Defense Threat Reduction Agency; Privacy Act; Implementation, 44603-44604 [06-6721]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 151 / Monday, August 7, 2006 / Proposed Rules
system of records. In general, the
exemptions were claimed in order to
protect properly classified information
relating to national defense and foreign
policy, to avoid interference during the
conduct of criminal, civil, or
administrative actions or investigations,
to ensure protective services provided
the President and others are not
compromised, to protect the identity of
confidential sources incident to Federal
employment, military service, contract,
and security clearance determinations,
to preserve the confidentiality and
integrity of Federal testing materials,
and to safeguard evaluation materials
used for military promotions when
furnished by a confidential source. The
exemption rule for the original records
will identify the specific reasons why
the records are exempt from specific
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a.
*
*
*
*
*
bajohnson on PROD1PC76 with PROPOSALS
Dated: August 1, 2006.
C.R. Choate,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 06–6719 Filed 8–4–06; 8:45 am]
• Mail: Federal Docket Management
System Office, 1160 Defense Pentagon,
Washington, DC 20301–1160.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number or Regulatory
Information Number (RIN) for this
Federal Register document. The general
policy for comments and other
submissions from members of the public
is to make these submissions available
for public viewing on the Internet at
https://regulations.gov as they are
received without change, including any
personal identifiers or contact
information.
Ms.
Brenda M. Carter at (703) 767–1771 or
DSN 427–1771.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’
It has been determined that Privacy
Act rules for the Department of Defense
are not significant rules. The rules do
not (1) Have an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more or
BILLING CODE 5001–06–M
adversely affect in a material way the
economy; a sector of the economy;
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
productivity; competition; jobs; the
environment; public health or safety; or
32 CFR Part 318
State, local, or tribal governments or
communities; (2) Create a serious
[Docket No. D0D–2006–OS–0169]
inconsistency or otherwise interfere
RIN 0790–AI03
with an action taken or planned by
another Agency; (3) Materially alter the
Defense Threat Reduction Agency;
budgetary impact of entitlements,
Privacy Act; Implementation
grants, user fees, or loan programs, or
the rights and obligations of recipients
AGENCY: Defense Threat Reduction
thereof; or (4) Raise novel legal or policy
Agency DoD.
issues arising out of legal mandates, the
ACTION: Proposed rule.
President’s priorities, or the principles
SUMMARY: The Defense Threat Reduction set forth in this Executive Order.
Agency is proposing to exempt those
Public Law 96–354, ‘‘Regulatory
records contained in HDTRA 021,
Flexibility Act’’ (5 U.S.C. Chapter 6)
entitled ‘‘Freedom of Information Act
and Privacy Act Case Files’’ when an
It has been determined that Privacy
exemption has been previously claimed Act rules for the Department of Defense
for the records in another Privacy Act
do not have significant economic impact
system of records. The exemption is
on a substantial number of small entities
intended to preserve the exempt status
because they are concerned only with
of the record when the purposes
the administration of Privacy Act
underlying the exemption for the
systems of records within the
original records are still valid and
Department of Defense.
necessary to protect the contents of the
Public Law 96–511, ‘‘Paperwork
records.
Reduction Act’’ (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)
DATES: Comments must be received by
October 6, 2006.
It has been determined that Privacy
Act rules for the Department of Defense
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by docket number and or RIN impose no information requirements
beyond the Department of Defense and
number and title, by any of the
that the information collected within
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https:// the Department of Defense is necessary
and consistent with 5 U.S.C. 552a,
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
known as the Privacy Act of 1974.
instructions for submitting comments.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:27 Aug 04, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
44603
Section 202, Public Law 104–4,
‘‘Unfunded Mandates Reform Act’’
It has been determined that Privacy
Act rulemaking for the Department of
Defense does not involve a Federal
mandate that may result in the
expenditure by State, local and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
and that such rulemaking will not
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments.
Executive Order 13132, ‘‘Federalism’’
It has been determined that Privacy
Act rules for the Department of Defense
do not have federalism implications.
The rules do not have substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship
between the National Government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 318
Privacy.
Accordingly, 32 CFR part 318 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 318—DEFENSE THREAT
REDUCTION AGENCY PRIVACY
PROGRAM
1. The authority citation for 32 CFR
part 318 continued to read as follows:
Authority: Pub. L. 93–579, 88 Stat. 1896 (5
U.S.C. 552a).
2. Section 318.16 is proposed to be
amended by adding paragraph (d) as
follows:
§ 318.16
Exemption rules.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) System identifier and name:
HDTRA 021, Freedom of Information
Act and Privacy Act Request Case Files.
(1) Exemption: During the processing
of a Freedom of Information Act or
Privacy Act request exempt materials
from other systems of records may in
turn become part of the case record in
this system. To the extent that copies of
exempt records from those ‘other’
systems of records are entered into this
system, the Defense Threat Reduction
Agency claims the same exemptions for
the records from those ‘other’ systems
that are entered into this system, as
claimed for the original primary system
of which they are a part.
(2) Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2),
(k)(l), (k)(2), (k)(3), (k)(4), (k)(5), (k)(6)
and (k)(7).
(3) Reasons: Records are only exempt
from pertinent provisions of 5 U.S.C.
