Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for the Development of the Westside of Marine Corps Base Quantico, Including the 2005 Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) Action, Marine Corps Base Quantico (MCBQ), Virginia, 44020-44021 [E6-12532]
Download as PDF
44020
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 149 / Thursday, August 3, 2006 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
[I.D. 072806C]
Marine Mammals; File No. 87–1851
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; receipt of application for
permit.
hsrobinson on PROD1PC69 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that
Daniel P. Costa, Ph.D., Department of
Biology and Institute of Marine
Sciences, University of California, Santa
Cruz, CA 95064, has applied for a
permit to conduct research on
pinnipeds in Antarctica and California.
DATES: Written, telefaxed, or e-mail
comments must be received on or before
September 5, 2006.
ADDRESSES: The application and related
documents are available for review
upon written request or by appointment
in the following office(s):
Permits, Conservation and Education
Division, Office of Protected Resources,
NMFS, 1315 East-West Highway, Room
13705, Silver Spring, MD 20910; phone
(301)713–2289; fax (301)427–2521; and
Southwest Region, NMFS, 501 West
Ocean Blvd., Suite 4200, Long Beach,
CA 90802–4213; phone (562)980–4001;
fax (562)980–4018.
Written comments or requests for a
public hearing on this application
should be submitted to the Chief,
Permits, Conservation and Education
Division, F/PR1, Office of Protected
Resources, NMFS, 1315 East-West
Highway, Room 13705, Silver Spring,
MD 20910. Those individuals requesting
a hearing should set forth the specific
reasons why a hearing would be
appropriate.
Comments may also be submitted by
facsimile at (301) 427–2521, provided
the facsimile is confirmed by hard copy
submitted by mail and postmarked no
later than the closing date of the
comment period.
Comments may also be submitted by
e-mail. The mailbox address for
providing email comments is
NMFS.Pr1Comments@noaa.gov. Include
in the subject line of the e-mail
comment the following document
identifier: File No. 87–1851.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Amy Sloan, (301)713–2289.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
permit is requested under the authority
of the Marine Mammal Protection Act of
1972, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1361 et
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:20 Aug 02, 2006
Jkt 208001
seq.), the regulations governing the
taking and importing of marine
mammals (50 CFR part 216), the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (ESA; 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.),
and the regulations governing the
taking, importing, and exporting of
endangered and threatened species (50
CFR 222–226).
The applicant proposes to conduct
two projects over a 5–year period.
Project I involves research in Antarctica
to conduct tagging studies and
physiological measurements on up to 35
Crabeater seals (Lobodon
carcinophagus), 35 southern elephant
seals (Mirounga leonina), 10 leopard
seals (Hydrurga leptonyx), 10 Weddell
seals (Leptonychotes weddellii), and five
Ross seals (Ommatophoca rossii) of any
age annually. Procedures would include
capture, sedation, ultrasound,
morphometrics, isotope and Evans blue
dye administration, blood sampling,
tagging/marking, instrument
attachment, stomach lavage, specimen
collection (whisker, claw, tooth, muscle
and blubber biopsy), and recapture to
remove instruments. An additional 50
juvenile southern elephant seals would
be captured, weighed, measured, and
flipper tagged annually. An additional
10 adult leopard seals, 10 adult Weddell
seals, and 30 adult female southern
elephant seals would have flipper tags
applied annually. Up to 100 additional
southern elephant seals and 100
additional seals of the other four species
combined would be harassed annually
incidental to these activities. The
applicant also requests unintentional
research-related mortality of up to three
seals of any of these five seal species
annually, not to exceed eight seals over
the five years of the permit. Tissue
samples would be imported into the
United States.
Project II would involve research on
California sea lions (Zalophus
californianus) to investigate foraging,
diving, energetics, food habits, and atsea distribution along the California
coast. Procedures would include
capture, sedation, morphometrics,
isotope and Evans blue dye
administration, blood sampling, tagging/
marking, instrument attachment,
stomach lavage and enema, blubber/
muscle biopsy, metabolic
measurements, stomach temperature
telemeters, and milk sampling. Up to
100 pups/juveniles and 100 adults
would be sampled annually, with some
or all of the procedures performed.
Harassment of unlimited numbers of
California sea lions, harbor seals (Phoca
vitulina), northern elephant seals
(Mirounga augustirostris), and northern
fur seals (Callorhinus ursinus) and up to
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
20 threatened Steller sea lions
(Eumetopias jubatus) annually
incidental to these activities is
requested. The applicant also requests
unintentional research-related mortality
of up to five California sea lions over the
course of the permit.
