Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent Extension; CLINACOX, 44032-44033 [E6-12572]
Download as PDF
hsrobinson on PROD1PC69 with NOTICES
44032
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 149 / Thursday, August 3, 2006 / Notices
may count toward the actual amount of
extension that the Director of Patents
and Trademarks may award (for
example, half the testing phase must be
subtracted, as well as any time that may
have occurred before the patent was
issued), FDA’s determination of the
length of a regulatory review period for
a human drug product will include all
of the testing phase and approval phase
as specified in 35 U.S.C. 156(g)(1)(B).
FDA recently approved for marketing
the human drug product IPLEX
(mecasermin rinfabate [rDNA origin]).
IPLEX is indicated for treatment of
growth failure in children with severe
primary IGF-1 deficiency or with growth
hormone (GH) gene depletion who have
developed neutralizing antibodies to
GH. Subsequent to this approval, the
Patent and Trademark Office received a
patent term restoration application for
IPLEX (U.S. Patent No. 5,681,818) from
Insmed Inc., and the Patent and
Trademark Office requested FDA’s
assistance in determining this patent’s
eligibility for patent term restoration. In
a letter dated May 19, 2006, FDA
advised the Patent and Trademark
Office that this human drug product had
undergone a regulatory review period
and that the approval of IPLEX
represented the first permitted
commercial marketing or use of the
product. Thereafter, the Patent and
Trademark Office requested that FDA
determine the product’s regulatory
review period.
FDA has determined that the
applicable regulatory review period for
IPLEX is 3,527 days. Of this time, 3,183
days occurred during the testing phase
of the regulatory review period, while
344 days occurred during the approval
phase. These periods of time were
derived from the following dates:
1. The date an exemption under
section 505(i) of the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (the act) (21 U.S.C.
355(i)) became effective: April 18, 1996.
The applicant claims April 24, 1996, as
the date the investigational new drug
application (IND) became effective.
However, FDA records indicate that the
IND effective date was April 18, 1996,
which was 30 days after FDA receipt of
the IND.
2. The date the application was
initially submitted with respect to the
human drug product under section
505(b) of the act: January 3, 2005. FDA
has verified the applicant’s claim that
the new drug application (NDA) for
IPLEX (NDA 21–884) was initially
submitted on January 3, 2005.
3. The date the application was
approved: December 12, 2005. FDA has
verified the applicant’s claim that NDA
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:20 Aug 02, 2006
Jkt 208001
21–884 was approved on December 12,
2005.
This determination of the regulatory
review period establishes the maximum
potential length of a patent extension.
However, the U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office applies several
statutory limitations in its calculations
of the actual period for patent extension.
In its application for patent extension,
this applicant seeks 1,657 days of patent
term extension.
Anyone with knowledge that any of
the dates as published are incorrect may
submit to the Division of Dockets
Management (see ADDRESSES) written or
electronic comments and ask for a
redetermination by October 2, 2006.
Furthermore, any interested person may
petition FDA for a determination
regarding whether the applicant for
extension acted with due diligence
during the regulatory review period by
January 30, 2007. To meet its burden,
the petition must contain sufficient facts
to merit an FDA investigation. (See H.
Rept. 857, part 1, 98th Cong., 2d sess.,
pp. 41–42, 1984.) Petitions should be in
the format specified in 21 CFR 10.30.
Comments and petitions should be
submitted to the Division of Dockets
Management. Three copies of any
mailed information are to be submitted,
except that individuals may submit one
copy. Comments are to be identified
with the docket number found in
brackets in the heading of this
document. Comments and petitions may
be seen in the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday.
Dated: July 21, 2006.
Jane A. Axelrad,
Associate Director for Policy, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research.
