Safety Zone; Pentwater Homecoming Fireworks, Pentwater, MI, 44217-44219 [E6-12658]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 150 / Friday, August 4, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–
4370f), and have concluded that there
are no factors in this case that would
limit the use of a categorical exclusion
under section 2.B.2 of the Instruction.
Therefore, this rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g) of the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation. This rule
fits the category selected from paragraph
(34)(g), as it would establish a safety
zone. A final ‘‘Environmental Analysis
Check List’’ and a final ‘‘Categorical
Exclusion Determination’’ will be
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
I For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
33 CFR Part 165
[CGD09–06–135]
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
2. Add temporary § 165.T06–017 to
read as follows:
I
§ 165.T–01–017 Safety Zone: Beverly
Homecoming Fireworks, Beverly, MA.
gechino on PROD1PC61 with RULES
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Pentwater Homecoming
Fireworks, Pentwater, MI
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR
1.05–1(g), 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
(a) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: All waters of Beverly
Harbor, from surface to bottom, within
a four hundred (400) yard radius of the
fireworks barge located at approximate
position 42°33.35″ N, 070°52.00″ W.
(b) Effective Date. This rule is
effective from 8:30 p.m. until 10 p.m. on
August 6, 2006.
(c) Definitions. As used in this section
Designated representative means a Coast
Guard Patrol Commander, including a
Coast Guard coxswain, petty officer, or
other officer operating a Coast Guard
vessel and a Federal, State, and local
officer designated by or assisting the
Captain of the Port (COTP).
(d) Regulations. (1) In accordance
with the general regulations in 165.23 of
this part, entry into or movement within
this zone by any person or vessel is
prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port (COTP), Boston or
the COTP’s designated representative.
(2) The safety zone is closed to all
vessel traffic, except as may be
permitted by the COTP or the COTP’s
designated representative.
Jkt 208001
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
Coast Guard
I
22:25 Aug 03, 2006
Dated: July 24, 2006.
James L. McDonald,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Boston, Massachusetts.
[FR Doc. E6–12585 Filed 8–3–06; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
VerDate Aug<31>2005
(3) Vessel operators desiring to enter
or operate within the safety zone must
contact the COTP or the COTP’s
designated representative to obtain
permission to do so. Vessel operators
given permission to enter or operate in
the safety zone must comply with all
directions given to them by the COTP or
the COTP’s designated representative.
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone for
the Pentwater Homecoming Fireworks,
Pentwater, Michigan. This safety zone is
necessary to safeguard vessels and
spectators from hazards associated with
fireworks displays. This rule is intended
to restrict vessel traffic from a portion of
Lake Michigan.
DATES: This safety zone is effective from
9 p.m. to 11 p.m. on August 12, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket, are part of docket CGD09–06–
135 and are available for inspection or
copying at U.S. Coast Guard Sector Lake
Michigan between 7 a.m. (local) and
3:30 p.m. (local), Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Chief Warrant Officer Brad Hinken, U.S.
Coast Guard Sector Lake Michigan, at
(414) 747–7154.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
We did not publish a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this
regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the
Coast Guard finds that good cause exists
for not publishing an NPRM. The permit
application was not received in time to
publish an NPRM followed by a final
rule before the effective date. Under 5
U.S.C. 553(d)(3), good cause exists for
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
44217
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Delaying this rule would be
contrary to the public interest of
ensuring the safety of spectators and
vessels during this event and immediate
action is necessary to prevent possible
loss of life or property. The Coast Guard
has not received any complaints or
negative comments previously with
regard to this event.
Background and Purpose
This temporary safety zone is
necessary to ensure the safety of vessels
and spectators from hazards associated
with a fireworks display. Based on
accidents that have occurred in other
Captain of the Port zones, and the
explosive hazards of fireworks, the
Captain of the Port Lake Michigan has
determined fireworks launches in close
proximity to watercraft pose significant
risk to public safety and property. The
likely combination of large numbers of
recreation vessels, congested waterways,
darkness punctuated by bright flashes of
light, alcohol use, and debris falling into
the water could easily result in serious
injuries or fatalities. Establishing a
safety zone to control vessel movement
around the location of the launch
platform will help ensure the safety of
persons and property at these events
and help minimize the associated risks.
Discussion of Rule
A temporary safety zone is necessary
to ensure the safety of spectators and
vessels during the setup, loading and
launching of a fireworks display in
conjunction with the Pentwater
Homecoming fireworks display. The
fireworks display will occur between 9
p.m. and 11 p.m. on August 12, 2006.
The safety zone will encompass all
waters of Lake Michigan within a 1000foot radius of the fireworks launching
site located on the north break wall in
position 43°46.56″ N/086°26.38″ W
(DATUM: NAD 83).
