated nonattainment areas, monitored data demonstrates
that the NAAQS has already been achieved. Based on its interpretation
of the Act, EPA has determined that certain requirements of part D,
subparts 1 and 2 (of title I) of the Act do not apply and therefore do
not require certain submissions for an area that has attained the
NAAQS. These include reasonable further progress (RFP) requirements,
attainment demonstrations and contingency measures, because these
provisions have the purpose of helping achieve attainment of the NAAQS.
EPA's Clean Data Policy is the subject of two memoranda setting
forth our interpretation of the provisions of the Act as they apply to
areas that have attained the relevant NAAQS. EPA also finalized the
statutory interpretation set forth in the policy in a final rule, 40
CFR 51.918, as part of its ``Final Rule to Implement the 8-hour Ozone
National Ambient Air Quality Standard--Phase 2'' (Phase 2 Final Rule).
See discussion in the preamble to the rule at 70 FR 71645-71646
(November 29, 2005). EPA believes that the legal bases set forth in
detail in our Phase 2 Final Rule; our May 10, 1995 memorandum from John
S. Seitz, entitled ``Reasonable Further Progress, Attainment
Demonstration, and Related Requirements for Ozone Nonattainment Areas
Meeting the Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard'' (Seitz memo);
and our
[[Page 44923]]
December 14, 2004 memorandum from Stephen D. Page entitled ``Clean Data
Policy for the Fine Particle National Ambient Air Quality Standards''
(Page memo) are equally pertinent to the interpretation of provisions
of subparts 1 and 4 applicable to PM10. EPA's interpretation
of how the provisions of the Act apply to areas with ``clean data'' is
not logically limited to ozone and PM2.5, because the
rationale is not dependent upon the type of pollutant. Our
interpretation that an area that is attaining the standard is relieved
of obligations to demonstrate RFP and to provide an attainment
demonstration and contingency measures pursuant to part D of the CAA,
pertains whether the standard is PM10, ozone, or
PM2.5.
The reasons for relieving an area that has attained the relevant
standard of certain part D, subparts 1 and 2 obligations, applies
equally to part D, subpart 4, which contains specific attainment
demonstration and RFP provisions for PM10 nonattainment
areas. As we have explained in the Phase 2 Final Rule and our ozone and
PM2.5 clean data memoranda, EPA believes it is reasonable to
interpret provisions regarding RFP and attainment demonstrations, along
with related requirements, so as not to require SIP submissions if an
area subject to those requirements is already attaining the NAAQS
(i.e., attainment of the NAAQS is demonstrated with three consecutive
years of complete, quality-assured air quality monitoring data). Three
U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeals have upheld EPA rulemakings applying its
interpretation of subparts 1 and 2 with respect to ozone. Sierra Club
v. EPA, 99 F.3d 1551 (10th Cir. 1996); Sierra Club v. EPA, 375 F.3d 537
(7th Cir. 2004); Our Children's Earth Foundation v. EPA, No. 04-73032
(9th Cir. June 28, 2005)(memorandum opinion). It has been EPA's
longstanding interpretation that the general provisions of part D,
subpart 1 of the Act (sections 171 and 172) do not require the
submission of SIP revisions concerning RFP for areas already attaining
the ozone NAAQS. In the General Preamble, we stated:
[R]equirements for RFP will not apply in evaluating a request
for redesignation to attainment since, at a minimum, the air quality
data for the area must show that the area has already attained.
Showing that the State will make RFP towards attainment will,
therefore, have no meaning at that point. 57 FR at 13564.
EPA believes the same reasoning applies to the PM10
provisions of part D, subpart 4.
With respect to RFP, section 171(1) states that, for purposes of
part D of title I, RFP ``means such annual incremental reductions in
emissions of the relevant air pollutant as are required by this part or
may reasonably be required by the Administrator for the purpose of
ensuring attainment of the applicable NAAQS by the applicable date.''
Thus, whether dealing with the general RFP requirement of section
172(c)(2), the ozone-specific RFP requirements of sections 182(b) and
(c), or the specific RFP requirements for PM10 areas of part
D, subpart 4, section 189(c)(1), the stated purpose of RFP is to ensure
attainment by the applicable attainment date. Section 189(c)(1) states
that:
Plan revisions demonstrating attainment submitted to the
Administrator for approval under this subpart shall contain
quantitative milestones which are to be achieved every 3 years until
the area is redesignated attainment and which demonstrate reasonable
further progress, as defined in section 7501(1) of this title,
toward attainment by the applicable date.