552a to the extent such provisions have
been identified and an exemption
E:\FR\FM\07AUP1.SGM
07AUP1
44604
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 151 / Monday, August 7, 2006 / Proposed Rules
bajohnson on PROD1PC76 with PROPOSALS
claimed for the original record and the
purposes underlying the exemption for
the original record still pertain to the
record which is now contained in this
system of records. In general, the
exemptions were claimed in order to
protect properly classified information
relating to national defense and foreign
policy, to avoid interference during the
conduct of criminal, civil, or
administrative actions or investigations,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:27 Aug 04, 2006
Jkt 208001
to ensure protective services provided
the President and others are not
compromised, to protect the identity of
confidential sources incident to Federal
employment, military service, contract,
and security clearance determinations,
to preserve the confidentiality and
integrity of Federal testing materials,
and to safeguard evaluation materials
used for military promotions when
furnished by a confidential source. The
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
exemption rule for the original records
will identify the specific reasons why
the records are exempt from specific
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a.
Dated: August 1, 2006.
C.R. Choate,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 06–6721 Filed 8–4–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–M
E:\FR\FM\07AUP1.SGM
07AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 151 (Monday, August 7, 2006)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 44603-44604]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-6721]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
32 CFR Part 318
[Docket No. D0D-2006-OS-0169]
RIN 0790-AI03
Defense Threat Reduction Agency; Privacy Act; Implementation
AGENCY: Defense Threat Reduction Agency DoD.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Defense Threat Reduction Agency is proposing to exempt
those records contained in HDTRA 021, entitled ``Freedom of Information
Act and Privacy Act Case Files'' when an exemption has been previously
claimed for the records in another Privacy Act system of records. The
exemption is intended to preserve the exempt status of the record when
the purposes underlying the exemption for the original records are
still valid and necessary to protect the contents of the records.
DATES: Comments must be received by October 6, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number and or
RIN number and title, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Federal Docket Management System Office, 1160
Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-1160.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and docket number or Regulatory Information Number (RIN) for this
Federal Register document. The general policy for comments and other
submissions from members of the public is to make these submissions
available for public viewing on the Internet at https://regulations.gov
as they are received without change, including any personal identifiers
or contact information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Brenda M. Carter at (703) 767-1771
or DSN 427-1771.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review''
It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of
Defense are not significant rules. The rules do not (1) Have an annual
effect on the economy of $100 million or more or adversely affect in a
material way the economy; a sector of the economy; productivity;
competition; jobs; the environment; public health or safety; or State,
local, or tribal governments or communities; (2) Create a serious
inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by
another Agency; (3) Materially alter the budgetary impact of
entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs, or the rights and
obligations of recipients thereof; or (4) Raise novel legal or policy
issues arising out of legal mandates, the President's priorities, or
the principles set forth in this Executive Order.
Public Law 96-354, ``Regulatory Flexibility Act'' (5 U.S.C. Chapter 6)
It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of
Defense do not have significant economic impact on a substantial number
of small entities because they are concerned only with the
administration of Privacy Act systems of records within the Department
of Defense.
Public Law 96-511, ``Paperwork Reduction Act'' (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)
It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of
Defense impose no information requirements beyond the Department of
Defense and that the information collected within the Department of
Defense is necessary and consistent with 5 U.S.C. 552a, known as the
Privacy Act of 1974.
Section 202, Public Law 104-4, ``Unfunded Mandates Reform Act''
It has been determined that Privacy Act rulemaking for the
Department of Defense does not involve a Federal mandate that may
result in the expenditure by State, local and tribal governments, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 million or more and
that such rulemaking will not significantly or uniquely affect small
governments.
Executive Order 13132, ``Federalism''
It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of
Defense do not have federalism implications. The rules do not have
substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between
the National Government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 318
Privacy.
Accordingly, 32 CFR part 318 is proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 318--DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY PRIVACY PROGRAM
1. The authority citation for 32 CFR part 318 continued to read as
follows:
Authority: Pub. L. 93-579, 88 Stat. 1896 (5 U.S.C. 552a).
2. Section 318.16 is proposed to be amended by adding paragraph (d)
as follows:
Sec. 318.16 Exemption rules.
* * * * *
(d) System identifier and name: HDTRA 021, Freedom of Information
Act and Privacy Act Request Case Files.
(1) Exemption: During the processing of a Freedom of Information
Act or Privacy Act request exempt materials from other systems of
records may in turn become part of the case record in this system. To
the extent that copies of exempt records from those `other' systems of
records are entered into this system, the Defense Threat Reduction
Agency claims the same exemptions for the records from those `other'
systems that are entered into this system, as claimed for the original
primary system of which they are a part.
(2) Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2), (k)(l), (k)(2), (k)(3), (k)(4),
(k)(5), (k)(6) and (k)(7).
(3) Reasons: Records are only exempt from pertinent provisions of 5
U.S.C. 552a to the extent such provisions have been identified and an
exemption
[[Page 44604]]
claimed for the original record and the purposes underlying the
exemption for the original record still pertain to the record which is
now contained in this system of records. In general, the exemptions
were claimed in order to protect properly classified information
relating to national defense and foreign policy, to avoid interference
during the conduct of criminal, civil, or administrative actions or
investigations, to ensure protective services provided the President
and others are not compromised, to protect the identity of confidential
sources incident to Federal employment, military service, contract, and
security clearance determinations, to preserve the confidentiality and
integrity of Federal testing materials, and to safeguard evaluation
materials used for military promotions when furnished by a confidential
source. The exemption rule for the original records will identify the
specific reasons why the records are exempt from specific provisions of
5 U.S.C. 552a.
Dated: August 1, 2006.
C.R. Choate,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 06-6721 Filed 8-4-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M