All persons and vessels must comply
with the instructions of the Captain of
the Port Lake Michigan or his
designated on-scene representative.
Entry into, transiting, or anchoring
within the safety zone is prohibited
unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port Lake Michigan or his designated
on-scene representative. The Captain of
the Port Lake Michigan may be
contacted via VHF Channel 16.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
E:\FR\FM\04AUR1.SGM
04AUR1
44218
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 150 / Friday, August 4, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order. It is not ‘‘significant’’ under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
the Department of Homeland Security
(DHS).
We expect the economic impact of
this rule to be so minimal that a full
Regulatory Evaluation under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
DHS is unnecessary. This determination
is based upon the size and location of
the safety zone within the waterway.
Recreational vessels may transit through
the safety zone with permission from
the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan
or his designated on-scene
representative.
gechino on PROD1PC61 with RULES
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule will affect the following
entities, some of which may be small
entities: The owners and operators of
vessels intending to transit or anchor in
a portion of the Lake Michigan off
Pentwater, Michigan, between 9 p.m.
and 11 p.m. on August 12, 2006.
This safety zone will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for
the following reasons: This rule will be
in effect for only two hours for one
event and vessels can safely pass
outside the safety zone during the event.
In the event that this temporary safety
zone affects shipping, commercial
vessels may request permission from the
Captain of the Port Lake Michigan to
transit through the safety zone. The
Coast Guard will give notice to the
public via a Broadcast to Mariners that
the regulation is in effect.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we offered to assist small entities in
understanding the rule so that they
could better evaluate its effects on them
and participate in the rulemaking
process. Small businesses may send
VerDate Aug<31>2005
22:25 Aug 03, 2006
Jkt 208001
comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise
determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and
Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement
Ombudsman and the Regional Small
Business Regulatory Fairness Boards.
The Ombudsman evaluates these
actions annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247).
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520.).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this rule would not result in
such expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not affect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
would not create an environmental risk
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it would not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
and Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 5100.1, which
guides the Coast Guard in complying
with the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–
4370f), and have concluded that there
are no factors in this case that would
E:\FR\FM\04AUR1.SGM
04AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 150 / Friday, August 4, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
limit the use of a categorical exclusion
under section 2.B.2 of the Instruction.
Therefore, we believe that this rule
should be categorically excluded, under
figure 2–1, paragraph (34)(g), of the
Instruction, from further environmental
documentation.
A final ‘‘Environmental Analysis
Check List’’ and a final ‘‘Categorical
Exclusion Determination’’ are available
in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
I For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
designated on-scene representative to
obtain permission to do so. Vessel
operators given permission to enter or
operate in the Safety Zone must comply
with all directions given to them by the
Captain of the Port or his designed onscene representative.
(4) The Captain of the Port may be
contacted by telephone via the Sector
Lake Michigan Operations Center at
(414) 747–7182 during working hours.
Vessels assisting in the enforcement of
the Safety Zone may be contacted on
VHF–FM channels 16.
Dated: July 26, 2006.
B.C. Jones,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Sector Lake Michigan.
[FR Doc. E6–12658 Filed 8–3–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
I
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
Patent and Trademark Office
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR
1.05–1(g), 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
37 CFR Part 1
2. A new temporary § 165.T09–135 is
added to read as follows:
I
gechino on PROD1PC61 with RULES
§ 165.T09–135 Safety Zone; Pentwater
Homecoming Fireworks, Pentwater,
Michigan.
22:25 Aug 03, 2006
Jkt 208001
RIN 0651–AC02
Clarification of Filing Date
Requirements for Ex Parte and Inter
Partes Reexamination Proceedings
United States Patent and
Trademark Office, Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
(a) Location. The following area is a
Safety Zone: All waters of Lake
Michigan within a 1000-foot radius of
the fireworks launching site located on
the north break wall in position
43°46.56″ N/086°26.38″ W (DATUM:
NAD 83).
(b) Effective Period. This safety zone
is effective from 9 p.m. until 11 p.m. on
August 12, 2006.
(c) Regulations. In accordance with
the general regulations in Section
165.23 of this part, entry into this zone
is subject to the following requirements:
(1) This safety zone is closed to all
marine traffic, except as may be
permitted by the Captain of the Port or
his designated on-scene representative.
(2) The ‘‘designated on-scene
representative’’ of the Captain of the
Port is any Coast Guard commissioned,
warrant or petty officer who has been
designated by the Captain of the Port
Lake Michigan, to act on his behalf. The
designated on-scene representative of
the Captain of the Port will be aboard
either a Coast Guard or Coast Guard
Auxiliary vessel.