Although this section states that revisions shall contain
milestones which are to be achieved until the area is redesignated to
attainment, such milestones are designed to show reasonable further
progress ``toward attainment by the applicable attainment date'', as
defined by section 171. Thus, it is clear that once the area has
attained the standard, no further milestones are necessary or
meaningful. This interpretation is supported by language in section
189(c)(3), which mandates that a state that fails to achieve a
milestone must submit a plan that assures that the state will achieve
the next milestone or attain the NAAQS if there is no next milestone.
Section 189(c)(3) assumes that the requirement to submit and achieve
milestones does not continue after attainment of the NAAQS.
If an area has in fact attained the standard, the stated purpose of
the RFP requirement will have already been fulfilled.\4\ EPA took this
position with respect to the general RFP requirement of section
172(c)(2) in the April 16, 1992 General Preamble and also in the May
10, 1995 memorandum with respect to the requirements of sections 182(b)
and (c). We are extending that interpretation to the specific
provisions of part D, subpart 4. In the General Preamble, we stated, in
the context of a discussion of the requirements applicable to the
evaluation of requests to redesignate nonattainment areas to
attainment, that the ``requirements for RFP will not apply in
evaluating a request for redesignation to attainment since, at a
minimum, the air quality data for the area must show that the area has
already attained. Showing that the State will make RFP towards
attainment will, therefore, have no meaning at that point.'' (57 FR
13564). See also our September 4, 1992 memorandum from John Calcagni,
entitled ``Procedures for Processing Requests to Redesignate Areas to
Attainment'' (Calcagni memo), p. 6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Thus we believe that it is a distinction without a
difference that section 189(c)(1) speaks of the RFP requirement as
one to be achieved until an area is ``redesignated attainment'', as
opposed to section 172(c)(2), which is silent on the period to which
the requirement pertains, or the ozone nonattainment area RFP
requirements in sections 182(b)(1) or 182 (c)(2), which refer to the
RFP requirements as applying until the ``attainment date'', since,
section 189(c)(1) defines RFP by reference to section 171(1) of the
Act. Reference to section 171(1) clarifies that, as with the general
RFP requirements in section 172(c)(2) and the ozone-specific
requirements of section 182(b)(1) and 182(c)(2), the PM-specific
requirements may only be required ``for the purpose of ensuring
attainment of the applicable national ambient air quality standard
by the applicable date.'' 42 U.S.C. section 7501(1). As discussed in
the text of this rulemaking, EPA interprets the RFP requirements, in
light of the definition of RFP in section 171(1), and incorporated
in section 189(c)(1), to be a requirement that no longer applies
once the standard has been attained.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
With respect to the attainment demonstration requirements of
section 189(a)(1)(B), an analogous rationale leads to the same result.
Section 189(a)(1)(B) requires that the plan provide for ``a
demonstration (including air quality modeling) that the [SIP] will
provide for attainment by the applicable attainment date. * * *'' As
with the RFP requirements, if an area is already monitoring attainment
of the standard, EPA believes there is no need for an area to make a
further submission containing additional measures to achieve
attainment. This is also consistent with the interpretation of the
section 172(c) requirements provided by EPA in the General Preamble,
the Page memo, and the section 182(b) and (c) requirements set forth in
the Seitz memo. As EPA stated in the General Preamble, no other
measures to provide for attainment would be needed by areas seeking
redesignation to attainment since ``attainment will have been
reached.'' (57 FR at 13564).
Other SIP submission requirements are linked with these attainment
demonstration and RFP requirements, and similar reasoning applies to
them. These requirements include the contingency measure requirements
of sections 172(c)(9) and 182(c)(9). We have interpreted the
contingency measure requirements of sections 172(c)(9) and 182(c)(9) as
no longer applying when an area has attained the standard because those
``contingency measures are directed at ensuring RFP
[[Page 44924]]
and attainment by the applicable date.'' (57 FR at 13564); Seitz memo,
pp. 5-6.