[FR Doc. E6–12571 Filed 8–2–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. 1999E–5113]
Determination of Regulatory Review
Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; CLINACOX
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) has determined
the regulatory review period for
CLINACOX and is publishing this
notice of that determination as required
by law. FDA has made the
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
determination because of the
submission of an application to the
Director of Patents and Trademarks,
Department of Commerce, for the
extension of a patent which claims that
animal drug product.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments
and petitions to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit
electronic comments to https://
www.fda.gov/dockets/ecomments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory
Policy (HFD–7), Food and Drug
Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane,
Rockville, MD 20857, 301–594–2041.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug
Price Competition and Patent Term
Restoration Act of 1984 (Public Law 98–
417) and the Generic Animal Drug and
Patent Term Restoration Act (Public
Law 100–670) generally provide that a
patent may be extended for a period of
up to 5 years so long as the patented
item (human drug product, animal drug
product, medical device, food additive,
or color additive) was subject to
regulatory review by FDA before the
item was marketed. Under these acts, a
product’s regulatory review period
forms the basis for determining the
amount of extension an applicant may
receive.
A regulatory review period consists of
two periods of time: A testing phase and
an approval phase. For animal drug
products, the testing phase begins on
the earlier date when either a major
environmental effects test was initiated
for the drug or when an exemption
under section 512(j) of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C.
360b(j)) became effective and runs until
the approval phase begins. The approval
phase starts with the initial submission
of an application to market the animal
drug product and continues until FDA
grants permission to market the drug
product. Although only a portion of a
regulatory review period may count
toward the actual amount of extension
that the Director of Patents and
Trademarks may award (for example,
half the testing phase must be
subtracted as well as any time that may
have occurred before the patent was
issued), FDA’s determination of the
length of a regulatory review period for
an animal drug product will include all
of the testing phase and approval phase
as specified in 35 U.S.C. 156(g)(4)(B).
FDA approved for marketing the
animal drug product CLINACOX
(diclazuril). CLINACOX is indicated for
use in broiler chickens, for the
prevention of coccidicosis caused by
E:\FR\FM\03AUN1.SGM
03AUN1
hsrobinson on PROD1PC69 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 149 / Thursday, August 3, 2006 / Notices
Eimeria tenella, E. necatrix, E.
acervulina, E. brunette, E. mitis (mivati),
and E. maxima. Subsequent to this
approval, the Patent and Trademark
Office received a patent term restoration
application for CLINACOX (U.S. Patent
No. 4,631,278) from Janssen
Pharmaceutica N.V., and the Patent and
Trademark Office requested FDA’s
assistance in determining this patent’s
eligibility for patent term restoration. In
a letter dated October 4, 2000, FDA
advised the Patent and Trademark
Office that this animal drug product had
undergone a regulatory review period
and that the approval of CLINACOX
represented the first permitted
commercial marketing or use of the
product. Thereafter, the Patent and
Trademark Office requested that FDA
determine the product’s regulatory
review period.
FDA has determined that the
applicable regulatory review period for
CLINACOX is 5,111 days. Of this time,
1,749 days occurred during the testing
phase of the regulatory review period,
3,362 days occurred during the approval
phase. These periods of time were
derived from the following dates:
1. The date an exemption under
section 512(j) of the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (the act) (21 U.S.C.
360b(j)), involving this animal drug
product, became effective: April 25,
1985. FDA has verified the applicant’s
claim that the date the investigational
new animal drug application became
effective was on April 25, 1985.
2. The date the application was
initially submitted with respect to the
animal drug product under section
512(b) of the act: February 6, 1990. The
applicant claims January 31, 1990, as
the date the new animal drug
application (NADA) for CLINACOX
(NADA 140–951) was initially
submitted. However, FDA records
indicate that NADA 140–951 was
officially acknowledged and assigned
the NADA number on February 6, 1990,
which is considered to be the NADA
initially submitted date.
3. The date the application was
approved: April 21, 1999. FDA has
verified the applicant’s claim that
NADA 140–951 was approved on April
21, 1999.
This determination of the regulatory
review period establishes the maximum
potential length of a patent extension.
However, the U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office applies several
statutory limitations in its calculations
of the actual period for patent extension.
In its application for patent extension,
this applicant seeks 1,096 days of patent
term extension.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:20 Aug 02, 2006
Jkt 208001
Anyone with knowledge that any of
the dates as published are incorrect may
submit to the Division of Dockets
Management (see ADDRESSES) written or
electronic comments and ask for a
redetermination by October 2, 2006.