Concurrent with the publication of
this notice in the Federal Register,
NMFS is forwarding copies of these
applications to the Marine Mammal
Commission and its Committee of
Scientific Advisors.
Dated: July 28, 2006.
Tammy C. Adams,
Acting Chief, Permits, Conservation and
Education Division, Office of Protected
Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E6–12555 Filed 8–2–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Navy
Notice of Intent To Prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement for
the Development of the Westside of
Marine Corps Base Quantico, Including
the 2005 Base Realignment and
Closure (BRAC) Action, Marine Corps
Base Quantico (MCBQ), Virginia
Department of the Navy, DoD.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 102(2)(C)
of the National Environmental Policy
Act (NEPA) of 1969, as implemented by
the Council on Environmental Quality
regulations (40 CFR parts 1500–1508),
and applicable Marine Corps Order
P5090.2A, guidelines for NEPA, the
Marine Corps announces its intent to
prepare an Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) for the development of
the westside of MCBQ, including the
2005 BRAC action at MCBQ, VA. The
Marine Corps previously published a
Notice of Intent (NOI) to prepare a
Programmatic Environmental Impact
Statement (Vol. 67 FR 37405) for the
development of the westside of MCBQ
on May 29, 2002. This NOI cancels the
previous NOI, and establishes the
opportunity for the public to comment
on the proposed action which now
includes the BRAC 2005 actions at
MCBQ.
The Marine Corps will hold a public
scoping meeting open house for the
purpose of further identifying the scope
of issues to be addressed in the EIS.
Written and recorded comments will be
accepted during this time. To ensure
that the full range of issues related to
this proposed action will be addressed,
representatives from MCBQ will be
E:\FR\FM\03AUN1.SGM
03AUN1
hsrobinson on PROD1PC69 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 149 / Thursday, August 3, 2006 / Notices
available to answer questions and solicit
public comments from all interested
parties during the open house.
Following future publication of the draft
EIS, at a time to be determined, a second
public meeting will be held to address
comments on the draft document.
DATES: All written comments must be
received by September 8, 2006. The
public scoping meeting will be held on
Tuesday, August 22, 2006, at the
Ramada Inn, 4316 Inn Street, Triangle,
VA between 7 p.m. and 9:30 p.m.
ADDRESSES: Agencies and the public are
also encouraged to provide written
comments in addition to, or in lieu of,
oral comments at the scoping open
house. Written comments and requests
for inclusion on the EIS mailing list may
be submitted to: Commander, NREA
Branch (B 046), Attn: J. Gardner, 3250
Catlin Avenue, Marine Corps Base,
Quantico, VA 22134–0855.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Jeff Gardner, 703–432–6770. Please
submit requests for special assistance,
sign language interpretation for the
hearing impaired, or other auxiliary aids
at the public meeting to Mr. Gardner by
August 14, 2006.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: MCBQ is a
60,000-acre combat education and
training base located approximately 30
miles south of Washington DC. The
2005 BRAC law has directed the
relocation and collocation of Military
Department Investigation Agencies and
the Department of Defense
Counterintelligence and Security
Agency to MCBQ. This is expected to
add approximately 3,000 personnel at
MCBQ by 2011. Other Federal and
Marine Corps initiatives are expected to
continue to identify MCBQ as a possible
site for relocation. As part of a longrange planning effort to accommodate
these anticipated requirements, the
Quantico Land Use Plan, I–95 West, was
developed for the Marine Corps which
evaluated potential areas within the
installation that are the most suitable/
practical for locating new development,
including the BRAC 2005 actions,
without impacting its primary mission
of military education and training. The
age and deteriorating condition of many
facilities on the Mainside of MCBQ
dictate a need for their replacement.
Space available for new development or
redevelopment is limited due to many
factors including acreage, current land
use, topography, and environmental
constraints. To eliminate existing
incompatible land uses and better
utilize land within the installation,
MCBQ has identified two parcels within
the westside of MCBQ (hereon referred
to as the Westside Development Area)
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:20 Aug 02, 2006
Jkt 208001
for potential future development. These
areas were determined to have suitable
acreage for the proposed development,
reduced construction costs, and are not
overly constrained by environmental or
operational factors. These locations are:
the Russell Road parcel and MCB–1
parcel. The proposed action for this EIS
is to use the Westside Development
Area of MCBQ for relocation of existing
and future potential base functions and
to accommodate the BRAC 2005 actions.