Both sections 172(c)(1) and 189(a)(1)(C) require ``provisions to
assure that reasonably available control measures'' (i.e., RACM) are
implemented in a nonattainment area. The General Preamble, 57 FR at
13560 (April 16, 1992), states that EPA interprets section 172(c)(1) so
that RACM requirements are a ``component'' of an area's attainment
demonstration. Thus, for the same reason the attainment demonstration
no longer applies by its own terms, the requirement for RACM no longer
applies. EPA has consistently interpreted this provision to require
only implementation of potential RACM measures that could contribute to
reasonable further progress or to attainment. General Preamble, 57 FR
at 13498. Thus, where an area is already attaining the standard, no
additional RACM measures are required.\5\ EPA is interpreting section
189(a)(1)(C) consistent with its interpretation of section 172(c)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ The EPA's interpretation that the statute only requires
implementation of RACM measures that would advance attainment was
upheld by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
(Sierra Club v. EPA, 314 F.3d 735, 743-745 (5th Cir. 2002), and by
the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit (Sierra Club
v. EPA, 294 F.3d 155, 162-163 (D.C. Cir. 2002)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Here, as in both our Phase 2 Final Rule and ozone and
PM2.5 clean data memoranda, we emphasize that the suspension
of a requirement to submit SIP revisions concerning these RFP,
attainment demonstration, RACM, and other related requirements exists
only for as long as a nonattainment area continues to monitor
attainment of the standard. If such an area experiences a violation of
the NAAQS, the basis for the requirements being suspended would no
longer exist. Therefore, the area would again be subject to a
requirement to submit the pertinent SIP revision or revisions and would
need to address those requirements. Thus, a determination that an area
need not submit one of the SIP submittals amounts to no more than a
suspension of the requirements for so long as the area continues to
attain the standard. However, once EPA ultimately redesignates the area
to attainment, the area will be entirely relieved of these requirements
to the extent the maintenance plan for the area does not rely on them.
Therefore, we believe that, for the reasons set forth here and
established in our prior ``clean data'' memoranda and rulemakings, a
PM10 nonattainment area that has ``clean data,'' should be
relieved of the part D, subpart 4 obligations to provide an attainment
demonstration pursuant to section 189(a)(1)(B), the RACM provisions of
section 189(a)(1)(C), and the RFP provisions established by section
189(c)(1) of the Act, as well as the aforementioned attainment
demonstration, RACM, RFP and contingency measure provisions of part D,
subpart 1 contained in section 172 of the Act.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ In prior rulemakings involving the Clean Data Policy and
PM10, EPA has applied criteria in addition to that of
attainment of the standard. See, e.g., 67 FR 43020 (June 26, 2002).
EPA does not believe that those additional criteria are required by
statute or are necessary for application of the policy for
PM10 areas, and does not employ them in applying the
policy to ozone and PM2.5 areas. EPA intends to make its
application of the policy consistent for ozone, PM10, and
PM2.5, and does not intend to require an area to meet
additional criteria for PM10.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Should EPA at some future time determine that an area that had
clean data, but which has not yet been redesignated as attainment for a
NAAQS, has violated the relevant standard, the area would again be
required to submit the pertinent requirements under the SIP for the
area. Attainment determinations under the policy do not shield an area
from other required actions, such as provisions to address pollution
transport.
As set forth above, EPA finds that because the Rillito area has
continued to attain the NAAQS, the requirement of an attainment
demonstration, reasonable further progress, reasonably available
control measures and contingency measures no longer applies for so long
as the area continues to monitor attainment of the PM10
NAAQS. If measurements of ambient PM10 concentration in the
Rillito area reveal a violation of the PM10 NAAQS, then the
State of Arizona would again be required to submit the pertinent CAA
requirements for this nonattainment area.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ Note, however, that on January 17, 2006, EPA published
proposed revisions to the NAAQS for particulate matter. See https://
www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-AIR/2006/January/Day-17/. The proposed
revisions address two categories of particulate matter: fine
particles which are particles 2.5 micrometers in diameter and
smaller; and ``inhalable coarse'' particles which are particles
between 2.5 and 10 micrometers (PM10-2.5). Upon
finalization of a primary 24-hour standard for PM10-2.5,
EPA proposes to revoke the current 24-hour PM10 standard
in all areas of the country except in areas where there is at least
one monitor located in an urbanized area (as defined by the U.S.