Furthermore, any interested person may
petition FDA for a determination
regarding whether the applicant for
extension acted with due diligence
during the regulatory review period by
January 30, 2007. To meet its burden,
the petition must contain sufficient facts
to merit an FDA investigation. (See H.
Rept. 857, part 1, 98th Cong., 2d sess.,
pp. 41–42, 1984.) Petitions should be in
the format specified in 21 CFR 10.30.
Comments and petitions should be
submitted to the Division of Dockets
Management. Three copies of any
mailed information are to be submitted,
except that individuals may submit one
copy. Comments are to be identified
with the docket number found in
brackets in the heading of this
document. Comments and petitions may
be seen in the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday.
Dated: July 20, 2006.
Jane A. Axelrad,
Associate Director for Policy, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research.
[FR Doc. E6–12572 Filed 8–2–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. 2003E–0418]
Determination of Regulatory Review
Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; EMEND
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) has determined
the regulatory review period for EMEND
and is publishing this notice of that
determination as required by law. FDA
has made the determination because of
the submission of an application to the
Director of Patents and Trademarks,
Department of Commerce, for the
extension of a patent which claims that
human drug product.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments
and petitions to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit
electronic comments to https://
www.fda.gov/dockets/ecomments.
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
44033
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory
Policy (HFD–7), Food and Drug
Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane,
Rockville, MD 20857, 301–594–2041.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug
Price Competition and Patent Term
Restoration Act of 1984 (Public Law 98–
417) and the Generic Animal Drug and
Patent Term Restoration Act (Public
Law 100–670) generally provide that a
patent may be extended for a period of
up to 5 years so long as the patented
item (human drug product, animal drug
product, medical device, food additive,
or color additive) was subject to
regulatory review by FDA before the
item was marketed. Under these acts, a
product’s regulatory review period
forms the basis for determining the
amount of extension an applicant may
receive.
A regulatory review period consists of
two periods of time: A testing phase and
an approval phase. For human drug
products, the testing phase begins when
the exemption to permit the clinical
investigations of the human drug
product becomes effective and runs
until the approval phase begins. The
approval phase starts with the initial
submission of an application to market
the human drug product and continues
until FDA grants permission to market
the drug product. Although only a
portion of a regulatory review period
may count toward the actual amount of
extension that the Director of Patents
and Trademarks may award (for
example, half the testing phase must be
subtracted, as well as any time that may
have occurred before the patent was
issued), FDA’s determination of the
length of a regulatory review period for
a human drug product will include all
of the testing phase and approval phase
as specified in 35 U.S.C. 156(g)(1)(B).
FDA recently approved for marketing
the human drug product EMEND
(aprepitant). EMEND, in combination
with other antiemetic agents, is
indicated for the prevention of acute
and delayed nausea and vomiting
associated with initial and repeat
courses of highly emetogenic cancer
chemotherapy, including high-dose
cisplatin. Subsequent to this approval,
the Patent and Trademark Office
received a patent term restoration
application for EMEND (U.S. Patent No.
5,719,147) from Merck & Co., and the
Patent and Trademark Office requested
FDA’s assistance in determining this
patent’s eligibility for patent term
restoration. In a letter dated November
18, 2003, FDA advised the Patent and
Trademark Office that this human drug
product had undergone a regulatory
E:\FR\FM\03AUN1.SGM
03AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 149 (Thursday, August 3, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44032-44033]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-12572]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. 1999E-5113]
Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; CLINACOX
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined the
regulatory review period for CLINACOX and is publishing this notice of
that determination as required by law. FDA has made the determination
because of the submission of an application to the Director of Patents
and Trademarks, Department of Commerce, for the extension of a patent
which claims that animal drug product.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments and petitions to the Division of
Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630
Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit electronic comments
to https://www.fda.gov/dockets/ecomments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory
Policy (HFD-7), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane,
Rockville, MD 20857, 301-594-2041.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug Price Competition and Patent Term
Restoration Act of 1984 (Public Law 98-417) and the Generic Animal Drug
and Patent Term Restoration Act (Public Law 100-670) generally provide
that a patent may be extended for a period of up to 5 years so long as
the patented item (human drug product, animal drug product, medical
device, food additive, or color additive) was subject to regulatory
review by FDA before the item was marketed. Under these acts, a
product's regulatory review period forms the basis for determining the
amount of extension an applicant may receive.