(3) Vessel operators desiring to enter
or operate within the Safety Zone shall
contact the Captain of the Port or his
VerDate Aug<31>2005
[Docket No.: PTO–P–2006–0007]
SUMMARY: The United States Patent and
Trademark Office (Office) is, in this
final rule making, revising the rules of
practice relating to the filing date
requirements for ex parte and inter
partes reexamination proceedings for
consistency with the provisions of the
patent statute governing ex parte and
inter partes reexamination proceedings,
and to permit the Office to have the full
statutory three months to address a
request for reexamination that is
complete. The Office is specifically
revising the rules to require that a
request for ex parte reexamination or for
inter partes reexamination must meet all
the applicable statutory and regulatory
requirements before a filing date is
accorded to the request for ex parte
reexamination or for inter partes
reexamination.
Effective Date: August 4, 2006.
Applicability Date: The changes in
this final rule apply to any request for
reexamination (ex parte or inter partes)
filed on or after March 27, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: By
telephone—Kenneth M. Schor, at (571)
272–7710; by mail addressed to U.S.
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
44219
Patent and Trademark Office, Mail Stop
Comments—Patents, Commissioner for
Patents, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA
22313–1450, marked to the attention of
Kenneth M. Schor; by facsimile
transmission to (571) 273–7710 marked
to the attention of Kenneth M. Schor; or
by electronic mail message over the
Internet addressed to
kenneth.schor@uspto.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
United States Patent and Trademark
Office (Office) is revising the rules of
practice in title 37 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) to require
that a request for ex parte reexamination
or for inter partes reexamination must
meet all the applicable statutory
requirements in 35 U.S.C. 302 or 311
(respectively) and the regulatory
requirements in § 1.510 or § 1.915
(respectively) before a filing date is
accorded to the request for ex parte
reexamination or for inter partes
reexamination. Thus, the Office is
amending the rules to clearly require
compliance with all the requirements of
filing an ex parte reexamination request
set forth in § 1.510 before a filing date
will be assigned to an ex parte
reexamination request, and to clearly
require compliance with all the
requirements of filing an inter partes
reexamination request set forth in
§ 1.915 before a filing date will be
assigned to an inter partes
reexamination request. The Office
published an interim rule revising the
rules of practice to implement this
revision of the rules. See Clarification of
Filing Date Requirements for Ex Parte
and Inter Partes Reexamination
Proceedings, 71 FR 9260 (February 23,
2006), 1304 Off. Gaz. Pat. Office 95
(March 21, 2006) (interim rule). This
notice adopts the interim revision as a
final revision of the rules of practice,
while making stylistic and nonsubstantive changes to the relevant
rules, which changes are discussed
below.
Section 1.510 sets forth the
requirements for the content of a request
for ex parte reexamination. Section
1.915 sets forth the requirements for the
content of a request for inter partes
reexamination. Former § 1.510(d) stated
that the filing date of a request for ex
parte reexamination is ‘‘(1) The date on
which the request including the entire
fee for requesting reexamination is
received in the Patent and Trademark
Office; or (2) The date on which the last
portion of the fee for requesting
reexamination is received.’’ In like
manner, former § 1.919(a) stated that
‘‘[t]he filing date of a request for inter
partes reexamination is the date on
E:\FR\FM\04AUR1.SGM
04AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 150 (Friday, August 4, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 44217-44219]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-12658]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[CGD09-06-135]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Pentwater Homecoming Fireworks, Pentwater, MI
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for
the Pentwater Homecoming Fireworks, Pentwater, Michigan. This safety
zone is necessary to safeguard vessels and spectators from hazards
associated with fireworks displays. This rule is intended to restrict
vessel traffic from a portion of Lake Michigan.
DATES: This safety zone is effective from 9 p.m. to 11 p.m. on August
12, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket, are part of docket CGD09-06-135 and are available for
inspection or copying at U.S. Coast Guard Sector Lake Michigan between
7 a.m. (local) and 3:30 p.m. (local), Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chief Warrant Officer Brad Hinken,
U.S. Coast Guard Sector Lake Michigan, at (414) 747-7154.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
We did not publish a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this
regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing an NPRM. The permit application was not
received in time to publish an NPRM followed by a final rule before the
effective date. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), good cause exists for making
this rule effective less than 30 days after publication in the Federal
Register. Delaying this rule would be contrary to the public interest
of ensuring the safety of spectators and vessels during this event and
immediate action is necessary to prevent possible loss of life or
property. The Coast Guard has not received any complaints or negative
comments previously with regard to this event.