Bureau of the Census) with a minimum population of 100,000 that
violates the current 24-hour PM10 standard based on the
most recent three years of data. In addition, EPA proposes to revoke
the current annual PM10 standard upon finalization of a
primary 24-hour standard for PM10-2.5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. EPA's Final Action
Based on quality-assured data meeting the requirements of 40 CFR
part 50, appendix K, we find that the Rillito, Arizona nonattainment
area attained the PM10 NAAQS by the applicable attainment
date (1994) and is currently attaining the standard. This action is not
a redesignation to attainment under CAA section 107(d)(3) because we
have not yet approved a maintenance plan as meeting the requirements of
section 175A of the CAA or determined that the area has met the other
CAA requirements for redesignation. The classification and designation
status in 40 CFR part 81 will remain moderate nonattainment for this
area until such time as Arizona meets the CAA requirements for
redesignation of the Rillito area to attainment. See footnote 7.
EPA also finds that, because the Rillito area has continued to
attain the NAAQS, the following CAA requirements no longer apply: The
part D, subpart 4 obligations to provide an attainment demonstration
pursuant to section 189(a)(1)(B), the RACM provisions of 189(a)(1)(C),
the RFP provisions established by section 189(c)(1), and the attainment
demonstration, RACM, RFP and contingency measure provisions of part D,
subpart 1 contained in section 172 of the Act.
Lastly, under CAA section 110(k)(6), we are correcting the entry
for the Rillito moderate PM10 nonattainment area in the
``Arizona--PM-10'' table in 40 CFR 81.303 so that it is identified as a
subarea within Pima County instead of Santa Cruz County.
We are publishing this rule without prior proposal because the
Agency views this as a noncontroversial action and anticipates no
adverse comments. However, in the proposed rules section of this
Federal Register publication, EPA is publishing a separate document
that will serve as the proposal should adverse comments be filed. This
action will be effective October 10, 2006, without further notice
unless the EPA receives relevant adverse comments by September 7, 2006.
If we receive such comments, then we will publish a document
withdrawing the final rule and informing the public that the rule will
not take effect. All public comments received will then be addressed in
a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. We will not
institute a second comment period. Parties interested in commenting
should do so at this time. If no such comments are received, the public
is advised that this rule will be effective on October 10,
[[Page 44925]]
2006 and no further action will be taken on the proposed rule.
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211,
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action
merely makes a determination based on air quality data and does not
impose any additional requirements. Accordingly, the Administrator
certifies that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this rule does not impose any
additional enforceable duty, it does not contain any unfunded mandate
or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in
the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4).
This rule also does not have tribal implications because it will
not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on
the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 97249, November 9, 2000). This action also does not have Federalism
implications because it does not have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64
FR 43255, August 10, 1999). This action merely makes a determination
based on air quality data and does not alter the relationship or the
distribution of power and responsibilities established in the CAA. This
rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 ``Protection of
Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically significant.
The requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply.
This rule does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by October 10, 2006. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be
filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action.
This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its
requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 81
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, National parks,
Wilderness areas.
Dated: July 25, 2006.
Wayne Nastri,
Regional Administrator, Region 9.
0
Part 81, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:
PART 81--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 81 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart C--[Amended]
0
2. In Sec. 81.303, the table entitled ``Arizona--PM-10'' is amended by
revising the entries for Santa Cruz County and Pima County to read as
follows:
Sec. 81.303 Arizona.
* * * * *
Arizona.--PM-10
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Designation Classification
Designated area ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date Type Date Type
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Santa Cruz County:
Nogales planning area.......... 11/15/90 Nonattainment............ 11/15/90 Moderate.
The portions of the
following Townships which
are within the State of
Arizona and lie east of
111 degrees longitude:
T23S, R13E, T23S, R14E,
T24S, R13E, T24S, R14E
Pima County:
Rillito planning area.......... 11/15/90 Nonattainment........... 11/15/90 Moderate.
Townships: T11S, R9E, T11S,
R10E, T11S, R11E, T11S,
R12E, T12S, R8E, T12S,
R9E, T12S, R10E, T12S,
R11E, T12S, R12E
Ajo planning area.............. 11/15/90 Nonattainment............ 11/15/90 Moderate.
Township T12S, R6W, and the
following sections of
Township T12S, R5W:
a. Sections 6-8
b. Sections 17-20, and
c. Sections 29-32
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 44926]]
* * * * *
[FR Doc. E6-12756 Filed 8-7-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P