A regulatory review period consists of two periods of time: A
testing phase and an approval phase. For animal drug products, the
testing phase begins on the earlier date when either a major
environmental effects test was initiated for the drug or when an
exemption under section 512(j) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (21 U.S.C. 360b(j)) became effective and runs until the approval
phase begins. The approval phase starts with the initial submission of
an application to market the animal drug product and continues until
FDA grants permission to market the drug product. Although only a
portion of a regulatory review period may count toward the actual
amount of extension that the Director of Patents and Trademarks may
award (for example, half the testing phase must be subtracted as well
as any time that may have occurred before the patent was issued), FDA's
determination of the length of a regulatory review period for an animal
drug product will include all of the testing phase and approval phase
as specified in 35 U.S.C. 156(g)(4)(B).
FDA approved for marketing the animal drug product CLINACOX
(diclazuril). CLINACOX is indicated for use in broiler chickens, for
the prevention of coccidicosis caused by
[[Page 44033]]
Eimeria tenella, E. necatrix, E. acervulina, E. brunette, E. mitis
(mivati), and E. maxima. Subsequent to this approval, the Patent and
Trademark Office received a patent term restoration application for
CLINACOX (U.S. Patent No. 4,631,278) from Janssen Pharmaceutica N.V.,
and the Patent and Trademark Office requested FDA's assistance in
determining this patent's eligibility for patent term restoration. In a
letter dated October 4, 2000, FDA advised the Patent and Trademark
Office that this animal drug product had undergone a regulatory review
period and that the approval of CLINACOX represented the first
permitted commercial marketing or use of the product. Thereafter, the
Patent and Trademark Office requested that FDA determine the product's
regulatory review period.
FDA has determined that the applicable regulatory review period for
CLINACOX is 5,111 days. Of this time, 1,749 days occurred during the
testing phase of the regulatory review period, 3,362 days occurred
during the approval phase. These periods of time were derived from the
following dates:
1. The date an exemption under section 512(j) of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the act) (21 U.S.C. 360b(j)), involving this
animal drug product, became effective: April 25, 1985. FDA has verified
the applicant's claim that the date the investigational new animal drug
application became effective was on April 25, 1985.
2. The date the application was initially submitted with respect to
the animal drug product under section 512(b) of the act: February 6,
1990. The applicant claims January 31, 1990, as the date the new animal
drug application (NADA) for CLINACOX (NADA 140-951) was initially
submitted. However, FDA records indicate that NADA 140-951 was
officially acknowledged and assigned the NADA number on February 6,
1990, which is considered to be the NADA initially submitted date.
3. The date the application was approved: April 21, 1999. FDA has
verified the applicant's claim that NADA 140-951 was approved on April
21, 1999.
This determination of the regulatory review period establishes the
maximum potential length of a patent extension. However, the U.S.
Patent and Trademark Office applies several statutory limitations in
its calculations of the actual period for patent extension. In its
application for patent extension, this applicant seeks 1,096 days of
patent term extension.
Anyone with knowledge that any of the dates as published are
incorrect may submit to the Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES) written or electronic comments and ask for a redetermination
by October 2, 2006. Furthermore, any interested person may petition FDA
for a determination regarding whether the applicant for extension acted
with due diligence during the regulatory review period by January 30,
2007. To meet its burden, the petition must contain sufficient facts to
merit an FDA investigation. (See H. Rept. 857, part 1, 98th Cong., 2d
sess., pp. 41-42, 1984.) Petitions should be in the format specified in
21 CFR 10.30.
Comments and petitions should be submitted to the Division of
Dockets Management. Three copies of any mailed information are to be
submitted, except that individuals may submit one copy. Comments are to
be identified with the docket number found in brackets in the heading
of this document. Comments and petitions may be seen in the Division of
Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Dated: July 20, 2006.
Jane A. Axelrad,
Associate Director for Policy, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.
[FR Doc. E6-12572 Filed 8-2-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S