The components of the proposed action
include construction and operation of
new facilities with a mix of uses to
include administrative, warehouse,
maintenance, and industrial facilities
and the necessary infrastructure, road
improvements, and security measures to
support the proposed action.
A range of alternatives was developed
to assess the proposed action based on
the Quantico Land Use Plan, I–95 West
(MCBQ, 2006). This study identified
potential development scenarios based
on present and future mission needs
and land use analysis. Alternatives to
implement the proposed action include
four intensities of development and two
proposed alternative locations for
implementing the BRAC action. For
each development intensity alternative,
sub-alternatives analyzing development
at either Location A or Location B will
be addressed. First alternative, highintensity development would add up to
10,000 personnel, including 3,000 under
BRAC. The construction would include
facilities designed primarily for
administrative and operational
functions, including warehousing,
maintenance, and support facilities.
Parking and road improvements would
be included. Second alternative,
medium-intensity development would
add up to 7,000 personnel, including
3,000 under BRAC. The construction
under this alternative would remain
mixed use with a lower intensity of
administrative facilities and include
parking and road improvements. Third
alternative, low-intensity development
would add 5,000 personnel, including
3,000 under BRAC. The majority of the
construction under this alternative
would include warehousing and
maintenance facilities and to a lesser
extent administrative and operational
facilities. Road improvements would be
limited to those necessary to
accommodate the BRAC action.
Additionally, a fourth alternative, the
BRAC Action alternative, would add
only the development required to
accommodate those personnel (3,000)
associated with the BRAC 2005 action.
The construction footprint would
include 70 to 100 acres of land,
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
44021
construction of approximately 735,000
square feet of new construction, and
improvement of existing roads. The No
Action Alternative will also be
evaluated as required by NEPA. The EIS
will address the following
environmental areas: topography,
geology, and soils; water and biological
resources; air quality; noise;
infrastructure and utilities; traffic;
cultural resources; land use;
socioeconomics; and hazardous waste
and materials.
Dated: July 27, 2006.
M.A. Harvison,
Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate
General’s Corps, U.S. Navy, Federal Register
Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. E6–12532 Filed 8–2–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810–FF–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. RP06–443–000]
Alliance Pipeline L.P.; Notice of
Proposed Changes in FERC Gas Tariff
July 27, 2006.
Take notice that on July 24, 2006,
Alliance Pipeline L.P. (Alliance)
tendered for filing as part of its FERC
Gas Tariff, Original Volume No. 1, the
following tariff sheets, to become
effective August 1, 2006:
Second Revised Sheet No. 2
Original Sheet No. 277E
Alliance states that copies of its filing
have been mailed to all customers, state
commissions, and other interested
parties.
Any person desiring to intervene or to
protest this filing must file in
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of
the Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214). Protests will be considered by
the Commission in determining the
appropriate action to be taken, but will
not serve to make protestants parties to
the proceeding. Any person wishing to
become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as
appropriate. Such notices, motions, or
protests must be filed in accordance
with the provisions of Section 154.210
of the Commission’s regulations (18 CFR
154.210). Anyone filing an intervention
or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant. Anyone
filing an intervention or protest on or
before the intervention or protest date
need not serve motions to intervene or
protests on persons other than the
Applicant.
E:\FR\FM\03AUN1.SGM
03AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 149 (Thursday, August 3, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44020-44021]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-12532]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Navy
Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for
the Development of the Westside of Marine Corps Base Quantico,
Including the 2005 Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) Action, Marine
Corps Base Quantico (MCBQ), Virginia
AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DoD.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, as implemented by the Council on
Environmental Quality regulations (40 CFR parts 1500-1508), and
applicable Marine Corps Order P5090.2A, guidelines for NEPA, the Marine
Corps announces its intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS) for the development of the westside of MCBQ, including the 2005
BRAC action at MCBQ, VA. The Marine Corps previously published a Notice
of Intent (NOI) to prepare a Programmatic Environmental Impact
Statement (Vol. 67 FR 37405) for the development of the westside of
MCBQ on May 29, 2002. This NOI cancels the previous NOI, and
establishes the opportunity for the public to comment on the proposed
action which now includes the BRAC 2005 actions at MCBQ.
The Marine Corps will hold a public scoping meeting open house for
the purpose of further identifying the scope of issues to be addressed
in the EIS. Written and recorded comments will be accepted during this
time. To ensure that the full range of issues related to this proposed
action will be addressed, representatives from MCBQ will be
[[Page 44021]]
available to answer questions and solicit public comments from all
interested parties during the open house. Following future publication
of the draft EIS, at a time to be determined, a second public meeting
will be held to address comments on the draft document.