Background and Purpose
This temporary safety zone is necessary to ensure the safety of
vessels and spectators from hazards associated with a fireworks
display. Based on accidents that have occurred in other Captain of the
Port zones, and the explosive hazards of fireworks, the Captain of the
Port Lake Michigan has determined fireworks launches in close proximity
to watercraft pose significant risk to public safety and property. The
likely combination of large numbers of recreation vessels, congested
waterways, darkness punctuated by bright flashes of light, alcohol use,
and debris falling into the water could easily result in serious
injuries or fatalities. Establishing a safety zone to control vessel
movement around the location of the launch platform will help ensure
the safety of persons and property at these events and help minimize
the associated risks.
Discussion of Rule
A temporary safety zone is necessary to ensure the safety of
spectators and vessels during the setup, loading and launching of a
fireworks display in conjunction with the Pentwater Homecoming
fireworks display. The fireworks display will occur between 9 p.m. and
11 p.m. on August 12, 2006.
The safety zone will encompass all waters of Lake Michigan within a
1000-foot radius of the fireworks launching site located on the north
break wall in position 43[deg]46.56'' N/086[deg]26.38'' W (DATUM: NAD
83).
All persons and vessels must comply with the instructions of the
Captain of the Port Lake Michigan or his designated on-scene
representative. Entry into, transiting, or anchoring within the safety
zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Lake
Michigan or his designated on-scene representative. The Captain of the
Port Lake Michigan may be contacted via VHF Channel 16.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section
3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does
not require an assessment of potential costs
[[Page 44218]]
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of
Management and Budget has not reviewed it under that Order. It is not
``significant'' under the regulatory policies and procedures of the
Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
We expect the economic impact of this rule to be so minimal that a
full Regulatory Evaluation under the regulatory policies and procedures
of DHS is unnecessary. This determination is based upon the size and
location of the safety zone within the waterway. Recreational vessels
may transit through the safety zone with permission from the Captain of
the Port Lake Michigan or his designated on-scene representative.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This rule will affect the following entities, some of which
may be small entities: The owners and operators of vessels intending to
transit or anchor in a portion of the Lake Michigan off Pentwater,
Michigan, between 9 p.m. and 11 p.m. on August 12, 2006.
This safety zone will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons: This
rule will be in effect for only two hours for one event and vessels can
safely pass outside the safety zone during the event. In the event that
this temporary safety zone affects shipping, commercial vessels may
request permission from the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan to
transit through the safety zone. The Coast Guard will give notice to
the public via a Broadcast to Mariners that the regulation is in
effect.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offered to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they could better evaluate
its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process. Small
businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal employees who
enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman and
the Regional Small Business Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman
evaluates these actions annually and rates each agency's responsiveness
to small business. If you wish to comment on actions by employees of
the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR (1-888-734-3247).
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule would not result in such expenditure, we do
discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not affect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it would not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
and Department of Homeland Security Management Directive 5100.1, which
guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
that there are no factors in this case that would
[[Page 44219]]
limit the use of a categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the
Instruction. Therefore, we believe that this rule should be
categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g), of the
Instruction, from further environmental documentation.
A final ``Environmental Analysis Check List'' and a final
``Categorical Exclusion Determination'' are available in the docket
where indicated under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g), 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub.
L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. A new temporary Sec. 165.T09-135 is added to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T09-135 Safety Zone; Pentwater Homecoming Fireworks,
Pentwater, Michigan.
(a) Location. The following area is a Safety Zone: All waters of
Lake Michigan within a 1000-foot radius of the fireworks launching site
located on the north break wall in position 43[deg]46.56'' N/
086[deg]26.38'' W (DATUM: NAD 83).
(b) Effective Period. This safety zone is effective from 9 p.m.
until 11 p.m. on August 12, 2006.
(c) Regulations. In accordance with the general regulations in
Section 165.23 of this part, entry into this zone is subject to the
following requirements:
(1) This safety zone is closed to all marine traffic, except as may
be permitted by the Captain of the Port or his designated on-scene
representative.
(2) The ``designated on-scene representative'' of the Captain of
the Port is any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or petty officer who
has been designated by the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan, to act on
his behalf. The designated on-scene representative of the Captain of
the Port will be aboard either a Coast Guard or Coast Guard Auxiliary
vessel.
(3) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the Safety
Zone shall contact the Captain of the Port or his designated on-scene
representative to obtain permission to do so. Vessel operators given
permission to enter or operate in the Safety Zone must comply with all
directions given to them by the Captain of the Port or his designed on-
scene representative.
(4) The Captain of the Port may be contacted by telephone via the
Sector Lake Michigan Operations Center at (414) 747-7182 during working
hours. Vessels assisting in the enforcement of the Safety Zone may be
contacted on VHF-FM channels 16.
Dated: July 26, 2006.
B.C. Jones,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Sector Lake Michigan.
[FR Doc. E6-12658 Filed 8-3-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P