DATES: All written comments must be received by September 8, 2006. The
public scoping meeting will be held on Tuesday, August 22, 2006, at the
Ramada Inn, 4316 Inn Street, Triangle, VA between 7 p.m. and 9:30 p.m.
ADDRESSES: Agencies and the public are also encouraged to provide
written comments in addition to, or in lieu of, oral comments at the
scoping open house. Written comments and requests for inclusion on the
EIS mailing list may be submitted to: Commander, NREA Branch (B 046),
Attn: J. Gardner, 3250 Catlin Avenue, Marine Corps Base, Quantico, VA
22134-0855.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Jeff Gardner, 703-432-6770. Please
submit requests for special assistance, sign language interpretation
for the hearing impaired, or other auxiliary aids at the public meeting
to Mr. Gardner by August 14, 2006.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: MCBQ is a 60,000-acre combat education and
training base located approximately 30 miles south of Washington DC.
The 2005 BRAC law has directed the relocation and collocation of
Military Department Investigation Agencies and the Department of
Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency to MCBQ. This is
expected to add approximately 3,000 personnel at MCBQ by 2011. Other
Federal and Marine Corps initiatives are expected to continue to
identify MCBQ as a possible site for relocation. As part of a long-
range planning effort to accommodate these anticipated requirements,
the Quantico Land Use Plan, I-95 West, was developed for the Marine
Corps which evaluated potential areas within the installation that are
the most suitable/practical for locating new development, including the
BRAC 2005 actions, without impacting its primary mission of military
education and training. The age and deteriorating condition of many
facilities on the Mainside of MCBQ dictate a need for their
replacement. Space available for new development or redevelopment is
limited due to many factors including acreage, current land use,
topography, and environmental constraints. To eliminate existing
incompatible land uses and better utilize land within the installation,
MCBQ has identified two parcels within the westside of MCBQ (hereon
referred to as the Westside Development Area) for potential future
development. These areas were determined to have suitable acreage for
the proposed development, reduced construction costs, and are not
overly constrained by environmental or operational factors. These
locations are: the Russell Road parcel and MCB-1 parcel. The proposed
action for this EIS is to use the Westside Development Area of MCBQ for
relocation of existing and future potential base functions and to
accommodate the BRAC 2005 actions. The components of the proposed
action include construction and operation of new facilities with a mix
of uses to include administrative, warehouse, maintenance, and
industrial facilities and the necessary infrastructure, road
improvements, and security measures to support the proposed action.
A range of alternatives was developed to assess the proposed action
based on the Quantico Land Use Plan, I-95 West (MCBQ, 2006). This study
identified potential development scenarios based on present and future
mission needs and land use analysis. Alternatives to implement the
proposed action include four intensities of development and two
proposed alternative locations for implementing the BRAC action. For
each development intensity alternative, sub-alternatives analyzing
development at either Location A or Location B will be addressed. First
alternative, high-intensity development would add up to 10,000
personnel, including 3,000 under BRAC. The construction would include
facilities designed primarily for administrative and operational
functions, including warehousing, maintenance, and support facilities.
Parking and road improvements would be included. Second alternative,
medium-intensity development would add up to 7,000 personnel, including
3,000 under BRAC. The construction under this alternative would remain
mixed use with a lower intensity of administrative facilities and
include parking and road improvements. Third alternative, low-intensity
development would add 5,000 personnel, including 3,000 under BRAC. The
majority of the construction under this alternative would include
warehousing and maintenance facilities and to a lesser extent
administrative and operational facilities. Road improvements would be
limited to those necessary to accommodate the BRAC action.
Additionally, a fourth alternative, the BRAC Action alternative, would
add only the development required to accommodate those personnel
(3,000) associated with the BRAC 2005 action. The construction
footprint would include 70 to 100 acres of land, construction of
approximately 735,000 square feet of new construction, and improvement
of existing roads. The No Action Alternative will also be evaluated as
required by NEPA. The EIS will address the following environmental
areas: topography, geology, and soils; water and biological resources;
air quality; noise; infrastructure and utilities; traffic; cultural
resources; land use; socioeconomics; and hazardous waste and materials.
Dated: July 27, 2006.
M.A. Harvison,
Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy,
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. E6-12532 Filed 8-2-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P